Re: Destination Problem: Upgrading from 7.6.04 to 8.1.02

2015-04-14 Thread Patil, Vivek
Joe is right. 8.1.02 Patch1 is just bundle of hotfixes . One cannot perform upgrade from 7604 using that. @Karthick : 1] Please download 8.1.02 release installer whose size will be around 1.5 GB Execute 8.1.02 config checker utility for config checks . 2] Upgrade AR using installer present

Re: HashFile which is not compatible with this version of Best Practice Conversion Utility

2015-04-13 Thread Patil, Vivek
https://communities.bmc.com/docs/DOC-12886 Hi Karthich, Please check if the hash file on communities works for you. Thanks, Vivek From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Karthick S Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 10:06 AM To:

Re: Upgrade to 8.1.2

2015-04-08 Thread Patil, Vivek
Please setup new environment , install present version products and then import DB from PRODUCTION. After that, I will recommend you to use config checker which is packaged with AR Installer zip file. The tool has ability to find most of configuration and unique ID violation issues due to

Re: 7.6.04 Install question...

2015-03-26 Thread Patil, Vivek
@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: 7.6.04 Install question... ** That may be it….any suggestion on what port should be used? From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Patil, Vivek Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 1:30 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist

Re: Error installing Atrium Core Patch 8.1.0.2

2015-03-26 Thread Patil, Vivek
Please check whether value of BMC_AR_SYSTEM_HOME is unique at below locations: 1] C:\windows\ProductRegistry.xml 2] AtriumCoreInstalledConfiguration.xml 3] environment variable BMC_AR_SYSTEM_HOME Questions: 1] is this 8.1.02 Patch or 8.1 Service Pack 2 [ 8.1.02 ] ; both are different

Re: 7.6.04 Install question...

2015-03-26 Thread Patil, Vivek
This may happen is 1433 port is being used by some other application. AR installer is not able to access 1433 and service creation fails. I faced this once where 1433 was being used by other application. Thanks, Vivek From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)

Re: Upgrade to 8.1 AR/ITSM

2015-01-12 Thread Patil, Vivek
Hi Kathy, Do you have customizations on CORE AR forms ? Planning the upgrade : https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/itsm81/Planning%20the%20upgrade All information on upgrades : https://kb.bmc.com/infocenter/index?page=contentid=S:KA400850 Thanks, Vivek From: Action Request System

Re: How long does the 8.1.02 SRM installer run?

2015-01-07 Thread Patil, Vivek
Hi Rick, Can you please mention few details: 1] Whether you are doing a fresh install or upgrade ? 2] How many locales are you are installing ? 3] Which Database and version ? SRM 8.1.02 all locale install on windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2 Unicode DB takes approximately 3 hours. On UNIX,

Re: Upgrading from 7.6.04 SP4 to 8.1 - Folder only has 0 MB of Free Disk Space

2014-12-28 Thread Patil, Vivek
Hi Lisa, If you are doing upgrade to 8.1 Sp2 then check whether you can copy installer to -Djava.io.tmpdir . Starting from 8.1 SP2 BMC Remedy Installers use default temp denoted by =-Djava.io.tmpdir. export _JAVA_OPTIONS=-Djava.io.tmpdir=large size path # Can you share below

Re: BMC Atrium Core 8.1.02 Installer

2014-10-20 Thread Patil, Vivek
Hi Brad, Please check what is failed in 8.1 SP1 because of which you see this error during upgrade. Please take DB backup . One will have to fix the failure. Thanks, Vivek From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Tanner, Doug Sent:

Re: Stuck at Executing SQLs in 8.1 Stack Installer

2014-10-16 Thread Patil, Vivek
Hi Aedrian, Can you please refer https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/itsm81/Configuring+Oracle+databasesConfiguring+Oracle+databases And https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/itsm81/Installing+the+BMC+Remedy+ITSM+Suite+Preconfigured+Stack In your case we would recommend you to

Re: Installing Additional Language Pack for ARS 7.6.04

2014-06-12 Thread Patil, Vivek
Can you try this on a TEST Box ? If there are customizations on Base forms then there can be possible effect. Thanks,   Vivek -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rajiv Nakkana Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014

Re: AR System 8.1 on AIX

2014-05-29 Thread Patil, Vivek
The 8.1.01.001 [ which is 8.1 SP1 Patch1 ] contains only MidTier fixes. When 8.1 Sp1 Patch1 was planned , critical fixes were shipped as part of it ; all of them being MidTier in Patch1 @Frank : The AR Server Patch Project consists of multiple features / components viz. AR Server ,

Re: ITSM 8.1 SP1 - Content missing ?

2014-05-26 Thread Patil, Vivek
agreed to work with me to resolve the issue. This is what customer service is all about. Terry From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Patil, Vivek Sent: May-21-14 9:32 PM To: arslist

Re: ITSM 8.1 SP1 - Content missing ?

2014-05-26 Thread Patil, Vivek
customer service is all about. Terry From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Patil, Vivek Sent: May-21-14 9:32 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM 8.1 SP1 - Content missing

Re: Remedy 7.6.04 SP3 user tool download...

2014-05-22 Thread Patil, Vivek
Hi Suresh , Please ensure that if you have 8.x ARServer installed then please install User Tool in different directory. AR 8.0 in directory A and 7604 User Tool in path B. Please refer KA387013 for details. Thanks,   Vivek -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion

Re: ITSM 8.1 SP1 - Content missing ?

2014-05-22 Thread Patil, Vivek
don't want to see the carcass of Remedy being eaten by a SNOW vulture. We, who are on the frontlines, cannot defend the kingdom by ourselves. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Patil, Vivek Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 8:43 PM To: arslist

Re: ITSM 8.1 SP1 - Content missing ?

2014-05-22 Thread Patil, Vivek
service is all about. Terry From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Patil, Vivek Sent: May-21-14 9:32 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM 8.1 SP1 - Content missing ? ** Did you

Re: ITSM 8.1 SP1 - Content missing ?

2014-05-21 Thread Patil, Vivek
Did you install 8.1 SLM GA on top of 8.1 SP1 ITSM ? Thanks, Vivek From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of tboot...@objectpath.com Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 12:05 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: ITSM 8.1 SP1 - Content missing ? **

Re: ITSM 8.1 SP1 - Content missing ?

2014-05-21 Thread Patil, Vivek
Hi Pritch, Can you please refer below topic in ARS List Installation Alert : Installing or upgrading to SLM 8.1 GA after with ITSM 8.1 SP1http://arslist.org/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A1=ind1405L=ARSLISTX=2ECE3F5456A712311DY=vivek_patil%40bmc.com#53 1] Just importing the 79 objects is not

Re: 8.1.0 installer

2014-05-16 Thread Patil, Vivek
Hi Philip, 1] After you complete Phase3 [ attribute deletion ] , you will get the option to upgrade RKM. 2] But if you want to install RKM and then later delete attributes then here is a way. a] Open Share:Application_Properties form . b] Search with Application ID =

Re: AR System /ITSM 7.6.4 Memory

2014-05-06 Thread Patil, Vivek
Where are you exactly seeing the latency ? Can you share a use-case ? Thanks, Vivek From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Koyb P. Liabt Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 10:39 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: AR System /ITSM 7.6.4 Memory

Re: Customizations in Base Development Mode during an ARS Upgrade from v7.6.04 to v8.1.

2014-04-28 Thread Patil, Vivek
One will have to manually reconcile the customizations on Base Objects. Thanks, Vivek From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of R Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 1:18 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Customizations in Base Development