RE: Exchange Redundancy
Clustering won't help you if your problem is an EDB problem. But, clustering will help you if (like your original request) you desire redundancy for the server, the Windows OS, and all processes and services running on that server. If you have problems with services stopping, Dr. Watson or Blue Screens or even intermittent hardware failures, the passive server will fail over and start your virtual Exchange server on the other hardware. We don't have many problems at all with Exchange or hardware, but where clustering is really advantageous is when you have to do MAINTENANCE - such as applying security hotfixes, service packs, or if you're having problems with a stuck service that requires a reboot. Trigger the servers to failover and you've got the machine to yourself. Failovers typically take about 30 seconds. During that time Outlook will appear to hang, but then (I always recommend Outlook 2002) it will reconnect to the other server and continue normally. The cluster manager will also attempt to start services when they've gone down before they failover - if that's what you want it to do. So, it's pretty flexible and does a lot for uptime and customer satisfaction. Bryan -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy I didn't even want to go down that path, but you're correct. You don't need clustering if you use good quality hardware and proactive monitoring. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy And even if/when you do failover, like when it takes the Trend service a couple cpu cycles too long to start back up when you're forcing a pattern update for klez, your users will still almost definitely notice the failure, and you will still get people calling the help desk to ask why. It's not seamless, and in most cases not necessary anyway. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy It's still called clustering. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Redundancy Having just had our sole Exchange server go down, is there a way of having a redundant server (or load balancing) that is an exact replicar (in terms of user mailboxes etc..)? Basically i am after failover redundacy, so that if one server goes down it will not effect users abilities to send and recive mail. - Is this practical? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustered Environment
Our University has about 13,000 students and 2500 faculty/staff. We run an Exchange 2000 cluster on two quad Dells (700Mhz Zeon) on the back end and two 1-U Dell web servers for OWA. CLARiiON SAN for disk storage. Active Directory is on two separate domain controllers. Students use OWA, faculty/staff use a combination of Outlook 2002 or POP3/IMAP clients while on campus, OWA off. If you follow the sizing guidelines, you may be surprised. But we checked with several other universities roughly the same size and they run comfortably with this same configuration. Clustering is great for maintenance and reliability. We don't have to wait for 4:00am Sunday morning to apply security hotfixes, etc. Bryan Schneider MN State University, Mankato -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustered Environment We are running an active/active cluster. Right now, we are having problems with Trendmicro Antivirus software not releasing the cluster resources but we are working to resolve this. Other than that it has been stable. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustered Environment Everyone, I was curious as to how many of you run Exchange2000 in a clustered environment and briefly your hardware specs and user population? Rick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
a1. admin.exe /i a2. ADSI a3. Sure, what's our budget. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forests prep domain prep
Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Migration woes...
I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forests prep domain prep
No, can't install exchange until these are run in your AD forest/domain. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forests prep domain prep Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Umm sorry.. a1)...she not work for me a2) unfamiliar with this...could you give me a clue on it a3) Ummm this sound like it's not really possible..simply... Are we saying here that this does not exist in standard exch55? that's about where it seems we're at.. thx bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. admin.exe /i a2. ADSI a3. Sure, what's our budget. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forests prep domain prep
Sure. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forests prep domain prep Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Migration woes...
Is that the case? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Forests prep domain prep
OK so if I successfully installed exchange these ran automatically!! -Original Message- From: Schneider, Bryan D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep No, can't install exchange until these are run in your AD forest/domain. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forests prep domain prep Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forests prep domain prep
Thanks Chris can I email you off list? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep Sure. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forests prep domain prep Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forests prep domain prep
If you don't run them prior to the Exchange setup, they do run automatically in the background. That's probably why your Exchange install took such a long time. In larger forests where you have multiple domains/trees, it is a better idea to run forestprep and wait a while until schema changes are replicated to all DCs and then run domainprep and Exchange server setup. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep OK so if I successfully installed exchange these ran automatically!! -Original Message- From: Schneider, Bryan D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep No, can't install exchange until these are run in your AD forest/domain. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forests prep domain prep Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
a1. Works for me given the proper header fields and a few minutes in excel. a2. http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/howitworks/activedirectory/ads ilinks.asp (link wrap and all that) a3. Bummer, no pizza for me this weekend. a4. Use templates to create users. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? Umm sorry.. a1)...she not work for me a2) unfamiliar with this...could you give me a clue on it a3) Ummm this sound like it's not really possible..simply... Are we saying here that this does not exist in standard exch55? that's about where it seems we're at.. thx bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. admin.exe /i a2. ADSI a3. Sure, what's our budget. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forests prep domain prep
Sure. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep Thanks Chris can I email you off list? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep Sure. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forests prep domain prep Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forests prep domain prep
OK, here's what I'm trying to do. Installed win 2k advance server sp2. Exchange ENT 2k sp2. Went through a process of setting up Mutliple Domains this exchange server will handle. Set up separate OU's and groups (user and admin) for each OU. Deleted global Address list and created address lists for each OU. I set the Msquerydatadn advanced options to each OU. When I look in the address Global list for each domain..there is nothing in there. I can connect via OWA and use mail server for each OU. But I cannot connect using outlook. Comes back and says could not resolve name..because there are no names in address global list for each OU??? What did I miss or screw up?!! -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep If you don't run them prior to the Exchange setup, they do run automatically in the background. That's probably why your Exchange install took such a long time. In larger forests where you have multiple domains/trees, it is a better idea to run forestprep and wait a while until schema changes are replicated to all DCs and then run domainprep and Exchange server setup. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep OK so if I successfully installed exchange these ran automatically!! -Original Message- From: Schneider, Bryan D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep No, can't install exchange until these are run in your AD forest/domain. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forests prep domain prep Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Redundancy
This however does not help you one whit if the MAINTENANCE required is Exchange maintenance. -Original Message- From: Schneider, Bryan D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy Clustering won't help you if your problem is an EDB problem. But, clustering will help you if (like your original request) you desire redundancy for the server, the Windows OS, and all processes and services running on that server. If you have problems with services stopping, Dr. Watson or Blue Screens or even intermittent hardware failures, the passive server will fail over and start your virtual Exchange server on the other hardware. We don't have many problems at all with Exchange or hardware, but where clustering is really advantageous is when you have to do MAINTENANCE - such as applying security hotfixes, service packs, or if you're having problems with a stuck service that requires a reboot. Trigger the servers to failover and you've got the machine to yourself. Failovers typically take about 30 seconds. During that time Outlook will appear to hang, but then (I always recommend Outlook 2002) it will reconnect to the other server and continue normally. The cluster manager will also attempt to start services when they've gone down before they failover - if that's what you want it to do. So, it's pretty flexible and does a lot for uptime and customer satisfaction. Bryan -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy I didn't even want to go down that path, but you're correct. You don't need clustering if you use good quality hardware and proactive monitoring. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy And even if/when you do failover, like when it takes the Trend service a couple cpu cycles too long to start back up when you're forcing a pattern update for klez, your users will still almost definitely notice the failure, and you will still get people calling the help desk to ask why. It's not seamless, and in most cases not necessary anyway. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy It's still called clustering. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Redundancy Having just had our sole Exchange server go down, is there a way of having a redundant server (or load balancing) that is an exact replicar (in terms of user mailboxes etc..)? Basically i am after failover redundacy, so that if one server goes down it will not effect users abilities to send and recive mail. - Is this practical? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
Anyone have any preferences for mail exchangers which run on the Windows NT 4.x platform? I am aware of XMail, but woould like some other options if you have them. Thanks. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: upgrading to the ESE engine with Trend
I did an upgrade of 20 servers in the last couple of weeks. I went from 3.52 - 3.8 without any problems with the upgrade. The key is you have to disable the attachment blocking fist before the upgrade. -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: upgrading to the ESE engine with Trend Thanks John for the info.. I did see something on Trend's website about the NON-ability of an upgrade. You have to totally un-install (including deleting registry entries) the old program and then install the 3.8. dave -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: upgrading to the ESE engine with Trend I'm currently running 3.8 without any real problems. However, save out your attachment blocking list to a text file before starting the upgrade. On three separate machines, the UPGRADE method did not work and I ended up having to uninstall Trend before going up to the version 3.8. Also, check for service packs to Trend before starting it's use in production (there's at least one hotfix that was developed to fix problems with scheduled/manual scans). John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: upgrading to the ESE engine with Trend I am considering upgrading to Trend ScanMail 3.8 (w/ESE API) from 3.52 (AVAPI). I have researched deja with not much luck..I figured there would be much more infoalso the swynk faq found NO results...still haven't figured out those archives! My question is how many of you have made that upgrade and are satisfied? Is it worth the extra possible data corruption on our database? I see that there were some bugs when it first came out but surely that has been fixed with 3.8. Any input would be greatly appreciated. dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Migration woes...
I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended
RE: DL usage
I have a hidden user named DL Monitor, that I slip into DLs that might be, shall we say, underutilized. -Peter -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL usage What do you think is the best way to go about finding out if a DL is used anymore. We have a bunch of them and I am not going to email the owner. Any ideas? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: DL usage
or, add yourself to them and see if you get any mail...notify the owner that you're doing this From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/09 Thu PM 02:12:27 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DL usage I guess you could export them to a csv file and then remove them. Wait for the scream? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL usage What do you think is the best way to go about finding out if a DL is used anymore. We have a bunch of them and I am not going to email the owner. Any ideas? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
a1.) Ha. admin.exe extended switchesdoc/link on these?? pls? a2.) Thx! a3.) Pizza and beer... that's it for a custom app/interface? ummm maybe... a4.) Users already made...was thinking from a continuing maint/admin stand point. thx! bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. Works for me given the proper header fields and a few minutes in excel. a2. http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/howitworks/activedirectory/ads ilinks.asp (link wrap and all that) a3. Bummer, no pizza for me this weekend. a4. Use templates to create users. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? Umm sorry.. a1)...she not work for me a2) unfamiliar with this...could you give me a clue on it a3) Ummm this sound like it's not really possible..simply... Are we saying here that this does not exist in standard exch55? that's about where it seems we're at.. thx bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. admin.exe /i a2. ADSI a3. Sure, what's our budget. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL usage
I like it! -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL usage I have a hidden user named DL Monitor, that I slip into DLs that might be, shall we say, underutilized. -Peter -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL usage What do you think is the best way to go about finding out if a DL is used anymore. We have a bunch of them and I am not going to email the owner. Any ideas? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL usage
Good one, Lori. LMAO. Thanks. Geoff -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL usage I guess you could export them to a csv file and then remove them. Wait for the scream? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL usage What do you think is the best way to go about finding out if a DL is used anymore. We have a bunch of them and I am not going to email the owner. Any ideas? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL usage
Sweet idea. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL usage I have a hidden user named DL Monitor, that I slip into DLs that might be, shall we say, underutilized. -Peter -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL usage What do you think is the best way to go about finding out if a DL is used anymore. We have a bunch of them and I am not going to email the owner. Any ideas? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
a1.) Got it thx! bill -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1.) Ha. admin.exe extended switchesdoc/link on these?? pls? a2.) Thx! a3.) Pizza and beer... that's it for a custom app/interface? ummm maybe... a4.) Users already made...was thinking from a continuing maint/admin stand point. thx! bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. Works for me given the proper header fields and a few minutes in excel. a2. http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/howitworks/activedirectory/ads ilinks.asp (link wrap and all that) a3. Bummer, no pizza for me this weekend. a4. Use templates to create users. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? Umm sorry.. a1)...she not work for me a2) unfamiliar with this...could you give me a clue on it a3) Ummm this sound like it's not really possible..simply... Are we saying here that this does not exist in standard exch55? that's about where it seems we're at.. thx bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. admin.exe /i a2. ADSI a3. Sure, what's our budget. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL usage
I like it! Very nice idea. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL usage I have a hidden user named DL Monitor, that I slip into DLs that might be, shall we say, underutilized. -Peter -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL usage What do you think is the best way to go about finding out if a DL is used anymore. We have a bunch of them and I am not going to email the owner. Any ideas? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: test
Can she make change with out her hands too? I'm copasetic with that. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: test Ah.. But I thought Lang Po was a Thai dish. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: test Lang po. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: test Can do what? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: test I hear the girls in the Philippines can do that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: test test lang po!... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers?
Hi All, I know there must be at least one good list for people developing Outlook Exchange Apps... Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers?
Sue Mosher has a list on Yahoo Groups. -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Hi All, I know there must be at least one good list for people developing Outlook Exchange Apps... Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cost to upgrade from 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Can someone out there smarter than me tell me how to figure out how much it costs to upgrade an Exchange 5.5 site with a 5 CAL to the same thing in Exchange 2000? I have gone to both CDW and Microsoft's sites and there are a zillion options but none says diddly squat about an upgrade. The impression I got was that it is almost like you have to buy the whole thing brand new and you don't get any credit for already owning the product? Thanks, Arch Willingham Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Migration woes...
The exact same error was what I had. I removed the E2K installation. Removed any ADC connector, and recreated it and allowed it to synch. Then re-installed E2K with the account which had the right to install E2K and aslo gave that account the service admin rights at all levels in 5.5. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Two questions on upgrade to 2k from 5.5
1. I think I do.I have one IMS connector. 2. I'm not sure how to tell the total size of IS but PRIV.EDB is 2.6 GB and PUB.EDB is 1 GB so I should be OK right??? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Two questions on upgrade to 2k from 5.5 1. do you have site connections? if yes, then create site connection after you have upgraded. that is how I did it. 2. Standard IS is maxed at 16GB. - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:35 AM Subject: Two questions on upgrade to 2k from 5.5 We have two remote Exchange sites that have their own Exchange servers with their own site names. I set them up so long ago, I am not sure I remember how I did it. Anyway, we get all of the mail for the domain and forward on the mail to the appropriate exchanges servers at the other site. Two questions: 1. If I upgrade our Exchange Server from 5.5 SP4 to Exchange 2000, will it stop working with those two sites if they stay at 5.5? 2. Can I use the standard Exchange Server? I.E. is there any reason to have to go to the Enterprise thing? Thanks, Arch Willingham Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Migration woes...
Do you have a problem? It seems each time I post something you come up with a wise a.se comment! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:40 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Is that the case? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Old Exchange Client (was RE: Best way to clean up corrupt cal endar folder?)
Do a search on your local machine for exchng32.exe. Should be under c:\program files\windows messaging. Jessica -Original Message- From: Yarbrough, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Old Exchange Client (was RE: Best way to clean up corrupt calendar folder?) Where does one find the 'old Exchange Client'? I remember using it back-in-the-day but where does one find it these days? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best way to clean up corrupt calendar folder? (on server) This is when the old Exchange Client comes in handy. You could have exported the calendar to a PST and then deleted the calendar folder. The next time you started OL, one would have been created. It also sounds like you need the CDO hotfix for Exchange. BB support should be able to help with that. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Best way to clean up corrupt calendar folder? (on server) I had one user who could not syncronize her calendar over the air with her blackberry. The errors in the event log basically said that the CDO stuff could not access the calendar. Email was forwarding just fine. After trying all sorts of things on the blackberry server, I finally created a new mailbox (with a different username) and synced the blackberry up with that (the calendar worked fine). I then exported everything from the user's mailbox to a PST file (so I could delete the mailbox and create a new one just like it). After exporting all the mailbox contents I tried deleting everything from the calendar folder (by using view by category and deleting everything). After doing only that (i.e. not yet creating a new mailbox) the blackberry still would not sync with the calendar (over the air). The calendar appeared completely empty from an outlook 2000 client. When I tried via OWA there was an appointment still showing up in the calendar (yikes). After deleting the mailbox and creating a new one with the same alias and email address, the old data was imported from the PST and the blackberry syncs up fine now. My only question was if there was some better way of fixing the calendar short of what I did. I had tried all of the /cleanfreebusy /cleanreminder /cleanshedplus options in outlook with no improvement. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Steve Kinter
Wouldn't it just be easier to content filter on a,e,i,o,u and sometimes y? Mike -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Steve Kinter He asked me to forward his e-mails... and I did it. It's not my fault if he has or doesn't have a sense of humour... Whatever! Filipe Joel de Almeida -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: quinta-feira, 9 de Maio de 2002 1:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Steve Kinter What the hell is this crap? Confessions by Steve? I dont a shavedmonkey about this guy's issues and what he is trying to work through. Damn, if you are going to post this stuff, it should be at least funny. -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 8:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Steve Kinter -Original Message- From: Steve Kintner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quarta-feira, 8 de Maio de 2002 20:33 To: 'Filipe Joel de Almeida' Subject: RE: Steve Kinter Thanks, Filipe... And one other thing: My apologies to anyone offended by my gay comment... It was never meant to go beyond the original intended recipient... (and yes, I confess... I am less than a perfect human, and am somewhat of a biggot... But I am trying to work it thru and eliminate my faults) Thanks again, Filipe... steve -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 12:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Steve Kinter I sent your e-mail to the list. That way, they'll get to hear your side. Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +351 967819600 -Original Message- From: Steve Kintner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quarta-feira, 8 de Maio de 2002 19:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Steve Kinter None of my posts ever make it to the list, so I will comment to you... I admit to being somewhat of an ass to that guy (Darren???) but the idea of what he was saying just pissed me off... The method you describe below is fine and I don't argue with it. I emailed him OFF LIST because I didn't want my personal flame bait to interfere with the goings on of the list. I am not afraid to speak my thoughts/feelings publicly and on the list unless I think it's inappropriate for the list' goal or purpose. In this case, baiting the little wanker was not appropriate (imho). It's been kind of funny... Reading the comments and watching the puke cry to the list over offensive email gave me a belly laugh such that I haven't had in quite awhile. Talk about a wuss! He could at least have read and spelled my name correctly (heh heh heh). Anyway, I remain subscribed to this (apparently) moderated list because every now and again something useful gets posted that I save for future reference (in spite of the fact that the few questions I have tried to post never seem to get there). I won't pick on any of the respondents any more. Take care, Filipe! steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Steve Kinter I was not refering to manual monitoring (reading e-mails). I was talking about content monitoring tools that automatically scan every e-mail for improper language, etc and block those that don't match company's policies. Every time a message is blocked, the mail admin gets a copy. That's how it works qith most companies I know, anyway. Maybe I misunderstood what you guys were talking about... Filipe Joel de Almeida -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul Sent: quarta-feira, 8 de Maio de 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Steve Kinter I always thought the primary function was to ensure the system is running properly. Followed closely by adding/deleting users/pf's, etc. I don't consider email monitoring a primary function. I would consider it to more of a thankless, distasteful job. In fact, I won't do it without written authorization from someone higher up. I know that the email system is owned by the company and the company has the right to examine any and all emails. I guess it boils down to a case of I can, but should I? Now, if there is evidence of wrong-doing or some other violation of company policy, then, by all means email monitoring may be an effective tool. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Steve Kinter What's the problem in monitoring E-mails? That's one of the primary functions of a mail admin. If your company is taken
RE: Cost to upgrade from 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Me..milage may differ.. 1.) I find it easier to call the sales rep. to get a straight answer. 2.) After July31? 2002..yes you will have no chioce but to buy the whole thing new...at least thats the way I understand it. Note: At =5 users I think you will qualify for the MOLP lic. Now they will get you for the upgrade cost and then theres the software assurence stuff. Call the rep it is a lot easier on the brain..I found... I found it to be cheaper now then if I said..NO I will never upgrade and then decided to laterfor approx +100 users. 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cost to upgrade from 5.5 to Exchange 2000 Can someone out there smarter than me tell me how to figure out how much it costs to upgrade an Exchange 5.5 site with a 5 CAL to the same thing in Exchange 2000? I have gone to both CDW and Microsoft's sites and there are a zillion options but none says diddly squat about an upgrade. The impression I got was that it is almost like you have to buy the whole thing brand new and you don't get any credit for already owning the product? Thanks, Arch Willingham Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Exchange Migration woes...
I think he was just asking you if you experience the issue he was describing. Basicaly if you can see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM . .. I think..but I wasn't following the thread. From: M2web [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/09 Thu PM 03:16:21 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... Do you have a problem? It seems each time I post something you come up with a wise a.se comment! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:40 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Is that the case? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized
RE: Exchange Migration woes...
Are you suggesting: - - I uninstall exchange 2k manually. - Remove ADC - Re install ADC, create CA and sych. -install E2k etc... -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... The exact same error was what I had. I removed the E2K installation. Removed any ADC connector, and recreated it and allowed it to synch. Then re-installed E2K with the account which had the right to install E2K and aslo gave that account the service admin rights at all levels in 5.5. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Steve Kinter
Only if the I comes before e -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Hoskins Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Steve Kinter Wouldn't it just be easier to content filter on a,e,i,o,u and sometimes y? Mike -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Steve Kinter He asked me to forward his e-mails... and I did it. It's not my fault if he has or doesn't have a sense of humour... Whatever! Filipe Joel de Almeida -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: quinta-feira, 9 de Maio de 2002 1:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Steve Kinter What the hell is this crap? Confessions by Steve? I dont a shavedmonkey about this guy's issues and what he is trying to work through. Damn, if you are going to post this stuff, it should be at least funny. -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 8:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Steve Kinter -Original Message- From: Steve Kintner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quarta-feira, 8 de Maio de 2002 20:33 To: 'Filipe Joel de Almeida' Subject: RE: Steve Kinter Thanks, Filipe... And one other thing: My apologies to anyone offended by my gay comment... It was never meant to go beyond the original intended recipient... (and yes, I confess... I am less than a perfect human, and am somewhat of a biggot... But I am trying to work it thru and eliminate my faults) Thanks again, Filipe... steve -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 12:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Steve Kinter I sent your e-mail to the list. That way, they'll get to hear your side. Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +351 967819600 -Original Message- From: Steve Kintner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quarta-feira, 8 de Maio de 2002 19:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Steve Kinter None of my posts ever make it to the list, so I will comment to you... I admit to being somewhat of an ass to that guy (Darren???) but the idea of what he was saying just pissed me off... The method you describe below is fine and I don't argue with it. I emailed him OFF LIST because I didn't want my personal flame bait to interfere with the goings on of the list. I am not afraid to speak my thoughts/feelings publicly and on the list unless I think it's inappropriate for the list' goal or purpose. In this case, baiting the little wanker was not appropriate (imho). It's been kind of funny... Reading the comments and watching the puke cry to the list over offensive email gave me a belly laugh such that I haven't had in quite awhile. Talk about a wuss! He could at least have read and spelled my name correctly (heh heh heh). Anyway, I remain subscribed to this (apparently) moderated list because every now and again something useful gets posted that I save for future reference (in spite of the fact that the few questions I have tried to post never seem to get there). I won't pick on any of the respondents any more. Take care, Filipe! steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Steve Kinter I was not refering to manual monitoring (reading e-mails). I was talking about content monitoring tools that automatically scan every e-mail for improper language, etc and block those that don't match company's policies. Every time a message is blocked, the mail admin gets a copy. That's how it works qith most companies I know, anyway. Maybe I misunderstood what you guys were talking about... Filipe Joel de Almeida -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul Sent: quarta-feira, 8 de Maio de 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Steve Kinter I always thought the primary function was to ensure the system is running properly. Followed closely by adding/deleting users/pf's, etc. I don't consider email monitoring a primary function. I would consider it to more of a thankless, distasteful job. In fact, I won't do it without written authorization from someone higher up. I know that the email system is owned by the company and the company has the right to examine any and all emails. I guess it boils down to a case of I can, but should I? Now, if there is evidence of wrong-doing or some other violation of company policy, then, by all means email monitoring may be an effective tool. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Cost to upgrade from 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Thanks a million! -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cost to upgrade from 5.5 to Exchange 2000 Me..milage may differ.. 1.) I find it easier to call the sales rep. to get a straight answer. 2.) After July31? 2002..yes you will have no chioce but to buy the whole thing new...at least thats the way I understand it. Note: At =5 users I think you will qualify for the MOLP lic. Now they will get you for the upgrade cost and then theres the software assurence stuff. Call the rep it is a lot easier on the brain..I found... I found it to be cheaper now then if I said..NO I will never upgrade and then decided to laterfor approx +100 users. 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cost to upgrade from 5.5 to Exchange 2000 Can someone out there smarter than me tell me how to figure out how much it costs to upgrade an Exchange 5.5 site with a 5 CAL to the same thing in Exchange 2000? I have gone to both CDW and Microsoft's sites and there are a zillion options but none says diddly squat about an upgrade. The impression I got was that it is almost like you have to buy the whole thing brand new and you don't get any credit for already owning the product? Thanks, Arch Willingham Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send mail to 600, 2000 contacts etc
Hi My customer has an ex 5.5 sp4 server They have a Public Folder with 4000 names THey often send eMail to 600, 1000, sometime 2000 contact at a time DOes anyone have customer doing that ? Any better method or 3rd party software allowing to do it ? (sometime it's very slow and hard for OL 2000 to manipulate that ) THe want to use OL because their contact are in a centralized Public Folder and thjis PF also synchronized with Palm (wiht Extend Connect Server) JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sending eMail to 600. 1000, 2000 Public Folder contacts
Hi My customer has an ex 5.5 sp4 server They have a Public Folder with 4000 names (contacts) THey often send eMail to 600, 1000, sometime 2000 contact at a time DOes anyone have customer doing that ? Any better method or 3rd party software allowing to do it ? (sometime it's very slow and hard for OL 2000 to manipulate that ) THe want to use OL because their contact are in a centralized Public Folder and thjis PF also synchronized with Palm (wiht Extend Connect Server) JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delegate access for a remote user
Hey, I need to give one user the ability to send email and have it look like it is coming from another users account (like delegate access), however the user whose mailbox that the email has to look like it's coming from is a non-local user and I do not have access to his Outlook is there a way that I can do this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delegate access for a remote user
What does his email administrator say? -Original Message- From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delegate access for a remote user Hey, I need to give one user the ability to send email and have it look like it is coming from another users account (like delegate access), however the user whose mailbox that the email has to look like it's coming from is a non-local user and I do not have access to his Outlook is there a way that I can do this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Migration woes...
uninstall e2k remove the CA in ADC and recreate (do not need to remove ADC) synch install e2k - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Are you suggesting: - - I uninstall exchange 2k manually. - Remove ADC - Re install ADC, create CA and sych. -install E2k etc... -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... The exact same error was what I had. I removed the E2K installation. Removed any ADC connector, and recreated it and allowed it to synch. Then re-installed E2K with the account which had the right to install E2K and aslo gave that account the service admin rights at all levels in 5.5. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
RE: Delegate access for a remote user
who? wha? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Delegate access for a remote user
If all you want is a look like http://www.topfun.co.uk/gonmadmail/ From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/09 Thu PM 03:50:32 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Delegate access for a remote user What does his email administrator say? -Original Message- From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delegate access for a remote user Hey, I need to give one user the ability to send email and have it look like it is coming from another users account (like delegate access), however the user whose mailbox that the email has to look like it's coming from is a non-local user and I do not have access to his Outlook is there a way that I can do this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forests prep domain prep
Well, whadja go deleting the GAL for before you even knew whether E2k worked? Anyway, I'm gonna assume everything's fine, because you gave another clue. Those queries you're using can't be based upon OU. The results in your address list creator may show them, but it won't work. Create groups to mirror your OU's and base the query on that group's membership. And you can't say group membership / begins with / whatever or the corresponding LDAP query, you have to do group membership / is exactly / cn=whatever,ou=whatever,dc=whatever,dc=com Try that. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 09, 2002 01:05 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Forests prep domain prep Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep OK, here's what I'm trying to do. Installed win 2k advance server sp2. Exchange ENT 2k sp2. Went through a process of setting up Mutliple Domains this exchange server will handle. Set up separate OU's and groups (user and admin) for each OU. Deleted global Address list and created address lists for each OU. I set the Msquerydatadn advanced options to each OU. When I look in the address Global list for each domain..there is nothing in there. I can connect via OWA and use mail server for each OU. But I cannot connect using outlook. Comes back and says could not resolve name..because there are no names in address global list for each OU??? What did I miss or screw up?!! -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep If you don't run them prior to the Exchange setup, they do run automatically in the background. That's probably why your Exchange install took such a long time. In larger forests where you have multiple domains/trees, it is a better idea to run forestprep and wait a while until schema changes are replicated to all DCs and then run domainprep and Exchange server setup. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep OK so if I successfully installed exchange these ran automatically!! -Original Message- From: Schneider, Bryan D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep No, can't install exchange until these are run in your AD forest/domain. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forests prep domain prep Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spam Filter Suggestions
I just purchased the Scanmail Emanager piece and so far it is working with just the updated default rules and it seems to be catching a lot of spam. Although I need to make some of my own rules to up the anti... So far I like it By the way, I am running it in AVAPI mode which the eManager piece runs better because I can forward the caught spam to a mailbox Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spam Filter Suggestions Does anyone have recommendations on good spam filtering software? We are currently using ScanMail and are looking at their Emanager product but I wanted to know if there are other products we should look at. Thanks! Louanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Migration woes...
I just noticed that I do not have ExchangeAdmins as one of the builtin users in AD, All the other required Admins are present ie Enterprise, schema, domain, etc...isn't that weird? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... uninstall e2k remove the CA in ADC and recreate (do not need to remove ADC) synch install e2k - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Are you suggesting: - - I uninstall exchange 2k manually. - Remove ADC - Re install ADC, create CA and sych. -install E2k etc... -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... The exact same error was what I had. I removed the E2K installation. Removed any ADC connector, and recreated it and allowed it to synch. Then re-installed E2K with the account which had the right to install E2K and aslo gave that account the service admin rights at all levels in 5.5. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This
RE: Can't replicate public folders E5.5 to E2k
I have now looked in the ADUC and can see the folders there. I have also resolved the problem error regarding replicating from Exchange 2000 to Exchange 5.5 (I did not select the replication tab on the Exchange 2000 folders - DUH!). So we now have public folder replication working fully to Exchange 5.5 but unfortunately this is not working correctly to Exchange 2000 as it does not appear in the exchange system manager, any ideas, troubleshooting techniques? Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
POP3 Authentication using SASL
Looking for help using Outlook Express (POP3 or IMAP) and checking the box Log on using Secure Password Authentication on the servers tab. This doesn't work and you get Your server has unexpectedly terminated the connection. Possible causes for this include server problems, network problems, or a long period of inactivity. Account: 'webmail.mail.com, Server: 'webmail.mnsu.edu', Protocol: POP3, Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Error Number: 0x800CCC0F Now we have and SSL certificate installed on the OWA box and setup for POP3 and IMAP. In fact, on Outlook Express I can unselect Log on using Secure Password Authentication and on the advanced tab select This server requires a secure connection (SSL) and this works fine. The password and the entire session is encrypted - even the userid/password authentication. The issue is with only encrypting the Authentication portion since in the wizard for setting up the mail account the check box is there for Log on using Secure Password Authentication (SPA) and this is what most people will check by default. This wants to use SASL over port 110, but once again, this authentication gets rejected. Can anyone help? Bryan Schneider MN State University, Mankato _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Spam Filter Suggestions
Mailmarshal at MarshalSoftware.com. Have been using it for 2 years. Works great! - Original Message - From: Louanne Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:48 PM Subject: Spam Filter Suggestions Does anyone have recommendations on good spam filtering software? We are currently using ScanMail and are looking at their Emanager product but I wanted to know if there are other products we should look at. Thanks! Louanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Migration woes...
There are some good TechNet articles on completely uninstalling Exchange and removing Exchange from AD... -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I just noticed that I do not have ExchangeAdmins as one of the builtin users in AD, All the other required Admins are present ie Enterprise, schema, domain, etc...isn't that weird? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... uninstall e2k remove the CA in ADC and recreate (do not need to remove ADC) synch install e2k - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Are you suggesting: - - I uninstall exchange 2k manually. - Remove ADC - Re install ADC, create CA and sych. -install E2k etc... -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... The exact same error was what I had. I removed the E2K installation. Removed any ADC connector, and recreated it and allowed it to synch. Then re-installed E2K with the account which had the right to install E2K and aslo gave that account the service admin rights at all levels in 5.5. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email
RE: Exchange Migration woes...
Chris, I have looked at q260378 and q273478. What about the mystery of ExchangeAdmins? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... There are some good TechNet articles on completely uninstalling Exchange and removing Exchange from AD... -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I just noticed that I do not have ExchangeAdmins as one of the builtin users in AD, All the other required Admins are present ie Enterprise, schema, domain, etc...isn't that weird? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... uninstall e2k remove the CA in ADC and recreate (do not need to remove ADC) synch install e2k - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Are you suggesting: - - I uninstall exchange 2k manually. - Remove ADC - Re install ADC, create CA and sych. -install E2k etc... -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... The exact same error was what I had. I removed the E2K installation. Removed any ADC connector, and recreated it and allowed it to synch. Then re-installed E2K with the account which had the right to install E2K and aslo gave that account the service admin rights at all levels in 5.5. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not
RE: Exchange Migration woes...
Dunno.. but it disturbs me that you don't remember having joined the existing org and site (based on your previous posts) and that you can't see the E2K server from the Exchange 5.5 admin. In my mind that places your configuration in the sufficiently fscked category such that I'd consider starting anew if possible. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Chris, I have looked at q260378 and q273478. What about the mystery of ExchangeAdmins? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... There are some good TechNet articles on completely uninstalling Exchange and removing Exchange from AD... -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I just noticed that I do not have ExchangeAdmins as one of the builtin users in AD, All the other required Admins are present ie Enterprise, schema, domain, etc...isn't that weird? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... uninstall e2k remove the CA in ADC and recreate (do not need to remove ADC) synch install e2k - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Are you suggesting: - - I uninstall exchange 2k manually. - Remove ADC - Re install ADC, create CA and sych. -install E2k etc... -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... The exact same error was what I had. I removed the E2K installation. Removed any ADC connector, and recreated it and allowed it to synch. Then re-installed E2K with the account which had the right to install E2K and aslo gave that account the service admin rights at all levels in 5.5. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k
RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers?
GOOD ONE: outlook-dev at yahoogroups.com ALSO: MAPI at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/mapi-l.html AND: outlook-users at yahoogroups.com has quite a knowledgeable crowd also... For info searching: Slipstick http://www.slipstick.com CDO LIVE http://www.cdolive.com/start.htm MICROEYE Programming Microsoft Outlook and Collaboration Data Objects http://www.microeye.com/resources/outlkb.htm ExchangeCode http://www.exchangecode.com/ Outlook/Exchange http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/home/outlooklinks.asp#Sample%20Appli cations on... -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Hi All, I know there must be at least one good list for people developing Outlook Exchange Apps... Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
Hi Just averted a nasty disaster and I had a question, forgive my noobness as I'm not a router guy but they are trying to make me one. Last night we had a cisco guy come in and tighten down one of our routers that borders our firewall. We had to delete all our access lists and recreate them as such we had to create permits for all the various ports. As part of our access statement we used tcp permit for 110 and 25. Well it turned out that by doing this mail came in but didn't go out. I started to think about it and with some of the IP stuff ive been reading about I thought maybe smtp isn't part of tcp and maybe its part of udp. Well from what I am told a statement of ip permit should cover it wherever smtp may fall. In this case it did, the new permit did work. My question is, where does smtp fall? Should I have used a udp permit statement instead? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Migration woes...
I agree. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Dunno.. but it disturbs me that you don't remember having joined the existing org and site (based on your previous posts) and that you can't see the E2K server from the Exchange 5.5 admin. In my mind that places your configuration in the sufficiently fscked category such that I'd consider starting anew if possible. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Chris, I have looked at q260378 and q273478. What about the mystery of ExchangeAdmins? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... There are some good TechNet articles on completely uninstalling Exchange and removing Exchange from AD... -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I just noticed that I do not have ExchangeAdmins as one of the builtin users in AD, All the other required Admins are present ie Enterprise, schema, domain, etc...isn't that weird? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... uninstall e2k remove the CA in ADC and recreate (do not need to remove ADC) synch install e2k - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Are you suggesting: - - I uninstall exchange 2k manually. - Remove ADC - Re install ADC, create CA and sych. -install E2k etc... -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... The exact same error was what I had. I removed the E2K installation. Removed any ADC connector, and recreated it and allowed it to synch. Then re-installed E2K with the account which had the right to install E2K and aslo gave that account the service admin rights at all levels in 5.5. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no
RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers?
Additionally to Lori's Nikki's suggestions, there are some more lists: ASP Lists ASP-Mail: http://www.asplists.com/aspmail ASP Friends ASP.NET Mail: http://www.aspfriends.com/aspfriends/ngfx-mail.asp Wrox asp_cdo: http://p2p.wrox.com/list.asp?list=asp_cdo And I just saw a new Yahoo! Group popping up which seems to be focused on messaging collaboration application technology (also including Instant Messaging and more stuff) at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mscollaboration ;-) Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Sue Mosher has a list on Yahoo Groups. -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Hi All, I know there must be at least one good list for people developing Outlook Exchange Apps... Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
On Thu, 9 May 2002, at 6:35pm, Hansen, Eric wrote: As part of our access statement we used tcp permit for 110 and 25. Well it turned out that by doing this mail came in but didn't go out. SMTP is TCP port 25. SMTP does not use UDP, not is it an IP-layer protocol. Make sure you have all the rules, and in all directions. Maybe you are accidentally blocking outbound TCP SYN packets on port 25? Also, if your default policy is to drop without reply, make sure you at least send a TCP RST for connect attempts to TCP port 113, which is the auth protocol (also called ident). Many SMTP mail exchangers will do an auth query, and if you just drop those packets on the floor, they may time out or reject you. If all else fails, use a packet sniffer to see what is going over the wire. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers?
Very Cool Siegfried...I look forward to the new group. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Additionally to Lori's Nikki's suggestions, there are some more lists: ASP Lists ASP-Mail: http://www.asplists.com/aspmail ASP Friends ASP.NET Mail: http://www.aspfriends.com/aspfriends/ngfx-mail.asp Wrox asp_cdo: http://p2p.wrox.com/list.asp?list=asp_cdo And I just saw a new Yahoo! Group popping up which seems to be focused on messaging collaboration application technology (also including Instant Messaging and more stuff) at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mscollaboration ;-) Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Sue Mosher has a list on Yahoo Groups. -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Hi All, I know there must be at least one good list for people developing Outlook Exchange Apps... Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers?
Yeah. After keeping it asleep one year, I decided to wake up the sleeping dog :-) Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Nikki Peterson - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Very Cool Siegfried...I look forward to the new group. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Additionally to Lori's Nikki's suggestions, there are some more lists: ASP Lists ASP-Mail: http://www.asplists.com/aspmail ASP Friends ASP.NET Mail: http://www.aspfriends.com/aspfriends/ngfx-mail.asp Wrox asp_cdo: http://p2p.wrox.com/list.asp?list=asp_cdo And I just saw a new Yahoo! Group popping up which seems to be focused on messaging collaboration application technology (also including Instant Messaging and more stuff) at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mscollaboration ;-) Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Sue Mosher has a list on Yahoo Groups. -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Hi All, I know there must be at least one good list for people developing Outlook Exchange Apps... Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Migration woes...
Getting in late. If your not or haven't done an Exchange upgrade, it is best to practice in a lab environment first. It is also bad to correct your swing on the golf course. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 6:37 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I agree. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Dunno.. but it disturbs me that you don't remember having joined the existing org and site (based on your previous posts) and that you can't see the E2K server from the Exchange 5.5 admin. In my mind that places your configuration in the sufficiently fscked category such that I'd consider starting anew if possible. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Chris, I have looked at q260378 and q273478. What about the mystery of ExchangeAdmins? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... There are some good TechNet articles on completely uninstalling Exchange and removing Exchange from AD... -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I just noticed that I do not have ExchangeAdmins as one of the builtin users in AD, All the other required Admins are present ie Enterprise, schema, domain, etc...isn't that weird? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... uninstall e2k remove the CA in ADC and recreate (do not need to remove ADC) synch install e2k - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Are you suggesting: - - I uninstall exchange 2k manually. - Remove ADC - Re install ADC, create CA and sych. -install E2k etc... -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... The exact same error was what I had. I removed the E2K installation. Removed any ADC connector, and recreated it and allowed it to synch. Then re-installed E2K with the account which had the right to install E2K and aslo gave that account the service admin rights at all levels in 5.5. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't
RE: Exchange Migration woes...
Can I email you offline? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 6:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I don't believe I was replying to you, but to Raj. I simply asked if the situation I described was in fact the situation he was experiencing as I was unclear from his response as to what the actual situation was at the moment. If you aren't happy with the method of inquiry and responses I use in eliciting additional information and providing direction to those who pose queries I offer several suggestions: 1. Ignore my posts. 2. Answer the questions instead and I'll endeavor to learn from your example. 3. Ask for a refund. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... Do you have a problem? It seems each time I post something you come up with a wise a.se comment! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:40 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Is that the case? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: Old Address
LOL!... u guys so cute! Cheers -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Old Address Ahhh don't do that -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Old Address I set up a rule to forward them all to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 6:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Old Address I would like to know what everyone else does when they delete an old email account. I had some people leave the company and I deleted their mailboxes now I receive all their junk mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Safeguard your company with cost-effective disaster recovery services. Find out more at :- http://www.scs.com.my/memComInfo.shtml#crc _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: KVS Enterprise Vault
Hi Ken, I asked a similar question last week, and Paul Hurst had sent this reply: snip--- I found that 'Archive one' would have required at least some PF servers unless you want one with 200Gb+ PF store, eCon did not SIS the PST's when migrated back in and was heavy on the install with two CD's and lots of install options (Oracle/SQL etc;) also their pre-sales tech support was very light, but does support UNIX back end servers and uses MAPI to retrieve the messages (good for OST's/Palms). We went for KVS since we could HSM the data, SIS the PST imports set policy's at user level folders and for us in the UK there tech support were on the ball (answered code page problems etc; fast), but does not use MAPI to retrieve so bad for OST's/Palms). snip--- My company is currently looking around for an archiving solution, and KVS is one of the ones we're looking at, along with some others. I don't have any valuable feedback yet myself, but I'm hoping that our server guys will be ready for some trials soon... -Christian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jasa, Ken Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: KVS Enterprise Vault Has anyone used this product that could provide some feedback on it? Ken Jasa Messaging Manager Weber Shandwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC as Inter-Org Connector/Sync
Hi all, I'm looking to learn what features are supported/not supported when you use the ADC to connect 2 Exchange 2000 Orgs. I had a difficult time finding anything detailed on the KB, so was hoping for some insight from any of you that might have set this up. TIA, Karen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
create different mailbox stores for each group and then set the limits per store. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slow opening unread messages
Hi, Just wondering if anyone has seen this before and can lead me towards the right direction. Outlook XP (SP1) is slow to open unread message. After it's marked as read, the speed appears to be fine. The symptom persists when you toggle between read/unread. This only happens with one particular mailbox. I have tried on different profile and computer with the same result. Thoughts? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
