Bear in mind that if you have cold buffers going into a room
temperature (or warmer) pumps, you can get outgasing that will cause
inaccurate flow or loss of priming for the pumps. You may be able to
work around by using freshly degassed eluents, but the outgasing will
still be a problem for long
Hi,
a cheap solution would be to put buffers, fraction collector, and the
column (if not too big)
inside a cold cabinet, next to the FPLC.
you probably need to use longer pipes but it works
Best regards,
GIA
Le 07/06/2019 16:51, - - a écrit :
Dear all,
our cold cabinet FPLC is rotting
Dear all, our cold cabinet FPLC is rotting away due to the high humidity in our lab. Anybody having a room temperature setup, where only the buffers, column(s) and fractions are being cooled? If so, by which means (cooling spiral, water pump, peltier element?). Thank you for your suggestions!
Apologies for this off topic request but there may be someone on this list who
can help.
We have RockImager installed which uses Alt-arrow shortcut key to move between
view of image settings (eg. UV and visible). This ability was lost a few months
ago. I have asked Formulatrix who don’t know
Hi All,
Does anyone know what is the actual difference between CIP and EDTA method
for exchanging the GppNHp (non-hydrolysable GTP) or GDP with the purified
RAS protein?
I have a protocol according to which I need to incubate the purified RAS
with GppNHp having 20U of alkaline phosphatase, 10uM
ago, and everything's still working as perfectly as it did on
the first day.
best,
j
Von: CCP4 bulletin board Im Auftrag von Nazahiyah Rodzli
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. April 2019 03:55
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [ccp4bb] Off topic - French Press Accessories
Dear All,
Our lab is using
.
Best regards
Miriam
Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von
Nazahiyah Rodzli
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. April 2019 03:55
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [ccp4bb] Off topic - French Press Accessories
Dear All,
Our lab is using the good old Thermo French press (FA
Dear All,
Our lab is using the good old Thermo French press (FA-078A-picture attached)
with a mini sample cell which has only 3.5 ml maximum sample capacity and
planning to use for as long as it lasts. However, we are now in need of a
bigger sample cell for our membrane protein work.
I was expressing Membrane protein (100 KD plant cell wall protein with
N-terminal His tag) in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. The vector i am using is
PDDGFP modified vector which have URA selection and GAL1 as promoter. I used
URA media and Galactose (2%) for induction. I have expressed this
[mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Andrew
Lovering
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2019 9:28 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] off topic: Membrane protein "into" soluble protein
Dear ccp4bb members,
A quick off topic question. I have a protein whose domain structure
Dear ccp4bb members,
A quick off topic question. I have a protein whose domain structure runs
N-TM-receptor-TM-enzyme-C, i.e. is a two transmembrane-helix containing
signalling protein. One would suspect that the receptor domain has ends that
cluster, and that the enzyme (via homology with
Dear Reza,
CD hit will do exactly that.
Cheers,
Georg
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 3, 2019, at 2:41 PM, Reza Khayat
mailto:rkha...@ccny.cuny.edu>> wrote:
Hi,
Happy new year to all! A bit of an off topic question. Does anyone know of a
method/program to extract the most distinct "n"
Hi Reza, happy new year!
The choice would depend on your alignment (aminoacid or nucleotides? are
the sequences closely or distantly related? is it a large alignment? are
there many gaps?)... Anyway, I think the safest, unbiased way to determine
a group of outliers might be to compute a
On Thursday, January 3, 2019 12:40:05 PM PST Reza Khayat wrote:
> ?Hi,
>
>
> Happy new year to all! A bit of an off topic question. Does anyone know of
> a method/program to extract the most distinct "n" (n>2) sequences from a
> sequence alignment? Thanks.
If these putative "most distinct"
PCA?
On Jan 3, 2019, at 3:41 PM, Reza Khayat
mailto:rkha...@ccny.cuny.edu>> wrote:
Hi,
Happy new year to all! A bit of an off topic question. Does anyone know of a
method/program to extract the most distinct "n" (n>2) sequences from a sequence
alignment? Thanks.
Best wishes,
Reza
?Hi,
Happy new year to all! A bit of an off topic question. Does anyone know of a
method/program to extract the most distinct "n" (n>2) sequences from a sequence
alignment? Thanks.
Best wishes,
Reza
Reza Khayat, PhD
Assistant Professor
City College of New York
Department of Chemistry
Hi everybody,
We do not have access to a local analytical ultracentrifuge (Chicago
area), and are in need of a reasonably priced facility for our urgent
AUC needs. We are interested in KD's and thus sedimentation equilibrium.
Recommendations are highly appreciated.
Thank you,
Engin
--
Greetings
Sorry for the off-topic post :)
We are looking to fill an RA position in Enzymology/MolBio (junior or
senior, depends on qualifications and experience). Full description follows.
Interested candidates should forward their CV and letter of interest to:
*i...@enkochem.com *
Hi Anamika,
As far as I understood, the biotin in the elution
buffer is helping your protein to get stripped off from the Avidin column.
So, maybe you dialyze your purified protein (or run FPLC) and get rid of
biotin completely, before you load the protein on to strptavidin
Hi Anamika,
- Have you double-checked that the sequence of your cDNA is correct and
includes the biotin acceptor peptide tag (BAP tag aka AviTag; GLNDIFEAQKIEWHE
in single-letter amino acid code)?
- Are you using a dedicated bacterial strain that over-expresses BirA enzyme?
This may not be
otein Interactions
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Anamika Singh
Reply-To: Anamika Singh
Date: Tuesday, 13 November 2018 at 10:15
To: "CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK"
Subject: [ccp4bb] OFF TOPIC
Hi All,
I am purifying the biotinylated protein (cloned into the pET28a vector) using
Hello,
you probably purified a contaminant. Do a blot with an anti-biotin
antibody or get electro-spray mass spectrometry done in order to
confirm the identity of your protein.
Wim
On 13/11/2018 11:13, Anamika Singh
wrote:
Hi All,
Hi All,
I am purifying the biotinylated protein (cloned into the pET28a vector)
using Avidin beads. Since I need the protein for SPR but when I used the
purified protein to interact with Streptavidin coated onto the SPR chip.
There was no signal. Can anybody tell me why is it so or how can I make
r 27, 2018 5:41 AM
To: Whitley, Matthew J
Cc: ccp4bb
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Off topic: 'Difficult' Datasets for Processing Practice
Dear Matthew,
I am also late in responding to this, but as part of a
Nature Protocols paper on iMosflm (Supplementary Information for Na
Hi All,
Sorry to bring this old topic up again. I planned to run tricine gels but
I found a possible error in table 2 (4% stacking gel formula) in Hermann
Schägger protocol (Nature Protocols volume 1, pages 16–22 (2006), the
author wrote 3ml 3X gel buffer in a total of 12 ml solution, it should
Hi Matthew, I am also a bit late in responding, I have a few
incommensurately modulated protein crystal datasets that you would be
welcome to use in your course. It would be neat for students to at
least know that this type of diffraction exists. As far as I know,
they can only be processed
Dear Matthew,
I am also late in responding to this, but as part of a
Nature Protocols paper on iMosflm (Supplementary Information for Nature
Protocols 12, 1310-1325, 2017) I provided a number of examples of “problem
datasets”. Some of these are just two images, to show
For some reason, the September 19th ccp4bb digest got caught in my spam filter
and didn't come through until a few minutes ago, so I didn't see several
responses concerning interesting datasets for processing until just now.
Therefore, thanks also to Kay Diederichs, Eugene Osipov, and David
Hi Matthew,
I'm a little late to the thread, but I thought I would still like to add
DPF3b, kindly provided by Wolfram Tempel. This dataset is available on
zenodo and forms the basis of a tutorial for using DIALS:
Dear colleagues,
I want to thank the following people for providing suggestions and comments
about ‘difficult’ datasets suitable for teaching data processing:
Tim Craig
Jacob Keller
Graeme Winter
Aleksandar Bijelic
Clemens Vonrhein
Loes Kroon-Batenburg
James Holton
If anyone else has
Hi,
We are looking to get a tabletop ultracentrifuge. There are two companies to
choose from, Beckman and Thermo Scientific (Hitachi). I have positive
experience with the older Beckman model, TL-100, that I used long time ago.
However, we don’t have any experience with the new Beckman models
It was brought to my attention that the link to the preprint I provided
below doesn't work, but this one does:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/08/18/394965
Thanks to Folmer Fredslund for pointing this out to me!
-James Holton
MAD Scientist
On 9/21/2018 3:50 PM, James Holton wrote:
Hi James,
you’re probably aware of this but you can edit CBF headers in place with
sed. That’s what I do when I make the detector on my diffractometer go
closer than the hardware limit.
All best - Andreas
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 at 00:51, James Holton
wrote:
> For teaching purposes I have found
For teaching purposes I have found that controlled pairs of data sets
are most instructive. You are right that an easy one-button-push
processing run tells you nothing, but so does a bang-it-crashed-now-what
data set. Most useful are two data sets that are identical in every
respect but one,
Dear Matthew,
In my search for the validity of meta data, I went through several data
sets in SBGrid and proteindiffraction.org (IRRMC), especially those
where automatic processing did not succeed are gave different results
with different processing software. We reprocessed those data sets
Hi Matthew,
I have some notes which indicate that SBgrid data sets 5, 62, 78, 117, 218
posed problems for "automatic" processing using generate_XDS.INP / XDS when I
saw them for the first time.
Some of these problems (mainly the conversion of header values to ORGX ORGY)
are taken care of in
Matthew,
One SBGrid example I used for a workshop was
https://data.sbgrid.org/dataset/218/
This has the “wrong” beam centre as understood by (me/dials/xia2) which causes
a certain amount of fun, nice example for use of the reciprocal lattice viewer
and image viewer in DIALS to make sensible
istake, please reply to this message and follow with
its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future.
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board On Behalf Of Whitley, Matthew
J
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 8:16 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject
Dear colleagues,
For teaching purposes, I am looking for a small number (< 5) of
macromolecular diffraction datasets (raw images) that might be
considered 'difficult' for a beginning crystallography student to
process. By 'difficult' I generally mean not able to be processed
automatically by
Dear CCP4 community,
In case any of you is interested in Computational Structural Biology, Protein
Evolution and Protein Design, and is looking for a postdoc position, I share
with you a job advertisement for a
Postdoctoral Position in Macromolecular Modelling and Design at our department
of
Batch mode generation of residue-based diagrams of proteins
Fabien CampagneEmmanuel BettlerGert VriendHarel Weinstein
/Bioinformatics/, Volume 19, Issue 14, 22 September 2003, Pages
1854–1855,https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg236
Published:
22 September 2003
On 4-8-2018 10:38, Joana
Try
http://gpcrdb.org/
They have a tool for snake plots of GPCRs
Best
Gebhard
Prof. Gebhard F.X. Schertler
Structural Biology ETH Zürich D-BIOL
Head of Biology and Chemistry
Division
Paul Scherrer Institut
Laboratory of Biomolecular Research,
LBR
OFLC 109
CH-5232 Villigen PSI
Dear CCP4 community,
I have seen many papers with detailed protein 2d diagrams like this one:
However, I can never find a reference for any tool that can compute such
diagrams from a 3D structure. Do you know of any?
Many thanks and enjoy the warm weather!
Joana
—
Dr. Joana Pereira
.pharmacie.univ-paris5.fr/spip.php?article18
>
>
>
> De : Jobichen Chacko <jobich...@gmail.com>
> À : CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Envoyé le : Mardi 6 mars 2018 5h11
> Objet : [ccp4bb] Off-topic question
>
> Dear All,
> We are trying to identify/sequence a D
6 mars 2018 5h11
Objet : [ccp4bb] Off-topic question
Dear All,
We are trying to identify/sequence a DNA/RNA fragment (around 100bp) which was
co-purified along with our protein.
The expression was done in E.coli.
Any suggestions on how to do this.
Thank you.
Jobi
Dear All,
We are trying to identify/sequence a DNA/RNA fragment (around 100bp) which
was co-purified along with our protein.
The expression was done in E.coli.
Any suggestions on how to do this.
Thank you.
Jobi
Dear colleagues,
slightly off topic question, but we have several issues with our
Formulatrix imager and I would like to get some meanings of other users.
If there are still some... ;-)
Since some weeks we are loosing the interior LED storage illumination on
startup. They lamps start
Hello everyone!
In which condition can we add ligand/substrate directly to the expression
medium for overexpression protein? One protein of i crystallized is a enzyme
that catalyze sterols substrate, as we know the solubility of sterols is very
poor, and the Km of the enzyme towards sterols
Perhaps this can be automated:
https://www.phenix-online.org/papers/wd5073_reprint.pdf
Software doesn't get tired or bored, and thus potentially can try more and
produce more plausible interretations. Then one can hire a number of people
of various expertise to choose "best" result according to
It sounds a bit like this paper from a year ago:
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12549
apart from the conclusion: here the point is that amateurs build
higher quality models than crystallographers.
On 20 November 2017 at 20:25, Shintaro Aibara wrote:
> Dear All,
al message
> From: Shintaro Aibara <shintaro.aib...@gmail.com>
> Date: 20/11/2017 21:25 (GMT+01:00)
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: [ccp4bb] [Off-topic] Comparison of the same structure built by
> many people
>
> Dear All,
>
> Apologies for the slightly
This one?http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?SE0260
Mark J van RaaijCNB-CSICwwwuser.csic.es/~mjvanraaij
Original message From: Shintaro Aibara
<shintaro.aib...@gmail.com> Date: 20/11/2017 21:25 (GMT+01:00) To:
CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] [Off-topic] Comp
Dear All,
Apologies for the slightly off-topic, but I was wondering if anybody knew
of a paper/textbook where a protein model was built by multiple people
(ranging from novice to experienced builders) and compared. I believe the
conclusion was that while the overall trace was broadly correct,
Dear all,
in our institute we thought about buying the Microfluidizer LM-20 for
cell disruption
(https://www.microfluidicscorp.com/microfluidizers/lab-machines/lm20/).
It would be nice if you shared your knowledge with us concerning the
handling, robustness, the frequency of repairs or spare
Hi Anamika,
As it was said before, a cocktail of protease inhibitors should be
fine. But let`s say you can not overcome the problem. It is not specified
if you are doing this dialysis to cleave or not your His-tagged protein but
even this you could try getting samples in 1 hour
suppose protease is the issue, then avoid overnight dialysis
发自网易邮箱大师
在2017年10月26日 22:18,Anamika Singh 写道:
Dear All,
I am purifying the His-tagged proteins ( 21Kda) using buffer 20mM Tris, 150mM
Nacl, and 5mM MgCl2 with 500mM imidazole. Earlier I was facing the
precipitation problem during
Hello,
PMSF inhibits only 1 class of proteinases
You can try to add other inhibitors :
e.g. for purification from yeast I used the following in addition to PMSF:
1000 x stock individual inhibitors
pepstatin5 mg/ml methanol
chymostatin1 mg/mlDMSO
antipain3 mg/mlmethanol (sonicate to
Dear All,
I am purifying the His-tagged proteins ( 21Kda) using buffer 20mM Tris,
150mM Nacl, and 5mM MgCl2 with 500mM imidazole. Earlier I was facing the
precipitation problem during dialysis but with the addition of 50mM L-Arg
somehow managed to overcome the precipitation issue. But this time I
Dear colleagues,
Anyone still using Oxford Cryosystems Cryostream 600 series?
We would like to know if there is interest in a computer program to control
these units via a rs232 connection. We are implementing this in our home source.
For data collection, the program allows automated shutdown
; Molecular Biology
> The University of Chicago
> pr...@uchicago.edu
>
>
>
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Opher
> Gileadi [opher.gile...@sgc.ox.ac.uk]
> Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2017 3:44 PM
> To
C.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Off topic: denaturing urea gels
In addition to the previous suggestions:
With very small gels, the sample composition and depth (in the well) have a
strong effect on the resolution.
Rinse the wells with TBE buffer just before loading, as urea from the gel
diff
In addition to the previous suggestions:
With very small gels, the sample composition and depth (in the well) have a
strong effect on the resolution.
Rinse the wells with TBE buffer just before loading, as urea from the gel
diffuses into the well and may prevent the sample from settling at the
Smith:
One should expect to see ladders each separated by 1 nt in such cases.
Mohammed:
My suggestions:
1) running at 70V seems low. I do not see a reason for not using higher
voltages. 200Vx45min should be OK. IT is better to not let the BPB front run
out of the gel - so that you know whether
your enzyme cannot give definite fragment. thus smear
发自网易邮箱大师
在2017年09月30日 19:28,Mohammad Khan 写道:
Dear all,
I am working with an exonuclease and I run the digested DNA on a
8Murea-20%acrylamide gel in TBE buffer. I use the Mini-Protean BioRad system
and cast gels of about 8.6x6.5 cm
Dear all,
I am working with an exonuclease and I run the digested DNA on a
8Murea-20%acrylamide gel in TBE buffer. I use the Mini-Protean BioRad
system and cast gels of about 8.6x6.5 cm dimensions with 1.5 mm thickness.
I use a 15 well comb. I run my gels at 70 V for as long as 4 hours till my
t; Khan <mohdkhan0...@gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *Mohammad Khan <mohdkhan0...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, 21 July 2017 at 14:32
> *To: *"CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK" <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> *Subject: *[ccp4bb] Off topic: Flourescence anisotropy measurement
>
Dear Didier and Opher,
The difference in polarities can reach upto 60 units. I have tried
concentrations between 1-5 nM DNA. Maybe I will give higher concentrations
a shot.
Thanks!
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Didier Spittler
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is your
Dear Julius,
That is a good suggestion. I will definitely try this.
Thanks!
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Rabl, Julius wrote:
> Dear Mohammad,
> your buffer is key to success in biophysical measurements. While your
> protein may be totally fine in standard buffer, the
, 2017 9:44 AM
To:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Off topic: Flourescence anisotropy measurement
Completely agree, you need a higher DNA concentration. We have had luck with 10
nM DNA.
Also, bubbles have a HUGE impact on how the fluorescent signal is measured.
Make sure you spin yo
r...@uchicago.edu>
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Morgan Milton
[eilise.mil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:44 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Off topic: Flourescence anisotropy measurement
Comple
if one has multiple species , e.g. bound and free, with each a
different relative brightness and anisotropy/polarisation, then the use
( and interpretation) of anisotropy is straight forward; just a sum
weighted by molecular fraction and the relative brightness.
For polarisation is far more
>Ideally you should convert polarization to anisotropy. Simple enough – but
>some referees can get picky…
What is the argument for anisotropy being better?
JPK
board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Mohammad
Khan
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:33 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Off topic: Flourescence anisotropy measurement
Dear all,
I am trying to measure the difference in polarization upon the binding of the
DNA to my protein
Completely agree, you need a higher DNA concentration. We have had luck
with 10 nM DNA.
Also, bubbles have a HUGE impact on how the fluorescent signal is measured.
Make sure you spin your plates down (assuming you are using them) to remove
any bubbles. We just had an undergrad read his anisotropy
>>
on behalf of Mohammad Khan
<mohdkhan0...@gmail.com<mailto:mohdkhan0...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: Mohammad Khan <mohdkhan0...@gmail.com<mailto:mohdkhan0...@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, 21 July 2017 at 14:32
To: "CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>"
gmail.com>
Reply-To: Mohammad Khan <mohdkhan0...@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, 21 July 2017 at 14:32
To: "CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK" <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: [ccp4bb] Off topic: Flourescence anisotropy measurement
Dear all,
I am trying to measure the difference in polariz
Hello,
What is your difference between the maximum and minimum value ? Have you
try to change the probe concentration?
Best,
Didier
Le 21 juil. 2017 15:34, "Mohammad Khan" a écrit :
Dear all,
I am trying to measure the difference in polarization upon the binding of
FP is the ratio between two fluorescence measurements; if the fluorescence
signal is too low, you will still get a ratio but it will be essentially noise.
Try to perform the measurements at 10-50 nM DNA. If your binding affinity is in
the low nM range, you may have to use other methods to
Dear all,
I am trying to measure the difference in polarization upon the binding of
the DNA to my protein. I take 1-5 nM of Cy3-labelled DNA and add varying
dilutions of my protein to it (100 microM to 1 nM). I do get a decrease in
difference of polarization with decrease in protein
In theory, what you say is quite sensible. But there is one interesting
counter example I am aware of.The fragment tool compound that
eventually gave rise to the clinical compound indeglitazar (
http://www.pnas.org/content/106/1/262.full.pdf) gives a negative shift by
DSF (in our hands):
ubject: [ccp4bb] off-topic: negative thermal shift upon ligand binding
To: ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk
Hello,
I am working on DSF to verify if some compounds bind to my protein. I see a
negative shift of about 3-4 degrees upon ligand addition (dose-response) in
comparison to the protein alone. I
Hello,
I am working on DSF to verify if some compounds bind to my protein. I see a
negative shift of about 3-4 degrees upon ligand addition (dose-response) in
comparison to the protein alone. I assume that this might be due to the
binding of compound to the unfolded stated rather than folded
2017 7:12 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] off topic
Hi,
Is anyone has worked with STAT1 proteins?
I have cloned the SH2 domain of STAT1 protein into pet28a vector but there was
no expression so far or rather say inconsistent expression. Sometimes the
expression was in inclusion
be happy to help you.
Cheers,
Mirella
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: David Blum
Sent: Thursday, 6 July, 22:10
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] off topic
To: ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk
Hi Anamika,
I did a search and it looks like researchers are using either mammalian
Hi Anamika,
I did a search and it looks like researchers are using either mammalian
cells or baculovirus to express this protein. I don't have experience with
this particular construct so could you tell me why you choose *E. coli*? I
run a protein expression facility and we typically use HEK or
Hey Anamika
I know SH2 domain is very much well-studied domain, and i am not sure why
are you facing troubles in the expression of this protein. Just go through
the literature and read about different protocol of expression of SH2
domain from several different proteins.. Well, reading that you
Hi,
Is anyone has worked with STAT1 proteins?
I have cloned the SH2 domain of STAT1 protein into pet28a vector but there
was no expression so far or rather say inconsistent expression. Sometimes
the expression was in inclusion bodies. I have tried different methods to
pull out the protein from
Dear all,
A BBSRC funded PhD position is available in my laboratory in Exeter, focusing
on enzymes for synthetic biology. The work is most likely going to be more
enzymology than structural work, but please pass this on to any candidates who
might be interested.
Full details are available
Dear All,
For those that have Facebook accounts the SSRL Users Organization has
established a Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/ssrluec/. This has
details on the SSRL/LCLS users meeting and news stories coming from SSRL.
Recently you may or may not have heard that the US Department of
Update: to get transparent background in GIF:
Chimera command file (now saves PNG with transparent background by
adding "set bgTransparency"):
close all;open #0 ABCD.pdb;
set bgTransparency;
~disp;ribbon :.a;
movie record directory "D:\mov_temp\" format png pattern frame_*;
turn y 1
Hi Shanti,
To get more control, you can use Chimera to generate the frames, save
each of them as PNG, then process and re-assemble the frames in
photoshop to make GIFs. The command line toolbox Imagemagick is also a
great way for making GIFs (shown below).
Step1 generating the frames
Dear all,
I am trying to make an animation using chimera. But it looks like that the
animation output is poor quality, seems less dpi. How to get a high
resolution animation, say 300 dpi, using ucsf chimera. I am using movie
record commands.
Thank you very much,
Shanti Pal
Thanks, Edward.
Yes, doing more manipulations with space-filling/surfaces is something
I've been thinking about adding. There is less that can automated when
things become more irregular and the meshes become more complex,
however. These tools can be used to do some mixing of surface and
That is beautiful!
The pins-and-holes approach might be useful also for space-filling models
of multi-subunit complexes- both for holding the subunits together, and in
cases where one subunit partially encircles another, the subunit would be sliced
in half and pins could hold the halves
Sorry for the somewhat off-topic post.
After getting interested in 3D printing I quickly found that making nice
ball-and-stick objects was very difficult to do on the typical fused
filament printers most people can afford. This is largely because of the
amount of support structures needed for
Hi,
I had this problem with Yosemite. Clicking on the icon still doesn’t open the
program, but I can start it using the sh command in XQuartz..
I’m not sure if there was something else I had to do in order for this to work
(it’s been a while since I started using it like this), but perhaps just
Dear All
I am wondering if its possible to change the bottom filter of the sepharose
12 gel filteration column.
best
Adriana
Hi all,
Sorry for the very off topic message, but I recently upgraded my OS to Sierra
and all of a sudden MacPymol has stopped working for me. Clicking on the
program just gives the appearance of it about to start by showing the icon on
the dock, and then just blinks out, without ever
One possibility: surface-immobilised forms of the peptide HGGHHG bind strongly
to His tags (coordinating around zinc rather than nickel). See
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15050643/. If you want true permanence,
you could apply the trick used on BiaCore chips. They use a NTA-functional
/labpages/computational_functional_genomics.html
- Original Message -
From: Jacob Keller <kell...@janelia.hhmi.org>
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Sent: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 08:49:40 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: Attach His-tagged Protein to Coverslip
Does anyone have a simple way to
101 - 200 of 1177 matches
Mail list logo