[DebianGIS-dev] [Announce] New tasks web Bpages for all CDDs
Hi, I'd like to announce the new tasks pages generating system for the CDD tasks pages. I want you to hunt for bugs in these pages for about one week before I replace the old pages by the new ones. My plan is to run a cron job[1] twice a day to regenerate all CDD pages. (The old cron jobs for Debian Med and Debian Science should be taken out operation, for Debian Med I will do this by just inserting an "exit 0" in the current script because the owner of the job David Paleino announced to be off line for a while.) Features: - (Hopefully) reimplemented all features of the old system - "Fully" translated modulo missing DDTP translations (and there are A LOT untranslated descriptions - this is YOUR job in case you have some spare time! ... Just visit the DDTP page[2] and see how you could enhance the situation!) - Better navigation from one task to the others by adding a menu in the left column - Fully translatable for all CDDs (no remaining references to Debian Med) - Easily adaptable for new CDDs by just adding a config file - Index page shows (translated, if there are DDTP translations) descriptions of the tasks instead of a plain list. - Pages are not PHP but static HTML, language preference settings are detected via "Options +MultiViews" in a .htaccess file (which is auto generated according the languages that are available); List of available languages at the bottom. Question: Do you think it makes sense to generate different sets of languages for different CDDs. I'd regard this as possibly interesting but not high on top of the todo list. Implementation is easy. - Probabably some more new features - Probably some new bugs Please have a look at the pages of your pet-CDD: Debian Edu: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/edu/tasks_new/ Debian GIS: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/gis/tasks_new/ Debian Junior: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/junior/tasks_new/ Debian Med: http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks_new/ Debian Science: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks_new/ Start working on DDTP decriptions of packages _NOW_! Kind regards Andreas. [1] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/cdd/cdd/trunk/webtools/update-all-tasks?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 [2] http://ddtp.debian.net/ -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Announcement: New bugs pages, status of renaming
Hi, I'm proud to announce a new QA tool for all CDD^W Blends: Overview about all bugs about Dependencies of our metapackages. For the impatient here is a list of these pages: Edu: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/edu/bugs GIS: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/gis/bugs Jr: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/junior/bugs Med: http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/bugs Science: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/bugs For the moment I hesitate to announce the DebiChem project here because this is work is neither finished nor do I want to take over the fame of announcing somebody elses project, but you might like to have a preliminary look at DebiChem: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/debichem/bugs as well. Please keep in mind that the tasks of this project are far from ready and there are also some remaining problems in obtaining the metapackage name in the page rendering code - I will fix this once the Debichem Project might agree to join the Blends effort and decides for a name. If you not care about the details of these pages but are interested in the status of CDD -> Blends renaming you can skip some paragraphs now. Motivation for the bugs pages - My main motivation for Debian Pure Blends is that I see a need to find some substructure in the large flat package pool of Debian. I'm absolutely convinced that this has to be done based on user interest and needs and so every Blend should be an entry point for a specific user group into the large world of Debian. I think that a specific user group is interested in a specific set of packages and consequently they might care more about the bugs of these packages than in any random package. So how should we attract users to have a look into this very specific package bugs? The answer are these bug pages. Assume you are a mathematician and have some time to spend on bugs inside Debian. Where would you like to start seeking where to spend your time best? It should be helpful for both: For Debian and for you personal work and you should feel competent about the package you want to work on. Since today the answer is simple: Go to http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/bugs/mathematics.html and watch for bugs. On top of the page you see the note: Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this metapackage is advised so your help is obviosely welcome. You also see immediately that there are two serious bugs in packages which are in the list of dependencies (not only suggested) of science-mathematics. So you found your targets quickly. The Bugs pages are not (yet) internationalised. I'm a little bit undecided whether this is really needed. I'm actually very keen on translations whereever needed - but if we want to attract people fixing the bugs they have to understand the bug report in English language anyway. So people unable to understand the navigation might probably be not able to work on the bugs. What do you think about this? Realisation of the evaluation of bug status --- I tried to find a measure how much help is needed for the dependencies of a metapackage. This measure is not about the quality of a metapackages because this would require a normalisation according to the number of packages. For instance a metapackage with 5 bugs in 25 dependendent packages is probably of a better quality than a metapackage with 3 bugs in 5 dependant packages. But I think we should care about the absolute number of bugs if we want to attract people who are willing to fix them and not about making some ranking inbetween metapackage quality. Moreover I think that bugs in packages that are in the list of Depends and Recommends should be weighted higher than those packages which are only suggested. This is reflected in the fact that the dependent packages are listed on top in a separate list. Below is a list of suggested packages. The bugs which are done are listed as well for historical reason - but they do n ot influence the bug status of the metapackage - done bugs do not need to attract our attention that much. The evaluation is done by finding some weighting numbers for the different severities ranging from 10 for the RC bugs until 0 for wishlist bugs (see the currently used numbers in the footnote on the bottom of each page). I decided to weight wishlist bugs with 0 not because I think that wishlist bugs are not very interesting. IMHO every bug should be fixed - but I think that it might be a very rare situation that on one page only bugs with severity wishlist and so chances are quite low that wishlist bugs are just overlooked because there is no mark on the index page to visit this page. These weighting numbers are multiplied by 3 if the package in question is a dependent or recommended package to reflect their higher importance. Lets make a simple example: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/bugs/linguistics.html 1
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] FYI: Netcdf 4 is now available.
Hi Francesco, On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > A long due upgrade to current Netcdf (4.0.1) is now available on > _experimental_ > ... > Please, do your homework using the experimental repository to test your apps. Thanks for your work on this. As far as I can see in our SVN this concerns our packages bioimagesuite and minc Please speak up if I missed some package. Could the actual uploaders please have a look? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de Klarmachen zum Ändern! ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Changes in Debian GIS Blend stuff
Hi, yesterday I worked on the Debian GIS Blends stuff because I was bored by the single task layout to move every GIS related application into one single task gis-workstation. When I was read with the restructuring I realised that I do not have any commit permission to pkg-grass SVN (formerly we used svn:external property in Blends SVN to point to this location, but commiting does not work that path). Because I was in a hurry to get the new tasks rendered on the web page I decided to cut this rope and move everything directly to svn://svn.debian.org/blends/projects/gis Please do NOT consider this as a rude tackover but just a workaround to enable me doing a presentation here at DudesConf 3 in A Coruña. I would completely agree to move the stuff back if you would like to maintain the files in pkg-grass - I was just afraid that things might be delayed more than possible until I get commit permissions. Just tell me what you think is the best solution. The poplicy for the Blends SVN is: Every DD has commit permissions - so feel free to work there or ask me for commit permissions if you are no DD. Now to the actual changes (just see [1] for the realisation). First I need to say: I'm no GIS expert at all - just got a new GPS device at christmas and started with some OSM mapping. So it sounded reasonably to me to have a task gis-gps to handle any GPS data and hardware. Moreover I introduced a gis-osm task featuring all OSM related packages. There might be a reason to have also a gis-osm-server task because not all the packages seem to be relevant for simple mappers. I made good experiences with a development task in other blends and so there is a gis-devel task featuring alls the lib-dev packages. I moved all R related packages from gis-workstation to gis-statistics - I'm definitely sure that there are more GIS relevant R packages in Debian currently. Please add more (in case you consider the gis-statistics task reasonable). I also invented a gis-tools task where I tried to move all smaller tools from gis-workstation which might be useful for people doing GIS work without using the large killer apps like GRASS. This choice of mine is surely questionable - just take it as suggestion and feel free to change it back or draw it into another direction. The last split up from gis-workstation is gis-web where I tried to assemble all packages which provide some addition to webservers. As above I have no idea whether this choice makes really sense - just feel free to enhance my first scratch work. You can change all the tasks by checking out svn://svn.debian.org/blends/projects/gis/trunk/tasks and edit the files there. The principle is simple - if you need further documentation you can find it in the Paper about Blends[2]. You are always invited to join the Blends mailing list[3]. Kind regards Andreas. [1] http://blends.alioth.debian.org/gis/tasks [2] http://blends.alioth.debian.org/blends/ch-sentinel.en.html [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/ -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#578348: gpsprune: Please regard http_proxy environment variable
Package: gpsprune Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, the attached wrapper script regards environment variable http_proxy to enable downloading maps even when sitting behind a proxy. It would be great if this would be included in the package. Kind regards and thanks for maintaining gpsprune Andreas. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-xenU (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash #!/bin/sh PRUNEJAR=/usr/share/gpsprune/gpsprune.jar proxyhost=`echo $http_proxy | sed 's?http://\([^:]\+\).*?\1?'` proxyport=`echo $http_proxy | sed 's?http://[^:]\+:\([0-9]\+\)?\1?'` if [ -z $proxyport ] ; then if [ -z $proxyhost ] ; then java -jar $PRUNEJAR $@ else java -Dhttp.proxyHost=$proxyhost -jar $PRUNEJAR $@ fi else java -Dhttp.proxyHost=$proxyhost -Dhttp.proxyPort=$proxyport -jar $PRUNEJAR $@ fi ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Ping: Changes in Debian GIS Blend stuff
Hi again, my mail[1] to pkg-grass-devel about more or less highjacking their (orphaned) prepearation for metapackages in the Blends style did not triggered any response. The good news is that obviosely nobody is against my action and so I consider the move of the GIS Blends stuff to svn://svn.debian.org/blends/projects/gis as accepted. IMHO it would be a good idea to remove the old stuff from pkg-grass SVN and possibly set a svn:external property for those who might wonder what happened. The bad news about the missing response is that there is obviosely a lack of interest from the GIS people in driving a Blend. IMHO it would be a really good idea to release Squeeze with some gis-* metapackages in version 0.1. I kept two obviosely interested people (maintainers of GIS applications) form the Debian Med team in CC - they might support my statement that the existence of the Debian Med project has drastically improved Debian's relevance for the use in medical care and science. So my idea is to give Debian a similar spin in GIS and I hope that people would try to make the step from simply adding GIS applications to the Debian package pool to start thinking in a Blend-ish which tries to deliver a complete working environment for GIS experts, hobby GIS adictives like OSM mappers etc. My first step in this direction is to provide the Blends tasks pages[2] (how these are maintained is explained in my previous mail[1]). Moreover I would recommend using a GIS team policy for packaging like we did in the Debian Med team[3] to enable including more developers into the team. Finally the documentation for instance the DebianGis Wiki page[4] needs probably an update (I just found at least one missing link to UbuntuGis). I really hope that this mail gets some active response especially the item about gis-* metapackages for Squeeze to make sure that GIS becomes some visibility inside the large pool (or should I say the ocean) of Debian packages and GIS users will favourise Debian over other distros because of the first class GIS support. Kind regards Andreas. [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2010-April/007258.html [2] http://blends.alioth.debian.org/gis/tasks/ [3] http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html [4] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Ping: Changes in Debian GIS Blend stuff
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 06:13:01PM -0700, Hamish wrote: > > my mail[1] to pkg-grass-devel about more or less highjacking > > their (orphaned) prepearation for metapackages in the Blends > > style did not triggered any response. > > sorry, I missed the earlier email. Probably not only you. I noticed that Petter was updating the tasks/workstation file 8 days ago. Petter, do you see any reasonable was to coordinate. As I wrote: I do not really wanted to highjack and I'm fine with maintaining the tasks files inside pkg-grass. So if you think this is the best solution I even might subscribe pkg-grass - perhaps granting commit permissions fo any DD would be easier (we have this for Debian Med and Blends, you can ask Alioth admins for this). > the blends pages look nice, thanks for setting it up. I had not > really heard of it much before now. If I may ask, how is this > different than the old -tasks metapackages beyond now with extra > bling? It is NOT different from the metapackages approach. I just suggested some more fine grained metapackages. IMHO a gis-workstation is a bit to general. > why can we expect them to be any more successful? Because they are more up to date? Because they specifically address people like OSM mappers which are quite active but do not necessarily want to install all the other packages - so they do not really feel at home with Debian GIS? > (I'll admit to still thinking about them as they were back in > the dselect days) The existence of reasonably shaped metapackages is practical whatever tool you are using for installation. So I do not understand your hint to dselect. > > The good news is that obviosely nobody is against my action > > and so I consider the move of the GIS Blends stuff to > > svn://svn.debian.org/blends/projects/gis > > as accepted. > > Add whatever new work you like- please do not slow down, but > kindly do not assume so much about other people's work and > interest after a single unanswered email! > :) The problem is if mails like this are unanswered I would conclude that there is no general interest in this work and I will not get much support in this. This would mean I'm entertaining the GIS tasks on my own which I really do not want to do because I'm not a GIS expert. > > IMHO it would be a good idea to remove the old stuff from > > pkg-grass SVN and possibly set a svn:external property for > > those who might wonder what happened. > > Do not do remove it, just add a README.Blends file or so pointing > to and explaining your Blends efforts. I hope this mail will help me finding a reasonable way to get commit permissions. I'd prefer DD writable SVN. > Currently a number of the DebianGIS team are upstream maintainers > helping out and not DDs, with access to the svn via $username- > guest and alioth gforge group. I take it they(we) will be locked > out if the -task is moved to the blends svn area? I was talking just about the tasks files which currently seem to be maintained only by Petter - so there is no real lock out. But as I said: The tasks files need more love and if you are sure they should stay in pkg-grass SVN I might adapt somehow. > Currently the mainly maintained thing is the package list in the > DebianGis wiki. Well, IMHO the most comparable thing with the tasks web pages is http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/debiangis-status.html If there is somebody keen on a feature of this page I'd volunteer to reimplemnt this feature in the tasks scope. If only somebody would talk to mee about this ... Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Ping: Changes in Debian GIS Blend stuff
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:12:57AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Andreas Tille] > > Probably not only you. I noticed that Petter was updating the > > tasks/workstation file 8 days ago. Petter, do you see any > > reasonable was to coordinate. > > I assume s/was/way/. Yes. :-) > Note, that as far as I know, the tasks/workstation file is part of the > draft debian-gis meta package I wrote several years ago, and which > have been largely untouched since then. I have observed this fact (that the tasks file is untouched) for a long time and I finally decided to give it some push for the reasons I layed out in my previous mails. > I stumbled across the live CD > build part of the meta package a few days ago, did a test build and > fixed some minor issues to get the live CD building, announced the new > live CD and got tips about an alternative live CD and put some of the > packages in the package list from that live CD into the debian-gis > package. All of this was a stunt triggered by me finding the old live > CD build directory, and is unlikely to result in any regular work on > my part. ... and it seems also not by anybody else ... > I created the meta package to show what direction we could take the > Debian GIS project in, but never had time to follow up on it and > no-one else seemed to trigger on the idea of providing a meta package > for GIS tools. I'm personally much in favour of the metapackages approach via tasks files since it enables us to generate the web pages I continuosely try to advertise. I have the (biased) impression that since I do so the attraction of the project in question is growing. This is specifically true in Debian Science and Debian Med (but has not stopped Debian Jr dying or helped Debian Lex starting). I'm positively convinced that we have quite good project groups but these groups fail to advertise their work to the world and hope that some users or developers might stumble upon the project by chance. IMHO the "effort of maintenance" to "effect of advertising" ratio of using the tasks files is quite good and besides this they turned out a really good QA tool (and I wished they would be used much more as such - see my last rant on Debian Edu). > I am regularly busy with other projects, and am unlikely to be able to > spend serious time on the gis tools because of this. This make me > want others to decide how the meta package should be maintained in the > future. Is it wanted? Useful? Worth the effort? I do not know, but > others need to answer yes to these for the package to move forward. I would really like to *support* the work on this stuff, but as I said I'm lacking some general overview over GIS packages. From the experience in other Blends I'm perfectly convinced that you need to widen your view from single package maintenance to try to form a complete system which covers certain workfields. The example of Debian Med shows (in a field which is probably much worse covered with FLOSS than GIS): We now have about at least five more DDs because Debian Med exists, Debian is reaching for the distribution of choice if it comes to the use of Free Software in medicine and we have a very good cooperation to several upstream developers. I don't know how things work in Debian GIS and my way to (wild) guess how a team works is to look at the mailing list activity graphs, which are available for Debian GIS here[1]. This shows what you probably know that Francesco is a very active developer over all the time and he definitely is the backbone of Debian GIS. He has got some supporters which changed over time but with perhaps the exception of David (hey David, you just *know* the stuff I'm talking about! ;-)) in the last two years none of them increased their activity. The general activity on the general discussion list is decreasing - even if I think the topic GIS becomes more and more interesting. So I do not see a solidly formed team and the run-over-by-bus factor is close to 1. > > As I wrote: I do not really wanted to highjack and I'm fine with > > maintaining the tasks files inside pkg-grass. So if you think this > > is the best solution I even might subscribe pkg-grass - perhaps > > granting commit permissions fo any DD would be easier (we have this > > for Debian Med and Blends, you can ask Alioth admins for this). > > I suspect giving you write access to the pkg-grass alioth project is a > good way to grant you access while still being able to give non-Debian > Developers access to the source. I applied for becoming a member of pkg-grass ... even if I have no interest in packaging GRASS. You understood the second part of the sentence? Always if I want to contact Debian GIS people I wonder whether there are only these GRASS packagers hanging around. Yes,
[DebianGIS-dev] [instal...@ftp-master.debian.org: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes is NEW]
Hi, just to let you know that we are now just waiting for ftpmaster approval. ;-) Kind regards and thanks for your support Andreas. - Forwarded message from Archive Administrator - From: Archive Administrator To: Andreas Tille , Debian GIS Project Subject: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes is NEW Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:17:09 + X-Spam_score: -3.0 (new) debian-gis_0.0.1.dsc extra misc (new) debian-gis_0.0.1.tar.gz extra misc (new) gis-gps_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc GPS related programs Set of Debian packages which are dealing with GPS devices and data. (new) gis-osm_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc OpenStreetMap related programs Set of Debian packages which are dealing with OpenStreetMap data. (new) gis-statistics_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc Statistics with geographical data Set of Debian packages which are useful for doing statistics with geographical data. (new) gis-tasks_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc Debian GIS tasks for tasksel This package provides Debian GIS tasks in tasksel. . These tasks are described in detail at http://blends.alioth.debian.org/gis/tasks/ (new) gis-web_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc Present geographic information using web features Debian packages which are dealing with geographical information to be presented for the web. (new) gis-workstation_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc Geographic Information Systems (GIS) workstation This task sets up your system to be a GIS workstation to process geographical information and make maps. Changes: debian-gis (0.0.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release. (Closes: #587856) Override entries for your package: Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 587856 Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. - End forwarded message - -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
Hi, I would like to inform you that ftpmaster has accepted the Debian GIS metapackages. I will care for pushing this information to the Squeeze release notes. Moreover I discussed with David Paleino about Mailing list naming. I learned that I'm not the only one who was confused by the name of a specific package (GRASS) in a more general scope mailing list. To fix this I would like to propose the following change: 1. Move the general discussion about GIS to a to be created mailing list about all GIS issues in Debian. If you agree I will ask listmaster for registering debian-...@lists.debian.org 2. Keep those mails which are concerning the *package* *development* of packages like GRASS, Qgis etc in pkg-grass-devel and use pkg-osm-maint for OSM and GPS devices related stuff Please tell me what you think about this plan to make Debian GIS more visible inside Debian. Kind regards Andreas. - Forwarded message from Archive Administrator - From: Archive Administrator To: Andreas Tille , Debian GIS Project Subject: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:02:07 + X-Spam_score: -3.0 Accepted: debian-gis_0.0.1.dsc to main/d/debian-gis/debian-gis_0.0.1.dsc debian-gis_0.0.1.tar.gz to main/d/debian-gis/debian-gis_0.0.1.tar.gz gis-gps_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-gps_0.0.1_all.deb gis-osm_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-osm_0.0.1_all.deb gis-statistics_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-statistics_0.0.1_all.deb gis-tasks_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-tasks_0.0.1_all.deb gis-web_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-web_0.0.1_all.deb gis-workstation_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-workstation_0.0.1_all.deb Override entries for your package: debian-gis_0.0.1.dsc - source misc gis-gps_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc gis-osm_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc gis-statistics_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc gis-tasks_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc gis-web_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc gis-workstation_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 587856 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. - End forwarded message - -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:30:18PM +0200, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > 1. Move the general discussion about GIS to a to be created > > mailing list about all GIS issues in Debian. If you agree > > I will ask listmaster for registering > > debian-...@lists.debian.org > > I'm pro. Even if only one person joins debian-gis who would not join > pkg-grass-general (or finds a message in an archive, ...),I consider > the move successful. Fine. I think we are now three persons who consider a debian-...@lists.debian.org list as useful - so just let's talk there. I'll care for the creation of this list and keep you informed. > In fact, I think you should send your message also to the > pkg-grass-general list to get feedback. In CC. > > 2. Keep those mails which are concerning the *package* *development* > > of packages like GRASS, Qgis etc in pkg-grass-devel and use > > pkg-osm-maint for OSM and GPS devices related stuff > > I'm not the right person to judge how much work switching that list is > (eg all packages refer to the list), but I would also move towards > debian-gis-devel. It is more consistent, and if the debian-gis list is > created, we have the 'momentum' to change it, otherwise it will not > happen. I admit this would also be my preference but I was hesitant to fight "historically grown habits". On the other hand to do things right we should register an Alioth project Debian GIS and create the mailing list there (I would prefer developer oriented list on Alioth and the general discussion list on l.d.o - this has turned out to be useful for other projects as well). In Debian Med and Debian Science there is a list for collaborative maintainership of medical/science related packages (debian-med-packag...@l.a.d.o / debian-science-maintain...@l.a.d.o) and also a list for the commits (debian-{med|science}-comm...@l.a.d.o . I would consider it a good idea to go with this scheme. The problem is that we have to fight an historical split (pkg-grass and pkg-osm, where the later is probably solvable) and this will take some time of migration and I wonder if there is some common will to push this change. If you ask me it is perfectly reasonable to do, but it is very hard if it is not supported by the whole group. > Anyway, don't ask my opinion, but perhaps frankie can judge if > > > it is doable? I'm actually a bit concerned that frankie stays silent to all mails in this discussion ... When we talked three years ago at Debconf 7 in Edinburgh (the last time I met Frankie) he was in principle in favour of the Blends idea. Some confirmation or doubts would be helpful to proceed here. > > Please tell me what you think about this plan to make Debian GIS more > > visible inside Debian. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:30:18PM +0200, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > 1. Move the general discussion about GIS to a to be created > > mailing list about all GIS issues in Debian. If you agree > > I will ask listmaster for registering > > debian-...@lists.debian.org > > I'm pro. Even if only one person joins debian-gis who would not join > pkg-grass-general (or finds a message in an archive, ...),I consider > the move successful. Fine. I think we are now three persons who consider a debian-...@lists.debian.org list as useful - so just let's talk there. I'll care for the creation of this list and keep you informed. > In fact, I think you should send your message also to the > pkg-grass-general list to get feedback. In CC. > > 2. Keep those mails which are concerning the *package* *development* > > of packages like GRASS, Qgis etc in pkg-grass-devel and use > > pkg-osm-maint for OSM and GPS devices related stuff > > I'm not the right person to judge how much work switching that list is > (eg all packages refer to the list), but I would also move towards > debian-gis-devel. It is more consistent, and if the debian-gis list is > created, we have the 'momentum' to change it, otherwise it will not > happen. I admit this would also be my preference but I was hesitant to fight "historically grown habits". On the other hand to do things right we should register an Alioth project Debian GIS and create the mailing list there (I would prefer developer oriented list on Alioth and the general discussion list on l.d.o - this has turned out to be useful for other projects as well). In Debian Med and Debian Science there is a list for collaborative maintainership of medical/science related packages (debian-med-packag...@l.a.d.o / debian-science-maintain...@l.a.d.o) and also a list for the commits (debian-{med|science}-comm...@l.a.d.o . I would consider it a good idea to go with this scheme. The problem is that we have to fight an historical split (pkg-grass and pkg-osm, where the later is probably solvable) and this will take some time of migration and I wonder if there is some common will to push this change. If you ask me it is perfectly reasonable to do, but it is very hard if it is not supported by the whole group. > Anyway, don't ask my opinion, but perhaps frankie can judge if > > > it is doable? I'm actually a bit concerned that frankie stays silent to all mails in this discussion ... When we talked three years ago at Debconf 7 in Edinburgh (the last time I met Frankie) he was in principle in favour of the Blends idea. Some confirmation or doubts would be helpful to proceed here. > > Please tell me what you think about this plan to make Debian GIS more > > visible inside Debian. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: lists.debian.org: Please create Debian GIS mailing list
Package: lists.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi listmasters, after some discussion on the pkg-grass mailing lists[1] which are currently used to do general discussions and not only issues about packaging GRASS we came up with the conclusion that it is better to have a dedicated mailing list for Debian GIS. The fact that metapackages of a Debian GIS Blend were just accepted by ftpmaster lets us think there now is a good moment to do so. Here is some description of the scope: The goal of the Debian GIS project is improving Debian to make it the best distribution for professional Geographical Information Systems, support of GPS devices and providing various OpenStreetMap tools to make Debian the distribution of choice for mappers. Home: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis Kind regards and thanks for maintaining lists.debian.org Andreas. [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2010-July/007756.html -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-xenU (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
Hi Francesco, On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:40:53PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > I have not specific preferences about lists, I simply would note that > pkg-grass-general/devel were born at the time to manage a low traffic > packaging oriented list and listmasters had the opinion that alioth > lists were appropriate for that. I hope that listmasters will agree that this is not the case any more. > That said, I would also note that > current -general list is closed to subscribers, while debian-gis > would be open to the world (as generally done for all listmasters lists), > with obvious consequence for subscribers about spamming... The pros and cons are heavily discussed in the past and I do not think it makes sense to repeat this discussion. I personally get about one or two mails per month from each mailinlist @l.d.o thanks to the spamfilters the listmasters applied (thanks to the effort of listmasters!) and local SPAM filters. That's IMHO acceptable. I take your mail as somethink like "it is fine for me to create the list if you care for it" and thus I hope the mailing list can be created soon. Question to listmasters: Is it possible to take over the content of the list archive of pkg-grass-general to debian-gis archive? I guess the different listservers might make this hard and I do not really want to put this on you. But if there would be a reasonable way to do this it would be probably a good idea. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#590471: josm: missing images
Package: josm Version: 0.0.svn3376-1 Severity: minor Hi, when starting Josm and quiting it immediately I get the following error messages on console: $ josm Using /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java to execute josm. Debian-Release: 0.0.svn3376-1 Build-Date: 2010-07-18 15:51:31 Revision: 3376 Is-Local-Build: true Fatal: failed to locate image 'service/fire_hydrant.png'. This is a serious configuration problem. JOSM will stop working. Mappaint style "standard" icon "service/fire_hydrant.png" not found. Fatal: failed to locate image 'fixme.png'. This is a serious configuration problem. JOSM will stop working. Mappaint style "standard" icon "fixme.png" not found. Fatal: failed to locate image 'fixme.png'. This is a serious configuration problem. JOSM will stop working. Mappaint style "standard" icon "fixme.png" not found. Kind regards and thanks for maintaining Josm Andreas. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-xenU (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[Git][blends-team/gis][master] gpxviewer 0.5.2 was released 2015-07-18 - drop the unmotivated comment
Andreas Tille pushed to branch master at Debian Blends Team / gis Commits: ca6e7bd5 by Andreas Tille at 2018-03-01T11:31:28+01:00 gpxviewer 0.5.2 was released 2015-07-18 - drop the unmotivated comment - - - - - 1 changed file: - tasks/osm Changes: = tasks/osm = --- a/tasks/osm +++ b/tasks/osm @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ Depends: python-imposm-parser Depends: gpsprune Depends: gpxviewer -Remark: Last upstream update was 08-May-2012 - Suggests: gpscorrelate, gpscorrelate-gui View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/gis/commit/ca6e7bd5d16ea43bf510a737e35da9e1bc435d3f --- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/gis/commit/ca6e7bd5d16ea43bf510a737e35da9e1bc435d3f You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [gis] branch master updated (2245028 -> ca6e7bd)
CCing pkg-grass-devel list - my fault to post in private initially] Hi Bas, On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:05:31PM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > > The hook on Alioth only sent it to blends-com...@lists.alioth.debian.org > initially, since I don't want to force Debian GIS contributors to subscribe > to that list too, I added pkg-grass-devel where the commits for the regular > repositories go too. In general I think it would be better to have separate lists *-devel and *-commit - at least that's usual for other teams. > We can drop blends-commit@ and only keep pkg-grass-devel@ if that's what you > prefer. I do not mind much. I'm reading blends-commit@ very frequently and pkg-grass-devel@ rarely and I might overlook some relevant blends commits in the "noise" of package commits. But it is not only about me and we could even keep two lists in case this was not injected by incident. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[Git][debian-gis-team/opencpn][master] 2 commits: Update upstream source from tag 'upstream/2.5.0+dfsg'
Andreas Tille pushed to branch master at Debian GIS Project / opencpn Commits: 48840a5c by Andreas Tille at 2018-02-22T19:14:01+01:00 Update upstream source from tag 'upstream/2.5.0+dfsg' Update to upstream version '2.5.0+dfsg' with Debian dir 3b92806038095365ef9ba84aca8b6a9b6874a68e - - - - - 0b2edd73 by Andreas Tille at 2018-02-22T19:19:40+01:00 Moved from SVN to Git - - - - - 30 changed files: - + debian/README.Debian - + debian/README.harmonics - + debian/README.lucid - + debian/changelog - + debian/compat - + debian/control - + debian/copyright - + debian/menu - + debian/opencpn-data.dirs - + debian/opencpn-data.docs - + debian/opencpn-data.install - + debian/opencpn-doc.dirs - + debian/opencpn-doc.doc-base - + debian/opencpn-doc.docs - + debian/opencpn-doc.install - + debian/opencpn-plugins.dirs - + debian/opencpn-plugins.install - + debian/opencpn.1 - + debian/opencpn.dirs - + debian/opencpn.docs - + debian/opencpn.install - + debian/opencpn.manpages - + debian/patches/allow_harden_plugins.patch - + debian/patches/backport_libgps20_support.patch - + debian/patches/ref_debian_doc_dir.patch - + debian/patches/ref_debian_gpl2.patch - + debian/patches/series - + debian/patches/use_pkg_tinyxml.patch - + debian/patches/use_xtide_coastline.patch - + debian/rules The diff was not included because it is too large. View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/opencpn/compare/81e9eb9c3e652e7d7a5b00b9eba8e379f71400eb...0b2edd7339f86a5348de47481a549600766406c4 --- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/opencpn/compare/81e9eb9c3e652e7d7a5b00b9eba8e379f71400eb...0b2edd7339f86a5348de47481a549600766406c4 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#825184: Please which tasks should be installed at a default installation of the blend
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:44:02PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > I'm not sure if there is much interest in have Debian GIS as an option > in the Debian Installer amongst our users. How can you ask for the opinion of users who would just learn about Debian GIS since it has an entry in the installer? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[gis] branch master updated (39debb1 -> 87549fe)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch master in repository gis. from 39debb1 Depend on pycsw only instead of python-pycsw & pycsw-cgi in web task. new 87549fe Add some packages maintained by Debian Med team The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: tasks/statistics | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#837614: Use and abuse of the unreproducible tag
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:38:37PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > > What I find disturbing is that we really think that shaming the > maintainer would be a better approach. I also consider the time of all involved persons (bug reporter, maintainer, posters and readers on this list) well better spent if the initial mail here would have been a) more friendly b) coming better to the point rather than inventing unrelated examples not connected to the issue Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
Hi, On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 03:12:29PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > tag 588812 moreinfo > thanks > > > different listservers might make this hard and I do not really want to > > put this on you. But if there would be a reasonable way to do this it > > would be probably a good idea. > Its no problem to import old mails if the come in a common format like mbox. > > If you really want this list get some seconders and complete the request as > listed in: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/HOWTO_start_list. It has become quite silent about this issue and I can understand listmaster to ask for seconders. So what do you think about my suggestions to make Debian GIS more popular than it currently is? I think it is a shame that Debian GIS is quite unknown to potentially interested persons and please trust me: I asked a lot of people when I did talks about Blends and mentioned Debian GIS as a potential Blend - there was nobody aware of this project whereever I asked. And there where people around which are working with GIS software. I also continue to think that we should try to involve OSM into the Debian GIS project. This all makes IMHO a lot of sense to discuss on a mailing list and especially if we are in the process of a release mentioning such a mailing list in the release notes would give the project a lot of attention and probably new supporters. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:13:31AM -0700, Hamish wrote: > Andreas: > > So what do you think about my suggestions to make Debian GIS more > > popular than it currently is? > > come on now, we are all intelligent people worthy of mutual respect. I'm sorry if I have made an impression which might have questioned this. It was not intended to disrespect your work. Rather the contrary: Because I highly respect your work I think it deserves more popularity. > So what are the suggestion(s) we are talking about?? I take it you just > mean to rename pkg-grass-gene...@lists.alioth.d.o to debian...@lists.d.o > and pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.d.o to debiangis-com...@lists.d.o? > > anything else? My suggestion is on the one side less on the other side more. IMHO it is enough to rename the general list because I would consider this as the main entry point for newcomers. (Perhaps bug #588812 is not really clear about which list to rename.) The more part is that I'm having the hope that the list will not only get a new name (and home) but turns into a medium where we actively can attract users (and later developers) better than before. > > I think it is a shame that Debian GIS is quite unknown to potentially > > interested persons and please trust me: I asked a lot of people when I > > did talks about Blends and mentioned Debian GIS as a > > potential Blend - there was nobody aware of this project whereever I > > asked. And there where people around which are working with GIS > > software. > > any interested person looking at the apt-cache info of any of our packages > will clearly see who the maintainer is. Because you do not seem to trust my experiences in general I would like to quote a woman who was engaged in the scientific track of Libre Software Meeting (main annual Free Software event in France) for several years, a geographer by profession, doing OSM work, etc. - in short a potential and interested user of Debian GIS software. She is using Debian and Ubuntu. She has heard and my talk in Amiens in 2008 and Nantes 2009 about Blends and Debian Science that there is a Debian GIS project and pronounced that she is an interested user but no developer. This year at Bordeaux LSM she told me: I have heard that Debian has decided to package Qgis. That would be really cool. So what to say? My first point is that she did not understand the Do-O-cracy principle in Debian. Not "Debian has decided" but one (or more) developers just have done something (packaging Qgis). If she is using stable she might not have noticed that qgis is in testing and obviosely has not checked the Deban website or any other medium to verify that there are just packages (which might be easy to backport or not). So she simply failed to get the information she was seeking. If there would be a list which is obviosely accepting questions like: "How can I run Qgis under Debian?" she might have gotten help. > I would not think that renaming > the mailing lists would harm our exposure, but I think it's somewhat > optimistic to think that that it will bring us too many new committers. I don't think that it is optimistic - I just can prove that it worked in the field of medicine and I would say that it is in several ways harder in the field of medicine to find users and developers than for GIS. If you are keen on some reasoning about this I might elaborate on this but it becomes off topic. If you compare http://blends.debian.net/liststats/authorstat_med.png against http://blends.debian.net/liststats/authorstat_pkg-grass-general.png you will see a contrary development of active users on the list. Debian Med has gathered active users over time and I can say that we do not just gathered commiters to the list but we have *at least* six new DDs *because* the Debian Med project exists (and some more are in the queue). For all of them the Debian Med project and the mailing list was the main entry point. It also serves as contact point for upstream developers. The tendency on the pkg-grass-general list is rather contrary. I do not want to say that it is just a question of the name of the list. But I know for sure from the example above (and others not mentioned here) that a pure packaging list on Alioth is not a good entry point to start. > i.e. people heavily using the packages are the best dev pool, and they > already know about us since looking at a package status or filing a bug. That's for sure. But did you gave users a reason to use Debian packages and not Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSuse, etc.? Do you think that you have given a random GIS user an explicite reason why he should use Debian? > > I also continue to think that we should try to involve OSM into > > the Debian GIS project. > > the door is always open to anyone who wants to show up.. all are welcome. There are so many open doors in Open Source - have you ever asked why so many people do not care about passing these doors? I'm quite convinced that's
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 02:05:05PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Even if David is doing a good job currently in the OSM field, OSM does > not cover all aspect of GIS area. Sure, that's perfectly clear. > Mappers would simply not interested > in maintainance of - just to say - Orfeo toolbox. As I tried to explain in my longish mail: Gene sequencers are not interested in maintaining health records of patients - however we were able to find good synergies in maintaining packages of these fields in one project. Joining people simply enlarges your team and you can profit from cross connections. > That said, also > people involved in the GIS area rarely are also interested in > distribution. So, even if DebianGIS project is quite known among > GIS community, there are very few people that are interested in > helping and/or able to use part of their working/free > time to collaborate. Do you know any reason for this? I would wild guess that it might be connected to the reasonings in my previous mail. About 8 years ago it was similar with people involved in medicine. Considering that there is something going on with CUT chances to change this might become much better these days. I do not see any reason not to try working a bit in the direction I suggested. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:44:52AM -0700, Hamish wrote: > Sorry if I come off a bit grumpy :) No problem. Sometimes e-mail communication is hard. ;-) > > The more part is that I'm having the hope that the list > > will not only get a new name (and home) > > (by 'home' I take it you mean @lists.d.o instead of @alioth.d.o server?) Yes. That's exactly the whole point of the arguing. I would not make such a fuzz about just a list renaming on alioth and the bug report I was refering to is exactly about this. > > but turns into a medium where we actively can attract users (and later > > developers) better than before. > > among those who frequent the lists of debian lists, yes, and that is not > a bad crowd to be exposed to. Exposal to people - that's actually the keyword ... > > So what to say? My first point is that she did not understand the > > Do-O-cracy principle in Debian. Not "Debian has decided" but one (or > > more) developers just have done something (packaging Qgis). > > my first impressions on that comment are > - ... > - I'd forgive the "debian executive has made a decision to package qgis" > as it is quite a strange notion to outsiders who are used to corporations > or top-down NGOs. I can forgive this as well for sure. My point was: We need a visible channel to educate people about the difference in Debian and who they can become part of the movement. It happens 3-4 times a year on Debian Med list that we are able to turn people with similar imagination about Debian into members of the packaging team (currently there is also a thread active where I try to patiently explain about proper packaging of OpenMRS (hospital management system) to a very engaged Debian newbee who is closely connected to upstream. This guy is learning quite quickly and we have contact *because* there is a visible list. > > backport or not). So she simply failed to get the information > > she was seeking. > > and yet she did hear of it from somewhere anyway..? But only the rumor - not a way to apt-get install ... > there is one, two actually if you include UbuntuGIS, and three if you > include the qgis list(s), and many more if you include the local osgeo > chapters and international osgeo lists. > > I fully agree that lowering the barriers to entry are important. That's the point. We should not trust other parties like Ubuntu or different upstream. IMHO it is our obligation to run such a list (and for sure we should cooperate with the others). > >http://blends.debian.net/liststats/authorstat_pkg-grass-general.png > > grain of salt: you must put that graph in perspective with the rise > of the OSGeo movement, which often informally communicates things which > would otherwise find a home here. Or maybe Frankie is just so damn > efficient and everything works that we don't get many complaints :o) > aka determining causation is a difficult call. Sure. Such graphs do not really tell a whole story. There are often more than just one simple explanations and BTW, I'm confident that Frankie is really efficient. However, please mind the run-over-by-bus effect. And it actually does not need an accident to lose developers. If you remember that developers become parents and need to care for children more then for Debian a one man driven team might be in danger to become ineffective. > I congratulate you on that, by any measure of success that is a healthy > situation to be in. > > but does FOSS 4 Med have an equivalent to OSGeo already filling that niche? I admit I do not know OSGeo enough to be able to do a real comparison. I can confirm that there are FOSS 4 Med related lists where I was subscribed in former times. I learned that there is a lot of *really* interesting *discussion* but just discussion without *implementation* finally does not help. The good thing in Debian is that we just have an *implementation ready to run* the things we are discussing about and IMHO this is a major point. > > The tendency on the pkg-grass-general list is rather contrary. I do not > > want to say that it is just a question of the name of the list. But I > > know for sure from the example above (and others not mentioned here) that > > a pure packaging list on Alioth is not a good entry point to start. > > Perhaps that's where our miscommunication lies, I've still been thinking > of it as mostly a packaging dev list, as opposed to say an osgeo-disc...@. > (not that I have any strong feeling of what it should be, just observation > on what it has been) For me as a GIS outsider who just started to dive into GIS issues (mostly via OSM but perhaps I might have other applications from my job - think of epidemiology issues) this is really the point. The fact that we are continuosely CCing both pkg-grass lists (because the difference is not really clear) and the discussion on pkg-grass-general which is also quite packaging centric is something which did not really attracted me and the suggestion is not on
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#600953: gpsprune: Gpsprune simply aborts
Package: gpsprune Version: 11-1 Severity: important Tags: sid Hi, yesterday I was perfectly able to edit a GPS track using gpsprune. Without any change on the system (no apt-get) today gpsprune breaks even if called with no argument. On console I get ~$ gpsprune # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGBUS (0x7) at pc=0x7f5d2382dd9b, pid=9993, tid=140038018230032 # # JRE version: 6.0_18-b18 # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (16.0-b13 mixed mode linux-amd64 ) # Derivative: IcedTea6 1.8.1 # Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid), package 6b18-1.8.1-2 # Problematic frame: # C [libc.so.6+0x7ed9b] memset+0xa5b # # An error report file with more information is saved as: # /home/tillea/hs_err_pid9993.log # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please include # instructions how to reproduce the bug and visit: # http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla # Aborted The error log file is attached to this mail. Kind regards and thanks for maintaining gpsprune Andreas. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gpsprune depends on: ii default-jre [java6-runtime] 1:1.6-40 Standard Java or Java compatible R ii libmetadata-extractor-java 2.3.1+dfsg-2 JPEG metadata extraction framework ii openjdk-6-jre [java6-runtim 6b18-1.8.1-2 OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspo Versions of packages gpsprune recommends: ii gnuplot 4.4.0-1.1A command-line driven interactive ii gpsbabel1.4.0-1 GPS file conversion plus transfer ii libimage-exiftool-perl 8.15-1 Library and program to read and wr ii libjava3d-java 1.5.2+dfsg-5 Java 3D API (java library) ii libjava3d-jni 1.5.2+dfsg-5 Java3D API (java jni library) ii libvecmath-java 1.5.2-2 javax.vecmath vector math package gpsprune suggests no packages. -- no debconf information # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGBUS (0x7) at pc=0x7f5d2382dd9b, pid=9993, tid=140038018230032 # # JRE version: 6.0_18-b18 # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (16.0-b13 mixed mode linux-amd64 ) # Derivative: IcedTea6 1.8.1 # Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid), package 6b18-1.8.1-2 # Problematic frame: # C [libc.so.6+0x7ed9b] memset+0xa5b # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please include # instructions how to reproduce the bug and visit: # http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla # --- T H R E A D --- Current thread is native thread siginfo:si_signo=SIGBUS: si_errno=0, si_code=2 (BUS_ADRERR), si_addr=0x7f5d2455c000 Registers: RAX=0x7f5d2455c000, RBX=0x7f5d2455c000, RCX=0x, RDX=0x RSP=0x7f5d2454da98, RBP=0x7f5d2454dbb0, RSI=0x, RDI=0x7f5d2455c000 R8 =0x7f80, R9 =0x0008, R10=0x, R11=0x7f5d2382d710 R12=0x8000, R13=0x0003, R14=0x7f5d2454e6b8, R15=0x7f5d2454dae0 RIP=0x7f5d2382dd9b, EFL=0x00010206, CSGSFS=0x0033, ERR=0x0006 TRAPNO=0x000e Top of Stack: (sp=0x7f5d2454da98) 0x7f5d2454da98: 7f5d2328c10e 6e696c004c54504e 0x7f5d2454daa8: 2115 211523b0be98 0x7f5d2454dab8: 00eea740 00eea710 0x7f5d2454dac8: 00eec700 7f5d2454db78 0x7f5d2454dad8: 00eec720 0011 0x7f5d2454dae8: 6dcd 0002 0x7f5d2454daf8: 05ae41ed 041a 0x7f5d2454db08: 003c 0x7f5d2454db18: 1000 0x7f5d2454db28: 4cc08e63 1166ff7b 0x7f5d2454db38: 4cc08e63 1166ff7b 0x7f5d2454db48: 4cc08e63 1166ff7b 0x7f5d2454db58: 0x7f5d2454db68: 7f5d2454dd70 0x7f5d2454db78: 7f5d2454dba0 0x7f5d2454db88: 7f5d23783f60 7f5d2454de0f 0x7f5d2454db98: 7f5d2454de80 7f5d2454dcf0 0x7f5d2454dba8: 7f5d2454dd70 7f5d2454dbe0 0x7f5d2454dbb8: 7f5d2328b8f4 7f5d2454dbd0 0x7f5d2454dbc8: 7f5d22ec6dee 7f5d2454dbe0 0x7f5d2454dbd8: 7f5d2454ddf0 0x7f5d2454dbe8: 7f5d23355a93 0x7f5d2454dbf8: 7f5d24353dda 0x7f5d2454dc08: 7f5d2454dc90 0x7f5d2454dc18: 7f5d2454dc90 00ee5538 0x7f5d2454dc28: 0009 a8428197 0x7f5d2454dc38: 7f5d24354500 000
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#600953: gpsprune: Gpsprune simply aborts
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:09:38PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > yesterday I was perfectly able to edit a GPS track using gpsprune. > Without any change on the system (no apt-get) today gpsprune breaks > even if called with no argument. On console I get I realised that a running JOSM process seemed to be responsible for this problem. After aborting the running JOSM Prune works as expected. I realised this when I tried to start another JOSM process which ended in the very same problem as starting prune. I can also confirm that not only gpsprune version 11 but also version 10 from testing is affected by this problem. Can you confirm that a running JOSM process prevents prune from starting as well as anny additional JOSM process? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: lists.debian.org: Please create Debian GIS mailing list
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:23:53PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Ok, as asked by the originator of this request, currently I see > no specific problems in moving to use debian-...@l.d.o and > debian-gis-committ...@l.d.o, Just to clarify the list request issue (where I was the originator): The main point is not *moving* the content of one currently existing list into two (how should be thia done?) but rather *creating* a new list for general discussion of GIS in Debian issues. The existence of such a list has turned out to have a positive effect regarding the communication between users and developers especially to gather new developers for the team. In short: the current developer oriented list which is used to discuss mostly pure packaging issues is not affected by my *original* suggestion. > but for the fact that the the main > list is an open one (with probably a better antispam management). > Other people did express some concerns about that. Note that > also the current pkg-grass-devel list is open, but rules are > good enough to avoid spamming AFAIK. My own pro is that I could > avoid to loose time to manage the two lists :) > > About the history, as explained on the wiki: > > > An existing mailing list can be moved to lists.debian.org: the > administrator of the list has to submit a request as described above and > provide us with a list of subscribers (in plain text format, one address > per line). Archives of the existing list can also be imported from files > in mbox format (preferably split per month). > > > So I *think* the past history could be moved from alioth to lists.d.o. > I can surely provide a subscribers list too. The discussion was somehow extended by the suggestion to solve the confusion about the naming of the developer oriented list. I agree with this suggestion but it is a separate issue (even if it has the same goal in mind). If I remember right the suggestion was also not to move the developer list from alioth to l.d.o. Usually you find the developer oriented lists at alioth and I do not see any reason for changing this. I would welcome if we would not spoil the original discussion with this issue because it obviosely has created more confusion than needed. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: lists.debian.org: Please create Debian GIS mailing list
Hi Francesco, uhmm, I I think I added even more confusioin to this issue than it was. Sorry for this. On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Sorry Andreas, but if I understood correctly your suggestion, you are > proposing a non-packaging list for GIS related topics in Debian? I found > that interesting but quite a duplicate of the -general list whose > topic was from start discussing packaging issues AND other GIS > related topic. So IMHO it makes sense moving the whole list in any > case, to avoid unuseful duplicates. Yes, you are perfectly right. The content of -general should be moved do debian-...@lists.debian.org. We should discuss the pkg-grass-devel issue in a different thread to not mix up things that much. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Updatable packages of debian-gis
Updatable packages in Task workstation gdal: Highest version in Debian is 1.7.2-2 Upstream has 1.7.3 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine geographiclib: Highest version in Debian is 1.2-1 Upstream has 1.4 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine gmt: Highest version in Debian is 4.2.1-4 Upstream has 4.5.5 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine grass: Highest version in Debian is 6.4.0-1 Upstream has 6.4.0RC7 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine postgis: Highest version in Debian is 1.4.0-2 Upstream has 1.5.2 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine qgis: Highest version in Debian is 1.4.0+12730-3+b2 Upstream has 1.5.0 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine grass: Highest version in Debian is 6.4.0-1 Upstream has 6.4.0RC7 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine openjump: Highest version in Debian is 1.0-4 Upstream has 1.4.0.2 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project Last uploader was Kumar Appaiah Updatable packages in Task statistics r-cran-sp: Highest version in Debian is 0.9-73-1 Upstream has 0.9-74 Maintainer is Debian Science Team Last uploader was Andreas Tille Updatable packages in Task osm viking: Highest version in Debian is 0.9.94-3 Upstream has 0.9.96 Maintainer is Bernd Zeimetz Updatable packages in Task gps qlandkartegt: Highest version in Debian is 0.18.5-1 Upstream has 0.20.1 Maintainer is Michael Hanke ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: Bug#588812: lists.debian.org: Please create Debian GIS mailing list
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:00:32PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > What about the content - or should I just create the list? Please take over the content from http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-general/ (yes, the general list, not the development oriented list). > P.S. and please complete the request according to: > http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/HOWTO_start_list Name: debian-gis Rationale: general discussion about GIS in Debian should not be hidden on alioth with a missleading name (of only one single GIS package Short description: General discussion about Debian GIS Long description: Discussion about Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in Debian. For more information about the Debian GIS Blend see http://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis Category: Developers Subscription Policy: open Post Policy: open Web Archive: yes I'm no admin of pkg-grass-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org and thus I can not provide the needed info for the moving. I hope Francesco will step in. Kind regards and thanks for maintaining lists.debian.org Andreas. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] RFS: epr-api
Hi Antonio, On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:10:35PM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "epr-api". > > * Package name: epr-api > Version : 2.2-1 > Upstream Author : Brockmann Consult > * URL : http://github.com/bcdev/epr-api > * License : GPL2 > Section : libs > > It builds these binary packages: > libepr-api2 - ENVISAT Product Reader API for C > libepr-api2-dev - ENVISAT Product Reader API for C > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 606877 > > My motivation for maintaining this package is: > I would like to maintain packages for the specialized SW related to SAR > processing and Earth Observation that I currently use for job. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/epr-api > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/epr-api/epr-api_2.2-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. In principle I could sponsor the package however I think you should follow the advise given at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis/InfoForDevelopers#Maintainership and use the Debian GIS developers list as maintainer and put yourself as Uploader. I'm not sure about Debian GIS upload policy but in Debian Med we usually use DM-Upload-Allowed: yes to enable DMs uploading packages. (If you seriousely consider working on these packages long term which is what I understand from your mails you should definitely apply for becomming a DM / DD.) Moreover I would like you to inject your packaging into Debian GIS SVN and set Vcs fields accordingly. BTW, lintian reveals some "Information" messages if started in nitpicking mode: lintian -i -I *.deb *.dsc Perhaps you might consider fixing these as well. Kind regards and thanks for working on these packages Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] RFS: epr-api
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 01:40:47PM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote: > I've sent a request to be added to the pkg-grass group via FusionForge. Good. > If you think epr-api.git should be pushed in > git://git.debian.org/pkg-grass please let me know, but I have to wait > to be added to the pkg-grass group to do it. This would make perfectly sense. Just tell me once it is there and I'll edit the tasks file accordingly to point to your packaging effort. > Unfortunately the library exports non-public symbols so, if my > understanding of > > http://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbolsFiles > > is correct symbols versioning should not be used. > > Of course I could try to make a patch for this if you think. THat's not really necessary - I just wanted to make sure you are aware of these lintian infos and handle them if you think they can be reasonably handled. Kind regards and thanks for your work on this Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] RFS: epr-api
On 18 Dec 2010 Antonio Valentino wrote: > Andreas, the package now has some modifications with respect to > the one uploaded to mentrors.debian.net. Should I re-upload modified > package or it is no more needed? In case you want me to sponsor the package it is fine if you tell me the VCS location. However, I'm not very knowledged in this field and can only veryfy the pure packaging stuff. So if there some more educated member of the Debian GIS team would step in this would probably a good idea. If nobody might step up I can check and upload the package in case you state explicitely that it is ready for an upload (in your mail above you said only that you modified it - that's no clear advise for me ;-) ). For the re-upload question: I'd consider it important that if there are two locations of some software which is featuring the same version number they should be identical. So either you remove the package from mentors and maintain it only in Vcs or you should sync it with mentors. Otherwise there are chances that somewone graps the old stuff from mentors.d.n without notifying that it is outdated. Kind regards and thanks for your work on this Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] RFS: epr-api
Hi Antonio, On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:56:18PM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote: > OK, I removed the package from debian.mentors.net. > Now the package is in pkg-grass git repo > > git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/epr-api.git OK. > Also I set the control fields Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser accordingly in > the control file (I'm going to update the task file in the blends > repo) and tagged the final version as debian/2.2-1. It is better to tag the status *after* the actual upload in case some changes are necessary. > From my point of view the package is ready for the upload so I would > appreciate a lot if you or some other developer would like to sponsor > it. I did a quick check and found out that it does not build twice in a row. Something might (or might not?) be wrong with the clean target: ... make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/andreas/debian-maintain/sponsor/antonio/epr-api/epr-api-2.2' if [ -d "." ]; then \ cd . && QUILT_PATCHES=/home/andreas/debian-maintain/sponsor/antonio/epr-api/epr-api-2.2/debian/patches quilt --quiltrc /dev/null pop -a -R || test $? = 2 ; \ fi Patch fix-build-flags.patch does not remove cleanly (refresh it or enforce with -f) make: *** [reverse-patches] Error 1 ... Can you reproduce (and fix) this? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] RFS: epr-api
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 06:40:48PM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote: > > make[1]: Leaving directory > > `/home/andreas/debian-maintain/sponsor/antonio/epr-api/epr-api-2.2' > > if [ -d "." ]; then \ cd . && > > QUILT_PATCHES=/home/andreas/debian-maintain/sponsor/antonio/epr-api/epr-api-2.2/debian/patches > > quilt --quiltrc /dev/null pop -a -R || test $? = 2 ; \ fi Patch > > fix-build-flags.patch does not remove cleanly (refresh it or enforce > > with -f) make: *** [reverse-patches] Error 1 ... > > > > > > Can you reproduce (and fix) this? > > Sorry Andreas, I forgot to push upstream and pristine-tar branches. > Now you should be able to to build the package with That's *not* the problem. > $ git-buildpackage > > I also tested building the package using debuild directly > > $ make -f debian/rules get-orig-source > $ debuild > > All seems to be OK Yes, *this* works - but try it a second time after you builded the package or simply try: $ quilt -a pop Patch fix-build-flags.patch does not remove cleanly (refresh it or enforce with -f) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#610006: josm: Please enable respecting system proxy settings
Package: josm Version: 0.0.svn3751-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, when trying to set proxy to system settings JOSM says that it is necessary to call JOSM with -Djava.net.useSystemProxies=true option. If this is not set you can not even choose the system proxy setting from the menu. I'd regard it reasonable to at least enable using system proxy if wanted without restarting JOSM manually. The following patch would do the trick: --- josm.orig 2011-01-01 23:50:15.0 +0100 +++ josm2011-01-13 23:22:34.0 +0100 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ JAVA_CMDS="$JAVA_HOME/bin/java /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/bin/java" fi -JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true" +JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Djava.net.useSystemProxies=true" for jcmd in $JAVA_CMDS; do if [ "z$ALTERNATIVE_JDK" = "z`readlink -n -f $jcmd`" ] && [ -z "${JAVACMD}" ]; then Kind regards and thanks for maintaining JOSM Andreas. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages josm depends on: ii libgettext-commons-java 0.9.6-2 Java classes for internationalizat ii libmetadata-extractor-j 2.3.1+dfsg-2 JPEG metadata extraction framework ii liboauth-signpost-java 1.2.1.1-1simple OAuth message signing for J ii openjdk-6-jre 6b18-1.8.3-2 OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspo ii openstreetmap-map-icons 1:0.0.svn20783-1 Collection of map icons (classic s Versions of packages josm recommends: ii josm-plugins 0.0.svn24925-2 Plugins for JOSM ii webkit-image-gtk 0.0.svn24632-1 generate images from webpages - GT josm suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: epr-api_2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:55:36PM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote: > > I apologize for the bad job. This was actualla not a "bad" job. Sometimes this just happens and picking all the licenses is the boring part of packaging (but necessary for sure). > I've just committed fixes requested by the ftpmaster to > > git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/epr-api > > I hope you are still interested in sponsoring the package. Done Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Seems spatialite-tools needs to be removed from testing
Hi, I tried to do some RC bug hunting and stumbled upon #661018. While the problem was Fixed in versions spatialite-tools/3.1.0b-1, spatialite/3.0.1-1 the package does not migrate to testing due to the dependency relation explained here: http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=spatialite-tools So libreadosm1 is not in testing and thus spatialite-tools remains uninstallable. IMHO the consequence would be to file a removal from testing request. I'd volunteer to do so if you might be busy with other stuff. Kind regards Andreas. PS: Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the list. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#698341: RM: spatialite-tools/3.0.0~beta20110817-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hi, I've got confirmation from "Francesco P. Lovergine" , member of pkg-grass team to ask for removal of spatialite-tools from testing due to the removal of its dependency libreadosm1. Kind regards and thanks for your release team work Andreas. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:02:07PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I tried to do some RC bug hunting and stumbled upon #661018. While the > problem was > >Fixed in versions spatialite-tools/3.1.0b-1, spatialite/3.0.1-1 > > the package does not migrate to testing due to the dependency relation > explained here: > >http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=spatialite-tools > > So libreadosm1 is not in testing and thus spatialite-tools remains > uninstallable. IMHO the consequence would be to file a removal from > testing request. > > I'd volunteer to do so if you might be busy with other stuff. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > PS: Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the list. > Andreas, please proceed and thanks so much. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#661018: Bug#698341: RM: spatialite-tools/3.0.0~beta20110817-3
Hi Julien, On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:10:13PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Andreas, we can't remove packages that have rdeps. Stable needs to be > self-contained. Sorry for this beginners mistake and the extra work to check for you. I tried to give this package another shot but stumbled way earlier about a FTBFS problem. I created a fresh wheezy chroot and tried $ debuild ... dh build dh_testdir debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure make[1]: Entering directory `/home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/spatialite/spatialite-3.0.0~beta20110817' dh_auto_configure -Dlibspatialite -- \ --enable-geos \ --enable-proj \ \ --disable-geosadvanced checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c ... checking geos_c.h usability... yes checking geos_c.h presence... yes checking for geos_c.h... yes checking for library containing GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify... no configure: error: 'libgeos_c' is required but it doesn't seems to be installed on this system. dh_auto_configure: ./configure --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --includedir=${prefix}/include --mandir=${prefix}/share/man --infodir=${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --libexecdir=${prefix}/lib/spatialite --disable-maintainer-mode --disable-dependency-tracking --enable-geos --enable-proj --disable-geosadvanced returned exit code 1 make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/spatialite/spatialite-3.0.0~beta20110817' make: *** [build] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 So it seems that libgeos-dev is somehow broken but when I try $ strings /usr/lib/libgeos_c.a | grep GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify_r GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify_r GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify_r it seems that the symbol that is missed by the configure script is available in the library in question. Before I might create more noise and because I know there are frequent auto-build tests and so the problem should have been detected earlier: Am I missing something or should I file another bug report against src:spatialite ? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#701506: ITP: osrm -- high performance routing engine for shortest paths in road networks
Hi Chris, thanks for the ITP. You might like to consider maintaining the package in the pkg-gis team using their VCS. Kind regards Andreas. On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:02:58PM +, Chris wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Chris > > * Package name: osrm > Version : 0.3.2 > Upstream Author : Dennis Luxen > * URL : http://project-osrm.org/ > * License : AGPL > Programming Lang: C++ > Description : high performance routing engine for shortest paths in road > networks > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/20130223220258.30970.50959.report...@chris-desktop.home > > -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#705046: unblock: debian-gis/0.0.2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package debian-gis As announced in [1] I now uploaded debian-gis metapackages targeting at Wheezy. The changes in the debian-gis package are to a large extend auto generated by blends-dev and the full debdiff (attached debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff.gz) is a bit hard to read because the files in tasks/ are serving at the same time used as documentation for the Debian GIS web sentinel[2]. There is no reasonable way to maintain this in a separate source so the diff is larger than you would usually accept these days. However, this was explained in [1] and was done this way in the last releases as well (and recently for other Blends). To enable you concentrating on the *relevant* changes which are caused due to changes in the package pool (some packages became removed and some became accepted since the last generation of the metapackages) I have split of the parts of the debdiff which are more easy to inspect to see what relevant changes in the dependencies have actually happended. Please feel free to inspect: debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff_tasks.gz: diff -Nru debian-gis-0.0.1/debian-gis-tasks.desc debian-gis-0.0.2/debian-gis-tasks.desc --- debian-gis-0.0.1/debian-gis-tasks.desc 2010-07-07 12:10:02.0 +0200 +++ debian-gis-0.0.2/debian-gis-tasks.desc 2013-04-02 12:02:12.0 +0200 This shows in the most simple way what recommends were added / removed debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff_control.gz: diff -Nru debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/changelog debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/changelog --- debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/changelog<->2010-07-07 11:09:29.0 +0200 +++ debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/changelog<->2013-04-02 11:50:56.0 +0200 diff -Nru debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/control debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/control --- debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/control<--->2010-07-07 12:10:03.0 +0200 +++ debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/control<--->2013-04-02 12:02:16.0 +0200 diff -Nru debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/control.stub debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/control.stub --- debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/control.stub<-->2010-07-07 11:28:01.0 +0200 +++ debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/control.stub<-->2013-04-02 11:59:57.0 +0200 This extract from debdiff shows the changes inside debian/. debian-gis_control_0.0.1-0.0.2.wdiff.gz: This was created using wdiff debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/control debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/control and is a better way to see the differences in the list of Recommends / Suggests inside the metapackages than a plain diff. Feel free to ask for any further information if needed. Kind regards and thanks for working on the Wheezy release Andreas. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/06/msg00323.html [2] http://blends.alioth.debian.org/gis/tasks/ unblock debian-gis/0.0.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.7 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff_control.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff_tasks.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data debian-gis_control_0.0.1-0.0.2.wdiff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#710046: mkgmap: Unable to create garmin map
Package: mkgmap Version: 0.0.0+svn1067-1 Severity: important $ ./mkgmap --gmapsupp 6*.img 7*.img clas*.TYP Using /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-amd64/bin/java to execute mkgmap. Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException at java.nio.Buffer.position(Buffer.java:235) at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.Utils.bytesToString(Utils.java:75) at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.sys.ImgHeader.setHeader(ImgHeader.java:212) at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.sys.ImgFS.readInitFS(ImgFS.java:292) at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.sys.ImgFS.openFs(ImgFS.java:126) at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.sys.ImgFS.openFs(ImgFS.java:119) at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.FileInfo.imgInfo(FileInfo.java:178) at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.FileInfo.getFileInfo(FileInfo.java:143) at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.endOptions(Main.java:315) at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.CommandArgsReader.readArgs(CommandArgsReader.java:123) at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.main(Main.java:100) Remark: The same happened with sun-java6-bin which (by accident) was yet installed on this machine (=current testing). I adopted the path to java executable which was lacking '-amd64' to be very sure that this one is really used. The very same happens with openjdk-7-jre. I can confirm that everything works fine on a stable (wheezy) machine. Kind regards Andreas. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages mkgmap depends on: ii default-jre-headless [java5-runtime-headless]1:1.6-47 ii gij-4.3 [java5-runtime-headless] 4.3.4-4 ii openjdk-6-jre-headless [java5-runtime-headless] 6b27-1.12.5-1 mkgmap recommends no packages. Versions of packages mkgmap suggests: ii josm 0.0.svn5759+dfsg1-1 ii qlandkarte 1.2.3-1 ii qlandkartegt [qlandkarte] 1.7.0~dfsg0-2 -- no debconf information ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#580170: [Help] Trying to upgrade mkgmap but failed with Java problem
Hi, I updated the packaging of mkgmap in SVN svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-grass/packages/mkgmap/trunk to recent packaging standards and latest upstream version. Unfortunately the build failed with /usr/bin/time --format 'Real: %E, %S+%U' java -XX:+UseCompressedOops -Xmx700m -cp build/classes uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main --tdbfile --family-id=909 --series-name="other map" --description='A test map' /opt/data/uk-071010-1.osm.gz Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: uk/me/parabola/mkgmap/main/Main Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) Could not find the main class: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main. Program will exit. Command exited with non-zero status 1 Real: 0:00.04, 0.00+0.03 make[1]: *** [makemap] Error 1 My guess is that this might be a quite simple problem for a Java expert who is comfortable with build.xml. Any hint to revitalise this de-facto orphaned OSM tool? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#580170: [Help] Trying to upgrade mkgmap but failed with Java problem
[for debian-java readers: the original mail explaining the problem is attached below] Hi Emmanuel, On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:15:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > The build doesn't compile the code, so you can't run the > uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main class. You probably want to run the Ant > dist target to build the project instead of using the makefile, see the > comment in ./Makefile: > > # This is NOT used to build mkgmap. To build use ant. Ahhh, it seems javahelper ist tricked by the existence of the Makefile. I blindly assumed that javahelper would prefer ant over make which is obviously wrong. However, if I try ant it says: $ ant Buildfile: /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/build.xml prepare: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/build/classes [mkdir] Created dir: /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/lib/optional ivy-availability: download-ivy: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/lib/build [get] Getting: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.2.0/ivy-2.2.0.jar [get] To: /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/lib/build/ivy-2.2.0.jar [get] Error getting http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.2.0/ivy-2.2.0.jar to /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/lib/build/ivy-2.2.0.jar BUILD FAILED /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/build.xml:109: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:327) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:193) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:180) at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:384) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:546) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:495) at sun.net.NetworkClient.doConnect(NetworkClient.java:178) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:409) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:530) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.(HttpClient.java:240) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:321) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:338) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getNewHttpClient(HttpURLConnection.java:935) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.plainConnect(HttpURLConnection.java:876) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.connect(HttpURLConnection.java:801) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.openConnection(Get.java:660) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.get(Get.java:579) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.run(Get.java:569) Total time: 1 second It seems maven is somehow involved even if at least to my limited knowledge this would use ratherpm.xml rather than build.xml. It seems I need to edit build.xml to tell ant to use local JAR files rather than trying to download anything. But what exactly? > PS: Don't forget to CC debian-j...@lists.debian.org for your Java > questions, there are plenty of people skilled in Java willing to help > there :) Thanks for the additional hint - attaching a full quote of my original mail for debian-java readers below. Kind regards Andreas. begin original mail Hi, I updated the packaging of mkgmap in SVN svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-grass/packages/mkgmap/trunk to recent packaging standards and latest upstream version. Unfortunately the build failed with /usr/bin/time --format 'Real: %E, %S+%U' java -XX:+UseCompressedOops -Xmx700m -cp build/classes uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main --tdbfile --family-id=909 --series-name="other map" --description='A test map' /opt/data/uk-071010-1.osm.gz Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: uk/me/parabola/mkgmap/main/Main Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) Could not find the main class: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main. Program will exit. Command exited with non-zero status 1 Real: 0:00.04, 0.00+0.03 make[1]: *** [makemap] Error 1 My guess is that this might be a quite simple problem for a Java expert who is comfortable with build.xml. Any hint to revitalise this de-facto orphaned OSM tool? Kind regards Andreas.
Re: Google Summer of Code Satus
Hi Alan, On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:57:02AM -0400, Alan Boudreault wrote: > > UbuntuGIS is working with DebianGIS and we share all work with them > directly using the official git debian repository. Cool! That's exactly the way I would have suggested because it works like a charm in Debian Med team with BioLinux (which is also an Ubuntu derivative). Is there some documentation (some kind of policy document to make this more visible for newcomers)? From several postings here I had the impression that Debian resources might be underestimated / rarely used. > However, we don't > decide when a new release is uploaded to unstable. Well, the question is whether this is actually a *decision* or rather a matter of time resources. > Francesco is the > administrator of DebianGIS. I know Francesco from some DebConfs in the past and I think he would not mind to get some helping hand. While Debian GIS is not my main focus and I'm quite far from considering myself as a GIS expert my OSM activities have brought me closer to Debian GIS and I'd be happy to sponsor packages after coordination with Francesco. I have no idea who strict he considers his "administrator" role but from my experience in other teams structures in Debian are rather flat - provided that you are not breaking anything it is fine to do something instead of waiting until somebody else have done it. > The DebianGIS process is also longer... > so the softwares are not immediately pushed in unstable. This is exactly the point where I would like to help if anyhow possible. To start with this help I also ported the Debian GIS thermometer once written by Francesco most probably in the intention to make the cooperation more effective: http://blends.alioth.debian.org/gis/thermometer/ubuntu_debian-gis_thermometer.html The port is using common Debian Blends techniques and I think I provided some extra features not available previously. So I'm quite serious to support the DebianGIS - UbuntuGIS cooperation to the best of my skills. Any ideas how I can be of more help are perfectly welcome. Kind regards Andreas. > On 13-08-29 09:51 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:19:08AM -0400, Jerome Villeneuve Larouche wrote: > >>Georaster and OCI packages would be a really great addition to > >>UbuntuGIS. It would be really nice if you could upload them to > >>UbuntuGIS or just send them to me and I'll take care of it. > > > >Just a question: Is there any connection also to Debian GIS team[1]? I > >lived under the impression that it might make sense to work together but > >questions previous hints to work inside Debian were basically ignored. > >I'm just asking this question seriously because if this might not be the > >case I would start personally in checking with Debian GIS team how we > >could adopt from UbuntuGIS (which seems to be top down to me - but better > >than no connection at all). > > > >Thanks for enlightening > > > >Andreas. > > > >[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Google Summer of Code Satus
Hi Alan, On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 06:24:06PM -0400, Alan Boudreault wrote: > >Cool! That's exactly the way I would have suggested because it works > >like a charm in Debian Med team with BioLinux (which is also an Ubuntu > >derivative). Is there some documentation (some kind of policy document > >to make this more visible for newcomers)? From several postings here > >I had the impression that Debian resources might be underestimated / > >rarely used. > > Not sure what you mean. We extensively use the work of the DebianGIS > team. However, we won't ask them to do the ubuntu tasks. With resources I mean for instance that somebody on this list was asking how to do some Java packaging and obviously had no idea that it might be straightforward to ask on debian-java mailing list. However, it could be that since I'm news to the various GIS teams I just do not know all the internals. > >I know Francesco from some DebConfs in the past and I think he would not > >mind to get some helping hand. While Debian GIS is not my main focus > >and I'm quite far from considering myself as a GIS expert my OSM > >activities have brought me closer to Debian GIS and I'd be happy to > >sponsor packages after coordination with Francesco. I have no idea who > >strict he considers his "administrator" role but from my experience in > >other teams structures in Debian are rather flat - provided that you are > >not breaking anything it is fine to do something instead of waiting > >until somebody else have done it. > > > > That would be very nice. Francesco has probably a lot more to do in > addition of DebianGIS... and I have the same problem. I would be > happy if someone could put some time in DebianGIS and UbuntuGIS. My main focus is Debian Med and general works on Blends. But I like to do some share of my time for *GIS. So just test me with your sponsoring requests or ideas to enhance the Blends framework for better use in *GIS. > >This is exactly the point where I would like to help if anyhow possible. > > > >To start with this help I also ported the Debian GIS thermometer once > >written by Francesco most probably in the intention to make the > >cooperation more effective: > > > > > > http://blends.alioth.debian.org/gis/thermometer/ubuntu_debian-gis_thermometer.html > > > >The port is using common Debian Blends techniques and I think I provided > >some extra features not available previously. So I'm quite serious to > >support the DebianGIS - UbuntuGIS cooperation to the best of my skills. > >Any ideas how I can be of more help are perfectly welcome. > > > > Great. I wonder if we could do an irc meeting with all debiangis and > ubuntugis members. Talking together, we could probably figure out > how everyone can help to. I could join a GIS IRC meeting in evening hours (European time zones). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. ce3bbd83f5665931f790d6f22d1866335273dbcd
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit ce3bbd83f5665931f790d6f22d1866335273dbcd Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Sep 12 23:06:46 2013 +0200 Add patch to get rid of perl warning diff --git a/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch b/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..19c343b --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +Author: Andreas Tille +Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:34:03 +0200 +Description: Prevent useless warnings saying: + defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 669. + (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) + defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 671. + (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) + defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 677. + (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) + ... so the defined was removed. + +--- rel2gpx.orig/rel2gpx.pl rel2gpx/rel2gpx.pl +@@ -666,15 +666,15 @@ +@{$self->{LON}} = reverse(@{$self->{LON}}); +@{$self->{NID}} = reverse(@{$self->{NID}}); +@{$self->{wayIds}} = reverse(@{$self->{wayIds}}); +- if (defined @{$self->{PREV}}){ ++ if (@{$self->{PREV}}){ + my @aTmp = (@{$self->{PREV}}); +- if (defined @{$self->{NEXT}}){ ++ if (@{$self->{NEXT}}){ + @{$self->{PREV}} = (@{$self->{NEXT}}); + }else{ + @{$self->{PREV}} = (); + } +}else{ +- if (defined @{$self->{NEXT}}){ ++ if (@{$self->{NEXT}}){ + @{$self->{PREV}} = (@{$self->{NEXT}}); + }else{ + @{$self->{PREV}} = (); diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series new file mode 100644 index 000..6385457 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/series @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +omit_defined.patch -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, pristine-tar, created. 000f7612608ae1791279958641947b014e758c7b
The branch, pristine-tar has been created at 000f7612608ae1791279958641947b014e758c7b (commit) - Shortlog commit 000f7612608ae1791279958641947b014e758c7b Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Sep 12 21:31:09 2013 +0200 pristine-tar data for rel2gpx_0.26.orig.tar.gz --- -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, created. 926ffc884a8090d73b8544924d46671610c74217
The branch, master has been created at 926ffc884a8090d73b8544924d46671610c74217 (commit) - Shortlog commit 926ffc884a8090d73b8544924d46671610c74217 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Sep 12 22:01:02 2013 +0200 Add initial packaging for rel2gpx --- -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. 8e93c8deadc9edbf115e8e806babd1a377ee2c31
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 8e93c8deadc9edbf115e8e806babd1a377ee2c31 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Sep 12 22:08:36 2013 +0200 Add missing Depends: libosm-gary68-perl diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index e6bba0d..a6d0df2 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libwww-perl, libio-stringy-perl, libxml-perl, - libmath-complex-perl -#Suggests OSM::osm.pm for parsing local OSM files - not yet packaged + libmath-complex-perl, + libosm-gary68-perl Description: create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation This script can download GPX tracks from a given OSM relation to feed it to your GPS device. Most relations are not ordered -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, upstream, created. f008f85bf5616d9857e4694e2e10b5e1e2ac2319
The branch, upstream has been created at f008f85bf5616d9857e4694e2e10b5e1e2ac2319 (commit) - Shortlog --- -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. 3cec0df5e8a17742db51bbb76e947a815ffe51a8
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 3cec0df5e8a17742db51bbb76e947a815ffe51a8 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Sep 12 22:51:45 2013 +0200 Add two examples how to use this script to download networks of trails diff --git a/debian/examples/get-harz-loipen b/debian/examples/get-harz-loipen new file mode 100755 index 000..56ede06 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/examples/get-harz-loipen @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# Fetch all cross country skiing routes in Harz +id=253120 + +DIR=`mktemp -d` +cd $DIR +rel2gpx -g -w $id 2> ${id}.err > ${id}.out +grep "Sub-Relation:" ${id}.err | sed 's/^[[:space:]]\+Sub-Relation:[[:space:]]*//' > subroutes +for id in `cat subroutes`; do + rel2gpx -g -w $id 2> ${id}.err > ${id}.out +done diff --git a/debian/examples/get-harzklub-wege b/debian/examples/get-harzklub-wege new file mode 100755 index 000..84ae64d --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/examples/get-harzklub-wege @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# Fetch all hiking routes maintained by Harzklub e.V. +id=2993062 + +DIR=`mktemp -d` +echo "Output will be available here: $DIR" +cd $DIR +rel2gpx -g -w $id 2> ${id}.err > ${id}.out +grep "Sub-Relation:" ${id}.err | sed 's/^[[:space:]]\+Sub-Relation:[[:space:]]*//' > subroutes +for id in `cat subroutes`; do + rel2gpx -g -w $id 2> ${id}.err > ${id}.out +done -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. 8d846f1eb5a17fef4b2a164fa995b61f1522fa63
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 023a3e935a44a62a0a8c3f13bfa55108ab42f29f Author: Andreas Tille Date: Fri Sep 13 22:38:47 2013 +0200 The patch is wrong since the script runs into an error in some cases which does not happen otherwise diff --git a/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch b/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch index 19c343b..8c2fdb2 100644 --- a/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch +++ b/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Description: Prevent useless warnings saying: (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 677. (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) - ... so the defined was removed. + ... but this patch is unfortunately wrong --- rel2gpx.orig/rel2gpx.pl +++ rel2gpx/rel2gpx.pl diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series index 6385457..eb9d1c7 100644 --- a/debian/patches/series +++ b/debian/patches/series @@ -1 +1 @@ -omit_defined.patch +##omit_defined.patch -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. 8d846f1eb5a17fef4b2a164fa995b61f1522fa63
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 8d846f1eb5a17fef4b2a164fa995b61f1522fa63 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Sun Sep 15 19:24:26 2013 +0200 The defined needs to stay but dereferencing is wrong (thanks to gregor herrmann for the hint) diff --git a/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch b/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch index 8c2fdb2..24a338b 100644 --- a/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch +++ b/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch @@ -1,13 +1,15 @@ -Author: Andreas Tille -Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:34:03 +0200 -Description: Prevent useless warnings saying: - defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 669. - (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) - defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 671. - (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) - defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 677. - (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) - ... but this patch is unfortunately wrong +Author: gregor herrmann +Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:28:02 +0200 +Description: Avoid dereferencing + Perl says: + defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 669. + (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) + defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 671. + (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) + defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 677. + (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) + ... but this hint is wrong. The defined needs to be kept but the + dereferencing is wrong --- rel2gpx.orig/rel2gpx.pl +++ rel2gpx/rel2gpx.pl @@ -16,17 +18,17 @@ Description: Prevent useless warnings saying: @{$self->{NID}} = reverse(@{$self->{NID}}); @{$self->{wayIds}} = reverse(@{$self->{wayIds}}); - if (defined @{$self->{PREV}}){ -+ if (@{$self->{PREV}}){ ++ if (defined $self->{PREV}){ my @aTmp = (@{$self->{PREV}}); - if (defined @{$self->{NEXT}}){ -+ if (@{$self->{NEXT}}){ ++ if (defined $self->{NEXT}){ @{$self->{PREV}} = (@{$self->{NEXT}}); }else{ @{$self->{PREV}} = (); } }else{ - if (defined @{$self->{NEXT}}){ -+ if (@{$self->{NEXT}}){ ++ if (defined $self->{NEXT}){ @{$self->{PREV}} = (@{$self->{NEXT}}); }else{ @{$self->{PREV}} = (); diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series index 4baf145..0112f64 100644 --- a/debian/patches/series +++ b/debian/patches/series @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -##omit_defined.patch +omit_defined.patch properly_handle_distances.patch -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. 8d846f1eb5a17fef4b2a164fa995b61f1522fa63
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 97d405cc0a87e3b2cb5e99958ad6acf819ff132b Author: Andreas Tille Date: Fri Sep 13 22:47:09 2013 +0200 Do not cause an error message when distance are properly specified. diff --git a/debian/patches/properly_handle_distances.patch b/debian/patches/properly_handle_distances.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..5a34f15 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/properly_handle_distances.patch @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +Author: Andreas Tille +Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:34:03 +0200 +Description: according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes: + 'Given including a unit and with a dot for decimals. (e.g. "12.5km")' + Prevent error when distances are properly specified + +--- a/rel2gpx.pl b/rel2gpx.pl +@@ -1879,9 +1879,14 @@ sub loadOsm{ + print " ", $LH->maketext("Fehler: Relation [_1] existiert nicht", $relId), "\n"; + next; + } ++ # according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes: ++ # Given including a unit and with a dot for decimals. (e.g. "12.5km") ++ if ($relDistance =~ /^([.\d]+)\s*km/) { ++ $relDistance = $1; ++ } + print $LH->maketext("Name:")," $relName\n"; + print $LH->maketext("Ref: ")," $relRef\n"; +- print $LH->maketext("Dist:")," $relDistance\n"; ++ print $LH->maketext("Dist:")," ${relDistance}km\n"; + print "\n"; + $fn = $relName; + $fn =~ tr/ /_/; diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series index eb9d1c7..4baf145 100644 --- a/debian/patches/series +++ b/debian/patches/series @@ -1 +1,2 @@ ##omit_defined.patch +properly_handle_distances.patch -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-13-gdd72374
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 824b8479360b72e3c817ae877b88578da323ef6f Author: Andreas Tille Date: Tue Sep 17 23:22:08 2013 +0200 Added watch file diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 75dd424..e46545d 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -osm2pgsql (0.81.0+r28712-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low +osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low [ Andrew Harvey ] * New SVN snapshot @@ -13,7 +13,10 @@ osm2pgsql (0.81.0+r28712-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * Standards-Version bump to 3.9.4, no changes needed * Removed Andreas Putzo and DMUA flag from debian/control - -- David Paleino Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:31:38 +0200 + [ Andreas Tille ] + * Added watch file + + -- Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-3) unstable; urgency=low diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch index 0b4d2af..92f1cf0 100644 --- a/debian/watch +++ b/debian/watch @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -# The current upstream version number comes from the second line in the -# configure.ac file found within the source code. +version=3 +https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/tags .*/v*(\d[\d\.]+)\.tar\.gz -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-13-gdd72374
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit dd7237490d14f830e28fd37fd33fe5f6b03a223c Author: Andreas Tille Date: Tue Sep 17 23:23:38 2013 +0200 Add myself to Uploaders (and drop pkg-osm) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index e46545d..6f8a367 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low [ Andreas Tille ] * Added watch file + * debian/control: + - Add myself as Uploader (and drop pkg-osm team) -- Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index fd5bf75..bf1f7e1 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Maintainer: Debian GIS Project Uploaders: Francesco Paolo Lovergine , David Paleino - , Debian OpenStreetMap Team + , Andreas Tille Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8~) , dh-autoreconf -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-17-gb4496fb
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit b4496fbaebd208fac859d4fdcfa10750eae5e9d8 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Wed Sep 18 00:09:42 2013 +0200 adapted patch diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 6f8a367..5ff7065 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * Removed Andreas Putzo and DMUA flag from debian/control [ Andreas Tille ] + * New upstream version (adapted patch) * Added watch file * debian/control: - Add myself as Uploader (and drop pkg-osm team) diff --git a/debian/patches/00-fix_build.patch b/debian/patches/00-fix_build.patch index ea1506c..31d9f07 100644 --- a/debian/patches/00-fix_build.patch +++ b/debian/patches/00-fix_build.patch @@ -1,21 +1,16 @@ From: David Paleino Subject: add missing ZLIB linkage +LastChanged: Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 Forwarded: no - Makefile.am |4 ++-- - 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - osm2pgsql.orig/Makefile.am -+++ osm2pgsql/Makefile.am -@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ +--- a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am +@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ endif osm2pgsqldir = $(datadir)/osm2pgsql --AM_CFLAGS = @PTHREAD_CFLAGS@ @POSTGRESQL_CFLAGS@ @XML2_CFLAGS@ @BZIP2_CFLAGS@ @GEOS_CFLAGS@ @PROJ_CFLAGS@ @PROTOBUF_C_CFLAGS@ -DOSM2PGSQL_DATADIR='"$(osm2pgsqldir)"' -DVERSION='"@PACKAGE_VERSION@"' --AM_CPPFLAGS = @PTHREAD_CFLAGS@ @POSTGRESQL_CFLAGS@ @XML2_CFLAGS@ @BZIP2_CFLAGS@ @GEOS_CFLAGS@ @PROJ_CFLAGS@ -DOSM2PGSQL_DATADIR='"$(osm2pgsqldir)"' -Igeos-fallback -+AM_CFLAGS = @PTHREAD_CFLAGS@ @POSTGRESQL_CFLAGS@ @XML2_CFLAGS@ @BZIP2_CFLAGS@ @GEOS_CFLAGS@ @PROJ_CFLAGS@ @PROTOBUF_C_CFLAGS@ @ZLIB_CFLAGS@ -DOSM2PGSQL_DATADIR='"$(osm2pgsqldir)"' -DVERSION='"@PACKAGE_VERSION@"' -+AM_CPPFLAGS = @PTHREAD_CFLAGS@ @POSTGRESQL_CFLAGS@ @XML2_CFLAGS@ @BZIP2_CFLAGS@ @GEOS_CFLAGS@ @PROJ_CFLAGS@ @ZLIB_CFLAGS@ -DOSM2PGSQL_DATADIR='"$(osm2pgsqldir)"' -Igeos-fallback +-AM_CFLAGS = @PTHREAD_CFLAGS@ @LFS_CFLAGS@ @POSTGRESQL_CFLAGS@ @XML2_CFLAGS@ @BZIP2_CFLAGS@ @GEOS_CFLAGS@ @PROJ_CFLAGS@ @PROTOBUF_C_CFLAGS@ -DOSM2PGSQL_DATADIR='"$(osm2pgsqldir)"' -DVERSION='"@PACKAGE_VERSION@"' ++AM_CFLAGS = @PTHREAD_CFLAGS@ @LFS_CFLAGS@ @POSTGRESQL_CFLAGS@ @XML2_CFLAGS@ @BZIP2_CFLAGS@ @GEOS_CFLAGS@ @PROJ_CFLAGS@ @PROTOBUF_C_CFLAGS@ @ZLIB_CFLAGS@ -DOSM2PGSQL_DATADIR='"$(osm2pgsqldir)"' -DVERSION='"@PACKAGE_VERSION@"' + AM_CPPFLAGS = @PTHREAD_CFLAGS@ @POSTGRESQL_CFLAGS@ @XML2_CFLAGS@ @BZIP2_CFLAGS@ @GEOS_CFLAGS@ @PROJ_CFLAGS@ -DOSM2PGSQL_DATADIR='"$(osm2pgsqldir)"' -Igeos-fallback AM_LDFLAGS = @PTHREAD_CFLAGS@ @ZLIB_LDFLAGS@ @ZLIB_LIBS@ @POSTGRESQL_LDFLAGS@ @POSTGRESQL_LIBS@ @XML2_LDFLAGS@ @BZIP2_LDFLAGS@ @BZIP2_LIBS@ @GEOS_LDFLAGS@ @GEOS_LIBS@ @PROJ_LDFLAGS@ @PROJ_LIBS@ @PROTOBUF_C_LDFLAGS@ @PROTOBUF_C_LIBS@ - -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-18-gdd9f447
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit dd9f44758bfb94a93842e886d8e3417eb589cf2e Author: Andreas Tille Date: Wed Sep 18 00:11:14 2013 +0200 canonical URIs for Vcs fields diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 5ff7065..ae91474 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * Added watch file * debian/control: - Add myself as Uploader (and drop pkg-osm team) + - canonical URIs for Vcs fields -- Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index bf1f7e1..fb0e966 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ Build-Depends: , protobuf-c-compiler Standards-Version: 3.9.4 Homepage: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql -Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-grass/osm2pgsql.git -Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-grass/osm2pgsql.git +Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-grass/osm2pgsql.git +Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/osm2pgsql.git Package: osm2pgsql Architecture: any -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-21-g2b337a0
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 90d2ff6bb2a5ff48e9642657ae555409ab90abc4 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Wed Sep 18 00:13:54 2013 +0200 cme fix dpkg-control diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index ae91474..1d50e37 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * debian/control: - Add myself as Uploader (and drop pkg-osm team) - canonical URIs for Vcs fields + - cme fix dpkg-control -- Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index fb0e966..fd6f1f8 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -1,40 +1,36 @@ Source: osm2pgsql +Maintainer: Debian GIS Project +Uploaders: Francesco Paolo Lovergine , + David Paleino , + Andreas Tille Section: utils Priority: optional -Maintainer: Debian GIS Project -Uploaders: - Francesco Paolo Lovergine - , David Paleino - , Andreas Tille -Build-Depends: - debhelper (>= 8~) - , dh-autoreconf - , libbz2-dev - , zlib1g-dev - , libgeos++-dev - , libpq-dev - , libxml2-dev - , libproj-dev - , libprotobuf-c0-dev (>= 0.14) - , protobuf-c-compiler +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8~), + dh-autoreconf, + libbz2-dev, + zlib1g-dev, + libgeos++-dev, + libpq-dev, + libxml2-dev, + libproj-dev, + libprotobuf-c0-dev (>= 0.14), + protobuf-c-compiler Standards-Version: 3.9.4 -Homepage: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-grass/osm2pgsql.git Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/osm2pgsql.git +Homepage: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql Package: osm2pgsql Architecture: any -Depends: - ${shlibs:Depends} - , ${misc:Depends} -Recommends: - postgis - , postgresql-9.1-postgis -Suggests: - josm - , gosmore +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, + ${misc:Depends} +Recommends: postgis, +postgresql-9.1-postgis +Suggests: josm, + gosmore Description: OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter Convert OSM planet snapshot data to SQL suitable for loading into a PostgreSQL database with PostGIS geospatial extensions. This database may then be used to render maps with Mapnik or for other geospatial analysis. + -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-21-g2b337a0
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 2b337a0d00a290a33dd35662ab9c8d09b9fb0b3e Author: Andreas Tille Date: Wed Sep 18 00:15:53 2013 +0200 DEP5 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 1d50e37..e5fb41f 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low - Add myself as Uploader (and drop pkg-osm team) - canonical URIs for Vcs fields - cme fix dpkg-control + * debian/copyright: DEP5 -- Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright index 21ef622..389fb48 100644 --- a/debian/copyright +++ b/debian/copyright @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0 -Upstream-Source: http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/export/osm2pgsql/ +Source: http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/export/osm2pgsql/ Files: * Copyright: © 2007-2008, Artem Pavlenko -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-21-g2b337a0
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 28ded6e8f4fd241c57907a85bad397a0d44cd858 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Wed Sep 18 00:14:51 2013 +0200 Debhelper 9 diff --git a/debian/compat b/debian/compat index 45a4fb7..ec63514 100644 --- a/debian/compat +++ b/debian/compat @@ -1 +1 @@ -8 +9 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index fd6f1f8..aa41e6a 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Uploaders: Francesco Paolo Lovergine , Andreas Tille Section: utils Priority: optional -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8~), +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), dh-autoreconf, libbz2-dev, zlib1g-dev, -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-15-g1d48e99
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 1d48e99850318003061394185f94c3c3eda7c409 Merge: dd7237490d14f830e28fd37fd33fe5f6b03a223c 49aee0f05fdd000cec6a587b3b695161b3232a46 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Tue Sep 17 23:48:50 2013 +0200 Merge tag 'upstream/0.82.0' Upstream version 0.82.0 Conflicts: debian/changelog debian/compat debian/control debian/copyright debian/dirs debian/rules debian/source/format diff --combined debian/changelog index 6f8a367,003c747..000 deleted file mode 100644,100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ /dev/null @@@ -1,167 -1,88 +1,0 @@@ - osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low - - [ Andrew Harvey ] - * New SVN snapshot - * Patches refreshed to apply to new source - * Update debian/rules get-orig-source to not bother trying to remove the - gazetteer as it is no longer included upstream - * Update manpage - * Add debian/watch documenting the situation of the upstream version number - - [ David Paleino ] - * Dropped 02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch, no more needed - * Standards-Version bump to 3.9.4, no changes needed - * Removed Andreas Putzo and DMUA flag from debian/control - - [ Andreas Tille ] - * Added watch file - * debian/control: - - Add myself as Uploader (and drop pkg-osm team) - - -- Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 - - osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-3) unstable; urgency=low - - * Update Recommends of postgresql-8.4-postgis to -9.1 - * Backport support for 64-bit IDs (Closes: #687965) - - -- David Paleino Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:14:15 +0200 - - osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-1) unstable; urgency=low - - * New SVN snapshot - * Strip the debian/ directory from the SVN checkout - * Standards-Version bump to 3.9.3, no changes needed - * Updated debian/copyright - * Patches refreshed to apply to new source - * Switch build-dependency from libgeos-dev to libgeos++-dev - - -- David Paleino Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:37:38 +0100 - - osm2pgsql (0.70.5+r25090-2) unstable; urgency=low - - * Fix Maintainer e-mail address - - -- David Paleino Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:15:54 +0100 - - osm2pgsql (0.70.5+r25090-1) unstable; urgency=low - - * New SVN snapshot - * debian/control: - - fix Vcs-* fields to point to the git repository. - - added pkg-osm to Uploaders - * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1, no changes needed - * Use "3.0 (quilt)" format - * Removed useless dpatch machinery - * Use dh7 for debian/rules - * Improve get-orig-source target - * Wrapped multi-value fields in debian/control - * Bump debhelper compatibility to 8 - * debian/docs updated - * Use new DebianGIS e-mail address - * Add Build-Dependencies on zlib, protobuf-c and dh-autoreconf - * Use DEP-5 for debian/copyright - * Clean protoc-generated files during the clean target - * Updated manpage - * Fix FTBFS, due to missing linkage with zlib (00-fix_build.patch) - * Remove 'gazetteer' from the packaged examples. It has become quite huge - (90M unpacked), and I suppose not much people need it. It might become - a separate binary package in future, though. - Also remove it from the "orig" tarball. I'll reintroduce it as soon - as someone actually asks for it. - * Don't actually build gazetteer (01-disable_gazetteer.patch) - - -- David Paleino Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:13:02 +0100 - - osm2pgsql (0.69+r20104-2) unstable; urgency=low - - [ Francesco Paolo Lovergine ] - * Changed debian/rules to autodetect latest svn revision and upstream version. - * Now recommends both postgis and last available postgresql-postgis revision. - (closes: #559604) - * Fixed previous changelog for repeated logs. - - [ David Paleino ] - * debian/control: - - fix Vcs-* fields to point to trunk only. - - added myself to Uploaders - - -- David Paleino Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:38:52 +0200 - - osm2pgsql (0.69+r20104-1) unstable; urgency=low - - * Added 900913.sql, containing EPSG:900913 for postgis, as example. (Andreas) - * New upstream svn snapshot as taken from upstream svn. Now using svn release - number instead of date to identify better the relevant snapshot. - * Patch 01_style_location merged upstream. - * Added Vcs-* fields to debian/control. - * Policy bumped to 3.8.4 without changes. - * Added a new set of examples (gazetteer and other scripts). - - -- Francesco Paolo Lovergine Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:43:12 +0100 - - osm2pgsql (0.66.20090526-1) unstable; urgency=low - - * New upstream svn snapshot. (Closes: #532145) - * Removed 10-missing-includes patch, fixed upstream. - * Updated long description, mostly taken from osm2pgsql.spec.in. - * Updated copyright year of debian packaging. - * Added DM-Upload-Allowed to debian/control. - * Added 01_style_location patch from Frederik Ramm to reflect - path o
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, pristine-tar, updated. 02a27fbefab5c9452a92672642f787bc385cd5cc
The following commit has been merged in the pristine-tar branch: commit 02a27fbefab5c9452a92672642f787bc385cd5cc Author: Andreas Tille Date: Tue Sep 17 23:40:18 2013 +0200 pristine-tar data for osm2pgsql_0.82.0.orig.tar.gz diff --git a/osm2pgsql_0.82.0.orig.tar.gz.delta b/osm2pgsql_0.82.0.orig.tar.gz.delta new file mode 100644 index 000..04b5bb7 Binary files /dev/null and b/osm2pgsql_0.82.0.orig.tar.gz.delta differ diff --git a/osm2pgsql_0.82.0.orig.tar.gz.id b/osm2pgsql_0.82.0.orig.tar.gz.id new file mode 100644 index 000..30baf1d --- /dev/null +++ b/osm2pgsql_0.82.0.orig.tar.gz.id @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +bb4aef8688639d803d35f98b89ed3ca81326b9ee -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-16-g3919776
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 39197763b305c2d6d8420ae7c5684352ece3c027 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Tue Sep 17 23:53:58 2013 +0200 Restore original debian/ packaging dir after readding the real files and removing unneeded files from upstream source diff --git a/debian/README b/debian/README deleted file mode 100644 index 6d53162..000 --- a/debian/README +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ -The Debian Package osm2pgsql - - -Debian packaging stuff created to allow building a stand-alone osm2pgsql package. - -Unrelated to Joerg Ostertag's "openstreetmap-utils" package which also contains -osm2pgsql! - - -- Frederik Ramm Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:14:15 +0100 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog new file mode 100644 index 000..6f8a367 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@ +osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + [ Andrew Harvey ] + * New SVN snapshot + * Patches refreshed to apply to new source + * Update debian/rules get-orig-source to not bother trying to remove the +gazetteer as it is no longer included upstream + * Update manpage + * Add debian/watch documenting the situation of the upstream version number + + [ David Paleino ] + * Dropped 02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch, no more needed + * Standards-Version bump to 3.9.4, no changes needed + * Removed Andreas Putzo and DMUA flag from debian/control + + [ Andreas Tille ] + * Added watch file + * debian/control: + - Add myself as Uploader (and drop pkg-osm team) + + -- Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 + +osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * Update Recommends of postgresql-8.4-postgis to -9.1 + * Backport support for 64-bit IDs (Closes: #687965) + + -- David Paleino Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:14:15 +0200 + +osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * New SVN snapshot + * Strip the debian/ directory from the SVN checkout + * Standards-Version bump to 3.9.3, no changes needed + * Updated debian/copyright + * Patches refreshed to apply to new source + * Switch build-dependency from libgeos-dev to libgeos++-dev + + -- David Paleino Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:37:38 +0100 + +osm2pgsql (0.70.5+r25090-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Fix Maintainer e-mail address + + -- David Paleino Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:15:54 +0100 + +osm2pgsql (0.70.5+r25090-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * New SVN snapshot + * debian/control: +- fix Vcs-* fields to point to the git repository. +- added pkg-osm to Uploaders + * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1, no changes needed + * Use "3.0 (quilt)" format + * Removed useless dpatch machinery + * Use dh7 for debian/rules + * Improve get-orig-source target + * Wrapped multi-value fields in debian/control + * Bump debhelper compatibility to 8 + * debian/docs updated + * Use new DebianGIS e-mail address + * Add Build-Dependencies on zlib, protobuf-c and dh-autoreconf + * Use DEP-5 for debian/copyright + * Clean protoc-generated files during the clean target + * Updated manpage + * Fix FTBFS, due to missing linkage with zlib (00-fix_build.patch) + * Remove 'gazetteer' from the packaged examples. It has become quite huge +(90M unpacked), and I suppose not much people need it. It might become +a separate binary package in future, though. +Also remove it from the "orig" tarball. I'll reintroduce it as soon +as someone actually asks for it. + * Don't actually build gazetteer (01-disable_gazetteer.patch) + + -- David Paleino Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:13:02 +0100 + +osm2pgsql (0.69+r20104-2) unstable; urgency=low + + [ Francesco Paolo Lovergine ] + * Changed debian/rules to autodetect latest svn revision and upstream version. + * Now recommends both postgis and last available postgresql-postgis revision. +(closes: #559604) + * Fixed previous changelog for repeated logs. + + [ David Paleino ] + * debian/control: +- fix Vcs-* fields to point to trunk only. +- added myself to Uploaders + + -- David Paleino Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:38:52 +0200 + +osm2pgsql (0.69+r20104-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Added 900913.sql, containing EPSG:900913 for postgis, as example. (Andreas) + * New upstream svn snapshot as taken from upstream svn. Now using svn release +number instead of date to identify better the relevant snapshot. + * Patch 01_style_location merged upstream. + * Added Vcs-* fields to debian/control. + * Policy bumped to 3.8.4 without changes. + * Added a new set of examples (gazetteer and other scripts). + + -- Francesco Paolo Lovergine Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:43:12 +0100 + +osm2pgsql (0.66.20090526-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * New upstream svn snapshot. (Closes: #532145) + * Removed 10-missing-includes patch, fixed upstream. + * Updated long description, mostly taken from osm2pgsql.spec.in. + * Updated copyright year of debian packaging. + * Added DM-Upload-
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-23-g688ab36
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 688ab36146a33bf21bca4f7aed98975a6a58a32d Author: Andreas Tille Date: Wed Sep 18 08:30:59 2013 +0200 DEP3 compatibility diff --git a/debian/patches/00-fix_build.patch b/debian/patches/00-fix_build.patch index 31d9f07..3b6e2a4 100644 --- a/debian/patches/00-fix_build.patch +++ b/debian/patches/00-fix_build.patch @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ From: David Paleino Subject: add missing ZLIB linkage -LastChanged: Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 +Last-Update: 2013-09-17 23:21:42 +0200 Forwarded: no --- a/Makefile.am -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-23-g688ab36
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit f53fcf3ea11362bb3a10ecf515d0bbd77b49df34 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Wed Sep 18 08:21:12 2013 +0200 Forgot to mention switch to debhelper 9 (rationale: Hardening) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index e5fb41f..09a446c 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low - Add myself as Uploader (and drop pkg-osm team) - canonical URIs for Vcs fields - cme fix dpkg-control + - debhelper 9 * debian/copyright: DEP5 -- Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-25-g6136dde
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 178c61ffd0e508f0de7f09b6ee9aee3a14c5fa9f Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Sep 19 08:42:13 2013 +0200 New Source location; Added Upstream-Contact # Bitte geben Sie eine Commit-Beschreibung für Ihre Änderungen ein. Zeilen, # die mit '#' beginnen, werden ignoriert, und eine leere Beschreibung # bricht den Commit ab. # Auf Branch master # zum Commit vorgemerkte Änderungen: # (benutzen Sie "git reset HEAD ..." zum Entfernen aus der Staging-Area) # # geändert: changelog # geändert: copyright # diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 09a446c..9849572 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -21,7 +21,10 @@ osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low - canonical URIs for Vcs fields - cme fix dpkg-control - debhelper 9 - * debian/copyright: DEP5 + * debian/copyright: + - DEP5 + - New Source location + - Added Upstream-Contact -- Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright index 389fb48..151ccf8 100644 --- a/debian/copyright +++ b/debian/copyright @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0 -Source: http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/export/osm2pgsql/ +Upstream-Contact: Kai Krueger +Source: https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/tags Files: * Copyright: © 2007-2008, Artem Pavlenko -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-25-g6136dde
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 6136ddeaa2afceaeabb781081c68bf96ef1bbe70 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Sep 19 08:44:29 2013 +0200 Install manpages provided upstream diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 9849572..feb5077 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low - DEP5 - New Source location - Added Upstream-Contact + * debian/manpages: Install manpages provided upstream + * debian/osm2pgsql.1: removed -- Andreas Tille Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:21:42 +0200 diff --git a/debian/manpages b/debian/manpages index b351308..7fc9e0a 100644 --- a/debian/manpages +++ b/debian/manpages @@ -1 +1 @@ -debian/osm2pgsql.1 +docs/*.1 diff --git a/debian/osm2pgsql.1 b/debian/osm2pgsql.1 deleted file mode 100644 index 5f008ec..000 --- a/debian/osm2pgsql.1 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,222 +0,0 @@ -.TH OSM2PGSQL 1 "September 23, 2012" -.\" Please adjust this date whenever revising the manpage. -.SH NAME -osm2pgsql \- Openstreetmap data to PostgreSQL converter. -.SH SYNOPSIS -.B osm2pgsql -.RI [ options ] " planet.osm" -.br -.B osm2pgsql -.RI [ options ] " planet.osm.{gz,bz2,pbf}" -.br -.B osm2pgsql -.RI [ options ] " file1.osm file2.osm file3.osm" -.br -.SH DESCRIPTION -This manual page documents briefly the -.B osm2pgsql -command. -.PP -.B osm2pgsql -imports data from OSM file(s) into a PostgreSQL database -suitable for use by the Mapnik renderer. -.br -OSM planet snapshots can be downloaded from http://planet.openstreetmap.org -.PP -.SH OPTIONS -These programs follow the usual GNU command line syntax, with long -options starting with two dashes (`-'). -A summary of options is included below. -.TP -\fB\-a\fR, \fB\-\-append -Add the OSM file into the database without removing -existing data. -.TP -\fB\-b\fR, \fB\-\-bbox -Apply a bounding box filter on the imported data -Must be specified as: minlon,minlat,maxlon,maxlat -e.g. \fB\-\-bbox\fR \-0.5,51.25,0.5,51.75 -.TP -\fB\-c\fR, \fB\-\-create -Remove existing data from the database. This is the -default if \fB\-\-append\fR is not specified. -.TP -\fB\-d\fR, \fB\-\-database -The name of the PostgreSQL database to connect -to (default: \fIgis\fR). -.TP -\fB\-i\fR, \fB\-\-tablespace\-index -The name of the PostreSQL tablespace where all indexes will be created. -If unset, use db's default; \fB\-i\fR is equivalent to setting -\fB\-\-tablespace\-main\-index\fR and \fB\-\-tablespace\-slim\-index\fR -.br -.br -The following options allow more fine-grained control: -.br -\fB\-\-tablespace\-main\-data\fR -tablespace for main tables -.br -\fB\-\-tablespace\-main\-index\fR -tablespace for main table indexes -.br -\fB\-\-tablespace\-slim\-data\fR -tablespace for slim mode tables -.br -\fB\-\-tablespace\-slim\-index\fR -tablespace for slim mode indexes -.TP -\fB\-l\fR, \fB\-\-latlong -Store data in degrees of latitude & longitude. -.TP -\fB\-m\fR, \fB\-\-merc -Store data in proper spherical mercator (default) -.TP -\fB\-M\fR, \fB\-\-oldmerc -Store data in the legay OSM mercator format -.TP -\fB\-E\fR, \fB\-\-proj num -Use projection \fIEPSG:num\fR -.TP -\fB\-u\fR, \fB\-\-utf8\-sanitize -Repair bad UTF8 input data (present in planet -dumps prior to August 2007). Adds about 10% overhead. -.TP -\fB\-p\fR, \fB\-\-prefix -Prefix for table names (default \fIplanet_osm\fR) -.TP -\fB\-s\fR, \fB\-\-slim -Store temorary data in the database. This greatly reduces the RAM usage but is much slower. -This switch is required if you want to update with \fB\-\-append\fR later. -.TP -\fB\-\-drop -Used with \fB\-\-slim\fR option to drop temporary tables after import, eliminating the -ability to apply updates. -.TP -\fB\-S\fR, \fB\-\-style -Location of the style file. Default to \fI/usr/share/osm2pgsql/default.style\fR -.TP -\fB\-C\fR, \fB\-\-cache -Use up to this this many MB for caching nodes. Default is 800MB. -.TP -\fB\-U\fR, \fB\-\-username -Postgresql user name. -.TP -\fB\-W\fR, \fB\-\-password -Force password prompt. -If omitted, password will be sourced from prompt or PGPASS environment variable. -.TP -\fB\-H\fR, \fB\-\-host -Database server hostname or socket location. -.TP -\fB\-P\fR, \fB\-\-port -Database server port. -.TP -\fB\-e\fR, \fB\-\-expire-tiles \fR[\fImin_zoom\fR-]\fImax_zoom\fR -Create a tile expiry list. -.TP -\fB\-o\fR, \fB\-\-expire-output filename -Output filename for expired tiles list. -.TP -\fB\-r\fR, \fB\-\-input-reader -Input frontend. -.br -\fIlibxml2\fR - Parse XML using libxml2. (default) -.br -\fIprimitive\fR - Primitive XML parsing. -.br -\fIpbf\fR - OSM binary format. -.TP -\fB\-O\fR, \fB\-\-output -Output backend. -.br -\fIpgsql\fR - Output to a PostGIS database. (default) -.br -\fIgazetteer\fR - Output to a PostGIS database suitable for gazetteer. -.br -\fInull\fR - No output. Useful for testing. -.TP -\fB\-x\fR, \fB\-\-extra-attributes -Include attributes for ea
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. 3b6431d60d00a2f324f60509c2bbd8426291dee4
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 3b6431d60d00a2f324f60509c2bbd8426291dee4 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Sep 19 09:41:30 2013 +0200 Add Upstream-Contact diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright index ec99023..fac7625 100644 --- a/debian/copyright +++ b/debian/copyright @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ +Upstream-Contact: Rainer Unseld Source: http://mr-unseld.de/?q=de/node/170 Files: * @@ -20,4 +21,4 @@ License: GPLv3 . On Debian you can find a copy of the General Public License at /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3. - \ No newline at end of file + -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. bf6f78744de3b9cbbb519efe6e1c983854cddeb8
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit bf6f78744de3b9cbbb519efe6e1c983854cddeb8 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Sep 19 09:48:22 2013 +0200 spelling diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index a6d0df2..224f43b 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libxml-perl, libmath-complex-perl, libosm-gary68-perl -Description: create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation +Description: create GPX-track from OSM relation This script can download GPX tracks from a given OSM relation to feed it to your GPS device. Most relations are not ordered in one single line. The script tries to bring all parts into -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#723724: ITP: rel2gpx -- create GPX-track from OSM relation
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: rel2gpx Version : 0.26 Upstream Author : Rainer Unseld * URL : http://mr-unseld.de/?q=de/node/170 * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: Perl Description : create GPX-track from OSM relation This script can download GPX tracks from a given OSM relation to feed it to your GPS device. Most relations are not ordered in one single line. The script tries to bring all parts into a reasonable order. The package will be team maintained by Debian GIS Project and is prepared ready for upload here Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/rel2gpx.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED]
Hi, hmmm, this came a bit unexpected from looking at the changelog. From what I can see at http://packages.debian.org/sid/osgearth there is no later version than 2.0+dfsg-4 uploaded to Debian. The changelog in Git is mentioning a *lot* of intermediate versions targeting at "unstable" but they are not. Usually you should tag something that was not released as "UNRELEASED" or if you upload to some other target distribution (for instance to Ubuntu) you should use this (and use a versioning like 2.4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0 or so. Could you please clarify what *really* was uploaded before? I would like to sort this out first before I simply build using --debbuildopts -sa because I do not intend to upload with a missleading changelog. In some sense the status at packages.debian.org is matching the tags $ git tag | grep ^debian debian/1.3-3 debian/1.3-4 debian/1.4-2 debian/1.4-3 debian/1.4-4 debian/1.4-5 debian/1.4-6 debian/1.4.1-1 debian/2.0-1 debian/2.0-2 debian/2.0-4 debian/2.0rc4-1 debian/2.4-1 Which means "2.1.1+dfsg-1" and 2.4-[23] are missing - no idea about "2.4-1". Pirmin, could you please shed some light into this? Kind regards Andreas. - Forwarded message from Debian FTP Masters - Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:50:11 + From: Debian FTP Masters To: Debian GIS Project , Bas Couwenberg , ti...@debian.org Subject: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4.dsc refers to non-existing file: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz Perhaps you need to include it in your upload? === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel - End forwarded message - -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED]
Hi Bas, On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:41:41PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > Which means "2.1.1+dfsg-1" and 2.4-[23] are missing - no idea about > > "2.4-1". Pirmin, could you please shed some light into this? > > Most outdated GIS packages in Debian are usually more actively > maintained in the UbuntuGIS PPA. osgEarth is no different. One good reason to bring Debian up to date. ;-) > Version 2.1.1+dfsg-1 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on > launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for oneiric. > > Version 2.4.0+dfsg-1 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on > launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for precise. I personally have no idea how to work with PPAs (please excuse my ignorance I'm pure Debian based and did not found time to dive into PPAs). However, I think it would be a good idea to avoid "unstable" as target distribution for a PPA upload. Either oneiric resp. precise should be injected here or something like "unstable-ppa" could fix the confusion. > Version 2.4.0+dfsg-2 is missing from the UbuntuGIS PPA, and was probably > never uploaded (anywhere public). > > Version 2.4.0+dfsg-3 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on > launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for precise and raring. ... or "ubuntugis-unstable" could be a proper target distribution. > https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugis/+archive/ubuntugis-unstable/+packages?field.name_filter=osgearth&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter= > > It's probably a good idea to rename the tags to ubuntu/ to > reflect the destination of the packaging. Yes, please! > The two Debian releases can be > tagged debian/ Yes. > We can fix the changelog for Debian by appending ~ubuntu1 to the > versions which were only uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA. I've done this > for MapCache on advise from Francesco, because MapCache has so far only > been uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA. It would be great if you could fix this also for osgearth. Thanks for the clarification Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Please consider Sponsering of Blends
Hi Christopher, your control file contains Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-grass/osrm.git Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-grass/osrm.git but there is no such repository. You also have set Maintainer: Debian GIS Project but I can not find any corresponding mail on this list which might be way better to seek for a sponsor because the list is "the Maintainer". If you are continuously seeking for a sponsor and can not find somebody perhaps my Sponsering of Blends offer might be interesting for you.[1] Unfortunetly I'll go on vaccation today - but meanwhile you might like to push your stuff to the Vcs-Git and it will automatically show up on the tasks pages (as per SoB preconditions). Kind regards and thanks for working on this nce package Andreas. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql branch, master, updated. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-26-g11907a8
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 11907a81a61729e95af6104219191455a90fa38e Author: Andreas Tille Date: Fri Sep 20 11:41:39 2013 +0200 Upload to unstable diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index feb5077..a7522d4 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low +osm2pgsql (0.82.0-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Andrew Harvey ] * New SVN snapshot -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql annotated tag, upstream/0.82.0, created. upstream/0.82.0
The annotated tag, upstream/0.82.0 has been created at 525dc281344b0d983114d499660450c6adc6c410 (tag) tagging 49aee0f05fdd000cec6a587b3b695161b3232a46 (commit) replaces upstream/0.81.0+r28712 tagged by Andreas Tille on Tue Sep 17 23:40:18 2013 +0200 - Shortlog Upstream version 0.82.0 Andreas Tille (1): Imported Upstream version 0.82.0 --- -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql tag, rm, created. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-26-g11907a8
The tag, rm has been created at 11907a81a61729e95af6104219191455a90fa38e (commit) - Shortlog commit 11907a81a61729e95af6104219191455a90fa38e Author: Andreas Tille Date: Fri Sep 20 11:41:39 2013 +0200 Upload to unstable --- -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osm2pgsql tag, debian/0.82.0-1, created. debian/0.80.0+r27899-3-26-g11907a8
The tag, debian/0.82.0-1 has been created at 11907a81a61729e95af6104219191455a90fa38e (commit) - Shortlog commit 11907a81a61729e95af6104219191455a90fa38e Author: Andreas Tille Date: Fri Sep 20 11:41:39 2013 +0200 Upload to unstable --- -- OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx tag, debian/0.26-1, created. 31bf76bb90da1d4f4e0eea2b613e99504f4c618e
The tag, debian/0.26-1 has been created at 31bf76bb90da1d4f4e0eea2b613e99504f4c618e (commit) - Shortlog commit 31bf76bb90da1d4f4e0eea2b613e99504f4c618e Author: Andreas Tille Date: Sun Oct 6 23:02:21 2013 +0200 Accepted in unstable --- -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. 31bf76bb90da1d4f4e0eea2b613e99504f4c618e
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 31bf76bb90da1d4f4e0eea2b613e99504f4c618e Author: Andreas Tille Date: Sun Oct 6 23:02:21 2013 +0200 Accepted in unstable diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 75a1f29..7b2ef66 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -rel2gpx (0.26-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low +rel2gpx (0.26-1) unstable; urgency=low - * Initial release (Closes: #???) + * Initial release (Closes: #723724) -- Andreas Tille Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:34:03 +0200 -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. upstream/0.26-12-gcfbfc1b
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 7241f43d0b07f5d2bbf385cf3437561326c45fa9 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Sep 19 11:12:39 2013 +0200 Close ITP and upload to unstable diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 75a1f29..7b2ef66 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -rel2gpx (0.26-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low +rel2gpx (0.26-1) unstable; urgency=low - * Initial release (Closes: #???) + * Initial release (Closes: #723724) -- Andreas Tille Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:34:03 +0200 -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx annotated tag, upstream/0.26, created. upstream/0.26
The annotated tag, upstream/0.26 has been created at 1cdee358f54d7f21c1fc8441673d0c83fc7813dd (tag) tagging f008f85bf5616d9857e4694e2e10b5e1e2ac2319 (commit) tagged by Andreas Tille on Thu Sep 12 21:31:09 2013 +0200 - Shortlog Upstream version 0.26 Andreas Tille (1): Imported Upstream version 0.26 --- -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. upstream/0.26-12-gcfbfc1b
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit cfbfc1bcd208164bd0936bf33bb25c159dc0078b Merge: 7241f43d0b07f5d2bbf385cf3437561326c45fa9 31bf76bb90da1d4f4e0eea2b613e99504f4c618e Author: Andreas Tille Date: Sun Oct 6 23:08:06 2013 +0200 Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/rel2gpx -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] osmctools branch, upstream, updated. upstream/0.1-1-gfe01032
The following commit has been merged in the upstream branch: commit fe010327e07b1dd4f6137fe7c5288a3a97eb740e Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Oct 17 10:13:18 2013 +0200 Imported Upstream version 0.1 diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog new file mode 100644 index 000..ecaf9ed --- /dev/null +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ +2013-06-30 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cmodified: osmfilter.c modified: osmupdate.c general repository update + +2013-02-16 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cBugfix: "PBF write: uint32 momory overflow" Many thanks to user kukuk! + +2012-12-23 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cUTF-8 BOM, bbox merging modified: osmfilter.c minor fixes + +2012-12-13 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cnew pbf file timestamp modified: osmfilter.c minor bugfixes + +2012-11-20 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cbugfix: tolerating unknown pbf header objects + +2012-10-14 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cadded --all-to-nodes-bbox option + +2012-09-22 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cmodified: osmfilter.c modified: osmupdate.c all: changed --help output to stdout omconvert: now processing AugmentedDiffs osmconvert and osmfilter: increased default for --hash-memory + +2012-09-15 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cminor changes modified: osmupdate.c changed planet default URL because of ODbL + +2012-07-15 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.c added csv-write supportmodified: osmfilter.c + +2012-07-02 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.c bugfix: 32 bit overflow in delta longitude thanks to WanMil and Jochen + +2012-05-13 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmfilter.c + +2012-05-13 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cmodified: osmfilter.c + +2012-05-13 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmupdate.c changed path for daily changefiles to day-replicate; hint: while in redaction period use this option: --planet-url=http://planet.openstreetmap.org/redaction-period/ + +2012-01-23 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmfilter.c + +2012-01-23 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.c minor changes + +2012-01-08 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cmodified: osmfilter.c minor changes + +2011-12-19 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.c minor changes modified: osmfilter.c added numeric comparisons and Boolean terms for filter definitions + +2011-11-24 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cmodified: osmfilter.c modified: osmupdate.c various updates and some fixes new options for osmconvert: --all-to-nodes, --complete-ways, --complex-ways, --parameter-file= + +2011-11-06 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cmodified: osmfilter.c modified: osmupdate.c all files: few minor fixes osmupdate: changed from daily normal downloads to daily replicate downloads, hence normal downloads may miss objects once in a while + +2011-10-27 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.c minor fixes for Bert modified: osmfilter.c new: wildcards for keys + +2011-10-25 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.c a few improvements for osmconBert + +2011-10-23 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cmodified: osmfilter.c system language recognition for osmconvert giude, osmfilter can filter objects by id + +2011-10-22 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.c fix: so-called "empty relations" have been discarded when reading .pbf + +2011-10-19 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cmodified: osmfilter.c modified: osmupdate.c very small interactive guide for osmconvert alternative planet update sources for osmupdate minor fixes for osmfilter + +2011-10-16 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.cmodified: osmupdate.c added modules for writing of .pbf files + +2011-09-30 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmupdate.c bugfix: difficulties if more than one osmconvert option was given + +2011-09-18 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmconvert.c bugfix: option --diff-contents sometimes did not complete + +2011-09-14 Markus Weber + + * modified: osmupdate.c fixed: delayed update if --daily option was set + +2011-09-11 Markus Weber + +
[SCM] osmctools branch, pristine-tar, created. 3d1d5725256433b9beb59c01a5f769cb56ae9f76
The branch, pristine-tar has been created at 3d1d5725256433b9beb59c01a5f769cb56ae9f76 (commit) - Shortlog commit 3d1d5725256433b9beb59c01a5f769cb56ae9f76 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Thu Oct 17 10:13:19 2013 +0200 pristine-tar data for osmctools_0.1.orig.tar.xz --- -- Some tools to manipulate OpenStreetMap files ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. upstream/0.26-13-gce5bfd2
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit ce5bfd2a6a626c08d18fe08052d75bdc9bc1ddf9 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Sun Oct 20 19:15:22 2013 +0200 Try to adapt watch file to new upstream source location but failed diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch index 262c4da..7ef269a 100644 --- a/debian/watch +++ b/debian/watch @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ version=3 opts="uversionmangle=s/v([0-9])([0-9]+)/$1.$2/,downloadurlmangle=s#\?q=de/node/##" \ - http://mr-unseld.de/?q=de/node/170 sites/mr-unseld.de/files/tools/rel2gpx_([v.\d]+)\.tgz + http://blog.velocarte66.fr/?q=de/node/170 /sites/blog.velocarte66.fr/files//filepicker/1/rel2gpx_([v.\d]+)\..tgz -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. upstream/0.26-14-g4ce1bae
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 4ce1bae6bbf72e53248e98dedf8daa19f6b8b136 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Sun Oct 20 21:08:51 2013 +0200 Update debian/watch (thanks to Bart Martens ) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 7b2ef66..8c0c31f 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +rel2gpx (0.27-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * New upstream version + * debian/watch: Adapted to new upstream version, thanks to +Bart Martens for the patch + + -- Andreas Tille Sun, 20 Oct 2013 21:06:17 +0200 + rel2gpx (0.26-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #723724) diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch index 7ef269a..ea09e32 100644 --- a/debian/watch +++ b/debian/watch @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ version=3 -opts="uversionmangle=s/v([0-9])([0-9]+)/$1.$2/,downloadurlmangle=s#\?q=de/node/##" \ - http://blog.velocarte66.fr/?q=de/node/170 /sites/blog.velocarte66.fr/files//filepicker/1/rel2gpx_([v.\d]+)\..tgz +opts=uversionmangle=s/^(0)(\d\d)$/$1.$2/ \ + http://blog.velocarte66.fr/?q=de/node/170 \ + (?:|.*/)rel2gpx(?:[_\-]v?|)(\d[^\s/]*)\.(?:tar\.xz|txz|tar\.bz2|tbz2|tar\.gz|tgz) -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. upstream/0.26-19-gf26a10e
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 205fe031cebc2deb8b2a52a248a3dcfe1ef33dc5 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Mon Oct 21 20:59:14 2013 +0200 New usage example diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 8c0c31f..02845c7 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ rel2gpx (0.27-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * New upstream version * debian/watch: Adapted to new upstream version, thanks to Bart Martens for the patch + * debian/examples/get-jakobswege-in-deutschland: New usage +example -- Andreas Tille Sun, 20 Oct 2013 21:06:17 +0200 diff --git a/debian/examples/get-harz-loipen b/debian/examples/get-jakobswege-in-deutschland similarity index 96% copy from debian/examples/get-harz-loipen copy to debian/examples/get-jakobswege-in-deutschland index 56ede06..cd825c0 100755 --- a/debian/examples/get-harz-loipen +++ b/debian/examples/get-jakobswege-in-deutschland @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #!/bin/sh # Fetch all cross country skiing routes in Harz -id=253120 +id=3235848 DIR=`mktemp -d` cd $DIR -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. upstream/0.26-19-gf26a10e
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit ceb6c2fb0d1954421280cc24fa87c6bf9cca97b7 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Mon Oct 21 21:00:28 2013 +0200 Upstream incorporated Debian patches diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 02845c7..e44beaf 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ rel2gpx (0.27-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low - * New upstream version + * New upstream version (all patched incorporated) * debian/watch: Adapted to new upstream version, thanks to Bart Martens for the patch * debian/examples/get-jakobswege-in-deutschland: New usage diff --git a/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch b/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 24a338b..000 --- a/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,34 +0,0 @@ -Author: gregor herrmann -Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:28:02 +0200 -Description: Avoid dereferencing - Perl says: - defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 669. - (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) - defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 671. - (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) - defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 677. - (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) - ... but this hint is wrong. The defined needs to be kept but the - dereferencing is wrong - rel2gpx.orig/rel2gpx.pl -+++ rel2gpx/rel2gpx.pl -@@ -666,15 +666,15 @@ -@{$self->{LON}} = reverse(@{$self->{LON}}); -@{$self->{NID}} = reverse(@{$self->{NID}}); -@{$self->{wayIds}} = reverse(@{$self->{wayIds}}); -- if (defined @{$self->{PREV}}){ -+ if (defined $self->{PREV}){ - my @aTmp = (@{$self->{PREV}}); -- if (defined @{$self->{NEXT}}){ -+ if (defined $self->{NEXT}){ - @{$self->{PREV}} = (@{$self->{NEXT}}); - }else{ - @{$self->{PREV}} = (); - } -}else{ -- if (defined @{$self->{NEXT}}){ -+ if (defined $self->{NEXT}){ - @{$self->{PREV}} = (@{$self->{NEXT}}); - }else{ - @{$self->{PREV}} = (); diff --git a/debian/patches/properly_handle_distances.patch b/debian/patches/properly_handle_distances.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 5a34f15..000 --- a/debian/patches/properly_handle_distances.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,24 +0,0 @@ -Author: Andreas Tille -Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:34:03 +0200 -Description: according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes: - 'Given including a unit and with a dot for decimals. (e.g. "12.5km")' - Prevent error when distances are properly specified - a/rel2gpx.pl -+++ b/rel2gpx.pl -@@ -1879,9 +1879,14 @@ sub loadOsm{ - print " ", $LH->maketext("Fehler: Relation [_1] existiert nicht", $relId), "\n"; - next; - } -+ # according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes: -+ # Given including a unit and with a dot for decimals. (e.g. "12.5km") -+ if ($relDistance =~ /^([.\d]+)\s*km/) { -+ $relDistance = $1; -+ } - print $LH->maketext("Name:")," $relName\n"; - print $LH->maketext("Ref: ")," $relRef\n"; -- print $LH->maketext("Dist:")," $relDistance\n"; -+ print $LH->maketext("Dist:")," ${relDistance}km\n"; - print "\n"; - $fn = $relName; - $fn =~ tr/ /_/; diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series deleted file mode 100644 index 0112f64..000 --- a/debian/patches/series +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2 +0,0 @@ -omit_defined.patch -properly_handle_distances.patch -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. upstream/0.26-19-gf26a10e
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit f26a10e4e7497dea5c345ee9c350dd671bee93d0 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Mon Oct 21 21:01:54 2013 +0200 New upstream homepage diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index e44beaf..3eb40c7 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ rel2gpx (0.27-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low Bart Martens for the patch * debian/examples/get-jakobswege-in-deutschland: New usage example + * New upstream homepage -- Andreas Tille Sun, 20 Oct 2013 21:06:17 +0200 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 224f43b..ba48e9a 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Maintainer: Debian GIS Project Uploaders: Andreas Tille Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9) Standards-Version: 3.9.4 -Homepage: http://mr-unseld.de/?q=de/node/170 +Homepage: http://blog.velocarte66.fr/de/node/277 Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/rel2gpx.git Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-grass/rel2gpx.git diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright index fac7625..9b4b01f 100644 --- a/debian/copyright +++ b/debian/copyright @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Upstream-Contact: Rainer Unseld -Source: http://mr-unseld.de/?q=de/node/170 +Source: http://blog.velocarte66.fr/?q=de/node/170 Files: * Copyright: © 2009-2013 Rainer Unseld -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. upstream/0.26-20-g1bb324f
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 1bb324f7243d8dac165ec76c300e1eeadc4b4189 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Mon Oct 21 21:38:57 2013 +0200 Upload to unstable diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 3eb40c7..e4f4d9b 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -rel2gpx (0.27-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low +rel2gpx (0.27-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version (all patched incorporated) * debian/watch: Adapted to new upstream version, thanks to -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, pristine-tar, updated. f9bc3fc696b82286c6924ca15a0576e85b34ef1f
The following commit has been merged in the pristine-tar branch: commit f9bc3fc696b82286c6924ca15a0576e85b34ef1f Author: Andreas Tille Date: Mon Oct 21 20:59:27 2013 +0200 pristine-tar data for rel2gpx_0.27.orig.tar.gz diff --git a/rel2gpx_0.27.orig.tar.gz.delta b/rel2gpx_0.27.orig.tar.gz.delta new file mode 100644 index 000..502336d Binary files /dev/null and b/rel2gpx_0.27.orig.tar.gz.delta differ diff --git a/rel2gpx_0.27.orig.tar.gz.id b/rel2gpx_0.27.orig.tar.gz.id new file mode 100644 index 000..eb79b64 --- /dev/null +++ b/rel2gpx_0.27.orig.tar.gz.id @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +9f42cfb9b8cb99616cfcc466748c338a67d3e03d -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. upstream/0.26-19-gf26a10e
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 3a38c1e3b6f7c74881c1cf82fc6ac7e35179ead4 Merge: 205fe031cebc2deb8b2a52a248a3dcfe1ef33dc5 ad523911649da76de94dc4587cd1bed9c4103792 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Mon Oct 21 20:59:27 2013 +0200 Merge tag 'upstream/0.27' Upstream version 0.27 -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx annotated tag, upstream/0.27, created. upstream/0.27
The annotated tag, upstream/0.27 has been created at 20516141d4df3bf6f66c80d96a98a82c86bb140b (tag) tagging ad523911649da76de94dc4587cd1bed9c4103792 (commit) replaces upstream/0.26 tagged by Andreas Tille on Mon Oct 21 20:59:27 2013 +0200 - Shortlog Upstream version 0.27 Andreas Tille (1): Imported Upstream version 0.27 --- -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx tag, debian/0.27-1, created. upstream/0.27-19-g1bb324f
The tag, debian/0.27-1 has been created at 1bb324f7243d8dac165ec76c300e1eeadc4b4189 (commit) - Shortlog commit 1bb324f7243d8dac165ec76c300e1eeadc4b4189 Author: Andreas Tille Date: Mon Oct 21 21:38:57 2013 +0200 Upload to unstable --- -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] libkml branch, upstream, updated. upstream/1.3.0_r863-2-g938dec1
The following commit has been merged in the upstream branch: -- A library to manipulate KML 2.2 OGC standard files ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] libkml branch, pristine-tar, created. cfac0a4997f299c349e0320dae713b8cb340fb7b
The branch, pristine-tar has been created at cfac0a4997f299c349e0320dae713b8cb340fb7b (commit) - Shortlog commit cfac0a4997f299c349e0320dae713b8cb340fb7b Author: Andreas Tille Date: Sat Nov 23 09:55:18 2013 +0100 pristine-tar data for libkml_1.3.0~r864.orig.tar.gz --- -- A library to manipulate KML 2.2 OGC standard files ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel