Re: Disturbing evidence of torture

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 7:44 AM Subject: Re: Disturbing evidence of torture > At 11:50 AM 4/30/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > >1) How stron

Re: Is it hot in here?

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 9:33 AM Subject: Re: Is it hot in here? > At 09:27 AM 4/28/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > >Science is not all c

Re: What America Does with its Hegemony

- Original Message - From: "Andrew Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 11:50 PM Subject: RE: What America Does with its Hegemony >My real concern is when facts are wrong, or, as you point >out, things are just never report

Re: March for Women's Lives

- Original Message - From: "Mike Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 12:44 AM Subject: RE: March for Women's Lives > But that's neither here nor there, since my comments were not based on my > own experience but on my ob

Re: Disturbing evidence of torture

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:31 PM Subject: Re: Disturbing evidence of torture > > But that's neither here nor there. It's not shocking > or surprising but it is, of cours

Re: Disturbing evidence of torture

- Original Message - From: "Mike Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 2:10 AM Subject: RE: Disturbing evidence of torture > > The effect of what these young idiots did is huge. How old are you to call them all young?

Re: Disturbing evidence of torture

- Original Message - From: "Gary Denton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 9:58 AM Subject: Re: Disturbing evidence of torture . > > I present you with the newspaper article and you want me to prove it. > OK, how many more a

Re: Disturbing evidence of torture

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 6:35 PM Subject: Re: Disturbing evidence of torture > --- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > &

Re: Disturbing evidence of torture

- Original Message - From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 3:21 PM Subject: Re: Disturbing evidence of torture > That lack of control in the prison would > all G. Gordo

Re: More on the environmental movement

- Original Message - From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 12:30 PM Subject: Re: More on the environmental movement > There's a huge difference between legislating against > McDonald's hamburgers and keepin

Re: Disturbing evidence of torture

- Original Message - From: "Gary Denton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 4:38 PM Subject: Re: Disturbing evidence of torture > On Wed, 5 May 2004 15:34:34 -0500, Dan Minette > <[

Re: Disturbing evidence of torture

- Original Message - From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 7:00 PM Subject: Re: Disturbing evidence of torture > > - Original Message - > From: "Mike Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Killer Bs

Re: More on the environmental movement

- Original Message - From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 4:07 PM Subject: Re: More on the environmental movement > > You've assumed that people > I've never heard of, or at best marginally so > (Choms

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 4:39 PM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > At 05:12 PM 5/6/2004 -0400 Tom Beck wrote: > >I have a friend who is devoutly Catholic and yet fe

Re: The Pill-Popping Dispicable Fool

- Original Message - From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "xBrin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 2:34 PM Subject: The Pill-Popping Dispicable Fool > <> > > <

Re: Democracy -

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 5:54 PM Subject: Re: Democracy - and am I the only Person here who is sick of Foolish Subject Titles? > At 05:38 PM 5/6/

Re: Democracy -

- Original Message - From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 6:21 PM Subject: Re: Democracy - > > That really wasn't my point. Appealing to someone who is, at bes

Re: - Darn this is annoying.....

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 6:02 PM Subject: - Darn this is annoying. > track record, so I won't go as far as you suggest, but I can only hope that > at some point they will come to

Re: Democracy -

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 6:16 PM Subject: Re: Democracy - > At 06:21 PM 5/6/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > >There is nothing wrong with plur

Re: - Darn this is annoying.....

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 6:47 PM Subject: Re: - Darn this is annoying. > At 06:39 PM 5/6/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > > One ne

Re: More on the environmental movement

- Original Message - From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 6:12 PM Subject: Re: More on the environmental movement > > I didn't know that. All I knew was, a certain amount would help in > tooth formation,

Re: Government / Corporate Newspeak: 'Rape' now = 'Forced Sex'

- Original Message - From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 12:22 PM Subject: Re: Government / Corporate Newspeak: 'Rape' now = 'Forced Sex' > Um . . . I thought that was the traditional definition of "rap

Numbers on the rebuilding of Afganistan

At http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/13/business/13scene.html There was a report detailing how limited the effort in rebuilding Afganistan has been. The claim here is that the donations to Afganistan has been substantially lower than other recent aid efforts. Here is the dismal record so far. Fin

Re: Numbers on the rebuilding of Afghanistan

- Original Message - From: "Kevin Tarr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 2:42 PM Subject: Re: Numbers on the rebuilding of Afghanistan > At 02:37 PM 5/15/2004, you wrote: > > >At > > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/13/busi

SS and Medicare projections

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 5:29 PM Subject: Re: Beheading Avenges Prison Abuse > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 07:05:07PM -0700, Gautam Mukunda wrote: > > > I don't think that the ent

Re: SS and Medicare projections

- Original Message - From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 4:16 PM Subject: Re: SS and Medicare projections > What is (are) the reason(s) why the US has far higher medical costs than > other major countries

Re: Numbers on the rebuilding of Afghanistan

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 1:21 PM Subject: Re: Numbers on the rebuilding of Afghanistan > At 10:37 PM 5/15/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > >T

Gay marriage update

A few months ago, JDG predicted that the recent push for gay marriages would trigger a massive backlash. The opposite seems to be happening. 51% of Americans favor either civil unions or actual marriage for gay people, while 44% favor no legal recognition. (28% favor marriages and 23% favor civi

Re: What America Does with its Hegemony L3

- Original Message - From: "Andrew Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 3:21 AM Subject: FW: What America Does with its Hegemony > From: Dan Minette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I

Re: The Savage Solution

- Original Message - From: "Keith Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 8:11 AM Subject: Re: The Savage Solution > > Who knows how many conditionally expressed psychological traits humans > have? Mothers bond with their

Re: Numbers on the rebuilding of Afghanistan

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 7:47 PM Subject: Re: Numbers on the rebuilding of Afghanistan A quick response to one point. > >What freedom and liberty. > > [snip] > > > Have you looked at >

Re: The Savage Solution

- Original Message - From: "Keith Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:22 PM Subject: Re: The Savage Solution > Now I can't see *any* logic for battering behavior for either the man or > the woman to be selected--any mo

Re: The Savage Solution

- Original Message - From: "Richard Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 8:15 AM Subject: Re: The Savage Solution > Dan said: > > > Most data suggests that it is mostly environmental. Indeed, my > > wife knows of no stud

Re: Gay marriage update

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 2:18 PM Subject: Re: Gay marriage update > At 03:56 AM 5/18/2004 -0500 Gary Denton wrote: > >Rights are not decided by majority vote. That is the purpose of

Re: Gay marriage update

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 2:57 PM Subject: Re: Gay marriage update > At 02:50 PM 5/22/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > >Well, we've yet to

Who's running the store in Iraq?

I expected problems in Iraq, but I am still blown away to find out who's been running the Iraq economy. Its six people 23-28 who had their resumes on the Heritage Foundation's website. They were appointed to perform low level functions for which they appeared qualified. But, as the folks above t

Re: WAS Re: Gay marriage update

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 5:48 PM Subject: WAS Re: Gay marriage update > At 04:15 PM 5/22/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > >>I could also po

Re: Numbers on the rebuilding of Afghanistan

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 7:47 PM Subject: Re: Numbers on the rebuilding of Afghanistan > Dan M., > > I think the whole difference here is this: > > The rebuilding of Iraq and the buildi

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:53 AM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > >Maybe someone here knows, but I thought the Vatican's riches had quite > >a bit to do with banking over the

Re: WAS Re: Gay marriage update

- Original Message - From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:19 PM Subject: Re: WAS Re: Gay marriage update > > > On Tue, 25 May 2004, Dan Minette wrote: > >

Re: Numbers on the rebuilding of Afghanistan

- Original Message - From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 3:39 PM Subject: Re: Numbers on the rebuilding of Afghanistan > Dan Minette wrote: > > > But, that

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 9:49 AM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > > >From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Rep

Re: More on the misinformation wars

- Original Message - From: "Andrew Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:40 PM Subject: RE: More on the misinformation wars snip > > Debbi > Them Fermions An' Bosons Got Nuthin' On Us Spinners Maru > Plenty of Stran

Re: All good things...

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 3:02 PM Subject: All good things... > > But all good things must, indeed, come to an end. I leave the BA program > for a world of new opportunities that I could not have imagined even a few > months ago. In

Re: All good things...

- Original Message - From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 6:14 PM Subject: Re: All good things... > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: All good things...

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 10:35 AM Subject: Re: All good things... > > 2) I don't _think_ so - I googled Two Rivers Group and > > didn't come up with anything much when I did.

Re: Day After Tomorrow movie [no spoilers]

- Original Message - From: "Gary Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Brin Mail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 1:28 PM Subject: Day After Tomorrow movie [no spoilers] > > I watched this movie yesterday and I left the theater a little bit > stunned and disturbed. > > I

Re: 'Liberal Media Bias'

- Original Message - From: "Kevin Tarr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 10:53 PM Subject: Re: 'Liberal Media Bias' > This is as idiotic as Dan's theory (from the NYT) that you can compare a > rebuilding effort on a per cap

Re: Southern-ness test

- Original Message - From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 5:31 PM Subject: Re: Southern-ness test > > - Original Message - > From: "Damon Agretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Killer Bs Discussion"

Re: Archbishop Chaput of Denver

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 8:27 PM Subject: Archbishop Chaput of Denver Archbishop's column, taken from the Denver Archdiocese website: >It's a matter of honesty: to receive Communion, we need to be in com

Re: Archbishop Chaput of Denver

- Original Message - From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 10:23 PM Subject: Re: Archbishop Chaput of Denver > I snipped some stuff. I just want to address some of what

Re: Jesus-anity

- Original Message - From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 5:44 PM Subject: Jesus-anity (was: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out) > > Travis Edmunds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > DISCLAIMER: I'm a r

Re: Jesus-anity

- Original Message - From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 7:48 PM Subject: Re: Jesus-anity > At 07:31 PM 6/8/04, Dan Minette wrote: > > > >One final point

Re: Request for Proposals

- Original Message - From: "Gary Denton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:27 AM Subject: Re: Request for Proposals > On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:01:50 -0400, JDG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > At 11:29 PM 6/14/2004 -0230 Ni

Re: Requests for Proposals

- Original Message - From: "Gary Denton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:03 PM Subject: Re: Request for Proposals > On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:10:09 -0500, Dan Minette > <[E

Re: Terrorism too close to home...

- Original Message - From: "Gary Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 5:57 PM Subject: RE: Terrorism too close to home... > > Gary Denton wrote > > I don't know, I am a couple miles from a petrochemical plant > > and

Re: Terrorism too close to home...

- Original Message - From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:05 PM Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home... > > > > > Would I give up some liberties to ensure their safety? Absolutely. > > > > Not me.

Re: Terrorism too close to home...

- Original Message - From: "Gary Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:50 PM Subject: RE: Terrorism too close to home... > Conscientia non oboedientia honor est. > Honor is conscience, not obedience. Actually, honor

Re: Memorial Ruled Unconstitutional

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 11:51 PM Subject: Re: Memorial Ruled Unconstitutional > At 09:36 PM 6/15/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote: > >Because it is on U.S. Government property it isn'

Re: Memorial Ruled Unconstitutional

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 12:17 AM Subject: Re: Memorial Ruled Unconstitutional > At 12:09 AM 6/16/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > >The

Re: The Holy Grail of Safety (was: Terrorism too close to home)

- Original Message - From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 5:06 PM Subject: The Holy Grail of Safety (was: Terrorism too close to home) > > Debbi > who BTW waves and grins at Dan ;) Are you just bei

Re: Requests for Proposals

- Original Message - From: "Andrew Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 2:09 AM Subject: RE: Requests for Proposals > "I would very much appreciate help in understanding how the > US set up the Bathe party...or how we

Re: Request for Proposals

- Original Message - From: "Richard Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 3:45 PM Subject: Re: Request for Proposals > Erik said: > > > You obviously don't understand quantum mechanics. > > Well, I understand quantum mech

Re: Speaking of Quantum.........

- Original Message - From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 7:13 PM Subject: Speaking of Quantum. > Scientists zap atom across room > That story is wrong. They zapped atomic properties across the room from one entangl

Re: The Founders on Separation of Church and State: Washington, Adams, Franklin

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:46 PM Subject: Re: The Founders on Separation of Church and State: Washington, Adams,Franklin > A pretty selective sampling there, Doug. > > It also neglec

Re: The Founders on Separation of Church and State: Washington, Adams, Franklin

- Original Message - From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 11:39 PM Subject: Re: The Founders on Separation of Church and State: Washington, Adams, Franklin > On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:46:05 -0400, JDG <[EMAI

Re: Speaking of Quantum.........

- Original Message - From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:03 PM Subject: Re: Speaking of Quantum. > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Dan

Re: Jesus-anity

- Original Message - From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 1:56 PM Subject: Re: Jesus-anity > > But Paul never met Jesus (unless new scripts that I > haven't heard about have emerged from somewhere); the

Re: Requests for Proposals

- Original Message - From: "Gary Denton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 3:57 AM Subject: Re: Requests for Proposals On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:39:15 -0500, Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: 1/3 of all PCs infected

- Original Message - From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 5:03 PM Subject: 1/3 of all PCs infected > > "There is a far greater likelihood your computer will be infected with > spyware than catch a virus." > > > > xponent > > Aler

Re: Terrorism too close to home...

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 7:03 AM Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home... > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 08:32:14PM -0400, Gary Nunn wrote: > > > Erik, I was not being condesce

Re: Speaking of Quantum.........

- Original Message - From: "Amanda Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 7:56 AM Subject: Re: Speaking of Quantum. > > > Well, as Neils Bohr said, "Anyone who thinks they understand quantum physics > is wrong."

Re: Speaking of Quantum.........

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 1:31 PM Subject: Re: Speaking of Quantum. > On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:26:09PM -0500, Dan Minette wro

Re: Terrorism too close to home...

Going back a while to answer parts of a post, as I've promised. - Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 1:28 PM Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home... > > I saw the smiley, but I thin

Re: Terrorism too close to home...

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 4:07 PM Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home... > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:41:12PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote

Re: Terrorism too close to home...

- Original Message - From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 8:20 PM Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home... > Humans, being social animals, created ethics/morality to enhance our > ability to co-operat

Re: Terrorism too close to home...

- Original Message - From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 9:15 PM Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home... > > > I'm just guessing, but I would think that language, ethics/morality, > and bigger brains

Re: Midnight in the ER

- Original Message - From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 1:00 PM Subject: Midnight in the ER > Thanks to the folks who answered my question about the speeches > on-line. I'll check those out sometime

Re: [L3 ] Re: Jesus-anity and the status of women

- Original Message - From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 5:38 PM Subject: [L3 ] Re: Jesus-anity and the status of women > > Exactly. > > > If someone says they believe in X because they > > believe in

Re: [L3 ] Re: Jesus-anity and the status of women

I missed covering this earlier. >> Several things >> gradually changed my self-acknowledged status; I've >> previously mentioned the issue of belief as a Gift, >> and my inability to accept that Belief is in itself a >> Grace or Gift, because that means that God withheld >> that Gift from some

Re: [L3 ] Re: Jesus-anity and the status of women

- Original Message - From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 6:20 PM Subject: Re: [L3 ] Re: Jesus-anity and the status of women > Dan Minette wrote: > > > So, m

Re: [L3 ] Re: Jesus-anity and the status of women

- Original Message - From: "Dave Land" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 6:16 PM Subject: Re: [L3 ] Re: Jesus-anity and the status of women > On Aug 5, 2004, at 3:34 PM, William T Goodall wrote: > > > Not having Belief is

Re: Every Single Sperm

- Original Message - From: "iaamoac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:58 PM Subject: Re: Every Single Sperm > > 1) The Catholic Church officially teaches that contraception is an > objective moral evil for reasons co

Re: Jesus-anity and the status of women

- Original Message - From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 6:32 AM Subject: Re: [L3 ] Re: Jesus-anity and the status of women > >I understand that the idea of double predestination has floated around >

Re: Every Single Sperm

- Original Message - From: "iaamoac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 11:57 AM Subject: Re: Every Single Sperm > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [L3 ] Re: Jesus-anity and the status of women

- Original Message - From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 8:42 PM Subject: Re: [L3 ] Re: Jesus-anity and the status of women A quick answer focusing on one point. > > Then what do you make of the 1 Tim

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 2:10 PM Subject: Objective Evil > The Catholic Church would argue that no, one should not... evil to prevent evil is still > evil. > > In reality, all the Catholic Church is saying

Re: Every Single Sperm

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 2:37 PM Subject: Re: Every Single Sperm > On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 02:33:25PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote: > > William T Goodall wrote: > > > > > > On

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 2:38 PM Subject: Re: Objective Evil > At 02:31 PM 8/8/2004 -0500 Dan M. wrote: > >I went to the web site, and I am embarassed as a Catholic by the lack of >

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 3:24 PM Subject: Re: Objective Evil > At 02:41 PM 8/8/04, Dan Minette wrote: > > >- Original Me

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 4:15 PM Subject: Re: Objective Evil > At 02:41 PM 8/8/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > >> The Catholic Church wo

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 4:18 PM Subject: Re: Objective Evil > At 03:25 PM 8/8/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > >> >I went to the web

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 6:34 PM Subject: Re: Objective Evil >And dropping bombs on Saddam Hussein's armies was not evil. So, the action of killing conscripts of Hussein, many of

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "Damon Agretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 6:35 PM Subject: Re: Objective Evil > > > Thus, the church opposes the use of condoms in > > Africa to decrease the > > spread of AIDs because birt

Re: the new Bush ad : I don't see any morphing...

- Original Message - From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 7:23 PM Subject: Re: the new Bush ad : I don't see any morphing... > JDG wrote: > > > > At 05:48 PM 7/10/2004 -0500 Gary Denton wrote: > > >In it'

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 7:31 PM Subject: Re: Objective Evil > At 07:27 PM 8/8/04, Dan Minette wrote: > > >- Original Me

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 6:32 PM Subject: Re: Objective Evil > > O.k., given your proposed definition of "Catholic", how do you define > "Protestant"?Are Protestants just simply

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 8:48 PM Subject: Re: Objective Evil > At 08:16 PM 8/8/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > >> O.k., given your p

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 9:40 PM Subject: Re: Objective Evil > At 07:23 PM 8/8/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: > >>And dropping b

Re: Objective Evil

- Original Message - From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 8:25 PM Subject: Re: Objective Evil > At 08:16 PM 8/8/04, Dan Minette wrote: > > >- Original Me

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >