Re: [PHP] How to get a PHP bug fixed?
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Enumag wrote: Hi, there is a bug I'd like to be fixed and even a patch is available. But there is still no reaction at all after 2 years. What else can I do to get the bug fixed? https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45351 - patch available from 2010-06-13 https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48724 - patch available from 2012-04-13 It looks like there is a thread about that on the PHP Bugzilla, but it is not admitted as a patch to be accepted. Maybe you might try by GitHub, making a pull request. iñ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] How to get a PHP bug fixed?
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Enumag enu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, there is a bug I'd like to be fixed and even a patch is available. But there is still no reaction at all after 2 years. What else can I do to get the bug fixed? https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45351 - patch available from 2010-06-13 https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48724 - patch available from 2012-04-13 The PHP General mailing list is only for discussing the use of the language and developing in PHP, not really for the development of the language itself. Instead, you should try to discuss these things on the PHP Internals list at intern...@lists.php.net. You may also want to speak with some of the developers via IRC on EFnet #php.pecl to discuss if there is any interest in patching the bugs you've mentioned. -- /Daniel P. Brown Network Infrastructure Manager http://www.php.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] How to get a PHP bug fixed?
Hi, there is a bug I'd like to be fixed and even a patch is available. But there is still no reaction at all after 2 years. What else can I do to get the bug fixed? https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45351 - patch available from 2010-06-13 https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48724 - patch available from 2012-04-13
[PHP] Bug in DOMDocument schemaValidate() function?
Hello,
I am validating user DOM against schema files using the following piece of code:
$valid = @$doc-schemaValidate($xsdFile);
where $doc is of type DOMDocument and $xsdFile is the file location of the XSD
file.
Everything worked fine until the following validation occured:
A validation of a XML against the SRW/U schema
(http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/sru1-1archive/xml-files/srw-types.xsd)
failed.
Here is the XML:
-
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
srw:explainResponse xmlns:srw=http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/;
xmlns:zr=http://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0/;
srw:version1.1/srw:version
srw:record
srw:recordSchemahttp://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0//srw:recordSchema
srw:recordPackingXML/srw:recordPacking
srw:recordData
zr:explain
zr:serverInfo wsdl=http://myserver.com/db; protocol=SRU
version=1.1
hostmyserver.com/host
port80/port
databasesru/database
/zr:serverInfo
zr:databaseInfo
title lang=en primary=trueSRU Test Database/title
description lang=en primary=true My server SRU Test
Database/description
/zr:databaseInfo
zr:metaInfo
dateModified27-11-2003/dateModified
/zr:metaInfo
/zr:explain
/srw:recordData
/srw:record
/srw:explainResponse
-
This XML is valid. However, I keep getting the following libxml error:
object(LibXMLError)#192 (6) {
[level]=
int(2)
[code]=
int(1871)
[column]=
int(0)
[message]=
string(133) Element '{http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}record': This element
is not expected. Expected is (
{http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}version ).
[file]=
string(0)
[line]=
int(0)
}
I think, the validator is unable to handle the xsd:extension part of the schema:
xsd:complexType name=explainResponseType
xsd:complexContent
xsd:extension base=responseType
xsd:sequencexsd:element ref=record/
xsd:element ref=echoedExplainRequest minOccurs=0/
xsd:element ref=diagnostics minOccurs=0/
xsd:element ref=extraResponseData minOccurs=0/
/xsd:sequence
/xsd:extension
/xsd:complexContent
/xsd:complexType
The version-element exists and is at the right place. If I add another
version-element after the first one, it complains
about expecting a record-element instead, which is correct. But it is not
correct to expect another version-element
after the already existing one.
Is this a bug? Or did I made a mistake somewhere and I am not able to see it
right now?
Thank you for any help!
Best regards,
Marko
---
Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftlich-technische
Information mbH.
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht Mannheim HRB
101892.
Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt.
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Thomas Greiner.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in DOMDocument schemaValidate() function?
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Voß, Marko marko.v...@fiz-karlsruhe.de wrote:
Hello,
I am validating user DOM against schema files using the following piece of
code:
$valid = @$doc-schemaValidate($xsdFile);
where $doc is of type DOMDocument and $xsdFile is the file location of the
XSD file.
Everything worked fine until the following validation occured:
A validation of a XML against the SRW/U schema
(http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/sru1-1archive/xml-files/srw-types.xsd)
failed.
Here is the XML:
-
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
srw:explainResponse xmlns:srw=http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/;
xmlns:zr=http://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0/;
srw:version1.1/srw:version
srw:record
srw:recordSchemahttp://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0//srw:recordSchema
srw:recordPackingXML/srw:recordPacking
srw:recordData
zr:explain
zr:serverInfo wsdl=http://myserver.com/db; protocol=SRU
version=1.1
hostmyserver.com/host
port80/port
databasesru/database
/zr:serverInfo
zr:databaseInfo
title lang=en primary=trueSRU Test Database/title
description lang=en primary=true My server SRU Test
Database/description
/zr:databaseInfo
zr:metaInfo
dateModified27-11-2003/dateModified
/zr:metaInfo
/zr:explain
/srw:recordData
/srw:record
/srw:explainResponse
-
This XML is valid. However, I keep getting the following libxml error:
object(LibXMLError)#192 (6) {
[level]=
int(2)
[code]=
int(1871)
[column]=
int(0)
[message]=
string(133) Element '{http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}record': This element
is not expected. Expected is (
{http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}version ).
[file]=
string(0)
[line]=
int(0)
}
I think, the validator is unable to handle the xsd:extension part of the
schema:
xsd:complexType name=explainResponseType
xsd:complexContent
xsd:extension base=responseType
xsd:sequencexsd:element ref=record/
xsd:element ref=echoedExplainRequest minOccurs=0/
xsd:element ref=diagnostics minOccurs=0/
xsd:element ref=extraResponseData minOccurs=0/
/xsd:sequence
/xsd:extension
/xsd:complexContent
/xsd:complexType
The version-element exists and is at the right place. If I add another
version-element after the first one, it complains
about expecting a record-element instead, which is correct. But it is not
correct to expect another version-element
after the already existing one.
Is this a bug? Or did I made a mistake somewhere and I am not able to see it
right now?
Thank you for any help!
Best regards,
Marko
If you're 100% sure this XML is valid, then this is a bug. You should
report it at bugs.php.net, but it is most likely this bug is in
libXML, and needs to be fixed there.
- Matijn
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in DOMDocument schemaValidate() function?
Hello,
I am sorry, but everything is ok here. I am performing an unmarshalling and
marshalling unit test for every resource and
the problem was, that after unmarshalling to the object, the marshalling of the
object did not create the version
element. I did not notice this in the first place.
So the validation error occured after the step of testing the marshalling and
not before testing the unmarshalling.
Thank you anyways!
Best regards,
Marko
Am 14.05.2012 16:43, schrieb Matijn Woudt:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Voß, Markomarko.v...@fiz-karlsruhe.de
wrote:
Hello,
I am validating user DOM against schema files using the following piece of
code:
$valid = @$doc-schemaValidate($xsdFile);
where $doc is of type DOMDocument and $xsdFile is the file location of the
XSD file.
Everything worked fine until the following validation occured:
A validation of a XML against the SRW/U schema
(http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/sru1-1archive/xml-files/srw-types.xsd)
failed.
Here is the XML:
-
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
srw:explainResponse xmlns:srw=http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/;
xmlns:zr=http://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0/;
srw:version1.1/srw:version
srw:record
srw:recordSchemahttp://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0//srw:recordSchema
srw:recordPackingXML/srw:recordPacking
srw:recordData
zr:explain
zr:serverInfo wsdl=http://myserver.com/db; protocol=SRU
version=1.1
hostmyserver.com/host
port80/port
databasesru/database
/zr:serverInfo
zr:databaseInfo
title lang=en primary=trueSRU Test Database/title
description lang=en primary=true My server SRU Test
Database/description
/zr:databaseInfo
zr:metaInfo
dateModified27-11-2003/dateModified
/zr:metaInfo
/zr:explain
/srw:recordData
/srw:record
/srw:explainResponse
-
This XML is valid. However, I keep getting the following libxml error:
object(LibXMLError)#192 (6) {
[level]=
int(2)
[code]=
int(1871)
[column]=
int(0)
[message]=
string(133) Element '{http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}record': This
element is not expected. Expected is (
{http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}version ).
[file]=
string(0)
[line]=
int(0)
}
I think, the validator is unable to handle the xsd:extension part of the
schema:
xsd:complexType name=explainResponseType
xsd:complexContent
xsd:extension base=responseType
xsd:sequencexsd:element ref=record/
xsd:element ref=echoedExplainRequest minOccurs=0/
xsd:element ref=diagnostics minOccurs=0/
xsd:element ref=extraResponseData minOccurs=0/
/xsd:sequence
/xsd:extension
/xsd:complexContent
/xsd:complexType
The version-element exists and is at the right place. If I add another
version-element after the first one, it complains
about expecting a record-element instead, which is correct. But it is not
correct to expect another version-element
after the already existing one.
Is this a bug? Or did I made a mistake somewhere and I am not able to see it
right now?
Thank you for any help!
Best regards,
Marko
If you're 100% sure this XML is valid, then this is a bug. You should
report it at bugs.php.net, but it is most likely this bug is in
libXML, and needs to be fixed there.
- Matijn
---
Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftlich-technische
Information mbH.
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht Mannheim HRB
101892.
Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt.
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Thomas Greiner.
Re: [PHP] Bug zlib.output_compression not normal work in IIS7.5
Because php5.4 compression not normal work. So I have to enable IIS7.5 system compression. ok. now please check the www.ongod.org/test/phpinfo.php site. just now I have close IIS compression. PHP5.4 sure can't work with zlib.output_compression. windows php enable by default. Now I have study try building php5.4 x64 by myself. but I can't building php ext. only building success php 5.4.1 main code.Who will tell me how building full php5.4.x ? -- Original -- From: Simon Schicksimonsimc...@googlemail.com; Date: Wed, Mar 21, 2012 03:21 PM To: 小鱼虾i...@xiaoyu.org; Cc: php-generalphp-general@lists.php.net; Subject: Re: [PHP] Bug zlib.output_compression not normal work in IIS7.5 2012/3/19 小鱼虾 i...@xiaoyu.org How I do fix it ? https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61434 Hi, I got a rough overview of the conversation in the bug-tracker ... You were always talking about a tool you used to test the gzip-compression ... but why not test it natively? Using Firefox (with the extension Firebug) or Safari / Chrome for example you can easily view the respond-header from the server and get more info out of that. Just press F12, click on the network-tab, select your request and search in the response-header for Content-Encoding: ... I would write my own small php-test-script where you just output some text. Then you're sure that not other code is doing something strange. Another possible problem: Is the extension zlib enabled at all? The documentation says that it's disabled by default ... http://www.php.net/manual/en/zlib.installation.php Bye Simon
Re: [PHP] Bug zlib.output_compression not normal work in IIS7.5
2012/3/19 小鱼虾 i...@xiaoyu.org How I do fix it ? https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61434 Hi, I got a rough overview of the conversation in the bug-tracker ... You were always talking about a tool you used to test the gzip-compression ... but why not test it natively? Using Firefox (with the extension Firebug) or Safari / Chrome for example you can easily view the respond-header from the server and get more info out of that. Just press F12, click on the network-tab, select your request and search in the response-header for Content-Encoding: ... I would write my own small php-test-script where you just output some text. Then you're sure that not other code is doing something strange. Another possible problem: Is the extension zlib enabled at all? The documentation says that it's disabled by default ... http://www.php.net/manual/en/zlib.installation.php Bye Simon -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug zlib.output_compression not normal work in IIS7.5
How I do fix it ? https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61434 ID: 61434 User updated by:info at ongod dot org Reported by:info at ongod dot org Summary:zlib.output_compression not normal work in IIS7.5 Status: Not a bug Type: Bug Package:Zlib related Operating System: windows2008R2x64 PHP Version:5.4.0 Block user comment: N Private report: N New Comment: it is Should be clean code for check. php5.4 not normal work. but php5.3.10 normal work in the same server. who tell me why this ? http://www.ongod.org/test/phpinfo.php Web page compressed? No Compression type?none Size, Markup (bytes) 83,611 Size, Compressed (bytes) 0 Compression % 0.0 php5.3.10 http://mail.ipv6china.com/phpinfo.php Web page compressed?Yes Compression type? gzip Size, Markup (bytes) 87,124 Size, Compressed (bytes) 13,730 Compression %84.2 check from http://www.gidnetwork.com/tools/gzip-test.php Previous Comments: [2012-03-19 14:14:54] paj...@php.net ok, not a bug but a support issue. @info at ongod dot org Please ask further support on the PHP general mailing list or any other support channel, thanks! [2012-03-19 14:10:56] a...@php.net I cannot reproduce the issue, tried with the latest php 5.4 and IIS7. IIS7 has compression turned off and the php.ini has both zlib.output_compression=on and zlib.output_compression_level=-1 set. The page is merely a phpinfo() page. Here the simple ping pong: GET /i.php HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost Connection: keep-alive Cache-Control: max-age=0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.79 Safari/535.11 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch Accept-Language: de-DE,de;q=0.8,en-US;q=0.6,en;q=0.4 Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: text/html Content-Encoding: gzip Vary: Accept-Encoding Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5 X-Powered-By: PHP/5.4.1RC1-dev Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:00:09 GMT Content-Length: 6182 The output compression seems to work. @info at ongod dot org Could you please try such a simple page scenario and post the request/response headers? [2012-03-19 14:01:26] nacin at wordpress dot org I can confirm that WordPress 3.3.1 does not set zlib.output_compression. Looks like WP never has. [2012-03-19 11:40:20] info at ongod dot org Security reasons, I would also send an email to you. [2012-03-19 11:25:40] m...@php.net zlib.output_compression can be disabled at runtime at later stage in PHP 5.4. I'd probably be lost on a Windows box, so I don't think I could help you there. The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61434
Re: [PHP] Bug 51860
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hello folks, any chance this one is ever fixed? https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=51860 I am a customer of 11. They told me they will not upgrade until this one is fixed. Imagine that there are thousands of customers running php 5.2.17 just because of this issue. Unfortunately I am not able to fix this on myself - my C-fu is not good enough. Because big hosters like 11 do not upgrade, we (the Apache log4php team) cannot make use of newer PHP versions too. We have decided to use the features once we see the old hosters move on. Same is true for other projects of mine. If we would upgrade we loose all the people on the big hosting companies. I think it is in the interest of the PHP-dev team to see people moving on. Otherwise at someday software like phpBB, wordpress et al will not work on many hosts at some day in future. Not sure if there has been any plans on this issue - i am very much interested in this and would like know if it is already on the schedule. Thanks, Christian This list is for users having problems with PHP scripts etc. If you want to contact the devs, you're on the wrong mailing list (there's a special one for it) Matijn -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug 51860
Hello folks, any chance this one is ever fixed? https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=51860 I am a customer of 11. They told me they will not upgrade until this one is fixed. Imagine that there are thousands of customers running php 5.2.17 just because of this issue. Unfortunately I am not able to fix this on myself - my C-fu is not good enough. Because big hosters like 11 do not upgrade, we (the Apache log4php team) cannot make use of newer PHP versions too. We have decided to use the features once we see the old hosters move on. Same is true for other projects of mine. If we would upgrade we loose all the people on the big hosting companies. I think it is in the interest of the PHP-dev team to see people moving on. Otherwise at someday software like phpBB, wordpress et al will not work on many hosts at some day in future. Not sure if there has been any plans on this issue - i am very much interested in this and would like know if it is already on the schedule. Thanks, Christian -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Think I found a PHP bug
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: This is fixed in PHP 5.4 by completely dropping support for the TZ environment variable. PHP will always use UTC unless you explicitly set it to something. It won't matter which timezone the system is running in. This is the only reliable way to always have consistent behaviour across all environments. Just taking that a step further ... The second that you need to actually take a users time zone into consideration, then the best way of working is to RUN the sever set to UTC. And store any time information in UTC. Then you can display times TO USERS either as UTC, or as their own local time or the local time of the location an event is happening at. You just need to remember that timezone information provided by the browser is only todays time offset, so any area with daylight saving will be wrong for half of the year, so that is the point you need to store a user or loction timezone reference. Many systems still only store 'offset' which is simply wrong :) -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Think I found a PHP bug
This is fixed in PHP 5.4 by completely dropping support for the TZ environment variable. PHP will always use UTC unless you explicitly set it to something. It won't matter which timezone the system is running in. This is the only reliable way to always have consistent behaviour across all environments. -Rasmus On 12/06/2011 04:46 PM, Patricia Dewald wrote: In OpenSuSE 12.1 i can reproduce this issue. My workaround is to check the correct timezone. On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:34:18 +0100, Geoff Shang ge...@quitelikely.com wrote: Hi, A couple of weeks ago, I discovered what I'm pretty sure is a PHP bug. In addition, I looked in the PHP changelog and I haven't seen any mention of a fix for it. I'm writing here because I was wondering if anyone else can confirm it and what to do about it. The bug is that if a server's timezone is set to Europe/London and you don't set an explicit timezone in your script, if it's winter time in the UK, PHP thinks the timezone is UTC instead of Europe/London. Example: First, lets confirm that the system time is in fact set to Europe/London. $ cmp --verbose /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/London $ echo $? 0 Now lets see what PHP thinks it is. $ php -r 'echo date_default_timezone_get();' UTC What about if we set it in the environment? $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo date_default_timezone_get();' Europe/London OK, so we appear to have an issue. But is this just semantics? Well no. consider the following (with TZ once again unset): $ php -r 'echo date (r, strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:00 + But of course, Europe/London isn't on + in July. $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo date (r, strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm));' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:00 +0100 The problem comes in when we view times created in one and printed in the other: $ unset TZ $ php -r 'echo strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm);' 1309521600 $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo date (r, 1309521600);' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:00:00 +0100 And the opposite: $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm);' 1309518000 $ unset TZ $ php -r 'echo date (r, 1309518000);' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:00:00 + This last one is what led me to discover this bug. We use automation software to run our Internet radio station. The playout system is written in C and the web front-end is written in PHP, with the data they work on the only point of commonality between them. The station was set up during the European summer. When the clocks changed, the playout system coped but the PHP front-end was showing everything an hour out. Now of course, I personally can force the front-end to use Europe/London and it will work for me. And I guess ultimately it would make sense to program the system to allow the user to specify a timezone rather than relying on the server default. But right now it doesn't, and any solution would need to take the playout system into account. At any rate, none of this is the point. If you're using the system default timezone, you expect it to (a) be correct and (b) be consistant. Note that this bug may affect other timezones which are on UTC durin the winter or summer, but I've not tested any other timezones as this would mean changing the system timezone and I'm not real keen on doing that on any of my systems. This bug was found on a Debian Squeeze system running the following version of PHP: PHP 5.3.3-7+squeeze3 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Jun 28 2011 08:24:40) Copyright (c) 1997-2009 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2010 Zend Technologies I realise this is 5.3.3 and that 5.3.8 is now out. It's possible that this has been fixed but I could not find any traces of such a fix in the changelogs. I'd be interested to know if anyone else can confirm this bug and, if confirmed, what I should do about it. Thanks, Geoff. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: Think I found a PHP bug
In OpenSuSE 12.1 i can reproduce this issue. My workaround is to check the correct timezone. On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:34:18 +0100, Geoff Shang ge...@quitelikely.com wrote: Hi, A couple of weeks ago, I discovered what I'm pretty sure is a PHP bug. In addition, I looked in the PHP changelog and I haven't seen any mention of a fix for it. I'm writing here because I was wondering if anyone else can confirm it and what to do about it. The bug is that if a server's timezone is set to Europe/London and you don't set an explicit timezone in your script, if it's winter time in the UK, PHP thinks the timezone is UTC instead of Europe/London. Example: First, lets confirm that the system time is in fact set to Europe/London. $ cmp --verbose /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/London $ echo $? 0 Now lets see what PHP thinks it is. $ php -r 'echo date_default_timezone_get();' UTC What about if we set it in the environment? $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo date_default_timezone_get();' Europe/London OK, so we appear to have an issue. But is this just semantics? Well no. consider the following (with TZ once again unset): $ php -r 'echo date (r, strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:00 + But of course, Europe/London isn't on + in July. $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo date (r, strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm));' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:00 +0100 The problem comes in when we view times created in one and printed in the other: $ unset TZ $ php -r 'echo strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm);' 1309521600 $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo date (r, 1309521600);' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:00:00 +0100 And the opposite: $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm);' 1309518000 $ unset TZ $ php -r 'echo date (r, 1309518000);' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:00:00 + This last one is what led me to discover this bug. We use automation software to run our Internet radio station. The playout system is written in C and the web front-end is written in PHP, with the data they work on the only point of commonality between them. The station was set up during the European summer. When the clocks changed, the playout system coped but the PHP front-end was showing everything an hour out. Now of course, I personally can force the front-end to use Europe/London and it will work for me. And I guess ultimately it would make sense to program the system to allow the user to specify a timezone rather than relying on the server default. But right now it doesn't, and any solution would need to take the playout system into account. At any rate, none of this is the point. If you're using the system default timezone, you expect it to (a) be correct and (b) be consistant. Note that this bug may affect other timezones which are on UTC durin the winter or summer, but I've not tested any other timezones as this would mean changing the system timezone and I'm not real keen on doing that on any of my systems. This bug was found on a Debian Squeeze system running the following version of PHP: PHP 5.3.3-7+squeeze3 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Jun 28 2011 08:24:40) Copyright (c) 1997-2009 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2010 Zend Technologies I realise this is 5.3.3 and that 5.3.8 is now out. It's possible that this has been fixed but I could not find any traces of such a fix in the changelogs. I'd be interested to know if anyone else can confirm this bug and, if confirmed, what I should do about it. Thanks, Geoff. -- best regards, Patty -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: Re: [PHP] Think I found a PHP bug
On 16 Nov 2011 at 16:30, Geoff Shang ge...@quitelikely.com wrote: On Wed, 15 Nov 2011, Tim Streater wrote: I find I need to do this: date_default_timezone_set (@date_default_timezone_get ()); in all my scripts since 5.x.x to avoid rude messages. Apart from the fact that I've not seen the rude messages of which you speak, even though I expected to, this won't help in this case. date_default_timezone_get() is returning the wrong timezone. Here's what I would otherwise get: Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /Users/tim/ -- Cheers -- Tim -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Think I found a PHP bug
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Jim Lucas wrote: Also, I recalled something from the early 5.1.0 version that was related to the introduction of the date_timezone_set() function. So, from there I searched Google for php changelog and found the changelog for php v5. Then I searched that document for 'date_' and found that under the 5.1.0 they added the above function. How it is stated, it makes me think that PHP now requires you to call this function prior to any use of other date functions. I cannot find anything in the php manual confirming my last statement. YMMV If you don't use date_default_timezone_set(), it's supposed to use the server timezone. I recalled reading that a notice/warning would be logged if you did this, but like you, I can't find any reference to this now. I've searched my apache error logs and can't find anything there either, which seems to suggest that this in fact is not the case. In case it wasn't obvious in my original post, this worked just fine during UK summer time. It's only since the clocks changed two weeks ago that PHP has been thinking that the server timezone is UTC rather than Europe/London. Geoff. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Think I found a PHP bug
On Wed, 15 Nov 2011, Tim Streater wrote: I find I need to do this: date_default_timezone_set (@date_default_timezone_get ()); in all my scripts since 5.x.x to avoid rude messages. Apart from the fact that I've not seen the rude messages of which you speak, even though I expected to, this won't help in this case. date_default_timezone_get() is returning the wrong timezone. Geoff. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Think I found a PHP bug
Hi, A couple of weeks ago, I discovered what I'm pretty sure is a PHP bug. In addition, I looked in the PHP changelog and I haven't seen any mention of a fix for it. I'm writing here because I was wondering if anyone else can confirm it and what to do about it. The bug is that if a server's timezone is set to Europe/London and you don't set an explicit timezone in your script, if it's winter time in the UK, PHP thinks the timezone is UTC instead of Europe/London. Example: First, lets confirm that the system time is in fact set to Europe/London. $ cmp --verbose /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/London $ echo $? 0 Now lets see what PHP thinks it is. $ php -r 'echo date_default_timezone_get();' UTC What about if we set it in the environment? $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo date_default_timezone_get();' Europe/London OK, so we appear to have an issue. But is this just semantics? Well no. consider the following (with TZ once again unset): $ php -r 'echo date (r, strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:00 + But of course, Europe/London isn't on + in July. $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo date (r, strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm));' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:00 +0100 The problem comes in when we view times created in one and printed in the other: $ unset TZ $ php -r 'echo strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm);' 1309521600 $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo date (r, 1309521600);' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:00:00 +0100 And the opposite: $ export TZ=Europe/London $ php -r 'echo strtotime (1 July 2011 12:00 pm);' 1309518000 $ unset TZ $ php -r 'echo date (r, 1309518000);' Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:00:00 + This last one is what led me to discover this bug. We use automation software to run our Internet radio station. The playout system is written in C and the web front-end is written in PHP, with the data they work on the only point of commonality between them. The station was set up during the European summer. When the clocks changed, the playout system coped but the PHP front-end was showing everything an hour out. Now of course, I personally can force the front-end to use Europe/London and it will work for me. And I guess ultimately it would make sense to program the system to allow the user to specify a timezone rather than relying on the server default. But right now it doesn't, and any solution would need to take the playout system into account. At any rate, none of this is the point. If you're using the system default timezone, you expect it to (a) be correct and (b) be consistant. Note that this bug may affect other timezones which are on UTC durin the winter or summer, but I've not tested any other timezones as this would mean changing the system timezone and I'm not real keen on doing that on any of my systems. This bug was found on a Debian Squeeze system running the following version of PHP: PHP 5.3.3-7+squeeze3 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Jun 28 2011 08:24:40) Copyright (c) 1997-2009 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2010 Zend Technologies I realise this is 5.3.3 and that 5.3.8 is now out. It's possible that this has been fixed but I could not find any traces of such a fix in the changelogs. I'd be interested to know if anyone else can confirm this bug and, if confirmed, what I should do about it. Thanks, Geoff. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Think I found a PHP bug
On 15 Nov 2011 at 22:34, Geoff Shang ge...@quitelikely.com wrote: The bug is that if a server's timezone is set to Europe/London and you don't set an explicit timezone in your script, if it's winter time in the UK, PHP thinks the timezone is UTC instead of Europe/London. I find I need to do this: date_default_timezone_set (@date_default_timezone_get ()); in all my scripts since 5.x.x to avoid rude messages. -- Cheers -- Tim -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Think I found a PHP bug
On 11/15/2011 2:58 PM, Tim Streater wrote: On 15 Nov 2011 at 22:34, Geoff Shang ge...@quitelikely.com wrote: The bug is that if a server's timezone is set to Europe/London and you don't set an explicit timezone in your script, if it's winter time in the UK, PHP thinks the timezone is UTC instead of Europe/London. I find I need to do this: date_default_timezone_set (@date_default_timezone_get ()); in all my scripts since 5.x.x to avoid rude messages. -- Cheers -- Tim Also, I recalled something from the early 5.1.0 version that was related to the introduction of the date_timezone_set() function. So, from there I searched Google for php changelog and found the changelog for php v5. Then I searched that document for 'date_' and found that under the 5.1.0 they added the above function. How it is stated, it makes me think that PHP now requires you to call this function prior to any use of other date functions. I cannot find anything in the php manual confirming my last statement. YMMV 1 http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.date-timezone-set.php 2 http://php.net/ChangeLog-5.php#5.1.0 -- Jim Lucas http://www.cmsws.com/ http://www.cmsws.com/examples/ http://www.bendsource.com/ C - (541) 408-5189 O - (541) 323-9113 H - (541) 323-4219 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug?
De: Igor Escobar titiolin...@gmail.com Para: php-general@lists.php.net php-general@lists.php.net Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 16 de Setembro de 2011 7:07 Assunto: [PHP] Bug? Anyone can explain this? https://gist.github.com/1220404 Part of the code are in portuguese so... iguais = equal diferentes = different Regards, Igor Escobar *Software Engineer * + http://blog.igorescobar.com + http://www.igorescobar.com + @igorescobar http://www.twitter.com/igorescobar The person who posted this (andersonfraga) has set up four string comparison tests. It was commented by augustohp who said:- float_a.php Existe uma configuração no php.ini da precisão de números de ponto flutuante. Acima desse número, todos são arredondados. There is a configuration setting in php.ini that determines the precision of floating point numbers. A number greater than that setting causes rounding. float_b.php Com a bcmath você não está comparando tipos especializados de dados, mas sim dados binários. É mais demorado, mas é extremamente preciso, sempre. With bcmath you are doing a binary comparison. It is slower but precise, always. string_a.php Quando você usa == você não compara os tipos, e não força o interpretador a respeitar o tipo de dado fornecido. O que acontece então!? O PHP converte o tipo para o tipo de dado mais apropriado em uma condição: boolean, inteiro, etc ... Se você converter para inteiro, vai ver que os números são iguais. When you use the == operator you don't compare data types and don't force the interpreter to respect the data type supplied. What happens then? PHP converts the type to the most appropriate data type and returns a boolean. (I assume he means casting. I always thought that you had to cast the variables implicitly in order to use ==.) I think he is saying in the next sentence that if you cast them to integers, you'll see that the numbers are equal. Doesn't make any sense to me, but then, I'm no expert. string_b.php Aqui sim você compara strings, garante que elas não sofram cast para outro tipo de dado. Você pode atingir isso usando === também, sem essa função de comparação de strings. Here you compare strings, and guarantee that they don't suffer casting to another data type. You can achieve the same thing by using the === operator also, without (using) this string comparison function. Hope this helps. Cheers, Robert
[PHP] Bug?
Anyone can explain this? https://gist.github.com/1220404 Part of the code are in portuguese so... iguais = equal diferentes = different Regards, Igor Escobar *Software Engineer * + http://blog.igorescobar.com + http://www.igorescobar.com + @igorescobar http://www.twitter.com/igorescobar
Re: [PHP] Bug?
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 17:07, Igor Escobar titiolin...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone can explain this? https://gist.github.com/1220404 Part of the code are in portuguese so... iguais = equal diferentes = different About this part are you confused? -- /Daniel P. Brown Network Infrastructure Manager http://www.php.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug?
I'm confused about the output of the code... very disturbed. But @*augustohphttps://gist.github.com/augustohp * already respond the question on the gist thread (in portuguese) and explained why those results. Regards, Igor Escobar *Software Engineer * + http://blog.igorescobar.com + http://www.igorescobar.com + @igorescobar http://www.twitter.com/igorescobar On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 17:07, Igor Escobar titiolin...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone can explain this? https://gist.github.com/1220404 Part of the code are in portuguese so... iguais = equal diferentes = different About this part are you confused? -- /Daniel P. Brown Network Infrastructure Manager http://www.php.net/
Fwd: [PHP] Bug?
Hit reply instead of reply-all /o\ -- Forwarded message -- From: tamouse mailing lists tamouse.li...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:39 PM Subject: Re: [PHP] Bug? To: Igor Escobar titiolin...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Igor Escobar titiolin...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone can explain this? https://gist.github.com/1220404 For the floats, http://us2.php.net/operators.comparison makes it pretty clear (and this has been a well-known thing about floats as far back as Uni for me, in 1979). The string thing is noted in PHP as far back as 2004: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php#41986 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: Fwd: [PHP] Bug?
On 15 Sep 2011 at 22:43, tamouse mailing lists tamouse.li...@gmail.com wrote: For the floats, http://us2.php.net/operators.comparison makes it pretty clear (and this has been a well-known thing about floats as far back as Uni for me, in 1979). The fact that floating point hardware has limited precision has been known ever since the first such hardware in the mid-1950's, in fact. -- Cheers -- Tim -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug #51739 tricky string to float conversion
On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie: On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Hi, I have opend Bug #51739 in 2010. It was closed as bogus before my last question was answered. It would be fine to know what you think about that bug. In short: var_dump((float)8315e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d); results in float(INF) This is because 8315 is treated as base and e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d is treated as an exponent. My hint that e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d is not a valid exponent was not answered. What do you think about? cheers Daniel The cast to float is truncating the invalid characters and since your string contains a float that is INF (8315e839) before the truncation at the d, then it returns INF. Makes perfect sense. This is what drives me crazy. If I use a string in PHP I don't want PHP to cut this string. Either it uses this string as it is or it gives me an error/warning/false (what ever...). But silently(!!!) using a small piece of a string is not understandable. cheers Daniel The manual clearly states this is how a string is converted into a number: http://php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php#language.types.string.conversion The value is given by the initial portion of the string. If the string starts with valid numeric data, this will be the value used. Otherwise, the value will be 0 (zero). Valid numeric data is an optional sign, followed by one or more digits (optionally containing a decimal point), followed by an optional exponent. The exponent is an 'e' or 'E' followed by one or more digits. If you don't want the string turned into a number using the documented method, don't use it as one. --- Simon Welsh Admin of http://simon.geek.nz/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug #51739 tricky string to float conversion
Simon J Welsh writes: On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie: On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: var_dump((float)8315e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d); results in float(INF) The cast to float is truncating the invalid characters and since your string contains a float that is INF (8315e839) before the truncation at the d, then it returns INF. Makes perfect sense. If I use a string in PHP I don't want PHP to cut this string. Either it uses this string as it is or it gives me an error/warning/false (what ever...). But silently(!!!) using a small piece of a string is not understandable. The manual clearly states this is how a string is converted into a number: http://php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php#language.types.string.conversion The value is given by the initial portion of the string. If the string starts with valid numeric data, this will be the value used. Otherwise, the value will be 0 (zero). Valid numeric data is an optional sign, followed by one or more digits (optionally containing a decimal point), followed by an optional exponent. The exponent is an 'e' or 'E' followed by one or more digits. If you don't want the string turned into a number using the documented method, don't use it as one. Ok, then let's discuss the documented behavior ;-) Do you (not the document) really like this behavior? I mean if I am the only one wondering about that behavior it is ok for me. I just want to help PHP. cheers Daniel -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug #51739 tricky string to float conversion
Le 01/09/2011 10:43, magic-...@damage.devloop.de a écrit : Simon J Welsh writes: On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie: On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: var_dump((float)8315e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d); results in float(INF) The cast to float is truncating the invalid characters and since your string contains a float that is INF (8315e839) before the truncation at the d, then it returns INF. Makes perfect sense. If I use a string in PHP I don't want PHP to cut this string. Either it uses this string as it is or it gives me an error/warning/false (what ever...). But silently(!!!) using a small piece of a string is not understandable. The manual clearly states this is how a string is converted into a number: http://php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php#language.types.string.conversion The value is given by the initial portion of the string. If the string starts with valid numeric data, this will be the value used. Otherwise, the value will be 0 (zero). Valid numeric data is an optional sign, followed by one or more digits (optionally containing a decimal point), followed by an optional exponent. The exponent is an 'e' or 'E' followed by one or more digits. If you don't want the string turned into a number using the documented method, don't use it as one. Ok, then let's discuss the documented behavior ;-) Do you (not the document) really like this behavior? I mean if I am the only one wondering about that behavior it is ok for me. I just want to help PHP. cheers Daniel No professional programmer would like this kind of behavior. But PHP want to be accessible for newbies so we have to deal with that. Hope this will be fixed in the next generation... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug #51739 tricky string to float conversion
On 1/09/2011, at 8:43 PM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Simon J Welsh writes: On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie: On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: var_dump((float)8315e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d); results in float(INF) The cast to float is truncating the invalid characters and since your string contains a float that is INF (8315e839) before the truncation at the d, then it returns INF. Makes perfect sense. If I use a string in PHP I don't want PHP to cut this string. Either it uses this string as it is or it gives me an error/warning/false (what ever...). But silently(!!!) using a small piece of a string is not understandable. The manual clearly states this is how a string is converted into a number: http://php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php#language.types.string.conversion The value is given by the initial portion of the string. If the string starts with valid numeric data, this will be the value used. Otherwise, the value will be 0 (zero). Valid numeric data is an optional sign, followed by one or more digits (optionally containing a decimal point), followed by an optional exponent. The exponent is an 'e' or 'E' followed by one or more digits. If you don't want the string turned into a number using the documented method, don't use it as one. Ok, then let's discuss the documented behavior ;-) Do you (not the document) really like this behavior? I mean if I am the only one wondering about that behavior it is ok for me. I just want to help PHP. cheers Daniel Yes, I think the way it works is correct. It follows similar conversions when changing from a data type that allows more data to one that allows less. Similar things happen when converting from a floating point to integral value. It also directly correlates to the C functions for doing the same thing (atof, strtod, the like). --- Simon Welsh Admin of http://simon.geek.nz/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug #51739 tricky string to float conversion
Hi, I have opend Bug #51739 in 2010. It was closed as bogus before my last question was answered. It would be fine to know what you think about that bug. In short: var_dump((float)8315e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d); results in float(INF) This is because 8315 is treated as base and e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d is treated as an exponent. My hint that e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d is not a valid exponent was not answered. What do you think about? cheers Daniel -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] A php bug or?..
Hi everyone,
As we all know, count() returns 1 if the variable
is not an array.
Question is: why in the world does it this? If a variable is *notA* an array,
it contains *zero* array elements.
You can answer: but no, man, you can say
$x=world;
$y=$x{3}; // $y=l
so the variable is treated or can be treated as an array.
Well. If strings are treated like arrays, why count($x) doesn't return 5
instead of 1?
Just asking.
--
With best regards from Ukraine,
Andre
Skype: Francophile
Blog: http://oire.org/menelion
Twitter: http://twitter.com/m_elensule
Facebook: http://facebook.com/menelion
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] A php bug or?..
On 9/08/2011, at 8:20 AM, Andre Polykanine wrote:
Hi everyone,
As we all know, count() returns 1 if the variable
is not an array.
Question is: why in the world does it this? If a variable is *notA* an array,
it contains *zero* array elements.
You can answer: but no, man, you can say
$x=world;
$y=$x{3}; // $y=l
so the variable is treated or can be treated as an array.
Well. If strings are treated like arrays, why count($x) doesn't return 5
instead of 1?
Just asking.
--
With best regards from Ukraine,
Andre
I'm assuming it has to do with the value, if not an array or object, being cast
as an array. Thus, non-false equivalent values get cast into an array of size 1:
?php
var_dump((array)1);
var_dump((array)null);
// Output
array(1) {
[0]=
int(1)
}
array(0) {
}
---
Simon Welsh
Admin of http://simon.geek.nz/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] A php bug or?..
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 16:20, Andre Polykanine an...@oire.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
As we all know, count() returns 1 if the variable
is not an array.
Question is: why in the world does it this? If a variable is *notA* an array,
it contains *zero* array elements.
You can answer: but no, man, you can say
$x=world;
$y=$x{3}; // $y=l
so the variable is treated or can be treated as an array.
Well. If strings are treated like arrays, why count($x) doesn't return 5
instead of 1?
Just asking.
Using count() will return the number of items passed in the first
parameter. If it's an array, each element is an item. If it's a
string, the string is an item. If it's an object, logically, the
items depend on what is contained in the object. However, at no time
does it return the number of characters within a string --- instead,
as you likely know, you'd use strlen().
--
/Daniel P. Brown
Dedicated Servers, Cloud and Cloud Hybrid Solutions, VPS, Hosting
(866-) 725-4321
http://www.parasane.net/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] A php bug or?..
Hello Daniel, DPB does it return the number of characters within a string --- instead, DPB as you likely know, you'd use strlen(). For sure. But I'm asking: why it doesn't return 0 if it is not an array? Logically: no array - no items! -- With best regards from Ukraine, Andre Skype: Francophile My blog: http://oire.org/menelion (mostly in Russian) Twitter: http://twitter.com/m_elensule Facebook: http://facebook.com/menelion -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] A php bug or?..
On 8 Aug 2011, at 21:41, Andre Polykanine wrote: DPB does it return the number of characters within a string --- instead, DPB as you likely know, you'd use strlen(). For sure. But I'm asking: why it doesn't return 0 if it is not an array? Logically: no array - no items! The manual explains what the function does - you may want to check it out cos it does the same for all the other functions too. Returns the number of elements in var. If var is not an array or an object with implemented Countable interface, 1 will be returned. There is one exception, if var is NULL, 0 will be returned. IOW, if you pass it a variable, that has one element, so it returns 1. An array may have 0 to many elements, and null, logically, has none. Rocket science this ain't! -Stuart -- Stuart Dallas 3ft9 Ltd http://3ft9.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] A php bug or?..
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 16:41, Andre Polykanine an...@oire.org wrote: For sure. But I'm asking: why it doesn't return 0 if it is not an array? Logically: no array - no items! No, actually, if it's a string, it's a single item --- thus, 1. The documentation should probably reflect that as well. It wasn't always this way before, though --- in older version of PHP5 it returned 0, and in all versions of PHP4 it did as well. Also, keep in mind that a blank string still constitutes a string and will return 1, but null or nonexistent variables will still return 0. -- /Daniel P. Brown Dedicated Servers, Cloud and Cloud Hybrid Solutions, VPS, Hosting (866-) 725-4321 http://www.parasane.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug #52782: DOMDocument subclass forgotten using -ownerDocument after closure
(I filed bug #52782 about a month ago, but have not received any reply. I am posting here to try and get some feedback on it.) We have custom XML document and element classes that extend the original DOMDocument and DOMElement classes for convenience. There is a class that uses an instance of XmlElement obtained via a callback specified at construction time. That XmlElement works fine and stays that way. However, when we get its ownerDocument outside of the closure, the result is not an XmlDocument but a DOMDocument. I cannot see a single reason why. I tried several options, and it only seems to happen with that closure. I have checked versions 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.3.3 and now the latest 5.3.4 snapshot compiled with './configure make'. More details and a test case: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52782 Jan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] bug in mkdir?
Hi all,
Using 5.2.9
I'm trying to create a directory but it is being created with incorrect
permissions. I'm following the online manual.
This is the command being used:
mkdir('/srv/www/domain/data/R1276190214358/thumbs', 0770, true);
This is what is created:
drwxr-x--- 2 apache apache 4096 2010-06-10 10:33 R1276190214358
Isn't that supposed to be 0770 instead of 0750? Either the manual is
wrong, the command is broken, or I'm screwing it up (most likely).
Thanks for any help,
Mike Wright
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in mkdir?
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:32 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
Hi all,
Using 5.2.9
I'm trying to create a directory but it is being created with incorrect
permissions. I'm following the online manual.
This is the command being used:
mkdir('/srv/www/domain/data/R1276190214358/thumbs', 0770, true);
This is what is created:
drwxr-x--- 2 apache apache 4096 2010-06-10 10:33 R1276190214358
Isn't that supposed to be 0770 instead of 0750? Either the manual is
wrong, the command is broken, or I'm screwing it up (most likely).
Thanks for any help,
Mike Wright
Did the R1276190214358 directory already exist? If so, it will retain
the permissions it had, and only the thumbs sub-directory within it will
have the new permissions.
Also, is this on a shared hosting server? It could be that a security
restriction in-place is not allowing the permissions to be configured as
the directory is written, and you may have to manually update them with
the chmod() function.
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Re: [PHP] bug in mkdir? [SOLVED]
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:32 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
Hi all,
Using 5.2.9
I'm trying to create a directory but it is being created with incorrect
permissions. I'm following the online manual.
This is the command being used:
mkdir('/srv/www/domain/data/R1276190214358/thumbs', 0770, true);
This is what is created:
drwxr-x--- 2 apache apache 4096 2010-06-10 10:33 R1276190214358
Isn't that supposed to be 0770 instead of 0750? Either the manual is
wrong, the command is broken, or I'm screwing it up (most likely).
Thanks for any help,
Mike Wright
Hi, Ash. Thanks for the help.
Did the R1276190214358 directory already exist?
No.
If so, it will retain
the permissions it had, and only the thumbs sub-directory within it will
have the new permissions.
Also, is this on a shared hosting server? It could be that a security
restriction in-place is not allowing the permissions to be configured as
the directory is written, and you may have to manually update them with
the chmod() function.
It's under my control.
Solution: run umask(000) first. (of the 3 choices above it turned out
to be #3 ;(
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
There is something new based on Trac but written in PHP. mtrack (http://bitbucket.org/wez/mtrack/wiki/Home) It is written by one of the PHP Core Developers (Wez Furlong). May be you want to try it out. Best, Anshul On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote: shiplu wrote: I want to add with Andre. I am looking for a free hosted bug tracking solution. I can not afford to host it in my web server. So is there any free one?? It should not be public. Only me and my clients will be able to see it. Thanks yes, for all cases, commercial or not; self hosted or remote; indefero [1] is a fantastic quick to use solution: [1] http://www.indefero.net/ Many Regards, Nathan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
2010/3/29 Anshul Agrawal drinknder...@gmail.com There is something new based on Trac but written in PHP. mtrack (http://bitbucket.org/wez/mtrack/wiki/Home) It is written by one of the PHP Core Developers (Wez Furlong). May be you want to try it out. And there's something quite new that's aimed to be like trac : JotBug http://code.google.com/p/jotbug/ Regards
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Jan G.B. ro0ot.w...@googlemail.com wrote: 2010/3/29 Anshul Agrawal drinknder...@gmail.com There is something new based on Trac but written in PHP. mtrack (http://bitbucket.org/wez/mtrack/wiki/Home) It is written by one of the PHP Core Developers (Wez Furlong). May be you want to try it out. And there's something quite new that's aimed to be like trac : JotBug http://code.google.com/p/jotbug/ Regards I kept wondering for long time why PHP community doesn't have something at least as cool as Trac. Times are changing :) -- Anshul
[PHP] bug tracking system
Hello everyone, Can you recommend a bug tracking system to be installed on the site? Requirements: written in PHP (or maybe Perl); tickets system; e-mail notifications. -- With best regards from Ukraine, Andre Http://oire.org/ - The Fantasy blogs of Oire Skype: Francophile; WlmMSN: arthaelon @ yandex.ru; Jabber: arthaelon @ jabber.org Yahoo! messenger: andre.polykanine; ICQ: 191749952 Twitter: http://twitter.com/m_elensule -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 16:28 +0300, Andre Polykanine wrote: Hello everyone, Can you recommend a bug tracking system to be installed on the site? Requirements: written in PHP (or maybe Perl); tickets system; e-mail notifications. -- With best regards from Ukraine, Andre Http://oire.org/ - The Fantasy blogs of Oire Skype: Francophile; WlmMSN: arthaelon @ yandex.ru; Jabber: arthaelon @ jabber.org Yahoo! messenger: andre.polykanine; ICQ: 191749952 Twitter: http://twitter.com/m_elensule I think your best option is Mantis. It's written in PHP, does all that you've asked, and it's pretty easy to use really. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
On 03/28/2010 06:58 PM, Andre Polykanine wrote: Hello everyone, Can you recommend a bug tracking system to be installed on the site? Requirements: written in PHP (or maybe Perl); tickets system; e-mail notifications. http://www.google.co.in/search?aq=0oq=php+bugsourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=php+bug+tracker -- Nilesh Govindarajan Site Server Administrator www.itech7.com मेरा भारत महान ! मम भारत: महत्तम भवतु ! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
Ashley Sheridan wrote: On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 16:28 +0300, Andre Polykanine wrote: Can you recommend a bug tracking system to be installed on the site? Requirements: written in PHP (or maybe Perl); tickets system; e-mail notifications. I think your best option is Mantis. It's written in PHP, does all that you've asked, and it's pretty easy to use really. agreed, unless IDE integration and familiarity is the name of the game, in which case the usual suspects of trac, jira and bugzilla are worth considering. regards! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
Use drupal with the bug tracking system http://drupal.org/project/project_issue On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Andre Polykanine an...@oire.org wrote: Hello everyone, Can you recommend a bug tracking system to be installed on the site? Requirements: written in PHP (or maybe Perl); tickets system; e-mail notifications. -- With best regards from Ukraine, Andre Http://oire.org/ - The Fantasy blogs of Oire Skype: Francophile; WlmMSN: arthaelon @ yandex.ru; Jabber: arthaelon @ jabber.org Yahoo! messenger: andre.polykanine; ICQ: 191749952 Twitter: http://twitter.com/m_elensule -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Bhaskar Tiwari GTSE Generalist Directory Services Microsoft All we have to decide is what to do with the time that has been given to us http://www.ebhakt.com/ http://fytclub.net/ http://ebhakt.info/
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
On 03/28/2010 07:25 PM, ebhakt wrote: Use drupal with the bug tracking system http://drupal.org/project/project_issue http://drupal.org/project/project_issue On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com mailto:li...@itech7.com wrote: On 03/28/2010 06:58 PM, Andre Polykanine wrote: Hello everyone, Can you recommend a bug tracking system to be installed on the site? Requirements: written in PHP (or maybe Perl); tickets system; e-mail notifications. http://www.google.co.in/search?aq=0oq=php+bugsourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=php+bug+tracker http://www.google.co.in/search?aq=0oq=php+bugsourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=php+bug+tracker -- Nilesh Govindarajan Site Server Administrator www.itech7.com http://www.itech7.com मेरा भारत महान ! मम भारत: महत्तम भवतु ! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Bhaskar Tiwari GTSE Generalist Directory Services Microsoft All we have to decide is what to do with the time that has been given to us http://www.ebhakt.com/ http://fytclub.net/ http://ebhakt.info/ Hey, I wasn't the one who put up the question. -- Nilesh Govindarajan Site Server Administrator www.itech7.com मेरा भारत महान ! मम भारत: महत्तम भवतु ! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
I want to add with Andre. I am looking for a free hosted bug tracking solution. I can not afford to host it in my web server. So is there any free one?? It should not be public. Only me and my clients will be able to see it. Thanks -- Shiplu Mokaddim My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu SUST Programmers, http://groups.google.com/group/p2psust Innovation distinguishes bet ... ... (ask Steve Jobs the rest) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
shiplu wrote: I want to add with Andre. I am looking for a free hosted bug tracking solution. I can not afford to host it in my web server. So is there any free one?? It should not be public. Only me and my clients will be able to see it. Thanks yes, for all cases, commercial or not; self hosted or remote; indefero [1] is a fantastic quick to use solution: [1] http://www.indefero.net/ Many Regards, Nathan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug in php-cgi.exe
Hello, i thing i found a bug in PHP-cgi.exe I use Php-cgi as fastCgi php-cgi.exe -b host:port i set in environement variables this : PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN=8 PHP_FCGI_MAX_REQUESTS=1000 in the task manager i see only one Php-cgi.exe process (when normaly i must see 9 process no?) and after i send more than 1000 request the php-cgi.exe process died ! and i must manually restart it! Thanks you by advance for you help -- stephane Http://www.arkadia.com/fra/ Http://www.arkadia.com/usa/ Http://www.arkadia.com/rus/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug or expected, mbstring.func_overload not changeable by .htaccess 5.2.8/5.2.9
Hello,
Besides the .htaccess which might be an apache configuration problem if
you use ini_set(mbstring.func_overload,2) in a script of this
directory does it work?
no, also the ini_set does not work for this Directive.
Sorry for the late reply.
The ini_set is meant to be used inside a php script not in an .htaccess
file.
So perhaps you could test this in a script specific manner.
In addition to this heck your apache configuration to see if you allow
.htaccess to be parsed.
apache and .htaccess are ok
i added a scond line which changes mbstring.encoding_translation from
off to on without problems:
Directive Local Value Master Value
mbstring.encoding_translation On Off
mbstring.func_overload 0 0
.htaccess:
php_value mbstring.func_overload 2
php_flag mbstring.encoding_translation On
IMHO this is not a good practice using .htaccess to alter php's behavior.
Perhaps you should consider ini_set after all.
Can you confirm or rebut this behavior?
Should we go to internals list?
Thanks,
Andre
Unfortunately I can confirm that.
This is a list with all the initial values you are allowed to change:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ini.list.php
This is a script that shows all the mbstring extension values in an array:
?php
print pre;
print_r(ini_get_all('mbstring'));
?
This array contains the default,local values and access level for each one.
Note that according to the manual:
http://www.php.net/ini_get_all
The access levels for every value are:|
Constant Value Meaning
PHP_INI_USER 1 Entry can be set in user scripts
PHP_INI_PERDIR2 Entry can be set in php.ini, .htaccess or
httpd.conf
PHP_INI_SYSTEM4 Entry can be set in php.ini or httpd.conf
PHP_INI_ALL 7 Entry can be set anywhere
|Although in the ini list the mbstring is supposed to have access level
2 I've noticed that I have access level 4 for mbstring.func_overload.
Perhaps *this is the problem*. You have access level 4 so that is why
you can't change the value using .htaccess.
I don't know if this is an expected behavior though. Can anyone else
confirm this??
--
Thodoris
Re: [PHP] bug or expected, mbstring.func_overload not changeable by .htaccess 5.2.8/5.2.9
Hello, Sorry for the late reply. no problem. The ini_set is meant to be used inside a php script not in an .htaccess file. So perhaps you could test this in a script specific manner. i know;) i do php/apache for some years... i found out the problem in meanwhile. http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47187edit=1 Its not allowed anymore, just not documented. formerly bug was fixed by deactivating ;) thats a pitty cause the patch for 3rd party patch for ~5.2.6 for mentioned bug worked really good. :( Thanks, Andre -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug or expected, mbstring.func_overload not changeable by .htaccess 5.2.8/5.2.9
Hello, Besides the .htaccess which might be an apache configuration problem if you use ini_set(mbstring.func_overload,2) in a script of this directory does it work? no, also the ini_set does not work for this Directive. In addition to this heck your apache configuration to see if you allow .htaccess to be parsed. apache and .htaccess are ok i added a scond line which changes mbstring.encoding_translation from off to on without problems: Directive Local Value Master Value mbstring.encoding_translation On Off mbstring.func_overload 0 0 .htaccess: php_value mbstring.func_overload 2 php_flag mbstring.encoding_translation On Can you confirm or rebut this behavior? Should we go to internals list? Thanks, Andre -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug or expected, mbstring.func_overload not changeable by .htaccess 5.2.8/5.2.9
Hello, following in my .htaccess works with php 5.2.6 (mod_php) php_value mbstring.func_overload 2 Seems that since (5.2.7?) 5.2.8/5.2.9 this value is not any more accepted by php in .htaccess. mbstring.func_overload should be changeable by PHP_INI_PERDIR which includes .htaccess Other values are changeable by .htaccess so it should not be a general problem on my side. Please someone could check this? Thanks, Andre Besides the .htaccess which might be an apache configuration problem if you use ini_set(mbstring.func_overload,2) in a script of this directory does it work? In addition to this heck your apache configuration to see if you allow .htaccess to be parsed. -- Thodoris -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] bug or expected, mbstring.func_overload not changeable by .htaccess 5.2.8/5.2.9
Hello, following in my .htaccess works with php 5.2.6 (mod_php) php_value mbstring.func_overload 2 Seems that since (5.2.7?) 5.2.8/5.2.9 this value is not any more accepted by php in .htaccess. mbstring.func_overload should be changeable by PHP_INI_PERDIR which includes .htaccess Other values are changeable by .htaccess so it should not be a general problem on my side. Please someone could check this? Thanks, Andre -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] php bug from 2003 still alive?!
Hello, I am experiencing problems with utf-8 and php. There seems to be a problem with BOM. Some postings say that I have to compile php with --enable-zend-multibyte. HOwever those postings are very old (2003!). http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=22108 Is this still necessary with the newest php build? If yes, do you believe I will run into trouble on sites that are saved in ansi? Thank you for any hint. Merlin -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: php bug from 2003 still alive?! - UTF8 BOM
Hello everybody, has anybody an idea on how to fix this? Is it really necessary to recomplile for utf-8 BOM support? Regards, Merlin Merlin Morgenstern wrote: Hello, I am experiencing problems with utf-8 and php. There seems to be a problem with BOM. Some postings say that I have to compile php with --enable-zend-multibyte. HOwever those postings are very old (2003!). http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=22108 Is this still necessary with the newest php build? If yes, do you believe I will run into trouble on sites that are saved in ansi? Thank you for any hint. Merlin -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php bug from 2003 still alive?!
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Merlin Morgenstern merli...@fastmail.fmwrote: Some postings say that I have to compile php with --enable-zend-multibyte. HOwever those postings are very old (2003!). http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=22108 Did you see what Derick said abut this in the last comment? * [22 Aug 2005 6:35pm UTC] der...@php.net* This will come with Unicode support in PHP 6.0 Is this still necessary with the newest php build? Looks like it. If yes, do you believe I will run into trouble on sites that are saved in ansi? I'm not sure, you should probably wait for someone else to reply :) Regards, Thiago Henrique Pojda http://nerdnaweb.blogspot DOT com
Re: [PHP] php bug from 2003 still alive?!
Yes I was reading about this. However, try to do a search on this: http://www.google.de/search?hl=deq=enable-zend-multibytebtnG=Google-Suchemeta= Loads of postings that do not look that good. What are all the chinese sites do? It is strange that there is no official description on php.net regarding this support. Thiago H. Pojda wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Merlin Morgenstern merli...@fastmail.fmwrote: Some postings say that I have to compile php with --enable-zend-multibyte. HOwever those postings are very old (2003!). http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=22108 Did you see what Derick said abut this in the last comment? * [22 Aug 2005 6:35pm UTC] der...@php.net* This will come with Unicode support in PHP 6.0 Is this still necessary with the newest php build? Looks like it. If yes, do you believe I will run into trouble on sites that are saved in ansi? I'm not sure, you should probably wait for someone else to reply :) Regards, Thiago Henrique Pojda http://nerdnaweb.blogspot DOT com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] UTF 8 support - enable-zend-multibyte ( was Re: [PHP] php bug from 2003 still alive?! - )
HI there, I now compiled php with zend multibyte. The trouble with the extra characters is now gone, but all special characters are now replaced with a questionmark! The document type shows utf-8, but somehow php seems not to pars the content OK. Does nobody have the same problem? Regards, Merlin Merlin Morgenstern wrote: Yes I was reading about this. However, try to do a search on this: http://www.google.de/search?hl=deq=enable-zend-multibytebtnG=Google-Suchemeta= Loads of postings that do not look that good. What are all the chinese sites do? It is strange that there is no official description on php.net regarding this support. Thiago H. Pojda wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Merlin Morgenstern merli...@fastmail.fmwrote: Some postings say that I have to compile php with --enable-zend-multibyte. HOwever those postings are very old (2003!). http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=22108 Did you see what Derick said abut this in the last comment? * [22 Aug 2005 6:35pm UTC] der...@php.net* This will come with Unicode support in PHP 6.0 Is this still necessary with the newest php build? Looks like it. If yes, do you believe I will run into trouble on sites that are saved in ansi? I'm not sure, you should probably wait for someone else to reply :) Regards, Thiago Henrique Pojda http://nerdnaweb.blogspot DOT com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] UTF 8 support - enable-zend-multibyte ( was Re: [PHP] php bug from 2003 still alive?! - )
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Merlin Morgenstern merli...@fastmail.fm wrote: HI there, I now compiled php with zend multibyte. The trouble with the extra characters is now gone, but all special characters are now replaced with a questionmark! The document type shows utf-8, but somehow php seems not to pars the content OK. Does nobody have the same problem? Regards, Merlin Please stop top-posting. Anyway, are you using a META tag codepage to tell the web browser what to do with those special characters? I'm not certain a DOCTYPE is going to handle everything. -- // Todd -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] UTF 8 support - enable-zend-multibyte ( was Re: [PHP] php bug from 2003 still alive?! - )
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Merlin Morgenstern
merli...@fastmail.fm wrote:
HI there,
I now compiled php with zend multibyte. The trouble with the extra
characters is now gone, but all special characters are now replaced with a
questionmark! The document type shows utf-8, but somehow php seems not to
pars the content OK.
Does nobody have the same problem?
Regards, Merlin
Please stop top-posting.
Anyway, are you using a META tag codepage to tell the web browser what
to do with those special characters? I'm not certain a DOCTYPE is
going to handle everything.
HI,
I am using a meta tag:
meta http-equiv=content-type content=text/html; charset=UTF-8
I have also configured apache:
AddDefaultCharset utf-8
Also php:
header('content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8');
Header:
HTTP/1.x 200 OK
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:14:22 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.9 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.9 OpenSSL/0.9.8h PHP/5.2.9
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.2.9
Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100
Connection: Keep-Alive
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
The chinese characters which come directly out of the database are shown
corretly. The chinese chars that are saved in a text file show up as a
question mark.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Is it PHP Bug - memory leak ?
Hello,
I try to run script below with PHP4 and it works.
--TEST--
Test session_encode() function : variation
--SKIPIF--
?php include('skipif.inc'); ?
--FILE--
?php
ob_start();
echo *** Testing session_encode() : variation ***\n;
var_dump(session_start());
$array = array(1,2,3);
$array[foo] = $array;
$array[blah] = $array;
$_SESSION[data] = $array;
var_dump(session_encode());
var_dump(session_destroy());
echo Done;
ob_end_flush();
?
--EXPECTF--
*** Testing session_encode() : variation ***
bool(true)
string(64)
data|a:5:{i:0;i:1;i:1;i:2;i:2;i:3;s:3:foo;R:1;s:4:blah;R:1;}
bool(true)
Done
But in PHP5 x64 I have errors like:
/root/src/php-5.2.6/Zend/zend_hash.c(247) : Freeing 0x0E76BC50 (75 bytes),
script=ext/session/tests/session_encode_variation5.phpt
[Sat Dec 27 11:27:09 2008] Script:
'ext/session/tests/session_encode_variation5.phpt'
/root/src/php-5.2.6/Zend/zend_vm_execute.h(3596) : Freeing 0x0E76B990 (71
bytes), script=ext/session/tests/session_encode_variation5.phpt
/root/src/php-5.2.6/Zend/zend_hash.c(388) : Actual location (location was
relayed)
If I add:
$array[foo] = null;
$array[blah] = null;
in test code it works without errors. But is I always need to add 'null' ?
I'm asking because I have some site which genereating many errors like
Actual location (location was relayed).
Thanks
Pawel R.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Is it PHP Bug - memory leak ?
Hi, Pawel; On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 05:40, Pawel Rutkowski rut...@freelance-worker.net wrote: [snip!] But in PHP5 x64 I have errors like: /root/src/php-5.2.6/Zend/zend_hash.c(247) : Freeing 0x0E76BC50 (75 bytes), script=ext/session/tests/session_encode_variation5.phpt [Sat Dec 27 11:27:09 2008] Script: 'ext/session/tests/session_encode_variation5.phpt' /root/src/php-5.2.6/Zend/zend_vm_execute.h(3596) : Freeing 0x0E76B990 (71 bytes), script=ext/session/tests/session_encode_variation5.phpt /root/src/php-5.2.6/Zend/zend_hash.c(388) : Actual location (location was relayed) Please file a bug report on this with the reproduce cases at http://bugs.php.net/. There was a nearly identical case mentioned in the Zend forums[1] as found by Google, but no resolution was reached there. KEY: 1: http://www.zend.com/forums/index.php?t=msggoto=19257S=e5a6d1ca82291c880a9d85093afe1ee7 -- /Daniel P. Brown daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/ Unadvertised dedicated server deals, too low to print - email me to find out! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in array_key_exist?
Korgan schreef:
Korgan napsal(a):
Jim Lucas napsal(a):
Korgan wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with array_key_exists in if statement.
I have a class with this function
class XXX {
private items = array();
...
...
...
public function addXXX($id, $count)
{
$count = (int)$cout;
Let me point at it
Check your spelling
If error_reporting was set to E_ALL AND display_errors were turned
on, you would see that you are using an undefined variable in your
method called $cout, casting is as an int and assigning the resulting
value (which would always be zero) to $count.
Sorry i didnt see it :). In the script is $count = (int)$count;
no point in anyone trying to help you then, because you don't post the code
you use, you post something else instead ... this is not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
btw there is practically no chance of a bug being in array_key_exists() and
you being the first to spot it, as a function it's used way too much to be
able to fly under the bug radar. jmho.
After add a item value is ok look at first B vardump which is on the end
of the script.
No variable $count is mandatory so that is defined.
But its not main idea of my question...
Function add items correctly, but if go to next page, values in array
change. Values are changed passing from one page to another one, why
and where?
if (!array_key_exists($id, $this-items))
$this-items[$id] = $count;
else
$this-items[$id] += $count;
}
...
...
}
And I want to send instance of this class with SESSION.
If I add a item to the array, count is ok, but if i go to the next
page count will change.
There is the code of index.php
/** its loading classes ***/
spl_autoload_register('loadClass');
session_start();
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** A **/
...
...
...
if ($_SESSION['XX'] instanceof XXX)
$x = $_SESSION['XX'];
else
new...
..
..
/** Do onzl this **/
if
$x-addXXX($id, $cnt);
...
...
$_SESSION['XX'] = X;
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** B **/
There is a vardump if action addXXX exec:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(0) { } }
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(1) } }
And than i will go to some page and vardums are:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } } 1 : 4
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } }
I am thinking that do both codes in if statement,
but $this-items[$id] += $count; exec after send page.
I am using PHP Version 5.2.6 and Smarty v.2.6.19
Thanks for help :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in array_key_exist?
Korgan napsal(a):
Jim Lucas napsal(a):
Korgan wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with array_key_exists in if statement.
I have a class with this function
class XXX {
private items = array();
...
...
...
public function addXXX($id, $count)
{
$count = (int)$cout;
Let me point at it
Check your spelling
If error_reporting was set to E_ALL AND display_errors were turned on,
you would see that you are using an undefined variable in your method
called $cout, casting is as an int and assigning the resulting value
(which would always be zero) to $count.
Sorry i didnt see it :). In the script is $count = (int)$count;
After add a item value is ok look at first B vardump which is on the end
of the script.
No variable $count is mandatory so that is defined.
But its not main idea of my question...
Function add items correctly, but if go to next page, values in array
change. Values are changed passing from one page to another one, why and
where?
if (!array_key_exists($id, $this-items))
$this-items[$id] = $count;
else
$this-items[$id] += $count;
}
...
...
}
And I want to send instance of this class with SESSION.
If I add a item to the array, count is ok, but if i go to the next
page count will change.
There is the code of index.php
/** its loading classes ***/
spl_autoload_register('loadClass');
session_start();
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** A **/
...
...
...
if ($_SESSION['XX'] instanceof XXX)
$x = $_SESSION['XX'];
else
new...
..
..
/** Do onzl this **/
if
$x-addXXX($id, $cnt);
...
...
$_SESSION['XX'] = X;
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** B **/
There is a vardump if action addXXX exec:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(0) { } }
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(1) } }
And than i will go to some page and vardums are:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } } 1 : 4
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } }
I am thinking that do both codes in if statement,
but $this-items[$id] += $count; exec after send page.
I am using PHP Version 5.2.6 and Smarty v.2.6.19
Thanks for help :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug in array_key_exist?
Hi,
I have a problem with array_key_exists in if statement.
I have a class with this function
class XXX {
private items = array();
...
...
...
public function addXXX($id, $count)
{
$count = (int)$cout;
if (!array_key_exists($id, $this-items))
$this-items[$id] = $count;
else
$this-items[$id] += $count;
}
...
...
}
And I want to send instance of this class with SESSION.
If I add a item to the array, count is ok, but if i go to the next page
count will change.
There is the code of index.php
/** its loading classes ***/
spl_autoload_register('loadClass');
session_start();
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** A **/
...
...
...
if ($_SESSION['XX'] instanceof XXX)
$x = $_SESSION['XX'];
else
new...
..
..
/** Do onzl this **/
if
$x-addXXX($id, $cnt);
...
...
$_SESSION['XX'] = X;
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** B **/
There is a vardump if action addXXX exec:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(0) { } }
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]= int(1) } }
And than i will go to some page and vardums are:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]= int(4) } }
1 : 4
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]= int(4) } }
I am thinking that do both codes in if statement,
but $this-items[$id] += $count; exec after send page.
I am using PHP Version 5.2.6 and Smarty v.2.6.19
Thanks for help :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in array_key_exist?
Korgan wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with array_key_exists in if statement.
I have a class with this function
class XXX {
private items = array();
...
...
...
public function addXXX($id, $count)
{
$count = (int)$cout;
Let me point at it
Check your spelling
If error_reporting was set to E_ALL AND display_errors were turned on, you would see that you are
using an undefined variable in your method called $cout, casting is as an int and assigning the
resulting value (which would always be zero) to $count.
if (!array_key_exists($id, $this-items))
$this-items[$id] = $count;
else
$this-items[$id] += $count;
}
...
...
}
And I want to send instance of this class with SESSION.
If I add a item to the array, count is ok, but if i go to the next page
count will change.
There is the code of index.php
/** its loading classes ***/
spl_autoload_register('loadClass');
session_start();
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** A **/
...
...
...
if ($_SESSION['XX'] instanceof XXX)
$x = $_SESSION['XX'];
else
new...
..
..
/** Do onzl this **/
if
$x-addXXX($id, $cnt);
...
...
$_SESSION['XX'] = X;
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** B **/
There is a vardump if action addXXX exec:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(0) { } }
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]= int(1) } }
And than i will go to some page and vardums are:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]= int(4)
} } 1 : 4
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]= int(4)
} }
I am thinking that do both codes in if statement,
but $this-items[$id] += $count; exec after send page.
I am using PHP Version 5.2.6 and Smarty v.2.6.19
Thanks for help :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in array_key_exist?
Jim Lucas napsal(a):
Korgan wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with array_key_exists in if statement.
I have a class with this function
class XXX {
private items = array();
...
...
...
public function addXXX($id, $count)
{
$count = (int)$cout;
Let me point at it
Check your spelling
If error_reporting was set to E_ALL AND display_errors were turned on,
you would see that you are using an undefined variable in your method
called $cout, casting is as an int and assigning the resulting value
(which would always be zero) to $count.
No variable $count is mandatory so that is defined.
But its not main idea of my question...
Function add items correctly, but if go to next page, values in array
change. Values are changed passing from one page to another one, why and
where?
if (!array_key_exists($id, $this-items))
$this-items[$id] = $count;
else
$this-items[$id] += $count;
}
...
...
}
And I want to send instance of this class with SESSION.
If I add a item to the array, count is ok, but if i go to the next
page count will change.
There is the code of index.php
/** its loading classes ***/
spl_autoload_register('loadClass');
session_start();
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** A **/
...
...
...
if ($_SESSION['XX'] instanceof XXX)
$x = $_SESSION['XX'];
else
new...
..
..
/** Do onzl this **/
if
$x-addXXX($id, $cnt);
...
...
$_SESSION['XX'] = X;
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** B **/
There is a vardump if action addXXX exec:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(0) { } }
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(1) } }
And than i will go to some page and vardums are:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } } 1 : 4
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } }
I am thinking that do both codes in if statement,
but $this-items[$id] += $count; exec after send page.
I am using PHP Version 5.2.6 and Smarty v.2.6.19
Thanks for help :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug in SimpleXML?
I was working on a project for XML Parsing. I came across instances where my
elements were completely missing.
After further Digging into the issue, I found out, that when placing tags
inside of an element with text, SimpleXML (and dom Document) ignore the
added tags, and the text within.
Heres an example.
---ok.xml-
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 standalone=yes?
Document
Article
Title pagenum=84 docname=Career Path mar 08Is Your
Face on Facebook? /Title
SubtitleEmploy simple strategies to market your ?profile?
using online social networking./Subtitle
BodyTemp Testing Example of SimpleXML Bug.bIs it a bug
though?/b/Body
FolioTrying to just show Examples/Folio
/Article
/Document
---ok.xml-
---ok.php-
?php
$file = file_get_contents('ok.xml');
$xml = new SimpleXMLElement($file);
print_r($xml);
print $xml-Article-Body-b . \n;
---ok.php-
---output-
SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[Article] = SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[Title] = Is Your Face on Facebook?
[Subtitle] = Employ simple strategies to market your ?profile?
using online social networking.
[Body] = Temp Testing Example of SimpleXML Bug.
[Folio] = Trying to just show Examples
)
)
Is it a bug though?
---output-
Furthermore if I place b tags at the beginning of of the Body tags
ie.
BodybTesting/bTemp Testing Example of SimpleXML Bug.bIs it a bug
though?/b/Body
The text between the /b and b is ignored and is output as follows..
---output---
SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[Article] = SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[Title] = Is Your Face on Facebook?
[Subtitle] = Employ simple strategies to market your ?profile?
using online social networking.
[Body] = SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[b] = Array
(
[0] = Testing
[1] = Is it a bug though?
)
)
[Folio] = Trying to just show Examples
)
)
Testing
---output---
The above output is using ok.php.
Is this working as intended?
Re: [PHP] Bug in SimpleXML?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Kyle Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was working on a project for XML Parsing. I came across instances where my elements were completely missing. After further Digging into the issue, I found out, that when placing tags inside of an element with text, SimpleXML (and dom Document) ignore the added tags, and the text within. thats a known limitation. i have written a workaround in some code for a personal project, but it cant be great for performance. anyway, another option is to use DOM. ---output- SimpleXMLElement Object ( [Article] = SimpleXMLElement Object ( [Title] = Is Your Face on Facebook? [Subtitle] = Employ simple strategies to market your ?profile? using online social networking. [Body] = Temp Testing Example of SimpleXML Bug. [Folio] = Trying to just show Examples ) ) are you using print_r() or var_dump() to generate this output? fyi, those are explicitly not supported by simplexml. -nathan
Re: [PHP] Bug in SimpleXML?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Kyle Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used both print_r and var_dump. Whats supported for ultimate nesting prints of values and keys?, or in objects words, properties and values. cc'ng the list again.. well var_dump() and print_r() just arent supported for simplexml, per the manual, http://php.oregonstate.edu/manual/en/function.simplexml-element-attributes.php *Note*: SimpleXML has made a rule of adding iterative properties to most methods. They cannot be viewed using var_dump()http://php.oregonstate.edu/manual/en/function.var-dump.phpor anything else which can examine objects. basically, youre best bet w/ simplexml is asXML() ;) -nathan
[PHP] Bug in stream_socket_server()?
If you want a high speed socket server, use the low-level sockets instead (socket_create/bind/listen). The stream_socket_server version appears to have internal fixed 8k buffers that will overflow if you don't keep up by reading. This is a serious problem if you an application that reads the socket for messages and then, say, saves the result in a database. The delay while it is busy processing means you can't read the data in time unless you get involved in muti-threading. With the the low-level functions, the OS quietly buffers TCP/IP packets so there is no problem (tested on Windows XP Professional). ( http://php.oregonstate.edu/manual/en/function.stream-socket- server.php#67837 ) Has anyone confirmed this? I am doing tests with a stripped-down multi-client socket server, wonder if this issue is causing some of the problems I've seen. ...Rene -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug with passing objects by reference and assigning a defeault null?
Has anyone tried to assign a default value of null for an object passed
by reference in PHP4?
Let's say I had this code:
$mObj = new testModel();
$mObj-msg = Bubba;
testFunc();
class testModel {
var $msg;
}
function testFunc($msg=null) {
echo $msg-msg;
}
Under PHP5, this works fine.
Under PHP4, the = will cause an error: Parse error: syntax error,
unexpected '=', expecting ')'. Removing the in the parameter
definition makes it work. I'm using 4.4.2 right now, but don't see
anything in the later change logs that say this was fixed. I also don't
find any mention of it in the bugs list. Is this a legit bug or am I
committing a big no-no?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug with passing objects by reference and assigning a defeault null?
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 12:19 -0400, Shu Chow wrote:
Has anyone tried to assign a default value of null for an object passed
by reference in PHP4?
Let's say I had this code:
$mObj = new testModel();
$mObj-msg = Bubba;
testFunc();
class testModel {
var $msg;
}
function testFunc($msg=null) {
echo $msg-msg;
}
Under PHP5, this works fine.
Under PHP4, the = will cause an error: Parse error: syntax error,
unexpected '=', expecting ')'. Removing the in the parameter
definition makes it work. I'm using 4.4.2 right now, but don't see
anything in the later change logs that say this was fixed. I also don't
find any mention of it in the bugs list. Is this a legit bug or am I
committing a big no-no?
Not a bug, it's a limitation of PHP4.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
::
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily. |
`'
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Help with the php bug in the Squirrelmail plugin's script
Hi I'd like to ask you for the help I'm using Squirellmail with plugin Shared calendar. This is simple nice plugin written by Paul Lesniewski But I found the bug in this plugin. The bug seems to be related with variable and memory. The scripts are really slow and sometimes takes 20-30 seconds under some conditions. Unfortunately Paul is busy and has no time to examine it. Just told me that it seems like there is a problem in that all files are inspected even when it just needs to look for one file. I found out what caused this delay and what action but I'm not good programmer therefore I cannot repair it by myself Can anybody look at this plugin and bug ? I can provide more information Can anybody give me some advice how to proceed? Thanks Pet -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Help with the php bug in the Squirrelmail plugin's script
If there are no people willing to, i am, but i don't have a lot of time. I hope it isn't urgent. Tijnema On 3/9/07, Jevos, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I'd like to ask you for the help I'm using Squirellmail with plugin Shared calendar. This is simple nice plugin written by Paul Lesniewski But I found the bug in this plugin. The bug seems to be related with variable and memory. The scripts are really slow and sometimes takes 20-30 seconds under some conditions. Unfortunately Paul is busy and has no time to examine it. Just told me that it seems like there is a problem in that all files are inspected even when it just needs to look for one file. I found out what caused this delay and what action but I'm not good programmer therefore I cannot repair it by myself Can anybody look at this plugin and bug ? I can provide more information Can anybody give me some advice how to proceed? Thanks Pet -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: Help with the php bug in the Squirrelmail plugin's script
Jevos, Peter wrote: Hi I'd like to ask you for the help I'm using Squirellmail with plugin Shared calendar. This is simple nice plugin written by Paul Lesniewski But I found the bug in this plugin. The bug seems to be related with variable and memory. The scripts are really slow and sometimes takes 20-30 seconds under some conditions. Unfortunately Paul is busy and has no time to examine it. Just told me that it seems like there is a problem in that all files are inspected even when it just needs to look for one file. I found out what caused this delay and what action but I'm not good programmer therefore I cannot repair it by myself Can anybody look at this plugin and bug ? I can provide more information Can anybody give me some advice how to proceed? You should post AS MUCH information as you have, that way someone can look at it and decide if it is something they can do right away. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: Help with the php bug in the Squirrelmail plugin's script
Hi I'd like to ask you for the help I'm using Squirellmail with plugin Shared calendar. This is simple nice plugin written by Paul Lesniewski But I found the bug in this plugin. The bug seems to be related with variable and memory. The scripts are really slow and sometimes takes 20-30 seconds under some conditions. Unfortunately Paul is busy and has no time to examine it. Just told me that it seems like there is a problem in that all files are inspected even when it just needs to look for one file. I found out what caused this delay and what action but I'm not good programmer therefore I cannot repair it by myself Can anybody look at this plugin and bug ? I can provide more information Can anybody give me some advice how to proceed? You should post AS MUCH information as you have, that way someone can look at it and decide if it is something they can do right away. So I hope this can tells more The plugin is using file backend for user calendar data. The structure is simple: data_dir | | calendar_data | | private_calendars | | | |- iCal files containing only calendar info | for user personal calendars | | public_calendars | | | |- iCal files containing only calendar info | for public calendars Problem is with files stored in the private calendars folder. There are files related to users. In my case there is thousands files. When I deleted this files plugin run without any problem. When the count of files is increasing it's getting worst Here is the answer from Paul: seems like there is a problem in that all users are inspected even when it just needs to look for one user When user files has increased the scripts stopped running and I got error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 128bytes) I had to increased memory_limit = 64M in php.ini but this is temporaly solution that force the plugin to work So it seems there is problem with variable $calId that is responsible for unique names of the private calendars But I cannot redefine it or change it I think it is necessary to install this plugin with SM Thanks a lot PEt -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug? (_ENV in PHP v5.2.0)
Hi Eli,
Check variable_order in php.ini
(http://us2.php.net/manual/en/ini.core.php#ini.variables-order) if the E is
missing you will not get any environment variables.
- Frank
Hi,
System:
Win32
PHP 5.2.0
Apache 2.0.54 (PHP in CGI mode)
CGI vars are not automatically loaded into $_ENV global array. Only when
calling getenv('var'), just then the variable appears in $_ENV.
Besides, it seems that the env vars are loaded automatically into
$_SERVER. And $HTTP_ENV_VARS is always NULL.
?php
echo before getenv...;
echo br\$_ENV: ; var_dump($_ENV);
echo br\$HTTP_ENV_VARS: ; var_dump($HTTP_ENV_VARS);
getenv('SERVER_PROTOCOL');
echo hrafter getenv...;
echo br\$_ENV: ; var_dump($_ENV);
echo br\$HTTP_ENV_VARS: ; var_dump($HTTP_ENV_VARS);
?
=== output:
before getenv...
$_ENV: array(0) { }
$HTTP_ENV_VARS: NULL
after getenv...
$_ENV: array(1) { [SERVER_PROTOCOL]= string(8) HTTP/1.1 }
$HTTP_ENV_VARS: NULL
Is it a bug? Or this is the way it should work?
-thanks, Eli
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug? (_ENV in PHP v5.2.0)
Frank M. Kromann wrote: Hi Eli, Check variable_order in php.ini (http://us2.php.net/manual/en/ini.core.php#ini.variables-order) if the E is missing you will not get any environment variables. - Frank Thanks, Frank.. That worked! :-) -thanks, Eli -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug? (_ENV in PHP v5.2.0)
Hi,
System:
Win32
PHP 5.2.0
Apache 2.0.54 (PHP in CGI mode)
CGI vars are not automatically loaded into $_ENV global array. Only when
calling getenv('var'), just then the variable appears in $_ENV.
Besides, it seems that the env vars are loaded automatically into
$_SERVER. And $HTTP_ENV_VARS is always NULL.
?php
echo before getenv...;
echo br\$_ENV: ; var_dump($_ENV);
echo br\$HTTP_ENV_VARS: ; var_dump($HTTP_ENV_VARS);
getenv('SERVER_PROTOCOL');
echo hrafter getenv...;
echo br\$_ENV: ; var_dump($_ENV);
echo br\$HTTP_ENV_VARS: ; var_dump($HTTP_ENV_VARS);
?
=== output:
before getenv...
$_ENV: array(0) { }
$HTTP_ENV_VARS: NULL
after getenv...
$_ENV: array(1) { [SERVER_PROTOCOL]= string(8) HTTP/1.1 }
$HTTP_ENV_VARS: NULL
Is it a bug? Or this is the way it should work?
-thanks, Eli
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug in == comparison?
OK I have a very strange bug: In the middle of my script I have these two lines: var_dump($test,$test2); echo '$test'=='$test2' is .($test==$test2); which is giving: int(0) string(6) Points '0'=='Points' is 1 I understand that PHP is loose typed and automatically does type conversion but in the many years I've been using PHP (mostly v4) the comparison had always converted to 'string' and in the case above returned FALSE, not TRUE. It seems here they are comparing as integers thus 'Points' evaluates to 0 and the comparison is TRUE. I tried comparing in the reverse sequence ($test2==$test) and the same occurred. It does work as expected if I have === but the rest of the scirpt isn't type sensitive so I want NULL, 0, and empty string to still maintain equality. Any ideas why this is suddenly happening? I'm using PHP 5.1, and I realize I could use other functions such as strval() in the comparison however I've used similar logic in the past without problems. Any help would be great. Thanks Jeff ~~ Jeffrey Sambells Director of Research and Development Zend Certified Engineer (ZCE) We-Create Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] email 519.745.7374 x103 office 519.897.2552 mobile ~~ Get Mozilla Firefox at http://spreadfirefox.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] PHP Bug Tracking
Can anyone point me in the direction where I can find a place to download the bug track system that PHP/PEAR PECL uses. I seem to remember it is available but can't find it anymore! Ta! Chris. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] PHP Bug Tracking
This one? http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/other/eventum/ On 7/6/06, Chris Hemmings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone point me in the direction where I can find a place to download the bug track system that PHP/PEAR PECL uses. I seem to remember it is available but can't find it anymore! Ta! Chris. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] PHP Bug Tracking
Dan McCullough wrote: This one? http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/other/eventum/ On 7/6/06, Chris Hemmings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone point me in the direction where I can find a place to download the bug track system that PHP/PEAR PECL uses. I seem to remember it is available but can't find it anymore! Ta! Chris. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php Cheers Dan, Looks like the one :-) http://www.mysqltalk.org/what-software-is-used-by-bugsmysqlcom-vt10767.html -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] PHP Bug Tracking
I just installed it so its fresh in my mind. :) On 7/6/06, Chris Hemmings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan McCullough wrote: This one? http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/other/eventum/ On 7/6/06, Chris Hemmings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone point me in the direction where I can find a place to download the bug track system that PHP/PEAR PECL uses. I seem to remember it is available but can't find it anymore! Ta! Chris. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php Cheers Dan, Looks like the one :-) http://www.mysqltalk.org/what-software-is-used-by-bugsmysqlcom-vt10767.html -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] bug in php 5.1.4
Hi, I' ve discovered a bug in PHP 5.1.4. This version of PHP create a new session everytime you refresh the same php page or that you switch from 1 page to another page. I downgraded it to PHP 5.1.2 and it works correctly. It could be interesting to fix this bug. if you want moredetail, contact me. Alain
Re: [PHP] bug in php 5.1.4
There must be a special code in your script that causes it like this bug: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=37926 on Friday 30 June 2006 11:39, Alain Roger wrote: Hi, I' ve discovered a bug in PHP 5.1.4. This version of PHP create a new session everytime you refresh the same php page or that you switch from 1 page to another page. I downgraded it to PHP 5.1.2 and it works correctly. It could be interesting to fix this bug. if you want moredetail, contact me. Alain -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in php 5.1.4
Alain Roger wrote: Hi, I' ve discovered a bug in PHP 5.1.4. This version of PHP create a new session everytime you refresh the same php page or that you switch from 1 page to another page. I downgraded it to PHP 5.1.2 and it works correctly. It could be interesting to fix this bug. if it is a bug it sounds like it's rather critical! if you want moredetail, contact me. you might want to post a small repro script to internals to illustrate the problem... if you do you better off asking if it is a bug rather than declaring it to be so. chances are that you'll be asked to make a report at bugs.php.net if someone sees merit in your observation. Alain -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug in XMLWriter?
I am using XMLWriter with PHP 5.1.4 and find that it doesn't behave as I expect. I am under the impressing that until I call 'endElement', I should be free to continue adding attributes to an opened element regardless of whether I have already added elements or text below it. Look at this sample code: ?php //-- // create an object to write to an in-memory buffer $XML = new XMLWriter(); $XML-openMemory(); // start new element and add 1 attribute $XML-startElement(a); $XML-writeAttribute(href, http://www.google.com;); // add a text node $XML-text(Google); // add another attribute (DOES NOT WORK) $XML-writeAttribute(target, _blank); // add more text $XML-text( Go There); // end the element and output so we can see what we have $XML-endElement(); print htmlspecialchars($XML-outputMemory()); //-- ? output: a href=http://www.google.com;Google Go There/a If you notice, the 'target=_blank' attribute was silently ignored. However, if I move that statement above the -text() method call, it will work as expected. Is this a bug or a feature I don't know about? Dante -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug madness
Hi all, I have been mashing my head trying to debug a web app I have written, the deadline is tomorrow and after implementing some changes a subtle and difficult-to-pin-down bug has emerged. I am not going to include code as there is too much of it, but here is the general issue: The app consists of three linked forms and three modules that process the data passed in from the forms. All was sweet and perfect before today. The forms are self-reloading, and after the data is checked, validated and entered into the database the form is supposed to display a thank you section. As part of the processing process (!), the scripts assemble and send multipart mails to the entrants. Now, when I submit the forms, I see a blank page - nothing, no html, no error messages. I have added debugging functions at each point to track the logic and they inform me that the processing functions get to the end (where the mails are sent) where they should return to the caller (ie the form). This does not happen. I have display_errors enabled and cannot seem to locate the source of this issue. Ambiguous I know, but it may be a recognisable issue to many of you, in which case any advice would be greatly appreciated. I am extremely calm. -- http://www.web-buddha.co.uk dynamic web programming from Reigate, Surrey UK (php, mysql, xhtml, css) look out for project karma, our new venture, coming soon!
RE: [PHP] Bug madness
Have you tried? error_reporting(E_ALL^E_NOTICE); Jeremy Schreckhise, M.B.A. -Original Message- From: Dave Goodchild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:37 AM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP] Bug madness Hi all, I have been mashing my head trying to debug a web app I have written, the deadline is tomorrow and after implementing some changes a subtle and difficult-to-pin-down bug has emerged. I am not going to include code as there is too much of it, but here is the general issue: The app consists of three linked forms and three modules that process the data passed in from the forms. All was sweet and perfect before today. The forms are self-reloading, and after the data is checked, validated and entered into the database the form is supposed to display a thank you section. As part of the processing process (!), the scripts assemble and send multipart mails to the entrants. Now, when I submit the forms, I see a blank page - nothing, no html, no error messages. I have added debugging functions at each point to track the logic and they inform me that the processing functions get to the end (where the mails are sent) where they should return to the caller (ie the form). This does not happen. I have display_errors enabled and cannot seem to locate the source of this issue. Ambiguous I know, but it may be a recognisable issue to many of you, in which case any advice would be greatly appreciated. I am extremely calm. -- http://www.web-buddha.co.uk dynamic web programming from Reigate, Surrey UK (php, mysql, xhtml, css) look out for project karma, our new venture, coming soon! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Bug madness
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 10:48 -0500, Jeremy Schreckhise wrote: Have you tried? error_reporting(E_ALL^E_NOTICE); Surely you mean error_reporting(E_ALL);? If one of my team members ships code that does not pass through on E_ALL (or E_STRICT), they get a beating. Now, back to the problem at hand... Are you 100% certain that your sendmail binary is available and the correct path set? I presume you are using the native mail() function? Thats probably where you are having issues. Also your script may be timing out because sendmail can't resolve a FQDN or something? --Paul -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] (Apache|php) Bug using modproxy
Hi all,
First time on the list... sorry for any errs.
I am using mod_proxy to pass requests to an internal server in our
lan. The setup looks like
Enduser---INet_link-Mod_proxy_serverLan---PHP_script
Now,
this does not work:
Enduser---https---Apache_mod_proxy-http---Destination_server.
* When a user submits a form (php) with a file upload and $_POST
vars, the $_POST array is mangled (missing) elements and the $_FILES
array is empty
while this works:
Enduser---http---Apache_mod_proxy-http---Destination_server.
* When a user submits a form with a file upload and $_POST vars,
Everything is all good
lmwangi
So something bad? happens when you use https in the request. Anyone
able to reproduce this. Is it a php bug (i doubt it) but you never
know until u waddle through the mod_proxy voodoo.
Here is a sample script
snip
?php
if(isset($_POST['btnSubmit'])){
print_r($_POST);
print_r($_FILES);
}
else{
?
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0
Strict//ENhttp://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 /
titlePost Test/title
/head
body
form action=?php echo $_SERVER['PHP_SELF']? method=post
name=frm_add_content id=frm_add_content
enctype=multipart/form-data
div
input name=id type=hidden value=0 /
input name=MAX_FILE_SIZE type=hidden value=2097152 /
table border=0
tr
td style=white-space: nowrap; background-color:
#CC; align=left valign=top colspan=2bAdd Media/b/td
/tr
tr
td align=right valign=topspan style=color:
#ff*/spanbMedia id/b/td
td valign=top align=leftinput class=inputbox
name=mediaid type=text //td
/tr
tr
td align=right valign=topbMedia File/b/td
td valign=top align=leftinput class=inputbox
name=mms_media type=file //td
/tr
tr
td align=right valign=topspan style=color:
#ff*/spanbSubject/b/td
td valign=top align=leftinput class=inputbox
name=subject type=text //td
/tr
tr
td align=right valign=topbMessage Body/b/td
td valign=top align=lefttextarea
class=inputbox name=msg_body/textarea/td
/tr
tr
tr
td align=right valign=topb/b/td
td valign=top align=leftinput class=button
name=btnClear value=Clear type=reset /nbsp;input
class=button name=btnSubmit value=Submit type=submit //td
/tr
tr
td/td
td align=left valign=topspan style=font-size:80%;
color:#ff;*/spanspan style=font-size:80%; denotes required
field/span/td
/tr
/table
/div
/form
/body
/html
?php
}
?
/snip
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] (Apache|php) Bug using modproxy
Lmwangi wrote: Hi all, First time on the list... sorry for any errs. I am using mod_proxy to pass requests to an internal server in our lan. The setup looks like Enduser---INet_link-Mod_proxy_serverLan---PHP_script Now, this does not work: Enduser---https---Apache_mod_proxy-http---Destination_server. * When a user submits a form (php) with a file upload and $_POST vars, the $_POST array is mangled (missing) elements and the $_FILES array is empty while this works: Enduser---http---Apache_mod_proxy-http---Destination_server. almost definitely not a php problem - maybe using ProxyPass instead of mod_proxy would work (probably requires https connection on the destination server) - personally I have used Squid as a reverse proxy for this kind of setup and let it deal with the https--http conversion - it works but if you think the Apache stuff is voodoo then I need a new name for the Squid configuration stuff ;-) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] (Apache|php) Bug using modproxy
I have the configuration you described: browser -- https- mod_proxy - http - php and i don't have any problem with it. Maybe it's an Apache misconfiguration. Can you send a snap of your httpd.conf? On 4/26/06, Lmwangi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, First time on the list... sorry for any errs. I am using mod_proxy to pass requests to an internal server in our lan. The setup looks like Enduser---INet_link-Mod_proxy_serverLan---PHP_script Now, this does not work: Enduser---https---Apache_mod_proxy-http---Destination_server. * When a user submits a form (php) with a file upload and $_POST vars, the $_POST array is mangled (missing) elements and the $_FILES array is empty -- Saludos Oscar -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
