On 11/20/20 07:06, aar...@gvtc.com wrote:
I don't know if I fully understand why a vendor EOL's a piece of equipment
or software version. There are probably various reasons why a vendor
chooses to do this. I feel as the customer that just because a vendor
thinks something is EOL, doesn't mean
On 9/10/20 10:24, Doug McIntyre wrote:
The NBASE-T speeds are popular in WiFi AP as the speeds one could get under
ideal
circumstances started pushing over 1G limits.
The inclusion of POE with NBASE-T also helps on the AP use case.
___
cisco-nsp
On 9/10/20 09:16, aar...@gvtc.com wrote:
Interesting... I've never heard of/seen 2.5 gig nor 5 g, geez, what is that?
802.3bz
Options for speeds beyond 1Gbps but maybe you can't (cheaply easily
quickly) rip and replace all your building/house cabling to make the
leap to 10GbE. You can do
On 7/21/20 09:54, joe mcguckin wrote:
We don’t buy anything that can’t be managed with a serial connection. That
means no fancy web based guis. Licensing is in the same category… A piece of
equipment has to do something extraordinary before we’d consider purchasing it,
if it implements some
On 7/20/20 9:58 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 20/Jul/20 19:20, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Does Cisco no longer honor previously purchased perpetual CSR1000V
licenses now that they're EOS? I had a host die and reinstalling the
VM (ESXi) from the OVA results in a new serial number my license file
won't
Does Cisco no longer honor previously purchased perpetual CSR1000V
licenses now that they're EOS? I had a host die and reinstalling the VM
(ESXi) from the OVA results in a new serial number my license file won't
work on, and trying to use the online license manager to rehost it
claims the new
On 11/3/13, 6:31 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
That's a shame. I don't understand the need to replace something that
worked reliably with something that doesn't solely because it's 'sexy'
(no, really, it isn't...) or web-2.0-y.
Because you can't ever be done therefore it needs a rewrite
On 6/1/13 6:13 AM, Lukasz Bromirski wrote:
On Jun 1, 2013, at 4:35 AM, Matthew Crocker matt...@corp.crocker.com wrote:
I'm looking for some advise on a C or J router.
Requirements:
200 mbps of throughput (small packets)
4 GigE interfaces (copper or SFP)
ip verify unicast reverse-path
On 5/29/13 11:58 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 29/05/2013 17:45, Matthew Huff wrote:
I agree with Chuck example of how to do it. That's how I would do
it.
However, as Chuck says cross your fingers. I've had too many bus
stalls and/or sup crashes that I would only do this during a
maintenance
Am I on crack or are messages being sent from 2010 to the list?
~Seth
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 2/20/13 6:13 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Mack McBride wrote:
At 768k you are effectively limiting your IPv6 table to 128k (you
can't really go more than that if you expect to use IPv6). I recommend
a 640k/192k split.
Well, I believe IPv4 will hit 640k before IPv6
On 1/15/13 6:08 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
Do you do any IP address summarisation in your network? Summarisation breaks
forwarding in MPLS networks.
So ospf summary-address statements will break MPLS? I guess I learned
something today to never try.
~Seth
On 1/8/13 9:33 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the spec sheet for the SUP2TXL on cisco's site and it mentions
that you can upgrade the x6704 and the x6716 with the DFC4 to make it
compatible with the SUP2T but it doesn't say anything about the X6708.
Does anyone have any solid
On 9/26/12 8:41 AM, harbor235 wrote:
Can anyone tell me the requirements for rack clearances in all directions
when building server rooms (too small for datacenter size)
I seem to remember 3 feet in any direction? Of course you have equipment
loading and unloading so front and back clearances
On 9/26/12 10:17 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:04:57AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
3' in back and 4' in front.
Those being inch, yard, feet, or what?
I guess it's feet... so roughly 1m, right?
My apologizes, ' is an alternate abbreviation for foot.
http
On 9/21/12 8:56 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Joseph Mays wrote:
interface FastEthernet0/22
description Trunk to sw2.dist.win.net
duplex full
speed 100
switchport access vlan 22
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,201-224,1002-1005
switchport mode trunk
no cdp enable
The
Does anyone have a good intro or beginner's guide to MPLS that they
like? Something succinct and focused that's not a 500 page
my-first-Cisco book. The situation I'm thinking is putting someone in
front of some routers and switches in a lab setting and saying take
these and set them up to do MPLS
On 7/9/12 3:13 PM, Spencer Barnes wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to move to a new ISP. Our old one provided a T3 and an external
IP range. The gateway IP they gave to us to assign to our router interface
was on a different subnet than the external IPs they provided so having
another
On 6/25/12 7:50 AM, Josh Baird wrote:
And guess what the Infoblox appliances run? :)
They run with vendor support. =) You can, of course, DIY fancy NTP
server solutions:
http://www.febo.com/pages/soekris/index.html
On 6/22/12 1:03 PM, Ross Halliday wrote:
This is an ideal use case for PPPoE. We just return RADIUS attribute
Framed-IP-Address to the access concentrator and off they go! As long as a
subscriber can get to PPPoE they can get that IP... doesn't even need to be
the same service type. IP
On 4/30/12 7:42 AM, Dave wrote:
Good morning list,
I apologize for what is a long winded explanation followed by what may
be a 'common knowledge' type of question, but I did try google first to
find this information and either I'm not using the correct search terms
or I am truly missing
On 12/8/11 7:58 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Gert Doering wrote:
The best choice? Don't use 6148-GE-TX modules. They are fundamentally
broken (8 ports share one ASIC with a single-GE uplink, one port that's
full will block out the other 7 ports, ...). It's even worse if
you
On 12/8/11 9:38 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Seth Mattinen wrote:
And the 6148A supports jumbo frames, if that matters. But yeah, it has
2.6MB per port buffers instead of 1MB shared across 8 ports.
It's supposed to have more than that.
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod
On 10/11/11 8:50 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 11/10/11 16:25, Vincent Aniello wrote:
What can be done to reduce the amount of time it takes BGP to detect
the failure of an Internet connection and start routing traffic
through another Internet connection?
Can you be a bit more specific about
I recently picked up some HWIC-2FE and 1FE cards. For fun I stuck two
HWIC-2FE cards and one HWIC-1FE card into a lab 2811. To my surprise, it
started up indicating 7 Ethernet interfaces and properly identified all
interfaces in the config.
According to Cisco* the maximum supported HWIC-2FE cards
On 7/26/11 6:01 AM, Farooq Razzaque wrote:
Dear CJ
Tanks for your reply
yes the ISDN is up.
Please find attached Topology observation during testing, show run of
branch.
You might want to go ahead and change your passwords, too.
~Seth
On 7/26/2011 15:41, Joseph Mays wrote:
I have a T3/E3 card in a cisco 3640 that I want to use as a serialT3,
but it does not show up as a serial interface, nor is there even a
controller line in the config. It only shows up in the hardware
infomration as a Subrate T3/E3 port. What does this
On 6/30/11 7:34 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
My NMS has the CISCO-ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB installed in it, so it nicely tells me
that I have low light levels on an interface:
CISCO-ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entitySensorMIBNotificationPrefix (1)
CISCO-ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entSensorThresholdValue.1045.2 : -80,
On 6/27/2011 11:59, Jason Greenberg wrote:
Can someone advise me as to why a 3750 L3 Switch (Metro Model) wouldn't
outperform a 7300 series router as a multi-homed BGP gateway? ISRs and
Enterprise class routers are still quite a bit more expensive than the L3
Switches, but I'm starting to
On 6/21/11 4:18 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 08:41:13PM +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
It's a platform dependent feature, primarily on the newer ISR G2s and
880s/890s. The original ISR's, 870s, 7200 etc have no such enforcement
under either 12.4 or 15.X.
... yet.
On 6/20/11 10:58 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Does anyone know what's up with ipv6 command on Dot11Radio interfaces? I
have CISCO1812W running ADVENTERPRISEK9 15.1(4)M and there no such
command at all. Searching Cisco bug toolkit doesn't reveal any bugs for
me. Software/hardware limitation?
I
On 6/20/2011 11:22, Jens Link wrote:
Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru writes:
Does anyone know what's up with ipv6 command on Dot11Radio interfaces? I
have CISCO1812W running ADVENTERPRISEK9 15.1(4)M and there no such
command at all. Searching Cisco bug toolkit doesn't reveal any bugs for
On 5/17/11 10:09 PM, hamid tavoli wrote:
hello
after install aim-ssl3 module in Router Cisco 3845 appear this message and
cpu process after enabling the IPSEC over than 90% and Router Hang.
pls help me to resolve this message:
AIM Type 0x4f5 is not supported by this platform
my ios is
On 5/3/2011 05:23, krunal shah wrote:
From Release notes
Release 12.2(33)SXJ and later releases do not support Cisco IOS Software
Modularity. With redundant supervisor engines, eFSU upgrade from a Cisco IOS
Software Modularity image to a Release 12.2(33)SXJ image might result in a
Is there a document out there that describes the limits for the neighbor
discovery table for IPv6 on the 6500?
~Seth
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On 4/26/11 7:23 AM, Leigh Harrison wrote:
Is a 6500 still the best bang for your buck or does the lack of anything
over 10G ports hold it back?
In the end you're still only looking at 40G per slot. The density won't
be there if you're thinking 10G at the same levels as gigabit Ethernet.
On 4/25/11 2:28 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
I'll have to test this, but I'm assuming since they're separate SVIs,
you could run un-numbered from the shared IPv4 range, but give each SVI
its own IPv6.
I've done that with IPv6 and can confirm that it works. (But not on a
Sup720.)
~Seth
On 3/28/2011 12:36, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
IPv6 supported? No. Probably coming in october this year.
Last I heard was 'sometime 2012' for IPv6 support -- Totally
unacceptable for any device doing L3 in SP environments, IMO -- so I
consider it a L2-only box.
The only thing any of
On 3/16/2011 11:13, Neal Rauhauser wrote:
I've just inherited a plant with a few dozen WS-C2950-EI doing access
duty - an apartment complex. We've had just ridiculous stuff, like certain
models of customer NAT device that will helpfully reforward an unknown
unicast frame(!), and I've
On 2/24/2011 10:02, Lawrence wrote:
Here is the further information that you have requested. I am using
iperf unix client/server to test my speed. I have the same 45M limit
if I try a bit torrent. I have a cisco 7200 router that is connected
via a mvp copper to fiber converter. The t3s are
On 2/17/2011 12:10, Keegan Holley wrote:
I wouldn't use the 2651 for much else than maybe a door-stop. The 2801
might not be able to do 20M ethernet depending on what else you are asking
it to do. Can you use a switch here? If it's all ethernet than a 3560 or
even a 3550/3750 would be fine.
On 2/16/11 8:49 AM, Benjamin Lovell wrote:
If you look at the spec sheets you will notice a few differences. MAC table
size, default DRAM, routing performance, etc
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet09186a0080159856.html
Most of the other
Are there any release notes out there for the 6500 that indicates
changes/fixes between the B and C versions of the EARL7? I've found a
few things, but nothing exceedingly useful beyond C is the newest one.
~Seth
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On 2/6/11 12:04 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2011-02-06 08:36 -0800), Seth Mattinen wrote:
normal burst = configured rate * (1 byte)/(8 bits) * 1.5 seconds
extended burst = 2 * normal burst
I use same formulae, I'm having hard time imagining situation where you'd
want 1.5s worth of buffering
On 2/6/11 6:24 AM, Righa Shake wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know of a tool that can be used to calculate rate limits on cisco
routers.
Do you mean CAR rate-limit values? Put this in a spreadsheet or any
calculator:
normal burst = configured rate * (1 byte)/(8 bits) * 1.5 seconds
extended burst = 2 *
On 1/27/2011 22:18, Jim Berwick wrote:
The idea that was put on the table already is a 3750 stack (two
switches, feeding each customer two connections) uplinked to two 3845s
to handle layer 3 routing of the customer VLANs and the BGP sessions.
My concern with that setup is the 3845 being
On 1/18/2011 09:52, Jay Hennigan wrote:
We got an alarm that a T3 to a customer was down. PE router showed
interface up, line protocol down. CE router showed down/down. Provider
side goes to an Adtran Opti-mux out OC-12 to Verizon, customer end is a
Verizon mux on premise.
Called Vz and
On 1/13/11 10:00 PM, Christopher J. Wargaski wrote:
Hey Felix--
I work in the 802.11 wireless arena and am also an amateur radio
operator. Aside from finding the offending station, there is really nothing
that can be done to prevent RF signal jamming.
Sure there is: use a wire. ;)
I've been trying to load the power calculator tool and all I'm getting
is a connection reset while page is loading. Is anyone else having
problems with the website?
~Seth
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 1/14/2011 12:34, Ramcharan, Vijay A wrote:
This is working fine for me:
http://tools.cisco.com/cpc/DS.cpc
It seems only broken in Firefox for me; I tried IE 8 and Safari (both on
Windows) and they worked fine. Ugh, it worked fine earlier this week.
~Seth
I think a 2900 (or even a 1900) with advanced IP services will more than
suffice for this. Any comments?
It would work fine (I currently use ISRs in this role), although I have
been seriously considering using MikroTik/Quagga in one of those
dual-core 1U chassis with forward facing ports as a
On 1/2/2011 21:37, Rogelio wrote:
I recently bought a grip of Cisco routers (2600s, 3600s) and Cisco
switches (3560s) for a few hundred dollars, and now I'm putting
together a setup that will let me do the INE CCIE lab exercises.
I was wondering if anyone had a good suggestion for extremely
On 1/1/11 10:01 PM, Jay Nakamura wrote:
I remember using something faster than 2500 with SSH and it was
painfully slow. So, I can't imagine how slow it will be with a 2500.
And with the whole, Cisco is going to prevent you from downloading
software not covered by your contract thing, I don't
On 1/1/11 10:56 PM, Jay Nakamura wrote:
Can you still get smartnets for 2511? I didn't even consider that may
be possible.
I doubt it, last date of support was in 2009*. Although I am curious
what will happen to IOS access for stuff that's considered obsolete, no
support.
~Seth
*
On 12/26/10 4:30 PM, Mike wrote:
We had a few other equipments 'locked up'. The 2970 we pulled apart and
observed a capacitor with tell-tell crust on the top of it, and some
other components that look like they have been heating up lately
(discolored). Everything else seems fine. We're going
On 12/14/10 6:54 AM, Garry wrote:
rant
Having just installed a set of nice ASR1k boxes with rather new IOS, I
noticed Cisco has still (after many years and many IOS releases) not
managed to get Backup Interfaces IPv6 to work with each other ... or
I'm missing something ... but while IPv4
On 12/14/10 10:09 AM, Jay Nakamura wrote:
Just a side note so I can vent, just talked to TAC and the lady
suggested to boot with the old RAM and swap it while the router was
powered on
I hope you didn't pay too much on the smartnet for that suggestion.
The only time I've seen the
On 12/9/2010 12:54, Jon Lewis wrote:
I need to start looking at replacing 3550-48 switches with something
comparable that supports ipv6. I tried using feature navigator, but the
info it was giving me was so suspect I won't even bother repeating it.
My impression from past looks into this
On 12/1/2010 14:12, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
there should be lots of other reasons why ASR9K would be more appropriate
for SP core network... but I just can not gather enough arguments to
initiate an upgrade project so far.
ASR9K gives good NetFlow, 7600 doesn't.
ASR9K doesn't have
On 12/1/2010 14:55, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Dec 2, 2010, at 5:48 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Basically, ASR is a next generation evolution that fixes long-standing
things like this.
I understand why that would appear to be the case, but the reality is that
ASR9K and 7600 have
On 11/24/10 1:33 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
Re Nick,
n...@foobar.org (Nick Hilliard) wrote:
Will try that - this sounds like the easiest way, although I dislike
special constructs normally. But - this would allow me to keep the
portfast setting which definitely helps when dealing with
On 11/24/10 9:04 AM, David Rothera wrote:
Last time I checked the CDP neighbours on one of our access switches with
Polycoms attached they showed up as CDP neighbours, didn't look into it
though
Yep, they support both CDP and LLDP. Earlier versions of the firmware
only support CDP
On 11/19/2010 14:07, Brian Raaen wrote:
I was wondering if there was any legitimate way to get access to IOS for
legacy devices. I have a 2611, 3725 and pair of 2950's in my home lab that I
would like to test some things on. Thanks
Right now any valid service contract will get you access
On 11/17/2010 14:10, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Hey all,
I've been googling and ciscocom searching and have found nothing so far.
I was to 'no service password-recovery' on a old Catalyst 2924. Does anyone
know of a way?
It is in a delicate environment and it doesn't support 'secret', so
On 11/15/2010 11:46, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
I have just received notification below.
[...]
To improve your experience with Cisco and protect your investment in
Cisco Products, we’re pleased to announce the improvement of Software
download
On 10/31/10 5:08 PM, John Neiberger wrote:
Anyway, can you settle this? Let's take a Cisco 4948 as an example.
Does manually configuring 1000/Full on an interface really do much? If
so, what exactly does it do? Does it behave in a non-standard way by
disabling autonegotiation?
Disabling
On 10/13/2010 14:46, Lee Riemer wrote:
The ASA platform is designed for this, whereas I don't see NAT as being
the primary function of a 2811.
I've seen 2800 series routers crash and burn on far smaller networks
than what the OP is looking at. I too would recommend a platform
specifically
On 10/3/2010 16:20, cisco...@secureobscure.com wrote:
Any definitive answers would be greatly appreciated. I would prefer not to
burn up all of my routable address space with p2p /64's however.
There is no definitive answer at this point. I use /112's for link nets.
~Seth
On 9/30/10 5:07 PM, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
Bear in mind that before the IOS license activation, there was no
way to tie for 100% your hardware to specific set of licenses/
feature sets you could download, and no way to check if the device
is still alive. So, the database that is used to
So I went to download the latest image for an ancient router and
received this nifty error message:
Service Agreement Validation Warning:
Please read before downloading software
As part of an ongoing effort to provide you with exceptional service and
support, Cisco is making enhancements to its
On 9/30/2010 15:53, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
On 2010-10-01 00:28, Seth Mattinen wrote:
So I went to download the latest image for an ancient router and
received this nifty error message:
Seeing as how the 3640 went EOS in 2002 and EOL in 2007, it can't have a
service contract or be eligible
On 9/30/2010 16:42, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
On 2010-10-01 01:15, Seth Mattinen wrote:
There's a End of new service attachment - November 2006. So, a
customer activating a 5-year agreement with Cisco on November 2006
could have a support to November 2011. Usually such agrements are made
On 9/29/2010 17:52, Sheremet Roman wrote:
Hi,
I want order Cisco device (Layer 3) with 8 SFP ports, i want RUN BGP
(4-5 fullview) in it.. so i think 512 - 1024 Mb RAM needed.
Device Should be 1U.
Please recommend which device will be optimal for this request?
The obvious choice would
On 9/29/10 6:47 PM, Benjamin Lovell wrote:
I missed the 1 RU part. I can't think of a platform that will do 8SFPs
in 1RU.
The most powerful 1U router I can think of is the 7201.
~Seth
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
About a year ago there were some large-ish threads on the Nexus and a
couple people that had them in production had commented that there were
bugs that made them feel like test subjects, plus a various assortment
of unexpected limitations. How much has this changed over the last year?
I do notice
On 9/27/2010 14:55, Jimmy Changa wrote:
Thanks for the info. I'm looking for a Cisco solution that takes up the
least amount of rack space and can handle full table. Any suggestions?
I'll add another recommendation: 7201. It is basically a one-slot
7200VXR NPE-2G with 4 gig-e ports in a 1U
On 9/26/10 8:26 AM, Andy Dills wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, Christopher J. Wargaski wrote:
Hey Jeff--
This year I installed a video WAN comprised of several 3845 routers
with the NM-1T3/E3 for point to point DS3s (that is all, nothing
else). The 3845 routers list at $13,000 and the
On 9/24/2010 12:48, Jeff Wojciechowski wrote:
Definitely planning on having the cable guys extend our dmarc with pre-made
cables.
How do you know if the DS3 signal is too hot?
You'll see errors on your interface counters. However, I have never seen
this personally with the NM-1T3/E3
On 9/22/10 10:31 PM, Jon Simola wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Peder pe...@networkoblivion.com wrote:
Does anybody have a good rule of thumb as to what type of coax to use for
DS3 over various distances? I know it has to be 75ohm, but have read it can
be RG-59 or RG-6.
I've only
On 9/23/10 2:32 AM, Jeffrey Denton wrote:
Looking at getting a couple of 3945s. NM-16ESW-1GIG is being
recommended by one of my colleagues. He prefers the easy of use, not
having to session in to the module. It's been pointed out that the
router IOS will have to devote some of it's time to
On 9/23/10 9:05 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Pretend
it's like having a 2690 series switch in module form; you are saving
space and combining management into a single device.
Whoops, I meant 2960. It's like an L2 only switch.
~Seth
___
cisco-nsp
I was mistaken; the Cisco cable I have is Belden 9555 RG-59/U.
~Seth
- Reply message -
From: Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2010 08:34
Subject: [c-nsp] DS3 Length over RG-6 or RG-59
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 9/22/10 10:31 PM, Jon Simola wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22
I'm trying to figure out QoS on a 2960 - something I've read about a lot
but never had to do before. I'm very simply attempting to limit a
customer to speed X, 8M for example. So far I have this:
!
mls qos srr-queue input bandwidth 100 1
mls qos srr-queue input buffers 100 0
mls qos srr-queue
On 9/15/10 2:26 AM, Walter Keen wrote:
Not many options for you I'm afraid. Some people filter out routes
smaller than a /24. Even if you had a /24 from ISP1, you would then
have to get their permission to have ISP2 advertise it. Most aren't
willing to do this.
Is a micro (/24)
On 9/15/2010 13:32, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:13:35 +0100, you wrote:
It's also looks like Cisco may be vaguely moving in the direction of
locking CCO accounts down to be able to access only software downloads
for which there are active smartnet contracts.
On 9/14/10 6:00 AM, Jason Gurtz wrote:
[Comments in-line]
From: ftp_download_feedback(mailer list)
[mailto:ftp_download_feedb...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 20:47
Subject: Important Message from Cisco Technical Support Manager,
Software
Downloads
Cisco has recently
On 9/1/10 7:55 AM, bored to death wrote:
hi,
thanks for the reply.
the document you pointed out
(http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf)
was good for the start, thank you. but it was very limited.
it just had the result for switching
On 9/1/2010 09:04, Christopher J. Wargaski wrote:
Thanks for posting the URL for the router performance matrix. Anyone
know of a similar matrix for switches (L2 L3) and firewalls?
Google cisco switch performance
~Seth
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On 8/31/10 1:27 PM, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
What's the difference between the C6500 and the 7600? Just software?
Different business units within Cisco. See archives for plenty more.
~Seth
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 8/31/2010 14:44, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 04:27:14 am Sridhar Ayengar
wrote:
What's the difference between the C6500 and the 7600?
Just software?
Oh no, you're going to wake Gert :-).
I always find Gert's input quite educational. ;)
~Seth
On 8/30/2010 12:30, Nick Voth wrote:
I'm most familiar with the 7206 VXR series, but that seems like over kill
for this solution. Anyone have any general recommendations or guidance you'd
be willing to share?
The 7206 would be appropriate if you need to move a gigabit of traffic.
~Seth
On 8/20/10 7:44 AM, Andrew Miehs wrote:
I guess the differing opionions have to do with age and brand of hardware.
I found Auto the best running HP Procurve switches with and Supermicro and
HP Proliant DL360 G5 servers (nothing older than 2004). I had no end of
problems with old PA Risc
On 8/19/2010 12:26, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:52:48AM -0600, John Neiberger wrote:
Adam, you are my new best friend. I've been saying this for the past
few years and people still think I'm crazy. I flat out refuse to
manually configure speed and duplex for someone
On 7/29/2010 15:07, Paul Stewart wrote:
We have several in production but have never pushed them to their limits.
One that comes to mind is a 3825 with max memory/max flash - it's going DHCP
services to 1200 students in a university residence, handing off a few meg
of voice traffic to those
On 7/26/2010 13:18, Jason Gurtz wrote:
No problems here from 93.160.0.0/13. (I hope I didn't jinx it this
way. :-)
I was able to get it working by using Internet Explorer. Strange that a
browser could affect the Java applet. Perhaps a cookie issue in the
Chrome profile.
As part of the
On 7/22/10 10:11 PM, Joe Maimon wrote:
Mike wrote:
Howdy,
This isn't exactly cisco-centric, but it's certainly related
operationally.
I operate a county wide isp network and I have about 15 different pops.
I equip each with APC700/1400's and with XR battery packs, with the goal
being
On 7/22/2010 08:45, Mike wrote:
a) went berserk and flooded the network with garbage
b) issued spurious turn off ups commands to the ups
c) began automated self test cycles that shut off the ups (even when
self-test is disabled!)
I further have experienced UPSs that for
On 7/14/10 7:41 AM, TCIS List Acct wrote:
We are using a boatload of aging 3550-EMI switches (-48s and -12Ts
mostly) as our distribution layer in our Co-lo facilities. The switches
talk a little bit of OSPF and iBGP back to the core (uplinked over the 2
Gig-E ports). All customers have their
On 7/3/10 9:52 AM, Chris Gotstein wrote:
We are a small ISP, using a 7204VXR as our gateway router to our 2
upstream providers. We have a full DS3 coming from one provider and a
75Mbs fiber connection from another provider. We having issues with
lagging when trying to run speedtests and
On 7/1/10 12:30 AM, Jan Gregor wrote:
Hi,
On 06/30/2010 02:39 PM, Jan Gregor wrote:
Hi,
one of our customers requested PI adresses from RIPE (for whatever
reason) and got back /26.
Opinions?
Best regards,
Jan
Will anybody accept a prefix smaller than a /24 (we won't for one ;-) ?
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
