Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)

Hypocrisy Jaime Solorza On Feb 8, 2018 7:34 AM, "Adam Moffett" wrote: > And the funniest part is that actual historical Puritans were all about > the weird sex AND public displays of it. It just couldn't be adultery. > > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Josh

Re: [AFMUG] blocking

Chuck, Which legislator is proposing this? I got Senator Bramble to back his off a few years ago after a conversation with him. -Layne Sent from my iPhone, so please excuse any misspelled words or embarrassing auto-corrects! On Feb 6, 2018, at 9:11 AM,

Re: [AFMUG] blocking

https://le.utah.gov/~2018/bills/static/SB0134.html Todd Weiler From: Layne Sisk Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 10:58 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] blocking Chuck, Which legislator is proposing this? I got Senator Bramble to back his off a few years ago after a conversation

[AFMUG] WX2100 / FluoroThane hydrophobic coating

" *WX2100* is superhydrophobic coating commonly used on marine and ground-based microwave antenna, radomes and other telecommunications gear. " http://www.wx2100.com/ I know it's a temporary substance, but has anyone ever tried this on 24Ghz+ links in the rain?

Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

Thanks for the tip! I'll be sure to ask them in the engineering call next week. -- Original Message -- From: "Cassidy B. Larson" To: af@afmug.com Sent: 2/8/2018 11:48:11 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave Ask them about IPv6. I’ve been asking

Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

Also ask about how they filter HTTPS (i.e.: over 73% of the sites in America). https://www.engadget.com/2017/10/21/googles-annual-report-shows-more-web-traffic-is-encrypted/ From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 10:33 AM To:

Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

What should really happen law wise, is that the state (Utah in this case) approve a group of content filtering companies for end users. Then mandate AT MOST that the ISP allow/offer at least one of those up to customers as a certified filtering option. Again, not mandatory, but as viable

Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

On 2/8/18 9:31 AM, Sterling Jacobson wrote: It’s just too much and too variant to have to mandate the ISP do any kind of filtering ‘mid-stream’ style. And moving everything to crypto makes that kind of filtering difficult. ISP content filtering is fast becoming a relic of the past.

Re: [AFMUG] Streaming service included

Viva is $35/month though. We probably couldn't throw that in for free. -- Original Message -- From: "Rory Conaway" To: "af@afmug.com" Sent: 2/6/2018 10:46:09 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming service included We are working with Viva

Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

Ask them about IPv6. I’ve been asking for years. No movement, no plans. They say I can bridge v6 through it and block all v6.. but that’s not a solution. > On Feb 8, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > Unrelated to Chuck's thread, we started talking internally

Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

But the parents already do have the option to buy something on their own (Net Nanny etc). -- Original Message -- From: "Sterling Jacobson" To: "af@afmug.com" Sent: 2/8/2018 12:31:36 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave What should

Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

IMO, completely 100% wrong. You don't get to come into my house or tell a private company that we don't meet your moral standards. The people can make their own damn decisions. Stop trying to legislate morality. The politicians that try this stuff are usually the ones that end up being freaks

Re: [AFMUG] Streaming service included

That’s what I was thinking Chuck. You are in charge  -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 12:54 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming service included I wonder if they would allow a co-op

Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

pffft... parents. Its the governments role to raise children, not parents, where have you been? 1950? On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > But the parents already do have the option to buy something on their own > (Net Nanny etc). > > > -- Original

Re: [AFMUG] Streaming service included

I wonder if they would allow a co-op type of company to get to the 100K... -Original Message- From: Layne Sisk Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 10:52 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Streaming service included Spoke on a panel 2 days ago with Netflix and asked them about it.

Re: [AFMUG] Streaming service included

I asked that question, got a smile and a “I doubt it” -Layne Sent from my iPhone, so please excuse any misspelled words or embarrassing auto-corrects! > On Feb 8, 2018, at 10:56 AM, "ch...@wbmfg.com" wrote: > > I wonder if they would allow a co-op type of company to get to

[AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

Unrelated to Chuck's thread, we started talking internally about offering content filtering as a value add. An initial conversation with Trustwave seemed promising, and I'm supposed to have a follow up to discuss tech details later. But does anybody still do this? Is there still consumer

Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

I agree, but Utah seems hell bent on doing something obtrusive. Since they can’t seem to let it go, that was my next proposal in lieu of abandoning the fruitless endeavor altogether. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 11:43 AM To:

[AFMUG] Viva Entertainment

Hey Rory Conway: I talked to Viva Entertainment today. There's basically no barrier to entry and that's good. The guy told me that network channels (ABC, NBC, FOX) would be from New York City. That wouldn't normally be allowed in the content licensing, so I'm wondering if he was mistaken.

Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

Any guesses which hardware vendors are helping craft this legislation? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 12:28 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave I agree, but Utah seems hell bent on

Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)

*Ezekiel 23:20 (CEBA)* She lusted after their male consorts, whose sexual organs were like those of donkeys, and whose ejaculation was like that of horses. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:07 AM, wrote: > Based on all your

Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave

State controlling private industry? Fascinating. On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Sterling Jacobson wrote: > What should really happen law wise, is that the state (Utah in this case) > approve a group of content filtering companies for end users. > > Then mandate AT MOST

Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)

+2 Moral issues entirely aside, the business risk in making yourself no longer a neutral carrier of information,but something that has a "clean" internet service, is too high. Just wait until some religious zealot sues you because their 12 year old discovered a certain video of a boeing engineer

Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)

Genesis 29 and 39 have some similar content. Lots daughters etc. I do have to say, I wish I could be like one of them there male consorts like when I was a young fella. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2018 6:43 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn .

[AFMUG] E400 voltage range

Does anyone know if 24v works? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373

Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)

We are currently using Barracuda units. By the end of next month, we be offering that service which will require secondary login for parents to get through to unfiltered internet. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 6:46 PM To:

Re: [AFMUG] E400 voltage range

Sure would be nice if the manual stated it :/ Thanks for testing for me! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Feb 8, 2018 10:53 PM, "George Skorup" wrote: > I think I tried it once and it didn't power up.

Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)

Is this a legislative attempt to get anti net neutrality case law on record? On Feb 8, 2018 10:10 PM, "Rory Conaway" wrote: We are currently using Barracuda units. By the end of next month, we be offering that service which will require secondary login for parents to

Re: [AFMUG] Viva Entertainment

It doesn’t get local channels. We have tested a couple of Android devices and will probably include an outdoor antenna with customers that get Viva in a package deal. We have a website set up for signing up and tracking all your customers that connect. I’ll have that information out by the

Re: [AFMUG] E400 voltage range

I think I tried it once and it didn't power up. Pretty sure it's 42-58VDC only. On 2/8/2018 9:35 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Does anyone know if 24v works? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373

Re: [AFMUG] Streaming service included

Spoke on a panel 2 days ago with Netflix and asked them about it. They require 100k subscribers to enter what they consider a “re-bill” program where you could do this. -Layne Sent from my iPhone, so please excuse any misspelled words or embarrassing auto-corrects! > On Feb 6, 2018, at

Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)

And the funniest part is that actual historical Puritans were all about the weird sex AND public displays of it. It just couldn't be adultery. -- Original Message -- From: "Josh Reynolds" To: af@afmug.com Sent: 2/7/2018 9:20:29 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn