Mark,
It may be easier to require them to input the work entry using a specific
work info type. Then you don't have to mess with time and date
calculations.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 2, 2013, at 2:31 PM, "Brittain, Mark" wrote:
**
Hi All & TGIF,
On the Work Order I have a requirement that
Hello listers,
My name is Paul Kelly. I am currently looking for mid to senior level Remedy
developers. There are currently 2 positions available.
If anyone is looking for a full time position, in this area, please contact me
offline at paul.e.ke...@jpmorgan.com.
Or, you can apply directly at
Hi All & TGIF,
On the Work Order I have a requirement that a Work Info Notes entry is required
when the Status is set to Completed or Closed. If the user just made an entry
it doesn't make sense they make another. So my thought is to use a guide to
walk through Work Info table and if the Submit
So I am up toward the top but then you need to factor in the quality index
to see if that volume is of any value.
Add +1 more to the count and subtract 2 points from the quality index :)
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Grooms, Frederick W <
frederick.w.gro...@xo.com> wrote:
> **
>
> I have 10 en
Advice taken...!
From: Howard Richter
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: Recruiters Odd NDA
**
Scott,
In my 30+ years in IT and a few positions found for me by headhunters, when I
am asked for my SS number or ot
Scott,
In my 30+ years in IT and a few positions found for me by headhunters, when
I am asked for my SS number or other that I would give an employer. I walk
away.
I do understand that they need to do some type of checkup on the person they
want to put in front of a possible employer, but
Lisa,
As long as you have a support ID and access to the BMC Support website,
you can find the Product Defects (SW#) in the Issue and Defect Management
section of the Support site. The section is called Product Defects.
Mac Rhoades / Sr Programmer/Analyst-Specialized Systems / IT Service
Manage
I got happy for a bit and then noticed your 2 addresses. Foiled me again
Batman!
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 2, 2013, at 11:41 AM, "Longwing, Lj" wrote:
**
LOL...I was about to say that I was falling off this year...but when you
combine both of my 'main' addresses...I'm still top poster :D, and
Awesome!!! Thank you!!
Lisa
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mac Rhoades
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 11:29 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Where can I Find "SWXX" Docs?
** Lisa,
As long as you
so, depending on how you calculate the 'who' you expect to vote...that's
not a bad turn out :D
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Cecil, Ken wrote:
> **
>
> So it seems like there is an active core of around 160 or so posters. 79
> votes is about 50% of that.
>
> ** **
>
> 100%+ would be exc
So it seems like there is an active core of around 160 or so posters. 79 votes
is about 50% of that.
100%+ would be excellent but 50% turnout is nothing to sneeze at.
Ken.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Longwing, Lj
Sent: Friday,
This defect SW00275135 is fixed in 7.0.03 Patch 10, Asset Management
Application module. However there is also another copy defect SW00275125 fixed
in 7.6 version asset application module.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Ken Pritcha
Lisa - I believe that's a ticket number for their software defects. BMC
Support would be the ones to contact on the status.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION
OPERATIONS
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 1
I'm looking at the knowledge base on the Support Section of the BMC
Website, and I found something similar to my problem and it refers to "a
bug covered in SW00275135."
I did a search on SW00275135 in the knowledge base to get more info
about this bug (and is it going to be fixed in a later v
Hi, we are looking at this issue and the data stored in the Person ID field in
the CTM:People WorkLog form is the entry ID of the Person record in the
CTM:People form. So there are no data issues here.
In addition, if you are validating CTM:LoadPeopleWorkLog records against people
records on t
Thanks and thats exactly what I did I signed the Non Compete but left my
social out. If they have a problem with that then I guess it goodbye.
From: "Longwing, Lj"
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: Recruiters Odd N
Just my 2 cents - if I was uncomfortable with a couple items and it seemed a
bit strange, it probably wouldn't be worth pursuing.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Scott Hallenger
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 9:26 AM
To: arslist@ARSLI
how many are there that have posted more that 100 times?
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Grooms, Frederick W <
frederick.w.gro...@xo.com> wrote:
> **
>
> You are probably correct … I was only doing a stare and compare at the
> posters who posted more than 100 times
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *F
I think for me you should actually find 3 different address that I've
posted from...but that's beside the point :)
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Grooms, Frederick W <
frederick.w.gro...@xo.com> wrote:
> **
>
> Just to update some statistics (I ran some Access queries against my
> outlook PST o
I would back away from them. There are enough "free" and very legit agencies
out there who do not ask for this up front. I have been a part of many NDA
write-ups and would never have worded something like this.
Also just to let some of you guys in on a little secret... I worked for a
company tha
I had a friend locally that was being asked for his social by a recruiter,
similar situation to yours where no interview was scheduled yet...the
recruiter stated that it was to perform a background check to ensure there
was no fraud on his part before submitting himfor me, the only person
needi
I probably jumped the gun a little. On first read it seemed to be saying that I
was not allowed to look for a job anywhere while they are shopping my resume
around. Which sounded ridiculous. Now they are asking for my SS# and have not
even interviewed my. I dunno, I'm just uncomfortable with thi
I think you are correct Jason. I think they are opening up the "Web"
report which is a BIRT report (.rptdesign)
I guess it's time to learn BIRT! :)
Thanks so much everyone!!
Lisa
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Be
On 8/1/13, Roger Justice wrote:
> It is a non compete which is almost impossible to get a lawyer to take you
> to court for. If you live in a right to work state, which I do I have seen
> this tried and the court through it out.
>
I was going to post the same thing - non compete clauses are fairl
Good :)
It was issue with email engine and we have already taken care in the latest
release.
Thanks
Parshuram
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Dave Barber
Sent: 02 August 2013 4:51
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Email Daemon
Many thanks; I've tried amending every single logging.properties file on
the server along with those suggestions.
The settings are being ignored maybe its an issue with the v7 email
engine, or possibly some other configuration on our server.
On 29 July 2013 09:34, Walunjkar, Parshuram wrote
Mark,
Carl is correct. For the Sample Apps, just open the form: Sample
Application Console in dev studio. Then go to the Form Properties and
uncheck the Entry Point selection. You'll need to flush the mid tier for
the change to take effect on the web.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 1, 2013, at 2:48 P
On 8/1/13, Brittain, Mark wrote:
o.
>
> In the Work Info Notes there are Work Info Types Such as Install Plan, Test
> Plan and Backout Plan. One thought is that if certain conditions are met, a
> set of filters would create the Work Info Notes. Anyone done something like
> this? If so how did you
28 matches
Mail list logo
