On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Jiriteach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After updating Chrome to 0.2.152.1, heading over to Tools About
Chrome, it starts checking for updates.
Except this keeps going and going!
Any one experiencing this same problem?
Yes, everyone using 152.1. A fix is in
Please bring up proposals like this on chromium-discuss, so we can keep
chromium-dev restricted to the nuts and bolts of development issues.
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Chromium-dev group.
To
Two recommendations for folks participating in code reviews using Rietveld (
codereview.chromium.org):
(1) When uploading a patch, make sure you Edit Issue and add at least one
review email; then use the Publish+Mail Comments link (with a blank body,
usually) to send out the review request. When
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Ojan Vafai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd love to hear from people who disagree about these proposed policies so
we can compromise on something everyone is happy with.
I tend to think anybody should be able to do anything TBR if they have a
good reason. I'm
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Glen Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like Evan, I'm not at all a fan of changing the page layout for a
normal range of text size changes - sometimes I change font size
temporarily just to read something quickly, and having the page
relayout as a consequence
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Ian Fette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds like you want to have form autofill, but not actually fill stuff
in until the user hits submit. While nice in theory, I'm not sure how you
exactly get this to work without causing unintended consequences. E.g. there
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Chris G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you surf the web nothing will ever be filled, and you need never
know the passcard system is at work! However as you surf the browser
will scan its passcards and if there is one matching the current page
a button will light
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Jim Roskind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note this code is not yet pushed to either Google Chrome's dev channel, nor
beta channel. I've only landed this on the Chromium tip-of-tree thus far.
It is possible that we'll get enough good data that we won't even need to
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Chris G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 6:29 pm, Peter Kasting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't mean that they were different HTML (although they can be), but
rather that users perceive them as having different functions.
This perception is what I (we
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Chris G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok so where are we?
Close to ending this thread, as it doesn't seem to be going anywhere. I
don't have the time or energy to continue replying, so this will probably be
my final response.
Is there any agreement we can reach
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Darin Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you make any changes to third_party/WebKit, please prepare an additional
CL to port your change to the merge branch. Your changes will be lost if
you do not do this! The merge branch is located here:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, I'd like to create a build of chromium that has all the
bells and whistles removed, but still keeps all the core
functionality.
Does such a build configuration already exist somewhere? If not, any
advice on
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:06 AM, PaulTopping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know, NPAPI requires that
the amount of space the equation takes up on a page be known in
advance, rather than be calculated at run-time to be dependent on the
MathML content. There is no support for baseline
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:30 AM, PaulTopping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was my hope that others would read this and
think of problems it might solve. SVG support could be done this way,
as I suggested. In general, I think it leads to a more modular
approach to browser architecture. It would
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Jonas Klink (Google) [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
It seems as if we are now doing a good job of supporting Large/Extra Large
Fonts all through the UI
There are limits; for example, once you make your fonts dramatically bigger
than the defaults, the omnibox starts
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Erik Kay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice to remove ATL/WTL dependencies from Chromium so that
people can build it with Visual C++ Express.
According to various webpages whose instructions I have not personally
tested (e.g.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Nicolas Sylvain [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Opening the try servers externally is tricky. If the patch is sent by a
malicious users, it means that they can run arbitrary code in our test
environment, which is not good.
Yes, I think that's the issue we'd have to
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:09 AM, PaulTopping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't NPAPI considered somewhat dead technology? Supported but not a
venue for enhancement.
No, there is a group dedicated to enhancing it, and proposals for how to
improve things. It doesn't get as much attention as a lot
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Andrew Scherkus [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
1) Overload CreateStringValue, GetAsString, etc.. to also accept
std::string. Add TYPE_UTF8_STRING to ValueType enum.
2) Overload CreateStringValue, GetAsString, etc.. to also accept
std::string. TYPE_STRING becomes
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Brett Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be careful because wstring != UTF16String.
Yes, hence the need to be very explicit about what these functions actually
do (since you can't infer things from types alone).
In other places of the code, we use GetWString,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Mike Pinkerton pinker...@chromium.orgwrote:
My point is that I shouldn't have to convince you. Your style of
surfing the interwebs is different than mine and no amount of
discussion is going to change how either of us surf the web. Let me
have my preference.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Don't you still need to engage some of webkit's code to ensure that space
is made for the resizer (when there is only a vertical scrollbar)?
He's doing that. (I was confused on this point too.) This requires
providing a
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
The status bubble is overkill for this; it was a separate window mainly so
it could move outside the main browser bounds as needed.
Bah, I was wrong. Another issue is that the content area has its own HWND.
If you
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
The problem isn't technical, it's that to do that spell correction
it'd involve sending all text form data up to a Google server.
Only misspelled words, right?
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Mark Larson (Google) m...@chromium.orgwrote:
So... what are the 1-3 top issues you think need to get fixed on trunk to
make it bearable for everyday use?
Maximized mode is pretty awful in XP and Vista non-Aero.
PK
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Darren Horrocks killallthehum...@gmail.com
wrote:
and as most people will only use the bookmark bar to access the other
bookmarks button,
Do you have data to back up this claim?
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Mohamed Mansour
m0.interact...@gmail.comwrote:
Would be nice to add another field such as Tag (or Label), where we
could tag our own bookmarks.
I think we've generally agreed internally that this has at least some
utility, but we haven't been as sure how to
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
Any thoughts, either on advantages or disadvantages to installing
extensions per-chrome install, or to assuming that there is only one
profile per browser process?
From a user perspective, I would very much want
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
My thought is that extensions should not apply in the incognito mode.
I don't know. From my perspective as a user, incognito is more like a
flag I temporarily set on my current window/profile, rather than a different
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ian Fette i...@chromium.org wrote:
1. Does it really make sense to show the RSS icon for all users, or is
there a way to only have it show up for people who actually use RSS feeds?
(Not sure how to define those users, maybe we recognize that they have a
reader
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
I believe both of these were caused by importing search keywords from
Firefox.
Yes.
In at least the latter case, Matt_2 was unaware that the
time keyword even existed on his Firefox (I think it might have been
part how
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:23 AM, t...@chromium.org wrote:
Should Create App Shortcut or Save Page As be in the same
place as Email/Print?
I kind of wondered this too, and proposed (verbally) to Nick that we could
split the existing Page menu into two menus, and put all these sorts of
things
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Absolutely... extensions should be able to store data in the profile. I
think that issue is orthogonal to where the extensions get installed.
Is it orthogonal to where Chrome itself is installed? i.e. if we have two
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't see how the UI for a seemingly random set of tabs being blocked by
a dialog in one tab could be done in a reasonable fashion. It seems like it
would be really confusing UI :-)
I agree in principle; in practice
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
This idea is similar to what happens today when one tab runs a synchronous
XMLHttpRequest that takes a long time to complete. The other tabs in the
same renderer become mysteriously unresponsive.
(I would love to do
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.comwrote:
The concrete suggestion might not be what we want, but the problem surely
sounds valid, no? We have a UI that returns things by type and we don't
have anything other than linear navigation to get past one type and to
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Mohamed Mansour
m0.interact...@gmail.comwrote:
Currently, this is what happens when you view source:
Right Click:
* Tab - Opens a new tab with source
* Application - Finds a window that has tabs, and opens view source
there.
* Popup -
Previously on this list, we have been urged to build and use the trunk to
shake out problems. But what if you don't have or don't want to keep a
trunk build updated and running? How can you make things better as a 1.0
release branch user?
If you add --enable-dcheck to your app shortcut, you will
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Mohamed Mansour
m0.interact...@gmail.comwrote:
the way it works now is by executing the following:
controller_-AddManagedButton(reload_, IDC_RELOAD);
That line of code is letting the CommandHandler manage key events and mouse
events. But I want to be able
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Brian Rakowski br...@chromium.org wrote:
There's not currently, but we have considered it several times. I don't
remember any arguments against it other than we weren't sure if it was going
to be necessary.
The main argument against it (IIRC) was that we were
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:13 AM, DeArto20 sy3...@gmail.com wrote:
The following is the reply written by me on bugtracker - Issue 5695.
So... why are you mailing it to this list?
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.orgwrote:
It looks like everyone and their dog adds init code to the startup
sequence. This takes the form of first time initialization, command
line switch parsing, etc. Is there any special reason why it's done in
the
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Marc-Andre Decoste m...@chromium.orgwrote:
I got a crash while playing with new code and I wonder if we should fix
the view parenting code to avoid this. The problem happens when you try to
add a child view to a parent view that already has this view as a
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Options, as I see them:
1) As close to Windows as possible, porting views.
2) As close to native as possible, avoiding views.
3) Something in the middle, hacking views.
(2) and (3) both sound better to me than (1), too.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Sorta like this screenshot:
http://userstyles.org/styles/11000
LOL @ that guy's lousy attempt to blur out Warez-BB.org.
I bet he's just getting Linux ISOs.
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
2009/1/29 Lutz B lutz.behre...@gmail.com
Fehler in der Chrome Konsole Bitte weiterleiten an Entwicklungsteam
Chrome!
Can you please file (or have the original author here file) a bug at our
public bug tracker? Just go to crbug.com.
Please provide the details of the error on that bug. I
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Simon B. simon.boh...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a bunch of everyday-links
(intranet...) that require lots of typing
Seems like inline autocomplete in the address bar still ought to get you to
these with a few keystrokes?
PK
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Glenn Wilson gwil...@chromium.org wrote:
Meeting notes from February 9, 2009 are now posted on the Chromium
developer documentation:
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/meeting-notes#02092009
Please contact me if you have any questions, and
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
To the degree that new upstream tests represent stuff we're shipping
should actually work as advertised, I would prefer not to defer it.
One more I forgot. If we're trying to not diverge from Safari too much (for
web
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't think it makes sense to block releases to the stable channel
on new tests that we've never passed.
I somewhat agree, but there is a caveat.
When we add a feature, if it's completely broken and awful, we probably
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Yes, I would suggest it is urgent that we improve all of Chromium as
rapidly as possible.
I AGREE THINGS THAT ARE BAD SHOULD BE LESS BAD
PLEASE TO BE FIX THIS NOW I CANOT TELL ALL MY FREIND TO SWITCH FROM FOXFIRE
PK
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
As your prize, I send you a video of RMS dancing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pube5Aynsls
RMS is disturbed that video of himself is available on a site not run by
Free Software. I am just disturbed at that video of
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.orgwrote:
I am thinking it might be better to coalesce these two types,
since one is a strict subset of another, and just have a mode on the
object that indicates it's using a custom frame. Then when we switch
DWM off we can
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Mike Pinkerton pinker...@chromium.orgwrote:
Here's a very quick list of things that I see us as needing in order
to get to something that we can call dogfood:
- bookmark bar
- class/nib infrastructure for tab dragging, even if we don't drag tabs
Because of
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
I think you're advocating this:
- Disable the flags we can't support - Leave the flags in
chromium/debug builds
Yes, this is much better than filtering these out of UMA.
PK
Googlers may remember that one of my brainstorm ideas for Chromium was
readability mode, a way to temporarily get rid of everything on a page
except the main article. Now a company has prototyped this in the wild
using a bookmarklet. Watch the intro video here.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:34 AM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm guessing I'm not the only one who's irritated by it. Can we make it so
that only members can post to chromium-reviews? We can automatically
subscribe everyone who's sent a review in the last month or something.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Daniel A. White dwh...@thetrueaplus.comwrote:
Thought I let you guys know. Amazing!
What was the answer? (I'm assuming the question was What is Google
Chrome?)
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Scott Violet s...@chromium.org wrote:
Those are easy. If the test never worked them DEFER.
I agree, if it's not a regression, and (as Linus mentioned) not a
hang/crash/leak, let's punt. I only care about not regressing tests that
are regressions, not sure how
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Avi Drissman a...@google.com wrote:
The term activatable, as seen in RenderWidgetHostViewWin, etc, is not
clearly defined.
Windows has two concepts relating to focus: focus and activation.
A focused window is the window that would receive input events if its
Without looking at the code, some thoughts:
* Scrollbars in web content differ from scrollbars in native content.
Native content can use native scrollbars. Web content cannot (web content
cannot use native widgets within pages as then pages can just recursively
include 10,000 iframes and take
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.comwrote:
What do others think about including this font with Chrome and making
it available to content in the font-family list by default? Also, it
occurs to me that including the Droid TTF files on the Google CDN
might make
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Siddhartha Chattopadhyay
sidc...@chromium.org wrote:
A new feature to add to Chromium would be automatic spelling correction. A
design doc for this feature can be found at
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Book'em Dano daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I notice that JSONStringValueSerializer in chrome\common takes a
narrow string. It expects a UTF8 encoded string, right (i.e. it
doesn't have to be ASCII only)?
The general pattern in the code is that
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Nick Baum nickb...@chromium.org wrote:
We want to start out with a very conservative approach so as to not be
annoying. We considered using the hunspell suggestions, but we wanted
something that captured one particular, common type of misspelling. However,
I
Avi/Adam, you got nominated on IRC as relevant people for this.
In http://codereview.chromium.org/66013 I'm changing the way some of the
RenderWidgetHost[View] functions work slightly. I need to coordinate to get
Mac and Linux changes to accommodate this in (I can't land my patch as-is
because of
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
X sends an expose message to us
We ask for a BackingStore
We don't have one, so we start a timed wait on the renderer to send us a
paint
We get the paint, so we create the backing store and copy the bitmap to it.
With
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com
wrote:
I strongly suggest picking Darin's brain directly for more detail as he
has
a stronger grasp of this than I do :)
I don't want to block
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
It's not that don't want to deal with this right now, it's that I
believe that the current behaviour is correct on Linux.
Yes, I grasped that.
I've reread
your patch and email and I haven't understood any arguments
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Avi Drissman a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.comwrote:
it doesn't fire on Mac and at some point Avi will fix the Mac
implementation.
Side note: I now understand the issue this fixes and the fix
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Mark Larson (Google) m...@chromium.orgwrote:
So, please don't do any work in a DCHECK. We're lucky that the above
example failed to compile, but it's possible to write code like this that
would compile and just cause bizarre errors in release builds.
...and I
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Nikita Ofitserov himi...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest:
Don't try to get pid dynamically, but create on startup in datadir
file 'ChromePid' or something like that with pid.
Creating files during startup would slow startup too much. Chrome crashing
would leave a
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Greg Spencer gspen...@google.com wrote:
1) I'd like to add some explicit routines for converting to/from UTF8 and
UTF16. While it's nice (and important) that FilePath uses the platform's
native string, we've found that many third party libraries have made
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Greg Spencer gspen...@google.com wrote:
So, I was unable to find the conversion utilities in base that do the
conversion to/from UTF8. What are they called? If I missed them (and I
looked for a while before I gave up), then maybe they need to be more
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Mohamed Mansour
m0.interact...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Chromium users, there has been some discussion on IRC regarding
redirecting users from #chrome to #chromium, etc. Please take a look at
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=7776 for the feature
There's actually a lot of useful things in this email for someone to learn
if they're seeking to become a more regular contributor.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Mohamed Mansour
m0.interact...@gmail.comwrote:
I usually browse the issue tracker for HelpWanted tags, and try to solve
those
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Jason A. Spiro jasonspi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org
wrote:
IRC is absolutely the wrong
method for support. Encouraging that makes everything worse.
Why is it a bad method for support?
Because
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote:
What does this mean? This means that our unforking efforts have
finally paid off -- we can now pull directly from WebKit upstream!
Nice! Please do write something for the Chromium blog! We need posts
there.
PK
If you check in patches for someone else, please do the following:* Mention
the person who wrote the patch.
* Since your gcl change is not the same Rietveld issue as the original
review, put a link to the original review in your change description.
* Put a BUG= or http://crbug.com/... line in so
2009/5/3 Evan Martin e...@chromium.org
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
How should I check whether someone has filed the CLA if it's his first
patch
going to be committed?
I don't know if there's a way to verify. I just ask if they're not
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm asking on the dev list because I do not feel I will get my answer
anywhere else.
Not only will asking here not necessarily get you an answer but it will
waste our time as we try and implement things people need and
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Leith le...@leithalweapon.geek.nz wrote:
Has anyone started work on integrating Chrome with the new thumbnail
previews in Windows 7?
You should probably search the bug tracker for relevant bugs for this. Any
information would presumably be there.
PK
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
Note that using cookies, as Peter suggests, won't work either.
The lesson is, never listen to me.
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
Something lazy-loaded after renderer start blocks system IO looking for a
nonexistent DLL or network drive or something? I dunno, I'd try and trace
what the IO calls being made are.
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I just committed a change that deletes our local copy of WebCore and
JavaScriptCore (we use the wtf/ directory from here).
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=15644
This change should be fairly
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:12 PM, sryo teodal...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks really good, but brings a usability problem: the hovered
entry's title has low contrast with it's bakcground color:
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/8058/omnibox2lowcontrast.png
That looks like something worthy of
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
+1 - I don't like the transparency either. I'd prefer opaque.
Me too
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
That is a good idea. We could just use the same download UI and
everything. When you click yes in the shelf, it just leads to the
normal install dialog.
Note, the plan is to change when the download prompting occurs to
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
One feature of #webkit that I find useful is that every commit is
summarized by the CIA-bot.
http://cia.vc/
Funny, that's a feature I find utterly useless and annoying and I hate it.
Why do you like it?
PK
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
Of course there are other ways of doing those things (like reading the
buildbot page or subscribing to the RSS), but I find IRC useful since
I'm half paying attention to it anyway.
OK, that makes some sense. I think if
2009/5/12 PhistucK phist...@gmail.com
Or give me an option to always always always go to google.com :()
www.google.com/ncr ?
By the way - is the Extensions system slated for the Chrome 2 release, or is
it not a requirement for it?
No
(Because I saw some messages, though not from
https://jetpack.mozillalabs.com/
Similar-sounding goals to Chrome extensions: web-tech-based, no restart
needed, backwards-compatible, etc.
Not sure how much overlap there is between the two. Any Mozillians who read
this (hi beltzner!) feel free to chime in. It would be very cool if these
would
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:06 PM, nakro yoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote:
Sub BuildStartupProject()
Dim sb As SolutionBuild = DTE.Solution.SolutionBuild
Dim projName As String = sb.StartupProjects(0)
sb.BuildProject(sb.ActiveConfiguration.Name, projName, False)
End
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:15 PM, nakro yoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote:
should have read a cool macro to only BUILD the startup
project .
OK, I understand what you're trying to do.
Generally when working I either want to test-compile the file I'm in
(ctrl-F7) or actually run the program
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
- The Notification service most definitely is designed to only work on
the UI thread. It and its users assume notifications happen on one
thread and synchronously.
FWIW, the second sentence here is true, but the first is
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
Don't bother doing an assertion when the next line will crash anyway:
DCHECK(foo);
foo-DoSomething();
I mostly do what Brett does, but I do sometimes DCHECK in cases like this,
where the DCHECK is placed at the very
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Also, the statement that we should always recover from a failed DCHECK
seems very wrong to me.
I agree, we should almost never recover from a DCHECK. 90+% of the time,
DCHECK is better than if (condition) {
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Book'em Dano daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Did I miss the announcement that we were going to VS
2008?
Not that I know of. Perhaps your local copy is modified somehow?
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Book'em Dano daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
The version of chrome.sln on the trunk (http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/
chrome/trunk/src/chrome/chrome.sln?view=markup) contains
snipMicrosoft Visual Studio Solution File, Format Version 9.00/
snip
This would seem
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Evan Stade est...@chromium.org wrote:
I'll also take this opportunity to complain that the dangerous
downloads dialog warning icon is way off center on windows. (see
attachment. for comparison purposes, I've also attached linux ;)
The entire download bar UI
1 - 100 of 451 matches
Mail list logo
