On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 19:56 -0800, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
> . . . which is also behavior that varies between individual products.
Right.
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org
> From: l...@holoweb.net
> To: cr33...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:09:30 -0500
> CC: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] import vs open
>
> Or I wasn't clear, I think. It's not really clean vs. dirty, but
> whether the canvas is new and unused and empty. E.g. try this i
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 14:06 -0600, Chris Mohler wrote:
> Current File-Open makes sense as it is, at least to me.
File->Save made sense to people too.
But if GIMP is an XCF editor that can only save xcf files, being able to
open non-xcf files is an obvious bug, a hole in the metaphor. It should
o
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Chris Mohler wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
>> * File->Open filters to *.xcf* by default; attempting to open a non-xcf
>> file brings up a message, "myfile.jpg is not an XCF file. Would you like
>> to import it?"
>
> Current File-Op
lmao
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Daniel Hornung wrote:
> > I can't believe this was not brought up by someone already...
> >
> > https://xkcd.com/1172/
> >
> > (Or my mail search function is bro
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Daniel Hornung wrote:
> I can't believe this was not brought up by someone already...
>
> https://xkcd.com/1172/
>
> (Or my mail search function is broken, which is possible)
It is broken.
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
I can't believe this was not brought up by someone already...
https://xkcd.com/1172/
(Or my mail search function is broken, which is possible)
--
Mein öffentlicher Schlüssel / My public key: 4096R/600ACB3B 2012-04-01
Fingerabdruck / Fingerprint:
9902 575B B9A0 C339 CFDF 250B 9267 CA6B 600A CB3B
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> * File->Open filters to *.xcf* by default; attempting to open a non-xcf
> file brings up a message, "myfile.jpg is not an XCF file. Would you like
> to import it?"
Current File-Open makes sense as it is, at least to me. After a
CTRL-O I don
* Noel Stoutenburg [02-18-13 14:03]:
> Christen Anderson wrote:
> >It would be interesting to know how many list messages by Maderios are on
> >this old, worn-out topic.
> The first post I have from Maderios happens to be on this topic in August,
> 2012. Since then, he has made 91 posts, which on
On 02/18/2013 11:15 AM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
* File->Maderios behaves as "open" but when you press Ok it uninstalls
GIMP.:-)
+1.5
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:26:37 -0700, Christen Anderson wrote:
> It
would be interesting to know how many list messages by Maderios are on
this old, worn-out topic. Please, everyone, complaining is getting you
nowhere and is annoying the rest of us who actually have more productive
things to do
Is it time to have Import for non-xcf files?
How about
* File->Open filters to *.xcf* by default; attempting to open a non-xcf
file brings up a message, "myfile.jpg is not an XCF file. Would you like
to import it?"
* File->Import behaves as "open as layers" today, unless the image
is not dirty,
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 10:34 -0600, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
> Sorry, madeiros, but when you write
>
> maderios wrote:
> > When you edit many kinds of files, jpeg, png, xcf, tiff, gif, etc...,
> > you can't spend your time to watch and remember which kind of file
> > you're working on.
>
> I'm n
Christen Anderson wrote:
It would be interesting to know how many list messages by Maderios are
on this old, worn-out topic.
The first post I have from Maderios happens to be on this topic in
August, 2012. Since then, he has made 91 posts, which on a cursory
review, most, if not all, seem to be
It would be interesting to know how many list messages by Maderios are
on this old, worn-out topic. Please, everyone, complaining is getting
you nowhere and is annoying the rest of us who actually have more
productive things to do. Surely there's a way to block certain email
addresses from post
Sorry, madeiros, but when you write
maderios wrote:
> When you edit many kinds of files, jpeg, png, xcf, tiff, gif, etc...,
> you can't spend your time to watch and remember which kind of file
> you're working on.
I'm not buying in. Knowing what the final result will be used for is a
critical p
> Von: maderios
> On 02/18/2013 04:45 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> >> Von: maderios
> >
> >> 3) These developers have created gimp according to their own practice.
> >
> > Have a look at http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign
> >
> > While I wouldn't say that the team are no developer
2013/2/18 maderios :
> On 02/18/2013 04:45 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>>>
>>> Von: maderios
>>
>>
>>> 3) These developers have created gimp according to their own practice.
>>
>>
>> Have a look at http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign
>>
>> While I wouldn't say that the team are no dev
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:08 PM, maderios wrote:
> These guys are "architects", they don't need Gimp...
> No artists, photographers, designers.
> Photoshop was made for professional photographers
> That's the difference.
It's been pointed out on a number of occasions that the usabilit
On 02/18/2013 04:45 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: maderios
3) These developers have created gimp according to their own practice.
Have a look at http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign
While I wouldn't say that the team are no developers, they probably aren't by
your definitio
> Von: maderios
> 3) These developers have created gimp according to their own practice.
Have a look at http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign
While I wouldn't say that the team are no developers, they probably aren't by
your definition.
Your problem is that this team managed to convi
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:13 PM, maderios wrote:
>> Assign Ctrl+S to the save/export clean (python plugin), and you have a
>> single option. End of problem.
>
> Done since a long time
And so the problem is...?
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
On 02/18/2013 03:45 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:35 PM, maderios wrote:
I use everyday "save-export-clean.py" plugin. Its' different from gimp-2.6
and other image editors like Krita, Digikam Showfoto, etc.. behavior. It
becomes complicated because you get 5 options
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Cristian Secară wrote:
> În data de Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:45:55 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine a
> scris:
>
>> Assign Ctrl+S to the save/export clean (python plugin), [...]
>> End of problem.
>
> It is not end of problem: the python plugin is not translated, so it
> does
În data de Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:45:55 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine a
scris:
> Assign Ctrl+S to the save/export clean (python plugin), [...]
> End of problem.
It is not end of problem: the python plugin is not translated, so it
does not offer a unitary experience for non-english users :p
Cristi
--
On 02/18/2013 09:37 AM, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
Burlen Loring writes:
I'm sure the author(s) feels that it's the best thing since sliced
bread, however, differentiating between save and export in newer gimp
is a ridiculous waste of time. it's so annoying and in efficient that
I feel the
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:35 PM, maderios wrote:
> I use everyday "save-export-clean.py" plugin. Its' different from gimp-2.6
> and other image editors like Krita, Digikam Showfoto, etc.. behavior. It
> becomes complicated because you get 5 options :
> - save
> - save as
> - export
> - save/export
On 02/18/2013 02:09 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Jeffery Small wrote:
When a major UI change like this is contemplated, why would it not be
implemented as a configuration switch which can be turned on/off on the
Preferences menu? In this particular case, a simple switc
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Psiweapon wrote:
> My main problem with the export faith is that now, one does not simply
> overwrite into a PNG image after enabling transparency.
Could you please elaborate on that? Ideally, in a bug report to
bugzilla.gnome.org.
May the glorious Sikking emanat
Heh, I've mostly adapted to the "new ways" - PRAISE BE TO OUR
SAVIOR THE EXPORT COMMAND! I AM NO LONGER A HEATHEN
BROTHERS! but it's still *very fun *to see this "Smug Developers Vs.
The Stupid Backlash that Wouldn't Die" movie franchise unfold in
countless installments.
My main problem with the e
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:37:25 +0100
Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
> 2) use this plugin which implements the old way within GIMP:
>http://www.shallowsky.com/software/gimp-save/
>
> 3) use the GIMP fork GIMB which reverts the change completely:
>https://github.com/mardy/gimb
... but if so d
Burlen Loring writes:
> I'm sure the author(s) feels that it's the best thing since sliced
> bread, however, differentiating between save and export in newer gimp
> is a ridiculous waste of time. it's so annoying and in efficient that
> I feel the need to chime in against it and strongly hope th
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Daniel Hauck wrote:
>> I have certain doubts that you understand the point of free (as in
>> speech) software. The reason for my doubts is because you keep talking
>> about the character of the giver.
>>
>> The giver/taker dichotomy is, frankly, artificial. GIMP is
33 matches
Mail list logo
