Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-13 Thread CBB - Jay Fuller
Hi Ben! :) - Original Message - From: Ben Moore To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 8:44 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors Hey Steve - We are right here and will answer ;) If you ever have issues, feel free to email me directly

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Lewis Bergman
cat5 coupler to see if they are causing the >> problem. Also, ground problems will cause this. >> >> We have had more problems with epmp than any other product with issues >> like this. >> >> *From:* Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:36 P

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Mike Hammett
quot;Steve Jones" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 8:41:56 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors Cambium was at least open about the fact that with EPMP they used a lower quality set of components to keep the costs down. Look at all the non public communic

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Ben Moore
would cause them to run at 100 Mbps. Easy >> to just bypass them with a cat5 coupler to see if they are causing the >> problem. Also, ground problems will cause this. >> >> We have had more problems with epmp than any other product with issues >> like this. >> >>

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Steve Jones
eve Jones > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:36 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors > > This is off topic, but semi related. I very much appreciate the vendors > here, Packetflux and Mccown tech in particular. > > We recently paid a fairly

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread chuck
Jones Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors This is off topic, but semi related. I very much appreciate the vendors here, Packetflux and Mccown tech in particular. We recently paid a fairly substantial amount to have a contractor

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Steve Jones
This is off topic, but semi related. I very much appreciate the vendors here, Packetflux and Mccown tech in particular. We recently paid a fairly substantial amount to have a contractor build out a site. Tho of the EPMP fed from powerinjectors are flapping ports. Theyre both going through Gigeapc

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
That's part of the reason that's going to go later. In my mind, there needs to be a small-form-factor version of the cambium sync version for 450i/450m. I also need to consider whether or not to embed the web-based controller in the unit or not, or offer both versions. After we get the rackmou

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread George Skorup
Do you intend to support Cambium Sync on the 12-port DIN as well? That would be pretty cool. Looking forward to both products. For now I guess I can stack another 4-port PowerInjector and get what I need. On 4/12/2017 5:50 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: Well, I'm off to bed, looks

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Well, I'm off to bed, looks like I've finally got the pieces all wired to test signal through the ethernet magnetics... got to write the test procedure tomorrow. This test equipment has (and will probably continue to be for a bit more) been a bit of a challenge as it's sort of an erector set - I'

Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

2017-04-12 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
We're in the process of getting the manufacturing side of things up to speed. The product is for all intents and purposes done and we could make and ship untested products at this point, as everything is ready to go, except for testing and a couple of non-critical remaining software items. The aut