[FairfieldLife] A most beautiful question....

2005-10-30 Thread wmurphy77
So my brother asks me, Why do we see a flower as beautiful? The 
answer, my brother, is that the flower is a reminder of the spiritual 
home within ourselves. You see, when we see a flower in nature it is 
a 'clue' as to what is hidden underneath, i.e. beauty, love, God. The 
flower tips us off as to the 'nature' of the creator and we in turn 
respond because that very creator is within us as well, as ourselves.
There you go...thanks to Maharishi!  BillyG.  







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread akasha_108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  My experience is that refereed journals and proceedings provide 
 some degree of feedback and critique, but are not absolute measures
of validity. 
 
 The please tell us what does give validity? 

Well, there  are tens of thousands of refereed journals. There is a  
substantial hierarchy of peer-reviewed journals that range from the
best and most important journals for the best and most important
research at the top, all the way down to 3rd tier low funded, rarely
read journals from 3rd tier universities, sometimes a bit of a vanity
press at the bottom.

Better journals will have a very strong advisory board. They will have
high submital rates -- everyone wants to be published in these
journals. They mean a lot on a resume or curriculum vitae. . They will
have high standards and accept a relatively low percent of submitals
for publications. The reviewers will be the tops in thier field. The
journal will have large numbers of attributions to articles in it from
other academic papers. 

On the other hand, third tier journals will be at the other end of the
scale for these paramenters. They have few submitals and publish most
anything submitted after checking for gross errors. 

So simply being published in any peer reviewed journal is not a
guarantee of stellar work. It some journals it is, in others not.

As I said in prior post, important also is the debate in letters to
the editor about the article -- critiques from a much wider range of
experts than the peer review process. And does the article generate
sufficient interest and credibility that other researchers can cite it
and build on it in subsequent research and funding proposals. If its
exciting, ground breaking, strong research, it will be cited often and
 used as reference to gain funding for more reseach in that area. 

Funding review is often more important than peer review in journals --
particularly lower tier ones. Research committees have dollars to
spend, and are under pressure for results, for funding good research.
Careers are on the line. And people are being paid professionally to
review and critique the funding proposal. On the other hand, peer
review is usually anonomous and virually always unpaid. A reviewer
gets no direct acknowledgment and no fuding for his research. Its kind
of a thankless job and sometimes a minimum amout of effort is put into it.

The fact that these peer reviewed studies have generated few cites,
and no new research outside of TMO researchers (from what I can see)
and no funding outside of the TMO, speaks to the quality of the
research and the peer prestige of the researchers. The studies and
researchers generally not highly respected leaders in thier fields, 
are not associated with institutions known for strong independent
research, and the research does not appear to be well acknowledged as
advancing the field.

 Please inform the scientific community and the world of your 
 technique, 

See above.


and tell Maharishi, because he thought for 30 years that 
 the peer-review scientific process was the best way to test a 
 theory. I did too, until you broke the news that it doesn't.
 
Sorry that you appear to be such a TB with regards to the peer review
process. It has its strong side, and many merits. But it has its weak
side, as touched on above. Its not perfect. The standards for whats
good enough range widely across the universe of PR journals. Some are
quite stringent, others correct just glaring mistakes. And the PR
process does not prevent fraud. 

Peer review, in scientific journals, assumes that the article
reviewed has been honestly written, and the process is not designed to
detect fraud. The reviewers usually do not have full access to the
data from which the paper has been written and some elements have to
be taken on trust (except perhaps in subjects such as mathematics).
The number and proportion of articles which are detected as fraudulent
at review stage is unknown. Some instances of outright scientific
fraud and scientific misconduct have got through review and were
detected only after other groups tried and failed to replicate the
published results. An example is the case of Jan Hendrik Schön, in
which a total of fifteen papers were accepted for publication in the
top ranked journals Nature and Science following the usual peer review
process. All fifteen were found to be fraudulent and were subsequently
withdrawn. The fraud was eventually detected, not by peer review, but
after publication when other groups tried and failed to reproduce the
results of the paper.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review


And peer review makes the ability to publish susceptible to control
by elites and to personal jealousy. Reviewers tend to be especially
critical of conclusions that contradict their own views, and lenient
towards those that accord with them. At the same time, elite
scientists are more likely than less established 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Intelligent FFLers

2005-10-30 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, Barry, that's an excuse.  The real reason is
 that you still need to vent.

And your vacation didn't do you a damned bit of good.  :-)







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] The Experience of a Conscious Self

2005-10-30 Thread akasha_108
This was published in the peer reviewed Thlise Journal of Mind and
Behavior, in which 2of the 12 ME studies  were published. So
according to the standards attributed to peer reviewed journals by
some, I guess this is gospel. Do you agree Dr. Pete? Others?



--

The Experience of a Conscious Self
Thomas Natsoulas, University of California, Davis
The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Autumn 1983, Volume 4, Number 4,
Pages 451–478, ISSN 0271–0137

Contrary to what a number of prominent psychologists have lately
proposed, the present article argues that there is no inner conscious
subject. Insofar as a mental episode may be said to have a subject, or
to be had by a conscious self, it is always the self-aware human being
who is its subject. The human being's experience of a conscious self,
as being distinct from himself or herself, amounts to a natural
dissociation produced by the human being's self-awarenesses. There is
a strong tendency to distinguish anything of which one is aware from
that which is aware of it. This leaves, finally, and inner subject of
which one cannot be aware, but to which one has learned to make a
purported reference each time one is directly aware of mental episode.

Requests for reprints should be sent to T. Natsoulas, Ph.D.,
Psychology Department, University of California, Davis, California 95616.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: A most beautiful question....

2005-10-30 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 So my brother asks me, Why do we see a flower as beautiful? The 
 answer, my brother, is that the flower is a reminder of the 
spiritual 
 home within ourselves. You see, when we see a flower in nature it is 
 a 'clue' as to what is hidden underneath, i.e. beauty, love, God. 
The 
 flower tips us off as to the 'nature' of the creator and we in turn 
 respond because that very creator is within us as well, as ourselves.
 There you go...thanks to Maharishi!  BillyG.


I love flowers too. Clues can also be found in a pile of garbage that 
we see by the side of the street and deem offensive. what good is 
there in that pile of garbage? How does that too reflect God? Why does 
it offend us purely because of its presence?

And how about that person who just rubs us the wrong way? How do they 
reflect God? What is our reaction to them telling us about ourselves? 
Does the dislike we feel for them lie inherently in them, in what they 
express, in their Being? Or does our perception of them share some of 
the responsibility, some of the awareness, for our reaction?

What if we are not 100% aligned with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi? 
Who's 'fault' is that? What if our world view never quite conforms to 
his, no matter how much we try? Is that our fault? His fault? Buddha's 
fault? Is Maharishi perhaps not Maharishi at all? Are we too lazy or 
stressed or unenlightened to become just like him?

Lots of beautiful questions. Lots of answers too!! 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Mother Meera coming to the US

2005-10-30 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  She told a friend of mine on the phone that not many Americans 
are
 coming to
  see her in Germany any more so she is going to come to the US 
next
 summer
  and tour around.
 
 
 That is wonderful. When I first saw her picture, i stared at it for
 three hours. For me, there is something special in her. (But I am a
 unredeemable retard -- so draw your own conclusions).
 
 http://home.arcor.de/maatrix/

I don't know about three hours, though I can see why you were 
entranced with her- She is quite beautiful.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Mother Meera coming to the US

2005-10-30 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 
 --- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
  
   She told a friend of mine on the phone that not
  many Americans are
  coming to
   see her in Germany any more so she is going to
  come to the US next
  summer
   and tour around.
  
  
  That is wonderful. When I first saw her picture, i
  stared at it for
  three hours. For me, there is something special in
  her. (But I am a
  unredeemable retard -- so draw your own
  conclusions).
  
  http://home.arcor.de/maatrix/
 
 Isn't it interesting how you can experience darshan
 from a photo?
 
This reminds me of what I heard as a child when traveling among 
some primitive tribes in the northern Philippines, that they 
didn't like having their pictures taken because they believed their 
soul was captured on the film. 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Asheville TM center/Gerbal88

2005-10-30 Thread vashtirama
Ok, cool, thanks.
I didn't know 'sparaig' is Lawson.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 It's not intended to dismiss what you said at all.
 It's just a comment on Lawson's comment to your post.
 I had a feeling that my intent would not be clear when
 it was posted. I'm not dismissing anyone, mostly just
 noticing the mind's need to create certain stories for
 itself. Das all folks!
 
 --- vashtirama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi Peter, I'm not really sure why you posted this.
  It has an 
  impatient and dismissive tone, so I wonder why you
  responded instead 
  of hitting the delete button on this one. Probably
  most people on 
  this list know about the mind's defenses.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  
   The mind wants to have a story as a defense
  against
   experiences that contradict its primary story. Why
   have any story at all? MMY is a con artist; MMY is
  a
   great saint. He's both, he's neither, he's
  nothing.
   Why have any story/position at all. Does it
  matter?
   Attached, non-attached...just more stories.
   
   --- vashtirama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
You're making up a story right now, that I seem
attached. Are you 
aware that it's just a story, or are you
  attached?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
  vashtirama
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  sparaig,
  Thank you for taking the time to say that.
 
 I was (and maybe you got my point and thought
  it
was stupid,or 
maybe 
 you missed it) pointing out that you seem very
attached to having 
a 
 handle on MMY's motivations. Since very few,
  if
any, people truely 
 understand their OWN motivations, it seems
  kinda
futile and counter-
 productive, to being attached to trying to
understand everyone 
 else's, except in the most extreme cases.
 
 I honestly don't think that MMY has a purely
criminal intent about 
 all (or even any) of the things he does, so
  trying
to understand 
 him isn't at the top of my list. I make up
  plenty
of stories to 
 explain his motivations, but I'm aware that
  they
are stories.
 
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
  sparaig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
vashtirama 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
   
Yes, others say there's more too, I'm
thinking of Dr. Pete 
for 
instance, who has also given it a lot of
thought. I referred 
to 
   this 
in my post. The snake vs elephant
  analogy is
a little too 
   simplistic 
for me, because how do you allow for
  someone
who partakes of 
 both 
snake and elephant? MMY could be an
  elephant
with a snaky 
   personality 
disorder--that doesn't mean the elephant
  is
a snake instead. 
So 
   that's 
how I make sense of his crassest,
  basest,
most inhumane 
traits 
  and 
actions, along with him at his most
spiritually rarified--
he's 
 a 
special person with a personality
  disorder.
Lots of people 
are 
   special 
AND screwed up. So that's why my working
hypothesis works for 
 me--
  I 
stopped expecting MMY's words and
  actions to
always express 
his 
specialness because as often as not,
  they
express his 
disorder 
instead. So far I haven't been surprised
  by
anything he is 
 saying 
   and 
doing, so I'm feelin' pretty good about
  my
hypothesis.

   
   So not being surprised is important...
   

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
  Rick
Archer 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 on 10/28/05 6:35 PM, vashtirama at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Maybe some people don't need to ever
make sense of MMY 
  himself. 
   On
  this list I've seen that those who
  do,
come up with a 
whole 
   range 
of
  conclusions or working hypotheses
  after
great thought. 
Mine 
  is 
   that
  he has a personality disorder, such
  as
the narcissistic 
one.
 
 I hear you saying that you've felt the
elephant's tail and 
   elephants 
are
 like snakes. I say there's more.

   
  
 







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups.
  Make
Yahoo! your home page
   
  
 
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
   
  
 
 

[FairfieldLife] Cynthia Preston?

2005-10-30 Thread vashtirama
Is Cynthia Preston on this list or does anyone know her?
She just came out with a wonderfully creative book in my field.
Thanks,
Vashti





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Journal of Mind and Behavior -- Third Tier University Journal

2005-10-30 Thread akasha_108
Following are the abstracts for all of the articles published in the
same volume as the 

Consciousness as a Field: The Transcendental Meditation and TM-Sidhi
Program and Changes in Social Indicators - one of the 12 ME cited PR
journal articles. 

and the later Volume 9 with the paper, Test of a Field Model of
Consciousness and Social Change: The Transcendental Meditation and
TM-Sidhi Program and Decreased Urban Crime


It gives a context for the type of research  the  Journal of Mind
and Behavior (from which 2 of the 12 cited ME studies were published)
accepts -- and its degree of rigor for reviewing research. 

It appears that the ME studies are the only papers in these two
volumes that actually did any research. The rest appear to be
conceptual papers. So reviewing complex statistical / econometric /
social science research does not appear to be its forte -- or its
peers committee.



The Journal of Mind and Behavior is published by the Department of
Psychology, University of Maine. The Graduate School  serves the needs
of the over 2000 graduate students -- not a particularly large
program. The UofM is ranked as a 3rd tier university by the USNWR survey.

The psychology faculty does not appear particularly distinguished
based on their graduate schools.
http://fhcit.hctr.um.maine.edu:16080/psychology/faculty.html

The editor of the Journal of Mind and Behavior is not even on the main
faculty but is on Associated Faculty as a Research Associate -- after
graduating almost 30 years ago from U of M.  

Raymond C. Russ, Ph.D. (University of Maine, 1977), Research
Associate. Editor, Journal of Mind and Behavior.






As a side note, some may be interested in an article in vol 9, 

Consciousness and Commissurotomy: II. Some Pertinencies for Intact
Functioning

Researchers in this area have addressed, for example, the general
problem of the unity of conscious experience. They have proposed
various means by which such unity is accomplished, based on their
observations of commissurotomized people. Some of these means are (a)
a verbal-conceptual consciousness system that unifies by making the
individual (or cerebral hemisphere) consciously aware and spinning out
interpretations, (b) the transmission of information from each
cerebral hemisphere to the other via subcortical pathways, (c) the
duplication or equalization of processes between cerebral hemispheres
by means of the forebrain commissures, and (d) the production of a
single stream of consciousness per intact human being in a tripartite
structure that includes a part of each cerebral hemisphere and the
forebrain commissures.




---


The Journal of Mind and Behavior 
Volume 8, Number 1

Roger W. Sperry's Interactionism
Thomas Natsoulas, University of California, Davis
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Winter 1987, Vol. 8, No.1, Pages
1-22 ISSN 0271-0137
Sperry has proposed a solution to the mind-body problem that is both
physical monist and, surprisingly for many readers, interactionist.
This combination, among other features of his position, has resulted
in puzzlement and misunderstanding. Objections to Sperry's conception
have sometimes been based on a failure to grasp what he has been
proposing. In the interests of making clear and defending the monist
interactionist position, this article considers seven objections that
have been made to it in the literature.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Thomas Natsoulas, Ph.D.,
Psychology Department, University of California, Davis, Davis
California 95616.

Roger Sperry's Science of Values
Willam A. Rottschaefer, Lewis and Clark College
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Winter 1987, Vol. 8, No.1, Pages
23-36 ISSN 0271-0137
Though much attention has been paid to E.O. Wilson's views about
biologizing ethics and some attention has been paid to B.F.
Skinner's claim that the science of operant behavior is the science of
values, less philosophical attention has been paid to the proposals
for a science of ethics and values by Nobel laureate Roger Sperry.
While rejecting both behaviorism and sociobiology, Sperry argues for a
science of values built on his thesis of emergent mentalism, a thesis
that itself has, Sperry believes, respectable scientific support. I
examine Sperry's proposoal and argue, first, that his proposal enables
him to overcome the fatal objections to reductionistic sociobiological
and behavioral attempts to make ethics scientific and that eliminate a
role for cognition in human behavior. Nevertheless, both as a
genealogy of morals and ethical behavior and as a metaethical
justification of values and ethical principals, Sperry's thesis can do
with some help from both non-reductionistic cognitive behavioral
psychology and sociobiology. Second, I contend that even with this
assistance it needs further support from naturalistic principles about
the relationships between fact and value. More specifically, Sperry's
causal thesis about the role of values in effecting behavior 

[FairfieldLife] Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science -- A pay to publish journal

2005-10-30 Thread akasha_108
One of the cited 12 ME studies was publsihed in the Journal of the
Iowa Academy of Science. 

Dillbeck, M. C. (1988). (abstract) Collective consciousness and
social change: Effects of the Maharishi Technology of the Unified
Field on U.S. violence. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science, 95
(1), A56.

This journal requires payment by authors for publication.
http://www.iacad.org/jiassubmit.html

 
current board members
http://www.iacad.org/board.html#past

The area of focus is broad based -- not social science focused. A
number of the chairs for areas of focus are vacant, including
psychology and physiology.

The Academy does not appear to be a research powerhouse -- its
research budget is $40,000 / year. And it does not appear to have
strong review capabilites in the fields of pshychology and physiology
-- areas particulalry important for TM / ME research. 

To call this a third tier journal may be generous.





Agricultural Sciences [A]   

Chair: Vacant
Vice Chair: Vacant
Anthropology [B]

Chair: Mark Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chair: Vacant

Botany [D]  Chair: Nels Lersten
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chair: Jean Gerrath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cellular, Molecular,  Microbiology [C] Chair: Heidi Sleister,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chair: Matthew Henry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Chemical Education [E]* Chair: Sara Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chair: Vacant

Chemistry: Inorganic, Physical,  Analytical [I]Chair: Wanda Reiter,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chair: Vacant

Chemistry: Organic  Biological [L] Chair: Vacant
Vice Chair: Vacant
College Science Teaching [T]Chair: Vacant
Vice Chair: Vacant

Community College Biologist [J] 
Chair: Red Tondreau
Vice Chair: Heidi Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Conservation [F]Chair: Matt McAndrew, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chair:

Earth Science Teaching [R]* Chair: DeAnna Tibben
Vice Chair: Vacant
Elementary Science Teaching [S]*Chair: Lynn Campbell
Vice Chair: Vacant

Engineering [G] Chair: Lester W. Schmerr, Jr.
Vice Chair:

Environmental Science  Health [K]  Chair: Kavita Dhanwada,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chair:

Geology [H] 
Chair: Lee Potter, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chair: Vacant

Psychology  Linguistics [O]Chair: Vacant
Vice Chair: Vacant

Physics [M] Chair: Cliff Chancey, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chair: Vacant

Physiology [N]  Chair: Vacant,
Vice Chair: Vacant

Science Teaching [Q]*   
Chair: Michael Clough (President)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chair: Gale Vermeulen (President-Elect)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff Weld (Past President)
Kathy Lockard (Secretary)
Jeanne Rogis (Treasurer)

Zoology [P] Chair: Terry VanDeWalle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chair: James Demastes





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread authfriend
Terrific post, akasha.  Maybe it should be included
in FFL's files section along with whatever else (if
anything) is there on TM research.

I'd just note that the deficiencies in the peer 
review process described in your post could just as
well result in the *undervaluing* of TM's research
as it could in unwarranted approval (at least in the
abstract).

There may be some substance to off_world's charge of
bigotry, although of course the existence of bigotry
doesn't in and of itself lend validity to the TM
studies.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 10+ Studies on Maharishi Effect in Peer Reviewed Journals

2005-10-30 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 
 --- off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
  off_world_beings 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
   
Akasha comes in with an upper-cut followed by a
  right
cross! Off-World staggers, but does not go
  down!
  
  
  Sorry Peter, I misread your statement a little. It
  came across 
  harshly when I realise it was not. Sorry. 
  Its all good.
 
 Sometimes my attempts at humor don't come across as
 intended. I was chuckling over your ongoing exchange
 with Akasha that degenerated into a verbal slugfest.

But isn't that the goal?
Ah...sorry, wrong planet.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: 10+ Studies on Maharishi Effect in Peer Reviewed Journals

2005-10-30 Thread off_world_beings
Lol...they have support groups that can help you with that ya 
know.

 
 --- off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  
  Does it hurt when you kick yourself in the bollocks
  Peter?
 
 Like a son-of-a-bitch! 
 
 
 
 
  
  
   --- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
Great. Since you are so familiar w ith such, and
have read and
analyzed them thoroughly, can you provide copies
  of
them to me. I will
pay the postage and copying fees.

And can you summarize the findings? And provide
  the
basics? What and
where were the experiments conducted? How many
meditators and yogic
flyers? How many observations in each study?  We
have DC and Israel.
Where were the others? Can you please provide
  the
more detailed
results of the studies? The r^2's, the t scores
  for
each independent
variable, the over all F scores, the variance
inflation factors, the
durbin-watsons,  plots of the residuals, the
covariance martices, etc.
Thanks.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Below is some peer-reviewed published research
  on
the Maharishi 
 Effect.
 
 With Travis' in International Journal of
Neuroscience, that makes 
 about 11 total.
 
 Never in the history of science has such
  extreme
bigotry been
 levelled at research published in
  peer-reviewed
scientific journals 
 as has
 been aimed at the research on the Maharishi
Effect..

You seem to be repeating your self. Is there a
reason for that? Being
a serious student of the history of science as
  you
are, what would you
consider the 2nd, 3rd and 4th most bigoted
projections at serious
research in the past 100 -200 years?


 (I have not included the ones published in
Dissertation Abstracts,
 or Proceedings of such and such)
 
 
 Assimakis, P. D.  Dillbeck, M. C. (1995).
  Times
series analysis of
 improved quality of life in Canada: Social
  change,
collective
 consciousness, and the TM-Sidhi program.
Psychological Reports, 76,
 1171–1193.
 
 Dillbeck, M. C. (1988). (abstract) Collective
consciousness and
 social change: Effects of the Maharishi
  Technology
of the Unified
 Field on U.S. violence. Journal of the Iowa
Academy of Science, 95
 (1), A56.
 
 Dillbeck, M. C., Cavanaugh, K. L., Glenn, T.,
Orme-Johnson, D. W., 
 Mittlefehldt, V. (1987). Consciousness as a
  field:
The
 Transcendental Meditation and TM-Sidhi program
  and
changes in social
 indicators. Journal of Mind and Behavior,
  8(1),
67–104.
 
 Dillbeck, M. C. (1990). Test of a field theory
  of
consciousness and
 social change: Time series analysis of
participation in the TM-Sidhi
 program and reduction of violent death in the
  U.S.
Social Indicators
 Research, 22, 399–418.
 
 Dillbeck, M. C., Banus, C. B., Polanzi, C., 
Landrith III, G. S.
 (1988). Test of a field model of consciousness
  and
social change:
 The Transcendental Meditation and TM-Sidhi
  program
and decreased
 urban crime. The Journal of Mind and Behavior,
9(4), 457–485.
 
 Dillbeck, M. C., Landrith III, G. S., 
Orme-Johnson, D. W. (1981).
 The Transcendental Meditation program and
  crime
rate change in a
 sample of forty-eight cities. Journal of Crime
  and
Justice, 4, 25–
 45.
 
 Gelderloos, P., Frid, M. J., Goddard, P. H.,
  Xue,
X.,  Löliger, S.
 A. (1988). Creating world peace through the
collective practice of
 the Maharishi technology of the Unified Field:
Improved U.S.-Soviet
 Relations. Social Science Perspectives
  Journal,
2(4), 80–94.
 
 
 Orme-Johnson, D. W., Gelderloos, P., 
  Dillbeck,
M. C. (1988). The
 effects of the Maharishi Technology of the
  Unified
Field on the U.S.
 quality of life (1960–1984). Social Science
Perspectives Journal, 2
 (4), 127–146.
 
 Orme-Johnson, D. W., Alexander, C. N., Davies,
  J.
L., Chandler, H.
 M.,  Larimore, W. E. (1988). International
  peace
project in the
 Middle East: The effects of the Maharishi
Technology of the Unified
 Field. The effects of the Maharishi Technology
  of
the Unified Field.
 Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32(4),
  776–812.
 
 Hatchard, G. D., Deans, A. J., Cavanaugh, K.
  L. ,
 Orme-Johnson, D.
 W. (1996). The Maharishi Effect: A model for
social improvement.
 Time series analysis of a phase transition to
reduced crime in
 Merseyside metropolitan area. Psychology,
  Crime
  
 === message truncated ===
 
 
 
   
 __ 
 Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
 http://farechase.yahoo.com


[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread off_world_beings

 Well, if you are not qualfied to judge, thats one thing. I would 
think
 that would make you unqualified to judge others qualifications.

Your posts emit huge ego and self agrandisement.
You are saying that peer-review is good but only if you decide if and 
when it is so.
Sorry but the scientists who reviewed those 10+ studies for 
publication will take issue with your unqualified criticisms of their 
work. 

However, whenever a scientist has insisted on his/her more, so 
called 'rigorous', approach to analysing the data, then the results 
came out EVEN STRONGER than the TM scientists had claimed. The TM 
scientists are MORE conservative about it than the average scientist 
uses for their own research.
The studies on the ME are more robust (p value) than almost any other 
studies in the social sciences and even more robust than many studies 
in the physical sciences.

Deal with this. I suggest you take all these studies, find the 
strictest criteria you can come up with, subject all the studies to 
such criteria, then get the results published in a peer-reviewed 
respected journal. If anyone does this analysis, they will find the 
results robust and lasting. Your protestation of this amounts to 
prejudice and supertition until you have published a statistical model 
yourself.

Until then you are pissing in the wind because no-one takes your 
qualifications as seriously as you do. They do however take, as having 
merit, the qualifications of the 3 to 5 scientists that reviewed the 
studies. Though of course all things can be questioned, but after 10+ 
studies under such conditions, as a rational person you have show some 
respector go get published on the topic yourselfor deferas 
I have asked you to do.

Never before has peer-reviewed published research in respected 
journals been subjected to such bigotry and irrationality as a few 
scientists have attempted and some educated laypeople are 
perpetuating. Do you concur?

OffWorld







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Journal of Mind and Behavior -- Third Tier University Journal

2005-10-30 Thread off_world_beings
And your qualifications over the scientists and professors that 
reviewed them and decided them worthy of publication are what?

Are you a scientist? Are you a professor? In what field?


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Following are the abstracts for all of the articles published in 
the
 same volume as the 
 
 Consciousness as a Field: The Transcendental Meditation and TM-
Sidhi
 Program and Changes in Social Indicators - one of the 12 ME cited 
PR
 journal articles. 
 
 and the later Volume 9 with the paper, Test of a Field Model of
 Consciousness and Social Change: The Transcendental Meditation and
 TM-Sidhi Program and Decreased Urban Crime
 
 
 It gives a context for the type of research  the  Journal of Mind
 and Behavior (from which 2 of the 12 cited ME studies were 
published)
 accepts -- and its degree of rigor for reviewing research. 
 
 It appears that the ME studies are the only papers in these two
 volumes that actually did any research. The rest appear to be
 conceptual papers. So reviewing complex statistical / econometric /
 social science research does not appear to be its forte -- or its
 peers committee.
 
 
 
 The Journal of Mind and Behavior is published by the Department of
 Psychology, University of Maine. The Graduate School  serves the 
needs
 of the over 2000 graduate students -- not a particularly large
 program. The UofM is ranked as a 3rd tier university by the USNWR 
survey.
 
 The psychology faculty does not appear particularly distinguished
 based on their graduate schools.
 http://fhcit.hctr.um.maine.edu:16080/psychology/faculty.html
 
 The editor of the Journal of Mind and Behavior is not even on the 
main
 faculty but is on Associated Faculty as a Research Associate -- 
after
 graduating almost 30 years ago from U of M.  
 
 Raymond C. Russ, Ph.D. (University of Maine, 1977), Research
 Associate. Editor, Journal of Mind and Behavior.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 As a side note, some may be interested in an article in vol 9, 
 
 Consciousness and Commissurotomy: II. Some Pertinencies for Intact
 Functioning
 
 Researchers in this area have addressed, for example, the general
 problem of the unity of conscious experience. They have proposed
 various means by which such unity is accomplished, based on their
 observations of commissurotomized people. Some of these means are 
(a)
 a verbal-conceptual consciousness system that unifies by making the
 individual (or cerebral hemisphere) consciously aware and spinning 
out
 interpretations, (b) the transmission of information from each
 cerebral hemisphere to the other via subcortical pathways, (c) the
 duplication or equalization of processes between cerebral 
hemispheres
 by means of the forebrain commissures, and (d) the production of a
 single stream of consciousness per intact human being in a 
tripartite
 structure that includes a part of each cerebral hemisphere and the
 forebrain commissures.
 
 
 
 
 ---
 
 
 The Journal of Mind and Behavior 
 Volume 8, Number 1
 
 Roger W. Sperry's Interactionism
 Thomas Natsoulas, University of California, Davis
 The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Winter 1987, Vol. 8, No.1, Pages
 1-22 ISSN 0271-0137
 Sperry has proposed a solution to the mind-body problem that is 
both
 physical monist and, surprisingly for many readers, interactionist.
 This combination, among other features of his position, has 
resulted
 in puzzlement and misunderstanding. Objections to Sperry's 
conception
 have sometimes been based on a failure to grasp what he has been
 proposing. In the interests of making clear and defending the 
monist
 interactionist position, this article considers seven objections 
that
 have been made to it in the literature.
 Requests for reprints should be sent to Thomas Natsoulas, Ph.D.,
 Psychology Department, University of California, Davis, Davis
 California 95616.
 
 Roger Sperry's Science of Values
 Willam A. Rottschaefer, Lewis and Clark College
 The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Winter 1987, Vol. 8, No.1, Pages
 23-36 ISSN 0271-0137
 Though much attention has been paid to E.O. Wilson's views about
 biologizing ethics and some attention has been paid to B.F.
 Skinner's claim that the science of operant behavior is the 
science of
 values, less philosophical attention has been paid to the proposals
 for a science of ethics and values by Nobel laureate Roger Sperry.
 While rejecting both behaviorism and sociobiology, Sperry argues 
for a
 science of values built on his thesis of emergent mentalism, a 
thesis
 that itself has, Sperry believes, respectable scientific support. I
 examine Sperry's proposoal and argue, first, that his proposal 
enables
 him to overcome the fatal objections to reductionistic 
sociobiological
 and behavioral attempts to make ethics scientific and that 
eliminate a
 role for cognition in human behavior. Nevertheless, both as a
 genealogy of morals and ethical behavior and as a metaethical
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Terrific post, akasha.  Maybe it should be included
 in FFL's files section along with whatever else (if
 anything) is there on TM research.
 
 I'd just note that the deficiencies in the peer 
 review process described in your post could just as
 well result in the *undervaluing* of TM's research
 as it could in unwarranted approval (at least in the
 abstract).


They are often undervalued by the TM researchers THEMSELVES !
 Whenever the studies have been subjected to stricter parameters 
imposed on them by someone complaining , then the results come out 
EVEN stronger. 


 
 There may be some substance to off_world's charge of
 bigotry, although of course the existence of bigotry

It is entirely substantive, and the bigotry will eventually come out 
in history books as a record of how such prejucidce can occur in this 
so-called objective scientific era

 doesn't in and of itself lend validity to the TM
 studies.

Of course. 
It is only the bigotry that I take issue with. As long as it exists 
and there is no proof of wrong-doing and 10+ studies show positive 
results, then I will rail against bigotry.

Another form of bigotry is that I do not even MENTION the other 30 or 
so PEER-REVIEWED studies, reviewed by experts in the field, that are 
not published in independent journals. To assume that the researchers 
(TM researchers) must be allowing the publication of the results and 
ignoring major flaws in order to publish them immorally (in Collected 
Papers) is a form of bigotry in itself. Yet I will accept that these 
cannot be entered into the equation at this time. 
I suspect that in 20 years these other papers will hold more 
respectability and sway as proper results in the main (though not 
without some flaws of course).

OffWorld









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Mother Meera coming to the US

2005-10-30 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  She told a friend of mine on the phone that not many Americans 
are
 coming to
  see her in Germany any more so she is going to come to the US 
next
 summer
  and tour around.
 
 
 That is wonderful. When I first saw her picture, i stared at it for
 three hours.



I can certainly see why if the photo you are referring to is the one 
you link to below.

I linked on to it and fell in love.





 For me, there is something special in her. (But I am a
 unredeemable retard -- so draw your own conclusions).
 
 http://home.arcor.de/maatrix/








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Cynthia Preston?

2005-10-30 Thread bluecabbagerose
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vashtirama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is Cynthia Preston on this list or does anyone know her?
 She just came out with a wonderfully creative book in my field.
 Thanks,
 Vashti


Are you referring to Cynthia Preston who recently came out with a book 
on crochet? Too Cute Crochet -- for Babies and Toddlers.

She is a MUM grad, married to artist John Preston. They live on a farm 
south of Fairfield. She is a very nice woman who, if I remember 
correctly, worked as a gourmet cook at Surya Financial way back in the 
80s. She is a talented, creative, gracious woman. 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread Vaj

On Oct 10, 2005, at 1:37 PM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:

 on 10/6/05 2:37 PM, peterklutz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Any one seen the Oct 5, 2005 press conference?

 It's now official: the Prime Minister of the Global Country of World
 Peace, His Excellency Dr Bevan Morris, is Enlightened and is capable
 of answering any question as well as handling any task.


 Tom T:
 I have two friends who are Enlightened and they both independently
 listened to the press conference of mid September, if the date is
 important to the detail freaks I will verify the exact date. In that
 Conference MMY explained in great detail how different physiologies
 can experience the same unboundedness and talk about it differently.
 When it came time for the BM to do his recapitulation gig he was
 unable to keep the message straight and in fact turned it around
 backwards. It was obvious to both friends that the reason BM couldn't
 get it right is that he does not have any experience of E and in fact
 was in way over his head. Why MMY is saying BM is E seems beyond
 anyones idea. Tom

How do you reconcile the fact, which was mentioned on here in some  
detail, that M. sleeps a full eight hours or more and the fact that  
enlightened beings require little sleep? There are numerous other  
items which would bring into question M.'s enlightenment.

So the story goes.



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread Vaj
oops, sorry--accidentally sent an old draft.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] The Experience of a Conscious Self

2005-10-30 Thread Peter
Well said. Like the person who posted the comment,
It's raining. There is no It that is raining.
Just, raining. It appears that there is an inner
subject or I, because consciousness projects into
and assumes the boundaries of mind, and to a lessor
extent, the body. So you end up with I am having
experience X but there is no I having or not having
anything. There is only X. The I is not
consciousness, but a delusion of subjectivity.
Consciousness has no boundary; it is no-thing.
Ramana's inquiry can bring this realization home very
quickly. Try to find I. You'll find a very abstract
felt-sense of an I or me. But who is aware of
that? It'll become clear that this I is only a
thought.

--- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This was published in the peer reviewed Thlise
 Journal of Mind and
 Behavior, in which 2of the 12 ME studies  were
 published. So
 according to the standards attributed to peer
 reviewed journals by
 some, I guess this is gospel. Do you agree Dr. Pete?
 Others?
 
 
 
 --
 
 The Experience of a Conscious Self
 Thomas Natsoulas, University of California, Davis
 The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Autumn 1983,
 Volume 4, Number 4,
 Pages 451–478, ISSN 0271–0137
 
 Contrary to what a number of prominent psychologists
 have lately
 proposed, the present article argues that there is
 no inner conscious
 subject. Insofar as a mental episode may be said to
 have a subject, or
 to be had by a conscious self, it is always the
 self-aware human being
 who is its subject. The human being's experience of
 a conscious self,
 as being distinct from himself or herself, amounts
 to a natural
 dissociation produced by the human being's
 self-awarenesses. There is
 a strong tendency to distinguish anything of which
 one is aware from
 that which is aware of it. This leaves, finally, and
 inner subject of
 which one cannot be aware, but to which one has
 learned to make a
 purported reference each time one is directly aware
 of mental episode.
 
 Requests for reprints should be sent to T.
 Natsoulas, Ph.D.,
 Psychology Department, University of California,
 Davis, California 95616.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ~-- 
 Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make
 Yahoo! your home page

http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM

~-
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 





__ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread Peter


--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 
 How do you reconcile the fact, which was mentioned
 on here in some  
 detail, that M. sleeps a full eight hours or more
 and the fact that  
 enlightened beings require little sleep? There are
 numerous other  
 items which would bring into question M.'s
 enlightenment.
 
 So the story goes.

MMY is fully enlightened, no doubt about it, 100%
true. Nothing in the relative indicates anything
regarding enlightenment. All mind games and ego
positions. Vaj, have you ever interacted with MMY
personally?



 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ~-- 
 Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make
 Yahoo! your home page

http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM

~-
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 
 




__ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  How do you reconcile the fact, which was mentioned
  on here in some  
  detail, that M. sleeps a full eight hours or more
  and the fact that  
  enlightened beings require little sleep? There are
  numerous other  
  items which would bring into question M.'s
  enlightenment.
  
  So the story goes.
 
 MMY is fully enlightened, no doubt about it, 100%
 true. Nothing in the relative indicates anything
 regarding enlightenment. All mind games and ego
 positions. Vaj, have you ever interacted with MMY
 personally?

I'm not sure what your point is, Doc.  I've
interacted with Maharishi many times, and 
based on those interactions I would never 
be tempted to assume that he is enlightened.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   How do you reconcile the fact, which was mentioned
   on here in some  
   detail, that M. sleeps a full eight hours or more
   and the fact that  
   enlightened beings require little sleep? There are
   numerous other  
   items which would bring into question M.'s
   enlightenment.
   
   So the story goes.
  
  MMY is fully enlightened, no doubt about it, 100%
  true. Nothing in the relative indicates anything
  regarding enlightenment. All mind games and ego
  positions. Vaj, have you ever interacted with MMY
  personally?
 
 I'm not sure what your point is, Doc.  I've
 interacted with Maharishi many times, and 
 based on those interactions I would never 
 be tempted to assume that he is enlightened.

Except in the sense that we all are enlightened,
of course.  :-)







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Asheville TM center/Gerbal88

2005-10-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vashtirama [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 I see that you said seem. I asked if you are only because you 
persist 
 with your idea that I seem attached. 
 I'm ok with your opinion that MMY doesn't have a purely criminal 
 intent as you said earlier. If you can't be ok with my opinion that 
 he's disordered, it's more about your attachments than mine.
 Best,
 Vashti

He may be disordered, or he may not. I never said I didn't have 
attachments.

 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vashtirama [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  
   You're making up a story right now, that I seem attached. Are 
you 
   aware that it's just a story, or are you attached?
  
  Of course its a story, and of course I'm attached. I also 
said You 
  seem rather than you are.
  
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vashtirama 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 sparaig,
 Thank you for taking the time to say that.

I was (and maybe you got my point and thought it was 
stupid,or 
   maybe 
you missed it) pointing out that you seem very attached 
  to having 
   a 
handle on MMY's motivations. Since very few, if any, people 
  truely 
understand their OWN motivations, it seems kinda futile and 
  counter-
productive, to being attached to trying to understand 
everyone 
else's, except in the most extreme cases.

I honestly don't think that MMY has a purely criminal intent 
  about 
all (or even any) of the things he does, so trying 
  to understand 
him isn't at the top of my list. I make up plenty of stories 
to 
explain his motivations, but I'm aware that they are stories.

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vashtirama 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  
   Yes, others say there's more too, I'm thinking of Dr. 
 Pete 
   for 
   instance, who has also given it a lot of thought. I 
  referred 
   to 
  this 
   in my post. The snake vs elephant analogy is a little 
too 
  simplistic 
   for me, because how do you allow for someone who 
partakes 
  of 
both 
   snake and elephant? MMY could be an elephant with a 
snaky 
  personality 
   disorder--that doesn't mean the elephant is a snake 
  instead. 
   So 
  that's 
   how I make sense of his crassest, basest, most inhumane 
   traits 
 and 
   actions, along with him at his most spiritually 
rarified--
   he's 
a 
   special person with a personality disorder. Lots of 
 people 
   are 
  special 
   AND screwed up. So that's why my working hypothesis 
works 
  for 
me--
 I 
   stopped expecting MMY's words and actions to always 
 express 
   his 
   specialness because as often as not, they express his 
   disorder 
   instead. So far I haven't been surprised by anything he 
 is 
saying 
  and 
   doing, so I'm feelin' pretty good about my hypothesis.
   
  
  So not being surprised is important...
  
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
   
on 10/28/05 6:35 PM, vashtirama at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Maybe some people don't need to ever make sense of 
 MMY 
 himself. 
  On
 this list I've seen that those who do, come up with 
a 
   whole 
  range 
   of
 conclusions or working hypotheses after great 
 thought. 
   Mine 
 is 
  that
 he has a personality disorder, such as the 
 narcissistic 
   one.

I hear you saying that you've felt the elephant's 
tail 
  and 
  elephants 
   are
like snakes. I say there's more.
   
  
 

   
  
 








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi School Enrollment Down

2005-10-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 What I have always found very interesting, and sad, is the parents 
who 
 yo-yo their kids between the MSAE and the public schools, or the 
MSAE 
 and one of the home-schooling programs, sometimes on a yearly 
basis, or 
 even during the middle of a year.  And then these same parents 
wonder 
 why their kids can't form friendships or are failing in school.  
It's 
 like they don't have a clue, even after years of fighting with the 
TMO 
 or seeing first-hand the lack of any significant educational 
quality at 
 the MSAE.
 
 Sal

I'm still wondering at this phrase lack of any significant 
educational quality at the MSAE.

Are you saying that the standardized test results are being somehow 
faked?


 
 
 On Oct 30, 2005, at 7:01 AM, dhamiltony2k5 wrote:
 
 
   What the Fairfeild Ledger article does not get at in their short
   story is the story underneath.  There have been more than a few
   families making their own switches in recent years now.  The 
public
   schools themselves have always remained a good alternative. 







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 The fact that these peer reviewed studies have generated few cites,
 and no new research outside of TMO researchers (from what I can see)
 and no funding outside of the TMO, speaks to the quality of the
 research and the peer prestige of the researchers. The studies and
 researchers generally not highly respected leaders in thier fields, 
 are not associated with institutions known for strong independent
 research, and the research does not appear to be well acknowledged as
 advancing the field.
 

Well, that's a catch-22 in the case of the ME research. I'm not 
contradicting the general utility of your analysis, but only pointing 
out that ME research is, by its nature, an exception to the rule. 
However, it's all moot since scientific fields themselves must publish 
or perish, and the TMO hasn't sponsored new research on the ME in many 
years.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread Vaj

On Oct 30, 2005, at 3:48 PM, Peter wrote:



 --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




 How do you reconcile the fact, which was mentioned
 on here in some
 detail, that M. sleeps a full eight hours or more
 and the fact that
 enlightened beings require little sleep? There are
 numerous other
 items which would bring into question M.'s
 enlightenment.

 So the story goes.


 MMY is fully enlightened, no doubt about it, 100%
 true. Nothing in the relative indicates anything
 regarding enlightenment. All mind games and ego
 positions. Vaj, have you ever interacted with MMY
 personally?



While different people will vary somewhat, there are some relative  
determinants. Sleep is definitely one of them. I believe Judy could  
probably list the 20 or so determinants from the TMO and what they  
are, as she has mentioned them before. Judy?

If nothing in the relative indicated *anything* about enlightenment,  
then the TMO would not've bothered with all this research on the  
neurophysiology of enlightenment, etc. I'd even go so far as to say  
the TMO model of enlightenment contains some elements of truth but is  
incomplete and extremely misleading. It has been created to help  
market the techniques they sell. Therefore, due to it's  
incompleteness, it leads people to prematurely imagine their own  
exalted status.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Oct 30, 2005, at 3:48 PM, Peter wrote:
  --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  How do you reconcile the fact, which was mentioned
  on here in some
  detail, that M. sleeps a full eight hours or more
  and the fact that
  enlightened beings require little sleep? There are
  numerous other
  items which would bring into question M.'s
  enlightenment.
 
  So the story goes.
 
  MMY is fully enlightened, no doubt about it, 100%
  true. Nothing in the relative indicates anything
  regarding enlightenment. All mind games and ego
  positions. Vaj, have you ever interacted with MMY
  personally?
 
 While different people will vary somewhat, there are some relative  
 determinants. Sleep is definitely one of them. I believe Judy
 could probably list the 20 or so determinants from the TMO and what 
 they are, as she has mentioned them before. Judy?

They weren't determinants of enlightenment, sorry.
It was a lecture called 20 Green Lights to Cosmic
Consciousness.  The green lights were said to
be indicators that one was making progress *toward*
Cosmic Consciousness, but they were not presented as
absolutes that everyone must have in order to be
considered to be progressing.

Nor do I remember most of them.  The only one I'm sure
of, because it struck me funny, is Breathing less.
I think sleeping less was one of them too, but I
couldn't swear to it.

What puzzles me about this exchange is that (a) I
can't recall seeing anything here about MMY sleeping
eight hours or more; and (b) I've heard *countless*
stories from people who worked closely with MMY that
he in fact sleeps very little.  Maybe, as he ages,
he sleeps more than he did, but this is the first
time I've heard anything about his sleeping more
than a few hours a night, even from the most rabid
TM critics.

In any case, it seems absurd to me to hold the
amount of time a person sleeps to be some kind of
surefire indicator of whether they're enlightened.
Even the 20 Green Lights lecture said explicitly
that the green lights were *tendencies* that one
might or might not have.  The green lights were
positive indicators, but not having them was *not*
a negative indicator.

(I believe I recall that the lecture was said to 
have been originated by a TM teacher whose first
name was Peter, who was rumored to be in CC himself.
He was around the Manhattan TM Center a lot and
taught many of its residence courses, another really
brilliant teacher.  Anybody know who I'm talking
about, or what he's doing now?  He would tell a
joke about a large-mouthed frog, which I can't
remember either.)







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread Vaj

On Oct 30, 2005, at 5:29 PM, authfriend wrote:

 Nor do I remember most of them.  The only one I'm sure
 of, because it struck me funny, is Breathing less.
 I think sleeping less was one of them too, but I
 couldn't swear to it.

 What puzzles me about this exchange is that (a) I
 can't recall seeing anything here about MMY sleeping
 eight hours or more; and (b) I've heard *countless*
 stories from people who worked closely with MMY that
 he in fact sleeps very little.

Yeah, me too. But we had some fairly authoritative testimony that  
this was in fact NOT the case on FFL. It was rather saddening to  
hear. Some commented that this was the type of misinformation that  
was being passed around.

   Maybe, as he ages,
 he sleeps more than he did, but this is the first
 time I've heard anything about his sleeping more
 than a few hours a night, even from the most rabid
 TM critics.

Yeah, I know, like I said, I was shocked--and these (IIRC) were older  
reports from some of his secretaries.


 In any case, it seems absurd to me to hold the
 amount of time a person sleeps to be some kind of
 surefire indicator of whether they're enlightened.
 Even the 20 Green Lights lecture said explicitly
 that the green lights were *tendencies* that one
 might or might not have.  The green lights were
 positive indicators, but not having them was *not*
 a negative indicator.

I think that's a good word, indicator. However, in the absence of  
the determinants I have both witnessed and received (often they are  
given as secret and super secret signs in various initiations) I  
have to stick with my own observations and my own intuitions on these  
matters.


 (I believe I recall that the lecture was said to
 have been originated by a TM teacher whose first
 name was Peter, who was rumored to be in CC himself.
 He was around the Manhattan TM Center a lot and
 taught many of its residence courses, another really
 brilliant teacher.  Anybody know who I'm talking
 about, or what he's doing now?  He would tell a
 joke about a large-mouthed frog, which I can't
 remember either.)


It would be interesting to hear and find out about.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread Vaj

On Oct 30, 2005, at 3:53 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 How do you reconcile the fact, which was mentioned
 on here in some
 detail, that M. sleeps a full eight hours or more
 and the fact that
 enlightened beings require little sleep? There are
 numerous other
 items which would bring into question M.'s
 enlightenment.

 So the story goes.


 MMY is fully enlightened, no doubt about it, 100%
 true. Nothing in the relative indicates anything
 regarding enlightenment. All mind games and ego
 positions. Vaj, have you ever interacted with MMY
 personally?


 I'm not sure what your point is, Doc.  I've
 interacted with Maharishi many times, and
 based on those interactions I would never
 be tempted to assume that he is enlightened.

But if you did *assume* or by leap-of-faith *believe* he was  
enlightened you could possibly mistake a meditative experience for a  
validation of the previously *assumed* state...there's the rub...

I would bet before Dr. Pete experienced M. as enlightened, he had  
already accepted that fact. Above and beyond that he had been  
conditioned--both verbally and subliminally--that M. was some species  
of exalted person. If this is *not* true, I seriously doubt he (and  
others) would have continued to invest both time and large sums of  
money.

Acceptance of any mental framework or sequence of objects in  
consciousness will only self-validate themselves when at anytime  
afterwards one experiences them from the level of the void (or pure  
consciousness). Thus previously accepted ideas can and will present  
themselves as (seemingly) genuine experiences (and validation).  
They are a form of validation--but only of the thoughts we have  
accepted at some level of our being.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Cynthia Preston?

2005-10-30 Thread vashtirama
Yes! She's the one. My Mom sent me a newsclipping about her from a 
Fairfield newspaper. Do you know how I might email her?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bluecabbagerose 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vashtirama [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 
  Is Cynthia Preston on this list or does anyone know her?
  She just came out with a wonderfully creative book in my field.
  Thanks,
  Vashti
 
 
 Are you referring to Cynthia Preston who recently came out with a 
book 
 on crochet? Too Cute Crochet -- for Babies and Toddlers.
 
 She is a MUM grad, married to artist John Preston. They live on a 
farm 
 south of Fairfield. She is a very nice woman who, if I remember 
 correctly, worked as a gourmet cook at Surya Financial way back in 
the 
 80s. She is a talented, creative, gracious woman.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Judy
You must be referring to Peter Muldavin, one of the funniest guys ever.
Here is what he has been up to:
http://www.kiddierekordking.com/aboutme.html
Ken


 
 (I believe I recall that the lecture was said to 
 have been originated by a TM teacher whose first
 name was Peter, who was rumored to be in CC himself.
 He was around the Manhattan TM Center a lot and
 taught many of its residence courses, another really
 brilliant teacher.  Anybody know who I'm talking
 about, or what he's doing now?  He would tell a
 joke about a large-mouthed frog, which I can't
 remember either.)








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 [...]
  The fact that these peer reviewed studies have generated few 
cites,
  and no new research outside of TMO researchers (from what I can 
see)
  and no funding outside of the TMO, speaks to the quality of the
  research and the peer prestige of the researchers. The studies 
and
  researchers generally not highly respected leaders in thier 
fields, 
  are not associated with institutions known for strong independent
  research, and the research does not appear to be well 
acknowledged as
  advancing the field.
  
 
 Well, that's a catch-22 in the case of the ME research. I'm not 
 contradicting the general utility of your analysis, but only 
pointing 
 out that ME research is, by its nature, an exception to the rule. 
 However, it's all moot since scientific fields themselves must 
publish 
 or perish, and the TMO hasn't sponsored new research on the ME in 
many 
 years.

Yes they have, but they have not been published yet, and to my mind 
are too far out. Eg: effects of ME on President Bush's pretzel 
intake successes and failures, stuff like that.

OffWorld







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread markmeredith2002
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
   My experience is that refereed journals and proceedings provide 
  some degree of feedback and critique, but are not absolute measures
 of validity. 

Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first PhD in
physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's research.  
I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological problem. 






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Stokes and Barbara Dickins 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I thought Donna Seibert developped the 20 Green Lights of CC 
 lecture, but maybe Peter Muldavin developped it and she also gave 
 the lecture.

Dunno, Stokes, I may have gotten it wrong.  I know
teachers other than Peter did give the lecture, but
my memory was that he had put it together.  Maybe
whoever told me that was mistaken.

Say hi to Barbara for me!







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread L B Shriver
Response below.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
My experience is that refereed journals and proceedings provide 
   some degree of feedback and critique, but are not absolute measures
  of validity. 
 
 Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first PhD in
 physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's research.  
 I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological problem.

**

The methodological problem had to do with the assumption that the reduction of 
oxygen 
consumption was due to TM practice. If I remember correctly, it went something 
like this:

Subjects sitting quietly with eyes open were compared to their measurements 
taken while 
meditating. The drop in oxygen consumption was attributed entirely to TM.

Subsequent research showed that just sitting quietly with eyes closed reduced 
oxygen 
consumption by the same amount as TM.

It was a bombshell that hardly anyone noticed. O2 consumption twice as low as 
the 
deepest point of sleep had been the proof of TM's profundity; now TM was 
equivalent to 
sitting quietly with eyes closed.

The next development was metastudies which showed that, according to global 
measures, TM produced a state of rest twice as deep as deep sleep. The claim 
was the 
same, but no longer based on a starkly simple, irrefutable measurement. Now it 
was 
teased out of the statistics.

The whole thing was smoothed over within a few months.

L B S


 








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] MUM website, like Peter Sutphen

2005-10-30 Thread off_world_beings
MUM website, like Peter Sutphen, has passed away?







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread L B Shriver
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Response below.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  My experience is that refereed journals and proceedings 
 provide 
 some degree of feedback and critique, but are not absolute 
 measures
of validity. 
   
   Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first PhD in
   physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's 
 research.  
   I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological problem.
  
  **
  
  The methodological problem had to do with the assumption that the 
 reduction of oxygen 
  consumption was due to TM practice. If I remember correctly, it 
 went something like this:
  
  Subjects sitting quietly with eyes open were compared to their 
 measurements taken while 
  meditating. The drop in oxygen consumption was attributed entirely 
 to TM.
  
  Subsequent research showed that just sitting quietly with eyes 
 closed reduced oxygen 
  consumption by the same amount as TM.
  
  It was a bombshell that hardly anyone noticed. O2 consumption 
 twice as low as the 
  deepest point of sleep had been the proof of TM's profundity; 
 now TM was equivalent to 
  sitting quietly with eyes closed.
 
 
 Wow, still relying on unpublished research and rumor are we? Hardly 
 a 'bombshell'. Unpublished gossip, another arrow to the bigot's bow.
 
 OffWorld



If you are referring to Kesterson's research, you might wish to consider that 
it was 
included in the dissertation for which MIU awarded his PhD.

L B S






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
   --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
How do you reconcile the fact, which was mentioned
on here in some  
detail, that M. sleeps a full eight hours or more
and the fact that  
enlightened beings require little sleep? There are
numerous other  
items which would bring into question M.'s
enlightenment.

So the story goes.
   
   MMY is fully enlightened, no doubt about it, 100%
   true. Nothing in the relative indicates anything
   regarding enlightenment. All mind games and ego
   positions. Vaj, have you ever interacted with MMY
   personally?
  
  I'm not sure what your point is, Doc.  I've
  interacted with Maharishi many times, and 
  based on those interactions I would never 
  be tempted to assume that he is enlightened.
 
 Except in the sense that we all are enlightened,
 of course.  :-)

I suspect Maharishi is enlightened. I have never met him, and many 
of his techniques and teaching methods aren't fool-proof, nor any 
evidence necessarily of his enlightenment. 

Nonetheless, his interest in, his goal of enlightening the world, 
and my intuition lead me to believe that he is enlightened. And 
that, and $4 will buy you a big cup of coffee...

By that I mean, it is really, really unimportant imo whether the man 
is enlightened, or not. Doesn't necessarily inform his skill as a 
teacher- just makes him a magnetic personality and drives his 
interest in the subject. In other words, it is impossible to 
determine through his teaching methods or his actions whether he is 
enlightened. And his teaching approach has absolutely no association 
with his state of consciousness.

The whole issue is a bit of a yawn at this point. Lots of tamas 
associated with it.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly (PS)

2005-10-30 Thread L B Shriver
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Response below.
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
   My experience is that refereed journals and proceedings 
  provide 
  some degree of feedback and critique, but are not absolute 
  measures
 of validity. 

Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first PhD in
physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's 
  research.  
I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological problem.
   
   **
   
   The methodological problem had to do with the assumption that the 
  reduction of oxygen 
   consumption was due to TM practice. If I remember correctly, it 
  went something like this:
   
   Subjects sitting quietly with eyes open were compared to their 
  measurements taken while 
   meditating. The drop in oxygen consumption was attributed entirely 
  to TM.
   
   Subsequent research showed that just sitting quietly with eyes 
  closed reduced oxygen 
   consumption by the same amount as TM.
   
   It was a bombshell that hardly anyone noticed. O2 consumption 
  twice as low as the 
   deepest point of sleep had been the proof of TM's profundity; 
  now TM was equivalent to 
   sitting quietly with eyes closed.
  
  
  Wow, still relying on unpublished research and rumor are we? Hardly 
  a 'bombshell'. Unpublished gossip, another arrow to the bigot's bow.
  
  OffWorld
 
 
 
 If you are referring to Kesterson's research, you might wish to consider that 
 it was 
 included in the dissertation for which MIU awarded his PhD.
 
 L B S




By the way, I discussed Kesterson's research with Keith, and he confirmed to me 
that 
Kesterson's findings were correct.

L B S






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Oct 30, 2005, at 3:48 PM, Peter wrote:
 
 
 
  --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
  How do you reconcile the fact, which was mentioned
  on here in some
  detail, that M. sleeps a full eight hours or more
  and the fact that
  enlightened beings require little sleep? There are
  numerous other
  items which would bring into question M.'s
  enlightenment.
 
  So the story goes.
 
 
  MMY is fully enlightened, no doubt about it, 100%
  true. Nothing in the relative indicates anything
  regarding enlightenment. All mind games and ego
  positions. Vaj, have you ever interacted with MMY
  personally?
 
 
 
 While different people will vary somewhat, there are some relative  
 determinants. Sleep is definitely one of them. 

MMY has never said anything, as far as Iknow, about quantity of sleep 
being a determinant of enlightenment. In fact, he goes with the BG on 
external indicators with the caveat that he thinks that physiological 
measures not available save in the past 50 years or so can give 
insight into states of consciousness, including enlightenment.

I believe Judy could  
 probably list the 20 or so determinants from the TMO and what they  
 are, as she has mentioned them before. Judy?
 
 If nothing in the relative indicated *anything* about 
enlightenment,  
 then the TMO would not've bothered with all this research on the  
 neurophysiology of enlightenment, etc. I'd even go so far as to 
say  
 the TMO model of enlightenment contains some elements of truth but 
is  
 incomplete and extremely misleading. It has been created to help  
 market the techniques they sell. Therefore, due to it's  
 incompleteness, it leads people to prematurely imagine their own  
 exalted status.



I'd go so far as to say that the TMO presentation of what 
enlightenment is or is not is far superior to your own.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Experience of a Conscious Self

2005-10-30 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Well said. Like the person who posted the comment,
 It's raining. There is no It that is raining.
 Just, raining. It appears that there is an inner
 subject or I, because consciousness projects into
 and assumes the boundaries of mind, and to a lessor
 extent, the body. So you end up with I am having
 experience X but there is no I having or not having
 anything. There is only X. The I is not
 consciousness, but a delusion of subjectivity.
 Consciousness has no boundary; it is no-thing.
 Ramana's inquiry can bring this realization home very
 quickly. Try to find I. You'll find a very abstract
 felt-sense of an I or me. But who is aware of
 that? It'll become clear that this I is only a
 thought.

Then it would appear that Ramana did not have the full experience, 
only a superficial one, true though his conclusions are.
The true experience is not so subtle. It is an awe inspiring bright 
homogenous energy that hums powerfully just below the surface and 
explodes into this dimension when the mind reaches it. It is 
unbounded, VERY powerful, even scary, but the body that is 
experiencing immediately knows that this Self cannot be wetted, nor 
burned, nor dried up, nor killed. It is who we are. It is the 
Universe. It is awe-inspiring and we cannot begin to imagine what 
power it holds and how it can express itself in such a limited 
world. This world does not seem strong enough for it to fully 
blossom. It would annihilate this plane if it were completely 
shining forth. The body could barely remain should such a power show 
its true face in this universe.
This is my experience. It is the all-powerful non-me that is me, 
bright and powerful like the sun, only not centered in one place. It 
is the One.

OffWorld





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's designated successor..

2005-10-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Oct 30, 2005, at 3:53 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 
  --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  How do you reconcile the fact, which was mentioned
  on here in some
  detail, that M. sleeps a full eight hours or more
  and the fact that
  enlightened beings require little sleep? There are
  numerous other
  items which would bring into question M.'s
  enlightenment.
 
  So the story goes.
 
 
  MMY is fully enlightened, no doubt about it, 100%
  true. Nothing in the relative indicates anything
  regarding enlightenment. All mind games and ego
  positions. Vaj, have you ever interacted with MMY
  personally?
 
 
  I'm not sure what your point is, Doc.  I've
  interacted with Maharishi many times, and
  based on those interactions I would never
  be tempted to assume that he is enlightened.
 
 But if you did *assume* or by leap-of-faith *believe* he was  
 enlightened you could possibly mistake a meditative experience for 
a  
 validation of the previously *assumed* state...there's the rub...
 
 I would bet before Dr. Pete experienced M. as enlightened, he 
had  
 already accepted that fact. Above and beyond that he had been  
 conditioned--both verbally and subliminally--that M. was some 
species  
 of exalted person. If this is *not* true, I seriously doubt he 
(and  
 others) would have continued to invest both time and large sums of  
 money.
 
 Acceptance of any mental framework or sequence of objects in  
 consciousness will only self-validate themselves when at anytime  
 afterwards one experiences them from the level of the void 
(or pure  
 consciousness). Thus previously accepted ideas can and will 
present  
 themselves as (seemingly) genuine experiences (and validation).  
 They are a form of validation--but only of the thoughts we have  
 accepted at some level of our being.


Thanks for this hint at the higher level of Truth that you, of all 
people on this forum, are the only one privy to...







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Response below.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 My experience is that refereed journals and proceedings 
provide 
some degree of feedback and critique, but are not absolute 
measures
   of validity. 
  
  Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first PhD in
  physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's 
research.  
  I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological problem.
 
 **
 
 The methodological problem had to do with the assumption that the 
reduction of oxygen 
 consumption was due to TM practice. If I remember correctly, it 
went something like this:
 
 Subjects sitting quietly with eyes open were compared to their 
measurements taken while 
 meditating. The drop in oxygen consumption was attributed entirely 
to TM.
 
 Subsequent research showed that just sitting quietly with eyes 
closed reduced oxygen 
 consumption by the same amount as TM.
 
 It was a bombshell that hardly anyone noticed. O2 consumption 
twice as low as the 
 deepest point of sleep had been the proof of TM's profundity; 
now TM was equivalent to 
 sitting quietly with eyes closed.


Wow, still relying on unpublished research and rumor are we? Hardly 
a 'bombshell'. Unpublished gossip, another arrow to the bigot's bow.

OffWorld





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
My experience is that refereed journals and proceedings provide 
   some degree of feedback and critique, but are not absolute 
measures
  of validity. 
 
 Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first PhD in
 physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's research.  
 I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological problem.


Why yes, and acknowledged by everyone these days: no control group.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Experience of a Conscious Self

2005-10-30 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  Well said. Like the person who posted the comment,
  It's raining. There is no It that is raining.
  Just, raining. It appears that there is an inner
  subject or I, because consciousness projects into
  and assumes the boundaries of mind, and to a lessor
  extent, the body. So you end up with I am having
  experience X but there is no I having or not having
  anything. There is only X. The I is not
  consciousness, but a delusion of subjectivity.
  Consciousness has no boundary; it is no-thing.
  Ramana's inquiry can bring this realization home very
  quickly. Try to find I. You'll find a very abstract
  felt-sense of an I or me. But who is aware of
  that? It'll become clear that this I is only a
  thought.
 
 Then it would appear that Ramana did not have the full experience, 
 only a superficial one, true though his conclusions are.
 The true experience is not so subtle. It is an awe inspiring 
bright 
 homogenous energy that hums powerfully just below the surface and 
 explodes into this dimension when the mind reaches it. It is 
 unbounded, VERY powerful, even scary, but the body that is 
 experiencing immediately knows that this Self cannot be wetted, 
nor 
 burned, nor dried up, nor killed. It is who we are. It is the 
 Universe. It is awe-inspiring and we cannot begin to imagine what 
 power it holds and how it can express itself in such a limited 
 world. This world does not seem strong enough for it to fully 
 blossom. It would annihilate this plane if it were completely 
 shining forth. The body could barely remain should such a power 
show 
 its true face in this universe.
 This is my experience. It is the all-powerful non-me that is me, 
 bright and powerful like the sun, only not centered in one place. 
It 
 is the One.
 
 OffWorld

Nice! It is the very diversity of the world that keeps this power 
fully blossoming. All of the gunas and their various combinations 
express the fully blossoming force of Oneness. Every fragment, every 
wholeness, indivisible and diverse, infinity in every point and 
particle, every shadow and shape, every thought and all of silence, 
whether of darkness or light, reflects this and that awesome power, 
of Oneness.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Response below.
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
   My experience is that refereed journals and 
proceedings 
  provide 
  some degree of feedback and critique, but are not 
absolute 
  measures
 of validity. 

Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first PhD 
in
physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's 
  research.  
I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological problem.
   
   **
   
   The methodological problem had to do with the assumption that 
the 
  reduction of oxygen 
   consumption was due to TM practice. If I remember correctly, 
it 
  went something like this:
   
   Subjects sitting quietly with eyes open were compared to their 
  measurements taken while 
   meditating. The drop in oxygen consumption was attributed 
entirely 
  to TM.
   
   Subsequent research showed that just sitting quietly with eyes 
  closed reduced oxygen 
   consumption by the same amount as TM.
   
   It was a bombshell that hardly anyone noticed. O2 consumption 
  twice as low as the 
   deepest point of sleep had been the proof of TM's 
profundity; 
  now TM was equivalent to 
   sitting quietly with eyes closed.
  
  
  Wow, still relying on unpublished research and rumor are we? 
Hardly 
  a 'bombshell'. Unpublished gossip, another arrow to the bigot's 
bow.
  
  OffWorld
 
 
 
 If you are referring to Kesterson's research, you might wish to 
consider that it was 
 included in the dissertation for which MIU awarded his PhD.
 
 L B S.

I am really only interested in research published in peer-reviewed 
journals, though I am sure the research you cite is good, it has no 
meaning to the world as it stands, and even if it were published it 
has been somewhat swamped and washed away by the hundreds of other 
studies showing more important results and the 20 million + dollars 
in hard won grant money given by the NIH.

OffWorld






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Response below.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 My experience is that refereed journals and proceedings 
provide 
some degree of feedback and critique, but are not absolute 
measures
   of validity. 
  
  Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first PhD in
  physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's research.  
  I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological problem.
 
 **
 
 The methodological problem had to do with the assumption that the 
reduction of oxygen 
 consumption was due to TM practice. If I remember correctly, it 
went something like this:
 
 Subjects sitting quietly with eyes open were compared to their 
measurements taken while 
 meditating. The drop in oxygen consumption was attributed entirely 
to TM.
 
 Subsequent research showed that just sitting quietly with eyes 
closed reduced oxygen 
 consumption by the same amount as TM.
 
 It was a bombshell that hardly anyone noticed. O2 consumption 
twice as low as the 
 deepest point of sleep had been the proof of TM's profundity; 
now TM was equivalent to 
 sitting quietly with eyes closed.
 
 The next development was metastudies which showed that, according 
to global 
 measures, TM produced a state of rest twice as deep as deep sleep. 
The claim was the 
 same, but no longer based on a starkly simple, irrefutable 
measurement. Now it was 
 teased out of the statistics.
 
 The whole thing was smoothed over within a few months.
 
 L B S


Except that Kesterson's finding was based on examining the physiology 
of people inthe breath suspension state because the assumption was 
that O2 consumption was driving the reduction in O2. It wasn't. That 
was NOT smoothed over, and Keith Wallace's book formally acknowledges 
that the early studies were flawed in that regard.

O2 is no longer seen as a measure of rest during TM.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: MUM website, like Peter Sutphen

2005-10-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 MUM website, like Peter Sutphen, has passed away?



Er, no?

http://www.mum.edu/






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Experience of a Conscious Self

2005-10-30 Thread Peter


--- off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 
 Then it would appear that Ramana did not have the
 full experience, 
 only a superficial one...

Yeah, Ramana Maharishi wasn't fully realized like us !




__ 
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly (PS)

2005-10-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
Response below.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
My experience is that refereed journals and 
proceedings 
   provide 
   some degree of feedback and critique, but are not 
absolute 
   measures
  of validity. 
 
 Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first 
PhD in
 physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's 
   research.  
 I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological 
problem.

**

The methodological problem had to do with the assumption that 
the 
   reduction of oxygen 
consumption was due to TM practice. If I remember correctly, 
it 
   went something like this:

Subjects sitting quietly with eyes open were compared to 
their 
   measurements taken while 
meditating. The drop in oxygen consumption was attributed 
entirely 
   to TM.

Subsequent research showed that just sitting quietly with 
eyes 
   closed reduced oxygen 
consumption by the same amount as TM.

It was a bombshell that hardly anyone noticed. O2 
consumption 
   twice as low as the 
deepest point of sleep had been the proof of TM's 
profundity; 
   now TM was equivalent to 
sitting quietly with eyes closed.
   
   
   Wow, still relying on unpublished research and rumor are we? 
Hardly 
   a 'bombshell'. Unpublished gossip, another arrow to the bigot's 
bow.
   
   OffWorld
  
  
  
  If you are referring to Kesterson's research, you might wish to 
consider that it was 
  included in the dissertation for which MIU awarded his PhD.
  
  L B S
 
 
 
 
 By the way, I discussed Kesterson's research with Keith, and he 
confirmed to me that 
 Kesterson's findings were correct.
 
 L B S


ANd Keith has written about how things have changed since he first 
started doing researchon TM 35 years ago.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
Response below.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
My experience is that refereed journals and 
 proceedings 
   provide 
   some degree of feedback and critique, but are not 
 absolute 
   measures
  of validity. 
 
 Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first 
PhD 
 in
 physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's 
   research.  
 I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological 
problem.

**

The methodological problem had to do with the assumption that 
 the 
   reduction of oxygen 
consumption was due to TM practice. If I remember correctly, 
 it 
   went something like this:

Subjects sitting quietly with eyes open were compared to 
their 
   measurements taken while 
meditating. The drop in oxygen consumption was attributed 
 entirely 
   to TM.

Subsequent research showed that just sitting quietly with 
eyes 
   closed reduced oxygen 
consumption by the same amount as TM.

It was a bombshell that hardly anyone noticed. O2 
consumption 
   twice as low as the 
deepest point of sleep had been the proof of TM's 
 profundity; 
   now TM was equivalent to 
sitting quietly with eyes closed.
   
   
   Wow, still relying on unpublished research and rumor are we? 
 Hardly 
   a 'bombshell'. Unpublished gossip, another arrow to the bigot's 
 bow.
   
   OffWorld
  
  
  
  If you are referring to Kesterson's research, you might wish to 
 consider that it was 
  included in the dissertation for which MIU awarded his PhD.
  
  L B S.
 
 I am really only interested in research published in peer-reviewed 
 journals, though I am sure the research you cite is good, it has no 
 meaning to the world as it stands, and even if it were published it 
 has been somewhat swamped and washed away by the hundreds of other 
 studies showing more important results and the 20 million + dollars 
 in hard won grant money given by the NIH.
 
 OffWorld


Which have nothing to do with O2 consumption, since Kesterson 
published his research...






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Time

2005-10-30 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
A friend asked a question about where time fits into this whole E gig.
In looking back at Patanjali (Shearer version) I happened to look at
the end of both chapters 3 Expansion and 4 Enlightenment and thought
some might like to ponder his points on Time.

Chapter 3 Expansion
Sutra 52 From Sanyama on moments and their succession, the finest
discriminative knowledge is born. 

Sutra 53 This enables us to distinguish between two objects that are
to all appearances identical.

Sutra 54 Knowledge born of the finest discrimination takes us to the
farthest shore.

Sutra 55 And when the translucent intellect is as pure as the Self,
there is Enlightenment.

Chapter 4 Enlightenment

Sutra 31 Knowledge which has been freed from the veils of impurity is
unbounded.
Whatever can be known is insignificant in its light.

Sutra 32 This samadhi completes the transformations of the gunas and
fulfils the purpose of evolution. 

Sutra 33 Now the process by which evolution unfolds through time is
understood.

Sutra 34 The gunas, their purpose fulfilled, return to their original
state of harmony, and pure unbounded Consciousness remains, forever
established in its own absolute nature.
This is Enlightenment.

What struck me was in Chapter 3 Time was used to gain the first stage
of E and in Chapter 4 Time is essential to the evolution of the three
gunas which appears to be the end state. This seems to suggest that
what is the opening at the end of Chapter 3 reaches closure at the end
of Chapter 4 and the entire teaching of this sage.
Tom T






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Florida News

2005-10-30 Thread Rick Archer
From a friend:

Just now reading a week's worth of FFL.

My parents and brother live in South Florida and lost
all power, telephone service AND water.  They wound up
going to a local hospital a day after the hurricane to
check in with me.  They were without these services
for several days.  Only Friday my parents (W. Palm
Beach) power came back on...think water came on a day
or two before.  My brother got through a couple times
on cell.  He said the lines at the gas stations were
over 8 HOURS long.  And he said something interesting.
 That water and ice were readily available for him
because he lived in a wealthy neighborhood.  FEMA had
set up a distribution center a couple of blocks away
from his house in a church and you just drove
through...he implied it was different for the
impoverished.

This is very scary.  Wealthy S. Florida without power
for days and days, some still without power a week
later.  WE ARE NOT PREPARED.

We share an office suite with a CPA who is a Mormon.
Part of their RELIGION is disaster preparedness...they
are required to have one year of food in storage.

Think I'm going to a food storage meeting with him
. non-Mormans can use their food storage
facility

The worst is yet to come.

Have a good week.



My addition: Nightline did a town hall meeting show the other night in which
they discussed the nation's preparedness for disasters which are likely to
strike. The general consensus was that despite 4 years of Homeland
Security efforts, we are poorly prepared. Ted Koppel's closing remark was
that he hoped we get prepared in time, but there was a strong note of doubt
in his voice.

I have friends here in FF who are planning to stockpile food and supplies in
the event of bird flu. If it strikes, and is as contagious and lethal as it
might potentially be, they don't want to leave their house until it passes.




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Response below.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 My experience is that refereed journals and proceedings 
provide 
some degree of feedback and critique, but are not absolute 
measures
   of validity. 
  
  Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first PhD in
  physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's 
research.  
  I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological problem.
 
 **
 
 The methodological problem had to do with the assumption that the 
reduction of oxygen 
 consumption was due to TM practice. If I remember correctly, it 
went something like this:
 
 Subjects sitting quietly with eyes open were compared to their 
measurements taken while 
 meditating. The drop in oxygen consumption was attributed entirely 
to TM.
 
 Subsequent research showed that just sitting quietly with eyes 
closed reduced oxygen 
 consumption by the same amount as TM.
 
 It was a bombshell that hardly anyone noticed. O2 consumption 
twice as low as the 
 deepest point of sleep had been the proof of TM's profundity; 
now TM was equivalent to 
 sitting quietly with eyes closed.
 
 The next development was metastudies which showed that, 
according to global 
 measures, TM produced a state of rest twice as deep as deep sleep. 
The claim was the 
 same, but no longer based on a starkly simple, irrefutable 
measurement. Now it was 
 teased out of the statistics.
 
 The whole thing was smoothed over within a few months.
 
 L B S


**

Mebbe so, but what TMer has not experienced the lessening of breath 
(which subsumes lessening of oxygen consumption), so it's a just a 
measurement problem -- it's not false that oxygen consumption is 
significantly lower in TM.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] The History of Psychedelia

2005-10-30 Thread Rick Archer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/r2music/documentaries/psych.shtml




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Kabbalah Guru Arrested For Fraud

2005-10-30 Thread Rick Archer
NHNE News List
Current Members: 1373
Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message.



KABBALAH GURU ARRESTED FOR FRAUD
By Avi Cohen
Ynetnews
October 30, 2005

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3161625,00.html
 
A woman suffering from cancer was talked into paying tens of thousands of
dollars to the Israeli Kabbalah Center, on the pretext that the donation
would help improve her condition.
 
After her death at the age of fifty, the woman's husband filed a complaint
against the head of the center, Shaul Youdkevitch, who was consequently
arrested by the police Sunday.
 
Youdkevitch, one of the main figures in Kabbalah studies worldwide and the
man behind Madonna's visit to Israel last year, was arrested on suspicion of
exploiting and deceiving the woman and her husband.
 
The couple has previously complained several months ago that they were told
by the rabbis who run the center in Tel Aviv that the woman should make 'a
significant and painful donation' if she wanted to get well and overcome
cancer.
 
A devotee of Kabbalah, the ill woman put her faith in the center and
contributed USD 36,000 to the organization. When her condition deteriorated,
members of the Israeli branch recommended she donate another USD 25,000.
Meanwhile, rabbis recommended that she also purchase holy water to improve
her condition - at an exorbitant price.
 
The couple, who soon after extending the donations ran out of financial
resources, continued to seek help with the center. The rabbis then suggested
that the husband leave his job and devote himself completely to work at the
center.
 
The husband, a father of two young children, turned down the proposal and
instead turned to the police to report the incidents.
 
First Sergeant Morris Tal told Ynet that according to Youdkevitch, the
Kabbalah Center proposed that the woman donate the money, but did not force
her to do so.
 
Youdkevitch will be brought before the Tel Aviv Magistrates court for
extension of remand Sunday.
 
Osnat Youdkevitch, his wife And the CEO of the center, will be interrogated
by the Police fraud unit as well.



RELATED LINKS:

THE GUARDIAN'S SPECIAL REPORT ON PHILIP BERG  KABBALAH CENTRE
Saturday, December 11, 2004
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,,1369895,00.html

WHAT'S BEHIND HOLLYWOOD'S FASCINATION WITH KABBALAH?
NEW TAKE ON ANCIENT JEWISH SPIRITUAL TEACHINGS HAS DRAWN CELEBRITIES
 -- AND CRITICISM
By Alan B. Goldberg and Katie Thomson
ABC News
June 17, 2005
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=855125page=1CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

THE KABBALAH CENTRE:
http://www.kabbalah.com/kabbalah/

RICK A. ROSS INSTITUTE'S COVERAGE OF THE KABBALAH CENTRE:
http://www.rickross.com/groups/kabbalah.html



PREVIOUS NHNE NEWS LIST ARTICLES:

PHILIP BERG  THE KABBALAH CHRONICLES (6/22/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/9420

MADONNA¹S SPIRITUAL MENTORS BUILDING 'MCMANSIONS' IN BEVERLY HILLS
(9/8/2004):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/7845




NHNE News List:

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To review current posts:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/messages

Published by David Sunfellow
NewHeavenNewEarth (NHNE)
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NHNE Website: http://www.nhne.com/
Phone: (928) 282-6120
Fax: (815) 642-0117




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Fwd: [Transcendental_Meditation] Maharish's beautiful comment on Mahalakshmi

2005-10-30 Thread Ron F
Note: forwarded message attached.

This is Maharishi's beautiful comment on
Mahalakshmi...very timely for this auspicious
occasion...DIVALI day


... Maha Lakshmi... the first syllable is Maha. Maha,
great. And this great in the context of education is
the characteristic of consciousness. 

This Maha is the goal of anyone who is not yet Maha.
So, Maha goal is the meaning of the word Laksha...
Laksha means the goal (Maha means unbounded, infinite,
immortal, eternal, Brahm, Totality, whole). 

Maha is the goal of that which is not Maha. The goal
of Maha is to swing in his greatness. It should be a
living reality. 

That the unbounded does not remain only silent. But in
that silence, there should be lively all
possibilities. So, the Laksha, the goal, the goal of
Maha is to have many in its unified wholeness. 

And the goal of that what is not Maha, the goal of
small is to be big and the goal of big is to swing in
its own expressions. 

Infinity wants to flow from one end of infinity to the
other end of infinity and it s flowing, it divides
itself, it quantifies itself, it qualifies itself. 

So it is the qualification which makes one look to the
goal. Small wants to qualify itself into as big as
possible. The big wants to qualify itself as the
field of all possibilities from this end to that end. 

Maha is a goal and MI is a very, very significant word
which is made of two values, MA and I. When we look to
MA, naturally it is me, the first to the self, ME,
even in English me, but in the Vedic terminology MI we
understand as total value of all four Vedas. MA, what
MA is, it s the HUM, Hummm.

Agnim-m-m. Rig, Yajur, Sama, Atharva. Then Atharva is
a Hum. Hum of all the four Vedas... Agni, it s a
collapse of all the progression of all the Vedas into
a Hum. 

Hum means the total values of all sounds; all
sounds are inherent in Hum. And in that Hum which is
focused on a point, that reality of the point is then
transformed into dynamism, which is represented by I. 

So, Maha Lakshmi this is the total Veda, concentrated
into the Hum and made dynamism. Here is concentration
at a point, which then in its nature is all dynamism. 

So, in the word Maha Lakshmi we have that enormous,
unbounded, total, infinite, eternal immortality
expressed in all the Vedas and found located in a
point.

And then expanding a point in infinity, and dynamism
again into Maha. So, here is the total __expression of
the Veda, total __expression of pure knowledge. 

Along with its infinite organising power in one point
concentrating and expanding. This point value, this is
Maha Lakshmi...

So, the element of Maha Lakshmi is a composite of two
values of opposite directions. Focal point and
expanding in its nature, this is called Anyonyabhava. 

It has two kinds of directions, coming in, expanding
and going out... So, the Laksha, the goal of expanding
value is to concentrate. 

The goal of concentrated value is to expand. And here
is the seed of Maha. This is Maha Lakshmi, at the 
point, which is both, expansion and contraction,
infinite potential of the expansion element we could
see along with infinite expansion of contraction
element. 

That means no matter where the situation is, there is
all possibility, no matter at what level we are
considering or at any level of contraction or at any
level of expansion, here or here, at any level is Maha
Lakshmi. 

There is a field of all possibilities and the field of
all possibilities in each cell is a concentrated point
of silence within the quality of infinite dynamism.
Silence and dynamism, that means completely fulfilled
of wakefulness. 

Completely fulfilled because it is not devoid of
anything. Infinite silence concentrated, infinite
dynamism concentrated and therefore it is eternal
state of fulfilment.

It is a fulfilment of eternal value. Fulfilment of
immortal value because there is a field of all
possibilities and in this field of all possibilities
is the element of fulfilment, infinite bliss. 

Infinite bliss is a quality of fulfilment and
fulfilment the quality of lack of lack. Devoid of
nothingness. 

It is all fullness, completely fulfilled,
self-sufficient infinity, eternity, capable of flowing
in terms of waves, modified, qualified and still
remaining unqualified at all time.

Unqualified qualified fulfilment, that means it is
unmanifest total potential of all qualifications that
may be thought or desired. 

Maha Lakshmi is an element of all possibilities,
completely self-sufficient at any time,
and any place. It is the total potential of all
possibilities. 

In the __expression of prosperity, the __expression of
growing prosperity, it is not stagnant prosperity it s
growing prosperity, growing and growing and growing.
Growing up to what? 

Beyond the capability of growth it grows and grows and
grows. This is what is materialised in the 
ever-expanding universe. So, this ever-expanding value
of universe and in every step of progress there is a
wave of happiness, wave of happiness. 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Time

2005-10-30 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A friend asked a question about where time fits into this whole E 
gig.
 In looking back at Patanjali (Shearer version) I happened to look 
at
 the end of both chapters 3 Expansion and 4 Enlightenment and 
thought
 some might like to ponder his points on Time.
 
 Chapter 3 Expansion
 Sutra 52 From Sanyama on moments and their succession, the finest
 discriminative knowledge is born. 
 
 Sutra 53 This enables us to distinguish between two objects that 
are
 to all appearances identical.
 
 Sutra 54 Knowledge born of the finest discrimination takes us to 
the
 farthest shore.
 
 Sutra 55 And when the translucent intellect is as pure as the Self,
 there is Enlightenment.
 
 Chapter 4 Enlightenment
 
 Sutra 31 Knowledge which has been freed from the veils of impurity 
is
 unbounded.
 Whatever can be known is insignificant in its light.
 
 Sutra 32 This samadhi completes the transformations of the gunas 
and
 fulfils the purpose of evolution. 
 
 Sutra 33 Now the process by which evolution unfolds through time is
 understood.
 
 Sutra 34 The gunas, their purpose fulfilled, return to their 
original
 state of harmony, and pure unbounded Consciousness remains, forever
 established in its own absolute nature.
 This is Enlightenment.

Yes, the subjective experience of the gunas acting upon us to orient 
us as to the universal Dharma, then, once oriented, the gunas 
operate again in endless harmony. 

Prior to that, the gunas, serving us intimately, seemingly out of 
balance to the universal Dharma, kick our butts pretty good!

 
 What struck me was in Chapter 3 Time was used to gain the first 
stage
 of E and in Chapter 4 Time is essential to the evolution of the 
three
 gunas which appears to be the end state. This seems to suggest that
 what is the opening at the end of Chapter 3 reaches closure at the 
end
 of Chapter 4 and the entire teaching of this sage.
 Tom T







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Run from your houses

2005-10-30 Thread Rick Archer
Someone asked me:

hey, rick -
do you have quotes from maharishi about how people should run from their
houses as if they're on fire (because their not sthapatya vedic)
Thanks.

---

Does anyone have such a quote or even a web address? Most of us remember him
saying this or people like Bevan quoting him as saying this.




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi School Enrollment Down

2005-10-30 Thread Rick Archer
on 10/30/05 8:01 AM, dhamiltony2k5 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
Another full paying family took their full-paying kids out of
 town to a Waldorf school where they found there was also a
 consciousness based values system.  The Fairfield home schooling
 program and the private home schooling seminar/tutoring teachers
 have always been a good alternative here and they are flourishing
 right now handling the MSAE erosion.

A friend of mine took her full-paying son out of MSAE because a lot of his
classmates were into swearing, looking at porn, etc. He's been doing home
schooling since.




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] A Take it as it comes quote

2005-10-30 Thread Rick Archer
Title: A Take it as it comes quote










Flow with whatever may happen
and let your mind be free;
Stay centered by accepting whatever you are doing.
This is the ultimate.

-Chuang Tsu





Hindu_title.gif
Description: Binary data


[FairfieldLife] Re: Florida News

2005-10-30 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 My addition: Nightline did a town hall meeting show the other night 
in which
 they discussed the nation's preparedness for disasters which are 
likely to
 strike. The general consensus was that despite 4 years of Homeland
 Security efforts, we are poorly prepared. Ted Koppel's closing 
remark was
 that he hoped we get prepared in time, but there was a strong note 
of doubt
 in his voice.

How can a nation whose very nature is based on 
the denial of reality be prepared for reality?
Not gonna happen.

 I have friends here in FF who are planning to stockpile food and 
supplies in
 the event of bird flu. If it strikes, and is as contagious and 
lethal as it
 might potentially be, they don't want to leave their house until it 
passes.

This, on the other hand, is a little scary.  Shades
of Poe's Masque of the Red Death.  If your number's
up, your number's up, wherever you hide.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Florida News

2005-10-30 Thread TurquoiseB
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 My addition: Nightline did a town hall meeting show the other night 
 in which
 they discussed the nation's preparedness for disasters which are 
 likely to
 strike. The general consensus was that despite 4 years of Homeland
 Security efforts, we are poorly prepared. 

LOOKING BACK ON HURRICANE HISTORY

President: Nixon
Category 5 Hurricane Camille, August 1969
Area: About the same area as that affected by Katrina
Response: Nixon prepared the National Guard in advance, ordering 
rescue ships from Tampa and Houston to stand waiting along with 
over a thousand regular military, 24+ helicopters to assist the 
Coast Guard and National Guard about as soon as the hurricane 
passed.

President: Bush (the Elder)
Category 5 Hurricane Andrew, August 1992
Area: Florida
Response: In the middle of a re-election campaign, Bush ceased 
campaigning the day before the hurricane, went to Washington, 
and assembled one of the largest military forces ever mustered 
on US soil. 7,000 National Guard and 22,000 regular military 
were sent in with the necessary equipment shortly after the 
hurricane passed through.

President: Clinton
Category 3 Hurricane Floyd, September 1999
Area: Virginia and Carolinas
Response: Meeting with China's president Jiang in New Zealand, 
Clinton immediately declared the hurricane-affected areas 
federal disasters, allowing the military and National Guard 
to move in and help. Clinton flew home immediately, one day 
before the hurricane hit, to help coordinate the rescue.

President: Bush (the Younger)
Category 5 Hurricane Katrina, August 2005
Area: Gulf Coast
Response: National Guard troops are down about 8,000 members 
because they are in Iraq with much of the needed rescue 
equipment. Bush was on vacation, riding his bike for two 
hours the day before the hurricane landed. On that day, 
Bush attended a birthday party for John McCain. The levees 
began to crack. While emergency 1.5-ton sandbags were ready 
to be placed to strengthen the levee and exclude water, 
there were insufficient helicopters and pilots to set them 
before the levees broke. New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin pleaded 
for federal-level assistance and got none. Bush went to San 
Diego to play guitar with a country singer and end his 
vacation early - but not until the next day, because he 
had tickets to a San Diego Padres game.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi School Enrollment Down

2005-10-30 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 10/30/05 8:01 AM, dhamiltony2k5 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
 Another full paying family took their full-paying kids out of
  town to a Waldorf school where they found there was also a
  consciousness based values system.  The Fairfield home schooling
  program and the private home schooling seminar/tutoring teachers
  have always been a good alternative here and they are flourishing
  right now handling the MSAE erosion.
 

 A friend of mine took her full-paying son out of MSAE because a 
lot of his
 classmates were into swearing, looking at porn, etc. He's been 
doing home
 schooling since.


And if he kid were in the Fairfield school system, she would have 
felt it necessary to have taken her kid out for the same reasons. 
And now she's going to make a homebody out of the kid so he is not 
around those sweary porny kids, in addition to home schooling him? 
Going to school socializes kids, and porn and swearing are part of 
the culture that kids need to deal with.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi School Enrollment Down

2005-10-30 Thread anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  on 10/30/05 8:01 AM, dhamiltony2k5 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
  Another full paying family took their full-paying kids out of
   town to a Waldorf school where they found there was also a
   consciousness based values system.  The Fairfield home schooling
   program and the private home schooling seminar/tutoring teachers
   have always been a good alternative here and they are flourishing
   right now handling the MSAE erosion.
  
 
  A friend of mine took her full-paying son out of MSAE because a 
 lot of his
  classmates were into swearing, looking at porn, etc. He's been 
 doing home
  schooling since.
 
 
 And if he kid were in the Fairfield school system, she would have 
 felt it necessary to have taken her kid out for the same reasons. 
 And now she's going to make a homebody out of the kid so he is not 
 around those sweary porny kids, in addition to home schooling him? 
 Going to school socializes kids, and porn and swearing are part of 
 the culture that kids need to deal with.



From the mouth and mind of Bob Brigante, noted world authority on
child behavior. How come you didn't include a Vedic quote?








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Familiar names?

2005-10-30 Thread cardemaister

John Hoffman, Harry Pavelka, Anthony Antimuro






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Shankara's aquirement of knowledge of sex-love, foot note!

2005-10-30 Thread cardemaister

[...] As the subject matter has been dealt with by a great
sage like Vidyaranya, we have given almost a full translation.

Excerpt:

[...] and in holding their [the ho's of King Amaruka, into whose
body Shankara has entered by performing the Yogic siddhi 
parashariiraaveshaH] bare bodies in tight embrace forgetting everything 
else in the thrill of concentrated joy.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Peer Reviewed Journals -- the Good, Bad and the Ugly

2005-10-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Response below.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  My experience is that refereed journals and proceedings 
 provide 
 some degree of feedback and critique, but are not absolute 
 measures
of validity. 
   
   Is anyone here familiar with what kesterton (MIU's first PhD in
   physiology) found in attempting to replicate Wallace's 
 research.  
   I've been told he uncovered a serious methodological problem.
  
  **
  
  The methodological problem had to do with the assumption that the 
 reduction of oxygen 
  consumption was due to TM practice. If I remember correctly, it 
 went something like this:
  
  Subjects sitting quietly with eyes open were compared to their 
 measurements taken while 
  meditating. The drop in oxygen consumption was attributed 
entirely 
 to TM.
  
  Subsequent research showed that just sitting quietly with eyes 
 closed reduced oxygen 
  consumption by the same amount as TM.
  
  It was a bombshell that hardly anyone noticed. O2 consumption 
 twice as low as the 
  deepest point of sleep had been the proof of TM's profundity; 
 now TM was equivalent to 
  sitting quietly with eyes closed.
  
  The next development was metastudies which showed that, 
 according to global 
  measures, TM produced a state of rest twice as deep as deep 
sleep. 
 The claim was the 
  same, but no longer based on a starkly simple, irrefutable 
 measurement. Now it was 
  teased out of the statistics.
  
  The whole thing was smoothed over within a few months.
  
  L B S
 
 
 **
 
 Mebbe so, but what TMer has not experienced the lessening of breath 
 (which subsumes lessening of oxygen consumption), so it's a just a 
 measurement problem -- it's not false that oxygen consumption is 
 significantly lower in TM.


Than what? Keith Wallace sez that prone resting shows the lowest O2 
consumption. You're behind the times...







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/