On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I've been reading the Apache API doc, and in addition to it being
> somewhat slim, I was wondering about some of the comments that make it
> sounds like it was written during the transition from 1.2 to 1.3.
>
> This doc is at http://h
I've been reading the Apache API doc, and in addition to it being
somewhat slim, I was wondering about some of the comments that make it
sounds like it was written during the transition from 1.2 to 1.3.
This doc is at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/API.html by the way.
Can someone confirm/deny
. If everyone likes it, we can do the
necessary stuff to get it in the Apache Documentation format and look.
Thanks
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rcbowen.com/kenya/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
or
B&N, or some other online bookstore?
Rich
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://geeks.cre8tivegroup.com/ --- Work
http://www.rcbowen.com/ --- Play
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
elf, or should they be in some sample_conf
directory and linked to from hither and yon. I would think that the
former would be much more likely to be kept updated.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... and another brother out of his mind, and another brother out at New
York (not the same, though it mi
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Joshua Slive wrote:
> >
> > 1. Apply tidy with exactly the same options to
> > httpd-docs-1.3 and hope that the formating is close
> > enough to make things work.
>
> +1
OK. I wondered about this at the time, and forgot to mention it. I was
not
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > I'm sorry, but I've been drowning in 'work-work' and 2.0 work :( Is there
> > anyone who could take up this PR and update the instruc
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'm sorry, but I've been drowning in 'work-work' and 2.0 work :( Is there
> anyone who could take up this PR and update the instructions based on the
> Apache 1.3.20 installer for Windows?
>
> Essentially, they now choose "Install a
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:05 AM
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rodent
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Apache HTTP Server 2.0 Documentation Status File.
> Last modified: $Date: 2001/09/17 18:32:45 $
>
> - XHTML conversion
> Status: unknown
All the 2.0 documentation has been converted to XHTML. It is now ...
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/D
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:05 AM
>
>
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >
> > > - XHTML conversion
> > >
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> - XHTML conversion
> Status: unknown
I was wondering about this. A few weeks ago I submitted some mod docs
that had been xhtml-ized via w3c tidy. Did anyone have any complaints
with those? If not, I can xhtml-ize the entire documentatio
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > Well, I do -- until there is a replacement. In fact,
> > I will veto its removal until there is something as
> > good or better for 3P module writers to use as a
> > template.
>
> Sorry, I was under the impression that mod_TEMPLATE was in httpd-docs-1.
Ah. Missed that one. I'll take care of making this just one file, and
getting rid of the other one.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... and another brother out of his mind, and another brother out at New
York (not the same, though it might appear so)
Someb
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Allan Liska wrote:
>
> Rich,
>
> Thanks for your comments, please see my answers in-line...
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Allan Liska wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > As I
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Allan Liska wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As I mentioned earlier this week, I would like to try to improve the
> layout of the security docs. I'd really like feedback from people
> on this list as to how in-depth the documents should go. As an
> example, should we explain how
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Because mod_dll is depricated. Where did you find this link so we can
> do away with it?
>
> The mod_so replaced mod_dll quite a while ago (two years or more.) Mod_so
> offers identical syntax and very similar behavior for multiple OS's.
mod_dl
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Sunday 16 September 2001 01:00 pm, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > In mod/prefork.html in the 2.0 docs, the following is stated:
> >
> > The StartServers, MinSpareServers, MaxSpareServers, and MaxServers
> > regulate how the parent
In mod/prefork.html in the 2.0 docs, the following is stated:
The StartServers, MinSpareServers, MaxSpareServers, and MaxServers
regulate how the parent process creates children to serve requests.
Is this a typo, or is there a MaxServers directive somewhere that I'm
not aware of? I know about Max
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Allan Liska wrote:
> I'd really like feedback from everyone as to whether or not this is
> a good start...or if there should be more information included?
This is a great start and a great idea. I would be glad to assist in
whatever capacity I can, particularly since I am
lots of examples of how to do .var files.
Or is this just one more thing to maintain, and one more thing to get
out of sync? I suppose if someone added a translation, and did not add
it to the .var file, someone would notice pretty quickly.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... and another brother o
I appear to be insufficiently clued into the current status of
mod_proxy, so if someone could fill me in, I'd appreciate it.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_proxy.html is not terribly
satisfying, and the only location that I can really find with useful
information is http://cvs.apache.org
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Allan Liska wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If no else is working on it, I would like to take a stab at the
> following action item:
>
> * Improving the "security docs"
>
> - More content and better organisation.
Where do you see the organization lacking/confusing?
I find that t
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Does the server-parsed handler go away completely in version 2.0, to be
> replaced by the INCLUDES filter?
I'm sorry. Silly question. I see that it does. Somehow, in my long
absence, I missed that.
I have a related question, howev
Does the server-parsed handler go away completely in version 2.0, to be
replaced by the INCLUDES filter?
--
Nothing is perfekt. Certainly not me.
Success to failure. Just a matter of degrees.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
putting them in the @@ServerRoot@@/manual directory, and setting up the
various include directives to have them parsed. Is there a reason to not
do this?
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rcbowen.com/kenya/
-
To unsub
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > How often are the docs on httpd.apache.org updated, and would it be
> > possible to update them somewhat more frequently?
>
> No schedule; it's a manual thing:
> ssh w
How often are the docs on httpd.apache.org updated, and would it be
possible to update them somewhat more frequently?
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... and another brother out of his mind, and another brother out at New
York (not the same, though it might appear so)
Somebody&#
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > On a related note, tidy has an -asxml switch that produces ...
> >
> > > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
> >
> > Is *this*
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I started doing a few docs with tidy to see how it went, and discovered
> that it is disobeying at least one of the edicts regarding HTML in the
> docs. Specifically, it is doing:
>
> "core.html#limitrequestfieldsize&qu
this that goes
beyond someone's personal preference?
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rcbowen.com/kenya/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, folks. I screwed up my mail filters, and have been bouncing email
for about a day and a half. It is fixed now, and I'm catching up in the
archives.
--
And everyone said, "If we only live,
We too will go to sea in a Sieve -
To the hills of the Chankly Bore!"
(The Jumblies, by Edward Lear)
I've been using tidy, from the w3c, for a while now, to do
pretty-reformatting of HTML documents. One of the things that it does is
lower-case HTML tags. I was wondering, in light of comments made a week
or two ago, whether it would be worthwhile to do this with files in the
docs as I a working wit
t is worth it.
I'd like to add more examples, and perhaps some stuff about mod_auth_db.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rcbowen.com/kenya/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Let's not make that document and say we did.
>
> Specifically, let's incorporate that info into the Overrides: foo headers
> in the directives tree, but write a simple script to just extract and build
> a table of that gook for the docs. We don't
doesn't already exist
> would probably go a long way...
Ah, ok. That makes sense. I have at least one such doc, which might
provide a decent starting place. Should that go in the howto area?
(By the way, I promised an authentication howto several weeks ago, and
it's almost ready.)
--
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> In case anyone needs a project ;-)
>
> -- Forwarded Message
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: .htaccess doc is bogus
>
> You create doc pages which contain all the information
I'm still missing something from the documentation for content
negotiation, and want to make sure that I am understanding this
correctly before I add something incorrect to the docs.
What you do, if I'm getting this, is to do an AddHandler ...
AddHandler type-map .var
and then create a file call
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > The docs for mod_negotiation say a number of different ways that the
> > module attempts to send to the client the document best suited to the
> > client's requirements. However,
y understanding that this determination is based on the
Accept header sent by the client, but I am not at all
sure of this. I'll look in the source, but if someone can answer this
definitively, I'd be much obliged.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://geeks.cre8tivegroup.com/ --- Wo
review that, and tell me what I did
wrong, or what I need to add? Thanks.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rcbowen.com/kenya/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > OK, try this on for size:
> >
>
> Looks good.
>
> A couple little points: The thing I quoted was the HTTP spec, not the MIME
> spec. Also, I would probably refer to
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> OK, try this on for size:
Note: I did not commit this yet. I wanted a little feedback before I
did so. Thanks.
>
>
> Index: mod_mime.html
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2
OK, try this on for size:
Index: mod_mime.html
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod/mod_mime.html,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -r1.44 mod_mime.html
--- mod_mime.html 2001/08/22 02:22:46 1.44
+++ mod_mime.
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> I like the concreteness. For reference, the RFC says:
>
> The Content-Encoding entity-header field is used as a modifier to the
> media-type. When present, its value indicates what additional content
> coding has been applied to the resource, and thus wh
particular language.
Ah, yes. I had not gotten to the language part, but that certainly
belongs in there also.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author - Apache Server Unleashed - http://www.apacheunleashed.com/
-
To unsubscribe,
d with the pkzip file encoding, then the file
Resume.doc.zip would be known to be a pkzipp'ed Word document.
===
Or something along those lines.
Perhaps this could go after the discussion of multi-extension files.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PRO
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > It would be nice to have at least a pointer to a regular expression
> > tutorial, and perhaps a description of some kind in the docs
> > themselves about what type of regular
On 24 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -This document explains the method in which Apache determines
> -what filesystem location to serve a file from based on the
> -URL of a request.
> +This document explains how Apache determines the filesystem
> +location from which to serve a file
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote:
> 1) How does everyone feel about having the apache specific web site
> httpd.apache.org accessible via rsync ?
> This then would give you guys the ability to have a fully functional local
> apache mirror instead of having your users forced to goto apache'
Having been rather out of touch with Apache things for 2 or 3 months,
I'm still catching back up on email to the docs list. I came across
this note from Joshua, which apparently nobody responded to, and which
deserves a response, since so much work obviously went into it.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Joshu
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > Regular expressions have the same syntax as those found in the Unix
> > egrep command.
> >
> > This is, as far as I can find so far, the only specific explanation of
> &g
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Thomas Eibner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 11:15:12PM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > No, the / character does not have special meaning in these regular
> > expressions. More specifically, there is no delimiter, as there is in
> > Perl. You j
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Thomas Eibner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 10:43:58PM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > Is there any treatment, anywhere in the Apache documentation, of what
> > flavor of regular expressions are supported by Apache directives? I
> > can't fin
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Thomas Eibner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 10:59:27PM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any treatment, anywhere in the Apache documentation, of what
> > > flavor of regular expressions a
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Is there any treatment, anywhere in the Apache documentation, of what
> flavor of regular expressions are supported by Apache directives? I
> can't find it, but perhaps I'm just overlooking it, and will find it
> as soon as I send thi
s of nifty things. If someone can
point me in the right direction, I'd be glad to get such a thing
started.
Thanks
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As we trace our own few circles around the sun
We get it backwards and our seven years go by like one
Dog Years (Rush - Test
Are we getting a list name change also? I was not clear on when/if
that was happening.
Thanks.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... and another brother out of his mind, and another brother out at New
York (not the same, though it might appear so)
Somebody's Luggage (Charles Di
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > When you sai that they need to be synched, do we have a general idea
> > at what point they got out of sync? I'm wondering if it is just a
> > question of going back and ap
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> My suggestion:
> Copy the 1.3 docs over the the 2.0 ones and commit. Someone will then
> need to go through the commit logs:
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/modules/http/mod_mime.c
> and see if anything needs docing. From a quick look, it
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Marc Slemko wrote:
> The HTML docs used to be postprocessed into postscript and made available
> as one big file so people didn't have to use a "web browser" to read them.
> The scripts that did it are probably around somewhere... the %plaintext
> stuff was used as part of som
What's up with these messages? I'm getting them every time I post,
although my messages are clearly going through.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: 22 Aug 2001 00:05:13 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Invalid user [EMAI
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> I would drop the
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > I was today looking at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/install.html and
> > found it to be ... how to put this nicely ... suboptimal. It contains
> > little nuggets like "Apache
harder, but I'm not seeing it.
Likewise with SSL, from what I've experienced, although there are
better reasons for making that seem harder than it really is.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://geeks.cre8tivegroup.com/ --- W
I was today looking at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/install.html and
found it to be ... how to put this nicely ... suboptimal. It contains
little nuggets like "Apache is designed to be configured and run from
the same set of directories where it is compiled." and "Copy or rename
these files to the
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > If the default value of TypesConfig is conf/MIME.types, why does
> > Apache ship with a file called mime.types instead? I presume there's
> > some historical reason for
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > I have not committed this. Just submitting it for peer review and
> > approval/suggestions.
>
> Looks good.
>
> I would drop the
If the default value of TypesConfig is conf/MIME.types, why does
Apache ship with a file called mime.types instead? I presume there's
some historical reason for this, right?
--
And everyone said, "If we only live,
We too will go to sea in a Sieve -
To the hills of the Chankly Bore!"
(The Jumblie
, if that were to happen, this will probably be confusing
anyway. Thoughts on that?
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... and another brother out of his mind, and another brother out at New
York (not the same, though it might appear so)
Somebody's Luggage (Charles Di
On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 9:47 PM
> > >
> > > The directive listing should not be shoved down. If the "Summary" grows
> > > beyond a few p
On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> 2.0 now has a very nice explanation of how the automatic directory
> ordering and searching works, but there is, as far as I can find, no
> description of this behavior in the 1.3 docs. I'm writing such a
> description, and wondered where the best plac
On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > The question is, american o vs. british ou. iSpell tells me that
> > 'behaviour' is mispelled. I know that it is not, technically, but I
> > also believe that the documentation shou
On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> 2.0 now has a very nice explanation of how the automatic directory
> ordering and searching works, but there is, as far as I can find, no
> description of this behavior in the 1.3 docs. I'm writing such a
> description, and wondered where the best plac
stuck in at the top of mod_autoindex.html, which
seems like a somewhat logical place, but means that you have to scroll
for some time to get to the listing of directives. However, if this is
where folks want it, I'll put it in there.
Thanks
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As we trace o
On 19 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rbowen 01/08/19 12:33:42
>
> Modified:htdocs/manual/mod mod_autoindex.html
> Log:
> Applied changes made to the 2.0 document, where appropriate.
Sorry this is ending up being so many separate patches. This doc is
really good, and I'm not fi
On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, Jason Lingohr wrote:
> I've never received any 2.0 commits either...
Yes, I was going to mention that also. I did not receive the commit
messages from my own commits, but my various attempts to subscribe to
that mailing list were rebuffed by the system.
--
Ri
lthough I can see that this could be done.
Thanks, folks.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... and another brother out of his mind, and another brother out at New
York (not the same, though it might appear so)
Somebody's Lu
The documentation for AddIcon states:
AddIconByType should be used in preference to AddIcon, when possible.
There is, however, no indication as to why this should be, anywhere
that I could find it. Could someone please suggests what the reasons
are for this recommendation?
Thanks.
--
Rich
lent of
IndexOptions FancyIndexing ScanHTMLTitles.
Unfortunately, there is no "example above". Can someone help me find
this example that is being referred to, so that I can patch this doc.
Thanks.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReefKnot - http://www.reefknot.org
---
I got a lot written this week at the O'Reilly conference, and then
discovered that I have not committed anything to the docs since the
... um ... event, a month or two ago, and so no longer have a ssh key
on the server that is valid. Anyone know who I need to send my key to
in order to get back in?
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> mod_env
> This module provides for modifying the environment which
> is passed to CGI scripts and SSI pages.
> Base
> [...]
>
>
> This module allows for control of the environment that will be
> provided to CGI scripts and
On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > I don't know if anyone has started on the task of reworking the
> > authentication/authorization tutorial from Apache Today for the Apache
> > docs. I will be working from that
that should be useful for the docs. So if nobody's started on
it, I'll be doing that either this evening or tomorrow.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have trouble remembering things?
http://www.idforgetmyhead.com/
---
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Chris Pepper wrote:
> At 10:05 PM -0700 2001/06/23, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> >- Tutorial on user authentication with Apache. Rich Bowen has contributed
> >his tutorial from ApacheToday, but it needs to be cleaned up and put in
> >a good format for th
fleshing out in
the areas you mention, but I think it's a pretty good starting place,
if I may say so.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReefKnot - http://www.reefknot.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ect/want them to do (kill an Apache
child when it gets too big), but I'm probably misunderstanding what they are
supposed to do.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have trouble remembering things?
http://www.idforgetmyhead.com/
--
o about the connections between the ASF system of
government, and that of the Apache people.
The "Patchy Server" pun bears mentioning, for historical reasons, but should
not be listed as the primary source of the name.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have trouble reme
On Wed, 9 May 2001 22:53:06 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time), Joshua Slive said:
> I just trashed the old install.html in httpd-docs-2.0 and replaced it with
> an html'ized version of INSTALL from the source distribution. This is a
> major change, but what was there was so innacurate that I figur
Cynthia Cote wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is there some document that discuss the design of apache ?
Could you perhaps be a little more detailed as to what it is that you
are looking for?
--
Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Have trouble remembering things? - http://
ke the right place to send them.
--
Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Come see me at Apachecon! -- http://www.apachecon.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whether you think that it works as one monolithic document, or
should be subdivided.
Thanks.
--
Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Come see me at Apachecon! -- http://www.apachecon.com/Title: The History of the Apache Server project
The History of the Apache Server project
Pre-history
Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >
> > Rich Bowen wrote:
> > >
> > > That would rock. I would fully expect ApacheWeek to be one of my two
> > > primary resources - the other being CVS, which is substantially less
> > > f
past. In particular, I had trouble finding out anything
about the timeline of the NSCA HTTPd server. I found a detailed change
log, but it had no dates in it.
Oh, well, perhaps someone can point me in the right direction on that.
Anyways, here it is.
--
Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Come
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > That would rock. I would fully expect ApacheWeek to be one of my two
> > primary resources - the other being CVS, which is substantially less
> > friendly to get information out of.
>
> Ah, but th
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > Perl has http://history.perl.org/ which Elaine Ashton maintains. I don't
> > know that we want to be that ambitious (translation: I don't have that
> > kind of time) but it's something to
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > By the way, I think that a lot of this could fill in some of the gap
> > left by the background section that appears to be going away from the
> > FAQ. Stuff like what is Apache all about, how it came to
at
sort of thing.
--
Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Come see me at Apachecon! -- http://www.apachecon.com/
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > Whatever format it's in, is there any interest in having a
> > cronjob that text-ifies it and posts it to usenet? comp.lang.perl
> > has something like this going, as do various other groups. I
> &
groups. I think I have that code here
somewhere. Having the document multi-page will complicate matters, but
only a little.
--
Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Come see me at Apachecon! -- http://www.apachecon.com/
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
