Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-23 Thread Dave Land
On Dec 22, 2005, at 11:47 AM, William T Goodall wrote: On 22 Dec 2005, at 7:07 pm, Dave Land wrote: Western cultures equate truth with factuality. Nonetheless, myths, legends and other _stories_ have tremendous truth-value despite their being possibly apocryphal and sometimes provably

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-22 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 12:11 AM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory Robert wrote: It is not something substantiated. The quote comes from an unnamed source who purportedly

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-22 Thread Doug Pensinger
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 05:30:07 -0600, Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But only reported through one source (AFAICT), hence the disclaimer. It would bear a lot more credence if the same story were being told via at least one other independent source. xponent Carefully Maru rob Don't

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-22 Thread Dave Land
On Dec 22, 2005, at 7:08 AM, Doug Pensinger wrote: On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 05:30:07 -0600, Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But only reported through one source (AFAICT), hence the disclaimer. It would bear a lot more credence if the same story were being told via at least one other

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Dave Land wrote: The story about how George Washington chopped down a cherry tree and did not tell a lie is a _founder's_myth_ that is accepted as _true_, even if it is probably not factual. It tells us something about George Washington and what we like to think about ourselves as a

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-22 Thread Dave Land
On Dec 22, 2005, at 11:12 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote: Dave Land wrote: The story about how George Washington chopped down a cherry tree and did not tell a lie is a _founder's_myth_ that is accepted as _true_, even if it is probably not factual. It tells us something about George

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-22 Thread William T Goodall
On 22 Dec 2005, at 7:07 pm, Dave Land wrote: This brings to mind the relationship between factuality and truth. I've been thinking about it in the context of Christianity and Biblical interpretation, but it obviously applies well beyond that narrow context. Western cultures equate

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Dave Land wrote: Whereas Oil-polluting, Amazon-destroying Brazil is a model for the rest of the world :-b. Yes! Why keep the useless Amazon if we don't get paid for it? Let's burn it all and make a huge parking lot! But I deny the accusation of oil-polluting! Oil is Good, all other energy

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-22 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 9:08 AM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 05:30:07 -0600, Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But only reported through

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-22 Thread Doug Pensinger
Robert wrote: All quotes of the CHB article unfortunately. That is a problem with blogs. The way they quote each other constantly, while often handy as helps to find news, is a bit incestuous. So when Woodward and Bernstien broke the Watergate stuff and all the other newspapers printed

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-21 Thread Max Battcher
Robert Seeberger wrote: From where I'm viewing, a corner seems to have been turned in recent months and most people in the US share opinions that are more leftish than they were over the last few years. Arguably the true American center has always been more to the left than right. -- --Max

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-21 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:35 PM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory G It's not all about you Dan!G I was suggesting that perhaps you are missing that most

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-21 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Dan Minette wrote: OK. The idea that we went to war in Iraq in order to make money for oil companies is centralist? Is this the official list position? I think it is: The USA went to war in Iraq to protect the interests of the Saudi Princes and that oil companies [including Petrobras

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-21 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory Dan Minette wrote: OK. The idea that we went to war in Iraq in order to make money for oil

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-21 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:58 AM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory - Original Message - From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-21 Thread Steve Sloan
Doug Pensinger wrote: These are the kinds of things that characterize the President; reckless disregard for the law. We hear about a man that calls the principals that have built this nation and to some extent have made the world what it is today a goddamned piece of paper What is the

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-21 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Steve Sloan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:34 PM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory Doug Pensinger wrote: These are the kinds of things that characterize the President; reckless disregard

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-21 Thread Doug Pensinger
Robert wrote: It is not something substantiated. The quote comes from an unnamed source who purportedly heard it in a WH staffing meeting and subsequently blogged. http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml IMO, it should be noted, but not passed along as fact. The guy

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-20 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 7:57 AM Subject: Defeat in Victory I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-20 Thread Doug Pensinger
Dan wrote: Indeed, from my perspective, most of the political posts here that are not my own, over the last few months, fit reasonably well into the Michael Moore wing of the Democratic party. That may seem true from your perspective, Dan, an oil industry professional living in the heart

RE: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-20 Thread Ritu
Dan Minette wrote: Indeed, from my perspective, most of the political posts here that are not my own, over the last few months, fit reasonably well into the Michael Moore wing of the Democratic party. Badly researched, misleading and inaccurate? :) Ritu

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-20 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 9:05 PM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory Dan wrote: Indeed, from my perspective, most of the political posts here that are not my own, over

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-20 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 5:12 PM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory - Original Message - From: Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-20 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 9:48 PM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory - Original Message - From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-20 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:00 PM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory - Original Message - From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-20 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:07 PM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory - Original Message - From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-20 Thread Doug Pensinger
Robert wrote: http://www.pollingreports.com ? Try it without the s http://www.pollingreport.com -- Doug ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-20 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:02 PM Subject: Re: Defeat in Victory - Original Message - From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-20 Thread Doug Pensinger
Dan wrote: It might aid my understanding to see the issues on which you are more conservative than most Americans. If you are in the middle, wouldn't it be 50-50? I said I was moderate on most issues, in fact I know we agree on many issues. Perhaps that is why it is frustrating me that

Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Andrew Paul
I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist viewpoints we all seem to espouse (Dan excepted). There is no right answer, we surely all know that, but the debate

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Doug Pensinger
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:57:22 +1100, Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist viewpoints we all seem to espouse (Dan

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Robert Seeberger
Andrew Paul wrote: I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist viewpoints we all seem to espouse (Dan excepted). There is no right answer, we surely all

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Julia Thompson
Doug Pensinger wrote: On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:57:22 +1100, Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist viewpoints we all

RE: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Andrew Paul
On Behalf Of Doug Pensinger On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:57:22 +1100, Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 09:53 AM Sunday 12/4/2005, Doug Pensinger wrote: On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:57:22 +1100, Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is no-one to staunchly dispute

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 10:10 AM Sunday 12/4/2005, Julia Thompson wrote: Doug Pensinger wrote: On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:57:22 +1100, Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is no-one

Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Julia Thompson
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 10:10 AM Sunday 12/4/2005, Julia Thompson wrote: I'm not going to jump into the Iraq debate except to ask for clarifications. I have too many other things Would that number be 3? Well, after Dan's outpatient procedure on Tuesday, it was more like 4 for a few