Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-13 Thread CBB - Jay Fuller
Hi Ben! :) - Original Message - From: Ben Moore To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 8:44 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors Hey Steve - We are right here and will answer ;) If you ever have issues, feel free to email me directly

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Lewis Bergman
>> to just bypass them with a cat5 coupler to see if they are causing the >> problem. Also, ground problems will cause this. >> >> We have had more problems with epmp than any other product with issues >> like this. >> >> *From:* Steve Jones >> *Se

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Mike Hammett
Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 8:41:56 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors Cambium was at least open about the fact that with EPMP they used a lower quality set of components to keep the costs down. Look at al

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Ben Moore
wrote: > >> Older GigE surge suppressors would cause them to run at 100 Mbps. Easy >> to just bypass them with a cat5 coupler to see if they are causing the >> problem. Also, ground problems will cause this. >> >> We have had more problems with epmp than any oth

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Steve Jones
e this. > > *From:* Steve Jones > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:36 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors > > This is off topic, but semi related. I very much appreciate the vendors > here, Packetflux and Mccown tech in particular. > > We

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread chuck
Jones Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors This is off topic, but semi related. I very much appreciate the vendors here, Packetflux and Mccown tech in particular. We recently paid a fairly substantial amount to have a contractor

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Steve Jones
This is off topic, but semi related. I very much appreciate the vendors here, Packetflux and Mccown tech in particular. We recently paid a fairly substantial amount to have a contractor build out a site. Tho of the EPMP fed from powerinjectors are flapping ports. Theyre both going through Gigeapc

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
That's part of the reason that's going to go later. In my mind, there needs to be a small-form-factor version of the cambium sync version for 450i/450m. I also need to consider whether or not to embed the web-based controller in the unit or not, or offer both versions. After we get the

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread George Skorup
Do you intend to support Cambium Sync on the 12-port DIN as well? That would be pretty cool. Looking forward to both products. For now I guess I can stack another 4-port PowerInjector and get what I need. On 4/12/2017 5:50 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: Well, I'm off to bed, looks

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Well, I'm off to bed, looks like I've finally got the pieces all wired to test signal through the ethernet magnetics... got to write the test procedure tomorrow. This test equipment has (and will probably continue to be for a bit more) been a bit of a challenge as it's sort of an erector set -

[AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-11 Thread George Skorup
So... when is the RackInjector supposed to start shipping? Got a site with an 8-port injector and a SyncInjector and now need to add a couple more APs. So might as well replace it all with a RackInjector and gain a couple ports in the process. It's the towers that you never expected to have