Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:message
* Igor Vaynberg: personally input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ looks better to me Do you really mean to embed a namespace prefix inside the attribute value? AFAIK there's no XML parser that can parse such constructs without checking every attribute value manually. Do you already have such constructs allowed in Wicket? -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:message
well..this is what it would be...checking every attribute of every tag. this will be done only once when the markup is loaded into the cache so there wont be a performance hit.-Igor On 8/3/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Igor Vaynberg: personally input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ looks better to meDo you really mean to embed a namespace prefix inside the attribute value?AFAIK there's no XML parser that can parse suchconstructs without checking every attribute value manually.Do you already have such constructs allowed in Wicket?-- Jean-Baptiste Quenot akaJohn Banana Qwertyhttp://caraldi.com/jbq/-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:message
that is correct. Which has the side effect that if the property files (or db entry or whatever) changes, it will not be reflected in the output generated. However this downside is a) only relevant for development b) if the markup cache is cleared, than the markup will be reloaded incl the new properties. Hence, even in prod there is no need to restart the apps. But it is a manual process (until now. May be worth an RFE?). Juergen On 8/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well..this is what it would be...checking every attribute of every tag. this will be done only once when the markup is loaded into the cache so there wont be a performance hit. -Igor On 8/3/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Igor Vaynberg: personally input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ looks better to me Do you really mean to embed a namespace prefix inside the attribute value? AFAIK there's no XML parser that can parse such constructs without checking every attribute value manually. Do you already have such constructs allowed in Wicket? -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] SSL Handoff in Wicket - Solved
Hi Igor,
Many thanks Igor, that solves our
issue.
Regards
Dipu
- Original Message -
From:
Igor
Vaynberg
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 5:17
PM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] SSL Handoff in
Wicket
you can write your own request coding strategy that looks
something like thismystrategy.encode(requestcycle, target)
{private boolean gotossl=false;if (target instanceof
ListerInterfaceRequestTarget) {
listenertarget=(ListerInterfaceRqeuestTarget)target;
if (listenertarget.getpage() has @SSL
annotationnot in ssl mode)
{
gotossl=true; } }CharSequence
orig= super.encode(requestcycle, target);
return
(gotossl)?orig+"gotossl=true":orig;}hope this gets you
started-IgorOn 8/2/06, Dipu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
Eelco,Thanks for your response, but if you read the rest of the
email you will seethat the solutions proposed on themailing list and
on the wiki are not appropriate.We are just about to go live and
this is the last issue so we would appreciate some
help.RegardsDipu- Original Message
-From: "Eelco Hillenius" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.netSent: Wednesday, August 02,
2006 4:36 PMSubject: Re: [Wicket-user] SSL Handoff in
WicketI haven't read you whole message, but did you search
through the mailing lists as well? I think there was a thread on
this just last week. http://woogle.billen.dk/search/q/SSL
Eelco On 8/2/06, Dipu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Hi
All, We are trying setup a suitable
switch to SSL method for our Wicket application. I have read
the wiki page regarding SSL switching: http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Switch_to_SSL_mode
but this does not solve our problem. We have
apache and mod_proxy in front of Tomcat. Our wicket application
will be used on multiple domains, so we can't hard code the
hostname into our application for SSL switching
because that will depend on which domain name was used for the
request. Getting our application to sense the calling hostname
is also not appropriate because some users (a from a third party
network) will be accessing the application by IP via a NAT'ed
connection, so the hostname sensed by the Servlet would be
incorrect. Also, we want the application to work
from our internal network on the default Tomcat port of
8080. In short, we want Apache to handle SSL
switching by redirecting (using mod_rewrite) to the SSL URL.
Apache already knows the hostname(s) it is controlling, so no
hard coding of hostnames in the application would required - far
more versatile in our opinion. To get this to work
properly however, an HTTP GET is required. Using the
REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER RenderStrategy causes HTTP 302 redirects to a
new friendly URL (via HTTP GET). This is perfect, except that
apache can't tell the difference between pages that we wish to
be secured, and those that we do not. So here's the
question: Is it possible for us to modify the URL
(perhaps by adding a GET parameter) generated for the HTTP 302
as generated by using the REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER
RenderStrategy? I hope this makes sense!
:) Kind regards,
Dipu.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your opinions on IT business topics
through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___ Wicket-user
mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join
SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys --
and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user-Take
Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net 's
Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT
business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cashhttp://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user
mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
[Wicket-user] jsessionid appear three times
Hi all. I use wicket-1.2.1 and WebSphere V5.1. I have a problem similar PageLink called request two times that I posted once. When I access my wicket application, the url is like this. http://localhost:9080/test;jsessionid=jp89QLSYv3dWVfmSLWcZO-m:-1;jsessionid=jp89QLSYv3dWVfmSLWcZO-m:-1;jsessionid=jp89QLSYv3dWVfmSLWcZO-m:-1?wicket:interface=:1:: jsessionid= appear three times. Regards, R.A -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jsessionid-appear-three-times-tf2044481.html#a5629101 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:message
see wicket:message. It exists a tag like wicket:message .. and as attribute wicket:message. It is a first draft, not added by default (I think), not needs some improvements to accomondate packaged refs etc. as well. That is easily doable. Juergen On 8/3/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Igor Vaynberg: well..this is what it would be...checking every attribute of every tag. this will be done only once when the markup is loaded into the cache so there wont be a performance hit. Attribute values are arbitrary strings. I wouldn't parse that. What if I put wicket:something on purpose? I don't expect a weird exception to be throwed. Attribute names on the contrary are normalized and you can safely add new constructs, as allowed by XML namespaces. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] jsessionid appear three times
No specific reason, but what's your application context (looks like either test or ROOT?) and what's your servlet-mapping (in web.xml - is it / - should be /*, although /app/* is recommended). /Gwyn On 03/08/06, R.A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. I use wicket-1.2.1 and WebSphere V5.1. I have a problem similar PageLink called request two times that I posted once. When I access my wicket application, the url is like this. http://localhost:9080/test;jsessionid=jp89QLSYv3dWVfmSLWcZO-m:-1;jsessionid=jp89QLSYv3dWVfmSLWcZO-m:-1;jsessionid=jp89QLSYv3dWVfmSLWcZO-m:-1?wicket:interface=:1:: jsessionid= appear three times. Regards, R.A -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jsessionid-appear-three-times-tf2044481.html#a5629101 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] jsessionid appear three times
that really looks like a bug of websphere 5.1johanOn 8/3/06, R.A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi all.I use wicket-1.2.1 and WebSphere V5.1.I have a problem similar PageLink called request two times that I posted once.When I access my wicket application, the url is like this. http://localhost:9080/test;jsessionid=jp89QLSYv3dWVfmSLWcZO-m:-1;jsessionid=jp89QLSYv3dWVfmSLWcZO-m:-1;jsessionid=jp89QLSYv3dWVfmSLWcZO-m:-1?wicket:interface=:1::jsessionid= appear three times. Regards,R.A--View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jsessionid-appear-three-times-tf2044481.html#a5629101 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] jsessionid appear three times
Hi Johan. But when I use wicket-1.2, this problem is not occured. Regards, R.A -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jsessionid-appear-three-times-tf2044481.html#a5629503 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] jsessionid appear three times
Hi Gwyn. test is context root. When I access http://localhost:9080/test/top;, this problem is occured, too. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jsessionid-appear-three-times-tf2044481.html#a5629541 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] jsessionid appear three times
Hmm, doesn't really help, but doesn't happen with my 1.2.1 app when I switch off cookies to enforce jsessionid use - that's with Jetty, though... Maybe try something like the wicket-quickstart or the wicket-template apps in the same environment to see if they behave the same? On 03/08/06, R.A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Johan. But when I use wicket-1.2, this problem is not occured. Regards, R.A -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jsessionid-appear-three-times-tf2044481.html#a5629503 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Basic Skeleton, Beginner Questions
Hi, i stumbled over Wicket some time ago and now have time to have a more close look on it. Therefore i have some questions. 1. I wantet to get a "Hello World app" working, however, i failed in finding out what is "really" necessary, to do it. I tried the Quickstart (Eclipse) example, but there seems many unneeded things in it, too (jetty, many docs etc), so i wondered if there is a , well basic, empty skelleton-appwith just 1 page and no gimmicks around. 2. On the wicket page i read: "an appserver is needed", however, i saw that the Quickstart itself only has jetty included and wondered why wicket needs an appserver and not only a caontainer like tomcat will do it. 3. is the Wicket Doc available as a pdf anywhere ? Reagrds and Thanks for answers, Korbinian - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] RadioGroup getModelObject() null ?
Hi everybody,Great job with wicket!i have a small problem with a radio group.i need to get the model value when the page is rendered (in my panel's Constructor),but myRadioGroup.getModelObject() is always null. The corresponding radio option is checked,on form submit,the pojo is updated,but if i return to this panel the radio gruop model object is still null.any sugestions?Thanks,Alex - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] apache wicket?
cowwoc wrote: I have similar questions. I generally perceive Apache as the place open-source projects go to die :) Let's just say I've never really been awe inspired by any of their stuff. As such is this a step forward or backward? SVN, Jira, Confluence sure are nice but keep in mind there are more than one way to gain access to them. In fact, as an open-source project Wicket is automatically entitled to free licenses, you don't need Apache for that. Apache might be the right way to go, but I'd definitely like to hear more about the impacts it'll have on the future of the project. What new rules and regulations will Apache enforce on the Wicket release schedule, license, etc? During incubation there are rules and regulations about releases (particularly to do with marking them with the label 'incubating', but also requiring a vote from the Incubator PMC). After incubation is complete, the current wicket folks will create a PMC (project management committee) and will be responsible themselves for deciding their release schedule and voting upon it. License restrictions: all code must be Apache License compatible. This is for the benefit of end users, as that gives them maximum flexibility. Otherwise, you can use stuff from wicket-stuff which will stay at SourceForge and is a place where non ASL code can exist. So, as I say, during incubation we can expect some pain and restriction. Once graduated, the current Wicket devs will pretty much be in charge of their destiny. Does that answer your questions sufficiently? Regards, Upayavira - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class java.lang.Integer expression: id
Hello, Wicket's error message are generally full of useful details, but this one is a bit more tricky : WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class java.lang.Integer expression: id It does not say anything about where the problem happens. As I had several classes that had ids of type int, I changed all of them to Integer, but it does not solve the problem. Can someone give some hints about what/where to look for ? Thanks Pierre-Yves - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class java.lang.Integer expression: id
It's due to invalid use of *PropertyModel. The POJO you use doesn't have a get method for the property defined.FrankOn 8/3/06, Pierre-Yves Saumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello,Wicket's error message are generally full of useful details, but this one is a bit more tricky :WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class java.lang.Integer_expression_: idIt does not say anything about where the problem happens. As I hadseveral classes that had ids of type int, I changed all of them to Integer, but it does not solve the problem.Can someone give some hints about what/where to look for ?ThanksPierre-Yves- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] setEnable on filter component of FilteredPropertyColumn
Yes, got it.
@Override
public Component
getFilter(String componentId, FilterForm form) {
ChoiceFilter comp =
(ChoiceFilter)super.getFilter(componentId, form);
comp.getChoice().setEnabled( false );
return comp;
}
on the FilteredPropertyColumn. I had been disablling the ChoiceFilter
instead of its choice.
This is really fun when you get the hang of it.
Wilko
Wilko Hische wrote:
Hi,
I am using the ChoiceFilteredPropertyColumn from the wicket-extensions
package and I would like to be able to freeze the selection for certain
users.
Would it be possible to setEnable( false ) for the filter component? I
fiddled with overriding the getFilter method but without succes so far.
Best regards,
Wilko Hische
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/setEnable-on-filter-component-of-FilteredPropertyColumn-tf2041478.html#a5630121
Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class java.lang.Integer expression: id
or your propertyOGNL is wrong. You are welcome to share some code with the problem.FrankOn 8/3/06, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:It's due to invalid use of *PropertyModel. The POJO you use doesn't have a get method for the property defined. FrankOn 8/3/06, Pierre-Yves Saumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,Wicket's error message are generally full of useful details, but this one is a bit more tricky :WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class java.lang.Integer_expression_: idIt does not say anything about where the problem happens. As I hadseveral classes that had ids of type int, I changed all of them to Integer, but it does not solve the problem.Can someone give some hints about what/where to look for ?ThanksPierre-Yves- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class java.lang.Integer expression: id
I followed your first advice and finally figure what it was (I was using autoboxing, which it seems Wicket is not aware of). The problem was difficult to find because it interfered with another problem (added a DO and forgot to implement Serializable). One should never make several changes without testing between each of them! Thanks a lot! Frank Bille a écrit : or your propertyOGNL is wrong. You are welcome to share some code with the problem. Frank On 8/3/06, *Frank Bille* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's due to invalid use of *PropertyModel. The POJO you use doesn't have a get method for the property defined. Frank On 8/3/06, *Pierre-Yves Saumont * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Wicket's error message are generally full of useful details, but this one is a bit more tricky : WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class java.lang.Integer expression: id It does not say anything about where the problem happens. As I had several classes that had ids of type int, I changed all of them to Integer, but it does not solve the problem. Can someone give some hints about what/where to look for ? Thanks Pierre-Yves - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Basic Skeleton, Beginner Questions
Korbinian, So we deliver a package that contains everything you need, including documentation, and then you complain that it is not minimal? :-) A servlet container suffices, so you can do in the quickstart project: mvn package or ant war and the resulting war file (found in the target directory) can be put into your tomcat or jetty server. Quickstart contains everything you need to get started. If you'd rather start without all that help, then remove everything you don't need. Or start with qwicket (http://qwicket.sf.net). The docs are not available as a pdf. Martijn On 8/3/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i stumbled over Wicket some time ago and now have time to have a more close look on it. Therefore i have some questions. 1. I wantet to get a Hello World app working, however, i failed in finding out what is really necessary, to do it. I tried the Quickstart (Eclipse) example, but there seems many unneeded things in it, too (jetty, many docs etc), so i wondered if there is a , well basic, empty skelleton-app with just 1 page and no gimmicks around. 2. On the wicket page i read: an appserver is needed, however, i saw that the Quickstart itself only has jetty included and wondered why wicket needs an appserver and not only a caontainer like tomcat will do it. 3. is the Wicket Doc available as a pdf anywhere ? Reagrds and Thanks for answers, Korbinian - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! Embed Wicket components in your portals! -- http://wicketframework.org - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class java.lang.Integer expression: id
On 03/08/06, Pierre-Yves Saumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (I was using autoboxing, which it seems Wicket is not aware of). Wicket 1.* deliberately doesn't make use of any JDK 1.5 features, in order to support JDK 1.4, so while you can use JDK 1.5 features, you need to be aware of this sort of potential issue, I'm afraid. Wicket 2.0 (which is currently under-development in SVN) will be 1.5 minimum take much more advantage of Generics, etc, so should help, but it's still very early days being actively developed. /Gwyn - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Basic Skeleton, Beginner Questions
Hi Gwyn, thank you for your reply, Just down to the defintion of appserver - all that's needed is servlet container functionality - We tend to use Jetty as it's easy to embed in IDEs run standalone, but there's no requirement for it over any other servlet engine. ok, then it seems as the wicket-homepage is bit away of the official specification what an appserver is (these are only the big-thing with whole EE stack with them) 3. is the Wicket Doc available as a pdf anywhere ? No, while there are books on the way, the info's mainly in the 1 - Javadocs (http://wicket.sourceforge.net/apidocs/wicket/package-summary. html#package_description) 2 - Quick Tour Examples (http://wicket.sourceforge.net/Examples.html http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/) and 3 - Wiki (http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wiki) thank you for that, Regards - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Question about ChoiceRenderer
In the Javadoc, it is written that only with this syntax : new DropDownChoice(users, new Model(selectedUser), listOfUsers) will toString() be used for display value. However, what happens with a syntax like : DropDownChoice laboratoireDropDown = new DropDownChoice( users, new PropertyModel(companyModel, user), listOfUsers, new ChoiceRenderer(name, id)); if the object returned by propery user of companyModel has no property name ? I thought it would throw an exception, but it seems it is silently using toString()??? Pierre-Yves - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Question about ChoiceRenderer
Sorry, I made a mistake. The object do have a user property, but Wicket is still using toString(). Is it normal ? Pierre-Yves Pierre-Yves Saumont a écrit : In the Javadoc, it is written that only with this syntax : new DropDownChoice(users, new Model(selectedUser), listOfUsers) will toString() be used for display value. However, what happens with a syntax like : DropDownChoice laboratoireDropDown = new DropDownChoice( users, new PropertyModel(companyModel, user), listOfUsers, new ChoiceRenderer(name, id)); if the object returned by propery user of companyModel has no property name ? I thought it would throw an exception, but it seems it is silently using toString()??? Pierre-Yves - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Basic Skeleton, Beginner Questions
well, i follow the definition by sun - not marketing buzz :P Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von James CookGesendet: Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 15:07An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.netBetreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Basic Skeleton, Beginner Questions On 8/3/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, then it seems as the wicket-homepage is bit away of the officialspecification what anappserver is (these are only the big-thing with whole EE stack with them) Not to pick nits, but I think maybe your understanding of 'appserver' is a bit dated. In today's day and age, Spring, Hibernate, JOTM, clustering technologies, etc. have improved the status of Tomcat, Jetty, and Resin from lowly webservers to deserve the appserver title. FWIW, most Gartner surveys include Jakarta Tomcat in the category of appserver. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Question about ChoiceRenderer
What's the signature of companyModel's getUser method? I'd expect that Wicket would be looking for a String getUser() method to call... /Gwyn On 03/08/06, Pierre-Yves Saumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I made a mistake. The object do have a user property, but Wicket is still using toString(). Is it normal ? Pierre-Yves Pierre-Yves Saumont a écrit : In the Javadoc, it is written that only with this syntax : new DropDownChoice(users, new Model(selectedUser), listOfUsers) will toString() be used for display value. However, what happens with a syntax like : DropDownChoice laboratoireDropDown = new DropDownChoice( users, new PropertyModel(companyModel, user), listOfUsers, new ChoiceRenderer(name, id)); if the object returned by propery user of companyModel has no property name ? I thought it would throw an exception, but it seems it is silently using toString()??? Pierre-Yves /Gwyn -- Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! - http://wicketframework.org Wiki: http://wicketframework.org/wiki Examples: http://wicketframework.org/Examples.html - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Basic Skeleton, Beginner Questions
Hi Martijn, So we deliver a package that contains everything you need, including documentation, and then you complain that it is not minimal? :-) well, these additional things were the problem for me ;) - no, seriously, because of the included jetty, docs and other jars i was a bit curious at first (only treid quickstart at first...), but now i found out what really is needed... sometimes less is better (especially for understanding sth now) A servlet container suffices, so you can do in the quickstart project: mvn package or ant war and the resulting war file (found in the target directory) can be put into your tomcat or jetty server. ok, understand that, it seems as the wiki and doc-writers prefer the word appserver over servlet-container... The docs are not available as a pdf. any plans for future ? (i prefer printable formats, as i print out and read it then :O ) Regards, Korbinian - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Basic Skeleton, Beginner Questions
On 8/3/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, then it seems as the wicket-homepage is bit away of the officialspecification what anappserver is (these are only the big-thing with whole EE stack with them)Not to pick nits, but I think maybe your understanding of 'appserver' is a bit dated. In today's day and age, Spring, Hibernate, JOTM, clustering technologies, etc. have improved the status of Tomcat, Jetty, and Resin from lowly webservers to deserve the appserver title. FWIW, most Gartner surveys include Jakarta Tomcat in the category of appserver. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] bokkmarkable pages
Hello all. I create application, setup homepage. But bokkmarkable pages don't work - application alwas start with homepage.. How to change this behaviour? Dmitry. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] bokkmarkable pages
This is connected with my frames - When I create link to rigtht frame (in left frame) and klick - in right frame open HomePage (homepage with frames, link point to another page). Dmitry. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:message
my primary concern is making it easy for our users.we are not talking about just wicket: we are talking about wicket:i18n: and wicket:packaged: prefixes - what do you really think the odds are with a user collission? i agree that it is not as clean/safe as a separate attribute, but it is quicker/easier to read.but i think we will walk in circles on this one so lets agree to disagree.the nice thing about wicket is that markup loading is pluggable, so i can write a filter that uses my scheme, and you can write a filter that uses yours. we make both of them available, and the users can choose which one they want to add :) -IgorOn 8/3/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Igor Vaynberg: well..thisis whatit wouldbe...checking everyattribute of every tag. this will be done only once when the markup is loaded into the cache so there wont be a performance hit. Attribute valuesare arbitrarystrings.I wouldn'tparse that.What if I put wicket:something on purpose?I don't expect a weirdexception to be throwed.Attribute names on the contraryare normalized and you can safely add new constructs, as allowed by XML namespaces.-- Jean-Baptiste QuenotakaJohn Banana Qwertyhttp://caraldi.com/jbq/- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] RadioGroup getModelObject() null ?
how about a quickstart that reproduces this. ive been working with the radiogroup/radio for a while and have yet to hit this issue. are your radio components in a listview? did you call listview.reuseitems(true) ? -IgorOn 8/3/06, Alex Parvulescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody,Great job with wicket!i have a small problem with a radio group.i need to get the model value when the page is rendered (in my panel's Constructor),but myRadioGroup.getModelObject() is always null. The corresponding radio option is checked,on form submit,the pojo is updated,but if i return to this panel the radio gruop model object is still null.any sugestions?Thanks, Alex -Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:message
Time for a vote then? Does anyone see any potential problems with the whole issue? Eelco On 8/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my primary concern is making it easy for our users. we are not talking about just wicket: we are talking about wicket:i18n: and wicket:packaged: prefixes - what do you really think the odds are with a user collission? i agree that it is not as clean/safe as a separate attribute, but it is quicker/easier to read. but i think we will walk in circles on this one so lets agree to disagree. the nice thing about wicket is that markup loading is pluggable, so i can write a filter that uses my scheme, and you can write a filter that uses yours. we make both of them available, and the users can choose which one they want to add :) -Igor On 8/3/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Igor Vaynberg: well..this is what it would be...checking every attribute of every tag. this will be done only once when the markup is loaded into the cache so there wont be a performance hit. Attribute values are arbitrary strings. I wouldn't parse that. What if I put wicket:something on purpose? I don't expect a weird exception to be throwed. Attribute names on the contrary are normalized and you can safely add new constructs, as allowed by XML namespaces. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class java.lang.Integer expression: id
yes, the messages are a bit cryptic for sureWicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class java.lang.Integer_expression_: idwhat it says is that it is looking to evaluate _expression_ id on the Integer class. so your property model is pointing to the wrong object. -IgorOn 8/3/06, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 03/08/06, Pierre-Yves Saumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (I was using autoboxing, which it seems Wicket is not aware of).Wicket 1.* deliberately doesn't make use of any JDK 1.5 features, inorder to support JDK 1.4, so while you can use JDK 1.5 features, youneed to be aware of this sort of potential issue, I'm afraid.Wicket 2.0 (which is currently under-development in SVN) will be 1.5minimum take much more advantage of Generics, etc, so should help,but it's still very early days being actively developed./Gwyn- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] problems migrating the application to the latest wicket
Hi, I can't find anything wrong with your code by looking at it. Maybe you could submit a complete example (include the base classes and markup files) in e.g. a quickstart project so that we can take a look at it? QWicket is a great way to get a project in a few clicks: http://www.antwerkz.com/qwicket/app/project Eelco On 8/2/06, Dipu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I am trying to migrate my application to the latest version of wicket and i am having troubles. The first thing that i identified is that the buttons on submit is not getting called. The findSubmittingButton() method in the Form object is returning null. I am attaching sample files on how i am doing it. I don't know what am i doing wrong here. Any help is greatly appreciated. thanks dipu - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Basic Skeleton, Beginner Questions
the reason why jetty is included is that there is a little file called Start.java. setup the project in the ide, right click Start to debug as a java application and bam you get a working servlet container setup with your app in exploded form. no need to package/deploy/blah blah -IgorOn 8/3/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i stumbled over Wicket some time ago and now have time to have a more close look on it. Therefore i have some questions. 1. I wantet to get a Hello World app working, however, i failed in finding out what is really necessary, to do it. I tried the Quickstart (Eclipse) example, but there seems many unneeded things in it, too (jetty, many docs etc), so i wondered if there is a , well basic, empty skelleton-appwith just 1 page and no gimmicks around. 2. On the wicket page i read: an appserver is needed, however, i saw that the Quickstart itself only has jetty included and wondered why wicket needs an appserver and not only a caontainer like tomcat will do it. 3. is the Wicket Doc available as a pdf anywhere ? Reagrds and Thanks for answers, Korbinian -Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] url mounting and weird url:s
No idea. And when you don't use that request cycle, the url stays like
it should be? It looks like Wicket thinks it has to auto-create and
use another (other than the default one your start in) page map. This
happens when you open up a new browser window/ tab for the same
session. The mechanism for that was recently improved. Could you use
wicket 1.2.1 or from svn to see whether that gets rid of your problem?
Eelco
On 8/2/06, Mats Norén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed something weird that I can't explain. I've created my own
RequestCycle by extending WebRequestCycle:
public class DIFRequestCycle extends WebRequestCycle {
transient Person user;
public DIFRequestCycle(WebSession webSession, WebRequest
webRequest, WebResponse response) {
super(webSession, webRequest, response);
}
public Person getUser() {
if (user == null) {
DIFSession mySession = (DIFSession) session.get();
UserService service = (UserService)
mySession.getDIFApplication().createSpringBeanProxy(UserService.class,
userService);
if (mySession.getUserId() != 0) {
user = service.getUser(mySession.getUserId());
}
}
return user;
}
public void onEndRequest() {
user = null;
}
}
When I started using this, suddenly my urls changed from:
http://localhost:8080/hemsida/test/trupp/id/210
to
http://localhost:8080/hemsida/test/trupp/wicket:pageMapName/wicket-0/id/210
for all my pages.
I mount the pages in the application like this:
mountBookmarkablePage(/trupp, TeamPage.class);
I haven't done any other change to my application.
Any ideas what causes my nice urls to turn bad like this? :)
/Mats
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Question about ChoiceRenderer
new ChoiceRenderer(name, id) will effect in calls to getName and getId on the user object. If it can't find that property, it will throw an exception (PropertyResolver.getValue is used to get the property value). If that doesn't happen, something else is wrong/ overlooked. Eelco On 8/3/06, Pierre-Yves Saumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I made a mistake. The object do have a user property, but Wicket is still using toString(). Is it normal ? Pierre-Yves Pierre-Yves Saumont a écrit : In the Javadoc, it is written that only with this syntax : new DropDownChoice(users, new Model(selectedUser), listOfUsers) will toString() be used for display value. However, what happens with a syntax like : DropDownChoice laboratoireDropDown = new DropDownChoice( users, new PropertyModel(companyModel, user), listOfUsers, new ChoiceRenderer(name, id)); if the object returned by propery user of companyModel has no property name ? I thought it would throw an exception, but it seems it is silently using toString()??? Pierre-Yves - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] bokkmarkable pages
If I understand you problem correctly, you need to create different framesets for the combinations you want to have bookmarkable, or do some javascript magic to set the proper ones. Working with frames can be a major hassle regardless of the framework you are using. If you have the choice, try to loose them. Eelco On 8/3/06, Арву Оетук [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is connected with my frames - When I create link to rigtht frame (in left frame) and klick - in right frame open HomePage (homepage with frames, link point to another page). Dmitry. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:message
time for a vote? Which kind do we want now?i like the simple parsing one:input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/or if we want default values: input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/both are fine by me and we could support both versions just fine. johanOn 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Time for a vote then? Does anyone see any potential problems with thewhole issue?EelcoOn 8/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my primary concern is making it easy for our users. we are not talking about just wicket: we are talking about wicket:i18n: and wicket:packaged: prefixes - what do you really think the odds are with a user collission? i agree that it is not as clean/safe as a separate attribute, but it is quicker/easier to read. but i think we will walk in circles on this one so lets agree to disagree. the nice thing about wicket is that markup loading is pluggable, so i can write a filter that uses my scheme, and you can write a filter that uses yours. we make both of them available, and the users can choose which one they want to add :) -Igor On 8/3/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Igor Vaynberg: well..thisis whatit wouldbe...checking everyattribute of every tag. this will be done only once when the markup is loaded into the cache so there wont be a performance hit. Attribute valuesare arbitrarystrings.I wouldn'tparse that. What if I put wicket:something on purpose?I don't expect a weird exception to be throwed. Attribute names on the contraryare normalized and you can safely add new constructs, as allowed by XML namespaces. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot akaJohn Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cashhttp://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:message
I'll start another thead for voting. Eelco On 8/3/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: time for a vote? Which kind do we want now? i like the simple parsing one: input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ or if we want default values: input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ both are fine by me and we could support both versions just fine. johan On 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Time for a vote then? Does anyone see any potential problems with the whole issue? Eelco On 8/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my primary concern is making it easy for our users. we are not talking about just wicket: we are talking about wicket:i18n: and wicket:packaged: prefixes - what do you really think the odds are with a user collission? i agree that it is not as clean/safe as a separate attribute, but it is quicker/easier to read. but i think we will walk in circles on this one so lets agree to disagree. the nice thing about wicket is that markup loading is pluggable, so i can write a filter that uses my scheme, and you can write a filter that uses yours. we make both of them available, and the users can choose which one they want to add :) -Igor On 8/3/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Igor Vaynberg: well..this is what it would be...checking every attribute of every tag. this will be done only once when the markup is loaded into the cache so there wont be a performance hit. Attribute values are arbitrary strings. I wouldn't parse that. What if I put wicket:something on purpose? I don't expect a weird exception to be throwed. Attribute names on the contrary are normalized and you can safely add new constructs, as allowed by XML namespaces. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either look like: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ which is compact, or 2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able. What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)? 1 [ ] 2 [ ] Eelco (I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] HTML tools
NVU (http://www.nvu.com/index.php) for complex stuff, simple stuff by hand. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/HTML-tools-tf2036067.html#a5637792 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 previewability is one of wicket's strong features Joni On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:10 -0700, Eelco Hillenius wrote: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either look like: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ which is compact, or 2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able. What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)? 1 [ ] 2 [ ] Eelco (I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] wicket -- JSR 168 Portlet -- WSRP ?
Sorry if this question is off topic, but has anyone made a Wicket app, exposed via WSRP (via JSR 168 I assume)? ,chris - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 [x] Eelco Hillenius a écrit : For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either look like: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ which is compact, or 2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able. What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)? 1 [ ] 2 [ ] Eelco (I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
1 [x]-IgorOn 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attributemodifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have twoalternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either looklike: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/which is compact, or2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able.What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)?1 []2 []Eelco(I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability)-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net 's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
if we have to choose for one then 2but i think we can support both, i think it can just be a markupfilter/parser implementation per option.johanOn 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attributemodifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have twoalternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either looklike: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/which is compact, or2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able.What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)?1 []2 []Eelco(I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability)-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net 's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
Yeah, but we have to choose a default here. Unless you want to support those two options at the same time. Eelco On 8/3/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if we have to choose for one then 2 but i think we can support both, i think it can just be a markupfilter/parser implementation per option. johan On 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either look like: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ which is compact, or 2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able. What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)? 1 [ ] 2 [ ] Eelco (I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net 's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
If you want the opinion of non-committers, here's a strong preference for 2 [X] The thought of seeing the wicket... text in preview mode really goes against the grain to me. -- Scott Eelco Hillenius wrote: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either look like: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ which is compact, or 2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able. What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)? 1 [ ] 2 [ ] Eelco (I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
All votes count for this thread as far as I am concerned. Eelco On 8/3/06, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want the opinion of non-committers, here's a strong preference for 2 [X] The thought of seeing the wicket... text in preview mode really goes against the grain to me. -- Scott Eelco Hillenius wrote: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either look like: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ which is compact, or 2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able. What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)? 1 [ ] 2 [ ] Eelco (I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 [x] Wilko -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/VOTE%3A-how-should-localized-attributes-work--tf2047179.html#a5639800 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] generating e-mail reports with wicket
Hello,I would like to reuse some of the components I have to generate e-mail reports. Is it possible? Thank you,Alex - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] generating e-mail reports with wicket
yes, you can use wickettester and stringresponse to render a page into a string.-IgorOn 8/3/06, Alexei Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello,I would like to reuse some of the components I have to generate e-mail reports. Is it possible? Thank you,Alex -Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] generating e-mail reports with wicket
It is possible, and you should look at our junit test cases to get some inspiration. Whether it is recommended... I don't know. I'd go for something simple like a Velocity template. Wicket components are meant for interaction, something you don't need when creating email messages. Eelco On 8/3/06, Alexei Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I would like to reuse some of the components I have to generate e-mail reports. Is it possible? Thank you, Alex - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 [ X ] - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] generating e-mail reports with wicket
i disagree, i think wicket is in itself a great templating enginein 3.0 i would like to separate the layers more so you can easily build up components and render them to anywhere - gets you a component-oriented templating engine :) -IgorOn 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is possible, and you should look at our junit test cases to getsome inspiration. Whether it is recommended... I don't know. I'd gofor something simple like a Velocity template. Wicket components aremeant for interaction, something you don't need when creating email messages.EelcoOn 8/3/06, Alexei Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I would like to reuse some of the components I have to generate e-mail reports. Is it possible? Thank you, Alex - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] generating e-mail reports with wicket
Fair enough. I wouldn't say I'm against it per se. But for many cases imo it is overkill. Eelco On 8/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i disagree, i think wicket is in itself a great templating engine in 3.0 i would like to separate the layers more so you can easily build up components and render them to anywhere - gets you a component-oriented templating engine :) -Igor On 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is possible, and you should look at our junit test cases to get some inspiration. Whether it is recommended... I don't know. I'd go for something simple like a Velocity template. Wicket components are meant for interaction, something you don't need when creating email messages. Eelco On 8/3/06, Alexei Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I would like to reuse some of the components I have to generate e-mail reports. Is it possible? Thank you, Alex - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] generating e-mail reports with wicket
well...if you are generating html emails and you have common display panels already in place for pojos, why not reuse those? you get to reuse the layout, css, etc with almost no effort.-Igor On 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fair enough. I wouldn't say I'm against it per se. But for many casesimo it is overkill.EelcoOn 8/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i disagree, i think wicket is in itself a great templating engine in 3.0 i would like to separate the layers more so you can easily build up components and render them to anywhere - gets you a component-oriented templating engine :) -Igor On 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is possible, and you should look at our junit test cases to get some inspiration. Whether it is recommended... I don't know. I'd go for something simple like a Velocity template. Wicket components are meant for interaction, something you don't need when creating email messages. Eelco On 8/3/06, Alexei Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I would like to reuse some of the components I have to generate e-mail reports. Is it possible? Thank you, Alex - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] generating e-mail reports with wicket
I had this need too, so I wrote a custom class to mail both HTML and TEXT versions of an email using WicketTester. It uses a custom resource finder to load ***.txt and ***.html files to send. The .html files are full wicket pages and they get rendered as-is, the .txt files contain only wicket: tags, span wicket:id=foo/span tags, and a wicket:id=mylink/a tags... the renderer strips all wicket tags, and for .txt files rewrites a tags as just the URL in the href-- so you get clean .txt files without any wicket markup. Some people have suggested using TextTemplate or whatever to do a Map key/value replace on separate text files written specifically for emails, but I chose this method so that I can use my existing models when rendering pages, and I also do not need to create separate code to email a normal page that already exists in the application. Dunno if it's the most elegant solution, but so far has worked out very well for me. Aaron On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:22 -0700, Alexei Sokolov wrote: Hello, I would like to reuse some of the components I have to generate e-mail reports. Is it possible? Thank you, Alex - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] CTRL+click
I have a markup container with AjaxEvenBehavior for 'onclick'. In the onEvent method i need to know whether CTRL was pressed during the click or no. How can it be done? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CTRL%2Bclick-tf2047972.html#a5640400 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] generating e-mail reports with wicket
Well, for instance if you need something like I needed for www.burgerweeshuis.nl (years ago): administrators maintain a template with basic scripting facilities (accessing context variables, conditionals, etc). In that case using Velocity is simpler. Eelco On 8/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well...if you are generating html emails and you have common display panels already in place for pojos, why not reuse those? you get to reuse the layout, css, etc with almost no effort. -Igor On 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fair enough. I wouldn't say I'm against it per se. But for many cases imo it is overkill. Eelco On 8/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i disagree, i think wicket is in itself a great templating engine in 3.0 i would like to separate the layers more so you can easily build up components and render them to anywhere - gets you a component-oriented templating engine :) -Igor On 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is possible, and you should look at our junit test cases to get some inspiration. Whether it is recommended... I don't know. I'd go for something simple like a Velocity template. Wicket components are meant for interaction, something you don't need when creating email messages. Eelco On 8/3/06, Alexei Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I would like to reuse some of the components I have to generate e-mail reports. Is it possible? Thank you, Alex - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 [x] - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] voicetribe beta testing
I'll test it. On 8/3/06, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: apologies to those who already heard from me on the developer list,but we're still looking for a couple more beta testers for our wicket-basedfilm community web site (voicetribe).drop me an email if you're interested.thanks,jon-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cashhttp://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 [x] On 8/3/06, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2 [x] - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2[x] - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 [X] --- Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either look like: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ which is compact, or 2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able. What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)? 1 [ ] 2 [ ] Eelco (I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:message
I think supporting both versions, while noble, is only going to confuse users. More importantly, it's going to confuse me. :)On 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll start another thead for voting.EelcoOn 8/3/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: time for a vote? Which kind do we want now? i like the simple parsing one: input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ or if we want default values:input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ both are fine by me and we could support both versions just fine. johan On 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Time for a vote then? Does anyone see any potential problems with the whole issue? EelcoOn 8/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my primary concern is making it easy for our users. we are not talking about just wicket: we are talking about wicket:i18n: and wicket:packaged: prefixes - what do you really think the odds are with a user collission? i agree that it is not as clean/safe as a separate attribute, but it is quicker/easier to read. but i think we will walk in circles on this one so lets agree to disagree. the nice thing about wicket is that markup loading is pluggable, so i can write a filter that uses my scheme, and you can write a filter that uses yours. we make both of them available, and the users can choose which one they want to add :) -Igor On 8/3/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:* Igor Vaynberg: well..thisis whatit wouldbe...checking everyattribute of every tag. this will be done only once when the markup is loaded into the cache so there wont be a performance hit. Attribute valuesare arbitrarystrings.I wouldn'tparse that.What if I put wicket:something on purpose?I don't expect a weirdexception to be throwed. Attribute names on the contraryare normalized and you can safelyadd new constructs, as allowed by XML namespaces.-- Jean-Baptiste Quenot akaJohn Banana Qwertyhttp://caraldi.com/jbq/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cashhttp://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 [X]On 8/3/06, MK Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2 [X]--- Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either look like: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ which is compact, or 2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able. What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)? 1 [] 2 [] Eelco (I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability)- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user__ Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection aroundhttp://mail.yahoo.com- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 [x]2006/8/3, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attributemodifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have twoalternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either looklike: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/which is compact, or2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able.What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)?1 []2 []Eelco(I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability)-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net 's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 [x] On 8/3/06, Dirk Markert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2 [x] 2006/8/3, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either look like: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ which is compact, or 2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able. What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)? 1 [ ] 2 [ ] Eelco (I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net 's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Scott Swank reformed mathematician - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 - Original Message - From: Dirk Markert To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:32 PM Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work? 2 [x] 2006/8/3, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attributemodifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have twoalternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either looklike:1) input type="submit" value="wicket:i18n:my_key"/which is compact, or2) input type="submit" value="Default Value" wicket:message="value:my_key"/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able.What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)?1 []2 []Eelco(I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability)-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net 's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cashhttp://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cashhttp://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
2 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
1 [X] as in this case every attribute would be assignable from java Imran - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
Hey, you cheat! You voted twice! :) Eelco On 8/3/06, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2 [X] On 8/3/06, MK Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2 [X] --- Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two alternative approaches in mind. For end-users this would either look like: 1) input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ which is compact, or 2) input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ which works better if you want to keep your components preview-able. What do you prefer (vote open to anyone that want to join in)? 1 [ ] 2 [ ] Eelco (I have to think about what I like a bit more myself, but currently I lean towards 2 as I think it is cleaner and supports preview-ability) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:message
We just don't tell you we support both. But I agree. Eelco On 8/3/06, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think supporting both versions, while noble, is only going to confuse users. More importantly, it's going to confuse me. :) On 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll start another thead for voting. Eelco On 8/3/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: time for a vote? Which kind do we want now? i like the simple parsing one: input type=submit value=wicket:i18n:my_key/ or if we want default values: input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/ both are fine by me and we could support both versions just fine. johan On 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Time for a vote then? Does anyone see any potential problems with the whole issue? Eelco On 8/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my primary concern is making it easy for our users. we are not talking about just wicket: we are talking about wicket:i18n: and wicket:packaged: prefixes - what do you really think the odds are with a user collission? i agree that it is not as clean/safe as a separate attribute, but it is quicker/easier to read. but i think we will walk in circles on this one so lets agree to disagree. the nice thing about wicket is that markup loading is pluggable, so i can write a filter that uses my scheme, and you can write a filter that uses yours. we make both of them available, and the users can choose which one they want to add :) -Igor On 8/3/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Igor Vaynberg: well..this is what it would be...checking every attribute of every tag. this will be done only once when the markup is loaded into the cache so there wont be a performance hit. Attribute values are arbitrary strings. I wouldn't parse that. What if I put wicket:something on purpose? I don't expect a weird exception to be throwed. Attribute names on the contrary are normalized and you can safely add new constructs, as allowed by XML namespaces. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on
Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE: how should localized attributes work?
he is a witch! throw him in the lake! if he floats that will prove he is a witch and then we burn him. if he drowns he wasnt a witch, we let him go.-IgorOn 8/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, you cheat! You voted twice! :)Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
