Re: Seamonke won't open doc. attachments.
Le 7/11/2012, gfagan...@gmail.com a supposé : Even when I chose 'Open' it asks where to save them. OS is Puppyt Linux. Hello fellow puppy linux user. What do you use? OpenOffice? LibrOffice? Abiword? In the preferences of SeaMonkey, helper applications, you have to configure the one you use. For OpenOffice/LibrOffice swriter, for AbiWord abiword -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonke won't open doc. attachments.
Le 10/11/2012, NoOp a supposé : On 11/09/2012 02:13 PM, Bernard Mercier wrote: Le 7/11/2012, gfagan...@gmail.com a supposé : Even when I chose 'Open' it asks where to save them. OS is Puppyt Linux. Hello fellow puppy linux user. What do you use? OpenOffice? LibrOffice? Abiword? In the preferences of SeaMonkey, helper applications, you have to configure the one you use. For OpenOffice/LibrOffice swriter, for AbiWord abiword If you are using the standard version of LibreOffice (non-distro), the plugin is included in the .deb rpm install: /opt/libreoffice3.6/program/libnpsoplugin.so In that case, open LO: Tools|Options|Internet|Browser Plug-in: Display documents in browser For Ubuntu/Debian distro versions install 'mozilla-libreoffice' which installs the same plugin: http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/i386/mozilla-libreoffice/filelist /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libnpsoplugin.so /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/nsplugin /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libnpsoplugin.so Thanks for highlighting the plugin way, but I don't know if it is this what the OP has in mind. I have some problems with the concept to use a browser as displaying vehicle. To see a pdf document referenced in a link, the helper application I use is epdfview. I can read then and eventually save a copy. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux][seamonkey 2.13.2]Youtube link not working.
Bernard Mercier vient de nous annoncer : Link http://www.youtube.com/v/AmrCH0AhbDg?version=3autohide=1 doesn't work in reported version. Anyone else having this problem? When I tried in Opera, I had no problem. Installed the latest flashplayer: = no go Having FF, upgraded it to the latest verssion: video runs ok. Verified the plugins installed and saw SeaMonkey has flashblock and FF not. Disabled flashblock and video runs ok now. However I have not this problem with other video's and flashblock enabled. I just have to click on the arrow to start the video. Thanks to all who replied. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.14b3 Released.
Dans son message précédent, Philip TAYLOR a écrit : Jens Hatlak wrote (with far more venom than the original message warranted) So Edmund did a simple search replace on a previous announcement instead of going through it again word by word. Big deal. Now that you found the issue you may keep it. Congratulations! I do not for one second undervalue Edmund's contribution to the project, but announcements that are not factually correct are a waste of everyone's time -- the sender's, and that of all those who seek to make use of the announcement. When a new version is released, what is new/fixed in that release is by far the most important information necessary to accompany it. If that information is not yet in place, and/or linked from the relevant document, then announcement of the release should be placed on hold until such time as those loose ends have been tidied up. Premature release announcements serve only to bring the project into disrepute, and to cast doubt on the care with which the release has been prepared. BTW Edmund, personally I don't think we need to announce betas at all. If you feel the necessity you may of course continue and deal with such reactions... Perhaps a dedicated channel targeted solely at those who are interested in beta- releases would be of benefit here. Philip Taylor Long time ago (my latests post I see are from 2009) there was a group mozilla.announce.prerelease. Seems to be inaccessable now. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux][seamonkey 2.13.2]Youtube link not working.
NoOp a pensé très fort : On 11/08/2012 05:17 AM, Bernard Mercier wrote: Link http://www.youtube.com/v/AmrCH0AhbDg?version=3autohide=1 doesn't work in reported version. Anyone else having this problem? When I tried in Opera, I had no problem. WFM Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.2 File: /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so Version: Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 Thank you. Have found the reason. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[linux][seamonkey 2.13.2]Youtube link not working.
Link http://www.youtube.com/v/AmrCH0AhbDg?version=3autohide=1 doesn't work in reported version. Anyone else having this problem? When I tried in Opera, I had no problem. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Java and Seamonkey?
Après mure réflexion, NoOp a écrit : On 10/25/2012 09:15 PM, Craig wrote: Does it work again yet? If so, what does one link to one's plugins directory? Not the Oracle/Sun version. I finally gave up and went with openjdk icedtea. Yesterday I looked at the open incident in Bugzilla. Still no progress on the issue. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux][seamonkey 2.13.2]Youtube link not working.
Le 8/11/2012, Philip TAYLOR a supposé : Bernard Mercier wrote: Link http://www.youtube.com/v/AmrCH0AhbDg?version=3autohide=1 doesn't work in reported version. Anyone else having this problem? When I tried in Opera, I had no problem. Sous les fenetres de Microsoft, ca marche bien ici, avec tous les deux le SeaMonkey/2.13.1l et aussi avec le SeaMonkey/2.13.2 : User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.1 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.2 Philip Taylor Merci. J'appèle les fenêtres: µbrol ;-) -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux][seamonkey 2.13.2]Youtube link not working.
Daniel a écrit : Bernard Mercier wrote: Link http://www.youtube.com/v/AmrCH0AhbDg?version=3autohide=1 doesn't work in reported version. Anyone else having this problem? When I tried in Opera, I had no problem. Bernard, the clip works for me (looks very nice!!), but then I'm only using SM 2.12.1!! User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 I did notice the header saying its a flash object! Is your flash working right?? Thank you Daiel. I'll look to see if I have the latest flash. Other flash objects seem to play fine. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux][seamonkey 2.13.2]Youtube link not working.
WaltS a exprimé avec précision : Bernard Mercier wrote: Link http://www.youtube.com/v/AmrCH0AhbDg?version=3autohide=1 doesn't work in reported version. Anyone else having this problem? When I tried in Opera, I had no problem. I get a Click here to activate plugin, but when I activate the plugin it is just a blank white page. Works in Firefox. Shockwave Flash 11.2.202.243 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.2 Thank you. This is indeed my issue. Flash at 11.2.r202 -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux][seamonkey 2.13.2]Youtube link not working.
Le 8/11/2012, upscope a supposé : On Thursday, November 08, 2012 02:17:13 PM Bernard Mercier wrote: Link http://www.youtube.com/v/AmrCH0AhbDg?version=3autohide=1 doesn't work in reported version. Anyone else having this problem? When I tried in Opera, I had no problem. Works fine for me using SeaMonkey 2.13.2 under openSUSE 12.2 Linux. great pictures and music. Thank you. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Video Problem
LR a exposé le 4/10/2012 : I think I'm having problems with Seamonkey and Flash. For example, when I try to play this http://www.fark.com/vidplayer/7364212 using Seamonkey the video freezes and does other strange things. If I click Reload the problem sometimes reoccurs. If I use the Flash replay button it seems to play ok. I've tried playing the video using IE and no problem. I seen problems with other videos. I think one may have crashed Flash recently, but I don't think I can duplicate that. Flash, 11,4,402,265 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 Build identifier: 20120909051100 I'm running XP. Suggestions? TIA LR SeaMonkey 2.12.1 on Linux. The video plays but very jerky. Nice video btw. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Updating 2.0.14 to 2.2 a disaster for the bookmarks.
Après mure réflexion, Daniel a écrit : Bernard Mercier wrote: Après mure réflexion, Robert Kaiser a écrit : Dale DePriest schrieb: I lost my bookmarks as well. Here is what I did to fix it. I did an open file and traversed the seamonkey support installation to the location of the bookmarks.html file and there they were. So I bookmarked the location. Now I can see them and use them whenever I wish. You should be able to import exactly that file from the bookmarks manager and then have your bookmarks available just like usual again. Robert Kaiser In my case, the problem is that I don't have a bookmarks.html file in the same directory as the places.sqlite and places.sqlite.corrupt. So import will not work. Perhaps KaiRo will correct me, but I believe SM 2.2 now stores your bookmarks file in the same location as your mail profile. If you have not created a bookmark since upgrading to SM 2.2 there will be no places.sqlite in your profile, so what you may need to do is locate your old bookmarks.html, then import it into your SM 2.2, then when you close, you might have a bookmarks.html in your profile locationmaybe. Thank you. What happened I think is that I was looking in a FireFox profile, while thinking I was in the SeaMonkey one. As I had a very recent bookmarks.html elsewhere, I did an import in SeaMonkey 2.2 and I got my bookmarks, as well as a bookmarks.html file, which is in the same directory as the places.sqlite. So still don't know what happened when the automatic update was done and I didn't have my bookmarks. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Updating 2.0.14 to 2.2 a disaster for the bookmarks.
Dans son message précédent, Bernard Mercier a écrit : Après mure réflexion, Daniel a écrit : Bernard Mercier wrote: Après mure réflexion, Robert Kaiser a écrit : Dale DePriest schrieb: I lost my bookmarks as well. Here is what I did to fix it. I did an open file and traversed the seamonkey support installation to the location of the bookmarks.html file and there they were. So I bookmarked the location. Now I can see them and use them whenever I wish. You should be able to import exactly that file from the bookmarks manager and then have your bookmarks available just like usual again. Robert Kaiser In my case, the problem is that I don't have a bookmarks.html file in the same directory as the places.sqlite and places.sqlite.corrupt. So import will not work. Perhaps KaiRo will correct me, but I believe SM 2.2 now stores your bookmarks file in the same location as your mail profile. If you have not created a bookmark since upgrading to SM 2.2 there will be no places.sqlite in your profile, so what you may need to do is locate your old bookmarks.html, then import it into your SM 2.2, then when you close, you might have a bookmarks.html in your profile locationmaybe. Thank you. What happened I think is that I was looking in a FireFox profile, while thinking I was in the SeaMonkey one. As I had a very recent bookmarks.html elsewhere, I did an import in SeaMonkey 2.2 and I got my bookmarks, as well as a bookmarks.html file, which is in the same directory as the places.sqlite. So still don't know what happened when the automatic update was done and I didn't have my bookmarks. I am confused now. I continued to work so. I added a bookmark and then looked where a change is made. The bookmarks.html is still at the same date and time. So nothing was added there. But places.sqlite changes regularly date and time. So where are the bookmarks really? In bookmarks.html as some tend to say? Or in places.sqlite? To be clear I use 2.2 now. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Updating 2.0.14 to 2.2 a disaster for the bookmarks.
Après mure réflexion, Robert Kaiser a écrit : Dale DePriest schrieb: I lost my bookmarks as well. Here is what I did to fix it. I did an open file and traversed the seamonkey support installation to the location of the bookmarks.html file and there they were. So I bookmarked the location. Now I can see them and use them whenever I wish. You should be able to import exactly that file from the bookmarks manager and then have your bookmarks available just like usual again. Robert Kaiser In my case, the problem is that I don't have a bookmarks.html file in the same directory as the places.sqlite and places.sqlite.corrupt. So import will not work. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Updating 2.0.14 to 2.2 a disaster for the bookmarks.
MCBastos a exposé le 27/07/2011 : Interviewed by CNN on 27/07/2011 12:42, Bernard Mercier told the world: Even before updating, I didn't have a bookmarks.html file. As far as I remember some comment, it is not used anymore and all is in one place, places.sqlite. Thus such a file can maybe grow considerably. Not quite correct. SM 2.0.x still uses the bookmarks.html. One of the big changes in 2.1 was precisely moving bookmars into places.sqlite -- which enabled a number of new features, such as Sync and the new click-on-the-address-bar-icon method of bookmarking, similar to Firefox's star. Still, for a variety of reasons, Seamonkey keeps the ability of exporting the bookmarks to an html file automatically on shutdown. I don't recall right now if this option is enabled by default. Then I don't understand why I don't have a bookmarks.html file. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Updating 2.0.14 to 2.2 a disaster for the bookmarks.
DrSlider a exprimé avec précision : I thought I, too, had lost my bookmarks, since they did not appear when I hit F9. However, they were just folded up. Click the + on the Bookmarks Menu and they are probably there. Custom icons will reload when you visit the sites. If you don't find them folded up, they will be at C:\Documents and Settings\Username\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\default\randomfilename.slt\bookmarks.html If they are not there, they may be lost. 20 MB is too big for a bookmarks file. Even with my hundreds, it is only ~300 KB. The places.sqlite files are history files. I am back in 2.0.14, but at my next attempt I'll see into your advice. Even before updating, I didn't have a bookmarks.html file. As far as I remember some comment, it is not used anymore and all is in one place, places.sqlite. Thus such a file can maybe grow considerably. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Updating 2.0.14 to 2.2 a disaster for the bookmarks.
Bernard Mercier a formulé ce vrijdag : Up to now I happily migrated from 1.x.x to 2.0.14 through the proposed update facility. When the proposal came to update to 2.2 I was confident to choose to update. Horror When 2.2 openend I didn't have my bookmarks any more. I looked in the forum here and saw an advice to look to try to rename places.sqlite.corrupt to places.sqlite. I had 2 such files ...corrupt and ...corrupt1. The places.sqlite and ..corrupt and ..corrupt1 are all 20MB. So supposingly containing my bookmarks. After such a rename I still didn't have my bookmarks. But going in the manage bookmarks, I found the structure of my bookmarks back, but apparently the urls aren't accesible as clicking on a bookmark doesn't open the bookmark. So this is really a disaster. The files being 20MB I have the feeling the URL's are there, but how can I access them? A fellow user of the same Linux distribution said he had the same problem. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[Linux] Updating 2.0.14 to 2.2 a disaster for the bookmarks.
Up to now I happily migrated from 1.x.x to 2.0.14 through the proposed update facility. When the proposal came to update to 2.2 I was confident to choose to update. Horror When 2.2 openend I didn't have my bookmarks any more. I looked in the forum here and saw an advice to look to try to rename places.sqlite.corrupt to places.sqlite. I had 2 such files ...corrupt and ...corrupt1. The places.sqlite and ..corrupt and ..corrupt1 are all 20MB. So supposingly containing my bookmarks. After such a rename I still didn't have my bookmarks. But going in the manage bookmarks, I found the structure of my bookmarks back, but apparently the urls aren't accesible as clicking on a bookmark doesn't open the bookmark. So this is really a disaster. The files being 20MB I have the feeling the URL's are there, but how can I access them? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] update to 2.0.12 problem.
Après mure réflexion, Bernard Mercier a écrit : Lucas Levrel avait énoncé : Le 5 mars 2011, Bernard Mercier a écrit : But then I got the message that I had probably another SeaMonkey instance running and that I had to close it first. Does anyone has the same issue? Yes, but I got it only once, at the first launch after updating. How can I correct this issue? Maybe: make sure again there's no SM running, then remove ~/.mozilla/seamonkey/*.default/lock Thank you for the answer. As there is no SeaMonkey instance running, I know now where to 'unblock' the situation. You answered my question, before I put it here. ^^ Unfortunately, I don't see that .../lock (directory? file?) But then I got the idea to edit the profile.ini and force profile selection. Having another profile, I selected that one. This time the update went ok. When I start with my usual defult profile, I have the new version now. Good, but I am still puzzled, why all of a sudden I had this problem. Will see what happens at the next upgrade. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[Linux] update to 2.0.12 problem.
Up to now I didn't have problems to update the SeaMonkey version. It always got downloaded and installed correctly. This latest update to 2.0.12 did download correctly and upon starting I got the usual message that the update would be applied. But then I got the message that I had probably another SeaMonkey instance running and that I had to close it first. But in reality, no other instance of SeaMonkey is running. (I checked in the running processes). Does anyone has the same issue? How can I correct this issue? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] update to 2.0.12 problem.
William Morrison a utilisé son clavier pour écrire : Bernard Mercier wrote: Up to now I didn't have problems to update the SeaMonkey version. It always got downloaded and installed correctly. This latest update to 2.0.12 did download correctly and upon starting I got the usual message that the update would be applied. But then I got the message that I had probably another SeaMonkey instance running and that I had to close it first. But in reality, no other instance of SeaMonkey is running. (I checked in the running processes). Does anyone has the same issue? How can I correct this issue? Are you sure you don't have the quick launch icon showing in your task bar? Thank you for the suggestion. That was the first thing which came to my mind. But as far as I know, for the Linix version, the quick launch has been suppressed. Also in the processes list I should have a SeaMonkey related one, which is not the case. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PLEASE ID the operating system in Subject line ?
Le 16/12/2010, Joe Rotello a supposé : Is it possible that we can all return to identifying the OS we are using SeaMonkey on, perhaps in the Subject line ? It would assist both the user and others that can assist or comment if that was known right in the Subject line...something like: Subject: [Win] [Linux] [] [subject text] Perhaps exemplified... Subject: Linux It chases cats out of the room Even though the message body might EVENTUALLY give some hint as to what OS we are discussing or having a trouble with, and even though the problem MIGHT also exist in other OS versions of SM, why make all users HAVE to read deeply every message just to find out ? Hopefully, just an outburst of potential common sense... Joe Is it also possible that people don't post three (or more) times the same message. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Automatic 2.0.5 version
Pat Connors avait écrit le 25/06/2010 : I was surprised this morning when I clicked on SM and found I had an automatic download from SeaMonkey that I didn't ask for. When the browser finally load, it said I now had 2.0.5. I have been on SM since Netscape stopped updating and this has never happened before. When I read the list, it was mentioned that this not the full 2.0.5 but a security update. What does that mean? Under Help, About SeaMonkey, it says I am using version 2.0.5. I guess I need a clarification on whether this is 5 or not 5. What are the options you ticked in software installation? I permitted to update and SM did so. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multiple bookmark entries.
Daniel a pensé très fort : James E. Morrow wrote: Bernard Mercier wrote: I am prety sure I have multiple bookmarks to the same url. Will there be development in the bookmarks manager to detect those? If not what solutions have posters here for this? (I didn't find an addon for it) You may wish to consider AM Dead Link. http://www.aignes.com/deadlink.htm I've used it for some years now and it seems to work with Seamonkey (which it may find as Mozilla Suite) Opera, IE and Chrome. The program helps to eliminate obsolete and duplicate bookmarks. James, when I last used AMdeadlink, it checked each of the bookmarks to see it the address was still a valid address. You could have had the same address in your addressbook nineteen times, and AMdeadlink would check that the address was valid, nineteen times, so no solve, the OP's problem. IMHO, of course. Daniel Thanks for specifying. I did use quite some time ago AMdeadlink also, but didn't remember it found duplicate bookmarks. Rechecking the AMdeadlink website it specifies a check for duplicate now also. Maybe time to revist that functionality. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multiple bookmark entries.
Bernard Mercier a pensé très fort : Daniel a pensé très fort : James E. Morrow wrote: Bernard Mercier wrote: I am prety sure I have multiple bookmarks to the same url. Will there be development in the bookmarks manager to detect those? If not what solutions have posters here for this? (I didn't find an addon for it) You may wish to consider AM Dead Link. http://www.aignes.com/deadlink.htm I've used it for some years now and it seems to work with Seamonkey (which it may find as Mozilla Suite) Opera, IE and Chrome. The program helps to eliminate obsolete and duplicate bookmarks. James, when I last used AMdeadlink, it checked each of the bookmarks to see it the address was still a valid address. You could have had the same address in your addressbook nineteen times, and AMdeadlink would check that the address was valid, nineteen times, so no solve, the OP's problem. IMHO, of course. Daniel Thanks for specifying. I did use quite some time ago AMdeadlink also, but didn't remember it found duplicate bookmarks. Rechecking the AMdeadlink website it specifies a check for duplicate now also. Maybe time to revist that functionality. Downloaded it and installed. The check for duplicate is grayed out when checking the bookmarks.html of SeaMonkey. I get e lot of error indications, but not sure if it are false errors. Maybe be it's because I am running in wine. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Multiple bookmark entries.
I am prety sure I have multiple bookmarks to the same url. Will there be development in the bookmarks manager to detect those? If not what solutions have posters here for this? (I didn't find an addon for it) -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multiple bookmark entries.
chicagofan a exprimé avec précision : chicagofan wrote: Bernard Mercier wrote: I am prety sure I have multiple bookmarks to the same url. Will there be development in the bookmarks manager to detect those? If not what solutions have posters here for this? (I didn't find an addon for it) With bookmark manager, can't you just Search for a name that would be common in those that you think have multiple entries? It will return them grouped together and you can delete. bj Forgot to say, that is what I do. Sorry if this is double posted, my server says the above did not send. bj Thanks for that. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multiple bookmark entries.
Il se trouve que Beverly Howard a formulé : utility to find duplicate bookmarks Woof!!! Turns our to be an interesting question. I just took a look at my (very old) bookmarks file (which is indispensable in my daily use of SeaMonkey) To investigate my own file, with seamonkey closed, I made a copy of the bookmarks file, then opened that copy with TextPad (an advanced text editor) I then replaced all instances of; A HREF= with the regular expression; \nA HREF= or newlineA HREF= ...then sorted the file by lines Doing so turned up a _huge_ number of duplicate urls, which, at least, allows you to see the dupes and possibly then manually delete them... too large a job in my case with just under 3,000 bookmarks. At the moment, I have no thoughts or suggestions on how to automate the process, but you have exposed the need for a utility. fwiw, I'll ponder on the problem to see if I can come up with a way to easily scrub my own file. Beverly Howard Looking forward to it. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Domain Lookup
David E. Ross a émis l'idée suivante : When I select the link to a Web page, I occasionally (too often) get the message www.abcd.com could not be found. Please check the name and try again. I immediately try again, and it works. I do get the Web page. Is there a problem in Core:Networking? Note: I have set browser.xul.error_pages.enabled to false. Windows XP Home Edition 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4 I experience the same issue in 2.0.4 -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Trouble with making Seamonkey my default browser
Jeffrey Needle avait énoncé : I'm using SM Portable version. I've used an app called SetBrowser that assigns the executable in my Portable folder to be the default browser. But when I start SM, it keeps asking me if I want SM to be my default browser. In my about:config file I see the following line: browser.shell.checkDefaultBrowser;false Shouldn't this disable the checking to see if SM is the default browser? Having to close the set default window every time I start SM is pretty annoying. Thanks. In that same panel, you get normally also the question 'do you want to see this questen every time' or someting the like. Answer 'no'. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sorting passwords?
Jay Garcia avait écrit le 1/06/2010 : On 01.06.2010 03:52, Broadback wrote: --- Original Message --- Is it possible, if so how please? I have that many passwords saved, some of which I am sure are duplications, it is difficult to identify those that need to go. Access your password manager, click on show passwords, you will see the list with the column headers - Site Username Password - clicking on any one of the headers will sort the list alphabetically. Apart from this (in my 2.04 SeaMonkey) when managing password there is a search facility. Very handy. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: password file
Melissa a écrit : I need to transfer my password file from my old to new computer. The new comp is Win7, Seamonkey 2.0.4. I've created a new file by saving a password, but I can't find where the file is stored for 2.0.4 on Win7. thanks! Maybe here: qr-dnynjwdjeeybwnz2dnuvz_gedn...@mozilla.org -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[Themes] pinball
When going ti SeaMonkey 2, I was unhappy that my favourite theme, pinball, wasn't supported. I just discovered an new version supports SeaMonkey 2 now, so I am happy. http://mozilla-themes.schellen.net/ -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Testing security of SM 1.x and 2.x
Dennis McCunney a exprimé avec précision : On 4/2/2010 4:30 PM, * JeffM: Paul wrote: I also don't see why every one is so worried about viruses, zombies, etc. When you use an OS that has you always running as root (e.g. the standard version of Puppy), drive-by infections and the ability of any user to bork the OS are constant worries. The logical solution is to get an OS that has proper user levels. There has been a Puplet with this feature since November 2009. Puppy gets away with it because it's an explicitly single-user system. There *aren't* other users to bork the OS. If Puppy was a shared system, that would be an issue, but if you expect others besides you to ever use the box, Puppy isn't what you run. (I've seen discussions on the Puppy forum who want to set up the system so others like family members can use it. That's not a simple task.) And the likelihood of drive by infections is minimal, considering that it's a Linux system, and by default uses SeaMonkey 1.1X as the browser/email client. If you think about it, MS-DOS, and Windows up to Vista used the the logged on user is administrator with all powers approach. Vista caused much wailing and gnashing of teeth because it defaulted to a power user profile and required run as admin settings for many things people were used to doing, but it's arguably what Windows should have done to begin with. I run Puppy, as well as Ubuntu 9.10 on an old Fujitsu Lifebook p2110 with an 867mhz Crusoe processor, 256MB RAM, and a 40GB UDMA 4 HD. I got Puppy because I was looking for a distro that would actually run acceptably on limited hardware. Puppy does, more or less. I originally installed Xubuntu along with Puppy, but it was snail slow. Wiping the partition, reformatting as ext4, and installing Ubuntu from the MinimalCD to get a bare bones command line instalaltion, then grabbing Xfce4 and other preferred packages with apt-get produced a system that isn't as sprightly as Puppy, but is usable if I'm patient. I have static builds of SM 1.1.19 and 2.04, and Opera 10.10 installed under Puppy, as well as Google Chrome 5.0 Beta, Firefox 3.6 and a few other things like Midori and Dillo installed. To the extent I browse from the Puppy box, I use SM 1.1.19. FF 3.6 is my preferred browser on my desktop, bit it's just too bag and slow on the Puppy box (it takes over 30 seconds just to load, and is sluggish once up.) SeaMonkey 2.04 isn't much better. Unfortunately, current versions of Mozilla products just aren't suitable for lower end kit. They need more horsepowwer than the box is likely to have. Puppy tends to get installed on lower end hardware that things like Red Hat, SuSE and Ubuntu are simply too much for. (My Puppy box is about in the middle of what is run in Puppy land. There are machines with 200mhz CPUs and 64MB RAM successfully running versions of Puppy. Try that with most distros, and see how far you get.) I started using *nix in the 80's with ATT System V Release 2, and have used a variety of flavors since. Puppy's All root, all the time approach took considerable adjustment, and I'd like to run a multi-user version. (Puppy forum member Pizzasgood's puplet is based on the 4.21 release, and reproducing his work in the current 4.31 release would be a challenge.) So I grit my teeth, and run s root, but security isn't my big concern when I do so. __ Dennis Hi, nice to see you here as well. There is nothing I can add to this. Béèm -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Testing security of SM 1.x and 2.x
Paul a émis l'idée suivante : Bernard Mercier wrote: Dans son message précédent, Paul a écrit : Bernard Mercier wrote: I have discussion in the puppy linux forum about SM security. A forum member claims that the developers say: *even the devs are saying it is not secure enough.* I did a test with this link: http://bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/ on my SM 2.0.. SM 2.0.3 passed all tests ok. Is this a valid test link? Are there others? What is your opinion? SM 1117 passed all tests. Congratulations! The test has found no vulnerabilities in your browser! Yes, but as Robert Kaiser pointed out in a reply to me, those tests aren't really meaningful. I agree. I also don't see why every one is so worried about viruses, zombies, etc. Personally I am not worried. I run linux as root (puppy linux) and wine for several years already and never had an issue. But I was engaged in a discussion about this in the puppy linux forum. Hence my post. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Testing security of SM 1.x and 2.x
Robert Kaiser a formulé ce donderdag : Bernard Mercier wrote: Would you have another link to site which test browsers? I don't think there can be any site that reliably tests browser security. Only long-going deep-level investigation and comparison of what vulnerabilities are reported publicly and how vendors react can tell the story of security. No automated test can do that. Robert Kaiser OK thanks for the update. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Testing security of SM 1.x and 2.x
JeffM avait énoncé : Bernard Mercier wrote: I have discussion in the puppy linux forum about SM security. You use *Puppy* and you're worried about *security*?? http://google.com/search?q=cache:gp3jKi0UjncJ:www.linux.com/archive/feature/137880+*-*-not-meant-*-*-*-*-*-*-*.*-*-*+inc+Unix.permissions+running-*-*-root-*+Single.User-Mode+*-*-*-destroy-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-.*.*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*.*-*-*-.*-*.*-*.*-*-*-*.*-*-*-*-*+sudo+writable-*+inc+turkey+*.*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-separate-*-accounts.*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+inc+*-*-*-*-*-touted-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+*-root-*-account+*-shares-*-*-*-*-Win95+*-*-*-*-*.*-*-*-*-convinced-*-*-*+inc+*-*-*-*-puzzling+Grafpup.a-*-*-*+*-Barnum-*-*strip=1 http://tinyurl.com/Puppy-AsSecureAsWin9x http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/137880 At least say you're using the multi-user puplet. http://google.com/search?q=%22+puppy-4.2.1-MULTIUSER-r3.iso If you would have read my initial post, you would have seen I am not the one fearing security. Mostly it are newbies. I run puppy for several years as root, and the only security issue is myself doing the wrong things. So be happy with puppy. ;-) -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Testing security of SM 1.x and 2.x
Dans son message précédent, Paul a écrit : Bernard Mercier wrote: I have discussion in the puppy linux forum about SM security. A forum member claims that the developers say: *even the devs are saying it is not secure enough.* I did a test with this link: http://bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/ on my SM 2.0.. SM 2.0.3 passed all tests ok. Is this a valid test link? Are there others? What is your opinion? SM 1117 passed all tests. Congratulations! The test has found no vulnerabilities in your browser! Yes, but as Robert Kaiser pointed out in a reply to me, those tests aren't really meaningful. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: TIME TO START PRUNING, FOLKS!
Phillip Jones a couché sur son écran : Bernard Mercier wrote: ---snip--- I remember a time where the 'Champions' formely requested to leave the thread in tact. This way they could take the last post in a thread and read the whole story, which did save them time. I don't know if the actual 'Champions' have the same request still. They have run off the Champions off Mozilla don't need them anymore. what few are let are largely ignored by moderators and the honchos at Mozilla. That program was back a netscape where a sense of community was desired and fostered. At Mozilla if they run people off , no skin off their nose. Except those that get run off because of disenchantment, and bad treatment go to products other than Mozilla. They can't seem to Grasp That concept. sigh very sad indeed. Thank you for the update. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: TIME TO START PRUNING, FOLKS!
»Q« avait écrit le 1/04/2010 : In news:b9cdnzobmlmlsi7wnz2dnuvz_q2dn...@mozilla.org, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Or do you really want to keep sending 117 lines to say one word? well the 17 lines refer to a problem concerning a bug about the progress window that stay open even after a post is sent. 117 lines, not 17. the history is needed so people coming to table late can figure the history of the thread. as I said in Support you don't trim. regardless of that the guideline say. Phillip, *please* stop encouraging people to violate netiquette guidelines here. And if you want to post about how bad/wrong/whatever you think the netiquette guidelines are, use mozilla.general. I've crossposted and set followups to there. This server being a private server, rules and guidelines may be different. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: UPLOADING websites
Le 30/03/2010, John a supposé : When will Sea monkey be able to upload websites with ease to a server? Currently I have to MANUALLY type in the remote folder name which I dont always know. There are programs in Windows which perform automatically what you request. (google is your friend) This functionality doesn't has it's place in SeaMonkey, unless somebody makes an addon for it. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Testing security of SM 1.x and 2.x
I have discussion in the puppy linux forum about SM security. A forum member claims that the developers say: *even the devs are saying it is not secure enough.* I did a test with this link: http://bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/ on my SM 2.0.. SM 2.0.3 passed all tests ok. Is this a valid test link? Are there others? What is your opinion? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Testing security of SM 1.x and 2.x
Bernard Mercier a écrit : I have discussion in the puppy linux forum about SM security. A forum member claims that the developers say: *even the devs are saying it is not secure enough.* I did a test with this link: http://bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/ on my SM 2.0.. SM 2.0.3 passed all tests ok. Is this a valid test link? Are there others? What is your opinion? The person was merely speaking about the End Of Life of SM 1.x -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: TIME TO START PRUNING, FOLKS!
Paul B. Gallagher avait écrit le 31/03/2010 : Phillip Jones wrote: chicagofan wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: chicagofan wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: chicagofan wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: chicagofan wrote: Ray_Net wrote: chicagofan wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I had this problem with SM1, and expected a solution in SM2. NO !!! Sometimes when sending mail, the popup windows entitled Sending Messages -mail-subject with Status: Copy complete Progress: [showing a never ending moving little green bar] is visible. The mail is well sent. The copy of the mail in the Sent box is done. This pop-up did on end ... - What could we do with this bug ? I believe that it happens when the SMTP server accepts the mail but doesn't return a final status indicating it's done. It usually will complete if you leave it for a bit, I'm moderately convinced that it's a server problem. I don't see it on most of my mail, where the mail server is my own, and doesn't hang. I see it on remote mail (and news) servers, and when it finally completes there's a bump in network usage about the right size for a completion message and socket teardown. I have let it run for ten minutes and went on with other messages receiving and sending replies. Its a bug. I've been using the same ISP which has the same SMTP Server , update equipment and software over the years. Same here... it's been happening on my regular server/ISP since version 1.1.14, through the latest release SM 2.0.4. bj Therefore, it's a SM bug ... and no hope for a solution . :-( Nohope, because, it needs votes and interesting developers ... Not the same for New Features ... more fancy, more chances to be implemented rapidly. Oh, I don't know. If Phillip would post his bugzilla report no. here, we might get more support for a fix, and attract the attention of someone who could fix it. Anyway, it couldn't hurt. :) I have to say though, that's pretty random for me, and I'd prefer to know why my browser switches to my e-mail window, when some commercial popups come up at various sites. ;) Obviously, they weren't blocked, yet SM sometimes says they are, and other times not. [The same ad, same site.] bj The problem is that this doesn't kill SeaMonkey. It just stay on the screen with the progress bar still running and say copy is complete. And I have let it run for ten minutes on it own just to see if it would die own it own. I just switched away and let run. It didn't affect reading and posting to other messages. No is no crash report for it to send. I've been posting my about crash items as soon as I get a crash, for the last several times. I would send error reports from the web development console but it doesn't give a method to make a copy. I know... I'm sorry I brought up *another* topic in this thread. I have exactly the same problem you have with copy complete popups. About the bugzilla report, I meant, if you would give the number that was assigned to your report of this problem, other people could find it, and log their comments in over there... on the bugzilla site. bj Look for Bug number 544783 feel free to make comments to refine details I am not exactly a Rocket scientist so My wording may be different than it should be. Your wording is just fine, and you have provided ample information at bugzilla on the copy complete hangup. So I just confirmed that I have the same problem, and hopefully others will to. If enough people report it, someone may look into it later on. :) Thanks for providing the number to look up! Surprisingly, I had a hard time finding the bugzilla site this morning, since everything looked different from the last time I was there.:) bj I added a Comment noting the theme I was using. and theme I used in SM1 which were different than yours its not theme related. I didn't think so either, but they need/want as much information as possible when looking at problems. :) bj Absolutely. Or do you really want to keep sending 117 lines to say one word? -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. I remember a time where the 'Champions' formely requested to leave the thread in tact. This way they could take the last post in a thread and read the whole story, which did save them time. I don't know if the actual 'Champions' have the same request still. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Frozen SeaMonkey v2.0.3 in Linux with Photobucket.com's videos?
Ant a écrit : Hello. http://s197.photobucket.com/albums/aa97/Reackerant/?action=viewcurrent=CLIP0359.flv It freezes my SeaMonkey v2.0.3 in my old Debian/Linux box, but not in the one on my old updated Windows XP Pro. SP3. Both have most of the same extensions and same Flash plugins version. What about the rest of you? Thank you in advance. :) Same here with puppylinux. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Frozen SeaMonkey v2.0.3 in Linux with Photobucket.com's videos?
Ant a présenté l'énoncé suivant : On 3/30/2010 6:48 AM PT, Phillip Jones typed: http://s197.photobucket.com/albums/aa97/Reackerant/?action=viewcurrent=CLIP0359.flv It freezes my SeaMonkey v2.0.3 in my old Debian/Linux box, but not in the one on my old updated Windows XP Pro. SP3. Both have most of the same extensions and same Flash plugins version. What about the rest of you? Thank you in advance. :) Same here with puppylinux. No problem on Mac Powerbook 17 G4-1.67 Gb PowerPC 2 GB Memory using OSX.4.11 , with Freezing the entire machine. it did stop the video three times to load the buffer but I could move the mouse around move a way from the page I didn't mean the whole computer. I meant just SeaMonkey. Others and I had to kill mine. I e-mailed to supp...@photobucket.com about this Linux's SeaMonkey freeze issue. I hope they reply and fix this soon. Indeed. Had to kill only the SeaMonkey process. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is anyone else getting an error?
Phillip Jones a formulé la demande :
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Phillip Pi wrote:
http://www.bellagio.com/ showed: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.bellagio.com/
Line Number 9, Column 27:scriptdocument.write('s'+'cript
language=JavaScript
src=http://switch.atdmt.com/jaction/mgmmgm_BellagioHomepage_1;/s'+'cript')/script
--^
IE8 had no problems. Thank you in advance. :)
HTML Validator extension indicate no errors but 101 warnings.
Is that the program the German guy sells?
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bellagio.com%2F
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Result: 116 Errors, 90 warning(s)
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbellagio.com%2Finclude%2Fstyles.cssprofile=css21usermedium=allwarning=1lang=en
CSS errors and warnings as well.
HTML Validator 0.8.5.8
Uses either HTML Tidy , or SGML Parser or both.
it was set to HTML Tidy.
set to serial show 1 warning and 108 errors using SGML Parser
Regardless its not written correctly.
I have that also now.
159 lines of error now.
BTW: I use the validator addon in SeaMonkey.
--
[URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge
[/URL]
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is anyone else getting an error?
Il se trouve que Bernard Mercier a formulé :
Phillip Jones a formulé la demande :
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Phillip Pi wrote:
http://www.bellagio.com/ showed: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.bellagio.com/
Line Number 9, Column 27:scriptdocument.write('s'+'cript
language=JavaScript
src=http://switch.atdmt.com/jaction/mgmmgm_BellagioHomepage_1;/s'+'cript')/script
--^
IE8 had no problems. Thank you in advance. :)
HTML Validator extension indicate no errors but 101 warnings.
Is that the program the German guy sells?
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bellagio.com%2F
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Result: 116 Errors, 90 warning(s)
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbellagio.com%2Finclude%2Fstyles.cssprofile=css21usermedium=allwarning=1lang=en
CSS errors and warnings as well.
HTML Validator 0.8.5.8
Uses either HTML Tidy , or SGML Parser or both.
it was set to HTML Tidy.
set to serial show 1 warning and 108 errors using SGML Parser
Regardless its not written correctly.
I have that also now.
159 lines of error now.
BTW: I use the validator addon in SeaMonkey.
HTML validator 0.8.5.9
--
[URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge
[/URL]
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is anyone else getting an error?
Phillip Jones a émis l'idée suivante :
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Il se trouve que Bernard Mercier a formulé :
Phillip Jones a formulé la demande :
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Phillip Pi wrote:
http://www.bellagio.com/ showed: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.bellagio.com/
Line Number 9, Column 27:scriptdocument.write('s'+'cript
language=JavaScript
src=http://switch.atdmt.com/jaction/mgmmgm_BellagioHomepage_1;/s'+'cript')/script
--^
IE8 had no problems. Thank you in advance. :)
HTML Validator extension indicate no errors but 101 warnings.
Is that the program the German guy sells?
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bellagio.com%2F
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Result: 116 Errors, 90 warning(s)
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbellagio.com%2Finclude%2Fstyles.cssprofile=css21usermedium=allwarning=1lang=en
CSS errors and warnings as well.
HTML Validator 0.8.5.8
Uses either HTML Tidy , or SGML Parser or both.
it was set to HTML Tidy.
set to serial show 1 warning and 108 errors using SGML Parser
Regardless its not written correctly.
I have that also now.
159 lines of error now.
BTW: I use the validator addon in SeaMonkey.
HTML validator 0.8.5.9
where did you get 0.8.5.9? I download from somewhere I think Phil Chee
adapted it to work on SeaMonkey.
I don't quite remember I think I had 0.8.5.8 and got an auto update.
It is installed as an extension and it uses tidy indeed.
But it's weird as there is no update available now and I see this page:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/249
--
[URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge
[/URL]
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is anyone else getting an error?
Phillip Jones a exposé le 27/03/2010 :
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Phillip Jones a émis l'idée suivante :
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Il se trouve que Bernard Mercier a formulé :
Phillip Jones a formulé la demande :
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Phillip Pi wrote:
http://www.bellagio.com/ showed: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.bellagio.com/
Line Number 9, Column 27:scriptdocument.write('s'+'cript
language=JavaScript
src=http://switch.atdmt.com/jaction/mgmmgm_BellagioHomepage_1;/s'+'cript')/script
--^
IE8 had no problems. Thank you in advance. :)
HTML Validator extension indicate no errors but 101 warnings.
Is that the program the German guy sells?
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bellagio.com%2F
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Result: 116 Errors, 90 warning(s)
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbellagio.com%2Finclude%2Fstyles.cssprofile=css21usermedium=allwarning=1lang=en
CSS errors and warnings as well.
HTML Validator 0.8.5.8
Uses either HTML Tidy , or SGML Parser or both.
it was set to HTML Tidy.
set to serial show 1 warning and 108 errors using SGML Parser
Regardless its not written correctly.
I have that also now.
159 lines of error now.
BTW: I use the validator addon in SeaMonkey.
HTML validator 0.8.5.9
where did you get 0.8.5.9? I download from somewhere I think Phil Chee
adapted it to work on SeaMonkey.
I don't quite remember I think I had 0.8.5.8 and got an auto update.
It is installed as an extension and it uses tidy indeed.
But it's weird as there is no update available now and I see this page:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/249
Best I can remember Phil Chee made the alteration to make it work on
SeaMonkey it was on his page.
Having seen that Linux apparently isn't supported and as I run Linux, I googled
a bit.
I found this site: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/download.html
I installed the linux version 0.8.6.1 and it installed ok.
--
[URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge
[/URL]
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is anyone else getting an error?
Phillip Pi a émis l'idée suivante :
Hello.
http://www.bellagio.com/ showed: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.bellagio.com/
Line Number 9, Column 27:scriptdocument.write('s'+'cript
language=JavaScript
src=http://switch.atdmt.com/jaction/mgmmgm_BellagioHomepage_1;/s'+'cript')/script
--^
IE8 had no problems. Thank you in advance. :)
Yes.
Absolutely not W3C compliant.
I get 161 lines of error. Too much to show here.
--
[URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge
[/URL]
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.03 fails on this page
Il se trouve que cmcadams a formulé : As Subject says, but it does work in IE. No matter what choices are made in the pick lists, everything reverts to defaults at Step 3 in SM. No difference with Java on or off. For the record, my choices: Step 1, Windows; Step 2, Windows XP; Step 3, Hyperion Pro (4in1) chipset drivers. http://www.via.com.tw/en/support/drivers.jsp Same issue in SM 2.0.3 in Linux -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Input zone values
Ray_Net a couché sur son écran : When i go per exemple at: http://www.lesoir.be/actualite/monde/2010-02-23/un-conge-de-maternite-de-20-semaines-en-europe-755164.shtml and i try to react on the article, i have to fill 4 zones on this form: # Identifiant: # # Mot de passe: # # Titre: # and # Rédigez votre commentaire (1000 caractères max.): # before clicking on the # postez votre commentaire # for sending the reaction. The # Identifiant : # zone must be filled with Ray_Net ...when i type the first letter R a dropdown list appeared with the two choices: Ray_Net *and* Ray_net . How can i delete the Ray_net proposal ? You have this in Netscape 1.08? ;-) Maybe through the password manager. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Two profiles, I only created one
Après mure réflexion, Monica a écrit : Bernard Mercier wrote: Monica avait énoncé : Bernard Mercier wrote: Monica avait prétendu : Daniel wrote: Monica wrote: Since the last update to the current 2.0.3. I have 2 profiles in C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\ApplicationData\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\ The first one (which has all my stuff in it) [random string].slt and the second one [random string].default I have never created more than one, but suspect that SM for some reason has created the second one, which I think may be messing a few things up for me (that I´ve posted about in another thread). I read another posting here which said that the Mail folder should be in C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\ApplicationData\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\[random string].default\Mail My mail (and everything else of my stuff) does not sit in the profile with the .default ending but in the profile with the .slt ending. How can I go about to correct this? Can I just delete the .default one? Any help will be much appreciated. Monica Monica, did you upgrade from SM 1.x?? I think it called its profiles .slt whereas SM 2 calls it .default I think!! Daniel I am not sure (can´t remember) if it was this last time I upgraded from SM 1.x or just did an update within SM2.x. I think the latter, because I think I can recall being annoyed at the update being done automatically without me being asked first. I know now that I can untick a box for that, which I did today. That .slt variant may have been with me ever since I upgraded to SM2 and I just haven´t noticed anything wrong until I needed to perform certain things lately. Do you know what can be done about this though? Select in Tools|switch profile. Then manage profiles. I´m sorry but manage profiles in what way? I´m not too familiar with things like this. What I do know though is that I am using the profile I want to, and that is not the default one that also sits there for whatever reason. Well the subject of your question is about profiles. So you can manage them through the way I provided. Sorry but that does not answer my initial questions. My mail (and everything else of my stuff) does not sit in the profile with the .default ending but in the profile with the .slt ending. How can I go about to correct this? Can I just delete the .default one? Going into Tools|switch profiles was a meeans to know the names. Mail and news can be in any profile. There is no need to have it absolutely in xx.default or in .slt So if you determined that the mail and news and every other configuration data is in .slt, make first the x.default unuseable by renaming f.e. to .default-org or copying to another place. Verify in any case if there is nothinf in x.default that you still need. Verify that .slt is working correctly. If yes you can get rid of the xx.default profile. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Two profiles, I only created one
Monica avait prétendu : Daniel wrote: Monica wrote: Since the last update to the current 2.0.3. I have 2 profiles in C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\ApplicationData\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\ The first one (which has all my stuff in it) [random string].slt and the second one [random string].default I have never created more than one, but suspect that SM for some reason has created the second one, which I think may be messing a few things up for me (that I´ve posted about in another thread). I read another posting here which said that the Mail folder should be in C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\ApplicationData\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\[random string].default\Mail My mail (and everything else of my stuff) does not sit in the profile with the .default ending but in the profile with the .slt ending. How can I go about to correct this? Can I just delete the .default one? Any help will be much appreciated. Monica Monica, did you upgrade from SM 1.x?? I think it called its profiles .slt whereas SM 2 calls it .default I think!! Daniel I am not sure (can´t remember) if it was this last time I upgraded from SM 1.x or just did an update within SM2.x. I think the latter, because I think I can recall being annoyed at the update being done automatically without me being asked first. I know now that I can untick a box for that, which I did today. That .slt variant may have been with me ever since I upgraded to SM2 and I just haven´t noticed anything wrong until I needed to perform certain things lately. Do you know what can be done about this though? Select in Tools|switch profile. Then manage profiles. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Error in SM v2.0.3 in this web page? (OT -- French)
Le 3/14/2010, Ant a supposé : On 3/14/2010 10:47 AM PT, Bernard Mercier typed: Speaking of typos, I love the other one (except all). If you set cookies to except all, that would mean none, right? Tout de même, j'vous ai compris. ;-) Another typo. except = accept. (phonetically the same.) Hope you agree now. ^^ Some would say the vowel in the first syllable is slightly different (e as in bet vs. a as in bat), but without stress or a conscious effort to differentiate, they merge as schwa or i as in bit. To my ears, the same. ;-) Isn't English fun? :P Pas autant que le Français. :P -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Error in SM v2.0.3 in this web page?
Paul B. Gallagher a pensé très fort : Bernard Mercier wrote: Paul B. Gallagher a écrit : Bernard Mercier wrote: Bernard Mercier vient de nous annoncer : Phillip Pi a exposé le 3/10/2010 : Hello. Is anyone else getting You do not have the roles required to access this portlet. error at http://www.needforspeed.com/web/world/news/-/nfsblogs/1273547 URL? My 64 bit Dell OEM W7 HP's IE8 had no problems. Thank you in advance. :) In Linux SM 2.0.2 works only when cookies set to except all, or from this site only. Typo, should read SM 2.0.3 Speaking of typos, I love the other one (except all). If you set cookies to except all, that would mean none, right? Tout de même, j'vous ai compris. ;-) -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. Vous faites de la fine politique. ;-) Another typo. except = accept. (phonetically the same.) Hope you agree now. ^^ Some would say the vowel in the first syllable is slightly different (e as in bet vs. a as in bat), but without stress or a conscious effort to differentiate, they merge as schwa or i as in bit. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. To my ears, the same. ;-) -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Error in SM v2.0.3 in this web page?
Paul B. Gallagher a écrit : Bernard Mercier wrote: Bernard Mercier vient de nous annoncer : Phillip Pi a exposé le 3/10/2010 : Hello. Is anyone else getting You do not have the roles required to access this portlet. error at http://www.needforspeed.com/web/world/news/-/nfsblogs/1273547 URL? My 64 bit Dell OEM W7 HP's IE8 had no problems. Thank you in advance. :) In Linux SM 2.0.2 works only when cookies set to except all, or from this site only. Typo, should read SM 2.0.3 Speaking of typos, I love the other one (except all). If you set cookies to except all, that would mean none, right? Tout de même, j'vous ai compris. ;-) -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. Vous faites de la fine politique. ;-) Another typo. except = accept. (phonetically the same.) Hope you agree now. ^^ -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Error in SM v2.0.3 in this web page?
Phillip Pi a exposé le 3/10/2010 : Hello. Is anyone else getting You do not have the roles required to access this portlet. error at http://www.needforspeed.com/web/world/news/-/nfsblogs/1273547 URL? My 64 bit Dell OEM W7 HP's IE8 had no problems. Thank you in advance. :) In Linux SM 2.0.2 works only when cookies set to except all, or from this site only. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Error in SM v2.0.3 in this web page?
Bernard Mercier vient de nous annoncer : Phillip Pi a exposé le 3/10/2010 : Hello. Is anyone else getting You do not have the roles required to access this portlet. error at http://www.needforspeed.com/web/world/news/-/nfsblogs/1273547 URL? My 64 bit Dell OEM W7 HP's IE8 had no problems. Thank you in advance. :) In Linux SM 2.0.2 works only when cookies set to except all, or from this site only. Typo, should read SM 2.0.3 -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Autoupdate of SeaMonkey 2.x.x
Dans son message précédent, Bernard Mercier a écrit : In a linux forum (puppylinux) I have a discussion with a guy who prefers FireFox because of the autoupdate function where updates are done in the background and only the changed files are replaced. Is there something like this in SeaMonkey and if no will it be there and when? Thank you all for the replies. I hoped SM would do this also now, so I can 'happily' reply to the guy. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Autoupdate of SeaMonkey 2.x.x
Jens Hatlak avait énoncé : Bernard Mercier wrote: In a linux forum (puppylinux) I have a discussion with a guy who prefers FireFox because of the autoupdate function where updates are done in the background and only the changed files are replaced. Is there something like this in SeaMonkey and if no will it be there and when? SM 2 already has support for that (Help Check for Updates). Maybe it's disabled if you installed SM through your Linux distribution or the user you're running it with doesn't have write permissions for the application directory. HTH Jens As far as I see, when the 'update' is detected, SeaMonkey proposes to go to the web site and download a new version. That's not what FF does, it updates automatically only thos files which have a need for it. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.03
Phillip Jones avait prétendu : MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 1/3/2010 20:59, Frank Van Eynde told the world: I have installed version 2.03 on another newer computer and am unable to send messages. I received the following notification Sending of message failed An error ocurred sending mail:Unable to authenticate to SMTP server shawmail.no.shawcable.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen to use authentication. Uncheck Use name and password for that server or contact the server provider Any assistance to solve this problem is appreciated. This is a known issue. In the old Seamonkey, if you chose to use authentication or encryption in your POP/SMTP connections and the server didn't support it, Seamonkey silently fell back to unencrypted/unauthenticated mode and did the connection anyway. The new Seamonkey 2 doesn't do that -- if you ask for higher security and the server doesn't provide it, it simply doesn't connect. I didn't see the discussion, but I believe that this change was introduced for one or both of the following reasons: (a) The old setup gave users a false sense of security -- they enabled the security options believing their traffic was protected, when in fact it was not. (b) The new setup makes it a little bit harder to spoof your mail servers (by a virus, for example), since the spoofer will have to provide compatible security features as well. The old way the spoofer could use a very basic server with no security and it would fool Seamonkey. So, you should go to the settings window for your SMTP connection and untick the Use name and password box for it. As an aside: I would worry about your ISP allowing non-authenticated use of the SMTP server -- that's what's known as an open relay, a thing that spammers love. If spammers begin routing crap through it, the server could be blacklisted -- and then, regular users like you wouldn't be able to send messages. There are some alternate ways to keep spammers from SMTP servers -- such as restricting the sender IP or demanding a successful POP connection before allowing the SMTP send -- but I have noticed that most ISPs that used those alternate means have switched to password authentication. I suppose that those alternate means must have shortcomings... I can imagine a couple, and there are probably more. annexcafe is an authenticated server and requires not only password but a username as well. You can go to one group only unauthenticated. that group is used to get instructions how to sign up. Since I've been on annexcafe (about 7-8 years) not one piece of spam have they ever had, not once. Perhaps the only other method that would even more secure would be a secure server. Do I understand well that annexcafe can be used to sent smtp mail, even from another mail client then SeaMonkey mail? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Turn Composer into a full-fledged word processor?
Rick Merrill a écrit : Bernard Mercier wrote: James Greenidge avait soumis l'idée : Greetings: A clueless non-techie just asking you mavens out there; Is it possible via special plug-ins to turn Composer into a full-fledged word processor? Thanks for any remarks. Jim I suppose you are aware that composer's goal is to produce web pages. The code to involved for this isn't the same as for word processing. Drive a 4 wheel driven jeep when in heavy accidented terrain. Drive a sedan while on a smooth motorway. Bernard, I'm not convinced that your metaphor is correct. For the OP a page-is-a-page; in fact lots of people use MS Word to compose web pages since it can output html code. Lots of people love to publish via web pages. More and more people read web pages ;-) If your document is going to live as a web page, your word processor should produce it. I think the OP's question makes a lot of sense, especially in terms of cloud computing and assuming that resources (e.g. speed) are not a concern. Which is more of a kludge: putting links into word processors (as we know them) or putting Table Of Contents into Composer? I see the OP's question as correctly portending the merger of word processing and web page composition until there is no longer a distinction. I have seen people using excell to make letters. That doesn't mean it's the good way to do it. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Migration help needed 1.1.18 to 2.0.3
hawker avait écrit le 2/26/2010 : So today I decided to update my last 1.1.18 hold out to 2.0.3 and I have some issues, most likely from an improperly performed upgrade (my fault). Can I get some help fixing this. I installed the 2.0.3 into the 1.1.18 directory, bad mistake. At that point I could not get Seamonkey to work at all. I uninstalled 2.0.3 and then reinstalled into the default directory, which was different for 2.x than 1.1.x. At this point 2.0.3 works fine and I was able to import most of my settings. I was not able to import mail or news though. I then reinstalled 1.1.8 and am using that to compose this. So my guess is the only question is, without using MozBackup or some other third party tool (or copying profiles over by hand)how do I get 2.0.3 to import my 1.1.18 mail and news? Thanx Hawker The last week and half this has been raised and answered a couple of times. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.03 having a problem on Hallmark.com site
Phillip Jones avait prétendu : Daniel wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 2/23/2010 4:55 AM, Daniel wrote: chicagofan wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote: Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal? bj 177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB doesn't seem all that much. Mine is using 340MB for example. But then my machine has 2GB total RAM. Sorry, I don't get the semantics right half the time. I have 1GB RAM, and 177 MB seemed like a lot to me. :) bj (I was going to type bite my tonguebite my tongue as I did in another thread, but, instead) My question might be If you've got 1GByte, why is your system not using 1GByte?? Why do people want lots of memory but complain if their system dares to use it?? Daniel He didn't say his system was using 177MB. He said SM was using 177MB. O.K. then the question should be If you've got 1GByte, why is your system not using all its 1GByte to run SM?? Daniel It shouldn't. The system be it Mac, Window, Unix, Linux, BEOS, NextStep, should have number one attention. Then any applications should divvy up what's left over. And the should completely release for use by other applications or the system as needed. In Practice though most systems/applications they grow as needed but don't shrink. once they use a certain amount they will be allocated that amount until the are closed and quit and then reopened. Off loading memory on to hard drive slows down computing by a factor of the drive speed. If You can have enough memory (RAM) so that the system and any applications never use the Hard drive then the computing becomes fast and efficient. The more Caching is done on the Hard drive the slower things go. According today's System Sizes and application sizes (memory usage) we need now a minimum of 8GB just to do every day computing without getting bogged down. What OS can address that 8GB ram? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.03 having a problem on Hallmark.com site
Phillip Jones avait prétendu : Bernard Mercier wrote: Phillip Jones avait prétendu : Daniel wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 2/23/2010 4:55 AM, Daniel wrote: chicagofan wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote: Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal? bj 177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB doesn't seem all that much. Mine is using 340MB for example. But then my machine has 2GB total RAM. Sorry, I don't get the semantics right half the time. I have 1GB RAM, and 177 MB seemed like a lot to me. :) bj (I was going to type bite my tonguebite my tongue as I did in another thread, but, instead) My question might be If you've got 1GByte, why is your system not using 1GByte?? Why do people want lots of memory but complain if their system dares to use it?? Daniel He didn't say his system was using 177MB. He said SM was using 177MB. O.K. then the question should be If you've got 1GByte, why is your system not using all its 1GByte to run SM?? Daniel It shouldn't. The system be it Mac, Window, Unix, Linux, BEOS, NextStep, should have number one attention. Then any applications should divvy up what's left over. And the should completely release for use by other applications or the system as needed. In Practice though most systems/applications they grow as needed but don't shrink. once they use a certain amount they will be allocated that amount until the are closed and quit and then reopened. Off loading memory on to hard drive slows down computing by a factor of the drive speed. If You can have enough memory (RAM) so that the system and any applications never use the Hard drive then the computing becomes fast and efficient. The more Caching is done on the Hard drive the slower things go. According today's System Sizes and application sizes (memory usage) we need now a minimum of 8GB just to do every day computing without getting bogged down. What OS can address that 8GB ram? Mac OSX Snow Leopard (its 64 bit) and can actually address up to 16 GB. I wouldn't be terribly surprised if windows 7 64 bit couldn't. Thank you to remind me about the 64-bit OS aspect. I didn't think about it. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.03 having a problem on Hallmark.com site
Dans son message précédent, chicagofan a écrit : Mark Hansen wrote: On 2/22/2010 7:37 PM, chicagofan wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote: Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal? bj 177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB doesn't seem all that much. Mine is using 340MB for example. But then my machine has 2GB total RAM. Sorry, I don't get the semantics right half the time. I have 1GB RAM, and 177 MB seemed like a lot to me. :) bj 10 years ago it was a lot. Today, not so much :-\ However, I don't know how you can run any contemporary version of Windows on 1GB RAM. You should consider adding more. This laptop is almost 4 yrs. old, and other than the DVD drive making a little noise on start up, still works great... except for this memory limitation you've pointed out. :) Hmm... now I have a reason to look at what's new. Thanks. ;) bj On my R40 Thinkpad (256MB ram) and with your link loaded, SM 2.0.3 takes only 38,6MB as seen in Task Manager. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: newest version
S. Beaulieu avait prétendu : u...@domain.invalid a écrit : I would like to delete the Local Folders but I haven't figured out yet if I can without messing things up. That's an excellent question I've long asked myself. So, *can* they be deleted altogether? If not, whay not? And what's the point of local folders anyway? S. Not long ago in a thread this came up, hower I don't remember what exactly the answer was. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: newest version
Dans son message précédent, Phillip Jones a écrit : S. Beaulieu wrote: u...@domain.invalid a écrit : I would like to delete the Local Folders but I haven't figured out yet if I can without messing things up. That's an excellent question I've long asked myself. So, *can* they be deleted altogether? If not, whay not? And what's the point of local folders anyway? S. wouldn't do any good if you could. they regenerate themselves. The same question came up years ago when they first appeared and it part of the SM/TB code. if they are removed. next time SM/TB opens they will reappear. Thanks. Wasn't sure that was the good answer, so I didn't mention. But in case of a switch from sm1 to sm2 with uninstall of sm1, the sm1 one wouldn't be regenerated. ;-) -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.03 having a problem on Hallmark.com site
Paul B. Gallagher a écrit : Bernard Mercier wrote: Dans son message précédent, chicagofan a écrit : Mark Hansen wrote: On 2/22/2010 7:37 PM, chicagofan wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote: Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal? bj 177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB doesn't seem all that much. Mine is using 340MB for example. But then my machine has 2GB total RAM. Sorry, I don't get the semantics right half the time. I have 1GB RAM, and 177 MB seemed like a lot to me. :) bj 10 years ago it was a lot. Today, not so much :-\ However, I don't know how you can run any contemporary version of Windows on 1GB RAM. You should consider adding more. This laptop is almost 4 yrs. old, and other than the DVD drive making a little noise on start up, still works great... except for this memory limitation you've pointed out. :) Hmm... now I have a reason to look at what's new. Thanks. ;) bj On my R40 Thinkpad (256MB ram) and with your link loaded, SM 2.0.3 takes only 38,6MB as seen in Task Manager. How about if you browse around for a while and load up the cache, is it still only 38.6 MB? Or is that only on startup? -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. h What do you expect me to say? It was definitely 38,6MB when I browsed to the link referenced. To please you, I browsed a bit and got a max peak of 57MB in task manager. I don't know on which site, as I visited a couple of them. I don't think the cache has much to do with it, but it is still at the standard 50MB. To please you more, I brought down the cache to 1MB. No change in the figures. Hope you are satisfied. :-) -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Virus in mail folders
Monica avait écrit le 21/02/2010 : Glen wrote: Monica wrote: I have an updated antivirus program but still got virus in 4 of my mail folders. F-secure can´t remove them it seems so I am wondering if I can just delete the mail folders where the viruses sit. Does anyone know ? Monica, Try downloading Malwarebytes (free version), do a full scan, and see what it comes up with. You can also install Avast as well, for full time protection. I hope this helps. Glen I d/l Malwarebytes and did a scan, and it found 4 objects (3 trojans and 1 adware). I had them removed and did a full scan which then came up clean. Ater that I did another full scan with my F-secure Internet Security 2010 and it still shows the 4 viruses (different from the ones Malwarebytes found). It could be false positives, in which case you should see with the F-Security support (forum ?) what to do in such a case. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lots of content in empty mail folders...
Monica a présenté l'énoncé suivant : Daniel wrote: Monica wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Monica wrote: I have been looking in a couple of mail folders in my Profile using a text editor, and I see a lot of (text) content in there even though the folders are empty when I check them in the SM mail client. How can this be? You need to compact your folders. Messages deleted in the SM UI are not really deleted, rather they are removed from your view, and marked for deletion. Compacting the folders accomplishes this deletion. FileCompact Folders Lee Oh yes, I now remember this feature, it used to come up every so often asking me if I want to compact folders. I haven´t seen that in a long time though, probably disappeared with one of my updates of SM! How can I get the option to get this reminding request back? Monica, what do you have set at Edit-Preferences-Mail Newsgroups-Network Settings in the part labeled Disk Space? Maybe you need a smaller number! Daniel I see I haven´t set that at all. What number would be considered default? You decide yourself. But when ticked the default is displayed. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
David Wilkinson a couché sur son écran : Ray_Net wrote: It's not very clear explanation, so i will be more specific: Did you mean that in Windows VISTA SM1 is composed of: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\ C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Local Settings\Application Data\ and in Windows VISTA SM2 is composed of: C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Roaming\ C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Local\ No. Where did I say that? In any Windows OS there are are two places an application might put your data. In XP they are C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\ C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Local Settings\Application Data\ In Vista and Windows 7 they are C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Roaming\ C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Local\ In each pair let us call the first one Roaming and the second Local. Roaming means that if you are connected to a corporate domain (which I am sure you are not), the data is synchronized to the domain server, and will be available on any machine that you use to log into the domain. Local means that the data is only on your machine. A possible strategy is for an application to always use the Roaming directory, except for features that require a large amount of data (which would be prohibitively expensive to synchronize). I am not 100% sure of the strategies that SM1 and SM2 use. They certainly use the Roaming directory, and at least SM2 uses the Local directory (but I am not quite sure for what). I can confirm for XP, that I have sm1 (as well as sm2 now)in both \application data\... and \local\application data\... Very confusing. Is there some site|faq|other where is explained what the files are used for, in fact specially the ...\local\application data\ one. The other one is quite know for me at least. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
Ray_Net avait soumis l'idée : Bernard Mercier wrote: Ray_Net avait prétendu : I am under windows XP and under the RAY user login. With SM 1.1.18 the config/profile is located in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\ With SM 2.0.2 the SM config/profile is located in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\ and in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\Extensions\ and in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\ Therefore after removing SM 1.1.18, installing/migrating to SM 2.0.2 i can remove the SM 1.1.18 config/profile by removing the directory: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\ Could someone modify the previous text to match a Windows Vista machine ? (I wish to cleanely migrate my friend from SM1 to SM2 under his Vista pc.) Glad this point is raised. I installed sm2 also and did the import of sm1 stuff. So if I understand well, I have now twi identique data structures one for sm1 and now one for sm2. So doubling up the space used on the HDD. Can this be confirmed? If I use sometimes sm1 and sometimes sm2, I suppose the data structure of both will be different, unless there is a sync function somewhere. Probably best is to remove the old sm1 and it's data structure, so no confusiong can be there then. A good way of doing? Add/remove programs remove SM1. Add/remove programs remove SM2. Install SM2 Remove only the C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\ directory. I forgot that removing sm1 didn't remove the corresponding data of it and still can be imported at the install of sm2. Thank you. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
Ray_Net avait prétendu : I am under windows XP and under the RAY user login. With SM 1.1.18 the config/profile is located in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\ With SM 2.0.2 the SM config/profile is located in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\ and in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\Extensions\ and in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\ Therefore after removing SM 1.1.18, installing/migrating to SM 2.0.2 i can remove the SM 1.1.18 config/profile by removing the directory: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\ Could someone modify the previous text to match a Windows Vista machine ? (I wish to cleanely migrate my friend from SM1 to SM2 under his Vista pc.) Glad this point is raised. I installed sm2 also and did the import of sm1 stuff. So if I understand well, I have now twi identique data structures one for sm1 and now one for sm2. So doubling up the space used on the HDD. Can this be confirmed? If I use sometimes sm1 and sometimes sm2, I suppose the data structure of both will be different, unless there is a sync function somewhere. Probably best is to remove the old sm1 and it's data structure, so no confusiong can be there then. A good way of doing? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
David Wilkinson avait énoncé : Ray_Net wrote: I expected SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista not the two places of a mozilla directory in Windows7. In other words,and in short, after remove SM1 and install SM2 in a Vista machine Where is the directory(ies)(profile stuff) of the old SM1 that i can delete ? superb if i have the directories(profile stuff) of SM1 and SM2 explained. Ray: First of all, Vista and Windows 7 are the same. You seem to know what is going on in XP, so all you need to know is the waty Windows has changed the directory names for Vista/7; C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\ becomes C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Roaming\ and C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Local Settings\Application Data\ becomes C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Local\ Although this change can be confusing, I think most would agree that the new Vista/7 method is both more concise and more descriptive. The way that SM1 and SM2 (and any well-written application) use these directories is the same in all OS's. I am not 100% sure, but I do not think that SM1 uses the local appdata folder, but I think SM2 does. Well in my XP installation, I have in local|appdata directories refereing to my sm1 installation, firefox and the newly installed sm2 one. Very confusing. Mostly these are .mlf files, which sometimes are big. I still wonder what these are used for. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Tools - Message filters Doesnot work
Phillip Jones vient de nous annoncer : Bernard Mercier wrote: Phillip Jones a utilisé son clavier pour écrire : chicagofan wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/23/2010 5:27 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: That is not true. I use message filters on news groups and do not have them set for off-line use. Unless things have improved in SM 2.0 in previous versions filters were useless on newsgroups (won't even set post to be marked as read.) And at one time when people asked about it we were told that filters don't work in News. That is not true. I'm using SM 1.1.16 at the moment, but I've been using filters for News for years. I don't know what he was told or misunderstood, but I'm using 2.02 now, and I've never had any version of SM mail or newsgroup filters to fail for me. SM lacked the ability to filter cross-postings for a long awhile, but we even have that feature now. There is something lacking in communication here it seems. bj I never could get filtering working in SM 1.1.8. I kept trying as I upgraded from version to version. I realize you can only set to mark as read (if you don't download for reading later). Never did get working. I haven't tried in 2.0 SM as I haven't had the need. SM 1.1.8? SM = SeaMonkey FF = FireFox TB = ThunderBird Should have been 1.1.18 Sorry I did guess 1.1.18 already. ;-) -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Tools - Message filters Doesnot work
Phillip Jones a utilisé son clavier pour écrire : chicagofan wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/23/2010 5:27 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: That is not true. I use message filters on news groups and do not have them set for off-line use. Unless things have improved in SM 2.0 in previous versions filters were useless on newsgroups (won't even set post to be marked as read.) And at one time when people asked about it we were told that filters don't work in News. That is not true. I'm using SM 1.1.16 at the moment, but I've been using filters for News for years. I don't know what he was told or misunderstood, but I'm using 2.02 now, and I've never had any version of SM mail or newsgroup filters to fail for me. SM lacked the ability to filter cross-postings for a long awhile, but we even have that feature now. There is something lacking in communication here it seems. bj I never could get filtering working in SM 1.1.8. I kept trying as I upgraded from version to version. I realize you can only set to mark as read (if you don't download for reading later). Never did get working. I haven't tried in 2.0 SM as I haven't had the need. SM 1.1.8? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Outgoing server
Mr. Cheese a formulé la demande : Mr. Cheese wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: I spend the winter at another location. In the past I merely had to change my outgoing server name to my new location ISP in order to send mail. I now get the following messsge: An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded: Authentication Failed, must login. Please check the message recipient email ID and try again. Note: the mail ID is whatever recipient to whom I am sending. Retrieving mail is not a problem This has worked in previous years. Any help would be appreciated There is a a new setting in SM 2 that should be off by default but is turned on. EDIT menu Mail Newsgroup settings SMTP choose edit uncheck use secure authentication. This wasn't in SM1.1.8 and lower. It's already unchecked. Any other ideas? I've uninstalled and reinstalled sm 2.0.1, Still no luck. Local ISP has reviewed my settings a says they're correct. ANy other ideas? When I am not at home, I use the smtp server of my gmail account. Works every time anywhere. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't figure out where SM2 is keeping datas to prompt me to log in twice for usenet/news server.
Il se trouve que Ant a formulé : Hello! I am trying to redo my nntp.earthlink.net usenet/newsgroup setup so I can log in with only one prompt since it requires me to enter my e-mail address and its password. However, I am still getting two login prompts. I removed this account, deleted this specific account files and folders/directories from my C:\Documents and Settings\FooBar\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\whatever123.default\News\, checked my prefs.js file (no signs of the old ones I just deleted), etc. After restarting SM and making a new acount, I still see the same problem. Am I mising something else to clean/delete? I do not have this problem on my new office machine with 64-bit Windows 7 HP (Dell OEM) with a clean install and setup from scratch. I am using an old, updated Windows XP Pro. SP3 at home that has the problems. I did NOT upgrade/migrate from SM v1.1.18 (just did a clean install and setup from scratch). Thank you in advance. :) Maybe in password manager? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Importing passwords form SM 1.x.x to SM2
Bernard Mercier a écrit : When making a new SM 1.x.x installation one could use the x.s file containing the passwords from the old installation to the new one. I am looking to do the same to use the xx.s from my old 1.x.x to SM2, but apparently SM2 doesn't use such a file anymore. Is there another way to do this? Thank you both for your answers. I had forgotten to say I am working in Linux, so the method referenced by Danny Kile can't be used by me. Hower the method referenced by Hartmut Figge did work. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache Path
Cedar a couché sur son écran : What would be the correct path for the cache file, if there is one? Does it make a difference to SM's performance if it is in a different spot? Is it supposed to be in the same folder as the rest of each profile? I see all my caches for various profiles have been in a different place than the rest of the profile. See edit|preferences|advanced|cache. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache Path
Il se trouve que Cedar a formulé : Bernard Mercier wrote: Cedar a couché sur son écran : What would be the correct path for the cache file, if there is one? Does it make a difference to SM's performance if it is in a different spot? Is it supposed to be in the same folder as the rest of each profile? I see all my caches for various profiles have been in a different place than the rest of the profile. See edit|preferences|advanced|cache. Ummmaybe I should give more details: My profile's cache is in: C:\Documents and Settings\my comp\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\my profile My SM profile is in: C:\Documents and Settings\my comp\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\my profile Is this normal for the cache to be in this directory, or should it be in the SM profile's directory? Or does it even matter? Normally the cache is in the same directory as the profile as far as I know. But it doesn't hurt if it's elsewhere. Why you have the situation you describe, I don't know. Did you have f.e. FireFox installed some time? So change if you want via the preferences. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Importing passwords form SM 1.x.x to SM2
When making a new SM 1.x.x installation one could use the x.s file containing the passwords from the old installation to the new one. I am looking to do the same to use the xx.s from my old 1.x.x to SM2, but apparently SM2 doesn't use such a file anymore. Is there another way to do this? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM2.0 does not launch
Sandalin a formulé la demande : I successfully installed SM2, but unforunately it does not launch or more exactly as i see in the task manager, it launches (does not open any window) and immediately closes. Tried to uninstall, re-download, re-install, all the same. Win XP SP3 PLEASE HELP !!! Not enough memory? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I cannot find
Richard Lee Holbert vient de nous annoncer : a location to download 1.18 of Seamonkey. 2.0 has left a bad taste in my mouth. Go the the SeaMonkey's home page. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Migrating a Profile
James a pensé très fort : Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:41:57 -0400 From: cciaffonecciaff...@verizon.net To:support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: Migrating a Profile Message-ID:aqsdna1gg5nulhbxnz2dnuvz_gpi4...@mozilla.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed desertgal wrote: When I install SM2 with SM1 in place, SM2 won't run. I am having that problem now. No matter which icon I click, even the seamonkey.exe executable in the sm 2 folder, when sm starts and I click HelpAbout it always comes up 1.1.18. Must I uninstall 1.1.18 to get 2.0 to run?? I think that neither version will work as long as the other is running so you need to make sure that nothing of 1.1.18 is running in order to run 2.0. For example, are you using quick start in 1.1.18? Try looking at processes in task manager and make sure nothing that says Seamonkey is running then try 2.0. Or try booting into safe mode and see if 2.0 will run [I don't know if it will or not]. Luck. James . . Thread rearranged to have the prefered bottom posting here. Yes, James is right, even the quick start of 1.1.18 should be exited for 2.0 to run. I had that experience. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Passwords from one installation to another.
I have a new installation of SeaMonkey on another PC and I would like to have the passwords on the new installation. Is there a file (or files) I can copy to the new installation. If yes, which one(s) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Passwords from one installation to another.
Paul Hartman wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Bernard Merciermerci...@not.yahoo.this.com wrote: I have a new installation of SeaMonkey on another PC and I would like to have the passwords on the new installation. Is there a file (or files) I can copy to the new installation. If yes, which one(s) I think if you take *.s *.w *.db from your old profile and place them in new, then edit the new prefs.js to point to the correct names, they will work in the new installation. Thank you for your quick reply. It is the *.s file for the passwords. After having it copied, I changed the statement with the about:config method. That worked very well. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Opening a link with Firefox from SeaMonkey-mail.
Bernard Mercier a présenté l'énoncé suivant : A link opens in SeaMonkey browser, not in Firefox I looked in preferences and didn't find an option how to change this. Is there some 'code' to put in prefs.js? Or is a plugin needed? Gert Klaus Hafenbrack and Jens Haftak, I ask the question for someone else. Personaly I can agree with you, but in a free computing environment, such a thing to use another browser should be possible, otherwise SeaMonkey is becoming like propriatory behavior like Microsoft. We don't want that, I suppose. I respond a lot to questions in forums as well and my first objective is to see if there is an answer to the question, in spite I don't share always the view of the original poster. Altho being seldom in Window, I made FireFox the default browser and clicked on a link in SeaMonkey mail (with the navigator closed) and the link didn't open in FireFox but in SeaMonkey instead. So same behaviar as in Linux (btw it's Puppylinux which is used) So the question remains: - Is there a possibility to open a link in the default browser, being FireFox here and if yes how is it done? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[Linux] Opening a link with Firefox from SeaMonkey-mail.
A link opens in SeaMonkey browser, not in Firefox I looked in preferences and didn't find an option how to change this. Is there some 'code' to put in prefs.js? Or is a plugin needed? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: two .slt folders
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo a présenté l'énoncé suivant : Bernard Mercier wrote: Henry a formulé la demande : Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Henry wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: If so, then close Mozilla, When I run mozilla.exe -p in the run box, all I get is my Mozilla home page. I get nothing about profile manager. I guess you missed those little words No, I closed Mozilla before I ran mozilla.exe -p Henry I can confirm what Henry says, albeit I tried with SeaMonkey. I think the reason is, there is only one profile, so no need to do a profile selection. no, if you don't have SeaMonkey running, including shutting down the QuickLaunch option, then you can start the profile manager at any time, even if there is only one profile. As I had quick launch active, that explains then why the -p didn't have an effect. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: two .slt folders
Henry a formulé la demande : Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Henry wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: If so, then close Mozilla, When I run mozilla.exe -p in the run box, all I get is my Mozilla home page. I get nothing about profile manager. I guess you missed those little words No, I closed Mozilla before I ran mozilla.exe -p Henry I can confirm what Henry says, albeit I tried with SeaMonkey. I think the reason is, there is only one profile, so no need to do a profile selection. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sick windows machine
Mort a couché sur son écran : Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Mort wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Lester Caine wrote: Just discovered that it does not like microsoft.com either so I can't run windows update :( but you can't use windows update with SM Why not? I have a problem with Windows Update with SM and Vista Home Premium, but my older XP machine updates nicely with SM. Please let me know why one can't use windows update with SM. Thanks. Morton Linder how do you get win update with SM? In all the years I've tried, I've never gotten it to work. So, whats your secret? Hi, I have no secret. As I said, it works with XP on my older laptop. On my newer laptop with Vista Home Premium, the Windows Update worked for about a year, then went screwy. On automatic update, it now downloads most important updates and no optional ones. On manual update attempts, I hit a stone wall with error code 80072EFD resulting. I've tried numerous methods to fix the error code problem, to no avail. If I turn SM browser off, and turn on Firefox or I,.E., I stil get the error message. Let's hope that Windows 7 will be better than Vista. Morton Microsoft will always find ways to trick users not using their products. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: seamonkey update (2.0b1 pre) failed
Margo Guda a couché sur son écran : Solved - not sure why, but rebooting windows proved to make the problem go away. Things seem OK again. Margo Guda wrote: It's not - I checked Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Hello, I'm running the 2.0 pre and tried today to install the latest update, which SM tells me is ready to install. However when I restart my system I keep getting the message that the update failed because another instance of SM is running (not true, I checked) and then proceeds to start the version I was already running, 2.0b1 pre. Does anybody know what the problem is here? Thanks in advance. Margo Guda. make sure that SM isn't running in the processes section of the task manager. Mostly it's because the preload/quick load is running. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Setting up Newsgroups in SeaMonkey
Dans son message précédent, Frog a écrit : Is there a place on the Internet where I can access a document describing the steps (1, 2, 3, 4 etc.) for establishing and setting up newsgroups on SeaMonkey. I have looked for two days for such a document (written at the elementary level user) without success. Also, are the setup procedures the same for both SeaMonkey and Thunderbird? How does one find a list of the many newsgroups available on the Internet? The Newsgroups currently on this computer were established by another person...thus, I don't know the steps they took to set them up. Thanks for any help sent my way. Frog Besides the answer you got already Using SeaMonkey help|using mail is a starting point as well. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
