>Hello Gimp-users,
>i've got a bad digital camera and want to work over the results. Bad in this
>case means, that i've got good resolution and good results concerning the
>light, but a bad sharpness.
>My idea is, that if i've got a good resolution, what the fact is, there must
>be a way to sh
Jeff Trefftzs writes:
> On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 14:19 +0100, qeldroma wrote:
> > No matter how, because EVERY image get's blured. It could be summer in the
> > desert and it would get blured ;)
>
> Every image?! Perhaps you have the camera set to "soft-focus" -
> sometimes suggested for taking ro
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 14:19 +0100, qeldroma wrote:
> No matter how, because EVERY image get's blured. It could be summer in the
> desert and it would get blured ;)
>
> It's just a 2MPix handy-cam, so that's the reason, but i don't need PERFECT
> results, just a little bit better results, i know
Am Mittwoch, 2. November 2005 18:13 schrieben Sie:
> ah, that is interesting. my photoshop using friend used photoshops
> limitations in this respect to justify upgrading her camera.
>
> if this is the case, then any marketing corporation should be able to
> downgrade the equipment that their staf
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:36:39AM +0100, qeldroma wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 2. November 2005 01:56 schrieben Sie:
> > i am sure your willingness to answer will be just as keen as your
> > willingness to ask for help here.
> Of course ;)
>
> I have asked a designer someone from a marketing corporate a
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:19:56PM +0100, qeldroma wrote:
> Ok, so i will try to answer every question:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 2. November 2005 01:56 schrieben Sie:
> > i am sure your willingness to answer will be just as keen as your
> > willingness to ask for help here.
> Of course ;)
>
> I have aske
Ok, so i will try to answer every question:
Am Mittwoch, 2. November 2005 01:56 schrieben Sie:
> i am sure your willingness to answer will be just as keen as your
> willingness to ask for help here.
Of course ;)
I have asked a designer someone from a marketing corporate and he told me,
that this
gimp wise you could try Filters->Unsharp Mask.
But as for the camera - I couldn't tell from the sample pic if it is a focus
problem. Is it focusing someplace else - easier to tell if there is more depth
in the photo. Take a snap of a brick wall from an angle, or snap a photo of
some stairs.
Is
The image looks blurred by camera shake with the long shutter speed
and a non-steady handheld photo. unsharp masking probably won;t help.
Try going here:
http://registry.gimp.org/list?category=12
and looking at the plug-ins that "refocus" the blurry image. I have
not used these plug-ins,
* Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-01-05 20:12]:
>
> i am sure your willingness to answer will be just as keen as your
> willingness to ask for help here.
>
touchette ...
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
http://wahoo.no-ip.org
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:36:27PM +0100, qeldroma wrote:
>
> Of course, i could do it in Windows using the well known utilities, but i
> WANT
>
since i do not use Windows and as a linux user, i do not have enough
time to discover all of the excellent and well known software available
to me, mu
On 11/1/05, qeldroma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Gimp-users,
>
> i've got a bad digital camera and want to work over the results. Bad in this
> case means, that i've got good resolution and good results concerning the
> light, but a bad sharpness.
How was the camera being held? Was it sitt
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 04:48 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:36:27PM +0100, qeldroma wrote:
> > i've got a bad digital camera and want to work over the results. Bad in
> > this case means, that i've got good resolution and good results
> > concerning the light, but a
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:36:27PM +0100, qeldroma wrote:
>
> i've got a bad digital camera and want to work over the results. Bad in this
> case means, that i've got good resolution and good results concerning the
> light, but a bad sharpness.
>
> My idea is, that if i've got a good resolution
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:36:27PM +0100, qeldroma wrote:
> i've got a bad digital camera and want to work over the results. Bad in this
> case means, that i've got good resolution and good results concerning the
> light, but a bad sharpness.
>
> My idea is, that if i've got a good resolution,
Hello Gimp-users,
i've got a bad digital camera and want to work over the results. Bad in this
case means, that i've got good resolution and good results concerning the
light, but a bad sharpness.
My idea is, that if i've got a good resolution, what the fact is, there must
be a way to sharpen
16 matches
Mail list logo
