This is still happening. VERY annoying. ANYONE who is disabling tests,
marking them flaky, etc needs to take the 30 seconds required to svn blame
the file and cc people the relevant people.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
Seriously. In a project as big
Hrmm... it looks your script assumes depot_tools is in your PATH -- if it
can't find it the script crashes.
Trying to figure out a workaround. If all else fails I can always give in
and add depot_tools to my PATH :)
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I think the main points of contention regarding SecurityOrigin::toString()
are the name toString and what type it should return.
In terms of the names: I think we should provide constructors and getters
for each
Today on the waterfall, I see:
Sheriffs: munjal
From past experience, one sheriff really isn't enough. Munjal should
be able to take a lunch break.
Also, I think that this will be his first stint as sheriff. It would
probably help him out if he had a co-sheriff who had done it at least
once
This makes me very happy!
2009/10/15 Glenn Wilson gwil...@chromium.org:
Hi Webkit gardeners,
The Windows canary bot now generates formatted layout test results on each
build that had unexpected failing layout tests, which means you can quickly
see layout test failures, diffs, and upstream
hi!
i want to know how to run an applicacion with the chrome, as the same
as activeX in IE and xpcom interfaces in Mozilla...
thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or
-
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Disabled the auto-crash features for Mac.
Kind Regards,
Anthony Laforge
Technical Program Manager
Mountain View, CA
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Mike Pinkerton pinker...@chromium.orgwrote:
I just had crashbot add a totally unrelated stack trace to a bug. I
emailed anthony about it, we'll
Is it possible to Compile Chrome OS version of Chromium?
Where I can find more news?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
Hi Webkit gardeners,
The Windows canary bot now generates formatted layout test results on each
build that had unexpected failing layout tests, which means you can quickly
see layout test failures, diffs, and upstream baselines without running the
tool manually. The goal of this output is to help
I guess you're rightabout pretty much everything.
I'll put it in chrome/common then? (Note I actually wasn't planning on
putting it in base unless the API depended on it, but it seemed like
including that would just make what I was saying more confusing.)
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:19 AM,
Christmas came early for anyone working on WebKit! Thanks Glen. :-)
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.com wrote:
This makes me very happy!
2009/10/15 Glenn Wilson gwil...@chromium.org:
Hi Webkit gardeners,
The Windows canary bot now generates formatted layout
This is not really an extensions question. I think you want chromium-...@.
- a
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Mixe twitter...@googlemail.com wrote:
Chrome does not support HTML5 spellcheck attribute? Then why
spellchecking is enabled by default?
How we can disable (using JS) spellchecking
Glenn, this tool is amazing! It really helped me yesterday on my 1st
gardening shift.
Re: upstream baselines without running the tool manually
How do I do that?
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Christmas came early for anyone working on WebKit! Thanks
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
This is not really an extensions question. I think you want chromium-...@.
- a
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Mixe twitter...@googlemail.com wrote:
Chrome does not support HTML5 spellcheck attribute? Then why
Replying off-list as requested...
Firstly, this is awesome!
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Chase Phillips ch...@chromium.org wrote:
git-cl upload
Runs presubmit tests on upload, continues even if tests fail.
This latter part is different than the gcl version. Is that intentional? I
I put some more thought into this. Given that we only store a month's worth
of data, it's not worth doing backups.
Keeping around all the data (maybe a year's worth?) would be awesome though.
I actually think that would not be too much work and would add value to the
dashboard. At that point,
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.orgwrote:
Hrmm... it looks your script assumes depot_tools is in your PATH -- if it
can't find it the script crashes.
Thanks for pointing this out. The hooks should fail gracefully in those
cases, so I'll make
I spent some time this morning looking at Chrome's memory usage (on OS
X 10.5.8) while viewing flickr.com. First I simply started at my photo-
stream page and hit Reload over and over. Next I tried going through
all of my photos one by one. I used the RPRVT column in 'top', and the
'heap'
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Chase Phillips ch...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Andrew Scherkus
scher...@chromium.orgwrote:
Hrmm... it looks your script assumes depot_tools is in your PATH -- if it
can't find it the script crashes.
Thanks for
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Replying off-list as requested...
Right! ;)
Firstly, this is awesome!
Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Chase Phillips ch...@chromium.orgwrote:
git-cl upload
Runs presubmit tests on upload, continues
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Chase Phillips ch...@chromium.org wrote:
To bypass the presubmit tests in upload or dcommit, use
the --bypass-hooks flag. git-cl dcommit's -f now implies --bypass-hooks
along with skipping the commit confirm prompt.
Ditto above. The gcl flag is
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Jens Alfke s...@google.com wrote:
• Switching to another tab in the same window is the only way to get
heap usage down significantly (by calling V8's IdleNotification) and
even then it takes over a minute of occasional idle-time GC to have a
significant
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
wrote:
As mentioned f2f, this falls apart as soon as Chrome tries to
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Jens Alfke s...@google.com wrote:
I spent some time this morning looking at Chrome's memory usage (on OS
X 10.5.8) while viewing flickr.com. First I simply started at my photo-
stream page and hit Reload over and over. Next I tried going through
all of my
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Jens Alfke s...@google.com wrote:
I spent some time this morning looking at Chrome's memory usage (on OS
X 10.5.8) while viewing flickr.com. First I simply started at my photo-
stream page and hit Reload over and over. Next I tried going through
all of my
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Chase Phillips ch...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Replying off-list as requested...
Right! ;)
Doh.
However, my tests of gcl upload show they already have the same behavior
here: gcl uploads
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
• We should call V8::IdleNotification in situations other than a
hidden tab. A long-lived tab might go for quite a while without being
hidden in this way: the user might activate another app, hide Chrome
itself, or just
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Darin Fisher
Today I reviewed some old bugs which didn't get any attention and tried to
correctly mark/assign/close them. Feel free to reassign a bug if I assigned
it to you - I was generally looking for people familiar with the area so
that they can decide what to do next (please not that the status of such
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Michael Nordman
Actually, can you package this so it could be upstreamed to webkit.org?
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Glenn Wilson gwil...@chromium.org wrote:
The tool lives in
src/webkit/tools/layout_tests/test_output_formatter{.bat,.sh}, and it can
actually be run against any builder, not just the
I am the only scheduled sheriff today and there is no co-sheriff. I was out
for 5 minutes to grab lunch and ran to my desk. The tree became red in the
meantime.
Sorry for not being thoughful to aks someone to cover for me during those 5
minutes.
It would be great if someone can help me out today
I'll keep an eye on things tomorrow morning (east coast hours).
TVL
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
I've been sheriffing for Munjal for the past hour, when I found the
tree in a bad state.
I'm happy to keep helping, but it'd be great if some other
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Thomas Van Lenten thoma...@chromium.orgwrote:
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/tree-sheriffs
...which is the top answer when you search for sheriff on dev.chromium.org.
(Plug for automated tools)
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
Today I reviewed some old bugs which didn't get any attention and tried to
correctly mark/assign/close them. Feel free to reassign a bug if I assigned
it to you - I was generally looking for people familiar with
oh. Thanks :)
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Thomas Van Lenten thoma...@chromium.orgwrote:
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/tree-sheriffs
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Abubakar abubak...@gmail.com wrote:
whats this sheriff thing can anyone explain :) ?I thought the first email
was
The layout try bots are just too slow for the purposes of webkit gardening,
which needs to keep up with the fast stream of layout test breakage coming
from webkit.org. Gclient and compilation consume most of the time, but the
gardener is usually only interested in the layout tests themselves.
How
Another class of layout tests with bad setTimeouts in them -
Tests of the form:
body onload=runTest();
img
...
function runTest() {
// Wait for img to load
setTimeout(step2, 200);
}
These tests are not flaky, but the setTimeouts are completely
unnecessary (body onload always fires AFTER the
Would another solution be to have canary bots for both release and debug?
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Yaar Schnitman y...@chromium.org wrote:
The layout try bots are just too slow for the purposes of webkit gardening,
which needs to keep up with the fast stream of layout test breakage
That will help too. I've been missing
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Julie Parent jpar...@chromium.org wrote:
Would another solution be to have canary bots for both release and debug?
That will certainly help. I've rolled in test failures into our tree because
the canaries didn't detect the
How exactly are you launching it? ie-what are you typing into the terminal.
it might be the executable path change last night.
TVL
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Mikhail Naganov mnaga...@chromium.orgwrote:
Hi all,
Starting from today, I can't run Chromium from Terminal, unless I'm
How are you launching it from the Terminal? Can you tell me the exact
invocation? $PATH and working directory too?
Can you log the value of path after PathService::Get(base::FILE_EXE,
path) in chrome::GetVersionedDirectory(),
chrome/common/chrome_paths_mac.mm:72?
Mark
Mikhail Naganov wrote:
Also answering on Mark's question.
$ pwd
/Users/mnaganov/chrome/src/xcodebuild/Release/Chromium.app/Contents/MacOS
$ ls -l
total 40
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mnaganov eng 16472 Oct 16 01:25 Chromium
$ echo $PATH
http://codereview.chromium.org/271113 may require a clobber for Linux
builds. The default build used to be 32-bit, but it will now be
whatever your build host architecture is. If you are on a 64-bit
machine, and haven't explicitly been setting 'target_arch' in gyp,
your build will switch from
I actually have a copy of the data from Tuesday at 2:30pm. If you need any
information out of the results page, just let me know.
Julie
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com wrote:
I put some more thought into this. Given that we only store a month's worth
of data,
Yes, possibly. The tool is written explicitly for the Chromium builders'
output, so it would be plausible but non-trivial to generalize it.
It may not be as useful since I don't think they have a concept of an
'upstream' baseline. Those of you who do a lot of work upstream, would it
be worth
There are a lot of tests that consistently (i.e. not flaky) timeout. They
eat up significant percentage (~10%!) of the cycle time for the test bots
(e.g., 1 minute on Windows release). If LTTF folk focus some effort on
fixing these first, it would help all of us move forward faster as the bot
One could show baselines of all the other platforms instead of just an
upstream baseline.
I'm not really sure from the output what this tool does. So it's
difficult for me to tell how useful it would be to upstream.
-eric
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Glenn Wilson gwil...@chromium.org
I'll take on the media ones.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com wrote:
There are a lot of tests that consistently (i.e. not flaky) timeout. They
eat up significant percentage (~10%!) of the cycle time for the test bots
(e.g., 1 minute on Windows release). If LTTF folk
In case any of you who hack on WebKit aren't on webkit-dev. (If
that's you, you should definitely join webkit-dev now. It's very very
low traffic and very high signal to noise ratio.)
-eric
-- Forwarded message --
From: Brian Weinstein bweinst...@apple.com
Date: Thu, Oct 15,
On x86_64 machine, I couldn't build even if I clobber..
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/local/google/home/ukai/src/chromium1/src/sconsbuild/Release/lib/libnpGoogleNaClPluginChrome.a
when searching for -lnpGoogleNaClPluginChrome
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lnpGoogleNaClPluginChrome
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏)
u...@chromium.org wrote:
On x86_64 machine, I couldn't build even if I clobber..
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/local/google/home/ukai/src/chromium1/src/sconsbuild/Release/lib/libnpGoogleNaClPluginChrome.a
when searching for
I'm currently working on tests under LayoutTests/http/tests/navigation/.
Thanks,
Yuta
2009/10/16 Ojan Vafai o...@google.com
There are a lot of tests that consistently (i.e. not flaky) timeout. They
eat up significant percentage (~10%!) of the cycle time for the test bots
(e.g., 1 minute on
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Michael Moss mm...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏)
u...@chromium.org wrote:
On x86_64 machine, I couldn't build even if I clobber..
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
I'll have a look at
LayoutTests/fast/dom/Window/window-property-shadowing-name.html
yours,
anton.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Yuta Kitamura yu...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm currently working on tests under LayoutTests/http/tests/navigation/.
Thanks,
Yuta
2009/10/16 Ojan Vafai
58 matches
Mail list logo
