Re: Default Focus Behavior?
What I mean is commonly used when users must enter data quickly, eg no mouse clicks. Not sure if the use case is large enough, though.. So the following thing can happend: When you fill a textfield to a certain length(or press enter) or choose a radio button it automaticly passes on to the next tab order.. : User comes to the form page(or wizard with multible steps) Fills in data by using only keyboard and numeric pad(for selecting radios etc)... Does that clarify anything? And yes tab order should be followed.. regards Nino Sebastiaan van Erk wrote: I think he means that, suppose you have a username and password field; then if the username is already filled in (e.g. from a cookie), then focus should go to the next field (password field). It probably should be the same as the tab order (first empty field in tab order gets focus) from a ui perspective... Regards, Sebastiaan James Carman wrote: I don't think I understand what you mean here. Do you mean something like setting the tab order like in Swing? On 3/9/08, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about a chaining component? EG you enter something in form.field a, and when thats filled then it jumps to form field b..? Etc... regards Nino James Carman wrote: On 3/9/08, Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WebMarkupContainer bodyTag = new WebMarkupContainer(bodyTag); bodyTag.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(onload, form.username.focus();)); Ok, but wouldn't it be cooler/easier/more java-oriented to do: TextField userName = new TextField(userName); userName.addBehavior(new DefaultFocusBehavior()); or Behaviors.defaultFocus(userName); // Assuming Behaviors existed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Carman Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 7:58 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Default Focus Behavior? Is there a behavior (or some other way) for having a field receive the focus when the page loads? For instance, in a login form, you'd want the focus to go to the username field or perhaps the password field if you've got remember me turned on. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -Wicket for love -Jme for fun Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -Wicket for love -Jme for fun Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AjaxBehaviour how to question
there are two ways to do it:
either use ajaxrequesttarget.appendjavascript() instead of behavior
or write a behavior that uses renderhead() to output the javascript
and override istemporary to return true - that way it is removed at
the end of the request.
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:39 PM, atul singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can i write an ajax behaviour which does not have its own callback, but
just appends javascript to an existing AjaxRequestTarget.
I want this so that i can write a fading feed back panel, which will be
added to AjaxRequestTarget of an ajax form submission.
What I want is something like this::
*the behaviour---*
public class AjaxFadeBehaviour extends AbstractAjaxBehavior{
private IModel fadingNeededIModel;
public AjaxFadeBehaviour() {
super();
}
/**
* Use a boolean value wrapped in an IModel to know if fading effect is
needed.
* This can be useful in situations for example when info messages need
to fade away while error messages need not.
* @param fadingNeededIModel
*/
public AjaxFadeBehaviour(IModel fadingNeededIModel) {
super();
this.fadingNeededIModel = fadingNeededIModel;
}
public void onRequest() {
System.out.println(on request called);
if(fadingNeededIModel!=null){
if(Strings.isTrue((String) fadingNeededIModel.getObject()))
((AjaxRequestTarget)RequestCycle.get().getRequestTarget()).appendJavascript(new
Effect.Fade($('
+ getComponent().getMarkupId() + ')););
}
}
}
*the feedback component ---
*public class AjaxFadingFeedbackPanel extends FeedbackPanel{
public AjaxFadingFeedbackPanel(String id, IFeedbackMessageFilter filter)
{
super(id, filter);
setOutputMarkupId(true);
final AbstractReadOnlyModel fadingNeededModel=new
AbstractReadOnlyModel(){
@Override
public Object getObject() {
return anyMessage(FeedbackMessage.INFO);
}
};
add(new AjaxFadeBehaviour(fadingNeededModel));
}
public AjaxFadingFeedbackPanel(String id) {
this(id,null);
}
}
I am not able to achieve this because onRequest() does not get called for
AjaxFadeBehaviour.
I am confused about which class I should extend to achieve this??
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
no, upper case string is not a special type, not unless you do not
use String to represent it...like i said, my suggestion is to do this
via a model decorator. further, something like this doesnt even sound
like it belongs in the web layer - sounds like a business requirement
which should be enforced by the setter of the bussiness pojo.
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used the trick it worked great. Thanks very much.
Should it be considered a bug?
What is interesting before using setType is that getConverter is actually
called (from my simple tracing), but after that its methods were
not called (I guess somewhere it learned the modelobject was a String so
it simply call the built-in converter.
I'd think if the getConverter is overriden, its methods should be called
regardless of what type was it. Besides, UppercaseString is
a special Type so it does not conflict with the rules.
(Any custom converter could be considered to target a special type
even though it could be just uppercasing or prepend a * to the string)
Built-in converter might follow the default rules but
if custom converter is provided, wicket should totally depend
on the custom converter to do whatever it does.
Anyway, thanks again.
if you set the type yourself by hand then getConverter() will be called and
you can do what ever you want
We dont do that automatic yes (resolveType doesn't set it to the
String.class)
johan
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i thought we agreed converters were type converters...so they shouldnt
be invoked if you are doing string-string :|
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
call setTYpe(String.class) on the textfield
or use that constructor with the type param
does that help?
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is a custom component with overrding the getConverter
for testing purpose. As you could see, it is plain simple one
with simple output debugging. But it is not working.
the getConverter is called (output here)
but the convertToObject never called (no there)
I basically cut and paste the WicketinAction example.
What I am doing wrong here?
public class RequiredUppperCaseTextField extends TextField {
public RequiredUppperCaseTextField(String id) {
super(id);
setRequired(true);
}
@Override
public final IConverter getConverter(Class arg000){
System.out.println(here+ arg0);
IConverter icAppend = new IConverter(){
public Object convertToObject(String arg0, Locale arg1) {
System.out.println(there+ arg0);
String s = sss;
return s;
}
public String convertToString(Object arg0, Locale arg1) {
return (String)arg0;
}
};
return icAppend;
}
}
Override the getConverter() method. First call super and with that
result call the special one (camel casing?)
On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
I wonder how to append a converter or java method to a component
so
that
I
would affect what is already defined. For example, I want
camelize a
TextField(or some customized subclass) so that after the converter
already
defined completes the conversion (regardless what has been done in
the
chain) , I could use the added converted/method to make the final
conversion
to my need. The example I am seeing appears to overide and only
one
can
be
defined for a component, unlike validators, that I could add a
chain of
them. Let me know if I am wrong about this.
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Re: Default Focus Behavior?
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:37 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/9/08, djo.mos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This simply looks great ! I think this should make it into the core Wicket behaviors as the componenet focus is quite useful. Me too! That's why I submitted: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1404 I was pretty surprised something didn't exist for this already. I don't mean any offense by that at all. It's just that it seems like every time I think to myself there should be a way to do x with Wicket, there's already something for that! This Wicket stuff is pretty cool! i dont think something like this should go into core. it seems pretty clear from this thread that there are very many ways to do this and each project will use their own. what you have proposed seems trivial to construct, so for projects that want to use it its a nobrainer. i think things that go into core should at least satisfy the majority of common usecases or be at least of moderate complexity. if we start putting every trivial thing like this into core we will end up with a huge surface area - at which point you have to start thinking of the find/build tradeoff - is it easier to find something that does what i want in core or simply roll my own which will only take fifteen minutes... now, for example, if this behavior was meant to be attached to a form and would set focus on the first component that is not valid... -igor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simple question about alert string
Hello,
I have a delete link in a list of names. If I click on the delete link of
name then the message should be are you sure to delete selectedName?
String selectedName = user1;
deleteLink.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(onclick, return confirm('Are
you sure to delete?');));
I am not able to append this selectedName after: Are you sure to delete
How to append this?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Simple-question-about-alert-string-tp15950581p15950581.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Simple question about alert string
onclick, return confirm('Are you sure to delete + selectedName + ?');));
On 3/10/08, tsuresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a delete link in a list of names. If I click on the delete link of
name then the message should be are you sure to delete selectedName?
String selectedName = user1;
deleteLink.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(onclick, return confirm('Are
you sure to delete?');));
I am not able to append this selectedName after: Are you sure to delete
How to append this?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Simple-question-about-alert-string-tp15950581p15950581.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
A converter is only called when type is set for converting from string
to object. Maybe we should document this a bit better.
The type is tried to be resolved for you, but if it is a string then
it is ignored so that normal convert() processing happens. This is a
bit weird but dont know how we can make this easier
On 3/10/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used the trick it worked great. Thanks very much.
Should it be considered a bug?
What is interesting before using setType is that getConverter is actually
called (from my simple tracing), but after that its methods were
not called (I guess somewhere it learned the modelobject was a String so
it simply call the built-in converter.
I'd think if the getConverter is overriden, its methods should be called
regardless of what type was it. Besides, UppercaseString is
a special Type so it does not conflict with the rules.
(Any custom converter could be considered to target a special type
even though it could be just uppercasing or prepend a * to the string)
Built-in converter might follow the default rules but
if custom converter is provided, wicket should totally depend
on the custom converter to do whatever it does.
Anyway, thanks again.
if you set the type yourself by hand then getConverter() will be called and
you can do what ever you want
We dont do that automatic yes (resolveType doesn't set it to the
String.class)
johan
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i thought we agreed converters were type converters...so they shouldnt
be invoked if you are doing string-string :|
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
call setTYpe(String.class) on the textfield
or use that constructor with the type param
does that help?
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is a custom component with overrding the getConverter
for testing purpose. As you could see, it is plain simple one
with simple output debugging. But it is not working.
the getConverter is called (output here)
but the convertToObject never called (no there)
I basically cut and paste the WicketinAction example.
What I am doing wrong here?
public class RequiredUppperCaseTextField extends TextField {
public RequiredUppperCaseTextField(String id) {
super(id);
setRequired(true);
}
@Override
public final IConverter getConverter(Class arg000){
System.out.println(here+ arg0);
IConverter icAppend = new IConverter(){
public Object convertToObject(String arg0, Locale arg1) {
System.out.println(there+ arg0);
String s = sss;
return s;
}
public String convertToString(Object arg0, Locale arg1) {
return (String)arg0;
}
};
return icAppend;
}
}
Override the getConverter() method. First call super and with that
result call the special one (camel casing?)
On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
I wonder how to append a converter or java method to a
component
so
that
I
would affect what is already defined. For example, I want
camelize a
TextField(or some customized subclass) so that after the
converter
already
defined completes the conversion (regardless what has been done
in
the
chain) , I could use the added converted/method to make the final
conversion
to my need. The example I am seeing appears to overide and only
one
can
be
defined for a component, unlike validators, that I could add a
chain of
them. Let me know if I am wrong about this.
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intention of PropertyModel in 1.3
What level is this reported to?
Its not error right?
On 3/10/08, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to follow up on this...
You're right, it does still work. The thing is that during the algorithm
when the properties of the bean are being tested the entire exception
stack is being printed out.
This is a bit confusing because it can lead the developer to think that
an error occurred.
I propose to log information instead of printing out the entire
exception stack. If you agree to this, I don't mind submitting a patch.
dml
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 09:38 -0800, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
hmm, this should still work. mind filing a jira bug with a quickstart?
-igor
On Feb 13, 2008 12:00 AM, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I'm (finally!) migrating to 1.3, so have a few wrinkles to iron out.
Is somebody able to tell me the intention of the PropertyModel? I'm
wondering if something has changed, or if I just wasn't using it
correctly before...
In one of my panels, I use this type of property:
PropertyModel languageModel = new PropertyModel( this, language );
And in the same class, I have a getter like this:
public String getLanguage()
{
return getSession().getLocale().getLanguage();
}
There is no setter and no language property.
This used to work in 1.2.6, but now 1.3.1 complains that there is no
setter for this class.
Now, I don't even _want_ a setter, but just to see what happens, I add
in a dummy setter, but wicket still complains that it can't find a
language property.
Am I not using the PropertyModel correctly (i.e. according to what
PropertyModel is intended for)? (If so, this means that I've been using
it incorrectly for many months without noticing, since it used to work.)
Or, should I be using some other type of model for this?
Thanx!
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fileuploadfield - preset the filepath
I am trying to pre-populate the filepath in the edit box in the fileuploadfield ? How can I do that ? Any ideas ? Thanks Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
Re: fileuploadfield - preset the filepath
that's true. ok, I guess I need to add a new field/label to reflect the previously selected file path then. thanks - Original Message From: Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 1:09:42 AM Subject: Re: fileuploadfield - preset the filepath It is not possible for security reasons. your browser will prevent it. Imagine a malicious server presetting the path to some sensitive data, and triggering an onsubmit in the onload. Maurice On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Ken Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to pre-populate the filepath in the edit box in the fileuploadfield ? How can I do that ? Any ideas ? Thanks Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Custom Exception/Error page
Hi. In my application I do: getApplicationSettings().setInternalErrorPage(ErrorPage.class); getExceptionSettings().setUnexpectedExceptionDisplay(IExceptionSettings.SHOW_INTERNAL_ERROR_PAGE); to display a custom page for error messages. I would also like to email myself the exception - is it possible that I can get a hold of the throwable from the ErrorPage.class, or do I have to explicitly catch and rethrow a RestartResponseException to obtain the exception? -- Edvin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FeedbackMessages per field
De: Alonso Sanchez, Daniel Enviado el: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2008 10:39 Para: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Asunto: FeedbackMessages per field Hello everybody! I'm a newbie with wicket and during my first examples I have had a problem that I don't know how to solve. The fact is that I have the typical login form, and I want to notify the users possible errors by showing an icon error next to each input field, just like showed in the image attached. Is there an easy way to do it, because I have been googleing, looking the wiki, reading the ajax examples... but nothing suits at all. Thanks in advance for your kindness ;D Daniel Alonso Sanchez - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
You could resolve the type because a converted is already registered
for that type. I could make a special class called UpperCaseString
and register a converter and new TextField( . UpperCaseString.class).
From this perspective, if I override getConverter to provide my own,
wicket should use it directly instead of infer the type and what to do
since I have give a definite converter. As I had observed,
the custom getConverter was actually called, so all that takes
is to call its methods instead of using builtin rules. The provider
of the custom converter would be responsible for the outcome.
A converter is only called when type is set for converting from string
to object. Maybe we should document this a bit better.
The type is tried to be resolved for you, but if it is a string then
it is ignored so that normal convert() processing happens. This is a
bit weird but dont know how we can make this easier
On 3/10/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used the trick it worked great. Thanks very much.
Should it be considered a bug?
What is interesting before using setType is that getConverter is actually
called (from my simple tracing), but after that its methods were
not called (I guess somewhere it learned the modelobject was a String so
it simply call the built-in converter.
I'd think if the getConverter is overriden, its methods should be called
regardless of what type was it. Besides, UppercaseString is
a special Type so it does not conflict with the rules.
(Any custom converter could be considered to target a special type
even though it could be just uppercasing or prepend a * to the string)
Built-in converter might follow the default rules but
if custom converter is provided, wicket should totally depend
on the custom converter to do whatever it does.
Anyway, thanks again.
if you set the type yourself by hand then getConverter() will be called
and
you can do what ever you want
We dont do that automatic yes (resolveType doesn't set it to the
String.class)
johan
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i thought we agreed converters were type converters...so they shouldnt
be invoked if you are doing string-string :|
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
call setTYpe(String.class) on the textfield
or use that constructor with the type param
does that help?
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is a custom component with overrding the getConverter
for testing purpose. As you could see, it is plain simple one
with simple output debugging. But it is not working.
the getConverter is called (output here)
but the convertToObject never called (no there)
I basically cut and paste the WicketinAction example.
What I am doing wrong here?
public class RequiredUppperCaseTextField extends TextField {
public RequiredUppperCaseTextField(String id) {
super(id);
setRequired(true);
}
@Override
public final IConverter getConverter(Class arg000){
System.out.println(here+ arg0);
IConverter icAppend = new IConverter(){
public Object convertToObject(String arg0, Locale arg1)
{
System.out.println(there+ arg0);
String s = sss;
return s;
}
public String convertToString(Object arg0, Locale arg1)
{
return (String)arg0;
}
};
return icAppend;
}
}
Override the getConverter() method. First call super and with that
result call the special one (camel casing?)
On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
I wonder how to append a converter or java method to a
component
so
that
I
would affect what is already defined. For example, I want
camelize a
TextField(or some customized subclass) so that after the
converter
already
defined completes the conversion (regardless what has been done
in
the
chain) , I could use the added converted/method to make the
final
conversion
to my need. The example I am seeing appears to overide and
only
one
can
be
defined for a component, unlike validators, that I could add a
chain of
them. Let me know if I am wrong about this.
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
I'd consider it a generic business component that applies
to so many apps/business pojos that would justify it to become a web component,
much like RequiredTextField or even PasswordTextField.
Could you illustrate how to do it better with model decorator
to use it like using RequiredTextField?
no, upper case string is not a special type, not unless you do not
use String to represent it...like i said, my suggestion is to do this
via a model decorator. further, something like this doesnt even sound
like it belongs in the web layer - sounds like a business requirement
which should be enforced by the setter of the bussiness pojo.
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used the trick it worked great. Thanks very much.
Should it be considered a bug?
What is interesting before using setType is that getConverter is actually
called (from my simple tracing), but after that its methods were
not called (I guess somewhere it learned the modelobject was a String so
it simply call the built-in converter.
I'd think if the getConverter is overriden, its methods should be called
regardless of what type was it. Besides, UppercaseString is
a special Type so it does not conflict with the rules.
(Any custom converter could be considered to target a special type
even though it could be just uppercasing or prepend a * to the string)
Built-in converter might follow the default rules but
if custom converter is provided, wicket should totally depend
on the custom converter to do whatever it does.
Anyway, thanks again.
if you set the type yourself by hand then getConverter() will be called
and
you can do what ever you want
We dont do that automatic yes (resolveType doesn't set it to the
String.class)
johan
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i thought we agreed converters were type converters...so they shouldnt
be invoked if you are doing string-string :|
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
call setTYpe(String.class) on the textfield
or use that constructor with the type param
does that help?
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is a custom component with overrding the getConverter
for testing purpose. As you could see, it is plain simple one
with simple output debugging. But it is not working.
the getConverter is called (output here)
but the convertToObject never called (no there)
I basically cut and paste the WicketinAction example.
What I am doing wrong here?
public class RequiredUppperCaseTextField extends TextField {
public RequiredUppperCaseTextField(String id) {
super(id);
setRequired(true);
}
@Override
public final IConverter getConverter(Class arg000){
System.out.println(here+ arg0);
IConverter icAppend = new IConverter(){
public Object convertToObject(String arg0, Locale arg1)
{
System.out.println(there+ arg0);
String s = sss;
return s;
}
public String convertToString(Object arg0, Locale arg1)
{
return (String)arg0;
}
};
return icAppend;
}
}
Override the getConverter() method. First call super and with
that
result call the special one (camel casing?)
On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
I wonder how to append a converter or java method to a
component
so
that
I
would affect what is already defined. For example, I want
camelize a
TextField(or some customized subclass) so that after the
converter
already
defined completes the conversion (regardless what has been done
in
the
chain) , I could use the added converted/method to make the
final
conversion
to my need. The example I am seeing appears to overide and
only
one
can
be
defined for a component, unlike validators, that I could add a
chain of
them. Let me know if I am wrong about this.
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Class aliases for shared resources
I have a shared resource that I add in my application's init() method via SharedResources sharedResources = getSharedResources(); sharedResources.add(repo, new MyResouce()); sharedResources.putClassAlias(Application.class, app); sharedResources.putClassAlias(MyResouce.class, tmp); I can access my resource via e.g. http://localhost:8080/app/resources/org.apache.wicket.Application/repo?nid=12 but both http://localhost:8080/app/resources/app/repo?nid=12 http://localhost:8080/app/resources/tmp/repo?nid=12 do not work. Any ideas why? Thanks! Kaspar - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Display text depending on user being logged in and intercept pages
Hi,
I'd need some help on getting the following to work properly:
If the user is logged in, display some text Hello {name}. If he
isn't logged in, display a text Please register or login instead,
where register is a link to the register page. If he clicks that
link and submits the register form, go back to the former page - use
the register page as an intercept page.
To start with, I don't know how to embed a link inside the label only
if the user is logged in - how should I structure the markup for that?
A Label component discards its body, so just nesting the link doesn't
work.
The other problem is that redirectToInterceptPage does the redirect,
but if I submit the register form I get a MarkupException about a
missing component. It looks like the intercept mechanism redirects
back to the original page, but loads the wrong template, here the
register-page-template. I've got no idea how to get that to work, so
far I replaced the intercept with a normal setResponsePage, which is
far from optimal.
Thanks
Jörn Zaefferer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to flush(?) page without using setResponsePage
Hi, our application has a login form on every page, defined in a Base WebPage. So far we have to use setResponsePage(getApplication().getHomePage()); to update the page, otherwise it looks like the login didn't work, even if it did. But we don't want to go to the homepage, the user wants to stay on the current page instead. How can I flush the current page? Thanks Jörn Zaefferer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to flush(?) page without using setResponsePage
If you don't set a responsepage the current page will be served again. For determining what might be the problem of the login not working we need to see some code and a better description of what is not working. Maurice On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, our application has a login form on every page, defined in a Base WebPage. So far we have to use setResponsePage(getApplication().getHomePage()); to update the page, otherwise it looks like the login didn't work, even if it did. But we don't want to go to the homepage, the user wants to stay on the current page instead. How can I flush the current page? Thanks Jörn Zaefferer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AjaxBehaviour how to question
Thank you for the isTemporary() suggestion.. . BTW before i got your reply i
tried implementing following way, by extending AbstractBehavior , not sure
if this is a good way..
@Override
public void onRendered(Component component) {
IRequestTarget reqTarget = RequestCycle.get()
.getRequestTarget();
if (reqTarget!=null reqTarget instanceof AjaxRequestTarget) {
AjaxRequestTarget ajaxTarget = (AjaxRequestTarget)
RequestCycle
.get().getRequestTarget();
if (ajaxTarget != null) {
ajaxTarget.appendJavascript(new Effect.Fade($('
+ component.getMarkupId() + ')););
}
}
}
Is it possible to have a chaining behaviour class in wicket which is not a
request listener??
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
there are two ways to do it:
either use ajaxrequesttarget.appendjavascript() instead of behavior
or write a behavior that uses renderhead() to output the javascript
and override istemporary to return true - that way it is removed at
the end of the request.
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:39 PM, atul singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can i write an ajax behaviour which does not have its own callback,
but
just appends javascript to an existing AjaxRequestTarget.
I want this so that i can write a fading feed back panel, which will be
added to AjaxRequestTarget of an ajax form submission.
What I want is something like this::
*the behaviour---*
public class AjaxFadeBehaviour extends AbstractAjaxBehavior{
private IModel fadingNeededIModel;
public AjaxFadeBehaviour() {
super();
}
/**
* Use a boolean value wrapped in an IModel to know if fading effect
is
needed.
* This can be useful in situations for example when info messages
need
to fade away while error messages need not.
* @param fadingNeededIModel
*/
public AjaxFadeBehaviour(IModel fadingNeededIModel) {
super();
this.fadingNeededIModel = fadingNeededIModel;
}
public void onRequest() {
System.out.println(on request called);
if(fadingNeededIModel!=null){
if(Strings.isTrue((String) fadingNeededIModel.getObject()))
((AjaxRequestTarget)RequestCycle.get().getRequestTarget()).appendJavascript(new
Effect.Fade($('
+ getComponent().getMarkupId() + ')););
}
}
}
*the feedback component ---
*public class AjaxFadingFeedbackPanel extends FeedbackPanel{
public AjaxFadingFeedbackPanel(String id, IFeedbackMessageFilter
filter)
{
super(id, filter);
setOutputMarkupId(true);
final AbstractReadOnlyModel fadingNeededModel=new
AbstractReadOnlyModel(){
@Override
public Object getObject() {
return anyMessage(FeedbackMessage.INFO);
}
};
add(new AjaxFadeBehaviour(fadingNeededModel));
}
public AjaxFadingFeedbackPanel(String id) {
this(id,null);
}
}
I am not able to achieve this because onRequest() does not get called
for
AjaxFadeBehaviour.
I am confused about which class I should extend to achieve this??
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Custom Exception/Error page
I would say that the standard practice is probably to use your logging subsystem to email you the exception. For example, if you are using log4j to log, you could add something like this to your log4j.xml file: appender name=ERRORMAILER class=org.apache.log4j.net.SMTPAppender param name=from value=[EMAIL PROTECTED] / param name=to value=[EMAIL PROTECTED] / param name=subject value=[mydomain] ERROR / param name=SMTPHost value=localhost / param name=threshold value=ERROR / layout class=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout param name=ConversionPattern value=%d %-5p - [%C:%L] %m%n / /layout /appender Regards, Sebastiaan Edvin Syse wrote: Hi. In my application I do: getApplicationSettings().setInternalErrorPage(ErrorPage.class); getExceptionSettings().setUnexpectedExceptionDisplay(IExceptionSettings.SHOW_INTERNAL_ERROR_PAGE); to display a custom page for error messages. I would also like to email myself the exception - is it possible that I can get a hold of the throwable from the ErrorPage.class, or do I have to explicitly catch and rethrow a RestartResponseException to obtain the exception? -- Edvin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
FeedbackMessages per field
Hello everybody! I’m a newbie with wicket and during my first examples I have had a problem that I don’t know how to solve. The fact is that I have the typical login form, and I want to notify the users possible errors by showing an icon error next to each input field, just like showed in the image attached. http://www.nabble.com/file/p15950642/sample.jpg Is there an easy way to do it, because I have been googleing, looking the wiki, reading the ajax examples… but nothing suits at all. I'm developing with wicket 1.3.1 Thanks in advance for your kindness ;D -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FeedbackMessages-per-field-tp15950642p15950642.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AjaxBehaviour how to question
Also, does returning true for isTemporary re-render any javascript resource
reference??
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:30 PM, atul singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the isTemporary() suggestion.. . BTW before i got your reply
i tried implementing following way, by extending AbstractBehavior , not sure
if this is a good way..
@Override
public void onRendered(Component component) {
IRequestTarget reqTarget = RequestCycle.get()
.getRequestTarget();
if (reqTarget!=null reqTarget instanceof AjaxRequestTarget) {
AjaxRequestTarget ajaxTarget = (AjaxRequestTarget)
RequestCycle
.get().getRequestTarget();
if (ajaxTarget != null) {
ajaxTarget.appendJavascript(new Effect.Fade($('
+ component.getMarkupId() + ')););
}
}
}
Is it possible to have a chaining behaviour class in wicket which is not a
request listener??
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
there are two ways to do it:
either use ajaxrequesttarget.appendjavascript() instead of behavior
or write a behavior that uses renderhead() to output the javascript
and override istemporary to return true - that way it is removed at
the end of the request.
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:39 PM, atul singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How can i write an ajax behaviour which does not have its own
callback, but
just appends javascript to an existing AjaxRequestTarget.
I want this so that i can write a fading feed back panel, which will
be
added to AjaxRequestTarget of an ajax form submission.
What I want is something like this::
*the behaviour---*
public class AjaxFadeBehaviour extends AbstractAjaxBehavior{
private IModel fadingNeededIModel;
public AjaxFadeBehaviour() {
super();
}
/**
* Use a boolean value wrapped in an IModel to know if fading
effect is
needed.
* This can be useful in situations for example when info messages
need
to fade away while error messages need not.
* @param fadingNeededIModel
*/
public AjaxFadeBehaviour(IModel fadingNeededIModel) {
super();
this.fadingNeededIModel = fadingNeededIModel;
}
public void onRequest() {
System.out.println(on request called);
if(fadingNeededIModel!=null){
if(Strings.isTrue((String) fadingNeededIModel.getObject
()))
((AjaxRequestTarget)RequestCycle.get().getRequestTarget()).appendJavascript(new
Effect.Fade($('
+ getComponent().getMarkupId() + ')););
}
}
}
*the feedback component ---
*public class AjaxFadingFeedbackPanel extends FeedbackPanel{
public AjaxFadingFeedbackPanel(String id, IFeedbackMessageFilter
filter)
{
super(id, filter);
setOutputMarkupId(true);
final AbstractReadOnlyModel fadingNeededModel=new
AbstractReadOnlyModel(){
@Override
public Object getObject() {
return anyMessage(FeedbackMessage.INFO);
}
};
add(new AjaxFadeBehaviour(fadingNeededModel));
}
public AjaxFadingFeedbackPanel(String id) {
this(id,null);
}
}
I am not able to achieve this because onRequest() does not get called
for
AjaxFadeBehaviour.
I am confused about which class I should extend to achieve this??
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any way to avoid a creation of the component still having a tag in an html file?
Hi people, I have a panel which is not visible in some cases. Wicket complans if I do not create it at all so I have to make it invisible. Is there any way to avoid a creation of the component still having a tag in an html file? Vitaly - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Display text depending on user being logged in and intercept pages
Use fragments for that instead to switch between the two. So you have
a UserRegistrationPanel that provides this functionality. On the panel
you create 2 fragments: one for just the label, another for the label
and link. Now you can do in onbeforerender:
if(loggedIn)
addOrReplace(new WelcomeFragment());
else addOrReplace(new HaveToSigninFragment());
Martijn
On 3/10/08, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd need some help on getting the following to work properly:
If the user is logged in, display some text Hello {name}. If he
isn't logged in, display a text Please register or login instead,
where register is a link to the register page. If he clicks that
link and submits the register form, go back to the former page - use
the register page as an intercept page.
To start with, I don't know how to embed a link inside the label only
if the user is logged in - how should I structure the markup for that?
A Label component discards its body, so just nesting the link doesn't
work.
The other problem is that redirectToInterceptPage does the redirect,
but if I submit the register form I get a MarkupException about a
missing component. It looks like the intercept mechanism redirects
back to the original page, but loads the wrong template, here the
register-page-template. I've got no idea how to get that to work, so
far I replaced the intercept with a normal setResponsePage, which is
far from optimal.
Thanks
Jörn Zaefferer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Confine feedback messages to a panel
Construct the feedbackpanels with and IFeedbackMessageFilter. Gerolf On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:22 PM, atul singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, I have an ajax checkbox, which when checked, i show a feedback at the top of the panel. Due to this event another panel on the same page is repainted and made visible. The problem is I see the feedback message in the feedback component present in the other panel as well. I feel this is because the feedback messages are shared in the session?? I thought I will be able to google out the solution, but could not find anything...Any suggestion about this problem ??
Confine feedback messages to a panel
hi, I have an ajax checkbox, which when checked, i show a feedback at the top of the panel. Due to this event another panel on the same page is repainted and made visible. The problem is I see the feedback message in the feedback component present in the other panel as well. I feel this is because the feedback messages are shared in the session?? I thought I will be able to google out the solution, but could not find anything...Any suggestion about this problem ??
Re: Is there any way to avoid a creation of the component still having a tag in an html file?
No. The hierarchy needs to match. Otherwise it is impossible to distinguish a programming error from a non programming error. Martijn On 3/10/08, Vitaly Tsaplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi people, I have a panel which is not visible in some cases. Wicket complans if I do not create it at all so I have to make it invisible. Is there any way to avoid a creation of the component still having a tag in an html file? Vitaly - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is there any way to avoid a creation of the component still having a tag in an html file?
On 3/10/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. The hierarchy needs to match. Otherwise it is impossible to distinguish a programming error from a non programming error. Can't you put in a placeholder empty Panel in the case where you don't want stuff to show? This assumes that the component you want to hide is more complex than just a TextField or something. So, when you want to show the complex panel, you instantiate it and add it. When you don't, you add some empty panel (both having the same ids). This way, the hierarchy matches. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
We do call it
you only have to specify the type
And if the type can be resolved and is NOT String.class your converter is
called
The only issue is if we cant resolve the type or the type is String then we
do by default something else
You have to set the type yourself then then your converter is called
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could resolve the type because a converted is already registered
for that type. I could make a special class called UpperCaseString
and register a converter and new TextField( . UpperCaseString.class).
From this perspective, if I override getConverter to provide my own,
wicket should use it directly instead of infer the type and what to do
since I have give a definite converter. As I had observed,
the custom getConverter was actually called, so all that takes
is to call its methods instead of using builtin rules. The provider
of the custom converter would be responsible for the outcome.
A converter is only called when type is set for converting from string
to object. Maybe we should document this a bit better.
The type is tried to be resolved for you, but if it is a string then
it is ignored so that normal convert() processing happens. This is a
bit weird but dont know how we can make this easier
On 3/10/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used the trick it worked great. Thanks very much.
Should it be considered a bug?
What is interesting before using setType is that getConverter is
actually
called (from my simple tracing), but after that its methods were
not called (I guess somewhere it learned the modelobject was a String
so
it simply call the built-in converter.
I'd think if the getConverter is overriden, its methods should be
called
regardless of what type was it. Besides, UppercaseString is
a special Type so it does not conflict with the rules.
(Any custom converter could be considered to target a special type
even though it could be just uppercasing or prepend a * to the string)
Built-in converter might follow the default rules but
if custom converter is provided, wicket should totally depend
on the custom converter to do whatever it does.
Anyway, thanks again.
if you set the type yourself by hand then getConverter() will be
called
and
you can do what ever you want
We dont do that automatic yes (resolveType doesn't set it to the
String.class)
johan
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i thought we agreed converters were type converters...so they
shouldnt
be invoked if you are doing string-string :|
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Johan Compagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
call setTYpe(String.class) on the textfield
or use that constructor with the type param
does that help?
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is a custom component with overrding the getConverter
for testing purpose. As you could see, it is plain simple one
with simple output debugging. But it is not working.
the getConverter is called (output here)
but the convertToObject never called (no there)
I basically cut and paste the WicketinAction example.
What I am doing wrong here?
public class RequiredUppperCaseTextField extends TextField {
public RequiredUppperCaseTextField(String id) {
super(id);
setRequired(true);
}
@Override
public final IConverter getConverter(Class arg000){
System.out.println(here+ arg0);
IConverter icAppend = new IConverter(){
public Object convertToObject(String arg0, Locale
arg1)
{
System.out.println(there+ arg0);
String s = sss;
return s;
}
public String convertToString(Object arg0, Locale
arg1)
{
return (String)arg0;
}
};
return icAppend;
}
}
Override the getConverter() method. First call super and with
that
result call the special one (camel casing?)
On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello:
I wonder how to append a converter or java method to a
component
so
that
I
would affect what is already defined. For example, I want
camelize a
TextField(or some customized subclass) so that after the
converter
already
defined completes the conversion (regardless what has been
done
in
the
chain) , I could use the added converted/method to make the
final
conversion
to my need. The example I am seeing appears to overide and
only
one
can
be
defined for a component, unlike validators,
Re: Display text depending on user being logged in and intercept pages
Hi Martijn,
thanks for the response.
Though your suggestion doesn't solve the problem of embedding a Link
within a Label. I need to be able to translate the text surrounding
the link and the text of the link itself. Depending on the language,
the position of the link varies. I can't embed a Link within a Label
and I can't wrap the Link with Labels, because then the position would
be fixed.
In other words: How would you implement the HaveToSigninFragment?
Thanks
Jörn
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use fragments for that instead to switch between the two. So you have
a UserRegistrationPanel that provides this functionality. On the panel
you create 2 fragments: one for just the label, another for the label
and link. Now you can do in onbeforerender:
if(loggedIn)
addOrReplace(new WelcomeFragment());
else addOrReplace(new HaveToSigninFragment());
Martijn
On 3/10/08, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd need some help on getting the following to work properly:
If the user is logged in, display some text Hello {name}. If he
isn't logged in, display a text Please register or login instead,
where register is a link to the register page. If he clicks that
link and submits the register form, go back to the former page - use
the register page as an intercept page.
To start with, I don't know how to embed a link inside the label only
if the user is logged in - how should I structure the markup for that?
A Label component discards its body, so just nesting the link doesn't
work.
The other problem is that redirectToInterceptPage does the redirect,
but if I submit the register form I get a MarkupException about a
missing component. It looks like the intercept mechanism redirects
back to the original page, but loads the wrong template, here the
register-page-template. I've got no idea how to get that to work, so
far I replaced the intercept with a normal setResponsePage, which is
far from optimal.
Thanks
Jörn Zaefferer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to flush(?) page without using setResponsePage
Ok. An example for the basic problem: There is a label that displays Loggein as ... when the user is logged in, and Not logged in when he's not. If the user logins in using the login form, the label doesn't change, unless I use setResponsePage. I figured out that I can use setResponsePage(getPage().getClass()); to keep the user on the same page, but that still looks like a workaround to me, not a solution. Jörn On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you don't set a responsepage the current page will be served again. For determining what might be the problem of the login not working we need to see some code and a better description of what is not working. Maurice On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, our application has a login form on every page, defined in a Base WebPage. So far we have to use setResponsePage(getApplication().getHomePage()); to update the page, otherwise it looks like the login didn't work, even if it did. But we don't want to go to the homepage, the user wants to stay on the current page instead. How can I flush the current page? Thanks Jörn Zaefferer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Display text depending on user being logged in and intercept pages
wicket:message key=beforeLink/wicket:messagea
href=#wicket:message
key=insideLink/wicket:message/awicket:message
key=afterLink/wicket:message
On 3/10/08, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Martijn,
thanks for the response.
Though your suggestion doesn't solve the problem of embedding a Link
within a Label. I need to be able to translate the text surrounding
the link and the text of the link itself. Depending on the language,
the position of the link varies. I can't embed a Link within a Label
and I can't wrap the Link with Labels, because then the position would
be fixed.
In other words: How would you implement the HaveToSigninFragment?
Thanks
Jörn
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use fragments for that instead to switch between the two. So you have
a UserRegistrationPanel that provides this functionality. On the panel
you create 2 fragments: one for just the label, another for the label
and link. Now you can do in onbeforerender:
if(loggedIn)
addOrReplace(new WelcomeFragment());
else addOrReplace(new HaveToSigninFragment());
Martijn
On 3/10/08, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd need some help on getting the following to work properly:
If the user is logged in, display some text Hello {name}. If he
isn't logged in, display a text Please register or login instead,
where register is a link to the register page. If he clicks that
link and submits the register form, go back to the former page - use
the register page as an intercept page.
To start with, I don't know how to embed a link inside the label only
if the user is logged in - how should I structure the markup for that?
A Label component discards its body, so just nesting the link doesn't
work.
The other problem is that redirectToInterceptPage does the redirect,
but if I submit the register form I get a MarkupException about a
missing component. It looks like the intercept mechanism redirects
back to the original page, but loads the wrong template, here the
register-page-template. I've got no idea how to get that to work, so
far I replaced the intercept with a normal setResponsePage, which is
far from optimal.
Thanks
Jörn Zaefferer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is there any way to avoid a creation of the component still having a tag in an html file?
Yep, that is making the hierarchies match. Martijn On 3/10/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/10/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. The hierarchy needs to match. Otherwise it is impossible to distinguish a programming error from a non programming error. Can't you put in a placeholder empty Panel in the case where you don't want stuff to show? This assumes that the component you want to hide is more complex than just a TextField or something. So, when you want to show the complex panel, you instantiate it and add it. When you don't, you add some empty panel (both having the same ids). This way, the hierarchy matches. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Custom Exception/Error page
Wow, that's a very nice solution. Thanks :)) -- Edvin Sebastiaan van Erk skrev: I would say that the standard practice is probably to use your logging subsystem to email you the exception. For example, if you are using log4j to log, you could add something like this to your log4j.xml file: appender name=ERRORMAILER class=org.apache.log4j.net.SMTPAppender param name=from value=[EMAIL PROTECTED] / param name=to value=[EMAIL PROTECTED] / param name=subject value=[mydomain] ERROR / param name=SMTPHost value=localhost / param name=threshold value=ERROR / layout class=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout param name=ConversionPattern value=%d %-5p - [%C:%L] %m%n / /layout /appender Regards, Sebastiaan Edvin Syse wrote: Hi. In my application I do: getApplicationSettings().setInternalErrorPage(ErrorPage.class); getExceptionSettings().setUnexpectedExceptionDisplay(IExceptionSettings.SHOW_INTERNAL_ERROR_PAGE); to display a custom page for error messages. I would also like to email myself the exception - is it possible that I can get a hold of the throwable from the ErrorPage.class, or do I have to explicitly catch and rethrow a RestartResponseException to obtain the exception? -- Edvin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to flush(?) page without using setResponsePage
The way you describe it, it sounds to me like you are not properly
using a model to update the label.
I am guessing you are doing something like new Label(id,Logged in)
or new Label(id,new Model(Logged in)).
What you have to remember is that you are in the constructor here,
rendering the same page does not trigger a new page object and thus no
constructor call.
In order to solve this you need a model to dynamically return whether
a user is logged in or not.
Something like this should do the job:
class MyModel extends loadableDetachableModel
{
public Object load()
{
//pseudo code:
if(Session.get().getUser()!=null)
return Logged in;
return Not logged in;
}
}
See
http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=IntroducingApacheWicket
for an introduction to Wicket including models
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Jörn Zaefferer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. An example for the basic problem:
There is a label that displays Loggein as ... when the user is
logged in, and Not logged in when he's not. If the user logins in
using the login form, the label doesn't change, unless I use
setResponsePage.
I figured out that I can use setResponsePage(getPage().getClass()); to
keep the user on the same page, but that still looks like a workaround
to me, not a solution.
Jörn
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't set a responsepage the current page will be served again.
For determining what might be the problem of the login not working we
need to see some code and a better description of what is not working.
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Jörn Zaefferer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
our application has a login form on every page, defined in a Base
WebPage. So far we have to use
setResponsePage(getApplication().getHomePage()); to update the page,
otherwise it looks like the login didn't work, even if it did. But we
don't want to go to the homepage, the user wants to stay on the
current page instead.
How can I flush the current page?
Thanks
Jörn Zaefferer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DropDownChoice getting value into the model
I don't understand. Vendor.state and SelectOption.state are both Strings.
I cut down my form to only have state on the form so I can post all the
code. The code pulls the correct data from the database and displays it on
the form but when I save it is gives me the following error.
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Model class
com.myprepress.pages.vendor.profile.VendorEntry2$1 does not support
setObject(Object)
html
form wicket:id=vendorEntryForm2
select wicket:id=state
option/option
/select
input type=submit wicket:id=save value=Savebr
/form
/html
public class VendorEntry2 extends BasePage {
@SpringBean
VendorDAO vendorDAO;
private long tblId;
private Integer oldVersionNumber;
public VendorEntry2(long id) {
tblId = id;
// get the version number to ensure that the object hasn't been
saved to
// the database by another users
// -1 is a new object
if (id != -1) {
Vendor vendor = null;
try {
vendor = vendorDAO.load(id);
oldVersionNumber = vendor.getVersionNumber();
} catch (DataObjectNotFoundException donfe) {
getSession().error(Object not found);
throw new RestartResponseException(new
ErrorObjectNotFound(new
VendorList()));
}
}
// load the object to be displayed to the screen
// make it LoadableDetachableModel so it is not stored in the
session
// -1 is a new object
IModel vendorModel = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
protected Object load() {
if (tblId == -1) {
return new Vendor();
} else {
return vendorDAO.load(tblId);
}
}
};
// add form
Form form = new Form(vendorEntryForm2, new
CompoundPropertyModel(vendorModel)) {
protected void onSubmit() {
Vendor updatedVendor = (Vendor)
getModelObject();
try {
vendorDAO.save(updatedVendor,
oldVersionNumber);
setResponsePage(VendorList.class);
} catch (DataObjectModifiedException dome) {
// try again);
setResponsePage(new VendorEntryError(
Data changed by
another user. Please refresh and try again.,
tblId));
}
}
};
add(form); // must add form before adding other components
// add state
ArrayListSelectOption states = new ArrayListSelectOption();
states.add(new SelectOption(AL, Alabama));
states.add(new SelectOption(OH, Ohio));
states.add(new SelectOption(NY, New York));
ChoiceRenderer choiceRenderer = new ChoiceRenderer(display,
state);
DropDownChoice stateFC = new DropDownChoice(state,
vendorModel, new
Model(states),
choiceRenderer);
form.add(stateFC);
// add submit button
form.add(new Button(save));
}
}
@Entity
@Table(name = vendor, schema = public)
public class Vendor implements java.io.Serializable {
private long tblId;
private String state;
@Column(name = state, length = 2)
public String getState() {
return this.state;
}
public void setState(String state) {
this.state = state;
}
Johan Compagner wrote:
This has to work yes, the only thing is do build up the new
Model(states) as States so the same type of object as vendor.state
returns.
On 3/7/08, Kai Mutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is nice to know I'm not the only one struggling with
DropDownChoices. I'm new to Wicket and I'm pretty far with
rebuilding an application we are using internally. Has anybody
proposed an alternative or a wrapper to DropDownChoices?
Have you tried something like:
Vendor vendor = (Vendor) vendorModel.getObject();
DropDownChoice stateFC = new DropDownChoice(state, new
PropertyModel(vendor, state), new Model(states), choiceRenderer);
This should work.
Kai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable and DropDownChoice
Hi All, I have implemented an AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable and would like to put a DropDownChoice in one of the columns to list values. For example in a table of users a roles column would show the roles assigned to the user as a dropdown list. I haven't been able to find any examples of doing this. If anyone has already done something like this or has any suggestions on how to do it, I'd appreciate the help. I tried to extend AbstractColumn but couldn't get it to work due to cellItem.add( ddc ) throwing an exception (Component cell must be applied to a tag of type 'select', not '' ). Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-and-DropDownChoice-tp15950744p15950744.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Russian localization
Frank Bille wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Juha Alatalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Russian language supports seems to be broken. Calling getString() causes class cast exception (stack trace in the end of the mail). Removing file org\apache\wicket\Application_ru.xml seems to be fixing the provlem. Should I create a jire issue for that? Yes please. I don't think the solution is to remove the file but instead fix the problem itself. :-) Yes :) Created an issue with simple test case: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1407 - Juha - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
styling thead in DataTable
Hey all, I am having an issue that seems to be simple, but still, no success. I have a normal DataTable. I add to it the toptoolbars manually: HeadersToolbar thead = new HeadersToolbar(entityDataTable, entitiesProvider); entityDataTable.addTopToolbar(thead); This is how it looks in the HTML: table wicket:id=entitiesList class=browserTable This is how (part of) the generated HTML looks like: table class=browserTable wicket:id=entitiesList thead tr class=headers th wicket:id=header class=wicket_orderUpwicket:border _moz-userdefined=a wicket:id=orderByLink class= href=?wicket:interface=:4:tabs:browserTabbedPanel:panel:entitiesList:topToolbars:2:toolbar:headers:1:header:orderByLink::ILinkListener::wicket:body _moz-userdefined=span wicket:id=labelPerson ID/span/wicket:body/a/wicket:border /th I want a simple thing: I want to align the header labels to the left. The problem(s): - style doesn't have an attribute of align. Only vertical-align. - I tried to add to the HeadersToolbar an AttributeModifier: thead.add(new AttributeModifier(align, true, new Model(left))); Nothing seems working. I am using Firebug and the label thead keeps with no attribute. Can anyone help? Thank a lot -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
Re: How to flush(?) page without using setResponsePage
Kudos Maurice! That was the one little thing that fixed most of the
issue I was having with Wicket. I've rewrote now most of the code,
using models and overwriting isVisible methods, works much better now.
Thanks
Jörn
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way you describe it, it sounds to me like you are not properly
using a model to update the label.
I am guessing you are doing something like new Label(id,Logged in)
or new Label(id,new Model(Logged in)).
What you have to remember is that you are in the constructor here,
rendering the same page does not trigger a new page object and thus no
constructor call.
In order to solve this you need a model to dynamically return whether
a user is logged in or not.
Something like this should do the job:
class MyModel extends loadableDetachableModel
{
public Object load()
{
//pseudo code:
if(Session.get().getUser()!=null)
return Logged in;
return Not logged in;
}
}
See
http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=IntroducingApacheWicket
for an introduction to Wicket including models
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Jörn Zaefferer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. An example for the basic problem:
There is a label that displays Loggein as ... when the user is
logged in, and Not logged in when he's not. If the user logins in
using the login form, the label doesn't change, unless I use
setResponsePage.
I figured out that I can use setResponsePage(getPage().getClass()); to
keep the user on the same page, but that still looks like a workaround
to me, not a solution.
Jörn
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you don't set a responsepage the current page will be served again.
For determining what might be the problem of the login not working we
need to see some code and a better description of what is not working.
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Jörn Zaefferer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
our application has a login form on every page, defined in a Base
WebPage. So far we have to use
setResponsePage(getApplication().getHomePage()); to update the page,
otherwise it looks like the login didn't work, even if it did. But
we
don't want to go to the homepage, the user wants to stay on the
current page instead.
How can I flush the current page?
Thanks
Jörn Zaefferer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DropDownChoice getting value into the model
First:
You bind the DDC to the wrong model. You bind it directly to the LDM
instead of the vendor's state property.
DropDownChoice stateFC = new DropDownChoice(state, states, choiceRenderer);
should be sufficient.
Second:
Your current setup assumes that the Vendor#state is of type
SelectOption (from the point of view of the DDC's model setup). I
would rewrite your setup to the following: make State a first class
citizen. Something like:
public class State {
private String short;
private String name;
. geters/setters
}
and then:
public class Vendor {
private State state;
}
ArrayListState states = Arrays.asList(new State(AL, Alabama), ...);
DropDownChoice stateFC = new DropDownChoice(state, new
PropertyModel(vendorModel, state), states, new
ChoiceRenderer(short, name);
(I've added the propertymodel to clarify to which property you
actually bind). Now everything should line up correctly.
Martijn
On 3/10/08, rmattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand. Vendor.state and SelectOption.state are both Strings.
I cut down my form to only have state on the form so I can post all the
code. The code pulls the correct data from the database and displays it on
the form but when I save it is gives me the following error.
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Model class
com.myprepress.pages.vendor.profile.VendorEntry2$1 does not support
setObject(Object)
html
form wicket:id=vendorEntryForm2
select wicket:id=state
option/option
/select
input type=submit wicket:id=save value=Savebr
/form
/html
public class VendorEntry2 extends BasePage {
@SpringBean
VendorDAO vendorDAO;
private long tblId;
private Integer oldVersionNumber;
public VendorEntry2(long id) {
tblId = id;
// get the version number to ensure that the object hasn't
been saved to
// the database by another users
// -1 is a new object
if (id != -1) {
Vendor vendor = null;
try {
vendor = vendorDAO.load(id);
oldVersionNumber = vendor.getVersionNumber();
} catch (DataObjectNotFoundException donfe) {
getSession().error(Object not found);
throw new RestartResponseException(new
ErrorObjectNotFound(new
VendorList()));
}
}
// load the object to be displayed to the screen
// make it LoadableDetachableModel so it is not stored in the
session
// -1 is a new object
IModel vendorModel = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
protected Object load() {
if (tblId == -1) {
return new Vendor();
} else {
return vendorDAO.load(tblId);
}
}
};
// add form
Form form = new Form(vendorEntryForm2, new
CompoundPropertyModel(vendorModel)) {
protected void onSubmit() {
Vendor updatedVendor = (Vendor)
getModelObject();
try {
vendorDAO.save(updatedVendor,
oldVersionNumber);
setResponsePage(VendorList.class);
} catch (DataObjectModifiedException dome) {
// try again);
setResponsePage(new VendorEntryError(
Data changed by
another user. Please refresh and try again.,
tblId));
}
}
};
add(form); // must add form before adding other components
// add state
ArrayListSelectOption states = new
ArrayListSelectOption();
states.add(new SelectOption(AL, Alabama));
states.add(new SelectOption(OH, Ohio));
states.add(new SelectOption(NY, New York));
ChoiceRenderer choiceRenderer = new ChoiceRenderer(display,
state);
DropDownChoice stateFC = new DropDownChoice(state,
vendorModel, new
Model(states),
choiceRenderer);
form.add(stateFC);
// add submit button
form.add(new Button(save));
}
}
@Entity
@Table(name = vendor, schema = public)
public class Vendor implements java.io.Serializable {
Re: Custom Exception/Error page
It is a really good way to blow up your exchange server... We had a bug somewhere that generated exceptions in an endless loop. It took exchange over a whole day to empty the queue. Martijn On 3/10/08, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow, that's a very nice solution. Thanks :)) -- Edvin Sebastiaan van Erk skrev: I would say that the standard practice is probably to use your logging subsystem to email you the exception. For example, if you are using log4j to log, you could add something like this to your log4j.xml file: appender name=ERRORMAILER class=org.apache.log4j.net.SMTPAppender param name=from value=[EMAIL PROTECTED] / param name=to value=[EMAIL PROTECTED] / param name=subject value=[mydomain] ERROR / param name=SMTPHost value=localhost / param name=threshold value=ERROR / layout class=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout param name=ConversionPattern value=%d %-5p - [%C:%L] %m%n / /layout /appender Regards, Sebastiaan Edvin Syse wrote: Hi. In my application I do: getApplicationSettings().setInternalErrorPage(ErrorPage.class); getExceptionSettings().setUnexpectedExceptionDisplay(IExceptionSettings.SHOW_INTERNAL_ERROR_PAGE); to display a custom page for error messages. I would also like to email myself the exception - is it possible that I can get a hold of the throwable from the ErrorPage.class, or do I have to explicitly catch and rethrow a RestartResponseException to obtain the exception? -- Edvin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable and DropDownChoice
Instead of directly adding the DDC to the column, add a panel or fragment containing the DDC. Martijn On 3/10/08, jnorris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I have implemented an AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable and would like to put a DropDownChoice in one of the columns to list values. For example in a table of users a roles column would show the roles assigned to the user as a dropdown list. I haven't been able to find any examples of doing this. If anyone has already done something like this or has any suggestions on how to do it, I'd appreciate the help. I tried to extend AbstractColumn but couldn't get it to work due to cellItem.add( ddc ) throwing an exception (Component cell must be applied to a tag of type 'select', not '' ). Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-and-DropDownChoice-tp15950744p15950744.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Simple question about alert string
The link should be AjaxLink or AJaxSubmitButton or AjaxSubmitLink
public onSubmit(AJaxtarget target,Form form){
//do your operations...
String javaScript = alert(' + are you sure to delete
+ ');
target.addJavascript(javaScript);
}
tsuresh wrote:
Hello,
I have a delete link in a list of names. If I click on the delete link of
name then the message should be are you sure to delete selectedName?
String selectedName = user1;
deleteLink.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(onclick, return confirm('Are
you sure to delete?');));
I am not able to append this selectedName after: Are you sure to delete
How to append this?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Simple-question-about-alert-string-tp15950581p15950760.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Custom Exception/Error page
Logging stuff in endless loops is generally a good way to blow things up. ;-) I remember back in my university days a friend of mine did some logging on /tmp on 150 or so Sun workstations. It went into an endless loop and all of the workstations became inaccessible (/tmp and virtual memory were connected, don't ask why, so login failed with an out of memory error :-)) What you can do in case your mail server doesn't throttle and protect you against DOS-attacks, is use log4j's triggering event evaluator and put throttling into that. See: http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/net/SMTPAppender.html and: http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/spi/TriggeringEventEvaluator.html) Thus by limiting your buffer size of the SMTPAppender and make sure you can only have N triggering events per hour, you can easily avoid this problem. Good point though, Martijn. :-) Regards, Sebastiaan Martijn Dashorst wrote: It is a really good way to blow up your exchange server... We had a bug somewhere that generated exceptions in an endless loop. It took exchange over a whole day to empty the queue. Martijn On 3/10/08, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow, that's a very nice solution. Thanks :)) -- Edvin Sebastiaan van Erk skrev: I would say that the standard practice is probably to use your logging subsystem to email you the exception. For example, if you are using log4j to log, you could add something like this to your log4j.xml file: appender name=ERRORMAILER class=org.apache.log4j.net.SMTPAppender param name=from value=[EMAIL PROTECTED] / param name=to value=[EMAIL PROTECTED] / param name=subject value=[mydomain] ERROR / param name=SMTPHost value=localhost / param name=threshold value=ERROR / layout class=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout param name=ConversionPattern value=%d %-5p - [%C:%L] %m%n / /layout /appender Regards, Sebastiaan Edvin Syse wrote: Hi. In my application I do: getApplicationSettings().setInternalErrorPage(ErrorPage.class); getExceptionSettings().setUnexpectedExceptionDisplay(IExceptionSettings.SHOW_INTERNAL_ERROR_PAGE); to display a custom page for error messages. I would also like to email myself the exception - is it possible that I can get a hold of the throwable from the ErrorPage.class, or do I have to explicitly catch and rethrow a RestartResponseException to obtain the exception? -- Edvin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Double submit problem
I'm trying to prevent the double submit problem, where the user clicks the submit button more than once causing a double post. I tried implementing the soluion suggested here: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-double-form-submission-handling---p13850262.html The problem is if there's a validation error and the user gets sent back to the same page (without a call to setResponsePage), the page still registers as submitted, so when the user fixes the form and submits, it's stuck in the resubmit state (which in my case sends the user to an error page). I even have one page where I don't call setResponsePage on a successful submit, because it just returns to that same page after a submit because there's a lot of overhead in constructing the page the first time. I don't want the submit to take a long time. I tried resetting the submitted boolean during the submit process, but no matter where I could find to put that code, it always seems to get executed before the 2nd submit get processed by wicket. I'd prefer not to implment a javascript solution (e.g. disabling the submit button after the first click), becuase I think the soultion linked above lends itself better to reusability across any form. So is there any way to differentiate between a double submit situation, and simply not calling setResponsePage? Or is there anywhere in wicket I can reset the submitted flag AFTER the double submit has begun to process (I'd prefer not to implement an artificial timer to reset the flag after a hard-coded number of seconds). Some point in the request cycle that occurs after the old page is unloaded? Now that I think about it, maybe some ajax that fires on the onunload event would be appropriate here. I'll try that while I wait to see of anyone has any better suggestions. Thanks. Joel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Double submit problem
Not 100% sure, but you could implement a NoDoubleSubmitForm with a
couple of tweaks:
form ...
input type=hidden wicket:id=submitNr /
/form
class NoDoubleSubmitForm {
private int submitNr;
NoDoubleSubmitForm(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(new HiddenField(submitNr, new Model(submitNr)).add(new
AbstractValidator() { boolean validate() { return submitNr == input;
} );
}
public void onSubmit() {
submitNr++;
}
}
It needs some refining, but this should prevent a double submit from
happening (the validation fails for the second submit).
Martijn
On 3/10/08, Joel Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to prevent the double submit problem, where the user clicks the
submit button more than once causing a double post.
I tried implementing the soluion suggested here:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-double-form-submission-handling---p13850262.html
The problem is if there's a validation error and the user gets sent back to
the same page (without a call to setResponsePage), the page still registers
as submitted, so when the user fixes the form and submits, it's stuck in the
resubmit state (which in my case sends the user to an error page). I even
have one page where I don't call setResponsePage on a successful submit,
because it just returns to that same page after a submit because there's a
lot of overhead in constructing the page the first time. I don't want the
submit to take a long time.
I tried resetting the submitted boolean during the submit process, but no
matter where I could find to put that code, it always seems to get executed
before the 2nd submit get processed by wicket.
I'd prefer not to implment a javascript solution (e.g. disabling the submit
button after the first click), becuase I think the soultion linked above
lends itself better to reusability across any form. So is there any way to
differentiate between a double submit situation, and simply not calling
setResponsePage? Or is there anywhere in wicket I can reset the submitted
flag AFTER the double submit has begun to process (I'd prefer not to
implement an artificial timer to reset the flag after a hard-coded number of
seconds). Some point in the request cycle that occurs after the old page is
unloaded?
Now that I think about it, maybe some ajax that fires on the onunload event
would be appropriate here. I'll try that while I wait to see of anyone has
any better suggestions.
Thanks.
Joel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Display text depending on user being logged in and intercept pages
Thanks, that worked.
Jörn
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wicket:message key=beforeLink/wicket:messagea
href=#wicket:message
key=insideLink/wicket:message/awicket:message
key=afterLink/wicket:message
On 3/10/08, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Martijn,
thanks for the response.
Though your suggestion doesn't solve the problem of embedding a Link
within a Label. I need to be able to translate the text surrounding
the link and the text of the link itself. Depending on the language,
the position of the link varies. I can't embed a Link within a Label
and I can't wrap the Link with Labels, because then the position would
be fixed.
In other words: How would you implement the HaveToSigninFragment?
Thanks
Jörn
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use fragments for that instead to switch between the two. So you have
a UserRegistrationPanel that provides this functionality. On the panel
you create 2 fragments: one for just the label, another for the label
and link. Now you can do in onbeforerender:
if(loggedIn)
addOrReplace(new WelcomeFragment());
else addOrReplace(new HaveToSigninFragment());
Martijn
On 3/10/08, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd need some help on getting the following to work properly:
If the user is logged in, display some text Hello {name}. If he
isn't logged in, display a text Please register or login instead,
where register is a link to the register page. If he clicks that
link and submits the register form, go back to the former page - use
the register page as an intercept page.
To start with, I don't know how to embed a link inside the label
only
if the user is logged in - how should I structure the markup for
that?
A Label component discards its body, so just nesting the link
doesn't
work.
The other problem is that redirectToInterceptPage does the redirect,
but if I submit the register form I get a MarkupException about a
missing component. It looks like the intercept mechanism redirects
back to the original page, but loads the wrong template, here the
register-page-template. I've got no idea how to get that to work, so
far I replaced the intercept with a normal setResponsePage, which is
far from optimal.
Thanks
Jörn Zaefferer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem when MIgrating from 1.2 to 1.3 - Parameters removed from HomePage URL
This doesnt work. The QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy class isn't hit.
When going to URL
http://localhost/helloworld?name=John
the code first calls the method
WicketServlet.doGet(..)
which delegates the call to WicketFilter.doGet(..)
As pointed in my first post, WicketFilter.doGet checks if the URL is
the home page and if so, redirects without appending the parameters.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:32 PM, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno.
I thought you were talking about mounted urls, whose urls displays are
rendered by a UrlCodingStrategy. If you're using the
QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy, then my guess is that it's relevant.
If you want to know for sure, try applying the patch to your local wicket,
or maybe try adding a break and debugging at the lines changed by the patch.
If that doesn't work, then I guess you'd better post your question again.
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Rajiv Jivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8 March 2008 00:28
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem when MIgrating from 1.2 to 1.3 - Parameters
removed from HomePage URL
Are we talking about the same thing? Your patch removes the trailing /
while in my case without the trailing / the parameters aren't
recognized.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:11 PM, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've already filed an issue and submitted a patch for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1385
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Rajiv Jivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7 March 2008 05:47
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Problem when MIgrating from 1.2 to 1.3 - Parameters
removed from HomePage URL
We have a site developed using Wicket 1.2. One of the use cases we
have is to pass in a parameter on the home page, and based on that we
perform some actions. e.g
http://localhost/helloworld?name=John
This functionality seem to be broken in 1.3. When passing in
parameters on the home page URL they are stripped. Going through the
Wicket I have narrowed down to an issue in WicketFilter
// Special-case for home page - we redirect to add a
trailing slash.
if (relativePath.length() == 0
!Strings.stripJSessionId(servletRequest.getRequestURI()).endsWith(/))
{
final String redirectUrl =
servletRequest.getRequestURI() + /;
servletResponse.sendRedirect(servletResponse.encodeRedirectURL(red
irectUrl));
return;
}
The only workaround I have is to change the URL to
http://localhost/helloworld/?name=John
Notice the traling / after helloworld
Am I missing something or is this a bug ?
Thanks,
Rajiv
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go edit a list item and come back. How-to?
Hi, I have a list (DataTable) of items and when I choose one I want to be taken to a page where I can edit the it (with a form). Upon completion (OK button is clicked) I want to be taken back to the page I was on the list and see my changes reflected there. How do I do this? Best regards, Johnny -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Go-edit-a-list-item-and-come-back.-How-to--tp15950856p15950856.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Go edit a list item and come back. How-to?
Hi Maurice,
Thank you for your quick response.
Best regards,
Johnny
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Marrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: segunda-feira, 10 de Março de 2008 16:17
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Go edit a list item and come back. How-to?
Upon clicking the list item, pass the page to your edit page and store
it there. e.g.
onclick()
{
setResponsePage(new EditPage(...,this.getPage());
}
Then in the onsubmit of your editpage set the responsepage to that page.
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Johnnie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a list (DataTable) of items and when I choose one I want to be taken
to a page where I can edit the it (with a form). Upon completion (OK button
is clicked) I want to be taken back to the page I was on the list and see my
changes reflected there. How do I do this?
Best regards,
Johnny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Go-edit-a-list-item-and-come-back.-How-to--tp15950856p15950856.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Este email e quaisquer ficheiros a ele anexados são confidenciais e
destinados, exclusivamente, à pessoa ou entidade a quem foi endereçado.
Se recebeu este email por erro, por favor, contacte-nos.
Obrigado
Prologica, SA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify us.
Thank you.
Prologica, SA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FeedbackMessages per field
see ComponentFeedbackPanel -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Daniel Alonso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everybody! I'm a newbie with wicket and during my first examples I have had a problem that I don't know how to solve. The fact is that I have the typical login form, and I want to notify the users possible errors by showing an icon error next to each input field, just like showed in the image attached. http://www.nabble.com/file/p15950642/sample.jpg Is there an easy way to do it, because I have been googleing, looking the wiki, reading the ajax examples… but nothing suits at all. I'm developing with wicket 1.3.1 Thanks in advance for your kindness ;D -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FeedbackMessages-per-field-tp15950642p15950642.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Go edit a list item and come back. How-to?
Maurice said:
Upon clicking the list item, pass the page to your edit page and store it
there. e.g.
onclick()
{
setResponsePage(new EditPage(...,this.getPage()); } Then in the onsubmit of
your editpage set the responsepage to that page.
Thank you, Maurice.
Johnnie wrote:
Hi,
I have a list (DataTable) of items and when I choose one I want to be
taken to a page where I can edit the it (with a form). Upon completion (OK
button is clicked) I want to be taken back to the page I was on the list
and see my changes reflected there. How do I do this?
Best regards,
Johnny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Go-edit-a-list-item-and-come-back.-How-to--tp15950856p15950893.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using single instance of page per browser window
Hi, I've used JSF (MyFaces + ICEfaces) before and I found it quite handy to be able to use one instance of page per session. User can navigate away from a view and the changes he has made to that view are remembered when the user returns to the view. I like this especially when implementing tab-like navigation: every page is its own tab and every tab has its own URL. There is no need to make one mammoth page with all the tabs and user can move between the tabs and the changes are remembered. Of course since its possible in wicket I think that the best way to implement this kind of behavior in wicket is to use one instance of page per browser window or browser tab rather than per session. This avoids confusion when user has multiple windows open. I think that this kind of feature has been discussed before, but I could not find any suggestion how to implement it in wicket 1.3. So what would be a good way to implement one page instance per browser window/browser tab in 1.3? I tried saving pageClassName + pageMapName = pageId entries to session attributes in page's onRender method and using a specialized link to lookup the page instance every time it is needed. This seems to work but it feels kind of hacky. Is this feature something that could be easily implemented as a framework feature? Or do others even consider it useful? Thanks in advance, Mika -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-single-instance-of-page-per-browser-window-tp15950920p15950920.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using single instance of page per browser window
actually it should already be done for you... when you open a page in a different tab/window wicket clones the page into a different pagemap so now you have two copies of the page that can be manipulated individually... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:58 AM, damischa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've used JSF (MyFaces + ICEfaces) before and I found it quite handy to be able to use one instance of page per session. User can navigate away from a view and the changes he has made to that view are remembered when the user returns to the view. I like this especially when implementing tab-like navigation: every page is its own tab and every tab has its own URL. There is no need to make one mammoth page with all the tabs and user can move between the tabs and the changes are remembered. Of course since its possible in wicket I think that the best way to implement this kind of behavior in wicket is to use one instance of page per browser window or browser tab rather than per session. This avoids confusion when user has multiple windows open. I think that this kind of feature has been discussed before, but I could not find any suggestion how to implement it in wicket 1.3. So what would be a good way to implement one page instance per browser window/browser tab in 1.3? I tried saving pageClassName + pageMapName = pageId entries to session attributes in page's onRender method and using a specialized link to lookup the page instance every time it is needed. This seems to work but it feels kind of hacky. Is this feature something that could be easily implemented as a framework feature? Or do others even consider it useful? Thanks in advance, Mika -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-single-instance-of-page-per-browser-window-tp15950920p15950920.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i thought we agreed converters were type converters... Did we? :-) Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
yes, since the converter interface now has convertToObject(String value); convertToString(Object value); not just a single convertTo(Object object, Class type) it makes it rather explicit that the converter is meant to convert something to a string and back...no? -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i thought we agreed converters were type converters... Did we? :-) Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, since the converter interface now has convertToObject(String value); convertToString(Object value); not just a single convertTo(Object object, Class type) it makes it rather explicit that the converter is meant to convert something to a string and back...no? It does. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Authentication and Assigning a Session Id
Hi Everyone, Is it possible to control when Wicket issues a valid session identifier to the user? The use case I am trying to support is only assign a valid session id to the user after they successfully authenticate. This is important to prevent possible session hijacking. When dealing with HTTP sessions directly you can copy the session contents, invalidate the session, request a new session, and put the contents of the original session into the new one. I've browsed through some of Wicket's source code to see if this is easily accomplished but I haven't been able to figure it out. Does anyone have any input or suggestions? Thanks, Larry __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _
Re: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id
session management is handled by the servlet container and is outside wicket's control. perhaps you can use a cookie in conjunction with a check in requestcycle.onbeginrequest to do something like what you want... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, Is it possible to control when Wicket issues a valid session identifier to the user? The use case I am trying to support is only assign a valid session id to the user after they successfully authenticate. This is important to prevent possible session hijacking. When dealing with HTTP sessions directly you can copy the session contents, invalidate the session, request a new session, and put the contents of the original session into the new one. I've browsed through some of Wicket's source code to see if this is easily accomplished but I haven't been able to figure it out. Does anyone have any input or suggestions? Thanks, Larry __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id
Igor, I thought that as long as you only use stateless pages and don't throw RestartResponseExceptions the http session remained temporary (as in is not assigned an id). Anyway Wicket-Security automatically binds the wicket session (assigns id to http session) after a successful login, if the session is not already bound. But there is no guarantee that the session is not bound until then. Maurice On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: session management is handled by the servlet container and is outside wicket's control. perhaps you can use a cookie in conjunction with a check in requestcycle.onbeginrequest to do something like what you want... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, Is it possible to control when Wicket issues a valid session identifier to the user? The use case I am trying to support is only assign a valid session id to the user after they successfully authenticate. This is important to prevent possible session hijacking. When dealing with HTTP sessions directly you can copy the session contents, invalidate the session, request a new session, and put the contents of the original session into the new one. I've browsed through some of Wicket's source code to see if this is easily accomplished but I haven't been able to figure it out. Does anyone have any input or suggestions? Thanks, Larry __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id
yes, if all that is true. but you still do not control the jsessionid token... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, I thought that as long as you only use stateless pages and don't throw RestartResponseExceptions the http session remained temporary (as in is not assigned an id). Anyway Wicket-Security automatically binds the wicket session (assigns id to http session) after a successful login, if the session is not already bound. But there is no guarantee that the session is not bound until then. Maurice On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: session management is handled by the servlet container and is outside wicket's control. perhaps you can use a cookie in conjunction with a check in requestcycle.onbeginrequest to do something like what you want... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, Is it possible to control when Wicket issues a valid session identifier to the user? The use case I am trying to support is only assign a valid session id to the user after they successfully authenticate. This is important to prevent possible session hijacking. When dealing with HTTP sessions directly you can copy the session contents, invalidate the session, request a new session, and put the contents of the original session into the new one. I've browsed through some of Wicket's source code to see if this is easily accomplished but I haven't been able to figure it out. Does anyone have any input or suggestions? Thanks, Larry __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id
While it is true that the jsessionid token is not controlled by application code, you can request a new one be generated by calling invalidate on the session then request a new session by calling getSession(true) on the request as I mentioned in my original message. Essentially it creates the illusion of one contiguous session to the user when it is actually two different sessions. I suppose I could attempt to do the same thing from within my application code in Wicket and use the HTTP request to accomplish it. I was just hoping to preserve Wicket's approach of treating HTTP as an implementation detail and not having to include any references to it in my code. From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 3/10/2008 4:24 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id yes, if all that is true. but you still do not control the jsessionid token... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, I thought that as long as you only use stateless pages and don't throw RestartResponseExceptions the http session remained temporary (as in is not assigned an id). Anyway Wicket-Security automatically binds the wicket session (assigns id to http session) after a successful login, if the session is not already bound. But there is no guarantee that the session is not bound until then. Maurice On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: session management is handled by the servlet container and is outside wicket's control. perhaps you can use a cookie in conjunction with a check in requestcycle.onbeginrequest to do something like what you want... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, Is it possible to control when Wicket issues a valid session identifier to the user? The use case I am trying to support is only assign a valid session id to the user after they successfully authenticate. This is important to prevent possible session hijacking. When dealing with HTTP sessions directly you can copy the session contents, invalidate the session, request a new session, and put the contents of the original session into the new one. I've browsed through some of Wicket's source code to see if this is easily accomplished but I haven't been able to figure it out. Does anyone have any input or suggestions? Thanks, Larry __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
But why cant converToObject(String) not return a string??
Thats up to the developer.
So
textfield = new TextField()
{
getConverter(Class clz)
{
}
}
textfield.setType(String.class)
that should work fine (and it does if i am not mistaken)
johan
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
yes, since the converter interface now has
convertToObject(String value);
convertToString(Object value);
not just a single convertTo(Object object, Class type)
it makes it rather explicit that the converter is meant to convert
something to a string and back...no?
-igor
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i thought we agreed converters were type converters...
Did we? :-)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
form submit to popup
Hello folks. Time for me to use the knowledge of the community again. Some background to enlighten my problem: In a form I have a textarea and a few buttons (cancel, reload, update and preview). Upon creation I load into the textarea some html that is stored in the database. The html is used as a template for creating emails. Eg: html body Dear 'customername'. bla bla /body /html To the preview button is actually a BookmarkablePageLink created as suggested in the Linkomatic example (except that I have PageParameters as well) and it opens a popup. PageParameters pp = new PageParameters(); pp.add(content, txtArea.getModelObjectAsString()); PopupSettings popupSettings = new PopupSettings(PageMap.forName(popuppagemap)).setHeight(500).setWidth(500); add(new BookmarkablePageLink(popupButtonLink, Popup.class, pp).setPopupSettings(popupSettings)); Now, the problem is that the PageParameter is added at creation time, hence no matter what changes are made in the text area, I can not pass it to the Popup so that I can view the changes. How can I make this happen? Sorry if this is a stupid question, but bare with me, I'm just a newbie. Also, let me know if you need clarification. TIA, Jörgen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id
wicket's Session has invalidate() and invalidateNow() -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While it is true that the jsessionid token is not controlled by application code, you can request a new one be generated by calling invalidate on the session then request a new session by calling getSession(true) on the request as I mentioned in my original message. Essentially it creates the illusion of one contiguous session to the user when it is actually two different sessions. I suppose I could attempt to do the same thing from within my application code in Wicket and use the HTTP request to accomplish it. I was just hoping to preserve Wicket's approach of treating HTTP as an implementation detail and not having to include any references to it in my code. From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 3/10/2008 4:24 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id yes, if all that is true. but you still do not control the jsessionid token... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, I thought that as long as you only use stateless pages and don't throw RestartResponseExceptions the http session remained temporary (as in is not assigned an id). Anyway Wicket-Security automatically binds the wicket session (assigns id to http session) after a successful login, if the session is not already bound. But there is no guarantee that the session is not bound until then. Maurice On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: session management is handled by the servlet container and is outside wicket's control. perhaps you can use a cookie in conjunction with a check in requestcycle.onbeginrequest to do something like what you want... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, Is it possible to control when Wicket issues a valid session identifier to the user? The use case I am trying to support is only assign a valid session id to the user after they successfully authenticate. This is important to prevent possible session hijacking. When dealing with HTTP sessions directly you can copy the session contents, invalidate the session, request a new session, and put the contents of the original session into the new one. I've browsed through some of Wicket's source code to see if this is easily accomplished but I haven't been able to figure it out. Does anyone have any input or suggestions? Thanks, Larry __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
sure, it works. but it seems rather silly that a String type converter
is invoked to convert what already is a String to a String - seems
like a noop to me
-igor
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why cant converToObject(String) not return a string??
Thats up to the developer.
So
textfield = new TextField()
{
getConverter(Class clz)
{
}
}
textfield.setType(String.class)
that should work fine (and it does if i am not mistaken)
johan
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
yes, since the converter interface now has
convertToObject(String value);
convertToString(Object value);
not just a single convertTo(Object object, Class type)
it makes it rather explicit that the converter is meant to convert
something to a string and back...no?
-igor
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i thought we agreed converters were type converters...
Did we? :-)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wicket-Stuff mini's and junit tests
For those of you having done work on Wicket-Stuff mini's i have a question. Why are there no tests in src/test ? I did find some tests in src/sandbox/test but they are not on the sourcepath (eclipse nor maven) and thus are never run. Bamboo build for this project failed because it was expecting testresults, i fixed this by configuring it so that it does not look for tests but it would be nice if we can move the tests from src/sandbox/test to src/test/java. Maurice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: form submit to popup
if you want this to work with a bookmarkable link then the only way to do it is to use javascript to add textarea's content to the url. but it isnt really safe to pass this on the url because those have a character limit... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello folks. Time for me to use the knowledge of the community again. Some background to enlighten my problem: In a form I have a textarea and a few buttons (cancel, reload, update and preview). Upon creation I load into the textarea some html that is stored in the database. The html is used as a template for creating emails. Eg: html body Dear 'customername'. bla bla /body /html To the preview button is actually a BookmarkablePageLink created as suggested in the Linkomatic example (except that I have PageParameters as well) and it opens a popup. PageParameters pp = new PageParameters(); pp.add(content, txtArea.getModelObjectAsString()); PopupSettings popupSettings = new PopupSettings(PageMap.forName(popuppagemap)).setHeight(500).setWidth(500); add(new BookmarkablePageLink(popupButtonLink, Popup.class, pp).setPopupSettings(popupSettings)); Now, the problem is that the PageParameter is added at creation time, hence no matter what changes are made in the text area, I can not pass it to the Popup so that I can view the changes. How can I make this happen? Sorry if this is a stupid question, but bare with me, I'm just a newbie. Also, let me know if you need clarification. TIA, Jörgen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket-Stuff mini's and junit tests
move them -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those of you having done work on Wicket-Stuff mini's i have a question. Why are there no tests in src/test ? I did find some tests in src/sandbox/test but they are not on the sourcepath (eclipse nor maven) and thus are never run. Bamboo build for this project failed because it was expecting testresults, i fixed this by configuring it so that it does not look for tests but it would be nice if we can move the tests from src/sandbox/test to src/test/java. Maurice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: form submit to popup
Igor, thanks for your reply. To me it doesn't matter how it's done, as long as I can do it :) Do you have any suggestion of a safer way? /Jörgen Igor Vaynberg skrev: if you want this to work with a bookmarkable link then the only way to do it is to use javascript to add textarea's content to the url. but it isnt really safe to pass this on the url because those have a character limit... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello folks. Time for me to use the knowledge of the community again. Some background to enlighten my problem: In a form I have a textarea and a few buttons (cancel, reload, update and preview). Upon creation I load into the textarea some html that is stored in the database. The html is used as a template for creating emails. Eg: html body Dear 'customername'. bla bla /body /html To the preview button is actually a BookmarkablePageLink created as suggested in the Linkomatic example (except that I have PageParameters as well) and it opens a popup. PageParameters pp = new PageParameters(); pp.add(content, txtArea.getModelObjectAsString()); PopupSettings popupSettings = new PopupSettings(PageMap.forName(popuppagemap)).setHeight(500).setWidth(500); add(new BookmarkablePageLink(popupButtonLink, Popup.class, pp).setPopupSettings(popupSettings)); Now, the problem is that the PageParameter is added at creation time, hence no matter what changes are made in the text area, I can not pass it to the Popup so that I can view the changes. How can I make this happen? Sorry if this is a stupid question, but bare with me, I'm just a newbie. Also, let me know if you need clarification. TIA, Jörgen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: form submit to popup
safer way would be to replace the textarea with a label that displays the html. that way you are not passing anything on the url... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, thanks for your reply. To me it doesn't matter how it's done, as long as I can do it :) Do you have any suggestion of a safer way? /Jörgen Igor Vaynberg skrev: if you want this to work with a bookmarkable link then the only way to do it is to use javascript to add textarea's content to the url. but it isnt really safe to pass this on the url because those have a character limit... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello folks. Time for me to use the knowledge of the community again. Some background to enlighten my problem: In a form I have a textarea and a few buttons (cancel, reload, update and preview). Upon creation I load into the textarea some html that is stored in the database. The html is used as a template for creating emails. Eg: html body Dear 'customername'. bla bla /body /html To the preview button is actually a BookmarkablePageLink created as suggested in the Linkomatic example (except that I have PageParameters as well) and it opens a popup. PageParameters pp = new PageParameters(); pp.add(content, txtArea.getModelObjectAsString()); PopupSettings popupSettings = new PopupSettings(PageMap.forName(popuppagemap)).setHeight(500).setWidth(500); add(new BookmarkablePageLink(popupButtonLink, Popup.class, pp).setPopupSettings(popupSettings)); Now, the problem is that the PageParameter is added at creation time, hence no matter what changes are made in the text area, I can not pass it to the Popup so that I can view the changes. How can I make this happen? Sorry if this is a stupid question, but bare with me, I'm just a newbie. Also, let me know if you need clarification. TIA, Jörgen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: styling thead in DataTable
well, I can and this is what I actually did. I found out that I can use in style, the attribute: *text-align* that has solved me the problem. But my (more general) question is: what if there is an attribute that can't be set in style? as what I understand, it can't be set in a CSS (if I'm mistaken, please tell me how it's done). How can I add attributes to thead of a DataTable? Hope I'm clear enough. Eyal On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can you not use css? -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I am having an issue that seems to be simple, but still, no success. I have a normal DataTable. I add to it the toptoolbars manually: HeadersToolbar thead = new HeadersToolbar(entityDataTable, entitiesProvider); entityDataTable.addTopToolbar(thead); This is how it looks in the HTML: table wicket:id=entitiesList class=browserTable This is how (part of) the generated HTML looks like: table class=browserTable wicket:id=entitiesList thead tr class=headers th wicket:id=header class=wicket_orderUpwicket:border _moz-userdefined=a wicket:id=orderByLink class= href=?wicket:interface=:4:tabs:browserTabbedPanel:panel:entitiesList:topToolbars:2:toolbar:headers:1:header:orderByLink::ILinkListener::wicket:body _moz-userdefined=span wicket:id=labelPerson ID/span/wicket:body/a/wicket:border /th I want a simple thing: I want to align the header labels to the left. The problem(s): - style doesn't have an attribute of align. Only vertical-align. - I tried to add to the HeadersToolbar an AttributeModifier: thead.add(new AttributeModifier(align, true, new Model(left))); Nothing seems working. I am using Firebug and the label thead keeps with no attribute. Can anyone help? Thank a lot -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
Re: Wicket-Stuff mini's and junit tests
done On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: move them -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those of you having done work on Wicket-Stuff mini's i have a question. Why are there no tests in src/test ? I did find some tests in src/sandbox/test but they are not on the sourcepath (eclipse nor maven) and thus are never run. Bamboo build for this project failed because it was expecting testresults, i fixed this by configuring it so that it does not look for tests but it would be nice if we can move the tests from src/sandbox/test to src/test/java. Maurice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
Yes, but the issue I encountered that wicket first call getConverter method, yet not using what was returned as supposed to be. Class based converter is a way to write one default converter for one class, but if a special converter is provided for a subset of that class, then the special convert should be used yes, since the converter interface now has convertToObject(String value); convertToString(Object value); not just a single convertTo(Object object, Class type) it makes it rather explicit that the converter is meant to convert something to a string and back...no? -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i thought we agreed converters were type converters... Did we? :-) Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cd app example
On http://www.wicket-library.com/ there is a cdapp example. I am interested in the source code for this example. I found some source in the wicket-stuff svn (1.2 branch), does anybody now if there is a 1.3 source somewhere? Maurice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
Another level of indirection?
for compoundpropertymode Could I could do
add(new textfield(foo).setModel(new uppercasingmodel(this))) ?
if this is the webpage with the foo field.
Compared to
add(new UpperCaseTextfield(foo));
the latter would be more efficient and clean.
class uppercasingmodel implements imodel {
private final imodel delegate;
public void setobject(object) {
delegate.setobject(uppercase((string)object));
}
...
}
add(new textfield(foo, new uppercasingmodel(model)));
-igor
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd consider it a generic business component that applies
to so many apps/business pojos that would justify it to become a web
component,
much like RequiredTextField or even PasswordTextField.
Could you illustrate how to do it better with model decorator
to use it like using RequiredTextField?
no, upper case string is not a special type, not unless you do not
use String to represent it...like i said, my suggestion is to do this
via a model decorator. further, something like this doesnt even sound
like it belongs in the web layer - sounds like a business requirement
which should be enforced by the setter of the bussiness pojo.
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used the trick it worked great. Thanks very much.
Should it be considered a bug?
What is interesting before using setType is that getConverter is
actually
called (from my simple tracing), but after that its methods were
not called (I guess somewhere it learned the modelobject was a String
so
it simply call the built-in converter.
I'd think if the getConverter is overriden, its methods should be
called
regardless of what type was it. Besides, UppercaseString is
a special Type so it does not conflict with the rules.
(Any custom converter could be considered to target a special type
even though it could be just uppercasing or prepend a * to the string)
Built-in converter might follow the default rules but
if custom converter is provided, wicket should totally depend
on the custom converter to do whatever it does.
Anyway, thanks again.
if you set the type yourself by hand then getConverter() will be
called
and
you can do what ever you want
We dont do that automatic yes (resolveType doesn't set it to the
String.class)
johan
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i thought we agreed converters were type converters...so they
shouldnt
be invoked if you are doing string-string :|
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Johan Compagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
call setTYpe(String.class) on the textfield
or use that constructor with the type param
does that help?
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is a custom component with overrding the getConverter
for testing purpose. As you could see, it is plain simple one
with simple output debugging. But it is not working.
the getConverter is called (output here)
but the convertToObject never called (no there)
I basically cut and paste the WicketinAction example.
What I am doing wrong here?
public class RequiredUppperCaseTextField extends TextField {
public RequiredUppperCaseTextField(String id) {
super(id);
setRequired(true);
}
@Override
public final IConverter getConverter(Class arg000){
System.out.println(here+ arg0);
IConverter icAppend = new IConverter(){
public Object convertToObject(String arg0, Locale
arg1)
{
System.out.println(there+ arg0);
String s = sss;
return s;
}
public String convertToString(Object arg0, Locale
arg1)
{
return (String)arg0;
}
};
return icAppend;
}
}
Override the getConverter() method. First call super and with
that
result call the special one (camel casing?)
On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello:
I wonder how to append a converter or java method to a
component
so
that
I
would affect what is already defined. For example, I want
camelize a
TextField(or some customized subclass) so that after the
converter
already
defined completes the conversion (regardless what has been
done
in
the
chain) , I could use the added converted/method to make the
final
Re: append a converter or coversion function
yes i think i explained that before the first call you see is the getConverter call that calls objectToString() on it but if type is not set on a field getConverter is not called for StringToObject johan On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, but the issue I encountered that wicket first call getConverter method, yet not using what was returned as supposed to be. Class based converter is a way to write one default converter for one class, but if a special converter is provided for a subset of that class, then the special convert should be used yes, since the converter interface now has convertToObject(String value); convertToString(Object value); not just a single convertTo(Object object, Class type) it makes it rather explicit that the converter is meant to convert something to a string and back...no? -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i thought we agreed converters were type converters... Did we? :-) Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: append a converter or coversion function
I missed this one. That explains what I just posted. I'd say the logic could be if a converter is provided, the its stringtoobject is called. otherwise, check the set type and use the types'registered converter. yes i think i explained that before the first call you see is the getConverter call that calls objectToString() on it but if type is not set on a field getConverter is not called for StringToObject johan On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, but the issue I encountered that wicket first call getConverter method, yet not using what was returned as supposed to be. Class based converter is a way to write one default converter for one class, but if a special converter is provided for a subset of that class, then the special convert should be used yes, since the converter interface now has convertToObject(String value); convertToString(Object value); not just a single convertTo(Object object, Class type) it makes it rather explicit that the converter is meant to convert something to a string and back...no? -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i thought we agreed converters were type converters... Did we? :-) Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem when MIgrating from 1.2 to 1.3 - Parameters removed from HomePage URL
Maybe you're right and that it's not related, but this really smells like
URL encoding to me... I've had to deal with this problem before.
Did you try changing the url encoding strategy to your own custom one? If
you do and you still get this problem, then I'll believe you. :-)
dml
-Original Message-
From: Rajiv Jivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 March 2008 00:43
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem when MIgrating from 1.2 to 1.3 - Parameters
removed from HomePage URL
This doesnt work. The QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy class isn't hit.
When going to URL
http://localhost/helloworld?name=John
the code first calls the method
WicketServlet.doGet(..)
which delegates the call to WicketFilter.doGet(..)
As pointed in my first post, WicketFilter.doGet checks if the URL is
the home page and if so, redirects without appending the parameters.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:32 PM, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno.
I thought you were talking about mounted urls, whose urls displays are
rendered by a UrlCodingStrategy. If you're using the
QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy, then my guess is that it's relevant.
If you want to know for sure, try applying the patch to your
local wicket,
or maybe try adding a break and debugging at the lines changed
by the patch.
If that doesn't work, then I guess you'd better post your
question again.
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Rajiv Jivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8 March 2008 00:28
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem when MIgrating from 1.2 to 1.3 - Parameters
removed from HomePage URL
Are we talking about the same thing? Your patch removes the
trailing /
while in my case without the trailing / the parameters aren't
recognized.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:11 PM, David Leangen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've already filed an issue and submitted a patch for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1385
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Rajiv Jivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7 March 2008 05:47
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Problem when MIgrating from 1.2 to 1.3 - Parameters
removed from HomePage URL
We have a site developed using Wicket 1.2. One of the
use cases we
have is to pass in a parameter on the home page, and
based on that we
perform some actions. e.g
http://localhost/helloworld?name=John
This functionality seem to be broken in 1.3. When passing in
parameters on the home page URL they are stripped.
Going through the
Wicket I have narrowed down to an issue in WicketFilter
// Special-case for home page - we redirect to add a
trailing slash.
if (relativePath.length() == 0
!Strings.stripJSessionId(servletRequest.getRequestURI()).endsWith(/))
{
final String redirectUrl =
servletRequest.getRequestURI() + /;
servletResponse.sendRedirect(servletResponse.encodeRedirectURL(red
irectUrl));
return;
}
The only workaround I have is to change the URL to
http://localhost/helloworld/?name=John
Notice the traling / after helloworld
Am I missing something or is this a bug ?
Thanks,
Rajiv
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Javascript not evaluating with AbstractAutoCompleteBehavior
For the record, I was able to accomplish what I want a lot easier using
OnChangeAjaxBehavior.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing a custom autocomplete and simply wanted to use
AbstractAutoCompleteBehavior to at least pass me back the search term. I
want to return a JavaScript call with the results which opens up a custom
results panel. I'm not looking to pass back HTML with the results.
I think Wicket should either change the behavior to use the same pipeline
as Ajax event or make the respond method final and make sure that
AjaxTargetRequest.get() returns null or an exception.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI:
you might want to check out the wicketstuff-scriptaculous auto
complete component instead.
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Script.aculo.us+AutoCompleteBehavior
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:38 AM, i ii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that does suck! why would wicket use a different pipeline??? that
is misleading!!!
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 00:21:26 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Javascript not evaluating with
AbstractAutoCompleteBehavior
Oh, that sucks. That's VERY misleading because I can override
respond and I
have the AjaxRequestTarget or call AjaxRequestTarget.get() and get
a valid
object. Doesn't really make much sense that a different pipeline
would be
used. I guess I'll have to come up with a better solution using
WicketAjaxEvent.
Thanks for your help!
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The autocomplete component doesn't use the wicket ajax pipeline
so
that ajaxrequesttarget methods will not work for request invoked
by
the autocomplete behavior.
-Matej
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
If I have the following code:
textField.add(new AbstractAutoCompleteBehavior() {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void onRequest(final String input,
RequestCycle requestCycle) {
}
@Override
protected void respond(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
target.appendJavascript(alert(\hello\););
}
});
When the page renders, the textfield is calling this event and
I see
the
response in the Wicket debug box, but the response is never
being
parsed and
the alert never shows up. Am I missing something here? I
tested
using an
AjaxEventBehavior with onkeypress and it works great. The
only problem
is
that I have no way of getting the text typed into the text
field, which
is
why I used the auto complete stuff. Any thoughts?
Thanks for your help!
--
Resizable and reorderable grid components.
http://www.inmethod.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: styling thead in DataTable
there shouldnt be anything you cannot do through css that you can do through adding things to markup that said you can always subclass datatable and provide your own markup -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, I can and this is what I actually did. I found out that I can use in style, the attribute: *text-align* that has solved me the problem. But my (more general) question is: what if there is an attribute that can't be set in style? as what I understand, it can't be set in a CSS (if I'm mistaken, please tell me how it's done). How can I add attributes to thead of a DataTable? Hope I'm clear enough. Eyal On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can you not use css? -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I am having an issue that seems to be simple, but still, no success. I have a normal DataTable. I add to it the toptoolbars manually: HeadersToolbar thead = new HeadersToolbar(entityDataTable, entitiesProvider); entityDataTable.addTopToolbar(thead); This is how it looks in the HTML: table wicket:id=entitiesList class=browserTable This is how (part of) the generated HTML looks like: table class=browserTable wicket:id=entitiesList thead tr class=headers th wicket:id=header class=wicket_orderUpwicket:border _moz-userdefined=a wicket:id=orderByLink class= href=?wicket:interface=:4:tabs:browserTabbedPanel:panel:entitiesList:topToolbars:2:toolbar:headers:1:header:orderByLink::ILinkListener::wicket:body _moz-userdefined=span wicket:id=labelPerson ID/span/wicket:body/a/wicket:border /th I want a simple thing: I want to align the header labels to the left. The problem(s): - style doesn't have an attribute of align. Only vertical-align. - I tried to add to the HeadersToolbar an AttributeModifier: thead.add(new AttributeModifier(align, true, new Model(left))); Nothing seems working. I am using Firebug and the label thead keeps with no attribute. Can anyone help? Thank a lot -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cd app example
i dont think that project is updated or maintained to 1.3 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On http://www.wicket-library.com/ there is a cdapp example. I am interested in the source code for this example. I found some source in the wicket-stuff svn (1.2 branch), does anybody now if there is a 1.3 source somewhere? Maurice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id
That was my initial inclination, but I don't see an easy way to get the data out of the session, request a new session, then populate the new session with the original data. From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 3/10/2008 6:00 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id wicket's Session has invalidate() and invalidateNow() -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While it is true that the jsessionid token is not controlled by application code, you can request a new one be generated by calling invalidate on the session then request a new session by calling getSession(true) on the request as I mentioned in my original message. Essentially it creates the illusion of one contiguous session to the user when it is actually two different sessions. I suppose I could attempt to do the same thing from within my application code in Wicket and use the HTTP request to accomplish it. I was just hoping to preserve Wicket's approach of treating HTTP as an implementation detail and not having to include any references to it in my code. From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 3/10/2008 4:24 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id yes, if all that is true. but you still do not control the jsessionid token... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, I thought that as long as you only use stateless pages and don't throw RestartResponseExceptions the http session remained temporary (as in is not assigned an id). Anyway Wicket-Security automatically binds the wicket session (assigns id to http session) after a successful login, if the session is not already bound. But there is no guarantee that the session is not bound until then. Maurice On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: session management is handled by the servlet container and is outside wicket's control. perhaps you can use a cookie in conjunction with a check in requestcycle.onbeginrequest to do something like what you want... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, Is it possible to control when Wicket issues a valid session identifier to the user? The use case I am trying to support is only assign a valid session id to the user after they successfully authenticate. This is important to prevent possible session hijacking. When dealing with HTTP sessions directly you can copy the session contents, invalidate the session, request a new session, and put the contents of the original session into the new one. I've browsed through some of Wicket's source code to see if this is easily accomplished but I haven't been able to figure it out. Does anyone have any input or suggestions? Thanks, Larry __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: styling thead in DataTable
You can change tag attributes by overriding the onComponentTag() method, at least that is what I do when modifying any class or other attribute. (you should get the attribute from the tag parameter, and then set it there as well) I'm not sure where you should add that for the thead builder, but if you find it, then you'll get it done. You may also use IBehaviours, like SimpleAttributeModifier. Or as Igor well said, use your own markup (you could see the default markup inside the jar, and simply add the attribute you want) Rgds, Christian On 3/10/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there shouldnt be anything you cannot do through css that you can do through adding things to markup that said you can always subclass datatable and provide your own markup -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, I can and this is what I actually did. I found out that I can use in style, the attribute: *text-align* that has solved me the problem. But my (more general) question is: what if there is an attribute that can't be set in style? as what I understand, it can't be set in a CSS (if I'm mistaken, please tell me how it's done). How can I add attributes to thead of a DataTable? Hope I'm clear enough. Eyal On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can you not use css? -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I am having an issue that seems to be simple, but still, no success. I have a normal DataTable. I add to it the toptoolbars manually: HeadersToolbar thead = new HeadersToolbar(entityDataTable, entitiesProvider); entityDataTable.addTopToolbar(thead); This is how it looks in the HTML: table wicket:id=entitiesList class=browserTable This is how (part of) the generated HTML looks like: table class=browserTable wicket:id=entitiesList thead tr class=headers th wicket:id=header class=wicket_orderUpwicket:border _moz-userdefined=a wicket:id=orderByLink class= href=?wicket:interface=:4:tabs:browserTabbedPanel:panel:entitiesList:topToolbars:2:toolbar:headers:1:header:orderByLink::ILinkListener::wicket:body _moz-userdefined=span wicket:id=labelPerson ID/span/wicket:body/a/wicket:border /th I want a simple thing: I want to align the header labels to the left. The problem(s): - style doesn't have an attribute of align. Only vertical-align. - I tried to add to the HeadersToolbar an AttributeModifier: thead.add(new AttributeModifier(align, true, new Model(left))); Nothing seems working. I am using Firebug and the label thead keeps with no attribute. Can anyone help? Thank a lot -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id
same us you would do with http session directly i guess... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That was my initial inclination, but I don't see an easy way to get the data out of the session, request a new session, then populate the new session with the original data. From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 3/10/2008 6:00 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id wicket's Session has invalidate() and invalidateNow() -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While it is true that the jsessionid token is not controlled by application code, you can request a new one be generated by calling invalidate on the session then request a new session by calling getSession(true) on the request as I mentioned in my original message. Essentially it creates the illusion of one contiguous session to the user when it is actually two different sessions. I suppose I could attempt to do the same thing from within my application code in Wicket and use the HTTP request to accomplish it. I was just hoping to preserve Wicket's approach of treating HTTP as an implementation detail and not having to include any references to it in my code. From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 3/10/2008 4:24 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Authentication and Assigning a Session Id yes, if all that is true. but you still do not control the jsessionid token... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, I thought that as long as you only use stateless pages and don't throw RestartResponseExceptions the http session remained temporary (as in is not assigned an id). Anyway Wicket-Security automatically binds the wicket session (assigns id to http session) after a successful login, if the session is not already bound. But there is no guarantee that the session is not bound until then. Maurice On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: session management is handled by the servlet container and is outside wicket's control. perhaps you can use a cookie in conjunction with a check in requestcycle.onbeginrequest to do something like what you want... -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, Is it possible to control when Wicket issues a valid session identifier to the user? The use case I am trying to support is only assign a valid session id to the user after they successfully authenticate. This is important to prevent possible session hijacking. When dealing with HTTP sessions directly you can copy the session contents, invalidate the session, request a new session, and put the contents of the original session into the new one. I've browsed through some of Wicket's source code to see if this is easily accomplished but I haven't been able to figure it out. Does anyone have any input or suggestions? Thanks, Larry __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed
Global Exception Handling...
If I'm developing a Hibernate-based application and I want to install some global StateObjectStateException handling code, what's the best way to do it? I could override Application.newRequestCycle() providing my own request cycle implementation which overrides the onRuntimeException() method. Is there a way to plug in logic which says if you see exception type X, use this handler? James - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Global Exception Handling...
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:39 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'm developing a Hibernate-based application and I want to install
some global StateObjectStateException handling code, what's the best
way to do it? I could override Application.newRequestCycle()
providing my own request cycle implementation which overrides the
onRuntimeException() method. Is there a way to plug in logic which
says if you see exception type X, use this handler?
notice requestcycle.onruntimeexception() has access to the exception,
and returns a page, so
myrc.onruntimexception(runtimeexception e) {
if (e.getrootcause() instanceof hibernateexception) {
return new hibernateerrorpage(e);
}
}
-igor
James
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Global Exception Handling...
On 3/10/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:39 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'm developing a Hibernate-based application and I want to install
some global StateObjectStateException handling code, what's the best
way to do it? I could override Application.newRequestCycle()
providing my own request cycle implementation which overrides the
onRuntimeException() method. Is there a way to plug in logic which
says if you see exception type X, use this handler?
notice requestcycle.onruntimeexception() has access to the exception,
and returns a page, so
myrc.onruntimexception(runtimeexception e) {
if (e.getrootcause() instanceof hibernateexception) {
return new hibernateerrorpage(e);
}
}
Okay, so this is the way to handle it, eh? I just wanted to make sure
there was nothing out there already for this. I may make up a
Spring-based solution that allows me to register an exception
handler for specific types of runtime exceptions. That way, my forms
don't need to know I'm using Hibernate. They can just deal with my
domain interface (a repository). Thanks for the tip!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone recommend any good wicket books?
Re: Can anyone recommend any good wicket books?
Yup http://www.manning.com/dashorst/ On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Gareth Segree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Scott Swank reformed mathematician - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cd app example
Yeah, it was discontinued after a bunch of discussions about choices made in the supporting libs (wicket-extensions-data etc). Eelco On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i dont think that project is updated or maintained to 1.3 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On http://www.wicket-library.com/ there is a cdapp example. I am interested in the source code for this example. I found some source in the wicket-stuff svn (1.2 branch), does anybody now if there is a 1.3 source somewhere? Maurice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Global Exception Handling...
On 3/10/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/10/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:39 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'm developing a Hibernate-based application and I want to install
some global StateObjectStateException handling code, what's the best
way to do it? I could override Application.newRequestCycle()
providing my own request cycle implementation which overrides the
onRuntimeException() method. Is there a way to plug in logic which
says if you see exception type X, use this handler?
notice requestcycle.onruntimeexception() has access to the exception,
and returns a page, so
myrc.onruntimexception(runtimeexception e) {
if (e.getrootcause() instanceof hibernateexception) {
return new hibernateerrorpage(e);
}
}
Okay, so this is the way to handle it, eh? I just wanted to make sure
there was nothing out there already for this. I may make up a
Spring-based solution that allows me to register an exception
handler for specific types of runtime exceptions. That way, my forms
don't need to know I'm using Hibernate. They can just deal with my
domain interface (a repository). Thanks for the tip!
What if we changed IRequestCycleSettings to include these methods:
public void addRuntimeExceptionHandler(Class exceptionClass,
IRuntimeExceptionHandler handler);
public IRuntimeExceptionHandler getRuntimeExceptionHandler(RuntimeException e);
Then, add the IRuntimeExceptionHandler interface:
public interface IRuntimeExceptionHandler
{
public Page onRuntimeException(Page page, RuntimeException e);
}
Then, RequestCycle's onRuntimeException() method as follows:
public void onRuntimeException(Page page, RuntimeException e)
{
IRuntimeExceptionHandler handler =
Application.get().getRequestCycleSettings().getRuntimeExceptionHandler(e);
if( handler != null )
{
return handler.onRuntimeException(page,e);
}
return null;
}
This way, folks could install their own exception handlers very
easily. The getRuntimeExceptionHandler() method would do a search up
the class hierarchy if necessary, so you could install a handler for
IOException which would cover FIleNotFoundException, for instance.
What do you think?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where and how would you internationalise the following... and integrate with wicket?
Where and how would you internationalise the following... and integrate with wicket? Exceptions thrown from a remote service where you have control over the codebase. How would you internationalise params from this? Would you manage the translations in the source of the external system, or have it expose keys and do the translations wicket side? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Where-and-how-would-you-internationalise-the-following...-and-integrate-with-wicket--tp15974621p15974621.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Default Focus Behavior?
Can we have a faq in the wiki enumerating all the possible scenarios and solutions? On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:37 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/9/08, djo.mos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This simply looks great ! I think this should make it into the core Wicket behaviors as the componenet focus is quite useful. Me too! That's why I submitted: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1404 I was pretty surprised something didn't exist for this already. I don't mean any offense by that at all. It's just that it seems like every time I think to myself there should be a way to do x with Wicket, there's already something for that! This Wicket stuff is pretty cool! i dont think something like this should go into core. it seems pretty clear from this thread that there are very many ways to do this and each project will use their own. what you have proposed seems trivial to construct, so for projects that want to use it its a nobrainer. i think things that go into core should at least satisfy the majority of common usecases or be at least of moderate complexity. if we start putting every trivial thing like this into core we will end up with a huge surface area - at which point you have to start thinking of the find/build tradeoff - is it easier to find something that does what i want in core or simply roll my own which will only take fifteen minutes... now, for example, if this behavior was meant to be attached to a form and would set focus on the first component that is not valid... -igor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where and how would you internationalise the following... and integrate with wicket?
On 3/11/08, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where and how would you internationalise the following... and integrate with wicket? Exceptions thrown from a remote service where you have control over the codebase. How would you internationalise params from this? Would you manage the translations in the source of the external system, or have it expose keys and do the translations wicket side? I would do the translations Wicket-side, personally since it's so easy to do. I've done this in the past. My application would throw BusinessLogicException derivatives which contain the message key and the parameters (easy to unit test that, too). Then, the view layer has to make sure that it has the right messages defined. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Where-and-how-would-you-internationalise-the-following...-and-integrate-with-wicket--tp15974621p15974621.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Default Focus Behavior?
On 3/10/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i dont think something like this should go into core. it seems pretty clear from this thread that there are very many ways to do this and each project will use their own. what you have proposed seems trivial to construct, so for projects that want to use it its a nobrainer. i think things that go into core should at least satisfy the majority of common usecases or be at least of moderate complexity. if we start putting every trivial thing like this into core we will end up with a huge surface area - at which point you have to start thinking of the find/build tradeoff - is it easier to find something that does what i want in core or simply roll my own which will only take fifteen minutes... Okay, suit yourself, but I was actually quite surprised that this wasn't included in the core. This seems like a common enough requirement that a certain field in a form should receive the focus when the page loads. p.s. I might change the name to FocusOnLoadBehavior, though. That seems more descriptive. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Global Exception Handling...
you might also need access to the request cycle inside the
exceptionhandler, so thats three arguments now...maybe on exception
you want to set a 503 error
also what is the search order for handler resolution? do we go root
cause-outer or outer-root cause? both can make sense in certain
situations which would make handler resolution ambiguous...
we prefer to keep wicket bare and let users come up with their own
solutions for these sorts of thing, that work exactly how they want.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:20 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/10/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/10/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:39 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'm developing a Hibernate-based application and I want to install
some global StateObjectStateException handling code, what's the best
way to do it? I could override Application.newRequestCycle()
providing my own request cycle implementation which overrides the
onRuntimeException() method. Is there a way to plug in logic which
says if you see exception type X, use this handler?
notice requestcycle.onruntimeexception() has access to the exception,
and returns a page, so
myrc.onruntimexception(runtimeexception e) {
if (e.getrootcause() instanceof hibernateexception) {
return new hibernateerrorpage(e);
}
}
Okay, so this is the way to handle it, eh? I just wanted to make sure
there was nothing out there already for this. I may make up a
Spring-based solution that allows me to register an exception
handler for specific types of runtime exceptions. That way, my forms
don't need to know I'm using Hibernate. They can just deal with my
domain interface (a repository). Thanks for the tip!
What if we changed IRequestCycleSettings to include these methods:
public void addRuntimeExceptionHandler(Class exceptionClass,
IRuntimeExceptionHandler handler);
public IRuntimeExceptionHandler getRuntimeExceptionHandler(RuntimeException
e);
Then, add the IRuntimeExceptionHandler interface:
public interface IRuntimeExceptionHandler
{
public Page onRuntimeException(Page page, RuntimeException e);
}
Then, RequestCycle's onRuntimeException() method as follows:
public void onRuntimeException(Page page, RuntimeException e)
{
IRuntimeExceptionHandler handler =
Application.get().getRequestCycleSettings().getRuntimeExceptionHandler(e);
if( handler != null )
{
return handler.onRuntimeException(page,e);
}
return null;
}
This way, folks could install their own exception handlers very
easily. The getRuntimeExceptionHandler() method would do a search up
the class hierarchy if necessary, so you could install a handler for
IOException which would cover FIleNotFoundException, for instance.
What do you think?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Global Exception Handling...
On 3/11/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you might also need access to the request cycle inside the exceptionhandler, so thats three arguments now...maybe on exception you want to set a 503 error also what is the search order for handler resolution? do we go root cause-outer or outer-root cause? both can make sense in certain situations which would make handler resolution ambiguous... we prefer to keep wicket bare and let users come up with their own solutions for these sorts of thing, that work exactly how they want. The request cycle is easy enough to access anywhere, RequestCycle.get() right? I hadn't thought of the root cause stuff, admittedly. However, just going up the main hierarchy is probably sufficient for a majority of use cases. If a user needs more advanced search capability, I guess they could do it themselves. Maybe the search algorithm could be put in the RequestCycle class' onRuntimeException() method itself. Then, all you'd have to do is override Application.newRequestCycle() and RequestCycle.onRuntimeException() to plug in your own advanced handler search capability. I think this sort of feature is a common enough need that it could be built in, but that's just my opinion. I'm somewhat new to the Wicket community, so maybe I just didn't get the Wicket philosophy. That doesn't mean that I won't offer suggestions that I find useful anymore. :) Keeping the core framework bare is a good approach. Another thought I had is that inside the new methods on Application, maybe it could call a factory instead of doing the logic itself. Then, the factory could be configured by subclasses to override the default behavior rather than having to implement the method themselves. For instance, you could come up with a IRequestCycleFactory interface. So, if I were to write a little project that does what I want w.r.t. this exception handler stuff, all someone would have to do in their application is plug in my IRequestCycleFactory implementation to get that functionality. They wouldn't have to extend my Application superclass (what if they wanted to use another library which requires the extension of an Application superclass also?). The same sort of stuff could be done for Sessions, etc. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: styling thead in DataTable
Does this also mean that one must add a wicket:id into the thead? ** Martin 2008/3/11, Christian Alejandro Marquez Grabia [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You can change tag attributes by overriding the onComponentTag() method, at least that is what I do when modifying any class or other attribute. (you should get the attribute from the tag parameter, and then set it there as well) I'm not sure where you should add that for the thead builder, but if you find it, then you'll get it done. You may also use IBehaviours, like SimpleAttributeModifier. Or as Igor well said, use your own markup (you could see the default markup inside the jar, and simply add the attribute you want) Rgds, Christian On 3/10/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there shouldnt be anything you cannot do through css that you can do through adding things to markup that said you can always subclass datatable and provide your own markup -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, I can and this is what I actually did. I found out that I can use in style, the attribute: *text-align* that has solved me the problem. But my (more general) question is: what if there is an attribute that can't be set in style? as what I understand, it can't be set in a CSS (if I'm mistaken, please tell me how it's done). How can I add attributes to thead of a DataTable? Hope I'm clear enough. Eyal On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can you not use css? -igor On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I am having an issue that seems to be simple, but still, no success. I have a normal DataTable. I add to it the toptoolbars manually: HeadersToolbar thead = new HeadersToolbar(entityDataTable, entitiesProvider); entityDataTable.addTopToolbar(thead); This is how it looks in the HTML: table wicket:id=entitiesList class=browserTable This is how (part of) the generated HTML looks like: table class=browserTable wicket:id=entitiesList thead tr class=headers th wicket:id=header class=wicket_orderUpwicket:border _moz-userdefined=a wicket:id=orderByLink class= href=?wicket:interface=:4:tabs:browserTabbedPanel:panel:entitiesList:topToolbars:2:toolbar:headers:1:header:orderByLink::ILinkListener::wicket:body _moz-userdefined=span wicket:id=labelPerson ID/span/wicket:body/a/wicket:border /th I want a simple thing: I want to align the header labels to the left. The problem(s): - style doesn't have an attribute of align. Only vertical-align. - I tried to add to the HeadersToolbar an AttributeModifier: thead.add(new AttributeModifier(align, true, new Model(left))); Nothing seems working. I am using Firebug and the label thead keeps with no attribute. Can anyone help? Thank a lot -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
