Hi Ish,
While the number of emails is significative, I was not looking into just
counting them. Also, you will need to point how many each year, if they are
related to specific proposals, and so many variables, that, as you very well
said “Do read these emails …”.
Also, to be fair, we
I do think Mauritius is more democratic than many countries on the continent
where you live… they just have some practices all may not like.
--
Arnaud
Le jeu. 17 févr. 2022 à 15:49, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
a écrit :
I fail to understand how is possible, that a resol
Democracy = Transparency
In this specific case, a monopoly accusation has nothing to be hidden. I fully
agree with retracting personal data, but NOTHING ELSE.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 18/2/22 12:41, "Mark Tinka" escribió:
On 2/17/22 17:47, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via
reesh Phokeer" escribió:
Hi JORDI,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 7:48 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
wrote:
>
> I fail to understand how is possible, that a resolution from a public
> Competition Commission is not public, even redacting personal data if needed.
>
I fail to understand how is possible, that a resolution from a public
Competition Commission is not public, even redacting personal data if needed.
In normal democratic countries, as I know, all those cases are published in
their web site.
AFRINIC legal staff must take care of that.
Regards,
That’s the point, we don’t have that problem in the IETF or any other RIR.
So, I think is fair that you look for solutions where you have problems or you
may have them.
Anyway, I know that other RIRs are watching the verification process in AFRINIC
so to implement also themselves, just
Very good news!
I don’t know how these things work in Mauritius courts, but it will be good to
ask that all the legal expenses are borne by the other party.
In addition to that, I believe AFRINIC must ask for image damages and
compensation for the troubles created by the accounts
I did a quick read. I need to review my notes/emails from previous rounds, but
it will be nice if the staff can explain if something that we discussed in the
list hasn't been considered, why.
At a first sight, still missing several key things, specially under the
Mauritius law, such as
Hi Owen,
I’ve been silent till now on till now on all this.
However, I must say that you’re right that they didn’t violate the CoC, they
did something presumable worst which may constitute criminal offenses (slander,
defamation, etc., I’m not sure what is the best way to translate it
lls,
but whatever effect it has caused in the previous weeks/months, remain in
effect.
Dear AfriNIC's Community,
Please see my comments below, inline...
Le jeudi 5 août 2021, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
a écrit :
Hi Sylvain,
Hi Jordi,
Thanks for replying, brot
Hi Sylvain,
11.4 literally says policy not DPP.
Also ready 11.5, otherwise you are taking it out of context.
Dear AfriNIC's Community,
Please see my comments below, inline...
Le dimanche 1 août 2021, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
a écrit :
Hi Noah,
Hi Jordi
Hi Noah,
Your interpretation on this is wrong.
Read my detailed email a few days ago.
11.4 Allows the Board to define any policy regarding Internet Resources that
they believe is urgently needed.
This can be implemented ASAP the Board decides. The Board MUST also send the
policy
And for clarity, no RIR (including RIPE NCC) used voting for matters that
belong to PDP decisions.
I think there is some confusion here, may be something taken out of context,
not sure what is the issue, but a PDP matter that is decided by consensus
hasn’t been decided by members voting.
Hi Owen,
I need to disagree with some of your points here.
The transfer proposal was wrongly managed by the chairs, I’m convinced that
they did in good faith. A proposal, can’t return once and again with
non-editorial changes to the discussion and sustain the consensus decision.
Even if a transfer policy is adopted, *before* any transfer AFRINIC has the
right to verify the resources are being used according to the policies, RSA,
documentation/justification provided when it was allocated/assigned, etc., etc.
If the resources don’t follow the rules, the RIR (not just
sure myself, this could work, but we could try.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
Dear AfriNIC's Community,
Please see my comments below, inline...
Le mercredi 28 juillet 2021, Owen DeLong via Community-Discuss
a écrit :
> On Jul 27, 2021, at 12:30 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
22:05, "Owen DeLong" escribió:
> On Jul 29, 2021, at 23:53 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
wrote:
>
> I understand what you mean, but is not so simple ... I don't know
Mauritius, but if the justice system works there and you fail to pay to a DPA
fine,
Legal battles and police investigations take time. You need to be patient.
I've battled several times against different parties, including Spanish
Government, Spanish DPA, etc., and even lost some of the cases in the 1st level
courts, but having appealed up to the Constitutional Court, even if
I understand what you mean, but is not so simple ... I don't know Mauritius,
but if the justice system works there and you fail to pay to a DPA fine, and
there is not a reciprocal specific with US, do you believe you will be able to
come to Mauritius without risking detention or do business
You don't think that any national law, in this case in Mauritius (which have an
equivalent to the GDPR), is on top of organization rules?
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 29/7/21 11:58, "Ronald F. Guilmette" escribió:
In message <1e7823b3-005a-4813-9e46-76f61d457...@consulintel.es>,
Hi Ronald,
Yes, no doubt the other fish is more important now ... but all this is also
relevant for the case, and legal counsel may need to consider all that in front
of the Courts ...
The typical interpretation of the DPA is (from previous judgements): If your
email about the vacation spot
Even more
They accept their president to ask for the Capitol invasion and nothing happens
... interesting at least!
But the question here is, in the EU, spam by SMS, phone, or *any means* (not
just email) is against GDPR and many other regulations.
I'm unsure if the "transposition" of
Hi Ronald,
I disagree. At a minimum they were against the equivalent to the GDPR in
Mauritius, as they used information collected from whois, mail exploders, etc.,
for a different purpose that the one agreed.
I can publish my email and phone in any public mailing list (or whois), but you
need
Ronald is very right.
How that can be possible?
Of course, the original justification is *extremely relevant*. Was it done
properly and in good faith?
Was it properly checked by the staff? Was the relevant staff doing correctly
his/her job?
Is that justification still valid, or if the
Very good observations Paul.
My doubt here is if there was sufficient evidence for a “real disk of
dissipation”. I doubt AFRINIC is such kind of organization where the Board can
take the risk of doing so without consulting the membership. Otherwise, the
Board could be committing presumable
Long" escribió:
> On Jul 27, 2021, at 12:30 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
wrote:
>
> This will be very simple to resolve (not taking a position in one side or
the other because I don't have all the real facts and documents).
>
> The or
, to mention just a few!
El 27/7/21 21:43, "Frank Habicht" escribió:
Hi Jordi,
On 27/07/2021 22:30, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss wrote:
> This will be very simple to resolve (not taking a position in one side or
the other because I don't have all t
By the way, if some parts of the justification are still "secret", then we
could probably live knowing only part of them, redacting the confidential parts.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 27/7/21 21:36, "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss"
escribió:
This
This will be very simple to resolve (not taking a position in one side or the
other because I don't have all the real facts and documents).
The original justificacion of the request of the resources I don't think it had
so many "secret" and "confidential" details. After several years if any
How such information could be confidential?
Everybody knows the details about the cost of resources, whois data is public,
companies need to have records of their accounts, etc.
By the way, emails can’t be deleted from the archive, we already discussed that
a couple of times, unless
The NRO, manages a fund, if I recall correctly, contributed by the 5 RIRs, in
order to secure sustainability/stability of any RIR in case of contingencies.
I guess this is a contingency that can apply to that fund, so a “loan” can be
provided to pay any operational expenses while the AFRINIC
El 17/7/21 4:19, "Owen DeLong" escribió:
> On Jul 16, 2021, at 08:19 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've sent already a couple of emails to comms about my concerns on the
CoC. I can only find right now the las
Hi,
I've sent already a couple of emails to comms about my concerns on the CoC. I
can only find right now the last one, but I've the feeling that my previous
inputs haven't been considered.
I think it will be nice, when some inputs are not considered, to explain why,
so to avoid
If you read the thread and all the attached whatsapps, you will see that once
you ask the first caller for some explanations, the phone call is close and
then the candidate is calling you.
Is not that sufficient evidence that the candidate knows about this campaign?
Regards,
Jordi
Hi SM,
Exactly, you will not find such RFC because it is not needed, as we haven't
been in that situation.
In any open and transparent organization, country, etc., etc., the principles
of freedom of expression and NON-censorship are presumed.
I don't know of any mailing list from IETF, RIRs,
Hi Eddy,
Unless I’m missing it, I believe that the summary of the community consultation
webinar is missing a key point that I made.
I stated that the only way for removing anything (even porn, terrorism, etc.,
which by the way are extreme cases, that never happened in any RIR or IETF
if the co-chairs have been recalled, I don’t have
any reasons to believe that they lied in sense that they didn’t sent the email.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 3/3/21 12:09, "Madhvi Gokool" escribió:
Hello Jordi /PDWG
On 03/03/2021 1:52 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via
Hi all,
Today, during the APNIC51 meeting, in the Global Reports session
(https://2021.apricot.net/program/schedule-conference/#/day/10/apnic-global-reports),
as usual, there was a presentation from every RIR, including AFRINIC.
In this presentation from AFRINIC, there have been two
Hi Ronald,
The point is not that you agree with the removal of the message. The point is
that it is censorship, and this community should not allow it, because then it
means in the future anything else could be removed.
This list is not to "satisfy" crazy laws in any country, whatever is the
"tagging",
MUST BE ARCHIVED AND NEVER CENSORED.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 24/2/21 11:27, "Mike Silber" escribió:
Hi Jordi
Trying to be objective here.
> On 24 Feb 2021, at 11:49, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
wrote:
>
Hi Sunday, all,
While I understand your point, we also need to understand that the Internet
communities are multicultural and we should not ban someone because is language
is not up to anyone local culture.
I fully agree that sometimes, the way some of us (and I'm including myself
here) speak
-up … and not
just by lawyers!
Le jeu. 11 févr. 2021 à 20:34, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
a écrit :
Hi Widjane,
I agree with you in some of the points, but not in all them.
1. Policies among the RIRs aren’t exactly the same. They tend to converge
with the time, but no
Hi Widjane,
I agree with you in some of the points, but not in all them.
Policies among the RIRs aren’t exactly the same. They tend to converge with the
time, but not always are 100% the same.
In fact, in some RIRs, right now, if you asked for resources and provided
documents about what
In my opinion, the right way to have this is:
Bylaws, almost as they are now. They refer already to the resources, PDP and
the RSA.
RSA. Handles well the relation of any member with AFRINIC. However, this is
only covering “full members” in the sense that they are getting any resources
from
Hi Ashil, all,
I’ve several issues here:
The AUP (Acceptable Usage Policy) of the RPD mailing list can only be developed
as a policy, following the PDP. This is a community task and not any committee
or board or anything like that.
I’m not convinced, in legal terms, if you can enforce
that state that you must
use the space as applied for – well – who’s to know what the space was applied
for – or the justifications given – the data for a ton of these applications is
missing – gone forever.
Andrew
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
Sent: Thursday, 20 Augu
Tks!
However, unless I got it wrong, and again, talking in general, when legacy
resource-holders sign the RSA they are bound to it as well (never mind if
you're are the source or the destination of the transfer).
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 20/8/20 12:10, "Ronald F. Guilmette"
e database – no
they are NOT in violation – because the rules are different when it comes to
this space.
Andrew
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
Sent: Thursday, 20 August 2020 11:50
To: General Discussions of AFRINIC
Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] AFRINC being s
don’t take into account all
of the facts as currently known.
Andrew
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
Sent: Thursday, 20 August 2020 09:44
To: community-discuss@afrinic.net
Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] AFRINC being sued
I've some points here:
1) Were those tran
I've some points here:
1) Were those transfers done following the Intra-RIR policy? Or it happened
before that policy existed?
2) Were those transfers inter-RIR?
3) In any case, were those transfers authorized by the staff (according to the
CPM)?
If any of those questions indicate that the CPM
Hi Abdalla, all,
I've a few inputs:
1) I think the definition of end-site should be amended.
An entity, corporation or individual can have multiple end-sites. Just think in
a bank. They will have a main office, maybe a backup “main-office” or DC for
disaster recovery and many branch offices.
ees waived.
2. Ticket value is placed on file as a credit to be
used to purchase a future flight.
3. Purchase must be made within one year or credit
expires.
Owen
On Mar 18, 2020, at 11:14 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
wro
Hi Nancy, all,
If I understand correctly, it means also the AFRINIC meeting part will not take
place.
Some of us book the flights quite early, from our own pockets, and to make them
cheap they are non-refundable.
Due to the circumstances of the Covid19, the airlines are offering free
I’ve never counted the % of messages in Spanish, Portuguese and English in
LACNIC lists, but my guess is that it is about 60% Spanish, 30% Portuguese and
10% English.
However, I have noticed, that this merge of languages is usually negative,
because most of the misunderstandings, for
Hi Sunday, all,
I’ve been in “internal conflict” myself, since I read the article. Let me tell
why.
I met Ernest the first time around 2005, if I recall correctly. My first
AFRINIC meeting was AFRINIC-2 in Maputo, Mozambique, and shortly after, during
an ITU meeting in Geneva, Adiel
o the side by the brokers.
Mark.
On 17/Nov/19 17:05, Augustine CHII Ngek wrote:
+1 Nishal
We can simply go back to that tradition and see how it helps us in this present
circumstances.
Augustine CHII NGEK
On Sun, 17 Nov 2019, 13:50 Nishal Goburdhan, wrote:
On 17 Nov 2019, at 13:09, JORDI PALE
Well … the so-called “Benjamin” broke *several times* the code of conduct:
https://afrinic.net/code
So should be ban from the meeting (and the lists) and not only Benjamin, but
also the real person behind him.
I’ve asked the staff/board to verify the information about who is behind
I don’t think this will be acceptable.
We like it or not we should not ban anyone to come to the meetings, unless they
violate code of conduct or anything similar that we have for the meetings. Of
course, unless in our code of conduct we state explicitly that anyone using the
whois or
+1
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 5/11/19 8:16, "Adewole Ajao" escribió:
Makes sense. Especially on operational and PR issues such as this. Letting the
CEO communicate will also reduce the sense of non-responsiveness that members
sometimes feel (although it's unavoidable
gt; El 5/7/19 10:16, "Alan Barrett" escribió:
>
>
>
>> On 3 Jul 2019, at 15:50, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
>> wrote:
>>
>> I’m angrier about this as much as I think on it again.
>>
>> Can the board and the staff in
to AfriNIC (if for example
it is determined that email targets/addresses were harvested from Afrinic
digital resources without consent from the data subjects).
walu.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 8:04 AM Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2019, at 14:13 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Disc
“open” database, we need to correct it.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 5/7/19 23:57, "Omo Oaiya" escribió:
Jordi,
On 5 Jul 2019, at 22:13, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
wrote:
Hi Alan,
If the board can't investigate that, we may have a proble
Hi Mirriam,
I don’t agree. The only way for organizations and communities to go forward is
to find solutions to problems.
If we don’t do that now, we will forget about this for 1 year, and then the
mistake will be repeated by someone else. Is that what we want or we prefer to
find our
will be happy to forgive her. My intent is not to punish anyone, just
to make sure that we find solutions to possible problems and mistakes and avoid
repeating them.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 5/7/19 10:16, "Alan Barrett" escribió:
> On 3 Jul 2019, at 15:50, JORDI P
regulations
(GDPR).
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 5/7/19 10:51, "Noah" escribió:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:42 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
wrote:
Hi Noah,
I’m sure we all have contacts from lots of people from the community, but we
use thos
if they don’t want to say.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 5/7/19 6:13, "Badru Ntege" escribió:
Jordi
Curious to know the end in mind with your question?? Please elucidate
BN
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
Reply-To: JORDI PALET MART
Thanks a lot for your response Ahmed!
I think is key to identify the source of the emails and to make sure that they
haven’t been provided explicitly by the owners.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 4/7/19 10:25, "Ahmed Fadl" escribió:
No
Ahmed Fadl | Healthcare
Hi Ahmen,
I mean before getting the email advertisings the candidates, have you
personally provided your email to Wafa?
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 4/7/19 10:06, "Ahmed Fadl" escribió:
Hi Jordi
Already my mail provided for all community members
Thank you
Hi Ahmed,
Can you confirm if you have provided your email to Wafa and if that’s the case,
if it was for discussing about candidates?
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 4/7/19 9:32, "Ahmed Fadl" escribió:
Thank you Sami for your introduction
Let me also introduce myself
My
Hi Arnaud,
I’m very happy that you send this email, because it addresses what I’m saying.
Note that I was not aware of that before, but looks good to me (I look to the
email on 6th of June), the other one is just congratulating about the results.
It is a public email, not private, even
a few responses, we will be able to understand if that was part of an
allowed communication or there is data protection issue.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 4/7/19 0:07, "Noah" escribió:
Hi Jordi,
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:51 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Communi
Hi Sander,
I agree with your if we mean summary of the discussion, but actually I was
meaning summary of the proposal, which in fact is already requested in the
proposal forms and is already done by authors. Sometimes that's more a single
paragraph, so in those cases I think it should be up to
Hi Wafa,
As I’ve expressed in many occasions, I’m all for freedom of speech. However,
when you have a position elected by the community, you need to take care and
avoid miss interpretations.
That’s means that in your messages you must clearly state “hat-off” and not
remark your positions as
, documents, software, databases, website) may only be used,
reproduced and made available to third parties upon prior written authorization
from LARUS.
So, I think this is contradictory.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 3/7/19 17:45, "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss"
Hi Anne-Vivien,
I don’t have any doubt about the good intent, but looking at your attachment,
it is more negative than good for the community, at least, in my opinion.
It is discussing about older versions of the policy proposals (even withdraw
ones), so it confuses people.
It is citing
Hi Sami,
My point here is that the campaigns need to be done *only* in a neutral way,
not by board or committee members, not by staff, and only to people that you
*already* know. So, they should be done only in the official ways determined in
the elections process.
I’m not, *at all*,
contacts, in order to understand if this
personal data (emails are personal data), have been collected from Afrinic
internal databases.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 3/7/19 13:43, "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss"
escribió:
This is really very ugly. Are
This is really very ugly. Are we really crazy to believe that the community is
not able to decide on their own?
I’ve seen a similar situation in other regions and this is outside of the code
of conduct (written or not), or the elections proccesses. There are several
points here:
Have the
opinions have a flavour of
... project!
Those who say that they come as samaritain to "help" must bear in mind that
AfriNIC community is more agile and smart than they think!
RESPECT! RESPECT! "Shouting is not a act of vitality"!
Dr Ousmane TESSA
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ vi
seful because new people get engaged in the list
and in the mics of the meeting.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 2/7/19 20:55, "Noah" escribió:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, 17:11 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss,
wrote:
When anyone present a summary of a po
Hi Andrew,
I’m not sure to agree with your view. I fully agree on freedom of expression,
but there is a fairness and transparency point here. It is about respect to the
PDP (and consequently the community).
When anyone present a summary of a policy proposal (which has been done already
by the
El 1/7/19 20:11, "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss"
escribió:
Hi SM,
Responding from my own perspective, hopefully is useful.
I think "independent" is not easy to find, and is not related to a specific
region.
But here are
Hi SM,
Responding from my own perspective, hopefully is useful.
I think "independent" is not easy to find, and is not related to a specific
region.
But here are some "numbers" based on my own experience (from my customers
networks, so independent on the sense of "not just one case").
This
We already knew that from previous measurements, however the nice thing from
this article is that it is analyzing many different providers worldwide:
https://teamarin.net/2019/06/25/why-is-ipv6-faster/
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
**
IPv4 is
Some time ago I posted in social networks this:
"Let's love words, words do, words take care, words kill, let's be careful with
words! The words in emails and social networks are more dangerous, but do not
be afraid of them!"
So allow me some final words for this week meeting.
1) We have a
Agree with Warwick.
Any member of an organization or community is free to speak.
What is not acceptable is that one person making accusations to other community
members, which said is in the meeting (so he can go to the mic), is not able to
provide his real identity and then is discovered that
Hi Benjamin,
Let me explain how I see this from my perspective.
I’ve not spoken with anyone, apart from the public emails in the list, about my
policy proposals. I usually don’t do. They come from my understanding of what
is good for the community.
I even don’t ask support in private to
Let’s make it generic, so it is easier to understand for everyone. Note that
I’m not a lawyer, but law is generally very logic. So:
In law, you can’t hide documents that are already public.
Moreover, an organization (membership or any other type), can’t have rules that
go *against* the law.
Hi Chittesh,
Yes, of course.
Need to find some time to read minutes, look at the videos, and of course, if
you have any suggestions on that, please, do those in the policy mailing list.
I will be responding to any comments and in some days/weeks, make an
alternative proposal.
Thanks!
Hi all,
I've reserved a room at the first suggested hotel (Hotel Diar Lemdina), which
I think is the AfriNIC venue, on October 2nd.
I've got the credit card payment confirmation charge in a matter of seconds
(company clictopay.com.tn).
However NEVER got the room reservation confirmation from
Hi Jean-Robert,
I guess the people interested can provide inputs to my related policy proposal:
https://www.afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/2467-abuse-contact-policy-update
Of course, use the RDP list please.
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
Regards,
When I said bylaws, I was actually thinking in membership agreement, but
actually either way (or both) may work.
Regards,
Jordi
De: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Fecha: martes, 8 de mayo de 2018, 12:26
Para: AfriNIC Resource Policy ,
I’ve also the same opinion, in general NIRs are not needed, but I have the
feeling that this may be beyond the scope of AfriNIC.
What happen if a country law mandate it? Then AfriNIC members of that country
will be mandated by law to go via the NIR.
Of course, you can “strongly
U citizens, EU residents, potentially even visitors to the EU (on anything
more than a transitory basis).
Still waiting for DPAs to make specific rules.
In the absence of those specific rules - everything else is conjecture.
> On 16 Apr 2018, at 22:34, Jordi Palet Mar
: S Moonesamy <sm+afri...@elandsys.com>
Fecha: martes, 17 de abril de 2018, 7:43
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>,
<community-discuss@afrinic.net>
Asunto: Re: [Community-Discuss] AFRINIC and the GDPR
Hi Jordi,
At 01:40 PM 16-04-2018, Jordi
And forgot to say that IP addresses are also personal data, so the logs when
visiting AfriNIC websites or the registration forms, etc., have the same issue
:-) DNS servers logs as well ... and so on ...
> El 16 abr 2018, a las 22:34, Jordi Palet Martinez via Community-Discuss
> <
Even simpler than that. The registration of emails of EU citizens in this
exploder or in the next AfriNIC meeting.
Emails are personal data.
> El 16 abr 2018, a las 21:15, ze...@auladin.com escribió:
>
> Hi Arsene,
>
> The GDPR applies for data protection for all EU citizens.
>
> If, for
I think Andrew is right.
I just found a short article that explains it:
https://www.gdprandbeyond.com/blog-post/data-privacy/gdpr-affect-non-european-companies/
If you don’t want to read all the article, this is the key:
“The short answer is: the regulation will affect firms both
98 matches
Mail list logo