[FairfieldLife] Re: Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Wit hin Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle
There, confusing, vomitting, this is what happens when you have one pint too many before starting work! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing With... http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle August 31, 2014 By owc105 Share View on owc105.oxil.co.uk http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Preview by Yahoo
[FairfieldLife] Lumosity is fudging the science too.
Brain-Training Apps: Neuroscience, or Pseudoscience? | Mind Read | Learn Science at Scitable http://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/mind-read/braintraining_apps_neuroscience_or_pseudoscience http://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/mind-read/braintraining_apps_neuroscience_or_pseudoscience Brain-Training Apps: Neuroscience, or Pseudosc... http://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/mind-read/braintraining_apps_neuroscience_or_pseudoscience I sure could use a little memory boost. Unfortunately, despite the growing popularity of brain-training apps and programs like Lumosity, CogniFit, Co... View on www.nature.com http://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/mind-read/braintraining_apps_neuroscience_or_pseudoscience Preview by Yahoo
[FairfieldLife] Fab 4 and hysterical fans?
Anyone recall an anecdote of Maharishi and the Beatles, rather unexpectedly, meeting a crowd of hysterical fans somewhere in the English countryside, and MMY protecting the boys, obviously using some of the eight mahaa-siddhis?
[FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
[FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote : Richard, I hear your plaintive cry for help. I will try to reach out to you. #1) The golden rule is not, those with the gold, make the rules. It is something other than that. #2) The jury is out as to whether Zen Master Rama, aka Frederick Lenz was able to levitate. Let's wait for more data to come in before we comment on that. #3) Postings made two to three years ago, should not be considered as current. Chat room protocol has generally set a six month, four day limit as to whether a posting is current or not. #4) Posting a person's name when they have requested anonymity is not considered good taste, and is really violation of the rules of the forum. #4a) Using a person's name in such a way that you are saying you are not going use such and such''s name, because such and such has requested that you not do it, does not get around point #4. It's not complicated. Now, we all need someone to talk to. Some more than others. Please note the daily post totals. (-: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 9/1/2014 8:44 PM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: FOR THE RECORD, I PROMISE NEVER TO USE WHATS-HER-NAME'S NAME IN ANOTHER POST. Maybe we should also make a FFL rule never to use someone's real name in the subject line of a message, BECAUSE THEY MIGHT BE LOOKING FOR WORK! And, always ask them, privately, if you should respond to them using their posted name. But, in my case it is alright to use my name anywhere, since I am NOT looking for work and I just want more attention. Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to, even if it's just drivel. FOR GOD'S SAKE! WILL SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME - I NEED SOME SPIRITUAL HELP! SERIOUSLY! Sunny and the Sunlglows - Talk To Me http://youtu.be/QclMCuhv4kQ http://youtu.be/QclMCuhv4kQ ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dmevans365@... mailto:dmevans365@... wrote : Richard, this is my name, but listen. You outed it here. My moniker does not out my name for that email, which I used by mistake. I was being compulsive yesterday. Please do not use my name again and do yourself a favor; let go of the need, along with Share, to relentlessly forward misconception. Thank you. Try not to form a resentment against me; it might take you years to let it go. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote : I think it was the word drivel that has hit you where it hurts, Ricky. Interesting. You are incorrect. I was defending your right to post drivel. On 9/1/2014 8:33 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: I don't need any defending on that front, but thanks. What I object to, is anyone butting into the drivel conversation without first reading the drivel. Em wasn't butting in, she is a regular poster to FFL. You just don't like being called out on your drivel. Denise Evans's last drivel post to FFL was over a year ago. It's just like at a social gathering when a group of people are sitting around a table discussing something and a stranger walks up and says You people are full of shit and then singles out the one person that wasn't even at the table - and when they don't even know anyone or what the group is talking about. That is rude. If anyone did that at a normal social gathering they would be asked to leave. Nice analogy but not accurate in this case. Emily is no stranger plus she has read and responded to plenty of your posts. By the by, Emily is hardly the only one here who has accused you of trolling and repeating yourself although I think her use of the word drivel was unique. The rest of the guys here just chalk it up to mental incapacitation. I wouldn't go that far, actually, I find your posts humorous and apropos some of the time. It was Denise Evans that used the word drivel and pointed a third finger at Share. http://www.mail-archive.com/fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com/msg327351.html http://www.mail-archive.com/fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com/msg327351.html What surprises me is the number of people on the list that didn't object, but cheered the boor on. The boor? Emily a boor? She really did find your button. But then nothing you say here should be taken seriously so I'll just chalk it up to a little fun you're having - as usual. Denise Evans was acting like a boor, not Emily. But, obviously Emily doesn't read all the posts on FFL. Often it's what people DON'T
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
From: j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
That's a question for Rick. I just ignore it all and suggest others do likewise. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote : From: j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com mailto:j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing W it hin Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle
Put up or shut up Sal. Going on and on about the Crop Circle being a hoax yet refusing to take this challenge confirms you are talking nonsense: The Crop Circle Challenge, Are You Ready to Claim £100.000 ($100.578) for 6 Hrs of Work | Educating Humanity http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html The Crop Circle Challenge, Are You Ready to Claim £1... http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html We are offering £100.000 (one hundred thousand pounds) to anyone who can create the replica of a crop circle called “The Galaxy” that was reported on 12 o... View on www.educatinghuman... http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html Preview by Yahoo . ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : There, confusing, vomitting, this is what happens when you have one pint too many before starting work! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing With... http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle August 31, 2014 By owc105 Share View on owc105.oxil.co.uk http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Preview by Yahoo
[FairfieldLife] Re: Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing W it hin Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Put up or shut up Sal. Going on and on about the Crop Circle being a hoax yet refusing to take this challenge confirms you are talking nonsense: Non sequitur (proper one) The fact that I couldn't complete a crop circle like that in 6 hours doesn't mean nobody else could either. and Nabby, the challenge really did end 2 years ago: The crop circle challenge has another month to run (Through Friday Aug 31. 2012) - See more at: The Crop Circle Challenge, Are You Ready to Claim £100.000 ($100.578) for 6 Hrs of Work | Educating Humanity http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html#sthash.T0JnMqNn.dpuf http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html#sthash.T0JnMqNn.dpuf The Crop Circle Challenge, Are You Ready to Claim £1... http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html#sthash.T0JnMqNn.dpuf We are offering £100.000 (one hundred thousand pounds) to anyone who can create the replica of a crop circle called “The Galaxy” that was reported on 12 o... View on www.educatinghuma... http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html#sthash.T0JnMqNn.dpuf Preview by Yahoo The Crop Circle Challenge, Are You Ready to Claim £100.000 ($100.578) for 6 Hrs of Work | Educating Humanity http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html The Crop Circle Challenge, Are You Ready to Claim £1... http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html We are offering £100.000 (one hundred thousand pounds) to anyone who can create the replica of a crop circle called “The Galaxy” that was reported on 12 o... View on www.educatinghuman... http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html Preview by Yahoo . ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : There, confusing, vomitting, this is what happens when you have one pint too many before starting work! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing With... http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle August 31, 2014 By owc105 Share View on owc105.oxil.co.uk http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. I tried a few times but gave up, now I'm too busy ignoring him. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing W it hin Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle
Nobody took that challenge two years ago nor the new one posted below. You are just a big talker Sal. http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4340 http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4340 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Put up or shut up Sal. Going on and on about the Crop Circle being a hoax yet refusing to take this challenge confirms you are talking nonsense: Non sequitur (proper one) The fact that I couldn't complete a crop circle like that in 6 hours doesn't mean nobody else could either. and Nabby, the challenge really did end 2 years ago: The crop circle challenge has another month to run (Through Friday Aug 31. 2012) - See more at: The Crop Circle Challenge, Are You Ready to Claim £100.000 ($100.578) for 6 Hrs of Work | Educating Humanity http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html#sthash.T0JnMqNn.dpuf http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html#sthash.T0JnMqNn.dpuf The Crop Circle Challenge, Are You Ready to Claim £1... http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html#sthash.T0JnMqNn.dpuf We are offering £100.000 (one hundred thousand pounds) to anyone who can create the replica of a crop circle called “The Galaxy” that was reported on 12 o... View on www.educatinghuma... http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html#sthash.T0JnMqNn.dpuf Preview by Yahoo The Crop Circle Challenge, Are You Ready to Claim £100.000 ($100.578) for 6 Hrs of Work | Educating Humanity http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html The Crop Circle Challenge, Are You Ready to Claim £1... http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html We are offering £100.000 (one hundred thousand pounds) to anyone who can create the replica of a crop circle called “The Galaxy” that was reported on 12 o... View on www.educatinghuman... http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Crop-Circle-Challenge-Until-Aug-31-2012.html Preview by Yahoo . ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : There, confusing, vomitting, this is what happens when you have one pint too many before starting work! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing With... http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle August 31, 2014 By owc105 Share View on owc105.oxil.co.uk http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. I tried a few times but gave up, now I'm too busy ignoring him. I guess I'm complaining because of all the extra effort it takes me *to* ignore him, or just to read the forum at all these days. I've given up entirely on Neo, because there is no way to filter or sort it usefully, and sadly setting up filters to block the email addresses of known spammers entirely doesn't seem to work properly. So every time I feel like reading FFL I have to perform this ritual of opening the whole list of emails that have arrived since the previous day and then clicking a checkbox next to all of them by Richard, Dan Friedman (while he was here), Ann, Nabby, and fleetwood (Jim), and then deleting them all unread. But then I start reading the remaining list and realize that I also have to delete almost everything from Steve, Share, and Emily/Denise, because they rarely ever said anything that isn't related to some bullshit posted by one of the people I'd already deleted. Vicious circle. :-) The remaining list is somewhat manageable, and occasionally contains something worth reading. Even more rarely, there is actually something worth replying to -- but at most 1 or 2 a day. That's not a very good track record for a forum, so I doubt I'll stick around if this is how things are going to continue to be. At this point I'm not quite sure which is more dismaying -- the outright insanity of people like Richard, or the shocking True Believerism from people like Share and Nabby and JR and Lawson. Both make me feel as if I'd accidentally dropped into a world in which reason is not only not the norm, but has never been heard of. :-) Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Black and White? (Where is Barry Wright?)
I don't think any of our lawmakers really understand the problem. This is not a black and white world and there are no 'black n white' solutions. One has to take into account the dualities and the paradoxes in nature. Which again brings us to the barbel strategy. If political parties and canditates received 'state funding', they would not sell the country to vested interests. Their loyalty would be to the country and not to some obscure corporate interest. It's an unfortunate situation where a flawed system holds back progress and development. --- Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote : Problem is that the US has gone overboard as far as capitalism goes. The place now resembles a carnival midway with everyone out hawking things. And if you criticize it the great unwashed just sees things as black and white and thinks you're a communist. On 08/31/2014 03:24 AM, jedi_spock@... mailto:jedi_spock@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: Hide message history ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... wrote : On 08/30/2014 03:17 PM, wayback71@... mailto:wayback71@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: Glad you are still here. I too have taken long stretches of time off from FFL. You might enjoy The 100 foot Journey with Helen Mirren. Fluff but charming. Movie attendance in the US has been way way down this summer. Much of the best stuff is on TV. Here in the US a really big issue these days in medical marijuana, its uses, which states allow it and in what manner. Another tidbit, financial planners are now routinely telling people to expect to have to make their savings last til age 95. Conservative planners use age 100, especially for younger people. A new and longer life span, and the need to save more and retire later. --- Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... wrote : So how many millions or billions (given future inflation) do they have to save up? You need several million dollars to comfortably retire these days. I think some of the financial planners may be living on another planet. They are certainly not very realistic about how much income one can make and save. Maybe they're smoking some of that medical marijuana? ;-) jedi_spock@... mailto:jedi_spock@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: It's important to draw a line of distinction between 'pro-market policies' and 'pro-business' policies. Pro-market policies create a level playing field, favors merit,and generate actual wealth. Pro-business policies favor only a few big business houses, it leads to corruption, inequalities in wealth, leads to crony capitalism. Pro-business policies lead to 'centralized state capitalism' Richard Wolf states that 'Centralised state Capitalism' is as bad as 'Centralised state Socialism' On the other hand, 'De-centralised non-state Socialism' can exist along with 'De-centralised non-state Capitalism' Cooperative entities exist, side by side with corporate entities. Even Ayn Rand wouldn't have approved of 'pro-business policies' https://m.ak.fbcdn.net/sphotos-a.ak/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10336604_10152572346297254_568679281787782448_n.jpg?oh=ecb8f198577839f3f50008b8da6ccad5oe=5470E71E__gda__=1416503841_6d1a37259665fb4410cbeecc401a60e5 https://m.ak.fbcdn.net/sphotos-a.ak/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10336604_10152572346297254_568679281787782448_n.jpg?oh=ecb8f198577839f3f50008b8da6ccad5oe=5470E71E__gda__=1416503841_6d1a37259665fb4410cbeecc401a60e5 https://m.ak.fbcdn.net/sphotos-a.ak/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10336604_10152572346297254_568679281787782448_n.jpg?oh=ecb8f198577839f3f50008b8da6ccad5oe=5470E71E__gda__=1416503841_6d1a37259665fb4410cbeecc401a60e5 https://m.ak.fbcdn.net/sphotos-a.ak/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10336604_10152572346297254_568679281787782448_n.jpg?oh=ecb8f198577839f3f50008b8da6ccad5oe=5470E71E__gda__=1416503841_6d1a37259665fb4410cbeecc401a60e5; class=ygrps-yiv-703950516link-enhancr-card-urlWrapper ygrps-yiv-703950516link-enhancr-element https://m.ak.fbcdn.net/sphotos-a.ak/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10336604_10152572346297254_568679281787782448_n.jpg?oh=ecb8f198577839f3f50008b8da6ccad5oe=5470E71E__gda__=1416503841_6d1a37259665fb4410cbeecc401a60e5 https://m.ak.fbcdn.net/sphotos-a.ak/hphotos-ak-x... https://m.ak.fbcdn.net/sphotos-a.ak/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10336604_10152572346297254_568679281787782448_n.jpg?oh=ecb8f198577839f3f50008b8da6ccad5oe=5470E71E__gda__=1416503841_6d1a37259665fb4410cbeecc401a60e5 View on m.ak.fbcdn.net https://m.ak.fbcdn.net/sphotos-a.ak/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10336604_10152572346297254_568679281787782448_n.jpg?oh=ecb8f198577839f3f50008b8da6ccad5oe=5470E71E__gda__=1416503841_6d1a37259665fb4410cbeecc401a60e5 Preview by Yahoo https://m.ak.fbcdn.net/sphotos-a.ak/hphotos-ak-x... View on m.ak.fbcdn.net Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 2:55 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. Thank you, Alex. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote : Richard, I hear your plaintive cry for help. I will try to reach out to you. #1) The golden rule is not, those with the gold, make the rules. It is something other than that. #2) The jury is out as to whether Zen Master Rama, aka Frederick Lenz was able to levitate. Let's wait for more data to come in before we comment on that. #3) Postings made two to three years ago, should not be considered as current. Chat room protocol has generally set a six month, four day limit as to whether a posting is current or not. #4) Posting a person's name when they have requested anonymity is not considered good taste, and is really violation of the rules of the forum. #4a) Using a person's name in such a way that you are saying you are not going use such and such''s name, because such and such has requested that you not do it, does not get around point #4. It's not complicated. Now, we all need someone to talk to. Some more than others. Please note the daily post totals. (-: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 9/1/2014 8:44 PM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: FOR THE RECORD, I PROMISE NEVER TO USE WHATS-HER-NAME'S NAME IN ANOTHER POST. Maybe we should also make a FFL rule never to use someone's real name in the subject line of a message, BECAUSE THEY MIGHT BE LOOKING FOR WORK! And, always ask them, privately, if you should respond to them using their posted name. But, in my case it is alright to use my name anywhere, since I am NOT looking for work and I just want more attention. Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to, even if it's just drivel. FOR GOD'S SAKE! WILL SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME - I NEED SOME SPIRITUAL HELP! SERIOUSLY! Sunny and the Sunlglows - Talk To Me http://youtu.be/QclMCuhv4kQ http://youtu.be/QclMCuhv4kQ ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dmevans365@... mailto:dmevans365@... wrote : Richard, this is my name, but listen. You outed it here. My moniker does not out my name for that email, which I used by mistake. I was being compulsive yesterday. Please do not use my name again and do yourself a favor; let go of the need, along with Share, to relentlessly forward misconception. Thank you. Try not to form a resentment against me; it might take you years to let it go. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote : I think it was the word drivel that has hit you where it hurts, Ricky. Interesting. You are incorrect. I was defending your right to post drivel. On 9/1/2014 8:33 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: I don't need any defending on that front, but thanks. What I object to, is anyone butting into the drivel conversation without first reading the drivel. Em wasn't butting in, she is a regular poster to FFL. You just don't like being called out on your drivel. Denise Evans's last drivel post to FFL was over a year ago. It's just like at a social gathering when a group of people are sitting around a table discussing something and a stranger walks up and says You people are full of shit and then singles out the one person that wasn't even at the table - and when they don't even know anyone or what the group is talking about. That is rude. If anyone did that at a normal social gathering they would be asked to leave. Nice analogy but not accurate in this case. Emily is no stranger plus she has read and responded to plenty of your posts. By the by, Emily is hardly the only one here who has accused you of trolling and repeating yourself although I think her use of the word drivel was unique. The rest of the guys here just chalk it up to mental incapacitation. I wouldn't go that far, actually, I find your posts humorous and apropos some of the time. It was Denise Evans that used the word drivel and pointed a third finger at Share. http://www.mail-archive.com/fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com/msg327351.html http://www.mail-archive.com/fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com/msg327351.html What surprises me is the number of people on the list that didn't object, but cheered the boor on. The boor? Emily a boor? She really did find your button. But then nothing you say here should be taken seriously so I'll just chalk it up to a little fun you're having - as usual. Denise Evans was acting like a boor, not Emily. But, obviously Emily doesn't read all the posts on FFL. Often it's what
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 3:16 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: *From:* j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? /Now this funny:/ A guy that has posted tens of thousands of messages full of drivel over the span of a decade or more, thinks, Dan is a troll trying to destroying the forum with endless crap, and that Willytex is insane. Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. I tried a few times but gave up, now I'm too busy ignoring him. I guess I'm complaining because of all the extra effort it takes me *to* ignore him, or just to read the forum at all these days. I've given up entirely on Neo, because there is no way to filter or sort it usefully, and sadly setting up filters to block the email addresses of known spammers entirely doesn't seem to work properly. So every time I feel like reading FFL I have to perform this ritual of opening the whole list of emails that have arrived since the previous day and then clicking a checkbox next to all of them by Richard, Dan Friedman (while he was here), Ann, Nabby, and fleetwood (Jim), and then deleting them all unread. But then I start reading the remaining list and realize that I also have to delete almost everything from Steve, Share, and Emily/Denise, because they rarely ever said anything that isn't related to some bullshit posted by one of the people I'd already deleted. Vicious circle. :-) LOL, slim pickings for you then. I'm just hoping I develop dementia so I don't realise I'm saying the same thing over and over again. Go figure The remaining list is somewhat manageable, and occasionally contains something worth reading. Even more rarely, there is actually something worth replying to -- but at most 1 or 2 a day. That's not a very good track record for a forum, so I doubt I'll stick around if this is how things are going to continue to be. At this point I'm not quite sure which is more dismaying -- the outright insanity of people like Richard, or the shocking True Believerism from people like Share and Nabby and JR and Lawson. Both make me feel as if I'd accidentally dropped into a world in which reason is not only not the norm, but has never been heard of. :-) I like this aspect of it, it reminds me of a fun time in my life when I was surrounded by people who had abandoned critical thinking for someone else's daydreams and wild promises. Good fun for a while but unsustainable for me. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
[FairfieldLife] Careful what you wish for...
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Yikes! I think Barry may have already entered this stage. You know, the theme, if this place doesn't turn around, I'm otta here (-: From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com LOL, slim pickings for you then. I'm just hoping I develop dementia so I don't realise I'm saying the same thing over and over again. Go figure The remaining list is somewhat manageable, and occasionally contains something worth reading. Even more rarely, there is actually something worth replying to -- but at most 1 or 2 a day. That's not a very good track record for a forum, so I doubt I'll stick around if this is how things are going to continue to be. At this point I'm not quite sure which is more dismaying -- the outright insanity of people like Richard, or the shocking True Believerism from people like Share and Nabby and JR and Lawson. Both make me feel as if I'd accidentally dropped into a world in which reason is not only not the norm, but has never been heard of. :-) I like this aspect of it, it reminds me of a fun time in my life when I was surrounded by people who had abandoned critical thinking for someone else's daydreams and wild promises. Good fun for a while but unsustainable for me. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Have you ever considered paragraph breaks? They are a pretty nifty device. But, who knows, maybe you write only for your clarification. Can we hear next about your sock drawer. (-: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Awake: The Life Of Yogananda - Rotten Tomatoes
Willy Thank you for your reply. It is so clarifying. No prob if you don't understand Comans book although that is hard to understand if you can also read scholars discussing Tantra. Since you don't understand Comans or unwilling to spend the $$ (I spent $128 – twice your price), much less copy the important parts, I have a better suggestion. Pay $12 new or $10 Kindle on Amazon for James Swartz How to Attain Enlightenment. I have found he tracks true with Comans, which is expected since they had the same mentor – Swami Dayanâda. Swatz has also done a lot of Patanjali yoga so he understands its value for purification. I have already place links to Comans article, (find it on Realization.org) tracing the conversion of Advaita to modern yogic-advaita, although you may not have read it. The article is fairly short but valuable for seeing why suspension of mental activity (yoga-samâdhi) is unnecessary for realization. However, Swartz is best at addressing all the current variances in yoga/advaita in our time. Perhaps then we might have a more useful discussion. … šrî gomâya gomâya svâhâ … Willy sez, This should be dirt simple, Bill, but it's just too subtle for us householders, I guess. I don't have Coman's book anymore and I'm not going to spend $60 to get one. Anyone would have to go back to UT Austin for a four more years and learn four languages in order to read and understand this stuff in the originals. Rita and I are tantrics and so we don't even have to understand anything - we know what works for us. So, I think I'll just stick to my preconceived notions until someone can explain everything to me in plain English that I can understand. It sounds complicated. It would be nice if you could just explain it in simple terms instead of wasting our time with more drivel. And, remember to hit the Show Message History button, SO WE KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. Thanks.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Yep, I interact with Richard as little as possible, and ignore 99.9% of his posts, even when he is the only channel ON. He posts so often, that he has lost all credibility with me. There is a balance and rhythm to any social interaction, even on-line, and his incessant posting becomes boorish and intrusive, even anti-social. He is like a dog incessantly barking, on the other side of the fence - No point in judging him, can't reason with him, he likes to bark, so I simply tune him out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote : That's a question for Rick. I just ignore it all and suggest others do likewise. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... mailto:j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it?
[FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
We can have a rule like, 100 posts for two weeks That would give Alex an easier time to keep track. By the way, into which folder you would send Judy's posts and Share's posts. --- xeno anartaxius@... wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. -- turquoiseb@... wrote : While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
In terms of mail filtering, using an email subscription with POP access (like Gmail) lets you use the filtering capabilities of an email client, which may be superior to whatever Yahoo Mail has to offer. As for me, I don't have the time or patience to deal with FFL management beyond what I'm doing right now. My beloved has been in poor health for the past year, and my days are filled with her pain and discomfort. She is so dependent on me being in Fairfield that I haven't traveled east to see my 87 year old father since last September, and I don't know if I'll ever see him again. And, now, my own low-grade infection, that had been kept well in check for 11+ years, is staging a major comeback. There is simply enough stress and unpleasantness in my own life that I refuse to tackle the inane bullshit that goes on here. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
lol - How many times has our nescafe writer informed us he is soon to depart, if things don't improve to his standards? Such a dick thing to say. Either stay, or leave. No one cares which, or why. I've been on here almost ten years, and the writer hasn't ever left for more than a few days. From my observation, he loves to battle himself in public. Maybe when he was a kid, he saw that old Superman comic where Supe plays tennis with himself, and it made a deep, yet flawed impression. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Yikes! I think Barry may have already entered this stage. You know, the theme, if this place doesn't turn around, I'm otta here (-: From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com LOL, slim pickings for you then. I'm just hoping I develop dementia so I don't realise I'm saying the same thing over and over again. Go figure The remaining list is somewhat manageable, and occasionally contains something worth reading. Even more rarely, there is actually something worth replying to -- but at most 1 or 2 a day. That's not a very good track record for a forum, so I doubt I'll stick around if this is how things are going to continue to be. At this point I'm not quite sure which is more dismaying -- the outright insanity of people like Richard, or the shocking True Believerism from people like Share and Nabby and JR and Lawson. Both make me feel as if I'd accidentally dropped into a world in which reason is not only not the norm, but has never been heard of. :-) I like this aspect of it, it reminds me of a fun time in my life when I was surrounded by people who had abandoned critical thinking for someone else's daydreams and wild promises. Good fun for a while but unsustainable for me. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Careful what you wish for...
Hilarious! Post of the week. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
[FairfieldLife] Re: Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing W it hin Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : There, confusing, vomitting, this is what happens when you have one pint too many before starting work! I haven't had a pint yet this morning and I'm confused! So these guys go to make a crop circle but somehow it appears in five minutes, then someone gets diarrhea and the other guy is told not to drive because he's too tired by someone's mum and then this same person is interviewed and the camera goes all wonky like it is in the middle of a pool of water where someone has tossed a pebble. What does all this mean? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing With... http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle August 31, 2014 By owc105 Share View on owc105.oxil.co.uk http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? I'm almost glad to hear your voice after so much Ricky in the last little while. Almost.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Have you ever considered paragraph breaks? They are a pretty nifty device. But, who knows, maybe you write only for your clarification. Can we hear next about your sock drawer. (-: Careful Steve, An-ar-tax-ius might put you in his fluff folder. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Yep, I interact with Richard as little as possible, and ignore 99.9% of his posts, even when he is the only channel ON. He posts so often, that he has lost all credibility with me. There is a balance and rhythm to any social interaction, even on-line, and his incessant posting becomes boorish and intrusive, even anti-social. He is like a dog incessantly barking, on the other side of the fence - No point in judging him, can't reason with him, he likes to bark, so I simply tune him out. There must be some agency that can help with online addiction. But as long as one has an audience I'm not sure it would do much good. http://netaddiction.com/internet-addiction-test/ http://netaddiction.com/internet-addiction-test/ ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote : That's a question for Rick. I just ignore it all and suggest others do likewise. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... mailto:j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing W it hin Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : There, confusing, vomitting, this is what happens when you have one pint too many before starting work! I haven't had a pint yet this morning and I'm confused! So these guys go to make a crop circle but somehow it appears in five minutes, then someone gets diarrhea and the other guy is told not to drive because he's too tired by someone's mum and then this same person is interviewed and the camera goes all wonky like it is in the middle of a pool of water where someone has tossed a pebble. What does all this mean? Probably that they made a crop circle and then invented a cool story to ramp up the myths associated with them, like they are made in 5 minutes etc. Or maybe they found some interesting mushrooms to eat while they were doing it. Or just maybe they had an encounter with the Space Brothers and their invisible circle machine that they are soon going to have to put in storage on Alpha Centauri until next year... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing With... http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle August 31, 2014 By owc105 Share View on owc105.oxil.co.uk http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. I second the motion. From: anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 8:55 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name? I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote : In terms of mail filtering, using an email subscription with POP access (like Gmail) lets you use the filtering capabilities of an email client, which may be superior to whatever Yahoo Mail has to offer. As for me, I don't have the time or patience to deal with FFL management beyond what I'm doing right now. My beloved has been in poor health for the past year, and my days are filled with her pain and discomfort. She is so dependent on me being in Fairfield that I haven't traveled east to see my 87 year old father since last September, and I don't know if I'll ever see him again. And, now, my own low-grade infection, that had been kept well in check for 11+ years, is staging a major comeback. There is simply enough stress and unpleasantness in my own life that I refuse to tackle the inane bullshit that goes on here. Whoa, so sorry to hear all of this. Absolutely forget FFL. It is a drop of spit in the ocean. My sincere wishes that life lightens up for you and that all of these things occurring at once will result in something more positive later. However, in the meantime I can only imagine the pressure and the concern and the real pain you are experiencing. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
From: j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com As for me, I don't have the time or patience to deal with FFL management beyond what I'm doing right now. My beloved has been in poor health for the past year, and my days are filled with her pain and discomfort. She is so dependent on me being in Fairfield that I haven't traveled east to see my 87 year old father since last September, and I don't know if I'll ever see him again. And, now, my own low-grade infection, that had been kept well in check for 11+ years, is staging a major comeback. There is simply enough stress and unpleasantness in my own life that I refuse to tackle the inane bullshit that goes on here. Sorry to hear all of this, Alex, and as I've said before, thanks for handling the thankless task of trying to manage this place as well as you always have. I know that there is not much you can do when faced with someone as psychotic and as unresponsive as Richard Williams. For all we know, if you were to revoke his posting rights, he's so insane that he might do what Ravi and others have done and just try to create new IDs so he could continue to harass the people here, and you as moderator. Dealing with people like this is a lose-lose situation, which is why I and some others who have spoken up lately have chosen not to interact with him at all, ever again. I guess the thing that bothers me the most, still having a tiny bit of affection for my days involved with TM, is how a discussion group about it could devolve into the inane bullshit that you so accurately describe it having become. What HAPPENED to all of these once-intelligent people to make them so petty, so vindictive, so irrational, and so attached to their beliefs or to the people who sold them those beliefs? If FFL continues as it is, many people will probably bail, because after all there is just so much inane bullshit one can take in a lifetime. The only good thing I see coming out of that is that any prospective newbies wondering whether TM might be right for them and coming to Fairfield Life to find out will probably run away screaming within a few days, and thus never fall prey to all the cult madness. In that sense, True Believers like Nabby and JR and Share and True Psychopaths like Richard Williams may actually be performing a service.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : lol - How many times has our nescafe writer informed us he is soon to depart, if things don't improve to his standards? Such a dick thing to say. Either stay, or leave. No one cares which, or why. I've been on here almost ten years, and the writer hasn't ever left for more than a few days. From my observation, he loves to battle himself in public. Maybe when he was a kid, he saw that old Superman comic where Supe plays tennis with himself, and it made a deep, yet flawed impression. Couldn't find that one but Iove these old images. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Yikes! I think Barry may have already entered this stage. You know, the theme, if this place doesn't turn around, I'm otta here (-: From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com LOL, slim pickings for you then. I'm just hoping I develop dementia so I don't realise I'm saying the same thing over and over again. Go figure The remaining list is somewhat manageable, and occasionally contains something worth reading. Even more rarely, there is actually something worth replying to -- but at most 1 or 2 a day. That's not a very good track record for a forum, so I doubt I'll stick around if this is how things are going to continue to be. At this point I'm not quite sure which is more dismaying -- the outright insanity of people like Richard, or the shocking True Believerism from people like Share and Nabby and JR and Lawson. Both make me feel as if I'd accidentally dropped into a world in which reason is not only not the norm, but has never been heard of. :-) I like this aspect of it, it reminds me of a fun time in my life when I was surrounded by people who had abandoned critical thinking for someone else's daydreams and wild promises. Good fun for a while but unsustainable for me. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing W it hin Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : There, confusing, vomitting, this is what happens when you have one pint too many before starting work! I haven't had a pint yet this morning and I'm confused! So these guys go to make a crop circle but somehow it appears in five minutes, then someone gets diarrhea and the other guy is told not to drive because he's too tired by someone's mum and then this same person is interviewed and the camera goes all wonky like it is in the middle of a pool of water where someone has tossed a pebble. What does all this mean? Probably that they made a crop circle and then invented a cool story to ramp up the myths associated with them, like they are made in 5 minutes etc. Or maybe they found some interesting mushrooms to eat while they were doing it. Or just maybe they had an encounter with the Space Brothers and their invisible circle machine that they are soon going to have to put in storage on Alpha Centauri until next year... Ha, thanks for the clarification! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing With... http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle August 31, 2014 By owc105 Share View on owc105.oxil.co.uk http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Whoa, Alex, hang in there, dude. Sure hurt to hear your reportyou're one of the sane ones, and it's so tough to see even the likes of you having karma from beyond. Me? I deserve everything I ever got, but you seem a notch more saintly than your average everyday lifeboat member. Ugh.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 8:34 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: In terms of mail filtering, using an email subscription with POP access (like Gmail) lets you use the filtering capabilities of an email client, which may be superior to whatever Yahoo Mail has to offer. Most professionals don't use Yahoo! Mail, except for Barry and Judy, apparently. Go figure. As for me, I don't have the time or patience to deal with FFL management beyond what I'm doing right now. My beloved has been in poor health for the past year, and my days are filled with her pain and discomfort. She is so dependent on me being in Fairfield that I haven't traveled east to see my 87 year old father since last September, and I don't know if I'll ever see him again. And, now, my own low-grade infection, that had been kept well in check for 11+ years, is staging a major comeback. There is simply enough stress and unpleasantness in my own life that I refuse to tackle the inane bullshit that goes on here. You have my sympathy, Alex. Maybe if the TurquiseB would refrain from sending you private emails complaining about Willytex, you wouldn't even have to respond to silliness like this. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : *From:* j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Is fluff like lint, or more like dust bunnies? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Have you ever considered paragraph breaks? They are a pretty nifty device. But, who knows, maybe you write only for your clarification. Can we hear next about your sock drawer. (-: Careful Steve, An-ar-tax-ius might put you in his fluff folder. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Can you imagine those three at a public court? A 911 call for sure. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : lol - How many times has our nescafe writer informed us he is soon to depart, if things don't improve to his standards? Such a dick thing to say. Either stay, or leave. No one cares which, or why. I've been on here almost ten years, and the writer hasn't ever left for more than a few days. From my observation, he loves to battle himself in public. Maybe when he was a kid, he saw that old Superman comic where Supe plays tennis with himself, and it made a deep, yet flawed impression. Couldn't find that one but Iove these old images. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Yikes! I think Barry may have already entered this stage. You know, the theme, if this place doesn't turn around, I'm otta here (-: From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com LOL, slim pickings for you then. I'm just hoping I develop dementia so I don't realise I'm saying the same thing over and over again. Go figure The remaining list is somewhat manageable, and occasionally contains something worth reading. Even more rarely, there is actually something worth replying to -- but at most 1 or 2 a day. That's not a very good track record for a forum, so I doubt I'll stick around if this is how things are going to continue to be. At this point I'm not quite sure which is more dismaying -- the outright insanity of people like Richard, or the shocking True Believerism from people like Share and Nabby and JR and Lawson. Both make me feel as if I'd accidentally dropped into a world in which reason is not only not the norm, but has never been heard of. :-) I like this aspect of it, it reminds me of a fun time in my life when I was surrounded by people who had abandoned critical thinking for someone else's daydreams and wild promises. Good fun for a while but unsustainable for me. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
MJ introduced a new low on this forum with swearing and namecalling never seen here before. I vote for having him removed.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing W it hin Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle
Most people, including researchers who have studied this conclude that 95% of Crop Circles are not man-made but constructed by some other not yet known form of intelligence. By doing their hoax'es perhaps these fellows upset that intelligence. They were certainly taught a lesson and from what I've heard they have not attempted to make crude, man-made cropcircles since. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : There, confusing, vomitting, this is what happens when you have one pint too many before starting work! I haven't had a pint yet this morning and I'm confused! So these guys go to make a crop circle but somehow it appears in five minutes, then someone gets diarrhea and the other guy is told not to drive because he's too tired by someone's mum and then this same person is interviewed and the camera goes all wonky like it is in the middle of a pool of water where someone has tossed a pebble. What does all this mean? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing With... http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Crop Circle Hoaxer Describing Crop Circle Appearing Within Five Minutes – Has Med Issues After Going In Circle August 31, 2014 By owc105 Share View on owc105.oxil.co.uk http://owc105.oxil.co.uk/?p=4330 Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 7:55 AM, anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' We were all wondering what happened to you - you got an entire thread dedicated to your name, asking what happened to you, which has run into over 186 messages by now. That should have given you plenty of excuses to post something interesting to read about yourself. As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. You nerd! All I have to do is log on using another alias if I really wanted to get your attention, to get around your dumb filters. By the time you get all your filters set, you'll have missed out on all the fun. Everyone knows that the only way to filter out all my replies is to switch off the entire forum messages. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. You sound really JELLOS, and scared. Maybe my comments about the claimed Rama levitation events are getting to you. All you have to do is admit your experience was either drug induced or an illusion. Maybe your ego won't let you tell the truth. Go figure. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. You are probably not making Alex's job any easier by sending him private emails complaining about my posting numbers on FFL. /Run to Alex. Run to Alex, Barry./ Sometimes you are so transparent, Barry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : *From:* j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Awake: The Life Of Yogananda - Rotten Tomatoes
On 9/2/2014 8:19 AM, emptyb...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Willy Thank you for your reply. It is so clarifying. No prob if you don't understand Comans book although that is hard to understand if you can also read scholars discussing Tantra. Now that's better! Since you don't understand Comans or unwilling to spend the $$ (I spent $128 – twice your price), much less copy the important parts, I have a better suggestion. Pay $12 new or $10 Kindle on Amazon for *James Swartz */How to Attain Enlightenment/. I have found he tracks true with Comans, which is expected since they had the same mentor – Swami Dayanâda. Swatz has also done a lot of Patanjali yoga so he understands its value for purification. I have already place links to Comans article, (find it on Realization.org) tracing the conversion of Advaita to modern yogic-advaita, although you may not have read it. The article is fairly short but valuable for seeing why suspension of mental activity (yoga-samâdhi) is unnecessary for realization. However, Swartz is best at addressing all the current variances in yoga/advaita in our time. Perhaps then we might have a more useful discussion. Thanks for the information - I am on it and I will get back to you soon. … šrî gomâya gomâya svâhâ … /Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa! / /Willy sez, / // /This should be dirt simple, Bill, but it's just too subtle for us householders, I guess. I don't have Coman's book anymore and I'm not going to spend $60 to get one. Anyone would have to go back to UT Austin for a four more years and learn four languages in order to read and understand this stuff in the originals. // Rita and I are tantrics and so we don't even have to understand anything - we know what works for us. So, I think I'll just stick to my preconceived notions until someone can explain everything to me in plain English that I can understand. It sounds complicated. It would be nice if you could just explain it in simple terms instead of wasting our time with more drivel. And, remember to hit the Show Message History button, SO WE KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. Thanks./
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 8:29 AM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Yep, I interact with Richard as little as possible, and ignore 99.9% of his posts, even when he is the only channel ON. You do realize that you just responded to my message, right? He posts so often, that he has lost all credibility with me. You do realize that your message is off-topic, right? There is a balance and rhythm to any social interaction, even on-line, and his incessant posting becomes boorish and intrusive, even anti-social. You do realize that you are sounding boorish, intrusive and anti-social, right? He is like a dog incessantly barking, on the other side of the fence - No point in judging him, can't reason with him, he likes to bark, so I simply tune him out. You do realize that you are judging me without reading 99.9% of my messages, right? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote : That's a question for Rick. I just ignore it all and suggest others do likewise. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : *From:* j_alexander_stanley@... mailto:j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 8:30 AM, jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: We can have a rule like, 100 posts for two weeks That would give Alex an easier time to keep track. By the way, into which folder you would send Judy's posts Good question, but where would you put Barry's responses to Judy? In your case, Jedi, it would be easy to put your messages in a folder, since you only post maybe two or three messages a week and most of them begin with RE: and end on one line. Go figure. and Share's posts. Share's posts contain relevant information, because she lives in Fairfiled and meditates in the dome every day, but you suck as an informant, Spock. --- xeno anartaxius@... wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. *From:* j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. -- turquoiseb@... wrote : While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Alex I hope that you and your beloved feel a whole lot better really soon. There are many people who can help bring about genuine relief. Wishing that for you both... On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 8:34 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: In terms of mail filtering, using an email subscription with POP access (like Gmail) lets you use the filtering capabilities of an email client, which may be superior to whatever Yahoo Mail has to offer. As for me, I don't have the time or patience to deal with FFL management beyond what I'm doing right now. My beloved has been in poor health for the past year, and my days are filled with her pain and discomfort. She is so dependent on me being in Fairfield that I haven't traveled east to see my 87 year old father since last September, and I don't know if I'll ever see him again. And, now, my own low-grade infection, that had been kept well in check for 11+ years, is staging a major comeback. There is simply enough stress and unpleasantness in my own life that I refuse to tackle the inane bullshit that goes on here. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
*From:* j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. On 9/2/2014 5:13 AM, salyavin808 wrote: I tried a few times but gave up, now I'm too busy ignoring him. Maybe you be more CONSCIOUS of what you are doing. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. You do realize that you are off-topic, right? Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control. That makes sense - adults don't need post limits, /but Yahoo! Neo should have an auto post that cuts out if you do more than 50 a week./ Have you ever considered taking a course in logic at a community college?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Richard, I'm sure Xeno puts my posts in Fluff folder. Fine with me. I continue to enjoy some of his. Since my 3D life is busier, I do delete more posts than before, mainly based on topic, but sometimes based on poster. And I guess everybody has someone they'd like to boot off the island. But I hope you don't get booted. Of course I don't read all your posts but I enjoy it when you and empty bring out more knowledge from each other. Also, some of your comments make me laugh out loud. And I'm amazed at and grateful for how you sussed out my feelings in the recent kafufel. And I admit that I have different reactions at different times to your obsession with turq's Rama levitation scenario. But I'm pretty sure that my reactions have at least 50% to do with the state of my own energy field (-: On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 9:42 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On 9/2/2014 8:30 AM, jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: We can have a rule like, 100 posts for two weeks That would give Alex an easier time to keep track. By the way, into which folder you would send Judy's posts Good question, but where would you put Barry's responses to Judy? In your case, Jedi, it would be easy to put your messages in a folder, since you only post maybe two or three messages a week and most of them begin with RE: and end on one line. Go figure. and Share's posts. Share's posts contain relevant information, because she lives in Fairfiled and meditates in the dome every day, but you suck as an informant, Spock. --- xeno anartaxius@... wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. -- turquoiseb@... wrote : While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 8:13 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Have you ever considered paragraph breaks? It's not like he was a newbie, Steve, but maybe he is on something he got over in Amsterdam. They are a pretty nifty device. Only a nerd would post a message about using technical software /without using paragraph breaks/. And, without explaining how filters work using Yahoo! Neo. And, when the topic isn't even about filtering. Go figure. But, who knows, maybe you write only for your clarification. That's probably true for just about everyone who posts here - this is supposed to fun. But, really some people do feel better when they have someone to talk to. Can we hear next about your sock drawer. (-: Non sequitur. It has not been established that Barry wears socks or even owns a chest of drawers. Maybe he just uses a shoe for the single pair of socks. Some batchlors actually just leave their sock on the floor at night, especially those that don't sleep in a bed. That way, all you have to do is reach out and grab without even standing up. It worked for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : *From:* j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Drivel, was Drivel,was, Where is Barry Wright?
Richard, I think one of the hardest lessons I've learned on FFL is that sometimes I like people who don't like me. But going on it's all grist for the mill, I've mostly healed that. It's kind of funny, but I think FFL has made it easier for me to get along with people in 3D life! On Monday, September 1, 2014 10:42 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I think it was the word drivel that has hit you where it hurts, Ricky. Interesting. You are incorrect. I was defending your right to post drivel. On 9/1/2014 8:33 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: I don't need any defending on that front, but thanks. What I object to, is anyone butting into the drivel conversation without first reading the drivel. Em wasn't butting in, she is a regular poster to FFL. You just don't like being called out on your drivel. Denise Evans's last drivel post to FFL was over a year ago. It's just like at a social gathering when a group of people are sitting around a table discussing something and a stranger walks up and says You people are full of shit and then singles out the one person that wasn't even at the table - and when they don't even know anyone or what the group is talking about. That is rude. If anyone did that at a normal social gathering they would be asked to leave. Nice analogy but not accurate in this case. Emily is no stranger plus she has read and responded to plenty of your posts. By the by, Emily is hardly the only one here who has accused you of trolling and repeating yourself although I think her use of the word drivel was unique. The rest of the guys here just chalk it up to mental incapacitation. I wouldn't go that far, actually, I find your posts humorous and apropos some of the time. It was Denise Evans that used the word drivel and pointed a third finger at Share. http://www.mail-archive.com/fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com/msg327351.html What surprises me is the number of people on the list that didn't object, but cheered the boor on. The boor? Emily a boor? She really did find your button. But then nothing you say here should be taken seriously so I'll just chalk it up to a little fun you're having - as usual. Denise Evans was acting like a boor, not Emily. But, obviously Emily doesn't read all the posts on FFL. Often it's what people DON'T say that is important. I don't have anything against anyone posting drivel - people do it all the time - I do object to a stranger attempting to co-opt the whole conversation with drivel insults. However, you don't seem to mind, since you don't like Share anyway. It was low, real low, and makes me think a lot less of the others at the table. Ha, ha Ricky. As I said Em is no stranger, no one is co-opting anything except you in this case, and I don't don't like Share anyway so stop making things up. The only one here who I wouldn't invite to my birthday party is bawee. Denise Evans is the stranger who hits and runs. And, Share thinks you don't like her. And, Barry is the only person NOT invited to ANY table, which is why he probably sits alone at a cafe.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Richard, are you replying to Xeno or turq?! On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 9:24 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On 9/2/2014 7:55 AM, anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' We were all wondering what happened to you - you got an entire thread dedicated to your name, asking what happened to you, which has run into over 186 messages by now. That should have given you plenty of excuses to post something interesting to read about yourself. As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. You nerd! All I have to do is log on using another alias if I really wanted to get your attention, to get around your dumb filters. By the time you get all your filters set, you'll have missed out on all the fun. Everyone knows that the only way to filter out all my replies is to switch off the entire forum messages. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. You sound really JELLOS, and scared. Maybe my comments about the claimed Rama levitation events are getting to you. All you have to do is admit your experience was either drug induced or an illusion. Maybe your ego won't let you tell the truth. Go figure. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. You are probably not making Alex's job any easier by sending him private emails complaining about my posting numbers on FFL. Run to Alex. Run to Alex, Barry. Sometimes you are so transparent, Barry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Is fluff like lint, or more like dust bunnies? I'm not sure but if it comes in strawberry, I'll take some. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Have you ever considered paragraph breaks? They are a pretty nifty device. But, who knows, maybe you write only for your clarification. Can we hear next about your sock drawer. (-: Careful Steve, An-ar-tax-ius might put you in his fluff folder. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, are you replying to Xeno or turq?! He's been responding to bawee all morning when he was really supposed to be responding to Xeno. Help him out Share, he seems to have become ker-fluffled. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 9:24 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' punditster@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On 9/2/2014 7:55 AM, anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' We were all wondering what happened to you - you got an entire thread dedicated to your name, asking what happened to you, which has run into over 186 messages by now. That should have given you plenty of excuses to post something interesting to read about yourself. As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. You nerd! All I have to do is log on using another alias if I really wanted to get your attention, to get around your dumb filters. By the time you get all your filters set, you'll have missed out on all the fun. Everyone knows that the only way to filter out all my replies is to switch off the entire forum messages. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. You sound really JELLOS, and scared. Maybe my comments about the claimed Rama levitation events are getting to you. All you have to do is admit your experience was either drug induced or an illusion. Maybe your ego won't let you tell the truth. Go figure. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. You are probably not making Alex's job any easier by sending him private emails complaining about my posting numbers on FFL. Run to Alex. Run to Alex, Barry. Sometimes you are so transparent, Barry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
You know, I'm even okay with the oft repeated threat. It's just that dang preample we have to hear, when he decides to respond to someone on his DNR list, or after he's sworn off for a week or so. Jesus Barry, it ain't no thang. Just post, or don't post. Reply or don't reply. It's all good, We're all just people here. (-: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : lol - How many times has our nescafe writer informed us he is soon to depart, if things don't improve to his standards? Such a dick thing to say. Either stay, or leave. No one cares which, or why. I've been on here almost ten years, and the writer hasn't ever left for more than a few days. From my observation, he loves to battle himself in public. Maybe when he was a kid, he saw that old Superman comic where Supe plays tennis with himself, and it made a deep, yet flawed impression. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Yikes! I think Barry may have already entered this stage. You know, the theme, if this place doesn't turn around, I'm otta here (-: From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com LOL, slim pickings for you then. I'm just hoping I develop dementia so I don't realise I'm saying the same thing over and over again. Go figure The remaining list is somewhat manageable, and occasionally contains something worth reading. Even more rarely, there is actually something worth replying to -- but at most 1 or 2 a day. That's not a very good track record for a forum, so I doubt I'll stick around if this is how things are going to continue to be. At this point I'm not quite sure which is more dismaying -- the outright insanity of people like Richard, or the shocking True Believerism from people like Share and Nabby and JR and Lawson. Both make me feel as if I'd accidentally dropped into a world in which reason is not only not the norm, but has never been heard of. :-) I like this aspect of it, it reminds me of a fun time in my life when I was surrounded by people who had abandoned critical thinking for someone else's daydreams and wild promises. Good fun for a while but unsustainable for me. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
As usual you are wrong - plenty of name calling and invectives before I blessed FFL with my sattvic presence. Look at the archives if you can stand the truth. What you are referring to is my penchant for calling Marshy apt descriptive names. From: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name? MJ introduced a new low on this forum with swearing and namecalling never seen here before. I vote for having him removed.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
float away - Google Search https://www.google.com/search?q=float+awayespv=2source=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=kOUFVIXVD4ToggT-94GoDQved=0CAcQ_AUoAgbiw=1280bih=899#facrc=_imgdii=_imgrc=paPNsdiu7KxdEM%253A%3BqARi17C7OpJB-M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Ffc07.deviantart.net%252Ffs71%252Fi%252F2012%252F231%252F1%252F3%252Ffloat_away_background_by_blargofdoom-d5bpd7t.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fblargofdoom.deviantart.com%252Fart%252FFloat-Away-Background-321990185%3B1024%3B769 https://www.google.com/search?q=float+awayespv=2source=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=kOUFVIXVD4ToggT-94GoDQved=0CAcQ_AUoAgbiw=1280bih=899#facrc=_imgdii=_imgrc=paPNsdiu7KxdEM%253A%3BqARi17C7OpJB-M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Ffc07.deviantart.net%252Ffs71%252Fi%252F2012%252F231%252F1%252F3%252Ffloat_away_background_by_blargofdoom-d5bpd7t.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fblargofdoom.deviantart.com%252Fart%252FFloat-Away-Background-321990185%3B1024%3B769 float away - Google Search https://www.google.com/search?q=float+awayespv=2source=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=kOUFVIXVD4ToggT-94GoDQved=0CAcQ_AUoAgbiw=1280bih=899#facrc=_imgdii=_imgrc=paPNsdiu7KxdEM%253A%3BqARi17C7OpJB-M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Ffc07.deviantart.net%252Ffs71%252Fi%252F2012%252F231%252F1%252F3%252Ffloat_away_background_by_blargofdoom-d5bpd7t.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fblargofdoom.deviantart.com%252Fart%252FFloat-Away-Background-321990185%3B1024%3B769 ohjoy.blogs.com happy weekend + float away. 470 × 557 - 17k dailypainters.com Float Away 350 × 495 - 123k - jpg blargofdoom.deviantart... Float Away B... View on www.google.com https://www.google.com/search?q=float+awayespv=2source=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=kOUFVIXVD4ToggT-94GoDQved=0CAcQ_AUoAgbiw=1280bih=899#facrc=_imgdii=_imgrc=paPNsdiu7KxdEM%253A%3BqARi17C7OpJB-M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Ffc07.deviantart.net%252Ffs71%252Fi%252F2012%252F231%252F1%252F3%252Ffloat_away_background_by_blargofdoom-d5bpd7t.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fblargofdoom.deviantart.com%252Fart%252FFloat-Away-Background-321990185%3B1024%3B769 Preview by Yahoo ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Have you ever considered paragraph breaks? They are a pretty nifty device. But, who knows, maybe you write only for your clarification. Can we hear next about your sock drawer. (-: Careful Steve, An-ar-tax-ius might put you in his fluff folder. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
thanks, Ann, nice play on words. Plus...got me chuckling. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 10:28 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, are you replying to Xeno or turq?! He's been responding to bawee all morning when he was really supposed to be responding to Xeno. Help him out Share, he seems to have become ker-fluffled. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 9:24 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' punditster@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On 9/2/2014 7:55 AM, anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' We were all wondering what happened to you - you got an entire thread dedicated to your name, asking what happened to you, which has run into over 186 messages by now. That should have given you plenty of excuses to post something interesting to read about yourself. As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. You nerd! All I have to do is log on using another alias if I really wanted to get your attention, to get around your dumb filters. By the time you get all your filters set, you'll have missed out on all the fun. Everyone knows that the only way to filter out all my replies is to switch off the entire forum messages. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. You sound really JELLOS, and scared. Maybe my comments about the claimed Rama levitation events are getting to you. All you have to do is admit your experience was either drug induced or an illusion. Maybe your ego won't let you tell the truth. Go figure. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. You are probably not making Alex's job any easier by sending him private emails complaining about my posting numbers on FFL. Run to Alex. Run to Alex, Barry. Sometimes you are so transparent, Barry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
OMG, Steve, I gotta admit: when I read your last sentence we're all just people here there was a nanosecond when my mind went blank, like in doubt or something... On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 10:37 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: You know, I'm even okay with the oft repeated threat. It's just that dang preample we have to hear, when he decides to respond to someone on his DNR list, or after he's sworn off for a week or so. Jesus Barry, it ain't no thang. Just post, or don't post. Reply or don't reply. It's all good, We're all just people here. (-: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : lol - How many times has our nescafe writer informed us he is soon to depart, if things don't improve to his standards? Such a dick thing to say. Either stay, or leave. No one cares which, or why. I've been on here almost ten years, and the writer hasn't ever left for more than a few days. From my observation, he loves to battle himself in public. Maybe when he was a kid, he saw that old Superman comic where Supe plays tennis with himself, and it made a deep, yet flawed impression. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Yikes! I think Barry may have already entered this stage. You know, the theme, if this place doesn't turn around,I'm otta here (-: From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com LOL, slim pickings for you then. I'm just hoping I develop dementia so I don't realise I'm saying the same thing over and over again. Go figure The remaining list is somewhat manageable, and occasionally contains something worth reading. Even more rarely, there is actually something worth replying to -- but at most 1 or 2 a day. That's not a very good track record for a forum, so I doubt I'll stick around if this is how things are going to continue to be. At this point I'm not quite sure which is more dismaying -- the outright insanity of people like Richard, or the shocking True Believerism from people like Share and Nabby and JR and Lawson. Both make me feel as if I'd accidentally dropped into a world in which reason is not only not the norm, but has never been heard of. :-) I like this aspect of it, it reminds me of a fun time in my life when I was surrounded by people who had abandoned critical thinking for someone else's daydreams and wild promises. Good fun for a while but unsustainable for me. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
All opposed? me! (maybe on ban on Rama's levitation though) (-: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote : I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. I second the motion. From: anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 8:55 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name? I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/1/2014 10:06 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Richard, I hear your plaintive cry for help. At least there are three or four people on the forum we can depend on to be decent. It's nice to be able to discuss something with someone without the respondent getting all bent out of shape. I still can't understand why Judy called you and the other guy, Anartaxius, liars - but it's all water under the bridge now anyway. Now if we could just deal with MJ and the TB. LoL! I will try to reach out to you. Thanks for responding. It was supposed to be a joke. #1) The golden rule is not, those with the gold, make the rules. It is something other than that. On this forum it is Rick that makes the rules. We are all guests on his forum. Anyone is free to start there own. #2) The jury is out as to whether Zen Master Rama, aka Frederick Lenz was able to levitate. Let's wait for more data to come in before we comment on that. The guy is dead, but only his students are making the claim that he could levitate. I don't recall Rama himself ever making that claim. So, I guess the burden of proof is on the students making the claims. #3) Postings made two to three years ago, should not be considered as current. Chat room protocol has generally set a six month, four day limit as to whether a posting is current or not. On most discussion groups, everything that has ever been posted is fair game. Judy was a master at searching out old comments in order to make her point. Quite often it's not what people are saying but what they once said that is important to the conversation. It is a common tactic to point out consistencies in any debate. Sadly, the Yahoo Groups search function seems to be on the blink, so we will have to use the other FFL archive to search out older messages. Of course, this isn't a chat room as Judy pointed out - it's supposed to be a discussion. But, sometimes it does act like a chat room when most of the messages begin and end on one single line and all begin with RE:. #4) Posting a person's name when they have requested anonymity is not considered good taste, and is really violation of the rules of the forum. It's not a good idea to post using your name and email address in the header if you want to be anonymous, Steve. That's my point. #4a) Using a person's name in such a way that you are saying you are not going use such and such''s name, because such and such has requested that you not do it, does not get around point #4. Maybe she didn't realize that her name was in the header of all her messages, including the one where she requested us not to reveal it. Go figure. But, in fact it was Judy and Susan that first revealed her her first name. If what's-her-name had not made a big deal out of it, probably nobody would have even noticed it. Now it's gone into over 200 replies, WITH HER NAME FOR ALL TO SEE! Not to mention that Susan's original post included the TurquoiseB's real name in the subject line. Go figure. It's not complicated. Now, we all need someone to talk to. Some more than others. Please note the daily post totals. (-: It's simple: /Be familiar with the group you are posting to before you post! One normally does not join a conversation by just walking up and talking. Instead, you listen first and then join in if you have something pertinent to contribute. If you have a question to ask, first consider if it's something you can find out by reading the appropriate manual or asking someone./ http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/wjh/newsgrp.shtml ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 9/1/2014 8:44 PM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: FOR THE RECORD, I PROMISE NEVER TO USE WHATS-HER-NAME'S NAME IN ANOTHER POST. Maybe we should also make a FFL rule never to use someone's real name in the subject line of a message, BECAUSE THEY MIGHT BE LOOKING FOR WORK! And, always ask them, privately, if you should respond to them using their posted name. But, in my case it is alright to use my name anywhere, since I am NOT looking for work and I just want more attention. Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to, even if it's just drivel. FOR GOD'S SAKE! WILL SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME - I NEED SOME SPIRITUAL HELP! SERIOUSLY! /Sunny and the Sunlglows - Talk To Me/ http://youtu.be/QclMCuhv4kQ ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dmevans365@... mailto:dmevans365@... wrote : Richard, this is my name, but listen. You outed it here. My moniker does not out my name for that email, which I used by mistake. I was being compulsive yesterday. Please do not use my name again and do yourself a favor; let go of the need, along with Share, to relentlessly forward misconception. Thank you. Try not to
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
that's funny Share. And you know, that's what I like so much about you. (-: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : OMG, Steve, I gotta admit: when I read your last sentence we're all just people here there was a nanosecond when my mind went blank, like in doubt or something... On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 10:37 AM, steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: You know, I'm even okay with the oft repeated threat. It's just that dang preample we have to hear, when he decides to respond to someone on his DNR list, or after he's sworn off for a week or so. Jesus Barry, it ain't no thang. Just post, or don't post. Reply or don't reply. It's all good, We're all just people here. (-: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : lol - How many times has our nescafe writer informed us he is soon to depart, if things don't improve to his standards? Such a dick thing to say. Either stay, or leave. No one cares which, or why. I've been on here almost ten years, and the writer hasn't ever left for more than a few days. From my observation, he loves to battle himself in public. Maybe when he was a kid, he saw that old Superman comic where Supe plays tennis with himself, and it made a deep, yet flawed impression. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Yikes! I think Barry may have already entered this stage. You know, the theme, if this place doesn't turn around, I'm otta here (-: From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com LOL, slim pickings for you then. I'm just hoping I develop dementia so I don't realise I'm saying the same thing over and over again. Go figure The remaining list is somewhat manageable, and occasionally contains something worth reading. Even more rarely, there is actually something worth replying to -- but at most 1 or 2 a day. That's not a very good track record for a forum, so I doubt I'll stick around if this is how things are going to continue to be. At this point I'm not quite sure which is more dismaying -- the outright insanity of people like Richard, or the shocking True Believerism from people like Share and Nabby and JR and Lawson. Both make me feel as if I'd accidentally dropped into a world in which reason is not only not the norm, but has never been heard of. :-) I like this aspect of it, it reminds me of a fun time in my life when I was surrounded by people who had abandoned critical thinking for someone else's daydreams and wild promises. Good fun for a while but unsustainable for me. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 8:38 AM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: lol - How many times has our nescafe writer informed us he is soon to depart, if things don't improve to his standards? Such a dick thing to say. Either stay, or leave. No one cares which, or why. I've been on here almost ten years, and the writer hasn't ever left for more than a few days. From my observation, he loves to battle himself in public. Maybe when he was a kid, he saw that old Superman comic where Supe plays tennis with himself, and it made a deep, yet flawed impression. He lost his target audience, so it's weird that he is still around, working feverishly on his filtering project. He seems like a good candidate for that new mobile phone app - the one where you watch on your phone others play video games. He says he doesn't read our messages but he always seems to pipe up when his name is mentioned. Maybe he doesn't realize that we've got him pegged - stuck over there with not much income, no vehicle of his own, and no way out of town except to ride the bus; longing for the States, with nobody to talk to; just watching American movies on his laptop, alone up in his bedroom. I could be wrong, but that's what I used to do living three years in Great Britain and two years in Japan as a military brat. Oh, I forgot - I went to the base Teen Club a few times and rode my bicycle past some Teddy Boys once when I was on the way to the local hobby shop to get a new model plane or car. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Yikes! I think Barry may have already entered this stage. You know, the theme, if this place doesn't turn around,I'm otta here (-: *From:* salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com LOL, slim pickings for you then. I'm just hoping I develop dementia so I don't realise I'm saying the same thing over and over again. Go figure The remaining list is somewhat manageable, and occasionally contains something worth reading. Even more rarely, there is actually something worth replying to -- but at most 1 or 2 a day. That's not a very good track record for a forum, so I doubt I'll stick around if this is how things are going to continue to be. At this point I'm not quite sure which is more dismaying -- the outright insanity of people like Richard, or the shocking True Believerism from people like Share and Nabby and JR and Lawson. Both make me feel as if I'd accidentally dropped into a world in which reason is not only not the norm, but has never been heard of. :-) I like this aspect of it, it reminds me of a fun time in my life when I was surrounded by people who had abandoned critical thinking for someone else's daydreams and wild promises. Good fun for a while but unsustainable for me. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Thanks, Steve, that means a lot to me. And I am sorry for misunderstanding and misjudging you before. Whew! That feels better (-: On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 11:04 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: that's funny Share. And you know, that's what I like so much about you. (-: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : OMG, Steve, I gotta admit: when I read your last sentence we're all just people here there was a nanosecond when my mind went blank, like in doubt or something... On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 10:37 AM, steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: You know, I'm even okay with the oft repeated threat. It's just that dang preample we have to hear, when he decides to respond to someone on his DNR list, or after he's sworn off for a week or so. Jesus Barry, it ain't no thang. Just post, or don't post. Reply or don't reply. It's all good, We're all just people here. (-: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : lol - How many times has our nescafe writer informed us he is soon to depart, if things don't improve to his standards? Such a dick thing to say. Either stay, or leave. No one cares which, or why. I've been on here almost ten years, and the writer hasn't ever left for more than a few days. From my observation, he loves to battle himself in public. Maybe when he was a kid, he saw that old Superman comic where Supe plays tennis with himself, and it made a deep, yet flawed impression. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Yikes! I think Barry may have already entered this stage. You know, the theme, if this place doesn't turn around,I'm otta here (-: From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com LOL, slim pickings for you then. I'm just hoping I develop dementia so I don't realise I'm saying the same thing over and over again. Go figure The remaining list is somewhat manageable, and occasionally contains something worth reading. Even more rarely, there is actually something worth replying to -- but at most 1 or 2 a day. That's not a very good track record for a forum, so I doubt I'll stick around if this is how things are going to continue to be. At this point I'm not quite sure which is more dismaying -- the outright insanity of people like Richard, or the shocking True Believerism from people like Share and Nabby and JR and Lawson. Both make me feel as if I'd accidentally dropped into a world in which reason is not only not the norm, but has never been heard of. :-) I like this aspect of it, it reminds me of a fun time in my life when I was surrounded by people who had abandoned critical thinking for someone else's daydreams and wild promises. Good fun for a while but unsustainable for me. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Spam is the word, it would be OK - ish if he made sense or if his links were relevant to what is being discussed, but they aren't. He is clearly a troll trying to ruin the place for his own amusement. As he happily admits. Bhairitu is right, adults don't need post limits so maybe we should petition yahoo for an auto post limit feature that cuts you out if you do more than 50 a week if we aren't mature enough to retain self control.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
*From:* j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? On 9/2/2014 8:46 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: I'm almost glad to hear your voice after so much Ricky in the last little while. Almost. So, it's all about Ricky. You do realize that almost every time I put down the TB, you give me a gold star, right?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Richard, I learned the hard way that it feels bad to say mean things to people here. So like with MJ, I try to restrict myself to responding simply to his out of date and inaccurate allegations. Like I've said, I think the Funny Farm Lounge has taught me a lot of useful stuff. Go figger (-: On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 11:02 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On 9/1/2014 10:06 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Richard, I hear your plaintive cry for help. At least there are three or four people on the forum we can depend on to be decent. It's nice to be able to discuss something with someone without the respondent getting all bent out of shape. I still can't understand why Judy called you and the other guy, Anartaxius, liars - but it's all water under the bridge now anyway. Now if we could just deal with MJ and the TB. LoL! I will try to reach out to you. Thanks for responding. It was supposed to be a joke. #1) The golden rule is not, those with the gold, make the rules. It is something other than that. On this forum it is Rick that makes the rules. We are all guests on his forum. Anyone is free to start there own. #2) The jury is out as to whether Zen Master Rama, aka Frederick Lenz was able to levitate. Let's wait for more data to come in before we comment on that. The guy is dead, but only his students are making the claim that he could levitate. I don't recall Rama himself ever making that claim. So, I guess the burden of proof is on the students making the claims. #3) Postings made two to three years ago, should not be considered as current. Chat room protocol has generally set a six month, four day limit as to whether a posting is current or not. On most discussion groups, everything that has ever been posted is fair game. Judy was a master at searching out old comments in order to make her point. Quite often it's not what people are saying but what they once said that is important to the conversation. It is a common tactic to point out consistencies in any debate. Sadly, the Yahoo Groups search function seems to be on the blink, so we will have to use the other FFL archive to search out older messages. Of course, this isn't a chat room as Judy pointed out - it's supposed to be a discussion. But, sometimes it does act like a chat room when most of the messages begin and end on one single line and all begin with RE:. #4) Posting a person's name when they have requested anonymity is not considered good taste, and is really violation of the rules of the forum. It's not a good idea to post using your name and email address in the header if you want to be anonymous, Steve. That's my point. #4a) Using a person's name in such a way that you are saying you are not going use such and such''s name, because such and such has requested that you not do it, does not get around point #4. Maybe she didn't realize that her name was in the header of all her messages, including the one where she requested us not to reveal it. Go figure. But, in fact it was Judy and Susan that first revealed her her first name. If what's-her-name had not made a big deal out of it, probably nobody would have even noticed it. Now it's gone into over 200 replies, WITH HER NAME FOR ALL TO SEE! Not to mention that Susan's original post included the TurquoiseB's real name in the subject line. Go figure. It's not complicated. Now, we all need someone to talk to. Some more than others. Please note the daily post totals. (-: It's simple: Be familiar with the group you are posting to before you post! One normally does not join a conversation by just walking up and talking. Instead, you listen first and then join in if you have something pertinent to contribute. If you have a question to ask, first consider if it's something you can find out by reading the appropriate manual or asking someone. http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/wjh/newsgrp.shtml ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 9/1/2014 8:44 PM, punditster@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: FOR THE RECORD, I PROMISE NEVER TO USE WHATS-HER-NAME'S NAME IN ANOTHER POST. Maybe we should also make a FFL rule never to use someone's real name in the subject line of a message, BECAUSE THEY MIGHT BE LOOKING FOR WORK! And, always ask them, privately, if you should respond to them using their posted name. But, in my case it is alright to use my name anywhere, since I am NOT looking for work and I just want more attention. Some people just feel better when they have someone to
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 09/02/2014 01:16 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: *From:* j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? Back on a.m.t I mentioned that Willy seemed to be a masochist and enjoyed people reviling against him. Perhaps the SM clubs have closed in Austin and he has no place other than this to hang out. Out of decorum most moderators would have booted him a long time ago.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 8:53 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. I second the motion. /This is funny/ - a guy that posts hundreds of non-sense messages and false rumors denigrating MMY, /wants to have the MMY defender removed from a forum about MMY/. Now that's funny! *From:* anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Tuesday, September 2, 2014 8:55 AM *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name? I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : *From:* j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
Yep, I interact with Richard as little as possible, and ignore 99.9% of his posts, even when he is the only channel ON. He posts so often, that he has lost all credibility with me. There is a balance and rhythm to any social interaction, even on-line, and his incessant posting becomes boorish and intrusive, even anti-social. He is like a dog incessantly barking, on the other side of the fence - No point in judging him, can't reason with him, he likes to bark, so I simply tune him out. On 9/2/2014 8:54 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: There must be some agency that can help with online addiction. But as long as one has an audience I'm not sure it would do much good. http://netaddiction.com/internet-addiction-test/ /Now this is really funny/ - a gal that claims to read as little as possible of Ricky's messages, who is supposed to be running a tack shop and a stable, is posting a reply on the internet to a thread started by Ricky, who is supposedly addicted to the internet. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote : That's a question for Rick. I just ignore it all and suggest others do likewise. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : *From:* j_alexander_stanley@... mailto:j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
I vote for keeping Richard here. And maybe he and Rita could give some classes or tips or something to those for whom it seems so very difficult to either ignore and or delete posts they would rather not read! Hey, if I can do it, anyone can do it. Or so I thought... On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 11:24 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On 9/2/2014 8:53 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. I second the motion. This is funny - a guy that posts hundreds of non-sense messages and false rumors denigrating MMY, wants to have the MMY defender removed from a forum about MMY. Now that's funny! From: anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 8:55 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name? I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : From: j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
*From:* j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com As for me, I don't have the time or patience to deal with FFL management beyond what I'm doing right now. My beloved has been in poor health for the past year, and my days are filled with her pain and discomfort. She is so dependent on me being in Fairfield that I haven't traveled east to see my 87 year old father since last September, and I don't know if I'll ever see him again. And, now, my own low-grade infection, that had been kept well in check for 11+ years, is staging a major comeback. There is simply enough stress and unpleasantness in my own life that I refuse to tackle the inane bullshit that goes on here. On 9/2/2014 9:01 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Sorry to hear all of this, Alex, and as I've said before, thanks for handling the thankless task of trying to manage this place as well as you always have. I know that there is not much you can do when faced with someone as psychotic and as unresponsive as Richard Williams. For all we know, if you were to revoke his posting rights, he's so insane that he might do what Ravi and others have done and just try to create new IDs so he could continue to harass the people here, and you as moderator. Dealing with people like this is a lose-lose situation, which is why I and some others who have spoken up lately have chosen not to interact with him at all, ever again. I guess the thing that bothers me the most, still having a tiny bit of affection for my days involved with TM, is how a discussion group about it could devolve into the inane bullshit that you so accurately describe it having become. What HAPPENED to all of these once-intelligent people to make them so petty, so vindictive, so irrational, and so attached to their beliefs or to the people who sold them those beliefs? If FFL continues as it is, many people will probably bail, because after all there is just so much inane bullshit one can take in a lifetime. The only good thing I see coming out of that is that any prospective newbies wondering whether TM might be right for them and coming to Fairfield Life to find out will probably run away screaming within a few days, and thus never fall prey to all the cult madness. In that sense, True Believers like Nabby and JR and Share and True Psychopaths like Richard Williams may actually be performing a service. OH GOD - WILL IT EVER END? It's all about what's-his'name. P.S. Get a clue, Barry - Alex doesn't want to discuss your petty ego problem with a chat room discussion group.
Re: [FairfieldLife] 600 HP car runs on salt water
It looks like just a fancy battery http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_battery Nothing wrong with fancy batteries, of course, but this may get your creative juices flowing: http://www.free-energy-info.com/FEindex.html Try Chapter 10.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 9:17 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote: MJ introduced a new low on this forum with swearing and namecalling never seen here before. I vote for having him removed. Maybe he needs to face this simple fact: HE WILL NEVER AGAIN BAKE BREAD ON THE MUM CAMPUS.
[FairfieldLife] Who remembers Walter Koch?
Hi all, I'm a younger relative of the late Walter Koch, and never got to meet him since he passed away before I was born. I'm working on discovering my family history, and I'd be deeply grateful if those of you who remember him could share a bit of what he was like. When I search online for information, I always get the early meditators, such as Walter Koch etc. etc. but rarely is there much more said. I gather he was a figure in the early movement who was know by so many that just mentioning his name was sufficient to get the point across. However, for a later generation reading through information about the early days, the big names don't have the same meaning. Any memories, impressions, letters, interactions you may have or know about? I'd love to hear it. Thank you all. Ms. Koch
[FairfieldLife] Future's So Bright I Gotta Wear Shades
Timbuk3 http://youtu.be/8qrriKcwvlY
[FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
But John, Mars goes into its own sign on Thursday. Won't that mitigate? BTW, I think FFL birthday is Sept 5or 6, same year as 9/11. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:31 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : But John, Mars goes into its own sign on Thursday. Won't that mitigate? Damn, I already forwarded it to the president. Back to defcon 2 BTW, I think FFL birthday is Sept 5or 6, same year as 9/11. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:31 PM, jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Who remembers Walter Koch?
dear Leopard, I was once in a meeting with Walter and some others in 1980. Even though it was so long ago and only that one time, I remember him clearly, can easily recall his face. He was such a bright light. Very welcoming of everyone, very gracious and down to earth at the same time. I was Director of Housing at that time and my best friend was Director of Housekeeping. So we both attended the meeting. She introduced herself and Walter brightened even more saying, That's my wife's name. I bet if you emailed some of the leaders at MUM, you could gather some even better memories. Welcome to FFL and thank you for evoking this sweet memory of mine. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:22 PM, leopardg...@hotmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Hi all, I'm a younger relative of the late Walter Koch, and never got to meet him since he passed away before I was born. I'm working on discovering my family history, and I'd be deeply grateful if those of you who remember him could share a bit of what he was like. When I search online for information, I always get the early meditators, such as Walter Koch etc. etc. but rarely is there much more said. I gather he was a figure in the early movement who was know by so many that just mentioning his name was sufficient to get the point across. However, for a later generation reading through information about the early days, the big names don't have the same meaning. Any memories, impressions, letters, interactions you may have or know about? I'd love to hear it. Thank you all. Ms. Koch
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
(-: On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:53 PM, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : But John, Mars goes into its own sign on Thursday. Won't that mitigate? Damn, I already forwarded it to the president. Back to defcon 2 BTW, I think FFL birthday is Sept 5or 6, same year as 9/11. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:31 PM, jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name? [1 Attachment]
On 9/2/2014 11:29 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: I vote for keeping Richard here. And maybe he and Rita could give some classes or tips or something to those for whom it seems so very difficult to either ignore and or delete posts they would rather not read! Hey, if I can do it, anyone can do it. Or so I thought... It's can be complicated, Share. First, you've got to be able to /find the Mail icon in Yahoo and then read the //Subject Line/ and then find the /From//column/; next you have to /locate //the DEL//button/ on the computer keyboard. And, then you have to know how to /aim and click the Misouze/. And, then after that, you've got to/find the Trash bin/ on the desktop, at least once a year, to empty out the trash contents. It's all about the computer software called the /desktop metaphor/, only people don't usually have a trash can sitting on top of their desk. Go figure. But, then again, most people don't have a computer sitting on top their dinning room table either. That's why I use a light-weight laptop - I can take it with me into the bathroom or to a bar. For some people, just turning on the computer is a challenge! I give people a lot of credit just for doing that. It's amazing how people find the news group in the fist place. We've already discussed the why they want to come here. The real question is: /if they don't want to dance, why did they come to the dance party?/ Go figure. See that /Macintosh G4/ computer in the background of this photo? /It clocks, but it was obsolete before I even opened the box! It's great, if you need a nice big heavy paper-weight./ Photo of computer technician /An average computer nerd when he hits the Send button/ On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 11:24 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On 9/2/2014 8:53 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com mailto:mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. I second the motion. /This is funny/ - a guy that posts hundreds of non-sense messages and false rumors denigrating MMY, /wants to have the MMY defender removed from a forum about MMY/. Now that's funny!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
Perfect setup for another false flag. Be aware. On 09/02/2014 10:31 AM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Where is Barry Wright?
On 9/2/2014 11:23 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Richard, I meant that you and Rita are still involved in the learning process--as teachers. Thanks. Yes, we are still learning and teaching what we know. Last year, we took dancing lessons, trying to learn folk dancing. We learned seven basic dances to world music. Then, in a few days we forgot the steps. So, last Saturday night we went to the Cowboy Dance Hall to learn some simple steps: the /so-called One Step/. We had fun at the dance, now we are teaching it to all of our friends. You might try it just for fun. First, you crank up some dance music; then you get out on the dance floor. Next, you put one foot forward (left foot first for the leader); then you put your right foot forward. Then after that, you step in place three times and then reverse the procedure. It's not complicated. Blue jeans with a big buckle and white snaps western shirt are optional, but cowboy boots are best, so you can slide. George Straight - I Just Want to Dance With You http://youtu.be/HxxhNAyj3QQ
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
For Thunderbird for a message filter use pundister for the From. Then you can delete or move those emails to whatever folder you want like 'Under the Bridge', 'Dungeon', 'Looney Bin'. ;-) Makes for a much cleaner looking FFL. On 09/02/2014 05:55 AM, anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : *From:* j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
As I just mentioned use punditster as the From filter. Sorry to hear about the health problems. Just remember the body isn't static and it can change states as you age as well as with the seasons. On 09/02/2014 06:34 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: In terms of mail filtering, using an email subscription with POP access (like Gmail) lets you use the filtering capabilities of an email client, which may be superior to whatever Yahoo Mail has to offer. As for me, I don't have the time or patience to deal with FFL management beyond what I'm doing right now. My beloved has been in poor health for the past year, and my days are filled with her pain and discomfort. She is so dependent on me being in Fairfield that I haven't traveled east to see my 87 year old father since last September, and I don't know if I'll ever see him again. And, now, my own low-grade infection, that had been kept well in check for 11+ years, is staging a major comeback. There is simply enough stress and unpleasantness in my own life that I refuse to tackle the inane bullshit that goes on here. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote : I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : *From:* j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 09/02/2014 01:16 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: ** While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. Dan Friedman tried to do exactly the same thing, but fortunately everyone just ignored him, so he seems to have lost interest and gone away. Good riddance. It's clear, however, that Willytex is too insane to do this, and will keep up this endless spamming forever, even if no one ever responds to him. Isn't there *something* you can do to get him to cut back on it? On 9/2/2014 11:20 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote: Back on a.m.t I mentioned that Willy seemed to be a masochist and enjoyed people reviling against him. You do realize that you are setting yourself up for a whipping, right? Perhaps the SM clubs have closed in Austin and he has no place other than this to hang out. Non sequitur. We live in San Antonio. Out of decorum most moderators would have booted him a long time ago. YOU BIG DUMB SHIT! There are no moderators on a.m.t. - it's an open forum on Google Groups.
Re: [FairfieldLife] 600 HP car runs on salt water
My jeep can fun on salt water also just needs to be frozen, a couple feet thick. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 9:36 AM, uns_tres...@yahoo.ca [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It looks like just a fancy battery http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_battery Nothing wrong with fancy batteries, of course, but this may get your creative juices flowing: http://www.free-energy-info.com/FEindex.html Try Chapter 10.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 11:18 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Richard, I learned the hard way that it feels bad to say mean things to people here. That's probably a good plan. We need fair and balanced people like you on the forum, Share. So like with MJ, I try to restrict myself to responding simply to his out of date and inaccurate allegations. But, he is an interesting character study. Who else do you know that would post to an Iowa public news forum using an /alias of a //dead black singer/ and then post from South Carolina? Go figure. Like I've said, I think the Funny Farm Lounge has taught me a lot of useful stuff. Go figger (-: It can be very funny as long as you don't have to meet up in person, face-to-face with friends at a campus party, or with people you know around town at the Revelations coffee shop. If they see you on the sidewalk, and they cross over to the other side, you can assume they've been read your messages on social media. LoL! On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 11:02 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On 9/1/2014 10:06 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com mailto:steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Richard, I hear your plaintive cry for help. At least there are three or four people on the forum we can depend on to be decent. It's nice to be able to discuss something with someone without the respondent getting all bent out of shape. I still can't understand why Judy called you and the other guy, Anartaxius, liars - but it's all water under the bridge now anyway. Now if we could just deal with MJ and the TB. LoL! I will try to reach out to you. Thanks for responding. It was supposed to be a joke. #1) The golden rule is not, those with the gold, make the rules. It is something other than that. On this forum it is Rick that makes the rules. We are all guests on his forum. Anyone is free to start there own. #2) The jury is out as to whether Zen Master Rama, aka Frederick Lenz was able to levitate. Let's wait for more data to come in before we comment on that. The guy is dead, but only his students are making the claim that he could levitate. I don't recall Rama himself ever making that claim. So, I guess the burden of proof is on the students making the claims. #3) Postings made two to three years ago, should not be considered as current. Chat room protocol has generally set a six month, four day limit as to whether a posting is current or not. On most discussion groups, everything that has ever been posted is fair game. Judy was a master at searching out old comments in order to make her point. Quite often it's not what people are saying but what they once said that is important to the conversation. It is a common tactic to point out consistencies in any debate. Sadly, the Yahoo Groups search function seems to be on the blink, so we will have to use the other FFL archive to search out older messages. Of course, this isn't a chat room as Judy pointed out - it's supposed to be a discussion. But, sometimes it does act like a chat room when most of the messages begin and end on one single line and all begin with RE:. #4) Posting a person's name when they have requested anonymity is not considered good taste, and is really violation of the rules of the forum. It's not a good idea to post using your name and email address in the header if you want to be anonymous, Steve. That's my point. #4a) Using a person's name in such a way that you are saying you are not going use such and such''s name, because such and such has requested that you not do it, does not get around point #4. Maybe she didn't realize that her name was in the header of all her messages, including the one where she requested us not to reveal it. Go figure. But, in fact it was Judy and Susan that first revealed her her first name. If what's-her-name had not made a big deal out of it, probably nobody would have even noticed it. Now it's gone into over 200 replies, WITH HER NAME FOR ALL TO SEE! Not to mention that Susan's original post included the TurquoiseB's real name in the subject line. Go figure. It's not complicated. Now, we all need someone to talk to. Some more than others. Please note the daily post totals. (-: It's simple: /Be familiar with the group you are posting to before you post! One normally does not join a conversation by just walking up and talking. Instead, you listen first and then join in if you have something pertinent to contribute. If you have a question to ask, first consider if it's something you can find out by reading the appropriate manual or asking someone./ http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/wjh/newsgrp.shtml
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
Share, I hope so. Perhaps, the terrorists will be apprehended before that date. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : But John, Mars goes into its own sign on Thursday. Won't that mitigate? BTW, I think FFL birthday is Sept 5or 6, same year as 9/11. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:31 PM, jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
Salyavin, The security forces should be on alert now. If not, they're failing in their duties. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : But John, Mars goes into its own sign on Thursday. Won't that mitigate? Damn, I already forwarded it to the president. Back to defcon 2 BTW, I think FFL birthday is Sept 5or 6, same year as 9/11. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:31 PM, jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
LOL, Richard...that's already happened. More than once. I survived (-: On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 1:29 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On 9/2/2014 11:18 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Richard, I learned the hard way that it feels bad to say mean things to people here. That's probably a good plan. We need fair and balanced people like you on the forum, Share. So like with MJ, I try to restrict myself to responding simply to his out of date and inaccurate allegations. But, he is an interesting character study. Who else do you know that would post to an Iowa public news forum using an alias of a dead black singer and then post from South Carolina? Go figure. Like I've said, I think the Funny Farm Lounge has taught me a lot of useful stuff. Go figger (-: It can be very funny as long as you don't have to meet up in person, face-to-face with friends at a campus party, or with people you know around town at the Revelations coffee shop. If they see you on the sidewalk, and they cross over to the other side, you can assume they've been read your messages on social media. LoL! On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 11:02 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On 9/1/2014 10:06 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Richard, I hear your plaintive cry for help. At least there are three or four people on the forum we can depend on to be decent. It's nice to be able to discuss something with someone without the respondent getting all bent out of shape. I still can't understand why Judy called you and the other guy, Anartaxius, liars - but it's all water under the bridge now anyway. Now if we could just deal with MJ and the TB. LoL! I will try to reach out to you. Thanks for responding. It was supposed to be a joke. #1) The golden rule is not, those with the gold, make the rules. It is something other than that. On this forum it is Rick that makes the rules. We are all guests on his forum. Anyone is free to start there own. #2) The jury is out as to whether Zen Master Rama, aka Frederick Lenz was able to levitate. Let's wait for more data to come in before we comment on that. The guy is dead, but only his students are making the claim that he could levitate. I don't recall Rama himself ever making that claim. So, I guess the burden of proof is on the students making the claims. #3) Postings made two to three years ago, should not be considered as current. Chat room protocol has generally set a six month, four day limit as to whether a posting is current or not. On most discussion groups, everything that has ever been posted is fair game. Judy was a master at searching out old comments in order to make her point. Quite often it's not what people are saying but what they once said that is important to the conversation. It is a common tactic to point out consistencies in any debate. Sadly, the Yahoo Groups search function seems to be on the blink, so we will have to use the other FFL archive to search out older messages. Of course, this isn't a chat room as Judy pointed out - it's supposed to be a discussion. But, sometimes it does act like a chat room when most of the messages begin and end on one single line and all begin with RE:. #4) Posting a person's name when they have requested anonymity is not considered good taste, and is really violation of the rules of the forum. It's not a good idea to post using your name and email address in the header if you want to be anonymous, Steve. That's my point. #4a) Using a person's name in such a way that you are saying
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 10:53 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: All opposed? me! Thanks. You really cheer me up! (maybe on ban on Rama's levitation though) (-: Maybe, but Barry will probably never live down that levitation claim. Until you pry the mouse out of my cold dead hands, Steve! It's just too big of a target to let go of. Or, at least until he comes clean with an better and honest explanation. Really I don't care if it's true or not, it's just that every time he opens his big yap about MMY and the bun-hopping that I get sent into peals of laughter and I can't seem to resist the temptation. But, I will try. Britney Spears - Oops! I Did It Again http://youtu.be/CduA0TULnow ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote : I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. I second the motion.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
Now, if I were a terrorist and planning an attack for September 11 2014 my first desired target would be the Thursday night football game between the Steelers and the Ravens. Prime time terror! Not sure which stadium it's in. It would definitely be a challenge since fans are screened and all bags taken into stadiums need to be plastic see- through. How about a small plane loaded with explosives or beer kegs loaded with C4 in the concession stands? On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 10:58 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: (-: On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:53 PM, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : But John, Mars goes into its own sign on Thursday. Won't that mitigate? Damn, I already forwarded it to the president. Back to defcon 2 BTW, I think FFL birthday is Sept 5or 6, same year as 9/11. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:31 PM, jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
Bhairitu, Yes, the security forces should now be aware and vigilant of possible attacks by ISIS agents here in this country. If not, they're failing in their duties. We'll see how this plays out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote : Perfect setup for another false flag. Be aware. On 09/02/2014 10:31 AM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote : Salyavin, The security forces should be on alert now. If not, they're failing in their duties. If they're reading their horoscopes they will be highly alert I should think. But we don't need soothsayers over here to know that we are in immanent danger. We've got maybe 600 of our own residents in ISIS learning the tricks of the terror trade, the two beheadings of American journalists (one today if you've not seen the news) were carried out by a Brit. He won't be very popular when he gets home! The government are trying to change the law so they can't come back but you can't just do that, we've lost enough of our rights since 9/11 and all new laws have ended up being used against the general public by our over-enthusiastic police. I think the biggest threat comes from Muslims living here, there are so many mosques where the disenfranchised can get radicalised by some visiting nutjob mullah. I fear it's only a matter of time before another strike in London. Probably on the tube network again. You get the maximum terror affect underground. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : But John, Mars goes into its own sign on Thursday. Won't that mitigate? Damn, I already forwarded it to the president. Back to defcon 2 BTW, I think FFL birthday is Sept 5or 6, same year as 9/11. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:31 PM, jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
On 9/2/2014 10:41 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: As usual you are wrong - plenty of name calling and invectives before I blessed FFL with my sattvic presence. Which ones? Perv, pedophile, troll, shit-heel, ass-hole, dumb-ass, idiot, war-monger, vile scum, fucking lost soul, piece of shit, sick fuck or dick-head? Look at the archives if you can stand the truth. What you are referring to is my penchant for calling Marshy apt descriptive names. Like Marshy? According to my search it's over 4140 matches in your case this year alone. Go do your own search. http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=marshyl=fairfieldlife%40yahoogroups.com *From:* nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Tuesday, September 2, 2014 10:17 AM *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name? MJ introduced a new low on this forum with swearing and namecalling never seen here before. I vote for having him removed.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
Mike, Anything is possible. I'm attempting to hone in to a specific place using astrological indicators. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mdixon.6569@... wrote : Now, if I were a terrorist and planning an attack for September 11 2014 my first desired target would be the Thursday night football game between the Steelers and the Ravens. Prime time terror! Not sure which stadium it's in. It would definitely be a challenge since fans are screened and all bags taken into stadiums need to be plastic see- through. How about a small plane loaded with explosives or beer kegs loaded with C4 in the concession stands? On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 10:58 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: (-: On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:53 PM, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : But John, Mars goes into its own sign on Thursday. Won't that mitigate? Damn, I already forwarded it to the president. Back to defcon 2 BTW, I think FFL birthday is Sept 5or 6, same year as 9/11. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:31 PM, jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New FFL Rule, was where is what's his name?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, are you replying to Xeno or turq?! On 9/2/2014 10:28 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: He's been responding to bawee all morning when he was really supposed to be responding to Xeno. Help him out Share, he seems to have become ker-fluffled. Since when does Xeno post in big blue, bold, and 14 point characters with no paragraph breaks that stretch all the way across a 26 inch screen? While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop...
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
Salyavin, From what I understand in the news, England is already on high alert for a terrorist attack. I hope the perpetrators are caught before they do any damage. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote : Salyavin, The security forces should be on alert now. If not, they're failing in their duties. If they're reading their horoscopes they will be highly alert I should think. But we don't need soothsayers over here to know that we are in immanent danger. We've got maybe 600 of our own residents in ISIS learning the tricks of the terror trade, the two beheadings of American journalists (one today if you've not seen the news) were carried out by a Brit. He won't be very popular when he gets home! The government are trying to change the law so they can't come back but you can't just do that, we've lost enough of our rights since 9/11 and all new laws have ended up being used against the general public by our over-enthusiastic police. I think the biggest threat comes from Muslims living here, there are so many mosques where the disenfranchised can get radicalised by some visiting nutjob mullah. I fear it's only a matter of time before another strike in London. Probably on the tube network again. You get the maximum terror affect underground. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : But John, Mars goes into its own sign on Thursday. Won't that mitigate? Damn, I already forwarded it to the president. Back to defcon 2 BTW, I think FFL birthday is Sept 5or 6, same year as 9/11. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:31 PM, jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory
you do have problems over there in Scorpionland - hundreds of English girls raped on a daily basis by Pakistanis and the cops are afraid to do anything about it cause they don't want to be perceived as racist? From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 2:52 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Terrorist Advisory ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote : Salyavin, The security forces should be on alert now. If not, they're failing in their duties. If they're reading their horoscopes they will be highly alert I should think. But we don't need soothsayers over here to know that we are in immanent danger. We've got maybe 600 of our own residents in ISIS learning the tricks of the terror trade, the two beheadings of American journalists (one today if you've not seen the news) were carried out by a Brit. He won't be very popular when he gets home! The government are trying to change the law so they can't come back but you can't just do that, we've lost enough of our rights since 9/11 and all new laws have ended up being used against the general public by our over-enthusiastic police. I think the biggest threat comes from Muslims living here, there are so many mosques where the disenfranchised can get radicalised by some visiting nutjob mullah. I fear it's only a matter of time before another strike in London. Probably on the tube network again. You get the maximum terror affect underground. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : But John, Mars goes into its own sign on Thursday. Won't that mitigate? Damn, I already forwarded it to the president. Back to defcon 2 BTW, I think FFL birthday is Sept 5or 6, same year as 9/11. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:31 PM, jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Given the ISIS violence that is occurring in Iraq and Syria, Americans should be on alert for possible terrorist activity in the country this coming September 11, 2014, which is the same calendar day of the attacks in New York 13 years ago. Astrologically, the reasons for concern are as follows: 1. Jupiter is now closely transiting the natal position of Rahu at 16 degrees, 51 minutes in Cancer. 2. Rahu is now closely transiting the natal position of Saturn at 24 degrees, 4 minutes in Virgo. 3. Mars and Saturn are still in close conjunction in Libra. The possible location of attack is the Capitol in Washington DC. At that time, the Moon will be transiting at one degree Aries, in the nakshatra owned by Ketu, the significator for a holy place.
