Re: [cisco-voip] Best Way To Bulk Update Lines/Directory Numbers?

gt; > Phone - +441509635635 <+441509635635> > > Teams - g.j.par...@lboro.ac.uk > > https://www.osx.ninja/pubkey.txt > > > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether

Re: [cisco-voip] Call Flow data via transfers

Hi, If you want better reception / operator functionality, then take a look at the Imagicle suite as well. You can have Advanced Queuing, IVR and reporting – even call recording if you need it. For plain reporting, I’d recommend Variphy too. If the information is there, they can typically find

Re: [cisco-voip] Assistance if you are able.

l of our meeting/classroom and lecture > spaces, so at this point we will continue to use both the Cisco phone and > Teams Voice client. That is our mess right now. With that being said I > am curious how you would proceed. > > > > > > *From:* Tim Smith > *Sent:* Tuesd

Re: [cisco-voip] Getting IOS to translate from DSCP to 802.1p

Hi James, It might be worth tidying up, but I'd be surprised if that was the cause of this issue. What version of CUCM are you running? Do you have a Webex Control Hub and Connected UC setup yet? (If you don't have Flex and Control Hub - a partner could spin up a trial to use temporarily). This

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP to iTSP best practices

Make sure to use Server Groups, E164 pattern maps and dial peer groups. Will allow you to create some very clean and simple config (without 1 million dial peers like we used to have) :) Read everything Jonathan has written about CUBE and SIP - start here :)

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Webex Serviceability Connector

Awesome hey :) When I did it - I don't think UCCX was an option. Will be great if it is now.. but I haven't had a look for a while. Will check it out. Let us know if you get it going. On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 01:48, Jonathan Charles wrote: > Not sure, the instructions say UCCX on the Enterprise

Re: [cisco-voip] Low space on partitions in CUCM

Matthew Huff* | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC > > > > *Office: 914-460-4039* > > *mh...@ox.com | **www.ox.com <http://www.ox.com>* > > > *..

Re: [cisco-voip] Third Party CDR Analysis

for the budget - in one VM. That's one thing I really like. Cheers, Tim. From: Palmer, Brian Sent: Friday, 5 June 2020 6:00 AM To: Tim Smith ; Anthony Holloway ; UC Penguin Cc: cisco-voip voyp list Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Third Party CDR Analysis EXTERNAL SENDER

Re: [cisco-voip] vCUBE Experiences

). That would be good for lab. Cheers, Tim From: Anthony Holloway Sent: Thursday, 4 June 2020 11:20 AM To: Tim Smith Cc: Cisco VoIP Group Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vCUBE Experiences EXTERNAL SENDER WARNING. This message was sent from outside your

[cisco-voip] Cisco Webex Serviceability Connector

Hi guys, Crossposting here possibly for some of you. This tool is truly awesome. IMHO - If we all get on board, this will definitely help drastically decrease time to resolve TAC cases. I'm sure that will benefit us all! This works to collect pretty much everything TAC needs - i.e. you can

Re: [cisco-voip] vCUBE Experiences

Great question, also interested in hearing production stories. I've deployed Virtual Acme Packet's previously - same limitations - no DSP's etc. It was a little early and we had teething issues of appliance to virtual machine type stuff.. but through the updates this improved. I've played with

Re: [cisco-voip] Java and custom UCCX

and no bouncy castle. (Which sounds less fun, but it works better :) Cheers, Tim Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> From: Tim Smith Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 10:00:07 AM To: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject

[cisco-voip] Java and custom UCCX

Hi guys, I’m not sure if we are supposed to do this. I am stuck on a Java and UCCX issue. We are trying to run a custom class, and we are having issues with the loading of the class. It seems very Cisco specific as we can run it anywhere else compiled and ran on same JDK/JRE etc. We’ve put a

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCx and Jabber - compatible or not?

Is anyone doing multi line on Jabber yet? I’ve always thought dedicated UCCX line is best? Just have one on phone, different one on Jabber Login to wherever you want to answer calls It’s unlikely to be desk and softphone at same time (and if it is then use CTI instead) Dedicated line then gets

Re: [cisco-voip] Thoughts on options for wireless conference phones

Hey mate, these are the best things I've seen in this space. Revo labs FX2 You get wireless mic's, keypad and base unit with charger https://uc.yamaha.com/products/conference-phones/analog-voip-bluetooth-wireless/ They were pretty nice, good sound quality. Looks like Yamaha has bought them out

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Softphone over WiFi

Fulgenzi Sent: Friday, 11 October 2019 10:15 AM To: Tim Smith Cc: Scott Voll ; voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Softphone over WiFi And speaking to that... test them out. And ask people around you. A headset with audio leak is fine

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Softphone over WiFi

Picking good headsets is important too… Much more hassle troubleshooting some rubbish USB headset Or even an expensive USB headset with rubbish support From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: Friday, 11 October 2019 9:55 AM To: Lelio Fulgenzi Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Softphone over WiFi

I still love the combination of Jabber and Phone with deskphone control. How nice does the new Jabber client look too! From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: Friday, 11 October 2019 9:55 AM To: Lelio Fulgenzi Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: Re:

Re: [cisco-voip] best software/device to simulate ITSP and test CUBE functionality

Depends on what you want to test exactly, and for what purpose, i.e. training, learning, deployment Lots of options though - CUCM - Another CUBE - Internet based SIP trunks (probably the best option) – plenty of cheap ones, and some free In practice, you’ll find lots of little differences and

Re: [cisco-voip] Separate cluster for third party SIP clients with SIP/ICT trunk to production

What version are you running? Should be able to just spin up a new cluster and point it at same ELM / PLM / Smart Licensing account I think? Share/pool your licensing Cheers, Tim From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Sunday, 29 September 2019 8:07 AM To: Jeremy Bresley Cc:

Re: [cisco-voip] Multicast MOH (MMOH) SRND Question

This looks to be specific to re-broadcasting (which I haven’t had the pleasure of playing with yet) Looking at the diagram in there. I assume you configure a new source with a multicast address on your MOH server. If it’s set to re-broadcast, it’ll be looking to capture the input stream from

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5(1)SU6, Port 6972 and EC Certs

Im on the road, but there was a similar bug for this. Can’t seem to find it. It’s TFTP based issue from memory. You had to de-activate and re-activate the TFTP services. From: cisco-voip on behalf of Anthony Holloway Date: Wednesday, 4 September 2019 at 12:03 pm To:

Re: [cisco-voip] Automated cluster building? (devops tools)

These guys built something a while back. I think he has dropped offline now. (Parzee) https://youtu.be/C7JqzjEzVJo It uses VMWare api’s It was sort of a remote deployment tool I have an email for the guy, will see what he’s up to. (If it still works) Cheers, Tim

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

My favourite meditation is to call TAC and listen to hold music  From: Ryan Huff Date: Friday, 17 May 2019 at 2:12 am To: Anthony Holloway Cc: Tim Smith , "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

HO, is rrr from prime time (as you even noted, “preview mode”). I honestly think it’s a bit further out than what the marketing department would have us believe too ;). Hopefully though, one day, we’ll all have this unified unicorn they’re promising... Jeams?... Jams? ... who knows  Tops t

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

still need to retain Hybrid Call for cloud registered devices. There was one specific annoyance with the Hybrid Call from the apps, and I can’t find it in my Teams search ☹ Cheers, Tim From: Ryan Huff Date: Thursday, 16 May 2019 at 12:14 pm To: Tim Smith Cc: Jonathan Charles , "cisco

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

Hey guys, I think this one has changed a little. We did “Spark hybrid calling” for one customer with the Spark RD devices in CUCM Honestly, the experience was a little confusing. I think the new direction is going to be the WebEx Calling via CUCM (it’s in preview mode still)

Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

Yikes.. it was menu driven.. I put my first one in and it had 48 x faxes on it… 48 faxes that all seemed to have different volume levels which couldn’t be adjusted on the fax, and it caused transmission errors.. So about 200 x Telstra FOLDS tests later – and manually adjusting the gain on each

[cisco-voip] CUCM 12 TSP Issue

Hi guys, Heads up, TSP in CUCM 12 seems pretty broken. It disconnects every 5 - 10 minutes. We were using it with Arc operator consoles on Windows 2012 server But we've had TAC replicate it with CUAC standard on Windows 10 Still waiting for defect. We've had a temp fix published, and that seems

Re: [cisco-voip] Csr 1000v ova

Hey mate, I did see this on the newest version. I can download the older ones, but not the new ones. That said, I have multiple service contracts on them, so I think it’s a CCO snafu. Have not taken a look yet though. Cheers, Tim ___ cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.6 with 7911 - Transfer Button disabled

Hi, What is your max calls set to on the DN ? Perhaps it is 1 and there is not another line available? Kind Regards, Tim Smith Technical Consultant | Enject Technology Solutions e: tim.sm...@enject.com.au | m: +61 408 801 844 On 20/07/2016, 11:09, "cisco-voip on behalf of Isamar Maia&quo

Re: [cisco-voip] Ireland Office on US CUCM

Hi Sean, That can technically be done, but you would need to be careful of the network connectivity between your Irish office and US. Think about a person picking up a phone in Dublin, phones goes off hook and sends a message across the world to figure out what it should do next :) If you have

Re: [cisco-voip] Service parameters on CUCM upgrade

I think this was the parameter I hit an issue with talking to CMR cloud as well. Cheers, Tim From: cisco-voip > on behalf of Eric Pedersen > Date:

Re: [cisco-voip] VCS Checker

They are pretty much all under http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/web/tools-catalog.html SIPp XML generator looks good Cheers, Tim From: cisco-voip > on behalf of Matthew Loraditch

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP call failure

Hi guys, See the SIP profile test tool on this page if you want to validate anything like this http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/web/tools-catalog.html Cheers, Tim. From: cisco-voip > on behalf of Ahmed Abd

Re: [cisco-voip] Feature Request to fix Licensing issues with EM

Hi Anthony, I think you’ve captured the usage and options pretty well. My problem is, I see the best solution in there as a double dip by Cisco. If I buy 100 UCL Enhanced , then each user is entitled to the use of a physical device. To me, the issue is still a Cisco licensing enforcement

Re: [cisco-voip] Feature Request to fix Licensing issues with EM

Could it be simpler? You have 1000 UCL standard users and 500 phones Phone licensing is in credit essentially here, so it doesn’t even need to count them You have 500 UCL standard users and 1000 phones User licensing doesn’t cover the phone count, you’d need to add either 500 more users, or

Re: [cisco-voip] Licensing going from 8.6 to 10.5

Hi Scott, UCSS is now replaced with ECMU (1 part that includes the ESW + UCSS – so maintenance and support) Go through the normal steps, put in an upgrade request at www.cisco.com/upgrade You will get a manual licensing conversion happening, they will ask you for

Re: [cisco-voip] Changing the enable password on VG224/2901/2911/881's

Hi Norm, What do you mean without reloading O/S? Do you mean without rebooting the device? Unless you have the old password, confreg 0x2142 is the only way I know of. Are you familiar with this one

Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse Sample gadget web page

Hi, Have you tried these guys? https://developer.cisco.com/site/finesse/downloads/sample-gadgets/ Cheers, Tim. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Claiton Campos Sent: Saturday, 11 July 2015 6:59 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip]

Re: [cisco-voip] What is better than MediaSense for recording calls?

...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, 22 June 2015 11:35 PM To: Tim Smith; Derek Andrew; Cisco VoIP Group Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] What is better than MediaSense for recording calls? Hi Tim, Yes, still separate recordings, call stitching, where we build you a single file from multiple call legs will probably

Re: [cisco-voip] What is better than MediaSense for recording calls?

...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Smith Sent: Saturday, 20 June 2015 12:59 AM To: Chris Ward (chrward); Derek Andrew; Cisco VoIP Group Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] What is better than MediaSense for recording calls? Hi Chris, Awesome, TAC told me about that in ver 11, but said it wasn’t available til mid

Re: [cisco-voip] What is better than MediaSense for recording calls?

For recording them – yes ☺ Finding them, managing them etc.. ? I am struggling with the way it splits calls and you have to manually correlate them with CCID at the moment. (CUBE not BIB) Has anyone used any of the third party UI’s? I was checking out the Aurus5 one. Donoma and Mida look good,

Re: [cisco-voip] What is better than MediaSense for recording calls?

Hi Ryan, Curious to know your reasoning for best in the market? Are you using it with another UI? Or maybe with Finesse? By itself I don’t think it is a perfect fit for all cases. Cheers, Tim From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Burtch Sent:

Re: [cisco-voip] What is better than MediaSense for recording calls?

Hi Chris, Awesome, TAC told me about that in ver 11, but said it wasn’t available til mid August ☺ I’ll download it and check it out. Cheers, Tim. From: Chris Ward (chrward) [mailto:chrw...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, 19 June 2015 10:40 PM To: Tim Smith; Derek Andrew; Cisco VoIP Group Subject

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx question

Hi James, do you have a bug ref, or some more details for that one? There is an extended branding bug due for fix in MR6, but no release date on it yet. -Original Message- From: James Buchanan [mailto:james.buchan...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 11 June 2015 1:10 PM To: Tim Smith Cc

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx question

To: James Buchanan; Tim Smith Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] WebEx question Hi James/Tim, Just to make sure we are on the same page, I have the major release of the CWMS 2.5 without any MR releases installed. Here is what I meant by my question, This is a snapshot

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx question

To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman Cc: Tim Smith; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx question Open a TAC case. It is post MR5. On 11 Jun 2015, at 7:46 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.commailto:ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.com wrote: Hi James, So I can go directly to MR5

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx question

...@bmbgroup.com] Sent: Friday, 12 June 2015 12:40 AM To: James Buchanan Cc: Tim Smith; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx question So as a conclusion I can go with MR5 and if I faced an issue with the mobile client I can open a TAC case to get the hot fix which is what happened

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx question

Hi Ahmed, Check out 2.5 MR4 if you are not on it.. Short URL feature is there, you can get rid of all the long URL's Also if you are security conscious, MR5 has split certificates too. You should upgrade to MR5 anyway if you aren't already, there are a couple of doozies fixed along the way :)

Re: [cisco-voip] setting up firewall security for jabber and/of IP Communicator

Hey mate, I’ve used SCCP and SIP inspection in the past Bit rusty maybe, but here is the jist - If you have a firewall with Jabber clients on one side, phones on the other, and maybe a CUCM in a separate segment, maybe even a voice gateway in another segment - With

Re: [cisco-voip] CUWL STD version

Hi, Not that simple unfortunately, due to Cisco selling users but enforcing usage based on devices in anything pre 9.x In 9.x + it's easier - you have ELM / PLM that will show you usage in terms of user licensing concepts So I am assuming you are on something before 9.x In that case, the best

Re: [cisco-voip] Sip Trunk - CUCM and Third-party PBX

Hi Claiton, I don’t think this has changed recently. You can’t do a SIP REGISTER from CUCM directly on a trunk. You need to have something in between, such as a CUBE / Acme, or some other SBC I would be pushing the PBX guys to see whether they can do without the registration requirement and

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

Hi James Cant think of a way in CUCM itself. A little TCL script on IOS box could do it though. Cheers, Tim Sent from my iPhone On 18 Mar 2015, at 17:33, James Andrewartha jandrewar...@ccgs.wa.edu.au wrote: Hi list, Is there a way in CUCM to make an extension that hangs up on the

Re: [cisco-voip] SBC/SIP Trunk Design queries

Hi Terry, I do quite a bit of CUBE, and have done a bit of Acme as well. There were some recent partner sessions that talk about some interesting things coming for CUBE, so it’s worth making sure you are getting latest roadmap info. My main comparison points.. # HA In enterprise there was HA

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

Thanks Abhiram, I think that was the confusing part. We had seen it as advertised for 10.6 I was surprised when I activated Finesse on 10.6 and still saw the warning. Cheers, Tim From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) Sent:

Re: [cisco-voip] Register SWSS?

Hi mate, I would send the UCSS support team the question. Usually it's just back end mapping thing that they can fix. Try ucss-supp...@external.cisco.com Cheers, Tim. On 13/01/2015 23:09, James Andrewartha jandrewar...@ccgs.wa.edu.au wrote: Hi all, We recently renewed our UCSS, although

Re: [cisco-voip] J4W cannot communicate with server

Hi mate, If you do a PRT you can pretty clearly see the discovery and logins (although it is quite verbose, and seems a bit repetitive) But it'll be the only thing your client is doing at the time, so shouldn’t be too hard to spot. How are you trying to login? Have you tried manually

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8.0.3 to 8.6

Hi Rick, Unsubscribe or change preferences here.. https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip Cheers, Tim From: Rick McCardell rmccard...@glpropinc.commailto:rmccard...@glpropinc.com Date: Thursday, 3 July 2014 0:13 To: Mike mik...@msn.commailto:mik...@msn.com, Tim Smith tim.sm

[cisco-voip] UCCX 10.5 and CUCM 8.6(4)SU4

Hi guys, I'd recently verified on the old style UCCX compatibility matrix that latest UCCX supported integration with CUCM 8.6(4) SU4 I notice the compatibility matrix has now been updated to docwiki format, and it looks like CUCM 8.6 support has been removed from 10.0 and 10.5 Seems others

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8.0.3 to 8.6

Hi Mike, Just to understand, what are you trying to gain by using COBRAS? Maybe a phased migration of users? Why not just the straight DRS server replacement method below? You would only have a small window between when you take backup and when you get restored version online where voicemails

Re: [cisco-voip] SSO ADFS Guide?

agrec...@gmail.commailto:agrec...@gmail.com wrote: thanks for this it was on my todo list On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Tim Smith tim.sm...@enject.com.aumailto:tim.sm...@enject.com.au wrote: If you haven't met already, this guy will be your new best friend for troubleshooting SAML SSO issues

Re: [cisco-voip] SSO ADFS Guide?

If you haven't met already, this guy will be your new best friend for troubleshooting SAML SSO issues. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/saml-tracer/ Cheers, Tim From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Pedersen Sent: Thursday, 26 June 2014

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE 15.2 ?

Hey mate, Philosophically? If a CUBE connects two calls with a single dial peer is it still a CUBE? I think the quality that makes it a CUBE is mainly the fact that it's connecting two IP legs instead of a POTS leg and an IP leg. Then of course then there are all the nice CUBEY things you can

Re: [cisco-voip] Installing CUPS 9 Subscriber - fails on connectivity

I’ve seen this with duplicate IP before. You’re talking to something, but maybe you’re trying to join a CUPS server to a domain controller. Might not be an issue in your own lab, but thought it’s worth a mention. I like to double check the basics, ping and check ARP or even disconnect the VM’s

[cisco-voip] Arc UAC

Hi guys, Apologies for cross post. I have posted this over at Arc forum, but not response so far. I'm looking for clarification on disabling UAC (as required by Arc) in Windows Server 2008. I've seen issues with other applications, whereby they run into problems with the File and Registry

Re: [cisco-voip] 9971 as a Trader phone

Hi guys, You can make this permanent with “Revert to All Calls” and “Show All Calls on Primary Line” It’s in 9.2(3) http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/9971_9951_8961/firmware/9_2_3/release_notes/9900_8900_923.html#wp239395 Cheers, Tim From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice-mail Failover CUC is not working

Hi mate, I remember something about this, I thought it was waiting for a fix in Jabber client, but can’t seem to find anything. Have you tried a profile to test the 2nd server as the primary mail store? i.e. just confirm it is actually working in non-failover. I like how bug was marked as 6,

Re: [cisco-voip] Avoiding reinventing the wheel if possible

Hi Terry, This should be a lot nicer since you've selected 10.x. You are able to make use of the Prime Collaboration Deployment manager tool (PCD) There are two really good sessions from recent networkers. All updated for 10 with deployment manager info in them. If you haven't seen them

Re: [cisco-voip] Project Mgmt Software

Hey mate, Main competition to ConnectWise seems to be AutoTask which looks quite a bit nicer than CW, and I think was designed as SaaS from ground up. We’ve done a few demos of it (they can give you a demo account to check it out if you ask) Similar to CW, probably not the best PM specific

Re: [cisco-voip] UC 9 licensing

Hey mate, Usually only a couple of days in my experience. I would complain and try and escalate it further. Cheers, Tim. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dana Tong Sent: Monday, 12 May 2014 11:50 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Jabber and Microsoft Lync Voice channels

Hey mate, How are you using the Jabber client? (phone mode?) I've seen other conflicts with Jabber and Lync installed together, so if it's not phone mode you are going for, then it is probably recommended to only have one or the other. I think you will have issues with links into office apps

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension Mobility - CSS and Partitions

Hi Michel, I’d say this would be a pretty uncommon configuration. Maybe you could explain the call flow you are trying to achieve? The most common approach is to have a different number range for your logged out phones Also common to have a single partition for all your internal extensions –

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7x with ACME SBC

Hi guys, I love this combo. They work really well together and both products have great capability for normalisation HMR on Acme, LUA on CUCM. Acme HA is fantastic. Virtual option is great. Acme docco is comprehensive and quite plentiful! Jason - I've unicasted you some info on one of my

Re: [cisco-voip] Requested circuit/channel not available

Hi mate, What does show isdn service say? When you changed it to reverse order, did you see it request Channel 1, and still get knocked back by BT? There are a few other things you could test on your side, but I think you are on the right track. I'd log a call with BT and ask them why they are

Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 configuration

Hi, In theory, you could probably make this work, but I think it would be considered an unusual application for these boxes. Their typical application is to provide analog connectivity for endpoints (i.e. modems, faxes, analog handsets) into a Cisco IPT environment, i.e. typical CUCM or CME

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx Meetings Server 2.0 OVA

Thanks John, It only looks like one bug, which wouldn't affect us. CSCum96822 3 Grow fails to update expanded system to same version as source system Cheers, Tim From: John Parduhn [mailto:pard...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2014 10:40 AM To: Tim Smith Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx Meetings Server 2.0 OVA

...@bennettjones.commailto:peders...@bennettjones.com wrote: Thanks for the info Adam. I'll go with a 1.5 install and upgrade after. From: Adam Blomfield [mailto:ad...@adman.net] Sent: 26 February 2014 10:39 AM To: Eric Pedersen Cc: Tim Smith; Andy; cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx Meetings Server 2.0 OVA

the old VM's in Vcenter. As I say that's just my speculation. It's got to be close to that. I have an upgrade booked in for next weekend. Happy to post back results when I get my answers! (and hopefully BU will also update the docs too) Kind Regards, Tim Smith Technical Consultant | m: +61 408 801

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS 240 M3 pink screen

Yes, we just had this on a C220 M3. Purple screen of death on VMWare. Bug was - CSCuh86924 (I was surprised it was not a field notice actually) TAC should be able to diagnose it pretty accurately. If they say replace the RAID card, then I would go ahead and replace it. Cheers, Tim From: