Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 6500/SUP720-3BXL - 7600-SIP-400 => VPDN for ppp connection ?

--- Begin Message --- I don't think you can do VPDN on 7600. I'm sure we looked at this a couple of years ago and it is not supported and doesn't work (do it on 7200 or ASR instead). https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11126991/7600-and-pptp From: Lukas Tribus

Re: [c-nsp] SFP DOM SNMP Polling?

this way because they would do it via writing to the EEPROM which is bad for it. Not saying whether they could do it some different way that would make it supportable, but who knows. May be some fundamental shortcoming/limitation of their design (or their OEM's design). $0.02 Tony On Tue, Nov 22

Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance

the vasileft/right interface commands (someone else was testing something under that IOS version). Thanks, Tony. From: James Bensley <jwbens...@gmail.com> To: Cisco Network Service Providers <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Sent: Thursday, 13 Octobe

Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance

--- Begin Message --- VASI is only on IOS-XE is it not ? - Original Message - From: James Bensley To: Cisco Network Service Providers Sent: Tuesday, 11 October 2016, 19:35 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance You can use

[c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance

the one on the other end does not. Should this be working ? What am I doing wrong ? It seems like I'm missing something fairly basic ?? Many Thanks, Tony. --- End Message --- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.ne

[c-nsp] HQos on 7600 port-channels

n this cat ? Thanks,Tony. --- End Message --- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] DSCP and Queue counters on 7600s

hat is happening (eg. tcpdump, wireshark, etc).2. I have never used it, but there is a thing called "PFC QoS statistics data export" which MIGHT do what you want (purely based on what the description of it says). Best of luck,Tony. From: James Bensley <jwbens...@gmail.com&g

Re: [c-nsp] DSCP and Queue counters on 7600s

ook something useful up to see what is happening (eg. tcpdump, wireshark, etc). 2. I have never used it, but there is a thing called "PFC QoS statistics data export" which MIGHT do what you want (purely based on what the description of it says). Best of luck, Tony.

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7600 Router Related

the license (ie. it's honour system). You said you're wanting to migrate to the 7600, what are you migrating FROM ? regards, Tony. - Original Message - From: Shoaib Farhan <farhan.sho...@gmail.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Sent: Sunday, 27 September 2015, 16:06 Subject: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs ISR4000

ing for. It does depend if you're buying new or 2nd hand, but I would think that even purchasing new should be able to get a 2911 for less than 4331 with 300M upgrade option. Although at that low end of the scale, an extra grand or two might not make that much difference. regards, T

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs ISR4000

individually. Best of luck with your upgrade :) regards, Tony. - Original Message - From: Michael Malitsky <malit...@netabn.com> To: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, 22 September 2015, 10:52 Subject: [c-nsp] ASR

Re: [c-nsp] Slightly off-topic - Network Monitoring software

It looks really funky, but quite pricey from what I can see:http://liveaction.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/LiveAction-Product-Update-for-Cisco.pdf Not sure I could justify half to three quarter $m on NMS. From the same PDF, also looks like it might not do so well supporting some of the gear

Re: [c-nsp] Changing Peer IP of VPN headend

, although I'm not really an advocate of upgrading hardware if there isn't really any reason for it. regards,Tony. From: Michael Malitsky malit...@netabn.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, 2 April 2015, 1:05 Subject: [c-nsp] Changing Peer IP of VPN

Re: [c-nsp] SNMP and interface description - IOS-XR

FYI, if you like to be able to get more than 64 bytes, use snmp-server ifmib ifalias long http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/iosxr_r3.7/system_management/command/reference/yr37snmp.html#wp1143236 . Tony On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: On Jan

Re: [c-nsp] ios-xr asr9k ipv6IfAdminStatus does return next instance if it does not exist

Jared, Perhaps you could sell your test suite (to Cisco, for starters). For this kind of thing where the SNMP data structures seem to go all wiggy, it may point to some underlying problem that isn't the SNMP stack itself; though it could well be. Tony On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Jared

[c-nsp] ME3600 dot1q-tunnel

Does anyone have tips on how to get the equivalent of a dot1q-tunnel between a ME3400 and a ME3600 working? I'm trying to provide a pretty basic Metro-E type service for a customer and have a ME-3400 at one site and a ME-3600 at the other site. A ME-3400 sits at the head end to connect the

Re: [c-nsp] Frequent crashes of snmpd on IOS XR 4.3.4 on ASR9k

We have been running the fix since the beginning of this week with no issues. Would recommend you check out the other available SMUs for 4.3.4 proactively. tv On 9/5/2014 7:56 AM, Praveen Sharma (psharma) wrote: Do you have the 434 SMU for CSCum44940 (AA08480) installed on the device?

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7600 and 'show mfib' commands

to a linecard if that was the problem encountered. regards, Tony. From: John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, 29 July 2014 2:47 AM Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 7600 and 'show mfib' commands I'm

Re: [c-nsp] Setting CS0 on ARP traffic

is going to lab it up and see what else might be possible. I don't hold much hope that they will find a solution, but at least they are still trying. regards, Tony. On Thu, 29 May 2014 22:11:51 +1000, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: On 29/05/14 12:50, Tony wrote: Thanks for your

[c-nsp] Setting CS0 on ARP traffic

, Tony. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Setting CS0 on ARP traffic

vlan/service. Thanks, Tony. From: Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com To: Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, 29 May 2014 9:37 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Setting CS0 on ARP traffic First thing, that's a bad carrier. Second

Re: [c-nsp] Setting CS0 on ARP traffic

On Thu, 29 May 2014 22:04:10 +1000, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote: On Thursday, May 29, 2014 01:50:34 PM Tony wrote: Unfortunately that isn't an option. The carrier is NBN (National Broadband Network - Australia) a monopoly government backed provider that has been tasked

Re: [c-nsp] Setting CS0 on ARP traffic

On Thu, 29 May 2014 22:03:22 +1000, Tom Hill t...@ninjabadger.net wrote: On 29/05/14 12:20, Tony wrote: Both of these are sub-optimal solutions, so obviously we'd like to find a way to set the outbound traffic from the ES20 card to CS0 so that it can work how we expected it to. Any

Re: [c-nsp] Billing per Mb (Large ISPs)

and also reports on MBtye usage (which is all traffic graphs are really, interface counter increment divided by time period). regards, Tony. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] qos for broadband aggregation

to be conservative in case the speed of the service drops. Good luck :) regards, Tony. On Wed, 14 May 2014 07:30:14 +1000, Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com wrote: Hi, Does anyone have code snippets or pointers to implemeting QoS solutions for broadband (eg: dsl) subscribers

Re: [c-nsp] 7609 ES+, WS marking behaviour

card. It is also possible that having a port-channel as the logical egress interface is causing some problem, have you tried it without the port-channel ? Port-channels do strange things with QoS in general. regards, Tony. On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 07:08:11 +1000, Victor Lyapunov

Re: [c-nsp] management access BCP?

ports (software selectable, don't need to worry about cables) and any external connectivity you could imagine (3G/4G, PSTN, wifi, IP, etc). regards, Tony. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] Help: attach a service-policy to an interface, without knowing which one is already attached

of no service-policy ... commands that would be run might be about 20 per interface. regards, Tony. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] RAM thing

a little more fraught with danger as the box may never come back after the reboot... regards, Tony. From: Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, 14 February 2014 1:15 AM Subject: [c-nsp] RAM

Re: [c-nsp] Re-licensing secondhand Cisco equipment

/cisco_software_transfer_relicensing_policy.html Although you are supposed to provide prior written notice to Cisco of a transfer permitted under the Exceptions section, wonder how many people do this ? regards, Tony. From: Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org To: Chris Marget ch

Re: [c-nsp] policy map shape being ignored?

as expected. regards, Tony. From: CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com To: td_mi...@yahoo.com td_mi...@yahoo.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, 19 September 2013 9:09 AM Subject: RE: [c-nsp] policy map shape being

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS/VPN Loadbalancing with 2 CPE routers

) between both iBGP eBGP routes. regards, Tony. From: Nicolas KARP li...@karp.fr To: Chris Stand cstand...@gmail.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Saturday, 21 December 2013 11:37 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS/VPN

Re: [c-nsp] 4500X weird issue...

On 12/6/2013 10:25 PM, Jeff Kell wrote: We received our first pair of 4500X switches, and proceeded to try to prepare them for deployment. They came up OK on console access, we got a very basic configuration setup, linked them together, and did an initial VSS pairing. With that successful, we

Re: [c-nsp] Bad routes in MPLS

years of uptime). Thanks, Tony. --- This is what it looked like when it was NOT working (it all looks ok to me): 7609#show mls cef  vrf xyz lookup 10.1.69.36 detail M(4962   ): E | 1 FFF  0 0 0 0   255.255.255.252 V(4962   ): 8 | 1 264  0 0 0 0   10.1.69.36 (A:475208 ,P:1,D:0,m:0 ,B:0

Re: [c-nsp] Bad routes in MPLS

in 3 days time... Thanks again for your valuable input. regards, Tony. From: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Sunday, 24 November 2013 7:10 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Bad routes in MPLS On (2013-11-23 12

[c-nsp] Bad routes in MPLS

to glaze over. Thanks, Tony. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 filters

such. Tony On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Hi, On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:58:26AM -0800, Scott Voll wrote: I'm currently using a filter list: ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$ ip as-path access-list 1 deny .* to make sure I'm not a transit

Re: [c-nsp] policy routing by dest port?

just route it to null0 instead ? I imagine that to apply a policy-route to PPP subscribers you'll need to supply it via RADIUS so that it ends up on virtual-access interfaces. regards, Tony. From: Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com To: 'Cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] cisco 2901 qos

more than 10M. regards, Tony. From: Michael Sprouffske msprouff...@yahoo.com To: Alex Pressé alex.pre...@gmail.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013 5:29 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco 2901 qos I get 1

Re: [c-nsp] ip tcp adjust-mss

it on your router you can just set the MTU on the interface of the host you are testing from. This is OS specific so you'll have to look up instructions on how to do it on your box (eg. Windows involves changing a registry setting, Linux you specify it as parameter for ifconfig, etc). regards, Tony

Re: [c-nsp] ip tcp adjust-mss

Thanks Tony , John and Juergan... This has been issue for many sites mainly towards yahoo.com. Can any one explain why this is happening for particular IPs in a subnet ??? We are using access list inbound Outbound to prevent ICMPs cumming inside to our network, will it be creating this problem

Re: [c-nsp] Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609

nothing will go into your class. What are you trying to achieve ? regards, Tony. - Original Message - From: Nam Nguyen nhna...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Sent: Thursday, 26 September 2013 8:21 PM Subject: [c-nsp] Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609 Hi

Re: [c-nsp] policy map shape being ignored?

, Tony. From: CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, 13 September 2013 5:58 PM Subject: [c-nsp] policy map shape being ignored? Hi Guys/Girls, 7200/G1, have other policy-maps/shaping

Re: [c-nsp] PRTG OR ZABBIX MONITORING TOOL what is your opinion

sometimes responds to my support queries !). I'm sounding a bit like a sales droid, but it's one of the few pieces of software that I've used over the years that I really like. I have absolutely no affiliation with the company that makes it. regards, Tony. From

Re: [c-nsp] PRTG OR ZABBIX MONITORING TOOL what is your opinion

like to do. regards, Tony. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] qos plan - advice please

easily deploy as remote probes for this kind of testing. regards, Tony. From: Aaron aar...@gvtc.com To: mark.ti...@seacom.mu; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Saturday, 31 August 2013 3:58 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] qos plan - advice please Thanks, taking

Re: [c-nsp] 6500, 7600 or ASR

On 8/29/2013 9:12 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: Same here - the RP2 in the ASR1001 will scale well when you run as many full feeds as you want. It's not an RP2...more of a RP2 lite :) Also note the memory restriction on the 1001 compared to a RP2 system. As a general thought, stay away from RP1

Re: [c-nsp] QoS

Is this a trick question ? Every time it sees a packet that matches the criteria you have specified and is put into your class it increments the packets counter by 1 and adds the size of the packet to the bytes counter. What is or isn't happening that you're concerned about ? regards, Tony

[c-nsp] ES20 aggregate QOS

of other services from the carrier delivered on the same interface (with different outer VLAN tag to identify each service), so using a 3-tier heirarchical QoS policy is not something that could be done. Thanks, Tony. outer tag (from carrier) = 1451 inner tag (from us) = 585 583 interface

Re: [c-nsp] Issue with POE on SF300-24P

/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6788/phones/ps10042/ps10044/data_sheet_c78-502433.html Alternatively upgrade to SPA-5xx series which has POE built in. regards, Tony. From: Dan Benson dben...@swingpad.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, 3 July 2013

Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

Can you not use the commands in BGP to support having only one AS, but appearing as a different AS to other neighbours ? eg. local-as, remote-as replace-as ? From: Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com To: Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] Combine two 2-wire DSL

, or anything more complex). When it negotiates the SHDSL with the DSLAM, it will use all four wires for the DSL session and should get the higher speed. regards, Tony. From: Pavel Dimow paveldi...@gmail.com To: Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Combine two 2-wire DSL

It requires the other end (exchange end) to be plugged into an equivalent type card on the dslam that can combine the 4-wires into a single service. Can you even do ADSL on 4-wire ? I know SHDSL can be done over 4-wire. regards, Tony. From: Pavel Dimow

Re: [c-nsp] cisco show Interface transceiver detail

if there is some loss in the quality of the signal (so D2A has more issues recognising a 0 or 1). Optics isn't really my field so I'm speculating, someone else might have a better answer on that. regards, Tony. From: nasrul azim nasrul...@yahoo.com To: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ipsla - latency - related to cellular backhaul

. Has potentially to be true. If you have no CoPP on the devices and they are under minimal load (CPU wise) then this probably shouldn't be a factor. Are you losing any traffic that is going through the device (ie. from ping tests) ? regards, Tony

Re: [c-nsp] ES20+ L3 subinterface or service instance ?

Hi, From: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi On (2013-04-21 03:11 -0700), Tony wrote: Hi, We are starting to migrate some connections from SIP400/SPA to ES20+ cards on our 7609's (sup720 w/ SRD4) interface GigabitEthernet2/0/1.512  service-policy output

[c-nsp] ES20+ L3 subinterface or service instance ?

it is just for simplicity unless there is a compelling reason to change to SI (which I believe would require me to bridge to a VLAN interface to terminate L3 ?). Thanks, Tony. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] 7200's (LNS) HSRP and VRF's

environment using dynamips to test first. regards, Tony. From: Jimbo Jones jimbojones...@outlook.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Sunday, 14 April 2013 8:00 AM Subject: [c-nsp] 7200's (LNS) HSRP and VRF's Hi, We have 2

Re: [c-nsp] Performance issue on link

Try using multiple TCP sessions  iperf -P 5  (note - capital P). regards, Tony. - Original Message - From: CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com To: Azher Mughal az...@hep.caltech.edu Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, 2 April 2013 9:51 AM

Re: [c-nsp] Performance issue on link

. Remove any other devices (ie. your routers) before testing so you will know that is not a problem. I assume your two linux test machines are on the same L3 subnet from what you've described ? regards, Tony. From: CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com

Re: [c-nsp] Performance issue on link

of the link. TCP tries to send as fast as it can (ie. 100Mbps or Gbps on gig NIC/port) and when packets get dropped it implements retries, windowing flow control to achieve the best it can. It could also be the carrier policing extremely hard, but they shouldn't really. regards, Tony

Re: [c-nsp] Processing one VLAN received on a Q-in-Q port

of complex L3 things you can do with them. regards, Tony. From: Robert Williams rob...@custodiandc.com To: 'Adam Vitkovsky' adam.vitkov...@swan.sk; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Monday, 25 March 2013 7:05 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] 1.1.1.0/24 and Cisco WLCs

On 3/11/2013 7:05 AM, Andrew Miehs wrote: Hi all, Was just doing a little bit of reading and had a look at http://rs2.swissix.ch/cgi-bin/bgplg?cmd=show+ip+bgp+source-asreq=15169 Specifically: flags destination gateway lpref med aspath origin *1.1.1.0/24

Re: [c-nsp] 1.1.1.0/24 and Cisco WLCs

On 3/11/2013 9:37 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 11/03/13 13:42, Tony Varriale wrote: engineer worth their salt does not use this. Maybe. But a lot of people *have* used it, because I've seen it when doing webauth logins e.g. in airports, train networks, etc. And by definition, the people

Re: [c-nsp] 1.1.1.0/24 and Cisco WLCs

On 3/11/2013 9:49 AM, Sandy Breeze wrote: On 11/03/13 14:37, Phil Mayers wrote: Cisco wrote docs suggesting that people did this: Enter the IP address of the controller's virtual interface. You should enter a fictitious, unassigned IP address, such as 1.1.1.1.

Re: [c-nsp] Next step-up from 7206VXR

On 2/19/2013 2:57 PM, Jon Lewis wrote: On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Eric A Louie wrote: I've run out of port capacity on my 7206VXR and need to go to the next router or put in another 7206VXR side-by-side. Any recommendations on what to use if I were to replace my existing 7206VXR with another

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7600 ES/ES+ licensing

suggesting the above. Cisco stance is obviously that if you're going to use the features from the Advanced license, then you need to purchase it. regards, Tony. From: Сергей Кремезной kremezn...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, 8 February

Re: [c-nsp] SIP 400 reload due to power supply issue

) = regards, Tony. From: John van Oppen jvanop...@spectrumnet.us To: Francisco López f...@transtelco.net; zaid zaidoo...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2013 5:22 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SIP 400

Re: [c-nsp] No. of vlans supported on 4948

in the domain. === regards, Tony. From: CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2013 1:07 PM Subject: [c-nsp] No. of vlans supported on 4948 Hi Guys

Re: [c-nsp] No. of vlans supported on 4948

). As to whether there are other limitations in how many you can actually configure/use at once on this device, I don't know about that. regards, Tony. From: CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com To: td_mi...@yahoo.com td_mi...@yahoo.com

Re: [c-nsp] Router for wholesale DSL aggregation over L2TP

(and is the same thing everyone else is using). As mentioned by someone else you will need larger MTU to handle the overhead (ie. need GigE with jumbo) and need to make sure that the handoff from your carrier allows for this too. regards, Tony. From: Scott

Re: [c-nsp] All multicast punting to CPU on 6500

On 12/16/2012 5:59 AM, Robert Williams wrote: Hi, I'll try to go into some additional detail on the traffic and other router config elements now. The traffic is basically made up of a randomly generated packet which is almost identical to the below. The 'random' element is that the source

Re: [c-nsp] All multicast punting to CPU on 6500

On 12/16/2012 10:49 AM, Robert Williams wrote: Hi, I'm sensing a lot of frustration / anger / hatred for NLB, having never really used it myself I'll just back away from that quietly :) Unfortunately the test is valid because the situation actually arose when a Windows NLB cluster went

Re: [c-nsp] sup2t XL with non XL linecards

On 11/22/2012 2:11 PM, . . wrote: Hi, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_qanda_item09186a00809a7673.shtml Thanks, that link helps a bit, but still a bit unclear on things. =) Assuming I don't need the performance and the 30 Mpps of sup2t is fine for a centralized

Re: [c-nsp] Is FWSM have a local security zone concept

On 11/3/2012 8:31 AM, zhangyongshun wrote: I find a problem thatunable to ping internet(for example 8.8.8.8) form FWSM(I have been ssh to FWSM) recently.But any business is worked fine through FWSMtraffic. and I can ping direct interface with FWSM outside interface. If FWSM have local security

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast packets dropping at 6509

On 10/30/2012 7:48 AM, Matthew Huff wrote: Do you have pim or igmp snooping turned on? Without a layer 3 multicast router configured, the 6509 will probably shunt the traffic. Setup a SVI interface on that vlan and enable pim dense mode. If you don't want multicast to pass the layer 3

Re: [c-nsp] LX GBIC at half duplex?

On 10/24/2012 1:23 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: On (2012-10-23 22:06 -0500), Tony Varriale wrote: None of GBIC will do half duplex IIRC. And, they won't do subrate. The negotiate is there to appease the other end if it tries. This is painfully common misconception. So some, even serious SPs tend

Re: [c-nsp] LX GBIC at half duplex?

On 10/23/2012 1:40 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: Hi all, Running up against an odd issue where we have a 3550 with an LX GBIC trying to talk to a copper port on an ME3600 with a media converter in the middle. The ME3600 side always shows as up; we disabled fault passthrough on the MC. The LX

Re: [c-nsp] QoS and Router Originated Traffic

Hi, We use ip local policy route-map xyz to apply a route-map to traffic that is originated locally on the router. The route-map is like any normal one with a match statement (using ACL), then a set statement. regards, Tony. From: Anton Kapela tkap

[c-nsp] bridging to second-dot1 vlan

? Thanks, Tony. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] bridging to second-dot1 vlan

802.1Q, vlan 202, p 0, ethertype ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has 192.168.2.10 tell 192.168.2.11, length 46 Do you think if I can loop my packets through another switch/cable I will be able to strip the extra vlan 202 tag off ? Thanks, Tony

Re: [c-nsp] PBR within MPLS VPN

Hi Jeff, In some cases that we have required to do something like this we have used the command set vrf xyz within the route-map to push the traffic into a different VRF that then has a different routing table. regards, Tony. From: Jeff Bacon ba

Re: [c-nsp] QinQ...inQ? question

port you are handing off. regards, Tony. From: Ross Halliday ross.halli...@wtccommunications.ca To: CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Saturday, 18 August 2012 7:52 AM Subject: Re

Re: [c-nsp] IOS compatibility

Hi Ali, No, the G2 is a different type of processor to all of the other previous NPE's and requires a different binary. The IOS code for a G2 will NOT run on an NPE-400, it will fail to boot. regards, Tony. From: Ali Sumsam ali+cisco...@eintellego.net

Re: [c-nsp] QinQ...inQ? question

problems (again, in theory they shouldn't care, and have no need to look at anything after the first vlan header they are switching on). Why not just test it with a couple of extra switches yourself (to simulate your customers gear) and see what happens ? regards, Tony

Re: [c-nsp] Customer VRF on Loopback

a loopback in the vrf for this. 2. L2TP/PPP termination. If you're terminating a PPP session in a vrf then you'll want a loopback IP address in the vrf to facilitate this (ip unnumbered loopback x). Why do you ask the question ? regards, Tony. From

Re: [c-nsp] Route Aggregation and Deaggregation

, Tony. From: Sascha Pollok nsp-l...@pollok.net To: Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com Cc: Jennifer Pruett jennypruet...@gmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, 19 July 2012 4:05 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Route Aggregation

Re: [c-nsp] Route Aggregation and Deaggregation

intention, then go for it. No need to also advertise the /24 to ISP1 ISP2 unless you want some of the traffic for that /24 to come inbound on those links. regards, Tony. From: Jennifer Pruett jennypruet...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday

Re: [c-nsp] VS-S720-10G alternative

On 6/13/2012 8:01 AM, Reuben Farrelly wrote: I have a requirement for a 1G/10G access switch also for a meet-me room project I am working on, and the 4500-X ticks all the boxes - except for the MPLS capability. The lack of this feature means I will likely have to backhaul data back to an MPLS

Re: [c-nsp] Frustration with XR show interface and pipe commands

int | utility egrep up |rate ^ Tony On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:19 AM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.comwrote: Someone asked me how to do something very simple and I'm finding it very difficult! He wants to do a show interface command and show only lines

Re: [c-nsp] Stacking 3750X vs diverse 4948E

On 5/20/2012 3:36 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: On (2012-05-19 22:25 -0500), Tony Varriale wrote: If you follow the rules, those are the easiest, most non-eventful events ever. I've done over 100 and had no issues. This is curious statement, it implies that if you are operating devices as per

Re: [c-nsp] Stacking 3750X vs diverse 4948E, 5K/VSS/ ....

On 5/20/2012 2:49 PM, chris stand wrote: The ability to reboot a 5K by itself, in fact you can upgrade hardware this way, vs 3750x stack is a worthwhile positive point. The ability to separate by distance ... say 100 feet if needed a 5K from its peer ... another positive point. What about

Re: [c-nsp] 4500-E EOL?

On 5/20/2012 9:25 PM, Keegan Holley wrote: Browsing cisco.com I found EOS/EOL notices for a few of the 4500E chassis. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but weren't these released in 2010? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps4324/eol_c51-706059.html Nah. They are 5-6

Re: [c-nsp] Stacking 3750X vs diverse 4948E

On 5/19/2012 6:21 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: On (2012-05-18 14:55 -0400), David Coulson wrote: Does anyone have any solid experience with 3750X switches, or stacking in a datacenter in general? I've seen plenty of stacks for We've had quite many 3750 stacks, and we do see more problems in them than

Re: [c-nsp] Stacking 3750X vs diverse 4948E

On 5/18/2012 1:55 PM, David Coulson wrote: In a datacenter environment, we typically deploy 4948 top-of-rack switches with L2 uplinks to our 6500 core - Systems get connections into two different switches and rely on OS NIC bonding (mostly Linux) to support switch failures. Switches running

Re: [c-nsp] Stacking 3750X vs diverse 4948E

On 5/19/2012 6:47 AM, Lee wrote: On 5/19/12, Saku Yttis...@ytti.fi wrote: On (2012-05-18 14:55 -0400), David Coulson wrote: Does anyone have any solid experience with 3750X switches, or stacking in a datacenter in general? I've seen plenty of stacks for We've had quite many 3750 stacks, and

Re: [c-nsp] Stacking 3750X vs diverse 4948E

On 5/19/2012 7:03 PM, scott owens wrote: How about Nexus 5010s. ^ +10 other than a missing odd feature. The Nexus 55xx are purty nice boxen and have HA features that the 375x only dream about. tv ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Tuning HSRP timers for BGP routers

On 5/9/2012 8:45 AM, Matthew Huff wrote: We have a pair of Cisco 7204VXR with NPE-G2 running 15.1(4)M3. We are using default timers for the HSRP interfaces, and we are seeing nightly HSRP state changes. Not a lot, but 1-2 a night. This appears to only have started recently. We are looking at

Re: [c-nsp] Will the Cisco 2911 push GigE with NAT enabled ?

On 4/30/2012 11:10 AM, Matthew Huff wrote: If you need the full 1GB for VPN, yes, the 5585-X with SSP10 will be the best bet. It will probably be on the close order of 20k though. Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management

Re: [c-nsp] multicast within a mpls vpn (ios xr , asr9000)

stream for testing purposes (just remember to set TTL to 1 !). regards, Tony. From: Aaron aar...@gvtc.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2012 5:53 AM Subject: [c-nsp] multicast within a mpls vpn (ios xr , asr9000) Anyone know the idea

  1   2   3   4   5   >