On 6/26/2020 6:14 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/26/20 9:11 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 16:08, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> On 6/26/2020 8:49 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>&g
On 6/26/2020 8:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
>
> G., you will need to initiate the decisions, but you can't yet, so hold
> on until the Fixes pass.
>
Can someone point me to the CFJ that says "authorized to" conditions are
triggered by a CAN, but not a SHALL?
On 6/26/2020 8:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> G., you will need to initiate the decisions, but you can't yet, so hold
> on until the Fixes pass.
>
Yah knowing this was coming up is one reason I grabbed the green ribbon
when I did :)
On 6/26/2020 8:49 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/19/20 8:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
>> The below CFJ is 3851. I assign it to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.
>>
>> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3851
>>
>>
On 6/25/2020 4:54 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/25/20 7:48 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/25/2020 4:40 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Auction regulations are regulations defined by this rule, all of which
>>> co
On 6/25/2020 4:40 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> Auction regulations are regulations defined by this rule, all of which
> comprise a single body of law, and for which the Treasuror is the
> promulgator. The scope of auction regulations is wholly restricted to
> defining specific
oh, crud. I copy and pasted and forgot to change "grok" to "ATMunn".
There's actually a couple precedents that the assignment in the message
worked, not the subject line. So I guess these are "linked" with grok as
judge (unless e recuses emself from one). Sorry about that!
On 6/25/2020 3:24
On 6/25/2020 11:33 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 17:03, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 6/25/2020 9:33 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 14:00, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>
On 6/25/2020 11:16 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2020-06-25 10:41, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/25/20 12:39 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
>> agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 6/25/20 12:37 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
This also
On 6/25/2020 9:33 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 14:00, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 6/24/2020 8:47 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Bump. Here's an updated text; all I did was remove the once-per-mon
On 6/25/2020 9:41 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> The Registrar wouldn't need to write any regulations, e would just need
> to pick a method that the Treasuror has defined in the auction regulations.
>
I think the auctioneer is free to point to any method that follows the
On 6/24/2020 7:51 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Jun 24, 2020, at 6:55 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>
>>
>> I object to any and all intents to declare apathy.
>
> But does this adequately identify the intents being objected to?
>
> (I think there might have been a CFJ
On 6/24/2020 8:47 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> Bump. Here's an updated text; all I did was remove the once-per-month
> restriction. G., what do you think about submitting this before nch's
> and R. Lee's possible victory? I'm happy to pend it (assuming
> DracoLotto worked as
I had it in mine for a bit the last time a rash of these broke out.
On 6/24/2020 6:57 AM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> (trigon, put this in your signature)
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:56 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> I
On 6/23/2020 1:34 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/23/20 3:21 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 1:16 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
>> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/23/20 4:13 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
I
On 6/23/2020 1:21 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 1:16 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 6/23/20 4:13 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
>>> I publish the following Notice of Honour:
>>>+1 Agora
On 6/23/2020 11:46 AM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:42 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business
> wrote:
>> If there exists no CFJ with the statement "If the person who sent the
>> above message is a player, e cast a vote on Proposal 8442 in that
>> message.", I initiate
On 6/23/2020 10:21 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/23/20 12:16 PM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
>> For what it's worth, I think that "manually" skunking this scam by proposal
>> would be a reasonable way to resolve the circumstance; I doubt either the
>> scamsters, nor the
On 6/23/2020 7:57 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/23/20 9:53 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/23/2020 7:49 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> This scam doesn't actually grind out economy to a hault, or at least it
>>> doesn't
On 6/23/2020 7:49 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> This scam doesn't actually grind out economy to a hault, or at least it
> doesn't have to. When someone wins by victory points, cards and products
> get reset but coins, blots, and assets created by contracts don't. That
> means there
On 6/23/2020 7:31 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/23/20 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/23/2020 7:03 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> On 6/23/20 10:01 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>> On 6/23/
On 6/23/2020 7:03 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/23/20 10:01 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/23/20 8:58 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> What I mean to say is that, to my mind, closing a loophole that allows a
>>> scam clearly against the intent of
On 6/23/2020 7:08 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/23/20 10:07 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>> You're right, I missed that last night. Still a poor reason to uninstall
>> a recently elected official I think, I'm not abusing the office.
>>
>
> You're not abusing it, but
On 6/22/2020 5:14 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> It's generally agreed that the PAoaM economic model didn't work out. Unlike
> the shinies economy, which is generally agreed to have suffered from
> unpredictable boom bust cycles that were more annoying than anything else,
> I
On 6/22/2020 3:47 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/22/20 6:42 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 3:40 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
>> agora-official wrote:
>>> SILVER QUILLS
>>> Alexis
On 6/22/2020 3:07 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 3:01 PM Aris Merchant wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:58 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/22/20 5:10 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
I still think it would be nice to have a party in
On 6/22/2020 1:55 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 20:53, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
> agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/22/20 4:06 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 6/22/20 3:00 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
>>>
On 6/22/2020 1:00 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/22/20 3:50 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I can do that without objection
>
> I can save everyone time by saying that I will object.
There's a weird, edge-case, legal precedent (that I won't bother to look
for,
sounds good to me
On 6/22/2020 11:37 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> I support this as well.
>
> On 6/22/2020 2:30 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/22/20 2:29 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> I intend to make two changes to the Header and one change to the
>>>
Note to Treasuror: having seen the Notary's list of tentative members of
this contract, I think there's significant ambiguity in this calculation
and "all" does not communicate the quantity.
On 6/21/2020 6:21 PM, Rebecca via agora-business wrote:
> I believe there are 7 parties to the
On 6/22/2020 10:29 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/22/2020 1:21 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/22/2020 10:16 AM, ATMunn via agora-official wrote:
>>>
>>&g
On 6/22/2020 10:16 AM, ATMunn via agora-official wrote:
>
> "The Plunder Partnership" (revision 4)
> Parties: Cuddlebeam, P.S.S.[1], Jason, R. Lee, Falsifian, Aris, ATMunn
> [Note: currently somewhat disputed. See [2] and
On 6/22/2020 9:33 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/22/2020 12:14 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>> There is now a section of the website with Help for new players. I plan
>> to keep this as something the Webmastor unilaterally maintains since
>> it's supplemental, but would
On 6/22/2020 9:14 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> There is now a section of the website with Help for new players. I plan
> to keep this as something the Webmastor unilaterally maintains since
> it's supplemental, but would appreciate any feedback.
>
> https://agoranomic.org/Help/
Good
On 6/21/2020 8:15 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> As Trigon points out, my message's subject might be more properly "BUS:
> TRIGON" rather than "TRIGON".
CFJ 3459 suggests we accept the evidence of a message's sender in terms of
what the subject line was when it was sent:
On 6/21/2020 2:30 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> Like I said, I'm not upset, just... mildly frustrated. Could you attempt to
> get your feedback in somewhat earlier in the process next time? I know the
> lists have been really busy lately, but this has been up for discussion for
On 6/21/2020 2:11 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> 8448* Aris, Alexis, Falsifian 3.0 Populist Administration
> AGAINST. I think it's very important that elections clear the regulatory
> slate for incoming officers (or at least let the incoming officer clear
> the slate). This current version
On 6/21/2020 12:49 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/21/20 3:45 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>> Herald's Weekly report
>>
>> Date of Last Report: 14 June 2020
>> Date of This Report: 21 June 2020
>>
>> Karma Entity
>> - --
>>
>> <=
On 6/21/2020 10:11 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 15:52, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> [This confuses everyone regularly, except Aris. Let's just make it clear]
>>
>> I submit the following proposal "no backdating needed", AI-3:
>>
>>
On 6/21/2020 8:33 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/21/20 2:16 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Here's my draft report. It's been a completely exhausting day in a
>> busy week, so the chance of errors here are higher than normal.
>
> That's alright! You
On 6/20/2020 11:32 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:25 PM Rebecca wrote:
>>
>> Welcome! My advice is just do stuff when you feel like it, no need to read
>> every message, rule or CFJ
>
> I on the other hand would advise reading all of the rules and
>
On 6/20/20 6:10 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> Due to a multitude of factors, I've noticed a lot of sentiment to "rebrand"
> a bit. Along with this, I would like to raise the discussion of potentially
> creating a new logo of sorts for Agora. The coat-of-arms has stood as our
>
On 6/20/2020 4:00 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/20/20 5:56 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>> I do, however, think setting up a chat client for discussion that runs
>> alongside a-d would be useful for many things, such as private
>> discussion of alliances, bugfixing on proposals and
On 6/20/2020 3:47 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I think there are valid criticisms of how we use email, and we could adopt
> guidelines to change that, but if we started to use Discord or anything other
> than IRC or email for significant amounts of discussion, I think I’d
On 6/20/2020 3:01 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/20/20 4:55 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/20/2020 2:46 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> To be clear, I'd never suggest moving gameplay to a chat client. Discord
>>> did not e
On 6/20/2020 2:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I don't think we need continuity/historicity on every card transfer, and
> the only reason for some of the other reports to have timestamped
> documents (e.g. Treasuror) is to have self-ratified rollback points.
What do people think about a type of
On 6/20/2020 2:42 PM, Stefan Fjellander via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I know the downside to chat systems is that things aren't recorded in a
> way
> that can be referenced long term,
> I happen to run an somewhat nomiclike conlang discord server, where we have
> a few channels corresponding
On 6/20/2020 2:46 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> To be clear, I'd never suggest moving gameplay to a chat client. Discord
> did not exist 27 years ago, and it's not that likely to exist in 27
> years. Agora needs something with the continuity of email. This would
> only be discussion
On 6/20/2020 2:10 PM, Stefan Fjellander via agora-discussion wrote:
> Thus, I was in the position of "I get 20-50 emails overnight, of which I
> instantly delete 99%, from a community which I almost never interact with
> and which I don't even understand the basics of", and it's unfair both to
>
On 6/20/2020 1:49 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/20/20 8:50 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/20/20 7:20 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> This may be the programmer in me speaking, but I don't think it's a good
>>> idea to couple these two values
On 6/20/2020 11:55 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 10:36 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On 6/19/2020 10:35 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
>>> These judgments are basically drafts. I'm assigning them because I've
>>> got to assign something, but I'm
On 6/20/2020 11:29 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 at 01:45, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> I think we need a free way of pending patch proposals. The voters appear to
>> agree with me.
A bit of spin here to correct :). 5 voters voted FOR, 5 voters voted
AGAINST.
On 6/20/2020 11:04 AM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 22:04, Edward Murphy wrote:
>>
>> G. wrote:
>>
>>> The below CFJ is 3844. I assign it to Murphy.
>>>
>>> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3844
>>>
>>> ===
On 6/19/2020 10:35 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> These judgments are basically drafts. I'm assigning them because I've
> got to assign something, but I'm happy to reconsider as appropriate. I
> think the core of the arguments should be good though.
I think your judgements as-is
On 6/19/2020 9:06 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:> Without
objection is a really high standard. My rule of thumb is that if
> something requires without objection approval, someone will object. They
> may even object for no reason, because they don't like the idea of a
> proposal
On 6/19/2020 7:06 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2020-06-19 19:44, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I think we need a free way of pending patch proposals. The voters appear to
>> agree with me. I know some prominent and respected voices disagree, but the
>>
On 6/19/2020 6:31 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 6:28 PM Rebecca via agora-business
> wrote:
>>
>> I certify every proposal in the proposal pool. I wasn't going to win in
>> this system anyway (and i dont really care about winning) and this gives me
>>
On 6/19/2020 6:06 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> I always seem to get the least CFJs :(
Hmmm... I think I've rotated pretty equally but maybe I'm wrong. I
noticed a couple weeks ago I had to skip you when you were on top (just
for one set of cfjs) because most of the cases were
On 6/19/2020 5:49 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 5:35 PM nch via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 6/19/20 7:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
>>> The below CFJ is 3853. I assign it to nch.
>>>
>>>
On 6/19/2020 5:25 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> A contract which has no explicit mechanism for joining may still
> be joined by other parties in some cases.
>
> The Plunder Partnership as it existed on June 15, 2020 could be
> joined by other players.
On 6/19/2020 5:31 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> This portion of the judge's arguments is very interesting. It sounds almost
> more like the sort of thing one would expect to hear in the caller's
> arguments. But that can't be right, now can it? ;)
>
> -Aris
>
gotcha thanks
On 6/19/2020 3:27 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 3:25 PM nch wrote:
>> On 6/18/20 5:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>> -Is 10 coins a good fee for Drawing?
>>> I don't think we can answer this right n
On 6/19/2020 3:30 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 3:28 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On 6/19/2020 2:31 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-business wrote:
>>> On 2020-06-19 07:32, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>> Since the as
On 6/19/2020 2:31 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-business wrote:
> On 2020-06-19 07:32, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Since the asset list rarely changes, may I suggest putting it lower down
>> in a lower profile?
>
> Why did we decide it was necessary to track t
On 6/19/2020 11:26 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/19/20 1:53 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Sure, it's all relative exchange ranges, I agree. But there's a fixed
>> point because they're both the cost of "pending 1 proposal". If tha
On 6/19/2020 10:16 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Friday, 19 June 2020, 16:24:06 GMT+1, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Not part of arguments: lol when I voted against this it was because it
>> lacked the basic checks (e.g. dependent action or something). Regardless
>> of CFJ outcome you
On 6/19/2020 8:31 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/19/20 11:21 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> Not part of arguments: lol when I voted against this it was because it
>> lacked the basic checks (e.g. dependent action or something). Regardless
>> of CFJ outcome you
On 6/19/2020 7:40 AM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> i remember someone called that CFJ in response to the first CFJ i ever
> called
> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3523
Thanks, I didn't remember that! The rule language has changed, though,
from (according to those
On 6/19/2020 7:18 AM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> there is a precedent actually that you can bar in a later message without
> recalling the CFJ if its "reasonably continuous" or something.
Can you point me to that doesn't ring a bell.
On 6/19/2020 7:03 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I CFJ: "Within the past week, Jason committed the crime of Uncertain
> Certification."
thanks! (the reason I didn't right away is I've lost count this week I
think I'm getting close to excess cfj territory).
On 6/19/2020 6:39 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 6/19/20 12:36 AM, Rebecca via agora-business wrote:
>> Hey nerd, a proposal is only a patch if
>>
>> A player SHALL NOT certify a proposal unless its sole function is
>> to minimally rectify a bug, error, or ambiguity (a
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:48 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 6/18/2020 8:02 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Merely thinking and planning to commit murder isn't attempted murder, the
>&g
On 6/19/2020 1:20 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2020-06-19 01:48, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Oh, another thing: I think you're supposed to list out the individual types
>> of cards and products? Isn't each its own class of asset?
>
> Just checked in on the
On 6/18/2020 8:02 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> Merely thinking and planning to commit murder isn't attempted murder, the
> acts carried out have to be "more than merely preparatory" (under English
> law). The same applies to this analogous crime, merely preparing to take
> the
Oh - forgot a couple comments!
On 6/18/2020 1:37 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> Enact a power-1 rule entitled "Discarding" with the following text:
> When a player pays a set of at least 2 cards,
You need to add something here - "pay" on its own could count paying
someone else,
On 6/18/2020 1:37 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> exactly proportional to the number of that Card
When we had a card game with a deck once, we had a lot of minor errors
happen where a card was thought to be in the deck that wasn't, or vice
versa. This led to a lot of breakages of
Minor discussion topic here.
Right now, as evidenced by recent CFJ, the rules are in a slightly weird
place in winning where sometimes you do a thing (Raise a Banner) that
causes you to win, and sometimes what you do is "win by announcement" if
certain conditions are met. These can break in
On 6/18/2020 9:38 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/18/20 12:31 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>
>> Fair's fair.
>>
>> I withdraw the proposal "UV Sunblock" from the pool.
>>
>> I submit the following Proposal, "UV-G Sunblock" AI-3, co=author ais523:
>>
On 6/17/2020 5:32 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/17/20 8:23 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>> RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 8431-8441
>> =
>>
>> IDTitle Result
>>
>>
On 6/17/2020 3:15 PM, grok via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, 7:44 PM Rebecca wrote:
>
>> either choice is perfectly valid and fine, but given that stuff is always
>> changing, you may make a mistake with the new stuff and get caught in an
>> infinite chain at that point lol
>>
On 6/16/2020 5:01 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:41 PM Aris Merchant wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:20 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On 6/13/2020 10:07 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 1:04 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 6/13/2020
On 6/16/2020 5:13 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> R. Lee wrote:
>
>> Once again, I intend to transfer a victory card and a legislative card from
>> the L department to me, without objection.
>
> Right, IIRC this is just recovery from Combinotron.
>
>> I intend to transfer 500
On 6/16/2020 4:11 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/16/20 6:59 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, a player CAN, by announcement,
>>> transfer the talisman for em to emself.
>> Could we make this "acting as emself"? Without that,
On 6/16/2020 1:31 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 20:17, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>> I could have just let this pass and banked some MAJOR coinage but the
>> long-term consequences of having people be paranoid about my contracts
>> isn't worth it imo, I much prefer
On 6/13/2020 5:09 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> And Cuddlebeam said this:
>
>> I intend, without objection, to transfer all coins belonging to the Lost
>> and Found Department to The Plunder Partnership.
>
>
> My reading is that Cuddlebeam only specified an intent to transfer
On 6/15/2020 11:28 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:26 AM Jason Cobb wrote:
>> On 6/15/20 2:20 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> to be clear, I wasn't really following this conversation it just caught
>> my
>>> eye
On 6/15/2020 11:12 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 6/13/2020 5:16 PM, Rebecca via agora-business wrote:
>> I do intend to transfer a victory card and also intend to transfer a
>> legislative card from the Lost and Found Department to myself, both without
>> objection.
>
> arrgh me hearties, is
On 6/13/2020 5:16 PM, Rebecca via agora-business wrote:
> I do intend to transfer a victory card and also intend to transfer a
> legislative card from the Lost and Found Department to myself, both without
> objection.
arrgh me hearties, is there a reason nobody be objecting to this one.
I tend to do awards in batches so I don't lose track, this is last week's
batch. (this week's batch will be awarded before end of next week).
On 6/14/2020 3:59 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> what about me
>
> On 6/14/2020 3:41 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>
>> For
On 6/14/2020 2:25 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> This is actually very interesting to me. Why is being able to strictly
> enforce secret deals *even necessary*? In Blognomic, secret alliances are
> rampant but there's never anything formal that forces you to do as the
> alliance
Cuddlebeam wrote:
> G. wrote:
>> Cuddlebeam wrote:
>>> Small survey for who is aiming for Victory Cards/Points because barring a
>>> scam surprising us, it’s going to be way harder to win if someone has to
>>> compete with someone else to get that 20 VP margin.
>>>
>>> I personally would like to
On 6/14/2020 12:15 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> Small survey for who is aiming for Victory Cards/Points because barring a
> scam surprising us, it’s going to be way harder to win if someone has to
> compete with someone else to get that 20 VP margin.
>
> I personally would like
On 6/14/2020 11:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/14/20 1:39 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>> RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 8409-8430
>> =
>
> I earn a Red Ribbon for Proposal 8422. I award myself Orange Glitter for
> Proposal 8422. I
On 6/14/2020 11:19 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/14/20 1:12 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>
>> On 6/14/2020 10:14 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 7:02 AM nch wrote:
>>>> On 6/14/20 8:55
On 6/14/2020 11:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 6/14/2020 11:01 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/14/20 1:44 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> I'll start pushing my weekly report somewhere so people can bookmark it to
>>> check deadline
On 6/14/2020 10:14 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 7:02 AM nch wrote:
>> On 6/14/20 8:55 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
* All members have been downgraded except me, g, and comex.
Now that everyone has read and write access the
On 6/14/2020 11:01 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/14/20 1:44 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I'll start pushing my weekly report somewhere so people can bookmark it to
>> check deadlines or whatnot - would people prefer it on my site or o
On 6/14/2020 2:36 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:44 AM Rebecca wrote:
>>
>> we can be a little overly rude to people who misinterpret the rules or
>> forget about a rule or two but if anyone actually tries to tell you they've
>> never made a similar
On 6/14/2020 7:14 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/14/20 2:30 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 2020-06-13 22:55, Reuben Staley wrote:
>>> On 2020-06-13 22:27, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
I personally dislike the new format as gmail does NOT give
On 6/14/2020 10:39 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 8409-8430
Since we're talking about reporting and usage, can I mention (with great
appreciation for the work of Assessor) that the lack of a quick summary
table of this report makes both current reading and
501 - 600 of 1009 matches
Mail list logo
