Geoff,
Very good presentation! I'm going to recommend it to several lower level
techs I know that always call me up asking about ColdFusion admin settings
and what they do, etc.
-Novak
- Original Message -
From: "Geoff Bowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
> Hopefully that will get you to here:
> >> In the JMC, drill into the cfmx server instance and the ColdFusion
> >> Application and change the context root to / - it should redeploy
> >> successfully.
>
> Again, sorry I missed out that key step...
No problem at all. And I can't thank you enough fo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 1:42 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CF Compatability
>
> What's the incentive to give away CF, the test suites or the language
to
> New Atalnta and others?
I'm not sure
> Therefore, if you follow best security practices as recommended by
Macromedia (everyone
> does, right?) then the question of auto-escaping single quotes within
CFQUERY is a non-
> issue. If you're not following best security practices, well...
Id like to use cfqueryparam, however, Im composing
I believe you have misspelled "returnVariable" as "returnVarible" in your
CFINVOKE tag.
-Cameron
-
Cameron Childress
Sumo Consulting Inc.
---
cell: 678-637-5072
aim: cameroncf
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Jake McKee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Help!
I am trying to write my first CFC, and am having quite a time with what
has to be the most basic CFC possible.
Every time I run the code below, I get this error:
Attribute validation error for tag cfoutput.
The value of the attribute query, which is currently "showResu
| Unfortunately, in the less-pleasant world I inhabit, I suspect that this is
| a goal that can't be reached without compromising other, equally important
| things. It's a simple fact that every hour that the MM guys spend working on
| the installer is one less hour spent working on something else
Of course, Macromedia recommends that you *always* use CFQUERYPARAM within
CFQUERY; from the CFML Reference for CFMX (the exact same wording is in the
CF5 docs):
"Macromedia recommends that you use the cfqueryparam tag within
every cfquery tag, to help secure your databases from unauthoriz
Windows XP ships with MDAC 2.6, and with a more recent version of the C++
runtime, so you're OK.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 10:38 PM
> To: CF-Tal
Dave,
I do appreciate your desire to understand, however this email, as in the
last one, has come across as judgementally attacking with a foundation
based in a very limited undedstanding. Intended or not, that's just how it
comes across. Poor business management how?
Because an individual c
> I have been unsuccessful in configuring the connectors to a
> specific site for CF administrator functions, and yet have
> CF available to the other sites for "normal" operations.
I've done this without any trouble. No matter where you specified the web
root directory to be during the CFMX ins
I only use Apache on Linux - no problems there
I use IIS on Windows
I have been unsuccessful in configuring the connectors to a specific site for CF
administrator functions, and yet have CF available to the other sites for
"normal" operations.
==
Stop spam on
> If the software company claims to support the platform, then
> the installer should be configured for it. no compromise here.
Last week, I configured someone's Win2K Pro laptop to run Apache 2.0.46, IIS
5, and CFMX simultaneously. I did this for a very specific, and kind of odd
reason which isn
> I'm still confused on this. I upgraded to MX and most of my
> datasources were to a SQL Server using windows authentication.
> When I installed all those datasources failed to copy over.
> Then when I tried to access them through the CFMX Admin it
> hung the server for like 5 minutes. I ended
Apache installs very nicely on windows.
But that aside, you can certainly do a standalone install, run the
connectors and use IIS, and still not have the default IIS running.
- Original Message -
From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June
| > In my opinion, there should be no middle ground for installer
| > packaging. I think that statement is merely a cop-out. I do
| > not agree that people "do not want" a comprehensive installer
| > package.
If the software company claims to support the platform, then the installer
should be conf
|
| Well, I use Apache and handle everything through that.
We are talking about Windows installations here, not apache. I have not had an
instll problem with Apache, either on a single or multi-homed
server.
| I don't understand you - the default install lets you access CF Admin
| from any mach
I've read the whole thread and sorry, I'm just not following your argument.
Can you please clarify??
Damon's original post to which you responded concerned competitors while you
seem to be addressing customers. So that leaves me slightly confused...
chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Dou
> In my opinion, there should be no middle ground for installer
> packaging. I think that statement is merely a cop-out. I do
> not agree that people "do not want" a comprehensive installer
> package.
>
> I am a firm believer that the installer package should address
> every configuration that
On Sunday, Jun 15, 2003, at 09:55 US/Pacific, Dave Carabetta wrote:
> I think the problem is that I'm exploding the cfusion.war file
> into the root directory of the server (which, without MX and the
> default-ear
> directories, only has the SERVER-INF directory)
Yes, you need to create a cfusio
> > You can create a DTS package using the tools built into
> > Enterprise Manager,
>
> I was trying to find, if there was a way to use JDBC with
> SQL Server Enterprise manager. I guess not.. Our current
> back end is U2(UniVerse) Multi-value Database... was trying
> to see if it was possible to
Very informative. Good job.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Geoff Bowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 6:51 PM
Subject: CFMX Admin: made easy-breezy
> Folks,
>
> Finished up some training on CFMX administration a few weeks ago. I
Read the whole thread, and you will have your answer.
==
Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772
==
If you are not sat
> Finished up some training on CFMX administration a few
> weeks ago. It struck me that there is very little in the
> way of admin information for CFMX bar a few technotes --
> so I put together a humble little Breeze presentation to
> run folks through server settings and their nuances:
>
> C
On Sunday, Jun 15, 2003, at 12:56 US/Pacific, Doug White wrote:
> What do we do to install the product anywhere but the web root, which
> requires
> that the default web site be always running? This exposes the server
> to the
> constant spew of unsolicited probes and attacks.
I never install
Folks,
Finished up some training on CFMX administration a few weeks ago. It
struck me that there is very little in the way of admin information for
CFMX bar a few technotes -- so I put together a humble little Breeze
presentation to run folks through server settings and their nuances:
CFMX Adm
> I'm about to install some software, and the install notes
> tell me I have to have MDAC2.6 SP2 installed, and Visual
> C++ 6.0 runtimes.
>
> The notes also refer to MS Knowledgebase articles about them
> but I can't make head or tail of them. I don't know if I
> have these components install
And there is a FREE trial download of CFMX...what's your point?
chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 3:27 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: CF Compatability
>
>perhaps a better choice of words should have been "customers"
>
>Tria
perhaps a better choice of words should have been "customers"
Trial versions and free limited versions have been a part of the software
business all along, right?
This is how you introduce your product, especially if it introduces new
technology to a market that has not used it before.
=
Hmmm...interesting, but how does that work into a business model?
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ:
Of course not - I was referring to products such as ColdFusion Express Not the
full product line. Geez!
==
Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772
=
I can appreciate those that have experienced many "trouble free" installs. I
have no quarrel with those that are interested in only installing the server
product on a single-homed box. Those installs appear to be what the current
installer is designed for.
But. What to we do to install the pro
By "new implementers" do you mean someone who would be competing against MM
for server sales?
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 3:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Compatability
Among others, Introducing the technology to new
Huh? You believe they should give the fruits of their hard work to others
for free? You're kidding right??
chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 12:23 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: CF Compatability
>
>Among others, Introducing
Among others, Introducing the technology to new implementers, provide a pathway
for a start up to build experience and follow an upgrade path that will be
profitable.
==
Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
I
> CFMX also comes in two flavors: Server and "for J2EE" editions. And CFMX
for J2EE is a Sun "J2EE Verified" certified J2EE application itself.
>
> I think copying *.cfm files is an acceptable and familiar task to J2EE app
server administrators and would probably not be considered overly complex.
I am not sure why one would want a Completely backward compatible platform..
Is .Net compatible with Classic ASP? There is a reason why MS doesnt
claim it to be compatible.. Completely different architecture.
Its a great that MM has made CFMX "almost" compatible with legacy CFML
code..
but this d
What's the incentive to give away CF, the test suites or the language to New Atalnta
and others?
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cf
> CFMX also comes in two flavors: Server and "for J2EE" editions. And CFMX
for J2EE is a Sun "J2EE Verified" certified J2EE application itself.
>
> I think copying *.cfm files is an acceptable and familiar task to J2EE app
server administrators and would probably not be considered overly complex.
CFMX also comes in two flavors: Server and "for J2EE" editions. And CFMX for J2EE is
a Sun "J2EE Verified" certified J2EE application itself.
I think copying *.cfm files is an acceptable and familiar task to J2EE app server
administrators and would probably not be considered overly complex.
Thanks for the feedback guys. I agree this should be simple, easy and automatic for
CF customers.
Fixed.
---
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 13:08 US/Pacific, Dave Carabetta wrote:
> I have installed CFMX for J2EE for JRun many times using "cfusion" as
> my
> context root. Howeve
Doug,
You had a bad experience with CFMX on Windows. I had, mostly, great
experiences on Windows, Solaris and Mac OS X - with probably the best
part of a hundred installs. I'm sorry that our experiences differ. That
said, calling it "crippled" and "dumb" and saying "all of [the
configuration a
My main problem with all of this is that we're still only comparing
implementations, not specifications.
Having a real CFML specification (instead of just usage documentation)
would make so many things so much easier, I think.
Jim Davis
President, http://www.depressedpress.com
Webmaster, http://w
Checking it out...
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
See comments in-line below
> Dave, it sounds like you have a residual install somewhere or you tried
> to rename the server instance:
Well, to be honest, I tried replacing the reisse calls in my post with a
more generic mysite, but missed that one. Nonetheless, I blew away the
server and fo
Coudn't agree more, at least on JRun. It's our stuff and should be easy.
Fixed.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subsc
Finally, a web site up and running on CFMX/
Windows2003 Enterprise.
I am using the IP as the link as the DNS is still updating.
http://66.139.91.36/brcfug/
Host is in Texas, group is in Sao Paulo Brazil!
==
Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
For hosti
My compatibility concerns could be interpreted as bias, but we do possess a
signficiant arsenal of quality assurance test suites here that we've made a massive
investment in over the years, and I know how important small incompatabilities can be
to customers.
There's a lot that goes into bein
Damon Cooper wrote:
> What's the issue you're seeing with CFQUERYPARAM in CFMX?
All 4 queries below should return the same value, but the last one
returns a string with 2 quotes.
SELECT '#string#' AS test
SELECT '#trim(string)#' AS test
SELECT AS test
SELECT AS test
my god I wasn't canning you!
Trying to understand how how you guys do it.
looks like poor business management to me
- Original Message -
From: "Rafael Alan Bleiweiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: CF Compatabi
What's the issue you're seeing with CFQUERYPARAM in CFMX?
(I posted this in the other thread as well, but it's appopriate here in answer to your
comment):
---
The reason for my post was to point of the difference between being "substantially
compatible" with ColdFusion CFML, and bei
The reason for my post was to point of the difference between being "substantially
compatible" with ColdFusion CFML, and being "compatible" with ColdFusion CFML for
CF4.5 and CF5 customers.
Increasingly, thread after thread of legitimate user and community discussion here and
elsewhere have b
The reason for my post was to point of the difference between being "substantially
compatible" with ColdFusion CFML, and being "compatible" with ColdFusion CFML for
CF4.5 and CF5 customers.
Increasingly, thread after thread of legitimate user and community discussion here and
elsewhere have b
At 04:58 AM 6/15/03 -0400, you wrote:
>If you're free-lancing things are only marginally better. You don't quite
>have to multiply by 3, since you don't have the overhead, but you do need to
>multiply by 2.5 since you'll be paying all the FICA taxes, insurance, etc
There's a LOT more to it... Let
Thanks Jochem. I came up a positive on both. In fact I have MDACv7.1 so
I'm well clear.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Michael Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks.
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 15 June 2003 9:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject:
Rafael Alan Bleiweiss wrote:
>
> OK - so after all that I've read, I still sit here with a fifty fifty
> issue, EXCEPT - Did I read correctly? BD's CFQUERY does NOT natively allow
> escaping single-quotes?
Yes.
This is about as bad as it can get for developers. CF MX breaks with
cfqueryparam
Mike Kear wrote:
> I'm about to install some software, and the install notes tell me I have to
> have MDAC2.6 SP2 installed, and Visual C++ 6.0 runtimes.
>
> The notes also refer to MS Knowledgebase articles about them but I can't
> make head or tail of them. I don't know if I have these componen
One of the other guys here has been looking into it more thoroughly as im
swamped, and he says we can ldap into it for this kind of authentication...
Thanks
Mikey
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 16:38
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE:
In my opinion, there should be no middle ground for installer packaging. I
think that statement is merely a cop-out. I do not agree that people "do not
want" a comprehensive installer package.
I am a firm believer that the installer package should address every
configuration that the software a
> What I don't get is how some of you guys work for shops that charge over
> $100 an hour but are only making 40k a year or so.
> so lets say 40 hour week that's 2080 hours a year @ $100 an hour = 208k a
> year. If you took home 1/2 that's 104k a year. That's a decent living,
even
> in NY.
> If yo
Hi Isaac,
thanks a lot.
We don't use any form. We get the
data, where to eMail to from the
customer. And this is the reason, we
oversaw that it was "Mrs " instead of "Mrs".
Instead of: Dear Mrs Miller it was Dear Miller
in the eMail. :-)
What I have thought to do is to write
a check routine to che
I'd give ya 2 suggestions.
1) trim your form fields
or
2) make the title field a menu with Ms. Mrs., Mr. as the choices then you
won't have the problem to begin with
:)
dave
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 3:5
I hear ya:)
but maybe I'm missing something
if you already have coldfusion its only $649 to upgrade right?
or
download the trial & you have a developers edition and find a good host to
send your clients too & you are good to go.
or
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=361292
Maybe, I just wrongly translated
it for understanding-reasons from the german word: anrede
which is not reserved :-)
It should be adresses I guess.
Uwe
DL> isn't "title" a reserved word?
DL>> - Original Message -
DL>> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DL>> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DL>>
hi folks,
I was succesfully using a Java CFX and today needed to reinstall it. After
re-starting the service,
I started getting the error
Error processing CFX custom tag "CFX_CFX_xmlParse".
so then I rebooted the server altogether. still the same problem. what's
with the sudden "cfx_cfx" ?
A sear
Well, it looks like the few minutes I used to create a solution could easily
been used to read this article on CF variables. It had the answer right in it:
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/server_archive/articles/using_cf_variables.html
> Just a small thing I found while adding more features to m
Just a small thing I found while adding more features to my spam-watcher. To
decode a base64 encoded string (as found in email for example), the following
code can be used:
ToString(ToBinary(string))
ToBinary() turns the base64 encoded string into ascii text. Unfortunately, CF
still thinks that thi
67 matches
Mail list logo
