Re: [Cooker] Updated heartbeat, and request

2003-11-19 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Mark Watts wrote:


On Tuesday 18 November 2003 3:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:39 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:

Bret Baptist wrote:

D'Oh, that one seems to be a new addition that wasn't in fact tested.

I've just tested on 8.2 in a chroot with:

%{!?lib: %global lib lib}
%{!?mklibname: %global mklibname(ds)
%lib%{1}%{?2:%{2}}%{?3:_%{3}}%{-s:-static}%{-d:-devel}}

(that's two lines ... in case the last one wrapped to two)

OK we are making progress now.  Only issues I am seeing is why would
these be  build dependencies?

libgnome32-devel is needed by heartbeat-1.0.2-2mdk
libid3tag0-devel is needed by heartbeat-1.0.2-2mdk

I found the same issue now, I just --nodeps'ed it (libid3tag0-devel is not
in 8.2, I installed the rest painfully with my old 8.2 CDs which I seem to
have written on bad media ...) and it seems to be building OK.

I really can't think why I need half of GNOME installed to build this!
Maybe I will find out some time ;-).


 Can we not just update the cooker version to 1.0.4 ? It does fix a
security
 issue after all, and also introduces some new functionality that some
of us
 want to use...

 http://www.linux-ha.org/download/

Done, please test it (I don't use heartbeat - yet ...)

Once I have a clean 9.2 installation, or klama's got a 9.2 chroot, I
will build packages for 9.2.

But, then we need to have a policy for updates to contrib ... and
possibly one on per-release release suffixes or epochs too ...

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/u2XErJK6UGDSBKcRAjypAJ9U+pgYAP/0wqooXaIIoOFEhCY3IwCgv0Yz
3Erp1/tx2nCoXHBWlx5wJCs=
=z619
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Re: No Subject

2003-11-19 Thread Buchan Milne
 sided, margin, tray ... ) and that's
 all. They don't need to have access to the printer icon when everything
 is going fine ( i.e when the page is printed ).

 2°/ Some computers still have floppy drives and windows still provides
 easy access to floppy drives.

I don't say it should be difficult to access floppy drives, but they
should *not* be grouped with files that in many cases are nowhere near
the mahine.

 On top of that for user wanting to save
 some files it's easier than CDRW ( as a sysadmin i don't want that my
 users could burn some CDROM ), and cheaper and more common than Zip !

USB flash disks are cheaper (1 floppy drive + 40 floppies is about the
price of a 64MB flash disk).


 3°/ On workstation it's true that normally a user don't use CDROM ( I
 even remove CDROM from computers and just let floppy drives for network
 installation and do everything by network ), but in desktop environment
 users use CDROM all the time ... in the windows world.

Please be more specific. desktop refers to anything besides servers,
so in our network we have 60 desktops (you seem to refer to them as
workstations, but workstation usually has different connotations.

On our 60 desktops, CD-ROMs are almost never used.

 - Use an encyclopedia - CDROM for installation and sometimes for
 consultation.
 - educative CDROM - CDROM for installation and sometimes for usage
 - gaming - CDROM for instalation and sometimes for gaming
 - audio - CDROM for audio CD or mp3 CD
 - Video - CDROM for divx or DVD ( yes sometimes you'd rather burn CD
 and put them in bag bag with the jacket of the film in order to keep all
 the divx and freed space from your HD )

Most of these are home uses, not necessarily applicable to all
desktop uses.

 So you have many many possibilities when you could end up using your
 CDROM in a desktop/normal usage.

Sure. But it still doesn't belong in $HOME.

Think about a network setup, with NFS homes and remote X.

If I have an app running on a remote machine, displaying on my local
machine, where would $HOME/cdrom point to? This could be very confusing,
as the same location in two different windows is different, with no
easy distinction that the location is machine-specific.

 Linux limited set of available
 applications that users can buy at WalMart/FNAC/Virgin/... should not
 hide the fact that one time they will have to install things from
 foreign sources and that this will be thanks to CDROM

 4°/ A good sysadmin provides links on the desktop ( .desktop or symlinks
 ) to the others NFS share so that the user don't need to browse in order
 to find the files. When the user is logged, it should directly see where
 are the files and not have to dig through the FHS to find something.
 This increase learning curve.


I don't think this is ideal (IMHO). Many user work with full-screen
windows, and hardly ever see the desktop. So, for Windows we just map
drives. But, how is the user supposed to know which drive is which (even
with the maximum comment we can fit in)? Under Linux, we just tell them
to look in /home (and from there it's much easier than in Windows.

But, before you start advocating desktop links everywhere, maybe we need
some solution to adding links to user's desktops that will actually work
well (ie like Default User profile in Windows).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/u4mqrJK6UGDSBKcRAqGWAJsHBaa9YCtKrNYEzapEhRYKVN3UiACgnhql
Znx/l1FFJPN+cERW+c5nMl8=
=97vf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Updated heartbeat, and request

2003-11-19 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Bret Baptist wrote:
 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 4:46 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Commented out the gnome and id3 stuff, compiled fine.

 But when I went to install the rpm we made and I get this:

 Installation failed:
 rpm-helper is needed by heartbeat-1.0.4-1mdk

 Can I just nodeps this?

For an upgrade, it should be ok (if you manually
restart/reload/condrestart heartbeat), for new installs it might not
automagically enable heartbeat.

rpm-helper provides the scripts used by %_pre_useradd, %_post_service
etc, and heartbeat just has a %_post_service and %_preun_service (ie no
big deal). If it used a %_pre_useradd it would have been more of an issue.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/u7TVrJK6UGDSBKcRAnxYAJ0RmQX68feFV093PN01TNbiiXDwRACgtMMn
mq7gg1ZQmLV2gtAeDVNIWFs=
=plPI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Updated heartbeat, and request

2003-11-19 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Olivier Thauvin wrote:
 No, rpm-helper is a batch of script which install/configure services,
users,
 group, ect...

 Better, uses urpmi.

No rpm-helper on 8.2 (including MNF which I think Bret is using):

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ cat /etc/mandrake-release
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Bluebird) for i586
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ urpmq mandrake-release -r
mandrake-release-8.2-1mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ urpmq rpm-helper
no package named rpm-helper

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/u7dlrJK6UGDSBKcRApiYAKCJ2W+pA5xQDA0uPKnSXYD9wTzymACgtmrW
qJjF9Xf/7b0PrXWEPZbVTy4=
=nzxL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6389] [mandrake_theme] provide a default background

2003-11-19 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[waschk] wrote:
 http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6389

 It doesn't always seem to work, as I don't have the
 /usr/share/mdk/backgrounds//default.png symlink.

Some previous versions had bad %postun's, so you might want to --force
the current package over itself ...

New installations and upgrades from 9.1 should work ok (AFAIK).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/u9AArJK6UGDSBKcRAioMAKDAPGIyR8gx2WNTd1uXwkt3CtGZpgCfdems
P98CczI4aCY4WHUzBtG2r5k=
=DXDL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] [PROPOSAL] Add QA link to all front pages

2003-11-18 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Leon Brooks wrote:
 Quite a common report I get from users is I don't know where to report
 bugs. An easy way to fix this would be a report bugs link to
 qa.mandrakesoft.com in the banner which adorns all Mandrake sites, and
 on the local welcome-to-mandrake page.

s/qa.mandrakesoft.com/bugs.mandrakelinux.com/g

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/ueAvrJK6UGDSBKcRAnUfAKDIRiQBzs3I/zw7Hv2WUhEo6kAEUQCgkNxm
s8aDTaYLiN780OMT0RQ+fIs=
=gFHE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Re: unable to use bewan drivers with 2.4.22-10mdk

2003-11-18 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Guillaume Rousse wrote:
 Ainsi parlait Juan Quintela :

It appears that your are compiling your drivers agaist a wrong source
for some reason.  Can you give one address for the drivers, please?

 You are right, i failed to notice it :-(

 However, i'd like to know why urpmi kernel-source on a fleshly
installed 9.1
 download a source different from the installed kernel...

urpmi installs the latest kernel-source, but doesn't install the latest
kernel and reboot your machine on it for you (would you *really* want
this?).

The driver package should warn you if the version of the kernel sources
doesn't match `uname -r` though (although there are reasons why this
would be valid, so it shouldn't exit/error).

Regards,
Buchan
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/ueE0rJK6UGDSBKcRAmuxAKCa+6r9KbPdvA59g456M8t6sJyBGQCeJBAs
QWASOq/S/sfe7XPJfefLfOg=
=UAID
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




[Cooker] Problems with dependencies in different prefixes

2003-11-18 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I am seeing some problems with dependencies missing on grass built on
current cooker (which is why we don't have 5.0.3 in cooker contrib at
the moment).

For example, compare grass-5.0.3 build on 9.1:

$ rpm -qRp RPMS.mdk9.1/i586/grass-5.0.3-1mdk.i586.rpm
xterm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
ld-linux.so.2
libcrypto.so.0.9.7
libcrypt.so.1
libc.so.6
libdl.so.2
libfftw.so.2
libfreetype.so.6
libgcc_s.so.1
libgdal.1.1.so
libgd.so.2
libGL.so.1
libGLU.so.1
libgpm.so.1
libgrass5.so.0
libhistory.so.4.3
libICE.so.6
libjpeg.so.62
libm.so.6
libncurses.so.5
libnsl.so.1
libodbc.so.1
libpng.so.3
libpq.so.3
libpthread.so.0
libreadline.so.4.3
libresolv.so.2
libSM.so.6
libssl.so.0.9.7
libstdc++.so.5
libtcl8.3.so
libtermcap.so.2
libtiff.so.3
libtk8.3.so
libungif.so.4
libX11.so.6
libXext.so.6
libXm.so.2
libXmu.so.6
libXpm.so.4
libXp.so.6
libXt.so.6
libz.so.1
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)


to a package built on cooker from the same SRPM:
$ rpm -qRp RPMS.mdk10.0/i586/grass-5.0.3-1mdk.i586.rpm
xterm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) = 4.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1

So, only manual dependencies and pre/post script dependencies are taking
effect on cooker.

I just rebuilt the grass-5.0.2-1mdk SRPM that is currently in contrib on
klama, and again the binary package misses all the automatic deps, while
the binary in contrib itself has the correct deps (from when it was
built on klama a few months ago).

So, something is definitely broken.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/uepxrJK6UGDSBKcRAlczAKCKK736tLjk9Ak1W7oPKARGkmHNSACeMIwL
SKyC+GwxwX4Xj/UwmU7BOZ0=
=wJYL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-11-18 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thierry Vignaud wrote:
 Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


How can harddrake detect the mouse/keyboard type ?
It is easy ?


 it's not.
 see:
 - the issues with detecting the wheel of ps/2 mice

Is this still necessary? On the mklivecd list it was mentioned that
XFree86 works OK with 'Option Protocol auto on most PS/2 mice. I
tested with a number of mice that are normally supported by different
protocols (at least the 4 major ones). See

https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/minicd-scripts/2003-October/000277.html

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/ugN2rJK6UGDSBKcRAnSPAKC+Q004oNyd9zgbZR9fOqqKcJoyhwCeNdHP
SVb43tQiGm2MYhSfB/cURfA=
=vIMv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Updated heartbeat, and request

2003-11-18 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Bret Baptist wrote:
 This is the result from rpm --rebuild heartbeat-1.0.2-2mdk.src.rpm:
 error: Bad package specification: %package -n %mklibname heartbeat 0


Easy fix (I think)

Add something like this to the top of the spec file:

%{!?mklibname: %define mklibname
%lib%{1}%{?2:%{2}}%{?3:_%{3}}%{-s:-static}%{-d:-devel}}
(that's one line)

This is what I use on samba, and it should still build on 8.0 even (not
that I have tried this particular feature on it recently ...)

If it's a couple of newer packages on 8.2, just add the macro to your
~/.rpmmacros (might need some tweaking).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/umdFrJK6UGDSBKcRAhM5AKC84sLuy1mjDeAc4fSYUl/q3KPadQCgpDAV
sME+2XWbiWffg5kiI3zYoYE=
=aRje
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] User says MDK 9.2 is a backward step and requests features

2003-11-17 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Harijs Buss wrote:
 On Monday 17 November 2003 02:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I guess you have mdkkdm. Use Mandrake Control Center-Hardware-Login
Manager (or similar) to change this. (This is a change from 9.0-9.1)


 Nope. Look, Buchan, even you didn't remember it right;

Actually I do, that is the way it is on 9.1 ;-).

 what to speak about us
 mortals...  For some unknown reason the way how to do this is Mandrake
 Control Center - System - Choose the Display Manager.  Why this Login
 Window is called Display Manager there, is beyond my understanding.

Technically, that is the correct term. KDE's terminology is wrong (and
why do they call it kdm and not klm?).

 I for
 sure wouldn't find it myself in a lifetime but somebody told me on
some list
 (don't remember, maybe even here on Cooker). This is _so_ confusing,
 specially because everything other related to this login window is
specified
 on KDE Control Center - System - Login Manager.

Well, you need to choose which display manager you use (in MCC), and
after that you use the tools for the display manager to configure it.
Just like you choose KDE/GNOME at login time, and use their tools to
configure it.

 The Mighty Ones at
 Mandrake could IMHO at least put the same name in MCC, to make it a
bit more
 understandable:  Mandrake Control Center - System - Choose Login
Manager.
 Certainly putting some more understandable icon for it could help as
well,
 instead of quite cryptic traffic lights (!) like now.

IMHO KDE is wrong, Mandrake is using the correct term.

I can't make out what the user is doing here.
kcontrol-Administration-Login Mangager? I am sure this works.


 Changing type of kdm now in 9.2 leads to following actions: if user
confirms
 he allows to re-start kdm, current KDE session is abruptly terminated
 (without any warning to save your job etc.), X are terminated as well and
 user finds himself in black textmode fullscreen with login prompt.
Certainly
 many of new users do not even know they can start graphic GUI again with
 startx, and are scared up to point of re-installing or something.

Well, actually they should restart the dm service. Something broke in 9.2.

  Yeah,
 maybe somebody should at least make red light glowing brightly on traffic
 light icon leading to change of kdm... :-)

???



It seems the user has some X configuration issue.


 Nope. This seems to me being principal issue of how new things are
introduced
 in MDK nowadays: somebody likes new thing better and wishfully thinks
that
 everybody will.  It gets never (or too less) tested how the user might
get
 back the _old_ feature, and the procedure itself is often cryptic or even
 non-existant (like you can not avoid installing of bootsplash anymore).
 Nevertheless most people are quite conservative and for some reason
want back
 things like they are used to. I for example wanted back correct hostname
 displayed on Login Screen, _and_ the clock ticking there ;-)

Well, AFAIK, 9.2 defaults to kdm, not mdkkdm (which had some issues, but
these were apparently corrected by updates).

The initial change to mdkkdm was in 9.1, and it didn't have the problem
with the dm not restarting properly.

Since kdm is the default (at least on new installs, and AFAIK), you
should by default be able to get your hostname and clock back.

So, I think your analysis isn't totally correct.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/uL1frJK6UGDSBKcRAizsAJ9swky63FyQXHbKoIquw4DPdTVU0QCeKsHq
xUYxJigaXGyxPMbak5ZUnJ4=
=gppG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6371] [drakconf] New: Please add option to change GTK+ 2 skin

2003-11-17 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[seguso.forever] wrote:
 http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6371

Summary: Please add option to change GTK+ 2 skin
Product: drakconf
Version: 9.3-2mdk
   Platform: PC
 OS/Version: All
 Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Severity: enhancement
   Priority: P2
  Component: drakconf
 AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 I use KDE as the primary desktop. Sadly there is no option to change
the looks
 of gnome apps. (both theme and font). Too bad, because many users would be
 attracted to Mandrake by goodlooking apps: imagine being able to set
Nuvola,
 Smokey-blue or Grand-canyon!

 Currently, I edit ~/.gtkrc-2.0 by hand, but this cannot be asked to
the ordinary
 user.

 The other options are not feasible either:

 1. calling the gnome-control-center by command line does not work
(why?) and the
 ordinary user cannot be asked to use the command line anyway.

Works for me, as does gnome-theme-manager.


 2. you could add switch2 to the distro, but beware that it currently
does not
 work (because it creates a bad .gtkrc-2.0).


3) Add menu for gnome-control-center to Configuration menu (I have
suggested this before), in which case it's a GNOME packaging bug
(control center should have needs=x11, not needs=gnome).

Of course, considering that default GTK font size is too small (IMHO)
and drakxtools etc use GTK, KDE users have too-small fonts in drakfw,
mandrakegalaxy, drakxtools etc, and have no easy way to change it.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/uMw1rJK6UGDSBKcRAk6rAJwIS48x/ZqjlD9mz+6xy+nRzrSY8gCfY+bd
Na8Yh6ozr/48ZTsTxpUL4gY=
=jWxm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] [PROPOSAL] Show windows drives on desktop

2003-11-17 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
 Le dim 16/11/2003 à 23:11, Larry Nguyen a écrit :

On Saturday 15 November 2003 11:03 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:

As a user that help newbies on forum and as i'm facing always the same
problem ( where are my windows drives ? can i access my windows drives
under linux ? ), I think that diskdrake when having detect a windows
partitions should put a link/icon on the desktop in order to give
the ability for the users to directly see that they can have access to
theses drives.


I really like to see all mounted partitions should be under one
directory and
then create that direcotry/link on the desktop instead of each mounted
partition with the hard drive icon on the desktop. This could be very
un-organized desktop and looks very ugly if one has more than 1 hard
drive,
which is not so un-common nowadays.

For example, create a link with description such as Access other
partitions,
then when users click on it, it will launch either nautilus or kfm or
whatever_your_favorite_file_manager_here .

You mean, under KDE, a shortcut to devices:/ ? (or use the services
sidebar in KDE and click Devices.



 1°/ mdk used to do this for removable devices ( CDROM, floppy ) but it
 ends up it was very ugly and unuserfriendly
 2°/ You know I used to see windows desktop with more than 15 icons.
 That's ugly, but people need to see directly some things or else ...

One of my friends had his whole desktop covered in icons!


 3°/ Here is the problem - launching the right filemanager.

???

 But in fact we should use the supermount stuff and extend it.

No, supermount is only necessary for removable media (USB devices are a
grey area ...).

 Under KDE you can select the device icons you want to show ( see
 Lookfeel - Comportment - device icons ). At this time we show
 CDROm/NFS/SMB/Floppy/Zip icons. We should add FAT32/NTFS drives.

What is special about FAT32/NTFS? What if I want to see other
filesystems (where is my Redhat drive? Where is my SuSE drive etc etc???).

That is what Hard Disk is for.

 This
 way you can easily disable the icons. Gnome have this feature but only
 for removable devices ( CDROM/Floppy )


On top of that windows partitions should be writable ( FAT32 only of
course ) by normal users ( so umask=0 should be set by default for
security level  high ). So by default diskdrake set umask=0 for windows
FAT32 partitions during install and when the user select a security
level higher than standard, then msec remove umask=0.

This is already the case AFAIK (last time I looked at the code). What
security level did you install with?

I would like to see this one also. But, will there be any risk, such
as, users
could accidently delete stuff from their winbloze partition?


 So ? under windows they can do it too. On top of that now most of the
 time under kde/gnome when you delete a file, by default the file is put
 in the trash, unless you specify directly delete and you have a
 confirmation box. So the risk is minimal.

But, OS's that default to fat32 are usually not multi-user, so it does
increase the risk IMHO.

Anyway, I don't think this problem should be solved in diskdrake or
anything else. The problem is (IMHO) due to shortcomings of the KDE
navigation tree (and the fact that GNOME doesn't really have one at all
yet). I have posted on this before. IMHO, the different buttons on the
splitter bar in Konqueror are the problem, they should be removed, all
entries reorganized and merged into one tree view.

Why do I access NFS/Fish/smb files in Services-LAN Browser, but http in
Network, and FTP in both? Why do I access the CD-ROM in Services-Audio
CD Browser and in Root Directory and Services-Devices?

Home
This Computer
- -Entire filesystem (/)
- -Media (devices:/ + audiocd:/ + supermount'ed devices)
Network
- -SMB/Windows (smb:/)
- -Unix (fish/nfs hosts from lisa or similar)
- -Web (ftp/http hosts from lisa or similar?)
- -Directory (ldap:/ ;-))

And we still need to find place for bookmars, history and printers.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/uNKkrJK6UGDSBKcRAmIEAKCy2Otddc84jjxQTRqzsefcEOj3KgCeOKfJ
LR427kDBu3oLT5hjGLg1ARQ=
=copb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] [PROPOSAL] Show windows drives on desktop

2003-11-17 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
 Le lun 17/11/2003 à 13:52, Buchan Milne a écrit :

FACORAT Fabrice wrote:


Under KDE you can select the device icons you want to show ( see
Lookfeel - Comportment - device icons ). At this time we show
CDROm/NFS/SMB/Floppy/Zip icons. We should add FAT32/NTFS drives.

What is special about FAT32/NTFS? What if I want to see other
filesystems (where is my Redhat drive? Where is my SuSE drive etc etc???).

That is what Hard Disk is for.


 Seeing others linux partitions is what i can call : advanced stuff - so
 this should not be enable by default ( and hard disk will show them ).

So, we should make it easier to use Windows, and less easy to use Linux?

 A normal user ( desktop environment ) should not see others linux
 partitions except his home directory.

So, if they have a backup partition or something (easy enough to do with
diskdrake), they shouldn't be able to access it as easily as a Windows
partition?

 So see / and /home on his desktop
 is useless for him. Most of the times this kind of users put files in
 their home directory and open/save some files in their windows
 partitions in order to share them with windows. So they need to know
 directly and easily where is their home directory ( the home icon ), and
 where is/are their windows partition(s).


 Showing FAT32/NTFS drives is what I called basic stuff for newbies. For
 example, the user need to install the firmware for his modem to make the
 connection work under linux, so he dl the firmware under windows and
 then his first question is : Can i have an access to my windows drives ?
 If yes, where can i access them ?
 At least 5 times a week on a forum where you have many newbies we have
 this kind of question. Mandrake control center ? they don't know or
 don't know where to go ( MountPoint is chinese for them )

But they shouldn't need to even see diskdrake now (I assume that's what
you mean), they can either look in /mnt/windows, or /mnt/win_{c,d} etc,
or browse in devices (but it would be better if you didn't have to know
all 6 buttons in Konqueror to be able to browse devices).

This
way you can easily disable the icons. Gnome have this feature but only
for removable devices ( CDROM/Floppy )



On top of that windows partitions should be writable ( FAT32 only of
course ) by normal users ( so umask=0 should be set by default for
security level  high ). So by default diskdrake set umask=0 for
windows
FAT32 partitions during install and when the user select a security
level higher than standard, then msec remove umask=0.

This is already the case AFAIK (last time I looked at the code). What
security level did you install with?


 since which version ? I don't know for me as I don't install 9.2 on HD
 where there was some FAT32 partitions, but on forum I have many times
 users saying that they can't write on their windows partitions ( 9.1,
 maybe 9.2 but will have to check ) at least if they was able to find
 where was their windows partitions.

Look in CVS, file libDrakX/fs.pm (line 468 in cooker)

if (isFat($part) || member('vfat', split(':', $part-{type})) ||
isThisFs('auto', $part)) {

put_in_hash($options, {
   user = 1, noexec = 0,
  }) if $opts{is_removable};

put_in_hash($options, {
   'umask=0' = $opts{security}  3,
'iocharset=' = $opts{iocharset}, 'codepage=' = $opts{codepage},
  });
}

So, users who want this by default should install in the less secure
option. Of course, a better description should be given for umask=0 in
the diskdrake options.



I would like to see this one also. But, will there be any risk, such

as, users

could accidently delete stuff from their winbloze partition?


So ? under windows they can do it too. On top of that now most of the
time under kde/gnome when you delete a file, by default the file is put
in the trash, unless you specify directly delete and you have a
confirmation box. So the risk is minimal.

But, OS's that default to fat32 are usually not multi-user, so it does
increase the risk IMHO.


 I'm talking for home/desktop usage. in multiuser/workstation usage, the
 sysadmin have the responsibility to enable/disable this feature. Now for
 desktop/home usage when several people have access to the computer the
 problem is Linux/unix rights limitations ( need ACL and easy way to
 managed ACL ) or need away to specify that this group and only this
 group of users can access theses drives.

The problem is that as soon as the user has a daemon running (ftp,
apache), they *are* multi-user. Whether it is real users or not is
irrelevant.

Anyway, I don't think this problem should be solved in diskdrake or
anything else. The problem is (IMHO) due to shortcomings of the KDE
navigation tree (and the fact that GNOME doesn't really have one at all
yet). I have posted on this before. IMHO, the different

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] bookcase-0.7-1mdk

2003-11-17 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Charles A Edwards wrote:
 [Contrib-RPM]

 -=-=-=-
 Name: bookcase Relocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 0.7   Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Mon Nov 17
17:07:24 2003
 Install Date: (not installed)   Build Host: klama.mandrake.org
 Group   : OfficeSource RPM: (none)
 Size: 784140   License: GPL
 Signature   : (none)
 Packager: Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL : http://www.periapsis.org/bookcase/
 Summary : A book collection manager
 Description :



 -=-=-=-
 Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.7-1mdk

 - 0.7
 - add marco iconname
 - use /bin/true
 - add BuildRequire ImageMagick and use for icons
 - add feature list
 - use make marco
 - no need to mkdir /pics it's auto done
 - use kdedesktop2mdkmenu for menu
 - rm man listing as it does not exist
 - use %doc %dir for HTML listing

Weird, I updated this about two weeks ago, I guess the upload didn't
make it.

BTW, 0.7.0 has some bug (encoding issues), the author suggests 0.7.1
(which I haven't managed to get to yet, todo list is too long ...).

http://www.periapsis.org/bookcase/download/bookcase-0.7.1.tar.gz

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/uP1zrJK6UGDSBKcRAsi7AKCxNr34V061z7RM7XDMwadnE3JI8gCdFVbg
jT0ozgp0jxiChdwV1bUDw6M=
=PAeX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] juk contrib rpm

2003-11-17 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

illogic-al wrote:
 On Monday 17 November 2003 03:43 am, Götz Waschk wrote:

That's not a good idea, as the contribs are always synched to the
current cooker. The Mandrake club repository is the right place for
your package.

 now the question is, just how would i do that?

Answered on a more appropriate list.

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/uQSZrJK6UGDSBKcRAtDPAJ4ueeAUscVHeARqljTdsMfB04nNBgCfbjoL
b6REbQ1Z58hTv8aORy02bbg=
=RKss
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6273] [Installation] bootsplash can not be unmarked in package list

2003-11-14 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Harijs Buss wrote:

 Do you really think it is good to have anything (un)markable on
installation
 package list that in fact cannot be unmarked (because it seems to be now
 specifically tied to all graphical environment)?  What is doing
bootsplash
 on this package list if it is now intended to be unmarkable? Keep it
off the
 list and there will be no questions like mine.

What about the case of a server with no X, where the admin *does* want
bootsplash?

What about the case of desktop machine that boots into a remote display
manager? The admin may want a nice graphical boot even though no window
manager is installed on the local machine.

Bootsplash *can* be removed, and there are situations where you might
want to select it or not select it.



You can always 'rpm -e --nodeps bootsplash' if you want.


 Yes, thank you for advice (all of them). To be resistant to unwanted,
imposed
 changes is certainly good incentive to learn more about Linux beyond
initial
 users GUI experience :)


How about the desktop backgrounds?


 Wrong example. Bootsplash is in no way _necessary_ part of boot process.

But it isn't (currently) required by any package used only in the boot
process, it's only required by the desktop packages, so that the typical
home machine gets it by default (even on upgrades from a machine which
didn't have it).

 There is IMHO no any clear aim to make it mandatory, except of course
writing
 Mandrake 9.2 on it (but it is written also during text boot).

I don't know the answer to that, ask the Mandrake interface team (if
they will give you an answer).

 I have nothing against bootsplash if somebody likes it. But I have
objection
 to have bootsplash forcefully imposed on all possible Mandrake users
 including me.

The use of bootsplash isn't forced on you. Only the installation of it.

 Even to get rid of it I now need to install it in the first
 place (this improvement is true only starting with 9.2).  Small step
in the
 same direction as so painfully known program called IE.  Mind you I
left
 Windows world partly because of such mandatory features imposed
against my
 own will.

So, removing IE from Windows 98SE is a 30 second job? I don't think so.

  And don't tell me that this long dependancy chain you presented
 cannot be corrected ;-)

Of course it can, but the question (as I said before) is whether
Mandrake considers it a feature or not. Since it was *added* for 9.2, I
would guess so.

binary, maybe initscripts should depend on bootsplash instead? Then we can
have it on servers too ;-).

 Actually you might be surprised how many Linux servers (including
Mandrakes)
 have full-scale graphical environment installed and in use nowadays.
Memory
 is cheap and CPU's are affordable. Admin's time and good perception of
 overall situation is much more expensive.

But many admins have bad habits (logging in to X as root for example,
not securing X correctly when using it on a server). GUI administration
can be done just as easily, and probably more securely, without X
installed on the server, using X tunneled over SSH.

And a lot of administration tasks can be done much more efficiently
without a GUI environment (eg via scripting) than with one.

About the only GUI tool we use on our servers is diskdrake, because it
is convenient to use to resize LVM volumes.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/tJ2frJK6UGDSBKcRApv+AJ49cMCLJNpF25YtEV+80S65BPU47ACfTqBE
qMU43fFsz4sylB+Y5zXSLm4=
=NA3y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6353] [autoconf2.5] New: compatibility mode 2.13/2.5x is broken

2003-11-14 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[gbburkhardt] wrote:
 http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6353

 Executing 'autoconf-2.5x' doesn't work, because the script doesn't
reference the
 the 'autom4te-2.5x' executable.  For example:


And you have read the output of 'rpm -qi autoconf2.5' or
/usr/share/doc/autoconf2.5-2.57/IMPORTANT.README.MDK ?

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/tKqhrJK6UGDSBKcRAlIWAJ42cqzDILes6wF4QK9I8T6FXhLecQCgrw0/
/CZ8tw6DH9ekMPn7EaVnY2w=
=lGML
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] zebra-0.93b-3mdk

2003-11-14 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Oden Eriksson wrote:
 [Contrib-RPM]

 -=-=-=-
 Name: zebraRelocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 0.93b Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 3mdk  Build Date: Fri Nov 14
12:26:43 2003
 Install Date: (not installed)   Build Host: klama.mandrake.org
 Group   : System/ServersSource RPM: (none)
 Size: 1045352  License: GPL
 Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Fri Nov 14 12:26:43 2003, Key ID 6a8743b0604aa4e4
 Packager: Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL : http://www.zebra.org/
 Summary : Routing daemon
 Description :
 GNU Zebra is a free software that manages TCP/IP based routing
 protocol. It takes multi-server and multi-thread approach to resolve
 the current complexity of the Internet.

 GNU Zebra supports BGP4, BGP4+, OSPFv2, OSPFv3, RIPv1, RIPv2, and RIPng.

 GNU Zebra is intended to be used as a Route Server and a Route
 Reflector. It is not a toolkit, it provides full routing power under
 a new architecture. GNU Zebra is unique in design in that it has a
 process for each protocol.


Oden, I am not sure if you are aware of Quagga ?

http://www.quagga.net/about.php

Might be worth a look ...

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/tNVXrJK6UGDSBKcRAuyqAKCYvuNMwjARslm+Tpa9nZro/J82WgCgi7Fs
CTnqo1sMw/efC9MoEz5Aqrw=
=o77O
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] 9.2 ISOs on the mirrors.

2003-11-14 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Owyn wrote:
 On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 11:50, Olivier Blin wrote:

On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 04:38, Warly wrote:

LG has finally released their errata and fix for their drives.

Is there a changelog for differences between the original and the new
ISOs?

Well, yes, it's empty ;p
There isn't any difference between the old ISOs and the new ones.


 Ouch


What, do we want:
1)Paying customers to have worse products than freeloaders?
2)Users to keep their vulnerable firmware?

The best solution for everyone is for users to update their firmware.

The best time for them to wipe their firmware (if you can qualify it as
best, maybe least-bad) is now, when there are documented fixes for it.

Hopefully users caught by the same problem on other Linux kernels
(Gentoo America's Army CD, some other Gentoo releases, custom-patched
etc etc) will find the solution too (and be able to revive their hardware).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/tR8erJK6UGDSBKcRArb+AJ9sy5UkaCIEhKu6ldT7Hv3p+50ipgCbBJvV
pjsOGrHf/XmLCoteiWsMhiA=
=I6QZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Danger: Magazine with 9.2 with problematic kernel

2003-11-13 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Robert L Martin wrote:
 Buchan Milne wrote:

 And  where on the mandrake site is a listing of exactly what is on the
 commercial cds

 From: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/9.2/features/

 Additional drivers for NVIDIA-based and ATI videocards are available in
 Mandrake packs.

 or less than a week old list of whats on the club site??

 http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com (which is where you get if you click on the
 big downloads link at the top of the mandrakeclub.com page)


 im going to assume that neither list is complete (the cd list only gives
 the download edition files and the club area doesn't seem to have any
files
 (for 9.2))
 the questions stand


Your original question was how users would know the NVidia or ATI
drivers were present (you don't need a listing of 5000 packages to find
the answer to that). So, for your first question, my answer should suffice.

For the second question, don't know what you searched for, but I got:
ati
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/ATI_kernel-smp-2.4.22.10mdk-3.2.5-2mdk.i586.html
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/ATI_kernel-p3-smp-64GB-2.4.22.10mdk-3.2.5-2mdk.i586.html
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/ATI_kernel-i686-up-4GB-2.4.22.10mdk-3.2.5-2mdk.i586.html
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/ATI_kernel-enterprise-2.4.22.10mdk-3.2.5-2mdk.i586.html
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/ATI_kernel-2.4.22.10mdk-3.2.5-2mdk.i586.html
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/ATI_GLX-3.2.5-2mdk.i586.html

(these are the original ones, new ones have been provided too)
nvidia
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/NVIDIA_kernel-2.4.22.10mdk-4496-2mdk.i586.html
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/NVIDIA_kernel-enterprise-2.4.22.10mdk-4496-2mdk.i586.html
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/NVIDIA_kernel-i686-up-4GB-2.4.22.10mdk-4496-2mdk.i586.html
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/NVIDIA_kernel-p3-smp-64GB-2.4.22.10mdk-4496-2mdk.i586.html
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/NVIDIA_kernel-smp-2.4.22.10mdk-4496-2mdk.i586.html
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/NVIDIA_GLX-4496-2mdk.i586.html

If you're going to ask rhetorical questions, at least check the answer
first.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/s1IerJK6UGDSBKcRAvTKAJ492sl7NtyXYN+6MAsmCrKGpaD5wgCghCXb
JS5+6Vxu4BMFpfiDrIvW/Q0=
=WZF3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Danger: Magazine with 9.2 with problematic kernel

2003-11-10 Thread Buchan Milne
 memory management)?

 And they won't take that attitude with Mandrake, and by
 extension (as you can see from the above quote) linux. This is what I am
 worried about. It doesn't matter whether the people who make these
 comments should have known better - they didn't. And that damages the
 perception of linux as a whole.

 Anyway, this issue has been done to death in other threads, and I won't
 extend the pain by carrying on the argument beyond this post. I just
 wanted people to see that the faults in the initial 9.2 release were
 causing real-life damage amongst less sophisticated linux users than
 Cooker subscribers. And that this damage hurts more than Mandrake - it
 hurts linux.

Well, the only additional issue you have mentioned (besides the LG
issue) is totally out of our hands. No distro can currently support the
latest Radeon cards without free software. So, users should either bite
the bullet and install the ATI drivers manually, buy the release, or
join the club and use the packages there (and hope they have been
updated for the new kernel too).

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/r2HkrJK6UGDSBKcRAllwAJ9Q2/RA+u6xwzUkdtVv3/OhaEblKgCgw3br
Q7lQjkLv5xJJAKhCkgGIPRE=
=Tdbh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Danger: Magazine with 9.2 with problematic kernel

2003-11-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Bruno Prior wrote:

 Buchan Milne wrote:

 Sure, for the Radeon 7500, there is no excuse (but AFAIK it should
 work fine out-the-box on 9.2), but for newer Radeon's, there isn't
 much we can do, since no free software driver supports them yet.


 That's not absolutely the case. The Vesa driver supported my Radeon 9600
 without acceleration, which is all you need to get a workable
 desktop, which is what we should be trying to provide at install as a
 minimum.

Sorry, I was not aware it was this bad (DrakX not using vesa if it does
not know the card).

 There would be much less issue if problems were along the lines
 of my games run slow, than I get dumped at the command prompt after
 installation.


BTW, you may have missed a lot of threads on cooker here where I have
been advocating that all display managers (not just gdm) kick off
XFdrake if X fails to start ...

 For some reason, this guy says the Vesa driver doesn't work for him. He
 hasn't provided enough info to be able to figure out what's going on,
 and probably won't now. Could very likely be user error (I suspect it
 may be configuration of his monitor rather than his card that is
 failing), but we will probably never know now, because he was put off by
 the difficulty of it all. It might be annoying, but we need people like
 that, and we certainly don't need them telling stories about how lame
 Mandrake is.

 XFree86 doesn't support these cards yet AFAIK. You have to have the
 non-free ATI driver. Fedora won't ship it, and the drivers are: - -on
  the commercial CDs - -on the Club.


 Yes, I've pointed this out, and that it would be fairer to compare the
 Mandrake box-set with Windows, but you aren't going to get many people
 spending money on Mandrake box-sets or Club membership, if it gets a
 reputation for being hard to install or (in extremis) damaging hardware.

Chicken and egg problem, and there's no real solution to this.


 This is ATIs problem, if they can't sort out their driver installation
 routine for non-free software. They are the ones providing bad support
 for their products. Most NVidia newbies don't have this problem.


 Agreed. It is frustrating that the only distro they support without
 having to compile modules (and therefore download the *%^ing missing
 kernel-source) is RedHat. Can't Mandrake contact them and provide
 modules to bundle with their install package, the same way they have
 bundled RedHat modules? Presumably it would be in ATI's interests to
 make this work as easily as possible with as many distros as possible.

 There is currently nothing that can be done about this issue. Nothing.
 Unless you are volunteering to write a free software driver that
 supports these cards.


 As I say, Vesa works with at least some Radeon 9600 cards, so presumably
 there _is_ something that can be done about this.

 Steffen Barzus had his device replaced, no-one has reported *not*
 having their device replaced.


 Good news.

 It's unfortunate, but this would have happened to some distro (whoever
 merged packet writing first), since it's very unlikely the problem
 would have been found by people manaully patching packet writing into
 their kernel (the patch has been available and in use for a long time).


 True. Mandrake has always been bleeding-edge.

Compared to say Redhat who ships with cvs snapshots of unstable versions
of glibc (and then has to issue updates to glibc so users in large
installations can see all users), and similar things?

 But if it's risky
 installing it before more experienced users have had a chance to test
 it, what were Mandrake doing providing it for inclusion with a UK
 magazine before it had even gone on public release?

Who said Mandrake provided it?

 I thought the idea
 this time was that the public download edition and box-sets would be
 delayed for a while, to give Club and Cooker members a chance to run it
 to spot and fix the most serious gremlins (and provide an incentive for
 people to join the Club).

And provides users who have already downloaded the ISOs (likely 85% of
users) absolutely no incentive to pay Mandrakesoft, buy boxed sets, or
join the club for no other reason but charity.

 This pretty well undermines that.

 So, I guess no-one applies service patches etc (some of which cause
 bigger problems, such as XP SP1 messing up virtual memory management)?


 Exactly. And why do you think Windows has the reputation it does? It's a
 regular refrain of linux advocates that linux is more stable than
 Windows. Is this not a part of what they are referring to?

Stability doesn't have that much to do with how many updates are
available (IMHO).


 I'm a long way from being a Windows advocate. I just don't think it
 helps for linux to suffer from the same problems as Windows. I want
 linux to be better than, not as good (or bad) as Windows.

Agreed, but you (and a lot of others) are concentrating on two hardware
issues, and not seeing a lot

Re: [Cooker] Danger: Magazine with 9.2 with problematic kernel

2003-11-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Robert L Martin wrote:
 Buchan Milne wrote:

 XFree86 doesn't support these cards yet AFAIK. You have to have the
 non-free ATI driver. Fedora won't ship it, and the drivers are:
 - -on the commercial CDs
 - -on the Club.

 And  where on the mandrake site is a listing of exactly what is on the
 commercial cds

From: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/9.2/features/

Additional drivers for NVIDIA-based and ATI videocards are available in
Mandrake packs.

 or less than a week old list of whats on the club site??

http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com (which is where you get if you click on the
big downloads link at the top of the mandrakeclub.com page)

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/r4lErJK6UGDSBKcRAmc0AJ9Ut47/gX2DvV+LNRzyMuFt0G94lgCff4aX
2YFk8bWchfQNPDIxbRb4mb8=
=16Q0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Mozilla 1.5 ? 1.6 Alpha is already out . . .

2003-11-07 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Robert Fox wrote:
 When is Cooker going to get the latest stable Mozilla (1.5)?

Look in the MandrakeClub mirrors in the mean time.

(there are some minor issues with the build, I don't know if it's
specific to the build or generic buglets in 1.5 - David Coe has problems
with mail crashing when starting it from the browser, and I have to
remove my XUL.mfasl file before I start mozilla if I want enigmail to work).

Regards,
Buchan
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/q2c7rJK6UGDSBKcRAoadAJwNg4XOufnHVifEznjx05oXNdsnwgCdEWuc
AEFODT/9lEFZ46ZTyMe/G5M=
=LaxU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Want to do a magazine CD

2003-11-07 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Leon Brooks wrote:
 On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 07:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

You might want to consider a live CD version ... (if it's prime
purpose isn't for installation, but more for demo).


 This one will be intended for installation.

 I am also considering a live CD as a later project, one with most of the
 above plus a web browser and the like, aimed at being a plug this in
 and try it template that developers can use to ship an active site
 (databases etc copied to a RAMdisk) to a customer.

 It would be even better with a script named i_like_it which installs
 to the running machine's hard disk if the end customer does in fact
 like it.


Patches are welcome (although I personally believe this is 2nd-rate and
potentially dangerous method of doing an installation since you don't
have much assurance about the binaries ...)


Well, if we get an answer on this, can we get it on the Wiki.


 Yes, please!

 A Knoppix-alike-Mandrake-HOWTO page would also be wonderful, if anyone
 reading this has ever made one.


# urpmi mklivecd

$ less /usr/share/doc/mklivecd*/FAQ

(there have been some features and bugfixes in CVS, and we should
probably get a new release out in a few days).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/q2fkrJK6UGDSBKcRAvIGAKC+tFlr7QJPkyrURBXgiqRpEJVhpwCfWOms
+exUmIo3nQySt33JZSJKVjQ=
=i3qN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Club test RPMS for ATI and Win4Lin

2003-11-07 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greg Meyer wrote:
 For Danny and Buchan, I have been using your test rpms for ATI kernel
modules
 and Win4Lin together on my Thinkpad for about four hours now without any
 problems.  Everything seems to be quite stable.

win4lin packages are supposed to be updated in the 9.2 contrib tree ...
but I have had no response from Lenny ...

Thanks for the report though!

(BTW, win4lin-utils-3-6mdk should fix all issues related to links in
/boot etc which were not quite working before)

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/q2j0rJK6UGDSBKcRAnrlAJwN7pVihTxBxCJiMMiEHy99ug6ijQCgqfTA
4s0JyQ++/f5XmCPi3uWdWf8=
=pFQg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kdebase-3.1.3-80mdk (many undefined symbols)

2003-11-07 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Laurent Montel wrote:
 Le Friday 24 October 2003 08:53, Luca Berra a écrit :

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 08:35:22AM +0200, Laurent Montel wrote:

See earlier threads. kdebase-3.1.3-80 was compiled against qt3.2, cooker
is still on qt3.1.

Solution is to upgrade libqt, get the rpms from:
http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/~lmontel/kde-3.2-alpha2/

Bad solution, because all other packages was compiled with qt-3.1.
I created and upload a new kdebase-3.1.3-81mdk which fixed compiled
problem, but there is a problem with upload :(

yes, bad.
It is especially bad having an incompatible ABI library ship with the
same soname.
Could you fix qt-3.2 to have libqt-mt.so.3.2 soname when you will
release 3.2 (you should also deal with it requiring qt3-common).


 fixed

Well, this still didn't prevent breakage. Our cooker mirror hasn't
managed to sync kdebase yet (since builds are uploaded late every day,
just before our mirror syncs from sunet.se which isn't up-to-date), but
libqt3-3.2 made it, so this morning I couldn't use KDE until I reverted
to the 9.2rc2 package (since we don't have a full 9.2 mirror either).

Plus, mdkkdm made it (but didn't work), and gdm doesn't work for some
reason. My cooker box is in the worst shape it has been in in about 18
months.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/q264rJK6UGDSBKcRAnYZAJ45BuJqSo8OljKPr96r5BO6KMPOlgCgmh+V
4tqRJ0feQfQW07nKJXfgmZQ=
=vs7L
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Club test RPMS for ATI and Win4Lin

2003-11-07 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greg Meyer wrote:
 On Friday 07 November 2003 04:42 am, Buchan Milne wrote:

win4lin packages are supposed to be updated in the 9.2 contrib tree ...
but I have had no response from Lenny ...


 Shouldn't the win4lin packages from the original kernel be made
available to
 for people that have chosen not to upgrade the kernel.  As long as the
 original kernel is available in the tree, the packages that go with it
should
 remain available.  Although if that .10 kernel is getting pulled
because of
 the LG business, then the related win4lin packages could be pulled also.

All kernel-related packages in the tree (main and contrib) have been
updated now I think. The tmb and mm kernels have already, and Lenny has
just let me know he has updated the win4lin kernels which should appear
on the mirrors soon.

 Maybe there needs to be a updates directory for contrib too.

This has been discussed before, but there was no final conclusion. In
the meantime we are abusing the MandrakeClub mirrors.



Thanks for the report though!

(BTW, win4lin-utils-3-6mdk should fix all issues related to links in
/boot etc which were not quite working before)


 Yes, the initrd link was set up properly this time, although I have
lost my
 bootsplash with the .21 kernel.  I am not sure if it is something I
have done
 or if it is a packaging problem.

I don't think it's a packaging problem, the 3 kernels I tested with (I
didn't have smp or enterprise kernels, so tested the normal, i686 and p3
kernels) all got bootsplash.

You may want to check what
/usr/share/bootsplash/scripts/detect-resolution says ...

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/q5txrJK6UGDSBKcRAlBCAJwKMlu7YEe9aDRAndyerXIMQHaZNwCfVFxA
7nvkt8LkCgAZoXspGB9aT/I=
=qynf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Re: Problems booting with ext3 for root partition

2003-11-06 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dave Cotton wrote:
 On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 10:33, Duncan wrote:

I compile my own kernel from kernel.org sources, so haven't been following
this real closely, but AFAIK, any of the Mdk kernels work if ext3 support
is compiled directly into the kernel, rather than as a module.


 I also compile my own from kernel.org and have always compiled ext3 into
 the kernel because I've never seen a good reason to compile it as a
 module. In fact the help screen on ext3 says Be aware however that the
 file system of your root partition (the one containing the directory /)
 cannot be compiled as a module, and so this may be dangerous.

So, we should compile every filesystem that is usable on a root
partition into the kernel? Then we will have 2MB kernels (have you seen
how big xfs is?). 500k for XFS, 220k for ReiserFS, plus JFS and ext3
(100k including jdb).

Since you can have root on LVM, maybe that should be compiled in too? Of
course, then we should compile md in also.

 So if it
 is compiled as a module in mdk, against this advice, perhaps the
 maintainer(s) can give their explanation as to why this advice from the
 kernel team is wrong.

Because initrd images work fine (and this has been the case almost for
ever).

The warning in the kernel source is for people who are compiling their
own kernels and may not know how to create initrd images that include
the required modules.

BTW, I don't think this has anything to do with the problem, as users
with this problem reported the modules were loaded before they had
probles ...

But, someone who has the problem may want to test with the Mandrake
kernel-source and see if compiling the root filesystem driver in helps.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/qicVrJK6UGDSBKcRAjobAJ9DL9brnaFCjn31WMN0ffQXOuH/HACglloM
gUqGbxTyzVPrDJTnEgpB+gY=
=ZnUC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Problems booting with ext3 for root partition

2003-11-06 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Svante Signell wrote:
 The long thread on 'kernel 23mdk panic' seems to be related to my
 problem. Has anyone made a summary of conclusions made so far? Which
 kernels are known to boot properly, with and without initrd?

Stick with 2.4.22-21mdk if you can for the moment ...

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/qic5rJK6UGDSBKcRAgaXAJ4quV6ME96cVw7c7exyFDgzwPj7NACgvcdB
Re/r/PLAgKuMtvctunV/L54=
=FItD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Re: No more fpons

2003-11-06 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Pascal Terjan wrote:
 Götz Waschk wrote:

 Am Donnerstag,  6. November 2003, 17:14:42 Uhr MET, schrieb Pascal
 Terjan:

 Götz Waschk wrote:

 What a typical macho opinion. I rather prefer the nice girls who can
 write good code.

But if they write good code, it means they need to be paid more ...



 I would prefer too, but it's really more difficult to find :-)


 Depends on where you're looking. When I was a CS student, there were
 almost no females, but this has changed a bit. In my Processor
 Architecture class there is 1/3 female students, so there might be a
 new generation of coding girls.


 Impressive !
 Here that didn't change :/

You think CS is bad? We (B.Eng - Mech) started with 80 guys and 4 girls
(one more joined us in 2nd year), 25 guys and no girls graduated at the
end of the 4 year course. 3 girls left Engineering, 2 changed to Industrial.

Chem eng, Industrial, Civil and Eletrical are a bit better off (in that
order, Chem eng has the highest proportion).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/qn1orJK6UGDSBKcRAi16AJ9F/YuVIUwKrAjFHZeVZNtHdXGkfgCgjmLS
BLp9QBXWDU8+Y/K64qNEjSw=
=ukgZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Versioning for multiple releases (was Re: [Cooker] Updated ATI Kernel Modules)

2003-11-06 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Götz Waschk wrote:
 Am Montag,  3. November 2003, 12:32:58 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

I did start naming everyting version.92mdk to distinguish them from
cooker stuff (like we are doing for security updates now).

 That's a start.

And I think we should use it for now until we have a more permanent
solution. So, anyone rebuilding cooker packages from Club should do this.

I would to raise another point here quickly, but it needs its own thread:
shouldn't we force release specific rpms? Too many people are using
cooker
rpms on stable version. Too many people are using rpms for different
versions on their stable version.


 I've already suggested something like this in a previous thread. I
 thought about a distribution epoch for all packages, so that official
 packages are always newer than backported packages.

I agree. This would solve the Texstar KDE-3.1.4 for 9.1 upgrade
problem (which some users are experiencing). I don't think there is any
other solution which would provide for this.

 This would need
 some rpm changes, so that a package built on 9.2 would have an epoch
 of 92 and one build on 10.0 would have epoch 100. But this would be a
 problem with packages that already has an epoch, as you can use only
 integer numbers for the epoch tag.

It could also cause some problems for Requires/BuildRequires with epoch
values? Any BuildRequires/Requires with an existing Epoch value would
need to be bumped also, which makes for some additional 'macro-isation'
for the packager, and makes it difficult to automate this.

 The problem of your naming is that you have to change it by hand. I'd
 like to rebuild a cooker package on a stable distribution version and
 have it's release changed automatically.

Ideally, we should be able to rebuild SRPMS from cooker on any release
automatically, and still be able to upgrade them to a newer distro with
older base packages.

For instance, say mozilla-1.5 goes into cooker. Say it is rebuilt for
9.1 (well, we have this already with the Club 1.5-0.91mdk package). The
user upgrades to 9.2, and mozilla-1.4 doesn't ugrade and the user may
end up with some problems.

I think it the distribution-specific Epoch is to be used, it needs to be
done by RPM, and any epoch in a spec file needs to be incremented with
the distro epoch. I don't think it is feasible to do it with rpm macros
(since you will have trouble with existing epoch values).

BTW, for reference some people may want to read the proposal Fedora has,
but note that it doesn't address the newer packages on old release than
on current release-issue, since their Vepoch is used in the release
tag. Also, they don't require the use of the Vepoch it seems.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/qoBKrJK6UGDSBKcRArUTAKC9Ycfc0IlwprZMAclD/N80dc9W8QCgjn3L
GS87fvAMgSt8XDXCasQtl1o=
=Yy9/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] test9.4mdk with ext3 as module

2003-11-05 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
Still a little issue in test9-4mdk : you should compile capability
(CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=yes) in the kernel, not a module (,
otherwise bind can't be started until capability module is loaded..

thanks, it will be done in next release


 please don't,
 the kernel is bug enough

 not everybody is running bind,
 the one's that do run it could
 just add it to modprobe preload

Maybe the bind initscript needs to check for this?

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/qMUZrJK6UGDSBKcRAvLmAJ9KiiF476Ud4h/clmxPLT7KiJGobgCgvVDt
Iu5Rv1xWNTnotGaHq3n5414=
=GX0O
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] 2.6 and building external modules

2003-11-05 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
 [please Cc me on this thread. thank you]


 -Original Message-


On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 17:21:12 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I fails to see these directions on www.minion.de. Quoting README:

[ snip ]

anyway - it works. It works for may people. Actually so far it worked
for everyone :)

Actually, no, there were some problems with the new kbuild  :


 ok, I apologize, I meant with custom built kernel :(



http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0307.1/1162.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg114289.html

I could add all this stuff in the %post of kernel-source, what do
you think of it ?


 no enough see below


But that would require the correct kernel to be installed before
kernel-source, because we need the correct
/boot/config-%name-%version-%release to make oldconfig.
What to do if both normal an -smp kernels are installed ?



 To summarize so far.

 On 2.4 module versions have been appended to symbol names themselves
 and stored in modversions.h file. It allows using sources without object
 modules to built external off-tree modules and using some #ifdef magic
 evem prepare single source tree that can be used to automatically build
 external modules for currently running kernel.

 On 2.6 module versions are stored in object file. As last step kbuild
 executes modpost that extracts versions (CRCs) from objects that define
 them and stores them in objects that use them. I.e. if module mod1.o
defines
 mod1_foo that is called by mod2.o, the CRC(mod1_foo) is extracted from
mod1.o
 and stored in mod2.o *object*. Later on this is used by kernel module
loader
 to check that module matches kernel for which it was built.

 This step as implemented currently in kbuild needs *all* modules and
vmlinux
 for build tree. It is called as modpopst vmlinux mod1 mod2  -
enable verbose
 and see :(

 Which means that to be able to buid external modules kernel build tree
must
 contain vmlinux and *all* module objects :(((

 Which also means that if we want to build for several kernel flavours
we need
 vmlinux and modules for *every* kernel flavour :(

 So what can be done so far.

 1. Disable modversions. I have not tested it as yet but I presume that as
 this problem exists only in presence of modversions it should allow you to
 build modules. IIRC in this case kernel version is still stored so it
should
 not allow you to load smp module for up kernel. needs checking.

 2. Ship separate kernel-source-up etc for every kernel flavour that
contains
 vmlinux and kernel objects. Use the same kheader trick to link
/usr/src/linux
 to currently booted kernel sources. This means quite a bit of space OTOH
 most users have just one kernel installed ... apparently this is approach
 taken by RH (see quoted thread and recent Arjan reply).

 3. Use separate build tree approach and ship single kernel sources
that point
 to different kernel build trees that are distributed as separate packages.
 (link established by kheader) That saves us overhead of having sources
 n x times. It almost certainly requires Makefile fiddling but not very
large.
 It may fail for some non-conformant Makefiles (but then anything can fail)

disclaimer type=kernel 2.6 newbie
Since the binary kernel packages ship with vmlinux and binary modules,
can they not be linked into the kernel-source-$flavour package, so that
you need kernel-source-base and kernel-source-$flavour (which requires
kernel-$flavour), thus avoiding the need to include two copies of many
files? kernel-source would be a virtual provides in kernel-source-$flavour.

This assumes either modpost can use compressed modules, or we ship
uncompressed modules in kernel binary packages (or some similar solution).

Of course, if this is what you meant, just ignore me.
/disclaimer



 4. Teach modpost to extract module versions from /boot/vmlinuz and
/lib/modules.
 Any takers? :)

 So far two most attractive approaches are

 - disable modversions. Frankly speaking, it was meant to allow people
to reuse
 modules across different kernel versions - as it stands now I have
never seen
 that module from one release could be loaded on another. It seems to
be more
 trouble than it is worth.

You don't maintain binary kernel module packages I think? If it does
work, it would make life easier ...


 - take approach 3. We need to teach users how to use 2.6 kbuild
anyway, there
 is quite a bit of jump, so we may teach them how to use separate build
tree
 at the same time.

Option 4 looks the best long-term solution (and useful to others too).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc

Re: [Cooker] FHS 2.3 (fwd)

2003-11-05 Thread Buchan Milne
, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;freestandards.org. IN  NS

;; Query time: 188 msec
;; SERVER: 204.152.189.113#53(ns2.kernel.org)
;; WHEN: Wed Nov  5 16:37:36 2003
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 35

[EMAIL PROTECTED] buchan]$ dig @ns1.kernel.org freestandards.org ns

;  DiG 9.2.3rc2  @ns1.kernel.org freestandards.org ns
;; global options:  printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached


ns1.kernel.org seems to not be responding, and ns2.kernel.org doens't
know about freestandards.org (although it does know about pathname.com
and kernel.org)

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/qRhMrJK6UGDSBKcRAntUAJ4h883pIO8ChZTyzOA9oyU4fpkUTwCdEeV/
bJDZEM8Z/gl3XgVLeWiuR5A=
=SgxT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

*
Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our
e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy.
*



Re: [Cooker] linux question

2003-11-04 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Computer-R-Us wrote:
 i just got 3 mandrake 9.2 cds and i'm having a problem installing it.
 i'm getting the same error as this
 http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/cooker/2003-09/msg03727.php

 and i'm not sure what to do to fix the problem.

You will notice that this is an email copy of the bugzilla transaction,
click on the link to the bugzilla entry, and you will have the most
up-to-date information on this bug (and you can include any additional
information you can provide).

It seems that at present it is not fixed, and you will have to install
in text mode. When you boot the installation media, hit F1 and enter 'text'.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/p2/RrJK6UGDSBKcRAhZMAJ4uzxHrTxRGVZgnsnfpwP63jAMA9wCgru4N
SpXdZvRH4qaOGbv6SpWgshA=
=wE6v
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] ldap + samba3 + pam_mount

2003-11-04 Thread Buchan Milne
via an IMAP on such a machine, or when you connect to a samba printer (if
you use 'obey pam restrictions = yes') etc. Also, I have had some problems
using pam_mount in system-auth (maybe it doesn't work too well with
pam_stack) in the past.
 
 
 I only use pam_mount is on clients, so there are no problems whith server 
 auth, and for imap it depends on where are your mail dirs...
 pam_mount now function correctly, with the differents remarks I made on its 
 position in the stack.
 
 
BTW, IMHO there is only (currently) one scenario where smbfs/cifs would be
a good idea for sharing home directories (if symlinks worked correctly)
 
 I gess we still have to use nfs ... symlinks are working correctly, as long as 
 targets remain on file server. Not really usefull for Unix workstations.
 
 
IMHO, the best method (currently) to manage file sharing between unix
machines in a network is with autofs (specifically automount maps in
LDAP).
 
 I'm going to try this instead, seems great, especially with LDAP mapping.
 

And autofs-4.1 will make life even easier for this by supporting direct
mounts ... I must get around to trying it ...

Regards,
Buchan

-- 
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7




Re: [Cooker] KDE 3.2 Beta 1: Say Hello To Rudi

2003-11-04 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Laurent Montel wrote:
 On Tuesday 04 November 2003 12:17, PAOLACCI Sébastien  wrote:

 I created beta1 package previous week, and sync on
 people.mandrakesoft.com:~lmontel/
 Ok directory is all the time kde-3.2-alpha2, but it's package from
yesterday
 CVS.

Laurent, any chance for you to run genhdlist on that directory?

Also, it is feasible for us to make a kde3.2-based Mandrake Live CD,
which may make it easier for some people to test KDE-3.2. Interested? We
should be able to keep it under 200MB I think.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/p7EorJK6UGDSBKcRAkjBAKCtfG81e/KgP0Mu96RL4Vb+PHL4BgCcCTWs
7gzOWJ3YpH+2M3UvNFsQNEQ=
=GNcn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] KDE 3.2 Beta 1: Say Hello To Rudi

2003-11-04 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Laurent Montel wrote:
 On Tuesday 04 November 2003 15:01, Buchan Milne wrote:

On Tuesday 04 November 2003 12:17, PAOLACCI Sébastien  wrote:

I created beta1 package previous week, and sync on
people.mandrakesoft.com:~lmontel/
Ok directory is all the time kde-3.2-alpha2, but it's package from
yesterday
CVS.

Laurent, any chance for you to run genhdlist on that directory?

 why not.

Thanks.


Also, it is feasible for us to make a kde3.2-based Mandrake Live CD,

 a kde3.2 cd live ?!
 KDe 3.2 is not stable for cd live.

But I would prefer to run it on a live CD than on my cooker box ...


which may make it easier for some people to test KDE-3.2. Interested? We
should be able to keep it under 200MB I think.


 200 Mo for the moment size of kde is 600 Mo

Cloop has ~2.5x compression, so let's say  350MB ISO (with X and other
libraries etc)?

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/p7kFrJK6UGDSBKcRAg4WAKDLBp5P6an2fyXZna6kDnbN6NMAowCeKk0Z
loY+enwdLFtoXa4up8X1+lk=
=og8/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mandrake-release-10.0-0.1mdk

2003-11-04 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Warly wrote:
 -=-=-=-
 Name: mandrake-release Relocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 10.0  Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 0.1mdkBuild Date: Tue 04 Nov
2003 04:36:01 PM CET
 Install Date: (not installed)   Build Host:
proca.mandrakesoft.com
 Group   : System/Configuration/OtherSource RPM: (none)
 Size: 8251 License: GPL
 Signature   : (none)
 Packager: Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL : http://www.linuxmandrake.com
 Summary : Mandrake Linux release file
 Description :
 Mandrake Linux release file.

 -=-=-=-
 Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10.0-0.1mdk

 - yo

 -=-=-=-

Does this mean main is open?

/me hopes samba-3.0.x will build on klama then ...

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/p8t6rJK6UGDSBKcRAshyAKCJmlbfoM4DvK4RsQ+zeYXLHw2ozwCgjfuY
6BckGRu6WzQgaMyY9AjFJg8=
=rBum
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] kernel source requires libgpm1-devel ?

2003-11-04 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Michael Scherer wrote:
 On Tuesday 04 November 2003 20:38, Brad Felmey wrote:

On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 13:33, Brad Felmey wrote:

This is not necessary, methinks. Is this an issue in urpmi or
kernel-source?

And requires libncurses5-devel?


 yes, for make menuconfig.
 In a perfect world, it should be possible to have one package for each
 configuration :)

 In fact, since kernel 2.6 offer qt and gtk, something should be done
 here.

Like splitting the files required to build modules from those to build a
kernel? I see why libncurses5-devel is necessary to build a kernel, but
why is it necessary to build (insert favourite hardware vendor)
proprietary drivers?

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/qAUArJK6UGDSBKcRAqJkAJ97Hr6Bkr/+Vx6HdX6HYfSJzhNn3gCeOlhZ
zqFygGSXqs23gQ+suOdYcvk=
=HFe/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] freechem livecd presentation

2003-11-03 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Austin wrote:
 The attendance was very good, the interest level was very very good, and
 the response was AMAZING.  Many people asked questions both after the
 lecture and throughout the rest of the day.  It seems that there is a
 definite desire for people to be able to easily make their own
 specialized live CD's by themselves.

That's the whole point of mklivecd. I have made 3 different live CDs,
none of which would be useful to a wide audience (one is only useful
internally for running simulations on machines that *have* to run only
Windows during work hours, but can be booted off the liveCD after hours
to have a crude computing cluster for some proprietary 1d CFD software),
but which really provide real-world functionality.

 I have put up the slides from the presentation, but they do not depict
 WHAT I said, only an outline of the topic matter.
 http://groundstate.ca/freechem-pres.pdf

You can now remove your con #3 local printing is tricky, since this
seems to be fixed in cvs (except for some issue with the GNOME menus
being in /var/lib AND HAVING SPACES IN THE [EMAIL PROTECTED]). In my test,
all you need to do is run printerdrake, and it should auto-detect any
local printer and work without any intervention.

NVIDIA support is apparently also there, we're looking at some
bootsplash progress support, and I'm fighting with getting ide-scsi
working correctly (which seems a bit tricky ...).


 One of the coolest ideas I got was from a guy who suggested that USB
 memory cards be used as the /home directory.  This is a brilliant
 idea... as you could walk around with the liveCD, and your USB memory
 card, and you would essentially have your desktop in your pocket, that
 would run on almost any workstation anywhere, with your /home/.hidden
 files and everything.  It would be cool if the liveCD startup script
 would automatically mount the USB memory card as /home if it was
 inserted before boot time, but as /mnt/usbram (or similar) if inserted
 after bootup.

There is initial support for this in CVS, but since I misplaced my USB
flash disk about a week ago I haven't been able to test it.

I would personally like an encrpyted filesystem, and a tool to prepare
such a filesystem.

On the CD we use for simulation, I just have it set up for our LDAP
server (I should test with _ldap._tcp SRV records to make it more
generic), and have autofs starting at boot, and now any user can log
into it and get their home directory via automounted NFS (with one extra
step before creating the image - but direct mount support in autofs
would remove the need for this).

 I'm planning on finishing freechem 1.0 (possibly to be renamed), and
 distributing it through the authors of the chemistry applications
 themselves.  Then I plan on making an audio production liveCD, but I'm
 waiting for cooker to re-open first, so I can update jack, alsa-tools,
 and a few other things.

You might want to at least do some tests at present for hardware
detection purposes ... since that may also take some time to sort out.

BTW, if others are interested in this, please join the mklivecd mailing
list:
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/minicd-scripts

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/pi6QrJK6UGDSBKcRAgHDAJ48q0Ps8cO2/F8fZRJkegh9B5UirgCcCgTu
FJppLayXagiIsEQV9DS4azI=
=4f0E
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Updated ATI Kernel Modules

2003-11-03 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Götz Waschk wrote:
 Am Montag,  3. November 2003, 11:39:35 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Götz, you work to hard:)
Any objections if I put them on club (with obsoletes for the in-house
version?)

 You can do everything the license permits. Please don't forget to
 upload the source rpms to the club.

Packages uploaded by contributors *must* have SRPMS, otherwise the
binaries won't be uploaded to the web server.

Unfortunately there isn't such a restriction for the packages put up
there by Mandrakesoft.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/pjWyrJK6UGDSBKcRAmIyAJ97pZe9t7F8EyeGhYSS2EpzPf0+jQCgkRU3
7zPaRPvF3lZxJoj5Sy2IfPA=
=PubL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk Stability

2003-11-03 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Frederic Crozat wrote:
 On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 08:34:50 +, David Coe wrote:


I mentioned in an earlier thread that I was having problems with the
Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk placed in the MandrakeClub archive, in particular,
that pressing the Mail icon on the Browser Status Bar (down at the
bottom left-hand corner) quite often resulted in an unceremonious
closedown of all Mozilla windows.

This bug had been *very* noticeable with Chip Cuccio's first offering of
Mozilla-1.5 on his NORLUG archive (I can't speak for the second), was
sporadically present with Buchan Milne / Fred Crozat's MandrakeClub RPM
and was absent (as far as I can tell) from Scott Bolander's XFT-enabled
tarball.

 I'm going to be a little rude but let's explain this clearly : I DON'T
 maintain Mandrake Club RPMs (I didn't upload nor check them) and I DON'T
 want to hear from them, specially on cooker mailing list.. I NEVER did
 those packages. The only package I maintain are on cooker.

No problem, I accept full responsibility for them, but David is the only
one reporting issues with the package (only other compaints were due to
people installing 3rd-party plugins on their own and getting some things
wrong).

However, I made no changes to any configuration options (I just backed
out the patches that were integrated upstream and updated ipc for
enigmail), so you may still want to take note of the issue. I have
attached a diff to your latest mozilla spec file in case it is useful to
you.

However, I haven't really been able to reproduce this problem myself. I
did get a crash once, but that was when testing this, and it happened
about the 15th time I opened the mail window. I tried it another two
times, and got to 20 openings of the mail window using the icon before I
stopped.

So, I will take a look at this, but I don't think it's that serious.

David, do you get the same problem when you use CTRL-2 or
Window-MailNewsgroups ?

BTW, on my cooker box (which has been running 1.5-0.92mdk for a week), I
start mozilla with the mail component first, and usually use the
keyboard shortcuts for the window I want to open, instead of the icons.
But it has been extremely stable (only one crash and that was testing
the mail icon).

I have been running 1.5-0.91mdk on my 9.1 box at home for almost 2 weeks
now, also with no problems.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/pjg7rJK6UGDSBKcRArOlAKC0x3aU65wprUNJbRXS+taxLiD7VwCghi+V
8M4nu0vfKLFZnn768VpRObI=
=K9YD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--- /home/bgmilne/rpm/mdk/SPECS/mozilla.spec	2003-09-18 16:13:01.0 +0200
+++ mozilla.spec	2003-10-19 11:52:40.0 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 %define lib_nss_name %mklibname nss %{major_nss}
 #warning : always end release date with 00 
 # (it should be the hour of build but it is not significant for rpm)
-%define releasedate 2003063000
+%define releasedate 2003101500
 %define french_policy 0
 %define dirversion  %{version}
 %define mozillalibdir %{_libdir}/mozilla-%{dirversion}
@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@
 %define build_xmlterm	 0
 %define enable_svg   0
 %define build_is_final   1
-%define enable_l10n	 1
-%define enable_l10n  1
+%define enable_l10n	 0
+%define enable_l10n  0
 %define build_debug  0
 %define build_corefonts	 0
 %define build_ggdefaults 0
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 
 # used for enigmail and protozilla sources:
 %define enigmail_version 0.76.1
-%define ipc_version  1.0.3
+%define ipc_version  1.0.4
 
 %{?_with_spellcheck: %{expand: %%define build_spellcheck 1}}
 %{?_with_enigmail: %{expand: %%define build_enigmail 1}}
@@ -57,8 +57,8 @@
 
 Name:  mozilla
 Summary:   Mozilla, open-source web browser
-Version:   1.4
-Release:   13mdk
+Version:   1.5
+Release:   0.92mdk
 License:   MPL
 Source0:   ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla%{version}/src/mozilla-source-%{dirversion}.tar.bz2
 Source2:   mozilla_16.png
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
 # (fc) 0.9.8-1mdk fix loading of file through command line (contributed by Chmouel) ,
 # set MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH to $HOME/.mozilla/plugins, autodetect locale, add -splash parameter
 Source10:  mozilla-1.0.0-sh.in.bz2
-Source20:  mozilla-1.4-spellcheck.tar.bz2
+#Source20:  mozilla-1.4-spellcheck.tar.bz2
 Source21:  http://enigmail.mozdev.org/dload/src/ipc-%{ipc_version}.tar.bz2
 Source22:  http://enigmail.mozdev.org/dload/src/enigmail-%{enigmail_version}.tar.bz2
 Source23:  mdkbugzilla.gif
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
 # (gb) 1.1-0.beta.3mdk add new xptcall tests
 Patch36:   mozilla

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-11-03 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Olivier Blin wrote:
So the problem may/must be in mkinitrd.
I'm working on it.


 My mistake, it's a bug in kernel packaging.
 No depmod is done in %install, so mkinitrd find the first time an empty
 modules.desc file and can't guess ext3 depends on jbd ...

 A test9.4mdk will come later this evening, or are we already in the
 morning ? ;)


It seems you're a bit ahead of the rest of us ... by about a day ...

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/pjlYrJK6UGDSBKcRAkw8AJ9J7X00TQL9kve3+c/T1c83KRYOUgCgoT7i
3wl7WitRaRpBn/LvkpoRA4Q=
=pQTo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] ANN: synaptics and radeontool

2003-11-03 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Luca Berra wrote:
 hello,
 i built rpms of synaptics (the X11 touchpad driver)
 and radeontool (switch on/off external monitor and laptop backlight)

 http://www.comedia.it/~bluca/cooker/misc/

 they will get into contrib if i don't get any negative feedback,
 anyone cares to try them?

And nrg2iso (it was on my to-do list)?
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/pkmtrJK6UGDSBKcRAlD/AKCwHRQtRaDEoiH9F3QYaCKSdGHnwgCgiHx5
qhP0iUMSlHlotHjqHU1ADWk=
=5/cr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk Stability

2003-11-03 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Brook Humphrey wrote:

 I also know since i have started rebuilding the mandrake rpm's with some
 extreme optimizations that I do not see this behavior at all on my
mandrake
 boxen. However I have had issues with the mandrake builds of mozilla for
 about 2 years now they just randomly lock up, completely crash, or the
one
 that really bugs me is that after a while of use it gets so that you
can not
 select text in the address bar. You have to shut it down to fix this.

Not really. You can temorarily get it back working by minimizing and
switching back to the window you were using, sometimes you need to do it
more than once (and there are other methods). But AFAIK this is not
processort specific, and may be GTK2/KDE bug.

 Because
 of this I almost never use the mandrake rpm's for mozilla.

So, which binaries work ok then? Mozilla 1.0.x-1.2.x worked fine using
Mandrake builds, so I think it is a GTK2 issue (and you wouldn't see it
on GTK1.x builds).

 My regular usage is to have 1 or 2 mozilla windows open with maybe 10
or 15
 tabs per window. This I have running for possibly weeks. With the
mandrake
 builds I get maybe 3 or 4 days max.

My regular use is at least 2 windows open, usually  25 tabs open total.
I probably have to do the minimize-ALT-SHIFT-TAB trick about once every
two hours or so of use.

Fred tried to reproduce it, but didn't succeed, and I don't think he'll
take kindly to running KDE and Mozilla for a week to find it ... he
complained as it was about having to run Mozilla instead of epiphany ;-).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/plGxrJK6UGDSBKcRAvupAJwJ9xAHuJGimJWxdVdKCtJPoKdPkQCfdN4v
54oa3GYxnUxPxOgsPNgrmtY=
=Uie1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] 9.2 Updates a total mess

2003-11-03 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I few years ago I needed postfix with mysql support. postfix in
mandrake didn't have it. I downloaded srpm and found that mysql was in
but switch in spec file wasn't activated. It took quite a while for a
new package to appear. Even one security update was released but the
switch wasn't activated. Once more i had to build it myself.


 Have you considered that maybe Mandrakesoft doesn't want postfix to depend
 on mysql by default, but *does* want to make it easy for someone to build
 the package with mysql support

 All you need to do is:
 $ rpm --rebuild --with mysql postfix*.src.rpm

 Luckily, ldap support is on by default.

It seems it is possible to build postfix with dynamic support for
mysql/postgres/ldap, see the patch Debian uses:

http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/postfix/postfix_2.0.16-2.diff.gz
(or newer I guess).

Luca Berra, care to look at this?

(/me wonders when Debian will seriously consider sending patches upstream)

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/pm0vrJK6UGDSBKcRApLnAKCXGUl+ChHVn3fuvmFpA+IKoQ69EACeNJMD
FimwGXiyojsj+GiZPlq8L64=
=BGhm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] kile-1.6-1mdk

2003-11-03 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Lenny Cartier wrote:
 [Contrib-RPM]

 -=-=-=-
 Name: kile Relocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 1.6   Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Mon Nov  3
14:44:06 2003
 Install Date: (not installed)   Build Host: klama.mandrake.org
 Group   : PublishingSource RPM: (none)
 Size: 1587376  License: GPL
 Signature   : (none)
 Packager: Lenny Cartier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL : http://xm1.net.free.fr/kile/index.html
 Summary : Integrated LaTeX Environment for KDE3
 Description :
 Integrated LaTeX Environment for KDE3


URL has changed: http://kile.sourceforge.net/

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/pnxvrJK6UGDSBKcRAiaFAJ4lkUKFVnD66SQIJ8IA4EEzPaqMnwCeJxjd
kxHmNmwMX7g+ETUzC9+QNwA=
=Fp/L
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Eclipse 2.1 hangs ... ?

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Thomas Lionel SMETS wrote:
 I upgraded my MDK 9.0 to 9.1

9.1 is an ancient (for this list) release. Please send your question to
list that deals with the stable releases (not the list that is working
on 10.0 now).

 from a CD  have now KDE desktop instead of
 Gnome. Moreover I decided to do an install with a 'higher' ('standart' 
 'High'  'Higher'  'Paranoid') security Level. The install went OK but
 know I seem to have lost a fair-bit of steering power.

Yes, security always sacrifices ease-of-use.

 If I try to start LinuxConf from a normal user terminal where I su'ed,
 it cannot connect to the X-client. So I did a 'xhost +127.0.0.1' with a
 'xhost +192.168.1.105' (my IP) as root or as the user...
 
 I keep getting :
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# Error message from remadmin :
 Error message from remadmin :Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0
 
 What else do I need to do ... ?

This is a generic X error, but has nothing to do with your eclipse problem.

Please, try the other lists Mandrake provides, expert and newbie may be
appropriate.

Regards,
Buchan

P.S. Eclipse works fine on my cooker box, since about the time it was
quite close to 9.1.

-- 
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7




Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Robert L Martin wrote:

 SomeDrake needs to post when the official LG-SAFE isos are ready

Why not just leave everyone in the dark? That would be better? (IOW, no
kidding, but the ISOs aren't available).

 (im
 going to assume that
 somebody yelled STOP THE PRESSES (aka via BF ARRÊTEZ LES PRESSIONS)
 when
 this bug was found so i couldn't buy a nonLG-SAFE set)
 btw you might want to include how to tell the difference (like maybe the
 win32 auto run reads linux-Mandrake 9.2a?)

It would be enough to make it say 9.2 ;-).

-- 
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7




Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils?

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
 Buchan Milne wrote:
 
 Bryan Whitehead wrote:


 Thanks for the kick in the pants. Looks like autofs can do what I need.
 Looks like this feature slipped in during 9.0 (or 8.2) and I didn't
 notice.

 Now if only autofs would support direct mounts we'd be another step
 closer to Solaris... ;)



 Could you explain what it is/how it works?
 
 
 auto_direct allows you to assign a directory a specific disk/nfsserver
 when it is accessed. this means you can make any directory managed by
 autofs without having autofs control the parent directory.
 
 most common use of direct mount is /var/mail.
 
 This config wants mail in /var/ to be mounted from a nfs server, but
 you can't have /var managed by autofs. So autofs will watch the mail
 directory directly. When a program enters/opens the directory autofs
 will mount the directory from it's configured source. An auto.direct
 entry would look like this:
 /var/mail   -actimeo=0  s383:/export/mail
 
 someone may say... why don't you just keep in mounted??!?!. Because of
 stale NFS handles when servers go down. Even when the server comes back
 up the client may be hosed... if you have several hundred workstations
 this can suck real fast. NFS mounts should only be mounted when in
 use. If no one is looking at /var/mail then /var/mail should not be
 mounted via nfs.
 
 Currently on linux we would have to change /var/mail to be a symlink to
 /net/s383/export/mail. However, this becomes a problem when applications
 decide to save the mail folder as /net/s383/export/mail. If we move
 our mail services to another server we'll have problems. But mail is
 just a simple stupid example...
 
 /usr/local is software that is installed by the SA. Many shops share
 this over nfs (very common at JPL) so each workstation can have new
 software by installing it on the server... auto_direct would look like
 this:
 /usr/local -rw s383:/export/opt/local
 
 having /usr/local as a symlink to /net/export/opt/local can screw up
 many things. For example, if a project compiles software on their
 workstation configure/makefiles and binarys can end up with
 /net/export/opt/local in them... resulting in huge problems when servers
 are moved, or decommissioned.
 
 

BTW, it appears that autofs 4.1 has/will have direct mount support,
including with maps in LDAP.

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v4/

Thomas, any chance of this in your kernel some time soon?
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v4/autofs4-2.4-module-20031013.tar.bz2

I will probably test it quite soon (some time next week I guess) myself
either way, but this is definitely something that we will want to have
in 10.0 ...

Regards,
Buchan

-- 
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-1mdk

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Dominique Petitpierre wrote:
 Hello,
 
 On Mandrake 9.2 (Download version) I have observed a symptom that
 is similar to the one discussed in the cooker mailing list thread
 [CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-1mdk on September 18 and 19
 (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg124027.html):
 After configuring ldap, commands fail with the following error message:
 
 relocation error: /lib/libnss_ldap.so.2: undefined symbol: dbopen
 
 I tried the rpm distributed with 9.2 (nss_ldap-207-2mdk.i586.rpm)
 as well as both version available at
  http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/~florin/www/rpms/ldap/:
  nss_ldap-207-2mdk.i586.rpm 18-Sep-2003 13:32   90K  
  nss_ldap-211-2mdk.i586.rpm 18-Sep-2003 12:38   89K  
 

I am running nss_ldap-207-2mdk on two cooker boxes without problems.

I don't have an official 9.2 tree accessible, or 9.2 ISOs though.

Regards,
Buchannss_lda
-- 
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7




Re: [Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Eric Fernandez wrote:
 In case of a hard-reset, init messages indicate the computer was not
 shut down cleanly, and a message appear :
 Press Y within 5 seconds to force the file system check
 
 Actually this is very misleading : if you do it with ext3, it does NOT
 use the journal and then you will experience system losses. Lots of
 newbies have reported that problem. Now that would be nice to change
 this message so that people leave the journalisation do the good work.

Are you *very* *very* sure this is still present in 9.2

It was there in 9.1, but it was fixed for 9.2.

Please ensure that you are not confused, as I am sure (and I tested
quite a few times with 9.2rc2) that it is fixed.

Regards,
Buchan

-- 
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-1mdk

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Dominique Petitpierre wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Thanks for your quick answer:
 
 On 31-Oct-03 at 16:38, Buchan Milne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
...
I am running nss_ldap-207-2mdk on two cooker boxes without problems.
...
 
 I just tried again with the latest cooker version: nss_ldap-207-4mdk
 ldd -r still complains about undefined symbol: dbopen.

Well, I seem to get the same error from ldd -r, but it seems to have no
impact on my system.

 
 Could you please let me know the result, on your system,
 of ldd and nm commands mentionned in my initial message, namely
 
  rpm -q -f /lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so

Testing on two different systems now, one with -2mdk, one with -4mdk:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ rpm -qf /lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so
nss_ldap-207-2mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ ldd -r /lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so
libldap.so.2 = /usr/lib/libldap.so.2 (0x40025000)
liblber.so.2 = /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 (0x40058000)
libcom_err.so.2 = /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x40064000)
libssl.so.0.9.7 = /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 (0x40067000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 = /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x4009a000)
libdb-4.1.so = /usr/lib/libdb-4.1.so (0x4019c000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4026b000)
libnsl.so.1 = /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4026e000)
libresolv.so.2 = /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x40282000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x40293000)
libsasl2.so.2 = /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x403c4000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000)
undefined symbol: dbopen(/lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ nm --dynamic  /lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so |
grep dbopen
 U dbopen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ ldd /lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so | awk '{print
$3}' | xargs nm --print-file-name --dynamic | grep dbopen
/usr/lib/libdb-4.1.so:00054540 T __db_dbopen



[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ rpm -qf /lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so
nss_ldap-207-4mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ ldd -r /lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so
libldap.so.2 = /usr/lib/libldap.so.2 (0x4003)
liblber.so.2 = /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 (0x40063000)
libkrb4.so.2 = /usr/lib/libkrb4.so.2 (0x4006f000)
libkrb5.so.3 = /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x4009)
libk5crypto.so.3 = /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x40105000)
libcom_err.so.2 = /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x4012d000)
libssl.so.0.9.7 = /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 (0x4013)
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 = /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x40162000)
libdb-4.1.so = /usr/lib/libdb-4.1.so (0x40264000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40333000)
libnsl.so.1 = /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x40337000)
libresolv.so.2 = /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x4034b000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x4035c000)
libsasl2.so.2 = /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x4048c000)
libdes425.so.3 = /usr/lib/libdes425.so.3 (0x404a)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000)
undefined symbol: dbopen(/lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ nm --dynamic  /lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so |
grep dbopen
 U dbopen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ ldd /lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so | awk '{print
$3}' | xargs nm --print-file-name --dynamic | grep dbopen
/usr/lib/libdb-4.1.so:00054540 T __db_dbopen


(it seems one version was compiled against kerberos, one wasn't - and
this is something that really needs to be addressed better, at present
since we don't necessarily force configure options, or BuildConflict
some packages, which features you get are sometimes quite random ...
AFAIK it should not be necessary to compile against kerberos now, since
we actually want GSSAPI via SASL instead?).

But, I don't see the problem:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ grep ^passwd /etc/nsswitch.conf
passwd: files ldap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ wc -l /etc/passwd
 38 /etc/passwd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ getent passwd|wc -l
187

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ wc -l /etc/pass
passwd   passwd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ wc -l /etc/passwd
 33 /etc/passwd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ getent passwd|wc -l
182


-- 
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7




Re: [Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Eric Fernandez wrote:
 
 Buchan Milne wrote:
 
 Are you *very* *very* sure this is still present in 9.2

 It was there in 9.1, but it was fixed for 9.2.

 Please ensure that you are not confused, as I am sure (and I tested
 quite a few times with 9.2rc2) that it is fixed.

 I am sure it still does it on my cooker box. I'll check again on the
 fresh box and will report.

Be very sure what you are reproducing. I can reproduce the notice, but
not the data corruption (which was very easy to reproduce on 9.1 if you
don't look carefully). On 9.1, you will first see a notice REBOOT
LINUX, and then further down the page it will wait for you to confirm
running fsck (but not time out, wait until you answer). It is if you
answer yes here that you get data corruption. On 9.2, you never get
there, since instead of the REBOOT LINUX notice, the machine
automatically reboots.

Regards,
Buchan

-- 
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7




Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6259] [urpmi] cannot install grace if grace-devel is installed

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
[aol002] wrote:
 http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6259
 
 Ok, thanks for your so fast answer. 
 You're right, the grace package is corrected. but I had a similar problem lastweek 
 on a cooker 
 (not in prod, so I overided in the same way I did it here) with another package I 
 cannot 
 remember. 
 I'll recreate a ticket I I can find this package and it is still bugged. 

Open a bug on the packages which are incorrectly packaged (not urpmi).

  
 BTW: will there be a MDKA with update of this package on MDK9.1? 

grace is in contrib, ie not officially supported (and will not get an
official update for any problem). And it's usually not useful to provide
an update for an issue that can be solved by one command (ie using the
version number with urpmi).

Regards,
Buchan

-- 
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7




Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6264] [drakxtools] New: drakperm does not save settings

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
[zefo] wrote:
 http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6264
 
Summary: drakperm does not save settings
Product: drakxtools
Version: 9.2-9mdk
   Platform: PC
 OS/Version: All
 Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Severity: normal
   Priority: P3
  Component: DrakSec
 AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 i changed permissions (actual security level 3) for /home/* from 711 to 750, hit
 ok, then reran drakperm and the setting was back to 711. i had to lower down the
 security level in draksec, then manually edit /usr/share/msec/perm.3 and then
 set the security level back in draksec.
 

drakxtools is currently 9.2-18mdk in cooker, and 9.2-16.3mdk in Mandrake
9.2 with all updates. IIRC, your bug was fixed for 9.2-16.3mdk, please
update and test.

-- 
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7




Re: [Cooker] Gnome Ghostview does not allow changing printer settings

2003-10-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
 Le jeu 30/10/2003 à 01:40, lamikr_mdk a écrit :

I tried to change the printer settings in the ggv (ggv-2.4.0.1-1mdk)
from /usr/bin/lpr to xpp but the settings does not store.

If I try to print or go to check out settings again, /usr/bin/lpr
is back...

Does anybody know where ggv stores config files, maybe I could then
try to change this setting manually.


 this cooker, not expert/confirme/...

 see in gconf-editor - apps - ggv - printing - command key


Or, to do this system-wide:

# update-alternatives --config lpr

There are 3 programs which provide `lpr'.

  SelectionCommand
- ---
  1/usr/bin/lpr-xpp
*+2/usr/bin/lpr-cups
  3/usr/bin/lpr-kprinter

Enter to keep the default[*], or type selection number:

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/oPvjrJK6UGDSBKcRAg+oAKC9TSf6nfjRbZb0YgOLDxhAPTIjWACeMDoO
VFH+bzS3hKfLQVZveOTYVdk=
=1KDr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] When can we finally get X to fall back to XFdrake??

2003-10-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Buchan Milne wrote:
 A long time ago, X used to fall back to running a configuration tool.
 This may have been long ago, when XFdrake wstill had a link for
 XF86configure (or whatever Redhat used to call their tool).

 Why, if a user makes a mistake, do they end up with a console login,
 when they could have XFdrake instead to help them fix the problem?

 See the comments in the OSNews review to see why I am asking this again.

 Windows95 even had a safe mode which would help you reoconfigure your
 display settings. 8 years later, and Mandrake doesn't.

Seen on a local LUG list:

I made the mistake of changing my monitor, and now X doesn't seem to be
running...I have no idea on how to fix the problem or where to start.  I
am currently running Mandrake 9.1.  Is there a console program (like in
RedHat, namely, setup and then to X setup) where you can fix the X
display resolution / refresh rates?  Or if there isn't, how can I set up
my computer to use the default setting which allows any monitor to be
connected to it and it still displays something.  What files do I need
to edit?

This kind of question should never need to be asked ...

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/oQchrJK6UGDSBKcRArIrAKCsRiHT4l4W5zzB1YgS8MiblW6wjQCfcHrM
LcqhL9RRyRx6yIBdxTlTv3w=
=ygZ7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Michael Lothian wrote:
 Would it be possible to have a desktop pc option at install where all
 prioritories are for a desktop user

 Make the gui no 1 prioritory at boot time

 Only load services when they're needed (or after gui is up)

 I think that's what WinXP does.

It's not that simple.

For me to be able to log in (on my desktop in a LAN), I need at least
NFS (ie portmap, nfslock) and autofs up and running. For a disconnected
LDAP setup (see the article on mandrakesecure.net), I need LDAP up and
running too (otherwise is is not possible to login, or show user lists
if using user lists on the dm).

So, maybe a Windows XP home type scenario and a Windows XP Pro in
Windows domain-type scenario.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/oQizrJK6UGDSBKcRAqbZAJ0SQriYn+c9iq5d4fJM/pD39r6pbwCfWw/G
wXF8Ov+0fK2uq0Foq9tLCBM=
=eiTP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] When can we finally get X to fall back to XFdrake??

2003-10-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Teletchéa Stéphane wrote:
 Le jeu 30/10/2003 à 13:42, Buchan Milne a écrit :

Buchan Milne wrote:

A long time ago, X used to fall back to running a configuration tool.
This may have been long ago, when XFdrake wstill had a link for
XF86configure (or whatever Redhat used to call their tool).

Why, if a user makes a mistake, do they end up with a console login,
when they could have XFdrake instead to help them fix the problem?

See the comments in the OSNews review to see why I am asking this again.

Windows95 even had a safe mode which would help you reoconfigure your
display settings. 8 years later, and Mandrake doesn't.

Seen on a local LUG list:

I made the mistake of changing my monitor, and now X doesn't seem to be
running...I have no idea on how to fix the problem or where to start.  I
am currently running Mandrake 9.1.  Is there a console program (like in
RedHat, namely, setup and then to X setup) where you can fix the X
display resolution / refresh rates?  Or if there isn't, how can I set up
my computer to use the default setting which allows any monitor to be
connected to it and it still displays something.  What files do I need
to edit?

This kind of question should never need to be asked ...

 Sorry to be against you Buchan, but as he knew there is a console
 program in RH, he should knew there is also one in Mdk aka XFdrake ...

And what if the user had never used Redhat before??? This guy has been
using Linux on hist desktop for over a year, do we expect newbies to
know more than this?

 I could agree if he had said : i tried drakXfree and didn't found it,
 but here, he didn't even try to figure out.

 May be we should normalize definitively the Mandrake tools as drak* for
 example, but that's another point.

This is largely irrelevant. For a desktop OS, it is criminal to dump a
user in a console without any help if they have just changed the
monitor. If we can't ensure that X will come up, why should newbies use
Mandrake over Debian?

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/oRAurJK6UGDSBKcRAjXEAJ9v3nN6Qew1iQcNTKNy2oWoTtXIGACgo1/6
sN2E3j43jKjKf8rj29PI27g=
=u8kz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jos Hulzink wrote:
 On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Michael Lothian wrote:


Would it be possible to have a desktop pc option at install where all
prioritories are for a desktop user

Make the gui no 1 prioritory at boot time

Only load services when they're needed (or after gui is up)

I think that's what WinXP does.


 Indeed, but this is impossible due to the fact Xfree acts like a
 monolythic block of concrete that relies on networking and stuff. As long
 as linux gets no decent separation between accellerated drivers and an X
 that supports this, (see also KGI, XGGI, fbdev) this is not an option.

 Mind that even in XP you can't log in untill your networking is up, if you
 are logging on to a domain. But it sure looks 1000 x faster and more
 smooth.

Yes, just accept the username and password, and show some moving
graphics until you have authenticated the user.

Ever noticed how long it takes to tell you your password is wrong on
first start?

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/oRCtrJK6UGDSBKcRAtpgAJ0c8l24eHCb/QUigsDcH9AH12YfuACgyi2d
sNSR8QqrO58Rag+AVgX9fBw=
=lufS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] When can we finally get X to fall back to XFdrake??

2003-10-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:22, Greg Meyer wrote:

I think Buchan's point is that if one tries to start X and it fails,
XFdrake
should be launched automatically to try and help the user fix the problem.

 Uh, it is. Anyone who uses nvidia drivers knows this, as every time you
 install a new kernel they aren't found, X fails to start, and Mandrake
 pops up two nice prompts offering to start XFdrake and show you the
 logs.

Are you using gdm? That would be the *non-default* display manager, and
this doesn't work with kdm or mdkkdm, and probably not 'startx' either.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/oRQdrJK6UGDSBKcRAh1LAKC8HjMj2DN6+BsZ2O5UQz/wwWofwACgs+iY
ppMX2E4cbMNfAmAbGgEzzw8=
=t52F
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] When can we finally get X to fall back to XFdrake??

2003-10-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Teletchéa Stéphane wrote:
 Le jeu 30/10/2003 à 14:20, Buchan Milne a écrit :

Sorry to be against you Buchan, but as he knew there is a console
program in RH, he should knew there is also one in Mdk aka XFdrake ...

And what if the user had never used Redhat before??? This guy has been
using Linux on hist desktop for over a year, do we expect newbies to
know more than this?

 Yes, but in that case, he should subscribe to MandrakeClub or buy a pack
 and solve this problem with the manual or on-line.

Why should he need a manual to do this trivial thing? When last did you
need a manual to do this in Windows (I'm guessing it was Windows 3.1).

This is largely irrelevant. For a desktop OS, it is criminal to dump a
user in a console without any help if they have just changed the
monitor. If we can't ensure that X will come up, why should newbies use
Mandrake over Debian?

 I agree on this point in the case you describe. I was just answering
 about THIS user in particular.

 BTW, i'm not sure if we should provide such -finger in the nose-
 practice that far : at the end, this is the kind of plus value one
 should expect from club membership and/or pack ?

So, we shouldn't be making a user-friendly linux distribution, instead
we should make a user-unfriendly linux distribution, and then sell
support? Sorry, but this business model is doomed.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/oRU4rJK6UGDSBKcRAoTCAJ0QKFxC4Bxh6OXI80rsqcvv9DN1HQCgrSfj
ynhNTghmZNdtZE0/ebZAmkY=
=qA8h
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] When can we finally get X to fall back to XFdrake??

2003-10-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jan Ciger wrote:
 | Le jeu 30/10/2003 à 14:20, Buchan Milne a écrit :
 |
 |Sorry to be against you Buchan, but as he knew there is a console
 |program in RH, he should knew there is also one in Mdk aka XFdrake ...
 |
 |And what if the user had never used Redhat before??? This guy has been
 |using Linux on hist desktop for over a year, do we expect newbies to
 |know more than this?

 I have better idea than to dump the newbie to XFdrake (that is finally a
 security risk, since the tool runs as root - i.e. you reboot, X fails,
 XFdrake runs, you are away from the machine and somebody screws your
 computer in the meantime).

Who said it would be without password? It should be something along the
lines of The X Window System failed to start, enter your root password
to reconfigure the X Windows System. The only question, is who would be
running this?

(Svetjlo's idea is better though, better to have vesa X than newt
console version of XFdrake).

 Why not put a message into /etc/issue saying to run XFdrake ?

Do you mean /etc/motd?

 It will
 display on the console, so the newbie gets the idea to do it. It is
 trivial change and will fix the issue.

sarcasm
Why don't we have cron send the user email saying Please run this task
now instead of running said task? It would be more secure than having
cron run the tasks, as cron could run as an unpriveleged user ...
/sarcasm

IMHO, a better /etc/motd (last time I saw FreeBSD, it had some hints in
/etc/motd) would be worthwhile, but mostly for console users (ie 
Permissions changing all the time? Configure msec using 'drakperm' (needs X)
Missing software? Search with urpmq name, urpmf --description
keyword or urpmf filename, install with urpmi package.
Remember to update your packages by adding an updates urpmi medium and
running 'urpmi.update update_source; urpmi --auto-select --media
update_source'.
Missing the tools you used during installation? Run 'drakconf' (console)
For application-specific help, try 'man -K keyword' or check the
documentation installed with a package by running 'rpm -qd package'

To remove this message, run ' /etc/motd'


Now, *that* would be useful.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/oSzlrJK6UGDSBKcRAjrHAKDHQA87bWuiIArBfN1723CKrq78LACeNVhY
A4l3jnrKk5fE7oJSGmoF2Wk=
=wR3L
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] A new guide about rpmdrake

2003-10-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Eric Fernandez wrote:
 Hi everyone

 I have updated my guide, corrected the font problem and added the kernel
 update tutorial.

BTW, you may want to mention Club free (I believe the urpmi.web page has
some mirrors listed) urpmi meduim.

Currently for 9.2 we have only mozilla-1.5 (and updated win4lin kernels
but they are now behind again). For 9.1, there is quite a bit more,
including mozilla-1.5, OpenOffice.org-1.1, and a few more (with my last
packages for 9.1 coming soon).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/oT+ZrJK6UGDSBKcRAqICAJsG9zPCoWeYW4z6JiaL8jGhW1YmhwCeM1Na
JSsqO9k9Z9rYgwaBg69lgXA=
=DgVf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Re: Kernel and Samba

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Norman Zhang wrote:
 Hi Buchan,


My Samba box stalls after some usage, mapped drives disappear and
users can't write or read from drives. The stalls happen randomly.
I'm running 2.4.19-16mdksmp and Samba 2.2.7a-9.2mdk. May I ask is
this a kernel bug or Samba bug? Does anyone know a fix for it? I
checked the memory from BIOS, they didn't report any errors.

BIOS memory check is (mostly) useless. Use memtest86 or similar.

Sure I will test it with memtest86 and report back. I have been
running LM9.0 with Samba on this box for 3/4 year now. The problem
only arose in the last 2 months by random. I swapped brand new
Crucial Micron ECC DDR266 SDRAM, but the problem still presists. BTW,
the BIOS memory check is quite extensive (Intel claims to scan it
block by block). It takes about 1 to 2 minutes for it to scan the
memory. Not sure how this compares to memtest86. I guess I will wait
after hours before I can run a memtest86.


 I ran memtest and found no error. Do you have other suggestions that I can
 further troubleshoot this? There are no cards plugged to the system. The
 system just runs software RAID. Thus it seems to be either XFS, md or
samba
 bug.

I would guess XFS. You may want to try a more recent kernel? (Thomas
hinted that earlier kernels may have had some issues with XFS). But I
think I'm running on XFS on the only production Winbind box I have at
present (running 8.2 still!), with no problems. But the only box I have
running XFS with an smp kernel runs 9.1.

 Maybe I could try upgrading samba to 2.2.8a-2mdk from your web server.

I would prefer if you used on of the samba FTP mirrors, you can get
setup easily at http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/?minor=1 (choose a Samba
medium).

 Are there potential gotchas that I should watch out for?

Not that I know of. In fact, I had reports that Squid authentication via
winbind works with these but not the version you have.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/n5x4rJK6UGDSBKcRAm7jAJ0eC55sftiAdids8ednjYV/RjrXVwCfRrzf
hp3Z6hE87MS2P7yhqclPxIs=
=NizD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] bootsplash kernel progress bar on non-mdk kernel

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
 Apparently this progress bar is displayed not by kernel but by some
external program?

No, it seems just to work by placing show $num in /proc/splash where
$num is a 16bit integer (see /sbin/splash.sh and the rc_splash function
in /etc/rc.d/).

 On 2.4.23-pre8 it is too short while on 2.6 it extends over the right
side - apparently
 it depends on relative kernel version number :)

Does framebuffer work on 2.6?

 seriously, how it is computed? Oh, and anyone knows any attepmt to
port bootsplash to
 2.6? Even incomplete one - it could be taken for a start

Probably better to ask on the bootsplash list? I am sure they are
interested.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/n55IrJK6UGDSBKcRAsSSAKDB1swhRO2AEEaeshiPDWPCM0ZwHACdFxFc
JTMqwKO65aGqMT7YVPmsDsw=
=q3ij
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Emmanuel Moll wrote:
 I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms


Hmm, do these have the l10n files? These packages were made after the
1.5 packages I made for Club (9.1 and 9.2) with corresponding galeon
(still in testing since I did them on Saturday) and epiphany packages
were made publicly available on the MandrakeClub mirrors.

Of course, they have already been in testing by Club members for over a
week before that.

I wonder if chipster also updated the relevant enigmail sources to
actually get a working enigmail or not ...

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/n6ATrJK6UGDSBKcRAmLGAJ40MMlaQom4Ogl5UuCK6+FLc1VZ4QCfY5Sg
Nu0Gr0Jl2TWA39NSL3RvthU=
=5bPp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

David Coe wrote:
 Emmanuel Moll wrote:

 I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms

 Manu

 I have noticed the norlug mozilla-1.5-1 bombs reliably on 9.2 when mail
 is called from the browser status bar. I'd better let chipster know :-).

Works fine in 1.5-0.92mdk:

http://mandrake.redbox.cz/Mandrake-devel/unsupported/MandrakeClub/9.2/i586/

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/n7nYrJK6UGDSBKcRAjStAJ9uW8tquP1Cwg14oqGQ/YNeDAj8LgCgzJId
lHPbhCKXDu6VYtPrhS9xh6o=
=HOv4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Install description need to be update

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Olivier Thauvin wrote:
 During 9.2 install, in package section, language French:
 (I translate from french to english)
 Internet: Some tools to send and read mail (pine, mutt) [...]

 Isn't time to remove pine from example ??? Except you plan to take
pine from
 plf and put it back into main ;)

Or allow network installation to install files direcltly from other
urpmi media (like PLF)? ;-)

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/n75zrJK6UGDSBKcRAlnDAKDCx01YdrHBeLcJ32a0zEkFQo0w5ACgx+/G
VfCZuBM4SUKCCwrkX1bjsTY=
=ekFL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] You really screwed up this time: Inconsistency between mirrors and packages in ML 9.2

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Galileo wrote:
 Old subject didn't get any attention, so I'm posting with this one
 which will surely get some.

And it had nothing to do with the subject, but the fact that it was
still quite a conflict-generating post.


 While I was trying to build updated isos i found in misc/doc/download
 a line kernel-source exclude. What ? this can't be true.

It is true, the download edition ISOs didn't have space for kernel source.

Yes, misc/doc applies *only* to ISO images, not to the mirrors.

 I search
 trough rpms, rpms2 and rpms3 and it isn't there.

http://mandrake.contactel.cz/Mandrake/9.2/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kernel-source-2.4.22-10mdk.i586.rpm

 I check on fr2.rpmfind.net and its there. Hm strange, lets see what
 else is missing.

Maybe fr2.rpmfind.net isn't in sync.

 I copy all the files from my rpms dirs to one directory and compare
 contents of that dir to
fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/Mandrake/9.2/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/
 What the f*** ?

Yes, that's a nice way to encourage us to answer your questions when you
don't even check official mirrors (or known-good ones).

 A LOOT of differences. It seems that I'm missing a lot of packages.
 My first thought was that these missing packages were transferred to
 contrib. Lets check no not there. Wait what's that.
 I have gcc-cpp_f-0.0.1-1mdk.noarch.rpm but on remote ftp there isn't
 one.

No idea what gcc-cpp_f is, never seen it before.

 I start to look at the differences and I notice a couple of odd things
 libsane-hpoj1-0.90-9mdk.i586.rpm that i have is newer that on mirror
 (on mirror libsane-hpoj1-0.90-8mdk),

What does the changelog on -9mdk say?

 mandrake_doc-en-9.2-0.9mdk.noarch.rpm that I have is older than on the
 mirror (mirror mandrake_doc-en-9.2-1mdk.noarch.rpm )


Not sure about this. Maybe you could politely ask the maintainer about
the changes reflected in the changelog (which you can see easily if you
subscribe to the changelog list.

 This has to me mirrors fault? I check with mandrakeclub mirror and
 its the same thing.
 What happened ???
 I have been told recently not to bitch/complain but to be a little
 more diplomatic when posting here.
 So here it is, I'm not bitching but asking nicely.

Riight, read the end of your previous post, really diplomatic in
comparison to all the other threads.

 I can understand that some packages like powermanga which isn't
 important (although very nice game) couldn't be fitted on the first 3
 cds but why wasn't it transferred to contrib.

Because contrib isn't main, main isn't contrib. That has nothing to do
with the fact that main is over 200MB larger than the space available on
3 CDs.

 And what's with the different versions ? I can understand that due to
 the last minute changes a newer package can be included in the
 download edition, but on mirrors a few packets are newer then in
 download !?
 So what should I do now ? I can download the missing packages from
 mirror but what shall I do with the packages which have different
 versions ?

Read the changelog to see if it's anything that affects you.

I don't see why I need to read your posts if you continue like this, so
don't expect an answer if you stick to your current style (as it doesn't
seem you are motivating anyone else to answer your posts either).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/n8rrrJK6UGDSBKcRAivSAJ9Sve6/iltoMaJ60uEu6lLseAGCfgCgjFNU
59TfGrzhyxgpheaCYePCZsw=
=TvZq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Install description need to be update

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Nora Etukudo wrote:
 Am 29. Oktober 2003 um 15:19:48 +0200 schrieb Buchan Milne:


Or allow network installation to install files direcltly from other
urpmi media (like PLF)? ;-)


 Yes! Please.
 I would like this. :-)

 But it should work with AutoInstall also.

Of course, since you may want to be able to have some internal
applications installed during installation (and some other features
related to unattended package installation could still be nice).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/n8xRrJK6UGDSBKcRApSoAJ0SLvUytfAsHE7bvDczCWIcfsAgSgCgkeKk
Hr92UPXz+xjWWkGsg1ktefA=
=hfUV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: NTP client in clock.pl [Was: Re: [Cooker] Some wishes for Mandrake 10.0...]

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Daouda LO wrote:
 Todd Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Jan Ciger wanted us to know:


computers. Setting up NTP server there is :
a) overkill

Maybe, for a dialup, I'll give you that.


b) quite tricky if you do not know what you are doing

I think someone should add to a wiki somewhere:

urpmi ntp
echo server time.ucla.edu prefer  /etc/ntp.conf
echo time.ucla.edu  /etc/ntp/step-tickers
service ntpd restart

It will automatically be configured to start when the rpm is installed.


 Ok, i just finished putting ntp client feature in mcc (clock.pl). It's
 aimed to sync with a ntp server in local network but can be used for
 external ntp servers.
 Replace /usr/sbin/clock.pl by the one at
 http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/~daouda/misc/clock.pl

 FeedbacksBugReports are welcome.

Well, in case you missed the NTP threads/bugs from about 2 months ago,
the default configuration (assuming users have full access to outside
NTP servers) should have 3 entries for 'pool.ntp.org' (IIRC, check in
bugzilla), since they have round-robin DNS, so ntpd should get 3
different servers:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ host pool.ntp.org
pool.ntp.org has address 217.114.97.97
pool.ntp.org has address 217.157.1.202
pool.ntp.org has address 65.211.109.11
pool.ntp.org has address 129.240.64.3
pool.ntp.org has address 130.60.73.143
pool.ntp.org has address 130.94.201.36
pool.ntp.org has address 193.170.141.4
pool.ntp.org has address 204.17.42.199
pool.ntp.org has address 206.168.231.98
pool.ntp.org has address 209.162.205.202
pool.ntp.org has address 212.204.230.141
pool.ntp.org has address 212.242.64.180
pool.ntp.org has address 213.15.3.1
pool.ntp.org has address 213.134.172.184
pool.ntp.org has address 216.27.185.42
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ host pool.ntp.org
pool.ntp.org has address 216.27.185.42
pool.ntp.org has address 217.114.97.97
pool.ntp.org has address 217.157.1.202
pool.ntp.org has address 65.211.109.11
pool.ntp.org has address 129.240.64.3
pool.ntp.org has address 130.60.73.143
pool.ntp.org has address 130.94.201.36
pool.ntp.org has address 193.170.141.4
pool.ntp.org has address 204.17.42.199
pool.ntp.org has address 206.168.231.98
pool.ntp.org has address 209.162.205.202
pool.ntp.org has address 212.204.230.141
pool.ntp.org has address 212.242.64.180
pool.ntp.org has address 213.15.3.1
pool.ntp.org has address 213.134.172.184


Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/n+W8rJK6UGDSBKcRAu0KAJ0fec8tXHbh1Zy3bxf0PgZpyU+IZwCglP3T
vB3/osOltwR2PLjBa041LXY=
=cCrO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Suggestion: move 9.2 to 9.2b or 9.2.1 and CHANGE the kernel!

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Eric Fernandez wrote:


 Claudio wrote:

 Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-)
 Since many of us are having BIG problem with the 9.2 tree on the mirror
 (expecially for the LG-bug), imho it would be safe to REMOVE the actual
 9.2 and upload a new 9.2b or similar, with the fixed kernel (and the
 correct kde packages and so on...). What do you think about it?

  Thanks, Claudio


 What you suggest has been announced ages ago on the errata page...
 Moreover, there is nothing to remove since it has not been distributed
 to the public and is not available on server (except for leaked versions).

And the FTP tree, with (I assume) offending kernels in the floppy images
and the modules for said kernel in the stage2's on the mirrors.

http://mandrake.redbox.cz/Mandrake/9.2/i586/images/
 Parent Directory -
 MD5SUM  23-Sep-2003 12:03  383
 alternatives/   23-Sep-2003 12:03-
 blank.img   23-Sep-2003 12:03  1.4M
 cdrom-changedisk.img23-Sep-2003 12:03  1.4M
 cdrom.img   23-Sep-2003 12:03  1.4M
 hd.img  23-Sep-2003 12:03  1.4M
 hdcdrom_usb.img 23-Sep-2003 12:03  1.4M
 memtest-x86.bin 10-Sep-2002 12:59   79K
 network.img 23-Sep-2003 12:03  1.4M
 network_gigabit_usb.img 23-Sep-2003 12:03  1.4M
 pcmcia.img  23-Sep-2003 12:03  1.4M

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/n+Y8rJK6UGDSBKcRAoW0AKC8cL1O+ZGCaolAAtdwyyT0VDhFRwCfc99w
vWNrzdWX9LK7krQoIAOMbpw=
=F6aC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: NTP client in clock.pl [Was: Re: [Cooker] Some wishes for Mandrake 10.0...]

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Luca Berra wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:07:25PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:

 Well, in case you missed the NTP threads/bugs from about 2 months ago,
 the default configuration (assuming users have full access to outside
 NTP servers) should have 3 entries for 'pool.ntp.org' (IIRC, check in
 bugzilla), since they have round-robin DNS, so ntpd should get 3
 different servers:


 the problem is that you cannot use dns names for restrictions in
 ntpd.conf, so we would have to putt all ip addresses for pool.ntp.org in
 there.

But I think (looking at Daouda's updated clock.pl) that we are talking
about the 'server' entries in /etc/ntp.conf, which most certainly can be
hostnames, and the NTP people have been suggesting using 3 entries the
pool.ntp.org for a few months now.

Regards,
Buchan
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/n/5wrJK6UGDSBKcRAiecAJwIOHFj+7P4O090bCAn8LH4JcEcYwCdFrWS
3YTQG5s0D4NmIq1s2wx2DI8=
=wKBM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] You really screwed up this time: Inconsistency between mirrors and packages in ML 9.2

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Galileo wrote:
 BM And it had nothing to do with the subject, but the fact that it was
 BM still quite a conflict-generating post.
 You replied within 30 minutes. A rest my case :)

I will reply to this one only because you have some misconceptions about
this list. After this one, I will ignore you (probably via procmail
rules) just like everyone else is.

 It was 1:20 AM, I was pretty frustrated while trying to figure
 who the hell cares. I'm an unsatisfied customer,

This isn't a customer support list, it's the development list, your
questions about 9.2 belong somewhere else.

 BM Because contrib isn't main, main isn't contrib. That has nothing to do
 BM with the fact that main is over 200MB larger than the space
available on
 BM 3 CDs.
 So should we make another Contrib. Or should we just let these 200mb
 of packages stay in total oblivion ?

No, they live about the same place contrib does. They are on the
Powerpack and ProSuite CDs.

Yes, add a urpmi medium for main to machines running from the 3 download
ISOs (just as you would for contrib).

 BM Read the changelog to see if it's anything that affects you.
 ? Do you even understand what I'm talking about.
 If it doesn't affect me maybe it affects other people.

 BM I don't see why I need to read your posts if you continue like
this, so
 BM don't expect an answer if you stick to your current style (as it
doesn't
 BM seem you are motivating anyone else to answer your posts either).

 Good. Then I will know that I'm left on my own and that I have to make
 my own modifications,

???

 build my own isos,

If you want.

 and my own updates.

I don't think you would be able to keep up with Vince.

 And at the end if it turns up that it is to much for me I will try
 some other distribution. i haven't installed anything else except
 mandrake in the last few years (since RH 6.2) but maybe its time to
 start now.

Or maybe it's time to change your expectations of this list. If you're
paying me consulting rates, I will be very polite, but you're not my
client just as you aren't a client of any of the other non-Mandrake
contributors on this list, and the Mandrakesoft people on this list are
developers, not support staff. If you aren't prepared to file a bug for
cooker, your issue does not belong on this list.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/n/RfrJK6UGDSBKcRAnhXAJ4jocLxc6ngW21M28p0KAs/pPw/MgCeKOeO
lKjFNTUnAkbG95H54ObGk1s=
=sLYc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] 9.2 problems with Dell Laptop c640

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jaimon Jose wrote:
 Hi,
 I have few of hardware related problems with a dell latitude c640
 1. I use a TEAC CD224E DVD drive with this.  I can see that drive is
 properly recognized while booting.  But I don't have a /dev/dvd
 created.  ( dmesg is attached.)

# ln -s /dev/hdc /dev/dvd
(or similar)?

/dev/dvd isn't necessary for anything really, it's just a convenience
link (like /dev/pilot too), and I don't know if there is any easy way to
auto-detect it.


 2. I do have a PCTEL 2304WT v.92 modem.  I can't see 9.2 recognizing
 this as valid modem.  I'm trying to set it up as per
 http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/pctel-linux/.  This appears to be little
 old.  Is this correct?

 3. As reported earlier, I have disabled ACPI due to system lock up.  I
 can't suspend the system now which was possible with Mandrake 9.1.  If
 anybody is interested in helping me debugging the problem, I can provide
 sufficient information.

Boot with the 'nolapic' option, ie at the bootloader prompt, hit ESC and
type:
linux nolapic

If if fixes it (all other Dell users who have tried this had success),
then add the option to the append line of your default kernel entry in
the bootloader.

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/njiJrJK6UGDSBKcRAqy7AJ47PW+vdPbojnzRqkrIwP+S00ekTQCdF4Q9
YkhejLvXKeXpbEBeAPK8+w8=
=sBbs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Fwd: [plug] Mandrake Bug announce warning rant ahead

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Leon Brooks wrote:
 FYI; Scott runs a local Linux retail business and consultancy

 --  Forward; originally to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --

 Subject: [plug] Mandrake Bug announce warning rant ahead
 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:58
 From: Scott Middleton DESPAMMED

 rant
 I am pissed off..
 Has anyone seen an official announcement to the Mandrake users that
 using their latest and greatest will completely stuff their CDROM?

It's been on the errata page for a few days already.

 I don't care that it is not their fault. I don't care that Suse has the
 same problem nor do i care if they have found a fix. I was told because
 i subscribe to PLUG. I am on the announcements list at Mandrake but it
 is usually 2 weeks behind. Maybe i will receive an official notice in
 two weeks!

If you are subscribed to security-announce, you would have received
notice along with the notification about the kernel update that fixes
the issue.

 I meet people everyday who run Mandrake but are not on any Mailing
  List. They are not activists, they just don't want to pay for software
  and they don't want to steal it either. How are they supposed to know
  when it is not even on the Mandrake Club front page?

The MandrakeClub front page is not where you go to read up on issues
that may affect you on installation of a new release. That's what the
errata page is for.

I *always* check the errata page when installing on a client's machine,
and usually check it for my own machines too.

If you even consider installing a distro on a machine without reading
the errata page, you're wasting your time and putting hardware at risk.

 I think this is a very important piece of information that should be
 well publicised by them at least in an effort to have some credibility.
 This just seems typical of M$ worrying about bottom line rather than
  the users of the product. I expect a  big blazon across their homepage
  saying Please be aware that Mandrake 9.2 can destroy your CDROM. Or
  at least; some official notice.

- From the errata page:
If you have or use a LG-based CD-ROM drive please read the special
Errata specifically for that severe problem!

where Errata points to http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/lgerrata.php3
which has quite comprehensive coverage of the issue.


- From the kernel advisory from this morning:

 A problem was discovered where the kernel would destroy certain LG-
 based CD-ROM devices.  This problem has been fixed in the kernels
 provided and MandrakeSoft encourages everyone to upgrade.


 I suppose what really pisses me off is i have now lost one of my major
 Linux selling points. Linux is good because it doesn't hide its
  faults, it acknowledges them and then fixes it.

???

 I didn't lose any CDROMs only because i didn't (fortunately) upgrade
  all the machines that are running Mandrake. My home machine luckily
  doesn't have LG CDROM and is working wonderfully. So for me it wasn't
  the cost of membership + 1 or more CDROMs but for many others it was.

Subtract the cost of the CDROMs, since LG must replace them if they are
under warranty (and I think all of them still should be).


 Even worse for Mandrake it only affects the financial contributors. The
 people who are starting to make Mandrake profitable, this really can't
 be good business decision for them. I can live with bugs and mistakes
 but i can't live with irresponsible behaviour and not informing users
  is plainly irresponsible. I will have to reconsider being a financial
  member next year.

???

 Maybe i am overreacting about people having to buy a new CDROM, forget
 the warranty, who wants to wait weeks/months for a replacement one. I
  am just a bit disappointed in Mandrake and their lack of urgency in
  informing the public.

 /rant

In the future, please read the errata page *before* installing or ranting.

BTW, Mandrakesoft *has* been working extensively on this problem, and
not only on this list (we started on the maintainers list on 20 October,
as soon as we saw reports from some users on MandrakeClub).

The thing is though that it was not totally clear exactly which drives
were affected and under which circumstances until a few days later.

Anyway, LG is responsible for the problem, if you had destroyed a drive,
you could have returned it and had a refund or a replacement unit.

I understand your frustration, but it's not possible to conduct every
single issue in public, and the errata page exists for a reason, for you
to read it *before* installing, *especially* if you are a consultant and
install on other people's hardware.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919

Re: [Cooker] network icon on deskop?

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:


Le ven 24/10/2003 à 12:20, Jan Ciger a écrit :

Brad Felmey wrote:
| I will smile and politely pat you on the shoulder, understanding
| perfectly that you obviously have zero experience migrating an
| enterprise environment to Linux.

Well, yes, you are right, but what I do not agree with is putting a link
to smb:/ on the desktop, unless it is made more reliable.

It does not work properly for me (I am current on Cooker) - I am seeing
some shares from our Windows server but not others, some directories
seem to be empty even though they are not and many other strange things
like this.

Either use LinNeighborhood (which works fine for me) or nothing for now,
because a half-broken solution is worse than none.

filled bug reports against lisa/gnome-vfs/kio-smb

 yes, but not to say they are bugged. The whole design idea is wrong. IMO
 in doesn't make sense to abstract a filesystem at a DE level, at least
not
 for current systems. It would be better if lisa (or whatever) asked LUFS
 or even plain (smb)mount to mount the fs. This is less work and has
 probably less bugs than the current hacks. Playing an mp3 via smb://
 currently means downloading the file first before a player starts playing
 it. I do not want 2 minute pauses between my music (don't even try it
with
 video). Mounting it makes it available for all apps and toolkits. Makes
 more sense to me.

I agree. But smbmount / smbfs is the wrong place to start now,
mount.cifs / cifs is the better place to start (in case you want to
watch a movie  2GB or access Win2k3 shares etc.

BTW, pam_mount and kio_smb are enough for us here (mainly since we have
a better solution for file sharing, a specific, automated share for
temporary sharing, and well-managed shares accessible via samba and NFS
for project-related files etc), so I won't have much motivation to look
at this ...

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nkicrJK6UGDSBKcRAkQiAJ4jex7/rGC5vAZbS+MTlb/cdClIOwCffEDx
3xRMU+QgxAZId5Hmprha5fE=
=Kw0b
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] network icon on deskop?

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10.23, Brad Felmey wrote:

BTW, if this ever comes to mdk, plz think that a network neighborhood is
not a 'windows' nbh, you can also see nfs shares... Learn from osx, the
network browse window shows AppleTalk zones and SMB zones, you do not
distinguish them.


 Well, at present lisa is so depressing that I can't really suggest lan:/
 over smb:/. If lisa is improved (to show something like this:

 LAN Browser:
 -All machines (current content of lan:/, showing all protocols)
 -Windows-compatible (smb:/)
 -Netware-compatible (as yet non-existent ncp:/)
 -Unix-compatible (as yet non-existent nfs:/ or autofs:/)
 -Directory (a better ldap:/, with working AD and NDS support)
 ) then I would agree. But, in a network with more than one subnet and/or
 workgroup, lan:/ is not able to do as well (for smb) as smb:/ (trust me).
 Since there is no precedent on unix for even needing to show an NFS
 browser on the desktop, I don't think it's such a high priority (since
 autofs can take care of it anyway, but can't do the same for most smb
 shares).

BTW, I have looked at this briefly, and this is what I have at the moment:

http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake/screenshots/konqueror-network-services.png

(Some windows machines on our network see 53 workgroups, I see 52 in
smb:/ at present)

Some small issues at present, mainly with LDAP:
kio_ldap needs some work, since IMHO ldap:/ should show the default LDAP
server (as pam_ldap, nss_ldap and ldapsearch etc use), either the one
configured in /etc/ldap.conf, or if it is not configured there, the
result of a lookup for the _ldap._tcp SRV record.

Also, my Directory entry doesn't have a tree that expands, if you try
an expand it, you get an error Can't find parent item
ldap://ldap.cae.co.za/?one in the tree. Internal error.

Also, double clicking on an entry gives you the dn for the entry in
KWrite (no attributes even). I guess we need a kpart for LDIF.

I have attached two files, modify them (at least the ldap.desktop if you
have an LDAP server) and place them in
.kde/share/apps/konqsidebartng/virtual_folders/services

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nksErJK6UGDSBKcRAvXIAJ4m+VS/HOtGf3dYA/mo5zSwfMvBkgCgopbS
NSDQdl4bmWqhLe8N1ewiBgA=
=FJIZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Desktop Entry]
Encoding=UTF-8
Type=Link
URL=ldap://ldap.cae.co.za/dc=cae,dc=co,dc=za
Icon=network
Name=Directory
Name[af]=lan blaaier
Name[ar]=تصفح LAN
Name[az]=LAN Səhhayı
Name[bg]=Преглед на локална мрежа(LAN)
Name[bs]=LAN preglednik
Name[cs]=Prohlížení lokální sítě
Name[de]=LAN-Browser
Name[el]=Περιηγητής LAN
Name[eo]=Rigardilo por loka reto
Name[es]=Navegador LAN
Name[et]=LANi lehitsemine
Name[eu]=LAN Arakatzailea
Name[fi]=LAN-selailu
Name[fr]=Navigateur dans le réseau local
Name[he]=רשת מקומית
Name[hu]=A helyi hálózat böngészése
Name[is]=Flakk um staðarnet
Name[it]=Navigazione della rete locale
Name[ja]=LAN ブラウザ
Name[lt]=Vietinio tinklo naršyklė
Name[lv]=LAN Pārlūks
Name[nb]=Lan-surfer
Name[nl]=LAN-Browser
Name[nn]=LAN-surfing
Name[pl]=Przeglądarka sieci lokalnej
Name[pt]=Navegador da LAN
Name[pt_BR]=Navegação LAN
Name[ro]=Navigator LAN
Name[ru]=Просмотр локальной сети
Name[sk]=Prehliadanie siete LAN
Name[sl]=Brskanje po LAN
Name[sv]=LAN-bläddrare
Name[ta]=LAN ¯Ä¡Å¢
Name[th]=การเรียกดูระบบแลน
Name[tr]=LAN Tarayıcı
Name[uk]=Перегляд ЛОМ
Name[ven]=Buronza ya LAN
Name[vi]=Trình duyệt LAN
Name[xh]=Umkhangeli zincwadi we LAN
Name[xx]=xx
Name[zh_CN]=LAN 浏览器
Name[zh_TW]=區域網路瀏覽器
Name[zu]=Umbheki zincwadi ze LAN
Open=false
X-KDE-TreeModule=Directory
X-KDE-KonqSidebarModule=konqsidebar_tree
[Desktop Entry]
Encoding=UTF-8
Type=Link
URL=smb:/
Icon=network
Name=Windows Network
Name[af]=lan blaaier
Name[ar]=تصفح LAN
Name[az]=LAN Səhhayı
Name[bg]=Преглед на локална мрежа(LAN)
Name[bs]=LAN preglednik
Name[cs]=Prohlížení lokální sítě
Name[de]=LAN-Browser
Name[el]=Περιηγητής LAN
Name[eo]=Rigardilo por loka reto
Name[es]=Navegador LAN
Name[et]=LANi lehitsemine
Name[eu]=LAN Arakatzailea
Name[fi]=LAN-selailu
Name[fr]=Navigateur dans le réseau local
Name[he]=רשת מקומית
Name[hu]=A helyi hálózat böngészése
Name[is]=Flakk um staðarnet
Name[it]=Navigazione della rete locale
Name[ja]=LAN ブラウザ
Name[lt]=Vietinio tinklo naršyklė
Name[lv]=LAN Pārlūks
Name[nb]=Lan-surfer
Name[nl]=LAN-Browser
Name[nn]=LAN-surfing
Name[pl]=Przeglądarka sieci lokalnej
Name[pt]=Navegador da LAN
Name[pt_BR]=Navegação LAN
Name[ro]=Navigator LAN
Name[ru]=Просмотр локальной сети
Name

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Diego Iastrubni wrote:

 i just wanted to say LOL!!!

 the title of the install disk (under windows of course) says 9.1!
 oh my god... i cannot beleave that your released it? whats next? calling
 it debian? LOL

sarcasm
Yes, for an operating system that is intended to remove the need for
Windows, the most critical feature is the version number on the software
which you should never need to use after installing it.

Maybe next time we should rather fix that than worrying about newer
packages, fixing bugs etc?
/sarcasm

MS spent about a month replacing all the graphics in Windows 2003
(Windows .Net - Windows 2003). Does that make Windows 2003 any better?

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nldLrJK6UGDSBKcRAqVgAKCXx8gIhHMcm9oiyrHSW9jlVMan1ACffGRU
tjQT4IbfcAE3aMEtMBS2XhU=
=oDQK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] A new guide about rpmdrake

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Eric Fernandez wrote:
 I have done a new guide for installing media and software, with 9.2
 screenshots. It is available here :http://www.zebulon.org.uk/ICML0.HTML
 (and licensed under FDL).
 It is not completely finished (see the TODO page).

 I would like to get some criticisms, advices. I think that Mandrake
 should advertise the club with such tutorials, and emphasizing theaccess
 to the different media. A lot of people still do not know the rpmdrake
 management.

Very nice. Except on page 3a:
http://www.zebulon.org.uk/ICML3A.HTML

You have a bad link:
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/ef2/Desktop/MDK92GUIDE/snapshot92.png

(shall we have a whole thread on Zeb using Windows 2000 or WIndows XP
now ;-)).

Also, it might be an idea to show urpmi.setup, and (if drakclub works
well enough - I haven't really tested it on 9.2 myself) drakclub.

BTW, in the latest Mandrake newsletter they asked for some submissions
like this (see the copy on MandrakeClub for more info). I was
considering submitting something on sharing printers to Windows machines
(with automatic printer installation on the Windows machines etc), but
it would end up with mostly Windows screenshots!

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nmsDrJK6UGDSBKcRAgNyAJwMfwbJzCWsrf5fuUlHOUcQXzqlvQCgk37P
a/aE5l7YP9A/vaBVISR6638=
=ZpGm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Vedran Ljubovic wrote:
 --- Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

For Stephane : I disagree there are a lot of bugs in
the distro. The
fact that the updates are big in size does not mean
there are a lot of
bugs. You may correct one little bug in KDe and
anyway have to release
100MB of updated rpm.


 There is already 50 MB of updates for SuSE 9.0 and
 it's not even released yet

 http://www.suse.co.uk/uk/private/download/updates/90_i386.html


Except if you use their .patch.rpms:

RPM XFree86 4.3.0.1 (i586)  9938 kB
Patch-RPM   XFree86 4.3.0.1-patch (i586)344 kB

At present we make huge updates (ie the kdebase one) for really small
fixes (I'm guess a less than 5 kB source patch) which result in really
minimal changes to the files distributed (I'm guessing less than 10kB),
but we distribute full new versions of all subpackages ...

There must be a better way ...

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nmvxrJK6UGDSBKcRArGHAJ9I54cdJYqzIkEWO78VsErY+EPU8wCfbxvp
4D5bWw+5iwcKOB4wEPW7GbM=
=grzY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Mozilla Thunderbird not on cooker

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

David Coe wrote:

 BTW, I also have mozilla-1.5 packages built for Mandrake Club for 9.2,
 which are just waiting for the admin to get the permissions right on the
 upload server for 9.2, the 9.1 packages are in testing.


 I did notice the mozilla-1.5 packages up on ranger but alas without the
 corresponding lib files. You couldn't put them up and/or the spec file?

Binaries and the SRPM are now on the public MandrakeClub mirrors for 9.1
and 9.2, for example in:
ftp://ftp.sun.ac.za/mandrake/mandrake-devel/unsupported/MandrakeClub/9.1/i586/
and
ftp://ftp.sun.ac.za/mandrake/mandrake-devel/unsupported/MandrakeClub/9.2/i586/

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nntArJK6UGDSBKcRAhdmAJwOSs5GUskfYU9sLrCiF2otqUMRXQCffLrh
vBEfWy3OrHi9JQBuHuhlXRU=
=f+w8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] OT: My $firewall is bigger than yours! g

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Brad Felmey wrote:
 On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 09:02, Juan Quintela wrote:


And people told me that my firewall with a Via C3-800 is
over-dimensioned :)


 LOL!

 Mine is a SuperMicro 4U dual 2.4GHz Xeon, 4GB RAM, 500GB RAID5 15k SCSI.
 It's kind of a waste, but the box was just an extra lying around.

I'll trade!

We run our production firewall (with about 60 machines behind it, a bit
of a DMZ etc) on a P133/32MB. Your firewall probably beats all of the
machines we have here (we have some 2.8GHz Xeon/2GB CAD machines, but
our fastest server is a single 2GHz Xeon/512MB/480GB hardware IDE RAID
and it gets abused for running simulations too).

If it was just an extra lying around, I will take any similar machines
you that are just taking up space!

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/no6trJK6UGDSBKcRAnm2AKDGOXbGg/6g1gbppxd+hpJAIZdrvgCfcPSj
Bu7A5vomnQwmVA/V8/JTYo4=
=5hp2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




[Cooker] Any reason wxPython is built against gtk1.x?

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I was wanting to build wxMozilla so I could build
http://documancer.sourceforge.net/screenshots.php

But, Mozilla is built with gtk2, and for some odd reason wxPython is
built with gtk1.x (whereas wxGTK is built against gtk2). wxMozilla won't
build the Python bits if the versions of gtk2 used don't match. And
documancer needs the Python bits of wxMozilla it seems.

Is there a good reason for this?
Götz?

Regards,
Buchan
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/no/4rJK6UGDSBKcRAie/AJ49nvixE0SeqarjLbNhIQMB3c0L3ACff+Vp
KIdnSvQSfbmRCvSVSfAjg2U=
=+26+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Any reason wxPython is built against gtk1.x?

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Götz Waschk wrote:
 Am Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2003, 17:49:13 Uhr MET, schrieb Buchan Milne:

But, Mozilla is built with gtk2, and for some odd reason wxPython is
built with gtk1.x (whereas wxGTK is built against gtk2). wxMozilla won't
build the Python bits if the versions of gtk2 used don't match. And
documancer needs the Python bits of wxMozilla it seems.
Is there a good reason for this?


 The readme said so, because it's still beta. I can change this to gtk2
 in the next package, but we should test this first.

I'm going home now, so I will try it on 9.1 with gtk2 (see if I can
build wxmozilla and documancer), and try it on cooker tomorrow (and some
other wxPython stuff, wxGlade should be enough to test it well I
think?). At least things will look better ...

Depending how it goes, maybe I will just add a switch for building with
gtk2 for the moment.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/npaprJK6UGDSBKcRAklMAJ4zH85ax/LhR1afk5EIgXKx+cR6+QCfWNBi
U+l7Q7pjWCd7uZl9/5Qmo2I=
=lWyt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] gambas and gambas-gui src.rpm's uploaded

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Rob wrote:
 I managed to work out my rpmlint problems and have finally
 uploaded source RPM's for gambas, a Visual BASIC-like language
 and IDE, to incoming.  Please let me know if there are any
 problems.

Any chance of making your spec file available where someone besides
Lenny can get it?

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/npjdrJK6UGDSBKcRAmnyAKCJWbaF55BsMIAN3veQI6iVegxTKgCePMwZ
28YvUjvCsatAvVQfPiqRVrw=
=uRiB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Emmanuel Moll wrote:
 Right, I've created the ISOs, updated all the packages from the update
 site. Have also updated Mozilla to version 1.5

If you're using my packages for mozilla 1.5, note that I didn't include
the 110n stuff, as it wasn't available at the time.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/np5urJK6UGDSBKcRAiaLAJ4i1xEEvwRvcL7sS/2cyAzwwsjJNQCgoZTE
jwMFnIBkgn6F1D/EYypTQBQ=
=BWpg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] gambas and gambas-gui src.rpm's uploaded

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Rob wrote:
 On Tuesday 28 October 2003 11:41, Buchan Milne wrote:

Is there any way to avoid duplicating the gambas source in the
gambas-gui package?

 Well, we had earlier discussed building a tarball of the gui code
 (the app/ subdirectory of the gambas source tree) that gets
 installed along with the gambas base rpm.

Or maybe make a gambas-source subpackage with only the source files
needed to build gambas-gui that are not in the gambas-devel package?

 It shouldn't be a big
 deal since gambas is a buildrequires of gambas-gui anyway.  But
 is that sort of thing acceptable for automated build processes
 and whatnot?

See apache-source and kernel-source. As long as the necessary files are
guaranteed to be available at build time by doing nothing besides
installing the SRPM and all buildrequires, it's no problem. Relying on
something else to place sources in $RPM_BUILD_DIR like the rhide SRPM
does is not acceptable.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nqCcrJK6UGDSBKcRAjAuAJ9bTuRF2FF9g/jYKPjHgdz7elipdgCfc0JY
y4FEjkFHU7Sq/SAnSNFkVg8=
=klWW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] network icon on deskop?

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

FACORAT Fabrice wrote:

 Have you fill some bug report to http://bugs.kde.org/ ? if not, you
 should as you have some very interesting things.

Not yet, I guess I should ... though I may start working on some things
quite soon, but I guess it's better to post pactches into KDE bugzilla.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nqjWrJK6UGDSBKcRAjeIAJ9++a9dCnAfkx0R4bj6hjWiTZ/H2wCfdzl2
APRL3aeKUeCz5J1VNF/0Jt0=
=bqoG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] jabber-1.4.2a-11mdk

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

magic wrote:
 Hey all,

I was just wondering if there was any chance of having the jabberd
 quickstart included in the jabber rpm (or possibly a seperate one)?

http://jabberd.jabberstudio.org/quickstart/

It's mainly a dialog-based bash script to hack (well, cat mostly) stuff
into the jabber.xml file, and a bundled jabberd binary.

It can't edit the configuration really, so there's not much that this
does that isn't done by the package.

(BTW, Fred, I didn't get that LDAP plugin to work, any time I added
configuration for it to the jabber.xml file I couldn't start the server
:-().

Regards,
Buchan
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nqibrJK6UGDSBKcRAk+yAJ9swNZJH0+V2qYeIqGGULWpi4MIeACfcr56
WZOkHy+FkcdiImW7gf+lDNY=
=xga/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Any reason wxPython is built against gtk1.x?

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Götz Waschk wrote:
 Am Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2003, 17:56:32 Uhr MET, schrieb Götz Waschk:

I've prepared some untested packages of wxPythonGTK with gtk2 and
unicode support:
http://wwwra.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/Mandrake
Please give them a try. I'll test them ASAP with nicotine and
bittorrent-gui.


 Bittorrent and pyslsk seem to work fine, but I don't know what will
 happen if these apps run for a few days. There have been reports of
 memory holes in the gtk2 builds of  amule and xmule, these could also
 be in wxPythonGTKs wxgtk library.

OK, I built initial packages for wxmozilla, but launching documancer
from it's source directory doesn't use wxmozilla, but wxHTML, so it may
not be necessary at present to have wxmozilla-python (though I will try
and get it working).

But, I will make a wxmozilla package (without python for now) anyway.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nqtwrJK6UGDSBKcRApb3AJ9SCLW6B4WPJyE5cVlqKtd8jsZo4wCfbdtc
uhSQ9oKyRdEqgv/xEN9dbLY=
=UoTV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] rpm and missing gpg key gpg-pubkey-22458a98-3969e7de

2003-10-27 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Galileo wrote:
 bccz Maybe next time you can give us information like this? You
seemed to imply
 bccz you were running urpmi.addmedia against an official updates mirror.
 Well i use this kind of setup for a long time since 8.2 or something
 so i didn't thought of that.

Well, updates always work better if your urpmi sources have hdlists
(which are in base/) ...

 Anyway mandrakesecure.net imply that I need this key
https://www.mandrakesecure.net/RPM-GPG-KEYS
 so ...

Or the one on the base of the CD, but they are no longer imported
automatically the way they were before (at install time), since:
1)rpm now uses it's own keystore, and not root's gpg keyring as in the
past, so gpg can no longer import the keys.
2)urpmi now manages keys per-source, so if people do things the expected
way (ie not remove files from their mirrors), everything works.

The mandrakesecure.net documentation does need to relect this though.

I just find it a bit unfortunate that you criticise everything first,
complaining that things are broken, before checking your own setup.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nTghrJK6UGDSBKcRAkAAAJ9dsiitxxWpO0AZ9jzAD/XiF376XACgxGZF
H/hsnHvUfFvuxn0c/rT3RXs=
=EBLm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] ADSL + postfix default config = open relay?

2003-10-27 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Bruno Prior wrote:
 My ISP has just pointed out to me that I was running an open relay,
 which is highly embarrassing. I have been running postfix without
 causing a problem until I switched to an ADSL connection. The notes in
 postfix/main.cf seem to make it pretty clear what the problem is: my
 ISP's subnet had been added as a trusted subnet, as ADSL counts as a
 dialup connection, which meant that anyone on their network could relay
 through my mail server.

But, who added that?

 Obviously, the fault is principally mine, for not being more careful
 when I set ADSL up - the information is all there if you look for it.
 But I was wondering how many people would look for it. Because, if you
 setup ADSL using drakconnect, you wouldn't have a clue you needed to
 edit main.cf to prevent this.

drakconnect doesn't touch main.cf

 Would it be a good idea to either enhance
 drakconnect to make this change automatically (if you could figure out a
 sensible way to deduce the appropriate list of trusted clients), or at
 least flag up a warning, to stop other people making this mistake?

By default, the important postfix settings are:

$ cp /etc/postfix/main.cf.rpmnew /tmp/main.cf
$ /usr/sbin/postconf -c /tmp mynetworks inet_interfaces relay_domains
mydestination
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8
inet_interfaces = localhost
relay_domains = $mydestination
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain

So, by default you shouldn't even be able to get a connection to postfix
unless you have manually changed mynetworks, or used some tool which
does so. drakconnect can't take responsibility for every single possible
configuration that may depend on it's settings.

Ideally we need a configuration tool which can find such issues, but
it's not drakconnect, and it needs to be very user friendly (and not do
things automatically). But I don't think this is your problem.

Maybe if you can try and find out what had changed any of the important
settings, we can take a look, but I don't see how either the default
postfix config or drakconnect are responsible.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/nToxrJK6UGDSBKcRApT5AKCZpIZPhXPWX5mfJLWJKvThBlbpKgCcDZ2r
RrYeCWK18OGb38ucwuW1pEk=
=ZyXe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-23 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

ef2 wrote:
 Here are some suggestions for 9.2

 - for the public release, you should release 9.2.1 isos that include the
 updates AND also corrects the problem with LG drives. I don't think
 Mandrakesoft can afford a public release of ISOs that kill CD drives. That
 would be very bad for Mandrake reputation. Please do NOT release Isos that
 kills drives !

I wonder if it might be possible to only remaster the first ISO, as I
think most updates were to packages which are on CD1 (or do we split
kde*-devel off onto CD2 or 3?).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/l/NArJK6UGDSBKcRAk/qAKC9yRWnNQ9SeXAqicSM1TQod6pNmQCfedfX
MADrKCiAgZAGyINFlZwqDEQ=
=U/ng
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




[Cooker] network icon on deskop?

2003-10-23 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I find the articles at http://www.open-mag.com are normally quite
pathetic, they place *huge* significance on a small setting (and don't
seem to notice that the same settings are available on every single
distribution they have bothered to test). However, in some ways, that's
how new users think.

For example:

SUSE has added a Local Network icon to the user's desktop that links
to a new network-browsing applet that closely mirrors the behavior of
the Network Neighborhood/ My Network Places applet found in Windows.
Clicking on the Local Network icon brings up all of the Windows
workgroups and domains discovered on the Network. From there, all of the
systems in any selected workgroup or domain will be listed using the
system's name rather than the system's IP address.

http://www.open-mag.com/1726339824.shtml

So, when can we add an icon on the desktop for smb:/ in KDE and GNOME by
default, called something like Local Network (I have one on my desktop
- - actually called Windows Network, and it works great).

And, at some stage, it might be nice to be able to enforce such icons on
the desktop for every user ...

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/mARgrJK6UGDSBKcRAjvSAJ9ZPsrWfSmSxUnezmclg9GPRNWH1wCgzGjP
18LJo1PnOsH51zZV+o+vrv4=
=ptF4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >