Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] After the match is before the match: GSOC 21

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hello,

thanks for suggesting a topic! 

well first we need to see if the GSOC application works well for us and then if 
there are students applying for it and what topics they like and so on .. but 
as for a topic suggestion, the integration of scancode is a good suggestion.

As for new licenses, we have improved the structure how licenses are stored as 
"the initial set". note that you can add your licenses to a fossology 
installation by CSV import as bulk operation or via Web UI license by license 
in addition to the default installation.

Regarding for relatively new licenses like the SSPL I looked into the spdx 
license list: SSPL-1.0 is there. And it is in the master file of fossology 
(https://github.com/fossology/fossology/blob/master/install/db/licenseRef.json).
 so it is found by monk. I guess it will be also found at spdx license ref 
statement (by ojo). It is found by nomos? There is an entry there.

but I agree, scancode integration is a good topic for fossology. I am not sure 
currently what technical obstacles will pop up and how it shall be done. I 
would say, the fossology appication understands if scancode is installed, and 
in case yes, it could be offered as a choice as it is done with nomos, monk or 
ojo.

let's add this to the wiki of topics.

Kind regards,
  Michael


> On 11. Feb 2021, at 21:20, Bryan Sutula  wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 11:13 +, Michael C. Jaeger wrote:
>> After the match is before the match: GSOC 21
>> Location:Microsoft Teams Meeting
>> Start time:  Wednesday, February 17 4:00 AM
>> End time:Wednesday, February 17 5:00 AM
> 
> I'm not likely to be able to attend live at that time but...
> 
>> In order to prepare our application (which shall include topic
>> proposals) we would like to invite for an open conf call in Teams –
>> for everyone who is interested in contributing to the GSoC 2021
>> application, for example with topic proposals. Please see the page
>> already prepared by Gaurav here as well:
>> 
>> https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki/Google-Summer-of-Code-Proposals-2021
> 
> Is the project interested in integrating "yet another" license scanner?
> I know that there's already Nomos and Monk, but there's quite a bit of
> activity around scancode toolkit as well.  The project is active and
> due to that, it has a good chance of being kept up to date with newer
> licenses, e.g. SSPL.
> 
> It seems like the addition of a scancode agent would be a reasonable,
> well-defined and actionable project for the GSoc.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -Bryan Sutula
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3434): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3434
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/80567526/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] After the match is before the match: GSOC 21

[Bryan Sutula]

On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 11:13 +, Michael C. Jaeger wrote:
> After the match is before the match: GSOC 21
> Location: Microsoft Teams Meeting
> Start time:   Wednesday, February 17 4:00 AM
> End time: Wednesday, February 17 5:00 AM

I'm not likely to be able to attend live at that time but...

> In order to prepare our application (which shall include topic
> proposals) we would like to invite for an open conf call in Teams –
> for everyone who is interested in contributing to the GSoC 2021
> application, for example with topic proposals. Please see the page
> already prepared by Gaurav here as well:
> 
> https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki/Google-Summer-of-Code-Proposals-2021

Is the project interested in integrating "yet another" license scanner?
I know that there's already Nomos and Monk, but there's quite a bit of
activity around scancode toolkit as well.  The project is active and
due to that, it has a good chance of being kept up to date with newer
licenses, e.g. SSPL.

It seems like the addition of a scancode agent would be a reasonable,
well-defined and actionable project for the GSoc.

Thoughts?

-Bryan Sutula



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3433): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3433
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/80567526/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] fossology

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hello,

I agree, several persons have written to me now (hi, Steve, Matija, ... )

So for every one on the list: there is a number of links coving this as scam as 
we learned now!

But thanks for reaching out!

Kind regards,
  Michael



On 13.01.21, 14:44, "fossology@lists.fossology.org on behalf of Udo Rader via 
lists.fossology.org"  wrote:

Hi Michael,

I hope you are aware that this is just a scamming attempt and the whole 
purpose it just to make you pay for some non-existent service.

More examples and variants of similar scamming attempts:


https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsquelchdesign.com%2Ffeatured%2Fchinese-domain-name-registration-scams%2Fcomment-page-45%2Fdata=04%7C01%7Cmichael.c.jaeger%40siemens.com%7Cf6a8c67aa87741f8008408d8b7c94e26%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637461422507659352%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000sdata=wO%2FaMvXfp9xP5we%2Fft3LUbM%2FIvRb5QAQnTi7YCfjeAE%3Dreserved=0

... and google finds loads more.

BR Udo

On 13.01.21 12:43, Michael C. Jaeger wrote:
> Hello Colton,
> 
> thank you for reaching out for us. question understood.
> 
> We will come back to you shortly.
> 
> Kind regards, Michael
> 
>> On 13. Jan 2021, at 08:00, colto...@mipo-internet.org.cn 
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Dear CEO or General Manager,
>>
>> Please read this letter carefully since this is an urgent case. We are 
>> an agency engaging in registering brand name and domain names. Today, 
>> our center received an application from Hao Ke Global Ltd applying to 
>> register fossology as their brand name and some top-level domain 
>> names(.CN .HK etc). After our careful investigation, We found the main 
>> body of domain names is same as yours. As a professional registrar, We 
>> are obligated to inform you of this situation.
>>
>> We are handling the application and we need to confirm whether or not 
>> you authorize them to register them? Let me know your answer ASAP so 
>> as to solve this promptly. Thanks for your cooperation.
>>
>> Best Regards, 

>> Colton Hu 

>> Tel: 0086.5595144820 

>> Fax: 0086.5595144820 

>> Address: No.315 Changjiang Road, Hefei, China 

>>  

>>
> 
> 

-- 
Udo Rader, CEO
BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
Salurner Straße 15, A-6020 Innsbruck

Re: [FOSSology] fossology

[Udo Rader via lists.fossology.org]

Hi Michael,

I hope you are aware that this is just a scamming attempt and the whole 
purpose it just to make you pay for some non-existent service.


More examples and variants of similar scamming attempts:

https://squelchdesign.com/featured/chinese-domain-name-registration-scams/comment-page-45/

... and google finds loads more.

BR Udo

On 13.01.21 12:43, Michael C. Jaeger wrote:

Hello Colton,

thank you for reaching out for us. question understood.

We will come back to you shortly.

Kind regards, Michael

On 13. Jan 2021, at 08:00, colto...@mipo-internet.org.cn 
 wrote:


Dear CEO or General Manager,

Please read this letter carefully since this is an urgent case. We are 
an agency engaging in registering brand name and domain names. Today, 
our center received an application from Hao Ke Global Ltd applying to 
register fossology as their brand name and some top-level domain 
names(.CN .HK etc). After our careful investigation, We found the main 
body of domain names is same as yours. As a professional registrar, We 
are obligated to inform you of this situation.


We are handling the application and we need to confirm whether or not 
you authorize them to register them? Let me know your answer ASAP so 
as to solve this promptly. Thanks for your cooperation.


Best Regards, 
Colton Hu 
Tel: 0086.5595144820 
Fax: 0086.5595144820 
Address: No.315 Changjiang Road, Hefei, China 
 






--
Udo Rader, CEO
BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
Salurner Straße 15, A-6020 Innsbruck
http://www.bestsolution.at/
Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3425): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3425
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/79646908/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] fossology

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hello Colton,

thank you for reaching out for us. question understood.

We will come back to you shortly.

Kind regards, Michael

> On 13. Jan 2021, at 08:00, colto...@mipo-internet.org.cn wrote:
> 
> Dear CEO or General Manager,
>
> Please read this letter carefully since this is an urgent case. We are an 
> agency engaging in registering brand name and domain names. Today, our center 
> received an application from Hao Ke Global Ltd applying to register fossology 
> as their brand name and some top-level domain names(.CN .HK etc). After our 
> careful investigation, We found the main body of domain names is same as 
> yours. As a professional registrar, We are obligated to inform you of this 
> situation. 
>
> We are handling the application and we need to confirm whether or not you 
> authorize them to register them? Let me know your answer ASAP so as to solve 
> this promptly. Thanks for your cooperation.
>
>
>
> Best Regards, 
> Colton Hu 
> Tel: 0086.5595144820 
> Fax: 0086.5595144820 
> Address: No.315 Changjiang Road, Hefei, China 
>  
>
>
>
>
>
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3424): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3424
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/79646908/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] New YouTube video - FOSSology Installation from Source

[Jeremiah C. Foster]

I think it’s a great idea to do this kind of video. I’ll try and review in the 
coming week because I think FOSSology is kind of hard to install. Also, there 
is lots of duplicated , out of date, and confusing documentation around 
installation which I think can be helped with explanatory video.

Great initiative Gaurav!

Jeremiah

On Jan 2, 2021, at 07:57, Gaurav Mishra  wrote:


*** THIS IS AN EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please do not reply, click on any links, or open 
any attachments unless you trust the sender and know that the content is safe. 
***
Hello All,

We have a new video on the FOSSology’s YouTube 
channel . It is 
recorded on the topic of installing FOSSology from source.

You can watch the video here: https://youtu.be/q12KwmPYZG4

Please leave your feedback as comments on the video or mail them directly to 
us. We will be happy to hear from you and improve our future videos.

Here is to a prosperous 2021! Have a wonderful new year!

With warm regards,
Gaurav Mishra




This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended only for the recipient(s) named 
above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive them. They 
may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please do not read this email or its attachment(s). Furthermore, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any 
attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete this e-mail and any attachment(s) or copies thereof from your system. 
Thank you.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3422): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3422
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/79441378/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result

[Jeremiah C. Foster]

Hi Prasaath,


For your use case I think that the recommendations given previously are likely 
correct; scancode for individual projects (in nearly any programming language) 
with the appropriate flags for license and copyright, and then use FOSSology 
for ISOs.

Scancode is faster for smaller projects because you don't have the overhead of 
a web server, database, etc. but FOSSology provides better tooling to drill 
down and manage licenses at the file level for large ISOs and tarballs.


There are, of course, other tools in the ecosystem, but I think for your use 
case you'll get a lot of mileage from those two.


Cheers,


Jeremiah


From: fossology@lists.fossology.org  on behalf 
of Prasaath Ramasamy (prasaara) via lists.fossology.org 

Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 6:30:57 AM
To: Michael C. Jaeger
Cc: Anupam Ghosh; Mishra, Gaurav; Prasad Iyer (prasadiy); Shiv Majji (smajji); 
Ted Gauthier (tedg); fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result

*** THIS IS AN EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please do not reply, click on any links, or open 
any attachments unless you trust the sender and know that the content is safe. 
***


Thanks Michael, I will check those links. My use case is to have a scanner to 
scan source code (from diff technologies like java, python, ruby etc) and also 
ISO images and give the license and component details.

-Prasaath

-Original Message-
From: Michael C. Jaeger 
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 6:13 PM
To: Prasaath Ramasamy (prasaara) 
Cc: Anupam Ghosh ; Mishra, Gaurav 
; Prasad Iyer (prasadiy) ; Shiv 
Majji (smajji) ; Ted Gauthier (tedg) ; 
fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result

Hello,

please note there are more open source tools out there, for example for 
component analysis:

* SW360 Antenna: https://github.com/eclipse/antenna
* And the tools from the ACT Initiative: 
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/press-release/2019/12/the-linux-foundations-automated-compliance-work-garners-new-funding-advances-tools-development/
* it depends a little on for which technology you re trying to identify the 
components from.

As for snippet scanning, I there're maybe open source attempts to tackle it, 
but could you describe maybe the use case that you have? It sounds like you 
would like to have one tool that does all the three things at once? (license 
scnaning, snippet scanning, SCA)

Kind regards, Michael


> On 21. Sep 2020, at 12:23, Anupam Ghosh  wrote:
>
> Hello Prasaath,
>
> Fossology is mainly design to scan licenses/copyrights information
> from your package, so, Fossology does not look into code-snippets or 
> dependencies inside source package.
>
> For code-snippet identification or dependency identification you have to use 
> a third party software.
>
> With regards,
> Anupam
>
> From: fossology@lists.fossology.org  On
> Behalf Of Prasaath Ramasamy (prasaara) via lists.fossology.org
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 8:42 AM
> To: fossol...@fossology.org; Mishra, Gaurav (CT RDA SSI ISF-IN)
> 
> Cc: Prasad Iyer (prasadiy) ; Shiv Majji (smajji)
> ; Ted Gauthier (tedg) 
> Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result
>
> Hello Fossology Team,
>
> Can you let me know if the component name identification is possible along 
> with the discovered license ?
>
> -Prasaath
>
> From: Prasaath Ramasamy (prasaara)
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:37 PM
> To: fossol...@fossology.org
> Cc: Prasad Iyer (prasadiy) ; Shiv Majji (smajji)
> ; Ted Gauthier (tedg) 
> Subject: Fossology scan result
>
> Hello team,
>
> I tried scanning a couple of Java source code and python source code and the 
> fossology tool was able to give me a list of all licenses (like Apache, MIT 
> etc..) but I am not able to find the corresponding component names (i.e. 
> activation, ant, apache-commons-logging etc…). Is there a way in the 
> fossology tool to get component names ?
>
> -Prasaath
>









This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended only for the recipient(s) named 
above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive them. They 
may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please do not read this email or its attachment(s). Furthermore, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any 
attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete this e-mail and any attachment(s) or copies thereof from your system. 
Thank you.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3402): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3402
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/76884403/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hello,

please note there are more open source tools out there, for example for 
component analysis:

* SW360 Antenna: https://github.com/eclipse/antenna
* And the tools from the ACT Initiative: 
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/press-release/2019/12/the-linux-foundations-automated-compliance-work-garners-new-funding-advances-tools-development/
 
* it depends a little on for which technology you re trying to identify the 
components from.

As for snippet scanning, I there're maybe open source attempts to tackle it, 
but could you describe maybe the use case that you have? It sounds like you 
would like to have one tool that does all the three things at once? (license 
scnaning, snippet scanning, SCA)

Kind regards, Michael


> On 21. Sep 2020, at 12:23, Anupam Ghosh  wrote:
> 
> Hello Prasaath,
>
> Fossology is mainly design to scan licenses/copyrights information from your 
> package,
> so, Fossology does not look into code-snippets or dependencies inside source 
> package.
>
> For code-snippet identification or dependency identification you have to use 
> a third party software.
>
> With regards,
> Anupam
>
> From: fossology@lists.fossology.org  On Behalf 
> Of Prasaath Ramasamy (prasaara) via lists.fossology.org
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 8:42 AM
> To: fossol...@fossology.org; Mishra, Gaurav (CT RDA SSI ISF-IN) 
> 
> Cc: Prasad Iyer (prasadiy) ; Shiv Majji (smajji) 
> ; Ted Gauthier (tedg) 
> Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result
>
> Hello Fossology Team,
>
> Can you let me know if the component name identification is possible along 
> with the discovered license ?
>
> -Prasaath
>
> From: Prasaath Ramasamy (prasaara) 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:37 PM
> To: fossol...@fossology.org
> Cc: Prasad Iyer (prasadiy) ; Shiv Majji (smajji) 
> ; Ted Gauthier (tedg) 
> Subject: Fossology scan result 
>
> Hello team,
>
> I tried scanning a couple of Java source code and python source code and the 
> fossology tool was able to give me a list of all licenses (like Apache, MIT 
> etc..) but I am not able to find the corresponding component names (i.e. 
> activation, ant, apache-commons-logging etc…). Is there a way in the 
> fossology tool to get component names ?
>
> -Prasaath
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3400): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3400
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/76884403/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result

[Anupam Ghosh]

Hello Prasaath,

Fossology is mainly design to scan licenses/copyrights information from your 
package,
so, Fossology does not look into code-snippets or dependencies inside source 
package.

For code-snippet identification or dependency identification you have to use a 
third party software.

With regards,
Anupam

From: fossology@lists.fossology.org  On Behalf 
Of Prasaath Ramasamy (prasaara) via lists.fossology.org
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 8:42 AM
To: fossol...@fossology.org; Mishra, Gaurav (CT RDA SSI ISF-IN) 

Cc: Prasad Iyer (prasadiy) ; Shiv Majji (smajji) 
; Ted Gauthier (tedg) 
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result

Hello Fossology Team,

Can you let me know if the component name identification is possible along with 
the discovered license ?

-Prasaath

From: Prasaath Ramasamy (prasaara)
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:37 PM
To: fossol...@fossology.org<mailto:fossol...@fossology.org>
Cc: Prasad Iyer (prasadiy) mailto:prasa...@cisco.com>>; 
Shiv Majji (smajji) mailto:sma...@cisco.com>>; Ted Gauthier 
(tedg) mailto:t...@cisco.com>>
Subject: Fossology scan result

Hello team,

I tried scanning a couple of Java source code and python source code and the 
fossology tool was able to give me a list of all licenses (like Apache, MIT 
etc..) but I am not able to find the corresponding component names (i.e. 
activation, ant, apache-commons-logging etc...). Is there a way in the 
fossology tool to get component names ?

-Prasaath



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3399): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3399
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/76884403/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

[Woźnicki Paweł - Partner Hurt via lists . fossology . org]

Hello Michael, Jeremiah

Yes. This is exactly what I meant
RAG policies applied per use case, distribution type. 
In our case we use different policies depending on the software type: mobile, 
frontend, backend, standalone software but still current functionality is not 
working as I would imagine it.

So if you are ok I could take in charge the proposition of changes to deliver 
the FR1 and FR2


Paweł Woźnicki, Współpracownik Kontrahenta
IT Obszaru Rozwiązań Cyfrowych, Wydział Zarządzania Jakością Aplikacji i 
Architektury Integracji
Tel.: +48 22 527 06 56, 
Orange Polska, Aleje Jerozolimskie 160, 02-326 Warszawa
http://www.orange.pl

-Original Message-
From: Michael C. Jaeger [mailto:m...@mcj.de] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 11:52 PM
To: Jeremiah C. Foster
Cc: Woźnicki Paweł - Partner Hurt; fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to 
csv and run on scanner results

Hi,

right now the idea is to have RAG per FOSSology server instance, meaning how 
the administrator of an instance wants to set it to.

However, even this might be still inflexible, because "red" licenses or 
obligations are even not a good category for an entire organisation, but maybe 
per case.

Maybe the future for fossology will not be about the RAG for obligations, but 
the use cases for files and RAG for these accordingly. ( a file can be green or 
red, depending on whatever analysis result)

Regarding the colouring in the reporting, I think it is just a matter of "no 
one did it so far". So, one solution could be to write issue and work on it:

https://github.com/fossology/fossology/issues/1727

Kind regards,
  Michael



> On 2. Jun 2020, at 17:57, Jeremiah C. Foster  wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 10:51 +, Woźnicki Paweł - Partner Hurt via 
> lists.fossology.org wrote:
>> Hello All
>>  
>> Have you ever thought about improving functionality of Fossology Obligation 
>> feature
>> Currently Fossology 3.8.0 allows to configure obligations on a specific 
>> conditions and provides a possibility to mark the findings in a proper way 
>> (RED, GREEN colour in the Doc report) but at the moment it is not quite 
>> handy.
>> The obligations in the output Unified report are not coloured and I think it 
>> would be also interesting to export obligation results also to another 
>> reports like CSV in a form of additional column indicating obligation state 
>> (Approved, Denied, to Verify)
>> 
> 
> My personal view is that colors in the report is a good idea. I do wonder 
> about how to do this however. Firstly, the usual 'RAG' (Red, Amber, Green) 
> colors are likely not flexible enough, but this is bikeshedding. What is 
> likely really important is for FOSSology users to have their own colors in 
> conjunction with their own policy. After all, some companies will mark as 
> "red" those licenses that other companies considerd "green". If there is a 
> flexible, rules-based policy engine then the various colors can be assigned 
> based on the policy on a per organization basis. Is this part of your 
> intended implementation?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended only for the recipient(s) 
> named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive them. 
> They may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, please do not read this email or its attachment(s). Furthermore, 
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of 
> this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by 
> replying to this e-mail and then delete this e-mail and any attachment(s) or 
> copies thereof from your system. Thank you.
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3370): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3370
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/74630198/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

[Jeremiah C. Foster]

On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 23:52 +0200, Michael C. Jaeger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> right now the idea is to have RAG per FOSSology server instance,
> meaning how the administrator of an instance wants to set it to.

Seems flexible.

> However, even this might be still inflexible, because "red" licenses
> or obligations are even not a good category for an entire
> organisation, but maybe per case.

Good point. I know that this is sometimes the case in the organizations
I work with.

> Maybe the future for fossology will not be about the RAG for
> obligations, but the use cases for files and RAG for these
> accordingly. ( a file can be green or red, depending on whatever
> analysis result)

+1

> Regarding the colouring in the reporting, I think it is just a matter
> of "no one did it so far". So, one solution could be to write issue
> and work on it:
>
> https://github.com/fossology/fossology/issues/1727
>
> Kind regards,
>   Michael

Regards,

Jeremiah

> > On 2. Jun 2020, at 17:57, Jeremiah C. Foster 
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 10:51 +, Woźnicki Paweł - Partner Hurt
> > via lists.fossology.org wrote:
> > > Hello All
> > >
> > > Have you ever thought about improving functionality of Fossology
> > > Obligation feature
> > > Currently Fossology 3.8.0 allows to configure obligations on a
> > > specific conditions and provides a possibility to mark the
> > > findings in a proper way (RED, GREEN colour in the Doc report)
> > > but at the moment it is not quite handy.
> > > The obligations in the output Unified report are not coloured and
> > > I think it would be also interesting to export obligation results
> > > also to another reports like CSV in a form of additional column
> > > indicating obligation state (Approved, Denied, to Verify)
> > >
> >
> > My personal view is that colors in the report is a good idea. I do
> > wonder about how to do this however. Firstly, the usual 'RAG' (Red,
> > Amber, Green) colors are likely not flexible enough, but this is
> > bikeshedding. What is likely really important is for FOSSology
> > users to have their own colors in conjunction with their own
> > policy. After all, some companies will mark as "red" those licenses
> > that other companies considerd "green". If there is a flexible,
> > rules-based policy engine then the various colors can be assigned
> > based on the policy on a per organization basis. Is this part of
> > your intended implementation?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jeremiah
> >
> >
> >
> > This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended only for the
> > recipient(s) named above and others who have been specifically
> > authorized to receive them. They may contain confidential
> > information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
> > read this email or its attachment(s). Furthermore, you are hereby
> > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-
> > mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender
> > by replying to this e-mail and then delete this e-mail and any
> > attachment(s) or copies thereof from your system. Thank you.
> > 



This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended only for the recipient(s) named 
above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive them. They 
may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please do not read this email or its attachment(s). Furthermore, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any 
attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete this e-mail and any attachment(s) or copies thereof from your system. 
Thank you.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3369): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3369
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/74630198/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hi,

right now the idea is to have RAG per FOSSology server instance, meaning how 
the administrator of an instance wants to set it to.

However, even this might be still inflexible, because "red" licenses or 
obligations are even not a good category for an entire organisation, but maybe 
per case.

Maybe the future for fossology will not be about the RAG for obligations, but 
the use cases for files and RAG for these accordingly. ( a file can be green or 
red, depending on whatever analysis result)

Regarding the colouring in the reporting, I think it is just a matter of "no 
one did it so far". So, one solution could be to write issue and work on it:

https://github.com/fossology/fossology/issues/1727

Kind regards,
  Michael



> On 2. Jun 2020, at 17:57, Jeremiah C. Foster  wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 10:51 +, Woźnicki Paweł - Partner Hurt via 
> lists.fossology.org wrote:
>> Hello All
>>
>> Have you ever thought about improving functionality of Fossology Obligation 
>> feature
>> Currently Fossology 3.8.0 allows to configure obligations on a specific 
>> conditions and provides a possibility to mark the findings in a proper way 
>> (RED, GREEN colour in the Doc report) but at the moment it is not quite 
>> handy.
>> The obligations in the output Unified report are not coloured and I think it 
>> would be also interesting to export obligation results also to another 
>> reports like CSV in a form of additional column indicating obligation state 
>> (Approved, Denied, to Verify)
>> 
> 
> My personal view is that colors in the report is a good idea. I do wonder 
> about how to do this however. Firstly, the usual 'RAG' (Red, Amber, Green) 
> colors are likely not flexible enough, but this is bikeshedding. What is 
> likely really important is for FOSSology users to have their own colors in 
> conjunction with their own policy. After all, some companies will mark as 
> "red" those licenses that other companies considerd "green". If there is a 
> flexible, rules-based policy engine then the various colors can be assigned 
> based on the policy on a per organization basis. Is this part of your 
> intended implementation?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended only for the recipient(s) 
> named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive them. 
> They may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, please do not read this email or its attachment(s). Furthermore, 
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of 
> this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by 
> replying to this e-mail and then delete this e-mail and any attachment(s) or 
> copies thereof from your system. Thank you.
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3368): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3368
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/74630198/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

[Jeremiah C. Foster]

On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 10:51 +, Woźnicki Paweł - Partner Hurt via 
lists.fossology.org wrote:
Hello All

Have you ever thought about improving functionality of Fossology Obligation 
feature
Currently Fossology 3.8.0 allows to configure obligations on a specific 
conditions and provides a possibility to mark the findings in a proper way 
(RED, GREEN colour in the Doc report) but at the moment it is not quite handy.
The obligations in the output Unified report are not coloured and I think it 
would be also interesting to export obligation results also to another reports 
like CSV in a form of additional column indicating obligation state (Approved, 
Denied, to Verify)

My personal view is that colors in the report is a good idea. I do wonder about 
how to do this however. Firstly, the usual 'RAG' (Red, Amber, Green) colors are 
likely not flexible enough, but this is bikeshedding. What is likely really 
important is for FOSSology users to have their own colors in conjunction with 
their own policy. After all, some companies will mark as "red" those licenses 
that other companies considerd "green". If there is a flexible, rules-based 
policy engine then the various colors can be assigned based on the policy on a 
per organization basis. Is this part of your intended implementation?

Regards,

Jeremiah




This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended only for the recipient(s) named 
above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive them. They 
may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please do not read this email or its attachment(s). Furthermore, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any 
attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete this e-mail and any attachment(s) or copies thereof from your system. 
Thank you.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3367): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3367
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/74630198/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology fails on unpacking

[Matija Šuklje]

Die 1. 04. 20 et hora 22:58 Michael C. Jaeger scripsit:
>  I think currently, the workaround is to remove these files from
> your upload before uploading, sorry.

Got it. Thank you both. I’ll try to do that then :)


cheers & stay in good health!
Matija
-- 
gsm:tel:+386.41.849.552
www:https://matija.suklje.name
xmpp:   matija.suk...@gabbler.org
sip:matija_suk...@ippi.fr



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3352): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3352
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/72707197/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology fails on unpacking

[Steve Winslow]

Hi Matija,

I don't know for certain if this is the problem you're seeing, but I see
some files in your log with .eot and .otf extensions.

There is a known problem with Fossology in that it fails to correctly
unpack or handle .eot and .otf files. See:
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/issues/915

Not sure if that helps -- but at least might indicate that it's not a
problem with your particular install  =)

Best,
Steve

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 2:02 PM Matija Šuklje  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I’m not opening an issue because I suspect this is to do with my
> install, not a general issue.
>
> Still, this is a big failure for me, and I would love it if
> someone could help me out.
>
> I’m on:
> Version: [3.7.0], Branch: [HEAD], Commit: [#193515] 2019/12/12
> 07:29 UTC built @ 2019/12/12 08:48 UTC
>
> …and this is the output of the stage where the scan fails:
>
> 2020-04-01 13:28:06 ununpack [0] ::
> JOB[1242].ununpack[5705.localhost]: "ERROR traverse.c.230: pfile
> 831907 Command 7z failed on: /srv/fossology/repository/
> cloud-10-50-0-96/ununpack/801880l/
> 4950c19a32eed8c9a15b362c780d5baf73605988.5626cd0d1993486b397bf4c9db422a7f.
> 17232957440.dir/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.liferay/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.classic.web/
> 2.0.2/1db2dbfe2e1a92e015c2225cd219a0349d9a4028/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.classic.web-2.0.2.jar.dir/META-INF/
> resources/classic/css/aui/lexicon/fonts/alloy-font-awesome/font/
> fontawesome-webfont.eot"
> 2020-04-01 13:28:06 ununpack [0] ::
> JOB[1242].ununpack[5705.localhost]: "ERROR traverse.c.230: pfile
> 831907 Command 7z failed on: /srv/fossology/repository/
> cloud-10-50-0-96/ununpack/801880l/
> 4950c19a32eed8c9a15b362c780d5baf73605988.5626cd0d1993486b397bf4c9db422a7f.
> 17232957440.dir/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.liferay/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.classic.web/
> 2.0.2/1db2dbfe2e1a92e015c2225cd219a0349d9a4028/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.classic.web-2.0.2.jar.dir/META-INF/
> resources/classic/css/aui/lexicon/fonts/alloy-font-awesome/font/
> FontAwesome.otf"
> 2020-04-01 13:28:06 ununpack [0] ::
> JOB[1242].ununpack[5705.localhost]: "ERROR traverse.c.230: pfile
> 831907 Command 7z failed on: /srv/fossology/repository/
> cloud-10-50-0-96/ununpack/801880l/
> 4950c19a32eed8c9a15b362c780d5baf73605988.5626cd0d1993486b397bf4c9db422a7f.
> 17232957440.dir/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.liferay/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.classic.web/
> 2.0.2/1db2dbfe2e1a92e015c2225cd219a0349d9a4028/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.classic.web-2.0.2.jar.dir/META-INF/
> resources/classic/css/aui/lexicon/fonts/alloy-font-awesome/font/
> fontawesome-alloy.eot"
> 2020-04-01 13:28:06 ununpack [0] ::
> JOB[1242].ununpack[5705.localhost]: "ERROR traverse.c.230: pfile
> 831907 Command 7z failed on: /srv/fossology/repository/
> cloud-10-50-0-96/ununpack/801880l/
> 4950c19a32eed8c9a15b362c780d5baf73605988.5626cd0d1993486b397bf4c9db422a7f.
> 17232957440.dir/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.liferay/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.classic.web/
> 2.0.2/1db2dbfe2e1a92e015c2225cd219a0349d9a4028/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.classic.web-2.0.2.jar.dir/META-INF/
> resources/classic/css/aui/lexicon/fonts/glyphicons-halflings-
> regular.eot"
> 2020-04-01 13:29:04 ununpack [0] ::
> JOB[1242].ununpack[5705.localhost]: "ERROR traverse.c.230: pfile
> 831907 Command 7z failed on: /srv/fossology/repository/
> cloud-10-50-0-96/ununpack/801880l/
> 4950c19a32eed8c9a15b362c780d5baf73605988.5626cd0d1993486b397bf4c9db422a7f.
> 17232957440.dir/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.liferay/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.admin.web/
> 1.0.3/1a9da18cd45eada9efe895dc700397ffe3e50d5e/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.admin.web-1.0.3.jar.dir/META-INF/
> resources/admin/css/aui/lexicon/fonts/alloy-font-awesome/font/
> fontawesome-webfont.eot"
> 2020-04-01 13:29:04 ununpack [0] ::
> JOB[1242].ununpack[5705.localhost]: "ERROR traverse.c.230: pfile
> 831907 Command 7z failed on: /srv/fossology/repository/
> cloud-10-50-0-96/ununpack/801880l/
> 4950c19a32eed8c9a15b362c780d5baf73605988.5626cd0d1993486b397bf4c9db422a7f.
> 17232957440.dir/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.liferay/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.admin.web/
> 1.0.3/1a9da18cd45eada9efe895dc700397ffe3e50d5e/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.admin.web-1.0.3.jar.dir/META-INF/
> resources/admin/css/aui/lexicon/fonts/alloy-font-awesome/font/
> FontAwesome.otf"
> 2020-04-01 13:29:04 ununpack [0] ::
> JOB[1242].ununpack[5705.localhost]: "ERROR traverse.c.230: pfile
> 831907 Command 7z failed on: /srv/fossology/repository/
> cloud-10-50-0-96/ununpack/801880l/
> 4950c19a32eed8c9a15b362c780d5baf73605988.5626cd0d1993486b397bf4c9db422a7f.
> 17232957440.dir/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.liferay/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.admin.web/
> 1.0.3/1a9da18cd45eada9efe895dc700397ffe3e50d5e/
> com.liferay.frontend.theme.admin.web-1.0.3.jar.dir/META-INF/
> resources/admin/css/aui/lexicon/fonts/alloy-font-awesome/font/
> fontawesome-alloy.eot"
> 2020-04-01 13:29:04 

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

[Gaurav Mishra]

Hello Sundaramoorthi,

Looks like your server is behind a proxy. You can provide the proxy information 
by editing the fossology.conf file. It can be found in locations:
1. /usr/local/etc/fossology.conf (in case of source install/docker)
2. /etc/fossology/fossology.conf (in case of installation from Debian packages)

Please update the proxy information and restart the agent.

With best regards,
Gaurav Mishra

-Original Message-
From: fossology@lists.fossology.org  On Behalf 
Of sundaramoorthi p via Lists.Fossology.Org
Sent: 17 March 2020 15:33
To: Michael C. Jaeger ; fossol...@fossology.org
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files 
result

Greetings,
PFA, Kindly assist us why Software heritage jobs always got failed. Looking for 
your reply to know about.



2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "Caught exception while processing 
uploadId=5: cURL error 7: Failed to connect to archive.softwareheritage.org 
port 443: Connection timed out (see 
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcurl.haxx.se%2Flibcurl%2Fc%2Flibcurl-errors.html)%230data=02%7C01%7Cmishra.gaurav%40siemens.com%7Cce4fb82c7c6d462924a208d7ced56a2f%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637205288328669168sdata=AHJFhGbU%2FejXNAnQmVQJ5EZ5YUbwuhhJ%2FpcB5yys1jk%3Dreserved=0
 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Handler/CurlFactory.php(149):
 
GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlFactory::createRejection(Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\EasyHandle),
 Array)"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#1 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Handler/CurlFactory.php(102):
 
GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlFactory::finishError(Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlHandler),
 Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\EasyHandle), Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlFactory))"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#2 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Handler/CurlHandler.php(43):
 GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlFactory::finish(Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlHandler), 
Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\EasyHandle), Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlFactory))"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#3 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Handler/Proxy.php(28): 
GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlHandler->__invoke(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request), 
Array)"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#4 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Handler/Proxy.php(51): 
GuzzleHttp\Handler\Proxy::GuzzleHttp\Handler\{closure}(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request),
 Array)"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#5 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/PrepareBodyMiddleware.php(37):
 
GuzzleHttp\Handler\Proxy::GuzzleHttp\Handler\{closure}(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request),
 Array)"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#6 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Middleware.php(30): 
GuzzleHttp\PrepareBodyMiddleware->__invoke(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request), 
Array)"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#7 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/RedirectMiddleware.php(70):
 GuzzleHttp\Middleware::GuzzleHttp\{closure}(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request), 
Array)"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#8 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Middleware.php(58): 
GuzzleHttp\RedirectMiddleware->__invoke(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request), Array)"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#9 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/HandlerStack.php(67): 
GuzzleHttp\Middleware::GuzzleHttp\{closure}(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request), 
Array)"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#10 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Client.php(277): 
GuzzleHttp\HandlerStack->__invoke(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request), Array)"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#11 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Client.php(125): 
GuzzleHttp\Client->transfer(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request), Array)"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#12 
/usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Client.php(131): 
GuzzleHttp\Client->requestAsync('get', Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Uri), Array)"
2020-03-17 07:

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

[sundaramoorthi p via Lists.Fossology.Org]

ray, 
26, '100')"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#17 
/usr/local/share/fossology/lib/php/Agent/Agent.php(338): 
Fossology\SoftwareHeritage\softwareHeritageAgent->processUploadId(5)"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#18 
/usr/local/share/fossology/softwareHeritage/agent/softwareHeritage.php(41): 
Fossology\Lib\Agent\Agent->run_scheduler_event_loop()"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#19 
/usr/local/lib/fossology/fo_wrapper(77): require('/usr/local/shar...')"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#20 {main}agent failed on 
uploadId=5#0  Fossology\Lib\Agent\Agent->bail() called at 
[/usr/local/share/fossology/lib/php/Agent/Agent.php:349]"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#1  
Fossology\Lib\Agent\Agent->run_scheduler_event_loop() called at 
[/usr/local/share/fossology/softwareHeritage/agent/softwareHeritage.php:41]"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#2  
require(/usr/local/share/fossology/softwareHeritage/agent/softwareHeritage.php) 
called at [/usr/local/lib/fossology/fo_wrapper:77]"
2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: agent failed with error code 1
2020-03-17 07:27:49 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: agent failed, code: 0

Thanks & Regards
Sundaramoorthi Palanivel
 IT Department
Unimoni Global Business Services Private Limited DLF Cyber City, Block 2, 
Ground Floor, Shivaji Garden 1/24, Mount Poonamallee Road, Ramapuram Chennai 
600 089, Tamil Nadu, India
M: +91 9940725488| P: +91 44 61212162 | Ext: 2162 sundaramoorth...@unimoni.com
--


-Original Message-
From: sundaramoorthi p
Sent: 13 March 2020 14:24
To: Michael C. Jaeger; fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: RE: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files 
result

Greetings,
Thanks for your support, I have restart the Fossology than schedulers are 
completed in few minutes.

Thanks & Regards
Sundaramoorthi Palanivel
 IT Department
Unimoni Global Business Services Private Limited DLF Cyber City, Block 2, 
Ground Floor, Shivaji Garden 1/24, Mount Poonamallee Road, Ramapuram Chennai 
600 089, Tamil Nadu, India
M: +91 9940725488| P: +91 44 61212162 | Ext: 2162 sundaramoorth...@unimoni.com

www.unimoni.com/gbs


-Original Message-
From: Michael C. Jaeger [mailto:m...@mcj.de]
Sent: 13 March 2020 13:52
To: sundaramoorthi p; fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files 
result

Hello,

There could be a number of things happened to your fossology setup.

Form the screenshot shot it looks like the "scheduler" is not processing your 
jobs. The scheduler is a central component which coordinates the analysis tasks 
on an upload.

Moreover I am seeing that you reach fossology using an IP, so it looks it is 
deployed somewhere and you reach it over the network.

poposals and iseas:

* As I write the email now, the situation has resolved and the scheduler has 
processed your jobs?

* Someone else has uploaded a number of uploads and they are processed before 
your upload is being processed. Since you have logged in with the fossy user, a 
multi user setup is unlikely and you re the only user on the server I assume?

* Then you could try to see if something went wrong with the schedule by 
looking into the "/var/log/fossology/fossology.log" on the server.

* You would stop and restart the scheduler with "sudo service fossology stop" 
and  "sudo service fossology start"

* You could restart the server machine which would start the scheduler 
(normally) automatically at boot.

Let us know if that helps,

Michael



> On 12. Mar 2020, at 12:09, sundaramoorthi p via Lists.Fossology.Org 
>  wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> I am new to Fossology, had uploaded a 
> pricing-rate-service-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.zip file with my local setup using fossy 
> credentials. Post upload checked the “JobsàMy Recent Jobs”  all are have 
> empty status. Please assist us how long it will take time to complete the 
> scan and also where to check for scanned files results.
>
> 
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Sundaramoorthi Palanivel
>  IT Department
> Unimoni Global Business Services Private Limited DLF Cyber City, Block
> 2, Ground Floor, Shivaji Garden 1/24, Mount Poonamallee Road,
> Ramapuram Chennai 600 089, Tamil Nadu, India
> M: +91 9940725488| P: +91 44 61212162 | Ext: 2162
> sundaramoorth...@unimoni.com www.unimoni.com/gbs 
>
> Discla

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

[sundaramoorthi p via Lists.Fossology.Org]

Greetings,
Please be informed that, we are receiving the connection time out response.

Thanks & Regards
Sundaramoorthi Palanivel
 IT Department
Unimoni Global Business Services Private Limited
DLF Cyber City, Block 2, Ground Floor, Shivaji Garden
1/24, Mount Poonamallee Road, Ramapuram
Chennai 600 089, Tamil Nadu, India
M: +91 9940725488| P: +91 44 61212162 | Ext: 2162
sundaramoorth...@unimoni.com

www.unimoni.com/gbs


-Original Message-
From: Michael C. Jaeger [mailto:m...@mcj.de]
Sent: 17 March 2020 15:44
To: sundaramoorthi p
Cc: fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files 
result

hello,

I think we may need to improve our error reporting here, to make the error more 
obvious.

The log says:

"Failed to connect to archive.softwareheritage.org port 443: Connection timed 
out"

So what happens is:

* The SW Heritage agent tries to connect to the server 
archive.softwareheritage.org on port 443
* That is basically a similar thing as typing into the browser 
https://archive.softwareheritage.org/ (because 443 is the https port)
* "Connection timed out " means that after a defined period of waiting, the SW 
Heritage agent  did not receive a response for this request.

What you could do:

* You could test, if the fossology server can actually contact this Internet 
address.
* On the fossology server (not in your browser, it is not the same!), you could 
try to submit a request "manually" to this server.
* Usually, FOSSology is installed in a command line environment, so you would 
need to submit the request from the command line most likely.
* There are tools for this, most popular, wget or curl
* You could use the man pages to understand the usage of wget or curl to submit 
a request to a server.

Would calling the URL "https://archive.softwareheritage.org/; from the command 
line of the FOSSology server work?

Kind regards,
  Michael




> On 17. Mar 2020, at 11:03, sundaramoorthi p  
> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> PFA, Kindly assist us why Software heritage jobs always got failed. Looking 
> for your reply to know about.
>
>
>
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "Caught exception while processing 
> uploadId=5: cURL error 7: Failed to connect to archive.softwareheritage.org 
> port 443: Connection timed out (see 
> http://curl.haxx.se/libcurl/c/libcurl-errors.html)#0 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Handler/CurlFactory.php(149):
>  
> GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlFactory::createRejection(Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\EasyHandle),
>  Array)"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#1 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Handler/CurlFactory.php(102):
>  
> GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlFactory::finishError(Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlHandler),
>  Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\EasyHandle), 
> Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlFactory))"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#2 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Handler/CurlHandler.php(43):
>  
> GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlFactory::finish(Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlHandler),
>  Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\EasyHandle), 
> Object(GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlFactory))"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#3 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Handler/Proxy.php(28):
>  GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlHandler->__invoke(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request), 
> Array)"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#4 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Handler/Proxy.php(51):
>  
> GuzzleHttp\Handler\Proxy::GuzzleHttp\Handler\{closure}(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request),
>  Array)"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#5 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/PrepareBodyMiddleware.php(37):
>  
> GuzzleHttp\Handler\Proxy::GuzzleHttp\Handler\{closure}(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request),
>  Array)"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#6 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Middleware.php(30): 
> GuzzleHttp\PrepareBodyMiddleware->__invoke(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request), 
> Array)"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#7 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/RedirectMiddleware.php(70):
>  GuzzleHttp\Middleware::GuzzleHttp\{closure}(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request),

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

[sundaramoorthi p via Lists.Fossology.Org]

Greetings,
Thanks for your support, I have restart the Fossology than schedulers are 
completed in few minutes.

Thanks & Regards
Sundaramoorthi Palanivel
 IT Department
Unimoni Global Business Services Private Limited
DLF Cyber City, Block 2, Ground Floor, Shivaji Garden
1/24, Mount Poonamallee Road, Ramapuram
Chennai 600 089, Tamil Nadu, India
M: +91 9940725488| P: +91 44 61212162 | Ext: 2162
sundaramoorth...@unimoni.com

www.unimoni.com/gbs


-Original Message-
From: Michael C. Jaeger [mailto:m...@mcj.de]
Sent: 13 March 2020 13:52
To: sundaramoorthi p; fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files 
result

Hello,

There could be a number of things happened to your fossology setup.

Form the screenshot shot it looks like the "scheduler" is not processing your 
jobs. The scheduler is a central component which coordinates the analysis tasks 
on an upload.

Moreover I am seeing that you reach fossology using an IP, so it looks it is 
deployed somewhere and you reach it over the network.

poposals and iseas:

* As I write the email now, the situation has resolved and the scheduler has 
processed your jobs?

* Someone else has uploaded a number of uploads and they are processed before 
your upload is being processed. Since you have logged in with the fossy user, a 
multi user setup is unlikely and you re the only user on the server I assume?

* Then you could try to see if something went wrong with the schedule by 
looking into the "/var/log/fossology/fossology.log" on the server.

* You would stop and restart the scheduler with "sudo service fossology stop" 
and  "sudo service fossology start"

* You could restart the server machine which would start the scheduler 
(normally) automatically at boot.

Let us know if that helps,

Michael



> On 12. Mar 2020, at 12:09, sundaramoorthi p via Lists.Fossology.Org 
>  wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> I am new to Fossology, had uploaded a 
> pricing-rate-service-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.zip file with my local setup using fossy 
> credentials. Post upload checked the “JobsàMy Recent Jobs”  all are have 
> empty status. Please assist us how long it will take time to complete the 
> scan and also where to check for scanned files results.
>
> 
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Sundaramoorthi Palanivel
>  IT Department
> Unimoni Global Business Services Private Limited DLF Cyber City, Block
> 2, Ground Floor, Shivaji Garden 1/24, Mount Poonamallee Road,
> Ramapuram Chennai 600 089, Tamil Nadu, India
> M: +91 9940725488| P: +91 44 61212162 | Ext: 2162
> sundaramoorth...@unimoni.com www.unimoni.com/gbs 
>
> Disclaimer: This communication is intended solely for the use of the 
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive 
> it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
> copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance upon the information is 
> strictly prohibited and/or is unlawful. If you have received this 
> communication by error, please notify us immediately by responding to this 
> email before deleting it from your system. Unimoni cannot be and/or will not 
> be held responsible for the improper or incomplete transmission of 
> information contained in this communication, or for any delay in its receipt. 
> The views and opinions included in this email belong to their author and do 
> not necessarily mirror the views and opinions of Unimoni. Our employees are 
> obliged not to make any defamatory clauses, infringe, or authorize 
> infringement of any legal right. Therefore, Unimoni will not take any 
> liability for such statements included in emails. In case of any damages or 
> other liabilities arising, employees are fully responsible for the content of 
> their emails. Disclaimer: This communication is intended solely for the use 
> of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to 
> receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
> disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance upon the 
> information is strictly prohibited and/or is unlawful. If you have received 
> this communication by error, please notify us immediately by responding to 
> this email before deleting it from your system. Unimoni cannot be and/or will 
> not be held responsible for the improper or incomplete transmission of 
> information contained in this communication, or for any delay in its receipt. 
> The views and opinions included in this email belong to their author and do 
> not necessarily mirror the views and opinions of Unimoni. Our employees are

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

[Michael C. Jaeger]

areHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#10 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Client.php(277): 
> GuzzleHttp\HandlerStack->__invoke(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request), Array)"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#11 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Client.php(125): 
> GuzzleHttp\Client->transfer(Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Request), Array)"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#12 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Client.php(131): 
> GuzzleHttp\Client->requestAsync('get', Object(GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Uri), Array)"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#13 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/vendor/guzzlehttp/guzzle/src/Client.php(89): 
> GuzzleHttp\Client->request('get', 'https://archive...', Array)"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#14 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/softwareHeritage/agent/softwareHeritageAgent.php(167):
>  GuzzleHttp\Client->__call('get', Array)"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#15 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/softwareHeritage/agent/softwareHeritageAgent.php(123):
>  
> Fossology\SoftwareHeritage\softwareHeritageAgent->getSoftwareHeritageLicense('CBFFB0EA0F04757...')"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#16 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/softwareHeritage/agent/softwareHeritageAgent.php(107):
>  
> Fossology\SoftwareHeritage\softwareHeritageAgent->processEachPfileForSWH(Array,
>  26, '100')"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#17 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/lib/php/Agent/Agent.php(338): 
> Fossology\SoftwareHeritage\softwareHeritageAgent->processUploadId(5)"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#18 
> /usr/local/share/fossology/softwareHeritage/agent/softwareHeritage.php(41): 
> Fossology\Lib\Agent\Agent->run_scheduler_event_loop()"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#19 
> /usr/local/lib/fossology/fo_wrapper(77): require('/usr/local/shar...')"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#20 {main}agent failed on 
> uploadId=5#0  Fossology\Lib\Agent\Agent->bail() called at 
> [/usr/local/share/fossology/lib/php/Agent/Agent.php:349]"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#1  
> Fossology\Lib\Agent\Agent->run_scheduler_event_loop() called at 
> [/usr/local/share/fossology/softwareHeritage/agent/softwareHeritage.php:41]"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: "#2  
> require(/usr/local/share/fossology/softwareHeritage/agent/softwareHeritage.php)
>  called at [/usr/local/lib/fossology/fo_wrapper:77]"
> 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: agent failed with error code 1
> 2020-03-17 07:27:49 softwareHeritage [0] :: 
> JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: agent failed, code: 0
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Sundaramoorthi Palanivel
> IT Department
> Unimoni Global Business Services Private Limited DLF Cyber City, Block 2, 
> Ground Floor, Shivaji Garden 1/24, Mount Poonamallee Road, Ramapuram Chennai 
> 600 089, Tamil Nadu, India
> M: +91 9940725488| P: +91 44 61212162 | Ext: 2162 sundaramoorth...@unimoni.com
> --
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: sundaramoorthi p
> Sent: 13 March 2020 14:24
> To: Michael C. Jaeger; fossol...@fossology.org
> Subject: RE: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files 
> result
> 
> Greetings,
> Thanks for your support, I have restart the Fossology than schedulers are 
> completed in few minutes.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Sundaramoorthi Palanivel
> IT Department
> Unimoni Global Business Services Private Limited DLF Cyber City, Block 2, 
> Ground Floor, Shivaji Garden 1/24, Mount Poonamallee Road, Ramapuram Chennai 
> 600 089, Tamil Nadu, India
> M: +91 9940725488| P: +91 44 61212162 | Ext: 2162 sundaramoorth...@unimoni.com
> 
> www.unimoni.com/gbs
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael C. Jaeger [mailto:m...@mcj.de]
> Sent: 13 March 2020 13:52
> To: s

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hello,

There could be a number of things happened to your fossology setup.

Form the screenshot shot it looks like the "scheduler" is not processing your 
jobs. The scheduler is a central component which coordinates the analysis tasks 
on an upload.

Moreover I am seeing that you reach fossology using an IP, so it looks it is 
deployed somewhere and you reach it over the network.

poposals and iseas:

* As I write the email now, the situation has resolved and the scheduler has 
processed your jobs?

* Someone else has uploaded a number of uploads and they are processed before 
your upload is being processed. Since you have logged in with the fossy user, a 
multi user setup is unlikely and you re the only user on the server I assume?

* Then you could try to see if something went wrong with the schedule by 
looking into the "/var/log/fossology/fossology.log" on the server.

* You would stop and restart the scheduler with "sudo service fossology stop" 
and  "sudo service fossology start"

* You could restart the server machine which would start the scheduler 
(normally) automatically at boot.

Let us know if that helps,

Michael



> On 12. Mar 2020, at 12:09, sundaramoorthi p via Lists.Fossology.Org 
>  wrote:
> 
> Greetings,
> I am new to Fossology, had uploaded a 
> pricing-rate-service-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.zip file with my local setup using fossy 
> credentials. Post upload checked the “JobsàMy Recent Jobs”  all are have 
> empty status. Please assist us how long it will take time to complete the 
> scan and also where to check for scanned files results.
>
> 
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Sundaramoorthi Palanivel
>  IT Department
> Unimoni Global Business Services Private Limited
> DLF Cyber City, Block 2, Ground Floor, Shivaji Garden
> 1/24, Mount Poonamallee Road, Ramapuram
> Chennai 600 089, Tamil Nadu, India
> M: +91 9940725488| P: +91 44 61212162 | Ext: 2162
> sundaramoorth...@unimoni.com
> www.unimoni.com/gbs
> 
>
> Disclaimer: This communication is intended solely for the use of the 
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive 
> it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
> copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance upon the information is 
> strictly prohibited and/or is unlawful. If you have received this 
> communication by error, please notify us immediately by responding to this 
> email before deleting it from your system. Unimoni cannot be and/or will not 
> be held responsible for the improper or incomplete transmission of 
> information contained in this communication, or for any delay in its receipt. 
> The views and opinions included in this email belong to their author and do 
> not necessarily mirror the views and opinions of Unimoni. Our employees are 
> obliged not to make any defamatory clauses, infringe, or authorize 
> infringement of any legal right. Therefore, Unimoni will not take any 
> liability for such statements included in emails. In case of any damages or 
> other liabilities arising, employees are fully responsible for the content of 
> their emails. Disclaimer: This communication is intended solely for the use 
> of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to 
> receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
> disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance upon the 
> information is strictly prohibited and/or is unlawful. If you have received 
> this communication by error, please notify us immediately by responding to 
> this email before deleting it from your system. Unimoni cannot be and/or will 
> not be held responsible for the improper or incomplete transmission of 
> information contained in this communication, or for any delay in its receipt. 
> The views and opinions included in this email belong to their author and do 
> not necessarily mirror the views and opinions of Unimoni. Our employees are 
> obliged not to make any defamatory clauses, infringe, or authorize 
> infringement of any legal right. Therefore, Unimoni will not take any 
> liability for such statements included in emails. In case of any damages or 
> other liabilities arising, employees are fully responsible for the content of 
> their emails.
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3323): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3323
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/71920459/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology copyright agent failing (partially)

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hello,

how did you install it? I think ct_pk should not be there but some older code 
is expecting it:

https://github.com/fossology/fossology/pull/1201

(apparently it is also not in the DB anymore, but suspecting some older code is 
still running)

Kind regards, Michael

> On 2. Oct 2019, at 14:44, Martin von Willebrand 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
>
> I get the following log from the Fossology copyright agent, which fails to 
> find all copyright notices:
> ---
> 2019-10-02 14:46:47 copyright [0] :: JOB[1821].copyright[1163.localhost]: 
> "ERROR: ERROR:  column "ct_pk" does not exist"
> 2019-10-02 14:46:47 copyright [0] :: JOB[1821].copyright[1163.localhost]: 
> "LINE 1: ...k = 12) inner join pfile on (PF = pfile_pk) WHERE ct_pk IS n..."
> 2019-10-02 14:46:47 copyright [0] :: JOB[1821].copyright[1163.localhost]: "   
>   ^"
> 2019-10-02 14:46:47 copyright [0] :: JOB[1821].copyright[1163.localhost]: 
> "On: SELECT pfile_pk FROM (  SELECT distinct(pfile_fk) AS PF  FROM 
> uploadtree_a   WHERE upload_fk = 213 and (ufile_mode'3C00'::int)=0 ) AS 
> SS left outer join copyright on (PF = pfile_fk and agent_fk = 12) inner join 
> pfile on (PF = pfile_pk) WHERE ct_pk IS null or agent_fk <> 12"
> ---
>
> I had a similar error in 3.5.0 and recently updated to 3.6.0.  Since the 
> error persisted, I decided to ask for help from the list. The problem seems 
> to repeat across uploads. The agent seems to process copyright notices 
> partially, but clearly leaves quite a bit unprocessed. I’m running Fossology 
> on Debian 8. I collected the logs from the output in the web UI/Show 
> Jobs/copyright/log.
>
> Appreciate any help.
>
> Best
> Martin
>
> Martin von Willebrand, Attorney-at-law, Partner
> HH Partners, Attorneys-at-law Ltd
> Bulevardi 7, 5th floor
> P.O. Box 232, 00101 Helsinki, Finland
> Tel: +358 9 177 613, Fax: +358 9 653 873
> GSM: +358 40 770 1818 
> martin.vonwillebr...@hhpartners.fi 
> www.twitter.com/mvonwi 
> www.hhpartners.fi 
> Validos ry, Chairman, www.validos.org
> 
> HH Partners shines in international rankings. See details at hhpartners.fi.
> Privileged and confidential information may be contained in this message. If 
> you are not addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery 
> of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to 
> anyone. In such case, kindly notify us by reply e-mail and delete this 
> message immediately. Thank you.
>
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3305): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3305
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/34369588/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology for custom Linux distributions?

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hello,

so, did the postgresql optimization work for you? Forgot to mention that key is 
a different work_mem setting, which could be 64MB in your case. Note that for 
every DB connection this amount is occpied, so if you have 200 DB connections 
...

As for the cumbersome file-by-file handling. There are several techniques for 
this.

I think you should not go by files, but by identified license statements. You 
can find them in the overview page for showing license results on the left side 
(the kind of histogram view for showing different identified license statement.)

But, as for the number of license statements, if you need to provide 
conclusions, you would need to check every different unconventional license 
statement.

You can select entire folders and set conclusions for all files of the 
containing folder if you click the "Edit" link at the right end of each row. 
The appearing dialog lets you set the license(es) you would like to conclude 
for this subtree. You can choose as many licenses as you wish in the edit view, 
I think the interface is obvious there.

For Dual license you need to additionally set the "Dual-License" conclusion in 
addition to all licenses being part of the license option to tell fossology 
this is not an AND but an OR conclusion of involved licenses.

Kind regards, Michael

On 06.09.19, 11:53, "fossology@lists.fossology.org on behalf of Daniels, 
Hans-Joachim"  wrote:

Good Morning,

> I think it is safe to say that FOSSology was designed for working with 
entire distros from the beginning on. (Dan?)

This gives me hope, thanks.

> but you need to change your postgresql setup.

I will try that and report back.


>> In addition, I couldn’t find a way to select multiple files at once to 
assign licenses with fewer clicks and therefore less waiting
>> (there is something similar via pattern matching, though).

Sorry for coming back to this question.
I've just looked again on the file count and I see 180.000 files. Even if 
the clicks don't take 5s, I don't want to go through all files.
How is FOSSology designed to assign licenses to multiple files at once?

If I know the main license of a software package (a folder in my 
whole-distro upload), how can I assign this license to this folder and mark it 
as cleared?
Bulk scanning only finds files with appropriate license headers. If these 
are missing, is there an alternative to manually selecting all 
affected/selected files?
How to handle the special license "Dual-license"? How can I choose a 
license for many files at once?

Thanks in advance and sorry for this avalance of questions,
Hans-Joachim

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michael C. Jaeger 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. September 2019 16:11
An: Daniels, Hans-Joachim 
    Cc: fossol...@fossology.org
Betreff: Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology for custom Linux distributions?

Hello,


but you need to change your postgresql setup.

The main thing that you need to keep in mind is that postgresql comes with 
settings (after installation via apt or what ever package manager) that are 
good for machines with 512MB of RAM or so. Larger packages (more than 10k 
files) will work "OK", but ...

For your Linux Distro I would plan to use a machine with 4Gb or 8Gb or RAM 
(actually, 300MB source code is not the main issue as it is the number of 
folders and files, but mostly folders, because walking through the directory 
three is insanely intensive when being mapped to the relational database tables 
of FOSSology)

So, in a nutshell the short recommendation is to adjust your postgresql 
memory settings.

Further tipp is to read: 
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ffossology%2Ffossology%2Fwiki%2FConfiguration-and-Tuningdata=02%7C01%7Cmichael.c.jaeger%40siemens.com%7C21d1a924011a48e50b8a08d732b00153%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637033603848551013sdata=nGekij0mhnuRLB9OBbt9pD%2FACpM9y%2FZzUUYzEQzCRb0%3Dreserved=0

Further tipp is to read on how to setup your postgresql for performance:


https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdba.stackexchange.com%2Fquestions%2F27893%2Fincreasing-work-mem-and-shared-buffers-on-postgres-9-2-significantly-slows-downdata=02%7C01%7Cmichael.c.jaeger%40siemens.com%7C21d1a924011a48e50b8a08d732b00153%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637033603848551013sdata=QJKVH6%2BCUizZ9lOhBjtMbfaI%2F94F6bWeluxS6aj%2BDb0%3Dreserved=0

or use something like:


https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpgtune.leopard.in.ua%2F%23%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Cmichael.c.jaeger%40siemens.com%7C21d1a924011a48e50b8a08d732b00153%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637033603848551013sdata=HDin4dg

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology for custom Linux distributions?

[Daniels, Hans-Joachim]

Good Morning,

> I think it is safe to say that FOSSology was designed for working with entire 
> distros from the beginning on. (Dan?)

This gives me hope, thanks.

> but you need to change your postgresql setup.

I will try that and report back.


>> In addition, I couldn’t find a way to select multiple files at once to 
>> assign licenses with fewer clicks and therefore less waiting
>> (there is something similar via pattern matching, though).

Sorry for coming back to this question.
I've just looked again on the file count and I see 180.000 files. Even if the 
clicks don't take 5s, I don't want to go through all files.
How is FOSSology designed to assign licenses to multiple files at once?

If I know the main license of a software package (a folder in my whole-distro 
upload), how can I assign this license to this folder and mark it as cleared?
Bulk scanning only finds files with appropriate license headers. If these are 
missing, is there an alternative to manually selecting all affected/selected 
files?
How to handle the special license "Dual-license"? How can I choose a license 
for many files at once?

Thanks in advance and sorry for this avalance of questions,
Hans-Joachim

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michael C. Jaeger 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. September 2019 16:11
An: Daniels, Hans-Joachim 
Cc: fossol...@fossology.org
Betreff: Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology for custom Linux distributions?

Hello,


but you need to change your postgresql setup.

The main thing that you need to keep in mind is that postgresql comes with 
settings (after installation via apt or what ever package manager) that are 
good for machines with 512MB of RAM or so. Larger packages (more than 10k 
files) will work "OK", but ...

For your Linux Distro I would plan to use a machine with 4Gb or 8Gb or RAM 
(actually, 300MB source code is not the main issue as it is the number of 
folders and files, but mostly folders, because walking through the directory 
three is insanely intensive when being mapped to the relational database tables 
of FOSSology)

So, in a nutshell the short recommendation is to adjust your postgresql memory 
settings.

Further tipp is to read: 
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki/Configuration-and-Tuning

Further tipp is to read on how to setup your postgresql for performance:

https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/27893/increasing-work-mem-and-shared-buffers-on-postgres-9-2-significantly-slows-down

or use something like:

https://pgtune.leopard.in.ua/#/

If you do not feel familiar with what I have written, please feed back and we 
could maybe sort out a way how to help you.

Kind regards, Michael

> On 2. Sep 2019, at 16:22, Daniels, Hans-Joachim 
>  wrote:
>
> Hello,
> is it possible to use FOSSology on the level of a complete (custom) Linux 
> distribution?
>
> Uploading the source code as one .tar.gz with ~300MB was possible, but the 
> FOSSology UI was quite slow (seconds per click) while browsing this upload.
> In addition, I couldn’t find a way to select multiple files at once to assign 
> licenses with fewer clicks and therefore less waiting (there is something 
> similar via pattern matching, though).
>
> Is FOSSology meant for the use case of a complete distro or am I abusing it?
> Or could I use FOSSology in a smarter way to work around the experienced 
> slowness?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Hans-Joachim Daniels
> Turck Electronics GmbH | Geschäftsführer, Managing Director: Hermann 
> Schwagmann, Guido Frohnhaus | Sitz, Registered Office: Detmold | 
> Registergericht, Register Court: Amtsgericht Lemgo HRB 4921
>
>
> Wichtiger Hinweis: Diese E-Mail enthält Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse, 
> rechtlich geschützte oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen und ist 
> ausschließlich für den Empfänger bestimmt. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail 
> irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine 
> Vervielfältigung, Weitergabe oder sonstige Nutzung des Inhalts der E-Mail 
> ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie sofort den Absender und 
> vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail.
>
>
> Important Note: This e-mail may contain trade or business secrets, 
> privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information and is only 
> intended for its addresses. If you have received this e-mail in error, you 
> are hereby notified that any review, copying, distribution or any use of the 
> content hereof is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender immediately 
> and destroy the received e-mail.
>
> 


Turck Electronics GmbH | Geschäftsführer, Managing Director: Hermann Schwagmann 
| Sitz, Registered Office: Detmold | Registergericht, Register Court: 
Amtsgericht Lemgo HRB 4921


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all me

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology for custom Linux distributions?

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hello,

I think it is safe to say that FOSSology was designed for working with entire 
distros from the beginning on. (Dan?)

but you need to change your postgresql setup.

The main thing that you need to keep in mind is that postgresql comes with 
settings (after installation via apt or what ever package manager) that are 
good for machines with 512MB of RAM or so. Larger packages (more than 10k 
files) will work "OK", but ...

For your Linux Distro I would plan to use a machine with 4Gb or 8Gb or RAM 
(actually, 300MB source code is not the main issue as it is the number of 
folders and files, but mostly folders, because walking through the directory 
three is insanely intensive when being mapped to the relational database tables 
of FOSSology)

So, in a nutshell the short recommendation is to adjust your postgresql memory 
settings.

Further tipp is to read: 
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki/Configuration-and-Tuning

Further tipp is to read on how to setup your postgresql for performance:

https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/27893/increasing-work-mem-and-shared-buffers-on-postgres-9-2-significantly-slows-down

or use something like:

https://pgtune.leopard.in.ua/#/

If you do not feel familiar with what I have written, please feed back and we 
could maybe sort out a way how to help you.

Kind regards, Michael

> On 2. Sep 2019, at 16:22, Daniels, Hans-Joachim 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> is it possible to use FOSSology on the level of a complete (custom) Linux 
> distribution?
>
> Uploading the source code as one .tar.gz with ~300MB was possible, but the 
> FOSSology UI was quite slow (seconds per click) while browsing this upload.
> In addition, I couldn’t find a way to select multiple files at once to assign 
> licenses with fewer clicks and therefore less waiting (there is something 
> similar via pattern matching, though).
>
> Is FOSSology meant for the use case of a complete distro or am I abusing it?
> Or could I use FOSSology in a smarter way to work around the experienced 
> slowness?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Hans-Joachim Daniels
> Turck Electronics GmbH | Geschäftsführer, Managing Director: Hermann 
> Schwagmann, Guido Frohnhaus | Sitz, Registered Office: Detmold | 
> Registergericht, Register Court: Amtsgericht Lemgo HRB 4921
> 
> 
> Wichtiger Hinweis: Diese E-Mail enthält Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse, 
> rechtlich geschützte oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen und ist 
> ausschließlich für den Empfänger bestimmt. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail 
> irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine 
> Vervielfältigung, Weitergabe oder sonstige Nutzung des Inhalts der E-Mail 
> ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie sofort den Absender und 
> vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail.
> 
> 
> Important Note: This e-mail may contain trade or business secrets, 
> privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information and is only 
> intended for its addresses. If you have received this e-mail in error, you 
> are hereby notified that any review, copying, distribution or any use of the 
> content hereof is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender immediately 
> and destroy the received e-mail.
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3295): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3295
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/33152999/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Info Rqrd:- Installation Process || Setup Process for Users || Requirements

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hi,

right and adding to the other points

Working process of fossology?
-> https://www.fossology.org/get-started/basic-workflow/

Installation process?
-> https://github.com/fossology/fossology

How to configure for license management?
-> Dan's answer

How to add any license to fossology web page?
-> go to "Admin" -> "License Admin" -> "Add Licenses"

How many hardware things required to set up and manage at least 400 users?
-> How many OSS packages would be there. What you need is
1. https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki/Configuration-and-Tuning
2. understanding apache httpd config und postgresql config for a larger numbe 
rof users
3. likely if you expect that 400 users will login in parallel you will need to 
adjust max connection limits etc 

How this software will prevent the license uses from the users?
-> Dan's answer / FOSSology is an analysis tool, so it delivers only information

Is it possible to provide remote support to users?
-> Yes, why not, is it maybe a about a hands-on training?

Kind regards, Michael


> On 17. Jul 2019, at 17:00, Dan Stangel  wrote:
> 
> Hi Shreemant,
> 
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 Shreemant Kumar wrote:
>> We are requiring a license management tool and we have found fossology
>> that can possible to manage the license. Actually, we need to manage 
>> Adobe, Windows and other licenses through the fossology but we are 
>> unable to install updated and compatible version of fossology tool so 
>> we requested to please provide the assistance to use.
> 
> FOSSology is not a "license management tool" in the sense that I think
> you mean.  It is designed to scan open source software source code and
> identify open source licenses, copyrights, and other details about open 
> source code.
> 
> It does not manage commercial software licenses such as for Windows or 
> Adobe.
> 
> I would highly recommend that you review the project documentation 
> available at https://fossology.org/ and let us know if you have any
> additional questions.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dan
> 
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3273): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3273
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/32505051/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Info Rqrd:- Installation Process || Setup Process for Users || Requirements

[Dan Stangel]

Hi Shreemant,

On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 Shreemant Kumar wrote:
> We are requiring a license management tool and we have found fossology
> that can possible to manage the license. Actually, we need to manage 
> Adobe, Windows and other licenses through the fossology but we are 
> unable to install updated and compatible version of fossology tool so 
> we requested to please provide the assistance to use.

FOSSology is not a "license management tool" in the sense that I think
you mean.  It is designed to scan open source software source code and
identify open source licenses, copyrights, and other details about open 
source code.

It does not manage commercial software licenses such as for Windows or 
Adobe.

I would highly recommend that you review the project documentation 
available at https://fossology.org/ and let us know if you have any
additional questions.

Cheers,
Dan

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3272): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3272
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/32505051/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology installation from source - question?

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hello,

  if there is no special reason for using 340-rc2, why not using 340?

Maybe it is indeed an Apache conf issue, you should see a conf file in 
/etc/apache/sites-enabled (or a link to  this)- is it there?

Maybe the copying of the conf file is broken, you could find a conf file at 

fossology/install/src-install-apache-example.conf

Maybe it is a timing issue, because the DB is not ready when the fossology 
starts.

Could you please check for error messages listed in:

/var/log/apache/error.log (or similar)

and

/var/log/fossolog/fossology.log

?

Kind regards, Michael


-Original Message-
From: fossology@lists.fossology.org [mailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org] On 
Behalf Of douglas, valerie
Sent: Montag, 11. März 2019 22:17
To: fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: [FOSSology] FOSSology installation from source - question?

I have a question regarding a problem with installation from source- any help 
is very much appreciated.
I'm installing v3.4,0 rc2 on Ubuntu 18.4.2 I followed steps as listed here:
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki/Install-from-Source

All seemed successful, until I receiving 'not found' when entering 
'localhost/repo/' or (http://yourhostname/repo/) into browser.
Both fossology and apache2 start normally from command line.

I see the note below, but I do not know how to check or fix this as described:
"If the browser returns a not found, pls check if the fossology apache 
httpd configuration is actually loaded by the apache httpd. The
  installation places the original file at 
/usr/local/etc/fossology/conf/src-install-apache-example.conf from
which a soft link is created   during # make install."

Can anyone please provide addition detail on this?

Thanks very much,
Valerie Douglas




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3237): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3237
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/30399504/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology report

[Nicolas Toussaint]

Hi,

You way want to have a look at the two projects below, aiming at driving 
a Fossology instance (the second being inspired by the first).

Not sure it fills exactly your need, we is probably worth a look.

- https://gitlab.com/toganlabs/fossup
- https://github.com/fossology/fossdriver

Nico


On 07/12/2018 11:15, venkatesh.gut...@ge.com wrote:

Hi,
I am planning automating fossology using jenkins.
went inside the container by cmd "*docker exec -it “container-id” 
/bin/sh*"

Then executing the bellow command.
The output is displaying in server browser so i have to login to the 
server and need to do multiple click and check the output.


CMD:
*cp2foss -q all --username fossy --password fossy -f /root/testcode -d 
'test all files' /fossology/testcode


*Is there any way to get the output in pdf/html format? instead of 
login to the server and check for the output

Is there any command to get the output in some format like pdf, html ?



--

Nicolas Toussaint
OAB - Orange Applications for Business - Lyon
Tel: +33 608 763 559


_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3191): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3191
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/28635906/21656
Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology offline

[Jaeger, Michael C.]

Hello,

you could do an export of SPDX (RDF-XML!) on one fossology server of an 
analysed package and import this again using the "Report Import" functionality 
for this file on another fossology sever.

But that is upload-wise, I am not sure if this is what you have in mind?

Kind regards, Michael

From: fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org 
[mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On Behalf Of NATANEL MAMAN
Sent: Sonntag, 27. Mai 2018 12:27
To: fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: [FOSSology] Fossology offline


Hi,



there is an offline solution for disconnected network ?



natanel

This message (including any attachments) issued by RAFAEL- ADVANCED DEFENSE 
SYSTEMS LTD. (hereinafter "RAFAEL") contains confidential information intended 
for a specific individual and purpose, may constitute information that is 
privileged or confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you should contact us immediately and thereafter 
delete this message from your system. You are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or forwarding of this message, 
or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail 
mailto:law...@rafael.co.il and completely delete or destroy any and all 
electronic or other copies of the original message and any attachments thereof.
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
https://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.2

[Matija Šuklje]

Dne četrtek, 22. februar 2018 ob 07:59:46 CET je Michael C. Jaeger napisal(a):
> -> but how about changing the output to ODF, would these proprietary Word
> processors run OK with *.odt (?) files?

The last time I checked – and that was quite some years ago – MS Office 
officially 
had ODF support.

How much it garbles the formatting these days though, I honestly don’t know.

But from the PoV of archiving and data preservations ODF and PDF/A make sense, 
while .docx doesn’t. Of course, the question is whether people actually want 
or need to store the written reports for any long period of time.


cheers,
Matija
-- 
gsm:+386 41 849 552
www:http://matija.suklje.name
xmpp:   matija.suk...@gabbler.org
sip:matija_suk...@ippi.fr
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
https://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.2

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hi,

no problem. just a few thoughts:

* LibreOffice/OO can open these files (... this is the "for" for ...)
* Actually this is a consensus because some organizations / persons run 
primarily proprietary Word processors on primarily proprietary OSes which 
understand the *.docx as well.

-> but how about changing the output to ODF, would these proprietary Word 
processors run OK with *.odt (?) files?

Kind regards, Michael

PS. By the way this report can be opened on macosx with TextEdit.app as well.


> On 21.02.2018, at 22:21, Matija Šuklje  wrote:
> 
> Very very neat! Congratulations to the whole team for the great new release!
> 
> Dne četrtek, 15. februar 2018 ob 10:46:29 CET je Jaeger, Michael C.
> napisal(a):
>> *   Comprehensive generation of analysis information as *.docx file for
>> Libre-/OpenOffice Write
> 
> Sorry to nit-pick, but wouldn’t that be the ODF format (which also happens to
> actually be an open format and ISO standard)?
> 
> 
> cheers,
> Matija
> --
> gsm:  +386 41 849 552
> www:  http://matija.suklje.name
> xmpp: matija.suk...@gabbler.org
> sip:  matija_suk...@ippi.fr
> ___
> fossology mailing list
> fossology@lists.fossology.org
> https://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
https://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hello,

I am sorry to hear that, some description is here:

https://github.com/fossology/fossology/blob/master/README.md 


otherwise, could you pls. be more specific what fails (like which docker 
version, machine specs, error message or what does not happen what you would 
expect...)

Kind regards, Michael


> On 14.07.2017, at 07:28, Jenny Patrick  
> wrote:
> 
> Dear Oliver,
> I'm trying for 2 days to install fossology on docker. But i failed! Can you 
> give me a description how it works?
> Thanks!
> Patrick
> ___
> fossology mailing list
> fossology@lists.fossology.org 
> https://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology 
> 


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
https://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology training question

[Michael C. Jaeger]

Hello,

I am glad to read there is interest for this.

We do not have the certification of fossology skills ready, but there are 1-day 
trainings co-located at some events of the Linux Foundation. The next 1-day 
training offered as colocated event at the Open Source Summit Europe 2017 can 
be found here:

http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/open-source-summit-europe/extend-the-experience/co-located-events
 


I think, regarding the certificates, we need to discuss this how to maybe 
change the existing 1-day training.

Kind regards, Michael



> On 05.04.2017, at 15:32, adriana.l...@continental-corporation.com wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I would like to know if you have any training program to use Fossology and 
> the possibility to get a certification or a document that proves Fossology 
> adquired skills.
> 
> I will be grateful if you can send me this information.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Adriana Lira___
> fossology mailing list
> fossology@lists.fossology.org
> https://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
https://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.1.0

[Stangel, Dan]

Michael and the FOSSology team,

Congratulations and great job on the 3.1.0 release! 

Dan Stangel
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Open Source Program Office



-Original Message-
From: fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org 
[mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On Behalf Of Jaeger, Michael C.
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 1:50 PM
To: fossology-de...@fossology.org; fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.1.0

Hi,

maybe you have seen it already:

   https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases

The FOSSology development community is pleased to release 3.1. Key features in 
FOSSology 3.1 compared to 3.0 are:

* User Interface improvements to make bulk scan more efficient when used with 
multiple licenses at the same time
* New Dockerfile also used for Docker Hub, including composed containers with 
separate DB server
* Support for SPDX 2.1 document formats(tag:value format now available as well 
as RDF)
* Generation of Debian copyright file (aka DEP5).

After the second release candidate of 3.1, the majority of contributions are 
therefore in the correction areas (see "fix") and the cleanup of the files and 
infrastructure (see "chore").

Overall, the community has merged about 45 pull requests between 3.1 release 
candidate 2 and this release - see the listing below. Compared to release 
3.0.0, about 123 pull requests have been merged.

Smaller Features

* feat(nomos): add and correct nomos licenses
* feat(users): apply correct email validation
* feat(spdx2): allow licenses to be spdx compatible and adapt the templates

Corrections

* fix(spdx2): add files with no license found to generated output format
* fix(ninka): ninka needs a new dependency
* fix(docker): use a simpler Dockerfile for standalone build 
* fix(browsefolder): added a check to see, if the folder is accessible
* fix(copyright): invalid pointer to regex
* fix(copyrightandeccview): added tooltip next to description
* fix(cp2foss): Refactor common perms
* fix(deshboard): Missing quotes around string literal
* fix(docker): change Dockerfile, docker run command
* fix(install): xenial support for postgres  in progress
* fix(make): do not place composer at `/tmp/composer/composer`
* fix(readme): Corrected the issue with mainlicense which was not displayed in 
readmeoss
* fix(scripts) : update timezone info to php.ini  bug needs review
* fix(setup): PHP warnings
* fix(spdx): fixes a list of SPDX compatibility bugs
* fix(test): fix copyright character
* fix(test): phpunit-bootstrap doesn't find Hamcrest Category
* fix(ui): Added recent agent_pk in the place of any agent_pk
* fix(unpacking): fix unpacking of mime-type application/java-archive
* fix(user-creation): email needs to be unique and required
* fix(www): correct ETA in all job view
* fix(www): PHP warnings
* fix(cleanup): remove HACKING, install_locations.xls, build.xml 
* fix(spdx): typo in template and bump LicenseListVersion
* fix(spdx): add files with no license found to generated output format

Improvements on Infrastructure and Testing

* chore(docs): updating readme and changelog, consolidation of license 
information 
* chore(changelog): rename CHANGES.md to CHANGELOG.md
* chore(doc): update documentation, change releases link to Github
* chore(docker): docker usage information
* chore(docker): refactor dockerfiles, splitting containers, avoid rebuilding, 
etc.
* chore(gitignore): update gitignore
* chore(make): Fix a typo
* chore(make): Fix target name for stanalone nomos
* chore(php): remove 5.3, set 5.6, add 7.0 to travis-ci
* chore(setup): Set Postgres driver using variable reference
* chore(testing): travis php7.1, phpunit5 for php56
* chore(travis): remove gcc-4.4,clang-3.5, MAKETARGETS for gcc variants

Improvements on Packaging

* chore(packaging): first import of a pbconf tree
* chore(packaging): Fix EPEL dependency
* chore(packaging): updating existing debian packaging for current fossology  
enhancement needs review
* chore(packaging): vagrant test file and config for httpd 2.4  enhancement
* chore(packaging): various enhancements with project builder

How to Install 3.1

Please refer to the github release page for the files or infos available:

https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases/tag/3.1.0

* Provided Debian 8 packages: 
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases/tag/3.1.0
* Using a vagrant script (such as the one provided in the project root 
structure)
* Using the docker-based deployment, see the project Readme file
* Install from source: 
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki/Install-from-Source

New Install

Did we mention that PHP and Postgresql likely requires adjustments? Please have 
a look at 

http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/SysConfig

Upgrade

* none known at this time

Scanners

* Some licenses have been added to Nomos, as such, old scanner findings could 
be updated.

User Interface

* Developers use Firefox and Chrome, sometimes Safari. Maybe, with other 
browsers, there could 

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.1.0

[Fendt, Oliver]

Great, well done.
Thank you very much Michael, Maximilian, Shaheem, Anupam, and all others

Ciao
Oliver

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org 
[mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] Im Auftrag von Jaeger, Michael C.
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. April 2017 21:50
An: fossology-de...@fossology.org; fossol...@fossology.org
Betreff: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.1.0

Hi,

maybe you have seen it already:

   https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases

The FOSSology development community is pleased to release 3.1. Key features in 
FOSSology 3.1 compared to 3.0 are:

* User Interface improvements to make bulk scan more efficient when used with 
multiple licenses at the same time
* New Dockerfile also used for Docker Hub, including composed containers with 
separate DB server
* Support for SPDX 2.1 document formats(tag:value format now available as well 
as RDF)
* Generation of Debian copyright file (aka DEP5).

After the second release candidate of 3.1, the majority of contributions are 
therefore in the correction areas (see "fix") and the cleanup of the files and 
infrastructure (see "chore").

Overall, the community has merged about 45 pull requests between 3.1 release 
candidate 2 and this release - see the listing below. Compared to release 
3.0.0, about 123 pull requests have been merged.

Smaller Features

* feat(nomos): add and correct nomos licenses
* feat(users): apply correct email validation
* feat(spdx2): allow licenses to be spdx compatible and adapt the templates

Corrections

* fix(spdx2): add files with no license found to generated output format
* fix(ninka): ninka needs a new dependency
* fix(docker): use a simpler Dockerfile for standalone build 
* fix(browsefolder): added a check to see, if the folder is accessible
* fix(copyright): invalid pointer to regex
* fix(copyrightandeccview): added tooltip next to description
* fix(cp2foss): Refactor common perms
* fix(deshboard): Missing quotes around string literal
* fix(docker): change Dockerfile, docker run command
* fix(install): xenial support for postgres  in progress
* fix(make): do not place composer at `/tmp/composer/composer`
* fix(readme): Corrected the issue with mainlicense which was not displayed in 
readmeoss
* fix(scripts) : update timezone info to php.ini  bug needs review
* fix(setup): PHP warnings
* fix(spdx): fixes a list of SPDX compatibility bugs
* fix(test): fix copyright character
* fix(test): phpunit-bootstrap doesn't find Hamcrest Category
* fix(ui): Added recent agent_pk in the place of any agent_pk
* fix(unpacking): fix unpacking of mime-type application/java-archive
* fix(user-creation): email needs to be unique and required
* fix(www): correct ETA in all job view
* fix(www): PHP warnings
* fix(cleanup): remove HACKING, install_locations.xls, build.xml 
* fix(spdx): typo in template and bump LicenseListVersion
* fix(spdx): add files with no license found to generated output format

Improvements on Infrastructure and Testing

* chore(docs): updating readme and changelog, consolidation of license 
information 
* chore(changelog): rename CHANGES.md to CHANGELOG.md
* chore(doc): update documentation, change releases link to Github
* chore(docker): docker usage information
* chore(docker): refactor dockerfiles, splitting containers, avoid rebuilding, 
etc.
* chore(gitignore): update gitignore
* chore(make): Fix a typo
* chore(make): Fix target name for stanalone nomos
* chore(php): remove 5.3, set 5.6, add 7.0 to travis-ci
* chore(setup): Set Postgres driver using variable reference
* chore(testing): travis php7.1, phpunit5 for php56
* chore(travis): remove gcc-4.4,clang-3.5, MAKETARGETS for gcc variants

Improvements on Packaging

* chore(packaging): first import of a pbconf tree
* chore(packaging): Fix EPEL dependency
* chore(packaging): updating existing debian packaging for current fossology  
enhancement needs review
* chore(packaging): vagrant test file and config for httpd 2.4  enhancement
* chore(packaging): various enhancements with project builder

How to Install 3.1

Please refer to the github release page for the files or infos available:

https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases/tag/3.1.0

* Provided Debian 8 packages: 
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases/tag/3.1.0
* Using a vagrant script (such as the one provided in the project root 
structure)
* Using the docker-based deployment, see the project Readme file
* Install from source: 
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki/Install-from-Source

New Install

Did we mention that PHP and Postgresql likely requires adjustments? Please have 
a look at 

http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/SysConfig

Upgrade

* none known at this time

Scanners

* Some licenses have been added to Nomos, as such, old scanner findings could 
be updated.

User Interface

* Developers use Firefox and Chrome, sometimes Safari. Maybe, with other 
browsers, there could be UI issues.

Participate in FOSSology

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.1.0

[Meier, Roger]

Dear Michael and contributors

THANK YOU!
-roger

Sent from my phone

> On 25 Apr 2017, at 21:50, Jaeger, Michael C.  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> maybe you have seen it already:
> 
>   https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases
> 
> The FOSSology development community is pleased to release 3.1. Key features 
> in FOSSology 3.1 compared to 3.0 are:
> 
> * User Interface improvements to make bulk scan more efficient when used with 
> multiple licenses at the same time
> * New Dockerfile also used for Docker Hub, including composed containers with 
> separate DB server
> * Support for SPDX 2.1 document formats(tag:value format now available as 
> well as RDF)
> * Generation of Debian copyright file (aka DEP5).
> 
> After the second release candidate of 3.1, the majority of contributions are 
> therefore in the correction areas (see "fix") and the cleanup of the files 
> and infrastructure (see "chore").
> 
> Overall, the community has merged about 45 pull requests between 3.1 release 
> candidate 2 and this release - see the listing below. Compared to release 
> 3.0.0, about 123 pull requests have been merged.
> 
> Smaller Features
> 
> * feat(nomos): add and correct nomos licenses
> * feat(users): apply correct email validation
> * feat(spdx2): allow licenses to be spdx compatible and adapt the templates
> 
> Corrections
> 
> * fix(spdx2): add files with no license found to generated output format
> * fix(ninka): ninka needs a new dependency
> * fix(docker): use a simpler Dockerfile for standalone build 
> * fix(browsefolder): added a check to see, if the folder is accessible
> * fix(copyright): invalid pointer to regex
> * fix(copyrightandeccview): added tooltip next to description
> * fix(cp2foss): Refactor common perms
> * fix(deshboard): Missing quotes around string literal
> * fix(docker): change Dockerfile, docker run command
> * fix(install): xenial support for postgres  in progress
> * fix(make): do not place composer at `/tmp/composer/composer`
> * fix(readme): Corrected the issue with mainlicense which was not displayed 
> in readmeoss
> * fix(scripts) : update timezone info to php.ini  bug needs review
> * fix(setup): PHP warnings
> * fix(spdx): fixes a list of SPDX compatibility bugs
> * fix(test): fix copyright character
> * fix(test): phpunit-bootstrap doesn't find Hamcrest Category
> * fix(ui): Added recent agent_pk in the place of any agent_pk
> * fix(unpacking): fix unpacking of mime-type application/java-archive
> * fix(user-creation): email needs to be unique and required
> * fix(www): correct ETA in all job view
> * fix(www): PHP warnings
> * fix(cleanup): remove HACKING, install_locations.xls, build.xml 
> * fix(spdx): typo in template and bump LicenseListVersion
> * fix(spdx): add files with no license found to generated output format
> 
> Improvements on Infrastructure and Testing
> 
> * chore(docs): updating readme and changelog, consolidation of license 
> information 
> * chore(changelog): rename CHANGES.md to CHANGELOG.md
> * chore(doc): update documentation, change releases link to Github
> * chore(docker): docker usage information
> * chore(docker): refactor dockerfiles, splitting containers, avoid 
> rebuilding, etc.
> * chore(gitignore): update gitignore
> * chore(make): Fix a typo
> * chore(make): Fix target name for stanalone nomos
> * chore(php): remove 5.3, set 5.6, add 7.0 to travis-ci
> * chore(setup): Set Postgres driver using variable reference
> * chore(testing): travis php7.1, phpunit5 for php56
> * chore(travis): remove gcc-4.4,clang-3.5, MAKETARGETS for gcc variants
> 
> Improvements on Packaging
> 
> * chore(packaging): first import of a pbconf tree
> * chore(packaging): Fix EPEL dependency
> * chore(packaging): updating existing debian packaging for current fossology  
> enhancement needs review
> * chore(packaging): vagrant test file and config for httpd 2.4  enhancement
> * chore(packaging): various enhancements with project builder
> 
> How to Install 3.1
> 
> Please refer to the github release page for the files or infos available:
> 
> https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases/tag/3.1.0
> 
> * Provided Debian 8 packages: 
> https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases/tag/3.1.0
> * Using a vagrant script (such as the one provided in the project root 
> structure)
> * Using the docker-based deployment, see the project Readme file
> * Install from source: 
> https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki/Install-from-Source
> 
> New Install
> 
> Did we mention that PHP and Postgresql likely requires adjustments? Please 
> have a look at 
> 
> http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/SysConfig
> 
> Upgrade
> 
> * none known at this time
> 
> Scanners
> 
> * Some licenses have been added to Nomos, as such, old scanner findings could 
> be updated.
> 
> User Interface
> 
> * Developers use Firefox and Chrome, sometimes Safari. Maybe, with other 
> browsers, there could be UI issues.
> 
> Participate in FOSSology
> 
> 

Re: [FOSSology] fossology reading from a repo (collection of git repositiries)

[Jeremiah Foster]

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:19 PM, David Van Beveren 
wrote:

> I am interested in extending fossology to load a large source file tree
> via the ‘repo’ command. Here is a blurb on repo from source.android.com:
> (there Is no Linux manpage):
>
>
>
> *Repo* is a repository management tool that we built on top of Git. Repo
> unifies the many Git repositories when necessary, does the uploads to
> Android’s  revision control system
> , and automates parts of the
> Android development workflow. Repo is not meant to replace Git, only to
> make it easier to work with Git in the context of Android. The repo command
> is an executable Python script that you can put anywhere in your path. In
> working with the Android source files, you can use Repo for across-network
> operations. For example, with a single Repo command you can download files
> from multiple repositories into your local working directory.
>
>
>
> I am presuming nobody has done this yet. I’m also presuming that this is
> not general enough for upstreaming, since repo is mainly an android
> workflow thing. (though my team does not use it on just  android projects).
>

​Repo works with any git repository, we use it with non-Android embedded
development, its a very useful tool. It replaces the need for using git
submodules I find.​

>
>
> If anyone has experience adding a new uploading mechanism, or wants to
> give me a good starting point, I am all ears.
>

​Isn't repo effective as a tool that uses SHA sums to assemble a local
repo? I would think this might be a useful addition to Fossology, depending
on how you're planning on using it of course.

Cheers,

Jeremiah​
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
https://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] fossology on ubuntu 14.04

[Paul Guttmann (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX)]

You may need to add your "user" to the group "fossy" - similar to:
1. Ensure ubuntu is a member of fossy group
   sudo usermod -a -G fossy ubuntu

Paul...

From: ag...@idirect.net At: 09/09/16 07:59:38
To: fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: Re:[FOSSology] fossology on ubuntu 14.04

Hi,
I am new to fossology and just installed it on my Ubuntu 14.04 machine and I 
guess installation went fine. However if I issue cli command it bashes to 
following error. Could some help be guide how to use it:
Root1:~$ cat /var/log/fossology/fossology.log
2016-09-07 22:30:28 scheduler [14619] :: NOTE: 
*
2016-09-07 22:30:28 scheduler [14619] :: NOTE: ***FOSSology 
scheduler started***
2016-09-07 22:30:28 scheduler [14619] :: NOTE: ***pid:  14620   
 ***
2016-09-07 22:30:28 scheduler [14619] :: NOTE: ***verbose:  1   
 ***
2016-09-07 22:30:28 scheduler [14619] :: NOTE: ***config:   
/etc/fossology   ***
2016-09-07 22:30:28 scheduler [14619] :: NOTE: 
*
Root1:~$ cp2foss
FATAL: You must be in group 'fossy'.

Regards,  
- Alok 
ag...@idirect.net  . o: (703) 648-8043  c: (571) 421-4311

Advancing a Connected World


_
This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
_

___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
https://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
https://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology and SPDX in AUTOSAR

[Fendt, Oliver]

Hi Heinz,

[Oliver] thank you for contacting us.
I am working for the AUTOSAR association as one of the FOSS responsibles. I am 
investigating about Fossology and SPDX. In that context I would like to get 
into contact with you.


•We want to use e.g. Fossology as the tool for analyzing the FOSS 
licenses and then exporting it as SPDX file. This is then transferred to a team 
dealing with license issues. Do we get a list of all FOSS licenses? Does it 
mean that all these licenses are known in SPDX. Is there a mapping of license 
information happening?



[Oliver] It is great that you intend to use FOSSology for the OSS package 
license analysis (incl. ecc keyword search and copyright extraction). FOSSology 
is able to find license relevant text even if it is only a reference to a 
license, e.g. “for licensing conditions please see: 
http://exampleproject.org/license.html”

This will be classified as “see URL” license. You then have the chance to look 
at the license of the project and incorporate the license into FOSSology (thus 
extending the license DB of FOSSology of you instance, of course you can also 
sent this license text to us and as for inclusion in the next version of 
FOSSology). When you have identified the license – this will be reflected in 
the “concluded license tag” of SPDX for that file



The SPDX generation capability has been added  to FOSSology and can be found in 
the development version today (3.1 candidate).  It is available to be tested 
and provide feedback on improving it is welcome.   FOSSology is able to 
generate a list of all FOSS licenses that have been detected in the scanned 
code, and provide a summary in SPDX format (both tag:value & RDF are 
supported), depending on how you would like to use it.

In SPDX tag:value format - if you grep for "“PackageLicenseInfoFromFiles:” in 
the spdx file, you'll find a summary of all the licenses found in the package 
analyzed.

FOSSology uses the SPDX license identifier in its output. When there is no 
equivalent license reference in SPDX, FOSSology will generate a 
"LicenseRef-", and put the actual text it discovers in the scanned 
files in the spdx file that FOSSology generates.


•What happens if some parts of the wording in the license are changed. 
Is the deviation not recognized, is it highlighted or listed as an unclassified 
license?



[Oliver] FOSSology has a very elaborated highlighting mechanism. It highlights 
modifications, additions and deletions of the Original license text all in 
different colors, thus it is very easy to identify modifications of license 
texts

This depends on the scanners selected to be used:   FOSSology has integrated 
into it 3 different scanners today:
Nomos - flexible, looks for keyword matches, hints, etc.
Monk - Certainty that known license text and headers is actually found and 
wording is exactly reproduced
Ninka - Another precise license scanner looking for actual license text matches.

The time to do the analysis and degree to you which the actual license text 
matches, is depended on the scanner you choose.

In tool interface,  the parts of the text that match a scanner are highlighted, 
so when you look at specific files, you can quickly see why a tool is asserting 
a match.
Please see: https://www.fossology.org/features for some pictures of what this 
looks like.


•Where does the list of licenses that is used in Fossology come from. 
In the Fossology documentation the NOMOS list is mentioned 
(http://archive15.fossology.org/attachments/3963/license_list_2.6.0.txt) Where 
has the list it origin? And does it go in accordance with the license list of 
SPDX? Deviation between SPDX and NOMOS

[Oliver] the list of licenses comes from the SPDX license list as well as from 
contributions of found licenses to the FOSSology project (see my comment above, 
where you have the ability to add licenses to the license DB of FOSSology)
The list of license keywords and regular expressions used for NOMOS originated 
when the tool was first created, and has evolved over time.   The SPDX license 
list started 5 years ago, and continues to evolve and update every quarter. 
There was some work done to analyze the differences between Nomos and SPDX 
license list a couple of years ago.  However in 2015, the FOSSology team did a 
lot of work to integrate with the SPDX specification and license list into the 
tool,  this is still ongoing work for 3.1 release.

In general only Nomos detects a few licenses that aren't part of the SPDX 
license list,  usually its because they are historical artifacts, etc.  The 
bulk of them correspond to those on the SPDX list.


•What happens if Fossology finds an unknown list or a commercial 
license 
(http://archive15.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Detection_of_Unclassified_licenses).
 Are they all classified as unclassified licenses?
That is my understanding.

[Oliver] it depends of the keywords matched (it could also be that the 

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology and SPDX in AUTOSAR

[Kate Stewart]

Greetings Heinz,

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:57 AM,  wrote:

> Dear Sir or Madam,
>
>
>
> I am working for the AUTOSAR association as one of the FOSS responsibles.
> I am investigating about Fossology and SPDX. In that context I would like
> to get into contact with you.
>
>
>
> ·We want to use e.g. Fossology as the tool for analyzing the FOSS
> licenses and then exporting it as SPDX file. This is then transferred to a
> team dealing with license issues. Do we get a list of all FOSS licenses?
> Does it mean that all these licenses are known in SPDX. Is there a mapping
> of license information happening?
>

The SPDX generation capability has been added  to FOSSology and can be
found in the development version today (3.1 candidate).  It is available to
be tested and provide feedback on improving it is welcome.   FOSSology is
able to generate a list of all FOSS licenses that have been detected in the
scanned code, and provide a summary in SPDX format (both tag:value & RDF
are supported), depending on how you would like to use it.

In SPDX tag:value format - if you grep for "“PackageLicenseInfoFromFiles:”
in the spdx file, you'll find a summary of all the licenses found in the
package analyzed.

FOSSology uses the SPDX license identifier in its output. When there is no
equivalent license reference in SPDX, FOSSology will generate a
"LicenseRef-", and put the actual text it discovers in the
scanned files in the spdx file that FOSSology generates.

>
>
> ·What happens if some parts of the wording in the license are
> changed. Is the deviation not recognized, is it highlighted or listed as an
> unclassified license?
>

This depends on the scanners selected to be used:   FOSSology has
integrated into it 3 different scanners today:
Nomos - flexible, looks for keyword matches, hints, etc.
Monk - Certainty that known license text and headers is actually found and
wording is exactly reproduced
Ninka - Another precise license scanner looking for actual license text
matches.

The time to do the analysis and degree to you which the actual license text
matches, is depended on the scanner you choose.

In tool interface,  the parts of the text that match a scanner are
highlighted, so when you look at specific files, you can quickly see why a
tool is asserting a match.
Please see: https://www.fossology.org/features for some pictures of what
this looks like.

>
>
> ·Where does the list of licenses that is used in Fossology come
> from. In the Fossology documentation the NOMOS list is mentioned (
> http://archive15.fossology.org/attachments/3963/license_list_2.6.0.txt)
> Where has the list it origin? And does it go in accordance with the license
> list of SPDX? Deviation between SPDX and NOMOS
>
The list of license keywords and regular expressions used for NOMOS
originated when the tool was first created, and has evolved over time.
The SPDX license list started 5 years ago, and continues to evolve and
update every quarter. There was some work done to analyze the differences
between Nomos and SPDX license list a couple of years ago.  However in
2015, the FOSSology team did a lot of work to integrate with the SPDX
specification and license list into the tool,  this is still ongoing work
for 3.1 release.

In general only Nomos detects a few licenses that aren't part of the SPDX
license list,  usually its because they are historical artifacts, etc.  The
bulk of them correspond to those on the SPDX list.

>
>
> ·What happens if Fossology finds an unknown list or a commercial
> license (http://archive15.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/
> Detection_of_Unclassified_licenses). Are they all classified as
> unclassified licenses?
>
That is my understanding.

> What happens if the license body is missing or if no license description
> exists for a file?
>
It shows up as "no license detected".

> And is this information about commercial licenses, not known licenses, …
> transferred in the SPDX file in case of an export?
>
Yes.   :-)

>
>
> ·Quite often I have seen that NOMOS is mentioned. I can’t find
> detailed information about NOMOS. What is NOMOS?
>
Nomos is one of the scanners that can be used by FOSSology (and was one of
the original ones),  it is very flexible
and does keyword and regular expression matching.   You can find more of an
overview: https://www.fossology.org/features

>
>
> We would like to continue a discussion based on the questions above. Could
> you please tell me who will be our contact person.
>

If you'd like to learn more in person, we will be having a hands-on
training session on FOSSology on Friday October 7th in Berlin.
Details about the training:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-europe/extend-the-experience/training-tutorials

In addition please feel free to contact me directly, and I'll work with the
FOSSology steering committee members
and FOSSology developers to help answer your further questions.


Hope this helps,

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Fossology looks dead...

[Jaeger, Michael C.]

Hello,

actually, I

1) call https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu
2) login using testuser/test
3) See Browse -> "Uploads in Software Repository"

-> no exception at all, just a list of 15 items. either the error is fixed or 
you did something additional not mentioned or not understood by me?

Kind regards, Michael

-Original Message-
From: Fossology-devel [mailto:fossology-devel-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On 
Behalf Of Tim Bird
Sent: Samstag, 19. März 2016 01:00
To: Sai Uday Shankar Korlimarla
Cc: fossology-de...@fossology.org; fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology-devel] [FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...



On 03/16/2016 10:59 AM, Sai Uday Shankar Korlimarla wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> 
> In addition to paul,
> 
> I currently see that FOSSology at the URL 
> (https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu/) is working. If you still find the URL 
> not working, please do let us know.

Thanks.  I logged on to the site (using user: testuser and password: test)

I successfully uploaded a small tarfile for an open source project, and did 
some analysis.

Unfortuantely, folder navigation seems to have a problem.

I keep getting the following error message, when I look at "Uploads in Software 
Repository"
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Exception' with message 'You are assigned to 
wrong group.' in /usr/share/fossology/www/ui/async/AjaxBrowse.php:77 Stack 
trace: #0 /usr/share/fossology/lib/php/Plugin/DefaultPlugin.php(239): 
Fossology\UI\Ajax\AjaxBrowse->handle(Object(Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request))
 #1 /usr/share/fossology/lib/php/Plugin/DefaultPlugin.php(271): 
Fossology\Lib\Plugin\DefaultPlugin->getResponse() #2 
/usr/share/fossology/www/ui/index.php(56): 
Fossology\Lib\Plugin\DefaultPlugin->execute() #3 {main} thrown in 
/usr/share/fossology/www/ui/async/AjaxBrowse.php on line 77
---
There's a box in the middle of the screen that says "Processing..." (that 
doesn't seem to ever go away).
And there are no entries listed.

In other views, I can see my package (grabserial) and look at information about 
it.

The reports are quite interesting.

It might be good to add the information about user account and password to use 
on the wiki page: http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Live_Demo

I got it from the home page, but other's might not find it.

Thanks,
 -- Tim
___
Fossology-devel mailing list
fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology-devel
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Fossology looks dead...

[Jaeger, Michael C.]

Hi,

I have updated the demo instance at
   https://52.26.97.143/repo

-> it has now the latest master (from March 18th) including all the latest 
improvements on SPDX2 Tag-Value and DEP-5 (aka debian-copyright) file 
generation. (user:testuser, pass:test)

I have also added the instance of Uday to the main web page 
(https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu/)  of fossology.org

Kind regards,

Michael


From: Fossology-devel [mailto:fossology-devel-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On 
Behalf Of Sai Uday Shankar Korlimarla
Sent: Mittwoch, 16. März 2016 18:59
To: tim.b...@sonymobile.com
Cc: fossology-de...@fossology.org; fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology-devel] [FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...

Hi Tim,

In addition to paul,

I currently see that FOSSology at the URL is working. If you still find the URL 
not working, please do let us know.


Regards
Uday


Regards
Uday

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Paul Guttmann (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX) 
<pguttm...@bloomberg.net<mailto:pguttm...@bloomberg.net>> wrote:
G'day Tim,
Fossology is actually quite active and in the process of moving to a new home ;)
For activity and to follow "the fun" please visit:
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki and 
https://github.com/fossology/fossology

The mail list(s) are very quiet though :)
Paul...


From: tim.b...@sonymobile.com<mailto:tim.b...@sonymobile.com> At: 15-Mar-2016 
14:59:51
To: fossol...@fossology.org<mailto:fossol...@fossology.org>
Subject: Re:[FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...
I decided to take a look at Fossology, and my first impression was somewhat 
tarnished
by the set of links I attempted to use. Fossology looked like a dead project, 
based
on the following:

On the Contact_Us wiki page 
(http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Contact_Us),
I followed the link to search the mailing list archives, using this link:
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossology@fossology.org/

The most recent e-mail there is from September of 2011. Yikes.

I also followed the link on the home page (Overview, at 
http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology)
to try out the demo server:

http://52.26.97.143/repo/

The web connection just hung, showing me no screens.

After poking around a bit, I found this other link to try to see what Fossology 
looked like:
On the page: http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Live_Demo
there is a link to: https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu/

I got this message from the server, when I clicked on the link:

"Fatal error: Cannot redeclare class agent_nomos_once in 
/usr/share/fossology/nomos2/ui/agent-nomos-once.php on line 0"

Hmmm. It appears that the web site is not maintained, nor are the demo servers, 
and the mailing
list is quite old. This was not a good first impression.

--
After poking around a bit more, I found that there actually are new releases, 
and mail-list
messages that are more recent (this year). However it might be good to clean up 
a few
of these things that don't work.
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org<mailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org>
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


___
Fossology-devel mailing list
fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org<mailto:fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org>
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology-devel

___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...

[Jaeger, Michael C.]

Hi,

(answering to the thread post at the very end of the this thread below)

Working on github may move conversations away from the mailing list: You will 
have more conversations either directly on the issues or to the pull requests. 
I think our pull requests show some good examples:

https://github.com/fossology/fossology/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed

(check the pull requests with number messages indicated in the right column 
with the bubble icon)

for me a good practice (apart from confusing people that a mailing list is 
surprisingsly quiet) because you put conversations right at the place of the 
subject: issue or pull request …

kind regards, Michael

From: fossology [mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On Behalf Of 
Jeremiah Foster
Sent: Donnerstag, 17. März 2016 14:38
To: fossol...@fossology.org
Cc: fossology-de...@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...



On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Jaeger, Michael C. 
<michael.c.jae...@siemens.com<mailto:michael.c.jae...@siemens.com>> wrote:

From: fossology 
[mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org<mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org>]
 On Behalf Of Paul Guttmann (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX)
Sent: Dienstag, 15. März 2016 20:03
To: tim.b...@sonymobile.com<mailto:tim.b...@sonymobile.com>
Cc: fossology-de...@fossology.org<mailto:fossology-de...@fossology.org>; 
fossol...@fossology.org<mailto:fossol...@fossology.org>

Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...

G'day Tim,
Fossology is actually quite active and in the process of moving to a new home ;)
For activity and to follow "the fun" please visit:
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki and 
https://github.com/fossology/fossology

The mail list(s) are very quiet though :)

This is a wee problem perhaps. Like others I'm used to starting at the mailing 
list to learn more about a given project, not least because people yell at me 
when I ask a question saying "did you ask on the list?" :-)

But the problem looks to be mitigated by recent traffic which is quite helpful 
to me.

Cheers,

Jeremiah


--
Jeremiah C. Foster
GENIVI COMMUNITY MANAGER

Pelagicore AB
Ekelundsgatan 4, 6tr, SE-411 18
Gothenburg, Sweden
M: +46 (0)73 093 0506
jeremiah.fos...@pelagicore.com<mailto:jeremiah.fos...@pelagicore.com>
[cid:image001.png@01D180F8.4A1D1640]
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...

[Matt Germonprez]

Back up: https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu

User: testuser
Pass: test

Matt


On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Matt Germonprez 
wrote:

> Hi Tim,
>
> Taking a look at the UNOmaha instance right now.
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Tim Bird 
> wrote:
>
>> I decided to take a look at Fossology, and my first impression was
>> somewhat tarnished
>> by the set of links I attempted to use.  Fossology looked like a dead
>> project, based
>> on the following:
>>
>> On the Contact_Us wiki page (
>> http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Contact_Us),
>> I followed the link to search the mailing list archives, using this link:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/fossology@fossology.org/
>>
>> The most recent e-mail there is from September of 2011.  Yikes.
>>
>> I also followed the link on the home page (Overview, at
>> http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology)
>> to try out the demo server:
>>
>> http://52.26.97.143/repo/
>>
>> The web connection just hung, showing me no screens.
>>
>> After poking around a bit, I found this other link to try to see what
>> Fossology looked like:
>> On the page: http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Live_Demo
>> there is a link to: https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu/
>>
>> I got this message from the server, when I clicked on the link:
>>
>> "Fatal error: Cannot redeclare class agent_nomos_once in
>> /usr/share/fossology/nomos2/ui/agent-nomos-once.php on line 0"
>>
>> Hmmm.  It appears that the web site is not maintained, nor are the demo
>> servers, and the mailing
>> list is quite old.  This was not a good first impression.
>>
>> --
>> After poking around a bit more, I found that there actually are new
>> releases, and mail-list
>> messages that are more recent (this year).  However it might be good to
>> clean up a few
>> of these things that don't work.
>> ___
>> fossology mailing list
>> fossology@lists.fossology.org
>> http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor
> Information Systems
> College of Information Science & Technology
> University of Nebraska Omaha
> http://ocrl.unomaha.edu/
>



-- 
Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor
Information Systems
College of Information Science & Technology
University of Nebraska Omaha
http://ocrl.unomaha.edu/
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...

[Paul Guttmann (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX)]

G'day Tim,
   Fossology is actually quite active and in the process of moving to a new 
home ;)
   For activity and to follow "the fun" please visit:
   https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki and 
https://github.com/fossology/fossology

   The mail list(s) are very quiet though :)
Paul...
  


From: tim.b...@sonymobile.com At: 15-Mar-2016 14:59:51
To: fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: Re:[FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...

I decided to take a look at Fossology, and my first impression was somewhat 
tarnished
by the set of links I attempted to use.  Fossology looked like a dead project, 
based
on the following:

On the Contact_Us wiki page 
(http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Contact_Us),
I followed the link to search the mailing list archives, using this link:
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossology@fossology.org/

The most recent e-mail there is from September of 2011.  Yikes.

I also followed the link on the home page (Overview, at 
http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology)
to try out the demo server:

http://52.26.97.143/repo/

The web connection just hung, showing me no screens.

After poking around a bit, I found this other link to try to see what Fossology 
looked like:
On the page: http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Live_Demo
there is a link to: https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu/

I got this message from the server, when I clicked on the link:

"Fatal error: Cannot redeclare class agent_nomos_once in 
/usr/share/fossology/nomos2/ui/agent-nomos-once.php on line 0"

Hmmm.  It appears that the web site is not maintained, nor are the demo 
servers, and the mailing
list is quite old.  This was not a good first impression.

--
After poking around a bit more, I found that there actually are new releases, 
and mail-list
messages that are more recent (this year).  However it might be good to clean 
up a few
of these things that don't work.
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Single server install on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

[Tupe, Amol (Amol)]

Hello Vincent,
I can install non fosology packages e.g.
I tried to install package, rpld  and I was able to install it

Then I tried to install package, rpm but resulted into following error,
$sudo apt-get install rpm
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package rpm is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
However the following packages replace it:
  rpm-i18n

E: Package 'rpm' has no installation candidate

Somehow I noticed that Ubuntu packages from repository type ‘universe’ are 
getting installed on my system… package, rpld is from ‘universe’ so I am able 
to install it.
Package, rpm is not from repository, ‘universe’ …. It looks like it is from 
repository ‘security’ and hence I could not install it.
This reminds me about following lines in my file, /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise universe
deb http://www.fossology.org/releases/2.6.2/Ubuntu/ 12.04 contrib

Do you think I should have more “deb” entries in my /etc/apt/sources.list  file?

Regards,

Amol T

From: Ma, Dong (Vincent, Open Source Program Office) [mailto:dong...@hp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 11:27 AM
To: Tupe, Amol (Amol); fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: RE: Fossology Single server install on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

Hi Amol,

Seems your system cannot install some Ubuntu packages, can you try to install 
some non fossology packages to see what happened?
For example: sudo apt-get install rpm

Vincent

From: Tupe, Amol (Amol) [mailto:tu...@avaya.com]
Sent: 2015年5月12日 21:40
To: Ma, Dong (Vincent, Open Source Program Office); 
fossol...@fossology.orgmailto:fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: RE: Fossology Single server install on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS


Hi Vincent,
Thanks for your prompt reply.

Yes, In intend to do “Single Server installation” of FOSSology.

I am very new to fossology, what do you mean by “fossology staff”?

You said, “…if your package repo configure correct, it will be installed 
automate by this step”
Do you have steps of how to configure the package repo correctly ?

Following are steps done by me:-


1.   On my Ubuntu 12.04, I have following in my /etc/apt/sources.list
~
deb 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntuhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntud=AwMFbwc=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Qr=vRtTQEVOC4UMcG21dg2FNwm=IvUu574vWYR49iT8t3jQzACxxHHktMvrc0h3DhqQFDcs=PGVaYeCjawz47lSSScGbJ7yCTQEd0OcNOVf3-OK61OEe=
 precise universe
# deb-src 
http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntuhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntud=AwMFbwc=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Qr=vRtTQEVOC4UMcG21dg2FNwm=IvUu574vWYR49iT8t3jQzACxxHHktMvrc0h3DhqQFDcs=OUiE_R2ZhxxWgqHFGRtMINGTYBPf-YcUDWSoRQJArqUe=
 precise main
deb 
http://www.fossology.org/releases/2.6.2/Ubuntu/https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.fossology.org_releases_2.6.2_Ubuntu_d=AwMFbwc=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Qr=vRtTQEVOC4UMcG21dg2FNwm=IvUu574vWYR49iT8t3jQzACxxHHktMvrc0h3DhqQFDcs=2duBqLg-s2FKGUtZO744UALS8V3P2dyKDoAPNAEQBJEe=
 12.04 contrib
~
After modifying the sources.list, I run following


2.
$ sudo apt-get update
[sudo] password for platform:
Ign 
http://www.fossology.orghttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.fossology.orgd=AwMFbwc=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Qr=vRtTQEVOC4UMcG21dg2FNwm=IvUu574vWYR49iT8t3jQzACxxHHktMvrc0h3DhqQFDcs=cb_QPrL6_8x1sUprQkqGCx5KRGI0yJTNewdNTsIFZnwe=
 12.04 Release.gpg
Hit 
http://ppa.launchpad.nethttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ppa.launchpad.netd=AwMFbwc=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Qr=vRtTQEVOC4UMcG21dg2FNwm=IvUu574vWYR49iT8t3jQzACxxHHktMvrc0h3DhqQFDcs=qgtA2C2keiUAGKoXMtj_TQ8GQRi-RJjDYZiSTAFjy84e=
 precise Release.gpg
Hit 
http://www.fossology.orghttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.fossology.orgd=AwMFbwc=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Qr=vRtTQEVOC4UMcG21dg2FNwm=IvUu574vWYR49iT8t3jQzACxxHHktMvrc0h3DhqQFDcs=cb_QPrL6_8x1sUprQkqGCx5KRGI0yJTNewdNTsIFZnwe=
 12.04 Release
Ign 
http://www.fossology.orghttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.fossology.orgd=AwMFbwc=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Qr=vRtTQEVOC4UMcG21dg2FNwm=IvUu574vWYR49iT8t3jQzACxxHHktMvrc0h3DhqQFDcs=cb_QPrL6_8x1sUprQkqGCx5KRGI0yJTNewdNTsIFZnwe=
 12.04/contrib amd64 Packages/DiffIndex
Hit 
http://ppa.launchpad.nethttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ppa.launchpad.netd=AwMFbwc=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Qr=vRtTQEVOC4UMcG21dg2FNwm=IvUu574vWYR49iT8t3jQzACxxHHktMvrc0h3DhqQFDcs=qgtA2C2keiUAGKoXMtj_TQ8GQRi-RJjDYZiSTAFjy84e=
 precise Release
Hit 
http://archive.ubuntu.comhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__archive.ubuntu.comd=AwMFbwc=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Qr=vRtTQEVOC4UMcG21dg2FNwm=IvUu574vWYR49iT8t3jQzACxxHHktMvrc0h3DhqQFDcs=2RvLgP59bPil4Z5VzIpYHTm0WJSBNIxgYyw12XcsCX4e=
 precise Release.gpg
Hit 

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Single server install on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

[Ma, Dong (Vincent, Open Source Program Office)]

Hi Amol,

Seems your system cannot install some Ubuntu packages, can you try to install 
some non fossology packages to see what happened?
For example: sudo apt-get install rpm

Vincent

From: Tupe, Amol (Amol) [mailto:tu...@avaya.com]
Sent: 2015年5月12日 21:40
To: Ma, Dong (Vincent, Open Source Program Office); fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: RE: Fossology Single server install on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS


Hi Vincent,
Thanks for your prompt reply.

Yes, In intend to do “Single Server installation” of FOSSology.

I am very new to fossology, what do you mean by “fossology staff”?

You said, “…if your package repo configure correct, it will be installed 
automate by this step”
Do you have steps of how to configure the package repo correctly ?

Following are steps done by me:-


1.   On my Ubuntu 12.04, I have following in my /etc/apt/sources.list
~
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise universe
# deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise main
deb http://www.fossology.org/releases/2.6.2/Ubuntu/ 12.04 contrib
~
After modifying the sources.list, I run following


2.
$ sudo apt-get update
[sudo] password for platform:
Ign http://www.fossology.org 12.04 Release.gpg
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg
Hit http://www.fossology.org 12.04 Release
Ign http://www.fossology.org 12.04/contrib amd64 Packages/DiffIndex
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg
Hit http://apt.postgresql.org precise-pgdg Release.gpg
Ign http://www.fossology.org 12.04/contrib i386 Packages/DiffIndex
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise Release
Ign http://www.fossology.org 12.04/contrib TranslationIndex
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources
Hit http://www.fossology.org 12.04/contrib amd64 Packages
Hit http://apt.postgresql.org precise-pgdg Release
Hit http://www.fossology.org 12.04/contrib i386 Packages
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe amd64 Packages
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe i386 Packages
Hit http://apt.postgresql.org precise-pgdg/main amd64 Packages
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe TranslationIndex
Hit http://apt.postgresql.org precise-pgdg/main i386 Packages
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main TranslationIndex
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Translation-en
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en
Ign http://apt.postgresql.org precise-pgdg/main TranslationIndex
Ign http://www.fossology.org 12.04/contrib Translation-en_US
Ign http://www.fossology.org 12.04/contrib Translation-en
Ign http://apt.postgresql.org precise-pgdg/main Translation-en_US
Ign http://apt.postgresql.org precise-pgdg/main Translation-en
Reading package lists... Done
$

3.
$ sudo apt-get install fossology
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
fossology : Depends: fossology-ununpack but it is not going to be installed
 Depends: fossology-buckets but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.



4.   After the step 3 above, if I try to install dependency packages but 
then there is next level of dependencies
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
fossology-pkgagent : Depends: rpm but it is not installable
  Depends: librpm2 (= 4.9.0) but it is not installable
  Depends: librpmio2 (= 4.9.0) but it is not installable
fossology-ununpack : Depends: sleuthkit but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: rpm but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


What is your suggestion, Is there something wrong in deb entry in my 
/etc/apt/sources.list
OR
I should go ahead and install all package dependency  tree?

Regards,

Amol T

From: Ma, Dong (Vincent, Open Source Program Office) [mailto:dong...@hp.com]
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 9:04 PM
To: Tupe, Amol (Amol); fossol...@fossology.orgmailto:fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: RE: Fossology Single server install on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

Hi Amol,

Your step use sudo apt-get install fossology is for single server installation, 

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Single server install on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

[Ma, Dong (Vincent, Open Source Program Office)]

Hi Amol,

Your step use sudo apt-get install fossology is for single server installation, 
it will install all fossology staff.

Fossology needed some dependencies packages for installation, you must install 
it first, if your package repo configure correct, it will be installed automate 
by this step.

Can you list your full install error log?

Thanks,
Vincent

From: fossology [mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On Behalf Of 
Tupe, Amol (Amol)
Sent: 2015年5月12日 7:02
To: fossol...@fossology.org
Subject: [FOSSology] Fossology Single server install on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

Hello FoSSology team,
I am trying to install FoSSology server on my Linux Ubuntu 12.04 machine.
I have already installed PostgreySQL 9.4.1, PHP 5.5.24-1 and Apache2.4.12
I am following instructions from 
http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Ubuntu_Install_2_6

But following step returns dependency errors:-
$ sudo apt-get install fossology

Error is
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
fossology : Depends: fossology-ununpack but it is not going to be installed
 Depends: fossology-buckets but it is not going to be installed

There are multiple further dependencies going up to  fossology-pkgagent depends 
on rpm, librpm2 and librpmio2 = 4.9.0

What controls whether it is a Single/Multi server installation?
Can you please give steps to make this installation through?

Regards,

Amol T


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Foundation discussion

[Bruno Cornec]

Hello Robert,

Monday 6:00CET if I translate correctly is something I can also do.
Not sure I'm the type of people important in that call, but if there is
a discussion around SW production and build, then I may be able to help
a bit. Including on the build service part. I'm adding Docker container
support for project-builder.org so that may ease the requirements for
you here.

If no other solution is found for hosting code and tools, I could help
as I'm hosting my projects here in our Solution Center (HP) but there
won't be a huge SLA, so anything else should probably be preferred. 

I personaly like the idea of Fossology being behind a foundation and
having the ability to benefit from legal protection, and also funding
support. For the legal side I think that the SFC is ideal, from a
funding perspective maybe more the LF. And of course as Bradley pointed
out, the philosophy behind is important.

I think that you may not receive a lot of feedback as IMO you're really
seen as the main person behind Fossology, and as such we rely on your
opinion to take the best decisions wrt the future of the project. Of
course we can give our view feedback, but the one who make the code are
the one who should decide first IMO.

Also maybe we should put on the wiki what is required by the project to
go on, and people could put their name as contact point to support that
future activity. That way we keep track of that in a single easy place.
I started a page summaryzing the discussions I've seen. Feel free to
amend. Cf: http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/The_future

And as everybody who as had the opportunity to work with it, I'd like to
thank you and the team you've manage for all the hard work that you've
accomplished with dedication during all these years as we can see now.

Best regards,
Bruno.

Gobeille, Robert said on Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:57:31AM -0600:

 I need to correct a mistake in my email.  Instead of SFLC I meant to write 
 SFC (Software Freedom Conservancy).   Sorry if that caused any confusion.  
 Call it a senior moment on my part.
 
 So far I’ve heard from Paul G., Bradley K., Oliver F. and it looks like 
 Monday is the preferred date for the phone conf.  I’m hoping everyone who is 
 interested will respond before the end of the day to confirm that Monday 
 works for them or suggest an alternate date/time.
 
 Thanks,
 Bob Gobeille
 
 
  On May 6, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Gobeille, Robert bob.gobei...@hp.com wrote:
  
  Hi Richard,
  I don’t have the use of ordinary phone connections when using the HP MyRoom 
  product. 
  
  I’m guessing your interest is the Foundation issue.  Perhaps this is a big 
  enough issue that we better separate it from the agenda and have a phone 
  conf just for it.  I’m thinking that Bradley Kuhn and Mike Dolan might also 
  want to be there to answer questions.
  
  I was hoping that there would be more foundation discussion on the mailing 
  list.  Mike has chimed in with the possibility of using the LF 
  infrastructure for build/test/host.  Bradley offered quite a few points on 
  what we should consider if choosing a foundation, as well as highlighting 
  the infrastructure options with the SFLC.  But I’ve heard little from 
  anyone else.  So how about if I set up a new phone conf to talk about the 
  foundation and project leadership?  Here are some suggested times:
  
  Mon May 11  9 am MST
  Tues May 12  9 am MST
  
  Will either of these work for folks?  If not, when would be good?
  
  I see an email to the list from Oliver Fendt about the possibility of 
  Siemens helping out, perhaps in lieu of a foundation.  I’ll send this reply 
  and the one to Oliver at the same time so you get them at the same time and 
  can evaluate both.
  
  Thanks,
  Bob Gobeille
  
 
 ___
 Fossology-devel mailing list
 fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology-devel

-- 
Open Source Profession, Linux Community Lead WW  http://opensource.hp.com
HP EMEA EG Open Source Technology Strategist http://hpintelco.net
FLOSS projects: http://mondorescue.org http://project-builder.org 
Musique ancienne? http://www.musique-ancienne.org http://www.medieval.org
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Future direction

[Gobeille, Robert]

Hi Mike,
Thanks for this information.  What the project needs is:

1) A public FOSSology instance (if Matt at UNO wants to move this off their 
server).
2) A package build/test infrastructure.  We build packages for several distros 
and distro versions, and currently use VM’s at HP to test them.
3) A test instance that is fairly large to identify performance problems at 
scale.  Our current test machine has a 154 GB database and a repository that is 
almost 2TB.

The fossology.org http://fossology.org/ website could certainly be moved if 
the team sees and advantage to do so.  Currently, fossology.org 
http://fossology.org/ is using an old version of redmine at OSUOSL.  Redmine 
has a great issue tracker but the team decided to move to github’s rather 
primitive issue tracker in order to integrate better with our source on github. 
 So all we are really making use of is the wiki, forum, and a place to put our 
nightly builds and release packages and tarball.

Bob

 On Apr 30, 2015, at 12:34 PM, Mike Dolan mdo...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
 
 Hi Bob, we actually do host project sites… this is something we could 
 certainly discuss. Is the desire to host the fossology.org 
 http://fossology.org/ website or a public FOSSology instance? We host 
 plenty of workgroup sites like spdx.org http://spdx.org/, diamon.org 
 http://diamon.org/, and all of our CP sites. We also have wiki and mailing 
 list infrastructure most of our projects leverage.
 
 We can take this offline if this is of interest to figure out the details. 
 I’m happy to help where we can.
 
 — Mike
 
 ---
 Mike Dolan
 Sr. Director of Strategic Programs, The Linux Foundation
 Office: +1.330.460.3250   Cell: +1.440.552.5322  Skype: michaelkdolan
 Email / Google Talk: mdo...@linuxfoundation.org 
 mailto:mdo...@linuxfoundation.org
 ---
 
 On Apr 30, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Gobeille, Robert bob.gobei...@hp.com 
 mailto:bob.gobei...@hp.com wrote:
 
 Hi Matt,
 Both the Linux Foundation and the Software Freedom Conservancy have 
 expressed a willingness to accept FOSSology.  But neither offers hosting.  
 Our only hosting is from OSUOSL, which hosts fossology.org 
 http://fossology.org/ and GitHub https://github.com/fossology/fossology 
 https://github.com/fossology/fossology for our development.  We haven’t 
 approached anyone about hosting a public FOSSology instance like you are 
 doing at https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu 
 https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu/ and 
 https://fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu 
 https://fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu/
 
 Thanks,
 Bob
 
 
 On Apr 30, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Matt Germonprez germonp...@gmail.com 
 mailto:germonp...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Bob, 
 
 Thanks for bringing this back up. Do you (or anyone) have any insights 
 about current discussions? Have any doors closed? Any opened? Expressed 
 interest in hosting? I have a lot of interest in how this plays out but 
 feel a bit in the dark. 
 
 Thanks, 
 Matt 
 
 
 On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM Gobeille, Robert bob.gobei...@hp.com 
 mailto:bob.gobei...@hp.com wrote:
 Hi Everyone,
 
 Several months back I brought up the idea of putting FOSSology under an 
 open source foundation.  This caused my employer, HP, to give some thought 
 as to how this might reflect on the company since some people think of 
 FOSSology as an HP project.   I’ve always run FOSSology as a truly open 
 project, not an HP project, and HP fully embraces this.  So to be 100% 
 clear on the idea of a move to a foundation, or any other FOSSology issue, 
 these decisions are completely community driven and any decisions made by 
 me as the project founder are 100% my own.
 
 I’ve been preoccupied by other issues but if anyone wants to pursue putting 
 the project under an open source foundation, please feel free to restart 
 the discussion.  As always, if you want to influence the future direction 
 of FOSSology, get involved.
 
 Thanks,
 Bob Gobeille
 FOSSology Founder
 b...@fossology.org mailto:b...@fossology.org
 ___
 fossology mailing list
 fossology@lists.fossology.org mailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology 
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
 
 ___
 Fossology-devel mailing list
 fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org 
 mailto:fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology-devel
 

___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Volunteer?

[Gobeille, Robert]

Hi Ryan,
I’ll contact you off list.  Thanks for volunteering.

Bob Gobeille


 On Mar 22, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Arnold, Ryan rarn...@qti.qualcomm.com wrote:
 
 Good morning,
  
 My name is Ryan Arnold, and I am a Software Quality Analyst (project 
 management) on Qualcomm’s Software Analysis and Scan Team (SAST). I 
 understand that there is the need for someone to maintain meeting minutes for 
 the FOSSOlogy project? If so, I’d like to volunteer. Please let me know if 
 there are any other opportunities as well. Thank you for your consideration.
  
 Kind regards,
  
 Ryan Andrew Arnold
 Sr.Q.A.
 QCT SAST
 Phone:  (858) 651-8432
 Cell: (619) 990-5049
 ___
 fossology mailing list
 fossology@lists.fossology.org
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user id/pwd of fossology

[Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS)]

Hi Kotrappa,

Please apply this patch 
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/commit/77c51dceb51991252e995a11a204bda3ab4aec92#diff-8a4d83510c38b443084833a2de2e6aaa
 to your  /usr/{local}/share/fossology/lib/php/common-auth.php in  2.6.1 
fossology, then test again. Hope it is helpful.
-Larry

From: kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com [mailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 12:12 PM
To: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org; ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
Subject: Re: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology


​Hello Lary,



Thanks for the reply.

No, the issue is still the same.



Best regards

Kotrappa.


From: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS) 
yao-bin@hp.commailto:yao-bin@hp.com
Sent: 16 March 2015 09:17
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Kotrappa,

Sorry for the late response, I was in a long FTO during the last month, have 
you got the issues fixed in this thread?

-Larry

From: kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.commailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com 
[mailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 8:11 PM
To: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.commailto:ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hello Lary,

Please find reply to your questions.

Before you run cp2foss ./upload , please make sure the current user has the 
permission to read .fossology.rc and set the correct user and password in 
.fossology.rc
I run commands with root login, hence I think there is no issues here.

If still fail, please paste the error message.
Please find attached error message, and other details.

Which version of fossology are you using? OS?
2.6.1, Ubuntu 13.10 OS.

Are you able to run cp2foss –user fossy –passworf fossy ./upload?
Yes, No issues here.


Best regards
Kotrappa.



From: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS) [mailto:yao-bin@hp.com]
Sent: 03 February 2015 08:36
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Kotrappa,

Before you run cp2foss ./upload , please make sure the current user has the 
permission to read .fossology.rc and set the correct user and password in 
.fossology.rc
If still fail, please paste the error message.
Which version of fossology are you using? OS?
Are you able to run cp2foss –user fossy –passworf fossy ./upload?

-Larry
From: kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.commailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com 
[mailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 5:38 PM
To: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.commailto:ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Lary

I placed the .fossology.rc with following changes  suggested by you in 
/home/fossy , /home/login_user , / and current directory where my automated 
script executes, but no luck.

Regards
Kotrappa.

From: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS) [mailto:yao-bin@hp.com]
Sent: 30 January 2015 08:10
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Kotrappa,

We are sorry for that, please try the blow again:
user=fossy
password=fossy

will fix soon.
-Larry

From: fossology [mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On Behalf Of 
kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.commailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:34 PM
To: Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.commailto:ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
Subject: [FOSSology] fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file 
with user id/pwd of fossology

Hello Bob,

Fossology commands does not recognize the fossology user id/password if 
.fossology.rc file is placed in /home/login_user or /  or current directory
Please let us know if any other way.
I want to bypass 

Re: [FOSSology] fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user id/pwd of fossology

[kotrappa.devershetty]

Hello Lary,

I was in root login when I execute fossology commands, and I missed placing 
.fossology.rc in /root.
Now it works without this patch.

One more issue is, if I am in some user login say /home/wipro and I execute 
fossology commands, I get a message “ You must be in group “fossy””.
Why is this restriction ?

Do we need to create login user called “fossy” mandatorily ?


Best regards
Kotrappa.



From: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS) [mailto:yao-bin@hp.com]
Sent: 17 March 2015 14:31
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org; Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi 
Tech)
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Kotrappa,

Please apply this patch 
https://github.com/fossology/fossology/commit/77c51dceb51991252e995a11a204bda3ab4aec92#diff-8a4d83510c38b443084833a2de2e6aaa
 to your  /usr/{local}/share/fossology/lib/php/common-auth.php in  2.6.1 
fossology, then test again. Hope it is helpful.
-Larry

From: kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.commailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com 
[mailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 12:12 PM
To: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.commailto:ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
Subject: Re: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology


​Hello Lary,



Thanks for the reply.

No, the issue is still the same.



Best regards

Kotrappa.


From: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS) 
yao-bin@hp.commailto:yao-bin@hp.com
Sent: 16 March 2015 09:17
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Kotrappa,

Sorry for the late response, I was in a long FTO during the last month, have 
you got the issues fixed in this thread?

-Larry

From: kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.commailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com 
[mailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 8:11 PM
To: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.commailto:ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hello Lary,

Please find reply to your questions.

Before you run cp2foss ./upload , please make sure the current user has the 
permission to read .fossology.rc and set the correct user and password in 
.fossology.rc
I run commands with root login, hence I think there is no issues here.

If still fail, please paste the error message.
Please find attached error message, and other details.

Which version of fossology are you using? OS?
2.6.1, Ubuntu 13.10 OS.

Are you able to run cp2foss –user fossy –passworf fossy ./upload?
Yes, No issues here.


Best regards
Kotrappa.



From: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS) [mailto:yao-bin@hp.com]
Sent: 03 February 2015 08:36
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Kotrappa,

Before you run cp2foss ./upload , please make sure the current user has the 
permission to read .fossology.rc and set the correct user and password in 
.fossology.rc
If still fail, please paste the error message.
Which version of fossology are you using? OS?
Are you able to run cp2foss –user fossy –passworf fossy ./upload?

-Larry
From: kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.commailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com 
[mailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 5:38 PM
To: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.commailto:ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Lary

I placed the .fossology.rc with following changes  suggested by you in 
/home/fossy , /home/login_user , / and current directory where my automated 
script executes, but no luck.

Regards
Kotrappa.

From: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS) [mailto:yao-bin@hp.com]
Sent: 30 January 2015 08:10
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)

Re: [FOSSology] fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user id/pwd of fossology

[kotrappa.devershetty]

​Hello Lary,


Thanks for the reply.

No, the issue is still the same.


Best regards

Kotrappa.


From: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS) yao-bin@hp.com
Sent: 16 March 2015 09:17
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org; Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi 
Tech)
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Kotrappa,

Sorry for the late response, I was in a long FTO during the last month, have 
you got the issues fixed in this thread?

-Larry

From: kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com [mailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 8:11 PM
To: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org; ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hello Lary,

Please find reply to your questions.

Before you run cp2foss ./upload , please make sure the current user has the 
permission to read .fossology.rc and set the correct user and password in 
.fossology.rc
I run commands with root login, hence I think there is no issues here.

If still fail, please paste the error message.
Please find attached error message, and other details.

Which version of fossology are you using? OS?
2.6.1, Ubuntu 13.10 OS.

Are you able to run cp2foss –user fossy –passworf fossy ./upload?
Yes, No issues here.


Best regards
Kotrappa.



From: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS) [mailto:yao-bin@hp.com]
Sent: 03 February 2015 08:36
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Kotrappa,

Before you run cp2foss ./upload , please make sure the current user has the 
permission to read .fossology.rc and set the correct user and password in 
.fossology.rc
If still fail, please paste the error message.
Which version of fossology are you using? OS?
Are you able to run cp2foss –user fossy –passworf fossy ./upload?

-Larry
From: kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.commailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com 
[mailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 5:38 PM
To: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.commailto:ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Lary

I placed the .fossology.rc with following changes  suggested by you in 
/home/fossy , /home/login_user , / and current directory where my automated 
script executes, but no luck.

Regards
Kotrappa.

From: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS) [mailto:yao-bin@hp.com]
Sent: 30 January 2015 08:10
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
Subject: RE: fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user 
id/pwd of fossology

Hi Kotrappa,

We are sorry for that, please try the blow again:
user=fossy
password=fossy

will fix soon.
-Larry

From: fossology [mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On Behalf Of 
kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.commailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:34 PM
To: Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.commailto:ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
Subject: [FOSSology] fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file 
with user id/pwd of fossology

Hello Bob,

Fossology commands does not recognize the fossology user id/password if 
.fossology.rc file is placed in /home/login_user or /  or current directory
Please let us know if any other way.
I want to bypass giving user id/password when executing fossology command like 
cp2foss, fo_nomos_license_list, fo_copyright_list etc.
The contents of .fossology.rc are like this
--
$ cat .fossology.rc
username=fossy
password=fossy
--
Thanks  Regards
Kotrappa.
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no 

Re: [FOSSology] fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user id/pwd of fossology

[Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS)]

Hi Kotrappa,

We are sorry for that, please try the blow again:
user=fossy
password=fossy

will fix soon.
-Larry

From: fossology [mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On Behalf Of 
kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:34 PM
To: Gobeille, Robert
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org; ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
Subject: [FOSSology] fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file 
with user id/pwd of fossology

Hello Bob,

Fossology commands does not recognize the fossology user id/password if 
.fossology.rc file is placed in /home/login_user or /  or current directory
Please let us know if any other way.
I want to bypass giving user id/password when executing fossology command like 
cp2foss, fo_nomos_license_list, fo_copyright_list etc.
The contents of .fossology.rc are like this
--
$ cat .fossology.rc
username=fossy
password=fossy
--
Thanks  Regards
Kotrappa.
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] fossology Digest, Vol 84, Issue 14

[Venkata Krishna Penmatsa]

Hi Raino,

Can you please check the owner for the spdx tables that are created in the
fossology database. The owner should be fossy. Also, can you please send me
the log file for more info.

Thanks,
Venkata K Penmatsa,
Open Communities Research Lab,
University of Nebraska at Omaha.
On Nov 25, 2014 9:47 AM, fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org wrote:

 Send fossology mailing list submissions to
 fossology@lists.fossology.org

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org

 You can reach the person managing the list at
 fossology-ow...@lists.fossology.org

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of fossology digest...


 Today's Topics:

1. SPDX module cannot access database
   (raino.lintula...@elektrobit.com)
2. Re: SPDX module cannot access database (Meier, Roger)
3. Re: SPDX module cannot access database (Gobeille, Robert)
4. Re: SPDX module cannot access database (Matt Germonprez)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:00:12 +
 From: raino.lintula...@elektrobit.com
 To: fossology@lists.fossology.org
 Subject: [FOSSology] SPDX module cannot access database
 Message-ID: F26E913A73C5F8478AA637FC208190F921DC448F@fioules001
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 Hi,
 I installed SPDX module to fossology-2.6.1 but it cannot access data base.
 The error I got is:
 Could not connect to FOSSology database.
 permission denied for configuration file.

 License agents can access database normally. Any idea what
 could cause this?

 br Raino




 
 Please note: This e-mail may contain confidential information
 intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this
 e-mail in error, please do not disclose it to anyone, notify
 the sender promptly, and delete the message from your system.
 Thank you.

 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 http://lists.fossology.org/pipermail/fossology/attachments/20141125/b186b26f/attachment-0001.html
 

 --

 Message: 2
 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:12:21 +
 From: Meier, Roger r.me...@siemens.com
 To: raino.lintula...@elektrobit.com
 raino.lintula...@elektrobit.com, fossology@lists.fossology.org
 fossology@lists.fossology.org
 Subject: Re: [FOSSology] SPDX module cannot access database
 Message-ID:
 
 7b43e01f5906f9448bf8baacd5d26b38249...@denbgat9eh2msx.ww902.siemens.net

 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

 I hope that the SPDX plugin will be contributed to the FOSSology project
 and issues like this will never happen again.
 -roger

 From: fossology [mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On Behalf
 Of raino.lintula...@elektrobit.com
 Sent: Dienstag, 25. November 2014 16:00
 To: fossology@lists.fossology.org
 Subject: [FOSSology] SPDX module cannot access database

 Hi,
 I installed SPDX module to fossology-2.6.1 but it cannot access data base.
 The error I got is:
 Could not connect to FOSSology database.
 permission denied for configuration file.

 License agents can access database normally. Any idea what
 could cause this?

 br Raino





 

 Please note: This e-mail may contain confidential information

 intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this

 e-mail in error, please do not disclose it to anyone, notify

 the sender promptly, and delete the message from your system.

 Thank you.
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 http://lists.fossology.org/pipermail/fossology/attachments/20141125/1285cc69/attachment-0001.html
 

 --

 Message: 3
 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:45:02 -0700
 From: Gobeille, Robert bob.gobei...@hp.com
 To: Meier, Roger r.me...@siemens.com, Matt Germonprez
 germonp...@gmail.com
 Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org fossology@lists.fossology.org,
 raino.lintula...@elektrobit.com raino.lintula...@elektrobit.com
 
 Subject: Re: [FOSSology] SPDX module cannot access database
 Message-ID: a2e9d9fb-1535-4e42-84e2-2564cc548...@hp.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

 Yes, we have on our list to bring the SPDX module into our master tree.
 Raino, where did you download the SPDX module from?  It looks like the
 link I have:
 http://spdxhub.ist.unomaha.edu/index.php 
 http://spdxhub.ist.unomaha.edu/index.php
 is no longer correct.  There is only a putty-src.zip there.

 Matt, can you help?

 Thanks,
 Bob Gobeille



  On Nov 25, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Meier, Roger r.me...@siemens.com wrote:
 
  I hope that the SPDX plugin will be contributed to the 

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

[Raino.Lintulampi]

Hi all,
change is always difficult and my first feeling was of course a worry how this 
good 
work can continue. But on the other hand this is a very natural move. When I 
have 
given presentations about FOSSology one question has been asked several times - 
what is the benefit for HP. Now it seems that the benefit is not big enough 
anymore. 
However, lot of new users and contributors have come during recent years and 
the 
community is stronger than ever, therefore I'm convinced there will be interest 
to maintain 
and develop FOSSology whatever the new home will be. That said, it will be very 
challenging 
to keep the same quality of work that the HP team has done during past years.

I cannot comment pros and cons for LinuxFoundation or Software Freedom 
Conservancy 
hosting FOSSology, although I agree Oliver's comment on LinuxFoundation's 
compliance
projects. But I'm sure that LinuxFoundation has not said do not update your 
project. 
Anyway Mr. Kuhn's comment ...home that regularly uses FOSSology might make 
sense
makes sense also to me. Nevertheless the challenges in this transition will be 
elsewhere than who is hosting the project.

Best regards
Raino



Please note: This e-mail may contain confidential information
intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please do not disclose it to anyone, notify
the sender promptly, and delete the message from your system.
Thank you.

___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

[Richard Schmitt]

I think what we need is a list of pro's and con's to both.

Does Linux Foundation charge?  Software Conservancy requests 10% of 
contributions.

I don't have a strong opinion either way, just a small opinion.  I like the 
Linux Foundation because it's fairly aligned with much of what Freescale is 
doing.   The Yocto project is a collaborative project with LF.

It would be good to have something more then a gut feeling to go on though.  

Rich  

-Original Message-
From: Fossology-devel [mailto:fossology-devel-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On 
Behalf Of raino.lintula...@elektrobit.com
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 7:32 AM
To: fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology-devel] [FOSSology] Conservancy as a possible home for 
Fossology

Hi all,
change is always difficult and my first feeling was of course a worry how this 
good work can continue. But on the other hand this is a very natural move. When 
I have given presentations about FOSSology one question has been asked several 
times - what is the benefit for HP. Now it seems that the benefit is not big 
enough anymore. 
However, lot of new users and contributors have come during recent years and 
the community is stronger than ever, therefore I'm convinced there will be 
interest to maintain and develop FOSSology whatever the new home will be. That 
said, it will be very challenging to keep the same quality of work that the HP 
team has done during past years.

I cannot comment pros and cons for LinuxFoundation or Software Freedom 
Conservancy hosting FOSSology, although I agree Oliver's comment on 
LinuxFoundation's compliance projects. But I'm sure that LinuxFoundation has 
not said do not update your project. 
Anyway Mr. Kuhn's comment ...home that regularly uses FOSSology might make 
sense
makes sense also to me. Nevertheless the challenges in this transition will be 
elsewhere than who is hosting the project.

Best regards
Raino



Please note: This e-mail may contain confidential information intended solely 
for the addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, please do not 
disclose it to anyone, notify the sender promptly, and delete the message from 
your system.
Thank you.

___
Fossology-devel mailing list
fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology-devel
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

[Gobeille, Robert]

Hi Richard,

First I’ll go over why I would like FOSSology to be under a foundation.  In a 
nutshell I want to do everything I can to make FOSSology self sustaining.  Then 
I’ll start a comparison between the Linux Foundation and the Software Freedom 
Conservancy.  I hope others help me fill this out.  Keep in mind, I don’t feel 
that a foundation is necessary.  I feel it is beneficial.  Here is my personal 
order of importance and a very subjective score:

1) Asset ownership.  Somebody should own the trademark and domain.  I think 
having this under a foundation is a good idea for FOSSology.  I think this is a 
good enough reason by itself to put FOSSology under a foundation.  (score LF: 
10, SFC: 10)

2) Ability to accept donations.  This gets back to 1) Assets ownership because 
if donations are made there should be an organization to accept them.  Does 
FOSSology have any potential to bring in donations?  I don’t know.  We have a 
lot of big (and small) companies using FOSSology.  I would like to think we are 
worth something to them.  It is a lot easier for companies to donate to an 
organization than to an individual.  What if someone donates a testing server, 
or conference travel, AWS time, … anything.  Also, if I’m going to continue 
being the project leader, I need funding.  That either comes from donations or 
someone needs to hire me.  Of course, someone else could step up to be the 
project leader, or the project can do without one.   LF is only set up to 
handle large donations, SFC will handle any size donation (Score LF:8, SFC:10)

3) Lowering barriers to contributions is very important.  I don’t know that 
this has been a problem in the past or if we will get any more contributions 
under a foundation.  But I do think it helps sell the idea when a potential 
contributor says they want to contribute to a LF project or a Conservancy 
project.  I think that gives the project some immediate credibility, especially 
with those who don’t know how fair, open and dedicated to free software we are. 
(Score LF:10, SFC: 10)

4) Being able to tap into other projects under the foundation for best 
practices.  For this the foundation should have other projects with the size 
and scope of FOSSology. (Score LF: 0, SFC: 10)

5) Create a governing body so that FOSSology isn’t run by a single person.  A 
single leader may be great, or they may not be.  I think having a board of say 
3 people from 3 different companies/projects/individuals is a superior 
solution.  This may seem odd for such a small project but it spreads the burden 
of leadership and gets more people invested.  We don’t need a foundation to 
create a governing body but I think it helps because without a foundation 
pushing this, people are happy with the status quo.  (Score LF: 5, SFC: 10)

I also feel that the foundation should be transparent and accessible.  (Score 
LF: 1, SFC: 10)

It is also important to me that the foundation “want us”. Bradley has 
emphasized SFC’s desire to have us as a project.  LF has evaluated our project 
and it fits well enough with their goals.  Given that and the recommendation by 
HP, which is a Platinum sponsor of LF, they are willing to take us on.  (Score 
LF:1, SFC: 10)

Here is my take on these two foundations:

Linux Foundation
———
- A trade association
- Projects are on the level of industry consortiums.  Yocto, SPDX, LSB, 
OpenDaylight, Automotive Grade Linux, etc.  (see 
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups)
- They say they use FOSSology.
- Accepts donations but set up for the $1000 and up size donations.  They don’t 
feel small donations are worth the overhead.
- Excellent marketing machine and conference organizers.
- Fraction of donations used for overhead is decided on a project by project 
basis (not transparent).
- Little if any project advisory role.
- Difficult to get questions answered.
- Well respected and known.

Software Freedom Conservancy
—
- US non-profit 501c(3)
- Projects are at the FOSS project level.   Samba, Busybox, Boost, Git, 
Mercurial, phpMyAdmin, OpenChange, Selenium, Sugar Labs, Wine, …  (see 
https://sfconservancy.org/members/current/)
- Uses FOSSology
- Accepts all donations 
- Public talks may include a mention of FOSSology which is very valuable since 
it is from the perspective of a knowledgeable user.  But there is no marketing 
machine or conference organization.  Marketing is up to the fossology project.
- Administrative costs are transparent (10% of donations)
- Services are transparent (https://sfconservancy.org/members/services/)
- Provides basic legal and project advice

Corrections and additions are encouraged and welcome.

I’m very thankful to HP for allowing me to open source FOSSology and for being 
FOSSology’s sustaining sponsor for so long.

Thanks,
Bob Gobeille




 On Nov 24, 2014, at 7:09 AM, Richard Schmitt richard.schm...@freescale.com 
 wrote:
 
 I think what we need is a list of pro's and con's to both.
 

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

[Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS)]

Hi All,

From the this discussion, I pay more attention to this comment from Oliver 
below, because I have the same feeling with Oliver, from my perspective, the 
primary thing we should consider is continue this tool after the change.
That is the most important metric.
The LinuxFoundation is a very powerful organization and has already the open 
compliance program but when looking at the program all tools provided seem to 
be dead and the only thing which is still alive is the SPDX effort. (I do 
not speak about the tools which are listed there under  Other Open Source 
Compliance Tools, those are very alive). This is only my impression (which 
can be wrong).

-Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Fossology-devel [mailto:fossology-devel-boun...@lists.fossology.org]
 On Behalf Of Gobeille, Robert
 Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 7:27 AM
 To: Richard Schmitt
 Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org; fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org
 Subject: Re: [FOSSology-devel] [FOSSology] Conservancy as a possible home
 for Fossology
 
 Hi Richard,
 
 First I’ll go over why I would like FOSSology to be under a foundation.  In a
 nutshell I want to do everything I can to make FOSSology self sustaining.
 Then I’ll start a comparison between the Linux Foundation and the Software
 Freedom Conservancy.  I hope others help me fill this out.  Keep in mind, I
 don’t feel that a foundation is necessary.  I feel it is beneficial.  Here is 
 my
 personal order of importance and a very subjective score:
 
 1) Asset ownership.  Somebody should own the trademark and domain.  I
 think having this under a foundation is a good idea for FOSSology.  I think 
 this
 is a good enough reason by itself to put FOSSology under a foundation.
 (score LF: 10, SFC: 10)
 
 2) Ability to accept donations.  This gets back to 1) Assets ownership because
 if donations are made there should be an organization to accept them.  Does
 FOSSology have any potential to bring in donations?  I don’t know.  We have
 a lot of big (and small) companies using FOSSology.  I would like to think we
 are worth something to them.  It is a lot easier for companies to donate to an
 organization than to an individual.  What if someone donates a testing server,
 or conference travel, AWS time, … anything.  Also, if I’m going to continue
 being the project leader, I need funding.  That either comes from donations
 or someone needs to hire me.  Of course, someone else could step up to be
 the project leader, or the project can do without one.   LF is only set up to
 handle large donations, SFC will handle any size donation (Score LF:8, SFC:10)
 
 3) Lowering barriers to contributions is very important.  I don’t know that 
 this
 has been a problem in the past or if we will get any more contributions under
 a foundation.  But I do think it helps sell the idea when a potential 
 contributor
 says they want to contribute to a LF project or a Conservancy project.  I 
 think
 that gives the project some immediate credibility, especially with those who
 don’t know how fair, open and dedicated to free software we are. (Score
 LF:10, SFC: 10)
 
 4) Being able to tap into other projects under the foundation for best
 practices.  For this the foundation should have other projects with the size
 and scope of FOSSology. (Score LF: 0, SFC: 10)
 
 5) Create a governing body so that FOSSology isn’t run by a single person.  A
 single leader may be great, or they may not be.  I think having a board of say
 3 people from 3 different companies/projects/individuals is a superior
 solution.  This may seem odd for such a small project but it spreads the
 burden of leadership and gets more people invested.  We don’t need a
 foundation to create a governing body but I think it helps because without a
 foundation pushing this, people are happy with the status quo.  (Score LF: 5,
 SFC: 10)
 
 I also feel that the foundation should be transparent and accessible.  (Score
 LF: 1, SFC: 10)
 
 It is also important to me that the foundation “want us”. Bradley has
 emphasized SFC’s desire to have us as a project.  LF has evaluated our
 project and it fits well enough with their goals.  Given that and the
 recommendation by HP, which is a Platinum sponsor of LF, they are willing to
 take us on.  (Score LF:1, SFC: 10)
 
 Here is my take on these two foundations:
 
 Linux Foundation
 ———
 - A trade association
 - Projects are on the level of industry consortiums.  Yocto, SPDX, LSB,
 OpenDaylight, Automotive Grade Linux, etc.  (see
 http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups)
 - They say they use FOSSology.
 - Accepts donations but set up for the $1000 and up size donations.  They
 don’t feel small donations are worth the overhead.
 - Excellent marketing machine and conference organizers.
 - Fraction of donations used for overhead is decided on a project by project
 basis (not transparent).
 - Little if any project advisory role.
 - Difficult to get questions answered.
 - Well respected and 

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

[Richard Schmitt]

Sorry for showing up  late to the party.  

Whey you say, 'looking for a home', what kind of home are you looking for?  A 
place to host git repos or more?  Why are you looking at 'non-profits'.  Is it 
a mechanism for contributions or something more?

And what does the choice of home mean to contributors?

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Fossology-devel [mailto:fossology-devel-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On 
Behalf Of Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS)
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:27 PM
To: Bradley M. Kuhn; fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org
Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

 -Original Message-
 From: Fossology-devel 
 [mailto:fossology-devel-boun...@lists.fossology.org]
 On Behalf Of Bradley M. Kuhn
 Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 10:42 AM
 To: fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org
 Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org
 Subject: [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for 
 Fossology
 
 Bob wrote earlier today:
  The Linux Foundation [LF] board has approved accepting the FOSSology 
  project.  I am just waiting on my employer (Hewlett Packard) to 
  confirm that we are good  That said, Siemens is now the largest 
  contributor to FOSSology ... I need to make sure Oliver/Michael is 
  ok with that.
 
 While I certainly think that the LF could be a good home for 
 FOSSology, I thought it important to mention that Software Freedom 
 Conservancy ( https://sfconservancy.org ) has also previously offered 
 itself as a potential home for FOSSology.
 
  I expect HP to drop all support for fossology after Oct 31, 2015
 
 In particular, given that HP, per Bob's email, is likely to drop 
 support for FOSSology in less than a year, it's a good time for the 
 FOSSology community to consider where the best non-profit home is for 
 the project, since HP will no longer be its home.
 
 As many of you know, Conservancy uses FOSSology weekly and has been in 
 regular touch with the community for more than five years.  
 Conservancy very much wants FOSSology to thrive, as we find FOSSology 
 extremely valuable and use it regularly in our work [0].  Perhaps a 
 non-profit home that regularly uses FOSSology might make sense.
 
 Furthermore, you may also know that I specifically encouraged Matt 
 Germonprez at UNO to get his students involved with FOSSology, and I 
 helped his students do so during my campus visit there.  Thus, while 
 Conservancy hasn't directly contributed to FOSSology's codebase 
 (frankly, we find it pretty darn good already and are quite happy 
 users), we've already for years been actively encouraging 
 collaboration with and contribution to FOSSology.
 
 Ultimately, the choice of a fiscal sponsor should reflect the needs of 
 the project.  LF's a better choice if your needs are conference 
 organizing and marketing.  But if FOSSology's focus is more along 
 these
 lines: https://sfconservancy.org/members/services/ , then I hope 
 FOSSology's community will consider Conservancy as a potential home.
 
 The main reason I'm posting, though, is: at a time of transition for 
 FOSSology, I want your community to know that you have multiple 
 non-profit options for your next phase -- all with very different service 
 plans and types.
 Conservancy would be delighted to help you sort through the options, 
 *even
 if* it's to help you evaluate your options and ultimately pick 
 something other than Conservancy.  As you know, Conservancy's staff 
 has (collectively) at least 30 years of experience in non-profit FOSS 
 project management.  We've always found that organizing a project into 
 a non-profit home produces great results for a project, so we'd love to make 
 it happen.
 
 Feel free to contact me, publicly or privately, if you'd like to 
 discuss this further.  Whatever you decide to do, we at Conservancy 
 really look forward to FOSSology getting even better in the years to come.
 
 [0] A great example: FOSSology was a huge help recently to Conservancy
 when we were helping our Kallithea project (
 http://kallithea-scm.org/ ) bring in code from other projects
 properly with proper license attribution, etc.
 --
 Bradley M. Kuhn
 President  Distinguished Technologist of Software Freedom Conservancy 
 ___
 Fossology-devel mailing list
 fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology-devel
[Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS)] it seems that Conservancy also  
is a good home.
___
Fossology-devel mailing list
fossology-de...@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology-devel
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

[Bradley M. Kuhn]

Gobeille, Robert wrote a few minutes ago:
 I’ll share with everyone that Conservancy was my personal choice for a
 foundation home [for FOSSology].  I encourage any truly open source project
 in need of a foundation home to consider Conservancy.

Thank you.  That means a lot to us at Conservancy, especially since
we're all fans of FOSSology!  (I think I first started telling
everyone to use FOSSology in all of my talks back in early 2008 or so. :)

 I really appreciate Bradley's welcome, especially if LF turns out to not be
 a good fit for us.

It's not uncommon for Conservancy to assist projects in finding the right
home-fit.  We're the FOSS project governance experts, and, thus, we're
honest with projects about what's seems a right fit and what doesn't. (For
example, we've sometimes recommended that a project would find a better
home elsewhere, and then we've even advocated (successfully)
to third-party orgs to convince those orgs to accept such projects.)

 That said, the success of the FOSSology project is not up to the foundation
 home.  It’s up to us, the developers and users.

I agree with this sentiment: a non-profit home can't assure success of
any FOSS project. But, the wrong non-profit home can sometimes make success
more difficult.  A project's non-profit home often has real influence on who
feels comfortable contributing, and whether contributors perceive themselves
as full-fledged members of a community.  Among many other things, Conservancy
creates for its projects a true neutral ground that puts needs of the
individual developers and users ahead of any specific institution or
for-profit interest.  As a 501(c)(3) charity, this work is particularly apt
for us.


As this thread gets going, I'd be delighted to participate and explain
honestly how Conservancy can help (or maybe *can't* help) with any specific
things that this community seeks from a non-profit home.  More generally, I'd
definitely encourage an open, public discussion with all parties about
this before you make a final decision on FOSSology's new home.

As a starting point in considering what a non-profit might offer you,
Conservancy's services to its member projects are listed at:
 https://sfconservancy.org/members/services/
--
Bradley M. Kuhn
President  Distinguished Technologist of Software Freedom Conservancy
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology 2.6.1 Error on Upload File

[Gobeille, Robert]

wget errors are usually caused by permission or proxy problems.  Was this the 
complete error message?  There should have been additional information above 
that line.


 On Oct 30, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Valerie Duncan 
 valerie.duncan.c...@statefarm.com wrote:
 
 I have just install Fossology 2.6.1 on RHEL6 and submitted an upload from 
 file job.  The job failed with the following error:
  
 Upload failed for file PocketAgent.zip: FATAL wget_agent.c.137: upload 3 
 Failed to import /tmp/phpTShTAU-uploaded from /tmp/phpTShTAU-uploaded into 
 repository gold 
 DEC3B102A0F0E9351767DE1AFB5CE2925F303D94.FDDDE4E12AA5D58C860E7E186B7CD9A2.62216821
  
 Any suggestions on what I should look at to address this error?  I don’t know 
 where to start.
  
 Respectfully,
  
 S.O.
  
  
  
  
 ___
 fossology mailing list
 fossology@lists.fossology.org
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology 2.6.1 Error on Upload File

[Gobeille, Robert]

I should have mentioned to please check your repository permissions.  If you 
click on Admin  Dashboard, it will show you the repository path.  User and 
group fossy should have read/write access.  Also, your web server (www, 
www-data, whatever rhel uses) should be in the fossy group.

 On Oct 30, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Gobeille, Robert bob.gobei...@hp.com wrote:
 
 wget errors are usually caused by permission or proxy problems.  Was this the 
 complete error message?  There should have been additional information above 
 that line.
 
 
 On Oct 30, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Valerie Duncan 
 valerie.duncan.c...@statefarm.com 
 mailto:valerie.duncan.c...@statefarm.com wrote:
 
 I have just install Fossology 2.6.1 on RHEL6 and submitted an upload from 
 file job.  The job failed with the following error:
  
 Upload failed for file PocketAgent.zip: FATAL wget_agent.c.137: upload 3 
 Failed to import /tmp/phpTShTAU-uploaded from /tmp/phpTShTAU-uploaded into 
 repository gold 
 DEC3B102A0F0E9351767DE1AFB5CE2925F303D94.FDDDE4E12AA5D58C860E7E186B7CD9A2.62216821
  
 Any suggestions on what I should look at to address this error?  I don’t 
 know where to start.
  
 Respectfully,
  
 S.O.
  
  
  
  
 ___
 fossology mailing list
 fossology@lists.fossology.org mailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
 
 ___
 fossology mailing list
 fossology@lists.fossology.org
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] fossology Digest, Vol 83, Issue 5

[Venkata Krishna Penmatsa]

Hi Klaus,

As new version of FOSSOlogy(i.e 2.6.1) didn't have template-plugin.php in
template directory. If old SPDX plugin was installed and if it
calls template-plugin.php you will get an error that file or directory not
found.

For the wget issue, please use the below format and let me know your
results:

wget -qO - --no-check-certificate --post-file=./fossology-spdx-master.zip
--timeout=0
https://fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu/?mod=spdx_license_oncenoCopyright=falsejsonOutput=falsefullSPDXFlag=falsepackageNameInLog=fossology-spdx-master.zip



eg: wget -qO - --no-check-certificate --post-file=./test.tar.gz --timeout=0
https://fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu/?mod=spdx_license_oncenoCopyright=falsejsonOutput=falsefullSPDXFlag=falsepackageNameInLog=test.tar.gz

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:28 AM, fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org
wrote:

 Send fossology mailing list submissions to
 fossology@lists.fossology.org

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org

 You can reach the person managing the list at
 fossology-ow...@lists.fossology.org

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of fossology digest...


 Today's Topics:

1. Re: fossology Digest, Vol 83, Issue 3 (Klaus Gmeinwieser)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:55:41 +0100
 From: Klaus Gmeinwieser klaus.gmeinwie...@oce.com
 To: Venkata Krishna Penmatsa vpenma...@unomaha.edu
 Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org
 Subject: Re: [FOSSology] fossology Digest, Vol 83, Issue 3
 Message-ID: 54510dfd.9020...@oce.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; Format=flowed

 Hi Venkata,

 I installed the new spdx version from github on a completely fresh
 installed fossology 2.6.1.

 -- It worked Thank you very very much for the quick help on this :)

 I also was able to generate a 30MB, 60 lines spdx tag file from
 component Wildfly (full package) now, which did NOT timeout (took about
 2h!). This is very good news, but this issue was not taken a look into
 as github just reports a single line to be changed. As all of my
 previous attempts failed, I am astonished about this, but also extremely
 happy. Do you have an idea about the reason, why it works?

 I also tried to use the WEB UI, as this would allow use of SPDX with
 CLI, but this still does not work  - or I made a mistake...?

 I added the wget (debug) output to my test machine, where the latest
 versions of all software is installed
 The process never came back, so I pressed CTRL-C and the last line was
 then printed (the package ngInfiniteScroll is already scanned from
 Fossology and the SPDX Tag file can be successfully generated using a
 webbrowser)

 Maybe you can have a quick look in the log and find my mistake...

 Thank you very much in advance  Best Regards
 Klaus

 Am 28.10.2014 um 16:43 schrieb Venkata Krishna Penmatsa:
  Hi Klaus,
 
  We are very happy that our tool is helping you and your organization in
  their daily activities.
 
  Coming to your problem please make the following changes.
 
  Remove -- require_once($MODDIR/www/ui/template/template-plugin.php);
 from *spdx/ui/output_module/spdx_output_db.php *
  *
  *
  This has been updated in https://github.com/spdx-tools/__fossology-spdx
  https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx .
 
  Please let me know if you have face any issues.
 
  Have a nice day ahead!!
 
  On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:04 AM, fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org
  mailto:fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org wrote:
 
  Send fossology mailing list submissions to
  fossology@lists.fossology.org mailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org
 
  To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
  http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
  or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
  fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org
  mailto:fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org
 
  You can reach the person managing the list at
  fossology-ow...@lists.fossology.org
  mailto:fossology-ow...@lists.fossology.org
 
  When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
  than Re: Contents of fossology digest...
 
 
  Today's Topics:
 
  1. General SPDX Error and also with WEB UI (Klaus Gmeinwieser)
  2. Re: General SPDX Error and also with WEB UI (Gobeille, Robert)
  3. Re: General SPDX Error and also with WEB UI (Matt Germonprez)
 
 
 
  --
 
  Message: 1
  Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:51:44 +0100
  From: Klaus Gmeinwieser klaus.gmeinwie...@oce.com
  mailto:klaus.gmeinwie...@oce.com
  To: fossology@lists.fossology.org

Re: [FOSSology] fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18

[kotrappa.devershetty]

Hi Venkata,

Thanks for the information.

I have one more query. I think following command sends the local file ( 
--post-file =../time-1.7.tar) to webserver, waits for file to be scanned and 
gets .spdx results from the webserver.
Do we have an  option where a big file is already uploaded to fossology server, 
and it has been already scanned, I need to just get the .spdx file results from 
the server by command line?
wget -qO - --no-check-certificate --post-file=./time-1.7.tar --timeout=0 
http://localhost/repo/?mod=spdx_license_oncenoCopyright=falsejsonOutput=falsefullSPDXFlag=falsepackageNameInLog=time-1.7.tar;
  time-1.7.tar.spdx

Best regards
Kotrappa.


From: Venkata Krishna Penmatsa [mailto:vpenma...@unomaha.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 8:26 PM
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
Cc: Matt Germonprez; bob.gobei...@hp.com; Liang Cao; 
fossology@lists.fossology.org; Akanksha Singh (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); 
Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
Subject: Re: fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18

Hi Kotrappa,

The reason is extracted license(the licenses not been defined in SPDX license 
list) is indexed as LicenseRef- in full spdx document.
In your case, you can find No_license_found license is defined as 
LicenseRef-3 in 
ln.347-349@time-1.7_localhost.spdxmailto:ln.347-349@time-1.7_localhost.spdx.

Thanks,
Venkata K Penmatsa
Open Source Research Lab
University of Nebraska

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:25 AM, 
kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.commailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com wrote:
Hi Venkata,

Thanks for information and clarification.

Sorry, there was a mistake in localhost address instead of https, it should be 
http. With https, always connection to localhost failed with wget command.

Now I could get .spdx out put from localhost.
Please find the .spdx and logs files for both [fullSPDXFlag] flag set as true 
and false, but why if fullSPDXFlag set to flase gives .spdx out put with No 
License Found entries for all the files which have license if [fullSPDXFlag] 
is set to true.

Best regards
Kotrappa


From: Venkata Krishna Penmatsa 
[mailto:vpenma...@unomaha.edumailto:vpenma...@unomaha.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 3:07 AM
To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
Cc: Matt Germonprez; bob.gobei...@hp.commailto:bob.gobei...@hp.com; Liang 
Cao; fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org; 
Akanksha Singh (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech); Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - 
Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
Subject: Re: fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18

Hi Kotrappa,

We are looking into the SPDX document output issue and it would really help us 
if you could provide logs while generating the SPDX document.

I would also suggest you to try using 
https://localhost/repo/?mod=spdx_license_oncenoCopyright=truejsonOutput=truefullSPDXFlag=truepackageNameInLog=time-1.7.tar.
 Because the SPDXFlag should be true to generate an SPDX document.

Regarding your other questions:

1. Do you support fossology+spdx module as a package, which is easier to 
upgrade by sudo apt-get command? Instead of everytime manually 
uninstall/installing the module.

This is a great suggestion and one that we have been considering. We will keep 
you posted on any progress in this area and would welcome any support as well.

2. Why fossology+spdx module does not have version information?

Thank you very much for the suggestion and we have updated the version 
information. Please find the VERSION file at: 
https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx
[https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif]

Thanks,
Venkata K Penmatsa
Open Source Research Lab
University of Nebraska at Omaha



On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Liang Cao 
liang...@unomaha.edumailto:liang...@unomaha.edu wrote:

-- Forwarded message --
From: 
fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org
Date: Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:46 AM
Subject: fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18
To: fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org


Send fossology mailing list submissions to
fossology@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology@lists.fossology.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org

You can reach the person managing the list at

fossology-ow...@lists.fossology.orgmailto:fossology-ow...@lists.fossology.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of fossology digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: query regarding fossology+spdx command line support
  (kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.commailto:kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:45:26 +
From: 

Re: [FOSSology] fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18

[Venkata Krishna Penmatsa]

Hi Kotrappa,

The reason is extracted license(the licenses not been defined in SPDX
license list) is indexed as LicenseRef- in full spdx document.
In your case, you can find No_license_found license is defined as
LicenseRef-3 in ln.347-349@time-1.7_localhost.spdx.

Thanks,
Venkata K Penmatsa
Open Source Research Lab
University of Nebraska


On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:25 AM, kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com wrote:

  Hi Venkata,



 Thanks for information and clarification.



 Sorry, there was a mistake in localhost address instead of https, it
 should be http. With https, always connection to localhost failed with wget
 command.



 Now I could get .spdx out put from localhost.

 Please find the .spdx and logs files for both [fullSPDXFlag] flag set as
 true and false, but why if fullSPDXFlag set to flase gives .spdx out put
 with No License Found entries for all the files which have license if
 [fullSPDXFlag] is set to true.



 Best regards

 Kotrappa





 *From:* Venkata Krishna Penmatsa [mailto:vpenma...@unomaha.edu]
 *Sent:* Friday, February 21, 2014 3:07 AM
 *To:* Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
 *Cc:* Matt Germonprez; bob.gobei...@hp.com; Liang Cao;
 fossology@lists.fossology.org; Akanksha Singh (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi
 Tech); Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing  Hi Tech)
 *Subject:* Re: fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18



 Hi Kotrappa,



 We are looking into the SPDX document output issue and it would really
 help us if you could provide logs while generating the SPDX document.



 I would also suggest you to try using 
 *https://localhost/repo/?mod=spdx_license_oncenoCopyright=truejsonOutput=truefullSPDXFlag=truepackageNameInLog=time-1.7.tar
 https://localhost/repo/?mod=spdx_license_oncenoCopyright=truejsonOutput=truefullSPDXFlag=truepackageNameInLog=time-1.7.tar*.
  Because
 the SPDXFlag should be true to generate an SPDX document.



 Regarding your other questions:



 1. Do you support fossology+spdx module as a package, which is easier to
 upgrade by sudo apt-get command? Instead of everytime manually
 uninstall/installing the module.



 This is a great suggestion and one that we have been considering. We will
 keep you posted on any progress in this area and would welcome any support
 as well.



 2. Why fossology+spdx module does not have version information?



 Thank you very much for the suggestion and we have updated the version
 information. Please find the VERSION file at:* 
 https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx
 https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx*



 Thanks,

 Venkata K Penmatsa

 Open Source Research Lab

 University of Nebraska at Omaha







 On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Liang Cao liang...@unomaha.edu wrote:



 -- Forwarded message --
 From: fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org
 Date: Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:46 AM
 Subject: fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18
 To: fossology@lists.fossology.org


 Send fossology mailing list submissions to
 fossology@lists.fossology.org

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 fossology-requ...@lists.fossology.org

 You can reach the person managing the list at
 fossology-ow...@lists.fossology.org

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of fossology digest...


 Today's Topics:

1. Re: query regarding fossology+spdx command line support
   (kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:45:26 +
 From: kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com
 To: germonp...@gmail.com, bob.gobei...@hp.com
 Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org, akanksha.sin...@wipro.com,
 ravishankar.thaga...@wipro.com
 Subject: Re: [FOSSology] query regarding fossology+spdx command line
 support
 Message-ID:
 73bb6caa46de0a4faac1384c20cad58b637e1...@blr-ec-mbx6.wipro.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 Hi Matt,

 Thanks for the information
 I was able to get .spdx output from below command line from
 fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu server.

 wget -qO - --no-check-certificate --post-file=./time-1.7.tar --timeout=0 
 https://fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu/?mod=spdx_license_oncenoCopyright=falsejsonOutput=falsefullSPDXFlag=falsepackageNameInLog=time-1.7.tar;
  time-1.7.tar.spdx

 On fresh Ubuntu 13.10 system, today I installed Fossology 2.4.0, with
 latest SPDX module as available from
 https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx by downloading zip file on
 right hand side of the page. I wanted to try same command as above on
 localhost server,but I did not get any output of spdx in localhost.

 wget -qO - --no-check-certificate --post-file=./time-1.7.tar --timeout=0 
 

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology+SPDX on windows?

[Matt Germonprez]

Hi Kotrappa,

At UNO, we have no current plans for the Windows environment.

Regards,
Matt


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:15 AM, kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com wrote:

  Hi Bob, Matt,



 Do you have plans to support FOSSology tool +SPDX on Windows? Currently I
 understand FOSSology is available only on Linux.



 Best regards

 Kotrappa.

 The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
 to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and
 may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are
 not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy
 this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of
 this message and any attachments.

 WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
 should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
 The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
 transmitted by this email.

 www.wipro.com




-- 
Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor of Information Systems
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Vita http://myweb.unomaha.edu/~mgermonprez/
Open Communities Lab http://ocrl.unomaha.edu/
NSF Grant on Open Communities http://1.usa.gov/17mbd1Z
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] fossology post

[Gobeille, Robert]

 From: SunChul Yoon ys482602...@gmail.com
 Subject: Cannot view the analysis result.
 Date: August 27, 2013 1:56:41 AM MDT
 To: fossol...@fossology.org
 
 
 Dear all,
 
 I'm SW test engineer, and I have to check Open Source.
 
 So, I install Fossology, and run. But, I cannot view the result. (Please, see 
 the attach image)
 
 Environment
 - VMware
 - Ubuntu 12
 - Fossology 2.2,  1.2
 
 Do you know this error?? Plz, let me know;(
 Fossology_error.png

Hello,

The View File screen is showing you the zip file itself, not the archived files 
in the zip file.  It isn't necessarily an error.  It depends how got to this 
screen.  If you clicked on the View option in a fossology browser window, 
then you got the right result.  However, it could also be that the zip file was 
not unpacked.  That would be an error where either the zip file is malformed, 
or for some reason fossology could not unpack it.

The way to check if the zip file was processed normally is, in the top menu, go 
to Jobs  My Recent Jobs.  Find the zip file job and look at the number of 
items unpacked.  If the number of items unpacked is greater than one, then you 
just made a browsing mistake (clicking on View instead of the file name or 
License Browser.   But if the number of items is one, then click on the left 
most link (it's a number) on the ununpack line.  That will bring you to a 
screen titled Show Jobs but with a subheading Geeky Scan Details.  On this 
screen, were there any errors logged?  If so, what?

Thanks,
Bob Gobeille
b...@fossology.org___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology access for Open Source Systems

[Lance Albertson]

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Stangel, Dan dan.stan...@hp.com wrote:

 I think I understand now.  Several years ago, we had planned to run a
 FOSSology repository at OSUOSL, and did make several references to it in
 presentations.  Since then, HP made an outright donation of the cluster
 hardware to OSUOSL, and I'm not sure if OSUOSL currently has any plans
 to run a public FOSSology repository -- that would be totally up to
 them.  However, as Bob noted in a separate email, there is a group at
 the University of Nebraska that is setting up a public FOSSology
 repository.


Long term we plan to try and revive the cluster unfortunately we have
other projects and priorities in front of making that happen. I'm hoping
within 6-9mo we may start working on that again.

-- 
Lance Albertson
Director
Oregon State University | Open Source Lab
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology + Antelink Reporter

[Gobeille, Robert]

Hello Ruben,
I'll take this as a +1 vote to make it easier to add new license signatures.  
That makes one vote so far.  I hope we hear from others.

Until it gets easier (and I hope to hear from enough other users to raise the 
priority) I can give you a few hints:

1. If you send me your licenses and test files (need not be the entire file, 
just the section with the license), I'll update the code for you and release it 
as part of FOSSology.  This way you don't have to maintain your license 
signatures for each fossology release and I'll test to make sure the new 
signature doesn't interfere with previous signatures.

2. When you are testing your new signature, use nomos stand alone, like nomos 
myfile.c and it will print out the license without putting the data in the 
database.

3. In parse.c there is an ifdef commenting out a couple of debug lines.  They 
generate a lot of output to help you determine which signatures were tried and 
which were successful.  Unfortunately, I can't reach my development server 
right now so I can't give you some pointers on what to look for in the output.  
I'll try to create some documentation on our wiki (fossology.org) when I get 
access to my server back.

Thanks for your suggestion.  I hope to hear from others to get a clearer 
picture of our priorities.

Bob Gobeille

On Oct 17, 2012, at 3:53 AM, Stein, Ruben ruben.st...@mevis.fraunhofer.de
 wrote:

 Hello Robert,
 
 if you need some user voices to raise the priorities: here we go!
 
 As a research institute we are working a lot with open source software. To
 improve our awareness and to sort out unwanted license dependencies for
 industry projects, I installed Fossology. The tool itself is very helpful
 to identify the hot-spots. It got difficult after I wanted the unknown
 license chunk of files to get smaller.
 
 First of all it was difficult to add new license RegExes at all, since I
 needed changes in the STRINGS.IN, which is not documented in a really good
 fashion, as well as code changes in the agent. It was a real pain to debug
 the new regexes, since every change in STRINGS.IN caused a time consuming
 generation process by the make file of the agent.
 Then, after I finally managed adding my regexes I tried them on real data
 with Fossology. The missing highlighting of matches makes debugging new
 regexes appear like some kind of quiz game. After I then managed to find
 the issue, rescheduling the new agent with prior removing of old results
 via SQL console was also very uncomfortable.
 
 In general I think the whole workflow of adding custom search expressions
 or adjusting existing ones is by far too complicated. What I thought of
 was some kind of scripting-language agent which passes all the evaluation
 work to a python? script which then can react directly on definition
 changes of a user-frontend. The resulting performance would be sufficient
 for many smaller searches we are performing at our site.
 
 So - since I think I am still at the beginning of using Fossology, please
 point out everything I might have missed.
 
 Regards, Ruben
 
 -- 
 Dipl.-Inf. Ruben Stein
 Software Developer
 
 Fraunhofer MEVIS
 Institute for Medical Image Computing
 Universitätsallee 29
 28359 Bremen, Germany
 
 http://www.mevis.fraunhofer.de
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Gobeille, Robert bob.gobei...@hp.com
 Date: Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2012 22:50
 To: Deveaud, Marion marion.deve...@siemens.com
 Cc: fossol...@fossology.org fossol...@fossology.org
 Subject: Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology + Antelink Reporter
 
 Hello Marion,
 Right now we are just trying to gauge the interest in a FOSSology -
 Antepedia plugin.  So we haven't talked about information exchange
 formats.
 
 Highlighting license signatures is something I'd dearly love to have.
 Unfortunately, the way the code was written makes this difficult.
 Another thing I'd like to have is a way to add signatures that doesn't
 require recompiling the code and makes it easy for users to build a
 private signature library.  This is also difficult with the current code.
 Hearing from users is what we need to raise the priority of doing this.
 
 You are right that we are planning on doing something with SPDX.  In
 2.2.0 we plan to synchronize our license names with SPDX and add licenses
 in SPDX that are not in FOSSology.  If making small changes to the
 license names is going to cause any grief, I sure hope people speak up.
 Also on the SPDX front, our friends at the University of Nebraska, Omaha
 are currently working on an SPDX plugin (thank you Matt Germonprez and
 Liang Cao!).
 
 Thank you so much for your input!
 
 Bob Gobeille
 
 On Oct 16, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Deveaud, Marion
 marion.deve...@siemens.com
 wrote:
 
 Dear Robert,
 
 I think it is a good idea to integrate FOSSology into a bigger software
 analysis framework. The FOSSology plugin is a great benefit for
 Antepedia users working in companies where license compliance is of
 prime importance. Both projects

Re: [FOSSology] fossology 2.0 install on RHEL 6

[Bob Gobeille]

I hit send a bit too quickly.  I meant to add that on rpm systems the packages 
are p7zip and p7zip-plugins.  On debian/ubuntu systems they are p7zip and 
p7zip-full

Bob

On Jul 11, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Bob Gobeille wrote:

 Hi Leslie,
 I don't know of any package called P8zip.  I think you mean p7zip.  Can you 
 not find p7zip or were you really looking for p8zip?   If our docs say p8zip 
 somewhere could you let us know where so we can fix it?
 
 Bob
 
 On Jul 11, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Haynes, Leslie D wrote:
 
 Hi,
  
 I am having trouble locating the package: p8zip .  I’m trying to install on 
 RHEL 6.3.  P8zip is listed as a dependency for fossology at runtime.
  
 Thanks,
  
 Leslie D. Haynes
 Lockheed Martin MS2
 Telephone (856) 359-1421
 Email: leslie.d.hay...@lmco.com
  
 ___
 fossology mailing list
 fossology@lists.fossology.org
 http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
 

___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] fossology 2.0

[Haynes, Leslie D]

Will fossology 2.0 install on RedHat 5.8?  I'm having a difficult time finding 
several of the dependency packages needed specifically (p8zip and file-libs).

Please let me know.

Thanks,


Leslie D. Haynes
Lockheed Martin MS2
Telephone (856) 359-1421
Email: leslie.d.hay...@lmco.com

___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology redirects

[Laser, Mary]

Thank you Martin!

 -Original Message-
 From: Michlmayr, Martin
 Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:14 AM
 To: Laser, Mary
 Subject: FOSSology redirects
 
 Hi Mary,
 
 I put in the following FOSSology redirects after checking the error
 log for common requests for the old web page.  Let me know if there
 are any problems.
 
 /about_us
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Introduction_to_FOSSol
 ogy
 /contact_us http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Contact_Us
 /contributing
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Contributing
 /debian_install
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Debian_Install_2_0
 /download
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Subversion_Download
 /feed.php http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/activity.atom
 /foss-scheduler http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Foss-
 scheduler_Pre-20
 /frequently_asked_questions
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Quest
 ions
 /home http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology
 /how_to_browse_the_data-base
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/How_to_Browse_the_Data
 -Base
 /how_to_create_a_new_release
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/How_to_create_a_new_re
 lease
 /how_to_create_an_agent
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/How_To_Create_An_Agent
 /i18n http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/I18n
 /install http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Install_2_0
 /legal_info http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Legal_Info
 /links_-_related_projects
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Links_-
 _Related_Projects
 /nomos_liclist http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Nomos
 /overview_of_the_user_interface
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Overview_of_the_User_I
 nterface
 /project_team
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Project_Team
 /release_notes
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Release_Notes
 /rest_api http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/REST_API
 /roadmap http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/roadmap
 /symbolic_alignment_matrix
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Symbolic_Alignment_Mat
 rix
 /sysadmin_documentation
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Sysadmin_Documentation
 /task_list http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Task_List
 /ubuntu_install
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Ubuntu_Install_2_0
 /unit_test_guidelines
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/Testing_FOSSology
 /user_documentation
 http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/User_Documentation
 /v2.0 http://www.fossology.org/versions/show/3
 
 --
 Martin Michlmayr
 Open Source Program Office, Hewlett-Packard
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@lists.fossology.org
http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology