Hello,
I have the following problem:
I want to create a query object in Java *manually* and return in to CF. Lesser
problem is to send a query to Java from CF. I looked all over the web and I was
unable to find any example that would explain how to do in java simple things
like “queryAddRow()
Hello,
The simplest solution is to loop over all tasks and see whatever its on of
yours. To do this define a list with all your task names. Then when you loop
over the task in your code don't display them right away, but have an if
statement that checks whatever a task is one of yours or not.
TK
I used to store data in XML data files in few applications including a
picture album and a guest book. XML as a storage was quite hard to work with
when compared to a database and you really need a good reason to use it. For
simple applications that don't have any special needs and can use a
You should always check whatever a scheduled process run and whatever that
run was successful (i.e. no error was thrown). One simple way to make sure
it run and the run was a success is to send an email at the end of the
process file to your (or some designated for that purpose) email account.
I remember one advisory, it was related to CF3 Administrator. The password
field length was only secured by the form maxlength attribute, not on
server side. Thus, someone could kill a CF server by posting to the
administrator login screen password field some very long string. The
application
Modern browsers should support 4k worth of data in a cookie - i.e. about
4096 characters. There is also a limit on the number of cookies you can
set - something around 20 per domain. It is a good idea to store as little
information in a cookie as possible. WDDX is a quick solution to your
problem,
I think this note explains a lot about CFIDE and CFTOKEN:
http://cfmxplus.blogspot.com/2002_06_23_cfmxplus_archive.html
As mentioned in above article, by default CFIDE and CFTOKEN are just
pseudo-random numbers that are rather short, thus, there is a chance of
them repeating.
TK
-Original
: Re: CFID
OK Tom thanks, I had a read of that, most helpful .. so if I want to make
sure I have a unique identifier all i need is the cftoken with uuid checked
in cfadmin?
Jenny
- Original Message -
From: Tom Kitta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Saturday
Hello,
There is a very useful tag used together with cfquery, cfqueryparam.
However, no matter how much I search I am unable to find a concise
documentation for this tag. What I mean is the translation of CF_SQL
argument types into database types. So far I am learning what works and what
doesn't
I am not sure what exactly you are trying to do but you access specific
parts of the query output by using this syntax:
queryname.columnname[rownumber]
If you want to get all data from specific column in a query and convert it
into a long string (say comma delimited),you need to loop over a query
I also discovered that CF_SQL_Numeric does not correspons to MS SQL Server
Numeric type, it is closer to an integer as it killed my decimal point
(rounds down to the closest integer).
CF_SQL_MONEY seams to work fine -- direct correspondance to MS SQL Money
type? (I think it is close enough)
I
I think the problem is in the fact that for CF no and false are the same
thing (as well as yes and true). So you could try:
function convertBooleanOrNull(target) {
var value = NULL;
switch (target) {
case Y:
case true:
value = True;
break;
case N:
case false:
value = False;
break;
}
return value;
It is great that someone compiled a table of translation. However, are you
sure about CF_SQL_NUMERIC? It doesn't correspond to MS SQL type numeric, MS
SQL allows for decimal point in its numeric while CF_SQL_Numeric doesn't. I
think CF_SQL_Numeric is more of an integer - or am I missing something
I am not an ASP person, but as far as I know ASP is an interpreted language and in its capabilities similar to CF5 (through CF has way more futures). There is no equivalent of components for ASP AFAIK. I think CFMX is more like .net.
I would suggest that you use web services for communication
Is there some CFX module for CF4 that mimicks cfexecute? There must be one, just have to search for it.
TK
- Original Message -
From: Gunny
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: RE: EXECUTING EXTERNAL PROGRAM
CFEXECUTE would be a snap, but it didn't exist in
Well, do you think every PC that she is tryied to use has cookies disabled? Also, if cookies are disabld logins still occur, but last only for the duration of a single request - this would be fine if you pass login information with each request.
If you are not going to use cookies, get rid of
I agree with this post, but there is another not too recommended way of getting that UDF, place it in say session scope and then you can access it from within your CFC
TK
- Original Message -
From: Barney Boisvert
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:07 PM
Subject: RE: CFCs
Certainly could be if she is in a company that doesn't allow cookies on
browsers.
But this would contradict everyone else not having any trouble with their logins.
cflogin is required though to help enforce authentication checking.
Also, afaik, cfloginuser should only be used inside cflogin.
That is quite complex navigation you got there. Do your navigation links change so much? How about using a database to populate your navigation or XML based menus?
TK
- Original Message -
From: Shannon Rhodes
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:27 PM
Subject: Dynamic Nav
What are your thoughts, will MM rebound or will it sink deeper? We don't want Jim's portfolio to sink any more ;-)
TK
- Original Message -
From: Jim Davis
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:33 PM
Subject: RE: Macromedia sinks on sales news
Yeah. I noticed that today.
My
You mean you wanted to do something like:
cfloop index=i from=1 to=4
cfset testStruct#i# = structNew()
/cfloop
4 different structures
or
cfset testStruct = arrayNew(1)
cfloop index=i from=1 to=4
cfset testStruct[i] = structNew()
/cfloop
array of 4 structs
or
cfset testStruct = structNew()
Does anyone hold a patent for thought? If not, then it is about time someone
patented it. Then each time someone uses his or her brain a fee would have
to be paid. I wander which country/institution/social class would have to
pay the most per capita :)
TK
-Original Message-
From: Bryan F.
Hello,
I have the following problem, I want to find out whatever the variable 'this.fieldArray[isUUIDpresent].selectArray' is Defined.
'this.fieldArray' is an array of structures. One member of some structure could be 'selectArray' I cannot do it with isDefined() function by doing this
-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 6:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Checking array def
Hello,
I have the following problem, I want to find out whatever the variable
'this.fieldArray[isUUIDpresent].selectArray' is Defined.
'this.fieldArray' is an array
You can make it a stored procedure in SQL server or at least use cfqueryparam tag. How often does the category data change and how recent results do you need? If it doesn't need to be the newest result set consider caching the query data (you may even run a process every so often to populate a
I thought CFMX fix the session jumping problems that CF 5 had and thus
did away with the need to lock session vars, other then in race
conditions.Is this true?Is it possible that locking causes a
problem if CFMX?
[Tom Kitta]
As far as Macromedia is disclosing, there is no need for shared
It is an undocumented feature, also known as a software bug. Well, it is not
the first nor the last that we see in CFMX. Well, then again someone migh
say that this is the desired behaviour and anything else would be a bug.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL
This article is basically saying dynamic is not for everyone and not the
best solution to every problem. However, the same thing could be said of
static pages.
When information changes very often, like every minute or less, dynamic
systems are far better bet. Sure, for something like About Us or
If writing SQL then how about SQL in 10 minutes by Ben Forta? This is a very short primer on sql.
TK
- Original Message -
From: Michael T. Tangorre
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 7:21 PM
Subject: RE: Book to learn MS SQL 2000
Are you talking administration or writing sql?
Happen to me once or twice, I have no clue why, but I am sure that strange behavior is not limited to MM products alone (having worked a bit with MS I sort of run into things ;)
TK
- Original Message -
From: Bosky, Dave
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 8:39 AM
Subject: CFMX
I done it once or twice before, I think the following would work (If my memory serves me well):
cfset result = evaluate(Validation. dynamicFunctionName (argumentVar))
Anyways if above doesn't work, there is a solution, you just have to play around with it as I do remember doing above in CFMX.
- Original Message -
From: Bryan F. Hogan
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:45 PM
Subject: RE: Dynamic CFCs
Why not just create a function that calls the correct function based on the
supplied argument?
How about having dynamic evaluation inside the CFC? If you have 20
Have you tried restarting both servers? It solved many strange problems for me like invisible templates etc.
TK
- Original Message -
From: Jim Davis
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 8:42 PM
Subject: RE: Wierd CFC Path Problem - Question on CFC types (HELP!!)
Sorry - I'm
in a different way and
dropping the name as it found it?
Should I be using com.depressedpress at all or maybe something more
like com_depressedpress (so that com isn't the mapped folder...)?
I'm going crazy on this one...
Thanks,
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL
The whole point of using cfqueryparam is to make sure that no one passes
;drop table users;- however, this is not what for the 'maxlength'
parameter is. It is there, in my opinion, to limit the amount of data passed
to the server to the specified number of characters. Say, a hacker
circumvents
The problem is that the CF server doesn't have access on the Win box to
access mapped drives. You need to change the security setting for CF process
to make it work. I saw a how to do list for this problem some time ago, and
the above is what I remember from it. Maybe someone else on the list can
Hello,
I would like you guys to give me some feedback as to my recent programming
practice. What do you think of it, how can it be improved etc.
I decided to place all of my CF application database access into a single
CFC, i.e. every query that the application ever uses is inside this cfc.
design.
-Matt
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 04:04 PM, Tom Kitta wrote:
Hello,
I would like you guys to give me some feedback as to my recent
programming
practice. What do you think of it, how can it be improved etc.
I decided to place all of my CF application database access into a
single
I never claimed that my solution is very OO. However, I treat DB interaction CFCs as objects - the more general cfc is inherited by child CFC and all cfcs encapsulate some functionality (like variable caching). Granted that I only need a single instance of my object and not much manipulation is
How about using cftry and cfcatch? Or am I missing the main idea behind your question?
TK
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 6:21 PM
Subject: emailings with cfmx and bad syntax email-adresses
Hi list, we are using
CFMX 6.1 now
The only problem we have with CFMX is the scheduler application under administrator. When we put scheduled events in MX they don't seam to run on the schedule we assign to them (don't run at all or run at different times). We were unable to fix this problem and thus all scheduled events are stuck
cfset structClear(session)
TK
- Original Message -
From: brob
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:03 PM
Subject: Killing a session variable
Hey guyshow do i kill a session variable so that I people can't log bck into the admin site.I just havent touched it in a long time
Well there is just a small problem with the enterprise edition, cost. It is very expensive solution as far as Linux goes. RH Linux 7.* was nice since it was a free download and had all the bells and whistles one needs. Now with Fedora we have not a very reliable version and Enterprise solution is
Poor Arden, his reputation is burned now. I didn't get anything from him - maybe that server e-mail virus scanner program that I installed last month does do something?
TK
- Original Message -
From: Haggerty, Mike
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:29 PM
Subject: RE:
Check this guys site:
http://www.singerscreations.com/
He created a small utility that grabs data from weather.com or something. I bet he can lead you to a solution you seek.
TK
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:18 PM
I think it takes more than just putting M$ name on some product to make it great and widely accepted especially in the developer community. I believe that developers will ultimately gravitate towards product easier to use rather than the one managers could be pushing for.
TK
- Original
Mainly performance loss, you don't want to hold a 'lock' on DB for too long.
Keep anything inside cftransaction tag to the minimum, especially don't
print long data results to the screen, or worse, do IO operations.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Spectrum WebDesign [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want something easy to setup, it will not be free, but will cost you
a bit. Most hard to setup FW are 'free' i.e. they either come with
operating system or are free add ons (like using Linux or OpenBSD. Try to
look for an appliance (otherwise known as HW firewall) - a little box which
is
can find out more about these HW FW by going to their respective
websites. There are many models to choose, prices vary a lot (usually you
can get the box for much less than the listed price on company website).
TK
[Tom Kitta]-Original Message-
From: Eric Creese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Move with is just an option on the restore, you need to specify new path for
the files that you are restoring.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Eric Creese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 2:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Restoring DB I'm screwed!
You may have to
that is statefull on dedicated OS
7 using real proxy firewall on common OS
8 using real proxy firewall on dedicated OS
I would tie 6 and 7. Of course, specifics of the product will matter a lot
and knowledge of the person that sets it all up. So above is only very
general outline.
TK
[Tom Kitta
Matt, I have checked all of your links and none of them lead to articles you
mentioned.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 4:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: XML storage
I would normally responsd to specific messages, but I am
to show it
too. Also, same thing holds for websites that use mySQL as a backend.
Otherwise mySQL would be only useful for strictly non-commercial
applications and it would simply be useless to most people.
TK
[Tom Kitta]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
I am running into a strange problem with CFMX6.1 and SQL Server2000. I am
able to insert 170k text into a 'text' field, however when I query and
retrieve the same text CF only dumps the first 64000bytes precisely. The
same query outside CF works fine (I cannot view actual data dump using
to pull back more than 64K bytes from a BLOB/CLOB
field.
Cheers,
barneyb
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 1:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Working with CLOBs
Hello,
I am running into a strange problem with CFMX6.1 and SQL
I don't know why people don't like iif (immediate if), it is as quick as
cfif and takes only one line. For simple things, like if x y print true
else print false, I think using iif makes code shorter without sacrificing
clarity and speed.
If you don't believe iif is fast then I encourage you to
/cfoutput
/cf_stopwatch
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2004 10:47 a.m.
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Which is quicker
I don't know why people don't like iif (immediate if), it is as quick as
cfif and takes only one line. For simple
of situations.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 2:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Which is quicker
I don't know why people don't like iif (immediate if), it is
as quick as
cfif and takes only one line. For simple things, like if x
Ooops, I forgot to say that my tests are all on MX6.1, of course on CF5
'iif' is painfully slow.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 6:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Which is quicker
I don't know why people don't like
Thank you Barney for more scientific tests of conditional's performance. I
hope these tests will show once and for all that in CFMX iif is nothing to
be afraid of as far as speed goes. The results for cfswitch slower
performance also surprise me, didn't expect that, good to know.
TK
-Original
I disagree, open source makes OS much safer than closed source OS. Everyone
can inspect the code and point out problems with open source, not so when it
is closed. Thus, MS has a problem when its source gets suddenly released --
people will most likely find a lot of holes in it which were long
Yes, you would like someone else to test your home security system. Even
with a total knowledge of all weaknesses by the attacker you still should
have strong security. You have to assume that robber knows as much about the
system as the person who created it because they might be the same person.
I sort of like it more with cfqueryparam in it, just place each cfqueryparam
tag on a line by itself and it looks great. As for security, you will make
it hard for someone to do sql injection but you will need to add some good
old access security if you want to put people out of your update page -
How about just wrapping CFDirectory inside a custom CFC/custom tag? That is
the 1st thing that comes to my mind.
TK
-Original Message-
From: cfhelp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 8:48 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Security - Tag restrictions
I have multiple clients
Hello,
Sorry for off topic, but it seems that most people on this list are working
with windows and thus most likely can point me in the right direction. I am
having some problems setting up domain controller for my workplace. Does
anyone know of a good mailing list or other resource that would
Thank you all for replying, I joined some mailing lists and I hope that I
will get answers to all of my windows networking related questions.
Agree. Well if its any consolation - in my experience - going to Linux
goes from hard to a better - where as going to windows goes from easy to
I am wondering, will CF 6.2 be a free upgrade from 6.1 or will MM want us to
pay for it? And if $$$ is involved, how much?
TK
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 10:21 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Question regarding CFMX 6.2
Correct me, if I am wrong, but didn't MM release a hot fix regarding some
problems with quotes in cfqueryparam tag?
Maybe that is related to your problem.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Les Mizzell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 8:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:
a spare
server.
TK
[Tom Kitta]
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 11:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX and CF5 on same server
Has anyone deployed a server with both CF5 and CFMX on it.I've got a
live
server with CF5 applications
Copy your whole query, go to query analyzer - view execution plan. This
will show you costs of each and every operation.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Eric Creese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 11:49 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT - Datbase Transaction question
I
Last time I checked there were some commercial decrypters floating around
for about $20 per copy. Sorry, I don't have a link handy, but they were not
hard to find last time I checked.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Burns, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 9:30 AM
I am not sure whatever it was already mentioned here (didn't read the whole
thread) but there was a security vulnerability in I believe CF4. The cracker
could save the administrator login page, modify password length column to
anything he wanted to (like 100) and send it over with a lot of
Nice dev box! It depends what you are developing, but for most cases it
would be fine to run both SQL and CF on the same box. How many thousands of
queries per second you plan to do, if you are warring? Anything under 1000/s
of simple queries will not harm your server performance. Also, unless you
I know there were some issues with upgrading servers. I cannot remember
clearly now and I got book at home. As soon as I get there I take a look. I
am quite sure you need to re-create statistics and re-populate all full text
search indexes.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL
Long time ago, when we were still using CF5 as production server I had a
similar problem. All seemed fine at first, but every 10th or 20th form
submission the form scope was just gone. It was a self posting form, it was
annoying to users to have to type everything again. I don't remember much of
Remote desktop is available for Mac, Linux and almost any PC running windows
(If I remember correctly, minimum requirements are Win3.1, 386SX, 8Mb RAM).
It is always free (but server part is not free, you need windows server
software and for anything but Administrative mode you need a CAL).
TK
I agree, we do the same thing here.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Nick de Voil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: SQL Server Table Design Question
Just to play devil's advocate and also enjoy the unusual experience of
disagreeing
I know I did dynamic function naming some time ago, it works fine, I think
syntax was:
cfset function_result = evaluate(function_name_var ())
For passing arguments:
cfset function_result = evaluate(function_name_var
(#arg1_variable#,arg2_as_number,'arg3_as_text'))
OR
cfset function_result =
Just wondering, does anyone have good/bad stories related to www.dotster.com
or http://www.buydomains.com/ ?
TK
-Original Message-
From: cfhelp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Good (inexpensive) domain registration
$8.95/Year if
It is OK to code for a single DB for almost every application. It simply
doesn't pay to ignore all DB enhancements and create fully DB independent
SQL. There is a good article about that by Ben Forta.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
I am sure everybody who goes as far as encrypting their form variables
remembers about cfqueryparam. Otherwise it is like barricading the window
and leaving the barn door open :)
TK
-Original Message-
From: Ian Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:54 AM
To:
It is a positive sign when so many people on this list recognize the need
for security in their web applications. The next step after acknowledging
that security is needed is to determine how much security is needed. We
don't want to protect 10c of assets using security worth $1000. Once we know
based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 2:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: Securing CF Apps.
It is a positive sign when so many people on this list recognize the need
for security in their web
I agree with Kwang Suh, security through obscurity is no security at all.
This is quite well known throughout security community and all encryption
standards available to the wide public adhere to it.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23,
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Securing CF Apps.
If thats the case, then whats the big deal with the MS code leak?
-adam
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 08:08 PM
To: 'CF
information that is secured by it. How
difficult (resource wise) do you want to make it for the attacker is up to
you. Obfuscation alone might just not make it difficult enough for the
attacker to get to your sensitive data in some cases.
TK
[Tom Kitta]-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto
As far as I know, in the Linux hacker community cracking Linux box of your
enemy hacker is far more worthy of a prize than hacking some MS box of some
inexperienced user. Anyway, I think this is getting off topic now, lets go
back to CF application security exclusively.
TK
-Original
Well, so anything out on the web fits the definition of an application. Any
web page, including HTML is a set of instructions that enable a computer
perform a desired sequence of operations. And of course it includes user
interface.
Before we get too far off topic I propose the following:
- all
The main reason that I don't use stored procedures often is the time it
takes to write them. It turns out that it is quicker for me to write cfquery
with cfqueryparams than stored procedure in sql server 2000 and cfstoredproc
in CFMX.
Also, when the query code is in the CFC I can right away see
no money is a natural state :)
TK
[Tom Kitta]
-Original Message-
From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 7:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: Securing CF Apps.
What a weak argument.Prove to me that is the definition of a web site.
- Original Message
I am not sure whatever Linux vis Windows security is not too much off topic,
but here is my 2c.
Linux comes out of the box with most major distributions in much more secure
configuration. One of the biggest security advantages that Linux has over
Windows is build in strong firewall (iptables).
I only briefly got some Spectra training. My 1st thoughts (after seeing CF
for the 1st time just few days before) were: who would ever use such a
complex product? Through I spend some time looking at it, my progress was
not as fast as in CF, spectra was just too complex for me at that time, I
I played around with this website a bit. I don't think that they are very
reliable. For example,
http://www.netcraft.com/?restriction=site+ends+withhost=.microsoft.com
suggests that M$ is running on Linux ... Maybe this is what people mean by $
in M$, they are so cheap that they cannot even
This sounds like a problem with your Apache configuration, I didn't have any
problems with Firefox .8 so far, works great for most sites except MS where
they want explorer :(
TK
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 10:49 AM
To: CF-Talk
up your logs by performing transaction log backup (with remove
log entries option). Then you can shrink your DB (not recommended).
TK
[Tom Kitta]
-Original Message-
From: brobborb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 1:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: SQL Server SLOW
Hey
Hmmm, it looks like there are going to be a lot of 'shortest path' algorithm
implementations. I guess to win on speed it should be written in cfscript as
much as possible.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 2:06 PM
To:
in cfscript as much as
possible.
Don't expect it to make much (or any) difference with CFMX.
--- Ben
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 2:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion Coding Contest
Hmmm, it looks like
If you want people to re-submit + new people then how about new deadline for
submissions?
TK
-Original Message-
From: Kazmierczak, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 3:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion Coding Contest
Steve,
Here is the deal.I am not the
Come on, that was top secret information. Now you taken my advantage edge
away from me ;o) I think it was csc350 through or something like that.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Jim McAtee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 8:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion Coding
What you are doing is called Caesar's cipher. This is 1st attempt at
encryption. Very weak, takes piece of paper to decipher, statistical
analysis are a killer. I guess it might deter a casual user or even a hacker
if he or she doesn't know how you encrypt. If they knew that you are using
this
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
