Alright. Am I eligible for one of those by the way? I forget what thing
let people get them.
On 4/29/2018 12:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote ATMunn for Tailor.
ATMunn - you can deputize for the job. I'm about 99% sure that the only
ribbons since the Feb report were this week's
m, so this is no Agoran Decision at all.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Ned Strange
wrote:
Vote ATMunn
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Edward Murphy
wrote:
Per Rule 2154, I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the
Tailor election. The vote collector is the ADoP, the valid op
For what? And what sort of image would I use?
On 4/29/2018 3:17 AM, Edward Murphy wrote:
ATMunn wrote:
Yeah, the problem with it working that way is that for anyone who
doesn't have any sort of theme on, the background is white by default,
so there would be no way to differentiate be
Interestingly, this message is not in my normal font, but it is
different from the font the report was in. The font of this message
isn't even monospace for some reason.
On 4/28/2018 4:56 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:
For some reason, this report and ma
lot levied on Murphy for failure to produce
Arbitor report. As it appears no work has been done for this office
for 16+ days in April, this is unforgivable (prevents May 1 salary).
PLEDGES (self-ratifying list of assets)
[
Changes since last report:
- G. destroyed 3 of eir pledges without ob
ll the
sources I can find are rather informal and pragmatic though, and seem to
disagree, so it's possible I'm wrong about this.
[1] https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/to
-Aris
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 5:13 PM ATMunn wrote:
"with no indirect object" by itself would not work in
At this point in reading through the DIS: Upgrading thread I kinda gave
up trying to understand what's going on. :P
On 4/25/2018 8:38 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Hang on for a second. I don't get what wrong with paying a fee of 0. The
fee for a given action is defined. If I pay a fee of 0, then I
"with no indirect object" by itself would not work in a rule, because "I
pay x things to y" is the same as "I pay y x things," but the former has
no indirect object (y is in a prepositional phrase).
On 4/25/2018 7:21 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
Well, I'm just gonna add that to the list of thing
Another (probably unpopular) option: Just get rid of zombies altogether.
On 4/26/2018 2:29 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
It's clear that zombies are way to powerful and need to be weakened
substantially. Proposed restrictions:
- 1 zombie per player max
- Zombies can be deregistered by announcement a
After reading some of the other messages, I change my mind, I'll keep my
land.
On 4/26/2018 9:37 AM, ATMunn wrote:
Honestly, I have no idea what I'm doing so sure.
On 4/25/2018 10:09 AM, Corona wrote:
Wanna sell? I offer 15 coins.
On Wednesday, April 25, 2018, ATMunn wrote:
Actu
I don't see how it is a scam though.
On 4/26/2018 3:14 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Just for people who look in the future but don't read other threads, and as
a form of penance: ignore what I said about there not being a scam. I was
being tired/stupid and apparently didn't read the text. So ignore
Honestly, I have no idea what I'm doing so sure.
On 4/25/2018 10:09 AM, Corona wrote:
Wanna sell? I offer 15 coins.
On Wednesday, April 25, 2018, ATMunn wrote:
Actually, that was in the single auction, so there's nothing really that I
could do about that. But it still sucks.
On 4
Actually, that was in the single auction, so there's nothing really that
I could do about that. But it still sucks.
On 4/25/2018 9:18 AM, ATMunn wrote:
I just realized I've been a total idiot. My one land unit is on the
complete other side of the map from me.
On 4/25/2018 1:05
0, 0) ( 0, 0)
Murphy ( 0, 0) ( 0, 0)
VJ Rada ( 0, 0) ( 0, 0)
Kenyon (-1, +1) (-1, +1)
ATMunn (-1, +1) (-1, -1)
Ouri ( 0, 0) ( 0, 0)
[1]: In Full, 天火狐
[2]: In Full, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
ALTERNATING LAND
Honestly, I've read all the replies, and I'm still not sure I entirely
get the point of this proposal. As is, I would likely just vote PRESENT.
On 4/21/2018 5:39 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
I remember someone saying that scary public actions weren't enough
compensation for all the power zombies pr
I don't even use Gmail anyway. My email address is Gmail, but my client
is Thunderbird.
On 4/18/2018 10:02 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:
Also, are my messages showing up for everyone else as not being
wrapped? When I'm typing, the message shows u
I transfer a dinky number of coins to Agora.
On 4/17/2018 5:26 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
I resolve the current single land auction as follows:
by bid
---
Aris 12
x Corona 6
x Quazie 6
Corona 1
Quazie 1
ATMunn 10
G. 8
1: the black land
Weird... Anyone here who uses Thunderbird and knows how to fix this?
On 4/16/2018 1:58 PM, Corona wrote:
Yes, I see 2 lines only too.
~Corona
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:02 PM, ATMunn wrote:
Also, are my messages showing up for everyone else as not being wrapped?
When I'm typing
ably
be 2 or 3 when I send it)
On 4/15/2018 9:15 PM, ATMunn wrote:
Thanks. I think the main reason why I didn't use the built-in color
definitions is that I came up with all the colors for the ribbons before
I did any of the actual CSS, and so I just copied and pasted the color
codes. After
/2018 9:58 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:
I wasn't entirely sure what to do for the Transparent. The goal was to
make it the same color as a blank spot (and making the blank spots
slightly gray to differentiate from white). I'm not exactly sure why
i
d CSS is supposed to be customizable by the end user. What you
need to do is change your .t class from "background-color: #f7f7f7;"
to "background-color: transparent;", which will make it actually
transparent, not just the same color as the background.
-Aris
On Sun, Apr 15,
Oh, it did go through, I just wasn't looking in the right place. Sorry.
On 4/15/2018 5:05 PM, Corona wrote:
I did think that it was weird that nobody was responding to me, but I
checked and it's in the archives.
~Corona
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:28 PM, ATMunn wrote:
No,
7:56 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:
3) I'm working on creating an HTML version of the report, which will
also be generated by the aforementioned Python script. Once it's
ready, there will be an always up-to-date report on the AgoraNomic
GitHub. For the moment,
No, it doesn't appear to have gone through.
On 4/15/2018 4:15 PM, Corona wrote:
Didn't anybody notice my email from Wednesday, replying to ATMunn:
"I was under the impression I had already collected stuff from (-1,-1) via
Quazie. Anyways, you couldn't collect assets
This is what I get for not properly reading the rules.
On 4/15/2018 2:59 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
I just realized this, but I'm pretty sure this transfer is invalid anyways
as you can only take from one preserved facility per week.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 07:33 ATMunn wrote:
Actua
Fair. I'm sure there's an easy way to say it... yet this is Agora we're
talking about, so probably not.
On 4/15/2018 3:50 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
That sentence is long and hard to understand though.
-Aris
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 6:30 AM ATMunn wrote:
Looks good, but I
So, we have an upcoming Tailor election, in which I am a candidate. Here
are some reasons to vote for me when the time comes:
1) I don't have any other office, so if I win, I won't increase
consolidation (that's probably not a great reason, but I have better ones)
2) I plan to create a Python
Looks good, but I feel you could condense those two sentences into one
with something like this:
If there exists one or more Units of non-Aether Land in the possession
of Agora with the preservation switch set to False, either all of them
if there are less than 5 or 5 of them if there are 5 or
I made the rule but I think I'd have to say yes. It was the first
proposal I made, after all...
On 4/13/2018 8:26 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Should we repeal the emotions rule? No one seems to be using it.
-Aris
For the record, though, I think I do actually prefer the 5 auctions
thing. It seems like it's a lot more interesting.
On 4/13/2018 2:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I don't consider 1 auctions/5 auctions to be a patch. It works as is,
but some people want it a different way (never mind that includ
o argument, so if someone has
a reason why single land auctions are better, please explain them to me.
On 4/12/2018 7:09 PM, ATMunn wrote:
Haven't read any of the other posts yet, but I would say that I would
probably prefer it to be a single auction.
On 4/12/2018 4:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrot
So winning the game is not as valuable as winning an auction?
On 4/12/2018 8:46 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Title: Crystals
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: Aris
Co-author(s):
[I'm changing it so that players CAN upgrade facilities they don't own,
let me know if that's a problem.]
Amend Rule 2562, Fa
Haven't read any of the other posts yet, but I would say that I would
probably prefer it to be a single auction.
On 4/12/2018 4:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Reading R2004, it looks like it was *supposed* to be a single auction?
That's definitely not how the announcement below reads, and not how
ora's Box of
sorts
and
that the map and zombie mechanics are going to spiral out of
control
to
create some ultra-capitalist society in the future. Oh well.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 07:33 ATMunn wrote:
Actually I believe this failed, as I tried to move from black to
white
by spending o
I absolutely see where you're coming from, and I wouldn't mind a
contract for it. The point of the auction rules, though, was to allow
bidders to bid more than they have as long as they can pay it when the
auction ends. Although, doing something like this with a contract does
prevent players fr
Ah no problem man. I might go for Tailor or something instead, not sure.
On 4/8/2018 2:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh, sorry ATMunn - should get to the end of messages before quick responses.
I deputized because, since I was the one who pushed for officer-blotting
that led to the resignation, I
Welcome to the madness, Ouri! Been a while since we've had a completely
new player before. I think Trigon was the latest one?
On 4/3/2018 11:14 AM, אורי פופקו wrote:
I intend to become a player at this time
nttpf
On 4/3/2018 2:29 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
I bid 3 on auctions 4 and 5
On Apr 2, 2018, at 3:32 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
Land auctions now work. Hooray.
There are currently 6 public, unpreserved, non-aether land units in existence.
As the Cartographor, I am to choose 5 of them to be au
What happened to your name? Ørjan Johansen?
On 3/28/2018 7:38 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I change my vote on 8031 to:
If there are 4 or more valid unconditional FOR ballots cast on 8031 at
the end of the voting period, FOR. Otherwise AGAINST.
On Tue,
I am interested in judging CFJs again. I would like to be placed on the
Weekend court.
On 3/26/2018 9:02 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
COURT GAZETTE (Arbitor's weekly report for 27 Mar 2018)
Disclaimer: Informational only. No actions are contained in this report.
Information in this re
So hang on, what was broken again? And how does this fix it?
On 3/19/2018 12:55 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I submit, and pend with paper, the following proposal.
-Aris
---
Title: PAoaM Patch v4
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors: Gaelan, Trigon, G.
Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#")
Fine
--- ATMunn Nov 6,
2017
Quorum Not Stated {2sh} Alexis Nov 6, 2017 Quorum Not Stated {2sh}
Fines in
{} indicate no Fine Levied. Fines in [] indicate Fine Levied, but not
paid
Yellow Cards: Player Until Reason Apology
thanks :P
I guess I better start thinking of something to do... I mean, it doesn't
have to be a good proposal, it just has to meet the criteria of silliness :P
On 3/11/2018 4:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
(I *think* we fixed this...?)
I designate ATMunn to be next week's[1] Si
Wow, I didn't even realize how long it's been since PSS posted.
On 3/6/2018 7:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I flip o's master switch to Agora.
I flip pokes' master switch to Agora.
I intend to deregister, with 3 Agoran Consent, each of:
omd, o, Quazie, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, pokes
4. Make contracts second class legal persons (possibly only if they have
multiple parties and/or other conditions are met). This is the big one. We
wouldn't want them to be able to vote or support or object. What else
should/shouldn't they be able to do?
They probably shouldn't be able to call
Thanks for this, it's been a while since I read the PAoaM proposal and I
forgot a lot of stuff.
On 2/27/2018 12:26 AM, Edward Murphy wrote:
Agora economic FAQ (updated 2018-02-26)
This is an informal summary of the board-game-esque areas of
gameplay (as opposed to proposals/offices/CFJs), and
Fine for me. I do have a filter specifically excepting messages on the
Agoran mailing lists from going to spam, though.
On 2/26/2018 2:17 PM, Corona wrote:
Ok, this is weird. My own messages also go to my spam folder, which is why I
thought they weren't getting sent. Could everyone also please
Not really, actually. This message was sent in the afternoon for me, and
Trigon's original message was in late morning. I live in the Eastern
Standard Time timezone though, so I can't speak for all Americans. :P
(I'm also not registered so I couldn't do any of that anyway)
On 2/26/2018 1:46 PM
On 2/26/2018 1:09 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
[snip]
Players can have Nomicbots, which are assets with Instructions and a Name
and a Banner. A Nomicbot's Instructions is a text document with
instructions about its behavior. A Nomicbot's Instructions is blank by
default. A Nomicbot's name is a string,
I forget when I deregistered. When am I allowed to reregister?
On 2/25/2018 2:24 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
This is your local Cartographor calling in to remind everyone that as
yesterday ended an Agoran week, Agora has created in possession of the
following facilities the following items:
The mine at (-1, -1): 3 stones, 2 ore
The mine at (+1, +1): 3
right, I should know this, I wrote the rule... :P
On 2/24/2018 10:38 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Auctioneer defaults to Agora (R2547).
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018, ATMunn wrote:
Unless I'm missing something, doesn't an Auctioneer have to be specified?
On 2/24/2018 12:24 AM, Kerim Aydin w
What's VI?
On 2/24/2018 2:17 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I resolve the Agoran Decisions to adopt Proposals 8008-8015 as follows:
8008 (Picto-Nomic) by CuddleBeam, AI-1.0
FOR : CuddleBeam
AGAINST : Trigon, Alexis, Gaelan, ATMunn, nichdel, (Murphy)
PRESENT :
Quorum : 3
VI : 1/5 o
Unless I'm missing something, doesn't an Auctioneer have to be specified?
On 2/24/2018 12:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I submit the following Proposal, Zombie Lots, AI-2, co-author Aris, and
pend it with shinies:
-
Amend
of Honour...].
~Corona
On 02:00, Feb 20, 2018, at 02:00, "Ørjan Johansen" wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Corona wrote:
For this decision, the valid votes are {Murphy, ATMunn, Alexis,
Cuddle
Beam, Telnaior}, the vote collector is the Herald, and the voting
method
is instant-runoff.
M, Corona wrote:
I initiate the Agoran Decision on the Jan 2018 Medal of Honour.
For this decision, the valid votes are {Murphy, ATMunn, Alexis, Cuddle Beam,
Telnaior}, the vote collector is the Herald, and the voting method is
instant-runoff.
Upon the resolution of this decision, the Herald CAN, a
gistration will not be accepted (i.e.
will not have any effect on the game). [2] The rules may explicitly renounce
their jurisdiction over non-players, but their jurisdiction over the game
itself is final, binding, and absolute. [3]
The relevant actions in the caller's message must be throw
It would probably be something in the normal ASCII charset.
On 2/16/2018 4:51 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
How about Ç for coins?
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
Speaking of which, once Coins goes through I think we might add a symbol
for our main currency? ($,%,# whatever?
New bids are supposed to overwrite old ones, don't know if it actually
works.
On 2/15/2018 1:23 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
If you’re right about newer bids overwriting older ones, we should be fine.
Gaelan
On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:14 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Ah - entirely forgot about that. W
Haven't read the rest of the discussion, but what if there was a rule
that maybe, say, allowed a free pend every week, as long as the proposal
is under some character count. It might need some tweaking, but it could
work.
On 2/14/2018 6:21 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
I find that, when economic lim
Simple gratuitous arguments:
Twitter (specifically Cuddlebeam's) is not, and has never been, a public
forum. I don't see how a contract could make it act as so.
On 2/13/2018 10:11 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
https://twitter.com/Cuddlebeam/status/963611395257503744
I CFJ with shinies the followi
dabbing is a dead mem- wait, we're not supposed to talk about memes at
all here are we...
On 2/11/2018 11:49 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
Yes, that's a bit the intent.
A bit of a ridiculous way to make someone lose some shinies because the
Auction is underway but oh well lol *dabs*
On Mon, Feb 12,
I don't think this worked as you failed to specify With Agoran Consent.
On 2/11/2018 10:51 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Ugh. I intend to amend (per the last paragraph) this contract by removing the
all-caps line, if it exists, as well as the blank line following it. I support.
I get annoyed about
yers' ribbon holdings:
ROGCBMUVIPLWKAT
ais523 ROGCBMUV PLWKAT
aranea ROGCBM V PLW A
ATMunn A
babelian U
Bayushi MU
BedeM W
Chuck M
grok
e to see Agora active again, even if the reason is a bug. You've
been a great player, and I hope you reregister soon.
-Aris
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:28 PM, ATMunn wrote:
I deregister.
(I, at least in part, wrote all the auction rules that are causing all this
confusion...)
it's aleph-null not aleph-zero
On 2/8/2018 4:25 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
Might as well:
I bid an amount equal to the cardinality of the set of all Natural numbers
(aleph-zero), on each auction
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:07 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
What does “winning” mean, anyway?
I bid i shi
So this is what happens when CB becomes the silly person...
On 2/7/2018 12:29 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
Yes it is I, ladies and damsels, the master of muse, the tsar of taste.
Ahem.
*clears throat with some yodeling*
Indeed, I hereby create the following proposal named "An utmost excellent
propo
did the rule for get get fixed?
On 2/6/2018 9:53 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
I designate Cuddle Beam as next week's Silly Person.
-Alexis
kerim at u.washington.edu 25
Aug 17
Cuddle Beam cuddlebeam at gmail.com 25
Aug 17
ATMunn iamingodsarmy at gmail.com 21
Sep 17
Trigon reuben.staley at gmail.com 24
Sep 17
Alexis
It happens to us all. I think overall interest in Agora has been very
low recently, and it's only just starting to rise again. I personally
have nothing really to do, and I considered actually deregistering and
becoming a watcher. I'm still thinking about doing that, but I'll remain
a player fo
I agree with this.
On 2/4/2018 10:09 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Yah just actually propose wherever you last left it - if there's still something
wrong with it it would progress faster being voted down and re-proposed
instead of waiting for a perfect version.
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018, Corona wrote:
I'd
) ~ o became a candidate for the Arbitor election
Sat, Dec 16 2017 (14:29:05) ~ ATMunn inititated the Agoran Decision for the
Arbitor election
Sat, Dec 16 2017 (16:55:51) ~ Alexis published the Short Logical Ruleset
Sun, Dec 17 2017 (22:09:20) ~ Aris published the proposal pool
Sun, Dec 17 2017 (22
You're not the Arbitor, though, right? I thought you resigned. Or am I just
missing something here?
On 1/26/2018 4:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Because, you know, apathy.
I deputize for the Assessor to recuse Publius Scribonius Scholasticus from
CFJ 3606. (recusal is over 14 days late).
I a
Assessor is the vote collector for
elections these days; pretty sure it used to be the ADoP.)
I make and accept a CoE on the recent alleged resolution of the Arbitor
election, as it also didn't announce deputisation.
ATMunn wrote:
> As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran D
But e holds the office?
On 1/18/2018 9:47 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
CoE: This fails as you didn't announce you were deputising to do so.
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 at 21:46 Edward Murphy wrote:
ATMunn wrote:
> As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
> select
Speaking of the ADoP, I kind of feel like it's my responsibility to
figure out how to get people into these offices, and how to resolve
these elections. That's actually more of a responsibility that you might
think, and I'm just not feeling up to it right now. I've been somewhat
sick over the last
!
Although the scansion is a bit hard. There should be a prize for anyone
who manages to sing the whole thing (each day included.)
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On 22:30, Jan 5, 2018, at 22:30, ATMunn
wrote:
That took an interesting turn.
Well done, by the way! I'm not sure I could have come u
That took an interesting turn.
Well done, by the way! I'm not sure I could have come up with that many
different things. :P
On 1/5/2018 2:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On the twelfth day of Nomic, the Forum sent to me
Twelve thousand messages containing
eleven threads discussing
ten claims of e
Welcome back!
On 12/29/2017 3:57 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
i register
That doesn't even matter anyways, the message was NttPF.
And yes, Merry Christmas :)
On 12/25/2017 8:55 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
see title
I'm sorry, but I believe precedent is that this is not clear enough for an
action.
Also, Merry Christmas!
Ørjan.
Are you taking suggestions here?
On 12/25/2017 9:26 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On the first day of Nomic, the Forum gave to me
- A ruleset of perfect clarity.
(To be continued)
When would a player not be eligible for being assigned a CFJ?
On 12/24/2017 12:07 AM, Edward Murphy wrote:
I AP-pend the proposal below.
Proposal: Hopefully routine fixes
(AI = 3)
Amend Rule 991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing "the Arbitor CAN
assign any player" with "the Arbitor CAN assign
I think the thing that makes Agora unique, aside from its ruleset, is the
fact that it does use a mailing list. It's going to have active times and
inactive times, of course, but wouldn't anything?
Another thing is that Agora almost changes too quickly to have a GNDT. We're
constantly changing th
one
candidate? Otherwise, we'll have to fix this by proposal (by either electing
via proposal or changing the rule), and that would be a hassle.
On 12/20/2017 6:07 PM, ATMunn wrote:
It's alright.
I initiate an election for the office of Assessor.
On 12/20/2017 3:50 PM, Publius Scri
Thank you for this, G.!
Would you like to stay interim for now, or should I initiate an election?
On 12/20/2017 4:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I deputise for the Reportor to publish the following Weekly Report.
THE WEEKLY SALPINX
Winter So
Is "Eastman" a term you made up, or is it a real thing? Just curious.
Also, most of the time February won't have a 29th, so that might create some
problems (but maybe not).
On 12/19/2017 11:53 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Eastman weeks
(AI = 2)
Amend Rule 1023 (Agoran Time) by app
We currently have no Arbitor, but there is an election going on. I'm sure the
new Arbitor will honor this and assign CFJs to you (well, unless Cuddlebeam
gets elected), but they may not keep the same Day/Night/Weekend court system.
You could also run for Arbitor yourself.
On 12/18/2017 3:14 AM
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2017-December/037600.html
On 12/17/2017 6:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
What's wrong with it, exactly? It worked for several proposals AFAIK
no one claimed it wasn't working...
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017, ATMunn wrote:
I
Welcome back!
On 12/17/2017 5:18 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
Having caught up on the Public Fora, I register.
s/instead/also
On 12/17/2017 6:39 PM, ATMunn wrote:
If you vote AGAINST, it would be nice if you instead proposed a fix proposal.
The rule is still quite broken.
On 12/17/2017 5:17 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 at 17:10 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com>
Title Pender Pend fee
---
7994* ATMunn 1.0 Silliness, Begone! ATMunn 1 AP
AGAINST
7995* Alexis 3.0 Older Cleanliness Alexis 1 AP
FOR
-Alexis
d fee
---
7994* ATMunn 1.0 Silliness, Begone! ATMunn 1 AP
7995* Alexis 3.0 Older Cleanliness Alexis 1 AP
The proposal pool is currently empty.
Legend: * : Proposal is pending.
A proposal may be pended for 1 AP, or for 1/20th the Floating Value
in shines (se
Ah yep, it was.
On 12/14/2017 6:39 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I think this might be the list you were looking for:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2017-November/048790.html
-Aris
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:11 AM, ATMunn wrote:
Thank you!
On 12/13/2017
I also recently started working on a proposal based on an old system from
the early 2000s. G. wrote a thesis about the old system, and I decided to
try and see what that would look like today. Not sure when that will be
done, though.
On 12/14/2017 5:58 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
They are the curr
The nomination period for the Arbitor election is going to end on
Saturday, and if nobody runs for it, the election will end with no
winner. We need an Arbitor, so if someone would be willing to take it
(even temporarily) that would be great.
I can (and will) obviously start another election if t
Thank you!
On 12/13/2017 2:04 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2017-May/034843.html
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017, ATMunn wrote:
I seem to remember a post by G. that had a link to eir current thesis, which
was talking about an old economic
I seem to remember a post by G. that had a link to eir current thesis, which
was talking about an old economic system from when e joined the game. I think e
also posted some other messages relating to economic systems. I tried for about
half an hour to find it, and couldn't. I decided it would
What if the Arbitor just refused all CFJs? Or none of them?
On 12/10/2017 8:12 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 01:07 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
Another argument in favour of making CFJ calls less fundamentally
conditional.
Perhaps we should pragmatise CFJs? If you call them, they a
d the voting period on all of these decisions by 7 days and issue
a humiliating public reminder to 天火狐, Quazie, Gaelan, omd, nichdel, G.,
Cuddlebeam, V.J. Rada, ATMunn, Trigon, Telnaior, and Corona.
On 12/03/2017 06:38 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the A
What would be an example of a "basic" conditional action?
On 12/10/2017 7:04 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 4:00 PM Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 10:55 +1100, Madeline wrote:
On 2017-12-11 03:54, Corona wrote:
I cause ACU to transfer to me 5-(no. of Agora's shini
401 - 500 of 841 matches
Mail list logo
