numbers because they
were “per subcarrier” or something?
*From:* Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Saturday, June 13, 2015 4:17 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Do you want to see this stuff here?
Patrick, I haven't been following Telrad but that's too incredible - I
that is -108 CINR, not RSSI, like the
numbers we're all used to.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:
I think Patrick said to add 30 dB to Telrad signal numbers because they
were “per subcarrier” or something?
*From:* Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
*Sent
CINR, not RSSI, like the
numbers we're all used to.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:
I think Patrick said to add 30 dB to Telrad signal numbers because they
were “per subcarrier” or something?
*From:* Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Saturday
As long as tangible goods and services are still being created/offered, by
humans, in the place they live.
http://www.omgfacts.com/lists/10051/Panasonic-has-a-factory-staffed-with-only-15-people-that-can-make-2-million-plasma-displays-per-month-ab637-1
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:47 AM,
Now that's confidence in your product. What's its rated weight capacity in
Chucks?
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:06 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
New pole mount tower mount prototype. Top of a 20 foot pole.
Patrick, I haven't been following Telrad but that's too incredible - I
can't see how -108, which is below the noise floor for any reasonable
channel bandwidth (20mhz+?) could get any reasonable speed, much less
those.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com
wrote:
I thought it was common knowledge that Ubiquiti antenna gain numbers add
2-3db in taxes.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
Wait I don't understand how is a 34dBi dish labeled as such if it's only
31dBi?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
The PTP radios with the gigabit port can do almost double the PPS - given
that that's an issue with wifi-chipset-based radios when links get loaded
or you're using VoIP, may be worth the extra investment.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
Glad to
Configure what? IP address? That is at
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Address . To make it easier you can
use winbox MAC access to add IPs..
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 7:08 PM, t...@nwohiobb.com wrote:
I already looked at that and it didnt tell me anything what I was looking
for.
On
...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
I think I have a Ubnt 120 2.4 sitting in the office
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 5, 2015 6:32 PM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote:
I posted this a few months back and got a few too bad we
radio when you have
fast IP connections via any other method?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 5, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote:
I posted this a few months back and got a few too bad we just threw
away a bunch of gear answers so I'm trying again as a reminder. I'm
In the high-RF environments where you'd need shielded ethernet cable, I
expect you'd have a patch panel to terminate the shield, not the wall wort.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Andy Trimmell atrimm...@precisionds.com
wrote:
It has no ground for shielding whatsoever. EOL was a good call.
I posted this a few months back and got a few too bad we just threw away a
bunch of gear answers so I'm trying again as a reminder. I'm thinking of
posting this every 3 months if no one considers it annoying.
I'm with a group of hams using wifi gear (mostly Ubnt/MT) at 2.3ghz in a
project to
Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end
(or use a backup link) to change it.
Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta
firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working
well, but that's another discussion).
On
that, so it does
not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I
read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
wrote:
Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive
60 or 240ghz multipoint, with the massive signal loss due to not using
directional antennas, would have a reliable range of say 300ft? May be more
reasonable to string fiber, heck cat6 in most cases.
On May 29, 2015 5:49 PM, Brett A Mansfield li...@silverlakeinternet.com
wrote:
60 and 240GHz can
this argument before. I respond the same way every time. Where
there is a will, there is a way. We just haven't found it yet.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On May 29, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote:
60 or 240ghz multipoint, with the massive signal loss due to not using
I'm geographically far from Vivint but just the things I've been reading
make it seem like a too much money not enough engineering business. But
they're making so much money in other areas that they don't need to care.
On May 21, 2015 2:08 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net wrote:
Vivint
I think the play nice/play dirty feature would be quite popular if they
put it in, but could lead to sour relationships between some companies when
they realized to what mode others set their radios.
On May 20, 2015 11:30 AM, Shayne Lebrun sleb...@muskoka.com wrote:
Yes, you certainly can. And
Nate, the contest is for a fictional If I had an AF5X story. The winner
may get radios to make their wish happen.
On May 20, 2015 10:35 AM, Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com wrote:
I got a note from Ubnt about a contest to 'Share your AF-5X story, and
win a pair of radios' I would love to submit
even copied screenshots from other sections, haha...
Probably Luthman?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
wrote:
Nate, the contest is for a fictional If I had an AF5X story. The winner
may get radios to make their wish happen.
On May 20, 2015 10:35 AM
What kind of signal did RM say it would get? If you mean an integrated ePMP
on a KP dish, IIRC the radio doesn't illuminate the antenna/keep phase too
well, so I wouldn't use that for longer links - better a connectorized
(non-GPS) ePMP radio with a 2/3ft dish, where windload allows.
On Tue, May
I think so, for the longer/higher links where windload is more of a factor,
you'd be using bigger antennas than the Force 110 anyways. Also based on
the fcc id for the ePMP with integrated dipole that we saw, Cambium is
likely coming out with a non-coax version of the Force dishes soon that may
To my knowledge there is no real unit of measurement, that's one of the
values which I've set (to 499% in most heavily-treed regions - no round
numbers so it's obviously something I changed, not a default program value)
to make RM's estimates better match results which were gotten in the real
I haven't heard of ePMP lockups. What kind? Radio stops responding to pings
and passing traffic? Cambium's tech support is really good - what did they
reply when you contacted them?
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 9:08 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller par...@cyberbroadband.net
wrote:
We're running some EPMP 2.4
That sounds problematic - what did Cambium tech support say?
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:
I’ve definitely noticed autosync issues on 450 running 13.2 FW, on both
3.65 and 5 GHz. It will report no sync from internal GPS, or it will
report receiving power
Which models of grids are those? We don't use the cheaper professionally
but I have some old ones I was going to use for my amateur radio wifi
project.
On May 8, 2015 10:38 AM, Glen Waldrop gwl...@cngwireless.net wrote:
Apparently the feed of the PacWireless grids I am using pulls in
moisture.
You need spatial diversity for a link that far, and a good air protocol so
PTP400 with one 4ft or larger dish at one end and two 4ft dishes
(separated by 50ft? Link planner would tell) at the other.
On May 6, 2015 12:15 PM, Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com wrote:
I have a customer that needs a
While the AirFiber line is very impressive, well engineered and by far
Ubiquiti's best products... for any link where reliability is of top
importance and any failure can take hours to fix from travel alone, I would
tend to recommend Orthogons...
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Peter Kranz
FYI... other than IP67 and mobility support (who uses that in unlicensed
bands?), this doesn't seem to have many advantages over the ePMP, and
likely will be quite a bit more expensive.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Proxim Wireless channelmarket...@proxim.com
Date: Tue, May 5,
Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix
https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange
https://twitter.com/mdwestix
--
*From: *Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Tuesday, May 5, 2015 10:51:31 AM
Other things I noticed:
-codename Ironman / Ironlad
-Manufacturer Gemtek (ChangSHU)
-name is 5GHz ePMP Integrated Radio and 5GHz ePMP Connectorized Radio
but the picture is only the integrated stick.
-testing lab is in India
Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small
dipoles, so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit.
-- Forwarded message --
From: FCCID.NET i...@fccid.net
Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM
Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks
I heard the first generation ubnt toughcable had about that failure rate?
On Apr 28, 2015 6:24 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Well if they really had experience in the field then Ubnt really screwed
the pooch on that one. I've never seen 100% product failure before my
Up to 25db loss (not as bad as some 30-40db), 10db gain (that part is
always surprising). I've seen thermal ducting happen more at
sunrise/sunset, it's a bit surprising to have it during many hours at
night, but you never know.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:07 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
I'm surprised that Cambium hasn't put diodes on the APs so that
GPS-sync-interrupted power can be input in a split-pair manner (e.g. 4+ 5-
7+ 8-) without resorting to nonstandard wiring hacks.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
LMG discovered this about 10
You've already checked for grounding issues and nearby 2-way transmitters
around 100-150mhz?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Eric Muehleisen ericm...@gmail.com wrote:
A while back there was a thread about issues running CAT5 cables along the
entire length of solid steel tower legs.
We've
I thought PTP600 was MTI? If MARS it's likely a variant of the MA-WA56-DP23.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Daniel Gerlach danielgerl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does anyone know the part number of the mars antenna it is?
Daniel
Beautiful, but tell me where that is and I'll go put the one zip tie needed
to make it perfect.
On Apr 10, 2015 4:30 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
*Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID*
-- Forwarded message --
From: Patrick Leary
You may have better luck selling them in lots of 3-5.
On Apr 4, 2015 9:10 AM, Daniel Gerlach danielgerl...@gmail.com wrote:
26 x keys for 5000 EURO
daniel
Wow, those AN-50s are quite reliable, also 5.5 years is impressive also in
terms of those sites not seeing any changes (or UPS replacements? Or are
they on 48V power systems?).
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
*Yawn*
Wow, you know the future has arrived when PCBs look like sci-fi cities.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Peter Kranz pkr...@unwiredltd.com wrote:
Check out all the antennas packed into the new Ruckus AC wave 2 access
point..
[image:
Oops 4 chain, I missed a connector, was wondering where that other coax
went.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting... Vivint company: http://fccid.net/business.php?id=2AAAS
That radio is listed as a video transceiver
http://fccid.net
Interesting... Vivint company: http://fccid.net/business.php?id=2AAAS
That radio is listed as a video transceiver
http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=2AAAS-SR1410id=132292 from inside
pictures it's pretty much a 3-chain Mini-PCIe wireless card on a PSU board
(100mbit only, likely passive PoE/)
On
AFAIK they are polarity agnostic, and the air protocol keeps 4 links going
(cross-pol both ways as spares) as a method to combat fade/multipath.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Kurt Fankhauser li...@wavelinc.com wrote:
Going to be installing a PTP650 link on 2 foot dishes and need to know if
] are PTP650's polarity agnostic?
4kish
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Matt matt.mailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is approximate price on PTP650 link?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
wrote:
AFAIK they are polarity agnostic, and the air protocol
Like an ePiMP.
On Mar 24, 2015 4:37 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc
t...@franklinisp.net wrote:
I should add it’s still getting 190/90 on the wireless link test… like a
pimp.
*Tyson Burris, President*
*Internet Communications Inc.*
*739 Commerce Dr.*
*Franklin, IN
I should've been more clear, those names are the unused/available ones per
my little knowledge of the ubnt catalog. I guess they'll last a year or two?
On Mar 24, 2015 4:32 PM, Chuck Macenski ch...@macenski.com wrote:
fiber?
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
Ubiquiti product name generator:
[air / nano / pico / power / rocket][fiber / beam / bridge / grid / station
/ dish / MAX]
airbeam
airbridge
airgrid
airstation
airdish
nanofiber
nanogrid
nanodish
nanoMAX
picofiber
picobeam
picobridge
picogrid
picodish
picoMAX
powerfiber
powergrid
powerdish
From my basic knowledge of electronics and taking apart radios, anything
above 28-36V needs a transformer and support circuitry instead of just a
voltage regulator IC, that entails a big jump in the price and board
complexity of the power supply. The AirFiber5X's FPGA is capable of
500mbits of
From the FCC registration, tx power is 0.77 Watts, so 28dbm, I assume
combined: http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=SWX-AF5Xid=222677
I doubt that rx sensitivity would be much different than their AirFiber5,
so let's guess -64 at 256QAM 50mhz +-2db.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Mike Hammett
You've got the BH230s connectorized? Assuming that both polarizations have
an electrical connection (most panel antennas do, some dishes do), or
anything less than high (40db?) isolation between them, you run the risk of
frying a radio if there's any minute difference in the sync between them.
It seems to have worked on a similar model
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=18783
On Mar 18, 2015 6:12 PM, Tim Reichhart t...@nwohiobb.com wrote:
Guys
Would you any of you guys know if mikrotik would work on firebox x500 or
not?
Tim
When I did security camera installs, I had seen adapters that were ethernet
over coax (unknown protocol, I think 50mbit throughput) with a 12/48v Poe
output at the far end. Those could be used to run an SM fully over a coax
line. I can look up model numbers if anyone wants.
On Mar 9, 2015 2:31
Perfect for those tapered towers that are wide at the top with a point at
the bottom.
On Mar 10, 2015 3:13 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Dang, I got the tower leg sloping the wrong way! Arrgh.
*From:* Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:11 PM
*To:*
Wow, I did not expect to see that... creative tower design.
On Mar 10, 2015 4:10 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Yes, towers that are pointy on the bottom!
*From:* Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:59 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re
Wow, $800+antennas for a FPGA-based link that can do 400mbit down / 100mbit
up and feed internet to a lot of people. Many of the cheaper licensed links
you buy today don't hit that 1-way speed, and they cost $800 for the
antennas alone. Bravo Ubiquiti.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Chuck McCown
It's good that they now have real beta testers, from what I could tell for
the wifi-based gear the users were the beta testers.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote:
I've learned to assume that there are a few people that will have had
whatever UBNT releases (and
For all the people not going to AFMUG this year (including me), Chuck can
you post details on the list once it's showtime?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Chuck Macenski ch...@macenski.com wrote:
Hi,
Catch-up with me tomorrow at Animal Farm and I will tell you all about it
:)
Chuck
On
Maybe AirFiber X doesn't exist, it's just Chuck's way of raking in the free
drinks tonight.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Bruce Robertson br...@pooh.com wrote:
He's already been spotted in the lobby of the Ramada!
A setup with 6x multi-band sector antennas, each with 2 heliax lines, on a
300ft tower - 3600ft of cable at $7/ft - that's $25K just in wiring and a
huge windload up the tower. Compared to that fiber is pretty much free and
invisible, they have to do it.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Josh
Yes, this is a very nice gift from Google. Amusingly this license didn't
work for me as Google still had a Google Earth Plus license (cost $20 a
long time ago) attached to my e-mail address and wouldn't put on the free
Google Earth Pro license.
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 8:15 PM, David Milholen
This woman somehow has balls of steel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10Ae2nN8RiY
Canopy dishes @ 3m50: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oq1ROVQ_9Y4
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote:
This woman somehow has balls of steel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10Ae2nN8RiY
Eh? When you are in a highly-treed area, you need to do towers or be quick
to send customers to a company that does. There's no other easy way to get
NLOS.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:53 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller
par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote:
well, we don't do towers by default. in fact, i
http://www.ebay.com/itm/111065551821
Get it while it's hot! Only $375K
Jeez time is going by quickly. I remember reading Tim's list of Canopy
telnet commands as I was discovering the platform, that was almost 10 years
ago now.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Hi Tim,
Long time no talk to. Got any fun cracks to share?
Here is
I've got IPv6 at home using HE.net tunnel and I've noticed problems today
too but I haven't troubleshooted them yet.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com wrote:
I'm not posting to the outages list since I haven't seen anything there
already, and have only tested from
I still have trouble believing that Flash can pass through a few hundred
mbps. It's far from a server program.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Sterling Jacobson sterl...@avative.net
wrote:
http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/4036548459
So I guess the formal Ookla speedtest.net stuff will do
Need to go to ip routes and add a default one using your default gateway.
On Dec 26, 2014 1:59 PM, joseph marsh via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
I have a Mikrotik on charter network and I have typed in the static ip
gateway and DNS. When I go to new terminal and ping. Google DNS. I get no
route to
Screen shot?
On Dec 26, 2014 2:11 PM, joseph marsh via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Ip-routes says everything is reachable
On Dec 26, 2014 2:05 PM, Colin Stanners via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Need to go to ip routes and add a default one using your default gateway.
On Dec 26, 2014 1:59 PM, joseph
I don't understand the reasons for configuration for the 2 other networks
(load balancing/redundancy between 3?) But this seems correct for your
current network. Try tracer out as Bill said.
On Dec 26, 2014 2:24 PM, joseph marsh via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
On Dec 26, 2014 2:12 PM, Colin Stanners
OK, I was wondering why it was labeled AT T1 but had a 24.x IP common to
cable modem networks. Don't know US providers that we'll.
. But swapped it out to a bigger one and I'm
using this one for a new site so I haven't changed the labels yet and
swiftfox done the initial config
On Dec 26, 2014 2:49 PM, Colin Stanners via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
OK, I was wondering why it was labeled AT T1 but had a 24.x IP common
to cable
Less than an hour ago I went on a rare FB visit and, seeing what others
were doing, posted a thought:
Today I will not be doing any work, paid or volunteer projects, other than
house cleaning. I don't know this feeling.
Now it seems that may have been a lie as I'm helping troubleshoot router
I've seen apple phones that seemed to have wireless compatibility issues
with some routers' older firmware - try a firmware update?
On Dec 26, 2014 9:41 PM, Jay Weekley via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Got this email from the wife of one of our landlords.
Hey, I'm Bill xx's wife, Barb. I had an
For stuff that wasn't our problem - mostly email client configuration when
the users couldn't figure out the instructions and didn't want to use
webmail - I have told customers that doing it over the phone is too slow,
they can bring it into the shop and I'll do it in a few minutes. If that
On any new platform, go close to the tower, connect and run rests, once
that's confirmed good you can worry about farther shots.
On Dec 23, 2014 3:49 PM, Alan West via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Hello all.
I am playing with a EPMP system to try to offload some customers over to
it from my legacy
I walked from my SLC hotel to the fairgrounds and Shilo at all hours
without issues these last few years; walking through a few completely
deserted city blocks at 2am was a surreal experience more than a scary one.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Travis Johnson via Af af@afmug.com
wrote:
You
An .AC ePMP would be incredible - but the issue is whether Cambium would be
fearful of it competing too much with the 450. What does a company do when
it has 2 products that are too good, and the cheaper one starts to outshine
the more expensive one in the most often used benchmark? (mbps - even
I'm sure they'll do a 24ghz AF 2/Duo/Super/Ultra with 1024QAM. In the
100mhz channels both ways that'll allow around 1280mbit FD - so a 2.5gbit
backhaul... I'm assuming 3.65 will come as well.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
I'd guess there's going
HFS on any windows machine. Quick and easy.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Nate Burke via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
I'm looking for a small HTTP Server that I can place on site at a location
for VoIP Phones to get their config/software upgrades from. Would a
Raspberry PI be the ideal device
I've done a number of installs, all using Kantech panels. Some examples:
Cheap 2-door setup:
-Entrapass Special edition software (supports like 256 panels) $350
-Kantech KT-300 from ebay (supports 2 readers; serial RS485 link to PC or
other panels): $150-350
-eBay RS485 to USB adapter $5
-metal
And still no sync, right?
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Or you can swap it out with -AC and get 65Mbps on a 10MHz channel,
realtime airview, and much better selectivity :P
On 11/21/2014 03:10 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:
you can swap it all
Soon Chuck will be on the whole social-media bandwagon.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Traci via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Please post this to the list. I am so special...
Expedience was the Pre-WiMAX system that they had acquired, no relation
whatsoever to Canopy systems. I actually found a 2.5ghz Expediance AP on
ebay and 2x CPEs that I want to try to setup one day, but documentation
seems almost inexistant.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Tyler Treat via Af
Where are you located Dave?
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Dave White via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
We are dumping all of the reflectors that we no longer use. If you can
use any of these, please make an offer. All are serviceable. None are new.
Pictures on request. Shipping is on you.
38
I'm with a group of hams using wifi gear (mostly ubnt) at 2.3ghz in a
HSMM project (it's incredible how far you can go when there's no noise
around!). We don't have a big budget so if anyone has 2.4ghz 60-120deg
sectors or non-grid dishes (I've seen the grid ones accumulate ice up here)
available
So, you get the complaints about slow speed / latency, but you don't have
the means to upgrade the satellite or otherwise improve the service...
sounds like you'd need to get paid a large amount of money to deal with
that and the hit on your reputation.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Mike
But until that migration happens, your satellite customers are telling
everything they know that your service is bad for gaming, low transfer
caps, variable speeds etc. And first impressions last. How long will that
reputation stick? How much money is it worth to you?
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at
Do you if there's plans for a 15mhz mode so 6APs per tower can be done with
more speed than the 10mhz mode?
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi via Af af@afmug.com
wrote:
Hi Dan - Absolutely Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of
Grommets that don't let cable pass through are worse than ISIS. Due to the
pmp320 using them, I've spent many hours of cumulative time, sometimes in
-30 weather, chopping off perfect RJ45s just to re-make them past a small
piece of plastic.
On Oct 10, 2014 4:02 PM, Charles Wu via Af af@afmug.com
Tests say up to 60mhz, I guess 1024QAM so almost 500mbit each way. From the
polarization label in back I guess it's single-polarized?
As often done, internal photos are restricted from the public :-/
From the letter to the FCC:
The device is sealed and disassembly would destroy the product.
How are you accessing it? http? Maybe when you're accessing it via fqdn
it's doing a reverse lookup for something. Waiting for socket just means
trying to connect.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:51 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
so for some reason out billing server is slow as molasses
Call your ISP, they're responsible for any problem on the internet.
On Sep 24, 2014 3:39 PM, Jason McKemie via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
It must have been something specific to my account. They fixed it.
-Jason
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014, Christopher Hair via Af af@afmug.com
wrote:
I assume the issue then is how do yo indicate the original sender's e-mail
address?
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
Not complaining, just a note. Can the reply-to be changed to just have AF
and not the original sender as well?
-
Mike Hammett
301 - 396 of 396 matches
Mail list logo
