is who they say they are, but
also that they are authorized on the account? This could be fun.
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:20 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* [BULK] Re: [AFMUG] Consumer Blogs on Net
to accommodate the disabled
On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:58 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
mailto:part15...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, my latest Linksys router has a yellow-painted wheelchair ramp.
Did I really say that?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/19/2015 1:51 PM
Do I have to put away my pitchfork?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/16/2015 12:16 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Excellent! I guess we won't be needing an angry mob then...
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
I thought they had implemented their own RF section; but I don't know.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/17/2015 9:19 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
The Nanobridges and Rockets on left off side of tower were installed
rwo weeks ago and now the WISP with the Purewave gear is complaing
about
We had a sub on a nanobridge with that issue last week. We had clamped
the mount to a 2 OD conduit, and the whole dang conduit rotated. and
resulted in an installation quite a lot like that.
The RSSI had dropped to about -80, but the darn thing was still online.
5GHz no less. Too bad I
I'll have my minions call your minions.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/17/2015 9:08 AM, Keefe John wrote:
maybe minion would be a better term.
On 3/17/2015 10:48 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Mope
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing
losguyswirel...@gmail.com mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:
This was done intentionally.. I kid you not.
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 17, 2015 10:10 AM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
mailto:part15...@gmail.com wrote:
We had a sub on a nanobridge with that issue last week. We
:47 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
did bill just invent a new product?
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Jaime Solorza
losguyswirel...@gmail.com mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes and no. Need to get one
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 8, 2015 11:34 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
Right. Flat and bridged are two different things. If you are bridging
VLANs all over the place, that doesn't really qualify as flat.
I might argue that bridging VLANs might be a bit more complicated to
manage, but I don't really know; I've never tried it.
Routing works for me.
bp
that into consideration since it
has a network element (BMU) that has to go somewhere.
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2015 12:17 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged
network torouted. (More Info
Yes. MRTG is free, but will make you crazy to admin if you have more
than a dozen devices to monitor.
Cacti is really free, other than your time. Lots of working examples.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/9/2015 10:17 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Am I thinking of MRTG? One of them is
Free for 30 days, or free for up to 30 sensors. The way I use sensors
on our network, that will cover about 2 devices.
http://www.paessler.com/prtg/download
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/9/2015 10:13 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
PRTG is free and will monitor all your stuff if you fire up
to take that into consideration
since it has a network element (BMU) that has to go somewhere.
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2015 12:17 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from
Cacti does not use MRTG. It has it's own internal polling system. Cacti
does use RRDTOOL though.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/9/2015 10:19 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
MRTG is OSS. Maybe you're thinking of Cacti which utilizes MRTG and
has a workable interface and such.
Josh Luthman
I think he means end, as a reference to the annoying thing on top of
his neck.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/9/2015 1:20 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Do you mean “end” as in the slightly annoying term used for an RJ45 plug?
Or as in a new radio/antenna?
*From:* Glen Waldrop
That's what the PGE smart meter hubs look like.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/9/2015 1:42 PM, Wireless Admin wrote:
Could it be a Smart Meter Collection device. Don�t know what else
�.. Steve B
We have a 1-hour minimum charge for this sort of thing. We charge
$120/hour.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/9/2015 2:17 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:
most of our customers don't have $100 to blow ?
we think $80 for such cases tho...
- Original Message -
*From:* Glen
All the ones around here seem to have the bullet holes..
;-)
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/9/2015 5:24 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote:
It�s missing the bullet holes � need to remedy that
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
*Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2015
Is that on the roadmap? I thought the sync implementation on the ePMP
would not allow for 2.5 ms sync?
I thought the way they were going to address this was to allow 5 ms sync
on PMP450?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/9/2015 11:57 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
When are
Ah. A Blaw-Knox tower:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaw-Knox_tower
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/10/2015 2:10 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Yes, towers that are pointy on the bottom!
*From:* Colin Stanners mailto:cstann...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:59 PM
*To:*
is that a live tower (as in AM maybe)?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/10/2015 2:10 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Yes, towers that are pointy on the bottom!
*From:* Colin Stanners mailto:cstann...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:59 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:*
But why did they dial down the power? If they were smart enough to know
that dialing down the modulation would help a marginal link, why didn't
they know they weren't operating at the licensed power?
Something's definitely not right there.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/11/2015 2:24 PM,
The sort of thing that makes me squeamish about 6.x ROS. Except that
you have to use it for some of the newer hardware platforms (like the
aforementioned CCR). We are stable on 5.26 unless forced down a 6.x path.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/6/2015 6:03 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Problem
So what's going to be in the box? RJ45-RJ45 female-female coupler, or what?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/5/2015 10:30 AM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:
Mmmm, that second one might work.
The first one is a bit big for joining cable.
Still wish the second had an access hole in the back and
Ask him yo' self:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/broadwick
https://twitter.com/jeffbroadwick
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/5/2015 4:08 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Er, I just got an email from him a few weeks ago about bitlomat stuff?
--
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.com
Me too. I remember getting a special doo-dad from US Robotics (or
someone?) that did auto-dial so that we could use more than one computer
on the net at the same time. That experience was part of what drove us
to become a WISP.
G. was an original member of the WELL (Whole Earth 'Lectronic
You can't blame them trying to hold down the number of versions they
need to support. Of course they release a new version (on average)
about once a month. I guess that means that if 6.x is up to 27, that
means that 6.x ROS has been out for a little over 2 years. Guess that's
true. Must
How is the power brick connected to the PCB? How hard would it be to
put a terminal strip on the back wired directly to the PCB (ala
Dragonwave IDU, or LMG CTM)?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/6/2015 9:23 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I remember hearing from somebody that inside the case was a
And look at the power consumption. 25w!!! Half of an AF24 (or AF5 for
that matter). But geez. 4.5 GHz channel size. Holy smokes.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/6/2015 9:33 AM, Peter Kranz wrote:
New-ish 3 Gbps full duplex uncompressed point to point radio I had not
heard of
Like I said earlier on another thread; Any sufficiently advanced
technology is indistinguishable from magic.
We've been playing with burning sticks, and Telrad is bringing us
electricity.
or something like that...
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/6/2015 10:27 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
I
An ongoing issue of (1) press not having much clue as to the
differentiation between the generic term network and what specific
network they are referring to. (2) The general public being clueless as
to where what comes from (ask someone using a smart phone which network
content is coming
Looks like about -77
(https://www.hol4g.com/documents/dragonwave/Horizon%20Compact%20Product%20Sheet.pdf)
They don't indicate any difference based on frequency, but I would
suspect that it's not the same in all the supported frequencies.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/7/2015 9:16 AM,
For about the last week, I've been seeing extremely _S_L_O_W_ graph
rendering in cacti, but only when I use a chrome browser. Both firefox
and IE at least 10X faster. An average subscriber with 8 graphs takes
about 1 second if the browser is firefox or IE, but chrome takes
something like 20
about that. Both antennas are about 168 ft AGL...you got me thinking. ..
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 8, 2015 10:33 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
mailto:part15...@gmail.com wrote:
18 is not that different from 11 or 23 for that matter. It should
behave similarly, except
18 is not that different from 11 or 23 for that matter. It should
behave similarly, except for the beamwidth with a given antenna size and
the freespace loss.
Are these split mount or all-outdoor? Is it the same at both ends? Is
the path clear? Any fresnel issues?
bp
We generally set CIR to 1/3 of the sustained rate, but only with subs
that get greater than the base level of service. Some sort of dynamic
prioritization is required. We've been playing with Butch Evans QOS script.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/13/2015 10:19 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
invent the wheel? WB
mfg has affordable mounting options. ..
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 12, 2015 12:56 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
mailto:part15...@gmail.com wrote:
And not just plated, but dipped. Makes a big difference.
Unistrut is usually just plated. If it's a quality plating job
So who are all the big carriers in Mexico?
Which one is Carlos Slim?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/13/2015 12:03 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
Speaking of ATT. They are buying Nextel Mexico lock stock and barrel
along with 3 million subscribers.
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 13, 2015 1:01 PM,
Looks like a DAS to me. They have similar here going through the woods.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/13/2015 12:40 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
These are going up all around Ft Bliss main base. Once done a cover
goes over the monopole so no antennas are visible and painted beige.
If the only way to gain more throughput in AC (over N) is to increase
the channel size, then there is no significant gain in AC.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/13/2015 1:42 PM, Vince West wrote:
To an extent. More range, more speed, beamforming.
But are you really gaining anything in the
if there's no chip set, no one will be making any.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/13/2015 1:23 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
It would really be nice if Ubiquiti would come out with 2.4 AC, I use
their existing 2.4GHz product fairly often.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Paul McCall
Better yet, make a themed T-shirt out of it for the 2016 Animal Farm.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/13/2015 11:11 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
*From:* Ken Hohhof mailto:khoh...@kwom.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:41 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] this
ouch.
Does that mean that if you need DFS, and the application wants a
nano-b, the bxxx=bridge?
That sure sucks, because I was under the impression that I'd never have
to install another nanobridge.
Which I do not like.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/14/2015 11:32 AM, John
. we are going to try
them in a 3 mile link next,
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
mailto:part15...@gmail.com wrote:
ouch.
Does that mean that if you need DFS, and the application wants a
nano
That image was inserted there. Try #2.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/10/2015 5:47 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
I tried running it on my old Windows XP machine. Same problem.
I did run the developer's profile tool, and it is spending a lot of
time (most of it in fact) in ftiens4.js. See
I also wonder with MIMO systems why the V/H or -45/+45 polarities are
not considered separate transmitters (because they are). In which case
each one should be allowed up to the limit?
AND... What allows UBNT to transmit at up to 27 dbm, yet PMP450 is
limited to 22 dbm? What's different
minutes to get a net-flow report,
now it's about 5 seconds.
On 3/7/2015 2:23 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
For about the last week, I've been seeing extremely _S_L_O_W_ graph
rendering in cacti, but only when I use a chrome browser. Both
firefox and IE at least 10X faster. An average subscriber
Has anyone tried these ethernet/coax extenders?
They're made by a company called Veracity. They claim to extend either
ethernet or coax plus POE at distances up to 1 km (depending on media type).
http://streakwave.com/items.asp?Cc=Eth-PoE-Extend
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On
AAAEEeeii!!!
New list server inserts crap for double spaces! is this the modern
equivalent of slapping the back of our hands with a ruler?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/10/2015 1:24 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
What issues would there be reversing the bracket?� Reason I ask is
that we have
.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/10/2015 1:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I know folks that have reversed the clamp and put M-TOWs on angle iron.
Can�t visualize the drawing.
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:24 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af
What issues would there be reversing the bracket? Reason I ask is that
we have a couple of towers built with angle iron that are also sloped.
Turning the outer clamp parts around is a fairly common way to deal with
this (like the text drawing below), and it would still allow a round
pipe on
Two possible explanations.
1. March 4th is a military command
2. March 4th is my brother's birthday
My brother is a computer-phobe. That is as good as I can get.
Stepping out of the room now...
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/11/2015 5:24 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Why it was crazy on
I am offended that Netflix, Verizon, Comcast, and ATT all get
mentioned, but there is no mention of me. They burned 400 pages worth
of electrons, and they can't acknowledge the existence of smaller providers?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/12/2015 8:59 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Something
Temporarily is a good word.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/12/2015 9:18 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Page 9, Paragraph 24: systems with fewer than 100,000 subscribers are
temporarily exempt from this thing.
December 15 2015 temporary might become permanent.
*From:* Chuck McCown
Not sure why.
If you talk to the man on the street, they're going to interpret this as
everyone should get 1 Gbps to every device in the nation, and that the
cost should be $9.99 per month.
That's not the reality. So in reality, ISPs will continue to do
bandwidth management to accommodate
A long, long time.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/13/2015 8:24 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
How long unti; UBNT, Cambium or Mimosa comes out with a similar ball?
One of our subscribers on a 900SM recently got T-Mobil WiFi calling.
Unless there is something I'm missing, it appears that it will not work
through Canopy NAT (SM and AP are on 13.1.3).
We had their router (a special ASUS router no less) on the DMZ. It
would make the UDP connection to
If you're running them full dux, you don't need no steenking adaptive
duty cycle...
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/12/2015 12:53 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Does the airfiber 5X (or any other variation of AF) support adaptive
duty cycle? Or am I locked down to 50/50 or 75/25 etc
Kurt
/export.
Aaron told me they know and they're working on it.
On 3/12/2015 1:56 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
So it's the fragmentation issue?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/12/2015 11:53 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Same as ATT. And I think it was fixed it 13.2 (NAT fragmentation
There will have to be some cost of entry, otherwise every Tom, Dick,
Harry is going to call him/herself an internet provider so that s/he can
hang his/her doomaflotchy on a pole.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/12/2015 1:06 PM, Bruce Robertson wrote:
The point is, now you don't have to
So it's the fragmentation issue?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/12/2015 11:53 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Same as ATT. And I think it was fixed it 13.2 (NAT fragmentation or
something), which obviously doesn't help FSK.
On 3/12/2015 1:47 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
One
And not just plated, but dipped. Makes a big difference.
Unistrut is usually just plated. If it's a quality plating job, it
might be OK, because I see several bits of galvanized unistrut here and
there, and they look fine even after years. But I occasionally see a
hunk of unistrut that
I need better glasses...
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/12/2015 2:54 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
this on roof
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Jaime Solorza
losguyswirel...@gmail.com mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:
Asus
Less filling! Tastes great!
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/12/2015 3:08 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Nope. No CLEC required. You are already a telecommunications
provider by virtue of the new net neutrality regulations. All the
benefit, none of the calories.
*From:* Mike Hammett
Your picture is really blurry. Gotta be because my eyes are going bad.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/12/2015 3:31 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
To see Mike's gear?
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 12, 2015 4:06 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
mailto:part15...@gmail.com wrote:
I need better
Oh! You had the inside/outside reversed too! So the consequences are
nil, because I just want to turn around the inside-most angle clamp.
What kind of load will this handle? Can I mount a PMP450/3GHz with
sector antenna on it? The 3650 dual-slant sector is 28 tall, and 5 wide.
bp
That is just... wrong.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/10/2015 2:10 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Yes, towers that are pointy on the bottom!
*From:* Colin Stanners mailto:cstann...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:59 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG]
hour.
On my little scratch pad, that is going to be about 25 300 watt panels
(best to figure about 80% efficiency on your solar panels).
I shudder to think how much battery that is, and that is only one radio.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/10/2015 4:41 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Watts
I thought so too. Cleared the cache; same-oh, same-oh.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/11/2015 5:12 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
This really seems like a Chrome cache problem to me.
(1) We NAT most of our SMs ( 96%)
(2) Block DHCP server in the SM
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/11/2015 7:05 AM, Brett A Mansfield wrote:
I’m curious what everyone does to prevent a customer from pulling more than one
IP address without using PPPoE, and how do you prevent their router
We have that through Powweb. We have about six web sites on one IP
address. They are all in subdirectories, and you put a special file in
the root directory to redirect everything.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/25/2015 12:40 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I feel a bit snookered. I purchased
. Any reason I can’t run the epmp force units through them?
Brandon
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
*Sent:* Sunday, March 29, 2015 11:28 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] WBMFG OPTIC DISHES
Thanks everyone.
*From:*Bill Prince mailto:part15
+1.
I'll second that. The first time we used the optic dish, we got the
dishes a couple weeks before we got the radios. So we installed
aligned the dishes, then came back a week later and installed the
radios. Much to our surprise, the links came up spot-on the path
prediction. In fact, I
Where is that? Many blown out windows.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/30/2015 6:57 AM, Brett A Mansfield wrote:
I've put pops on many homes including my own. I cannot imagine doing something
on this scale.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
Here's a pretty good overview of nkey rollover:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/mechanical-keyboard-razer-logitech-gigabyte,3505-6.html
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/30/2015 7:39 AM, Simon Westlake wrote:
You need a keyboard that advertises full NKRO. This will allow an
infinite
We're using an Alpha omni on PMP450, but 2.4 GHz. We have not seen any
significant change in weather other than when trees are in the way.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/30/2015 8:14 AM, Brian Sullivan wrote:
I deployed a 3.65 Omni antenna attached to a 450AP about 2 weeks ago.
Two SM's
We do 99% of what we need on MT level 4. You only need level 5 or 6 if
you have a bunch of tunnels. Get what you need mainly based on
throughput and simultaneous connections. A lowly RB493 easily handles
tens of thousands simultaneous connections, and a X86 router probably
another order of
I wanted to give someone the latest non-RC version of winbox, but the
only thing on their web site is version 3.0rc6.
I think the latest non-RC version I saw was around 2.1.26 (and I'm using
2.1.18). I tried substituting version in the URL, but got nowhere. Where
is the latest version, and
I've got a subscriber that gets google.co.uk, even though they type in
google.com. What?
They have the correct DNS entries in both their router as well as their
computers. Google must use some secret information to decide which web
site they're going to take you to?
--
bp
mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 4:42 PM
To: Motorola III
Subject: [AFMUG] google.com http://google.com - google.co.uk
http://google.co.uk
I've got a subscriber that gets google.co.uk
http
They are with us on the same AS (along with all of our other
subscribers). We should all geolocate to the same place?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/30/2015 1:53 PM, Larry Smith wrote:
Check a few of the geolocation services to see where their IP
are listed as being. Have seen errors pop
connecting to anyway.
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Monday, March 30, 2015 7:02 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Latest winbox that's NOT a release candidate?
I think the latest is 2.2.18, (per Ken), but I saw a couple of web
sites with other
Cool. That works for me.
Thanks Ken!
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/30/2015 3:50 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
You can download it from a router via the web interface. I am seeing
2.2.18.
-Original Message- From: Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 5:32 PM
To: Motorola III
Subject
stored on the router like Winbox v2 though. It's really
annoying when someone leaves the window on their second monitor.
On 3/30/2015 9:52 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
There ya go. If George says it's so, then I will not go down that path.
Still don't understand why the latest stable version isn't
}com
On 3/30/2015 4:50 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:
The one i'm using is 2.2.13 ?
- Original Message -
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*To:* Motorola III mailto:af@afmug.com
*Sent:* Monday, March 30, 2015 5:32 PM
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Latest winbox that's
of the hex type jumpers. Can't remember where
they came from. And that was well over a year ago when we got
them. I think possibly the WAV equivalents are the hex type.
On 3/31/2015 7:30 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Oh crap! I just got some of those pigtails and they're all the
hex
I think some people use the word simplex to mean a single fiber.
Simplex can also mean (and more often in my experience) to mean one-way
communication. In the HAM world, I think simplex usually means
half-duplex, or one-way at a time.
I think in our world, there would not be much use for an
Just different volumes. Tens of millions of units versus a million, or
maybe a few hundred thousand.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 4/1/2015 7:01 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
That’s the same in a lot of the telco world as well… DSLAM’s, DS3 Mux
gear, DWDM gear .. various stuff.. they all have
SAIE, Exalt...
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/27/2015 7:48 AM, Matt wrote:
Looking at updating a short 5Ghz link to licensed. In past we have
used SAF and pretty happy with it. What other affordable gear is out
there now?
If we have a managed router (specifically MT) behind the SM we generally
bridge the SM.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/31/2015 9:36 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
If you manage the customer router (such as a Mikrotik) do you
generally run the SM in NAT or bridged mode? I have been doing NAT
Steve needs to prefix all his posts with sarcasm
and finish with /sarcasm
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/31/2015 3:33 PM, Neil Lathwood wrote:
Don't worry about him. That's Steve. He's just in on the comic
joke. I does read that way but he's not implying it is.
Guess I've not
Oh crap! I just got some of those pigtails and they're all the hex
variety. To make it worse, I just got 100' of the heat shrink. Double crap!
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/31/2015 4:38 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Did cambium change the 16'' pigtail they sell for the 450 AP's
recently? I
An old style meter would probably spin up to mach 2 or something before
frying. I don't think anything that's inside the home would fait much
better.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/31/2015 3:58 PM, Peter Kranz wrote:
Looks like the transmission line hit the distribution line.. So your
salad.
Don’t be hatin’ on spam. Gud stuff.
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Friday, March 27, 2015 3:42 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] For sale 5GHz ePMP 1000 with dish
__TWO__ cans of Spam.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/27/2015 2:09 PM
Mushy peas are not a food.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/27/2015 4:30 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I like real North Atlantic Cod Fish (10 hours off the boat) and Chips
served in a newspaper.
I like mushy peas. And pasties and Cornish clotted cream on scones.
You gotta know what to ask for
for announcement on this.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 3:37 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Software Release 13.3
When it morphs into 13.3.1.
Last I heard was maybe March.
Oh. Wait
devices. We recently reviewed a few
Homeplug v2 adapters with WiFi. They performed quite nicely. We are
using them to extend IPTV throughout houses that can't be wired. In
most cases we could perform 4 HD multicast streams. So between 40-60mb/s.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Bill Prince part15
When it morphs into 13.3.1.
Last I heard was maybe March.
Oh. Wait. It's March!
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 1:31 PM, Matt wrote:
When will Cambium 13.3 with working alignment tone be released?
HP
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/3/2015 8:52 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Who�s gonna buy ubnt?
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
From: Travis Johnson t...@ida.net mailto:t...@ida.net
Reply-To: af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
We have been installing shields ala' silence of the lambs where necessary.
Image result for silence of the lambs
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/3/2015 9:05 AM, Jerry Richardson wrote:
Yep, lived it.
The discussions PGE ended with “Our lawyers say we are in compliance,
take it
201 - 300 of 2800 matches
Mail list logo
