Thanks very much Gaz! We'll take a look at these ASAP.
- Dan
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Gaz Davidson garethdavid...@gmail.comwrote:
There's tons of bugs on the tracker which have already been fixed in
2.2 or earlier, but have not been marked as resolved in the 2.2
release.
As FroYo
The .apk files submitted will be treated as normal applications when
installed on the device, so if the user has both versions installed, he/she
will see two icons.
- Dan
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Vytautas Vaitukaitis
vaitukaitis.vytau...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, everyone,
Just a
We are not planning to extend the submission deadline.
- Dan
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:22 PM, patrick android.com...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i'm asking wher can we ask google to extend the deadline?
thks
On 25 août, 17:05, Dan Sherman impact...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no reason that they
Yes, this is correct. We will review all apps that make it on to the second
round to confirm eligibility.
- Dan
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Dan Sherman impact...@gmail.com wrote:
a) I'd imagine, they'll go through ADC getting rated, but if they should
win, I'd imagine Google would check
Timothy is quite correct.
In fact, the original rules said that you couldn't have published your app
publicly anywhere at all, but we loosened that rule in response to feedback
since it unintentionally excluded open source projects. We also were
originally going to require apps to wait until the
You are not required to submit a trial version. However, many developers
prefer to do so, so the rules are simply making it clear that this is
permitted.
- Dan
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:33 AM, androidDeveloper stepmas...@googlemail.com
wrote:
So...will ADC2 apps be used by people outside
25, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Ehab Bassilli ehab.bassi...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Dan,
Sorry to be a pain but what about upgraded versions of apps sumitted after
aug 1st?
I.e. the new features and ui were available after aug 1st?
Thanks
On Aug 25, 2009 4:21 AM, Dan Morrill morri...@google.com wrote
We don't know what happened to it, but whatever it was was unintentional. :)
We're looking into it now. Sorry for the inconvenience.
-Dan
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Streets Of Boston flyingdutc...@gmail.com
wrote:
No idea. I'm missing it, too.
On Aug 25, 12:48 pm, Doug
While we do recommend that you design your apps and assets to be
resolution-independent, it's okay to focus on HVGA devices for the ADC2.
- Dan
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Fallen Leaf fallenleafga...@gmail.comwrote:
Just a question. I have read that judges can use devices that aren't
This site is using the same infrastructure as the Android Market and shares
a unified namespace, primarily to avoid squatting issues. That is, we
want to make sure that if a developer submits an app via ADC2 that an evil
third party could not come along and put an app with the same package up on
should use com.myapp.adc2 or similar in order to avoid a
future conflict?
Peli
On Aug 24, 7:48 pm, Dan Morrill morri...@google.com wrote:
This site is using the same infrastructure as the Android Market and
shares
a unified namespace, primarily to avoid squatting issues. That is, we
Ah yes, I misunderstood the question. I guess I had the other topic on my
mind. ;)
- Dan
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.comwrote:
This site is using the same infrastructure as the Android Market and
shares
a unified namespace, primarily to avoid
Users will be randomly assigned apps to judge, without regard for
categories.
- Dan
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Peli peli0...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have a question regarding the judging application that is provided
by Google:
Will users (judges) have the possibility to choose which
This is correct: upgraded versions of apps submitted to Market before 1
August are ineligible; this includes UI upgrades.
- Dan
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:09 PM, mgpc mcumm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ehab,
The rules say:
An Entry (or substantially similar application by the same
Participant)
Hi, all!
I wanted to let you know that a new SDK has been released: 1.5_r3 is now
available. This is a minor release, and includes a Japanese IME and fixes
for a few bugs, including a permissions issue. You can read more about the
permissions issue here:
It looks like while doing this morning's anti-spam moderation, I
accidentally clicked Allow instead of Mark as Spam in the UI. This is
why all the spam you guys probably just saw got through.
I apologize for this inconvenience.
- Dan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
As Disconnect noted, the ADP1 builds do not update OTA. Some third-party
builds mis-report themselves (mistakenly, I doubt this is intentional) as
builds that can update OTA, so if you had previously installed a third-party
build, that's likely why. Unfortunately this configuration is
Hello! You probably need to use android:minSdkVersion rather than
minSdkVersion.
- Dan
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:16 PM, 6real xirgon...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
since today I have the following clear message :
Market requires the minSdkVersion to be set in AndroidManifest.xml.
but my
Hello!
Actually, the DDA didn't change. What happened is that due to a bug a while
back, a few developers were able to create accounts without agreeing to the
correct DDA. So when those developers log in, they are now being prompted to
agree.
The DDA you are seeing should not introduce any new
This is not true. Devices that are identified as root-enabled, whether an
ADP1 or a rooted retail G1, cannot access copy-protected apps. They can
still access both paid and free apps that are not copy-protected, however.
- Dan
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael MacDonald
If you have the holiday devphone build, it's either an actual
Google-employee holiday phone, or you've flashed a third-party system image
on some other device. The latter case is an unsupported configuration, and
it would not surprise me at all if the Market client in that build simply
pre-dates
Oops. Yes, the document is wrong. Sorry about that. We'll get it fixed.
- Dan
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Michael Bollmann
michael.bollm...@googlemail.com wrote:
yep that was the problem
thank you very much
this document talks about Locale Code en-UK:
That page refers to the underlying system, which is indeed capable of
encoding to H.263. However, no API for video recording exists in Android
1.0 or 1.1. A future version of Android (likely the next one) will support
video recording, including an API.
- Dan
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:51 PM,
We do aim to include features from HTML5 over time, but currently the
Android Browser app does not include any HTML5 capabilities. It does
include Gears, which might be useful to some developers but unfortunately
has no counterpart for the audio tag.
- Dan
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:47 AM, j
Oops. Looks like that page was collateral damage when we did the move to
developer.android.com. We're looking into it; thanks for pointing it out.
At any rate the content that would be there refers only to the first
Developer Challenge.
Regarding the second Developer Challenge, it definitely
their apps to the limit of what
they can do, and allow Google to focus the prizes on groups delivering
what people want.
Just a thought.
Al.
Dan Morrill wrote:
Oops. Looks like that page was collateral damage when we did the move
to developer.android.com http://developer.android.com. We're
The user account you indicated was indeed disabled due to suspicious
high-volume activity, indicative of an attempted denial-of-service attack or
similar inappropriate activity. We do not provide any more detail than that
in such cases.
Presumably this was related to this work, although we have
stopped approximately two or three weeks ago. So I guess I'm not
sure why this was an issue right now - more than two weeks later?
-Tim
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Dan Morrill morri...@google.com wrote:
The user account you indicated was indeed disabled due to suspicious
high-volume activity
Hello! Thanks for pointing this out; it looks like the Previous SDK
Releases link was broken when we migrated to the new
developer.android.comsite. We will fix this as soon as possible.
In the meantime, here are direct links to the M5 SDKs:
Actually, in this case I'm going to go ahead and request that we move
conversations of this type to android-discuss.
Normally, for our other developer products we wouldn't make such a request:
anything and everything related to the product is welcome. For instance,
discussions about this sort of
Hello!
We are indeed preparing the compatibility process and program for Android.
We'll announce the details of that program when they are finalized;
however, there are currently no resources for this.
- Dan
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:42 AM, rookiejava rookiej...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All!!!
We have been working on some documentation to help developers localize their
applications, in anticipation of Android devices becoming available in more
countries. (You might have seen some information on this via an email to
Android Market developers, recently.)
We bumped into a couple issues
This is false. As we've said, developers will receive 70% of the Android
Market revenue for their apps, when billing is available.
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/10/android-market-now-available-for-users.html
- Dan
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Shane Isbell shane.isb...@gmail.com
To shed a bit more light, the reason the multi-part APIs were removed is
because those APIs will not be final in the upstream Apache HTTPClient in
time for Android's schedule for a final 1.0 version. Rather than ship an
early/incompatible API, we chose to remove it, and rely on other libraries
as
What do you mean by OTA in this context?
- Dan
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Shane Isbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Is there an OTA implementation with the latest SDK? I couldn't find it in
the docs. In the upcoming 1.0?
Shane
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
and installations of apks.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Dan Morrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by OTA in this context?
- Dan
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Shane Isbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Is there an OTA implementation with the latest SDK? I couldn't find
Yes, spam on our lists recently got much worse. Presumably the spammers are
exploiting the Gmail captcha issue to create Groups accounts and spam
groups. The general technique is that they create accounts, spam with them
until they get banned, and then switch to new accounts.
We're trying to
Hello!
With the current implementation, it can indeed take a long time for GTalk to
connect to the servers. If you are saying that it takes a long time for the
network connection to complete, that may not be unusual. We are working on
improving the network performance of the GTalk service in
38 matches
Mail list logo
