Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Gimp 2.0 difficulties

2004-03-22 Thread Michael Schumacher
 under sane-frontends
 
 ./doc/xscanimage.man
 ./src/xscanimage-gimp-1_0-compat.h
 ./src/xscanimage.c
 Is this what you wanted?

xscanimage is not XSane.

HTH,
Michael

-- 
The GIMP (deutsch): http://www.gimp.de 

+++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÜV-geprüfter Virenschutz +++
100% Virenerkennung nach Wildlist. Infos: http://www.gmx.net/virenschutz

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Script-fu problem -- how to load an image

2004-03-22 Thread Norbert Preining
Hello!

Gimp version 2.0pre4 (debian/sid gimp1.3 1.3.27+2.0pre4)

I am trying to extend one of my scripts from an old version but cannot
get gimp-file-load to work:

Here the script:
(define (script-fu-fileload filein)
   (gimp-message-set-handler 1)
   ; Create an img and a layer
   (gimp-message 1)
   (gimp-message filein)
   (set! my-image (gimp-file-load 1 filein filein))
   (gimp-message 2))

(script-fu-register script-fu-fileload
  Toolbox/Script-Fu/Norb/fileload
  Testscript
  Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Norbert Preining
  2004.03.17
  
  SF-FILENAME filein ./dummy.tiff)


But I cannot get it to run without error:
$ gimp --no-data -i --verbose -b '(script-fu-fileload \test.tif\)
This is a development version of The GIMP.
Debug messages may appear here.

INIT: gimp_load_config
Parsing '/etc/gimp/1.3/gimprc'
Parsing '/home/norbert/.gimp-1.3/gimprc'
gimp_composite: use=yes, verbose=no
supported by gimp_composite: +mmx +sse -sse2 -3dnow -altivec -vis
INIT: gimp_initialize
INIT: gimp_real_initialize
INIT: gimp_restore
INIT: gimp_real_restore
Starting extension: 'extension_script_fu'
script-fu: 1

script-fu: test2.jpg

batch command: experienced an execution error.



Also, when I give the full pathname to test.tif (which exits) it doesn't
work.

No idea why, but maybe someone can help me!

Best wishes and thanks for all your help

Norbert

---
Norbert Preining preining AT logic DOT at Technische Universität Wien
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094  fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
---
QUERRIN (n.)
A person that no one has ever heard of who unaccountably manages to
make a living writing prefaces.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Script-fu problem -- how to load an image

2004-03-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I am trying to extend one of my scripts from an old version but cannot
 get gimp-file-load to work:
 
 Here the script:
 (define (script-fu-fileload filein)
(gimp-message-set-handler 1)
; Create an img and a layer
(gimp-message 1)
(gimp-message filein)
(set! my-image (gimp-file-load 1 filein filein))
(gimp-message 2))
 
 (script-fu-register script-fu-fileload
   Toolbox/Script-Fu/Norb/fileload
   Testscript
   Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Norbert Preining
   2004.03.17
   
   SF-FILENAME filein ./dummy.tiff)
 
 
 But I cannot get it to run without error:
 $ gimp --no-data -i --verbose -b '(script-fu-fileload \test.tif\)

You need to pass all parameters to your script. You can use the PDB
Browser to check how the script is actually registered. GIMP added a
run-mode parameter for you. So please try this command-line instead:

 gimp --no-data -i --verbose -b '(script-fu-fileload 0 \test.tif\)


Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] RPms of Gimp 2.0

2004-03-22 Thread Tom Cole
Hi there,

Currently using 1.2.5 but I really want to use the new GIMP.

The only problem is that I tried compiling the source and got stuck in 
dependency hell. Downloaded the installation document and used that to grab 
other components but I have still had no joy.

Does anyone know if any RPMs exist for Gimp 2.0 yet anywhere? I'm using 
Mandrake 9.2 and possibly looking to upgrade to Mandrake 10 in the near 
future, unless it stops me from having an RPM of Gimp 2.0.

Many thanks,

Tom

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] gradient-blur

2004-03-22 Thread William Skaggs
On 20 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Combining a blurred picture with an unblurred picture using layer mask
 seems to work well for me. Of course it's not the same but it should
 look reasonably similar.
 
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Jakub Steiner wrote:
 Just create an appropriate selection for the blur filter. The fastest
 method in this case would be toggling the quickmask, creating the
 gradient, toggling back and applying the blur filter.

 What is the best technique? What you suggest or the one that follows? Are
there any problems with these two ways, compared with the mod of the blur 
filter way?

Neither of these techniques work, as you will see if you try to apply them.
When you mix a blurred image with a sharp image, the result does not look like
a less-blurred image, it looks like a sharp image whose contrast has been reduced.

Best,
  -- Bill
 

 
__ __ __ __
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at primate.ucdavis.edu


 
   
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Menus *over* the picture

2004-03-22 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Hi,

I build almost everyday the cvs for gimp-2.0.

Sometimes ago, I've remarked that the menus were always on top.  
Moving the picture I was working on was moving it *under* the opened  
menus.

Sometimes later, I remarked (I was happy of that) that the focus raised  
the picture.

I've just compiled the 20040322 version on the cvs and I remarked that  
this feature is here again.

So I have several questions:
- Is it a feature or is it a bug (generally the question is the  
opposite, I think)  ;-) ?
- If it is a feature (some exchanges I have had in the past seems that  
it *was* a feature, I hopped this feature was dropped...) is there a  
mean to disable it ? I've been fooling in the preferences menu and I've  
not found where it is hidden.

--
Regards
- Jean-Luc


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Gimp-user] gradient-blur

2004-03-22 Thread Jakub Steiner
On Po, 2004-03-22 at 09:12 -0800, William Skaggs wrote:

 Neither of these techniques work, as you will see if you try to apply them.
 When you mix a blurred image with a sharp image, the result does not look like
 a less-blurred image, it looks like a sharp image whose contrast has been reduced.

Uh? It works pretty well I'd say: 
http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff/linearblur.png

-- 
Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] RPms of Gimp 2.0

2004-03-22 Thread Alan Horkan

On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Tom Cole wrote:

 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:13:16 +
 From: Tom Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Gimp-user] RPms of Gimp 2.0

 Hi there,

 Currently using 1.2.5 but I really want to use the new GIMP.

 The only problem is that I tried compiling the source and got stuck in
 dependency hell. Downloaded the installation document and used that to grab
 other components but I have still had no joy.

 Does anyone know if any RPMs exist for Gimp 2.0 yet anywhere? I'm using
 Mandrake 9.2 and possibly looking to upgrade to Mandrake 10 in the near
 future, unless it stops me from having an RPM of Gimp 2.0.

I'd be interested in Mandrake RPMs too.

It might be of interest to you to know that this morning I tried to
compile Gimp 2.0 rc1 on a fairly clean install of Mandrake 10.0 rc1 but it
failed at the GTK tests and told me it needed GTK = 2.2.2

I didn't have time to look into it further.  I might be doing something
wrong, it might simply mean GTK2 just isn't being detected correctly or it
might just mean Mandrake 10 doesn't include a recent enough version of GTK
with which to build the GIMP.

- Alan H.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] RPms of Gimp 2.0

2004-03-22 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Just try to add in the gtk-devel package. 

There is a recipe to build the GIMP  on mdk 9.2 I posted here a couple of 
months ago, and on the GUG list lastweek.

I will paste it here again.

Regards,
JS
--
[Gimp-user] Instaling 1.3 CVS HEAD on MDK 9.2

From: Joao S. O. Bueno 
Subject: [Gimp-user] Instaling 1.3 CVS HEAD on MDK 9.2 
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:56:42 -0700 

Hi,

sometimes compiling the latest GIMP may seen a scary thing to do.

I just upgraded my distribution from mandrake 9.1 to 9.2 this weekend, 
and had finished compiling GIMP from CVS, with no major nuisance.

So, just in case there is someone around willing to make it, but 
afraid, here is what I had to do beyond install:

The only outdated packahe is notoriously Automake. 
Mandrake comes with 1.4, and you need 1.6 to build GIMP from CVS. 
The GIMP autongen script itself brings a link to the tar ball with it:

ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/automake/automake-1.7.3.tar.gz

All the other thing I needed, I installed smoothly through URPMI - 
just be sure to properly configure a contrib URPMI repository with 
urpmi.addmedia:
#urpmi.addmedia contrib 
ftp://ftp.belnet.be/linux/Mandrake/9.2/contrib/i586 with 
../../i586/Mandrake/base/hdlist2.cz

will do.
The packages needed are listed as the ./configure script fails for not 
locating them, but they were:
intltool
libgtkhtml2_0 
libgtkhtml2_0-devel
librsvg
librsvg-devel
gimpprint-devel

After which, The GIMP ./congure'd, make'd, and make install'ed 
gracefully.

Regards,
JS
--



On Monday 22 March 2004 16:35, Alan Horkan wrote:
 On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Tom Cole wrote:
  Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:13:16 +
  From: Tom Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [Gimp-user] RPms of Gimp 2.0
 
  Hi there,
 
  Currently using 1.2.5 but I really want to use the new GIMP.
 
  The only problem is that I tried compiling the source and got stuck in
  dependency hell. Downloaded the installation document and used that to
  grab other components but I have still had no joy.
 
  Does anyone know if any RPMs exist for Gimp 2.0 yet anywhere? I'm using
  Mandrake 9.2 and possibly looking to upgrade to Mandrake 10 in the near
  future, unless it stops me from having an RPM of Gimp 2.0.

 I'd be interested in Mandrake RPMs too.

 It might be of interest to you to know that this morning I tried to
 compile Gimp 2.0 rc1 on a fairly clean install of Mandrake 10.0 rc1 but it
 failed at the GTK tests and told me it needed GTK = 2.2.2

 I didn't have time to look into it further.  I might be doing something
 wrong, it might simply mean GTK2 just isn't being detected correctly or it
 might just mean Mandrake 10 doesn't include a recent enough version of GTK
 with which to build the GIMP.

 - Alan H.
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Menus *over* the picture

2004-03-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I build almost everyday the cvs for gimp-2.0.
 
 Sometimes ago, I've remarked that the menus were always on top.  

Menus are by definition always on top. Do you really mean menus?
How could menus not be on top of the window they pop up from ?


Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Menus *over* the picture

2004-03-22 Thread Bryce Benton
Sven Neumann wrote:

Hi,

Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 

I build almost everyday the cvs for gimp-2.0.

Sometimes ago, I've remarked that the menus were always on top.  
   

Menus are by definition always on top. Do you really mean menus?
How could menus not be on top of the window they pop up from ?
Sven
 

I wonder if this person is voicing a issue that I also have. When I am 
working on an image and I want to modify the hue/saturation, the first 
thing I always do is move the dialog box so that it is not covering the 
image. Perhaps it would be an improvement if there were a way for the 
GIMP to remember the location of the last dialog box and then open 
subsequent dialog boxes there. That way, I'd only have to move the 
dialog box the first time.

--bryce

P.S. Cheers to the excellent work on such a great program. Bravo!

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Menus *over* the picture

2004-03-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Bryce Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I wonder if this person is voicing a issue that I also have. When I am
 working on an image and I want to modify the hue/saturation, the first
 thing I always do is move the dialog box so that it is not covering
 the image. Perhaps it would be an improvement if there were a way for
 the GIMP to remember the location of the last dialog box and then open
 subsequent dialog boxes there. That way, I'd only have to move the
 dialog box the first time.

It does that already. Unfortunately a lot of window managers decided
to completely ignore this setting and center the dialog instead. We
have since removed the transient relationship from the tool dialog to
the image window and this problem is gone.


Sven

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re : [Gimp-user] Menus *over* the picture

2004-03-22 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 22.03.2004 22:48, Sven Neumann a écrit :
Hi,

Bryce Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I wonder if this person is voicing a issue that I also have. When I
am
working on an image and I want to modify the hue/saturation, the
first
thing I always do is move the dialog box so that it is not covering
the image. Perhaps it would be an improvement if there were a way  
for
the GIMP to remember the location of the last dialog box and then
open
subsequent dialog boxes there. That way, I'd only have to move the
dialog box the first time.
It does that already. Unfortunately a lot of window managers decided
to completely ignore this setting and center the dialog instead. We
have since removed the transient relationship from the tool dialog to
the image window and this problem is gone.
Sven
It is not what I complain against.

When I say menu, I mean the main dialog window and all the other  
dialog boxes/windows opened.

It is right for the popup.

But if I've i.e. a layer window opened and I move the picture I'm  
working on, it is not moving *over* this dialog but *under* it.

It was not the behaviour 2 dyas ago.

--
Regards
- Jean-Luc

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re : Re : [Gimp-user] Menus *over* the picture

2004-03-22 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 22.03.2004 23:12, Simon Budig a écrit :
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
When I say menu, I mean the main dialog window and all the other
dialog boxes/windows opened.
It is right for the popup.

But if I've i.e. a layer window opened and I move the picture I'm
working on, it is not moving *over* this dialog but *under* it.
It was not the behaviour 2 dyas ago.
Please test the setting of Window Type Hints under the Window
Management page in the preferences. Depending on the window manager
you use it might be more useful to choose the Normal Window hint
for the Toolbox and the Docks.
Hope this helps,
   Simon
Simon,

Fine! Many thanks!
It should be set to normal windows instead of utility window. At  
least with my system: gnome/metacity.

Thanks again

--
- Jean-Luc

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Gimp-user] gradient-blur

2004-03-22 Thread Jakub Steiner
V Po 22. 03. 2004 v 11:38 -0800 pe William Skaggs:

 Uh? It works pretty well I'd say: 
 http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff/linearblur.png
 
 To my eyes this image looks sharp in the lower 2/3, and uniformly blurred 
 in the upper 1/3.  What you _do_ get using this method is a nice smooth
 transition from blurred to unblurred, which may be all you need in many
 situations, especially if the blur is rather soft.  

Didn't occur to me prior this, but you are in fact right.

Another workaround of this limitation than the GAP method may be using a
huge soft parametric brush so that it's as high as the image height and
paint a few lines on the top egde (so a half of the brush covers the
image) using the blur tool. One needs to zoom out a bit to get a bit of
space on the image border.

cheers

-- 
Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Script-Fu/Logos/Text Circle question

2004-03-22 Thread John Culleton
On Sunday 21 March 2004 06:42 pm, Geoffrey wrote:
 Peter L. Hurd wrote:
  Hey All,
 
  I want to put text in a circle, but with the top and
  bottom halves of the circle both reading from left to
  right.  The top half is easy to do with the Xtns -
  Script-Fu - Logos - Text Circle and a 180 degree arc
  of text, so far so good.
 
  The bottom half is more problematic, since the focus of
  the arc of text has to be above, rather than below the
  text.  In a perfect world I'd just set a negative value
  for radius...
 
  I'm getting the creepy feeling Text Circle can't do
  what I need, any ideas?

 Can't you use the flip layer option to properly orient
 the text so that you can create the bottom part of the
 circle  the same way you created the top, then flip it.

  Cheers, -P.
Someone mentioned LaTeX. The Context version of TeX has an 
interface to metapost called metafun that does some fancy 
things in text in circles.  There is a very complete manual 
with lots of examples,including one of a CDR label with 
text in a circle.  Possibly that could be used as a 
starting point, then imported into Gimp for refinement.  
-- 
John Culleton
Able Typesetters and Indexers
http://wexfordpress.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Questions about Gimp 2.0

2004-03-22 Thread Tom Williams
Hi!  Ok, I just installed Gimp 2.0rc1 on Linux.  The build went smoothly 
and I noticed the executable was installed as gimp instead of 
gimp-1.3.  I accidentally clobbered my Gimp 1.2.5 installation but I 
can build that again.  :)

Anywho, I was wondering if/when the Add Glow and the Perl-o-Tine 
filters would be available, if ever, in Gimp 2.0?  I've been using the 
1.3 releases for a while primarily and 1.2.5 for things I needed, like 
Perl-o-Tine and Add Glow. I noticed Py-slice works similarly to 
Perl-o-tine but Py-slice doesn't support RGB images.  :(

Thanks...

Peace...

Tom
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Re: Questions about Gimp 2.0

2004-03-22 Thread Carol Spears
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:58:40PM -0800, Tom Williams wrote:
 Hi!  Ok, I just installed Gimp 2.0rc1 on Linux.  The build went smoothly 
 and I noticed the executable was installed as gimp instead of 
 gimp-1.3.  I accidentally clobbered my Gimp 1.2.5 installation but I 
 can build that again.  :)
 
you should not need to rebuild that.  it will be named gimp-1.2 and you
might need to include the path to start it.  gimp is a symbolic link
and you can rm it and if you prefer that gimp-1.2 be the default gimp
then type ln -s gimp-1.2 gimp in that directory (probably
/usr/local/bin if you built it yourself).

 Anywho, I was wondering if/when the Add Glow and the Perl-o-Tine 
 filters would be available, if ever, in Gimp 2.0?  I've been using the 
 1.3 releases for a while primarily and 1.2.5 for things I needed, like 
 Perl-o-Tine and Add Glow. I noticed Py-slice works similarly to 
 Perl-o-tine but Py-slice doesn't support RGB images.  :(
 
py-slice works on RGB images.  it is not as complete as perlotine but it
does most of the same things.  i had problems when there were guides
left after a crop.  well, guides left on the new edges.  at 0px -- you
can see them if they are there.  i am just guessing why the plugin did
not work for you.

gimp-perl is working and hopefully they will tell how to install it.
right now it is available via cvs checkout and needs a list of extra
perl things -- a list i lost track of.

enjoy the new gimp.

i miss photo mosaic myself.

carol

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Re: Questions about Gimp 2.0

2004-03-22 Thread Tom Williams
Carol Spears wrote:

On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:58:40PM -0800, Tom Williams wrote:
 

Hi!  Ok, I just installed Gimp 2.0rc1 on Linux.  The build went smoothly 
and I noticed the executable was installed as gimp instead of 
gimp-1.3.  I accidentally clobbered my Gimp 1.2.5 installation but I 
can build that again.  :)

   

you should not need to rebuild that.  it will be named gimp-1.2 and you
might need to include the path to start it.  gimp is a symbolic link
and you can rm it and if you prefer that gimp-1.2 be the default gimp
then type ln -s gimp-1.2 gimp in that directory (probably
/usr/local/bin if you built it yourself).
 

Great!  I can run gimp-1.2.. That will work just fine.  :)

Anywho, I was wondering if/when the Add Glow and the Perl-o-Tine 
filters would be available, if ever, in Gimp 2.0?  I've been using the 
1.3 releases for a while primarily and 1.2.5 for things I needed, like 
Perl-o-Tine and Add Glow. I noticed Py-slice works similarly to 
Perl-o-tine but Py-slice doesn't support RGB images.  :(

   

py-slice works on RGB images.  it is not as complete as perlotine but it
does most of the same things.  i had problems when there were guides
left after a crop.  well, guides left on the new edges.  at 0px -- you
can see them if they are there.  i am just guessing why the plugin did
not work for you.
 

I know what I did wrong. I tried to slice a JPEG as a test and left 
the default image type as GIF in the Py-slice filter.  I was able to 
get Py-slice to work as I needed it to.  :)

gimp-perl is working and hopefully they will tell how to install it.
right now it is available via cvs checkout and needs a list of extra
perl things -- a list i lost track of.
enjoy the new gimp.

 

So far, I really like it.  :D

i miss photo mosaic myself.
 

Xsane support and the Add Glow fliter is what I'm currently missing 
but can wait for since 1.2.5 still works for me.  :)

I *really* like the new text tool as it's able to handle the 1000+ 
Windows TrueType fonts I've got installed.  :)

Thanks for the help!

Peace...

Tom
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Get ready for 2.0.0

2004-03-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

as most of you probably have noticed already, the 2.0rc1 tarball is
available from ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v2.0/testing/.

The plan is to do the 2.0.0 release tomorrow afternoon/evening
(middle-european time). Then switch the web-site, give the mirrors
some time to catch up and announce the release. Details about the
web-site switch and when to send out announcements still need be to
figured out, but I thought I let you know that 2.0 is going to
happen. Really.

In order to celebrate the GIMP 2.0 release, there are going to be
release parties. So far the Wiki lists two parties:

  -
  Friday, March 26th 2004 (starting 21:00)
  at c-base, Rungestr. 20, Berlin, Germany

  GIMP hackers, GIMP users, fans and friends of Wilber, everyone's invited.
  If you like, you can bring your leather mask
  -


  -
  Thursday, March 25th 2004 (starting 19:00)
  at Le Magali, 114 rue Paul Bert, Lyon, France (in conjunction with ALDIL)

  Lyon Linux users group, a couple of GIMP hackers will be about, and
  we might even have some GNOMErs come in.
  -
 

If you cannot join one of these parties, why don't you organize your
own and Bring out The GIMP with some friends? Please add your party to
the list at http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/ReleaseParty.


Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] Get ready for 2.0.0

2004-03-22 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi,

On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 18:30, Sven Neumann wrote:
 If you cannot join one of these parties, why don't you organize your
 own and Bring out The GIMP with some friends? Please add your party to
 the list at http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/ReleaseParty.

It would be nice if more people would add the adresses of the
computer/photo magazines of their respective countries to
http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/MagazineAddresses as well.

These lists will be used when we send out the press release for GIMP
2.0.

Sincerely,
Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Re :[Gimp-developer] Get ready for 2.0.0

2004-03-22 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 22.03.2004 19:00, Henrik Brix Andersen a écrit :
Hi,

On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 18:30, Sven Neumann wrote:
If you cannot join one of these parties, why don't you organize your
own and Bring out The GIMP with some friends? Please add your party
to
the list at http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/ReleaseParty.
It would be nice if more people would add the adresses of the
computer/photo magazines of their respective countries to
http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/MagazineAddresses as well.
These lists will be used when we send out the press release for GIMP
2.0.
Sincerely,
Brix
--
You can add some French Photo magazines, each of them has papers on  
digital photography:

Chasseur d'Images:
--
web: http://www.photim.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Chasseur d'Images
La Petite Motte
86100 - Senilé
PhotoFan (same company as Chasseur d'Images):
---
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Editions Jibena
BP 100
86101 - Châtellerault Cedex
Réponses Photo:
---
Réponses Photo
41-43 rue du Colonel Pierre Avia
75754 Paris Cedex 15
Le Photographe (same company as Réponses Photos):
---
email: bernard.perrine0emapfrance.com
Le Photographe
43 rue du Colonel Pierre Avia
75745 Paris Cedex 15
---
Regards
- Jean-Luc




pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Gimp-user] Re:[Gimp-developer] Get ready for 2.0.0

2004-03-22 Thread David Neary
Hi Jean Luc,

Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
 You can add some French Photo magazines, each of them has papers on  
 digital photography:

The idea of a wiki is that you can do this yourself by clicking
on EditionTexte (EditText in english) - the mark-up is
minimal and is described at the bottom of the text box. I'll
add these now though, thanks.

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
   David Neary,
   Lyon, France
  E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature