Ok, not talking about the most recently-completed auction this time! But
the upcoming ones.
The new auction rule purposefully took out the concept of auctioning the
ability to flip a master switch. It's restricted to auctioning assets
only now.
There was a Talisman proto floating around
On 6/13/2020 9:52 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> In CFJ 1500, the Court found that words should be
> interpreted by their common language definition after a definition in
> the rules has been overturned. The Court presently believes that this
> is somewhat misguided: while the
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:01 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> The master of a player CAN act on behalf of em to perform any action
> except the following:
You need to keep the word "zombie" in the above sentence somewhere,
otherwise this stops a person who is their own master from
Oh oops (my workflow was briefly interrupted and I lost my place). Second
one should do nothing.
On 6/13/2020 11:37 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> This was sent twice for some reason.
>
On 6/13/2020 9:13 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/13/20 10:01 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>
>> On 6/13/2020 3:43 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> So, with coins no longer backed by wins, the only pure mechanical value I
>
On 6/13/2020 11:26 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/13/20 2:18 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Hmm - I missed that implication and it's a point against voting for it, I
>> think. It would be nice if we didn't try to change any gameplay aspect
On 6/13/2020 9:52 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> First of all, I think I should address a potential conflict of
> interest with respect to CFJ 3831, that I am the recipient of the
> karma in Murphy's message. I don't believe this represents a conflict
> of interest because Murphy
On 6/2/2020 10:53 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> This topic has been bugging me ever since some recent CFJ
> discussion(s) (don't remember which) in which authorial intent was
> dismissed as irrelevant to the meaning of the rules, because it's not
> explicitly mentioned in R217. I
On 6/2/2020 4:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 6/2/2020 10:53 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> This topic has been bugging me ever since some recent CFJ
>> discussion(s) (don't remember which) in which authorial intent was
>> dismissed as irrelevant to the meaning of the rules,
On 6/3/2020 9:19 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:03 PM Aris Merchant wrote:
>>
> proposal when resolving it. Players SHOULD NOT attempt to game popularity.
>
Can we be a bit less moralistic about trying to game, well, a game?
On 6/3/2020 10:36 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 10:04 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On 6/3/2020 9:19 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:03 PM Aris Merchant wrote:
>>
>>> proposal when resolving it. Players SHOULD NOT attempt to game
On 6/2/2020 7:16 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Trigon
>>>
>> Those CFJs aren't the end of the story, we had a player back in 2017 who
>> communicated eir game actions almost entirely in Japanese and we allowed
>> them if they could be google translated into making sense on the
On 6/7/2020 1:00 AM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> I personally greatly prefer Referendum (and voted for it) because it's
> intuitiuve. The rules need less incomprehensible, unintuitive terms of art
> (like Switch!) and more like Referendum imho.
Huh, interesting. The switch language
On 6/7/2020 7:03 AM, Rebecca wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 11:44 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On 6/7/2020 1:00 AM, Rebecca wrote:
>>> I personally greatly prefer Referendum (and voted for it) because it's
>>> intuitiuve. The rules need less incomprehensible, unintuitive terms of
>> art
>>> (like
On 6/7/2020 7:29 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> In terms of ruleset changes to fix the problem, moving towards more
> subjective proposal rewards would help, rather than having them as something
> automatic; perhaps Agora should have a purse for proposal rewards, and some
> fair
Proto: "Registrar's monthly report highlights birthdays coming up in the
next month." (or maybe just a suggestion to the registrar :) )
On 6/14/2020 4:14 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/14/20 5:03 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>> * What resources do you wish were online?
>> I'd like to put my reports online since people seem to want them all to
>> be online, but I don't currently
Cuddlebeam wrote:
> G. wrote:
>> Cuddlebeam wrote:
>>> Small survey for who is aiming for Victory Cards/Points because barring a
>>> scam surprising us, it’s going to be way harder to win if someone has to
>>> compete with someone else to get that 20 VP margin.
>>>
>>> I personally would like to
On 6/14/2020 2:25 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> This is actually very interesting to me. Why is being able to strictly
> enforce secret deals *even necessary*? In Blognomic, secret alliances are
> rampant but there's never anything formal that forces you to do as the
> alliance
On 6/14/2020 12:15 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> Small survey for who is aiming for Victory Cards/Points because barring a
> scam surprising us, it’s going to be way harder to win if someone has to
> compete with someone else to get that 20 VP margin.
>
> I personally would like
I tend to do awards in batches so I don't lose track, this is last week's
batch. (this week's batch will be awarded before end of next week).
On 6/14/2020 3:59 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> what about me
>
> On 6/14/2020 3:41 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>
>> For
On 7/24/2020 8:05 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 7/24/2020 2:40 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
>> So there's precedent that you can basically take a shortcut to do many
>> actions (a loop of them) as long as it is reasonable that you could perform
>> those actions by writing them out.
>>
>>
On 7/24/2020 5:08 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> -Tiger
>
Didn't process your signature at first then did a double-take. Hi!!
-G.
On 7/24/2020 2:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3819
Just to add that in the Caller's Arguments for this case, Gaelan provides
a decent summary of several relevant cases (though not the 'large but
finite' one I don't think).
On 7/24/2020 2:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 7/24/2020 2:09 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/24/20 5:07 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 7/24/2020 2:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>>> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/
On 7/24/2020 2:09 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/24/20 5:07 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/24/2020 2:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3819
>> Just to add that in the Caller's Argumen
On 7/24/2020 1:38 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 08:44 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/24/2020 8:05 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On 7/24/2020 2:40 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
>>>> So there's precede
On 7/25/2020 6:33 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> As France has been eliminated, it is with great sadness that I cause R.
> Lee to cease to be a Contestant in the 2020 Birthday Tournament,
> pursuant to Regulation BT2.
>
H. Judge Publius,
I'd like to ask for a clarification here
On 7/25/2020 9:15 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 7/25/20 11:54 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/25/2020 6:33 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> As France has been eliminated, it is with great sadness that I cause R
H. Publius,
Another diplonomic rules question!
The original Diplomacy Rules say:
> A unit may not retreat to the province from where the dislodging unit
> came or to an "embattled" province, meaning one left vacant by a
> bounce/standoff that turn.
On 7/26/2020 9:40 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 7/26/20 12:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>
>> H. Publius,
>>
>> Another diplonomic rules question!
>>
>> The original Diplomacy Rules say:
>>> A unit may not retrea
On 7/29/2020 7:21 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> ItalyA Bul S Sev - Rum**
> Russia F Sev - Rum **
> Turkey F Rum - Bul **
> 20. A unit moves with its own strength combined with all of its valid
> supports. Support is cut if the unit giving support is
On 7/29/2020 1:35 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> I’m not entirely familiar with the CfJ background concerning this aside
> from the possible issue (that this aims to sidestep) of that you can’t do
> an unlimited amount of actions if it would be “unreasonable” for a human to
> be
On 7/19/2020 5:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:> On 7/19/2020 4:49 PM, Jason Cobb
via agora-business wrote:>> For the avoidance of doubt, I award myself a
Black Ribbon if I do not>> already have one. [This should do nothing.]
I award myself a white ribbon, as I have never owned one before.>>> > I
On 7/19/2020 4:50 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I Raise a Banner.
>
Congratulations At just over a year that's a really fast Renaissance!
Dunno if it's fastest ever, but it's up there.
On 7/16/2020 2:41 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 14:29 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-official
> wrote:
>> Agoran Court Gazette (Arbitor's Weekly Report)
>> Thu 16 Jul 2020 UTC
>
> COE: This omits the case I called about Diplonomic proposals being
> misinterpreted as
On 7/18/2020 11:30 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> I motion to reconsider, I don't believe it to be overly hypothetical when
> it refers to how Agora itself works. It's a question about Agora's
> fundamental way of working.
First, I found this tidbit in CFJ 1895:
> R2160(d) allows
On 7/5/2020 10:17 AM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
>> ... what? It doesn't matter if it's "antithetical". The rule clearly
>> says "sole function". This is an ulterior function and therefore
>> violates the rule. This interpretation means 'patches' dont't have to
>> be primarily patches
On 7/5/2020 9:32 AM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
> On 2020-07-05 4:25 p.m., Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
>>> I object to the above announcement of intent. This may do nothing.
>>>
>>>
>>> I CFJ: Regardless of other supporters/objectors, Agora will not be
>>> satisfied with the
On 7/30/2020 2:02 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 30, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official
>> wrote:
>>
>> Holding with that precedent, "interested in judging" is not regulated due
>> to having a recordkeepor, and can be determined by a common-sense
On 8/15/2020 5:54 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
Nevermind, I should probably read more than just one email before
replying like this.
>>>
>>> I called a CoE to make sure it wouldn't self-ratify. I don't think just
>>> listing the assumption does that.
>>>
>>> In the past,
On 8/13/2020 8:29 PM, shelvacu via agora-business wrote:
> I am interested in becoming a judge.
welcome to the bench!
> (I vaguely remember something about announcements in subjects not
> counting, so I repeated in the body just in case)
If you say "I do as in the subject line" that works,
On 12/7/2020 11:05 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> If all instances of a class of asset with the same owner are fungible,
> that class is a currency. If the backing document of a class of assets
> defines it as a currency, it is a currency.
Is the intent that "fungible" must be
On 12/8/2020 6:16 AM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 12/8/20 5:41 AM, N. S. via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Coins are fungible but that doesn't mean they don't exist as separate
>> singular entities. Individual coins (obviously) exist in real life too and
>> they are still (obviously)
On 12/18/2020 1:48 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> The most recently enacted Rule entitled "Temporary CFJ Setup" is hereby
> renumbered as Rule 2609 (if it does not already have that number).
>
> The most recently enacted Rule entitled "Statutory Instrumentation
> Simultaneity" is
On 12/20/2020 12:41 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 11:32 AM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 12/13/20 11:28 PM, Lucidiot via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Le 13/12/2020 à 23:28, Reuben Staley via
On 12/20/2020 1:29 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 12/20/20 1:41 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 11:32 AM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion <
>> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/13/20 11:28 PM, Lucidiot via
On 11/16/2020 1:18 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> G. responded with yet another counter. E pointed out that the relevant
> section has a long history, dating back at least to 2003. While e
> agreed that interpretation had recently gone in a less than preferable
> direction, e
On 11/16/2020 10:45 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 11/16/2020 1:40 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> The honor/karma system seems to have fallen largely out of use. Should
>> we try to fix it, and if so, what do we need to do?
>>
>> -Aris
>>
>
> I say get rid of it.
Sorry, head's *really* not in the game. fails of course misremembered the
rule.
On 10/31/2020 6:38 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> [It's been a hard week my heads not in the game - I hope you'll not mind
> that it's prerogative of the dictator to be late, on very rare occasions.]
>
> I issue the
On 12/25/2020 8:10 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> Merry Christmas to those who celebrate it!
>
> Every year in December, I take the opportunity to evaluate what I have
> been doing in the past year and make plans for the new year. This year,
> I've decided that continuing as a
On 12/30/2020 12:00 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> Amend Rule 2638 "Player Focuses" so that the second paragraph reads:
>
>An active player CAN plan to flip eir own Ministry Focus by
>announcement at any time.
I think it's an overall good idea and the above is a good
On 12/30/2020 2:12 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Switches that can be flipped in
>>this way are called "planned switches". Planning to flip a switch
>>is secured.
>
>
> This should be more explicit about what power the flipping occurs at
> (right now I think it's the
On 12/30/2020 3:15 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 12/30/20 1:49 PM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> This one confuses me a little, as it changes the dynamics somewhat (the
>>> Treasuror can set the next month's Buoyancy nearly a month in advance).
>>> But part of that is
On 12/30/2020 8:01 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> I originally set arbitrary limits on when a termination message for an
> auction could be posted and when lots could be claimed. It has caused
> several victory auctions to not actually award anything because of
> negligence
On 12/30/2020 9:54 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 09:01:53PM -0700, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> I originally set arbitrary limits on when a termination message for an
>> auction could be posted and when lots could be claimed. It has caused
Proto: Turn Undead, AI-3:
Create the following Rule, Activity:
Activity is a player switch tracked by the Registrar, with values
Active (default) and Inactive. The date on which each player's
activity
On 1/3/2021 4:10 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 3:17 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 15:08 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Proto: Turn Undead, AI-3:
>>>
>>
On 1/6/2021 1:43 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>> Your move, Agorans.
>
> I point my finger at CuddleBeam for violating No Faking, 2471/1, by taking an
> action e knew not to be effective, with intent to mislead.
>
Before you claim this failed, please look at the results.
On 1/8/2021 2:54 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> E.g. if I said "I hereby express my gratitude for your hard work",
> that's not defined by the rules, but I would have thought it's
> nonetheless legally true and effective, because I did in fact express
> my gratitude by writing it,
On 1/8/2021 9:57 PM, JTAC via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 9/1/2021 10:52 am, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Ratify the Short Logical Ruleset published on the 1st December, 2020,
>> available
>> here [1].
>>
>> [1]
>>
[pretty straightforward, but I think it captures the loopholes we used or
were planning to use].
proto: de-dictatorship AI-3
Amend Rule 2614 (Eclipse Light) by appending the following paragraph:
Rules to the
On 1/20/2021 9:13 AM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>> If an inactice player has been inactive continuously for the past
>
> typo: "inactice" twice
>
>> 60 days, then any player CAN deregister em with notice; for such
>> a deregistration to be successful, the
On 1/20/2021 11:20 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> I award G. a White Ribbon
>
> Thank you G.!
>
my pleasure!
proto v0.2: de-dictatorship AI-3
(diff: secured-2 changes in voting period, a grammar fix).
Amend Rule 2614 (Eclipse Light) by appending the following paragraph:
Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, Emergency
On 1/17/2021 8:41 AM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> G. wrote:
>
>> [pretty straightforward, but I think it captures the loopholes we used or
>> were planning to use].
>>
>> Repeal Rule 2633 (Rulebending).
>
> What about ending a voting period?
>
When I last sent around a proto
On 1/16/2021 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/16/21 5:24 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Award all Patent Titles to eir former holders that were lost solely due
>>> to the entity not being a person (under any current or former definition
>>> of "person"),
On 1/18/2021 11:40 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
>> 8531g^ Jason 1.5 Patent Title Restoration v2
> FOR. I'm a bit iffy on the idea of allowing new patent titles to be
> granted to non-persons, but it doesn't seem like there's a mechanism
> for that at
On 1/29/2021 5:55 AM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/29/21 7:52 AM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
>> The issue is a white ribbon scam. The pet argument (that your pet can
>> consent to play a game with you) allows a single individual to generate
>> a new white ribbon, which is
On 1/29/2021 9:29 AM, JTAC via agora-official wrote:
>BlotsActive player
>--
> 7 R. Lee
> 2 Shelvacu
This isn't a formal CoE because you don't officially track this info, but
Shelvacu is a deregistered fugitive now (that's why I didn't include
On 1/27/2021 12:02 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> Apply S->I to Rule 1688, "Power".
> Apply S->I to Rule 2438, "Ribbons".
In the next draft, can you write out in full the changes to R1688? I
think seeing all the substantive changes together will be important.
For example,
On 1/31/2021 1:42 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 21:17 +, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> At present, if we unperson everyone, AIAN will prevent the unpersonning
> proposal passing.
>
> With a change like this, AIAN would no longer directly block a
On 2/3/2021 9:26 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3896. I assign it to G..
>
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3896
>
> === CFJ 3896 ===
>
> If an AI 3.0 proposal with the text "Destroy Agora."
On 1/26/2021 2:12 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> I find it fascinating how inner mental states (or more accurately, the
> perception others have of them) can affect the outcome of winning or not.
This wasn't touched on, but in a legal sense, determining whether a person
"knows"
On 1/27/2021 4:18 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/6/21 4:28 PM, Falsifian via agora-official wrote:
>> u Wes wesc at ichips.intel.com 5 Apr 94
>> u Timothy timothy.ferguson at jcu.edu.au 12 Sep 94
>> u Chuck
On 1/27/2021 12:32 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> Prime Minister is, by tradition, the one office we regularly call
> elections for. The current Prime Minister has served eir term, and it
> is time for a new Agoran to take eir place.
>
> I intend, with 2 support, to call an
Proto: The Firm
[A change in the way vote cards lead to votes]
Enact a Rule, "The Firm" (Power 2), with this text:
The Firm is a secured ordered list of players. HR is an office;
the firm as it was at the beginning of the week is part of HR's
weekly report. A player's position
On 6/11/2021 8:02 AM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 03:27:54PM -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal (stolen from Trigon
>> with permission):
>>
>> Title: The Name of the Win Cards
>>
>> Adoption index:
On 6/8/2021 9:39 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 09:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I had a feeling you'd bring this one up when I saw you register and saw
>> that your computer delivery was faster than mine :) !
> My CFJ ea
On 6/6/2021 11:23 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> Trying to make extra votes work is hard, though; either they break the
> game, or they do nothing, with not much in between. I think they worked
> better when they were tied to an asset that also had more common uses
> than boosting
On 6/10/2021 11:46 AM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
> I vote as follows.
>
>> ID Author(s) AITitle
>> ---
>> 8561& G., nix 2.0 Election Cycle
> AGAINST
>
> [Just because it
On 6/13/2021 3:24 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Surely being the owner's nephew ought to carry an advantage? Except it
> doesn't do anything with Bonuses yet (presumably they would be tied into
> voting strength somehow).
I was thinking "despised in the company and given no
On 6/20/2021 6:27 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>
> I change my vote on that proposal to AGAINST
>
> It's not an (intentional) scam, though I think the better solution is to
> remove that ability from emergency regs than to let non-Festive people
> object to them.
>
sorry
On 6/8/2021 8:37 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/8/21 11:30 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
>> The Mad Engineer CAN act on behalf of
>> the device to take any action that the device may take, and
>> SHALL act on behalf of the device to ensure that
Oh crap well that's completely broken. I was madly trying to sculpt
Murphy's text and missed those differences.
On 6/8/2021 8:51 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 6/8/21 11:25 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal:
>>
>>
On 6/8/2021 8:56 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/8/21 11:53 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Oh crap well that's completely broken. I was madly trying to sculpt
>> Murphy's text and missed those differences.
>
>
> It seems to ju
On 6/8/2021 9:01 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-08, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to Buy Strength.
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to Buy Strength.
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to Buy Strength.
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to
Without taking away anything whatsoever from the current Stonekeepor's
current playing (or criticizing eir strategy in *any* way), we have the
makings of a "too much officer control" situation for a single subgame:
1. Stonekeepor can auction as many stones as e wants, whenever.
2. Can bid on
On 5/20/2021 1:44 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>
>
>> On May 19, 2021, at 6:36 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> I bid 670 coins on the Protection Stone.
>
> For each stone being auctioned, I bid n-1 coins, where n is the value of the
> current highest bid on
On 5/23/2021 2:21 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:12 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
>>
>> After the nomination period ends, the ADoP (or, if the office is
>> the ADoP, the Assessor) CAN and, in a timely fashion, SHALL:
>>
>>
Gratuitous initial thoughts: "violating a pledge" isn't in itself an
action to perform or refrain from performing, but the consequences of some
action. You can't just "violate a rule" as an action, you do some other
action which as a consequence violates a rule.
It's like saying "I pledge that
As Arbitor, I have a general policy of filtering out "the most
self-interested" parties from judge assignments whenever possible, so I
would not (even if I hadn't favored it) be prone to grant this one? Happy
to discuss.
On 5/31/2021 3:28 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> I favor
On 6/5/2021 4:55 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> Title: Determinacy is a Good Thing
> Adoption index: 1.7
> Author: Aris
Want to lodge a bit of a protest here - paradox to me is inherent to
Suberian nomic, and if any nomic follows that purist tradition, it's this
one, so it seems
On 6/5/2021 6:23 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 6:13 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On 6/5/2021 4:55 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
>>> Title: Determinacy is a Good Thing
>>> Adoption index: 1.7
>>> Author: Aris
>>
>> Want to lodge a bit of a
On 6/6/2021 3:04 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Jun 5, 2021, at 2:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> CFJ, barring Gaelan: For the purposes of R2553, CFJ 3907 is about the
>> effectiveness, possibility, or legality of a change in the gamestate.
>
> The
On 7/12/2021 12:39 PM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 03:12:18PM +1000, Rebecca Lee via agora-business
> wrote:
>> I call a CFJ: Each player may claim a justice card this Agoran week.
>>
>> Rule 2478 states in relevant part "The player who initiated the most Finger
I'm considering a motion to reconsider this case, and would like comments.
Reasons: ID Numbers are nowhere explicitly defined. So what's an ID
number? It's a number used to ID a rule. Once a SLR has been published a
few times, it's clear that there's only one number that identifies a
On 2/7/2021 7:23 AM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
> On 2/3/2021 10:16 AM, ATMunn wrote:
>> I intend, with 3 Agoran Consent, to repeal all existing Emergency
>> Regulations.
>
> Having received support from Jason and no objections, I do so.
>
Simple and straightforward.
My plan had been
On discord, it came up that running tournaments is hard work and should
have some implied reward. I think the current ruleset would actually
allow for theses based on tournaments - game design is hard, and a set of
regulations for a subgame, played and debugged through peer review, would
almost
601 - 700 of 1009 matches
Mail list logo
