Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper
Josh, I think the reason why you have this because you are missing the binding under the Voice vlan interface make h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.1.130.1 *h323-gateway voip id HQ ipaddr 10.1.110.1 1719* * * * * *also there could be routing issue so you might need to do this in all your routers* * * *router ospf 2 or 1* *network 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 area 0* * * * * *Try this and let me know and if it didnt work plz share your HQ and BR2 show run and will take it from there* * * * * *Thanks,* *Hesham* On 7 October 2013 17:56, Josh Petro josh.pe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I have a strange issue I ran into on a lab recently. The BR2 gateway would not register to the HQ gatekeeper unless I changed the IP address from the 'voice' subnet IP to the 'data' subnet IP. The question said I could not configure the gatekeeper with Zone Prefixes, Aliases nor could I register any e.164 addresses with it. It also said I could only allow the CUCM and BR2 endpoints to register to it. That basically left me to use the Zone Subnet commands. Why would the BR2 gateway not register until I changed the command on the VLAN interface from this: interface Vlan130 ip address 10.1.130.1 255.255.255.0 h323-gateway voip interface * h323-gateway voip id HQ ipaddr 10.1.110.1 1719 G0/0.110 interface* h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 56 to this interface Vlan130 ip address 10.1.130.1 255.255.255.0 h323-gateway voip interface * h323-gateway voip id HQ ipaddr 10.1.5.1 1719 !gig0/0.5 interface* h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 56 Here's the config HQ interface GigabitEthernet0/0 no ip address duplex auto speed auto media-type rj45 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0.5 encapsulation dot1Q 5 ip address 10.1.5.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0.10 encapsulation dot1Q 10 ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.1.5.2 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0.110 encapsulation dot1Q 110 ip address 10.1.110.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.1.5.2 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.1.110.1 ! gatekeeper zone local HQ cisco.com no zone subnet HQ default enable zone subnet HQ 10.1.5.3/32 enable zone subnet HQ 10.1.5.2/32 enable zone subnet HQ 10.1.130.1/32 enable no shutdown ! ! BR2 interface Vlan130 ip address 10.1.130.1 255.255.255.0 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id HQ ipaddr 10.1.5.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 56 ! dial-peer voice 855 voip translation-profile outgoing SiteCode destination-pattern 855 session target ras tech-prefix 55 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric ! dial-peer voice 887 voip translation-profile outgoing SiteCode destination-pattern 887 session target ras tech-prefix 87 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric ! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE License Installation Issue
Dear Experts, I have been trying to install the CUE License and till last week CUE License for CME was working perfectly now when I try to install any license whether CCME or CCM I get the following error Error: Download error Can not download cue-vm-license_25mbx_cme_7.0.3.pkg error code 150 : error type 'Operation too slow. Less than 50 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds software install clean url ftp://142.100.64.14/cue-vm-license_25mbx_cme_7.0.3.pkg username heathrow password heathrow I have tried 2 different machines the UCCX VM as well as my candidate machines some time I get this error operation too slow and another error I have tried to reload the CUE many times. I am using FreeFTPd and I created a totally new accoutn still didn't work I reset the CUE still the problem exists. Reloaded the router itself many times still no chance. Tried another files same version to check if the file is corrupted still no chance. Please share your thought. Many Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE License Installation Issue
HI Maritn, Yes I do have Switch and WANS QOS applied but I always do that normally and it was working perfectly without any issues. This is the first time ever to happen. I investigated that issue myself and I saw this could happen if there is a duplex or speed mismatch in the server port with the SW but there is nothing like that. Thats very akward. I will just return everything to the base and will see if it will work without QOS. Thanks for your help and I will let you know the results. Hesham On 20 September 2013 07:05, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, Any chance this is a QoS issue like FRTS applied on the HQ WAN interface but no map-class applied to the SB sub-interface so traffic is at default 56k? Maybe try to do a copy tftp flash of the file from the SB router itself eliminate a step in between. Later, Marty On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, I have been trying to install the CUE License and till last week CUE License for CME was working perfectly now when I try to install any license whether CCME or CCM I get the following error Error: Download error Can not download cue-vm-license_25mbx_cme_7.0.3.pkg error code 150 : error type 'Operation too slow. Less than 50 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds software install clean url ftp://142.100.64.14/cue-vm-license_25mbx_cme_7.0.3.pkg username heathrow password heathrow I have tried 2 different machines the UCCX VM as well as my candidate machines some time I get this error operation too slow and another error I have tried to reload the CUE many times. I am using FreeFTPd and I created a totally new accoutn still didn't work I reset the CUE still the problem exists. Reloaded the router itself many times still no chance. Tried another files same version to check if the file is corrupted still no chance. Please share your thought. Many Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE License Installation Issue
Martin, You are the man!!! I did restored everything to the base configs and I was able to make it man. Thank you very much. Its the first time in my life to face that issue for almost a year :). I am happy for that to happen now. Many Thanks, Hesham On 20 September 2013 16:16, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.comwrote: HI Maritn, Yes I do have Switch and WANS QOS applied but I always do that normally and it was working perfectly without any issues. This is the first time ever to happen. I investigated that issue myself and I saw this could happen if there is a duplex or speed mismatch in the server port with the SW but there is nothing like that. Thats very akward. I will just return everything to the base and will see if it will work without QOS. Thanks for your help and I will let you know the results. Hesham On 20 September 2013 07:05, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, Any chance this is a QoS issue like FRTS applied on the HQ WAN interface but no map-class applied to the SB sub-interface so traffic is at default 56k? Maybe try to do a copy tftp flash of the file from the SB router itself eliminate a step in between. Later, Marty On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, I have been trying to install the CUE License and till last week CUE License for CME was working perfectly now when I try to install any license whether CCME or CCM I get the following error Error: Download error Can not download cue-vm-license_25mbx_cme_7.0.3.pkg error code 150 : error type 'Operation too slow. Less than 50 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds software install clean url ftp://142.100.64.14/cue-vm-license_25mbx_cme_7.0.3.pkg username heathrow password heathrow I have tried 2 different machines the UCCX VM as well as my candidate machines some time I get this error operation too slow and another error I have tried to reload the CUE many times. I am using FreeFTPd and I created a totally new accoutn still didn't work I reset the CUE still the problem exists. Reloaded the router itself many times still no chance. Tried another files same version to check if the file is corrupted still no chance. Please share your thought. Many Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice mail to user
Yes mate its pretty much easy. All you need to go Go to Unity Connection --- User -- Say the user with 3002 --- Edit--- Alternate Extensions in the Alternate Extensions add all the other lines on the same user for example if the phone has 3002 , 3005 , 3010 , 3020 then add alternate extensions as 3005 , 3010 and 3020 Please let me know if you need anything else On 18 September 2013 10:53, Dharambir kumar varma dharambi...@gmail.comwrote: Hi ALL, can we provide voice mail facility to a user having multiple cisco phone extensions when some body dial 3002, if no answer it should go to A user voice mail ..dial 3005 if no answer it should also go to A user voice mail. means go to same user voice mail. Response will be higly appreciated.. -- Regards, Dharambir Kumar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Softkey template parameter
Transfer connected is when you have an active call and you find on the softkey template it gives you a tone first then you dial the number and then transfer this operation is Transfer + Number + Transfer again I believe for Transfer direct is when you have a speed dial button configured on your phone so when you got a call ringing and you want to transfer it directly without making Transfer + Number + Transfer again then you just hit the speedial 2 times or hold it for 2 seconds then it will transfer immediately On 15 September 2013 12:50, Dharambir kumar varma dharambi...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All can u please guide.. difference between Transfer/ Direct transfer/connected transfer. in cisco IP Phone Softkey template -- Regards, Dharambir Kumar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cue + callmanger srst problem
First of all, How is your SiteC Router CUE? Is it originally MGCP Gateway integrated with CUCM and the CUE is integrated with CUCM or CME? If that happens , The only way I could think of that your CTI Route Point 85224044220 has mistakenly configured with Call Forward Unregister to the UCCX Pilot 4000 You have to check carefully the CTI RP for UCCX Trigger as well as the CUE there could be somesort of typo error caused that. Also make sure on SiteC Gateway you have that config application global service alternate default ccm-manager fallback-mgcp voice translation-rule 8 rule 1 /^\*/ // voice translation-profile vmredirect translate redirect-called 8 dial-peer voice 4220 voip destination-pattern 42..$ session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:142.1.66.253 dtmf-relay sip-notify codec g711ulaw vad translation-profile out vmredirect Make sure you have that config on the CUE ccn subsystem sip gateway address 142.1.66.254 mwi sip unsolicited end subsystem ccn trigger sip phonenumber 4220 application voicemail enabled maxsessions 6 end trigger Also make sure the LO0 is routed properly and pingable from any router to CUE and from CUE to all your network Int lo0 ip ospf network point-to-point On 10 September 2013 08:37, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, You can get that message if the SIP trigger is enabled for SRST but for some reason the voicemail application isn't. Login to the CUE via CLI and check that your SIP trigger is pointing to the voicemail application and also do a 'show ccn application' to check the status of the voicemail application. Guessing from your error, it might not be enabled. Marty On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:27 AM, probert...@gmail.com probert...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, *I'm sorry*, *we* are currently experiencing system problems and are *unable to process your call * Is usually played by UCCX I have never heard it from CUE. Try factory reset on CUE just to make sure there is nothing wrong with it. On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:54 AM, sanity insanity networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Guys, Still waiting any update on this ? On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:22 PM, sanity insanity networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com wrote: hi Guys, In the normal mode when wan is up I can call into the cue ( on site c ) through jtapi . However when the wan link breaks and the when my site c router and phones fall into srst and then try placing calls to the cue using sip dial peer I hear the following prompt - *I'm sorry*, *we* are currently experiencing system problems and are *unable to process your call * *I have checked everything in the setup and unable to figure out what the problem is . Has anyone seen this ? * *-MJ * ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Generate a report for number of calls into PRI
Hi Pavan, Thank you so much for your valuable information. I appreciate your great efforts. Have a wonderful day, On 4 September 2013 20:06, Pavan K pav.c...@gmail.com wrote: If I am not mistaken, all perfmon counters are also logged to a CSV file by ucm for investigation by TAC should a system issue arise. I can't remember the name of the file but it must be in the active log directory somewhere On Sep 4, 2013 9:59 PM, John Boxold jbox...@gmail.com wrote: One option you could use the RTMT on a specific pc and create a customized alert and set it to log, the reports can be opened in excel. I have set the alarms to notify when a specific threshold is hit and send out an email alert for a PRI I set the limit to 19 active channels. I have used a temp license for Operations Manager and let it provide the graphing for your gateways, this can be set to poll automatically. It really depends on the amount of time you have available to generate, parse, and review the data. My personal opinion would be to let the telco provide the reporting for usage. Sent from my iPad On Sep 4, 2013, at 7:05 PM, CCIE Voice Aspirant ccievoice2013.2...@gmail.com wrote: CDR/CAR should be able to provide breakdown by PRI since it's MGCP. On Sep 4, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Edgar Feliz ejzi...@gmail.com wrote: TELCO can provide a usage report for each PRI, who is the SP? Edgar On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, I have 12 PRI configured as MGCP gateways and would like to replace them by a CUBE. Now, I would like to make Statistics/Feasability study about the number of concurrent calls on each PRI for example today from 8am to 5PM. Is there is anyway I can do that? That will help me in the calculation to order the number of concurrent calls properly when I migrate into SIP. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] One Button Login Bulk Subscription
Dear Experts, I have one of my customers using normal IPPA they manually hit the button and enter the information. I have proposed One Button Login is way better in this scenario but my question is can I make a bulk subscription of the service in some phone and can I BAT their information such as User ID , Ext and Pwd? Many Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Generate a report for number of calls into PRI
Thanks Somphol for that and Yes I was using the RTMT definitly On 3 September 2013 18:10, Somphol Boonjing somp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: the number of concurrent calls on each PRI for example today from 8am to 5PM. I played around with SNMP to collect that values for a while. I remember that there is no MIBS OID for concurrent calls on MGCP's interface. You can achieve that via some sort of Perfmon AXL. The easiest seems to be via RTMT, but that can't be automated. Regards, --Somphol. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One Button Login Bulk Subscription
I have 8.5.1 CUCM and I download the bat.xls and I was unable to locate anything related to services. Even Bulk Administration tab. If you will use Phone Template to subsribe all phones to it. I know it but I can't imagine how can I enter the information or whats the end-user experience? I believe there should be away where I can put 3 columns one for User ID , Ext and Pwd but I don't know how or where to begin even? Kindly , Please guide me in detail whats the idea to do it. Thanks, Hesham On 4 September 2013 11:57, Edgar Feliz ejzi...@gmail.com wrote: yes you can, but what version of CM, there is a bug in one of the recent version that BAT does not work on. Edgar On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, I have one of my customers using normal IPPA they manually hit the button and enter the information. I have proposed One Button Login is way better in this scenario but my question is can I make a bulk subscription of the service in some phone and can I BAT their information such as User ID , Ext and Pwd? Many Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 7970 Phones are black dead how to recover them?
Dear Experts, I have couple of 7970's using them for my homelab for practicing. Some of the phones were frozen due to normal boot/upgrade process then went black and unable to recover them. I have used this URL http://greenwirecommunications.com/phone-systems/cisco-ip-phones/guide-faq-unbrick-reflash-cisco-7970g/ as well as tried to reboot then press # till lights became amber then release # then put 123456789*0# as well as the other one 1673492850*# All that never worked at all. I have CUCM , CME , POE Switches , Laptop. Whats the best way to recover a phone from a black screen? When you connect the phone to a POE switch. I just see the headset , speaker and mute button blinks in the beginning then nothing. No logo or anything is shown. Thank you very much in advance, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP incoming calling party prefix
Hi Aman, After applying that prefix make sure you restart the gateway on the gateway page then Telnet/SSH to the MGCP Gateway/Router itself then conf t and then NO MGCP then MGCP See if that will work Thanks, Hesham On 2 September 2013 23:58, aman sinha aman.i...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All. Prefixing +44 in calling number is not working on MGCP gateways. Any suggestions ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP incoming calling party prefix
Glad that i was able to help ok for your info. In the future when u make any minor changes into mgcp gateways always restart and no mgcp and mgcp even if it a tickbox on the gateway but in h323 or sip trunk u can just restart the h323 gateway or sip trunk are good enough On Tuesday, September 3, 2013, aman sinha wrote: Hi Hesham, I had tried resetting the Gateway multiple times. Tried no mgcp and mgcp ; and ir worked. Thanks !! On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'heshamcentr...@gmail.com'); wrote: Hi Aman, After applying that prefix make sure you restart the gateway on the gateway page then Telnet/SSH to the MGCP Gateway/Router itself then conf t and then NO MGCP then MGCP See if that will work Thanks, Hesham On 2 September 2013 23:58, aman sinha aman.i...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'aman.i...@gmail.com'); wrote: Hi All. Prefixing +44 in calling number is not working on MGCP gateways. Any suggestions ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 7970 Phones are black dead how to recover them?
Hi Alex, Thank you very much for your help , I'll do that and I'll let you know. Many Thanks, Hesham On 3 September 2013 07:44, Alex Mendoza aa.mend...@icloud.com wrote: Hi, Hesham. Connect the ip phone (black screen) to a PoE switch, turn on debug ip DHCP server all to see if the ip phone are trying to get an IP address. If not, I don't know what to do, but If the phone are trying to get an IP address you can use a CME to put a correct firmware and bring back to live. regards! On Sep 3, 2013, at 2:28 AM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, I have couple of 7970's using them for my homelab for practicing. Some of the phones were frozen due to normal boot/upgrade process then went black and unable to recover them. I have used this URL http://greenwirecommunications.com/phone-systems/cisco-ip-phones/guide-faq-unbrick-reflash-cisco-7970g/ as well as tried to reboot then press # till lights became amber then release # then put 123456789*0# as well as the other one 1673492850*# All that never worked at all. I have CUCM , CME , POE Switches , Laptop. Whats the best way to recover a phone from a black screen? When you connect the phone to a POE switch. I just see the headset , speaker and mute button blinks in the beginning then nothing. No logo or anything is shown. Thank you very much in advance, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Generate a report for number of calls into PRI
Dear Experts, I have 12 PRI configured as MGCP gateways and would like to replace them by a CUBE. Now, I would like to make Statistics/Feasability study about the number of concurrent calls on each PRI for example today from 8am to 5PM. Is there is anyway I can do that? That will help me in the calculation to order the number of concurrent calls properly when I migrate into SIP. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ACS 2509 Issues
Thank you very much Sam for that and I will try it on the weekend and I'll let you know. Have a wonderful day, Hesham On 26 August 2013 13:26, Sam Wilson wilsonc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Try entering no service config in the config mode, save the config and reload the router Hope that help, Rwgards Sent from my Windows Phone -- From: Hesham Abdelkereem Sent: 8/26/2013 1:05 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ACS 2509 Issues Dear Experts, I have Cisco ACS 2509 using it for labs. I have suffering couple of issues with it First when I turn on the device i get the following System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 16384 Kbytes of main memory Then I hit B to boot then I get the following Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-BOOT-R), Version 11.0(10c), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 27-Dec-96 17:33 by loreilly Image text-base: 0x0101, data-base: 0x1000 cisco 2509 (68030) processor (revision D) with 16384K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 01886520, with hardware revision X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface. 2 Serial network interfaces. 8 terminal lines. 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Loading network-confg ... [timed out] Loading cisconet.cfg ... [timed out] Loading acserver-confg ... [timed out] Loading acserver.cfg ... [timed out] Press RETURN to get started! I always get these messages for infinity Loading network-confg ... [timed out] Loading cisconet.cfg ... [timed out] Loading acserver-confg ... [timed out] Loading acserver.cfg ... [timed out] Then finally when I access any device connected to the ASYNC cable I am able to connect but not unable to exit the session I hit Ctrl + Shift + 6 + X many times by the Laptop keyboard and even by On-Screen keyboard and still nothing is working well. I have tried to do the following workaround 1-I have another 2509 which has a defective ASYNC Socket , I removed all the Memories and stuff and put it in the other one and still get the same results. Your help would be highly appreciated. Thank you very much in advance, ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ACS 2509 Issues
Dear Experts, I have Cisco ACS 2509 using it for labs. I have suffering couple of issues with it First when I turn on the device i get the following System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 16384 Kbytes of main memory Then I hit B to boot then I get the following Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-BOOT-R), Version 11.0(10c), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 27-Dec-96 17:33 by loreilly Image text-base: 0x0101, data-base: 0x1000 cisco 2509 (68030) processor (revision D) with 16384K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 01886520, with hardware revision X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface. 2 Serial network interfaces. 8 terminal lines. 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Loading network-confg ... [timed out] Loading cisconet.cfg ... [timed out] Loading acserver-confg ... [timed out] Loading acserver.cfg ... [timed out] Press RETURN to get started! I always get these messages for infinity Loading network-confg ... [timed out] Loading cisconet.cfg ... [timed out] Loading acserver-confg ... [timed out] Loading acserver.cfg ... [timed out] Then finally when I access any device connected to the ASYNC cable I am able to connect but not unable to exit the session I hit Ctrl + Shift + 6 + X many times by the Laptop keyboard and even by On-Screen keyboard and still nothing is working well. I have tried to do the following workaround 1-I have another 2509 which has a defective ASYNC Socket , I removed all the Memories and stuff and put it in the other one and still get the same results. Your help would be highly appreciated. Thank you very much in advance, ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD limit max 2 call
Hi, Thats the way you do it to fulfil your requirement ccm-manager music-on-hold ephone-hunt 1 longest-idle pilot 4500 list 4101,4102 timeout 10,10 auto logout 2 dynamic application service app-b-acd param number-of-hunt-grps 1 param second-greeting-time 40 param aa-hunt1 4500 param queue-len 2 param queue-manager-debugs 1 ! service app-b-acd-aa paramspace english index 1 paramspace english language en paramspace english location flash: param service-name app-b-acd param handoff-string app-b-acd-aa param aa-pilot 4000 param number-of-hunt-grps 1 param dial-by-extension-option 1 param second-greeting-time 32 param call-retry-timer 10 param max-time-call-retry 60 param max-time-vm-retry 2 param voice-mail *4001 param drop-through-option 1 param drop-through-prompt _bacd_welcome.au ! dial-peer voice 4000 voip service app-b-acd-aa destination-pattern 4000 session target ipv4:142.102.66.254 incoming called-number 4000 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw On 9 August 2013 16:43, Karen Johnson karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca wrote: all, is there a way to limit so BACD can only accept 2 call ? i have used -max-conn under dial-peer -param queue-len under sript app-b-acd however it still play Thanks for calling then reject the call. Can we achieve rejecting call right away, without play Thanks for calling ? K ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Off net to off net transfer and Conference using Verizon SIP Trunk Issues
Hi Ashok, Thanks for checking out. I was running a know bug of my CUCM http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetailsbugId=CSCuf24788 The fix was upgrading the CUCM to a different version. Many Thanks, Hesham On 28 July 2013 20:27, Ashok Boinpally ping.as...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, Have you checked Geolocation configs if they are active? The mid-call features can be controlled through Geolocation policies. On Friday, 19 July 2013, Hesham Abdelkereem wrote: Dear Experts, I have an issue when trying to complete an off net to off net transfer for calls using Verizon SIP trunking, When a Deskphone calls a PSTN number call connected then transfer it to another internal extension or Conference , I get the message cannot complete transfer on the phone and the transfered part of the call fails but the original call stays on hold. I did the following:- I have got the Block offnet to offnet transfer set to False on the CUCM, also I tried to do this voice service voip sip pass-thru content sdp Also let me tell you other sutff for help All the phones are 6945 , CIPC and Jabber I have tested the same situation with a Polycom Conference station that is registered to CUCM as 3rd Party SIP Endpoint everything is working perfect transfer to another extension and make a multiple conference with multiple PSTN numbers and internal extensions also other weird thing is If any Deskphone receive inbound PSTN call and transfer it to another extension then it works also but not calling outbound to PSTN and transfer. 6945 , CIPC and Jabber clients are doing the same issues while with 3rd Party Polycom conference everything works perfect I have traced in the phones and I don't get any acknowledgment it just try invite 3 times. What could be the issue? Many Thanks, Hesham -- Ashok Kumar Boinpally. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Off net to off net transfer and Conference using Verizon SIP Trunk Issues
Please don't talk about the LAB because the LAB is a matter of luck and not a matter of knowledge or experience. On 28 July 2013 20:31, Ashok Boinpally ping.as...@gmail.com wrote: Ha ha... What can we do if we hit these kind of bugs in the lab except pulling our hair :) On Monday, 29 July 2013, Hesham Abdelkereem wrote: Hi Ashok, Thanks for checking out. I was running a know bug of my CUCM http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetailsbugId=CSCuf24788 The fix was upgrading the CUCM to a different version. Many Thanks, Hesham On 28 July 2013 20:27, Ashok Boinpally ping.as...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, Have you checked Geolocation configs if they are active? The mid-call features can be controlled through Geolocation policies. On Friday, 19 July 2013, Hesham Abdelkereem wrote: Dear Experts, I have an issue when trying to complete an off net to off net transfer for calls using Verizon SIP trunking, When a Deskphone calls a PSTN number call connected then transfer it to another internal extension or Conference , I get the message cannot complete transfer on the phone and the transfered part of the call fails but the original call stays on hold. I did the following:- I have got the Block offnet to offnet transfer set to False on the CUCM, also I tried to do this voice service voip sip pass-thru content sdp Also let me tell you other sutff for help All the phones are 6945 , CIPC and Jabber I have tested the same situation with a Polycom Conference station that is registered to CUCM as 3rd Party SIP Endpoint everything is working perfect transfer to another extension and make a multiple conference with multiple PSTN numbers and internal extensions also other weird thing is If any Deskphone receive inbound PSTN call and transfer it to another extension then it works also but not calling outbound to PSTN and transfer. 6945 , CIPC and Jabber clients are doing the same issues while with 3rd Party Polycom conference everything works perfect I have traced in the phones and I don't get any acknowledgment it just try invite 3 times. What could be the issue? Many Thanks, Hesham -- Ashok Kumar Boinpally. -- Ashok Kumar Boinpally. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HWIC-4ESW
Sir, Just use 3550 24 Poe switch it cost $70 on ebay. That HWIC will cost u at least $200 or more. I know its better for practicing labs but its not cost effective. You can find it on ebay.com Thanks, Hesham On 25 July 2013 09:45, CCIE Voice Aspirant ccievoice2013.2...@gmail.comwrote: Hello list I am looking for 2 HWIC-4ESW cards for my lab, does anyone have spares I can buy? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HWIC-4ESW
Yes sure just make DOT1Q on port 24 switchport mode trunk switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q in the Branch router like gig0/1 or whatever make a router on stick (Sub interfaces) Int gig0/0.302 encapsulation dot1q 302 ip address 142.102.65.254 255.255.255.0 no shut int gig0/0.402 encpasulation dot1q 402 ip address 142.202.65.254 255.255.255.0 no shut ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HWIC-4ESW
Just get that model is good enough and cheap 3550-PWR-24 On 25 July 2013 11:28, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Yes sure just make DOT1Q on port 24 switchport mode trunk switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q in the Branch router like gig0/1 or whatever make a router on stick (Sub interfaces) Int gig0/0.302 encapsulation dot1q 302 ip address 142.102.65.254 255.255.255.0 no shut int gig0/0.402 encpasulation dot1q 402 ip address 142.202.65.254 255.255.255.0 no shut ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Troubleshooting Cisco IP phone 7912
That has many possibilities 1-Make sure you have the correct Calling Search Space configured on the phone configuration page 2-Make sure that the phone has the correct Device Pool configured that is pointing to the Standard Local Route Group 3-Make sure the the phone has CSS that has access to the gateway that you will dial-out via it. Thanks, Hesham On 23 July 2013 13:27, cisco 2006 inht...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Dear All , I have a problem in my Cisco IP Phone 7912 . I can receive a call from the outside , but I cannot place a call in my phone . Can anyone help me to troubleshoot this problem as soon as possible , please . Best Regards, Israa ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Gateway with Unity Connection issues
Dear All, I have solved this issue by going into the SIP TRUNK and make Calling Party Selection :- Last Redirect Number (External). However , If CellPhone called unity connection and then transfer by extension that has CFA to another cell then the Caller ID shown to the last destination is the External Phone number mask of the phone that did the CFA and not the originator. Any Idea how to transfer the originator caller-id which is the PSTN number to the last forwarded hop. Many Thanks, Hesham On 16 July 2013 13:45, Justin McIntyre justin.mcint...@blackbox.com wrote: So what does the diversion header get translated to when you try the call via UCxN? Are you saying that the SIP profile is working when you directly call the forwarded phone but not when UCxN AA calls the forwarded phone. Can we see the comparing SIP traffic. Can we see associated SIP traffic when you call forwarded phone and then the SIP traffic when UCxN AA makes the call? I'd like to see the difference. Based upon your diversion header info being set to .*@.* this should apply the change to the UCxN VM pilot as well depending on the length of your VM pilot etc... If your VM pilot is only 4 digits and not 7 then that may be the reason it works by calling forwarded phone directly but not UCxN AA. Maybe Provider isn't seeing enough incoming digits? Excluding all of these options you could also check and see if your provider allows additional authentication methods for calls. Trunk groups, digest authentications etc... Thanks, Justin This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Off net to off net transfer and Conference using Verizon SIP Trunk Issues
Dear Experts, I have an issue when trying to complete an off net to off net transfer for calls using Verizon SIP trunking, When a Deskphone calls a PSTN number call connected then transfer it to another internal extension or Conference , I get the message cannot complete transfer on the phone and the transfered part of the call fails but the original call stays on hold. I did the following:- I have got the Block offnet to offnet transfer set to False on the CUCM, also I tried to do this voice service voip sip pass-thru content sdp Also let me tell you other sutff for help All the phones are 6945 , CIPC and Jabber I have tested the same situation with a Polycom Conference station that is registered to CUCM as 3rd Party SIP Endpoint everything is working perfect transfer to another extension and make a multiple conference with multiple PSTN numbers and internal extensions also other weird thing is If any Deskphone receive inbound PSTN call and transfer it to another extension then it works also but not calling outbound to PSTN and transfer. 6945 , CIPC and Jabber clients are doing the same issues while with 3rd Party Polycom conference everything works perfect I have traced in the phones and I don't get any acknowledgment it just try invite 3 times. What could be the issue? Many Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Gateway with Unity Connection issues
Dear All, I have SIP Verizon and Unity Connection. I setup the Unity Connection Automated Attendant to make dial-by-extension feature. Now suppose I have extension is forwarded to a cell 408202 If I called from PSTN to AA number then called extension which is forwarded to cell is not working. I did debug ccsip messasges and the reason why is because the remote-party or ANI becomes the voicemail pilot this exactly related to that problem http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/voip/148095 How can I fix that in the SIP header? knowing that I did a change to let Phone 1 calls Phone 2 and Phone 2 is forwarded to PSTN number that worked with me but didn't work when I do it via unity connection. Please give me some advice. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Gateway with Unity Connection issues
yes I did that to make a normal call forwarding by doing so oice class sip-profiles 1 request INVITE sip-header Diversion modify sip:(.*)@(.*) sip:305...@sbcglobal.com where XXX is a real DID range that make it work with me when I call phone A to Phone B while Phone B is forwarded to cell phone but doesn't work when I call Unity AA to call Phone B while Phone B is forwarded to a cell phone Thanks, On 15 July 2013 19:36, Ashok Boinpally ping.as...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Have you tried to modify SIP header with SIP profiles on Cisco VG while going finally out? On Tuesday, 16 July 2013, Hesham Abdelkereem wrote: Dear All, I have SIP Verizon and Unity Connection. I setup the Unity Connection Automated Attendant to make dial-by-extension feature. Now suppose I have extension is forwarded to a cell 408202 If I called from PSTN to AA number then called extension which is forwarded to cell is not working. I did debug ccsip messasges and the reason why is because the remote-party or ANI becomes the voicemail pilot this exactly related to that problem http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/voip/148095 How can I fix that in the SIP header? knowing that I did a change to let Phone 1 calls Phone 2 and Phone 2 is forwarded to PSTN number that worked with me but didn't work when I do it via unity connection. Please give me some advice. -- Ashok Kumar Boinpally. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Access list for cue traffic marking
Guys , Get the biggest relief in your life. If you see this CUE QOS question just give it up. No one has ever scored that CUE Switch QOS and many people tried different things. My only advice give it up completely and never waste ur time or energy solving it. That particular lab is very long and if you have 2 hours left then try to play with it and enjoy. Knowing that the guys who passed this lab still didn't score that question in particular. In order for that question to be solved that needs to be consulted to a very knowledgable Routing and Switching . SP and Voice simultaneously even though the Cisco grading would be different than the real realistic world. To conclude , Never waste ur time or energy solve this stupid question trust me. Your passing score is 80% and this stupid question could be about 4% of the whole test. I know for fact that every minor mark counts in the total but its really up to the destiny. To me CCIE Test is no longer a test that you are real knowledgable or not. I definitely believe 100% CCIE test is like a gambling game , Jackpot or a roulette in LAS VEGAS. Don't have the faith that this thing is graded fairly with a standard. On 7 July 2013 02:25, LorenzLGRC lorenzl...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, you can use something like this: access-list 101 permit tcp host a.b.c.d any eq 2748 ! class-map match-all cti-qbe match access-group 101 ! policy-map cti-qbe class cti-qbe set dscp af31 bandwidth 20 ! interface Serial0/1 service-policy output cti-qbe On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Piyush Jain jainpiyush2...@ymail.comwrote: Hi Guys, I am trying to understand how we can mark CUE traffic on HQ Switch to implement LAN QOS. I have come up with the below solution. ip access-list extended name CUE permit tcp host 142.100.64.12 host 142.1.66.253 eq 2748 class-map match-any CUE-CLASS match access group name CUE policy-map CUE-POLICY class CUE-CLASS set ip dhcp CS3 int fa 1/0/4 description * CONNECTED TO SUB CUCM *** service policy input CUE-POLICY In above config, 142.100.64.12 is SUB CUCM, 142.1.66.253 is CUE on SC router. Explanation: Since we are applying service policy in incoming direction on switch port connected to CUCM, so the source port number (of CUCM) can be anything but destination port number (i.e for CUE) should be 2748 (JTAPI port). Any advice or inputs are most welcome. Cheers !! Piyush Jain ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can I use 1 single T1 line for voice and data at the same time?
Dear Experts, Can I use single T1 Line from any carrier such as ATT or Verizon for Voice and Data at the same time? Or it must be one dedicated for each? Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can I use 1 single T1 line for voice and data at the same time?
Hi Experts, that answered my questions If the T1 is Dynamic T1 or Integrated then It can combine voice and DATA? http://www.carrierschoice.com/what_is_a_t1.html I have another questions. If I have SIP Circuit from a telco (Verizon) can I have a voice T1 from ATT to work as backup for the SIP? Thanks, Hesham On 3 July 2013 10:09, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, Can I use single T1 Line from any carrier such as ATT or Verizon for Voice and Data at the same time? Or it must be one dedicated for each? Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can I use 1 single T1 line for voice and data at the same time?
Bill thanks for your great participating. Let me ask you more challenging question If I have SIP from Verizon and I have Dynamic/Integrated T1 from ATT. Can I have the Dynamic T1 work as backup for Verizon's SIP? I know that if you have the same service provider you can make T1 Line can work as backup for SIP but I don't know if that will work out on different providers? Thanks, On 3 July 2013 10:51, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: You can run voice over a data t1 from most providers. This could be as a sip or h323 trunk (perhaps other ways too) My recommendation is to get one with QoS that matches your needs Sent from my iPhone On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, Can I use single T1 Line from any carrier such as ATT or Verizon for Voice and Data at the same time? Or it must be one dedicated for each? Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can I use 1 single T1 line for voice and data at the same time?
Thank you very much Bill. As always I witness and confess you are the man. It's really difficult and tricky question and you given me great experience. Many Thanks, On 3 July 2013 14:15, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: Only if the service provider slows it So an example would be in your case Verizon accepts the SIP trunk from their IP 10.10.10.1 and they could also accept it from 20.20.20.1 on an ATT circuit What they most likely wont do is promise it will work as well Sent from my iPhone On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Bill thanks for your great participating. Let me ask you more challenging question If I have SIP from Verizon and I have Dynamic/Integrated T1 from ATT. Can I have the Dynamic T1 work as backup for Verizon's SIP? I know that if you have the same service provider you can make T1 Line can work as backup for SIP but I don't know if that will work out on different providers? Thanks, On 3 July 2013 10:51, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: You can run voice over a data t1 from most providers. This could be as a sip or h323 trunk (perhaps other ways too) My recommendation is to get one with QoS that matches your needs Sent from my iPhone On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, Can I use single T1 Line from any carrier such as ATT or Verizon for Voice and Data at the same time? Or it must be one dedicated for each? Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Problem
Dear Experts, I have configured B-ACD. I have been configuring that everyday for months. Today is the first time. when i call the pilot number it says You have entered an invalid option , for sales press 1 for customer service press 2 for dialing by extension please press 3 What could be the problem? Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Problem
Hi Khaled , Here you are below application no service app-b-acd-aa param voice-mail 4220 paramspace english index 1 param max-time-call-retry 700 param service-name app-b-acd param number-of-hunt-grps 1 param drop-through-option 1 paramspace english language en param handoff-string app-b-acd-aa param max-time-vm-retry 2 paramspace english location flash: param aa-pilot 4000 param second-greeting-time 60 param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au param call-retry-timer 15 ! service app-b-acd param queue-len 15 param aa-hunt1 4500 param number-of-hunt-grps 2 param queue-manager-debugs 1 ! global service alternate default ! ! dial-peer voice 4000 voip service app-b-acd-aa destination-pattern 4000 session target ipv4:142.102.66.254 incoming called-number 4000 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 4001 pots service app-b-acd-aa incoming called-number 4000 no ephone-hunt 10 longest-idle ephone-hunt 10 longest-idle pilot 4500 list 4101, 4102 timeout 10, 10 ! On 2 July 2013 04:06, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, Can you post the config of B-ACD and ephone-hunt ? Also the output of show flash: | in au Regards. Khaled -- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 03:24:10 -0700 From: heshamcentr...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Problem Dear Experts, I have configured B-ACD. I have been configuring that everyday for months. Today is the first time. when i call the pilot number it says You have entered an invalid option , for sales press 1 for customer service press 2 for dialing by extension please press 3 What could be the problem? Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Problem
Hi Khaled, Thanks a lot for your reply yes regarding no service (I was just trying to delete it after when it didn't work) I got your points and I have erased the whole lab I'd like to thank you so much for your great efforts. Hesham On 2 July 2013 04:32, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, here are my comments: -I see under the application , no service app-b-acd-a , is this typo error? It shouldn't preceded with no. -If you're using drop through option , change the (1) param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.auparam drop-through-prompt _bacd_welcome.au (2) paramspace english index 1 from 1 to 0 -And under service app-b-acd , change param number-of-hunt-grps 2 from 2 to 1 Try these changes and let us know how it went with you. Regards. Khaled -- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 04:21:09 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Problem From: heshamcentr...@gmail.com To: khaled_sah...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi Khaled , Here you are below application no service app-b-acd-aa param voice-mail 4220 paramspace english index 1 param max-time-call-retry 700 param service-name app-b-acd param number-of-hunt-grps 1 param drop-through-option 1 paramspace english language en param handoff-string app-b-acd-aa param max-time-vm-retry 2 paramspace english location flash: param aa-pilot 4000 param second-greeting-time 60 param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au param call-retry-timer 15 ! service app-b-acd param queue-len 15 param aa-hunt1 4500 param number-of-hunt-grps 2 param queue-manager-debugs 1 ! global service alternate default ! ! dial-peer voice 4000 voip service app-b-acd-aa destination-pattern 4000 session target ipv4:142.102.66.254 incoming called-number 4000 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 4001 pots service app-b-acd-aa incoming called-number 4000 no ephone-hunt 10 longest-idle ephone-hunt 10 longest-idle pilot 4500 list 4101, 4102 timeout 10, 10 ! On 2 July 2013 04:06, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, Can you post the config of B-ACD and ephone-hunt ? Also the output of show flash: | in au Regards. Khaled -- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 03:24:10 -0700 From: heshamcentr...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Problem Dear Experts, I have configured B-ACD. I have been configuring that everyday for months. Today is the first time. when i call the pilot number it says You have entered an invalid option , for sales press 1 for customer service press 2 for dialing by extension please press 3 What could be the problem? Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Problem
Somphol that was such a great point your have raised. Yes I agree it was playing en_bacd_invalidoption.au even when I didn't configure it on B-ACD I have deleted the lab but thanks for your points. Hesham On 2 July 2013 05:15, Somphol Boonjing somp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham / Khaled, Fully agreed with that Kaled on that typo. Just a few more thought, there is also possibility that this is the actual audio of the file flash:en_bacd_welcome.au. You have entered an invalid option , for sales press 1 for customer service press 2 for dialing by extension please press 3 You can use debug voip application script to quickly see what audio files are played. Is it only en_bacd_welcome.au that is played or en_bacd_invalidoption.au is played first then followed by en_bacd_welcome.au.? Another quick isolation point is at POTS dial-peer, I think a quick change to number other than 4000 would help isolating the issue even further. My rational is to scope down the problematic area. dial-peer voice 4001 pots service app-b-acd-aa incoming called-number 4008 ! Then, make a test call from PSTN. Not that there is anything obvious, but isolation will make it easier to focus. Regards, --Somphol. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:32 PM, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.comwrote: Hi Hesham, here are my comments: -I see under the application , no service app-b-acd-a , is this typo error? It shouldn't preceded with no. -If you're using drop through option , change the (1) param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.auparam drop-through-prompt _bacd_welcome.au (2) paramspace english index 1 from 1 to 0 -And under service app-b-acd , change param number-of-hunt-grps 2 from 2 to 1 Try these changes and let us know how it went with you. Regards. Khaled -- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 04:21:09 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Problem From: heshamcentr...@gmail.com To: khaled_sah...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi Khaled , Here you are below application no service app-b-acd-aa param voice-mail 4220 paramspace english index 1 param max-time-call-retry 700 param service-name app-b-acd param number-of-hunt-grps 1 param drop-through-option 1 paramspace english language en param handoff-string app-b-acd-aa param max-time-vm-retry 2 paramspace english location flash: param aa-pilot 4000 param second-greeting-time 60 param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au param call-retry-timer 15 ! service app-b-acd param queue-len 15 param aa-hunt1 4500 param number-of-hunt-grps 2 param queue-manager-debugs 1 ! global service alternate default ! ! dial-peer voice 4000 voip service app-b-acd-aa destination-pattern 4000 session target ipv4:142.102.66.254 incoming called-number 4000 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 4001 pots service app-b-acd-aa incoming called-number 4000 no ephone-hunt 10 longest-idle ephone-hunt 10 longest-idle pilot 4500 list 4101, 4102 timeout 10, 10 ! On 2 July 2013 04:06, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, Can you post the config of B-ACD and ephone-hunt ? Also the output of show flash: | in au Regards. Khaled -- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 03:24:10 -0700 From: heshamcentr...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Problem Dear Experts, I have configured B-ACD. I have been configuring that everyday for months. Today is the first time. when i call the pilot number it says You have entered an invalid option , for sales press 1 for customer service press 2 for dialing by extension please press 3 What could be the problem? Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Clocking for GW
Hi Lorenz, I have tried that at my home lab now and under s0/0/0:23 or 15 i don't have an option for that also I have removed network-clock-participate 1 t1 0/0/0 not working??? any ideas?? Thanks a lot On Jun 30, 2013, at 11:49 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for that great information. I wonder should I do that for all routers R1 , R2 and R3? Because as far as i remember it's just mentioned in the beginning of the Voice Gateway section not individually per each router? Thanks, Hesham On Jun 30, 2013, at 11:16 PM, LorenzLGRC lorenzl...@gmail.com wrote: Under your se0/0/0:15 interface add: Isdn layer1-protocol-emulate network Hth Lorenz Il giorno lunedì 1 luglio 2013, Karen Johnson ha scritto: hi folks, when we were asked to do below : what is the right command and verification? Take clocking for Layer 1 from Network side. Your PRI clocking of layer 2 should be user side. tks K ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Clocking for GW
Thanks for that great information. I wonder should I do that for all routers R1 , R2 and R3? Because as far as i remember it's just mentioned in the beginning of the Voice Gateway section not individually per each router? Thanks, Hesham On Jun 30, 2013, at 11:16 PM, LorenzLGRC lorenzl...@gmail.com wrote: Under your se0/0/0:15 interface add: Isdn layer1-protocol-emulate network Hth Lorenz Il giorno lunedì 1 luglio 2013, Karen Johnson ha scritto: hi folks, when we were asked to do below : what is the right command and verification? Take clocking for Layer 1 from Network side. Your PRI clocking of layer 2 should be user side. tks K ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Single Alert in RTMT for MGCP when PRI Channel is Down
Dear Experts, I would like to configure a single alert when MGCP PRI Channel is down to be sent to a specific email. I know how to configure it by going to RTMT --- Alert Central -- MGCPDCHANNEL is down --- Set Alert/Propertis but I don't know how to make a single alert to avoid excessive e-mail? Kindly , Please advise Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation-rule help
Dear All, I would like to make a translation-rule to do the following remove 9 from 91[10 digits] remove 9 from 9[10 digits] remove 9 from 9[7 digits] i did it the following but was invalid voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /^91../ /../ rule 2 /^9../ /../ rule 3 /^9.../ /.../ when i did it like that it didn't work I would like to make it strict match not like /^9/ // this will overlap Please help me whats the other way to do it. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation-rule help
Regist what about if i need it for 9011T I would like to strip 9 from 011T how can i do it? On 28 June 2013 10:02, Regis Reis regis_r...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Hi Hesham, You make this form: voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /^91\(..$\)/ /\1/ rule 2 /^9\(..$\)/ /\1/ rule 3 /^9\(...$\)/ /\1/ Test it. I put the $ after last digit, because I understand that you want match with the total digits diled. ** *Regis Reis* -- *De:* Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com *Para:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Enviadas:* Sexta-feira, 28 de Junho de 2013 13:29 *Assunto:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation-rule help Dear All, I would like to make a translation-rule to do the following remove 9 from 91[10 digits] remove 9 from 9[10 digits] remove 9 from 9[7 digits] i did it the following but was invalid voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /^91../ /../ rule 2 /^9../ /../ rule 3 /^9.../ /.../ when i did it like that it didn't work I would like to make it strict match not like /^9/ // this will overlap Please help me whats the other way to do it. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper is unable to reach SiteB under Call Forward UnRegister
Guys I got the fix, The problem was a typo error due to my fast copy and paste in SB router i type gateway command by default and that resulted the following R1#sh gatekee end GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name TypeFlags --- - --- - - - 142.100.64.11 41758 142.100.64.11 32793 GKVOIP-GW H323-ID: GK-Trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 142.100.64.12 37277 142.100.64.12 32790 GKVOIP-GW H323-ID: GK-Trunk_2 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 142.102.65.254 1720 142.102.65.254 57138 GKH323-GW E164-ID: 3002 E164-ID: 3001 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 142.102.66.254 1720 142.102.66.254 51323 GKH323-GW H323-ID: CUCME Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 4 R1# so it was invalid when i deleted the gateway from SiteB gateway it fixed the problem Thank you very much guys Special Thanks to Bill , Ramy and Somphol Hesham On 23 June 2013 04:00, Somphol Boonjing somp...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, I assume wrongly that SBGW will ever take the call for 3 Your normal path is for both 2... and 3... to be pointing to CUCMTRUNK only. Given that both SBGW and CUCMTRUNK are registered to the same zone, it would be necessary to exclude SBGW from ever getting the call destined to 2... or 3 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 0 SBGW zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 10 CUCMTRUNK zone prefix THEZONE 2... gw-priority 0 SBGW zone prefix THEZONE 2... gw-priority 10 CUCMTRUNK Sorry for the confusion. Even if you don't have gw-priority, when SBGW is unreachable, it should not cause the problem and call should be sent correctly to CUCMTRUNK. Then, it is less likely that the problem would be in the gatekeeper call leg, unless you use some sort of tech-prefix in addition to zone prefix. Regards, --Somphol On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Somphol Boonjing somp...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Hesham, Essentially, the gw-priority is to advise the gatekeeper to choose SBGW over CUCMTRUNK. The higher the number, the higher the priority. Without this it will distribute the call to 3XXX to both CUCMTRUNK and SBGW in a round robin fashion. If you give higher priority to SBGW, then call will be routed to SBGW unless it is not available. gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 100 SBGW zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 10 CUCMTRUNK I'm fairly new to gatekeeper myself, so it would be great if you can lab it up and see if I am wildly off the mark. Regards, --Somphol. On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Somphol, HQ SB are in the same zone and i don't understand zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 100 SBGW I think I should disregard it as they are int he same zone It's all just the CUCM Trunk and has both 2XXX and 3XXX I think that could make it work Thank you very much for ur great input I will test it and let u know Thank you very much for ur great efforts. On Jun 23, 2013, at 3:30 AM, Somphol Boonjing somp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, If the problem is on the gatekeeper, it could be as simple as the zone prefix not configured to point to CUCM for the pattern 3... Given that in normal situation, the zone prefix would be pointing SBGW either dynamically or statically. The configure with static zone prefix set would look similar to this. gatekeeeper ... ... gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 100 SBGW zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 10 CUCMTRUNK ... ... If your CUCM SBGW happens to be in the different zones, that is a different matter. Looking at a configuration guide for zone prefix command, I don't think it is possible for a zone prefix to point to two different local zones. (See: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/vvf_r/vrg_z1_ps1839_TSD_Products_Command_Reference_Chapter.html#wp1002271 ) So, in essence, I doubt that this would work. gatekeeeper ... ... gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology zone prefix SBZONE 3... gw-priority 100 SBGW zone prefix CUCMZONE 3... gw-priority 10 CUCMTRUNK ... ... Regards, --Somphol. On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Somphol, Of course all your sequence of ideas definitely make sense. However, I did exactly all that I made the Route List for CFUR is very specific to HQ Gateway and not SLRG. and Tried to change the Inbound Calls in the trunk and changed the CSS to INTERNAL and still didn't work, yes I am looking into the debug command that will show me
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper is unable to reach SiteB under Call Forward UnRegister
Hi Somphol, HQ SB are in the same zone and i don't understand zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 100 SBGW I think I should disregard it as they are int he same zone It's all just the CUCM Trunk and has both 2XXX and 3XXX I think that could make it work Thank you very much for ur great input I will test it and let u know Thank you very much for ur great efforts. On Jun 23, 2013, at 3:30 AM, Somphol Boonjing somp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, If the problem is on the gatekeeper, it could be as simple as the zone prefix not configured to point to CUCM for the pattern 3... Given that in normal situation, the zone prefix would be pointing SBGW either dynamically or statically. The configure with static zone prefix set would look similar to this. gatekeeeper ... ... gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 100 SBGW zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 10 CUCMTRUNK ... ... If your CUCM SBGW happens to be in the different zones, that is a different matter. Looking at a configuration guide for zone prefix command, I don't think it is possible for a zone prefix to point to two different local zones. (See: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/vvf_r/vrg_z1_ps1839_TSD_Products_Command_Reference_Chapter.html#wp1002271) So, in essence, I doubt that this would work. gatekeeeper ... ... gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology zone prefix SBZONE 3... gw-priority 100 SBGW zone prefix CUCMZONE 3... gw-priority 10 CUCMTRUNK ... ... Regards, --Somphol. On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Somphol, Of course all your sequence of ideas definitely make sense. However, I did exactly all that I made the Route List for CFUR is very specific to HQ Gateway and not SLRG. and Tried to change the Inbound Calls in the trunk and changed the CSS to INTERNAL and still didn't work, yes I am looking into the debug command that will show me the gatekeeper call flow. I have been a long time never worked with that. Thanks for your ideas, I will keep you and the forum posted if I got any updates, Thanks, Hesham On 23 June 2013 01:40, Somphol Boonjing somp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, I have a few ideas. I want to remove a few things out of the equation, first try to set codec for all inter-region to G711. Second, if you are using Local Route Group (LRG), replace it with a more straightforward settings -- i.e. point the RL directly to HQ gateway in your case for relevant route pattern. We can deal with them later on once we understand this case to the bone. There are two call legs. The first call leg is from SC PH1 to reach x3001 via a H323 Trunk on CUCM -- the Trunk with gatekeeper control. The call should be directed to the gatekeeper who in turn should be routing it to the H323 Trunk on CUCM. The H323 Trunk should have significant digits set to 4 and a CSS that can reach x3001. Upon hitting x3001, CUCM will discover that the number is forwarded to 9723033001. Assuming that you have set the CSS for CFUR on x3001 correctly, that will match a Router Pattern that route the call toward HQ Gateway. This is a second call leg.(If you use the LRG, at this point, the LRG for the incoming H323 Trunk will cause the call to route to the wrong RG.) Once the second call leg is established, then CUCM will tell the two parities to open the RTP channel directly to each other (i.e. between the CME and the HQ Gateway.) (Well, sort of, if you have MTP required check on the H323 Trunk, then an MTP will be involved.) You problem could be on either one of this. While I believe that since you can make a call from HQ PH1 to x3001 successfully, the problem may not be in the 2nd leg, I don't entirely want to rule out the CSS, the Significant digits as well as the fact that HQ PH1 and the incoming H323 Trunk will be more than likely belong to a different Device Pool Region. I think debug gatekeeper main 10 on the gatekeeper would help. On the H323 CUCM Trunk, RTMT Real Time monitoring with Detailed Debug turn on would help you see whether the H323 Trunk has the right CSS to reach x3001. Hope this gives you some idea to work on this case. Regards, --Somphol. On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Somphol Boonjing somp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, Thanks for the detail explanation and well thanks for sharing the case. I find it very intriguing. I'm working on some idea, but for now, I just want to forward your reply to the group, in case anyone else can help too. --Somphol On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Somphol, I have to give you details as much as I can for better assistance not to tackle some of the information. Ok let me tell you the call flow In my scenario HQ and SB are registered to CUCM
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper is unable to reach SiteB under Call Forward UnRegister
Dear Experts, SiteC is CME and connected with HQ and SB via Gatekeeper Gatekeeper is working excellent with HQ and SB I am configuring Call Forward Unregister for SiteB. SiteB has Call-Manager-Fallback mode working excellent Now, I have configured Call Forward Unregister in the service parameter I changed maximum hops to DN unregister is 1 I have Created a Partitions and CSS for CFUR I forward SiteB1 and SiteB2 telephones in unregisted internal and external to be 9723033001 with forward css CFUR-CSS I created Route List to point to HQ Router and create route pattern for CFUR Now gatekeeper is reaching both HQ and SiteB in normal operaiton when I put SiteB under call-manager-fallback mode when I dial from HQ 3001 the CFUR works and shows the E164 number when I dial from SiteC 3001 via gatekeeper it shows unknown number knowing that Gatekeeper is working with SiteB under normal operation but doesn't work with CFUR Any Ideas, Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Timers fine tuning
Hi Robert, Thank you for your reply. In the CUBE Level there is an early offer forced but in the CUCM Level in the Trunk config , I didn't check MTP Required? Will that fix the issue if I checked MTP required and I will use the soft MTP resource then? Thanks, Hesham On 16 June 2013 20:52, Robert Thomas tho...@gmail.com wrote: You should look into Early offer and Early media. Perhaps you might need PRACK enabled, to cut throught the audio before the call connects. Usually your Telco can give the specific requirements you need. On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I have a SIP Circuit to Verizon and when I call out I hear 3 rings first before the call is actually routed to the PSTN. Also , I have Automated Attendant and when I dial in to the AA the first 3 seconds are cut from the prompt? Any Ideas what parameters should I change to fix that. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Robert Thomas Zamora tho...@gmail.com +50689389544 http://cr.linkedin.com/pub/robert-thomas-zamora/29/913/8a8 CCNP, CCNP Voice ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Bug in Cisco Unity with Unity Xfer becareful
Guys, I have tried to configure Unity Xfer at one of my customers by making CTI Route point * on the internal-pt and I made the alerting name voicemail and then I forward all to voicemail. Then making the Voicemail profile with mask. Very tricky. If you made the alerting name of * as voicemail when you call *+extension that would prompt you please enter your id followed by pound make sure the alerting name is anything different than Voicemail for example Unity Xfer or anything as this will overlap with your Pilot Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialing *Extension to reach the person voicemail is not working on v9.1
Dear Experts, I'd like to configure on CUCM when I dial *Extension then I can reach the voicemail of the person directly and says Sorry Extension 1130 is not available please record ur message In V7 I just make a CTI Route Point with extension * on the internal partition then forward all to voicemail then its absoultely working. I have CUCM and Unity connection v9.1 and when I did that it just telling enter your pin followed by pound like I am calling the normal voicemail pilot number I tried to tweak the forwarding routing rule and direct routing rule but no chance unfortunately. Any Ideas Thank you very much in advance ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 Gateway for POTS with CUCM issue
Dear All. I have configured H323 Gateway to use the 4 FXO ports on the router with CUCM. When I call in to the POTS line sometimes its working perfectly and sometimes when I call in it give me like a faxtone and i hear no voice then I drop the call and call again it works. Also , There is a big delay to reach the PLAR number. Do you have any ideas how to fix that? Many Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Best Practice to block certain pattern
Dear All, I'd like to block 91900 pattern efficient the CUCM. What's the best and most efficent practice to do that? Many Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Timers fine tuning
Dear All, I have a SIP Circuit to Verizon and when I call out I hear 3 rings first before the call is actually routed to the PSTN. Also , I have Automated Attendant and when I dial in to the AA the first 3 seconds are cut from the prompt? Any Ideas what parameters should I change to fix that. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 Gateway for POTS with CUCM issue
of course voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip h323 ! voice class codec 1 codec preference 1 g711ulaw codec preference 2 g729r8 ! voice class h323 1 h225 timeout tcp establish 3 h225 timeout setup 3 interface Vlan100 description ***Voice Vlan*** ip address VLAN100IP 255.255.255.0 ip pim dense-mode h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr VLAN100IP voice-port 0/1/0 no battery-reversal no comfort-noise connection plar opx caller-id enable ! voice-port 0/1/1 no battery-reversal no comfort-noise connection plar opx caller-id enable ! voice-port 0/1/2 no battery-reversal no comfort-noise connection plar opx caller-id enable ! voice-port 0/1/3 no battery-reversal no comfort-noise connection plar opx caller-id enable ! dial-peer voice 1 pots description ** FXO pots dial-peer ** incoming called-number . port 0/1/0 ! dial-peer voice 2 pots description ** FXO pots dial-peer ** incoming called-number . port 0/1/1 ! dial-peer voice 3 pots description ** FXO pots dial-peer ** incoming called-number . port 0/1/2 ! dial-peer voice 4 pots description ** FXO pots dial-peer ** incoming called-number . port 0/1/3 ! dial-peer voice 100 voip preference 2 destination-pattern .T session target ipv4:172.30.55.11 voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 dtmf-relay h245-signal h245-alphanumeric no vad ! dial-peer voice 5 pots translation-profile outgoing STRIP9 preference 1 destination-pattern .T port 0/1/0 ! dial-peer voice 6 pots translation-profile outgoing STRIP9 preference 1 destination-pattern .T port 0/1/1 ! dial-peer voice 7 pots translation-profile outgoing STRIP9 preference 1 destination-pattern .T port 0/1/2 ! dial-peer voice 8 pots translation-profile outgoing STRIP9 preference 1 destination-pattern .T port 0/1/3 ! ! ! Thank you very much On 16 June 2013 09:14, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: Do you think sharing your config might help? On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All. I have configured H323 Gateway to use the 4 FXO ports on the router with CUCM. When I call in to the POTS line sometimes its working perfectly and sometimes when I call in it give me like a faxtone and i hear no voice then I drop the call and call again it works. Also , There is a big delay to reach the PLAR number. Do you have any ideas how to fix that? Many Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Verizon SIP Trunking + SRST configs questions
Dear Experts, I would like to configure 2901 Gateway as SIP Trunking with Verizon. I have been working 8 hours with Verizon and they are barely can help or support while when I have dealed with ATT they have provided me SIP script that made everything smooth. Now the issue inbound calls hitting the gateway but nothing received on the phones and when i make outbound the SIP message make 408 request timeout. Kindly , If anyone has done SIP with Verizon can you provide me with your configurations? Also , I am using for testing now CME V9.1 with 6945 SIP Phone is there are any concerns needs to be addressed in CME its just temporarily maybe I need trasncoder or CFB or something or? Also, After that I will configure remote site for SRST as SIP is peer to peer protocol like H323 can I use CALL MANAGER FALLBACK same as H323 will it will work? I don't want to hassle myself for learned configuration of CME as SRST knowing that the phones are SIP Phones Cisco 6945? Please share all your concerns. Thank you very much in advance. Best Regards, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEHO BEST PRACTICE
Dear Experts, Guys have a very tricky question for you. Suppose you are asked to call from HQ (408) to 972 TEHO 1ST you will use remote gateway SB (972) and Second you will use SLRG Ok my question here If I will use the Remote gateway siteb What should I do my pattern , ANI AND DNIS manipulation? If I call 972 numbers from HQ via SB 972 Gateway Should I make my pattern 91972.XXX make my ANI 408XXX NATIONAL DNIS 7 Digits Subscriber or 10 DIGIT NATIONAL Please let me know the best practice Which one makes more sense to make ANI 10 DIGIT 408XX NATIONAL DNIS 7 DIGIT LOCAL or ANI 10 DIGIT 408XXX NATIONAL DNIS 10 DIGIT NATIONAL and prefix 1972 Thank you so much in advance. Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced
Yes its really frustrating what Cisco is doing to us. Ok let me tell you this. People now have invested a lot of money in pursuing their CCIE Voice that includes (Verious Workbook fees , Rack Rentals , Home Lab building , travel expenses and Lab fees attempts for whatever times) So when people achieve CCIE Voice nowadays a year or two later it would be considered old and grandfathered. Also , Cisco has released a new lab for 2 months while they are planning to abolish the whole syllabus. Why they do that to us They already make money out of everything especially lab multiple times of lab attempts per each person. CCIE Voice achievers has to send cisco request for Migration without Lab test. CCVP it was automatically migrated to CCNP Voice without any additional tests. CCNA is migrated to CCNA R/S without any additional tests. In case of Video part then I suggest whether they force CCIE Voice people to make CCNA VIDEO or CCNP Video if they will release or they make just a migration lab track that includes VIDEO stuff only for a cheaper fee something like $500. Thats same for MICROSOFT they abolished MCSE to change it to MCITP people usually just add 2 tracks to become full MCITP same when they migrate to new MCSE (Microsoft Certified Solutions Experts) there is only an upgrade track rather than taking the whole 5 tracks again. Cisco obviously has to do something like that.It's really unfair retiring the whole cisco voice totally. Guys to make the new Collaboration lab that would cost anyone over 50K to buy telepresence , X9XX routers stuff , 9971 Video Phones , TV's and etc.. Even the rack rentals would be 5 times the old voice track as the equipment would be way more expensive. Seriously , We have to agree all of us from multiple different voice study group to have a migration track to Collaboration please share your thoughts guys On 28 May 2013 18:56, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote: Bummer, I was really hoping CCIE Voice candidates would transition to Collaboration without any additional lab exams. On May 28, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: For my initial reaction read here: http://bit.ly/12MNK5t Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE QOS Configuration
Dear Experts, I'd like to know how to configure LAN QOS for CUE Traffic? As far as i know it's the following Under all Phone Ports apply qos Int range fas1/0/14-16 auto qos voip cisco-phone no mls qos map policed-dscp 24 26 46 to 0 mls qos mls qos map policed-dscp 24 to 8 mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56 Under the Server Ports AND TRUNK such as CUCM/Unity Connection/UCCX EXCEPT CUPC TEST/CUPS SERVER MLS QOS TRUST DSCP access-list 100 permit tcp host 142.1.66.253 any eq 2748 access-list 101 permit udp host 142.1.66.253 any range 16384 32767 class-map match-any CUE-SIG match access-group 100 class-map match-any CUE-RTP match access-group 101 policy-map CUE-POLICY class CUE-SIG set dscp cs3 police 32000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit class CUE-RTP set dscp ef class class-default interface gi 1/0/4 UCCX service-policy input cue mls qos trust dscp interface gi 1/0/3 CUCM mls qos trust dscp interface gi 1/0/13.15 Phones mls qos trust cos mls qos trust device cisco-phone Please let me know If I am missing anything in my configuration such as port numbers . Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to solve the LFI LLQ for Router QOS?
Dear Experts, I have solved the LLQ LFI for Router QOS with exactly the following solution and I have never scored any points in the section. Kindy , Please could you tell me what I am missing ? ON HQ SB Routers Set the Bandwidth to 384 for LFI under the frame relay dlci enable the autoqos auto qos voip trust map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/1:0-101 frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay bc 3840 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 384000 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust to frame-relay cir 364800 frame-relay bc 3648 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 364800 policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority percent 70 class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust bandwidth percent 5 class class-default fair-queue TO policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority 47 class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust bandwidth 16 class class-default fair-queue UNDER HQ-SC LINK wr need to apply a special class map for that link map-class frame-relay FR-Se0/0/1:0-201 frame-relay cir 1466800 frame-relay bc 14668 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 1466800 interface Serial0/0/1:0.2 point-to-point frame-relay interface-dlci 201 class FR-Se0/0/1:0-201 After finishing then last thing just do on both HQ and SB Router HQ Router interface Serial0/1/1:0.102 point-to-point no frame-relay ip rtp header-compression ! policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority 47 compress header ip rtp SB Router interface Serial0/1/0:0.102 point-to-point no frame-relay ip rtp header-compression ! policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority 47 compress header ip rtp Please let me know whats missing? Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to send calling name with TEHO?
Dear Experts, How can i send the calling name when I configure TEHO? in normal Route Pattern there is a field for calling name to make it allowed when you do it with SLRG but when You configure Route List for TEHO you don't have this option to be enabled and disabled however, If you did it on the Route Pattern level and you've used a TEHO route list everything is controlled on the Route List Level. Please advise me Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco evils erase configurations needs magician to explain how?
Hi pIYUSH, Yes , I was using both Manual first to define the Switch type , Controller , Serial Interface then I was doing ccm-manager config server (subscriberip) then ccm-manager config OK , Don't you think in the service parameters when you go advanced and Make MGCP B-Channel Maintenanance status and you can busy out the channels by making 12 zeros and then 20 One's. Anyway , What you are saying is definitely make sense although I did the above and I still find issues and I'd like to thank you so much for your great input. Best Regards, Hesham On 20 May 2013 04:10, Piyush Jain jainpiyush2...@ymail.com wrote: Hi Hesham, Are you using ccm-manager config and ccm-manager config server commands on gateway ?? Whenever you have to configure Partial PRI (like 12 channels) then don't use ccm-manager config commands. If you use, then everytime your router reboots or you change anything in configuration then it will download the configuration from call manager.. Call manager always create full PRI (i.e. 31 channels). I believe thats the reason you are facing this issue.. Thanks and Regards, Piyush Jain -- Message: 2 Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 16:01:55 -0700 From: Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco evils erase configurations needs magicianto explain how? Message-ID: caa-uhvfss6yfv-tas-hcs1p3hszc_+eyogwpt9cgvcyh06h...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Dear Experts, I was practicing labs on my homelab yesterday. I have noticed 2 things happened knowing that I always save my configs every short bit of time. 1- On my SC router I have configured the PRI Channels to use 12 channels only. I have hardcoded it with the manual configs as well as GUI Config and it was working and when i was seeing show isdn service all the unused channels were busied out and it was fine for all day. 2-On my SC router , I have configured SRST and All dial-peer and everything were working perfectly. I save all configs I have safely shutdown my lab and saved all configs before second day I have found 1-SiteC MGCP became 31 Channels and not 12 2-All dial-peer are missing port 0/0/0:15 can someone explain me the reason why that happened to me and how to avoid? I am saving my configs always whenever i config any thing even if its small It's something severe and I was wondering why i scored 20% on my SRST as well as low score on my VG sections. so I believe it has something to do with that. Thank you very much in advance Best Regards, Hesham -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130518/b689de9e/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 3 Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 06:44:35 +0530 From: sanity insanity networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD DOUBTS... Message-ID: cag4zmyv+xmyonfj-8vni0u9fwd6wvk+7beqffa5d-4ufnnu...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 hi Guys, Any update? On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:15 AM, sanity insanity networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, If there is a requirement using BACD that If agent did not answer the call in 10 s , the call should be routed to next agent. If agents are busy they should hear All agents are currently busy... The following prompts are available on the tftp serer ( ip address X.Y.X.X) and this needs to taken/downloaded to the flash of router. The prompts available are... 3) en_bacd_music-on-hold.au 4) en_bacd_options_menu.au 5) en_bacd_xferto_operater.au 6) en_bacd_afag.au 7) en_bacd_disconnect.au 8) en_bacd_enter_dest.au 9) en_bacd_invalidoption.au 10) en_bacd_welcome.au == Questions: == 1) Does this mean that we need to be using the BACD embedded scripts for bacd? 2) Also which one of the above prompts do we download ? The standard cco doc for the embedded script shows the following as the welcome prompt welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au . Are we requried to rename the prompt? -MJ -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130519/5c23e516/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 4 Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 07:19:17 +0530 From: singh singh8...@in.com To: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com;ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity connections - Unassigned Numbers question Message-ID: 1368928157.4b55df75e2e804bab559aa885be40...@mail.in.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Guys,For a block of unassigned numbers . I am able to play a prompt ofThe number which you are trying reach is not a valid number
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] FastStart fast busy signal when enabled with MTP
Dear Experts, I have configured h323 gateway and enabled outbound fast start. It gives me fast busy signal when I enable it. However , I have tried to configure on SiteB router Hardware and Software MTP as well as Hardware Transcoder associated to an MRG then to MRGL then to the DP and still didn't work. I have made it work before many times successfully and I just don't know why is not working? Media Termination Point is checked as well as H245 Wait for TCS is unchecked then Outbound fast start checked Inbound fast start is working perfectly but outbound gives fast busy signal and when i disable it then the call works. I believe the gateway is unable to invoke the MTP thats why it result for fast busy signal for outbound. I tried to reload the router didn't work. tried to make NO SCCP then SCCP Tried to restart the gateway on cucm gateway section restarted the Device Pool Don't know what to do please share ur ideas Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco evils erase configurations needs magician to explain how?
Dear Experts, I was practicing labs on my homelab yesterday. I have noticed 2 things happened knowing that I always save my configs every short bit of time. 1- On my SC router I have configured the PRI Channels to use 12 channels only. I have hardcoded it with the manual configs as well as GUI Config and it was working and when i was seeing show isdn service all the unused channels were busied out and it was fine for all day. 2-On my SC router , I have configured SRST and All dial-peer and everything were working perfectly. I save all configs I have safely shutdown my lab and saved all configs before second day I have found 1-SiteC MGCP became 31 Channels and not 12 2-All dial-peer are missing port 0/0/0:15 can someone explain me the reason why that happened to me and how to avoid? I am saving my configs always whenever i config any thing even if its small It's something severe and I was wondering why i scored 20% on my SRST as well as low score on my VG sections. so I believe it has something to do with that. Thank you very much in advance Best Regards, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ssh client
I think it should be v2 however I am not quite sure On 14 May 2013 15:07, Barrera, Hugo hugo.barr...@nexusis.com wrote: Anybody know what version of ssh client that is in the real lab on the CUPC Test PC? ** ** - Hugo ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Please remove this email from this group kar...@naver.com
Attention To:- Administrator of CCIE Voice Study Group. Kindly , Please remove this e-mail from your e-mail distribution group kar...@naver.com. Whenever we reply to the Study Group we always get a message from this email that his e-mail is full or invalid. Your Prompt action would be highly appreciated Thanks in advance, Hesham Abdelkereem ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to debug H323 inbound fast start?
I think this is what we are looking for only debug h225 asn 1 h323-message-body connect : { protocolIdentifier { 0 0 8 2250 0 5 } h245Address ipAddress : { ip '8E64400C'H port 33671 } destinationInfo { vendor { vendor { t35CountryCode 181 t35Extension 0 manufacturerCode 18 } productId '436973636F43616C6C4D616E61676572'H versionId '31'H } terminal { } mc FALSE undefinedNode FALSE } conferenceID '140B17D3B6D611E28007002699A4A0C0'H callIdentifier -- * { guid '140C5023B6D611E2801EDA9F86EAC63F'H } fastStart { '000C60138011140001008E66411E59E4008E...'H, '40060401004C60138011140001008E6641FE...'H } * On 8 May 2013 07:27, Robert Thomas tho...@gmail.com wrote: I would debug the H225 plane on the GW. Debug h225 asn1 should do it. I don't have a sample debug now, but you should look for OpenLogicalChannels and H245 characteristics like Codecs on the same initial SETUP message the GW is sending/receiving. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, I would like to know whats the debug command that will prove me that I have enabled they inbound fast start on the H323 gateway? for example give me what should I look for in the debug command. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ -- Robert Thomas Zamora tho...@gmail.com +50689389544 http://cr.linkedin.com/pub/robert-thomas-zamora/29/913/8a8 CCNP, CCNP Voice ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to configure ringlist for a specific phone in CUCM?
Dear Experts, I would like to know how can i edit the ringlist for a specific phone only and not for all? I believe there is a specific configuration file sepxx.cnf is available somewhere in the CUCM but I don't know how to get hold of it. Please share your ideas. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to configure MOH Ringback for UCCX?
Dear Experts, I'd like to configure MOH for UCCX Ringback tone. Please share your thoughts and inputs for how we configure this. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to debug H323 inbound fast start?
Dear Experts, I would like to know whats the debug command that will prove me that I have enabled they inbound fast start on the H323 gateway? for example give me what should I look for in the debug command. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to configure ringlist for a specific phone in CUCM?
Hi William, Thanks a lot for your great input. Yes I am aware of the universal ringlist.xml which is located at http://cucmip:6970/ringlist.xml. I know how to change and edit that very well for all the phones. Ok , now for that thing you mentioned below to point to a different TFTP server and then have a different Ringlist.xml do you mean by that for example I make the universal on Publisher and let all phones register to Publisher? and make the other ringlist on the subscriber and let that specific phone register with the subscriber likewise I should configure the first option 150 ip for the phone to subscriber and publisher is the second. I think I can let the UCCX publish the ringlist.xml as it has an IIS as webserver but I don't know how to apply this file on that specific phone on which tab or parameter I am able to do that. In Directories menu , I can create a custom Directories.xml and publish it via UCCX server then I apply the link on the service provisioning enterprise parameters. Then I make service provisioning both inernal and external. Now , the question where is the parameter where can I apply an external link for the ringlist.xml? I am sure that it has something to do with the original phone file configuration which can be tweaked for that. Thanks, Hesham On 7 May 2013 05:18, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: There is a specific config file for each phone, this is true. However, that config file does not contain the ring list. That is a separate config file, as I am sure you are aware. As far as I know the ringlist file is universal. The only way you could specify a custom ringlist for one phone would be to point that phone to a different TFTP server and then have a different Ringlist.xml on that TFTP server (along with all of the other files you would need). -BIll -- William Bell, CCIE #38914 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On May 7, 2013, at 2:28 AM, Hesham Abdelkereem wrote: Dear Experts, I would like to know how can i edit the ringlist for a specific phone only and not for all? I believe there is a specific configuration file sepxx.cnf is available somewhere in the CUCM but I don't know how to get hold of it. Please share your ideas. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] h323 fast start
WW I just got that link earlier this morning as well as Suresh really helped. Bill , Thank you so much you've been such a great helpful man. I appreciate all your great efforts. Many Thanks, Hesham On 7 May 2013 15:35, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: try this http://ciscovoip-amitr.blogspot.com/2011/04/fast-start-vs-slow-start.html On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Barrera, Hugo hugo.barr...@nexusis.comwrote: Hi, ** ** Anyone guide me in the right direction how to read the debugs for h323 fast start? ** ** *thanks* ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 5 Lab Handbook Lab 4 task 7.3 : Caller hear Ringback when agent phone ringing
Hi Ramarchan, I wonder if you have solved the issue as I am looking forward how we accomplish that. If you solved it please share your solution if you don't mind. Thanks, Hesham On 27 April 2013 18:19, Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have configure ringback as per solutions guide when agent phone is ringing caller hear tone of hold. I am using music on hold audio source 2 ringback2.wav file ringback file is upload in PUB and SUB. IP voice streaming media app service restarted Network on hold is set as per solutions guide.PSTN caller and HQ caller hear tone on hold. Can someone please suggest approach how to troubleshoot this issue. Thanks Regards, Ramcharan Arya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection Unity Express Ports Region Interregion Relationship
Dear Experts, I'd like to ask when I configure the Regions between HQ , SB and SC Usually for Interregion relationship is G729 Codec is used while for Intraregion we use G711 Codec. So , In case of the Unity Connection and Unity Express. I wonder if i should apply the same rule on them? On Unity Connection it has Device Pool and usually you apply HQ for it. So When SB communicates with unity then is it should be G729 What is your recommendation of how to make it in the test? Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buying home lab or Waiting for Cisco Live in June
Robert, Robert my good advice for you. But the lab with the highest end Server something like DELL POWER EDGE V3 which has 64 gb rams and 4 TB hard drives the server will be valid for any other application you want. CUCM Cluster V9 , Microsoft Server 2012 , Exchange 2013 and LYNC 2013. Make sure your server is powerful in the first place and that will not cost you more than $950 from ebay.com. For the routers and switches If you bought it as components and you would like to sell it as component it will still sell slightly more or less than the price you get. I see don't hesitate just buy your homelab nowadays from ebay.com and Never give up. If you have only this year for this current version then keep calm and carry on. Study and If you didn't pass schedule a test every 30 days exactly till the abolishment date. You will find a spot somewhere for sure whether in SJC , RTP , Europe , Dubai and it worth to travel if needed. We have to struggle for something which will give us the lifeline and CCIE is a big lifeline for many people not necessarily R/S as it lost it's value in the market already but CCIE Voice is unique and demanded and if you invested 20K for lab equipment , lab attempts , workbooks and etc. believe me you will get compensated right away as soon as you achieve it. If you value in the market now 80K - 120K with your current experience + CCVP then when you become CCIE V you will get a job for 150K or 150K+ then its worth it its lifetime investment do it mate. Thanks, Hesham On 30 April 2013 18:35, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: I know this can be true. When I took my lab, another version was updating and I talked to one of the guys taking it. he said that all the seats were full for the next 6 weeks. So if he did not pass, he most likely would not get another chance. Not sure what people do, book extra labs just in case? Then what do you do with the extra one if you pass? Oh well, don't have to worry about that. On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Robert Thomas tho...@gmail.com wrote: Eventhough they refresh the HW I don't expect any major changes. I mean I think people will continue to use 28XX series and PVDM2 for a while... Most likely they will upgrade to CUCM 8.6, 9 is still too early on the field. 10 wont be comming out until next year to the customers. The only thing that concerns me, is if they anounce a change, everyone is going to book their last attempts and buyout any remaining spots for the year. Cisco might go for a refresher just to increase demand for spots On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Bill whl...@gmail.com wrote: If they announce a new version in June you will have about 6 months from then to pass your lab. My recommendation from there is if you have plenty of study/lab time then go for it. If you don't and have to squeeze it in then you might be better off waiting to see. My thought is that 600 to 1200 hours of lab time is needed, more if you spread it out and less if you can focus solely on Cisco voice stuff. Sent from my iPad On Apr 28, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Alex Mendoza aa.mend...@icloud.com wrote: Did you know the official date for new version? I assume that I'll be ready for Sep/oct 2013 Best Regards AA Mendoza Sent from my iPhone On 28/04/2013, at 10:33, Robert Thomas tho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm thinking on buying a home lab to start my studies. It would run around 3K investment according to my amazon shopping list. However I'm thinking to wait for June and Cisco Live for announcement about the new version. I don't expect major changes on the setup, perhaps some new phone models like 99XX, or 89XX on the phones. And upgrade to the routers 29XX. However I don't expect major new features from the 29XX roll out on the exam. I would appreciate your opinions on this. -- Robert Thomas Zamora tho...@gmail.com +50689389544 http://cr.linkedin.com/pub/robert-thomas-zamora/29/913/8a8 CCNP, CCNP Voice ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Robert Thomas Zamora tho...@gmail.com +50689389544 http://cr.linkedin.com/pub/robert-thomas-zamora/29/913/8a8 CCNP, CCNP Voice ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buying home lab or Waiting for Cisco Live in June
Also , It's good to mention that if you've decided to wait for a new version. You have to wait for a very long time at least a year after the new version released. As you must wait for a new workbook versions as well as you need to consult people who took and passed the new version so that will never be in a couple of months and you talkin' at least a year for things to get cleared to you if you will wait for a new version so you talkin' about 2 years from now to make your first attempt. I see go ahead look for the equipment right this minute , Practice and Study and good luck On 30 April 2013 19:12, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Robert, Robert my good advice for you. But the lab with the highest end Server something like DELL POWER EDGE V3 which has 64 gb rams and 4 TB hard drives the server will be valid for any other application you want. CUCM Cluster V9 , Microsoft Server 2012 , Exchange 2013 and LYNC 2013. Make sure your server is powerful in the first place and that will not cost you more than $950 from ebay.com. For the routers and switches If you bought it as components and you would like to sell it as component it will still sell slightly more or less than the price you get. I see don't hesitate just buy your homelab nowadays from ebay.com and Never give up. If you have only this year for this current version then keep calm and carry on. Study and If you didn't pass schedule a test every 30 days exactly till the abolishment date. You will find a spot somewhere for sure whether in SJC , RTP , Europe , Dubai and it worth to travel if needed. We have to struggle for something which will give us the lifeline and CCIE is a big lifeline for many people not necessarily R/S as it lost it's value in the market already but CCIE Voice is unique and demanded and if you invested 20K for lab equipment , lab attempts , workbooks and etc. believe me you will get compensated right away as soon as you achieve it. If you value in the market now 80K - 120K with your current experience + CCVP then when you become CCIE V you will get a job for 150K or 150K+ then its worth it its lifetime investment do it mate. Thanks, Hesham On 30 April 2013 18:35, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: I know this can be true. When I took my lab, another version was updating and I talked to one of the guys taking it. he said that all the seats were full for the next 6 weeks. So if he did not pass, he most likely would not get another chance. Not sure what people do, book extra labs just in case? Then what do you do with the extra one if you pass? Oh well, don't have to worry about that. On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Robert Thomas tho...@gmail.com wrote: Eventhough they refresh the HW I don't expect any major changes. I mean I think people will continue to use 28XX series and PVDM2 for a while... Most likely they will upgrade to CUCM 8.6, 9 is still too early on the field. 10 wont be comming out until next year to the customers. The only thing that concerns me, is if they anounce a change, everyone is going to book their last attempts and buyout any remaining spots for the year. Cisco might go for a refresher just to increase demand for spots On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Bill whl...@gmail.com wrote: If they announce a new version in June you will have about 6 months from then to pass your lab. My recommendation from there is if you have plenty of study/lab time then go for it. If you don't and have to squeeze it in then you might be better off waiting to see. My thought is that 600 to 1200 hours of lab time is needed, more if you spread it out and less if you can focus solely on Cisco voice stuff. Sent from my iPad On Apr 28, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Alex Mendoza aa.mend...@icloud.com wrote: Did you know the official date for new version? I assume that I'll be ready for Sep/oct 2013 Best Regards AA Mendoza Sent from my iPhone On 28/04/2013, at 10:33, Robert Thomas tho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm thinking on buying a home lab to start my studies. It would run around 3K investment according to my amazon shopping list. However I'm thinking to wait for June and Cisco Live for announcement about the new version. I don't expect major changes on the setup, perhaps some new phone models like 99XX, or 89XX on the phones. And upgrade to the routers 29XX. However I don't expect major new features from the 29XX roll out on the exam. I would appreciate your opinions on this. -- Robert Thomas Zamora tho...@gmail.com +50689389544 http://cr.linkedin.com/pub/robert-thomas-zamora/29/913/8a8 CCNP, CCNP Voice ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS User is not authorized to access this page
Dear Experts, I'd like to add contacts to CUPC Client. However i go to https://CUPSSERVERIP/ccmuser I login with HQ2 and SB2 first it gives me hard time to login sometimes it logins right away sometimes gives me an error and then i go back its logined. The most important thing is when I am succesfully logged in when I go to any other page such as Preferences , Contacts or etc. I get User is not authorized to access this page Knowing that in CUCM user has the CCM Super Users , Standard CTI Enabled , Standard AXL API access , ALLO CONTROL from CTI Devices and Standard CCM USER. Also , All users are associated to phones as well as the DN's. What could be the problem then? Thanks in advance, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE installation via boothelper
Dear Experts, The current version of CUE is 2.1.3 something like that and I was trying to install CUE 7.0.3 However , I have downloaded all the package from CCO. I have used the following document http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/rel3_0/installation/guide/upg3boot.pdf for my installation process Everything went quite well except the last step after I have choosed the language installation instead of reloading it told me that installation was failed. Any advice. Is there are any pre requisits such as formatting the flash? or anything Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] The best way to restore routers to base configs HOMELAB
Dear Experts? I wonder whats the best and most efficient way to restore all the routers/switches of the homelab to the base configs? Should I just write erase on all devices and then paste the base configs? Please give me some advice Thanks in Advance, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to restore CUPS , UCCX and Unity Connection to Post Installation Wizard State?
Dear Experts, I have deleted the CUCM PUB and SUB and did a fresh installation. However , I would like to restore the CUPS and UCCX to the Post Installation State as they were integrated with the old CUCM nodes. How can I restrore the CUPS to Post Installation Wwizard? Ok regarding the UCCX , I have followed the below web pages http://ccie4fun.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/password-recovery-for-uccx-4-to-7/ http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/custcosw/ps1846/products_tech_note09186a00805a7acc.shtml In the UCCX 1) Go to Start, run, type ‘cet’ on the UCCX Server. This will launch the Configuration Object Editor. 2) Browse to: com.cisco.crs.cluster.config.AppAdminSetupConfig in the left hand pane. 3) Right click the row on the right and hit modify. Then select the ‘com.cisco.crs.cluster.config.AppAdminSetupConfig’ tab. 4) Change the setup state to: FRESH_INSTALL and hit OK 5) Log into the CRA App Admin page with the default username (may be case sensitive): Administrator and password: ciscocisco When I open the CET I just see the left list only and on the right its blank white page. Now , for the appadmin its not directly in wfavvid its in \wfavvid\system and I am unable to find the line that contains * com.cisco.wf.admin.installed=false* *Also , Please let me know If I need to do anything with Unity Connection as I have deleted the PUB and SUB nodes.* ** *Thanks in advance,* ** *Best Regards,* *Hesham* ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UTILS DBREPLICATION REPAIRREPLICATE
Dear Experts, I have been running UTILS DBREPLICATION REPAIRREPLICATE FOR 1 DAY and still the replicaiton is running in the background. Is it normal that this command takes over 12 hours now and still working? How long it usually it takes to finish process? It's just a new 2 Pub and Sub not in production servers which takes forever. Please advise me? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unable to reach my voicemail to CUE under SRST with CUE TRANSFER
Dear Experts, I am integrating CUE with CUCM and I am doing a feature called CUE TRANSFER. Which is during an active call , I can transfer the caller to Voicemail by pressing Transfer + *4XXX + Transfer. The feature is working and everything under CUCM. Know I want to make it work under SRST mode. However, I made it work under SRST but when I transfer it say's no mailbox setup for the user.Basically, When I press the envelope button from SCPHONE1 or SCPHONE2 it works and I hear my mailbox greetings but when I do it by CUE transfer it unable to recognize my mailbox and I configured E164 number in the mailbox but still didn't work. The alternate number is working with CUCM integration but it doesn't look like its working under SRST mode. Howeve , My testing was the following Call from SC2 to SC1 and SC1 hit Transfer + Xfer-To-VM + Transfer result no mailbox setup from user Call from HQ1 to SC1 and SC1 hit Transfer + Xfer-To-VM + Transfer result no mailbox setup from user Call from SC1 to VM Pilot ---Reaching personal greeting Call from SC2 to VM Pilot ---Reaching personal greeting So it looks like this configs CUE(config)# username SiteC1 phonenumberE164 85224044001 CUE(config)# username SiteC2 phonenumberE164 85224044002 is not working under SRST because I am able to make the same thing when its registered to CUCM Please let me know what to do to reach my mailbox Here you are my configurations below:- voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to sip allow-connections sip to h323 sip bind all source-interface loopback0 sip-ua mwi-server ipv4:142.1.66.253 unsolicited dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /^2404/ // voice translation-profile STRIP translate called 1 voice-port 0/0/0:15 translation-profile in STRIP voice translation-rule 8 rule 1 /^\*/ // voice translation-profile vmredirect translate called 8 dial-peer voice 4220 voip destination-pattern 42..$ session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:142.1.66.253 dtmf-relay sip-notify codec g711ulaw vad translation-profile out vmredirect voice translation-rule 2 rule 1 /^4...$/ /2404/ type any subscriber plan any isdn rule 2 // // type any unknown plan any isdn voice translation-profile 999 translate calling 2 translate called 2 dial-peer voice 999 pots translation-profile outgoing 999 destination-pattern 999 port 0/0/0:15 forward-digits all clid strip name ! voice translation-rule 3 rule 1 /^4...$/ /2404/ type any subscriber plan any isdn rule 2 // // type any subscriber plan any isdn voice translation-profile LOCAL translate calling 3 translate called 3 dial-peer voice 98 pots translation-profile outgoing LOCAL destination-pattern 9[2-9]... port 0/0/0:15 voice translation-rule 4 rule 1 /^4...$/ /+8522404/ type any international plan any isdn rule 2 // // type any international plan any isdn voice translation-profile INT translate calling 4 translate called 4 dial-peer voice 900 pots translation-profile outgoing INT destination-pattern 900T port 0/0/0:15 voice translation-rule 6 rule 1 /^4...$/ /+852404/ type any international plan any isdn rule 2 /^2...$/ /1408202/ type any international plan any isdn rule 3 /^3...$/ /1972303/ type any international plan any isdn ! voice translation-profile 4digits translate calling 6 translate called 6 dial-peer voice 2300 pots translation-profile outgoing 4digits destination-pattern [23]...$ port 0/0/0:15 ephone-dn 10 number 1998 no-reg both mwi on number 1999 no-reg both mwi off ephone-dn 11 octo-line number *4... call-forward all 4220 telephony-service srst mode auto-provision all srst dn template 1 srst dn line-mode octo max-ephones 15 max-dn 15 ip source-address 142.102.66.254 port 2000 strict-match time-zone 42 date-format dd-mm-yy voicemail 4220 mwi relay max-conferences 8 gain -6 call-forward pattern .T moh music-on-hold.au transfer-system full-consult transfer-pattern .T secondary-dialtone 9 moh music-on-hold.au multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 142.1.65.254 142.102.65.254 create cnf-files ephone-dn-template 1 call-forward busy 4220 call-forward noan 4220 timeout 20 mwi sip huntstop channel 1 ephone-dn 1 octo-line number 4001 no-reg both description +85224044001 name SCPHONE1 ephone-dn-template 1 ephone-dn 2 octo-line number 4002 no-reg both description +85224044002 name SCPHONE2 ephone-dn-template 1 ephone-dn 3 octo-line number 4101 description +85224043101 name sc ph1 icd ephone-dn-template 1 ephone-dn 5 octo-line number *4001 call-forward all 4220 ephone-dn 4 octo-line number 4102 description +85224043102 name sc ph2 icd ephone-dn-template 1 ephone 1 device-security-mode none mac-address 0024.14B3.8341 speed-dial 4 *4001 label Xfer-to-VM type 7965 button 1:1 2:3 ! ! ! ephone 2 device-security-mode none mac-address 001A.2F83.3616 type 7970 button 1:2 2:4 application global service alternate default ccm-manager fallback-mgcp interface
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Subscriber failure
Dear Experts, I was working yesterday on one of the online Rack Rentals. I have registered all Phones , Gateways and everything to the Subscriber. Something is very odd. I was unable to make any calls from the phone at all and the calls were not reaching the gateway. I have deleted the SLRG and Recreated, Delete all Route Patterns and then Recreated them again. Deleted all Route Groups and recreated them again. Disassociated LRG from Device Pool and Recreated them Again never worked. Restarted all Device Pool , Phones and Gateways never worked. However, When I shut down the subscriber and when it was restarting and everything fails over on Publisher then everything works perfectly and as soon as the Subscriber comes back everything is ruined. However , NTP Server is configured properly , Checked DB replication in Unified Reporting and it's good status. All Endpoints shows registered successfully but I am unable to perform calls. All Devices are configured with the correct Device Pool and Correct CSS. So what's likely other problem that makes the subscriber fail? I restarted it and as soon as it comes back nothing works. Thanks a lot for your great efforts. Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to configure CUE as a Backup of Unity Connecitons?
Dear Experts, I'd like to know how to configure CUE to work as a backup in case of Unity Connection failure. It's very important question as It could come in the new CCIE Voice Labs all over the world. Best Regards, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH Music On Hold source from local router issue
Dear Experts, I am trying to configure MOH in order to make SB Router source its music on hold from the local router. thats my configs A-Enable Multicast MOH for the audio stream: Go to CUCM ---Media Resources---Music On Hold Audo Source Tick play continuously , Allow Multicasting B-Enable Multicast MOH for the MOH server: Publisher will be unicast MOH Server for HQ Subscriber will be multicast for SB Site Go to Media Resources --- MOH Server---MOH_3(Subscriber) Make MOH Device Pool Enable Multicast Audo Source on this MOH Server C-Create a Media Resource Group (MRG) for unicast MOH: Media Resources Media Resource Group Add New Name: MOH_UNICAST Selected Media Resources: MOH_2 (MOH) Make sure use multicast in unticked D-Create a Media Resource Group (MRG) for multicast MOH: Media Resources Media Resource Group Add New Name: MOH_MCAST Selected Media Resources: MOH_3 (MOH) Make sure use multicast in ticked E-Assign the newly created MRGs to appropriate Media Resource Group List (MRGL): Under HQ MRGL Add MOH_UNICAST Under SB MRGL Add MOH_MCAST Then Reset Device Pool to take effect On your SRST make sure that you make multicast SB call-manager-fallback moh music-on-hold.au multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 142.1.65.254 142.102.65.254 loopback -to voice vlan exit ccm-manager music-on-hold ip multicast-routing int vlan 302 ip pim dense-mode int lo0 ip pim dense-mode I created a Region called MOH and it's G711 with all sites HQ , SB , SC When I call and place on hold and try to issue show ccm-manager music-on-hold i see 0 active calls knowing that also on the HQ Phone 1 and SB Phone 1 I put a music on hold source and without. All phones are in the correct Device pool , region and location. I have noticed it's beeping while on hold that means it's unable to invoke the moh knowing that i checked the flash: of the router it has the moh file correclty ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BBGK Gatekeeper issues
Experts, Thank you so much Suresh and Bill for your great efforts. I think you both right because i was trying to troubleshoot for one of my friends. I didn't look at all for the the Route List thing thats my bad. Thanks a lot for your great efforts. Hesham On 26 March 2013 05:16, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: So the call is completing even without showing in GK calls? That could mean you are using an alternative path so check if the call is completing: - debug isdn q931 - check for alternate dial peer/trunk it could be using On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, I'd like to ask you a very quick question. I have setup a BBGK gatekeeper CUBE between HQ and PSTN (Belgium). However, I see very odd behaviors 1-The call is connecting whether the Gatekeeper trunk has h245 TCS waiting for capability set is ticked or untucked. I want to know why it is working with the checkbox ticked. 2- when i debug and write the following debugs *debug cch323 h225 * *debug cch323 h245 * *show gatekeeper-calls* *it never shows anything * *whether if i call from HQ - PSTN OR HQ-SC on both sides* * * *also it doesn't show anything on show gatekeeper calls it comes up with no active call results.* * * *3-i have attached here SDL traces from RTMT to look on.* * * *Thank you in advance and I appreciate all your efforts,* * * *Hesham* ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] all incoming calls to HQ phones failing
Hi Farooq, You should provide the group with the PSTN configuration here in order to help you solve your issues. Thanks, Hesham On Mar 9, 2013, at 11:12 PM, Jaleel ccie clubjal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am having problem with incoming calls to HQ phones, outgoing calls from HQ phones are working. I can't even call HQ phone from HQ-PSTN number. I have gone through PSTN config several times but I couldn't find any thing wrong with it. HQ Router is a mgcp gateway and I'm using only 6 Channels for T1 controller. What else can I do or check to fix this problem. Farooq ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP PHONE CUSTOMIZATION best answer
Dear All, I want to solve this case study with the lowest time I can for the test SB PHONE 1 user is alleging an unauthorized access of his corporate directory services from his phone and has asked to disable access to his IP Phone corporate Directory. You have management approval to disable the corporate directory for this phone only. When directory button is depressed for the other phones it should display services in below order 1) Missed Call 2) Received Calls 3) Placed Calls 4)Corporate Directory. Kindly , Please guide me step by step for the quickest best way to make it easily in less than 15 minutes as this may take with me about 30 minutes in my way. Also , Whats the best way of writing xml files to be in a working format that's my tricky part? I can change ringlist.xml easily but this one is kind of difficult to make the thing working properly with IIS of the UCCX Server? I want the best practice/optimal way to do it from A-Z so that I can beat that question as soon as I can. Best Regards, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to edit and overwrite .cnf.xml file on CUCM?
Dear All, Hi All, I would like to download .cnf.xml for a specific phone so that I can edit it's Directories button for that particular phone only. However , I can do the following http://cucmip:6970/phonemac.cnf.xml I click on it --- refresh save as and I can get it and edit it fine. But there is a big problem when i edit it and upload it back to CUCM nothing happens I did the following Service Parameters CISCO TFTP ---Advanced -- Build CNF Files (Build All) then Enable Caching of constant and bin (false). Then I have went to OS Admin --- TFTP upload then i uploaded with / directory Then i restarted TFTP and restarted the phone then nothing happened. Please give me some advice this is very important for you to beat the CCIE lab phone customization so quickly and efficiently ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ-SC Gatekeeper Between CUCM and CME issue
Ok Suresh thank you so much sir for adding that point as well. On Feb 18, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Suresh Bhandari bring...@gmail.com wrote: Two more things from my side: 1. If you have the output of sh gatek end and sh gatek gw as mentioned, why you used the second zone local command for UCME? 2. On you SC router, under your dial-peer to UCM,you need a tech-prefix command. dial-peer 85 tech-prefix 1* Even then the call to CUCM fails, look at / paste the output of debug gatekeeper main 10. HTH On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with you and and it does make sense. I have nothing now I just do that for my CCIE Voice lab preparation and I just try that during the rack rental. I have to do all that over again. As soon as I do it , I will let you know. I appreciate all your valuable information and thanks so much On Feb 17, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Steve Keller skeller...@gmail.com wrote: Since you have 2 zones i believe you must rely on zone prefix to determine which zone to select a gw from in order to route the call. In your config your zone prefix is 3... which seems incorrect by glancing at it. To route calls to CME via GK i would have a RP in CUCM like 4XXX and then prefix whatever the zone prefix is to it in the pattern. In your case prefix 31* to match your gateway registration to GK. Thus, my GK config would say zone prefix CUCME 31* The ARQ would come into GK with dialed digits of 31*4XXX , Then the gatekeeper would match tech prefix of 31*, and route to the gw registered in that zone (your CUCME). I would expect the call setup to arrive on CME with digits 31*4XXX and try to hit an inbound voip dialpeer, then you would need the inbound voip dialpeer to strip down to the last 4 digits, or 4XXX in this case, to match a registered ephone-dn. My inbound voip dialpeer on CME would only allow the g729 if my GK trunk was set to use g729. Apply a voice translation rule to the dialpeer to strip down to last 4 digits. If that ephone-dn is registered then it should ring. just my 2 cents... When you make the call from the CUCM phone, what output do you see on the CME with debug voip dialpeer? Do you see anything? On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Yes i am using g729 and i configured them from both sides CUCM side as region and location /devicepool and voice class codec as cme side. I am able to send calls from CME to CUCM but cucm unable to place calls to CME On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: Should not have allow connections either unless you are doing cube but that should not break it. Debug h22r ans1 and look to see if there is detail on why the call is failing. Make sure you are using g729 as well Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: I did that and allow connections as well On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: Not sure if this is what is breaking it but you should not have voice class h323 1 on your ras dialpeer on site c Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I have tried to configure a gatekeeper between HQ-SC for interoperability between CME and HQ The issue is I am just able to call from CME to CUCM but Unable to call from CUCM to CME. Knowing that I have created a Device Pool , Route Pattern , Gatekeeper info , Gatekeeper controlled trunk for Gatekeeper to call CME from CUCM Side when I debug i always get ARJ Admission Rejection. I don't want to change anything in the technology prefix or anything. I don't want to use default technology prefix. I want show gatekeeper endpoints and show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix to be the same exactly. I just want to troubleshoot the issue of calling from CUCM to CME. Thank you so much for all your efforts However, here you are my configs GATEKEEPER HQ Router - SIDE voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.1 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.1 gatekeeper zone local CUCM cisco.com 177.1.254.1 zone local CUCME cisco.com zone prefix CUCM 1... zone prefix CUCM 2... zone prefix CUCME 3... gw-type-prefix 1* no shutdown SC Side interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id CUCM ipaddr 177.1.254.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id CUCME h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 31 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.3 dial-peer voice 85 voip destination-pattern [12]...$ voice-class h323 1 session
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ-SC Gatekeeper Between CUCM and CME issue
Dear All, I have tried to configure a gatekeeper between HQ-SC for interoperability between CME and HQ The issue is I am just able to call from CME to CUCM but Unable to call from CUCM to CME. Knowing that I have created a Device Pool , Route Pattern , Gatekeeper info , Gatekeeper controlled trunk for Gatekeeper to call CME from CUCM Side when I debug i always get ARJ Admission Rejection. I don't want to change anything in the technology prefix or anything. I don't want to use default technology prefix. I want show gatekeeper endpoints and show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix to be the same exactly. I just want to troubleshoot the issue of calling from CUCM to CME. Thank you so much for all your efforts However, here you are my configs GATEKEEPER HQ Router - SIDE voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.1 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.1 gatekeeper zone local CUCM cisco.com 177.1.254.1 zone local CUCME cisco.com zone prefix CUCM 1... zone prefix CUCM 2... zone prefix CUCME 3... gw-type-prefix 1* no shutdown SC Side interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id CUCM ipaddr 177.1.254.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id CUCME h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 31 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.3 dial-peer voice 85 voip destination-pattern [12]...$ voice-class h323 1 session target ras dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)#do show gatekeeper end GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name TypeFlags --- - --- - - - 177.1.10.10 1720 177.1.10.10 32811 CUCM VOIP-GW H323-ID: CUCM_TRUNK_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 177.1.10.20 1720 177.1.10.20 32788 CUCM VOIP-GW H323-ID: CUCM_TRUNK_2 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 177.1.254.3 1720 177.1.254.3 63360 CUCM H323-GW H323-ID: CUCME Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)# CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)#do show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 31* Zone CUCM master gateway list: 177.1.254.3:1720 CUCME Prefix: 1* Zone CUCM master gateway list: 177.1.10.10:1720 CUCM_TRUNK_1 177.1.10.20:1720 CUCM_TRUNK_2 CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)# ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ-SC Gatekeeper Between CUCM and CME issue
I did that and allow connections as well On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: Not sure if this is what is breaking it but you should not have voice class h323 1 on your ras dialpeer on site c Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I have tried to configure a gatekeeper between HQ-SC for interoperability between CME and HQ The issue is I am just able to call from CME to CUCM but Unable to call from CUCM to CME. Knowing that I have created a Device Pool , Route Pattern , Gatekeeper info , Gatekeeper controlled trunk for Gatekeeper to call CME from CUCM Side when I debug i always get ARJ Admission Rejection. I don't want to change anything in the technology prefix or anything. I don't want to use default technology prefix. I want show gatekeeper endpoints and show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix to be the same exactly. I just want to troubleshoot the issue of calling from CUCM to CME. Thank you so much for all your efforts However, here you are my configs GATEKEEPER HQ Router - SIDE voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.1 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.1 gatekeeper zone local CUCM cisco.com 177.1.254.1 zone local CUCME cisco.com zone prefix CUCM 1... zone prefix CUCM 2... zone prefix CUCME 3... gw-type-prefix 1* no shutdown SC Side interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id CUCM ipaddr 177.1.254.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id CUCME h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 31 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.3 dial-peer voice 85 voip destination-pattern [12]...$ voice-class h323 1 session target ras dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)#do show gatekeeper end GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name TypeFlags --- - --- - - - 177.1.10.10 1720 177.1.10.10 32811 CUCM VOIP-GW H323-ID: CUCM_TRUNK_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 177.1.10.20 1720 177.1.10.20 32788 CUCM VOIP-GW H323-ID: CUCM_TRUNK_2 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 177.1.254.3 1720 177.1.254.3 63360 CUCM H323-GW H323-ID: CUCME Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)# CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)#do show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 31* Zone CUCM master gateway list: 177.1.254.3:1720 CUCME Prefix: 1* Zone CUCM master gateway list: 177.1.10.10:1720 CUCM_TRUNK_1 177.1.10.20:1720 CUCM_TRUNK_2 CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)# ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ-SC Gatekeeper Between CUCM and CME issue
Yes i am using g729 and i configured them from both sides CUCM side as region and location /devicepool and voice class codec as cme side. I am able to send calls from CME to CUCM but cucm unable to place calls to CME On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: Should not have allow connections either unless you are doing cube but that should not break it. Debug h22r ans1 and look to see if there is detail on why the call is failing. Make sure you are using g729 as well Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: I did that and allow connections as well On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: Not sure if this is what is breaking it but you should not have voice class h323 1 on your ras dialpeer on site c Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I have tried to configure a gatekeeper between HQ-SC for interoperability between CME and HQ The issue is I am just able to call from CME to CUCM but Unable to call from CUCM to CME. Knowing that I have created a Device Pool , Route Pattern , Gatekeeper info , Gatekeeper controlled trunk for Gatekeeper to call CME from CUCM Side when I debug i always get ARJ Admission Rejection. I don't want to change anything in the technology prefix or anything. I don't want to use default technology prefix. I want show gatekeeper endpoints and show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix to be the same exactly. I just want to troubleshoot the issue of calling from CUCM to CME. Thank you so much for all your efforts However, here you are my configs GATEKEEPER HQ Router - SIDE voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.1 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.1 gatekeeper zone local CUCM cisco.com 177.1.254.1 zone local CUCME cisco.com zone prefix CUCM 1... zone prefix CUCM 2... zone prefix CUCME 3... gw-type-prefix 1* no shutdown SC Side interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id CUCM ipaddr 177.1.254.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id CUCME h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 31 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.3 dial-peer voice 85 voip destination-pattern [12]...$ voice-class h323 1 session target ras dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)#do show gatekeeper end GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name TypeFlags --- - --- - - - 177.1.10.10 1720 177.1.10.10 32811 CUCM VOIP-GW H323-ID: CUCM_TRUNK_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 177.1.10.20 1720 177.1.10.20 32788 CUCM VOIP-GW H323-ID: CUCM_TRUNK_2 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 177.1.254.3 1720 177.1.254.3 63360 CUCM H323-GW H323-ID: CUCME Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)# CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)#do show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 31* Zone CUCM master gateway list: 177.1.254.3:1720 CUCME Prefix: 1* Zone CUCM master gateway list: 177.1.10.10:1720 CUCM_TRUNK_1 177.1.10.20:1720 CUCM_TRUNK_2 CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)# ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ-SC Gatekeeper Between CUCM and CME issue
Thank you so much for your efforts. I believe it may need a strip but i don't know exactly what or how to strip the prefix as with CUBE it works without need for translation rule. Thanks for info i will try and feed you back. Thanks, Hesham On Feb 17, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: I am sorry. I had it backwards. I thought you had an issue routing to CUCM. For call into CUCME, you need this Dial peer voice 3000 voip Incoming called ^3...$ Dtmf-r h245a No vad Translation-profile in STRIP ! Voice translation-rule 1 Rule 1 /.+\(\)$/ /\1/ ! Voice translation-profile STRIP Translate called 1 -Original Message- From: Hesham Abdelkereem [mailto:heshamcentr...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 5:56 PM To: Cory Gray Cc: ccie_voice Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ-SC Gatekeeper Between CUCM and CME issue Yes i am using g729 and i configured them from both sides CUCM side as region and location /devicepool and voice class codec as cme side. I am able to send calls from CME to CUCM but cucm unable to place calls to CME On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: Should not have allow connections either unless you are doing cube but that should not break it. Debug h22r ans1 and look to see if there is detail on why the call is failing. Make sure you are using g729 as well Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: I did that and allow connections as well On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: Not sure if this is what is breaking it but you should not have voice class h323 1 on your ras dialpeer on site c Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I have tried to configure a gatekeeper between HQ-SC for interoperability between CME and HQ The issue is I am just able to call from CME to CUCM but Unable to call from CUCM to CME. Knowing that I have created a Device Pool , Route Pattern , Gatekeeper info , Gatekeeper controlled trunk for Gatekeeper to call CME from CUCM Side when I debug i always get ARJ Admission Rejection. I don't want to change anything in the technology prefix or anything. I don't want to use default technology prefix. I want show gatekeeper endpoints and show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix to be the same exactly. I just want to troubleshoot the issue of calling from CUCM to CME. Thank you so much for all your efforts However, here you are my configs GATEKEEPER HQ Router - SIDE voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.1 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.1 gatekeeper zone local CUCM cisco.com 177.1.254.1 zone local CUCME cisco.com zone prefix CUCM 1... zone prefix CUCM 2... zone prefix CUCME 3... gw-type-prefix 1* no shutdown SC Side interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id CUCM ipaddr 177.1.254.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id CUCME h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 31 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.3 dial-peer voice 85 voip destination-pattern [12]...$ voice-class h323 1 session target ras dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)#do show gatekeeper end GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - 177.1.10.10 1720 177.1.10.10 32811 CUCM VOIP-GW H323-ID: CUCM_TRUNK_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 177.1.10.20 1720 177.1.10.20 32788 CUCM VOIP-GW H323-ID: CUCM_TRUNK_2 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 177.1.254.3 1720 177.1.254.3 63360 CUCM H323-GW H323-ID: CUCME Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)# CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)#do show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 31* Zone CUCM master gateway list: 177.1.254.3:1720 CUCME Prefix: 1* Zone CUCM master gateway list: 177.1.10.10:1720 CUCM_TRUNK_1 177.1.10.20:1720 CUCM_TRUNK_2 CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)# ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ-SC Gatekeeper Between CUCM and CME issue
Yes thanks a lot I believe that's the whole issue of the prefix. That make sense and yes I believe you do understand what I am getting at totally and yes all what you've said are correct. I thank you so much for all your efforts. I will test it and feed you back but It may take with me a week or so to test but I have put it in my consideration. Many Thanks for all your efforts and it's highly appreciated. On Feb 17, 2013, at 4:25 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: With CUBE, there is no tech prefix so that is why you don't need it here. Based on your config, I am assuming your CUCME phones are 3XXX. That strip pattern (taught by IPexpert) will take the last 4 digits of any inbound call. H323 has two legs. 1. Inbound Call - which reminds me... needs to be ^313...$ because Site A GK will send the tech-prefix to Site C Gateway (your output shows 31 as the tech prefix for Site C) 2. Outbound Call - now that you have accepted the call on dial peer 3000 (or whatever you decided to use) Site C Gateway will look to make another call out based on destination-pattern. Normally the call would be made to 313 but we will use the stip translation rule to make it 3XXX before trying to make the call Where is destination pattern 3XXX? You hidden CUCME dial-peers is where. Show voice dial-peer summary will show your hidden CUCME dial-peer which I am assuming have destination patter 3001 and 3002 Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: Hesham Abdelkereem [mailto:heshamcentr...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 6:16 PM To: Cory Gray Cc: 'ccie_voice' Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ-SC Gatekeeper Between CUCM and CME issue Thank you so much for your efforts. I believe it may need a strip but i don't know exactly what or how to strip the prefix as with CUBE it works without need for translation rule. Thanks for info i will try and feed you back. Thanks, Hesham On Feb 17, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: I am sorry. I had it backwards. I thought you had an issue routing to CUCM. For call into CUCME, you need this Dial peer voice 3000 voip Incoming called ^3...$ Dtmf-r h245a No vad Translation-profile in STRIP ! Voice translation-rule 1 Rule 1 /.+\(\)$/ /\1/ ! Voice translation-profile STRIP Translate called 1 -Original Message- From: Hesham Abdelkereem [mailto:heshamcentr...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 5:56 PM To: Cory Gray Cc: ccie_voice Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ-SC Gatekeeper Between CUCM and CME issue Yes i am using g729 and i configured them from both sides CUCM side as region and location /devicepool and voice class codec as cme side. I am able to send calls from CME to CUCM but cucm unable to place calls to CME On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: Should not have allow connections either unless you are doing cube but that should not break it. Debug h22r ans1 and look to see if there is detail on why the call is failing. Make sure you are using g729 as well Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: I did that and allow connections as well On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: Not sure if this is what is breaking it but you should not have voice class h323 1 on your ras dialpeer on site c Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I have tried to configure a gatekeeper between HQ-SC for interoperability between CME and HQ The issue is I am just able to call from CME to CUCM but Unable to call from CUCM to CME. Knowing that I have created a Device Pool , Route Pattern , Gatekeeper info , Gatekeeper controlled trunk for Gatekeeper to call CME from CUCM Side when I debug i always get ARJ Admission Rejection. I don't want to change anything in the technology prefix or anything. I don't want to use default technology prefix. I want show gatekeeper endpoints and show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix to be the same exactly. I just want to troubleshoot the issue of calling from CUCM to CME. Thank you so much for all your efforts However, here you are my configs GATEKEEPER HQ Router - SIDE voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.1 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.1 gatekeeper zone local CUCM cisco.com 177.1.254.1 zone local CUCME cisco.com zone prefix CUCM 1... zone prefix CUCM 2... zone prefix CUCME 3... gw-type-prefix 1* no shutdown SC Side interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id CUCM ipaddr 177.1.254.1 1719 h323
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ-SC Gatekeeper Between CUCM and CME issue
I agree with you and and it does make sense. I have nothing now I just do that for my CCIE Voice lab preparation and I just try that during the rack rental. I have to do all that over again. As soon as I do it , I will let you know. I appreciate all your valuable information and thanks so much On Feb 17, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Steve Keller skeller...@gmail.com wrote: Since you have 2 zones i believe you must rely on zone prefix to determine which zone to select a gw from in order to route the call. In your config your zone prefix is 3... which seems incorrect by glancing at it. To route calls to CME via GK i would have a RP in CUCM like 4XXX and then prefix whatever the zone prefix is to it in the pattern. In your case prefix 31* to match your gateway registration to GK. Thus, my GK config would say zone prefix CUCME 31* The ARQ would come into GK with dialed digits of 31*4XXX , Then the gatekeeper would match tech prefix of 31*, and route to the gw registered in that zone (your CUCME). I would expect the call setup to arrive on CME with digits 31*4XXX and try to hit an inbound voip dialpeer, then you would need the inbound voip dialpeer to strip down to the last 4 digits, or 4XXX in this case, to match a registered ephone-dn. My inbound voip dialpeer on CME would only allow the g729 if my GK trunk was set to use g729. Apply a voice translation rule to the dialpeer to strip down to last 4 digits. If that ephone-dn is registered then it should ring. just my 2 cents... When you make the call from the CUCM phone, what output do you see on the CME with debug voip dialpeer? Do you see anything? On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Yes i am using g729 and i configured them from both sides CUCM side as region and location /devicepool and voice class codec as cme side. I am able to send calls from CME to CUCM but cucm unable to place calls to CME On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: Should not have allow connections either unless you are doing cube but that should not break it. Debug h22r ans1 and look to see if there is detail on why the call is failing. Make sure you are using g729 as well Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: I did that and allow connections as well On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com wrote: Not sure if this is what is breaking it but you should not have voice class h323 1 on your ras dialpeer on site c Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I have tried to configure a gatekeeper between HQ-SC for interoperability between CME and HQ The issue is I am just able to call from CME to CUCM but Unable to call from CUCM to CME. Knowing that I have created a Device Pool , Route Pattern , Gatekeeper info , Gatekeeper controlled trunk for Gatekeeper to call CME from CUCM Side when I debug i always get ARJ Admission Rejection. I don't want to change anything in the technology prefix or anything. I don't want to use default technology prefix. I want show gatekeeper endpoints and show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix to be the same exactly. I just want to troubleshoot the issue of calling from CUCM to CME. Thank you so much for all your efforts However, here you are my configs GATEKEEPER HQ Router - SIDE voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.1 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.1 gatekeeper zone local CUCM cisco.com 177.1.254.1 zone local CUCME cisco.com zone prefix CUCM 1... zone prefix CUCM 2... zone prefix CUCME 3... gw-type-prefix 1* no shutdown SC Side interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id CUCM ipaddr 177.1.254.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id CUCME h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 31 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.3 dial-peer voice 85 voip destination-pattern [12]...$ voice-class h323 1 session target ras dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric CorpHQ(config-dial-peer)#do show gatekeeper end GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - 177.1.10.10 1720 177.1.10.10 32811 CUCM VOIP-GW H323-ID: CUCM_TRUNK_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 177.1.10.20 1720 177.1.10.20 32788 CUCM VOIP-GW H323-ID: CUCM_TRUNK_2 Voice Capacity Max
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE with CUCM
Yes it's but not necessarily all the attempts you will do. But yes CUE with CUCM is included but not in all the models just for your information On Dec 28, 2012, at 2:15 PM, CCIEing aboaz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I want to make sure that the CUE integration with CUCM is included of the LAB exam , right ? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] voice jobs in dubai
Hi Peter, i have been living and working in the U.A.E for a while but the job market now is very low. Low salaries , no job openings and everything is crap over there. The triple CCIE people get a very low salary something about 2500$ a month including everything and they will pay accommodation and everything. In U.A.E there are many global companies but they are racist and they just hire people with EU/BRITISH/U.S/Canada/Australia/New Zealand passports only. Also, there is a high recession in the U.A.E and I don't think you will be able to work for a company which will involve you in a large enterprise project environment unless it's a vendor/service provider such as British Telecom /Nokia Siemens Networks / Huawei and etc.. The most famous cisco partners u can work or is GBM , CNS , INJAZAT DATA SYSTEMS , RAQAMIYAT , ELINEAR SOLUTIONS , EMIRCOM , DIMENSION DATA and etc. Just go through the Cisco Partner Locator and look for them. I have been living in U.A.E for almost 2 years and I moved to United States Take Care brother On Dec 3, 2012, at 12:41 AM, peter adler adlerpeter...@gmail.com wrote: hi peers i have been preparing for my lab attempt for some times now and am thinkin of relocating from nigeria because i dont really get hands on experience outside the proctorlab rentals in nigeria which really affected me in my first lab attempt. so i want to ask any guy based in dubai, is it possible i get the job to give me that the much experience i desire?? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com