2009/6/7 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Tiger wrote:
2009/6/7 Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jonatan
Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I really couldn't find any other way of reading that rule that made as
much
2009/6/7 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Ed Murphy wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
Please! Trim these messages before responding.
Or at least quote using so my QuoteCollapse add-on will work.
I do. It's the GMail guys who use tabs.
The GMail huys who use RTF. I've turned that off.
--
-Tiger
Tiger wrote:
That's what I hoped. Otherwise I would have tried to get the panel to
not remand.
Panels have generally interpreted I don't want it back as making
REMAND clearly inappropriate, on the grounds that the prior judge
would evidently not do a better job.
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 10:11 -0700, Taral wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I remind the appeals panel in CFJ 2480a ({Wooble, Rodlen, Tiger}) that
they CAN and SHALL destroy the 4 rests I own:
{{{
If a verdict or sentence that led to
the
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 18:16 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/6/6 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgment as homonyms (and hence
the bad puns used here) are not a valid means of interpreting a statement.
Typo rule, you... you uncouth... person!
I'm
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 15:58 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Additionally, the game of Agora began in June of 1993; R1727 takes
precedence over R2244 numerically), as does R104 (by Power), which
tells us that the speaker for the first game shall be Michael; thus
the first game must have happened
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 16:04 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Goethe wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with
3 support, or without objection, or by spending 1 Note.
Why bother with distributability then. -G.
To
c-walker wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
mailto:emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Flight Schedule
If I haven't already, I join this contract.
It lets you, but you don't need to; props are available to all
first-class players, amendment is
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c-walker wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
mailto:emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Flight Schedule
If I haven't already, I join this contract.
It lets you, but you
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2545a
Appeal 2545a
Panelist: Tiger
Decision:
Panelist:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Jonatan
Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/7 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com
wrote:
The following proposal constitutes the Anarchists weekly duties.
Anarchist
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Jonatan
Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/7 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com
This case is about HTML mail.
On 2009-06-07, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2570
== CFJ 2570 ==
C-walker recently submitted a
Fail
On 2009-06-07, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
How ironic!
On 2009-06-07, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/7/09, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Flight Schedule
If I haven't already, I join this contract.
--
C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
You
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
If I haven't already, I join this contract.
You can't join this contract.
R2198:
If a contract does not purport to regulate becoming a party to it, then any
person CAN become a party to it by announcement.
--
Intentional.
On 6/7/09, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
How ironic!
On 2009-06-07, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/7/09, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Prop holdings
-
25 ais523
15 allispaul
13 Billy Pilgrim
7 comex
13 coppro
13 ehird
13 G.
17 Murphy
13 OscarMeyr
10 Pavitra
13 Quazie
17 root
12 Sgeo
17 Tiger
13 Tom
17 Wooble
17
Taral wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Prop holdings
-
25 ais523
15 allispaul
13 Billy Pilgrim
7 comex
13 coppro
13 ehird
13 G.
17 Murphy
13 OscarMeyr
10 Pavitra
13 Quazie
17 root
12 Sgeo
17 Tiger
13 Tom
17
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Very little or no lurk time (II=1, AI=1)
{
Amend rule 1922, Defined Regular Patent Titles, by adding a new bullet
to the end of the bulleted list reading:
(i) Leapt before Lookt, awarded to those individuals
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Taraltar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're tired of the position, I'll gladly take it.
I intend, with support, to initiate an election for Anarchist.
--
Taral tar...@gmail.com
Please
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 08:55 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
= Criminal Case 2480 =
Appeal:
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 10:15 -0700, Taral wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Very little or no lurk time (II=1, AI=1)
{
Amend rule 1922, Defined Regular Patent Titles, by adding a new bullet
to the end of the bulleted list reading:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
(i) Leapt before Lookt, awarded to those individuals who attempted to
emulate First Speaker Michael Norrish by registering as soon as
possible after hearing about Agora.
Award the Patent Title of Not A Lurker to Yally,
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 12:08 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 11:32 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
The only risk I see is that reducing quorum when the number of active
players stays high ups the
Alex Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 12:08 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 11:32 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
The only risk I see is that reducing quorum when the number of active
players stays high
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 12:08 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
(And you'd need to include both the Rubberstamper and the wielder of the
veto in the 3). It's actually been a long time since we've had a proposal
that people on both sides have used the various
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Alex Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 12:08 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
(And you'd need to include both the Rubberstamper and the wielder of the
veto in the 3). It's actually been a long time since we've had a proposal
that people on both sides have used
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 13:37 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
Alex Smith wrote:
What about a sort of proposal that can't be made democratic, but can't
do anything but award wins? That would let people mess around with all
the ordinary-proposal tricks without making things too hairy.
All that would
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 13:37 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
Alex Smith wrote:
What about a sort of proposal that can't be made democratic, but can't
do anything but award wins? That would let people mess around with all
the ordinary-proposal tricks without
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
WEEKLY REPORTS
Office Subject Last published
--
Conductor Notes 06 Jun 09
CotC Cases,
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
WEEKLY REPORTS
Office Subject Last published
--
Conductor Notes 06 Jun 09
CotC
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 21:44 -0700, Charles Reiss wrote:
On 6/1/09 6:13 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:33 AM, comex com...@gmail.com
mailto:com...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Attitude
I intend, with
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 19:11 -0400, Quazie wrote:
I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the person who, while not a
player and not barred from registering (either due to recent
deregistration or non-personship), attempts to
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Taraltar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Kyle Marek-Spartzzeckal...@gmail.com wrote:
I support and do so.
I nominate allispaul for Anarchist.
--
Taral tar...@gmail.com
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 21:44 -0700, Charles Reiss wrote:
On 6/1/09 6:13 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:33 AM, comex
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 17:14, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I publish an NoV alleging that Quazie violated Rule 2247, a power-1
rule, by failing to perform the Janitor's weekly duties for the week
beginning on 1 June 2009.
Fails. You need support to do this as you have
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 17:14, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I publish an NoV alleging that Quazie violated Rule 2247, a power-1
rule, by failing to perform the Janitor's weekly duties for the week
beginning on 1 June 2009.
Fails. You need support to do
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 17:14, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I publish an NoV alleging that Quazie violated Rule 2247, a power-1
rule, by failing to perform the Janitor's weekly duties for
2009/6/8 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
Corrected IADoP's Office Report
HTML KILL
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
In view of these facts, I find that the space in the phrase registered
continuously was dropped after the message left C-walker's normal
domain of technical control. This situation is fundamentally
Elliott Hird wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2570
== CFJ 2570 ==
C-walker recently submitted a proposal containing the 'word'
'registeredcontinuously'.
Charles Walker wrote:
proposal:
{
SHOULD
AI 3, II 2
In Rule 2152, Mother, May I?, replace point 7 with:
{{
7. SHOULD, ENCOURAGED, RECOMMENDED: Before failing to perform the described
action, the full implications of failing to perform it SHALL be understood
and carefully
The HTML version had what rendered as a line break or space between the words.
On 2009-06-08, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Elliott Hird wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2570
== CFJ 2570
Elliott Hird wrote:
On 2009-06-08, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Elliott Hird wrote:
This case is about HTML mail.
I don't see what you're getting at. I was and am aware that HTML, DIV
tags, and MIME were all part of the situation; are you seeing some issue
or
46 matches
Mail list logo
