etween the two calls. Without this then, as suspected, it
adds the H2O lines twice.
Does this make sense?
Stuart
From: Richard Larsson
Sent: 17 March 2022 13:13
To: Fox, Stuart
Subject: Re: Help, something broke my simulations!
This email was received from an external source. Always check se
Hi ARTS devs,
One of the recent-(ish) commits to ARTS has broken my simulations! With the
current head of master I get big differences in simulated brightness
temperature around a water vapour absorption line when I do simulations that
also include ozone (blue line in attached plots), compared
(which I assume is taken direct from
the Makarov paper?)
Should we be attempting to avoid this type of semi-duplication, or is it an
acceptable thing to do?
Stuart
From: Richard Larsson
Sent: 10 March 2022 15:50
To: Fox, Stuart
Cc: arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
Subject: Re: Another question
Hi ARTS developers,
I'm trying to add the latest version of the Rosenkranz absorption models into
ARTS for a study we are currently doing. One of the "features" of the model is
that the oxygen absorption calculation has a dependence on the water vapour
density (due to the fact that the water
Hi ARTS developers,
I'm hoping someone will be able to help me with the ARTS build system. I'm
trying to add a new "modern" predefined absorption model (in
src/predefined/xx.cc) and I'd like to use the Faddeeva compex error
function from 3rdparty/Faddeeva. The problem I'm having is getting
Hi ARTS devs,
One of the recent commits to the github repository seems to have broken
propmat_clearsky_fieldCalc when used with line absorption calculations (but not
complete absorption models). There's been a massive change in the results
(orders of magnitude different) between revision
etc), so this isn’t restricted to Tretyakov-05
Stuart
From: Richard Larsson
Sent: 22 October 2021 10:45
To: Fox, Stuart
Cc: arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
Subject: Re: Another Tretyakov-05 O2 absorption question
This email was received from an external source. Always check sender details
Hi ARTS devs,
I've got another question about the Tretyakov-05 complete absorption
implementation in ARTS. In the code for TRE05O2AbsModel, the line absorption is
calculated, and then converted in the final line into a partial cross-section.
When calculating this cross-section a constant equal
Hi arts devs,
I'm currently working on incorporating v3.5 of the MT-CKD continuum into ARTS,
and have a question relating to the "correct" text encoding for the ARTS source
files.
The file I'm working on (legacy_continua.cc) has some non-ASCII characters in
the comments, which I think are
> It seems a bit weird to me to use this definition at the (low) level of the
> absorption routines. Perhaps one solutions would be to have an option for
> this behaviour when ingesting concentration profile data? Perhaps by >
> passing in a list of species that should be considered as not
Sorry – for v2.5 I should have said I’m seeing differences between
mirroring_option=”SameAsLineShape” and mirroring_option=”Manual”.
From: Fox, Stuart
Sent: 10 June 2021 09:26
To: Richard Larsson
Cc: arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
Subject: RE: ARTS line absorption v2.3 vs v2.5
Hi Richard
2021 17:01
To: Fox, Stuart
Cc: arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
Subject: Re: ARTS line absorption v2.3 vs v2.5
This email was received from an external source. Always check sender details,
links & attachments.
Hi Stuart,
All the differences between current 2.5 version and old version th
Hello all,
Thanks for all the work on the line cutoff behaviour in the latest version of
ARTS! However,I'm still struggling to reproduce the absorption line behaviour
between v2.3.1277 and v2.5 even after the latest work on the line cutoff from
Richard. In fact, even without a line cutoff
Dear ARTS developers,
I'm trying to understand some changes to clear-sky simulations when moving to
ARTS v2.4 and have noticed that there seems to be a difference in how a cutoff
frequency for absorption lines is handled. I've put a basic example
illustrating this at
Hi ARTS developers,
I hope you are all well. Since next week was supposed to be the ARTS workshop
and I had some spare time when I was on holiday last week I decided to develop
syntax highlighting for ARTS control files in my favourite editor, VS Code. I
thought I'd share in case it is of use
onst&, Verbosity const&)'
Any ideas what’s wrong?
Stuart
From: Richard Larsson
Sent: 09 April 2020 14:40
To: Fox, Stuart
Cc: arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
Subject: Re: [arts-dev] ARTS/Python interfaces
Hi Stuart,
The dev-version of ARTS has full support of the workspace methods of
Hi developers,
I've just been working on interfacing some Python code with ARTS (basically
using ARTS to provide atmospheric radiances for use with the SMRT snow surface
microwave model). So far my implementation uses the typhon.arts.workspace
functions for the interfacing, but I notice from
Hi all,
I would like to add some further PSD options to ARTS (specifically ones for
rain and graupel that are consistent with the single-moment schemes used in the
Met Office NWP model). I will be making use of them by defining hydrometeor
mass density fields and then using
Hi developers,
I've been trying to use the Python assp methods (downloaded from the Zenodo
link) to work with some single scattering data. Specifically, I have been
trying to use assp.assp_interp_size to interpolate some optical properties onto
a common size grid. However, there seems to be a
Hi Patrick,
I have done a quick test with the pre-983 temperature Jacobian and it now looks
the same.
Cheers,
Stuart
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Eriksson
Sent: 19 November 2018 20:38
To: Fox, Stuart ; arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
Subject: Re: [arts-dev] Change
Hi all,
I have just noticed that there has been relatively large changes to some
calculated temperature Jacobians with "recent" versions of ARTS. The
differences appeared with arts-2-3-983. Attached is an example set of
controlfiles/data that will show the differences when run with versions
,
Stuart
From: Richard Larsson [mailto:ric.lars...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 October 2017 14:01
To: Fox, Stuart <stuart@metoffice.gov.uk>
Cc: arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
Subject: Re: [arts-dev] Problem with line absorption in ARTS
Stuart,
I am also seeing the problem but I have n
Hi all,
I wasn't sure whether to ask this on arts-user or arts-dev - I'm not sure
whether there's a bug in ARTS or something wrong with my inputs!
I'm trying to do some clear sky brightness temperature simulations for Earth
using water vapour lines from HITRAN-2016. However, I am getting huge
Hi all,
Is there a reason why the MPM89 complete H2O absorption model isn't included as
an option in continua.arts? As far as I can tell the code for it has been
implemented in continua.cc, so all that's needed is to add
abs_cont_descriptionAppend(tagname="H2O-MPM89",model="MPM89") to the
24 matches
Mail list logo
