On Jul 19, 2004, at 8:35 PM, Rick Mason wrote:
Dick,
Doug Engelbart was the inventor of the mouse. Got the chance to meet
him around twelve years ago. One of his employees actually coined the
name mouse.
http://www.invent.org/hall_of_fame/53.html
Rick Mason
Yes, that sounds
, July 19, 2004 4:19 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: VMWare was Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
The thing is, as I see it, they've tried over and over again and one
day
they're going to succeed at running that company completely into the
ground. They're still on the lookout for that guy
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:49 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: VMWare was Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
Whoa Matt, I was half-kidding. Like I said, they're still looking for a
guy who can do the job right. Why
...several good points...
If, that is mismanagement, Jobs should teach business management at
Wharton, or Harvard.
Their competitors should shoud be so badly managed!
Dick
Yeah, I agree with you that Jobs is doing a great job right now. I just
like to look into the history of a
volume automatically adjusts based on the speed of the car
because of the associated increase in noise. Again, you can
easily change the volume of the radio yourself, but AAA
studies show that is the number one cause of accidents.
I must admit that when I had a Ford Focus that did this I
: RE: VMWare was Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
The thing is, as I see it, they've tried over and over again and one
day
they're going to succeed at running that company completely into the
ground. They're still on the lookout for that guy who can do the job
right! Jobs, Sculley
As Sean suggested, maybe this thread should be moved over to CF-OT or
CF-Community.
Thanks
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
I think you guys are a little blinded by emotion or something of the sort. Please listen to me as I state something VERY CLEARLY that I've tried to state several times, but you guys seem to skip right over.
*** I'm not saying that Apple is any less (good/competent/rich/innovative...) than MS or
Or ended - you guys are right and I'm wrong, whatever... I think I've
been wasting my own time trying to get a simple point across that
doesn't really even matter. Sorry to have inconvenienced the LIST!
-Ferg
As Sean suggested, maybe this thread should be moved over to CF-OT or
CF-Community.
I don't think I understand the point you are trying to make. You started
with Apple was going bankrupt and then moved on to Macs being toys and now
you are saying people just perceive Macs to be toys. Yeah, so what?
It does all sound oddly familiar though. CF does scale... err I mean CF is a
://www.grida.no
-
| -Original Message-
| From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 02:43
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: VMWare was Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
|
| So what advice
Amen to that! Can we please end all this 'Mac is the greatest thing since sliced bread' propaganda that seems to be more and more prevalent on this list. If you prefer to use a Mac, more power to you. Heck, I used them for years (but never again). But this is a CF list, not a Macintosh evangelism
testing or don't value your
testers, but testing should be a major part of any application and certainly
takes time and money.
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 3:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Best choice for ColdFusion
My suggestion would be to buy a Mac and use Mac OS X for your
everyday stuff. You can also install Linux on it and use UML
(remember, context!) for various server related tasks.
So, I'd have to boot out of OS X to run Linux, so I can run User-Mode Linux?
How will that help me run Windows
No problem, but are you sure you're qualified to admin Windows boxes if
you
didn't know how to run something as a different user? That's a pretty
basic
thing, you know!
I am not qualified to admin Windows boxes, but then neither are most MCSEs
either. I was aware that I could run services
Dave Watts wrote:
The Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit comes with a native tail utility. And,
I have Cygwin installed. However, there are plenty of alternatives out there
for Windows that aren't Cygwin-based. I'll bet there's a tail in MS's
Services for Unix package, which I think is free.
SFU is next to useless: you are not allowed to redistribute
it.
Why does that make it useless? There are lots of things that provide utility
to me, that I can't redistribute myself. I can, however, redistribute the
link to it:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/downloads/default.asp
Dave
Dave Watts wrote:
SFU is next to useless: you are not allowed to redistribute
it.
Why does that make it useless?
According to Microsoft it is intended to help people port
applications to Windows. That by itself works very nicely (for
instance a PostgreSQL port to Windows was done in a few
I am not qualified to admin Windows boxes, but then neither
are most MCSEs either. I was aware that I could run services
as different users, but I wasn't aware that I could get a
command-line as a different user using runas.
There's no need to explain; I was simply having some fun at your
There's no need to explain; I was simply having some fun at your expense.
Seriously, though, if you're going to assert the superiority of OS X, it
would be to your benefit to know more about the current versions of
Windows.
In a perfect world I would know everything about everything, so I
In reality, I know enough to make an informed decision.
You might be a savvy buyer, but you're a lousy salesman.
How informed can your decision possibly be, if you recommend one product
over another based on features found in both?
I have no problem with you saying that one product works
How informed can your decision possibly be, if you recommend one product
over another based on features found in both?
It isn't really that hard to figure out. People make decisions every day
based on old information that may no longer be accurate, but the resulting
the decision could still
Macs have long had a history of being first and Windows has had a long
history of copying everyone else's good ideas. Do I know how each and
every
feature in Mac OS X compares with Windows 2003? No, because at a high
level
it is obvious where the innovation is. Longhorn sounds like it will
It isn't really that hard to figure out. People make
decisions every day based on old information that may no
longer be accurate, but the resulting the decision could
still be.
People make decisions every day based on old information that may no longer
be accurate, and the resulting
People make decisions every day based on old information that may no
longer
be accurate, and the resulting decision is the wrong one, too. So, as
decision-making methods go, this doesn't sound too good.
People make decisions every day based on current information that is also
accurate, and
The thing is, as I see it, they've tried over and over again and one day
they're going to succeed at running that company completely into the
ground. They're still on the lookout for that guy who can do the job
right! Jobs, Sculley, Spindler, Amelio, and back to Jobs after Anderson
had a cup
Do a google search for The Art of Unix Programming, read through the first half of the book, then reflect on your statements...While they are not wrong, the intent behind them seems misplaced (my personal take on this, though I haven't been following the thread).
In The Art of Unix Programming,
On Jul 19, 2004, at 1:23 PM, Ken Ferguson wrote:
The thing is, as I see it, they've tried over and over again and one
day
they're going to succeed at running that company completely into the
ground. They're still on the lookout for that guy who can do the job
right! Jobs, Sculley, Spindler,
People make decisions every day based on current information
that is also accurate, and the resulting decision is the
wrong one, too. So, as decision-making methods go, this
doesn't sound too good.
I feel like I've entered Bizarro World here. Are you honestly saying that
it's no better to
Do a google search for The Art of Unix Programming, read
through the first half of the book, then reflect on your
statements...While they are not wrong, the intent behind
them seems misplaced (my personal take on this, though I
haven't been following the thread).
Can you be more specific
People make decisions every day based on old information that may no longer be accurate,
[snip...] Macs have long had a history of being first
You are exactly contradicting yourself here my friend.
Mac is better for graphics, Mac is better for music... here are the old information.
This was true
In The Art of Unix Programming, you get an interesting history on WHY
various OS's are the way they are
It's also horribly misinformed. Though ESR seems to know a good deal about
Unix, his knowledge of other operating system seems to be very shallow. In
particular, some of the statements he
PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: VMWare was Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
Do a google search for The Art of Unix Programming, read
through the first half of the book, then reflect on your
statements...While they are not wrong, the intent behind
them seems misplaced (my personal take
On Jul 19, 2004, at 2:52 PM, Claude Schneegans wrote:
The truth now is that all programs developed for the Mac are know
developed on PCs,... and eventually
converted for Macs later.
For the majority of programs, you are likely correct.
Except, of course, those Mac-only programs.And, from
I feel like I've entered Bizarro World here. Are you honestly saying that
it's no better to know something before making a decision than not to know
something, all other things being equal? Have you considered a career in
politics?
No and No, just showing that your argument wasn't sound by
Jul 2004 15:37:56 -0700
Subject: Re: VMWare was Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 19, 2004, at 2:52 PM, Claude Schneegans wrote:
The truth now is that all programs developed for the Mac are know
developed on PCs,... and eventually
converted for Macs
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 23:11:48 -0400, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I could tell there's very little real difference in how well they
work: they both (VMWare and VPC) do a damn, damn fine job.
I've used both quite a bit too, and the main differences I've found are:
- Virtual PC
Subject: Re: VMWare was Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 23:11:48 -0400, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I could tell there's very little real difference in how well they
work: they both (VMWare and VPC) do a damn, damn fine job.
I've used both quite
Two questions -- MS bought Connectix to get VirtualPC -- from what
I've heard, not so much for Mac emulation of PCs, but for PC emulation
of multiple PCs (the old IBM ploy -- If somebody is going to take away
some of our business, it might as well be us!)
Yes, that's the impression I have
- Virtual PC's networking seems to work much better - setting up a VM
as a computer on your network and getting internet access etc seems to
work almost automatically. VMWare installs a networking driver on the
host machine for this which I've found sometimes interferes with other
network
On Jul 17, 2004, at 8:11 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
I'm doing all of my development now off a dual [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 1,5 gig
of RAM
running Windows 2003 and the Virtual Server Beta. With that much RAM
I can
easily run 5 or 6 moderately configured Windows 2000 Servers with
ColdFusion
or SQL
On Jul 18, 2004, at 7:02 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
Two questions -- MS bought Connectix to get VirtualPC -- from what
I've heard, not so much for Mac emulation of PCs, but for PC
emulation
of multiple PCs (the old IBM ploy -- If somebody is going to take
away
some of our business, it might
So, NT4 (and other older systems) are treated as legacy systems.
Yes, that's MS's plan, I think.
Are there any viri that recognize that they are running under
emulation and attack out of the bounds of the VM?
There's one that doesn't run correctly within a VM as of last week,
according to
On my laptop, I hit a wall at two concurrent VMs, and each of those has to
be pretty bare-bones even for that. That's why I want to get a new laptop!
Each VM requires a significant amount of memory, and running them
concurrently taxes the CPU significantly too.
While you're getting the new
happy with less
than 512.The OS itself protects around 300-400 meg of RAM (at least
Windows 2003 does) so the more RAM the better!
Jim Davis
From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 10:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: VMWare was Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio
While you're getting the new laptop you might need to change the OS
as well.
Matt, are you being paid by commission?
Why is it, when people switch to Macs, they often become fanatics and try to
convince everyone else to switch too? You people are as bad as ex-smokers,
and rapidly approaching
Matt, are you being paid by commission?
No, but feel free to make a donation in my name to your favorite company
that isn't a monopoly.
Why is it, when people switch to Macs, they often become fanatics and try
to
convince everyone else to switch too? You people are as bad as ex-smokers,
On Jul 18, 2004, at 11:55 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
I apologize in advance to any Jehovah's Witnesses on the list - I'm
just
kidding. You folks aren't as bad as Mac fanatics.
We are most commonly called:MacFannies or OSXists.
For the record, I am not a switcher -- only computers I ever
As you might guess, User Mode Linux is just for Linux; not
x86. Further, you might want to avoid using UML to mean User
Mode Linux since UML means quite a different thing in the
development world.
Context is everything, you know! It's pretty clear what it means within the
context of this
So what advice are you giving me, exactly?
My suggestion would be to buy a Mac and use Mac OS X for your everyday
stuff. You can also install Linux on it and use UML (remember, context!) for
various server related tasks. Expose is a pretty killer feature and let's
not forget all those cool Unix
We are most commonly called:MacFannies or OSXists.
Then we should call an exOSXists| ;-)
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks.
[Todays
On Jul 16, 2004, at 7:04 AM, Matt Liotta wrote:
190mb RAM!? What processes are you viewing to calculate that? I
have at
present a 56mb peak.which is no more that DWMX2004 requires to
even
show
a menu.
I didn't state Eclipse was using 190MB of RAM. I stated that by
default it
is
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
SNIP
Anyway, I was hoping the days of platform specific software for developers
was over
Anyway, I was hoping the days of platform specific software for developers
was over.
---
I am very curious as to your meaning here.
I simply mean that having a tool that only works on Windows i.e. not Mac or
Linux is pretty stupid.
Whether you use C++ or Java, there are ways to have a single code
base that works across platforms, so why not do it?
Because it might be more work to do this? Because it might not be worth the
time on the part of the developer to spend this extra time?
I truly believe the fastest growing
Because it might be more work to do this? Because it might not be worth
the
time on the part of the developer to spend this extra time?
It takes little to no additional time to support multiple platforms, so even
a few percentage points in additional market is quite a good ROI.
That's
: Saturday, July 17, 2004 12:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
I truly believe the fastest growing segment of the Mac and
Linux desktop
market is with developers. And why not? The level of stress a
developer puts
on their desktop requires Unix underneath
It takes little to no additional time to support multiple platforms,
so even a few percentage points in additional market is quite a good
ROI.
Perhaps if you're already programming in Java, but there are plenty of VB
and C++/MFC guys out there for whom it would take a significant amount of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Samuel R. Neff
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 1:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
I personally would not call any decision made by a knowledgeable
individual
Dave Watts wrote on 7/17/2004, 13:34:
Because it might be more work to do this? Because it might not be
worth the time on the part of the developer to spend this extra time?
I disagree.If you are wanting to hit a particular market with a
product, should you provide the extra time to provide
Perhaps if you're already programming in Java, but there are plenty of VB
and C++/MFC guys out there for whom it would take a significant amount of
time to move to something else. In their cases, they might need more than
a
few percentage points in additional market share.
Obviously if you
Okay, I think we had lost focus on the subject of this discussion and
that would be if the ROI would be there to develop cross platform
applications for developers.
Restricting most developers to on operating system to develop with your
product is a poor choice.Developers are another bread of
I just wanted to make a quick comment on your development environment.
WOW!Must be nice to have the money for all of that software. So what
do you recommend to us 1099 people who are going from project to project
?Or the developers who have that idea for an application and are
working to
Obviously if you are programming in Java or .NET (thanks to Mono) there
really is no work.
I admit I haven't been keeping up with Mono, but are there lots of Mono
applications out in the world now?
If you are using C++ (MFC or not) there are plenty of
cross-platform toolkits to get you
Because it might be more work to do this? Because it might not be
worth the time on the part of the developer to spend this extra time?
I disagree. If you are wanting to hit a particular market with a
product, should you provide the extra time to provide the product in
something that in
I just wanted to make a quick comment on your development environment.
WOW!Must be nice to have the money for all of that software. So what
do you recommend to us 1099 people who are going from project to project
?Or the developers who have that idea for an application and are
working to
I admit I haven't been keeping up with Mono, but are there lots of Mono
applications out in the world now?
The idea is that .NET applications work on Mono as well, so yes. I am not
really aware of Mono-specific applications as applications developed with
Mono work on .NET as well.
Do you
The idea is that .NET applications work on Mono as well, so yes.
I am not really aware of Mono-specific applications as applications
developed with Mono work on .NET as well.
I guess the better question is whether there are lots of .NET applications
that can run on non-Windows platforms
On Jul 17, 2004, at 11:17 AM, Matt Liotta wrote:
Have you looked at the numbers for how many developers are not using
Windows? The number is quite large and according to the research will
be
passing 20% soon enough.
Matt
Can you point to a source for these numbers -- Intuitively, I think you
I guess the better question is whether there are lots of .NET applications
that can run on non-Windows platforms using Mono.
I believe there are.
But you suggested I get a newer computer! That will certainly cost money.
If
I did get a newer computer, I suppose I could leave all those
Can you point to a source for these numbers -- Intuitively, I think you
are correct, but have not been able to find any reliable stats.
I don't believe any research as specific as this is available for free. I
get my research from Gartner and Meta Group, but it is rather costly.
According to
There is no way you can start IIS, CFMX, SQL Server, and be able to
get a request handled in 30 seconds. You may start CFMX either through
the services control panel or a script and it seem to start in less
than 30 seconds, but CFMX isn't actually available to serve a request
until later.
On Jul 17, 2004, at 12:12 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
VMware is about $400 or so, and worth every penny.
Dave You mention the above and in a later post that you are using
VMWare more and more.
Two questions -- MS bought Connectix to get VirtualPC -- from what I've
heard, not so muchfor Mac
I've used both and I use VirtualPC exclusively now - not for any real
reason, it just worked out that way.Also I'm on the beta for MS Virtual
Server and the VMs are compatible across the products.
>From what I could tell there's very little real difference in how well they
work: they both (VMWare
Intuitively, I think you
are correct, but have not been able to find any reliable stats.
My personal feeling is that traditiannally one was counting Mac people PLUS UNIX/LINUX people.
If one is still counting the same way, one is now counting Mac users two times: one for using a Mac, and another
Recommendations?
By default Eclipse can use up to 190MB of RAM, which works fine for me. I
suggest you try other settings until the max is higher than the actual
usage.
It should be -- that's what a MMU and a PE Multitasking OS are supposed
to give you.
Yes, but each time you switch
-
| -Original Message-
| From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 19:41
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
|
| On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:26:44 +0200, Hugo Ahlenius
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| That's where I vote VIM as my CF
190mb RAM!?What processes are you viewing to calculate that?I have at
present a 56mb peak.which is no more that DWMX2004 requires to even show
a menu.
_
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2004 13:59
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE
re: (cf)eclipse/he3 -- I might give it a try the day it has implemented
decent vi(m) key-bindings...
No need to wait; Eclipse is ready for that now.
-Matt
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
190mb RAM!?What processes are you viewing to calculate that?I have at
present a 56mb peak.which is no more that DWMX2004 requires to even
show
a menu.
I didn't state Eclipse was using 190MB of RAM. I stated that by default it
is only allowed to use a maximum of 190MB of RAM. Mine tends
-Talk
| Subject: RE: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
|
| re: (cf)eclipse/he3 -- I might give it a try the day it has
| implemented decent vi(m) key-bindings...
|
| No need to wait; Eclipse is ready for that now.
|
| -Matt
|
|
|
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast
Great, but I doubt it will be complete enough -- there is always that
special key-combo (or functionality) that one will miss.
Another approach would be to have optimistic expectations. Anyway, below is
a link to the viPlugin that should give you what you want.
... I think you're exaggerating the difficulty of
writing ASP.NET code in any generic text editor. It's
simply not that difficult.
It might not be difficult, but it is more time consuming.
I'm personally finding the difference to be less and less over time,
actually.
Even the best
So the question isn't whether or not to have tools, but what sort of tools
will they be?
Personally I'd like a tool that can fill in the blanks on simple coding tasks. Templates and wizards help to some extent, but I'd like something smart enough to go back and fix my mistakes, add missing
Most people are comfortable with the notion that CFML is a
RAD platform, while Java and .NET are not.
I suspect many .NET developers would not be comfortable with this notion,
actually.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
phone: 202-797-5496
fax: 202-797-5444
[Todays
trying to get used to a
new
program
Ray
At 11:29 AM 7/15/2004, Marlon Moyer wrote:
What's DWMX 2004 performance like compared to eclipse/bbedit?
-Original Message-
From: Dick Applebaum
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 10:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best choice
Some more random comments to the many posts on this thread.
Rob pointed out that Eclipse is slow on the Mac (in comparison to other
Mac Java apps) because IBM wrote Eclipse using its own SWT toolkit,
rather than the standard stuff from Sun.Apple optimized much of Sun's
Java GUI stuff for the
-Talk
Subject: Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
On Jul 15, 2004, at 6:15 AM, Matt Liotta wrote:
This is different than He3 in which we aim
to provide an IDE for CFML development. CFML development includes
more than
just CFML; it also includes HTML, SQL, JS, CSS, XML, Fusebox,
Mach-II
To All:
Man I am loving this Flame War.I wanted to respond to this
particular post because it seems Sean has caught the most heat for his
opinion on the products whether they are bias or not.
I had some issues getting first setup with the He3, I had been forced to
use the Eclipse plugin install
Man I am loving this Flame War.I wanted to respond to this
particular post because it seems Sean has caught the most heat for his
opinion on the products whether they are bias or not.
I had some issues getting first setup with the He3, I had been forced to
use the Eclipse plugin install method
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 10:36 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
I got curious and downloaded Eclipse this AM, and as far as speed, DW is
beat down bad by CFEclipse.However, right now I find the whole thing
rather cumbersome
What's DWMX 2004 performance like compared to eclipse/bbedit?
-Original Message-
From: Dick Applebaum
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 10:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
So, because of what a Mac user is accustomed to, in Eclipse:
1
Subject: Re: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
So, because of what a Mac user is accustomed to, in Eclipse:
1) switching windows is like switching pages in a book when the pages
are stuck together
2) typing/selecting/manipulation of content feels like you are wearing
mittens
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:59:33 -0700, Dick Applebaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He did say that CFEclipse was slow
No, I didn't. Spike is correct - the issue was a very specific
CFEclipse bug that they've already fixed in CVS.
[2 windows]
Pretty standard way of doing things on the Mac (at least
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 7:36 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
I got curious and downloaded Eclipse this AM, and as far as
speed, DW is
beat down bad by CFEclipse.However, right now I find the whole thing
rather cumbersome, and for about an hour now I have
AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...
I started to use Eclipse 3.0 (with CF plugin) and must say that I haven't
opened up HS+ since.I installed and looked at He3 (strange choice of
name...dunno what it has to do with a Helium Isotope...)
http
.
Ferg
_
From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 11:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RAD (was RE: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...)
So the question isn't whether or not to have tools, but what sort of
tools
will they be?
Personally I'd like a tool
Ken,
that's not Hal Helms is it?
-mk
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 1:45 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RAD (was RE: Best choice for ColdFusion Studio IDE...)
I know you're half-kidding here, but you're not too far off of what
I am half-kidding, but I would like a tool that is smart enough to show inline spelling and grammar problems and fix them. Just like the spelling and grammar tools in Word, this should be a feature you can disable if it gets in your way.
The biggest obstacle I see to building tools like this is
On Jul 14, 2004, at 8:54 PM, Spike wrote:
Barney are the first people to say that Eclipse is slow on that
platform.
Sean C. also mentioned this.
Did he?
I thought he said cfeclipse was slow, or rather that it ate up his
CPU. That
was an issue with the internal browser and has been fixed in
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
