Re: [css-d] Elegant alternative to br style=clear:both; /?

; visibility:hidden; } It won't work in IE, but then again IE pushes past floated elemenss anyway. (Although I have had the occasional glitch with Netscape, but for the most part it works very well.) All you have to do is add 'class=clearfix' to any element you want cleared. ~Shelly

Re: [css-d] Background image not centring correctly in Firefox

need to do it. Very simple, and I think one of the cleanest methods I've found (even if it does call for extra divs!) Whoever it was that posted it before - awesome, and thank you. ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [css-d] Avoiding Bugs and Hacks, Any Resources?

that...well I can't even remember exactly how it goes! I'd have to look it up again. ;) Anyway, hope that helps you out. :) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7

[css-d] Layout question

and a small flash animation (for aesthetic purposes only - it's just pretty stuff, nothing important). So am I trying to do something absolutely insane here, or is this possible to do? I'd appreciate any insight you all may have for me :) ~Shelly

Re: [css-d] Layout question

set of eyes to try it out. In other words - no real HTML yet. I'm asking for opinions/ideas on how you all would go about doing it if this were given to you to code out. ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css

Re: [css-d] site check pc explorer

Exactly what David said - this is precisely what I'm seeing on IE6, Windows XP. ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page

Re: [css-d] CLICK ON THUMBNAIL TO SHOW LARGER IMAGE ON THE SIDE

to use a script (like javascript). But if you can live with on hover, you can use CSS: http://anekostudios.com/2006/05/07/disjointed-rollovers/ Hope that helps you! ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css

Re: [css-d] min height with ie and ff

last. IE6 doesn't recognize min-height, so it ignores it and sticks with height. But anything that recognizes min-height will apply it. In any case, you also need to have: html, body { height:100%; min-height:100%; } to make whatever div you're using go to 100% also. :) ~Shelly

[css-d] Clearing absolutely positioned elements

on this method...) I thought it was pretty interesting, and just wanted to get some input on what you all thought of it. ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information

Re: [css-d] Clearing absolutely positioned elements

Thanks for that - I didn't even notice it was doing that. Too bad, though - I was all excited there for a second ;) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information

[css-d] clearing issue

what I must do (it's the only other thing I can think of to do). But I'm hoping someone here can help me figure out what I'm overlooking, 'cause y'all are smarter than I am. ;) Thanks for any help you can give :) ~Shelly __ css

Re: [css-d] clearing issue

Use the following to clear the div.entry div.entry {width:100%; overflow:auto;} I *love* you! Thank you so much :) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information

[css-d] Opera question

, anyway. (If you email me offlist, I can pass a URL that way - I promise I'll post the solution to the whole list - just sans URL.) SO if anyone has any ideas, that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! ~Shelly __ css

Re: [css-d] Opera question

! ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http

Re: [css-d] Opera question

it ;)) Thanks for the nudge in the right direction! (and the ideas form everyone - I appreciate it :) ) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css

[css-d] shadow over gradient

with as little noticability as possible? I'd appreciate any pointers! Thanks :) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7

Re: [css-d] shadow over gradient

similar, except it's lighter to the edge. So I'm just wondering if there's a way to accomplish this without a script, and with CSS? Any help is appreciated :) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org

[css-d] IE bug?

find anything on this at all - and it's never happened to me before. Anyone have any ideas? ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css

[css-d] styling ordered lists

!) and now I can't seem to figure out how they did it. I'm *positive* it was done, somehow, using CSS. Would anyone have any ideas on how to accomplish this? ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org

Re: [css-d] Designing for a CMS?.. absolute positioning vs wrapper div

my site's layout simply because it's a CMS. As long as you know *where* to put the code that's needed, the rest is just gravy. It shouldn't affect how you design and use CSS at all. ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [css-d] change the background colour of a div or p on a mouse over hover?

pretty big, so I'm not going to put it here! However, the script *did* have the uRL where I got it (so I guess a credit *does* go back!): http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/ Worked like a charm (and validated). Hope that helps you out. ~Shelly

[css-d] 100% height question

, doesn't it? I've become fairly certain that what I'm asking for is impossible, but I don't believe much in things being impossible...there's *got* to be a way to do this. LOL Am I crazy in thinking so? ~Shelly __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] FOUC problem

Try adding this in your meat tags in the head of your document: meta http-equiv=Page-Enter content=blendTrans(Duration=0.1) See if that helps. ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [css-d] Faux columns - are there only two solutions?

, better, opinions will follow, as well as some corrections for what I'm saying!) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7

[css-d] Serving extra stylesheet info

verification on this (and if you have any better ideas - that'd be great too!) Thanks :) ~SHelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com

Re: [css-d] CSS Conditional Statements

it is right before the closing /head tag. (If you put it *before* the original stylesheet calls, then the CC won't override the other stuff - it has to be after) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css

[css-d] Small glitch in Safari

; } sorry for the novel - I swear, if I were home, it'd be shorter - but I'd appreciate any insight! ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css

Re: [css-d] I've got a problem with CSS and WordPress

. Which is in YOUR URL/wpcontent/themes/chrometheme/ - your path is incorrect. In your header.php file, you need to change it so it says: link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=?php bloginfo('template_directory'); ?/chrometheme/chromestyle5.css / ~Shelly

Re: [css-d] faux column with a mix of fixed and undefined width columns

at 100% width with a right padding of 10em, then your text at 100% width, and your right div being 10em wide with the margin pushing it past the outer edge of the container? Something like that? ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL

[css-d] Weird jumping menu in IE 5

! ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http

[css-d] Older Mozilla question

a general answer to this, though, that'd be nice to know :) Thanks! ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List

Re: [css-d] Older Mozilla question

the clearfix:after thing. Worked like a charm! Thanks for helping! :) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http

Re: [css-d] CSS Calendar

if I'm wrong! ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported

[css-d] inline image issue

in with text? Would anyone know a trick or something that would push the image into place? I'd appreciate any help on this somewhat ambiguous question. ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman

Re: [css-d] Two interesting problems

This: #current a:link { color: #FF; background: #CC; } should be this: a#current:link { color: #FF; background: #CC; } As for the gap - I don't see it in either IE6 *or* 7. Is your cache cleared? ~Shelly

[css-d] stylesheet question (@import?)

in using stylesheets in this manner, or is it a common practice? If there are no drawbacks or weirdness into using stylesheets in this manner, I *so* want to utilize this. It could come in very handy for a large site I'm working on right now. Thanks a bunch :) ~Shelly

Re: [css-d] stylesheet question (@import?)

Thanks so much for this info - that's great! I have a lot to read up on. Look at me, all excited about this. I'm such a geek. ;) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2

[css-d] Interesting columns challenge...

, for the life of me, figure out why. I'm not too concerned about IE7 *right now*, but it'd be great if I could figure out why it's not working in these three versions. Would anyone have any ideas/suggestions? Thanks :) ~Shelly

Re: [css-d] Interesting columns challenge...

! - and IE7 (as far as I know). I still can't believe it's working in IE for Mac. If you have a suggestion as to *why* it's not working in Netscape 7/IE7, I'd appreciate any input. But thanks again :) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL

Re: [css-d] IE 5.0

the standalone versions from evolt, and there's a tutorial on making them work at positioniseverything.net Works great. And it's free. ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing

Re: [css-d] min-width/masx-width and IE

wouldn't work no matter what I did. But Georg's was different, and by God it works wonderfully. Again, though - thanks for the help - you all rock :) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman

[css-d] min-width/masx-width and IE

in the right direction for this? Thanks so much :) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css

Re: [css-d] dt styling, mess in IE, help please

Tee - your URL is coming up as a 404 page. Sure you typed it in right? ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7

Re: [css-d] p:first-letter

Ooo..one I can finally answer! .classname p:first-letter should be: p.classname:first-letter Hope that helps :) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub

Re: [css-d] Horizontal scrollbar on iframe displaying in IE

with that and you'll probably figure it out :) Usually, you all around here are lots smarter than me! ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css

[css-d] IE and :first-letter

, I can do that so you all can take a peek, too - it's just not online yet, so let me know. Any help would be appreciated. ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ

Re: [css-d] RE-POST:default list image markers

too high?) and since the actual image has the padding built in, then it should do exactly what you want. I've never had a problem with this at all. It seems kind of crude, but it works! ~Shelly On Nov 15, 2005, at 7:44 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: On 15 Nov 2005, at 5:15 pm, Mark Batty

Re: [css-d] Too Funny, and not really off topic...

I'm not offensive ;) ) It *is* a nice thing to do... ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http

Re: [css-d] don't want image on last li link!

ul.sitemap li.last a{ padding:0 1.5em 0 .5em; background: none; } See if that helps you :) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css

Re: [css-d] Please Explain CSS Parser Hacks

Here's a couple of good links that provide explanation: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/about-boxmodel.htm http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=BoxModelHack Oh! and look at that - the second one looks kinda familiar, doesn't it? ;) HTH! ~Shelly

Re: [css-d] Off Topic - Sorry

My favorite will always be www.istockphoto.com Not free, but *definitely* cheap, and good photos/artwork. ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css

Re: [css-d] Mozilla hacks?

would appreciate any help! Thanks :) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http

[css-d] Mozilla hacks?

I can feed in corrective stylesheets? I do not want to use Javascript or any other sort of scripting language to do so - I've managed to come this far without using such a notion, and I'd prefer to stay away from it. Thanks in advance :) ~Shelly