On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 09:29:43AM +0100, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2018, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> > You did not mention that people using old ICU (e.g. 60) also had the
> > problem.
> Because I do not agree with that: For me, firefox-63 built just fine without
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
You did not mention that people using old ICU (e.g. 60) also had the
problem.
Because I do not agree with that: For me, firefox-63 built just fine
without patching with either its internal icu (ISTR despite system
icu-63) or with system
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 05:36:45AM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 02:18:13AM +0100, dueffert--- via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Worked for the moment, but wasn't really a solution. So I waited for
> > firefox-63.0.1, but that did not change anything. Then I digged for the
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 02:18:13AM +0100, dueffert--- via blfs-dev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2018, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> >
> > > After the clang build (probably) fails, can you try commenting out
> > >
Hi all,
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
After the clang build (probably) fails, can you try commenting out
ac_add_options --with-system-icu
Thanks, that's it, at least for me: Build fails with system icu4c-63.1,
Hi all,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Tue Oct 16 19:10:44 CDT 2018 icu4c-62.1
I have -63_1
^ - see the end of my reply
After the clang build (probably) fails, can you try commenting out
ac_add_options --with-system-icu
Thanks, that's it, at least for
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:40:30AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> Meanwhile, trying clang-5.0 on an 8.2 system (I know I said "don't",
> but things need to be confirmed - and gentoo appear to require
> llvm >= 4.0)..
>
Built and installed ok, works.
ĸen
--
Is
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:28:38PM -0500, renodr via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 2018-10-25 16:29, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> >
> > For elfhack, all I can find is a comment that that builds failed in
> > fedora 29, no details at all. Also, for 63, and probably for 62
> > befoe that, they use a
On 2018-10-25 16:29, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
wrote:
Summary:
1. Drop system icu unless that is 61 or 62.
2. Enable clang if its major version is 6 or 7.
3. I need to check how to enable gold.
4. I need to look at
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> Summary:
>
> 1. Drop system icu unless that is 61 or 62.
>
> 2. Enable clang if its major version is 6 or 7.
>
> 3. I need to check how to enable gold.
>
> 4. I need to look at fedora to see if I can find out why
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 03:26:11PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> As you may have seen in my earlier post, I came to the same conclusion
> independently. I did use the internal icu and FF built, installed, and ran
> (very limited testing) fine. I did use both the clang exports and
On 10/25/2018 02:56 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 01:08:36PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/25/2018 09:31 AM, renodr via blfs-dev wrote:
Here's a list of my packages (at least as it pertains to Firefox
dependencies):
Wed Oct 17 22:26:59 CDT 2018
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 01:08:36PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 10/25/2018 09:31 AM, renodr via blfs-dev wrote:
> >
> > Here's a list of my packages (at least as it pertains to Firefox
> > dependencies):
> >
> > Wed Oct 17 22:26:59 CDT 2018 autoconf-2.13
> > Tue Oct 23 21:02:49
On 10/25/2018 09:31 AM, renodr via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2018-10-25 00:38, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/24/2018 08:49 PM, renodr via blfs-dev wrote:
In my case, I can build it fine if I run at -j1 (96 SBU!), but I
cannot install it. When I attempt to install it, it bombs out about
On 2018-10-25 00:38, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/24/2018 08:49 PM, renodr via blfs-dev wrote:
In my case, I can build it fine if I run at -j1 (96 SBU!), but I
cannot install it. When I attempt to install it, it bombs out about
"elfhack". Something throws an "iostream" error:
I
On 2018-10-24 23:46, Brendan L via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:49 PM renodr via blfs-dev
wrote:
On 2018-10-24 19:09, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 10/24/2018 05:44 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:21:37AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
>>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:49:08PM -0500, renodr via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> I have 504 coredumps on this system (and it's not more than a couple weeks
> old). A majority of them were due to ICE's (CPU was too new for it's quirks
> to be covered in the kernel, as well as some Illegal Operation
On 10/24/2018 08:49 PM, renodr via blfs-dev wrote:
In my case, I can build it fine if I run at -j1 (96 SBU!), but I cannot
install it. When I attempt to install it, it bombs out about "elfhack".
Something throws an "iostream" error:
I tried -j1 also, but it still failed for me at the same
On 10/24/2018 11:46 PM, Brendan L via blfs-dev wrote:
In my case, I can build it fine if I run at -j1 (96 SBU!), but I cannot
install it. When I attempt to install it, it bombs out about "elfhack".
Something throws an "iostream" error:
There is a mozconfig option --disable-elf-hack. I had to
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:49 PM renodr via blfs-dev
wrote:
>
> On 2018-10-24 19:09, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> > On 10/24/2018 05:44 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:21:37AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi all
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Just
On 2018-10-24 19:09, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/24/2018 05:44 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:21:37AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hi all
Just tried to build firefox 63.0 and got the folllowing error:
-12:10.16
On 10/24/2018 05:44 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:21:37AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
Just tried to build firefox 63.0 and got the folllowing error:
-12:10.16 /lgl-bld/firefox-63.0/js/src/vm/JSContext-inl.h:180:73: error: no
‘void
On 10/25/18 12:53 AM, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Just tried to build firefox 63.0 and got the following error:
so far I fail to build FF63 too (while 62.0.3 was fine)...
This is with gcc 7.3.0 and the system_graphite2_harfbuzz-1
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:53:17AM +0200, dueffert--- via blfs-dev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> > Just tried to build firefox 63.0 and got the following error:
> so far I fail to build FF63 too (while 62.0.3 was fine)...
>
> > This is with gcc 7.3.0
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Just tried to build firefox 63.0 and got the following error:
so far I fail to build FF63 too (while 62.0.3 was fine)...
This is with gcc 7.3.0 and the system_graphite2_harfbuzz-1 patch, but
without node.js
... with gcc 8.2.0 and
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:21:37AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
> Just tried to build firefox 63.0 and got the folllowing error:
>
>
> -12:10.16 /lgl-bld/firefox-63.0/js/src/vm/JSContext-inl.h:180:73: error: no
> ‘void JSContext::checkImpl_63(int, const Head&, const
26 matches
Mail list logo