rt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 9 August 2001 4:11 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Public open-source PCB software. was-> Changes to
> the Protel company name
>
>
> > Whenever I do a demo for other programmers such as C++ guys
> or whoever,
This is, like, s far off topic
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 6:21 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Public open-source PCB software. was-> Changes to
the Protel company name
I thought Delphi
Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
>
> > Whenever I do a demo for other programmers such as C++ guys or whoever,
> > they are astonished that I do in 10 minutes what takes them a day.
> > This is what applies to the viual stuff. Obviously when doing nonvisual,
> such
> > as processing multiple link
8:58 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Public open-source PCB software. was-> Changes to
the Protel company name
I admit Protel is far too slow in implemeting long requested features such
as
righthand mouse panning in the schematic. It would be simple to implement -
I did
such things in
ne Tschaggelar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Public open-source PCB software. was-> Changes to the
Protel company name
> I'm doing Delphi myself, though not in the
I'm doing Delphi myself, though not in the Protel context.
Whenever I do a demo for other programmers such as C++ guys or whoever,
they are astonished that I do in 10 minutes what takes them a day.
This is what applies to the viual stuff. Obviously when doing nonvisual, such
as processing multiple
I admit Protel is far too slow in implemeting long requested features such as
righthand mouse panning in the schematic. It would be simple to implement - I did
such things in other contexts. I don't have an idea about Protels agenda and time
allocations.
Delphi or Protel are complex packages,
Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:(bcc: Rob LaMoreaux/DSPT)
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Public open-source PCB software. was-> Changes to the
Protel company name
There is no way to come up to speed on such a project in another l
There is no way to come up to speed on such a project in another language
than delphi. Why are the competitiors blown to pieces, not because they were
dummies, they used the wrong tools. The language must be efficient in development
the IDE, meaning RAD has to be efficient. No C++, no nothing exce
rom: "chris mackensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Public open-source PCB software. was-> Changes to the
Protel company name
> > Is there a public domain open s
ck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:33 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Public open-source PCB software. was-> Changes to
the Protel company name
This made me think of an interesting question.
Is there a public domain open source PCB & schematic c
Brian Guralnick wrote:
> This made me think of an interesting question.
>
> Is there a public domain open source PCB & schematic capture software? This way,
> users have the ability to make significant changes themselves & publicly post them.
Yes, there are several projects going. One is
This made me think of an interesting question.
Is there a public domain open source PCB & schematic capture software? This way,
users have the ability to make significant changes themselves & publicly post them.
Brian Guralnick
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Velande
15 matches
Mail list logo
