Hi all,
We plan to use a 7204 NPE-G2 with 3 STM-1 (PA-POS-OC3SMI ),
will the 7206 NPE-G2 support 3x155Mbps traffic?
Regards.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010, RAZAFINDRATSIFA Rivo Tahina wrote:
Hi all,
We plan to use a 7204 NPE-G2 with 3 STM-1 (PA-POS-OC3SMI ),
will the 7206 NPE-G2 support 3x155Mbps traffic?
According to my interpretation of
Here is a show version from one of our 7200 G2:
ATM STM-1 card placed in slot 2 and 3
PCI bus mb1 (Slots 1, 3 and 5) has a capacity of 600 bandwidth points.
Current configuration on bus mb1 has a total of 300 bandwidth points.
This configuration is within the PCI bus capacity and is supported.
Dear all,
I am trying to set snmp agent in my PIX 506E FW(192.168.1.1). I am not good in
PIX FW. The following is my configuration
PIX506# sh snmp-server
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server community mosnmpcommunity
no snmp-server enable traps
After command, I can ping
This is not possible on 67xx line card.
This card have only dropped statistics via show queueing int XXX
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:50 +, Edward Iong wrote:
I am trying to set snmp agent in my PIX 506E FW(192.168.1.1). I am not
good in PIX FW. The following is my configuration
PIX506# sh snmp-server
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server community mosnmpcommunity
no
Dear all,
How to make a bandwidth shape with upload and download side on Cisco 3750
Catalyst at OSI Layer2 ?
Best regards,
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
show queueing int xxx detailed in SXI seems to know about 5-min
average bps and 30-s bytes counters
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Ruslan Pustovoytov ru...@inbox.ru wrote:
This is not possible on 67xx line card.
This card have only dropped statistics via show queueing int XXX
There must be two crashinfo files for SP and RP and show tech-support. You
need to collect it when you contact tech support.
TAC usually has decoders from their developer to decode hex values in
traceback.
-Traceback= 41183348 41180F04 40DADF40 40FFA1CC 40FFA4D8 40752F58 40752F44
Krunal
On
conf t
mls qos
!
class-map match-all CLASSNAME
match ip dscp 0
!
policy-map POLICYNAME
class CLASSNAME
police 100 187500 exceed-action drop
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
service-policy input POLICYNAME
service-policy output POLICYNAME
!
end
The numbers in the policy are CIR and BC
Thanks guys...
I was afraid I would hear your solutions
I think I will try to persuade Cisco to solve this issue, and in the mean
time have Rancid ignore the level 7's :-(
Martin
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]
Hello,
We would like to get some advices from you regarding the configuration of
iBGP Route Reflection.
To prevent too many iBGP sessions inside our network, here is what we would
like to do:
1. The two main routers connected to the upstreams (both get full
internet table from
Hello,
Small update on this one, got the crashfile info found this :
Cache error detected!
CPO_ECC (reg 26/0): 0x00BE
CPO_CACHERI (reg 27/0): 0xA000
CP0_CAUSE (reg 13/0): 0x0400
Real cache error detected. System will be halted.
Error: Primary data cache, fields: data,
Looks like some of you folks were already hit by this :
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/108155
Hum
Y.
2010/7/6 Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr
Hello,
Small update on this one, got the crashfile info found this :
Cache error detected!
CPO_ECC (reg
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 14:05 +0200, Andriy Bilous wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Ruslan Pustovoytov wrote:
This is not possible on 67xx line card.
This card have only dropped statistics via show queueing int XXX
show queueing int xxx detailed in SXI seems to know about 5-min
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 5:51 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; sunny.ie...@esprit.com
Subject: [c-nsp] snmp config in PIX
Dear all,
I am trying to set snmp agent in my PIX 506E FW(192.168.1.1). I am not good
in PIX FW. The following is my
i have cisco router 1841 configured for dial in using vpn client
the user obtains an IP address from a local pool configured on the router
i want to be able to assign a username from the tacacs and each user obtain a
specific ip address
Hi group,
A portion of our metroE network is as below:
CPE1---DSLAM1--(Gi9/19)PE
CPE2---DSLAM2--(Gi9/20)PE
The two DSLAM assign the same vlan 147 to traffic sending from CPE1 CPE2,
port G9/19 G9/20 on PE are configured as trunk that allow vlan 147,
You might want to try clear ip route all
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
-Original Message-
From:
Hi.
We are seeing a problem with high cpu usage on a VIP4/80 card when
traffic hits above 10Mbps. Has anyone seen this type of behavior?
Details are below.
The IOS version is rsp-pv-mz.124-23.
GigabitEthernet6/0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is cyBus GigabitEthernet Interface,
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010, Rin wrote:
I have two questions here:
1. Is there any method that the router does not additional
configuration on port configured with port-security MAC sticky?
2. Anyone has other idea rather than configure port-security to detect
same MAC address on CPE?
It looks like you have a physical-layer problem, given the number of
framing errors in the output you provided.
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9
Actually, we had a bad PA that I replaced, but did not clear the
counters. The errors are not incrementing. I just now cleared the
counters on this interface to make sure. We installed the VIP4/80 to
replace the VIP2/50 that was in there with the same issue except that
it was at 99% CPU
Ahh, okay. Are you running DCEF globally and CEF switching on the
interface?
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
Yep. We saw this with another VIP2/50 in the chassis as well that had
a 100BaseTX card in it and upgraded it to a VIP4/80 and that problem
went away, but this one still has issues.
-Troy
On Jul 6, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
Ahh, okay. Are you running DCEF
What does the output of 'sh int switching' look like?
David
On 7/6/2010 2:39 PM, Troy Beisigl wrote:
Actually, we had a bad PA that I replaced, but did not clear the
counters. The errors are not incrementing. I just now cleared the
counters on this interface to make sure. We installed the
Could you send a sanitized configuration of the port?
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
-Original
Turns out to be an issue with the one of the upstream providers. They
were able to re-create the problem and are working on a fix.
Chris Gotstein, Network Engineer, U.P. Logon/Computer Connection U.P.
http://uplogon.com | +1 906 774 4847 | ch...@uplogon.com
On 7/5/2010 7:46
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone run into BGP VPNv4 scanner wedgies? I appear to have 4 boxes,
SUP720-3C running 12.2(33)SXI3 with this problem:
RTR-1#sh bgp vpnv4 unicast all pending-prefixes
...
1050 pending network entries using 143850 bytes of
GigabitEthernet6/0/0 feed to cat1.5/6
Throttle count 1352
Drops RP 38775 SP 0
SPD Flushes Fast 81140SSE 0
SPD Aggress Fast 0
SPD Priority Inputs
What about the other interfaces? It's not using dCEF for a lot of
packets. Are there some non-dCEF capable interfaces on that router?
David
On 7/6/2010 4:05 PM, Troy Beisigl wrote:
GigabitEthernet6/0/0 feed to cat1.5/6
Throttle count 1352
Drops RP
Not much to the config. I have included both sides of the connection.
the other end is a 6500
7507:
interface GigabitEthernet6/0/0
description feed to cat1.3/6
bandwidth 100
ip address X.X.X.X 255.255.255.240
load-interval 30
negotiation auto
end
6500:
interface GigabitEthernet3/6
We've seen this in the past when 'per packet' or 'round robin' load balancing
(sometimes called 'operating mode') was turned on on the host. The host would
send alternate packets down each NIC in their team thus causing the flapping.
This round robin mode is the default for at least some
Yes. There are several multilink PPP and multilink frame-relay
interfaces that are across two VIPs that would not do dCEF, but the
rest of the traffic in and out of this chassis would/should be. There
are 5 PA-MC-T3 cards and 2 PA-2T3 cards in the chassis along with this
interface and a
On 2010.07.06 08:53, Thierry wrote:
1.The two main routers connected to the upstreams (both get full
internet table from them) will be Route Reflectors. We will create a cluster
on these two routers.
Since nobody responded yet, I'll put my neck on the line...
Personally, I wouldn't use
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Steve Bertrand
My network has to be this way (at this time). Many of my routers don't
have enough interfaces to full-mesh. I used to put a switch in front of
many of
Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 06:49:04PM +0100, Alan Buxey:
Hi,
I have an issue when I configure a l2tp-class with a password in it, every
time I do a sho run the level 7 encrypted password is shown differently.
When using Rancid for config backups, every time Rancid runs I receive a
37 matches
Mail list logo
