Trend AV problem
Hi, Anybody come across the problem with Trend Scanmail vers 3.51 or 3.52, not able to duplicate the AV package to the server AND update the server selection. We have a server that gets the package from Trend WWW site and update it's own AV and have the rest of the servers get their updates from this. IE When selecting to update the server only - it works. When selecting to 'duplicate the package' onto this server - it works. When selecting to update and 'duplicate the package', it duplicates the package BUT does not run it's own update. Here in the UK you have to go through your dealer for problems and at the moment they are just getting me to go through hoops unnecessarily (IE check proxy settings, run without 'duplicate package' selected to see it works IE they haven't listened to my explanation). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re installing OWA for 5.5 on win2k box
Do I have to install exchange server on this box before I install OWA, I did not install exchange 5.5 or the service pack on the current NT box. I have tried to install OWA 5.5 on this new win2k box and I get the following error setup has detected that you are not running a set of windows nt related fixes required for OWA. Please see the release notes for further instructions. As this is a win2k box what patches need to be installed as I cannot install nt patches for a win2k server. Thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lost Emails after making new user
Hi, This might be confusing, but here is my situation: I made a new user and the user logged in and used the mailbox. Since he travels around and did not have a VPN connection set up, he did not want to be an Exchange user, but rather just receive his emails through POP3. The user was deleted, and then I made him a contact. He had been a contact for some weeks now, and now wants to be a real Exchange user. I deleted the contact for him, and made him a real user (same name and information as when I first made his user account some weeks ago). I went into his Outlook, and under services, I noticed he still had the Exchange service as well as the POP3 internet email service. I closed his Outlook, and re-logged him in. Now, his inbox is empty and all of his old mails are gone. On the Exchange server System-Manager, I see his mailbox has only a few items. What mistakes did I make? I had no idea he still had the Exchange service this whole time, because he was not a real user. His mailbox never appeared in the System-manager, yet his mails were obviously stored there. From what I could see on the server, he was a contact with no Mailbox. I searched his harddrive for both a PST and OST and found neither. How do I get his emails back? Exchange 2000 SP2 Client: Windows XP Outlook 2000 Regards, Allison _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?
Still sounds at least partially MTU related. I'll spare you the gory details, but there is about 50-60 bytes of overhead IIRC for VPN encapsulation, which is why you're seeing an MTU top out at 1450 (ethernet I believe is 1536). Dial up connections are a bit trickier, depending on the hardware involved. They have smaller MTU's IIRC, and some stick as low as 576, which is the bare minimum allowed. I'd start by setting the MTU to 576 and trying it. It will be slow, but it should work. Then ratchet it up to 1200ish and test it. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix? Well, that is just the thing. It is not just that one client. He is always the pain-in-the-patootie guy so I assumed it was just his karma when I couldn't find anything different between our machines other than I use DSL and he uses dial-up. At that time that Q article told you to call PSS and I wasn't willing to do that for the one guy until I knew more about what the fix was. But now they have released that fix and I also have another user (a much more capable one) who is experiencing the same thing. He too is on dialup. In both cases, they can ping by name, they can explore the domain, their home drives get properly mapped to the server here in the office. In fact, they can do everything except connect to the Exchange server and get data from it. Connections do show up under netstat -a on the Exchange server if they try but it never manages to load the data. The connections say waiting and are on a couple of highish ports iirc. At least on the Exchange server end. All of the client machines involved are Windows 2000 Pro machines that were joined to the domain here in the office before being taken home. The only users successfully using the MUVPN client (software vpn) and running Outlook to connect back to the Exchange server are those who have DSL not dial-up connections. I know the pitp guy's virtual adapter was set up exactly correctly because I did it myself and compared step by step with my own machine which worked fine over my dsl line. I will check the other user's machine when he brings it back in (it's his laptop). And I guess I will add a modem to my machine, make sure it still works over dsl and then see if it works over dialup. This may be instructive enough to be worth the effort and expense. Thanks to all who have passed on ideas. I will try adding a modem to my machine next. Unless I can get the guy with the laptop to loan it to me. Ronni -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix? I would agree with Mike that it is probably and issue with that one client. I would look carefully at the name resolution. Can the user ping the exchange server via name resolution across the tunnel? We ran into some recent problems when using the MUVPN from Watchguard, especially on XP machines. Occasionally some of the MUVPN's do not setup the Virtual Adapter and it connects using SafeNet's default mode which uses the Shim (there are 3 options for this disabled, preferred, and required) which leaves you without any name resolution that may have been supplied via the virtual adapter. The only way around the problem with those that will only connect with the Shim was to use an ALMOST file on there machine. Watchguard is aware of this issue and is working with SafeNet -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix? Ronni, Given that your other VPN clients work OK except this one I think I'd be looking at the specifics of this guys VPN and network setup and start with the simple stuff like the Watchguard traffic monitor and logs to see if anything's getting blocked and with the name resolution and dialup performance at the client end, rather than diving in with a bunch of hotfixes. We have a very similar setup here, and these tools fix pretty much all these issues here. Just my approach, Mike -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 February 2003 22:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix? We are a one Exchange 5.5 server shop. A few months ago I began the process of moving us to a new
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
One thing you do not want to do is install Outlook on your Exchange server due to possible MAPI conflict between Outlook and Exchange server version. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
OK, well AFAIK Outlook is the only mapi client for 2000, so I guess that equates to don't have a mapi client installed on the server? I'm struggling to think of a reason we'd need one, it just struck me as the sort of thing that might crop up further down the line... I've also just mailed Trend to get their take on Scanmail mapi/avapi vs. Scanmail ESE - I believe there are still potential Microsoft support issues with ESE scanners? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] One thing you do not want to do is install Outlook on your Exchange server due to possible MAPI conflict between Outlook and Exchange server version. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
I might say for myself...is that IF you have(as IN I must for some reason) to have OL..on your exchange box.. Memory serves me that you should install OL first, then do all the exchange install.. Why??? the MAPI***.DLL, Exe other crap..I believe it is specifically the MAPI32.DLL Exchange will replace/update it to the versions exchange requires. OL will do the same replace/update them too. SO thus if you install Exchange and then OL..OL will break exchange...(cause it over writes exchange with its (OL)files) So by doing OL and then Exchange, exchange will put in the files it requires to run correctly...which is the point to begin with. Avoid the OL on the box unless you absolutely must have it..then re investigate why before you do it 2 cent bill -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 One thing you do not want to do is install Outlook on your Exchange server due to possible MAPI conflict between Outlook and Exchange server version. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Paul, I normally install the Exchange 5.0 client on my Windows 2000 servers that require MAPI. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 OK, well AFAIK Outlook is the only mapi client for 2000, so I guess that equates to don't have a mapi client installed on the server? I'm struggling to think of a reason we'd need one, it just struck me as the sort of thing that might crop up further down the line... I've also just mailed Trend to get their take on Scanmail mapi/avapi vs. Scanmail ESE - I believe there are still potential Microsoft support issues with ESE scanners? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] One thing you do not want to do is install Outlook on your Exchange server due to possible MAPI conflict between Outlook and Exchange server version. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Thanks Paul - do you know if that's downloadable (legitimately)? I remember looking for it a while back and I just couldn't find it anywhere. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] Paul, I normally install the Exchange 5.0 client on my Windows 2000 servers that require MAPI. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Could you let me know about what Trend states about the AVAPI and ESE scanner? we still run the avapi and have not really seen the requirement to upgrade to ese...however, it would be nice to get more detailed info when viruses are found...and I also understand that the ese does not reset the mailbox accessed each time it performs a manual scan. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 OK, well AFAIK Outlook is the only mapi client for 2000, so I guess that equates to don't have a mapi client installed on the server? I'm struggling to think of a reason we'd need one, it just struck me as the sort of thing that might crop up further down the line... I've also just mailed Trend to get their take on Scanmail mapi/avapi vs. Scanmail ESE - I believe there are still potential Microsoft support issues with ESE scanners? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] One thing you do not want to do is install Outlook on your Exchange server due to possible MAPI conflict between Outlook and Exchange server version. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Will do. I've been running the ESE v3.8 scanner on a small sites server for around a year now, never had any problems, but then there's only a 2gb store and about 40 mailboxes. I guess I'm trying to do best practice as I'm effectively going to be starting from scratch with these new boxes. Oh, and I'm talking crap, I do have a v5 client CAB files, I haven't installed it (still don't know if I should or not!), but I've extracted the exchng32.exe and it's version is 5.0.1457.3. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] Could you let me know about what Trend states about the AVAPI and ESE scanner? we still run the avapi and have not really seen the requirement to upgrade to ese...however, it would be nice to get more detailed info when viruses are found...and I also understand that the ese does not reset the mailbox accessed each time it performs a manual scan. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 OK, well AFAIK Outlook is the only mapi client for 2000, so I guess that equates to don't have a mapi client installed on the server? I'm struggling to think of a reason we'd need one, it just struck me as the sort of thing that might crop up further down the line... I've also just mailed Trend to get their take on Scanmail mapi/avapi vs. Scanmail ESE - I believe there are still potential Microsoft support issues with ESE scanners? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] One thing you do not want to do is install Outlook on your Exchange server due to possible MAPI conflict between Outlook and Exchange server version. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Paul, I'm probably overly paranoid, but I would not install MBSA on the Exchange box. If memory serves me correctly, you can run this software remotely and still gather the patch information. Avoid installing Outlook on the server. You don't mention this, but I always install the network monitor that comes with Windows 2000. This is not installed by default, and requires a reboot. Often when I get a quirky problem, Microsoft will want to take a packet capture. Having this installed saves having to plan a reboot of the Server. Dennis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul HutchingsBSA Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
It was on the Exchange 5.0 media, and maybe 5.5, but I can't remember for sure. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Thanks Paul - do you know if that's downloadable (legitimately)? I remember looking for it a while back and I just couldn't find it anywhere. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] Paul, I normally install the Exchange 5.0 client on my Windows 2000 servers that require MAPI. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
I've got it on 5 mailbox servers with stores up to 35GB without issue as well. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Will do. I've been running the ESE v3.8 scanner on a small sites server for around a year now, never had any problems, but then there's only a 2gb store and about 40 mailboxes. I guess I'm trying to do best practice as I'm effectively going to be starting from scratch with these new boxes. Oh, and I'm talking crap, I do have a v5 client CAB files, I haven't installed it (still don't know if I should or not!), but I've extracted the exchng32.exe and it's version is 5.0.1457.3. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] Could you let me know about what Trend states about the AVAPI and ESE scanner? we still run the avapi and have not really seen the requirement to upgrade to ese...however, it would be nice to get more detailed info when viruses are found...and I also understand that the ese does not reset the mailbox accessed each time it performs a manual scan. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 OK, well AFAIK Outlook is the only mapi client for 2000, so I guess that equates to don't have a mapi client installed on the server? I'm struggling to think of a reason we'd need one, it just struck me as the sort of thing that might crop up further down the line... I've also just mailed Trend to get their take on Scanmail mapi/avapi vs. Scanmail ESE - I believe there are still potential Microsoft support issues with ESE scanners? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] One thing you do not want to do is install Outlook on your Exchange server due to possible MAPI conflict between Outlook and Exchange server version. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of
RE: Notes client to Outlook client
Migrate or coexistence of Lotus/Exchange http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/domino.asp Resource page for lotus/2000 info http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/notes.asp Outlook 2002 connector to Notes server for email. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=60c4d659-3249-46cc- 9cb9-db128b38e399DisplayLang=en Ask me next week and I will let you know how a migration goes. Allan -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Notes client to Outlook client Have a client doing a Notes to Exchange 2000 migration. What he wants migrated is Calendar and Contact from the client side not the server side. Does anyone know of tools for that? _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re installing OWA for 5.5 on win2k box
Install required w2k/IIS5 patches as needed. Copy the exchange installables to a local directory and rename servnnn.exe to setup.exe Select OWA only. Install Exchange SP as fits your environment. -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re installing OWA for 5.5 on win2k box Do I have to install exchange server on this box before I install OWA, I did not install exchange 5.5 or the service pack on the current NT box. I have tried to install OWA 5.5 on this new win2k box and I get the following error setup has detected that you are not running a set of windows nt related fixes required for OWA. Please see the release notes for further instructions. As this is a win2k box what patches need to be installed as I cannot install nt patches for a win2k server. Thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Paul, It is either available on 5.0 CD or Select CD's (could be elsewhere) but that's where I get mine. If haven't got it wait until after 18:00 GMT then you will ;-) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Thanks Paul - do you know if that's downloadable (legitimately)? I remember looking for it a while back and I just couldn't find it anywhere. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] Paul, I normally install the Exchange 5.0 client on my Windows 2000 servers that require MAPI. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
connect to exchange over vpn
Hello, I have problem with a user that is using vpn connection to read his email off our server. He can log into the vpn and access his email but when he tries to send he recieves the following message: Microsoft Outlook Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. The wierd thing is when I set him up here at my office it worked fine also it worked on his cable modem at home. Then when he went to his new office with a new dsl line he started to recieve this message. I looked up the error on google and one suggestion was to remove TCP/IP and add it again. This worked for about 5 hours and the next day he came to the office the same error popped up. I thought the problem might be the dsl line so I had him troubleshoot it with his service provider. They recommended that he upgrade his service to a faster speed. I didnt think this was the issue so I told him to test it out on another internet connection and he did and got the same error. I have about 25 users that connect to vpn and access their email and he is the only one having the problem. He uses windows xp pro and he is trying to connect to exchange server 5.5 sp4 on windows nt 4.0 sp6. Thanks Richard Tener _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still no PF data replication!
It's been two days and still no data replication. Folders are all there, just nothing in them. I am getting a few 3091 errors in the Event Log that I'm not familiar with: Error 3091 in App log. Error -1026 occurred while processing an incoming replication message. Folder: (3-0004) NON_IPM_SUBTREE\Events Root More info that may be a factor. OldServ is the first server in site. When I went to the instances tab I did a shift-click and moved all folders including OAB and Schedule+ Free Busy. When I look at public folder resources I do see a last access time of today for the Free Busy so I believe it is working OK. When I began this process I created a test folder on OldServ, the went into replicas and set it to NewServ. All of this appeared to work fine. I just want to avoid having to do this for every folder on the server. Again, any help would be appreciated. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question: ES2k on a DC
Hello All, Two questions in one ... I know that MS discourages the use of ES2k on a domain controller. Why is this? Load? Security? Other? Are there any good articles on this? Also, does anyone have any comments on the below config: I have (and will have) well under 100 mailboxes and am planning on using a Proliant DL380 G3 with 2x2.4 Xeons, 1 GB RAM and two RAID1 36 10k drives for the OS and the logs and three RAID5 36 10k drives for the information stores. Thanks, Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question: ES2k on a DC
There are good and bad reasons to do most anything. The # of mailboxes on a server, by itself, is not all that indicative of hardware requirements for many reasons. However, for what passes for normal requirements in my experience you have way more server than you need so it will probably perform well, all things being equal. You need at least 2 DCs in each domain and in small environments one being an Exchange Server is not unusual. DCs in small shops don't need to be high performance boxes but I would hardware mirror the OS on each. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trevor Porter Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question: ES2k on a DC Hello All, Two questions in one ... I know that MS discourages the use of ES2k on a domain controller. Why is this? Load? Security? Other? Are there any good articles on this? Also, does anyone have any comments on the below config: I have (and will have) well under 100 mailboxes and am planning on using a Proliant DL380 G3 with 2x2.4 Xeons, 1 GB RAM and two RAID1 36 10k drives for the OS and the logs and three RAID5 36 10k drives for the information stores. Thanks, Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lost Emails after making new user
Hi, I found an answer but I would still like to know something. Where does Windows XP store (by default) PSTs and/or OSTs? My user had almost nothing in C:\Documents and Settings\User Name\Local Settings\Programs\Microsoft\Outlook\* Somehow the user had been working in Exchange offline-mode, even though he had no Exchange account. When he was prompted with the Exchange login info, he was just hitting cancel. When I had given the proper login info (after creating the account), I was getting his empty mailbox folders. Since he had no PSTs or OSTs, where is the data? Before I created his account, the System Manager showed no Mailbox for him. After it was created, it showed 1 or 2 items. Does XP store this offline info as another file type? I have never noticed this on Win2k + Outlook 2k, only this Win XP + Outlook 2k machine. Thanks Allison On Thursday 13 February 2003 01:03 pm, you wrote: Hi, This might be confusing, but here is my situation: I made a new user and the user logged in and used the mailbox. Since he travels around and did not have a VPN connection set up, he did not want to be an Exchange user, but rather just receive his emails through POP3. The user was deleted, and then I made him a contact. He had been a contact for some weeks now, and now wants to be a real Exchange user. I deleted the contact for him, and made him a real user (same name and information as when I first made his user account some weeks ago). I went into his Outlook, and under services, I noticed he still had the Exchange service as well as the POP3 internet email service. I closed his Outlook, and re-logged him in. Now, his inbox is empty and all of his old mails are gone. On the Exchange server System-Manager, I see his mailbox has only a few items. What mistakes did I make? I had no idea he still had the Exchange service this whole time, because he was not a real user. His mailbox never appeared in the System-manager, yet his mails were obviously stored there. From what I could see on the server, he was a contact with no Mailbox. I searched his harddrive for both a PST and OST and found neither. How do I get his emails back? Exchange 2000 SP2 Client: Windows XP Outlook 2000 Regards, Allison _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
The service manager said it was running Must have been high solar-flare activity... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error Was SA still running or had it quit? I have seen some weird situation when SA has quit and Outlook clients can't log in but OWA is still working. Or another time SA and all other services were running but no one could log in, restarting SA and dependent services fixed it. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error Whatever it was, restarting the SA fixed it. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error usually when I see error 500 it means that the user account does not have a mailbox, but in that case the whole page is displaying error 500, no frames. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error (Exch2k SP3 on Win2k SP3) Hmm. I'm getting this error: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error, when users are logging in to OWA. The folder list appears and populates just fine, but that error appears in what would be the (bigger pane) item listing. Interestingly enough, if the user clicks Calendar, their calendar will appear in the big pane But all other folders result in the error. A google and MSKB search only mentions old browsers and free-busy stuff Nothing that seems to apply to me. Anyone seen this before? tia ___ There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who do not. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange2K3 and registering DLL's
I'm stuck in the install trying to register the DLL's 'regsvr32 oledb32.dll'. The original problem is based 'Setup failed with 0xc103798a registering the base dav protocol which I found in the Q base as Q296436 based on Exchange2000 on Win2000 where you have to manually register the C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\msdaurl.dll, C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\Msdaipp.dll and C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\Oledb32.dll. This is a 2003 and 2003 problem and I can't register the Oledb32.dll (I am dual booting with Win2K but since Exchange2K3 can run on Win2K, these DLL's should be cross compatible anyway. Can someone check and see what version of Oledb32.dll they are using (mine is 2.71.9030.0) with a running Win2K3 / Exchange 2K3 setup. I don't want to roll back another attempt as it was a mess last time to get rid of the failed install and try again. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: connect to exchange over vpn
Maybe he has enabled the built in XP (software) firewall and that is interfering?? Tom -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, I have problem with a user that is using vpn connection to read his email off our server. He can log into the vpn and access his email but when he tries to send he recieves the following message: Microsoft Outlook Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. The wierd thing is when I set him up here at my office it worked fine also it worked on his cable modem at home. Then when he went to his new office with a new dsl line he started to recieve this message. I looked up the error on google and one suggestion was to remove TCP/IP and add it again. This worked for about 5 hours and the next day he came to the office the same error popped up. I thought the problem might be the dsl line so I had him troubleshoot it with his service provider. They recommended that he upgrade his service to a faster speed. I didnt think this was the issue so I told him to test it out on another internet connection and he did and got the same error. I have about 25 users that connect to vpn and access their email and he is the only one having the problem. He uses windows xp pro and he is trying to connect to exchange server 5.5 sp4 on windows nt 4.0 sp6. Thanks Richard Tener _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: connect to exchange over vpn
It could also be an MTU problem (see recent discussion on the list). If it is MTU related, you keep pinging with some command line options (no frag and vary the ping packet size) and see how large you can make the packet before it fails. Then download and use doctor-tcp to set the MTU for that interface. Dr-tcp just makes it easy to set the registry for the custom MTU size. The MTU setting is in a registry tree below the name of the network interface (which varies from machine to machine) so you can't just merge a REG file to set the MTU. Tom -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Maybe he has enabled the built in XP (software) firewall and that is interfering?? Tom -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, I have problem with a user that is using vpn connection to read his email off our server. He can log into the vpn and access his email but when he tries to send he recieves the following message: Microsoft Outlook Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. The wierd thing is when I set him up here at my office it worked fine also it worked on his cable modem at home. Then when he went to his new office with a new dsl line he started to recieve this message. I looked up the error on google and one suggestion was to remove TCP/IP and add it again. This worked for about 5 hours and the next day he came to the office the same error popped up. I thought the problem might be the dsl line so I had him troubleshoot it with his service provider. They recommended that he upgrade his service to a faster speed. I didnt think this was the issue so I told him to test it out on another internet connection and he did and got the same error. I have about 25 users that connect to vpn and access their email and he is the only one having the problem. He uses windows xp pro and he is trying to connect to exchange server 5.5 sp4 on windows nt 4.0 sp6. Thanks Richard Tener _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Swing / Swing back Upgrade question....
At the very beginning of the year I finally managed to install Win2k and AD into our environment (more management concerns than technical stopped me in the past)... Everything with that upgrade went pretty smoothly... Now it's time to upgrade our Exch 5.5 SP4 server to Exchange 2K... When all is said and done, we want to have Exch 2K running on the same hardware that our present Exch 5.5 install. Instead of doing a direct upgrade, I'm under the impression that doing a swing / swing back style upgrade would be better as I need to upgrade HD space on the server in the process... I have a temporary machine that should be able to handle the load as the swing server for a week or two while I rebuild the present Exch box... Since the temporary machine is really only a workstation with 1Gb RAM and an IDE RAID, and is normally only part of my test environment, I don't want to leave Exch on it permanently Unless someone can tell me why this approach is a bad idea the question I have is this: Should I make the temporary swing server an Exch 5.5 server or go ahead and make the move to Exchange 2000 on the swing machine? I'm looking for pro's and cons of either method. Thanks in advance for any advice! Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2K3 and registering DLL's
Fresh install of Win2K3 RC2 and Exchange 2K3 Beta 2: 2.80.1015.0 Greg -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2K3 and registering DLL's I'm stuck in the install trying to register the DLL's 'regsvr32 oledb32.dll'. The original problem is based 'Setup failed with 0xc103798a registering the base dav protocol which I found in the Q base as Q296436 based on Exchange2000 on Win2000 where you have to manually register the C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\msdaurl.dll, C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\Msdaipp.dll and C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\Oledb32.dll. This is a 2003 and 2003 problem and I can't register the Oledb32.dll (I am dual booting with Win2K but since Exchange2K3 can run on Win2K, these DLL's should be cross compatible anyway. Can someone check and see what version of Oledb32.dll they are using (mine is 2.71.9030.0) with a running Win2K3 / Exchange 2K3 setup. I don't want to roll back another attempt as it was a mess last time to get rid of the failed install and try again. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2K3 and registering DLL's
Thanks, just a expand and replace did the trick :) -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 13:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2K3 and registering DLL's Fresh install of Win2K3 RC2 and Exchange 2K3 Beta 2: 2.80.1015.0 Greg -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2K3 and registering DLL's I'm stuck in the install trying to register the DLL's 'regsvr32 oledb32.dll'. The original problem is based 'Setup failed with 0xc103798a registering the base dav protocol which I found in the Q base as Q296436 based on Exchange2000 on Win2000 where you have to manually register the C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\msdaurl.dll, C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\Msdaipp.dll and C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\Oledb32.dll. This is a 2003 and 2003 problem and I can't register the Oledb32.dll (I am dual booting with Win2K but since Exchange2K3 can run on Win2K, these DLL's should be cross compatible anyway. Can someone check and see what version of Oledb32.dll they are using (mine is 2.71.9030.0) with a running Win2K3 / Exchange 2K3 setup. I don't want to roll back another attempt as it was a mess last time to get rid of the failed install and try again. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question: ES2k on a DC
Dear Trevor, In addition, you will experience a port conflict. Active Directory, on the Domain Controller, and Exchange 2000 will both want to use the same port number. I do not remember what the port number is, but I believe that it is the port used for LDAP by Exchange. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question: ES2k on a DC There are good and bad reasons to do most anything. The # of mailboxes on a server, by itself, is not all that indicative of hardware requirements for many reasons. However, for what passes for normal requirements in my experience you have way more server than you need so it will probably perform well, all things being equal. You need at least 2 DCs in each domain and in small environments one being an Exchange Server is not unusual. DCs in small shops don't need to be high performance boxes but I would hardware mirror the OS on each. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trevor Porter Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question: ES2k on a DC Hello All, Two questions in one ... I know that MS discourages the use of ES2k on a domain controller. Why is this? Load? Security? Other? Are there any good articles on this? Also, does anyone have any comments on the below config: I have (and will have) well under 100 mailboxes and am planning on using a Proliant DL380 G3 with 2x2.4 Xeons, 1 GB RAM and two RAID1 36 10k drives for the OS and the logs and three RAID5 36 10k drives for the information stores. Thanks, Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Dear Paul, Back on Thursday, April 12, 2001, I wrote a Haiku memorializing Windows Messaging. Windows Messaging, more than a utility, powerful, simple. Able to resolve, Administrator's best friend, Never forgotten!! For those who need more, there is the following Q Article. Q254458 It is found on the November 1998 MS Select Server CD. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 09:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Paul, It is either available on 5.0 CD or Select CD's (could be elsewhere) but that's where I get mine. If haven't got it wait until after 18:00 GMT then you will ;-) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Thanks Paul - do you know if that's downloadable (legitimately)? I remember looking for it a while back and I just couldn't find it anywhere. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] Paul, I normally install the Exchange 5.0 client on my Windows 2000 servers that require MAPI. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lost Emails after making new user
Also check c:\documents and settings\username\application data\microsoft.. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allison M. Wittstock Sent: 13 February 2003 17:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Lost Emails after making new user Hi, I found an answer but I would still like to know something. Where does Windows XP store (by default) PSTs and/or OSTs? My user had almost nothing in C:\Documents and Settings\User Name\Local Settings\Programs\Microsoft\Outlook\* Somehow the user had been working in Exchange offline-mode, even though he had no Exchange account. When he was prompted with the Exchange login info, he was just hitting cancel. When I had given the proper login info (after creating the account), I was getting his empty mailbox folders. Since he had no PSTs or OSTs, where is the data? Before I created his account, the System Manager showed no Mailbox for him. After it was created, it showed 1 or 2 items. Does XP store this offline info as another file type? I have never noticed this on Win2k + Outlook 2k, only this Win XP + Outlook 2k machine. Thanks Allison On Thursday 13 February 2003 01:03 pm, you wrote: Hi, This might be confusing, but here is my situation: I made a new user and the user logged in and used the mailbox. Since he travels around and did not have a VPN connection set up, he did not want to be an Exchange user, but rather just receive his emails through POP3. The user was deleted, and then I made him a contact. He had been a contact for some weeks now, and now wants to be a real Exchange user. I deleted the contact for him, and made him a real user (same name and information as when I first made his user account some weeks ago). I went into his Outlook, and under services, I noticed he still had the Exchange service as well as the POP3 internet email service. I closed his Outlook, and re-logged him in. Now, his inbox is empty and all of his old mails are gone. On the Exchange server System-Manager, I see his mailbox has only a few items. What mistakes did I make? I had no idea he still had the Exchange service this whole time, because he was not a real user. His mailbox never appeared in the System-manager, yet his mails were obviously stored there. From what I could see on the server, he was a contact with no Mailbox. I searched his harddrive for both a PST and OST and found neither. How do I get his emails back? Exchange 2000 SP2 Client: Windows XP Outlook 2000 Regards, Allison _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question: ES2k on a DC
I wouldn't exactly say they discourage it - they sell Small Business Server that runs Exchange (and SQLServer, and ISA) on a domain controller. If all you will have is one Exchange server, it's not a problem. You will see some strange errors in the event log periodically, but a little research will show that they are expected when everything is running on one server. -Original Message- From: Trevor Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question: ES2k on a DC Hello All, Two questions in one ... I know that MS discourages the use of ES2k on a domain controller. Why is this? Load? Security? Other? Are there any good articles on this? Also, does anyone have any comments on the below config: I have (and will have) well under 100 mailboxes and am planning on using a Proliant DL380 G3 with 2x2.4 Xeons, 1 GB RAM and two RAID1 36 10k drives for the OS and the logs and three RAID5 36 10k drives for the information stores. Thanks, Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Public Folders
Yeah, you have to select them all and click the little arrow button so they show up on the right. (I think, anyway. I don't have a UI to look at just now.) You want them on both servers. Also you should set your Public Folder Affinity so users in one site can view content in the other. They'll always see the hierarchy; affinity allows the content. Base your decision to replicate on what should be local to the other server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Follow-up to my earlier questions. I did replicate at the server level. Got called back to work as users were complaining that the folders had no data. To answer your question, yes, the servers are in the same site. Under the Instances Tab of OldServ all folders are on the left. Replication Tab is set to always. Both tabs on NewServ are the same. Am I missing something? Q196403 states that data may not initially be available for some users. It appears to be most users not accessing the data and how long should I expect wait? More than three hours? Going against the Ed Crowley Server Move Method, I've reset all the server's Public Folders back to OldServ. Hopefully by the morning the data will have replicated. In the meantime, I would still highly appreciate any suggestions or comments anyone might have. Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Both servers are in the same site, right? Then you can create replicas (instances) on the properties pages for each folder, or on the properties pages of the Public Information Store on the server to which you want to create replicas. Ed Crowley Technical Consultant Enterprise Microsoft Services Team hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving Public Folders NT 4.0 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 First time migrating PFs from one server to another and I'm just not sure what the procedure is. The FAQ states to create replicas on the new server, but do I need to do anything with the Replication Schedule tab? Right now all replication is set to never. I created a test folder and then set it up as a replica, but when I look at the Folder Replication Status tab, I don't see any info in any of the columns except server name which lists both the new and old. I tried setting the Replication Schedule tab to always, but it didn't appear to make a difference. Also, I have over 200 folders nested under about 40 folders which are then under one folder for my site. Can I just set up a replica on the top folder, or do I need to go into the properties for each folder and set it up? Is there a server setting for the entire server? Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Importing Contacts from 5.5 to E2K
I think he means migrating custom recipients to Active Directory contacts. You could use any of the following: 1. HP LDAP Directory Synchronization Utility (LDSU) 2. Microsoft Metadirectory Server 3. SimpleSync 4. MS Mail Dirsync (unsupported by Microsoft, but is supposed to work) 5. InterOrg tool 6. Active Directory Connector (in interorganizational mode) 7. Your own code Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Importing Contacts from 5.5 to E2K Drag the contacts to a PST and then drag them back? It's still somewhat manual but would not require the massaging that a CSV file might. -Original Message- From: Arnold, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Importing Contacts from 5.5 to E2K Good morning all. I was wondering if anyone knew of an easy way to import Exchange contacts into Exchange 2000. We have a subsidiary that is running Exchange 5.5 and quarterly they export their list of mailboxes to us using the Directory Export tool. We then have to manually massage the file to get it into the proper csv format for import into Ex2K. (using the csvde tool) It's a PITA and I was wondering if anyone knew/used a 3rd party product/homemade solution to accomplish this. I have looked around on Slipstick and could not locate an obvious solution. Thanks Paul LEGAL NOTICE: Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders
You'll never know. He got his answer and disappeared until the next time he has a question to ask. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Levis Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders Which solution fixed it? -Original Message- From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders That fixed the problem beautifully. Thanks alot! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA in DMZ Zone
I'm currently running an OWA with two LAN cards - one on my private network and one on the internet. I would like to move the OWA server to my DMZ and would like to know what ports I have to open on the private side to communicate with my exchange server. I understand that I only have to open port 80 on the public side (actually, 443 for SSL) Thanks! Raul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange 550 error
So... You don't consider sending bulk e-mail from accounts like the ones below as SPAM? [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your company is listed in the FiveTen block list and was already in MY personal block list and has been for several weeks. In fact, had it not been for Bill East replying to your post, I wouldn't have known this thread exists. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange 550 error Actually the name optonline.net is misleading, the company I believe is Optimum Online or some such, n'est ce pas? But the name was a point of discussion, Jeffrey; it appears that the first thing that a spammer does after bringing the KFC and Schlitz into his trailer is to pick a domain name with the phrase opt-in in it. At the moment I am turfing email from optinforyou, optindeals, opt-inemail, optinllc, and about 30 other domains with the word opt in them. -- be - MOS The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange 550 error Jim - The customer is not on optonline.net, is not listed at ordb.org, there has not been any spamming coming from this domain from this server, and the problem is sporadic - so I don't think that's the issue. And what's you got against Optonline.net :) Although the owners won't let us watch the Yankees (can't get it on cable here on Long Island!), they give kick as* Internet speeds. Regards, Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange 550 error ...no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. Maybe you just answered your own question. Have you checked the RBL's to see if your listed? Have you been spamming this domain to death? With a domain name like optonline.net, I'd be tempted to drop you in a Blackhole list, just on general principles. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange 550 error It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic). Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if you'd like.[1] [1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any. On 2/12/03 7:42, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a specific domain. I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't make heads or tails out of the rest of the message. What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25. The users have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or since, except for this most important email (or course). There was no NDR, no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. Thanks for any assistance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blackberry/Cingular down
We are not getting any Blackberry messages in or out of the network right now (this afternoon). I called Aether and they said the problem was not on our end. It sounded like the problem was with Cingular, and he had no idea when it would be fixed. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blackberry/Cingular down
I'm seeing the same thing, and I'm about to initiate a call with Cingular. I'll let you know what I find. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blackberry/Cingular down We are not getting any Blackberry messages in or out of the network right now (this afternoon). I called Aether and they said the problem was not on our end. It sounded like the problem was with Cingular, and he had no idea when it would be fixed. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connect to Echange using CDO
Hi everyone, thank you so much. With your help she was able to get it workingand I can stop troubleshooting something that isnt broken :P J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blackberry/Cingular down
I am seeing the same thing. I just got off the phone with RIM and they are aware of the problem. -Original Message- From: Bingel, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blackberry/Cingular down I'm seeing the same thing, and I'm about to initiate a call with Cingular. I'll let you know what I find. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blackberry/Cingular down We are not getting any Blackberry messages in or out of the network right now (this afternoon). I called Aether and they said the problem was not on our end. It sounded like the problem was with Cingular, and he had no idea when it would be fixed. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blackberry/Cingular down
According to Cingular, the whole Mobitex network has been up and down all day. There is no ETA, and for some reason, they haven't issued their normal email alerts. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blackberry/Cingular down We are not getting any Blackberry messages in or out of the network right now (this afternoon). I called Aether and they said the problem was not on our end. It sounded like the problem was with Cingular, and he had no idea when it would be fixed. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA in DMZ Zone
there are some white papers out there that list all the ports. try http://www.microsoft.com/isn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA in DMZ Zone I'm currently running an OWA with two LAN cards - one on my private network and one on the internet. I would like to move the OWA server to my DMZ and would like to know what ports I have to open on the private side to communicate with my exchange server. I understand that I only have to open port 80 on the public side (actually, 443 for SSL) Thanks! Raul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
have you had any UFOs in the area? I heard car engines stop when a UFO flies by. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error The service manager said it was running Must have been high solar-flare activity... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error Was SA still running or had it quit? I have seen some weird situation when SA has quit and Outlook clients can't log in but OWA is still working. Or another time SA and all other services were running but no one could log in, restarting SA and dependent services fixed it. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error Whatever it was, restarting the SA fixed it. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error usually when I see error 500 it means that the user account does not have a mailbox, but in that case the whole page is displaying error 500, no frames. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error (Exch2k SP3 on Win2k SP3) Hmm. I'm getting this error: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error, when users are logging in to OWA. The folder list appears and populates just fine, but that error appears in what would be the (bigger pane) item listing. Interestingly enough, if the user clicks Calendar, their calendar will appear in the big pane But all other folders result in the error. A google and MSKB search only mentions old browsers and free-busy stuff Nothing that seems to apply to me. Anyone seen this before? tia ___ There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who do not. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange 550 error
Real domain names would be the only way we could possibly provide more info now. On 2/12/03 13:39, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris - Thanks for the info - looks like it could be an MX issue as the MX record for the customer points to oldcustomername.com not newcustomername.com (although both names are still valid). FYI - If you check out MSKB 284204, it does say that 550 maps to a Generic protocol error (SMTP error). Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic? Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange 550 error It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic). Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if you'd like.[1] [1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any. On 2/12/03 7:42, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a specific domain. I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't make heads or tails out of the rest of the message. What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25. The users have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or since, except for this most important email (or course). There was no NDR, no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. Thanks for any assistance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Swing / Swing back Upgrade question....
I'd swing to 5.5 and then swing back to an upgraded E2K server. No hard reason why, just feels better all other things being equal. On 2/13/03 13:17, Joe Pochedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At the very beginning of the year I finally managed to install Win2k and AD into our environment (more management concerns than technical stopped me in the past)... Everything with that upgrade went pretty smoothly... Now it's time to upgrade our Exch 5.5 SP4 server to Exchange 2K... When all is said and done, we want to have Exch 2K running on the same hardware that our present Exch 5.5 install. Instead of doing a direct upgrade, I'm under the impression that doing a swing / swing back style upgrade would be better as I need to upgrade HD space on the server in the process... I have a temporary machine that should be able to handle the load as the swing server for a week or two while I rebuild the present Exch box... Since the temporary machine is really only a workstation with 1Gb RAM and an IDE RAID, and is normally only part of my test environment, I don't want to leave Exch on it permanently Unless someone can tell me why this approach is a bad idea the question I have is this: Should I make the temporary swing server an Exch 5.5 server or go ahead and make the move to Exchange 2000 on the swing machine? I'm looking for pro's and cons of either method. Thanks in advance for any advice! Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA in DMZ Zone
Assuming you are talking about E2K, there is a white-paper at http://go.microsoft.com/fliwink/?linid=4721 which lists the ports that are required to be opened at the end of the document. From my investigations though, it depends very much on what type of firewall you are using as to where to place the OWA server (ie: if you are using ISA server with Feature Release 1, it is probably more secure to publish the OWA server through ISA and leave it on your internal network). Hope that helps. Greg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 14 February 2003 08:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA in DMZ Zone I'm currently running an OWA with two LAN cards - one on my private network and one on the internet. I would like to move the OWA server to my DMZ and would like to know what ports I have to open on the private side to communicate with my exchange server. I understand that I only have to open port 80 on the public side (actually, 443 for SSL) Thanks! Raul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blackberry/Cingular down
Saw a Cingular guy on a pole...he says they can't fix w/o duct tape, and alas, none is to be found sorry -Original Message- From: Bingel, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blackberry/Cingular down According to Cingular, the whole Mobitex network has been up and down all day. There is no ETA, and for some reason, they haven't issued their normal email alerts. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blackberry/Cingular down We are not getting any Blackberry messages in or out of the network right now (this afternoon). I called Aether and they said the problem was not on our end. It sounded like the problem was with Cingular, and he had no idea when it would be fixed. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA in DMZ Zone
Sorry - that link should be http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=4721 -Original Message- From: Greg Marr Sent: Friday, 14 February 2003 09:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA in DMZ Zone Assuming you are talking about E2K, there is a white-paper at http://go.microsoft.com/fliwink/?linid=4721 which lists the ports that are required to be opened at the end of the document. From my investigations though, it depends very much on what type of firewall you are using as to where to place the OWA server (ie: if you are using ISA server with Feature Release 1, it is probably more secure to publish the OWA server through ISA and leave it on your internal network). Hope that helps. Greg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 14 February 2003 08:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA in DMZ Zone I'm currently running an OWA with two LAN cards - one on my private network and one on the internet. I would like to move the OWA server to my DMZ and would like to know what ports I have to open on the private side to communicate with my exchange server. I understand that I only have to open port 80 on the public side (actually, 443 for SSL) Thanks! Raul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lost Emails after making new user
Search his hard drives and network drives for *.pst and *.ost. If you find nothing, there is likely nothing to be found. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Allison M. Wittstock Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Lost Emails after making new user Hi, I found an answer but I would still like to know something. Where does Windows XP store (by default) PSTs and/or OSTs? My user had almost nothing in C:\Documents and Settings\User Name\Local Settings\Programs\Microsoft\Outlook\* Somehow the user had been working in Exchange offline-mode, even though he had no Exchange account. When he was prompted with the Exchange login info, he was just hitting cancel. When I had given the proper login info (after creating the account), I was getting his empty mailbox folders. Since he had no PSTs or OSTs, where is the data? Before I created his account, the System Manager showed no Mailbox for him. After it was created, it showed 1 or 2 items. Does XP store this offline info as another file type? I have never noticed this on Win2k + Outlook 2k, only this Win XP + Outlook 2k machine. Thanks Allison On Thursday 13 February 2003 01:03 pm, you wrote: Hi, This might be confusing, but here is my situation: I made a new user and the user logged in and used the mailbox. Since he travels around and did not have a VPN connection set up, he did not want to be an Exchange user, but rather just receive his emails through POP3. The user was deleted, and then I made him a contact. He had been a contact for some weeks now, and now wants to be a real Exchange user. I deleted the contact for him, and made him a real user (same name and information as when I first made his user account some weeks ago). I went into his Outlook, and under services, I noticed he still had the Exchange service as well as the POP3 internet email service. I closed his Outlook, and re-logged him in. Now, his inbox is empty and all of his old mails are gone. On the Exchange server System-Manager, I see his mailbox has only a few items. What mistakes did I make? I had no idea he still had the Exchange service this whole time, because he was not a real user. His mailbox never appeared in the System-manager, yet his mails were obviously stored there. From what I could see on the server, he was a contact with no Mailbox. I searched his harddrive for both a PST and OST and found neither. How do I get his emails back? Exchange 2000 SP2 Client: Windows XP Outlook 2000 Regards, Allison _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
It only shipped in the early betas of 5.5. That version, which never shipped outside the beta community, also had deleted item recovery support. Microsoft decided to abandon the Exchange client before shipping 5.5 and the client went away. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 5:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 It was on the Exchange 5.0 media, and maybe 5.5, but I can't remember for sure. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Thanks Paul - do you know if that's downloadable (legitimately)? I remember looking for it a while back and I just couldn't find it anywhere. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] Paul, I normally install the Exchange 5.0 client on my Windows 2000 servers that require MAPI. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
You can install Outlook before Exchange and you probably won't have problems. There are also Knowledge Base articles that address this problem. If you're careful, you can have both. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 5:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 One thing you do not want to do is install Outlook on your Exchange server due to possible MAPI conflict between Outlook and Exchange server version. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question: ES2k on a DC
That applies to running Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2000 domain controller, not Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question: ES2k on a DC I wouldn't exactly say they discourage it - they sell Small Business Server that runs Exchange (and SQLServer, and ISA) on a domain controller. If all you will have is one Exchange server, it's not a problem. You will see some strange errors in the event log periodically, but a little research will show that they are expected when everything is running on one server. -Original Message- From: Trevor Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question: ES2k on a DC Hello All, Two questions in one ... I know that MS discourages the use of ES2k on a domain controller. Why is this? Load? Security? Other? Are there any good articles on this? Also, does anyone have any comments on the below config: I have (and will have) well under 100 mailboxes and am planning on using a Proliant DL380 G3 with 2x2.4 Xeons, 1 GB RAM and two RAID1 36 10k drives for the OS and the logs and three RAID5 36 10k drives for the information stores. Thanks, Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA in DMZ Zone
It's way more trouble than it's worth in my opinion because you have to open so many ports, and very dangerous ones at that. With Exchange 2000, you not only have to open ports to other Exchange servers, but also to domain controllers. I believe that unless you have sophisticated intrusion detection systems and professional staff watching them all the time, you're probably better off opening only port 443 to your front-end (or Exchange 5.5 OWA) server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA in DMZ Zone I'm currently running an OWA with two LAN cards - one on my private network and one on the internet. I would like to move the OWA server to my DMZ and would like to know what ports I have to open on the private side to communicate with my exchange server. I understand that I only have to open port 80 on the public side (actually, 443 for SSL) Thanks! Raul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Swing / Swing back Upgrade question....
Whichever method you choose, remember to be sure to follow Q152959 and its successor article for Exchange 2000 to be sure, since each move will involve the first server in the site. The articles are badly titled; they apply to any server that holds those special roles. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Swing / Swing back Upgrade question I'd swing to 5.5 and then swing back to an upgraded E2K server. No hard reason why, just feels better all other things being equal. On 2/13/03 13:17, Joe Pochedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At the very beginning of the year I finally managed to install Win2k and AD into our environment (more management concerns than technical stopped me in the past)... Everything with that upgrade went pretty smoothly... Now it's time to upgrade our Exch 5.5 SP4 server to Exchange 2K... When all is said and done, we want to have Exch 2K running on the same hardware that our present Exch 5.5 install. Instead of doing a direct upgrade, I'm under the impression that doing a swing / swing back style upgrade would be better as I need to upgrade HD space on the server in the process... I have a temporary machine that should be able to handle the load as the swing server for a week or two while I rebuild the present Exch box... Since the temporary machine is really only a workstation with 1Gb RAM and an IDE RAID, and is normally only part of my test environment, I don't want to leave Exch on it permanently Unless someone can tell me why this approach is a bad idea the question I have is this: Should I make the temporary swing server an Exch 5.5 server or go ahead and make the move to Exchange 2000 on the swing machine? I'm looking for pro's and cons of either method. Thanks in advance for any advice! Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Public Folders
I'm not even sure where to go from here. This was supposed to be easy. I'm simply moving PFs from one server to another in the same site! On both servers all the folders are shown on the right side. However, I'm still receiving Error 3091 in the Event Logs. Anyone know what this error is for? Am I correct in expecting to see equal folder sizes on both servers when I check public folder resources? Do I need to rehome these folders? Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Yeah, you have to select them all and click the little arrow button so they show up on the right. (I think, anyway. I don't have a UI to look at just now.) You want them on both servers. Also you should set your Public Folder Affinity so users in one site can view content in the other. They'll always see the hierarchy; affinity allows the content. Base your decision to replicate on what should be local to the other server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Follow-up to my earlier questions. I did replicate at the server level. Got called back to work as users were complaining that the folders had no data. To answer your question, yes, the servers are in the same site. Under the Instances Tab of OldServ all folders are on the left. Replication Tab is set to always. Both tabs on NewServ are the same. Am I missing something? Q196403 states that data may not initially be available for some users. It appears to be most users not accessing the data and how long should I expect wait? More than three hours? Going against the Ed Crowley Server Move Method, I've reset all the server's Public Folders back to OldServ. Hopefully by the morning the data will have replicated. In the meantime, I would still highly appreciate any suggestions or comments anyone might have. Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Both servers are in the same site, right? Then you can create replicas (instances) on the properties pages for each folder, or on the properties pages of the Public Information Store on the server to which you want to create replicas. Ed Crowley Technical Consultant Enterprise Microsoft Services Team hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving Public Folders NT 4.0 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 First time migrating PFs from one server to another and I'm just not sure what the procedure is. The FAQ states to create replicas on the new server, but do I need to do anything with the Replication Schedule tab? Right now all replication is set to never. I created a test folder and then set it up as a replica, but when I look at the Folder Replication Status tab, I don't see any info in any of the columns except server name which lists both the new and old. I tried setting the Replication Schedule tab to always, but it didn't appear to make a difference. Also, I have over 200 folders nested under about 40 folders which are then under one folder for my site. Can I just set up a replica on the top folder, or do I need to go into the properties for each folder and set it up? Is there a server setting for the entire server? Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: Moving Public Folders
You may be having a replication problem. You might try turning up diagnostic logging. Unfortunately, public folder replication is kind of a black art. You put in the eye of newt, antennae of ant, stir it up and wait for the puff of smoke. Not much information is available here: http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=3091source= If you think you have everything set up properly, you might want to call PSS. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders I'm not even sure where to go from here. This was supposed to be easy. I'm simply moving PFs from one server to another in the same site! On both servers all the folders are shown on the right side. However, I'm still receiving Error 3091 in the Event Logs. Anyone know what this error is for? Am I correct in expecting to see equal folder sizes on both servers when I check public folder resources? Do I need to rehome these folders? Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Yeah, you have to select them all and click the little arrow button so they show up on the right. (I think, anyway. I don't have a UI to look at just now.) You want them on both servers. Also you should set your Public Folder Affinity so users in one site can view content in the other. They'll always see the hierarchy; affinity allows the content. Base your decision to replicate on what should be local to the other server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Follow-up to my earlier questions. I did replicate at the server level. Got called back to work as users were complaining that the folders had no data. To answer your question, yes, the servers are in the same site. Under the Instances Tab of OldServ all folders are on the left. Replication Tab is set to always. Both tabs on NewServ are the same. Am I missing something? Q196403 states that data may not initially be available for some users. It appears to be most users not accessing the data and how long should I expect wait? More than three hours? Going against the Ed Crowley Server Move Method, I've reset all the server's Public Folders back to OldServ. Hopefully by the morning the data will have replicated. In the meantime, I would still highly appreciate any suggestions or comments anyone might have. Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Both servers are in the same site, right? Then you can create replicas (instances) on the properties pages for each folder, or on the properties pages of the Public Information Store on the server to which you want to create replicas. Ed Crowley Technical Consultant Enterprise Microsoft Services Team hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving Public Folders NT 4.0 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 First time migrating PFs from one server to another and I'm just not sure what the procedure is. The FAQ states to create replicas on the new server, but do I need to do anything with the Replication Schedule tab? Right now all replication is set to never. I created a test folder and then set it up as a replica, but when I look at the Folder Replication Status tab, I don't see any info in any of the columns except server name which lists both the new and old. I tried setting the Replication Schedule tab to always, but it didn't appear to make a difference. Also, I have over 200 folders nested under about 40 folders which are then under one folder for my site. Can I just set up a replica on the top folder, or do I need to go into the properties for each folder and set it up? Is there a server setting for the entire server? Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Blackberry/Cingular down
This is just a problem with Blackberrys running on the Cingular network right? We are looking at getting BB's from Nextel and also T-Mobile for the people that travel out of the US. Anyone use BB's from Nextel or T-Mobile? How is the support? Ryan, -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blackberry/Cingular down Saw a Cingular guy on a pole...he says they can't fix w/o duct tape, and alas, none is to be found sorry -Original Message- From: Bingel, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blackberry/Cingular down According to Cingular, the whole Mobitex network has been up and down all day. There is no ETA, and for some reason, they haven't issued their normal email alerts. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blackberry/Cingular down We are not getting any Blackberry messages in or out of the network right now (this afternoon). I called Aether and they said the problem was not on our end. It sounded like the problem was with Cingular, and he had no idea when it would be fixed. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange 550 error
Jim - Relax. I'm just some poor schlub who subscribes to a cable ISP - it's not my company. Heck, I'd be off jetting around the world like the owners of this cable company do if it was my company. The bastards own the Knicks, Rangers, Madison Square Garden and a host of other small luxuries. Anyway, we're off-topic here so no need to man the flame-thrower over this issue. Regards, Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange 550 error So... You don't consider sending bulk e-mail from accounts like the ones below as SPAM? [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your company is listed in the FiveTen block list and was already in MY personal block list and has been for several weeks. In fact, had it not been for Bill East replying to your post, I wouldn't have known this thread exists. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange 550 error Actually the name optonline.net is misleading, the company I believe is Optimum Online or some such, n'est ce pas? But the name was a point of discussion, Jeffrey; it appears that the first thing that a spammer does after bringing the KFC and Schlitz into his trailer is to pick a domain name with the phrase opt-in in it. At the moment I am turfing email from optinforyou, optindeals, opt-inemail, optinllc, and about 30 other domains with the word opt in them. -- be - MOS The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange 550 error Jim - The customer is not on optonline.net, is not listed at ordb.org, there has not been any spamming coming from this domain from this server, and the problem is sporadic - so I don't think that's the issue. And what's you got against Optonline.net :) Although the owners won't let us watch the Yankees (can't get it on cable here on Long Island!), they give kick as* Internet speeds. Regards, Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange 550 error ...no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. Maybe you just answered your own question. Have you checked the RBL's to see if your listed? Have you been spamming this domain to death? With a domain name like optonline.net, I'd be tempted to drop you in a Blackhole list, just on general principles. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange 550 error It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic). Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if you'd like.[1] [1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any. On 2/12/03 7:42, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a specific domain. I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't make heads or tails out of the rest of the message. What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25. The users have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or since, except for this most important email (or course). There was no NDR, no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. Thanks for any assistance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
KMS
Dear All, is their any best practice articles on deploying KMS (E2K). Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
calendar import/export
Hi When I export and import the calendar items we are unable to update the meetings because it looses the associations with attendees Does any one know how to restore the associations in the Calendar Regards Santhosh.H E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
POP3 Collection
Is there any way of getting an Exchange 2000 server to collect pop3 email from other sources and deliver it to specific exchange mailboxes? I mean all automatic from the server... Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
