RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
we have a 2-node active/passive exchange 2000 cluster running fine. i can fail the exchange group over, and downtime is generally around 60 seconds. We are looking at possibly going with 2 x 4-node datacenter clusters to support 20,000 exchange users. Rob -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Thanks, sir Andy. I have seen firewalls clusters and web farms in action. And was quite very impressed. None yet for Exchange though. In your case then, can we fairly say that Exchange clusters are a flop (or forget it as some would say)? You did not answer as to whether we should wait or forget it -it is impossible for exchange to attain 5 9s in a cluster, ever (again, I am just asking your opinion since you are well respected in this list). Thanks, -botp -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:49 AM To: 'Peña, Botp' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Definitely 1. 2 is a matter of your expertise and the ultimate roi of the clustered solution in your environment. I think clusters have their place, but it's more with applications which behave more like the clusters do. People seem to be unsatisfied with their clusters in my experience once they've seen them in action. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:39 PM To: 'Webb, Andy' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Thanks, Sir Andy. Very helpful and well said. To summarize your point (in so far as I can comprehend): 1. clusters add complexity 2. clusters are risky Do your statements apply to clusters in general, or is it only for Exchange (or as to the current Exchange clustering stage)? I am asking since we might abandon the plan totally or just wait for another year or years Thank you again, -botp -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:27 AM To: 'Peña, Botp ' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Knowing no more about your business than what is in that note, I'd say you're needlessly adding complexity to your environment which will not result in the net availability increase you forecast at the low cost you expect. There is downtime associated with a clean node swap in a clustered environment. Is 2x that downtime significantly less than that required for a service pack install? Not usually. Does it let you apply one or more hotfixes with less impact to the users? Not usually. Running a clustered environment also means you need to be running a clustered test environment so that you can simulate all these rolling upgrades. Having that AV upgrade hose an entire node of your cluster is not significantly better than having it hose a standalone server, and you may not know that things are bad until you've moved the active node back to the already upgraded server. As noted above, I don't know enough about your environment to make this a firm recommendation. To spend the time to get that familiarity, I'd likely want a consulting contract. Clustering is not for the faint of heart, and it is not to be used without serious thought to the whys and whatfors. Do you really have a business need for mail to every user to be available five nines or more? You may, but you would be one of a very few. I'd rather take that second server and use it for disaster recovery drills and testing of all the software upgrades you mentioned. Then my actual downtime would be minimized by having a known, tested, and understood upgrade process that could proceed quickly. Most service packs and hotfixes are 10-15 minute activities if planned and practiced. $0.02 Andy Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List
RE: OT - great fish tacos
Well it's overcast, warm (don't know how that happened) but not raining (horayy) here in Weybridge. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2001 22:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - great fish tacos I thought this WAS normal! g,d,r ...Joel (inventor of the PBJ taco and the tortilla pizza roll-up) PLEASE NOTE: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Reader Is Not Directly Observing This Email, It May Cease to Exist or Will Exist Only in a Vague and Undetermined State. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OT - great fish tacos Okay. I love you all dearly. But please, let's cut this for a while and get back to some sense of normalcy. Please. Missy - Original Message - From: Byron Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:51 PM Subject: OT - great fish tacos I just thought I'd let some of you folks know that it's another beautiful sunny California day here in Sausalito and i just had some great Thai-style Ahi fish tacos w/ lemongrass, shredded almonds and carrots, cilantro, lettuce and tomato .mu. Just needed the cervesa bohemia to make it complete! later.byron Byron Kennedy MarketTools Inc. ___ MarketTools is the leading application service provider (ASP) of web-based market research tools. MarketTools provides business tools to build and deploy sophisticated surveys, gather responses and report results online. MarketTools is privately held and headquartered in Mill Valley CA. See www.markettools.com, www.ztelligence.com and www.zoomerang.com. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Sony cannot accept liability for statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of Sony. (03) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - great fish tacos
I mean weather report , The spell checker took liberty to change the meaning Kuminda Chandimith Sr. Technical Consultant Ducont.com FZ-LLC Tel: + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237 Fax: +971-4-3913001 http://www.ducont.com -Original Message- From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2001 11:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - great fish tacos Its Bright, burning sun in desserts of Dubai. Very difficult go out for a fish tacos.. so just a sandwich and a tea for breakfast. Like Heiku fridays and Fish tacos, How about daily whether report. So newbies know what is the whether at the seniors city.. before posting 120 times answered Q. and get flamed (Sunny bright day.. Ok shoot the damn question) Kuminda Chandimith Sr. Technical Consultant Ducont.com FZ-LLC Tel: + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237 Fax: +971-4-3913001 http://www.ducont.com -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2001 11:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - great fish tacos Well it's overcast, warm (don't know how that happened) but not raining (horayy) here in Weybridge. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2001 22:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - great fish tacos I thought this WAS normal! g,d,r ...Joel (inventor of the PBJ taco and the tortilla pizza roll-up) PLEASE NOTE: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Reader Is Not Directly Observing This Email, It May Cease to Exist or Will Exist Only in a Vague and Undetermined State. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OT - great fish tacos Okay. I love you all dearly. But please, let's cut this for a while and get back to some sense of normalcy. Please. Missy - Original Message - From: Byron Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:51 PM Subject: OT - great fish tacos I just thought I'd let some of you folks know that it's another beautiful sunny California day here in Sausalito and i just had some great Thai-style Ahi fish tacos w/ lemongrass, shredded almonds and carrots, cilantro, lettuce and tomato .mu. Just needed the cervesa bohemia to make it complete! later.byron Byron Kennedy MarketTools Inc. ___ MarketTools is the leading application service provider (ASP) of web-based market research tools. MarketTools provides business tools to build and deploy sophisticated surveys, gather responses and report results online. MarketTools is privately held and headquartered in Mill Valley CA. See www.markettools.com, www.ztelligence.com and www.zoomerang.com. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Sony cannot accept liability for statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of Sony. (03) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
cool and great! At last, I can hear good news :-) Sir Robert, how long has the cluster been running (without downtime)? Did you have some difficulty? (You could share your experience off list since this topic is too general, IMHO). Thanks, -botp -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance we have a 2-node active/passive exchange 2000 cluster running fine. i can fail the exchange group over, and downtime is generally around 60 seconds. We are looking at possibly going with 2 x 4-node datacenter clusters to support 20,000 exchange users. Rob -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Thanks, sir Andy. I have seen firewalls clusters and web farms in action. And was quite very impressed. None yet for Exchange though. In your case then, can we fairly say that Exchange clusters are a flop (or forget it as some would say)? You did not answer as to whether we should wait or forget it -it is impossible for exchange to attain 5 9s in a cluster, ever (again, I am just asking your opinion since you are well respected in this list). Thanks, -botp -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:49 AM To: 'Peña, Botp' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Definitely 1. 2 is a matter of your expertise and the ultimate roi of the clustered solution in your environment. I think clusters have their place, but it's more with applications which behave more like the clusters do. People seem to be unsatisfied with their clusters in my experience once they've seen them in action. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:39 PM To: 'Webb, Andy' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Thanks, Sir Andy. Very helpful and well said. To summarize your point (in so far as I can comprehend): 1. clusters add complexity 2. clusters are risky Do your statements apply to clusters in general, or is it only for Exchange (or as to the current Exchange clustering stage)? I am asking since we might abandon the plan totally or just wait for another year or years Thank you again, -botp -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:27 AM To: 'Peña, Botp ' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Knowing no more about your business than what is in that note, I'd say you're needlessly adding complexity to your environment which will not result in the net availability increase you forecast at the low cost you expect. There is downtime associated with a clean node swap in a clustered environment. Is 2x that downtime significantly less than that required for a service pack install? Not usually. Does it let you apply one or more hotfixes with less impact to the users? Not usually. Running a clustered environment also means you need to be running a clustered test environment so that you can simulate all these rolling upgrades. Having that AV upgrade hose an entire node of your cluster is not significantly better than having it hose a standalone server, and you may not know that things are bad until you've moved the active node back to the already upgraded server. As noted above, I don't know enough about your environment to make this a firm recommendation. To spend the time to get that familiarity, I'd likely want a consulting contract. Clustering is not for the faint of heart, and it is not to be used without serious thought to the whys and whatfors. Do you really have a business need for mail to every user to be available five nines or more? You may, but you would be one of a very few. I'd rather take that second server and use it for disaster recovery drills and testing of all the software upgrades you mentioned. Then my actual downtime would be minimized by having a known, tested, and understood upgrade process that could proceed quickly. Most service packs and hotfixes are 10-15 minute activities if planned and practiced. $0.02 Andy Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any
RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
Hi All, I would like to share my view with you all on Exchange on a cluster. We have a 2 node Active/passive NT 4.0 cluster with Exchange 5.5 SP3 running on it. From the start I am not able to make it work as it should. The failover from one node to another takes not less than 20 minutes and have looked all over to improve it. If any of you have some pointers where I can get some more info on this, it would be great!!. Thanks and regards, Anil Hangal -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance cool and great! At last, I can hear good news :-) Sir Robert, how long has the cluster been running (without downtime)? Did you have some difficulty? (You could share your experience off list since this topic is too general, IMHO). Thanks, -botp -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance we have a 2-node active/passive exchange 2000 cluster running fine. i can fail the exchange group over, and downtime is generally around 60 seconds. We are looking at possibly going with 2 x 4-node datacenter clusters to support 20,000 exchange users. Rob -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Thanks, sir Andy. I have seen firewalls clusters and web farms in action. And was quite very impressed. None yet for Exchange though. In your case then, can we fairly say that Exchange clusters are a flop (or forget it as some would say)? You did not answer as to whether we should wait or forget it -it is impossible for exchange to attain 5 9s in a cluster, ever (again, I am just asking your opinion since you are well respected in this list). Thanks, -botp -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:49 AM To: 'Peña, Botp' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Definitely 1. 2 is a matter of your expertise and the ultimate roi of the clustered solution in your environment. I think clusters have their place, but it's more with applications which behave more like the clusters do. People seem to be unsatisfied with their clusters in my experience once they've seen them in action. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:39 PM To: 'Webb, Andy' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Thanks, Sir Andy. Very helpful and well said. To summarize your point (in so far as I can comprehend): 1. clusters add complexity 2. clusters are risky Do your statements apply to clusters in general, or is it only for Exchange (or as to the current Exchange clustering stage)? I am asking since we might abandon the plan totally or just wait for another year or years Thank you again, -botp -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:27 AM To: 'Peña, Botp ' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Knowing no more about your business than what is in that note, I'd say you're needlessly adding complexity to your environment which will not result in the net availability increase you forecast at the low cost you expect. There is downtime associated with a clean node swap in a clustered environment. Is 2x that downtime significantly less than that required for a service pack install? Not usually. Does it let you apply one or more hotfixes with less impact to the users? Not usually. Running a clustered environment also means you need to be running a clustered test environment so that you can simulate all these rolling upgrades. Having that AV upgrade hose an entire node of your cluster is not significantly better than having it hose a standalone server, and you may not know that things are bad until you've moved the active node back to the already upgraded server. As noted above, I don't know enough about your environment to make this a firm recommendation. To spend the time to get that familiarity, I'd likely want a consulting contract. Clustering is not for the faint of heart, and it is not to be used without serious thought to the whys and whatfors. Do you really have a business need for mail to every user to be available five nines or more? You may, but you would be one of a very few. I'd rather take that second server and use it for
Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster
hi all, we're having trouble installing scanmail on our 2 node exchange 5.5 cluster, running on win2k. it manages to install onto the passive node but fails when attempting the active node. We're not getting much joy through trend tech support, so if anyone here has any experience with scanmail on a cluster then I'd appreciate some help... regards, dan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster
Have you tried failing over and then installing on the (then) passive node? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster hi all, we're having trouble installing scanmail on our 2 node exchange 5.5 cluster, running on win2k. it manages to install onto the passive node but fails when attempting the active node. We're not getting much joy through trend tech support, so if anyone here has any experience with scanmail on a cluster then I'd appreciate some help... regards, dan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster
Have you tried failing over and then installing on the (then) passive node? no, but i would not expect that to work since the installer requires both nodes to be installed at one time, or it reports failure... maybe this is worth a try as a last resort, although I am aiming for a clean installation since this is a production server. thanks for your reply. regards, dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster
I've installed it once on a 2 node, I don't recall having any problems like that. Could it be a permissions thing? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster Have you tried failing over and then installing on the (then) passive node? no, but i would not expect that to work since the installer requires both nodes to be installed at one time, or it reports failure... maybe this is worth a try as a last resort, although I am aiming for a clean installation since this is a production server. thanks for your reply. regards, dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Mac 2001 (2 profiles ? )
Yes it will. You use the Outlook Settings Control Panel to set them up. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2001 14:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Outlook Mac 2001 (2 profiles ? ) Does Outlook Mac 20001 support several users on the same stations ? Several profile ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k Server Password recovery!
I hope you've already called PSS, but you want forceful? http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/ I think I'd have security escort that utility out of the building, if it were headed toward a production server. I'd pay PSS. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:48 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Win2k Server Password recovery! Subject: Win2k Server Password recovery! I have a win2k SP2 that I migrated from an NT4 domain to an AD domain today, now when I try and logon onto either domain I get an error stating that the computer accoutn in the primary domain is either corrupt or the password is incorrect. When I first logon to the AD domain and I have to change my password it says I do not have permission to change the password. 10 other machines have been successfully migrated, but his one server is being a pain. Now I cannpt even logon to the machine AT ALL. Somehow even the local admins password has been corrupted. Any help is appreciated ALso any pointers on forcefully resetting the admin password on the box. Anthony L. Sollars Sightward (Formerly Applied Inference) System/Network Administrator (425) 688-9921 - Voice (425) 241-6562 - Cell (425) 467-1006 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sightward.com When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things. - Corinthians I 13:11 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange to Groupwise Connector Help needed.
That's a good question. There is an API gateway running on the Novell server. With regard to the Groupwise SMTP agent, (Gateway to Internet Mail) I would have initially assumed that once the directories had been replicated, I would be able to use Novell box (not the case). The API gateway loaded on the novell server facilitates DirSync with Exchange and facilitates messaging between the two systems. As for sending SMTP mail from Exchange(different address space) out the Novell Groupwise internet Agent Gateway, I have accomplished this. The problem is return mail. The mail when replied to does not get routed back to the Exchange server. I may have to set up rules on the novell environment for this domain. The documentation from MS is decent, zero support from Novell on this process and of course they have thier own connector that resides on the Novell server that has a giant security hole. I'm dying for better documentation or if someone has done this before. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Internet Mail Service requires DNS domain name........... ....
In network control panel, click on the protocols. Double-click on TCP/IP to get to the properties page. Enter the domain name there. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The Internet Mail Service requires DNS domain name... Sorry - This is fro 2K wint 5.5 I have nt4.0 and 5.5! Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2001 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The Internet Mail Service requires DNS domain name... Q247063 Hi, I am trying to add and Internet Main Connection, but I am getting the following message: The Internet Mail Service requires DNS domain name to be configured on 'Servername'. To configure the domain name, use the network icon in the control panel on 'servername', or select another server? What is going on? It all looks ok? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster
I had issues. It turned out that they did not support versions 3.5 clustered on W2K with Exchange 5.5 with sp4. we have scanmail v3.52 with W2K, Exchange 5.5/sp4 - is this compatible to your knowledge? It turned out it did not get all the registry entries installed on the other cluster node but it did get the cluster part of the registry okay. ok, i'll check what's happening with registry settings. Did you have problems with the actual installation? When we install, the passive node installs without problems, just goes straight in, then the installer pauses for ages trying to install the active node before finally reporting failure. Make sure the registry entries in the services section are identical. where exactly in the registry do you mean? hkey_local_machine/system? thanks for your reply... regards, dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving Exchange 55 to another nt4 domain
Hello - Having read some info about the pitfalls of moving an Exchange 5.5 server to another domain, and that it is not a good idea to do so. I would like to know if any of you have tried it and how did you do it. This particular server is a member of a site with a couple of other exchange servers. Thanks Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
No, I didn't say they're a flop. I said that expectations with respect to clusters are often off target. I still don't have enough information to recommend whether you should go forward with them or not. I suppose if you hired Rob Ellis to implement it and provide training, you might just get a successful implementation. :) Some people /have/ been successful with clustered Exchange. Many have not. Success however is an objective concept defined by the initial expectations set and the ability to meet them. So, with mis-set expectations, whether simply technical or vis-a-vis the skill of the people involved. I don't think I'd make a production Exchange cluster the first cluster in the environment in most cases. Hosting 20K users on a DataCenter cluster is a pretty niche market. I suspect that the due dilligence has been performed there and expectations are pretty on target. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Thanks, sir Andy. I have seen firewalls clusters and web farms in action. And was quite very impressed. None yet for Exchange though. In your case then, can we fairly say that Exchange clusters are a flop (or forget it as some would say)? You did not answer as to whether we should wait or forget it -it is impossible for exchange to attain 5 9s in a cluster, ever (again, I am just asking your opinion since you are well respected in this list). Thanks, -botp -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:49 AM To: 'Peña, Botp' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Definitely 1. 2 is a matter of your expertise and the ultimate roi of the clustered solution in your environment. I think clusters have their place, but it's more with applications which behave more like the clusters do. People seem to be unsatisfied with their clusters in my experience once they've seen them in action. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:39 PM To: 'Webb, Andy' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Thanks, Sir Andy. Very helpful and well said. To summarize your point (in so far as I can comprehend): 1. clusters add complexity 2. clusters are risky Do your statements apply to clusters in general, or is it only for Exchange (or as to the current Exchange clustering stage)? I am asking since we might abandon the plan totally or just wait for another year or years Thank you again, -botp -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:27 AM To: 'Peña, Botp ' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Knowing no more about your business than what is in that note, I'd say you're needlessly adding complexity to your environment which will not result in the net availability increase you forecast at the low cost you expect. There is downtime associated with a clean node swap in a clustered environment. Is 2x that downtime significantly less than that required for a service pack install? Not usually. Does it let you apply one or more hotfixes with less impact to the users? Not usually. Running a clustered environment also means you need to be running a clustered test environment so that you can simulate all these rolling upgrades. Having that AV upgrade hose an entire node of your cluster is not significantly better than having it hose a standalone server, and you may not know that things are bad until you've moved the active node back to the already upgraded server. As noted above, I don't know enough about your environment to make this a firm recommendation. To spend the time to get that familiarity, I'd likely want a consulting contract. Clustering is not for the faint of heart, and it is not to be used without serious thought to the whys and whatfors. Do you really have a business need for mail to every user to be available five nines or more? You may, but you would be one of a very few. I'd rather take that second server and use it for disaster recovery drills and testing of all the software upgrades you mentioned. Then my actual downtime would be minimized by having a known, tested, and understood upgrade process
Exchange 2000 adding an contact via a scritp
I am looking for the context for scripting the creation of custom recipients (AD Contacts) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Manipulating Exchange 5.5 Mailboxes in VB6
For 1 2 you need to learn how to write LDAP queries, which will be very useful since you can utilize that skill to manipulate AD. To use LDAP against Exchange 5.5 in VB, you'll also need to learn ADSI. I've never used it but I hear it's pretty easy. Tom Rizzo has a very good book that covers ADSI/LDAP and Exchange programming in detail. I think it's called Programming Exchange and Outlook. It's from Microsoft Press. S. -Original Message- From: Nigel Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Manipulating Exchange 5.5 Mailboxes in VB6 Can anyone point in the right direction or tell me what I need to do to be able to: 1. Create an Exchange 5.5 mailbox 2. Delete an Exchange 5.5 mailbox 3. Manipulate mailbox (i.e. Set auto-forwarding etc.) I want to be able to do this in Visual Basic 6. The Exchange Server is on a Windows NT 4.0 machine with no active directory. If anyone has any code, or knows a good website, I would appreciate it. Thanks Nigel Ellis _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
In our case it would be 10,000 users on a datacenter cluster. Running 3 active/1 passive, we end up with around 3400 users per node. By the way, I don't consider myself any kind of authority on clustering or exchange! Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance No, I didn't say they're a flop. I said that expectations with respect to clusters are often off target. I still don't have enough information to recommend whether you should go forward with them or not. I suppose if you hired Rob Ellis to implement it and provide training, you might just get a successful implementation. :) Some people /have/ been successful with clustered Exchange. Many have not. Success however is an objective concept defined by the initial expectations set and the ability to meet them. So, with mis-set expectations, whether simply technical or vis-a-vis the skill of the people involved. I don't think I'd make a production Exchange cluster the first cluster in the environment in most cases. Hosting 20K users on a DataCenter cluster is a pretty niche market. I suspect that the due dilligence has been performed there and expectations are pretty on target. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Thanks, sir Andy. I have seen firewalls clusters and web farms in action. And was quite very impressed. None yet for Exchange though. In your case then, can we fairly say that Exchange clusters are a flop (or forget it as some would say)? You did not answer as to whether we should wait or forget it -it is impossible for exchange to attain 5 9s in a cluster, ever (again, I am just asking your opinion since you are well respected in this list). Thanks, -botp -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:49 AM To: 'Peña, Botp' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Definitely 1. 2 is a matter of your expertise and the ultimate roi of the clustered solution in your environment. I think clusters have their place, but it's more with applications which behave more like the clusters do. People seem to be unsatisfied with their clusters in my experience once they've seen them in action. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:39 PM To: 'Webb, Andy' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Thanks, Sir Andy. Very helpful and well said. To summarize your point (in so far as I can comprehend): 1. clusters add complexity 2. clusters are risky Do your statements apply to clusters in general, or is it only for Exchange (or as to the current Exchange clustering stage)? I am asking since we might abandon the plan totally or just wait for another year or years Thank you again, -botp -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:27 AM To: 'Peña, Botp ' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance Knowing no more about your business than what is in that note, I'd say you're needlessly adding complexity to your environment which will not result in the net availability increase you forecast at the low cost you expect. There is downtime associated with a clean node swap in a clustered environment. Is 2x that downtime significantly less than that required for a service pack install? Not usually. Does it let you apply one or more hotfixes with less impact to the users? Not usually. Running a clustered environment also means you need to be running a clustered test environment so that you can simulate all these rolling upgrades. Having that AV upgrade hose an entire node of your cluster is not significantly better than having it hose a standalone server, and you may not know that things are bad until you've moved the active node back to the already upgraded server. As noted above, I don't know enough about your
Error 1025
WIN2K Server sp1/ Exchange 5.5 sp4 I received an error in Event Viewer this morning. Event 1025. I have been using EXMerge to move over some users from another server, not sure if that might play a part. MS Says in the TechNet article it's a problem with Exchange 4.0 and they know about it.? What could cause this error, if I have 5.5 sp4? Anyone have this issue before? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 adding an contact via a scritp
MSDN is a fairly useful resource for this. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/_cdo_cr eating_a_contact.asp (Link wrap yadda yadda) * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 adding an contact via a scritp I am looking for the context for scripting the creation of custom recipients (AD Contacts) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster
Dan, are you installing over an existing scanmail installation or is this new? I had this same problem with my 5.5 cluster and we finally got it to install by removing the older version first. Now the thing STILL won't send any e-mail notifications when it finds a virus, but that's another kettle of fish. Lori Hunter LAN Administrator Citi Commerce Solutions (847) 597-3118 Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nuc -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster Have you tried failing over and then installing on the (then) passive node? no, but i would not expect that to work since the installer requires both nodes to be installed at one time, or it reports failure... maybe this is worth a try as a last resort, although I am aiming for a clean installation since this is a production server. thanks for your reply. regards, dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
Hello all I have two Exchange 5.5 sites with one server in each site (Windows NT Server 4.0/sp6a, Exchange 5.5/sp3 on both servers). I am using Exchange behind Proxy 2.0 in one site, and in order to make inter-site communication possible, I had to assign a fixed TCP port for the MTA (I am using port 6000). It was working fine, until I upgraded from sp3 to sp4. Since then, messages are stuck in the MTA queue, and I get error messages every 10 minutes that say: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 4, NT/MTA error code: 1753. Comms error 1753, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name TOM [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) I had this same problem in the first place (with Exchange sp3) before I assigned a static TCP port for the MTA (because of MS Proxy), and the solution was to assign this static port. Is there a way to fix this problem? And if not, can I revert back to sp3? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Open Relay Black list
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 also available here: http://downloads.members.tripod.com/ladysun1969/misc/relay.tif -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - How about never? Is never good for you? - -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Open Relay Black list Hi, I sent an email to some one at [EMAIL PROTECTED] The mail bounced back to me with the following message: Sent RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received 501 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... no access from [xx.xx.xx.xx] see http://www.orbl.org Could not deliver mail to this user. Upon checking the ORBL site, I realized that we are probably relaying unsolicited mail. Has anyone come across this before, any suggestions how to prevent open relay ? Exchange 5.5 sp4 scanmail for exchange SMTP Server: Interscan Virus wall. thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
Does one or more of these servers have multiple IP addresses? If so, try using a hosts file. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Hello all I have two Exchange 5.5 sites with one server in each site (Windows NT Server 4.0/sp6a, Exchange 5.5/sp3 on both servers). I am using Exchange behind Proxy 2.0 in one site, and in order to make inter-site communication possible, I had to assign a fixed TCP port for the MTA (I am using port 6000). It was working fine, until I upgraded from sp3 to sp4. Since then, messages are stuck in the MTA queue, and I get error messages every 10 minutes that say: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 4, NT/MTA error code: 1753. Comms error 1753, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name TOM [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) I had this same problem in the first place (with Exchange sp3) before I assigned a static TCP port for the MTA (because of MS Proxy), and the solution was to assign this static port. Is there a way to fix this problem? And if not, can I revert back to sp3? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: third party client can't send email to external address!?
I tried doing the relaying and this is the error message I'm getting: 550 Relaying is prohibited and also the users that has multiple email address can't get outside email now. pls. help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: third party client can't send email to external address!?
Jeremy, what exactly did you do? if you're using the web interface to access this list, please be sure to click the box/button/whatever that includes the original message text. thanks -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Sports Commentary Gem: Andrew Mehrtens loves it when Darryl Gibson comes inside of him (NZ rugby commentator) - -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: third party client can't send email to external address!? I tried doing the relaying and this is the error message I'm getting: 550 Relaying is prohibited and also the users that has multiple email address can't get outside email now. pls. help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster
I installed over an older version and had no problems on a 5.5 Clustered Exchange. And it emails virus notices. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster Dan, are you installing over an existing scanmail installation or is this new? I had this same problem with my 5.5 cluster and we finally got it to install by removing the older version first. Now the thing STILL won't send any e-mail notifications when it finds a virus, but that's another kettle of fish. Lori Hunter LAN Administrator Citi Commerce Solutions (847) 597-3118 Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nuc -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster Have you tried failing over and then installing on the (then) passive node? no, but i would not expect that to work since the installer requires both nodes to be installed at one time, or it reports failure... maybe this is worth a try as a last resort, although I am aiming for a clean installation since this is a production server. thanks for your reply. regards, dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: third party client can't send email to external address!?
On the routing restritions page, which is located under the routing tab of the IMS properties page, I added the IP addresses. Stop and re-start Message Transfer Agent and Internet Mail Service. Jeremy, what exactly did you do? if you're using the web interface to access this list, please be sure = to click the box/button/whatever that includes the original message text. thanks=20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Sports Commentary Gem: Andrew Mehrtens loves it when Darryl Gibson = comes inside of him (NZ rugby commentator)=20 - -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: third party client can't send email to external address!? I tried doing the relaying and this is the error message I'm getting: 550 Relaying is prohibited=20 =20 and also the users that has multiple email address can't get outside = email now. pls. help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster
I've rarely had a successful installation of a new version of Trend over an older version. I've pretty much given up trying and uninstall the older version, clean out the bits that the uninstall fails to remove properly and then do a fresh installation. It saves me from having to do it later when I call SSM support because feature $foo isn't working as expected. Never tried it on a cluster though. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster I installed over an older version and had no problems on a 5.5 Clustered Exchange. And it emails virus notices. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster Dan, are you installing over an existing scanmail installation or is this new? I had this same problem with my 5.5 cluster and we finally got it to install by removing the older version first. Now the thing STILL won't send any e-mail notifications when it finds a virus, but that's another kettle of fish. Lori Hunter LAN Administrator Citi Commerce Solutions (847) 597-3118 Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nuc -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster Have you tried failing over and then installing on the (then) passive node? no, but i would not expect that to work since the installer requires both nodes to be installed at one time, or it reports failure... maybe this is worth a try as a last resort, although I am aiming for a clean installation since this is a production server. thanks for your reply. regards, dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: third party client can't send email to external address!?
The IP addresses of what? You snipped to much so I don't know what you're referring to anymore. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Sir, a woman preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all. -Samuel Johnson - -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: third party client can't send email to external address!? On the routing restritions page, which is located under the routing tab of the IMS properties page, I added the IP addresses. Stop and re-start Message Transfer Agent and Internet Mail Service. Jeremy, what exactly did you do? if you're using the web interface to access this list, please be sure = to click the box/button/whatever that includes the original message text. thanks=20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Sports Commentary Gem: Andrew Mehrtens loves it when Darryl Gibson = comes inside of him (NZ rugby commentator)=20 - -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: third party client can't send email to external address!? I tried doing the relaying and this is the error message I'm getting: 550 Relaying is prohibited=20 =20 and also the users that has multiple email address can't get outside = email now. pls. help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: third party client can't send email to external address!?
I'm sorry but I just assumed that you read the previous messages. IP addresses of the client PC and server that has the third party software thats trying to send outside mail. The IP addresses of what? You snipped to much so I don't know what = you're referring to anymore. -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Sir, a woman preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It = is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all. -Samuel = Johnson=20 - -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: third party client can't send email to external address!? On the routing restritions page, which is located under the routing tab = of the IMS properties page, I added the IP addresses. Stop and re-start Message Transfer Agent and Internet Mail Service. Jeremy, what exactly did you do? =20 if you're using the web interface to access this list, please be sure = =3D to click the box/button/whatever that includes the original message = text. thanks=3D20 =20 -Mich=3DE8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Sports Commentary Gem: Andrew Mehrtens loves it when Darryl Gibson = =3D comes inside of him (NZ rugby commentator)=3D20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: third party client can't send email to external = address!? =20 =20 I tried doing the relaying and this is the error message I'm getting: =20 550 Relaying is prohibited=3D20 =3D20 =20 and also the users that has multiple email address can't get outside = =3D email now. =20 pls. help =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
I'm assuming that the MTA static port assignment was done through a registry change. Verify that it's still there. SP4 may have overwritten it. S -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Hello all I have two Exchange 5.5 sites with one server in each site (Windows NT Server 4.0/sp6a, Exchange 5.5/sp3 on both servers). I am using Exchange behind Proxy 2.0 in one site, and in order to make inter-site communication possible, I had to assign a fixed TCP port for the MTA (I am using port 6000). It was working fine, until I upgraded from sp3 to sp4. Since then, messages are stuck in the MTA queue, and I get error messages every 10 minutes that say: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 4, NT/MTA error code: 1753. Comms error 1753, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name TOM [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) I had this same problem in the first place (with Exchange sp3) before I assigned a static TCP port for the MTA (because of MS Proxy), and the solution was to assign this static port. Is there a way to fix this problem? And if not, can I revert back to sp3? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: third party client can't send email to external address!?
Did you make the change on the Exchange Server with IMS? If you make the change on another Exchange Server and stop/restart IMS, there's a good chance that you restart the service without the information replicate to the server with IMS, hence your IMS working with old config. S. PS: We read your previous messages, but didn't memorize them. It's always useful (and never hurts) to have the entire thread in the replies so everbody can follow what's going on. -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: third party client can't send email to external address!? I'm sorry but I just assumed that you read the previous messages. IP addresses of the client PC and server that has the third party software thats trying to send outside mail. The IP addresses of what? You snipped to much so I don't know what = you're referring to anymore. -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Sir, a woman preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It = is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all. -Samuel = Johnson=20 - -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: third party client can't send email to external address!? On the routing restritions page, which is located under the routing tab = of the IMS properties page, I added the IP addresses. Stop and re-start Message Transfer Agent and Internet Mail Service. Jeremy, what exactly did you do? =20 if you're using the web interface to access this list, please be sure = =3D to click the box/button/whatever that includes the original message = text. thanks=3D20 =20 -Mich=3DE8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Sports Commentary Gem: Andrew Mehrtens loves it when Darryl Gibson = =3D comes inside of him (NZ rugby commentator)=3D20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: third party client can't send email to external = address!? =20 =20 I tried doing the relaying and this is the error message I'm getting: =20 550 Relaying is prohibited=3D20 =3D20 =20 and also the users that has multiple email address can't get outside = =3D email now. =20 pls. help =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error 1025
I would not agree with this assessment without first seeing the entire contents of the event AND finding out if it's actually causing any problems. Is it? Or are you just worried because there are red stop signs in your event log? On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:26:47 -0500 , Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I might have found the fix. Would those who might be researching this with me agree I need to run: ISInteg -pri -fix -test alltests Thanks! Ron Event ID: 1025 Source: MSExchangeIS Private Type: Warning Category: General Description: An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcGenerateReadReport: -Original Message- From: Ron Grant Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error 1025 WIN2K Server sp1/ Exchange 5.5 sp4 I received an error in Event Viewer this morning. Event 1025. I have been using EXMerge to move over some users from another server, not sure if that might play a part. MS Says in the TechNet article it's a problem with Exchange 4.0 and they know about it.? What could cause this error, if I have 5.5 sp4? Anyone have this issue before? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x400 connector?
We use Exchange server 5.5 as an internal mail system and Seattle Lab mail as our external email. Our users use Outlook98 as clients. Somehow we always get some errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; But if we upgrade to Outlook 2000, it will be fine. Please help. Thanks! __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: x400 connector?
Ummm No psychics here. When do you get these errors? Are these in the event log? NDR? Pop-up window? S. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: x400 connector? We use Exchange server 5.5 as an internal mail system and Seattle Lab mail as our external email. Our users use Outlook98 as clients. Somehow we always get some errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; But if we upgrade to Outlook 2000, it will be fine. Please help. Thanks! __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: x400 connector?
and what are the errors? Those are just encapsulated addresses down there, not error messages. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - FOR GREAT JUSTICE! - -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Ummm No psychics here. When do you get these errors? Are these in the event log? NDR? Pop-up window? S. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: x400 connector? We use Exchange server 5.5 as an internal mail system and Seattle Lab mail as our external email. Our users use Outlook98 as clients. Somehow we always get some errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; But if we upgrade to Outlook 2000, it will be fine. Please help. Thanks! __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: x400 connector?
Suppose no encapsulated addresses shown in the receipt. Why? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and what are the errors? Those are just encapsulated addresses down there, not error messages. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - FOR GREAT JUSTICE! - -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Ummm No psychics here. When do you get these errors? Are these in the event log? NDR? Pop-up window? S. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: x400 connector? We use Exchange server 5.5 as an internal mail system and Seattle Lab mail as our external email. Our users use Outlook98 as clients. Somehow we always get some errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; But if we upgrade to Outlook 2000, it will be fine. Please help. Thanks! __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: x400 connector?
You still haven't answered my question. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? These shown only in recipent side. --- Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ummm No psychics here. When do you get these errors? Are these in the event log? NDR? Pop-up window? S. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: x400 connector? We use Exchange server 5.5 as an internal mail system and Seattle Lab mail as our external email. Our users use Outlook98 as clients. Somehow we always get some errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; But if we upgrade to Outlook 2000, it will be fine. Please help. Thanks! __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: x400 connector?
This is the error(or encapsulated addresses ) which supposed not to show on recipient side. IMCEAEX [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What receipt? You still haven't posted the errors. http://www.ultratech-llc.com/Personal/Files/?File=~MoreInfo.TXT -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to believe you are invisible. - -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Suppose no encapsulated addresses shown in the receipt. Why? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and what are the errors? Those are just encapsulated addresses down there, not error messages. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - FOR GREAT JUSTICE! - -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Ummm No psychics here. When do you get these errors? Are these in the event log? NDR? Pop-up window? S. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: x400 connector? We use Exchange server 5.5 as an internal mail system and Seattle Lab mail as our external email. Our users use Outlook98 as clients. Somehow we always get some errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; But if we upgrade to Outlook 2000, it will be fine. Please help. Thanks! __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: x400 connector?
Jim, That is not an error message. Can you please describe, in excrutiating detail, what exactly is happening? (Off the cuff, and without any other information from Jim, I think that your users don't have SMTP addresses but are still allowed to send Internet email. ) -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - You can't tell which way the train went by looking at the tracks. - -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? This is the error(or encapsulated addresses ) which supposed not to show on recipient side. IMCEAEX [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What receipt? You still haven't posted the errors. http://www.ultratech-llc.com/Personal/Files/?File=~MoreInfo.TXT -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to believe you are invisible. - -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Suppose no encapsulated addresses shown in the receipt. Why? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and what are the errors? Those are just encapsulated addresses down there, not error messages. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - FOR GREAT JUSTICE! - -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Ummm No psychics here. When do you get these errors? Are these in the event log? NDR? Pop-up window? S. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: x400 connector? We use Exchange server 5.5 as an internal mail system and Seattle Lab mail as our external email. Our users use Outlook98 as clients. Somehow we always get some errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; But if we upgrade to Outlook 2000, it will be fine. Please help. Thanks! __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com
RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
Thank you Serdar for the reply, and yes both sides are at sp4. Regarding reverting back to sp3, does it actually work to restore on sp3 whereas the latest backup was made after the upgrade to sp4? According to MS PSS, you should install the same service packs before restoring. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Did you upgrade both sides to SP4? Did you make any other changes after the SP4 upgrade? As far as falling back to SP3, I'm afraid you'll have to restore from backup. Exchange won't allow you to reinstall SP3 on top of SP4 or uninstall SP4. S/ -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Already did. I even tried to change it and assign a new port on both sides. There is no use. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 I'm assuming that the MTA static port assignment was done through a registry change. Verify that it's still there. SP4 may have overwritten it. S -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Hello all I have two Exchange 5.5 sites with one server in each site (Windows NT Server 4.0/sp6a, Exchange 5.5/sp3 on both servers). I am using Exchange behind Proxy 2.0 in one site, and in order to make inter-site communication possible, I had to assign a fixed TCP port for the MTA (I am using port 6000). It was working fine, until I upgraded from sp3 to sp4. Since then, messages are stuck in the MTA queue, and I get error messages every 10 minutes that say: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 4, NT/MTA error code: 1753. Comms error 1753, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name TOM [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) I had this same problem in the first place (with Exchange sp3) before I assigned a static TCP port for the MTA (because of MS Proxy), and the solution was to assign this static port. Is there a way to fix this problem? And if not, can I revert back to sp3? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
SP4 modified the schema of the databases. You did make a backup before upgrading to SP4, right? - Original Message - From: Nizar El-Assaad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:04 PM Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thank you Serdar for the reply, and yes both sides are at sp4. Regarding reverting back to sp3, does it actually work to restore on sp3 whereas the latest backup was made after the upgrade to sp4? According to MS PSS, you should install the same service packs before restoring. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Did you upgrade both sides to SP4? Did you make any other changes after the SP4 upgrade? As far as falling back to SP3, I'm afraid you'll have to restore from backup. Exchange won't allow you to reinstall SP3 on top of SP4 or uninstall SP4. S/ -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Already did. I even tried to change it and assign a new port on both sides. There is no use. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 I'm assuming that the MTA static port assignment was done through a registry change. Verify that it's still there. SP4 may have overwritten it. S -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Hello all I have two Exchange 5.5 sites with one server in each site (Windows NT Server 4.0/sp6a, Exchange 5.5/sp3 on both servers). I am using Exchange behind Proxy 2.0 in one site, and in order to make inter-site communication possible, I had to assign a fixed TCP port for the MTA (I am using port 6000). It was working fine, until I upgraded from sp3 to sp4. Since then, messages are stuck in the MTA queue, and I get error messages every 10 minutes that say: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 4, NT/MTA error code: 1753. Comms error 1753, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name TOM [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) I had this same problem in the first place (with Exchange sp3) before I assigned a static TCP port for the MTA (because of MS Proxy), and the solution was to assign this static port. Is there a way to fix this problem? And if not, can I revert back to sp3? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: x400 connector?
That's not an error. That's nothing more than an encapsulated address. You're gonna have to get more specific here. - Original Message - From: Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:55 AM Subject: RE: x400 connector? This is the error(or encapsulated addresses ) which supposed not to show on recipient side. IMCEAEX [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What receipt? You still haven't posted the errors. http://www.ultratech-llc.com/Personal/Files/?File=~MoreInfo.TXT -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to believe you are invisible. - -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Suppose no encapsulated addresses shown in the receipt. Why? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and what are the errors? Those are just encapsulated addresses down there, not error messages. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - FOR GREAT JUSTICE! - -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Ummm No psychics here. When do you get these errors? Are these in the event log? NDR? Pop-up window? S. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: x400 connector? We use Exchange server 5.5 as an internal mail system and Seattle Lab mail as our external email. Our users use Outlook98 as clients. Somehow we always get some errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; But if we upgrade to Outlook 2000, it will be fine. Please help. Thanks! __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
Umpfh. In that case, your latest backup won't work. The only one that would is the last successful backup before the upgrade. -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thank you Serdar for the reply, and yes both sides are at sp4. Regarding reverting back to sp3, does it actually work to restore on sp3 whereas the latest backup was made after the upgrade to sp4? According to MS PSS, you should install the same service packs before restoring. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Did you upgrade both sides to SP4? Did you make any other changes after the SP4 upgrade? As far as falling back to SP3, I'm afraid you'll have to restore from backup. Exchange won't allow you to reinstall SP3 on top of SP4 or uninstall SP4. S/ -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Already did. I even tried to change it and assign a new port on both sides. There is no use. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 I'm assuming that the MTA static port assignment was done through a registry change. Verify that it's still there. SP4 may have overwritten it. S -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Hello all I have two Exchange 5.5 sites with one server in each site (Windows NT Server 4.0/sp6a, Exchange 5.5/sp3 on both servers). I am using Exchange behind Proxy 2.0 in one site, and in order to make inter-site communication possible, I had to assign a fixed TCP port for the MTA (I am using port 6000). It was working fine, until I upgraded from sp3 to sp4. Since then, messages are stuck in the MTA queue, and I get error messages every 10 minutes that say: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 4, NT/MTA error code: 1753. Comms error 1753, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name TOM [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) I had this same problem in the first place (with Exchange sp3) before I assigned a static TCP port for the MTA (because of MS Proxy), and the solution was to assign this static port. Is there a way to fix this problem? And if not, can I revert back to sp3? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2nd SMTP address
Nope. Sorry, you'll have to either manually enter them (or import them using CSV file and the field Secondary-Proxy-Addresses if you want to do bulk changes). It sucks but them's the breaks. Eric On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:00:14 -0400 , Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to setup Exchange 5.5 so that every time I create a mailbox it automatically creates 2 SMTP addresses? (ex: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: x400 connector?
Actually, you won't have to configure Outlook in that fashion if you just install IMS on your Exchange Server and point it to you SL server. It can save you a lot of headache. Also, when you install IMS, I believe it generates SMTP addresses for all of your mailboxes. S. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Michelle: This only happens when other people out of my company receive my message. They only can see these:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; and could not see Jim or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think you are right we don't have smtp address. When configuring outlook client, we need to put Internet mail on top of Exchange; configure POP3:mail SMTP: mail or use out internet slmail server's IP address 206.180.10.1. I don't know what I am describing clear enough. Many thanks! Jim --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim, That is not an error message. Can you please describe, in excrutiating detail, what exactly is happening? (Off the cuff, and without any other information from Jim, I think that your users don't have SMTP addresses but are still allowed to send Internet email. ) -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - You can't tell which way the train went by looking at the tracks. - -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? This is the error(or encapsulated addresses ) which supposed not to show on recipient side. IMCEAEX [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What receipt? You still haven't posted the errors. http://www.ultratech-llc.com/Personal/Files/?File=~MoreInfo.TXT -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to believe you are invisible. - -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Suppose no encapsulated addresses shown in the receipt. Why? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and what are the errors? Those are just encapsulated addresses down there, not error messages. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - FOR GREAT JUSTICE! - -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Ummm No psychics here. When do you get these errors? Are these in the event log? NDR? Pop-up window? S. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: x400 connector? We use Exchange server 5.5 as an internal mail system and Seattle Lab mail as our external email. Our users use Outlook98 as clients. Somehow we always get some errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; But if we upgrade to Outlook 2000, it will be fine. Please help. Thanks! __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: third party client can't send email to external address!?
we only have one Exchange server. We only have 2 cats. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: third party client can't send email to external address!?
I only have one piece of beef jerky left :( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scharff, Chris Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: third party client can't send email to external address!? we only have one Exchange server. We only have 2 cats. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k Server Password recovery!
Thanks for all the input, I went ahead and called PSS and they had me reinstall windows 2k to a differently named winnt directory so I could recover the data, and rebuild. They still didn't have much information for me as to why the migration caused this behavior, I am just glad it is an isolated incident, since the following 20 machines have had no problems migrating at all. Thanks again, TOny -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k Server Password recovery! I hope you've already called PSS, but you want forceful? http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/ I think I'd have security escort that utility out of the building, if it were headed toward a production server. I'd pay PSS. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:48 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Win2k Server Password recovery! Subject: Win2k Server Password recovery! I have a win2k SP2 that I migrated from an NT4 domain to an AD domain today, now when I try and logon onto either domain I get an error stating that the computer accoutn in the primary domain is either corrupt or the password is incorrect. When I first logon to the AD domain and I have to change my password it says I do not have permission to change the password. 10 other machines have been successfully migrated, but his one server is being a pain. Now I cannpt even logon to the machine AT ALL. Somehow even the local admins password has been corrupted. Any help is appreciated ALso any pointers on forcefully resetting the admin password on the box. Anthony L. Sollars Sightward (Formerly Applied Inference) System/Network Administrator (425) 688-9921 - Voice (425) 241-6562 - Cell (425) 467-1006 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sightward.com When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things. - Corinthians I 13:11 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unknown Mails are stored in queue
Sounds like you're being used as a relay. Make that stop. The FAQ has a link to an article explaining how to do this, IIRC. M- Original Message - From: Adil Azad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:04 AM Subject: RE: Unknown Mails are stored in queue Yes peoples are able to send the mails but not receive the mails because one erson in my company receive the mail and manually distribute to the users. yesterday me Exchange Server 5.5 hanging 3 times and i am restart the server after that e-mail process are starts. regards adil --- Leeann McCallum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you clarify more: (1) Are users able to send mail? (2) Are users able to receive mail? (3) Any viruses hanging around? (4) Problems with your DNS servers/gateways/Internet connection -Original Message- From: Adil Azad To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 5/09/01 18:51 Subject: Unknown Mails are stored in queue Hello! I am using Exchange server 5.5 with SP3 behind MS Proxy server 2.0.In my Exchange Server on IMS (Queue) i am checking daily queue messages . Before two days in that Queue few mails are waiting in Outbound messages awaiting for delivery option. When i am asking in my office no one can send these mails. When i see the details of that mails the Originator name of these mails are same and that is ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) and the Recipient adresses are change. Can anyone help me what can i do . Regards adil __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unknown domain?
What version of Exchange? Do you have it set up to accept inbound connections for that domain? Missy - Original Message - From: Stevens, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:15 AM Subject: RE: unknown domain? The ip is 198.207.239.16the 13 address is for our primary internet gateway..but we use it as the backup IMC for the new exchange server. 13 should have the higher preference number.. -Original Message- From: Joe Kinne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unknown domain? What is the public IP address for the server? I see two MX records from my site (198.207.239.16 and 192.207.239.13). Is it possible that you have a forwarder that is configured incorrectly? Joe Kinne Civia Media Group 140 4th Ave N Seattle WA 98109 Tel. 206.404.7538 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:04 AM Posted To: MSX ListServ Conversation: unknown domain? Subject: unknown domain? We have created a new domain and built dedicated Exchange server for it. We have the upstream dns entries made and also built the applicable records in our dns. nslookups seem to work fine but for whatever reason, we cannot seem to get mail to recepients on this server. We have been patient waiting several days for the dns replication to spread. here is my test account on this server: [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain is obviously yao.doe.gov Does anyone see where we went wrong? TIA NT4.0/SP6a/5.5/SP4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem
Hello Folks, This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try here first. We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our migration. We installed the E2K server in the same site and moved all the mailboxes to the new server. We setup our cc:Mail connector and SMTP connector on the new server and disabled the old ones. Despite a few bumps it is working fairly well. We have a mixture of Windows 2000, NT 4.0, 98, and one ME client all using Outlook 2000. Everybody connects fine on the LAN. Some clients connect to the LAN via a VPN connection. All Windows 2000 clients connecting this way work fine. The Windows 98 and one ME client do not. When starting Outlook these clients just hang forever. When looking at the profile we see that the server name has been automatically switched as usual. However, if we rebuild the profile and try to resolve the mailbox name, that too hangs forever. If we create a mailbox on the Exchange 5.5 server and try to resolve that it all works fine. Any attempt to contact the Exchange 2000 server instead results in the process hanging - only on 98 and ME. Win2K works fine. We can map shares, ping, and do all kinds of other network things from these Windows-98 clients via VPN to the Exchange 2000 server. The connectivity seems to be there. We have tested with RPCPing and so on as well and that all works. I can't figure out what VPN would have to do with it and why it works fine for Windows 2000 clients. All work fine on the LAN. We have only seen this problem with VPN and only to the Exchange 2000 server - not the Exchange 5.5 Server. We also tried installing the Active Directory client add-on for Windows 9x (DSCLIENT) and that didn't fix it either. Any thoughts? Thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: x400 connector?
Thank you, Soysal! We will try the way you suggested. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Great Inspector Soysal! :-) -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Why is the alphabet in that order? Is it because of that song? - -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? According to what I think your setup is, you shouldn't need to. Here's what I think you have, so correct me if I'm wrong. ServerEX - Exchange Server with mailboxes ServerSL - Seattle Labs server ServerSL is what your MX record points to. Your Exchange Server hosts IMS and user mailboxes. The IMS is configured to don't reroute incoming SMTP mail. When you said you have to configure Outlook with Internet E-mail on top of Exchange Server and type in the IP of ServerSL to send outbound mail, you're taking your IMS server out of the loop. Your Outlook will make a direct connection to your ServerSL. If that's the only reason you install Internet E-mail, you don't need it. Your IMS will happily route internet mail coming from Outlook clients. Also, when you've configured your ServerSL to route all mail to your Exchange box, that one will be configured as a relay server. As long as the advertised email addresses of your users match the SMTP addresses in the Exchange directory, everything should be fine. S. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Yes, we did that but we didn't reroute incoming smtp mail. We select don't reroute incoming SMTP mail Do you think we need to reroute ? Thanks! --- Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, you won't have to configure Outlook in that fashion if you just install IMS on your Exchange Server and point it to you SL server. It can save you a lot of headache. Also, when you install IMS, I believe it generates SMTP addresses for all of your mailboxes. S. -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? Michelle: This only happens when other people out of my company receive my message. They only can see these:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; and could not see Jim or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think you are right we don't have smtp address. When configuring outlook client, we need to put Internet mail on top of Exchange; configure POP3:mail SMTP: mail or use out internet slmail server's IP address 206.180.10.1. I don't know what I am describing clear enough. Many thanks! Jim --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim, That is not an error message. Can you please describe, in excrutiating detail, what exactly is happening? (Off the cuff, and without any other information from Jim, I think that your users don't have SMTP addresses but are still allowed to send Internet email. ) -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - You can't tell which way the train went by looking at the tracks. - -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 connector? This is the error(or encapsulated addresses ) which supposed not to show on recipient side. IMCEAEX [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What receipt? You still haven't posted the errors. http://www.ultratech-llc.com/Personal/Files/?File=~MoreInfo.TXT -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to believe you are invisible. - -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:50 PM === message truncated === __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email
RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem
What VPN protocol and client are you usingPPTP or IPSEC...cisco or windows client software. If you are using IPSEC, make sure you set the MTU setting to 1400. -Tony -Original Message- From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Hello Folks, This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try here first. We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our migration. We installed the E2K server in the same site and moved all the mailboxes to the new server. We setup our cc:Mail connector and SMTP connector on the new server and disabled the old ones. Despite a few bumps it is working fairly well. We have a mixture of Windows 2000, NT 4.0, 98, and one ME client all using Outlook 2000. Everybody connects fine on the LAN. Some clients connect to the LAN via a VPN connection. All Windows 2000 clients connecting this way work fine. The Windows 98 and one ME client do not. When starting Outlook these clients just hang forever. When looking at the profile we see that the server name has been automatically switched as usual. However, if we rebuild the profile and try to resolve the mailbox name, that too hangs forever. If we create a mailbox on the Exchange 5.5 server and try to resolve that it all works fine. Any attempt to contact the Exchange 2000 server instead results in the process hanging - only on 98 and ME. Win2K works fine. We can map shares, ping, and do all kinds of other network things from these Windows-98 clients via VPN to the Exchange 2000 server. The connectivity seems to be there. We have tested with RPCPing and so on as well and that all works. I can't figure out what VPN would have to do with it and why it works fine for Windows 2000 clients. All work fine on the LAN. We have only seen this problem with VPN and only to the Exchange 2000 server - not the Exchange 5.5 Server. We also tried installing the Active Directory client add-on for Windows 9x (DSCLIENT) and that didn't fix it either. Any thoughts? Thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem
I don't think you're way off at all... this is exactly what I was getting ready to suggest when your message came in. First rule of Outlook Troubleshooting: If Outlook is slow launching, check DNS. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: McKnight, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem We had a similar deal on several 9x machines after moving to a new (5.5 in our case) server and it was simply that the new exchange server didn't have a DNS entry.. we added this and it immediately fixed it for all of these machines so you might try looking into a DNS, hosts file solution.. but again this was on and NT4/exch 5.5 setup so I may be way off.. Charles Charles F. McKnight PC/Lan Specialist Mercy Health System - NWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Hello Folks, This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try here first. We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our migration. We installed the E2K server in the same site and moved all the mailboxes to the new server. We setup our cc:Mail connector and SMTP connector on the new server and disabled the old ones. Despite a few bumps it is working fairly well. We have a mixture of Windows 2000, NT 4.0, 98, and one ME client all using Outlook 2000. Everybody connects fine on the LAN. Some clients connect to the LAN via a VPN connection. All Windows 2000 clients connecting this way work fine. The Windows 98 and one ME client do not. When starting Outlook these clients just hang forever. When looking at the profile we see that the server name has been automatically switched as usual. However, if we rebuild the profile and try to resolve the mailbox name, that too hangs forever. If we create a mailbox on the Exchange 5.5 server and try to resolve that it all works fine. Any attempt to contact the Exchange 2000 server instead results in the process hanging - only on 98 and ME. Win2K works fine. We can map shares, ping, and do all kinds of other network things from these Windows-98 clients via VPN to the Exchange 2000 server. The connectivity seems to be there. We have tested with RPCPing and so on as well and that all works. I can't figure out what VPN would have to do with it and why it works fine for Windows 2000 clients. All work fine on the LAN. We have only seen this problem with VPN and only to the Exchange 2000 server - not the Exchange 5.5 Server. We also tried installing the Active Directory client add-on for Windows 9x (DSCLIENT) and that didn't fix it either. Any thoughts? Thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem
Make sure you have WINS available for resolution and static mappings for your mail servers. I no MS says win2k does not need wins but as many have found out, that turining off wins causes many problems. I have directly discovered problems with Outlook over VPN when not using the wins service. -TOny -Original Message- From: McKnight, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem We had a similar deal on several 9x machines after moving to a new (5.5 in our case) server and it was simply that the new exchange server didn't have a DNS entry.. we added this and it immediately fixed it for all of these machines so you might try looking into a DNS, hosts file solution.. but again this was on and NT4/exch 5.5 setup so I may be way off.. Charles Charles F. McKnight PC/Lan Specialist Mercy Health System - NWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Hello Folks, This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try here first. We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our migration. We installed the E2K server in the same site and moved all the mailboxes to the new server. We setup our cc:Mail connector and SMTP connector on the new server and disabled the old ones. Despite a few bumps it is working fairly well. We have a mixture of Windows 2000, NT 4.0, 98, and one ME client all using Outlook 2000. Everybody connects fine on the LAN. Some clients connect to the LAN via a VPN connection. All Windows 2000 clients connecting this way work fine. The Windows 98 and one ME client do not. When starting Outlook these clients just hang forever. When looking at the profile we see that the server name has been automatically switched as usual. However, if we rebuild the profile and try to resolve the mailbox name, that too hangs forever. If we create a mailbox on the Exchange 5.5 server and try to resolve that it all works fine. Any attempt to contact the Exchange 2000 server instead results in the process hanging - only on 98 and ME. Win2K works fine. We can map shares, ping, and do all kinds of other network things from these Windows-98 clients via VPN to the Exchange 2000 server. The connectivity seems to be there. We have tested with RPCPing and so on as well and that all works. I can't figure out what VPN would have to do with it and why it works fine for Windows 2000 clients. All work fine on the LAN. We have only seen this problem with VPN and only to the Exchange 2000 server - not the Exchange 5.5 Server. We also tried installing the Active Directory client add-on for Windows 9x (DSCLIENT) and that didn't fix it either. Any thoughts? Thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gloabl Address Book
It's so only necessary to ask once (or are there three of you?). It was a Good Thing that you changed the subject line this time, though, so you get credit there. I'm not sure what the first sentence has to do with the second, but I'll give it a stab. Sure, you can integrate the GAL into a web page in numerous ways. What's the goal? How much do you want published? Be as clear as possible. Missy - Original Message - From: David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:16 PM Subject: Gloabl Address Book I would like to intergrate the Gloabl Address Book with a web page we have. Anybody do this and if so can I take a look at your HTML code? Any help qould be appreciated. Regards, David Jaffe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox move rates
Interesting stuff there. Fun little tests to run. In any case, it speeds things up a bit, but not to the extent I would have thought. M - Original Message - From: Scharff, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:54 PM Subject: RE: Mailbox move rates .:: ponders the effect SIS has on move rates ::. -Original Message- From: David Grimstone (DSLWN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 4:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox move rates 3-4Gb per hour. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 5 September 2001 9:11 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox move rates Assuming relatively contemporary target system hardware and relatively aged source system hardware, and a 100MB LAN in between, what average data rates are y'all seeing in terms of megabytes per hour when moving mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000? Thanks, Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instant Messaging: install problem
An account with the Exchange Full Admin right is what he should need. Shema, Domain, Enterprise, etc. don't matter to Exchange 2K - it's the Exchange-specific rights he needs. Also, Admin rights on the local box. Missy - Original Message - From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:54 PM Subject: RE: Instant Messaging: install problem Good point.. : I meant the admin account or what ever it is.. The one with all the power in exchange. Normally the account you installed exchange with.. What is that called?? With out making me go RTFM or log into my exchange sever./ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Instant Messaging: install problem Kevin, Exchange2K does not have a separate service account as with Ex5.5; in Ex2K the service account is the machine account. Can't log on as the machine account. Alexio: when you say you logged on as administrator what do you mean? Is this account enabled as an Exchange Enterprise administrator? Does it have modify schema rights? - Original Message - From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:38 PM Subject: RE: Instant Messaging: install problem Try It as the service account for exchange. That will fix all of your rights issues. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cassani Alexio Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Instant Messaging: install problem Hi, I'm tryiing to install Instant Messaging Service in a server running Win2000 sp2 Exch2000 Ent. I've performed the installation process using a Terminal Service session, and logging on with my administrator account (member of domain admins and enterprise admins groups). At the end of the setup process, I've got an error (OxC0070005) and I need to cancel the setup. In the log file I've found some info about this problem: [16:56:18] CAtomIM::ScAddRegistryKeys (K:\admin\src\udog\exsetdata\components\im\a_im.cxx:230) Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied. . . . [16:56:18] Service = '' CBaseServiceAtom::ScAdd (K:\admin\src\udog\setupbase\basecomp\basesvcatom.cxx:196) Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied. . . . [16:56:19] CComExchSetupComponent::Install (K:\admin\src\udog\BO\comboifaces.cxx:668) Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied. Anyone can help me? TIA Alexio Cassani _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exch 5.5 installation problem
Hi We have a single Site/Server setup currently, and are looking to add some additional servers to the site, to be based at remote offices. Problem is, we cant get a successful installation. It always fails towards the end with the following message; some replication operations were not completed. directories will be updated during normal replication updatesetc Event viewer says; Unexpected error 0xc004 - Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists. MAPI was unable to load the information service emsabp.dll. Be sure the service is correctly installed and configured. Microsoft Exchange Address Book ID no: 00040380-- occurred. I've run a search on the drives on the Exchange Server, and cant find that file at all. I've checked both the Directory and Directory Synch Services are running, but none made a difference. Name resolution is handled by WINS, and seems fine. I can ping back and forwards between the servers using their Netbios names and IP adds, I have tried the rpcpings programme, and all seems well, and I have checked the relevant technet documents relating to this error. I've had a similar errors on one installation, which instructed me to Check Knowledge Consistency on the Directory service, which said it found errors, and corrected them. I've just applied SP3, which made no difference. A few weeks ago we were forced to change the admin password (which is also the service account password for exchange) although we updated all the services (but nothing else) and all seemed well. Exchange itself seems to work fine. I've considered using Exmerge off the reskit to export all the mailboxes top PST, and start afresh, but it keeps telling me it doesn't have permission to access the message store (MSEMS) I'm pretty sure Ive checked all the permissions tabs, and all seems well. I'm getting kind of desperate now, and need some kind of solution, no matter how long winded it might seem, regarding re-installs etc. Regards Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another Outlook Web Access problem - Please help?
Hi there, We are running Exchange Server 5.5 at our site. I have problems with users not being able to log on to their mailboxes using Outlook Web Access (trough Internet Browser). It has been setup for them to enter their domain logon details first to get to the Outlook Web Access logon Page. Some users cannot get access to the Outlook Logon Page (Internet Explorer). Yes, we have checked their domain logon details. We have even setup new user accounts to try and log on, but still we cannot. If I type in another user logon details it then works fine. I did check to see if they are setup to log on locally on the Exchange Server and they are. Can anybody please tell me what could be wrong or how to enable Web Access for the users. Thank you, Ghaleed . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changing Address Book Default Columns
How can the Address Book default columns be changed so users cannot view the alias? The full story:) In Outlook 98 Address Book, the 'alias field' is visible to users (if they maximise window or scroll right). Our NT Username = user's unique staff number = mailbox alias. Seemed a good idea, allows direct mail to staff numberwithout an extra process. Very useful...but some users have complained to HR director at this personal info being easily available to all other staff. We're Exch 5.5 SP4, clients using mostly Outlook 98. You can: add/remove columns displayed in ExchAdmin View of recipients (via View/Columns). or change fields/layout of the Mailbox Properties Window displayed in Address Book. (via ExchAdmin Config/Addressing Templates/Details -Mailbox) or Use 'Address Book Views' in ExchAdmin, but these seem to control 'sets of users displayed' (eg filtered so Group A cannot see Group B's details) and not which fields display. Removing/hiding an Address Book View field seems a simple requirement to my Director but we can't find how to do it. I've searched Help/TechNet/Web/Exchange Discussions Archive. Have I missed something obvious. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks Fiona -- ___ The information in this email and in any attachment(s) is commercial in confidence. If you are not the named addressee(s) or if you receive this email in error then any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately by email at [EMAIL PROTECTED], and then delete this message from your computer. While attachments are virus checked, AWE plc does not accept any liability in respect of any virus which is not detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5.5)
Our law firm has a client that would like to have the e-mail exchange encrypted. We do not want to use digital certificates because of administration. I have heard that you can connect two seperate mail domains over the Internet securely with the Internet Mail Service. Is this correct? How is it done? What type of encryption is used? Does IIS have to be on both Exchange servers? Exchange serveres are not in the same domain. Any help would be appreciatted. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Private IS corruption...
Hi everybody! My Private Information Store was corrupted by a RAID array problem. I have repaired the drive array, and restored my last backup of the IS, however, the IS corruption persists. I get -1018 errors, and Outlook clients have periodic troubles moving or deleting messages. I have tried ESEUTIL and ISINTEG, but they fail with JetDatabase read/verify errors. I have tried everything to repair this IS and admit defeat. I have one idea on how to work around this and would like your input/opinion of this idea. I propose to: 1) set up a temporary Exchange server in the same site 2) move the mailboxes to the new server 3) delete the corrupted PRIV.EDB from the original server and let the system create a fresh one 4) move the Mailboxes back to the original server/fresh IS 5) take down the temporary server Do you think that will work? and/or can you think of anything else to do? Thanks, Rob Ayers _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
orphaned .ost files
What utilitie or procedure can be used to extract mailbox data from an orphaned .ost file to a new mailbox? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Test
Test _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NDR that I've never seen before
I attempted to send an email this recipient and received the following NDR. Although it's clearly a 550 relay error from their server, the other parts like does not like recipient and giving up I have never seen before. Just wondering if this is common and I've just missed it. Thanks. This message could not be delivered to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 216.242.209.191 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied Giving up. David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Private IS corruption...
Slow down cowboy! When you first got the -1018 pop up, what was going on in the Application log? It's possible you just needed to patch the database. Check your logs and report back. Eric On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:03:11 -0500, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody! My Private Information Store was corrupted by a RAID array problem. I have repaired the drive array, and restored my last backup of the IS, however, the IS corruption persists. I get -1018 errors, and Outlook clients have periodic troubles moving or deleting messages. I have tried ESEUTIL and ISINTEG, but they fail with JetDatabase read/verify errors. I have tried everything to repair this IS and admit defeat. I have one idea on how to work around this and would like your input/opinion of this idea. I propose to: 1) set up a temporary Exchange server in the same site 2) move the mailboxes to the new server 3) delete the corrupted PRIV.EDB from the original server and let the system create a fresh one 4) move the Mailboxes back to the original server/fresh IS 5) take down the temporary server Do you think that will work? and/or can you think of anything else to do? Thanks, Rob Ayers _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: orphaned .ost files
It's encrypted with a key pair. The key resides in the profile in the registry. Are you saying the profile AND the mailbox have both been deleted? Eric On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:11:43 -0500, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What utilitie or procedure can be used to extract mailbox data from an orphaned .ost file to a new mailbox? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
F -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Test _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR that I've never seen before
You can configure the text for SMTP responses. Some SMTP servers allow you to do that, and I believe it's possible in E2K using protocol events. Does anyone know if it can be done in 5.5? S. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR that I've never seen before I attempted to send an email this recipient and received the following NDR. Although it's clearly a 550 relay error from their server, the other parts like does not like recipient and giving up I have never seen before. Just wondering if this is common and I've just missed it. Thanks. This message could not be delivered to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 216.242.209.191 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied Giving up. David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR that I've never seen before
I don't believe it can be done in 5.5. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? Well, I think so Brain, but what if we stick to the seat covers? - -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR that I've never seen before You can configure the text for SMTP responses. Some SMTP servers allow you to do that, and I believe it's possible in E2K using protocol events. Does anyone know if it can be done in 5.5? S. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR that I've never seen before I attempted to send an email this recipient and received the following NDR. Although it's clearly a 550 relay error from their server, the other parts like does not like recipient and giving up I have never seen before. Just wondering if this is common and I've just missed it. Thanks. This message could not be delivered to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 216.242.209.191 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied Giving up. David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem
Ugh, are you serious? Static mappings in WINS are EVIL. Besides, DNS is where most of these problems are. Outlook uses DNS to resolve the Exchange server, not WINS. If Outlook is slugglish, putting static entries in WINS won't do anything to resolve the problem. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Make sure you have WINS available for resolution and static mappings for your mail servers. I no MS says win2k does not need wins but as many have found out, that turining off wins causes many problems. I have directly discovered problems with Outlook over VPN when not using the wins service. -TOny -Original Message- From: McKnight, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem We had a similar deal on several 9x machines after moving to a new (5.5 in our case) server and it was simply that the new exchange server didn't have a DNS entry.. we added this and it immediately fixed it for all of these machines so you might try looking into a DNS, hosts file solution.. but again this was on and NT4/exch 5.5 setup so I may be way off.. Charles Charles F. McKnight PC/Lan Specialist Mercy Health System - NWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Hello Folks, This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try here first. We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our migration. We installed the E2K server in the same site and moved all the mailboxes to the new server. We setup our cc:Mail connector and SMTP connector on the new server and disabled the old ones. Despite a few bumps it is working fairly well. We have a mixture of Windows 2000, NT 4.0, 98, and one ME client all using Outlook 2000. Everybody connects fine on the LAN. Some clients connect to the LAN via a VPN connection. All Windows 2000 clients connecting this way work fine. The Windows 98 and one ME client do not. When starting Outlook these clients just hang forever. When looking at the profile we see that the server name has been automatically switched as usual. However, if we rebuild the profile and try to resolve the mailbox name, that too hangs forever. If we create a mailbox on the Exchange 5.5 server and try to resolve that it all works fine. Any attempt to contact the Exchange 2000 server instead results in the process hanging - only on 98 and ME. Win2K works fine. We can map shares, ping, and do all kinds of other network things from these Windows-98 clients via VPN to the Exchange 2000 server. The connectivity seems to be there. We have tested with RPCPing and so on as well and that all works. I can't figure out what VPN would have to do with it and why it works fine for Windows 2000 clients. All work fine on the LAN. We have only seen this problem with VPN and only to the Exchange 2000 server - not the Exchange 5.5 Server. We also tried installing the Active Directory client add-on for Windows 9x (DSCLIENT) and that didn't fix it either. Any thoughts? Thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Private IS corruption...
How about calling PSS? They are supposed to be pretty good at fixing problemsIt may or may not produce a quicker result, but I'm betting you would be able to get some first-hand instruction on using some of the repair utilities. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Robert Ayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Private IS corruption... Hi everybody! My Private Information Store was corrupted by a RAID array problem. I have repaired the drive array, and restored my last backup of the IS, however, the IS corruption persists. I get -1018 errors, and Outlook clients have periodic troubles moving or deleting messages. I have tried ESEUTIL and ISINTEG, but they fail with JetDatabase read/verify errors. I have tried everything to repair this IS and admit defeat. I have one idea on how to work around this and would like your input/opinion of this idea. I propose to: 1) set up a temporary Exchange server in the same site 2) move the mailboxes to the new server 3) delete the corrupted PRIV.EDB from the original server and let the system create a fresh one 4) move the Mailboxes back to the original server/fresh IS 5) take down the temporary server Do you think that will work? and/or can you think of anything else to do? Thanks, Rob Ayers _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Private IS corruption...
I would suspect that the Move Mailbox will fail on the mailboxes that the users are having trouble with. For those, you may try using ExMerge. Really though, call PSS. You won't regret it. S. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private IS corruption... How about calling PSS? They are supposed to be pretty good at fixing problemsIt may or may not produce a quicker result, but I'm betting you would be able to get some first-hand instruction on using some of the repair utilities. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Robert Ayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Private IS corruption... Hi everybody! My Private Information Store was corrupted by a RAID array problem. I have repaired the drive array, and restored my last backup of the IS, however, the IS corruption persists. I get -1018 errors, and Outlook clients have periodic troubles moving or deleting messages. I have tried ESEUTIL and ISINTEG, but they fail with JetDatabase read/verify errors. I have tried everything to repair this IS and admit defeat. I have one idea on how to work around this and would like your input/opinion of this idea. I propose to: 1) set up a temporary Exchange server in the same site 2) move the mailboxes to the new server 3) delete the corrupted PRIV.EDB from the original server and let the system create a fresh one 4) move the Mailboxes back to the original server/fresh IS 5) take down the temporary server Do you think that will work? and/or can you think of anything else to do? Thanks, Rob Ayers _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR that I've never seen before
If anyone finds a way, let me know because I want my Exchange server to say And then... instead of CR LF (Dude Where's My Car RULES!) Eric On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:18:10 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can configure the text for SMTP responses. Some SMTP servers allow you to do that, and I believe it's possible in E2K using protocol events. Does anyone know if it can be done in 5.5? S. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR that I've never seen before I attempted to send an email this recipient and received the following NDR. Although it's clearly a 550 relay error from their server, the other parts like does not like recipient and giving up I have never seen before. Just wondering if this is common and I've just missed it. Thanks. This message could not be delivered to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 216.242.209.191 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied Giving up. David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 installation problem
Are there any anti=virus programs running on the server? If so stop them and re-try. Eric On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 21:16:47 +0100 , Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At the moment, I'm trying to add another server on the same subnet across a 100mb switched LAN The connection between sites will be 512k ADSL, but that's another issue At the moment, I just need to be able to add a server in any way possible, or extract the mailboxes so I can start again -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2001 19:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 installation problem What bandwidth do you have between the remote offices and the main site? An Exchange 5.5 site is called a site for a reason. Intra-site communication is intensive and requires a nice pipe. Eric On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:39:57 +0100 , Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi We have a single Site/Server setup currently, and are looking to add some additional servers to the site, to be based at remote offices. Problem is, we cant get a successful installation. It always fails towards the end with the following message; some replication operations were not completed. directories will be updated during normal replication updatesetc Event viewer says; Unexpected error 0xc004 - Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists. MAPI was unable to load the information service emsabp.dll. Be sure the service is correctly installed and configured. Microsoft Exchange Address Book ID no: 00040380-- occurred. I've run a search on the drives on the Exchange Server, and cant find that file at all. I've checked both the Directory and Directory Synch Services are running, but none made a difference. Name resolution is handled by WINS, and seems fine. I can ping back and forwards between the servers using their Netbios names and IP adds, I have tried the rpcpings programme, and all seems well, and I have checked the relevant technet documents relating to this error. I've had a similar errors on one installation, which instructed me to Check Knowledge Consistency on the Directory service, which said it found errors, and corrected them. I've just applied SP3, which made no difference. A few weeks ago we were forced to change the admin password (which is also the service account password for exchange) although we updated all the services (but nothing else) and all seemed well. Exchange itself seems to work fine. I've considered using Exmerge off the reskit to export all the mailboxes top PST, and start afresh, but it keeps telling me it doesn't have permission to access the message store (MSEMS) I'm pretty sure Ive checked all the permissions tabs, and all seems well. I'm getting kind of desperate now, and need some kind of solution, no matter how long winded it might seem, regarding re-installs etc. Regards Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook web access
Mahesh, FYI, PSS recommended reregistering the cdo.dll and cdohtml.dll on these IIS servers. Right now we are monitoring them to see if that helped or not. S./ -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook web access Ok. We are having the exact same problem and I've been trying to figure it out, too. We have a very similar setup. OWA5.5 SP4 running on W2K SP2 and separate Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers running also on W2K SP2. So, it's not a W2K to NT4.0 issue. Here's what we've discovered so far: 1. We have noticed that this ALWAYS happens after network outages/hiccups. For example, if the switch that is connected to the backbone where the Exchange Servers run is rebooted, all OWA servers start exhibiting this behavior. 2. IIS and ASP engine still work when this problem happens. I wrote some test ASPs and put them in the same vroot and they function just fine. 3. Restarting the WWW service clears the error. 4. The problem started happening only after we deployed OWA5.5 on W2K. Never an issue with OWA5.5 on NT4.0. 5. The cannot connect to Exchange Server xxx error is for the initial connection of OWA (the server name you provide when you run OWA setup), not necessarily the server that hosts the mailbox. 6. Found the following Q articles on this topic, but haven't had a chance to go through them yet: Q176240, Q247085, Q178511. I doubt it's the last one since that would cause a permanent problem, not an intermittent one. 7. While the problem is happening, name resolution works fine both ways between the OWA and Exchange servers. Serdar Soysal Technical Specialist Electronic Messaging Group Kmart Corporation -Original Message- From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook web access Nothing changed. I think that maybe there are some sort of connections or sessions that owa opens and never closes but i can't find any. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 8:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook web access ok, now we're gettin' somewhere. This makes me think that it isn't individual users, but the OWA server itself. Has anything changed? Did the Exchange server change? Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net I am darn unsatisfied to be killed in this way. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mahesh Bharatsingh Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook web access Yes, if clients can't connect to owa, because the owa server Failed to connect to the mailserver, we are able to ping the server. We also can browse the default website, IIS keeps on running. The problem occurs when owa tries to open a mailbox. Before owa tries to open a mailbox, the user must be validated by a PDC or BDC. The same credentials are used to open a mailbox. When the owa server can't connect ot the mailserver, the users are still able to be validated, there are no problems there. After validation, the owa service tries to connect to a exchange server and can't. Mahesh -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook web access maybe, although I've not heard of DNS errors that get worse. When Exchange locks, can you still ping the actual server? Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net He was a wise man who invented beer. --Plato -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mahesh Bharatsingh Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook web access Not at all. The processor is being used for about 10% at the most and with memory no problems also. I have a DNS server in the network. Could there be a problem with DNS? Mahesh -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook web access Do you have DNS or WINS running at all? it sounds to me like that's a memory leak or something -- does the processor or RAM become completely used up? Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5.5)
I always love seeing the messages Management has decided they want a system to do extended foo. But they don't want to spend any money on foo management or foo tools. What can we get? I know it isnt totally the admins fault they get put in these situations, but rather stupid managers who think they can ask for anything without spending money on it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Barry Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5.5) They don't want to spend the money and they don't need full access to all resources. I am getting some sporadic info that it can be done with the Internet Mail Service but IIS has to be installed and a Key has to be generated for each server. I am looking for some concrete info on how it can be done or if it can. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5.5)
Are you talking about Q174754? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5.5) Our law firm has a client that would like to have the e-mail exchange encrypted. We do not want to use digital certificates because of administration. I have heard that you can connect two seperate mail domains over the Internet securely with the Internet Mail Service. Is this correct? How is it done? What type of encryption is used? Does IIS have to be on both Exchange servers? Exchange serveres are not in the same domain. Any help would be appreciatted. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: third party client can't send email to external address!?
If it works internally, check relay settings. -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2001 7:57 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: third party client can't send email to external address!? Hi, We have an Exchange 5.5 and Microsoft Outlook as a client. We have a couple of users that uses Purchasing Net on their PC . This software has the ability to send out an email directly to our exchange server , then our email server should take care of the rest. It works internally ,but externally it doesn't . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem
one other thing that I know we had run into here a long while ago was the issue of the RPC binding order on machines causing clients to hang on launch.. I can't remember the QFile right now but the key name is HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider and the Value to look at is Rpc_Binding_Order in which we would sometimes have ipx and spx ahead of tcp and rpc when our Exhange server had no ipx or spx bindings.. I suppose as a long shot you could check this on those machines but again since it's just over the VPN connection I don't know if this would be a solution or not... again my experience is completely with Exch 5.5/NT 4 so use at your own risk and remember editing the registry could cause temporary blindness, premature baldness and severe cases of depression... ;) Charles Charles F. McKnight PC/Lan Specialist Mercy Health System - NWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Folks, Thanks for all the suggestions. The client is a Microsoft VPN PPTP connection. We have verified the DNS and WINS settings are correct on both servers (Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000). We have verified the DNS and WINS settings on the client after the VPN connection comes up. We can from the client: ping e55.domain.com successfully (e55 = exchange 5.5 server) ping e55 successfully ping e2k.domain.com successfully (e2k = exchange 2000 server) ping e2k successfully RPingc e2k Rping successfully RPingc e2k Store successfully Rpingc ek2 Admin successfully ping ad.domain.comsuccessfully (ad = active domain controller) ping ad successfully If I point the Windows-98 profile at the e55 server, the profile is automagically updated to point to the e2k server but then it hangs. It hangs forever by the way. I noticed that the registry entry in the profile on a Windows 2000 box gets updated to point to ad.domain.com (the 01e6602 string value in the \dca740c8c042101ab4b908002b2fe182 key) like it is supposed to but this isn't happening on the VPN 98 box. I tried adding the value with no such luck. I follow the logic and I keep thinking name resolution problem but when I try all the above it doesn't make sense. Michael -Original Message- From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Hello Folks, This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try here first. We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our migration. We installed the E2K server in the same site and moved all the mailboxes to the new server. We setup our cc:Mail connector and SMTP connector on the new server and disabled the old ones. Despite a few bumps it is working fairly well. We have a mixture of Windows 2000, NT 4.0, 98, and one ME client all using Outlook 2000. Everybody connects fine on the LAN. Some clients connect to the LAN via a VPN connection. All Windows 2000 clients connecting this way work fine. The Windows 98 and one ME client do not. When starting Outlook these clients just hang forever. When looking at the profile we see that the server name has been automatically switched as usual. However, if we rebuild the profile and try to resolve the mailbox name, that too hangs forever. If we create a mailbox on the Exchange 5.5 server and try to resolve that it all works fine. Any attempt to contact the Exchange 2000 server instead results in the process hanging - only on 98 and ME. Win2K works fine. We can map shares, ping, and do all kinds of other network things from these Windows-98 clients via VPN to the Exchange 2000 server. The connectivity seems to be there. We have tested with RPCPing and so on as well and that all works. I can't figure out what VPN would have to do with it and why it works fine for Windows 2000 clients. All work fine on the LAN. We have only seen this problem with VPN and only to the Exchange 2000 server - not the Exchange 5.5 Server. We also tried installing the Active Directory client add-on for Windows 9x (DSCLIENT) and that didn't fix it either. Any thoughts? Thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem
Ben, Try this for size. At one company I used to work for they had a WINS failure and had to reregister everything in WINS. In order to be proactive for any future WINS failures, they put static entries for all NT servers in DNS (about 350+ servers). Oh, I forgot to mention that as a second precautionary measure, they also created static WINS entries for all NT servers as well. They thought that importing the static WINS entries was a very rapid way of recovery. How do you like that? What a nightmare! I hear that they have a lot of NETLOGON problems these days. S. I see stupid people... ...they're everywhere... they walk around like everyone else ...they don't even know that they're dumb. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Static mappings in WINS should really only be used for non-Windows based servers (i.e. Unix-based) that for some reason, you need to resolve to their netbios names. I'm not arguing that WINS is bad or that you shouldn't use it, but for goodness sakes, don't put static WINS mappings in for Windows-based computers. You're just asking for problems. What are you going to do if you ever have to change the IP of some of the servers that have static mappings? Guess what, you just introduced some corruption into your WINS database. BELIEVE me, we have been dealing with crap like this for a while as a result of past mistakes. I haven't been deeply involved, but those that are doing the cleanup have said that it is a nightmare. Spare yourself while you still can. I am sure there have got to be some Q articles that detail why you don't use static mappings (except on Unix-based systems), but I don't have the time right now to look them up. Maybe I will another day. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Actually just restarting wins allowed my VPN Outlook user to connect to exchange where before when wins was stopped, they could not. Though my locl Outlook users were not effected at all, so it must have something to do with the VPN equation. Oh well it works great now, so I will leave wins in place. Also, why are static WINS mappings so evil if their mapped for a statically IP'd server. Just wondering, because I have never heard this, but I owuld like to know why? -TOny -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Ugh, are you serious? Static mappings in WINS are EVIL. Besides, DNS is where most of these problems are. Outlook uses DNS to resolve the Exchange server, not WINS. If Outlook is slugglish, putting static entries in WINS won't do anything to resolve the problem. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Make sure you have WINS available for resolution and static mappings for your mail servers. I no MS says win2k does not need wins but as many have found out, that turining off wins causes many problems. I have directly discovered problems with Outlook over VPN when not using the wins service. -TOny -Original Message- From: McKnight, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem We had a similar deal on several 9x machines after moving to a new (5.5 in our case) server and it was simply that the new exchange server didn't have a DNS entry.. we added this and it immediately fixed it for all of these machines so you might try looking into a DNS, hosts file solution.. but again this was on and NT4/exch 5.5 setup so I may be way off.. Charles Charles F. McKnight PC/Lan Specialist Mercy Health System - NWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Hello Folks, This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try here first. We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our migration. We installed the E2K server in the same site and moved all the mailboxes to the new server. We setup our cc:Mail connector and SMTP connector on the new
RE: NDR that I've never seen before
and then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR that I've never seen before If anyone finds a way, let me know because I want my Exchange server to say And then... instead of CR LF (Dude Where's My Car RULES!) Eric On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:18:10 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can configure the text for SMTP responses. Some SMTP servers allow you to do that, and I believe it's possible in E2K using protocol events. Does anyone know if it can be done in 5.5? S. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR that I've never seen before I attempted to send an email this recipient and received the following NDR. Although it's clearly a 550 relay error from their server, the other parts like does not like recipient and giving up I have never seen before. Just wondering if this is common and I've just missed it. Thanks. This message could not be delivered to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 216.242.209.191 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied Giving up. David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5.5)
Yes. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5.5)
Cool -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Barry Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5.5) Yes. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5 .5)
If you're using the web interface to access this list, please be sure to click the box/button/whatever that includes the original message text. Thanks! -Original Message- From: James Barry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5.5) Yes. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5.5)
Have you ever done this? Have you ever worked with ESMTP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR that I've never seen before
eric: SMTP 250-NO AND THEN On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:22:24 -0500 , Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR that I've never seen before If anyone finds a way, let me know because I want my Exchange server to say And then... instead of CR LF (Dude Where's My Car RULES!) Eric On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:18:10 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can configure the text for SMTP responses. Some SMTP servers allow you to do that, and I believe it's possible in E2K using protocol events. Does anyone know if it can be done in 5.5? S. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR that I've never seen before I attempted to send an email this recipient and received the following NDR. Although it's clearly a 550 relay error from their server, the other parts like does not like recipient and giving up I have never seen before. Just wondering if this is common and I've just missed it. Thanks. This message could not be delivered to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 216.242.209.191 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied Giving up. David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR that I've never seen before
The text is for human consumption... The only relavent bit is 550. I know of one server which answers 550 fsck off spammer. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR that I've never seen before I attempted to send an email this recipient and received the following NDR. Although it's clearly a 550 relay error from their server, the other parts like does not like recipient and giving up I have never seen before. Just wondering if this is common and I've just missed it. Thanks. This message could not be delivered to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 216.242.209.191 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied Giving up. David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x400 Connector
Hi all, Whilst on the x.400 connector theme, is it required within a small LAN environment ? I have Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on an NT4 box with clients from a mixed bag of Outlook 2k and 98. I use the IMS to connect to the internet (via a Linux box). I did have another Exchange server running within the same site, but since removing it, the event log generates MTA errors and x400 related errors. TIA. Tim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: x400 Connector
You probably don't need the x.400 connector; you probably don't even have it installed. But the x.400 errors can show up because all Exchange objects have an x.400 address even without the connector installed (it's needed for internal routing). If you would like assistance with your MTA errors post the exact error to the list. Scott. -Original Message- From: Tim John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: x400 Connector Hi all, Whilst on the x.400 connector theme, is it required within a small LAN environment ? I have Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on an NT4 box with clients from a mixed bag of Outlook 2k and 98. I use the IMS to connect to the internet (via a Linux box). I did have another Exchange server running within the same site, but since removing it, the event log generates MTA errors and x400 related errors. TIA. Tim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Internet Mail Service requires DNS domain name........... ....
Have Done - Still doing it! -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2001 11:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The Internet Mail Service requires DNS domain name... In network control panel, click on the protocols. Double-click on TCP/IP to get to the properties page. Enter the domain name there. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The Internet Mail Service requires DNS domain name... Sorry - This is fro 2K wint 5.5 I have nt4.0 and 5.5! Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2001 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The Internet Mail Service requires DNS domain name... Q247063 Hi, I am trying to add and Internet Main Connection, but I am getting the following message: The Internet Mail Service requires DNS domain name to be configured on 'Servername'. To configure the domain name, use the network icon in the control panel on 'servername', or select another server? What is going on? It all looks ok? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem
Thanks for the response Ben, and I see your point to be very valid. I guess their is no real reason to have the static mappings, only that I did it as a precautionary measure. Since this action could pose to be my downfall, maybe I will just let windows do it's own thing with wins. Thanks again, TOny -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Static mappings in WINS should really only be used for non-Windows based servers (i.e. Unix-based) that for some reason, you need to resolve to their netbios names. I'm not arguing that WINS is bad or that you shouldn't use it, but for goodness sakes, don't put static WINS mappings in for Windows-based computers. You're just asking for problems. What are you going to do if you ever have to change the IP of some of the servers that have static mappings? Guess what, you just introduced some corruption into your WINS database. BELIEVE me, we have been dealing with crap like this for a while as a result of past mistakes. I haven't been deeply involved, but those that are doing the cleanup have said that it is a nightmare. Spare yourself while you still can. I am sure there have got to be some Q articles that detail why you don't use static mappings (except on Unix-based systems), but I don't have the time right now to look them up. Maybe I will another day. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Actually just restarting wins allowed my VPN Outlook user to connect to exchange where before when wins was stopped, they could not. Though my locl Outlook users were not effected at all, so it must have something to do with the VPN equation. Oh well it works great now, so I will leave wins in place. Also, why are static WINS mappings so evil if their mapped for a statically IP'd server. Just wondering, because I have never heard this, but I owuld like to know why? -TOny -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Ugh, are you serious? Static mappings in WINS are EVIL. Besides, DNS is where most of these problems are. Outlook uses DNS to resolve the Exchange server, not WINS. If Outlook is slugglish, putting static entries in WINS won't do anything to resolve the problem. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Make sure you have WINS available for resolution and static mappings for your mail servers. I no MS says win2k does not need wins but as many have found out, that turining off wins causes many problems. I have directly discovered problems with Outlook over VPN when not using the wins service. -TOny -Original Message- From: McKnight, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem We had a similar deal on several 9x machines after moving to a new (5.5 in our case) server and it was simply that the new exchange server didn't have a DNS entry.. we added this and it immediately fixed it for all of these machines so you might try looking into a DNS, hosts file solution.. but again this was on and NT4/exch 5.5 setup so I may be way off.. Charles Charles F. McKnight PC/Lan Specialist Mercy Health System - NWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Hello Folks, This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try here first. We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our migration. We installed the E2K server in the same site and moved all the mailboxes to the new server. We setup our cc:Mail connector and SMTP connector on the new server and disabled the old ones. Despite a few bumps it is working fairly well. We have a mixture of Windows 2000, NT 4.0, 98, and one ME client all using Outlook 2000. Everybody connects fine on the LAN. Some clients connect to the LAN via a VPN connection. All Windows 2000 clients connecting this way work fine. The Windows 98 and one ME client do not. When starting Outlook these
Send mail to multiple distribution lists
Exchange 5.5 SP4 A custom recipient is a member of DL1 and a member of DL2. If I send a message to both DL1 and DL2, the custom recipient would receive two copies of the message. Other non-custom recipients (Mailboxes) just receive one copy. I want the custom recipient being able to receive only one copy of message when sending to multiple distribution lists. Is there a fix for this? Thanks, Phillip Yan PMC-Sierra _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Appending messages in Exchange 2000
I have searched extensively to try and find a solution to appending messages to the end of an out going email in Exchange 2000. Everything I find seems to indicate that a person needs to be a programmer to edit SMTP files just to append a message. (Exchange 5.5 offered a registry hack, although this should not be necessary, but 2000 does not seem to that forgiving). A progammer I am not nor does my company have an inventory of developement packages. Does someone know of a third party package or script that can aid in this dilemma. Thank you for any help that can be given. Dave Seier _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
inbound message crashed IMC and Information Store
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a Today the IMS on one of our Exchange servers puked. It seems that a malformed incoming message caused the IMS to die, in turn causing the Information Store to die. My users started having problems connecting to the server, so I looked in the event log and found the following errors (see below). Rebooting the box took care of the problem and now it's happy, but I'd like to get a better idea of what happened - especially because this exact scenario happened on another of our Exchange servers about a week ago. Article #Q293288 in the MS KB seems to describe exactly what happened. But, article #Q278320 indicates that this problem was fixed in SP4, which we have. (I also checked the version #'s for the pertinent files, and they are definitely all at SP4.) I've poked around in various newsgroups and the knowledge base and haven't found anything helpful. I realise that this isn't much information to go on. If anyone has any insights, I would be very grateful. Or, if you happen to know which utility is used to look at messages in the BAD folder, that would be great. -Kirsten Petersen Event ID: 4182 An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. As a result, the message in spool file PKLPP9YR will be retried when the server is restarted. Event ID: 3039 The error 0x80040115 was encountered while trying to communicate with the message store. An attempt to refresh the connection will be made. If not successful, the service will be shut down. Event ID: 4116 An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered. The message will be moved to the BAD folder, if possible, and the error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to the BAD folder. Event ID: 4094 The error 0x8004011d occurred while trying to refresh network connections to the Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. Event ID: 4102 A serious error has occurred while trying to send mail into the Exchange Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. Event ID: 270 A permanent error has occurred with Entity blah blah blah...=MICROSOFT PRIVATE MDB. Entity is a Message Object is a Normal Priority Message. Object: 0600015E. Message ID: blah blah blah ... Content length: 4767, External Trace information (first 100 bytes) = blah blah blah..., PDU dump reference 250 [MTA SUBMIT 17 74] (14) Event ID: 4182 An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. As a result, the message in spool file PKLPP9YS will be retried when the server is restarted. Event ID: 3039 The error 0x80040115 was encountered while trying to communicate with the message store. An attempt to refresh the connection will be made. If not successful, the service will be shut down. Event ID: 7 An unexpected error [0x80040115] occurred in maintenance thread. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2K OWA question
Hi all, Forgive me if this has been answered in the past but I can't seem to find it in the FAQ's, Microsoft Tech Database, or anyplace else for that matter! I've just finished (?) rolling out a brand new W2K server farm with Exchange 2K server and Outlook Web Access as the remote mail client. After the normal growing pains and bugs things are working well with only 2 OWA quirks. First is that when you look up an address in the Address Book (or the To button) and search on the Company field it truncates the list to the first 100 users. I can find no way to increase this to show all my users. The other problem is that the list is default sorted in what appears to be Email name order and not the user's last name. I assume that this info comes from the Active Directory Store? BTW, Outlook Express and Outlook 2K clients work just fine. Any help would be much appreciated! Bob Kersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tech Coordinator Iroquois Central School District .+-¦-xm¶ÿà ,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\ öªÙÈb½ë!¶Úÿ 0³ §ÊþÈzÇȱæ«r¬¥:.˱Êâmé[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÙ¢Ì2G(
