Re: DIS: Proto-proposal: Some economic suggestions

gt; wrote: > > >> On May 17, 2017, at 11:26 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com >> <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote: >> >> The only problem I see is that the secretary is free to cheat on the >> randomness with no accountability. It’s possible t

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Machine-Readable Reports

Yes. I intend to deputize as soon as the SLR becomes overdue (is it? I thought G. said it wasn’t, but I thought it was). > On May 17, 2017, at 7:59 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > >> On May 17, 2017, at 10:57 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com>

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Deputy Tailor] Ribbons

I have a cyan now as well. Not sure if the republished report reflects the game state at the time of the initial publishing or the republishing. Gaelan > On May 17, 2017, at 11:08 PM, Quazie wrote: > > COE PSS and I have Cyans > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 20:56 Alex

DIS: The Hypertext Logical Ruleset

I quickly threw together an HTML format of the ruleset. The formatting’s a bit off (I’ll be invoking Cleanup Time soon to fix some of it), but it’s decent. It also has keywords link to relative rules, which should make it a bit easier for newcomers to read the ruleset.

Re: DIS: Proto-proposal: Some economic suggestions

The only problem I see is that the secretary is free to cheat on the randomness with no accountability. It’s possible to generate verifiable randomness (hash of the Bitcoin block mined immediately after the timestamp of this message); we might want to incorporate that. I see four ways to do

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Machine-Readable Reports

> >> On May 17, 2017, at 12:41 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> >> Very well. I retract my proposal, replacing it with an informal request that >> if someone has a machine-readable record they use to generate their report, >> they publish i

DIS: Re: BUS: Super Election Season

For Rulekeepor, I've parsed the current FLR into YAML files and am working on scripts to generate the FLR, SLR and probably an HTML file from the YAML. Maybe it would be possible to have proposals submitted as diffs? That way it would be trivial for the Keepor to apply them. If I were elected

DIS: [Proto] G. Shiny repair

If G.’s shines do become lost, I would like to propose this in advance: Title: Shiny Reshuffling AI: 2 Amend Rule 2487 (Shiny Supply Level) by replacing 1000 with 1001. After any changes to the gamestate occur as a result of the previous change, amend the same rule by replacing 1001 with 1000.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Machine-Readable Reports

I don't think "machine readable" needs to be defined any more clearly for now—it's a SHOULD, so if you wanted to ignore the rule you'd be perfectly fine anyway. What are the rules for determining the source of a message? Could we have a web-based form for transferring currency that

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7850 (Attempt 1)

I’ve been watching Agora off and on for a few years now, and I too am saddened to see you go. Before you go, G., would you mind publishing the XML ruleset you mentioned that you had? I imagine it would make life much easier for whoever followed you. > On May 15, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Kerim Aydin

Re: DIS: testing mailman 3

Looks like the HTML on list.agoranomic.org is already bootstrap, so adding in the header shouldn’t be too hard. Gaelan > On Jun 22, 2017, at 8:20 PM, omd wrote: > > I'd like to change the HTML so it shares the site header (and maybe > other styling) from

DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Short Logical Ruleset

Meh. I don’t believe that’s rule-mandated information; don’t think it’s worth resubmitting for that. Gaelan > On Jun 22, 2017, at 11:00 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 22:58 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com > <mailto:g...@canis

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool

Maybe I'm missing something, but aside from tournaments, does this proposal affect gameplay in any real way or just set the groundwork for future mechanics? > On Jun 19, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > The proposal pool currently contains the

Re: DIS: Proto: Buy low, sell high

Organization balances (or whatever they're called) are defined as a switch for each (org, player) pair, which has the advantage of creating fewer switch types; I think that's a good thing. Gaelan > On Jun 24, 2017, at 1:17 PM, omd wrote: > > For each Stock, Holdings of

Re: DIS: Proto: Track it on the wiki

I like the idea of having separate repositories per report (like we have now), which also allows recordkeepors to manage their tooling (under this rule, I couldn't keep the rules in YAML, for example). I think we should keep anything on GitHub as unofficial, which allows record keepers to do

DIS: Vacation upcoming

I will be in the Northern California mountains with no network access from 7/3 to 7/26; we'll need to think of some plan for Rulekeeping during those 3 weeks. If somebody was willing to take over for that period, I could set up an Agency to allow them to publish the ruleset while I was gone; I

Re: DIS: Proto-proposal: Some economic suggestions

I feel like we currently have two parallel currency systems, shinies and income. I think it is probably a good idea to unify the two at some point. Gaelan > On May 20, 2017, at 12:20 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > I might want to tie this to either a decrease in the income

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: [Arbitor] OFF: [Deputy Arbitor] Judge assignments

> -o > >> On May 20, 2017, at 1:51 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> >> Wait, did you pay me 40? Did you pay 20 to me, then another 20 to me if you >> got G's shinies? Did you pay me 20, and pay 20 to my nonexistent >> doppelgänger with no tast

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

I assume those links are copypasted from the links in the ruleset itself. If you wanted permalinks, you could link directly to the YAML files in the repo. I don't know of a good way to do versioning of GH pages; I'd need something to talk with GH's API and pull down the correct version of the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Cyan Ribbons of the Grand Deputies

My family runs our own email as well, and I didn't get it either. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 9:12 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > I run my own mail infrastructure (fx: waits for the gasps of shock to die > down) and I didn’t get that, either. I’ll have to check what got

Re: DIS: Proto: Faster Vote Resolution

at the beginning of the 24 hour period, and maybe even allow explicitly cancelling the early resolution (without changing their vote). > On May 20, 2017, at 12:00 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > > On May 20, 2017, at 2:50 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com >

Re: DIS: Programmable actions:

CFJs 1451-1452. My bad. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > >> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> >> The rules specify that a game message may be spread across multiple email >> messages as lon

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: [Arbitor] OFF: [Deputy Arbitor] Judge assignments

isfaction of my pledge to pay for judgements on six outstanding > CFJs, if I inherited G.’s shinies, then I pay 20 Shinies to Gaelan, and I pay > 20 Shinies to Gaelen. > > -o > >> On May 19, 2017, at 12:26 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> >

DIS: Proto: Faster Vote Resolution

Perhaps I’m impatient, but 7 days is an awfully long time to wait when most players vote within a day or two of the decision being announced. I protose this: Create a rule named “Early Resolution” with power 3.1: If an Agoran decision: 1. Has enough votes such that the result of the decision

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Establishing an Agency can be Expensive

ese. > > Also PSS this is what limited agency proposal is for, this awfulness. > >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 08:44 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> For the purposes of this message, this is defined as The List: >> Apple >> Banana >> Cat >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Establishing an Agency can be Expensive

Could the officer have a shorthand like mine in their report? > On May 20, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 20 May 2017, Quazie wrote: >> You are the worst. I will likely give up superintendent if you Finalize the >> intent on these. >> >> Also

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

I don't believe this is a valid condition. Gaelan > On May 22, 2017, at 12:34 PM, caleb vines wrote: > >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> wrote: >> True, the CoE having been successful, I

Re: DIS: GitHub Notifications

I think maybe not. At least with the rule set, I don't think the notifications would be very useful. All of the changes will either be adopted proposals (redundant with the Assessor) or changes to my scripts/the formatting (irrelevant). Gaelan > On May 18, 2017, at 6:45 AM, Publius

Re: DIS: The Wiki, Revived and Revamped

I’ve invited you to the @AgoraNomic organization on GitHub if you’d like to move the wiki there. I figure it’s probably a good idea to have stable URLs for these things instead of moving the ruleset every time the Rulekeepor changes. > On May 4, 2017, at 4:02 PM, Nic Evans

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3505 assigned to Quazie

I don't know if I've ever seen someone use all-caps SHALL in a pledge. > On May 22, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Quazie wrote: > > Proposal: "Pledge Timelines" AI=1.7 Coauthor='G.' > {{{ > Replace the text of Rule 2450 with the following: > {{{ > Breaking a publicly-made

DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical Ruleset

scam. There was no abuse of a specific power exclusive to the Rulekeepor. Gaelan > On May 21, 2017, at 10:46 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > > On May 21, 2017, at 1:37 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: > >> The following

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No Sneakiness

within official duties. > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 18:34 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com > <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote: > I create the power-1 proposal “No Sneakiness” by Gaelan: { > Create a rule “No Sneakiness” with the following text: { > If the rules speci

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical Ruleset

I still don't buy this. I surrounded the apathy attempt in "this section is not part of the report"/"the report resumes below." Regardless of whether that worked, I think that makes it pretty clear I did not intend to ratify that into the ruleset. Gaelan > On May 23, 2017, at 3:50 AM,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: fast resolution 2.0

t; wrote: > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:05 PM Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com > <mailto:thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com>> wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com > <mailto:g...@canishe.com>&

Re: DIS: Votes, Supports, and Objections - OH MY

How did gigs work? > On May 23, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Quazie wrote: > > With so much activity, it's hard to keep track of all the things that could > be Supported, Objected, and Voted upon. > > Anyone else having trouble? > > I know we don't need any more officers at the

DIS: Proposal Concept: Hidden Motives

I had an interesting idea for a win condition: players privately select a random item from a pre-defined set of goals; when they reach that goal, they win. There would be some complex setup involved in proving that you selected a goal randomly without revealing your selection. I have a

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical Ruleset

it. Gaelan > On May 23, 2017, at 7:53 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > >> On May 22, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> >> I don’t think the Pink Slip is valid. >> >> Rule 2476/0: "A Pink Slip is a typ

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Article 5 invokation

The words spell UNDEAD - that’s probably important in some way > On May 23, 2017, at 8:33 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > We at least deserve a hint. I looked briefly, but couldn't find the > purported 2012 occurrence. > > -Aris > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at

Re: DIS: Proposal Concept: Hidden Motives

sentence, and hash it. Publish the hash. > A recordkeepor just keeps a list of everyone's hash and submission > date. When you reach the goal, publish your original sentence to > prove it. > >> On Tue, 23 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> I had an interesting idea for a win cond

Re: DIS: Proposal Concept: Hidden Motives

, 2017-05-23 at 19:36 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote: >>> I feel that this would create some interesting gameplay where we >>> would be second-guessing everybody’s moves, wondering if they are >>> part of a win condition. >> >> What's to prevent players just not tr

DIS: Re: BUS: Cleanup on Aisle 869

Remind me not to sign the message where I resolve this. Gaelan > On May 23, 2017, at 8:27 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > >> On May 23, 2017, at 2:38 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com >> <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote: >> >

Re: DIS: Wow - Proposal Competitions are crazy powerful.

A stock market could be interesting. Stocks could be real (tied to actual stock data) or just simulated Gaelan > On May 25, 2017, at 11:01 PM, Quazie wrote: > > I ENCOURAGE someone to come up with an interesting proposal competition. > > I SUGGEST that the economy is

DIS: Rule Numbering

How attached is everyone to the current rule numbering scheme? I’ve started applying proposals on git branches as they are distributed (so I can just merge them when resolution rolls around), but I realized that this system will not work if I have to assign sequential ID numbers, as I will not

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: 蘭亭社の憲章の修正箇条 2017/05/19

"Organizational Restructuring:" > If a Charter does not specify the appropriateness of an amendment to its > Organization, or if it attempts to specify the appropriateness of such an > amendment but in a way that is unclear, ambiguous, circular, inconsistent, > paradoxical, or that depends on

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Cleanup Time (and Markdown reward agency)

I did. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 2:54 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Well, since you have had objection you must begin again. > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >> On Thu, May 1

DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

Darn it all, I snuck one into the middle of the FLR. Gaelan > On May 21, 2017, at 6:59 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > I object to all intentions to declare winner by apathy that currently exist, > except for those that intend to declare me as winner by apathy. smime.p7s

DIS: Re: BUS: A move

Don’t tell me this is a registration attempt. > On May 21, 2017, at 8:09 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > I deploy the cuttlefish. > > Authentication: cerebellum. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical Ruleset

;> On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 01:46 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: >>> On May 21, 2017, at 1:37 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >>> >>> The following section is not a portion of the report: >>> For the purposes of this section, The Sentence is “I

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7853-7857

> On May 21, 2017, at 4:54 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Resolving MKD

http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg28175.html > On May 20, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > MKD? I can't find the initial intent? > >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:10 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: &g

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Resolving MKD

*sigh* > On May 20, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > "clear and ambiguous" not unambiguous? > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:09 PM, G

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Super Election Season

My vote goes to the GitHub. > On May 20, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Edward Murphy wrote: > > ais523 wrote: > >> Secretary: One of the more difficult offices. (It's the spiritual >> successor of Notary, which I held for a long time and was rather time- >> consuming). However, having

DIS: Experimental Ruleset Restructuring

I’ve experimentally restructured the categories in the Ruleset in an attempt to make it easier to find rules–feedback on the new categories? https://agoranomic.github.io/ruleset/ Gaelan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Alien Contact Program

Just create the agency again; you have no obligation to resolve your 24 hours’ notice. > On May 20, 2017, at 11:08 PM, CuddleBeam wrote: > > I need to adjust it then lol (I think I can only do that once it actually > materializes though). Thank you for telling me.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

This was my wording: The following section is not a portion of the report: For the purposes of this section, The Sentence is “I intend, without objection, to declare [word], specifying myself.” I execute The Sentence, substituting [word] for a word beginning with “ap” that is a synonym for “not

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Resolving MKD

h the following > information` is a valid intent to establish an agency. > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:38 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com > <mailto:quazieno...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Ah-ha! Thanks. > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:37 PM Gaelan Steele <g...@cani

Re: DIS: Re: Draft: Promotor Report

Don’t remember who mentioned this, but I agree that the todo list would do fine as an org. Pay shinies to list something (or add to the existing bounty), get the shinies for completing it. Gaelan > On May 20, 2017, at 5:06 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On

Re: DIS: Regulating snark

I don't like the voting strength bit—I don't think there is any harm in creating a temporary grudge whenever you vote AGAINST. Gaelan > On May 29, 2017, at 10:35 AM, Quazie wrote: > > Proto proposal: Grudge. > > There exists an asset called a Grudge. > > Each Grudge

Re: DIS: Sites Progress

Will do when I get home Gaelan > On May 25, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote: >> * The original agora front page has been replicated, and is in the process of >> being updated. > > Cool!! > > Do you mind if a top

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3515 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

FYI: I ruled a similar case as TRUE because "action" is undefined. Gaelan > On May 25, 2017, at 4:14 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > >> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 00:21 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: >> I pay 1 Shiny to Quazie, fulfilling, if it was ever valid, my Pledge >> appended in

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] Court Gazette

<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> I'd love if you could place these annotations somewhere my FLR script can >> access. >> I'll try and send you a file with the old annotations I parsed out from the >> FLR tonig

Re: DIS: Re: Re: BUS: CFJ 3509 Judgement (Dismissed, insufficient information)

are at you menacingly for ignore my wishes. > > I have gotten the mailing list to accept 天火狐 as my name as of this message, > and if everything goes well it should use that for the name field of the > email than pulling directly from gmail, hopefully. > > 天火狐 > >> On 25 Ma

Re: DIS: Re: Re: BUS: CFJ 3509 Judgement (Dismissed, insufficient information)

Idea: "offer" CFJs instead of assigning them. Have an Agency that lets us accept an offered CFJ, at which point it actually assigns. > On May 25, 2017, at 7:41 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 14:20 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: >> As for removing myself,

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] Court Gazette

I'd love if you could place these annotations somewhere my FLR script can access. I'll try and send you a file with the old annotations I parsed out from the FLR tonight. Gaelan > On May 25, 2017, at 2:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > [Comments on the below

Re: DIS: Supply Level Change - Proto

Why require the secretary's action? Why not just "if, at any point, the sum of all Balance switches does not equal the Balance Level" Gaelan > On May 18, 2017, at 12:53 PM, Quazie wrote: > > I proto-submit the following proto-proposal entitled "Shiny Releveling Event"

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: 蘭亭社の憲章の修正箇条 2017/05/19

Where? > On May 19, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > It has already been determined that Japanese acceptable. > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > 2017-05-19 11:08 GMT-04:0

Re: DIS: The Gmail (or really modern web mail) problem

Why is this related to webmail? > On May 19, 2017, at 11:13 AM, Quazie wrote: > > Proto-Proposal: This time to a public forum > Create a new rule, power .5 entitled "Traveling Message Infraction" with the > following text: > {{{ > Players SHOULD NOT muddy up the waters

Re: DIS: CFJ data for FLR

PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> Currently our CFJ data is a bit duplicated between the Rulekeepor's and >> Arbritor's records. I think it would be optimal if we did things like this: &

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Ambiguity

Whew. I wasn't excited about that. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > I would like to judge this. > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Quazie

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3501 assigned to ais523

I remember reading something in the FLR saying it wasn't. I'm not sure if it was a CFJ or a rule, but registration is special anyway. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 1:41 PM, Quazie wrote: > > Valid - I was unsure if subject line only information was considered valid >

Re: DIS: Bleach, what is it good for?

Yeah, that confused me. To stay on the safe side, I went to a lot of effort to preserve white space when I imported the ruleset until I could invoke Cleanup Time. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Quazie wrote: > > I was looking at the following rule when trying to

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7852

FOR Gaelan > On May 16, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the

DIS: Re: [Arbitor] OFF: [Deputy Arbitor] Judge assignments

My reading of the rules (person can communicate logical thoughts, player is a registered person) makes me believe that Alexis and scshunt refer to the same player, and therefore are synonyms. Therefore, I believe that the ratified Tailor’s report is equivalent to this: Alexis: CWY scshunt:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Cleanup Time (and Markdown reward agency)

Gaelan > On May 18, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 18:23 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com > <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote: > I intend to cause “Cleanup Time” to make the following rules, without &

DIS: CFJ data for FLR

Currently our CFJ data is a bit duplicated between the Rulekeepor's and Arbritor's records. I think it would be optimal if we did things like this: - Summary field on (some) CFJs in the CFJ database similar to how they are listed in the FLR now. - Field in either the CFJ or ruleset database

DIS: Rule question: Deputization/Cleanup Time

Is it possible to invoke Cleanup Time to reformat the ruleset as I deputize to submit it? Gaelan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] State of the Union

ke that it is self-ratifying because that would allow bypassing > formalized procedures. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On May 28, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Judicial Reform

, then I'm with you about not passing this. Gaelan > On May 30, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 30 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >>> On May 30, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Judicial Reform

> On May 30, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > It wasn't clear. But being stuck with a CFJ you don't want is part of the > job and random draw of being a judge, helping to clear the load. (we > should definitely have judicial compensation/salaries though). I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Judicial Reform

I don't know if this was clear, but the intent of the proposal was to avoid people getting "stuck" with CFJs they don't wish to judge. Under this proposal, the only people bothered by a frivolous CFJ are ais523 and anyone interested in judging (assuming others don't mind skipping over the DIS

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Judicial Reform

> On May 29, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > Missing a close parenthesis. Why do we need None? Surely any player > could occasionally want to judge a case, so the distinction seems > unnecessary. Fair. > I'd also make Wide the default, although

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Judicial Reform

I think normal threading handles voting fine (and subject changes may break threads, making more of a mess). I agree about tagging the others. Gaelan > On May 30, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:59 PM grok (caleb

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Judicial Reform

..@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:17 PM Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com > <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote: >> On May 29, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Aris Merchant >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com >> <mailto:thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmai

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] State of the Union

nization which does not do so with 1 week Notice. } > Gaelan > On May 28, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State

DIS: Done!

This email is signed with a new cert - does it appear as valid now? Gaelan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3516 assigned to Quazie

> On May 31, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 31 May 2017, Quazie wrote: >> Thus switches are regulated to being defined by the rules. >> >> Thus switches can only be defined by the rules. >> >> Thus switches can't exist on Agencies and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3509 Judgement (Dismissed, insufficient information)

I resolve this intent. > On May 31, 2017, at 6:02 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: > > I intend with 2 support to enter this into Moot. This does not address the > issue in the CFJ, which is whether there were any CAN NOTs violated in the > issuing of the slip.

DIS: FYI: Cert change incoming

I’m switching to a proper signed cert for S/MIME, and unfortunately I am unable to keep my old keypair, so my email will be signed with a new key from now on. Gaelan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

DIS: Re: OFF: [Superintendent] Weekly Report

I think GII is missing. > On Jun 5, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Quazie wrote: > > Superintendent's Weekly Report > > Short List of agencies: > > ASC - Head: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > C♥️N - Head: CuddleBeam > C♥️U - Head: CuddleBeam > GOD - Head: Quazie > MKD

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3498 Judged FALSE by Gaelan

Unicode bug—I see the name as "?" Gaelan > On May 31, 2017, at 11:32 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3498 > (This document is informational only and contains no game actions). > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Judicial Reform

> On May 31, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > > On Wed, 31 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: > >>> However, your messages curiously often makes Alpine give a loud beep and a >>> complaint that their signature doesn't verify.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Judicial Reform

> On May 31, 2017, at 11:14 AM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > >> On Wed, 31 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> >> I'm not causing any trouble, am I? I'm using Apple Mail. > > You seem to top post, which makes it harder to break things _too_

Re: DIS: Draft Report: Proposal Pool

IIRC, we still need ais to pend reports. I'll probably pend or destroy some of mine after the cleanup is passed. > On Jun 5, 2017, at 12:17 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > This is my draft report. I'm starting to get a little fed up with all > of the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7858

Oops, I was under the impression creating a proposal was an automatic FOR. Guess not. Gaelan > On Jun 6, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You didn't vote, so yes? > >> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:37 PM Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wr

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7858

Curious: should I have been shamed? Not gonna bother with judicial proceedings or anything, but it's an amusing bug in the rules if this is the case Gaelan > On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Quazie wrote: > >> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant >>

Re: DIS: Has anyone pointed out…

Reminds me of BlogNomic CFJs (in BlogNomic, a CFJ is just a votable gamestate change, just like a proposal, used to both fix the broken rule and clean up). Gaelan > On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:49 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > Has anyone pointed out, or ideally discussed in more

DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Stamps

To clarify, is the admin fee a one time fee? This is different from the current system (where there is a cost to maintaining an org, not just creating one). Gaelan > On May 24, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > I submit the following proposal: > > Title:

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] Court Gazette

Fair enough. > On May 25, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 25 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> That format looks fine, although it would be nice if you listed the rule >> number to apply the imp

Re: DIS: ADoP and Assessor

I'd love if your assessor scripts automatically updated the ruleset. My plan is to create proposals as git branches, then just have a script to merge them and fill in rule IDs, etc. If you kept a Promotor log on GitHub, I could probably set up a web hook that merged the accepted proposals. >

Re: DIS: ADoP and Assessor

our infrastructure, I do not promise to maintain > that link All fair. > > I'm already aiming to put myself under more Agora load than i'm comfortable > with - I will not maintain that link up (Sorry) It's fine, makes total sense. Gaelan > >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:20 AM Ga

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >