On 3 Sep 2006, at 2:30AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006 at 0:53, William T Goodall wrote:
On 2 Sep 2006, at 10:10PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 2 Sep 2006 at 21:57, William T Goodall wrote:
On 2 Sep 2006, at 9:34PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
No, the issue is that some people are
On 3 Sep 2006, at 3:03AM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Interesting. Why do you suppose you feel that way?
Oh, I suppose I feel that way.
Eliza Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
Theists cannot be
'Faith school' - hah! Why mince words - let's call it what it is, a
murder school! And exactly typical of the filthy evil of religion.
http://tinyurl.com/fpxc7
Anti-terrorist police were last night searching a Muslim school at
the centre of an investigation into terrorist training camps
On 3 Sep 2006 at 8:54, William T Goodall wrote:
'Faith school' - hah! Why mince words - let's call it what it is, a
murder school! And exactly typical of the filthy evil of religion.
And let's call you a potential murder, since you follow the faith of
militant atheism yourself...
14 men
On 3 Sep 2006 at 8:31, William T Goodall wrote:
Perhaps if you read the origional again? I gave plenty of evidence,
which starts with the fact that they operate as whatever sort of
organisation better suits the area. They not a religion, they are a
form of organised crime (especially in
Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006 at 8:54, William T Goodall wrote:
'Faith school' - hah! Why mince words - let's call it what it is, a
murder school! And exactly typical of the filthy evil of religion.
And let's call you a potential murder, since you follow the faith of
militant
On 3 Sep 2006, at 3:07PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006 at 8:31, William T Goodall wrote:
Perhaps if you read the origional again? I gave plenty of evidence,
which starts with the fact that they operate as whatever sort of
organisation better suits the area. They not a religion, they
On 3 Sep 2006, at 3:32PM, David Hobby wrote:
Look, I teach at a real school. The phrase
Faith school already sounds pretty bad to
me, as it indicates that nothing of substance
is taught. Maru.
Apart from bomb-making obviously.
God loves an explosion Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail :
William T Goodall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 3:32PM, David Hobby wrote:
Look, I teach at a real school. The phrase
Faith school already sounds pretty bad to
me, as it indicates that nothing of substance
is taught. Maru.
Apart from bomb-making obviously.
I figured that Bomb Making would
I would be interested in seeing William provide evidence that the Catholic
Church has been running a pedophile ring for centuries...
Damon.
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
On 3 Sep 2006, at 7:55PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be interested in seeing William provide evidence that the
Catholic Church has been running a pedophile ring for centuries...
It's common knowledge. There have been hundreds of news stories about
the Catholic Church covering up
Merging several posts on this subject:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of PAT MATHEWS
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 3:49 PM
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Religious freedom
TIME! Everything's been repeated - asserted, not
The point is, If I presented a paper that, FREX, the Fyrd was a common element
of the Anglo-norman army as common knowledge, I can guarantee I wouldn't make
it too far.
No, if you're going to make blanket statements, you should be prepared to back
it up. I would want to see REAL evidence,
On Sep 1, 2006, at 9:05 AM, William T Goodall wrote:
And yes, OSX is marvelous. Its merest bootlace, Windows is not
worthy to kiss. - David Brin
With all the things that you and I have to disagree about, it is nice
that we
have this in common.
Dave
On Sep 1, 2006, at 10:08 PM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Aug 26, 2006, at 11:54 PM, Dave Land wrote:
Apparently, after screening and re-screening that couple of
milliseconds
of Janet Jackson's nipple at the 2004 Superbowl for hours on end, the
geeks at the FCC have lost all sense of
On 3 Sep 2006, at 8:28PM, Dan Minette wrote:
Merging several posts on this subject:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of PAT MATHEWS
TIME! Everything's been repeated - asserted, not debated - several
times
over and we're
On 3 Sep 2006, at 8:37PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point is, If I presented a paper that, FREX, the Fyrd was a
common element of the Anglo-norman army as common knowledge, I
can guarantee I wouldn't make it too far.
But I'm not presenting a paper.
And since it is common knowledge
On Sep 2, 2006, at 10:20 PM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:49:52 -0700, Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, PAT MATHEWS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TIME! Everything's been repeated - asserted, not debated -
several times
over and we're getting into battling
On Sep 3, 2006, at 12:18 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 7:55PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be interested in seeing William provide evidence that the
Catholic Church has been running a pedophile ring for centuries...
It's common knowledge. There have been hundreds of
On 3 Sep 2006, at 10:09PM, Dave Land wrote:
On Sep 3, 2006, at 12:18 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 7:55PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be interested in seeing William provide evidence that the
Catholic Church has been running a pedophile ring for centuries...
It's
Let's put it this way: I flatly reject that it is common knowledge since I
have NEVER heard of a centuries old Catholic Pedophile Ring. Irregardless,
saying its common knowledge in no way makes it true.
Let me be more blunt then: William, I think your statement is bull and I'm
calling you out
On 3 Sep 2006 at 21:45, William T Goodall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 8:28PM, Dan Minette wrote:
IMHO, that's not surprising when people are discussing sets of
presuppositionsespecially when one of the people is convinced
that his
own set is Truth.
I'm glad you're prepared to
On 3 Sep 2006 at 12:51, Dave Land wrote:
On Sep 1, 2006, at 9:05 AM, William T Goodall wrote:
And yes, OSX is marvelous. Its merest bootlace, Windows is not
worthy to kiss. - David Brin
With all the things that you and I have to disagree about, it is nice
that we
have this in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Doug Pensinger
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 12:01 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Jobs, not trees! (Collapse, Chapter 2)
As another example, you seem to indicate that we should be
On 3 Sep 2006, at 10:45PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's put it this way: I flatly reject that it is common
knowledge since I have NEVER heard of a centuries old Catholic
Pedophile Ring. Irregardless, saying its common knowledge in no
way makes it true.
Let me be more blunt then:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 10:45PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
And no, I can't spell. I'm dyslexic. Your point?
It's harder to read your incoherent babbling when it's full of
spelling mistakes.
Good spelling is polite Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web :
Oh, I had no real expectation that you would respond in any meaningful way, but
I could not let such a statement of intellectual vacuum lay unchallenged. Since
so far you are the only one making a statement of such belief, I can rest
assured that there is no need to prove otherwise.
On 3 Sep 2006, at 10:53PM, William T Goodall wrote:
It seems pretty obvious to me, but it's not a subject I find
important enough to put any extra effort into. If you want to prove
me wrong go ahead and knock yourself out. Otherwise we'll just have
to differ on the matter.
Just to
On 9/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be interested in seeing William provide evidence that the Catholic
Church has been running a pedophile ring for centuries...
There are many things that are true for which no evidence can be produced.
In fact, I would suggest that
On 3 Sep 2006, at 11:03PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I had no real expectation that you would respond in any
meaningful way, but I could not let such a statement of
intellectual vacuum lay unchallenged. Since so far you are the only
one making a statement of such belief, I can rest
On 3 Sep 2006 at 17:19, William T Goodall wrote:
I doubt that the heads of most religions believe. These are
intelligent college educated people after all. Belief is what they
use to gull money and power from the ignorant and superstitious
people that they prey on.
There's only one
Andrew Crystall wrote:
I do dual-boot windows 2k and linux, but I don't feel that Linux is
ready for most home users, unlike projects like OpenOffice, which
I've recommended for some years... it's a shame that I can't move
away entirely because of some of the more arcane Excel spreadsheets
On 9/3/06, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And the Catholic Church is the
largest pedophile ring in the world. That's pretty criminal and
they've been covering that up for centuries.
That is an absolutely ridiculous statement. Dan posted a very clear
analysis here during the
WTG wrote:
And no, I can't spell. I'm dyslexic. Your point?
It's harder to read your incoherent babbling when it's full of
spelling mistakes.
Thta's rude, William. Yuo can't bunr peopel at the steak for
things they are born with!
Ablerto Monteiro
On 9/3/06, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 10:53PM, William T Goodall wrote:
It seems pretty obvious to me, but it's not a subject I find
important enough to put any extra effort into. If you want to prove
me wrong go ahead and knock yourself out. Otherwise
On 9/3/06, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'Faith school' - hah! Why mince words - let's call it what it is, a
murder school! And exactly typical of the filthy evil of religion.
http://tinyurl.com/fpxc7
I've been wracking my brain to figure out who it is that you remind me of.
It
John, you are a (insert inflammitory accusation here) . I do not need evidence
of this, because I cannot get the evidence I need to prove it. Nonetheless,
because I believe it to be so, must MAKE it so.
Damon, who does not ACTUALLY believe John is a murderer, etc, but is merely
trying to make
If you have no intention of pursuing this line of thought, why are you
continuing to post on it?
Your other post only illustrates you want to make conclusions based on belief,
not on evidence.
Damon.
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3 Sep 2006, at 11:19PM, Mauro Diotallevi wrote:
On 9/3/06, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And the Catholic Church is the
largest pedophile ring in the world. That's pretty criminal and
they've been covering that up for centuries.
That is an absolutely ridiculous statement.
On 3 Sep 2006, at 11:33PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have no intention of pursuing this line of thought, why are
you continuing to post on it?
I'll stop right now!
Your other post only illustrates you want to make conclusions based
on belief, not on evidence.
You have
On 3 Sep 2006, at 11:23PM, John W Redelfs wrote:
On 9/3/06, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the Church's ongoing efforts to cover up the issue any lack of
published scandal prior to the well-known present day cases can't
show that molestation wasn't going on then too.
I
http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/060829roswell.htm
--
Mauro Diotallevi
Hey, Harry, you haven't done anything useful for a while -- you be the god
of jello now. -- Patricia Wrede, 8/16/2006 on rasfc
___
On 3 Sep 2006, at 11:19PM, Mauro Diotallevi wrote:
Dan posted a very clear
analysis here during the height of the recent pedophilia scandal
that
showed that rates of pedophilia among Catholic priests was no
higher than in
the general population at large, and I seem recall reading
It's nice that this topic has attracted some interest and that people
are giving some thought to the sickening poisonous evil filth of
religion and the ghastly damage it causes individuals and society.
However a number of people (you know who you are and I won't
embarrass you by quoting
We went to the San Jose Flea Market today... a large affair, with all sorts
of vendors... including a photogaphy studio... where They Have Appeared. I
got a picture with my camera phone.
And dang it, they're not teal.
http://www.mccmedia.com/pink_unicorn/
Nick
--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL
On 4 Sep 2006 at 0:41, William T Goodall wrote:
It's nice that this topic has attracted some interest and that people
are giving some thought to the sickening poisonous evil filth of
religion and the ghastly damage it causes individuals and society.
No, people are calling you a atheist
On 3 Sep 2006 at 23:00, William T Goodall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 10:45PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
And no, I can't spell. I'm dyslexic. Your point?
It's harder to read your incoherent babbling when it's full of
spelling mistakes.
That's nice. I allready know you can't be
On 3 Sep 2006 at 23:08, William T Goodall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 10:53PM, William T Goodall wrote:
It seems pretty obvious to me, but it's not a subject I find
important enough to put any extra effort into. If you want to prove
me wrong go ahead and knock yourself out.
On 3 Sep 2006, at 10:45PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
And I'm going to keep on using windows purely because it's what the
programs I use run on, and the Mac's charge a stiff premium for their
hardware.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060823/ap_on_hi_te/tech_test_mac_pro_3
The recently released Mac
On 4 Sep 2006 at 1:02, William T Goodall wrote:
A low-end Mac Pro will cost you $2,124 compared with $3,071 for a
In America. For one specific model. And with a very expensive Windows
PC make for comparison. And without similar options for warranty,
etc.
In the UK, the difference for someone
More to the point, pointing out spelling mistakes and bad grammer is an
indication you have nothing better to say...
Damon, posting from his Blackberry, where I can ONLY top post...
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat
On 4 Sep 2006, at 12:58AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006 at 23:00, William T Goodall wrote:
Good spelling is polite Maru
Not criticising people for disabilities is polite, as well. But given
the propaganda you spew, I can't expect politeness from you.
I'm being far politer to you
On 4 Sep 2006, at 1:15AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More to the point, pointing out spelling mistakes and bad grammer
is an indication you have nothing better to say...
Some posts have nothing in them worth replying to.
Both my parents were teachers Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL
On 4 Sep 2006 at 1:22, William T Goodall wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006, at 12:58AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006 at 23:00, William T Goodall wrote:
Good spelling is polite Maru
Not criticising people for disabilities is polite, as well. But given
the propaganda you spew, I can't
I have started deleting every post headed religious freedom after sampling
the endless debate and the level of debate. (You're another!)
Two of them just showed up in my junk mail box. Dave Land and William
Goodall.
TIME Gentlemen!
http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/
On 4 Sep 2006, at 1:14AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006 at 1:02, William T Goodall wrote:
A low-end Mac Pro will cost you $2,124 compared with $3,071 for a
In America. For one specific model. And with a very expensive Windows
PC make for comparison. And without similar options for
At 06:46 PM Sunday 9/3/2006, Nick Arnett wrote:
We went to the San Jose Flea Market today... a large affair, with all sorts
of vendors... including a photogaphy studio... where They Have Appeared. I
got a picture with my camera phone.
And dang it, they're not teal.
They could be in the
At 05:33 PM Sunday 9/3/2006, William T Goodall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 11:19PM, Mauro Diotallevi wrote:
On 9/3/06, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And the Catholic Church is the
largest pedophile ring in the world. That's pretty criminal and
they've been covering that up for
At 01:12 PM Sunday 9/3/2006, David Hobby wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 3:32PM, David Hobby wrote:
Look, I teach at a real school. The phrase
Faith school already sounds pretty bad to
me, as it indicates that nothing of substance
is taught. Maru.
Apart from bomb-making
On 4 Sep 2006 at 1:33, William T Goodall wrote:
In the UK, the difference for someone like me who builds my own is in
the region of 60% more expensive for the mac in raw performance
terms, and I cannot get a base spec Mac which suits me as a gamer.
So by non-technophile you don't mean
On 4 Sep 2006, at 1:28AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006 at 1:22, William T Goodall wrote:
I'm being far politer to you than all the careless educators who
couldn't be bothered to teach you the basics of thinking and writing
because you had a handicap.
Your basic lack of knowledge
On 4 Sep 2006 at 1:27, William T Goodall wrote:
Both my parents were teachers Maru
Shame they didn't teach you the value of tolerence.
AndrewC
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 4 Sep 2006 at 1:51, William T Goodall wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006, at 1:28AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006 at 1:22, William T Goodall wrote:
I'm being far politer to you than all the careless educators who
couldn't be bothered to teach you the basics of thinking and writing
Andrew Crystall wrote:
A low-end Mac Pro will cost you $2,124 compared with $3,071 for a
In America. For one specific model. And with a very expensive Windows
PC make for comparison. And without similar options for warranty,
etc.
Here in Brazil it's even worse. A Mac costs about twice as
On 04/09/2006, at 2:58 AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006 at 23:08, William T Goodall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 10:53PM, William T Goodall wrote:
It seems pretty obvious to me, but it's not a subject I find
important enough to put any extra effort into. If you want to prove
me wrong
On 4 Sep 2006, at 2:27AM, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
Andrew Crystall wrote:
A low-end Mac Pro will cost you $2,124 compared with $3,071 for a
In America. For one specific model. And with a very expensive Windows
PC make for comparison. And without similar options for
On 4 Sep 2006 at 2:49, William T Goodall wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006, at 2:27AM, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
Andrew Crystall wrote:
A low-end Mac Pro will cost you $2,124 compared with $3,071 for a
In America. For one specific model. And with a very expensive Windows
PC make
Perhaps inspired by today's pink unicorn sighting, allow me mumble a bit
about evil and ethics (not just a county in England, as Tom Holt says).
When I arrived at Kenyon College a couple of decades ago for my freshman
year, one of the rites of passage was a talk by the provost, whose name I
wish
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charlie Bell
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 8:44 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Religious freedom
On 04/09/2006, at 2:58 AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006 at 23:08, William
On 02/09/2006, at 6:41 PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
Further, ID has very little to do with belief that G-d created the
universe...
...apart from all the major ID spokespeople have said at various
times that the designer is God, and a number of them are YECs who
were convinced that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charlie Bell
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 9:36 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Pope prepares to embrace theory of intelligent design
The conflict is between people who think science
On 4 Sep 2006 at 5:36, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 02/09/2006, at 6:41 PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
Further, ID has very little to do with belief that G-d created the
universe...
...apart from all the major ID spokespeople have said at various
times that the designer is God, and a
On Sep 3, 2006, at 7:05 PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006 at 2:49, William T Goodall wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006, at 2:27AM, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
Andrew Crystall wrote:
A low-end Mac Pro will cost you $2,124 compared with $3,071 for a
In America. For one specific
On 3 Sep 2006 at 20:01, Dave Land wrote:
On the contrary, there may well be better words for it, such as better
informed about the current state of the Macintosh line than you seem to
be. Or, not just shooting his mouth off without being in possession of
the facts.
Okay, you're supporting
On 9/3/06, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006, at 2:27AM, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
Andrew Crystall wrote:
A low-end Mac Pro will cost you $2,124 compared with $3,071 for a
In America. For one specific model. And with a very expensive Windows
PC make
Just wanted to add my belated felicitations. I hope you're enjoying your
honeymoon in Cyprus.
May you have a long and exceedingly happy marriage!
--
Doug
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 9/3/06, Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006 at 1:33, William T Goodall wrote:
In the UK, the difference for someone like me who builds my own is in
the region of 60% more expensive for the mac in raw performance
terms, and I cannot get a base spec Mac which suits me
On 9/2/06, Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's just the best link again: http://www.xenu.net
And you know who fights them? Not your precious atheists, it's
Christians and Jews.
AndrewC
Really. So Keith Henson is not an atheist? I'd be surprised to learn that.
~maru
On 3 Sep 2006 at 23:30, maru dubshinki wrote:
Could you elaborate on this? I'm kind of curious since I don't think
computer building has been discussed on list, and I've been
contemplating building a PC for some time now (following the template
Not really - it's a catch 22, I'm not buying
On 9/2/06, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2 Sep 2006, at 11:49PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/2/06, PAT MATHEWS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TIME! Everything's been repeated - asserted, not debated - several
times
over and we're getting into battling assertions now with ad hominem
On 3 Sep 2006 at 23:38, maru dubshinki wrote:
On 9/2/06, Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's just the best link again: http://www.xenu.net
And you know who fights them? Not your precious atheists, it's
Christians and Jews.
AndrewC
Really. So Keith Henson is not
Maru Dubshinki wrote:
Clearly that the pink unicorn is actually an Invisible Pink Unicorn,
as no one can see it.
It surprised me that so many of you believe in this Pink Unicorn Myth.
The ammount of people that believe in this is a strong evidence
that They(tm) didn't disable the Orbital Mind
Nick Arnett wrote:
We went to the San Jose Flea Market today... a large affair,
with all sorts of vendors... including a photogaphy studio...
where They Have Appeared. I got a picture with my camera phone.
And dang it, they're not teal.
http://www.mccmedia.com/pink_unicorn/
Sigh.
No,
Andrew Crystall wrote:
...
Your basic lack of knowledge about dyslexia is glaring. It is not
something which can be overcome by an educator. It is a literal
perceptile gap on the part of the dyslexic person.
Andrew--
Sorry about my Scientototology joke a couple days
ago. On the other hand,
Dan Minette wrote:
...
Again, per my last email absolute rubbish. Scientology is a
creed, a UFO cult set up to milk the members of cash. It is a
business, not a religion.
If I could step in here, I think this is part of William's point.
From the outside, it's hard to tell one group that
William T Goodall wrote:
On 3 Sep 2006, at 10:53PM, William T Goodall wrote:
It seems pretty obvious to me, but it's not a subject I find important
enough to put any extra effort into. If you want to prove me wrong go
ahead and knock yourself out. Otherwise we'll just have to differ on
I don't know if you know who Billy Graham is, Charlie. He's the
most famous
American evangelical preacher of the last 50 years.
...and I've seen him evangelise.
A friend of mine is
sending me an email quoting Billy stating that evolution and
Christianity
are fully compatible He
87 matches
Mail list logo
