On Saturday 27 October 2001 10:46, Robert L Martin wrote:
Given a stock 8.1 install (soon to be a box set install) how would one
1 get a functioning dvd playing program running
Can't speak to that, don't have a DVD drive, never set one up, would expect
it to work out of the box. Playing
On Thursday 01 November 2001 07:54 am, David wrote:
I have two computers testing cooker stuff. I share a monitor and
keyboard between them. I can't share the mouse, cause when X loses the
mouse, well you know.
I would figure that XFree86.org would be the best place, but maybe
someone knows
On Friday 02 November 2001 06:47 pm, Han wrote:
Borsenkow Andrej ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I switched on ClearType. It is really impressive even on CRT
terminal -
Is it based on the grc stuff?
No idea.
The technique is the same. I have a friend with a acorn electron that
does that stuff.
On Friday 02 November 2001 10:28 pm, Roach, Mark R. wrote:
for me, /dev/mouse does not work either, I tried running mousedrake, with
same results, I deleted /dev/psaux /dev/mouse /dev/psmouse /dev/misc/psaux
and ran mousedrake, it did recreate the devices, but they still did not
work.
Had
On Saturday 03 November 2001 05:13 am, Yura Gusev wrote:
Warning: Failed opening 'root.exe' for highlighting in
/var/www/html/default.ida on line 14
Do i need root.exe on the server? Where can i get one?
Set up an unpatched IIS webserver, and you will have one within a few hours.
On Thursday 25 October 2001 09:14, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
I'm not certain how I might gather more information about this bug, but
the upgrade of 8.0 to 8.1 on a stock Dell L700cx lost the CDROM (which
obviously worked during the upgrade ;)
Looks like a supermount problem, maybe the
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 22:36, John Allen wrote:
svetljo wrote:
you should wait till Alan Cox releases a stable 2.4.14 or maybe 2.4.15
Linus has merged ext3 intermezo zisofs mgag550-framebuffer
and a lot of other things from Alan
The only problem I can see with breaking from AC, and
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 22:36, John Allen wrote:
svetljo wrote:
The only problem I can see with breaking from AC, and going with Linus
is that Redhat will *always* be AC
...oh, and Alan will not be maintaining 2.4 or any other kernel in particular
after 2.5 forks away.
Cheers; Leon
On Monday 26 November 2001 18:01, Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:34:59 +0100, Blue Lizard wrote:
On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 03:47, Frederic Crozat wrote:
- Lower optimizations
What now (specifically)?
-O3, fastmath, and friends are working well for stock builds...
Crash when
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 03:32, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
le lun 26-11-2001 à 20:11, Ron Secord a écrit :
I would like to upgrade the kernel to
kernel-2.4.13-10mdk.i586.rpm to see if it will better detect my video
card.
Nothing to do with kernel. It's XFree area.
The two intersect. There
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 19:24, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
You can't have two different version of foo installed
simultaneously (unless they bear different names),
Why not? It works for me. (-:
I have machines with two versions of (g)libc installed at once, two kernels,
etc. No worries.
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 08:56 pm, you wrote:
I know that if I want to use cooker, I should update my whole distribution
to cooker. (I have done this in my computer at work)
Unfortunately I have only a modem-connection at my home, and updating
Mandrake to cooker in my home computer would
On Monday 10 December 2001 07:53, Han wrote:
Hoyt Duff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sunday 09 December 2001 04:22 pm, you wrote:
Yura Gusev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi, is it possible to move Konqueror and KDM from kdebase to the
seperate packages?
/me thinks konqueoror resembles IE
On Monday 10 December 2001 10:16, Han wrote:
Leon Brooks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Konqueror and KMail run fine for me under Enlightenment, Gnome and
BlackBox. Conversely, Galeon and Evolution seem happy under KDE. As
long as everyone has enough libraries, there doesn't seem
On Monday 10 December 2001 17:30, Myles Byrne wrote:
I just downloaded kernel-2.4.16-6mdk and am attempting to install it, in
order to get sound and networking going on a IBM 600e.
Sound... wlll... your mileage is likely to vary from chip to chip. The
600E uses a NeoMagic chipset for
Not that I want this much Windows integration by default, but it's a nice
option to offer, perhaps as a ``make my computer more like Windows but
without the crashes and security holes'' check-box during install and/or as a
new-user window manager option for those who do:
On Monday 10 December 2001 22:54, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
le lun 10-12-2001 à 14:01, Leon Brooks a écrit :
Not that I want this much Windows integration by default, but it's a nice
option to offer, perhaps as a ``make my computer more like Windows but
without the crashes and security holes
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 00:29, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
They seem to have a KDE desktop with a My Computer and a Network
Neighbourhood, hardly much more (the rest pretty much looks like
RH stuff).
Not hard to reproduce in an Mdk distro then? (-:
Cheers; Leon
http://overflow.sourceforge.net/
Very small (100k exe, 14k docs), needs only Qt (it expects 1.4 but
works with 2.3.1 although I had to edit the configure script to make
it search /usr/include/qt2 for the header files before it would
compile), it looks like Othello but works completely
On Friday 31 January 2003 07:47 am, Damian Gatabria wrote:
Likewise the text console mod would blank the console when it lost
focus, and demand a password before unblanking when focus returned.
Umm.. there should be an easy way to disable all of this stuff, right?
Yeah, just leave root
On Friday 31 January 2003 05:09 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
Maybe Mandrakesoft should consider shipping something like GnuWin2 or
whatever it's called in Pro-Suite?
Not a bad idea. How much does it cost them to label, wrap and include one more
CD?
Cheers; Leon
On Friday 31 January 2003 07:57 pm, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's my proposal. Why not ship distributable win32 applications like
WinSCP, cygwin, etc?
i don't belive that's our job to develop for others OS than the one we
create :-).
Not develop,
On Friday 31 January 2003 09:27 pm, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Michael Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, the fact is some others OS need your help, since it would be too easy
without it :)
ask MS to hire us 8-p
`Special rate* for Microsoft'
Cheers; Leon
* 3x normal rate
On Saturday 01 February 2003 12:07 am, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I belive MS ship migration tools for moving away from Novell?
And from Unix (SFU - Services For Unix, GPLed(!) software to supply many of
the Unix services and features still absent from Windows).
If we had such a boxed collection
On Saturday 01 February 2003 12:40 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
Oden Eriksson wrote:
but it's ok, I'm real quick doing my internet
banking (which is mainly why...).
For that, I would use win4lin :-).
Boots windows faster than any machine I have ever seen ...
About 3 seconds on a dual P3/1000
On Saturday 01 February 2003 11:00 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Leon Brooks wrote:
And from Unix (SFU - Services For Unix, GPLed(!) software to supply many
of the Unix services and features still absent from Windows).
And they still complain about the GPL?
Yup. Chutzpah
On Saturday 01 February 2003 11:16 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Leon Brooks wrote:
I assume we have you to thank for this entertaining write-up of
linux.conf.au:
http://linux.org.au/~leonb/lca2003/LCA2003-wrapup.html
^^ that's me!
Cheers; Leon
Space Shuttle Columbia disintegrated over Texas during re-entry (200,000ft),
lots of links at http://news.google.com/
Interesting that the news is out _before_ the shuttle was due to land.
Astronauts almost certainly all dead.
That'll knacker NASA for a while too, but maybe they'll try more
On Saturday 01 February 2003 11:26 pm, andre wrote:
On Saturday 01 February 2003 16:00, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Leon Brooks wrote:
And from Unix (SFU - Services For Unix, GPLed(!) software to supply
many of the Unix services and features still absent from Windows
On Sunday 02 February 2003 12:48 am, J. Greenlees wrote:
Leon Brooks wrote:
That'll knacker NASA for a while too, but maybe they'll try more
imaginative launch vehicles now.
maybe they'll get rid of legacy tech and go state of the art in design?
naw, NASA turned that down when starting
On Sunday 02 February 2003 01:26 am, J. Greenlees wrote:
definately a better way to go, but most effective location is either
peru or india. the distance to a geosync orbit being reduced by the
altitude of the base.
the US government will never approve of a system that could not be based
in
On Monday 03 February 2003 08:48 am, Levi Ramsey wrote:
Leon wrote:
(francophones: any idea how I pluralise that?)
And it's pluralize, Leon... ;o)
You -ing Americans are all the -ing same! It's listen-to-me this and
let-me-tell-you that...
At least we don't need context to differentiate
On Monday 03 February 2003 05:50 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
Levi Ramsey wrote:
Anyone who watched Independence Day knows that aliens run Macs... ;o)
That doesn't just apply to aliens, it really applies to most movies and
many TV shows where props are ordered by the arty-type people, who don't
On Monday 03 February 2003 06:29 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 08:00, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Monday 03 February 2003 08:48 am, Levi Ramsey wrote:
Leon wrote:
(francophones: any idea how I pluralise that?)
And it's pluralize, Leon... ;o)
You -ing Americans are all the -ing
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 05:09 am, Thomas Backlund wrote:
I had some spare time so I decided to try to make
a kernel with support for the Intel 845 IDE chipset...
( meaning (U)DMA support ...)
I have a machine which still hasn't recovered from your nForce patch. (-:
I'd foolishly assumed
On Thursday 06 February 2003 11:50 pm, Ross Ferson wrote:
please do. I hate not using what i have. anyone advise what i should do ?
reinstall? or ?
You could simply install the -smp kernel if it hasn't been already (rpm -qa |
grep kernel) and make that the LILO default if it doesn't claim
On Sunday 09 February 2003 05:30 am, Preston Cody wrote:
My Problem: I have an Nvidia TNT2, so I need to get the nvidia drivers
from their website, compile them, and manually edit my XF86Config-4
file. The average user shouldn't have to do this.
They have RPMs which work flawlessly out of the
On Sunday 09 February 2003 05:45 am, David Walser wrote:
We do not include proprietary software in the downloadable version of
the distribution, period.
In the boxed sets, we do include a package of the nVidia modules, and if
you have an nVidia card, DrakX (the installer) will use it
On Sunday 09 February 2003 10:48 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
OpenOffice is very picky about fonts. It might be helpful for you to read
this:
http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/fontguide.html
For a devil's-advocate opinion, I've thrown over 300 different fonts at OOo
1.0.2 (DrakFont is great) and it
On Monday 10 February 2003 05:06 pm, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
Maybe NVidia, now that they lost the
crown of faster 3D card even on newer GeForce FX against
ATI, can think to release freely their drivers freely (which I doubt)
trying to conquer other markets, like those of Linux
3D workstations.
the world-wide Open Source
community wholeheartedly, please spell them out to us, as we may be able to
do something about some or all of them.
Thanking you in advance
Leon Brooks
--
Member, Perth Linux User Group http://plug.linux.org.au/
Committee Member, Linux Australia
...was fielded by an automated system which (apparently) discarded the email
and referred me to a web page form. So I pasted the email into the form and
sent that, will relay the results as they arrive.
Cheers; Leon
On Monday 10 February 2003 11:07 pm, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Montag, 10. Februar 2003, 09:00:32 Uhr MET, schrieb Narfi Stefansson:
Götz:There must be something missing in your statement, such as you
can only get accelerated AGP with the closed nvidia graphics
drivers or something of that nature.
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 06:25 am, Ben Reser wrote:
I have to wonder why there isn't a movement to just simply not
buy nVidia hardware.
Because the competing (SiS, here in Oz at least) hardware sucks. Sad but true.
Cheers; Leon
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:05 am, Ben Reser wrote:
Microsoft chose nVidia's chip for
the Xbox and can't really switch chips in mid-stream.
Don't bet your last dollar on that.
Cheers; Leon
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:32 am, Austin Acton wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 19:05, Ben Reser wrote:
Seems to me the truth is nVidia just is paranoid about
competitors learning something from their drivers.
b) don't release code, keep secrets from competition
What secrets?
Just how much
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:10 am, et wrote:
I don't
want my inclusion in this lists archives seen as approval to petition
anyone in my name.
I said `many', not `all'.
Cheers; Leon
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:37 am, Narfi Stefansson wrote:
I believe that we should only ask them for the specs.
That's a very modest thing to ask for and it's much harder to come up with
arguments for why they shouldn't release them.
OK, when (if) they say `no' to the drivers, I'll fall
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:54 am, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 01:31, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 06:25 am, Ben Reser wrote:
I have to wonder why there isn't a movement to just simply not
buy nVidia hardware.
Because the competing (SiS, here in Oz
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:28 pm, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
we do have man sex
Are you sure that was phrased right?
Cheers; Leon
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:36 pm, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
Le mer 12/02/2003 à 08:19, Götz Waschk a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 12:07:49 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
we do have man sex
And it would be nice if it were removed. I have children using Mandrake
and would be
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 08:50 pm, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 07:44:02 Uhr MET, schrieb Greg Meyer:
Let me guess: you are a catholic?
You don't have to be a Catholic to have morals!
Let me get this straight: I'm not against christians or jews or
mormons or
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:55 pm, Götz Waschk wrote:
Maybe the next time someone
will complain about swearing in kernel-source:
The kind of pencil-neck who would do that generally coincides with the kind of
dweeb who couldn't find it in the first place. This is helped by
kernel-source
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:34 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Next PLF mplayer release will just have [ $USER=mickwd ] rm -rf / in
%postin. We're supposed to be evil terrorists, after all.
That wouldn't work, mickwd wouldn't have permission to delete anything, and
would be installing with
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:24 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
$man sex
is not half as bad as the spam I get every twenty minutes or so...
or as graphic...
urpmi kdehelp-sex ?
Cheers; Leon
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:32 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
Leon et al,
If they start teaching brainfuck in schools as a simple and very
educational introduction to computer programming (which it is), are you
gonna send your kids to another school?
Moot point, 'coz they won't.
However, I
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:54 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
Please remove all of them at once.
I am offended.
Oh, bugger off! (-:
Cheers; Leon
On Thursday 13 February 2003 12:18 am, scott chevalley wrote:
I can't get my 14 year old daughter to touch a computer running Linux
unless it has a punk-rock penguin logo somewhere visible.
My 12yog themes everything in eye-searing pinks and purples. (-:
This all reminds me of the old apple
On Thursday 13 February 2003 07:46 am, Quel Qun wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 15:39, Leon Brooks wrote:
A simple userdel -r mickwd
would probably be more effective ...
Now I am going to freak out every time I install a new rpm.
Well, I must admit that it is easier to implement than under
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:41 pm, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
I'll bet that until it was brought up NOBODY remembered that this was in
the man pages. It's been there since 1987 - not exactly a recent addition.
Never seen it before, and I've been using Linux since kernel version
1.something
On Thursday 13 February 2003 08:14 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
I don't see a controversy yet this morning. I need a good Cooker
controversy to get my day started properly, although I do realize that many
of you have already had lunch.
How about Let's bring back rpmdrake 1.4!
I've got a better
On Friday 14 February 2003 05:24 pm, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
I [...] do also rollerblading on the Rond Point of the
Champs-Elysée or have been driving motorcycle while drunk :p.
Scraped a lady off the pavement tonight who had been driving only her feet
while drunk (her mum had died and she
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 01:24 am, Bret Baptist wrote:
Arggg, do you think we could get Licq up to 1.2.4 from 1.2.0a that we have
now??
Note to all: a month ago was the time to ask things like this.
There are a couple of last-minuters like the BlueFish update that could be
excused for
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 10:09 pm, Chuck Shirley wrote:
You can build a cluster of cheap PCs, no need for the 3D hardware and
the other useless stuff inside the xbox.
Hmm... Noteworthy...
Note this, while you're at it (-:
http://xbox.plug.linux.org.au/
Cheers; Leon
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 11:10 pm, Götz Waschk wrote:
While we could argue
about the popularity of xcdroast and xfce, I like the fact that
Mandrake includes alternatives to the KDE monoculture.
Very much agree. I use the KDE tools for almost everything, my preference, but
seeing the
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 11:15 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, I use xcdroast, for one.
K3B here. My ex-Windows users lap it up.
Cheers; Leon
On Thursday 20 February 2003 02:02 pm, Brook Humphrey wrote:
Was not insulting I did say I understand why it is there.
That's still not anything like reasonable cause for calling other peoples'
hard work and dedication `garbage'.
Cheers; Leon
On Thursday 20 February 2003 11:30 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tryed to rebuild the nvidia-kernel source file, but I have several
error messages.
Using a fairly recent Cooker kernel on a 9.0 system worked fine for me, after
I had hand-added the symlink between /lib/modules/$(uname
On Friday 21 February 2003 03:12 am, guran wrote:
Kformat signed that the drive was still
busy. So I had to unmount as root.
See if `sync' is enough next time.
Cheers; Leon
On Saturday 22 February 2003 12:15 am, Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:04:56 -0600, Bret Baptist wrote:
On Friday 21 February 2003 9:54 am, Frederic Crozat wrote:
I think I made my point very clear.. It is a bug in Kcontrol..
It is a bug because another toolkit doesn't have to
On Saturday 22 February 2003 03:49 pm, Rob Snow wrote:
Thanks for the reply, thats why I wanted to check. I've just done another
check and the nvnet and nvaudio will compile when I run with a cooker
system (done today) but with 9.0 kernel (19-16) and same sources. With
21-8 to 21- 10
On Saturday 22 February 2003 05:05 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
I run iceWM on the laptop just because it's quicker to start. Not much
problem on start time with Konq or any of the other apps. just tired
of waiting for KDE itself to start.
What, you don't appreciate the aesthetic value of
On Sunday 23 February 2003 04:31 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
How about ISP config if a modem is detected?
Or ISDN, or broadband.
I asked Mandrake about submitting data for Aussie ISPs for this, and got no
reply. Riding on the coat-tails of your karma with 'bated breath. (-:
Cheers; Leon
On Sunday 23 February 2003 07:33 am, Quel Qun wrote:
If sombody (wish I had the time) could rewrite the LAN driver as OSS, I
could live with that: it would yield a 100% operational system from which
you could then download the [...] accelerated video drivers for performance
bliss [...] if you
On Sunday 23 February 2003 06:01 pm, guran wrote:
I have been looking at yoper from nz and they have have an nvidia file with
sound file in it.
Later kernels (including 9.1) support the nvaudio device, since it's really
only another set of PCI IDs to add to the Intel i810 audio driver.
A
On Monday 24 February 2003 12:27 am, marcos colome wrote:
I would like to inform you that this version of Mandrake, 9.1 is a very
nice distro, but the beta3 is worst than the beta2 and beta1
My friends who have tried it have been very pleased. One rates RC1 as
`completely stable'.
Some
On Monday 24 February 2003 08:04 pm, Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
I propose that in such places not only the device node filename be
shown, but also a description of the device, like in this example:
/dev/hda: SAMSUNG SV2042H, ATA DISK drive
Sensible, easy to implement. Seconded! (-:
Cheers;
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 04:57 pm, Robert Fox wrote:
Is BLUE the only choice?
Hoag's Object is kind of yellow, would tyhat do...? (-:
Cheers; Leon
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 01:34 pm, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
Tonights update - we're back to broken again.
Unpack them and diff. Unpack the sources and diff.
Cheers; Leon
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 04:17 am, Pixel wrote:
Szakacsits Szabolcs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pixel, it may make sense to present this information to the user at
some point in some way not to scare them to death later on, e.g. (in
non-native English): Please note, for extra safety NTFS
On Thursday 27 February 2003 03:34 am, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
I'm having problems with Explorer today apparently.
Today only? Lucky you. (-:
Cheers; Leon
On Thursday 27 February 2003 06:24 pm, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Complaint: The new default login manager again looks sparse and
amateurish. Please, either pretty it up a bit or change it back.
why make it more complex that it should ?
So we can have the clock back. As large 3D clock hands
On Friday 28 February 2003 04:56 am, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 20:46, Alexander Volovics wrote:
Look at /boot/config-2.4.21pre4-10mdk. Under the heading 'ACPI Support'
you see that CONFIG_ACPI_AC, CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY, CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON,
CONFIG_ACPI_FAN,
On Sunday 02 March 2003 12:06 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
Any other rational arguments for or against these packages?
No, not really, but I'm sure there are heaps of rational-*sounding* ones, and
even more rational*ist* ones. (-:
So before anyone leaps on that bandwagon, let me emphasise that this
On Sunday 02 March 2003 03:29 am, Élie Charest wrote:
As a semi-practicing Buddhist and fully-licensed discordian Pope, I second
that motion!
(-:
Seriously, even for non-believers this can be very interesting. The Bible
and other sacred text are part of the world's heritage and culture. Plus
On Sunday 02 March 2003 03:38 am, Philip Webb wrote:
no problem here, provided they are neutral between religions,
ie it's a scholarly tool which allows users to study texts
which may belong to any religion, incl eg the Koran or the Talmud.
most would object -- i would strongly -- , if it
On Sunday 02 March 2003 04:14 am, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Samstag, 1. März 2003, 18:06:02 Uhr MET, schrieb Buchan Milne:
Any other rational arguments for or against these packages?
OK. But you should be aware of the fact that some religious texts
could be more offensive that any sex, baby or
On Sunday 02 March 2003 06:04 am, N Smethurst wrote:
Informal questionnaires like this are
always going to attract replies from proactive individuals who have a
specific interest in pushing whatever the questionnaire is talking about.
True, but in this case the majority of respondents have
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:54 pm, N Smethurst wrote:
There is nothing non-religious and in fact nothing non-christian about any
of the texts I could find on the Sword website. It's clear that the
advocates of this software are painting a picture of misinformation in
order to further their
On Sunday 02 March 2003 10:09 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, N Smethurst wrote:
to reflect that it is a general text study tool and not
something aimed at the study of religious material.
No one claimed the aim of the software was anything but to assist in
studying religious
On Sunday 02 March 2003 10:40 pm, Robert L Martin wrote:
1 how many angels can dance on the head of a pin
2 how much torture a cenobyte can get from the point of the same pin
Sounds like very Small Gods...
Cheers; Leon
On Monday 03 March 2003 04:51 am, N Smethurst wrote:
The cooker mailing list is not a good place to have this kind
of political debate. The club has forums for this type of thing, so could
you continue this discussion there instead please.
Really? Then why are you prolonging it here? (-:
On Monday 03 March 2003 10:03 am, Texstar wrote:
Right! GnomeSword and Bibletime are just frontends to various religious
modules that one can download depending on their religious preferences.
Or non.
BTW, while the installation process is dead simple, a script (wrapped to
prompt for
On Monday 03 March 2003 10:37 pm, Danny Tholen wrote:
Loki's Kohan runs only in 1024x768, but I hate using my desktop in that
resolution (low refresh, small fonts). Switching during session would be
nice. And certainly easier compared to starting a new xserver.
Hmm... some of you will probably
BTW, the following page lists OSIS-XML texts, which are in theory at least
compatible with Sword (and therefore BibleTime):
http://www.ccel.org/osis/xml/
These include `Tolstoy, Leo Nikolayevich (1828-1910): Twenty-Three Tales' in
addition to the Webster's English Dictionary on the Sword
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 04:31 pm, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Dienstag, 4. März 2003, 13:24:15 Uhr MET, schrieb Leon Brooks:
Sun have this really cool feature for their SunRay and similar
workstations which allows you to log in to any random terminal with a
card; when you pull out your card your
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 06:36 pm, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Didn't the gdm provides
this fast user switching ?
No. GDM left a user running on one display, and opened a new display (same
card) for the new user.
Cheers; Leon
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 07:47 pm, Steffen Barszus wrote:
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 11:40, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Dienstag, 4. März 2003, 11:36:14 Uhr MET, schrieb Steffen Barszus:
I don't know if there is anything like this. But for sure it is not
possible to use things like xv or OpenGL on
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 04:54 pm, Jeremy Wilkins wrote:
sounds like your looking for something similar to Xmove.
xmove is indeed a step in the right direction. It doesn't seem to do much of
the adaptation stuff (for example, it explicitly disclaims the ability to run
colourmapped visuals on
On Thursday 06 March 2003 02:26 am, francisco wrote:
Under rc2, nvidia drivers (rpm rebuilded from src.rpm), tuxracer (free
package) crass X if you select some of the races (Who says that penguins
can't fly). I have tested the package comming with rc2 and also that
comming with 9.0 under rc2
601 - 700 of 982 matches
Mail list logo
