Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:37:11 -0500, /art/: When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to cut/paste/edit the link before using it instead of just clicking on it. The wrap is only visual. If you observe the source of the message you'll see the link text is continuous. Copying and pasting it in a simple plain text editor should also show the text is not broken. The new wrapping behavior is in effect since Firefox 3.0/Gecko 1.9.0, if I'm not mistaken. Previously Mozilla wrapped text only at white space which made tables containing such links expand too wide, for example. -- Stanimir ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Eliminating long To: lists when printing
Mr. Cheese a écrit : Rick Merrill wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer than the email content... what a waste Tell them you are concerned about your privacy and ask them to make the list a BCC list (Blind Carbon Copy). That way there will be No Long List. I know about bcc: that's the method I use. I don't mind seeing the long address lists cause I sometimes add an entry to my address book), I just don't want to print them. what about copy / paste the whole body ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Seamonkey 2.0 release information and known issues.............
Is anyone having problems with the following? Any caveats to share? From http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0/ Extensions and Themes Extensions installed under SeaMonkey 1.x are not migrated to SeaMonkey 2, and may not be compatible for reinstalling in this version due to major changes in our architecture. Please report any issues to the maintainer of the extension. Extensions and Themes for SeaMonkey 2.0 can be installed from the SeaMonkey Add-Ons website or the Get Add-Ons section in the Add-Ons manager. Known Issues This list covers some of the known problems with SeaMonkey 2.0. Please read this before reporting any new bugs. * Installing SeaMonkey 2.0 into the same location where an older version of SeaMonkey is installed will result in a non-working installation. Either install SeaMonkey 2.0 to a different location - for example the default installation location as given by the installer - or un-install the older version of SeaMonkey first. (Bug 526202) jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
Cedar wrote: When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta. (snip) Any ideas what this might be about? The website is using XHTML, which requires it to be well-formed. But it's not well-formed, so parsing it fails with that error message. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. -- Lee (in Florida)US Army Retired Georgie Boy Cruise Master Logitech Vid Skype lee.g.bray ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:02:27 +0200, Stanimir Stamenkov s7a...@netscape.net in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:37:11 -0500, /art/: When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to cut/paste/edit the link before using it instead of just clicking on it. The wrap is only visual. If you observe the source of the message you'll see the link text is continuous. Copying and pasting it in a simple plain text editor should also show the text is not broken. The new wrapping behavior is in effect since Firefox 3.0/Gecko 1.9.0, if I'm not mistaken. Previously Mozilla wrapped text only at white space which made tables containing such links expand too wide, for example. Kudos! It is my understanding that all files are simply stored as a data string, including hard line breaks. However the application chooses to format that string into readable form is irrelevant to the source. So, what we should have is 'soft' line breaks based on the reading application 'wrapping to screen'. But.we may have had hard line breaks inserted on wrap respected by a compatible reading system and if not respected those hard breaks mess up the URL -- or other intended long string -- or, if respected, will result in a broken link. Observationally, an easy way of checking in the case of a long URL is to send the visually wrapped string to yourself, receive it and then, if you have links shown in contrasting colors (mine are blue) note whether the multiple lines displayed all are that same contrasting color. Empirically, click the link and see if it resolves in fullness. On the other hand, you could just create a one short word hyperlink to the URL, which fixes nothing at all except that it hides it... jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Eliminating long To: lists when printing
jean-francois.per...@laposte.net wrote: Mr. Cheese a écrit : Rick Merrill wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer than the email content... what a waste Tell them you are concerned about your privacy and ask them to make the list a BCC list (Blind Carbon Copy). That way there will be No Long List. I know about bcc: that's the method I use. I don't mind seeing the long address lists cause I sometimes add an entry to my address book), I just don't want to print them. what about copy / paste the whole body ? That would work -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problems with SeaMonkey 2.0
On Nov 20, 9:51 pm, David Wilkinson no-re...@effisols.com wrote: Campy wrote: 2. The size of the site showing on the screen typically has to be reduced to 75% in order to be able to see it without a lot of scrolling back and forth. I have tried reducing the size of the fonts, however this has had minimal effect. Is there a way to adjust SeaMonkey so that the screen will automatically be reduced ? Campy: Do you have your Windows 7 set to enlarge the fonts to 150% (144 DPI) or more? If so, SeaMonkey 2 (and FireFox 3) will zoom all your web pages by a factor of two. If you decrease the font magnification to 125% (120 DPI) then this will not happen. The rationale for this behavior is that many web pages containing graphics do not display well when zoomed by non-integer factors, so the browser does not zoom until the requested text magnification is closer to 2.0 than 1.0. I personally think this behavior is a mistake when it causes the page to require horizontal scaling. -- David Wilkinson Thank you. That solved the problem of scrolling back and forth. I am still having the problem of having to hit the bookmark/link multiple times before the browser will go to the web site. Any suggestions on solving this problem ? Thanks again, Campy ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Update on problems with SeaMonkey 2.0
I am running SeaMonkey 2.0 on an HP computer with an I7 chip and the upgrade to Windows 7. The problem: 1. I have to click on a bookmark between 5 and 15 times before it will finally go to the web site and not say Site not found, could not connect or something similar. These are sites such as Yahoo, Google, etc. I have tried uninstalling, re-downloading and reinstalling SeaMonkey 2.0 with no difference in the problems. Update: I have tried FireFox 3.5.4 and have the same problem. Can anyone provide some guidance as to whether this is a Mozilla problem. a Windows 7 (and Vista problem) or a possible compatibility problem (I have also tried disabling SpyWare Doctor (PC Tools) for my anti-virus) and it has made no difference. Thanks, Campy ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
When receive
When receive pictures in an email unable to forward or reply and send the pictures. Like the system except for that. willy ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
Cedar wrote: When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta. Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/ Line Number 36, Column 449:meta name=google-site-verification content=OaEYk1WjScjIOpwuOyxCWyPJhJk0F9byX3q7s6cgtOQ /link href=/App_Themes/Theme/CSSHandler.axd?page=JGiJdDpvd5mqQf4kon3jcktmlugEgTLeXrO97BQ6_M0zuv2f1x9gDI74u0-Lq79G0amp;t=-enbEn1smA5dIAmLvd63r98KRSZX9FhMgM3HF72lIjk1amp;p=11Ir3EFxTdMkv009Q5tOcQ2 type=text/css rel=stylesheet /meta name=description content=Up To The Minute Beef Cattle News amp; Information Ranging From Ranch To Retail //head ^ Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Yes, I get it too, with SM 1.1.16. The point of the message is that if you have a meta tag you must also have a /meta tag (that's what mismatched means -- it's like having an opening parenthesis without a closing parenthesis). When the parser reaches the /head tag, it gives up. Not your fault, not your browser's fault, though I suppose some might say the browser should overlook this error. Internet Exploiter does. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
Cedar: [www.cattlenetwork.com] Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Well, using http://validator.w3.org/: Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional! Result: 762 Errors, 239 warning(s) ;) Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
On 11/21/2009 4:27 AM, Benoit Renard wrote: Cedar wrote: When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta. (snip) Any ideas what this might be about? The website is using XHTML, which requires it to be well-formed. But it's not well-formed, so parsing it fails with that error message. The page has 762 XHTML errors and 9 (or more) CSS errors. While many different browsers are designed to attempt to render pages containing errors, there are limits beyond which such attempts cannot succeed. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
/Paul B. Gallagher/: Cedar wrote: When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta. (...) Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Yes, I get it too, with SM 1.1.16. The point of the message is that if you have a meta tag you must also have a /meta tag (that's what mismatched means -- it's like having an opening parenthesis without a closing parenthesis). When the parser reaches the /head tag, it gives up. In HTML the META element doesn't have an end tag. However they serve the page explicitly specifying 'Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml' which makes the browser use an XML parser. Seems they sniff on the 'User-Agent' request header and serve different 'Content-Type' depending on the browser, as I don't get problem using Firefox 3.5, Safari 4 and Opera 10. Not your fault, not your browser's fault, though I suppose some might say the browser should overlook this error. Internet Exploiter does. Internet Explorer doesn't understand XHTML. It parses it as regular tag-soup HTML. -- Stanimir ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
With patience akin to a cat's, Hartmut Figge, on 11/19/2009 9:53 PM typed: David E. Ross: One warning: You cannot have both SM 1.1.18 and SM 2.0 running at the same time. Once one of them is running, attempting to launch the other will merely launch a new window of the one that is already running. While running SM2 i sometimes launch SM1 with the parameter -no-remote. Or i start SM2 a second time in another profile, also whith -no-remote, when i want to check something. Hartmut Harmut, does one need the -no-remote parameter on both the 1.1.18 and the 2.0 shortcuts? Or does it suffice just to have it on the 2.0 shortcut? My situation is such that I'm still using 1.1.18 for mail until Karsten can finalize Mnenhy for 2.0, but I often would like to use 2.0's superior browser with 1.1.18's mail component open. Thanks for any info -- -- /\ /\ | Even if you have just destroyed a ^o o^D.K. Cat Kraft | Ming vase, purr. Usually all will -T- | be forgiven. ~ Lynnwood, WA | ___oOO___OOo___ | -- Lenny Rubenstein ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Filter Problem
I'm using Seamonkey 1.1.18 on a Windows XP Pro system. I have set up several filters, and all of a sudden, after working forever, I'm getting an error message asking if: 1) I have 'rights' to the disk; and 2) asking if the disk is full. 1st of all, I'm logged in as the administrator, and 2ndly the disk is only half full. It moves some of the filtered items before this message pops up (2 or 3 times) and continues to move some messages, per my filter's instructions, but other messages are now ending up in my inbox. It only seems to affect those messages that I'm sending to my Junk/Spam box, while it never affects those messages being sent simply to other folders in my Local Folders. Anyone have an idea as to how to fix this? Thanks in advance. Neil Marcus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
D. K. Kraft: Harmut, does one need the -no-remote parameter on both the 1.1.18 and the 2.0 shortcuts? Or does it suffice just to have it on the 2.0 shortcut? I haven't tested this. When i need SM1 while running SM2 i start SM1 with -no-remote. Or when i need SM2 while running SM1 i start SM2 with -no-remote. You should test by yourself. I'm much too lazy. ;) My situation is such that I'm still using 1.1.18 for mail until Karsten can finalize Mnenhy for 2.0, [...] *g* Mnenhy is the other of the two AddOns i refuse to miss. Look at my header. But this hacked version is only for hazardous people who can deal with problems. And the new version of Karsten should be ready soon. :) Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: c /Paul B. Gallagher/: Cedar wrote: When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta. (...) Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Yes, I get it too, with SM 1.1.16. The point of the message is that if you have a meta tag you must also have a /meta tag (that's what mismatched means -- it's like having an opening parenthesis without a closing parenthesis). When the parser reaches the /head tag, it gives up. In HTML the META element doesn't have an end tag. However they serve the page explicitly specifying 'Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml' which makes the browser use an XML parser. Seems they sniff on the 'User-Agent' request header and serve different 'Content-Type' depending on the browser, as I don't get problem using Firefox 3.5, Safari 4 and Opera 10. Yes, Internet Exploiter 8 is told it's text/html, but SeaMonkey is not. How about that. Not your fault, not your browser's fault, though I suppose some might say the browser should overlook this error. Internet Exploiter does. Internet Explorer doesn't understand XHTML. It parses it as regular tag-soup HTML. Hard to know /what/ this is -- an embedded graphic in the XHTML code??? input type=hidden name=__VIEWSTATE id=__VIEWSTATE value= [51,256 characters of alphabet soup snipped] / Hell, it took IE four minutes just to /display/ all this crap in Notepad. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:54 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote: D. K. Kraft: Harmut, does one need the -no-remote parameter on both the 1.1.18 and the 2.0 shortcuts? Or does it suffice just to have it on the 2.0 shortcut? I haven't tested this. When i need SM1 while running SM2 i start SM1 with -no-remote. Or when i need SM2 while running SM1 i start SM2 with -no-remote. Note: D. K. Kraft is on Windows. Hartmut is on Linux. On linux both 1.1 and 2.0 support the -no-remote command line switch. On windows only 2.0 recognizes the -no-remote switch. For 1.1 on Windows you need to create a batch file along the lines of: set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 seamonkey.exe %1 %2 %3 %4. Actually the only reason that 1.1 on linux supports -no-remote is that on linux seamonkey is a shell script that translates -no-remote into set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 seamonkey-bin etc. And the new version of Karsten should be ready soon. :) So aliens have kidnapped Karsten and are preparing a doppelgänger to infiltrate the highest echelons of the SeaMonkey Council? Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]I'm just a peripheral visionary. * TagZilla 0.066.6 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
Philip Chee: On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:54 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote: And the new version of Karsten should be ready soon. :) So aliens have kidnapped Karsten and are preparing a doppelgänger to infiltrate the highest echelons of the SeaMonkey Council? :-P Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Filter Problem
On 11/21/2009 8:31 AM, Neil Marcus wrote: I'm using Seamonkey 1.1.18 on a Windows XP Pro system. I have set up several filters, and all of a sudden, after working forever, I'm getting an error message asking if: 1) I have 'rights' to the disk; and 2) asking if the disk is full. 1st of all, I'm logged in as the administrator, and 2ndly the disk is only half full. It moves some of the filtered items before this message pops up (2 or 3 times) and continues to move some messages, per my filter's instructions, but other messages are now ending up in my inbox. It only seems to affect those messages that I'm sending to my Junk/Spam box, while it never affects those messages being sent simply to other folders in my Local Folders. Anyone have an idea as to how to fix this? Thanks in advance. Neil Marcus I would try compacting your Junk/Spam box. Right-click on the mailbox in the tree-view list, and select 'Compact this folder'. Otherwise, perhaps the Junk/Spam box is corrupted? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
With patience akin to a cat's, Philip Chee, on 11/21/2009 8:56 AM typed: On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:54 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote: D. K. Kraft: Harmut, does one need the -no-remote parameter on both the 1.1.18 and the 2.0 shortcuts? Or does it suffice just to have it on the 2.0 shortcut? I haven't tested this. When i need SM1 while running SM2 i start SM1 with -no-remote. Or when i need SM2 while running SM1 i start SM2 with -no-remote. Note: D. K. Kraft is on Windows. Hartmut is on Linux. On linux both 1.1 and 2.0 support the -no-remote command line switch. On windows only 2.0 recognizes the -no-remote switch. snippage Thanks, Phil. Totally forgot to read the User-Agent line when asking the question of Hartmut. (duh!) I will use the switch on my 2.0 shortcuts, and make sure to have 1.1.18's mail open first. Clarification gratefully accepted, merci beaucoup. And the new version of Karsten should be ready soon. :) So aliens have kidnapped Karsten and are preparing a doppelgänger to infiltrate the highest echelons of the SeaMonkey Council? LOL! snort I don't know why this is so funny, but it is, and I'm still laughing as I type... Purrs to all -- -- /\ /\ | Even if you have just destroyed a ^o o^D.K. Cat Kraft | Ming vase, purr. Usually all will -T- | be forgiven. ~ Lynnwood, WA | ___oOO___OOo___ | -- Lenny Rubenstein ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . Which ATT version are using? I have Worldnet as do others replying here and it works fine. My daughter just went from ATT DSL to ATT Uverse in TX and they wanted her to change to att yahoo but she insisted on staying with Worldnet. Worldnet users will have a POP3 of imailhost.worldnet.att.net port 995 whereas Yahoo ATT will have a POP3 of pop.att.yahoo.com port 995 or something similar. Which do you have or is it something else? In the near future ATT will be turning Worldnet off and replacing it with something called ATT Internet Service which I suspect to be ATT Yahoo. Thus, while I don't have your problem now, I may have it in the future which would mean using port 110 and no SSL in order to use Seamonkey. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Restore the old Form Manager!
Philip Chee wrote: I think an interim workaround is to port the Firefox Form Autofill extension which (I think) uses it's own storage format and allows autofilling whole forms as well as it's own editor to access stored forms data. Another extension supporting form filling calling itself iMacros claims to already be compatible. -- Warning: May contain traces of nuts. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Eliminating long To: lists when printing
Mr. Cheese wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer than the email content... what a waste Tell them you are concerned about your privacy and ask them to make the list a BCC list (Blind Carbon Copy). That way there will be No Long List. I know about bcc: that's the method I use. I don't mind seeing the long address lists cause I sometimes add an entry to my address book), I just don't want to print them. Don't know about the Windows version, but on the Linux version I can Forward as inline and edit out what I don't want to see, then just print the text. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Password migration to 2.0
I have successfully imported everything except passwords. I guess I need to do it manually but the password file does not seem to be in the same place or have the same name in 2.0. Can someone guide me? Thanks, Steve ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Password migration to 2.0
Steve B.: I have successfully imported everything except passwords. I guess I need to do it manually but the password file does not seem to be in the same place or have the same name in 2.0. Can someone guide me? In SM1 is a file named numbers.s in the profile. Copy it to the profile of SM2 and make sure, that signon.SignonFileName in prefs.js of SM2 points to this file. Also delete every file in the profile of SM2 which begins with signon. The next start of SM2 should create signons3.txt and signons.sqlite. The first is handy because it is a text file in which to show is easy. The second is used in the future. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Password migration to 2.0
Hartmut Figge: In SM1 is a file named numbers.s in the profile. Copy it to the profile of SM2 and make sure, that signon.SignonFileName in prefs.js of SM2 points to this file. Also delete every file in the profile of SM2 which begins with signon. Also the file key3.db should be copied from the profile of SM1 to the profile of SM2. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Eliminating long To: lists when printing
Bill Davidsen wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer than the email content... what a waste Tell them you are concerned about your privacy and ask them to make the list a BCC list (Blind Carbon Copy). That way there will be No Long List. I know about bcc: that's the method I use. I don't mind seeing the long address lists cause I sometimes add an entry to my address book), I just don't want to print them. Don't know about the Windows version, but on the Linux version I can Forward as inline and edit out what I don't want to see, then just print the text. Macs are same as Linux and Unix, so far as this goes. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problems with SeaMonkey 2.0
Campy wrote: I am running SeaMonkey 2.0 on an HP computer with an I7 chip and the upgrade to Windows 7. The problems: 1. I have to click on a bookmark between 5 and 15 times before it will finally go to the web site and not say Site not found, could not connect or something similar. These are sites such as Yahoo, Google, etc. How does IE work compared to SM? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Lee wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. AMEN!!! The same happened to me , But With 4 computers thru the gatway and ONE wireless. Had to turn off SSL as I stated . About a year ago Att sent emails telling us to Change to port 995 or we would not be able to Get e-mail after a Certain Date, Now they Tell us to Use port 110 with NO SSL . Server is POP.ATT.YAHOO.COM . The Outgoing Server is Still ssl port 465 . Smtp.Att.yahoo.com. Computer #1 Seamonkey 2.0 #2 Seamonkey 1.1.18 #3 seamonkey 1.1.17 #4 Seamonkey 2.0 #5 Wireless Seamonkey 2.0 And as posted above All e-mails Worked Fine till Yesterday . Tech Support Guy ( Thru Supervisor) Said No Support Except for OUTLOOK . Then asked me if he could help me with Anything Else .. i Said Yes ... Then told him HOW DO I DISCONNECT FROM ATT and setup a New ISP ... He Hung up the phone . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Lee wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. It cannot be a Seamonkey problem , Since we have been using SSL since 2.0 Was released . And Then BANG it quits working with No 2.0 updates . Wonder if any Thunderbirds users Have the Same problem ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroup 2 copies
Cedar wrote: Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup? Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes Checked . Seriously I do not have an Answer for you ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. Change the port to 110 No SSL looks as if Microsoft is up to Something Dominating Browers ... How much is Yahoo and Att making on this Deal ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. don't you Remember The E-mail you got From ATT that Said You MUST use port 995 Before a certain Date ? Only Big $$ from Microsoft who Void that E-mail . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Cannot import passwords, etc. when installing 2.0
I've downloaded 2.0 and attempted to install it twice. Both times the same thing happened. When 2.0 starts up the first time it prompts me to import the items from 1.18 I tell it to go ahead and both times it just froze. Will someone please tell me how to fix this problem? Thanks, Serge ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroup 2 copies
Bush wrote: Cedar wrote: Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup? Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes Checked . Seriously I do not have an Answer for you Hmmm...darn! Oh welltoday all the headers disappeared from the newsgroup, had to download them all againgrrr!!...and now all seems fine, at least for now. I wonder if this is going to happen to my mail folders too!!??? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
Hartmut Figge wrote: Cedar: [www.cattlenetwork.com] Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Well, using http://validator.w3.org/: Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional! Result: 762 Errors, 239 warning(s) ;) Hartmut Wow! Thanks much everybody! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE
Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. Problem solved. When I changed my ATT account p/w and ATT updated the modem, I forgot to change the smtp p/w. Outgoing Port 465, SSL =ON, smtp.att.yahoo.com, works again. Incoming Port 995, SSL =ON, pop.att.yahoo.com, works. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: AVG 9.0 SeaMonkey
Arne wrote: When installing AVG 9.0, did you choose the Personal E-mail Scanner when AVG requested you to choose the plugin? There is only 2 options, one for Outlook and one for all other email app's. Check in Components E-mail scanner if the Installed e-mail protections is indeed Personal E-mail Scanner and not anything else. If it's not, then reinstall with the option to only make changes to the current install. AVG Free has always worked great on my PC's, now AVG 9.0 on Vista, and in my opinion it's the best AV software. ;) Hello, Ares! Good news for you! I have followed your good instruction. I've found that I have not added a compnent! Big oops! I have fixed that so far, it is working nicely! And one curious question to ask you. Do you guys uses IMAP server? incoming mails does not get scanned. Are they??? Thank you. -- John Cunniff President, Deaf-Blind Contact Center E-mail: jo...@shellworld.net Videophone: 866-350-7482 Fax: 781-979-0215 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
On 11/21/09 5:02 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:37:11 -0500, /art/: When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to cut/paste/edit the link before using it instead of just clicking on it. The wrap is only visual. If you observe the source of the message you'll see the link text is continuous. Copying and pasting it in a simple plain text editor should also show the text is not broken. The new wrapping behavior is in effect since Firefox 3.0/Gecko 1.9.0, if I'm not mistaken. Previously Mozilla wrapped text only at white space which made tables containing such links expand too wide, for example. That's certainly a good rationale for modifying the wrapping. So as links are never stored/transmitted with hard breaks, there should be no problems with messages composed in SM2 being read by any well-behaved mail client. Operative term is well-behaved :-). Thus, to summarize, SM2 will: during message compose - 1) hard break text in the message pane based on wrap text setting using white space used as the wrapping delimiter. 2) soft break links in the message pane using special characters (e.g. , /) for the wrapping delimiters for links. during message reading - 3) soft break links/text in the message pane based on pane width. Same delimiters as #1 for text, #2 for links. -- Art ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroup 2 copies
Cedar wrote: Bush wrote: Cedar wrote: Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup? Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes Checked . Seriously I do not have an Answer for you Hmmm...darn! Oh welltoday all the headers disappeared from the newsgroup, had to download them all againgrrr!!...and now all seems fine, at least for now. I wonder if this is going to happen to my mail folders too!!??? It could, if your ISP is doing some maintenance work, and things are not going too smoothly. ;) bj ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
On 11/20/2009 11:34 PM, Cedar wrote: When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta. Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/ Line Number 36, Column 449:meta name=google-site-verification content=OaEYk1WjScjIOpwuOyxCWyPJhJk0F9byX3q7s6cgtOQ /link href=/App_Themes/Theme/CSSHandler.axd?page=JGiJdDpvd5mqQf4kon3jcktmlugEgTLeXrO97BQ6_M0zuv2f1x9gDI74u0-Lq79G0amp;t=-enbEn1smA5dIAmLvd63r98KRSZX9FhMgM3HF72lIjk1amp;p=11Ir3EFxTdMkv009Q5tOcQ2 type=text/css rel=stylesheet /meta name=description content=Up To The Minute Beef Cattle News amp; Information Ranging From Ranch To Retail //head ^ Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Thanks. Works for me. However note that I have the 'NOT Firefox' in my UI: # Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 NOT Firefox/3.5 Lightning/1.0pre SeaMonkey/2.0 Let's take it out try again to see if they are browser sniffing... Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 Lightning/1.0pre SeaMonkey/2.0 Whoops... that get's the same error as your's. Put the 'NOT Firefox/3.5' back in it now works. So they *are* browser sniffing. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
IETab.dll in Win 7?
I can't get the ietab.dll plugin to work with 1.18 and Windows 7 64-bit. Any advice? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.
Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0. So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple identities with out having to do the extra ones manually? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.
Nairda wrote: Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0. So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple identities with out having to do the extra ones manually? If you planning on waiting, it will be a long wait. I don't think it will ever be available. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cannot import passwords, etc. when installing 2.0
Serge Popper wrote: I've downloaded 2.0 and attempted to install it twice. Both times the same thing happened. When 2.0 starts up the first time it prompts me to import the items from 1.18 I tell it to go ahead and both times it just froze. Will someone please tell me how to fix this problem? Thanks, Serge When I have installed 2.0, the import tool worked in all cases. However, I have a very complex mail/news profile, so the wizard appeared to stall when importing the mail. It took some minutes, but it did complete successfully. How long are you waiting before aborting? Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cannot import passwords, etc. when installing 2.0
Leonidas Jones wrote: Serge Popper wrote: I've downloaded 2.0 and attempted to install it twice. Both times the same thing happened. When 2.0 starts up the first time it prompts me to import the items from 1.18 I tell it to go ahead and both times it just froze. Will someone please tell me how to fix this problem? Thanks, Serge When I have installed 2.0, the import tool worked in all cases. However, I have a very complex mail/news profile, so the wizard appeared to stall when importing the mail. It took some minutes, but it did complete successfully. How long are you waiting before aborting? Lee Fifteen minutes on the first attempt and over 30 minutes on the second attempt. As a matter of fact, when I clicked on the screen, after thirty minutes, a screen came up which said not responding. Think I should wait longer? Thanks ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
Philip Chee wrote: Actually the only reason that 1.1 on linux supports -no-remote is that on linux seamonkey is a shell script that translates -no-remote into set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 seamonkey-bin etc. Well, supports suggests it checks for exactly that option. The truth is that -anyoptionthatisntlistedinthatfile does the same in SM 1.1. ;-) Greetings, Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
NoOp wrote: On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Subject: says it all. :) ... As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux distributions? +1 Why no 'official' 64bit linux build? Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use at your own risk of course): http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/ [seamonkey-2.0.1pre.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 20-Nov-2009 02:5114M] I'm certainly willing to try the above on 64-bit Linux, but when I installed the current (32-bit) SeaMonkey 2.0 under 64-bit Linux (Xubuntu 9.10), it would not run. If I ran it from a terminal window, it displayed: ./run-mozilla.sh: 399: ./seamonkey-bin: not found I then checked the directory where it installed to and seamonkey-bin IS there, showing 13,638,200 bytes. Any thoughts as to why the 32-bit Linux version apparently doesn't work with 64-bit Linux? --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 091121-1, 11/21/2009 Tested on: 11/21/2009 6:47:29 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
mail problem
Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been getting the following message when trying get my mail: could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was refused. This will happen for a short period of time and hour or so later it will start working for whatever reason. It has been off and on for a few days and I am not sure where to even start looking for a problem or who to call. I have checked my yahoo home using the internet side of SM and I can get my mail there. Any suggestions or directions that I may try. Thanks ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cannot import passwords, etc. when installing 2.0
Serge Popper wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Serge Popper wrote: /snip/ Fifteen minutes on the first attempt and over 30 minutes on the second attempt. As a matter of fact, when I clicked on the screen, after thirty minutes, a screen came up which said not responding. Think I should wait longer? Thanks No. I would think 30 minutes should do. I suppose you could try limiting the data to be migrted to that which you really need to be transferred, but I suppose the next answer will be manual transfer of the data. I hope someone else has a better answer. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Lee wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. AMEN!!! The same happened to me , But With 4 computers thru the gatway and ONE wireless. Had to turn off SSL as I stated . About a year ago Att sent emails telling us to Change to port 995 or we would not be able to Get e-mail after a Certain Date, Now they Tell us to Use port 110 with NO SSL . Server is POP.ATT.YAHOO.COM . The Outgoing Server is Still ssl port 465 . Smtp.Att.yahoo.com. Computer #1 Seamonkey 2.0 #2 Seamonkey 1.1.18 #3 seamonkey 1.1.17 #4 Seamonkey 2.0 #5 Wireless Seamonkey 2.0 And as posted above All e-mails Worked Fine till Yesterday . Tech Support Guy ( Thru Supervisor) Said No Support Except for OUTLOOK . Then asked me if he could help me with Anything Else .. i Said Yes ... Then told him HOW DO I DISCONNECT FROM ATT and setup a New ISP ... He Hung up the phone . I am having the same issue with firefox on linux. Changing to port 110 allows connection. Stupid. -- norm ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cannot import passwords, etc. when installing 2.0
Leonidas Jones wrote: Serge Popper wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Serge Popper wrote: /snip/ Fifteen minutes on the first attempt and over 30 minutes on the second attempt. As a matter of fact, when I clicked on the screen, after thirty minutes, a screen came up which said not responding. Think I should wait longer? Thanks No. I would think 30 minutes should do. I suppose you could try limiting the data to be migrted to that which you really need to be transferred, but I suppose the next answer will be manual transfer of the data. I hope someone else has a better answer. Lee Thanks Lee. I tried again, before you responded, and it worked this time. Took exactly 26 minutes and now it is all there. Appreciate your input. Serge ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: mail problem
Norvin wrote: Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been getting the following message when trying get my mail: could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was refused. This will happen for a short period of time and hour or so later it will start working for whatever reason. It has been off and on for a few days and I am not sure where to even start looking for a problem or who to call. I have checked my yahoo home using the internet side of SM and I can get my mail there. Any suggestions or directions that I may try. Thanks This has been a problem, but, unfortunately, only those with that ISP can give specifics. I hae ATT Worldnet iservers set up, and they are working without issues. So you have SSL enabled on the account? Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
On 11/21/2009 03:47 PM, Edward wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Subject: says it all. :) ... As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux distributions? +1 Why no 'official' 64bit linux build? Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use at your own risk of course): http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/ [seamonkey-2.0.1pre.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 20-Nov-2009 02:51 14M] I'm certainly willing to try the above on 64-bit Linux, but when I installed the current (32-bit) SeaMonkey 2.0 under 64-bit Linux (Xubuntu 9.10), it would not run. If I ran it from a terminal window, it displayed: ./run-mozilla.sh: 399: ./seamonkey-bin: not found I then checked the directory where it installed to and seamonkey-bin IS there, showing 13,638,200 bytes. Any thoughts as to why the 32-bit Linux version apparently doesn't work with 64-bit Linux? It should: $ locate seamonkey-bin Note: I use this instead of 'seamonkey' as I have multiple installations of SeaMonkey (2.0, 2.0.1pre, 1.1.18) installed it's easier to find the right folder(s) this way $ cd seamonkey-binlocation $ ./seamonkey Note that you do not run 'seamonkey-bin' but just 'seamonkey'. Note: the reasoning for using the 64bit build is to run the new 64bit flash java plugins. There is a thread over on mozilla.dev.apps.seamonky ([2.0rc - linux] java plugin on 64bit) where Barry Edwin Gilmour Robert (Kairo) helped me sort this out. You might want to wander over there read through the thread. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: mail problem
Leonidas Jones wrote: Norvin wrote: Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been getting the following message when trying get my mail: could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was refused. This will happen for a short period of time and hour or so later it will start working for whatever reason. It has been off and on for a few days and I am not sure where to even start looking for a problem or who to call. I have checked my yahoo home using the internet side of SM and I can get my mail there. Any suggestions or directions that I may try. Thanks This has been a problem, but, unfortunately, only those with that ISP can give specifics. I hae ATT Worldnet iservers set up, and they are working without issues. So you have SSL enabled on the account? Lee Yes, SSL is enabled ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cannot import passwords, etc. when installing 2.0
Serge Popper wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Serge Popper wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Serge Popper wrote: /snip/ Fifteen minutes on the first attempt and over 30 minutes on the second attempt. As a matter of fact, when I clicked on the screen, after thirty minutes, a screen came up which said not responding. Think I should wait longer? Thanks No. I would think 30 minutes should do. I suppose you could try limiting the data to be migrted to that which you really need to be transferred, but I suppose the next answer will be manual transfer of the data. I hope someone else has a better answer. Lee Thanks Lee. I tried again, before you responded, and it worked this time. Took exactly 26 minutes and now it is all there. Appreciate your input. Serge I suppose the saying patience is a virtue really applies here! I'm so glad its working for you. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
norm wrote: Bush wrote: Lee wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. AMEN!!! The same happened to me , But With 4 computers thru the gatway and ONE wireless. Had to turn off SSL as I stated . About a year ago Att sent emails telling us to Change to port 995 or we would not be able to Get e-mail after a Certain Date, Now they Tell us to Use port 110 with NO SSL . Server is POP.ATT.YAHOO.COM . The Outgoing Server is Still ssl port 465 . Smtp.Att.yahoo.com. Computer #1 Seamonkey 2.0 #2 Seamonkey 1.1.18 #3 seamonkey 1.1.17 #4 Seamonkey 2.0 #5 Wireless Seamonkey 2.0 And as posted above All e-mails Worked Fine till Yesterday . Tech Support Guy ( Thru Supervisor) Said No Support Except for OUTLOOK . Then asked me if he could help me with Anything Else .. i Said Yes ... Then told him HOW DO I DISCONNECT FROM ATT and setup a New ISP ... He Hung up the phone . I am having the same issue with firefox on linux. Changing to port 110 allows connection. Stupid. Meant thunderbird, not firefox, when posting earlier about my issue. -- norm ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM 2.0 Copy Function Not Working
Windows XP SP3 Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 1. I can copy from a web page in Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 and paste it anywhere including into the Sea Monkey Composer. 2. I cannot copy anything from a Sea Monkey 2.0 web page anywhere. The information never gets posted to the Clipboard. I even tried saving a web page as a HTML and Text file. I cannot copy from either of those files after I open them in Sea Monkey. 3. However I was able to take the page I saved in Sea Monkey to my desktop and then open it in Firefox. I could then copy that information into the Sea Monkey composer from Firefox. 3. I disabled all of the Extensions and Plugins but to no avail. 4. I understand that SM 2.0 and Firefox 3.5 and 3.6 use the same engine. 5. So if I am able to copy from Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 (I have never had a problem coping anything from a Firefox page going back to version 2x.) I certainly should be able to copy from Sea Monkey. 6. I did a standard installation of Sea Monkey 7. There is some problem with SM 2.0 copy function because if Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 copy function works fine it should work fine in Sea Monkey 2.0 especially with all of the Extensions and Plugins disabled. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE
Paul wrote: Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. Problem solved. When I changed my ATT account p/w and ATT updated the modem, I forgot to change the smtp p/w. Outgoing Port 465, SSL =ON, smtp.att.yahoo.com, works again. Incoming Port 995, SSL =ON, pop.att.yahoo.com, works. Glad you got it Going I just Tried again with 995 No luck Had to go back port 110 None SSL Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong with the Built-in Firewall All settings are correct . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Copy Function Not Working
John Galt wrote: Windows XP SP3 Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 1. I can copy from a web page in Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 and paste it anywhere including into the Sea Monkey Composer. 2. I cannot copy anything from a Sea Monkey 2.0 web page anywhere. The information never gets posted to the Clipboard. I even tried saving a web page as a HTML and Text file. I cannot copy from either of those files after I open them in Sea Monkey. 3. However I was able to take the page I saved in Sea Monkey to my desktop and then open it in Firefox. I could then copy that information into the Sea Monkey composer from Firefox. 3. I disabled all of the Extensions and Plugins but to no avail. 4. I understand that SM 2.0 and Firefox 3.5 and 3.6 use the same engine. 5. So if I am able to copy from Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 (I have never had a problem coping anything from a Firefox page going back to version 2x.) I certainly should be able to copy from Sea Monkey. 6. I did a standard installation of Sea Monkey 7. There is some problem with SM 2.0 copy function because if Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 copy function works fine it should work fine in Sea Monkey 2.0 especially with all of the Extensions and Plugins disabled. This problem has been pretty much isolated to the MacAfee Site Advisor. If you disable it, it should solve the problem. Check this link for more information: http://community.mcafee.com/thread/18746?decorator=printdisplayFullThread=true Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
On 11/21/2009 8:08 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: /Paul B. Gallagher/: Cedar wrote: When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta. (...) Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Yes, I get it too, with SM 1.1.16. The point of the message is that if you have a meta tag you must also have a /meta tag (that's what mismatched means -- it's like having an opening parenthesis without a closing parenthesis). When the parser reaches the /head tag, it gives up. In HTML the META element doesn't have an end tag. However they serve the page explicitly specifying 'Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml' which makes the browser use an XML parser. Seems they sniff on the 'User-Agent' request header and serve different 'Content-Type' depending on the browser, as I don't get problem using Firefox 3.5, Safari 4 and Opera 10. Not your fault, not your browser's fault, though I suppose some might say the browser should overlook this error. Internet Exploiter does. Internet Explorer doesn't understand XHTML. It parses it as regular tag-soup HTML. Hmm. The server is sniffing for the UA string. When I spoof Firefox 3.5, I can readily view the page. When I don't spoof at all, I see Cedar's original problem. The interesting thing is that, when I send the URI to the W3C validator at http://validator.w3.org/, it reports 762 XHTML errors. When I spoof Firefox 3.5, view and copy the source, and paste it into the W3C validator, it reports 787 XHTML errors, 25 more than for just the URI. All this merely reaffirms the old saying: Garbage in equals garbage out. I might submit a Tech Evangelism bug report. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroup 2 copies
Bush wrote: Cedar wrote: Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup? Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes Checked . Seriously I do not have an Answer for you I am seeing that the last couple of days as well. Years ago I had that problem with email from AOL (bask when it was strictly AOL) and it turned out to be bad header info. The only cure for that was wiping out my email accounts wait over night then My ISP would rebuild my mailboxes. I had to have them killed and resurrected 3 times before AOL fixed the problem. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problems with SeaMonkey 2.0
Paul wrote: Campy wrote: I am running SeaMonkey 2.0 on an HP computer with an I7 chip and the upgrade to Windows 7. The problems: 1. I have to click on a bookmark between 5 and 15 times before it will finally go to the web site and not say Site not found, could not connect or something similar. These are sites such as Yahoo, Google, etc. How does IE work compared to SM? That's a Loaded question. I and others here that use SM day to day; will swear its the greatest thing since Sliced Bread. OE people will say the same about IE. The advantages to SM over IE; is that Web Browsing, Mail, news, IRC (chat), even light web page design or repair; is built all in one. Where IE, is a One trick Pony, it does Web only. OE on PC Or Outlook on PC, or Entourage on Mac does the rest. Entourage at best could be absolute atrocious, and clunky to use. I would recommend it to my worst enemy. You can do newsgroups but its royal PIA to set up. it Forte is email only. It does have an advantage in that the address portion and Dictionary/Thesaurus is shared with Word and Excel so you can get mailing addresses from your emails to send letters and do mailing list in word. But its not worth the pain to use it. Supposedly Outlook is supposed to come to the Mac Platform but I will believe it when I actually see it. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
art wrote: On 11/21/09 5:02 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:37:11 -0500, /art/: When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to cut/paste/edit the link before using it instead of just clicking on it. The wrap is only visual. If you observe the source of the message you'll see the link text is continuous. Copying and pasting it in a simple plain text editor should also show the text is not broken. The new wrapping behavior is in effect since Firefox 3.0/Gecko 1.9.0, if I'm not mistaken. Previously Mozilla wrapped text only at white space which made tables containing such links expand too wide, for example. That's certainly a good rationale for modifying the wrapping. So as links are never stored/transmitted with hard breaks, there should be no problems with messages composed in SM2 being read by any well-behaved mail client. Operative term is well-behaved :-). Thus, to summarize, SM2 will: during message compose - 1) hard break text in the message pane based on wrap text setting using white space used as the wrapping delimiter. 2) soft break links in the message pane using special characters (e.g. , /) for the wrapping delimiters for links. during message reading - 3) soft break links/text in the message pane based on pane width. Same delimiters as #1 for text, #2 for links. Are you talking about in SM1.18 and TB if you provided a Link you could type an unlimited amount of characters and it would no break and when you read a reply that had you link was hot (would work). On SM 2 if you get to a certain amount of character while you type it breaks at what ever number of Characters you have set but when you view the item after sent remains hot sometimes I notice that as well. IN SM 1.x URL's and Mailto: were treated as unique items and they were not broken. in SM2 sometimes it is sometimes it isn't. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
NoOp wrote: On 11/20/2009 11:34 PM, Cedar wrote: When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected:/meta. Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/ Line Number 36, Column 449:meta name=google-site-verification content=OaEYk1WjScjIOpwuOyxCWyPJhJk0F9byX3q7s6cgtOQ /link href=/App_Themes/Theme/CSSHandler.axd?page=JGiJdDpvd5mqQf4kon3jcktmlugEgTLeXrO97BQ6_M0zuv2f1x9gDI74u0-Lq79G0amp;t=-enbEn1smA5dIAmLvd63r98KRSZX9FhMgM3HF72lIjk1amp;p=11Ir3EFxTdMkv009Q5tOcQ2 type=text/css rel=stylesheet /meta name=description content=Up To The Minute Beef Cattle Newsamp; Information Ranging From Ranch To Retail //head ^ Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Thanks. Works for me. However note that I have the 'NOT Firefox' in my UI: # Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 NOT Firefox/3.5 Lightning/1.0pre SeaMonkey/2.0 Let's take it out try again to see if they are browser sniffing... Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 Lightning/1.0pre SeaMonkey/2.0 Whoops... that get's the same error as your's. Put the 'NOT Firefox/3.5' back in it now works. So they *are* browser sniffing. was able to go to it with no problem. I use on a Mac, OSX.4.11 and Flash 10 plugin No alteration of my user agent. (Mas OSX 4.11 SM2) -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0
Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provide secure up dadates. I went into EDITPREFERENCESADVANCEDSOFTWARE INSTALLATIONMANAGE SOFTWARE NSTALLATION AND UPDATESALLOWED SITES There I inserted Roboform.com and made it an allowed site. I attempted to install the Adapter again and again, the same message came up as is listed above. I went back into Software installations and RoboForm was no longer there. I went through the same procedure, re-inserted RoboForm.com, tried again and got the same denial message. I tried once more but the Software Installations wouldn't accept roboform.com at all this time. How do I get around this? Thanks, Serge Popper Can you give a direct link to the extension you are trying to install? I'll try to install it, but I'm not finding it. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0
Leonidas Jones wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provide secure up dadates. I went into EDITPREFERENCESADVANCEDSOFTWARE INSTALLATIONMANAGE SOFTWARE NSTALLATION AND UPDATESALLOWED SITES There I inserted Roboform.com and made it an allowed site. I attempted to install the Adapter again and again, the same message came up as is listed above. I went back into Software installations and RoboForm was no longer there. I went through the same procedure, re-inserted RoboForm.com, tried again and got the same denial message. I tried once more but the Software Installations wouldn't accept roboform.com at all this time. How do I get around this? Thanks, Serge Popper Can you give a direct link to the extension you are trying to install? I'll try to install it, but I'm not finding it. Lee Never mind, I couldn't find it because its Windows only. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: mail problem
Norvin wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Norvin wrote: Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been getting the following message when trying get my mail: could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was refused. This will happen for a short period of time and hour or so later it will start working for whatever reason. It has been off and on for a few days and I am not sure where to even start looking for a problem or who to call. I have checked my yahoo home using the internet side of SM and I can get my mail there. Any suggestions or directions that I may try. Thanks This has been a problem, but, unfortunately, only those with that ISP can give specifics. I hae ATT Worldnet iservers set up, and they are working without issues. So you have SSL enabled on the account? Lee Yes, SSL is enabled Now its working again, for how long? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: mail problem
Norvin wrote: Norvin wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Norvin wrote: /snip/ So you have SSL enabled on the account? Lee Yes, SSL is enabled Now its working again, for how long? Well, lets hope forever. If not I suspect its on ATTYahoo's end. Post back if the problem recurs. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: mail problem
Norvin wrote: Norvin wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Norvin wrote: Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been getting the following message when trying get my mail: could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was refused. This will happen for a short period of time and hour or so later it will start working for whatever reason. It has been off and on for a few days and I am not sure where to even start looking for a problem or who to call. I have checked my yahoo home using the internet side of SM and I can get my mail there. Any suggestions or directions that I may try. Thanks This has been a problem, but, unfortunately, only those with that ISP can give specifics. I hae ATT Worldnet iservers set up, and they are working without issues. So you have SSL enabled on the account? Lee Yes, SSL is enabled Now its working again, for how long? Seems to be an att issue. For a work-around, switch the incoming port to 110, which will also uncheck ssl. The issue is intermittent, seems to be regional and affects more than just seamonkey, so you should use the work-around for now, until att gets whatever issue they have with pop.att.yahoo.com fixed. Switch back to ssl/995 on occasion. If the issue recurs, go back to 110. -- norm ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
On 11/21/2009 5:21 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 11/21/2009 8:08 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: /Paul B. Gallagher/: Cedar wrote: When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta. (...) Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Yes, I get it too, with SM 1.1.16. The point of the message is that if you have a meta tag you must also have a /meta tag (that's what mismatched means -- it's like having an opening parenthesis without a closing parenthesis). When the parser reaches the /head tag, it gives up. In HTML the META element doesn't have an end tag. However they serve the page explicitly specifying 'Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml' which makes the browser use an XML parser. Seems they sniff on the 'User-Agent' request header and serve different 'Content-Type' depending on the browser, as I don't get problem using Firefox 3.5, Safari 4 and Opera 10. Not your fault, not your browser's fault, though I suppose some might say the browser should overlook this error. Internet Exploiter does. Internet Explorer doesn't understand XHTML. It parses it as regular tag-soup HTML. Hmm. The server is sniffing for the UA string. When I spoof Firefox 3.5, I can readily view the page. When I don't spoof at all, I see Cedar's original problem. The interesting thing is that, when I send the URI to the W3C validator at http://validator.w3.org/, it reports 762 XHTML errors. When I spoof Firefox 3.5, view and copy the source, and paste it into the W3C validator, it reports 787 XHTML errors, 25 more than for just the URI. All this merely reaffirms the old saying: Garbage in equals garbage out. I might submit a Tech Evangelism bug report. This is now bug #530359 at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530359. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.
Nairda wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Nairda wrote: Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0. So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple identities with out having to do the extra ones manually? If you planning on waiting, it will be a long wait. I don't think it will ever be available. Lee Thanks for your reply Lee. In that case I think I will wait till MozBackup 1.4.10 comes out of Beta. When ever that will be. (: Mozbackup 1.4.9 claims to work with SeaMonkey 1.0a - 2.0. Has anyone tried it with SM 2.0 yet? ~N OK, well I tried it, and MB 1.4.9 only finds SM2 and SM2 profiles after SM2 has been installed. SM2 doesn't even seem to import your old settings from the one single profile that it does let you import. It took me ages to get things just the way I wanted them, and it looks like one update blows them all away. SM2 may be better, faster, and easier for some, but until the profile migration is fixed (which as Lee says maybe never), I guess I'm sticking with 1.1.18 for the foreseeable future. All the best to everyone here. ~N ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: mail problem
norm wrote: Norvin wrote: Norvin wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Norvin wrote: Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been getting the following message when trying get my mail: could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was refused. This will happen for a short period of time and hour or so later it will start working for whatever reason. It has been off and on for a few days and I am not sure where to even start looking for a problem or who to call. I have checked my yahoo home using the internet side of SM and I can get my mail there. Any suggestions or directions that I may try. Thanks This has been a problem, but, unfortunately, only those with that ISP can give specifics. I hae ATT Worldnet iservers set up, and they are working without issues. So you have SSL enabled on the account? Lee Yes, SSL is enabled Now its working again, for how long? Seems to be an att issue. For a work-around, switch the incoming port to 110, which will also uncheck ssl. The issue is intermittent, seems to be regional and affects more than just seamonkey, so you should use the work-around for now, until att gets whatever issue they have with pop.att.yahoo.com fixed. Switch back to ssl/995 on occasion. If the issue recurs, go back to 110. Not just a mozilla thing . Mailwasher cannot get the att yahoo mail with ssl enabled . As stated it is an area problem. Even outlook Gets rejected Now ! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.
Nairda wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Nairda wrote: Nairda wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Nairda wrote: Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0. So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple identities with out having to do the extra ones manually? If you planning on waiting, it will be a long wait. I don't think it will ever be available. Lee Thanks for your reply Lee. In that case I think I will wait till MozBackup 1.4.10 comes out of Beta. When ever that will be. (: Mozbackup 1.4.9 claims to work with SeaMonkey 1.0a - 2.0. Has anyone tried it with SM 2.0 yet? ~N OK, well I tried it, and MB 1.4.9 only finds SM2 and SM2 profiles after SM2 has been installed. SM2 doesn't even seem to import your old settings from the one single profile that it does let you import. It took me ages to get things just the way I wanted them, and it looks like one update blows them all away. SM2 may be better, faster, and easier for some, but until the profile migration is fixed (which as Lee says maybe never), I guess I'm sticking with 1.1.18 for the foreseeable future. All the best to everyone here. ~N Moz Backup is Windows only, so I have no direct knowledge of it. However, your description seems consistent with how it should work. Remember, it is backup tool, its not designed for profile migration. You can invoke the migration wizard manually, to migrate other profiles: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonkey#Manual_migration Lee Yes I did look at that once or twice, but it all seemed rather convoluted. And it still begs to question, why don't settings seem to stick? Like clicking a link in all my old profiles opened a new tab, not a whole new window. Or maybe that was part of what I used MultiZilla for. Which of course would have to be reinstalled and re-setup from scratch I guess. http://multizilla.mozdev.org/features/index.html I will have another go at the migration when I get more time. Thanks for all your help Lee. ~N Sad to say, Multizilla is not compatible with SM 2.0. It is a hobby extension, so there is no saying when or if it will ever be ported over. As far as settings, most of mine did seem to carry over, but it is a totally different program. They can be reset easily enough in Preferences. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
